Descriptions of five new species of the salamander genus Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae) from eastern Mexico and the status of three currently recognized taxa

Abstract

The genus Chiropterotriton is endemic to Mexico with a geographical distribution along the Sierra Madre Oriental, the Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt and the Sierra de Juárez. The recent use of molecular tools has shown that Mexico’s amphibian diversity is highly underestimated, including a large number of cryptic, unnamed species. Chiropterotriton has 18 described species including terrestrial, arboreal and cave-dwelling species. In previous molecular studies, the presence of multiple undescribed species was evident. We present a phylogenetic hypothesis based on mitochondrial data, which includes all described species and six undescribed taxa. Based on the morphological analyses and, when available, combined with molecular data, we describe five new species of the genus; Chiropterotriton casasi sp. nov., C. ceronorum sp. nov., C. melipona sp. nov., C. perotensis sp. nov. and C. totonacus sp. nov. In addition, we redescribe two others: Chiropterotriton chiropterus and C. orculus, and provide a comparable account of one additional sympatric congener. This increases the number of species in the genus to 23, which represent a considerable component of Mexican plethodontid richness.

Full text

Descriptions of five new species of the
salamander genus Chiropterotriton
(Caudata: Plethodontidae) from eastern
Mexico and the status of three currently
recognized taxa
Gabriela Parra Olea
1
, Mirna G. Garcia-Castillo
1,2
, Sean M. Rovito
3
,
Jessica A. Maisano
4
, James Hanken
5
and David B. Wake
6
1Zoology, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, Mexico city, México
2Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de
México, México
3Unidad de Genómica Avanzada (Langebio), CINVESTAV, Irapuato, Guanajuato, México
4Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
5Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology,
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
6Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California,
Berkeley, CA, USA
ABSTRACT
The genus Chiropterotriton is endemic to Mexico with a geographical distribution
along the Sierra Madre Oriental, the Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt and the Sierra de
Juárez. The recent use of molecular tools has shown that Mexico’s amphibian
diversity is highly underestimated, including a large number of cryptic, unnamed
species. Chiropterotriton has 18 described species including terrestrial, arboreal and
cave-dwelling species. In previous molecular studies, the presence of multiple
undescribed species was evident. We present a phylogenetic hypothesis based on
mitochondrial data, which includes all described species and six undescribed taxa.
Based on the morphological analyses and, when available, combined with molecular
data, we describe five new species of the genus; Chiropterotriton casasi sp. nov.,
C. ceronorum sp. nov., C. melipona sp. nov., C. perotensis sp. nov. and C. totonacus sp.
nov. In addition, we redescribe two others: Chiropterotriton chiropterus and
C. orculus, and provide a comparable account of one additional sympatric congener.
This increases the number of species in the genus to 23, which represent a
considerable component of Mexican plethodontid richness.
Subjects Taxonomy, Zoology
Keywords Plethodontids, Phylogeny, Taxonomy, Mexico, Bolitoglossines
INTRODUCTION
The genus Chiropterotriton Taylor (1944) has proven to be one of the taxonomically most
difficult of all genera of neotropical salamanders. These salamanders vary widely in
morphology and ecology from relatively large troglodytic forms to gracile arboreal species.
Most species, however, are small to medium sized with a fairly generalized external
How to cite this article Parra Olea G, Garcia-Castillo MG, Rovito SM, Maisano JA, Hanken J, Wake DB. 2020. Descriptions of five new
species of the salamander genus Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae) from eastern Mexico and the status of three currently recognized
taxa. PeerJ 8:e8800 DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800
Submitted 6 December 2019
Accepted 25 February 2020
Published 26 May 2020
Corresponding author
Gabriela Parra Olea,
gparra@ib.unam.mx
Academic editor
Nikolay Poyarkov
Additional Information and
Declarations can be found on
page 65
DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800
Copyright
2020 Parra Olea et al.
Distributed under
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0

morphology, representing minor variations on a conserved body plan (Darda & Wake,
2015). This external morphological similarity has complicated recognition of new species
and the relationships between them, particularly based on morphological data alone.
When Taylor (1944) described the genus, he initially included a number of other Central
American salamanders from Nuclear Central America and Costa Rica. These species,
which are all relatively small and slender, were recognized as a distinct unit within the
genus (Chiropterotriton Beta; Wake & Lynch, 1976) and eventually described as several
distinct genera (Cryptotriton, Dendrotriton and Nototriton), leaving Chiropterotriton
endemic to the highlands of Mexico and west of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Despite their
external similarity, the divergence between each of these genera and Chiropterotriton
spans the basal node in the Bolitoglossini clade (Rovito et al., 2015a). Taxonomy of the
Mexican Chiropterotriton was complicated not only by their small size and generalized
morphology, but also by the fact that two of the earliest species descriptions for the group,
C. chiropterus (Cope, 1863) and C. orculus (Cope, 1865) are very brief and provide
imprecise localities, and because the holotype of each species has been lost.
Rabb (1958) made a major advance in our understanding of the taxonomy and
morphology of the northern species in the group. By examining both topotypic specimens
and material from additional localities, he showed that unappreciated diversity existed
even within the subset of species from this region, based on external morphology and tooth
counts. Rabb’s foundational morphological and taxonomic work on the genus was
followed by a long period of taxonomic stasis. Following his discovery and description of
Chiropterotriton magnipes (Rabb, 1965), the most morphologically distinct species in the
genus, no additional species were described for nearly 50 years. Despite the lapse in
species descriptions, molecular data made it clear that much diversity lay hidden within
already known populations. Darda (1994) derived an allozyme dataset that showed
that many populations likely represented distinct species, and his results were largely
corroborated by mtDNA sequence data (Parra-Olea, 2003) although there were some
discrepancies between the results from the two data sets. Collection of new material from
previously known populations for molecular analysis, as well as the discovery of new
populations, led to the description of six new species since 2014 (Campbell et al., 2014;
Rovito & Parra-Olea, 2015;García-Castillo et al., 2017,2018). Despite these recent
descriptions, many populations from central Mexico have defied assignment to known
species and are best recognized as distinct species.
The Chiropterotriton chiropterus complex has suffered from taxonomic rearrangements,
mostly due to imprecise type localities and the lack of adequate samples from those
localities. Based on external morphology, Wake & Lynch (1976) defined the chiropterus
group to include C. chiropterus, C. chondrostega, C. dimidiatus and C. lavae. Later, on
the basis of immunological data, Maxson & Wake (1981) redefined the chiropterus
group to include only C. chiropterus and C. lavae. Based on allozyme data, Darda (1994)
recognized a group of populations found along the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, which he
called the chiropterus complex. This group was formed by C. chiropterus from La Joya,
Veracruz, C. orculus from Zacualtipan, Hidalgo, and nine additional undescribed species.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 2/71

However, Parra-Olea (2003) concluded that C. chiropterus applies exclusively to the
low-elevation populations located in or near the city of Huatusco, Veracruz.
The Chiropterotriton orculus complex is represented by a relatively widespread species
of the genus. Based on morphological characters, Cope (1865) described C. orculus as
Spelerpes orculus from Mexican Table Land, but 4 years later he placed this species in
synonymy with C. chiropterus (Cope, 1869). Darda’s (1994) allozyme data recognized
C. orculus as a distinct species, restricting it to two populations. Parra-Olea (2003) added
one more population to C. orculus and emphasized the discordance between allozymes
and mtDNA between some populations. Currently, C. orculus includes several
morphologically uniform populations in the central Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt
around Mexico City.
We focus on populations of Chiropterotriton from the eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic
Belt and nearby regions of Veracruz and Puebla (Fig. 1). While some of these populations
have already been included in allozyme and/or mtDNA analyses, data for others are
presented here for the first time. Using a combination of linear morphological
measurements, osteological data derived from micro-computed tomography (µCT) scans,
and previously published mtDNA and allozyme data we examine the taxonomic status of
these populations. We present a phylogenetic hypothesis based on mtDNA which
includes all 18 described species plus six undescribed taxa, including populations identified
in previous studies as new species within complexes. Based on the molecular data and
morphological analyses, we describe five new species. These increase the number of
described species from 18 to 23 and still recognize one candidate species not yet described.
We redescribe C. orculus and C. chiropterus, designating neotypes for each, in order to
clarify the taxonomic status of nearby populations that resemble one or both of these
species in external morphology. Finally, in order to make full comparisons with sympatric
taxa for the newly described species, we provide a fuller description of C. lavae based on
examination of the type series and additional specimens collected subsequently.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sampling
Animal use was approved by the University of California, Berkeley, IACUC protocol
#R093-0205 to DBW. Collection permits were provided by the Secretaría del Medio
Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT): SGPA/DGVS/00947/16, SGPA/DGVS/
03038/17 and FAUT-0303, issued to Gabriela Parra-Olea.
Amplification and sequencing
Whole genomic DNA was extracted from liver, intestine or tail tissue using DNeasy tissue
Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Although a comprehensive molecular analysis of the
genus Chiropterotriton is beyond the scope of the present work, two mitochondrial
fragments of each new species (when available) were sequenced in order to allow
comparisons to other members of the genus (Table 1). PCR amplification was done using
primers LX12SN1 and LX16S1R for mitochondrial fragment L2; it includes partial
sequences from the 12S ribosomal subunit, the tRNA and the large subunit 16S
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 3/71

(Zhang et al., 2008). PCR conditions were as follows: 35 cycles at 96 C (2 min), 55 C
(1 min) and 72 C (5 min). We also amplified a fragment of the COI gene using primers
dgLCO and dgHCO (Meyer, 2003). PCR conditions were as follows: 35 cycles at 94 C
(30 s), 50 C (30 s) and 72 C (45 s). We cleaned PCR products with ExoSap-IT (USB
Corporation, Cleveland, OH, USA) and sequencing reaction with BigDye Terminator v3.1
cycle kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The products were purified using
Sephadex G-50 (GE Heathcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and run on an ABI 3730 capillary
sequencer at the Instituto de Biología, UNAM.
Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses
Editing and assembly of sequences were performed in Sequencher 5.0.1 (Gene Codes
Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). We used Muscle 3.8 (Edgar, 2004) to align L2 and
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of the genus Chiropterotriton in Mexico. Numbers correspond to
the following species: (1) C. priscus;(2)C. miquihuanus;(3)C. infernalis;(4)C. cieloensis;(5)C. cracens;(6)
C. multidentatus (Cd. Maíz); (7) C. multidentatus (Rancho Borbotón); (8) C. multidentatus (Sierra de
Álvarez); (9) C. magnipes;(10)C. mosaueri;(11)C. chondrostega;(12)C. terrestris;(13)C. arboreus
(Zacualtipán); (14) C. arboreus (Zilacatipan); (15) C. dimidiatus;(16)C. chico;(17)C. melipona sp. nov.
(Xicotepec); (18) C. melipona sp. nov. (Cuetzalan); (19) Chiropterotriton sp. G; (20) C. casasi sp. nov.; (21)
C. aureus;(22)C. totonacus sp. nov.; (23) C. lavae;(24)C. nubilus (Tlalnehuayocan); (25) C. nubilus
(Coxmatla);(26) C. perotensis sp. nov. (Las Lajas); (27) C. perotensis sp. nov. (Llanillo Redondo); (28)
C. perotensis sp. nov. (Conejo); (29) C. chiropterus (Huatusco); (30) C. ceronorum sp. nov. (Xometla); (31)
C. ceronorum sp. nov. (Texmalaquilla); (32) C. orculus (Amecameca); (33) C. orculus (Amecameca); (34)
C. orculus (Ciudad de México); (35) C. orculus (Bosque de Tlalpan); (36) C. orculus (Desierto de los Leones);
(37) C. orculus (Ajusco); (38) C. orculus (Lagunas de Zempoala); (39) C. chiropterus (La Esperanza);
(40) C. chiropterus (Yolox) and (41) Chiropterotriton sp. K. Full-size

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8800/fig-1
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 4/71

Table 1 Voucher information and GenBank numbers. Voucher information and GenBank numbers for specimens used for phylogenetic analyses
from Colección Nacional de Anfibios y Reptiles, Instituto de Biología, UNAM (IBH), Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ) and Colección de
Referencia de Anfibios y Reptiles del Instituto de Ecología, A. C (CARIE). GP, EPR and AMH correspond to field numbers with no voucher available.
Numbers in parentheses correspond to geographic location shown in Fig. 1.
Species Voucher
number
Locality 16S
GenBank
COI
GenBank
C. arboreus IBH 28191 Hidalgo: 6.8 km SW (by rd) of Zacualtipán on road to Tianguistengo (13) MK335386 MK335232
C. arboreus IBH 22847 Veracruz: 3.2 km S Zilacatipan (14) MN914712 –
C. aureus IBH 31042 Veracruz: 6.5 km (by air) N from Atzalan, ejido de desarrollo urbano
Quetzalcoatl (21)
MK335396 MK335242
C. aureus IBH 31044 Veracruz: 6.5 km (by air) N from Atzalan, ejido de desarrollo urbano
Quetzalcoatl (21)
MK335397 MK335243
C. ceronorum sp. nov. IBH 30987 Veracruz: 1.1 km N Xometla (30) MN914713 MN920423
C. ceronorum sp. nov. IBH 30988 Veracruz: 1.1 km N Xometla (30) MN914714 MN920424
C. ceronorum sp. nov. MVZ 201387 Puebla: Santa Cruz de Texmalaquilla (31) AY522488 –
C. ceronorum sp. nov. MVZ 201389 Puebla: Santa Cruz de Texmalaquilla (31) AY522487 –
C. chico MVZ 200679 Hidalgo: 3.8 km S Mineral del Chico (16) AY522471 –
C. chiropterus CARIE 0777 Veracruz: Huatusco (29) MK335407 MK335253
C. chiropterus CARIE 0719 Veracruz: Huatusco (29) MK335408 –
C. chiropterus IBH 30099 Oaxaca: San Bernardo, 4.8 km SW (by rd) of La Esperanza on MX 177 (40) MK335409 MK335254
C. chiropterus IBH 22736 Oaxaca: San Bernardo, ca. 5 km SW (by rd) of La Esperanza on MX 175 (40) MN914715 –
C. chiropterus IBH 30088 Oaxaca: ca. 400 m from MX 175 on road to San Isidro Yolox (40) MN914716 –
C. chiropterus IBH 22550 Oaxaca: La Galera, 11.0 km SW (by rd) of La Esperanza on MX175 (39) MN914717 –
C. chiropterus GP 088 Oaxaca: 67 km N Guelatao, trail to San Isidro, La Esperanza (39) AY522490 –
C. chondrostega IBH 28195 Hidalgo: 1.0 km S (by rd) of La Encarnación on road to MX 85, Parque Nacional
los Marmoles (11)
MN914718 –
C. chondrostega IBH 30098 Hidalgo: 1.0 km S (by rd) of La Encarnación on road to MX 85, Parque Nacional
los Marmoles (11)
MK335383 MK335229
C. cieloensis IBH 28181 Tamaulipas: 0.2 km E (by air) of Rancho El Cielo, 6.9 km NNW (by air) of center of
Gómez Farías, Reserva de la Biosfera El Cielo (4)
MK335385 MK335231
C. cieloensis IBH 28190 Tamaulipas: 0.2 km E (by air) of Rancho El Cielo, 6.9 km NNW (by air) of center of
Gómez Farías, Reserva de la Biosfera El Cielo (4)
MN914719 –
C. cracens IBH 28192 Tamaulipas: Road from Alta Cima to San Jose, 1.3 km NE (by air) of San Jose,
Reserva de la Biosfera El Cielo (5)
MK335384 MK335230
C. dimidiatus IBH 22344 Hidalgo: 4.3 km N Hwy 105 at Mineral del Monte (15) MN914720 –
C. dimidiatus IBH 28196 Hidalgo: 4.1 km S (by rd) of Mineral del Chico on road to Pachuca, Parque
Nacional El Chico (15)
MK335390 MK335236
C. infernalis MVZ 269665 Tamaulipas: Cueva del Brinco, Conrado Castillo, ca. 43.5 km SW (by rd) of Ejido
Guayabas (3)
MK335382 MK335228
C. infernalis IBH 29575 Tamaulipas: Conrado Castillo, ca. 43.5 km SW (by rd) of Ejido Guayabas (3) MN914721 MN920425
C. lavae IBH 22349 Veracruz: 200 m N Hwy 140 at La Joya (23) MN914724 –
C. lavae IBH 22351 Veracruz: 200 m N Hwy 140 at La Joya (23) MN914723 –
C. lavae IBH 22360 Veracruz: 200 m N Hwy 140 at La Joya (23) MN914722 –
C. lavae IBH 22369 Veracruz: 200 m N Hwy 140 at La Joya (23) MK335393 MK335239
C. magnipes IBH 28176 Hidalgo: “El Coní”, 900 m SSE of center of Durango, Municipio Zimapan, Parque
Nacional los Marmoles (9)
MK335387 MK335233
(Continued)
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 5/71

Table 1 (continued).
Species Voucher
number
Locality 16S
GenBank
COI
GenBank
C. magnipes IBH 30093 Hidalgo: “El Coní”, 900 m SSE of center of Durango, Municipio Zimapan, Parque
Nacional los Marmoles (9)
MN914725 –
C. melipona sp. nov. IBH 30112 Puebla: 7.1 km N (by rd) of center of Cuetzalan on road to Yohualichán (18) MK335410 MK335255
C. melipona sp. nov. MVZ 178706 Puebla: 3.9 km S Xicotepec de Juárez (17) AY522477 –
C. melipona sp. nov. MVZ 200723 Puebla: Xicotepec de Juárez (17) AY522478 –
C. melipona sp. nov. MVZ 178707 Puebla: Xicotepec de Juárez (17) AY522479 –
C. miquihuanus IBH 30329 Nuevo León: 1.8 km S (by rd) of La Encantada on road from La Bolsa to
Zaragoza (2)
MK335381 MK335227
C. miquihuanus IBH 30330 Nuevo León: 22.6 km N (by rd) of La Bolsa on road to Zaragoza (2) MN914726 –
C. mosaueri IBH 28179 Hidalgo: “El Coní”, 900 m SSE of center of Durango, Municipio Zimapan, Parque
Nacional los Marmoles (10)
MK335388 MK335234
C. multidentatus IBH 28177 San Luis Potosí: Cueva el Madroño, 900 m NW (by air) of entrance to Valle de los
Fantasmas on MX 70, Sierra de Alvarez (8)
MK335416 –
C. multidentatus IBH 30102 San Luis Potosí: Cueva el Madroño, 900 m NW (by air) of entrance to Valle de los
Fantasmas on MX 70, Sierra de Alvarez (8)
MK335417 –
C. multidentatus IBH 28193 San Luis Potosí: 26.2 km E (by rd) of center of Ciudad del Maíz on MX 80, at
turnoff to RMO Las Antenas San Luis Potosí (6)
MK335412 –
C. multidentatus IBH 30104 San Luis Potosí: 26.2 km E (by rd) of center of Ciudad del Maíz on MX 80, at
turnoff to RMO Las Antenas San Luis Potosí (6)
MK335414 –
C. multidentatus IBH 28194 San Luis Potosí: 26.2 km E (by rd) of center of Ciudad del Maíz on MX 80, at
turnoff to RMO Las Antenas San Luis Potosí (6)
MK335413 –
C. multidentatus IBH 23111 San Luis Potosí: Rancho Borbortón (7) MK335415 –
C. nubilus IBH 31048 Veracruz: 8.2 km W from Xico, Coxmatla (25) MK335402 MK335248
C. nubilus CARIE 0740 Veracruz: Bosque Rancho Viejo, Tlalnehuayocan (24) MK335406 MK335252
C. orculus IBH 30765 Estado de México: Amecameca, road to Popocatepetl volcano (33) MK335391 MK335237
C. orculus IBH 30746 Estado de México: Amecameca, road to Popocatepetl volcano (32) MK335392 MK335238
C. orculus IBH 30943 Estado de México: Amecameca, road to Popocatepetl volcano (33) MN914727 –
C. orculus IBH 22866 Estado de México: Amecameca, road to Popocatepetl volcano (32) MN914728 –
C. orculus IBH 22210 Ciudad de Mexico: Colonia Prolongación Miguel Hidalgo (34) MN914729 –
C. orculus AMH 300 Ciudad de Mexico: Desierto de los Leones (36) MN914730 –
C. orculus EPR Ciudad de Mexico: Bosque de Tlalpan (35) MN914731 –
C. orculus IBH 29851 Morelos: Parque Nacional Lagunas de Zempoala (38) MN914732 –
C. orculus IBH 31023 Morelos: Parque Nacional Lagunas de Zempoala (38) MN914733 –
C. orculus IBH 26478 Ciudad de Mexico: El Ajusco, km 29.4 from Picacho-Ajusco road (37) MN914734 –
C. orculus MVZ 138672 Ciudad de Mexico: Desierto de Los Leones National Park, 8.8 km [rd.] SW La
Venta by Mexico Hwy. 15 (36)
AY522442 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 22395 Veracruz: 15.9 km on microondas road, Las Vigas (26) MN914735 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 22568 Veracruz: Microondas las Lajas (26) KP886893 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 23066 Veracruz: 15.9 km on microondas road, Las Vigas (26) MN914736 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 31032 Veracruz: Conejo, road to the peak of Cofre de Perote (28) MN914743 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 31033 Veracruz: Conejo, road to the peak of Cofre de Perote (28) MN914744 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 31034 Veracruz: Conejo, road to the peak of Cofre de Perote (28) MN914737 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 31035 Veracruz: Conejo, road to the peak of Cofre de Perote (28) MN914738 MN920426
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 31036 Veracruz: Conejo, road to the peak of Cofre de Perote (28) MN914739 –
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 6/71

COI sequences. The alignment for the L2 fragment included 35 Chiropterotriton samples
sequenced in this study, 40 sequences available on GenBank from previous studies
(Parra-Olea, 2003;Rovito et al., 2015a;García-Castillo et al., 2018) and two additional
sequences from Aquiloeurycea cephalica and Thorius sp. as outgroups. The alignment for
COI included seven sequences from this study and 21 from GenBank (García-Castillo
et al., 2018). All sequence information is shown in Table 1. We used Mesquite v3.40
(Maddison & Maddison, 2018) to concatenate and review the data matrix. We used
PartitionFinder v1.0 (Lanfear et al., 2012) to select substitution model and a partitioning
scheme using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). We ran Maximum Likelihood
and Bayesian inference through the CIPRES data portal (Miller, Pfeiffer & Schwartz, 2010)
for phylogenetic analyses; RAxML v8.2 (Stamatakis, 2014) to generate a Maximum
Likelihood tree, with 1,000 bootstrap replicates as nodal support; and MrBayes v3.2
(Huelsenbeck & Ronquist, 2001) for Bayesian inference, with 20 million generations,
sampling every 1,000 generations, with four chains to obtain a majority consensus tree.
Finally, we used Tracer v.1.7 (Rambaut et al., 2018) to review the convergence and stability
of the chains.
Morphological analyses and species descriptions
Species descriptions largely follow the format used by Lynch & Wake (1989) for species
of Neotropical plethodontids and include many of the same basic characters and
measurements, including coloration and external measurements. We used an electronic
vernier calipers to measure 11 characters: snout-vent length (SVL), tail length (TL),
axilla-groin distance (AX), forelimb length (FLL), hind limb length (HLL), snout-to-gular-
fold distance (head length, HL), head width at angle of jaw (HW), head depth (HD),
shoulder width (SW), internarial distance (IN) and right foot width (FW). In order to
obtain an index for nostril shape, we used an ocular micrometer to measure the longest and
Table 1 (continued).
Species Voucher
number
Locality 16S
GenBank
COI
GenBank
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 31037 Veracruz: 2 km (by air) al NE de Llanillo redondo camino a Valle Alegre (27) MN914740 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 31038 Veracruz: 2 km (by air) al NE de Llanillo redondo camino a Valle Alegre (27) MN914741 –
C. perotensis sp. nov. IBH 31039 Veracruz: 2 km (by air) al NE de Llanillo redondo camino a Valle Alegre (27) MN914742 MN920427
C. priscus IBH 22367 Nuevo León: 19.4 km W 18 de Marzo, Cerro Potosí (1) MK335380 MK335226
C. terrestris GP 215 Hidalgo: 5.3 km N Hwy 105 at Zacualtipan (12) MK335389 MK335235
C. totonacus sp. nov. IBH 31030 Veracruz: El Polvorín, 5 km SW of Villa Aldama (22) MN914745 MN920428
C. totonacus sp. nov. IBH 31031 Veracruz: El Polvorín, 5 km SW of Villa Aldama (22) MN914746 MN920429
Chiropterotriton sp. G MVZ 178700 Puebla: 4 km S Chignahuapan (19) AY522480 –
Chiropterotriton sp. G MVZ 178703 Puebla: 4 km S Chignahuapan (19) AY522481 –
Chiropterotriton sp. K MVZ 173231 Oaxaca: Cerro San Felipe (41) AY522493 –
Aquiloeurycea
cephalica
IBH 30253 Hidalgo: 1.0 km S (by rd) of La Encarnación on road to MX 85, Parque Nacional
los Mármoles
MK335378 –
Thorius sp. IBH 30942 Oaxaca: Santa María Chilchotla, Sierra Mazateca MN914747 –
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 7/71

shortest nostril dimensions (nostril length, NL; nostril width, NW) and we calculated a
ratio of nostril dimensions (ND = NL/NW). We also counted ankylosed premaxillary
(PMT), maxillary (MT) and vomerine teeth (VT). We present counts for PMT and MT
together because of the difficulty in distinguishing them in some specimens. We also
measured limb interval (LI) as the number of costal folds between adpressed limbs.
Positive values equal the number of folds visible between adpressed limbs that don’t meet
or overlap; negative values denote overlap between limbs. We treat males and females
separately to evaluate the extent of sexual dimorphism (Table 2). Finally, 12 additional
measurements were obtained for each holotype: anterior rim of orbit to snout, eyelid
length, eyelid width, horizontal orbital diameter, interorbital distance, length of third
(longest) toe, length of fifth toe, projection of snout beyond mandible, snout to anterior
angle of vent, snout to forelimb, tail depth at base, and tail width at base.
In addition, µCT scans were used to prepare osteological accounts based primarily on
the cranial characters and character states defined by Darda & Wake (2015;Table 3;Fig. 2).
Scans made at the University of Texas High-Resolution X-ray CT Facility are archived in a
digital repository and may be viewed online via the Internet links provided below.
The complete scans include the ossified forelimb skeleton as well as the bony skull, but
only skulls are illustrated here.
We examined 123 individuals from the eight species of principal interest and used
published data for comparisons to other species of Chiropterotriton. The latter species were
chosen for comparison based on either geographic or phylogenetic closeness. All material,
including holotypes or neotypes designated below, is deposited at the National Museum
of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA (USNM) and the
Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California Berkeley, USA (MVZ) collections
(Appendix I).
The electronic version of this article in Portable Document Format (PDF) will represent
a published work according to the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature
(ICZN), and hence the new names contained in the electronic version are effectively
published under that Code from the electronic edition alone. This published work and the
nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration
system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the
associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID
to the prefixhttp://zoobank.org/. The LSID for this publication is: [9B4B9DFF-E12B-
430D-A541-BA0EBB9B90E6]. The online version of this work is archived and available
from the following digital repositories: PeerJ, PubMed Central and CLOCKSS.
RESULTS
Our phylogenetic reconstruction was based on two mitochondrial fragments, with a final
matrix of 2,143 bp (gaps included) from 75 individuals that includes all described species
of Chiropterotriton. Both ML and Bayesian analyses show two main clades in the
genus (Fig. 3). The first main clade, with rather low support (BS = 54, not recovered in
Bayesian tree), includes 12 species that correspond to the north-central distributions:
C. cracens, C, cieloensis, C. arboreus, C. multidentatus, C. infernalis, C. mosaueri,
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 8/71

Table 2 Mean ± standard deviation (above) and range (below) of morphometric variables. Mean ± standard deviation (above) and range (below)
of morphometric variables from males and females of C. aureus,C. nubilus,C. ceronorum,C. perotensis,C. totonacus,C.melipona,C. casasi,
C. chiropterus,C. orculus and C. lavae. Measurements are given in millimeters (mm), except TL/SLV (proportional value), LI (limb interval), and
tooth counts.
Males C. aureus
N=1
C. nubilus
N=1
C. ceronorum
sp. nov.
N=10
C. perotensis
sp. nov.
N=12
C. totonacus
sp. nov.
N=10
C. melipona
sp. nov.
N=4
C. casasi sp.
nov. N=4
C. chiropterus
N=8
C. orculus
N=10
C. lavae
N=10
SVL 28.5 29.4 33.9 ± 1.54
(30.6–36.2)
29.7 ± 1.92
(26.5–32.8)
35.7 ± 1.96
(32.0–38.6)
29.2 ± 2.25
(26.4–31.4)
37.8 ± 3.10
(34.5–42.0)
37.5 ± 0.98
(36.1–38.8)
35.9 ± 1.36
(33.6–38.9)
32.4 ± 0.92
(31.0–33.8)
TL 36.5 40.2 33.9 ± 1.99
(30.4–37.7)
30.9 ± 3.06
(26.0–35.2)
N=8
41.1 ± 3.20
(34.3–44.9)
N=9
33.9 ± 3.37
(31.0–38.2)
39.1 ± 3.29
(36.8–42.9)
N=3
47.3 ± 3.24
(42.6–52.3)
N=7
36.6 ± 2.87
(33.3–41.0)
N=9
38.5 ± 2.11
(36.2–42.3)
TL/
SVL
1.28 1.37 1.00 ± 0.06
(0.89–1.12)
1.03 ± 0.08
(0.92–1.16)
N=8
1.16 ± 0.10
(0.92–1.24)
N=9
1.16 ± 0.05
(1.10–1.22)
1.04 ± 0.13
(0.90–1.15)
N=3
1.25 ± 0.08
(1.13–1.38)
N=7
1.02 ± 0.08
(0.86–1.15)
N=9
1.19 ± 0.06
(1.11–1.27)
AX 15.5 15.9 16.9 ± 0.70
(15.5–17.9)
15.5 ± 0.93
(14.2–17.0)
18.3 ± 1.30
(16.7–20.4)
15.7 ± 1.30
(14.0–17.0)
19.8 ± 0.46
(19.4–20.4)
19.6 ± 0.59
(18.7–20.8)
18.6 ± 1.04
(17.1–20.5)
16.2 ± 0.87
(14.7–17.4)
FLL 5.9 6.4 8.9 ± 0.69
(7.2–10.0)
6.8 ± 0.59
(5.5–7.8)
10.0 ± 0.72
(8.9–10.9)
6.3 ± 0.86
(5.1–7.0)
9.9 ± 0.59
(9.4–10.7)
9.1 ± 0.44
(8.2–9.5)
8.9 ± 0.65
(7.4–9.6)
9.3 ± 0.59
(8.4–10.2)
HLL 7.5 7.1 9.4 ± 0.83
(7.5–10.3)
7.2 ± 0.61
(6.1–8.2)
11.0 ± 1.00
(9.4–12.2)
7.2 ± 0.83
(6.1–7.9)
11.5 ± 0.74
(11.1–12.6)
10.3 ± 0.47
(9.5–10.8)
9.3 ± 0.64
(8.2–10.4)
N=9
9.9 ± 0.72
(8.5–11.0)
HL 6.4 6.6 7.5 ± 0.55
(6.3–8.2)
6.6 ± 0.33
(6.1–7.1)
8.5 ± 0.64
(7.7–9.5)
6.3 ± 0.52
(5.5–6.6)
8.3 ± 0.60
(7.5–8.8)
8.1 ± 0.41
(7.7–8.9)
7.4 ± 0.47
(6.7–8.1)
7.5 ± 0.33
(7.2–8.1)
HW 4.0 4.0 5.1 ± 0.35
(4.3–5.5)
4.2 ± 0.18
(3.9–4.5)
5.2 ± 0.29
(4.8–5.7)
4.3 ± 0.33
(3.9–4.6)
5.8 ± 0.45
(5.3–6.3)
5.6 ± 0.22
(5.4–6.0)
5.0 ± 0.35
(4.5–5.5)
4.9 ± 0.31
(4.5–5.6)
HD 1.8 2.0 2.5 ± 0.17
(2.1–2.7)
2.0 ± 0.18
(1.7–2.3)
2.4 ± 0.34
(2.1–3.3)
2.3 ± 0.22
(2.1–2.6)
2.5 ± 0.28
(2.2–2.8)
2.7 ± 0.07
(2.6–2.8)
2.4 ± 0.13
(2.2–2.7)
2.5 ± 0.19
(2.3–2.9)
SW 3.4 3.4 3.6 ± 0.29
(3.0–3.9)
2.7 ± 0.28
(2.3–3.4)
3.6 ± 0.28
(3.2–4.0)
3.3 ± 0.26
(3.1–3.7)
3.5 ± 0.37
(3.1–3.8)
4.0 ± 0.35
(3.2–4.4)
3.4 ± 0.30
(3.1–4.0)
3.1 ± 0.30
(2.6–3.5)
IN 1.0 1.2 2.3 ± 0.18
(2.0–2.6)
1.7 ± 0.26
(1.1–2.0)
2.4 ± 0.23
(1.9–2.7)
1.4 ± 0.13
(1.3–1.6)
2.1 ± 0.30
(1.7–2.4)
1.9 ± 0.13
(1.7–2.1)
2.2 ± 0.19
(1.9–2.5)
2.3 ± 0.20
(1.9–2.5)
FW 2.4 2.6 3.8 ± 0.44
(2.9–4.6)
2.6 ± 0.33
(2.1–3.1)
4.2 ± 0.45
(3.5–4.9)
2.4 ± 0.27
(2.2–2.8)
3.7 ± 0.19
(3.6–4.0)
3.7 ± 0.33
(3.3–4.4)
3.2 ± 0.22
(2.8–3.5)
3.7 ± 0.39
(3.1–4.2)
LI 2.0 2.0 0.0 ± 0.41
(−0.5 to 1.0)
2.5 ± 0.67
(1.0–3.0)
−0.6 ± 0.70
(−1.0 to 1.0)
2.3 ± 0.29
(2.0–2.5)
0.8 ± 0.50
(0.0–1.0)
0.3 ± 0.53
(−0.5 to 1.0)
1.9 ± 0.88
(0.0–3.0)
−0.6 ± 0.52
(−1.0 to 0.0)
PMT 4.0 7.0 3.4 ± 0.97
(3.0–6.0)
2.8 ± 0.97
(0.0–4.0)
4.8 ± 0.63
(4.0–6.0)
2.3 ± 1.50
(1.0–4.0)
3.5 ± 1.29
(2.0–5.0)
3.6 ± 1.30
(2.0–5.0)
2.7 ± 0.82
(2.0–4.0)
3.3 ± 2.00
(0.0–6.0)
MT 10.0 13.0 11.0 ± 3.30
(7.0–18.0)
7.2 ± 4.73
(2.0–17.0)
32.9 ± 7.80
(18.0–48.0)
9.5 ± 2.38
(7.0–12.0)
9.0 ± 2.94
(6.0–13.0)
12.6 ± 3.46
(9.0–17.0)
8.2 ± 2.25
(5.0–11.0)
7.0 ± 2.71
(1.0–10.0)
VT 15.0 10.0 13.0 ± 2.05
(11.0–17.0)
9.0 ± 1.65
(7.0–12.0)
11.6 ± 1.90
(10.0–15.0)
11.0 ± 2.94
(8.0–15.0)
9.0 ± 1.41
(8.0–11.0)
10.6 ± 1.06
(9.0–12.0)
8.6 ± 1.90
(5.0–11.0)
8.9 ± 1.10
(7.0–10.0)
Females C. aureus
N=3
C. nubilus
N=2
C. ceronorum
sp. nov.
N=10
C. perotensis
sp. nov. N=8
C. totonacus
sp. nov.
N=10
C. melipona
sp. nov.
N=3
C. casasi
sp. nov.
N=1
C. chiropterus
N=4
C. orculus
N=10
C. lavae
N=9
SVL 26.8 ± 0.86
(26.0–27.7)
30.5 ± 3.89
(27.7–33.2)
34.9 ± 1.53
(33.3–38.4)
31.7 ± 2.19
(27.4–34.3)
35.5 ± 1.90
(31.8–38.3)
28.5 ± 1.36
(27.1–29.8)
40.9 33.5 ± 2.55
(30.7–36.7)
39.0 ± 2.70
(34.9–43.0)
31.6 ± 2.46
(27.9–34.9)
TL 31.1 ± 1.41
(30.1–32.1)
34.3 ± 5.16
(30.6–37.9)
33.9 ± 2.82
(28.5–38.2)
31.5 ± 3.31
(27.0–37.3)
N=7
42.6 ± 5.08
(36.3–49.2)
N=6
32.3 ± 2.26
(30.7–33.9)
N=2
34.0 br 39.5 ± 2.35
(37.0–42.6)
39.2 ± 3.64
(34.7–44.7)
N=9
32.5 ± 4.89
(25.7–40.1)
(Continued)
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 9/71

C. chondrostega, C. magnipes, C. priscus, C. miquihuanus, C. terrestris and C. chico.
The second main clade with strong support (Bootstrap, BS = 100 and Posterior Probability,
PP = 1.0) also includes 12 species, but with central-southern distributions: C. dimidiatus,
C. totonacus sp. nov., C. ceronorum sp. nov., C. lavae, C. perotensis sp. nov., C. sp. K,
C. sp. G, C. orculus, C. melipona sp. nov., C. aureus, C. nubilus and C. chiropterus.
The major clade is the main subject of the following species descriptions and includes four
of the five new species that were initially proposed by Darda (1994) as Chiropterotriton sp.
E, C. sp. F, C. sp. H and C. sp. I. This clade also contains the two redescribed species,
C. orculus and C. chiropterus, as well as C. lavae. One of the species we describe below,
C. casasi sp. nov., has not been found since the collection of the type series in 1969
and no tissue has been available for molecular analyses. Each species is diagnosed by
Table 2 (continued).
Females C. aureus
N=3
C. nubilus
N=2
C. ceronorum
sp. nov.
N=10
C. perotensis
sp. nov. N=8
C. totonacus
sp. nov.
N=10
C. melipona
sp. nov.
N=3
C. casasi
sp. nov.
N=1
C. chiropterus
N=4
C. orculus
N=10
C. lavae
N=9
TL/SVL 1.16 ± 0.00
(1.16–1.16)
1.12 ± 0.03
(1.10–1.14)
0.97 ± 0.07
(0.85–1.07)
1.00 ± 0.11
(0.79–1.11)
N=7
1.20 ± 0.13
(1.06–1.38)
N=6
1.11 ± 0.11
(1.03–1.18)
N=2
–1.19 ± 0.12
(1.01–1.26)
1.02 ± 0.08
(0.87–1.12)
N=9
1.02 ± 0.10
(0.85–1.15)
AX 15.0 ± 0.49
(14.7–15.6)
16.4 ± 2.69
(14.5–18.3)
18.5 ± 0.95
(17.1–20.0)
16.6 ± 1.58
(13.6–19.2)
18.7 ± 0.95
(17.3–20.1)
15.8 ± 0.59
(15.4–16.5)
20.3 18.5 ± 2.27
(15.4–20.7)
21.2 ± 1.58
(18.6–23.2)
16.3 ± 1.68
(13.9–18.5)
FLL 5.3 ± 0.42
(4.8–5.6)
6.5 ± 0.28
(6.3–6.7)
8.6 ± 0.38
(8.1–9.3)
6.7 ± 0.61
(5.9–7.5)
9.7 ± 0.85
(8.7–11.3)
6.5 ± 0.72
(6.0–7.3)
10.6 7.8 ± 0.48
(7.1–8.2)
8.9 ± 0.63
(7.6–10.0)
8.2 ± 0.72
(7.1–9.5)
HLL 6.7 ± 0.35
(6.4–7.1)
7.2 ± 0.14
(7.1–7.3)
8.9 ± 0.70
(7.3–9.9)
7.1 ± 0.66
(6.1–8.2)
10.8 ± 0.93
(9.3–12.5)
7.4 ± 0.58
(7.1–8.1)
12.0 8.9 ± 0.31
(8.4–9.1)
9.5 ± 0.57
(8.6–10.4)
8.8 ± 0.73
(7.5–9.8)
HL 6.0 ± 0.31
(5.7–6.3)
7.4 ± 0.99
(6.7–8.1)
7.1 ± 0.29
(6.6–7.6)
6.7 ± 0.31
(6.2–7.2)
7.6 ± 0.38
(7.0–8.1)
6.4 ± 0.60
(5.8–7.0)
8.6 7.3 ± 0.56
(6.5–7.8)
8.0 ± 0.52
(7.4–8.9)
7.0 ± 0.42
(6.3–7.6)
HW 3.6 ± 0.10
(3.5–3.7)
4.4 ± 0.14
(4.3–4.5)
5.1 ± 0.21
(4.7–5.3)
4.4 ± 0.21
(4.1–4.6)
5.2 ± 0.22
(5.0–5.6)
4.2 ± 0.25
(4.0–4.5)
5.9 4.8 ± 0.21
(4.5–5.0)
5.2 ± 0.29
(4.7–5.6)
4.7 ± 0.30
(4.1–5.0)
HD 1.8 ± 0.02
(1.8–1.8)
2.0 ± 0.07
(1.9–2.0)
2.4 ± 0.12
(2.3–2.6)
2.2 ± 0.17
(2.0–2.5)
2.3 ± 0.17
(2.0–2.6)
2.4 ± 0.12
(2.3–2.5)
2.6 2.5 ± 0.14
(2.3–2.6)
2.6 ± 0.32
(2.3–3.4)
2.3 ± 0.18
(2.1–2.7)
SW 3.1 ± 0.17
(3.0–3.3)
3.3 ± 0.28
(3.1–3.5)
3.7 ± 0.24
(3.3–4.1)
3.1 ± 0.22
(2.6–3.3)
3.6 ± 0.17
(3.4–3.9)
3.2 ± 0.15
(3.1–3.4)
3.3 3.6 ± 0.38
(3.3–4.1)
3.9 ± 0.46
(3.4–4.8)
3.3 ± 0.33
(2.8–3.8)
IN 1.1 ± 0.06
(1.0–1.1)
1.2 ± 0.02
(1.2–1.2)
1.9 ± 0.15
(1.5–2.1)
1.8 ± 0.14
(1.6–2.0)
2.2 ± 0.19
(2.0–2.5)
1.4 ± 0.06
(1.4–1.5)
2.3 1.7 ± 0.38
(1.4–2.1)
2.1 ± 0.25
(1.7–2.5)
1.8 ± 0.13
(1.6–2.0)
FW 1.8 ± 0.21
(1.6–2.0)
2.3 ± 0.57
(1.9–2.7)
3.5 ± 0.40
(2.8–3.9)
2.6 ± 0.24
(2.2–3.0)
4.0 ± 0.52
(3.3–4.8)
2.6 ± 0.38
(2.3–3.0)
3.7 3.1 ± 0.37
(2.6–3.5)
3.4 ± 0.37
(2.6–3.9)
3.3 ± 0.27
(3.0–3.7)
LI 2.3 ± 0.58
(2.0–3.0)
1.5 ± 0.71
(1.0–2.0)
1.5 ± 0.41
(1.0–2.0)
3.3 ± 0.71
(2.0–4.0)
0.0 ± 0.67
(−1.0 to
1.0)
1.8 ± 0.76
(1.0–2.5)
1.0 2.0 ± 0.41
(1.5–2.5)
2.9 ± 0.32
(2.0–3.0)
0.6 ± 0.73
(0.0–2.0)
PMT 6.3 ± 0.58
(6.0–7.0)
6.5 ± 0.71
(6.0–7.0)
7.4 ± 0.97
(6.0–9.0)
6.1 ± 2.17
(4.0–11.0)
7.0 ± 1.05
(6.0–9.0)
7.0 ± 1.73
(6.0–9.0)
6.0 6.3 ± 1.26
(5.0–8.0)
7.1 ± 0.88
(6.0–8.0)
7.2 ± 1.99
(4.0–10.0)
MT 38.3 ± 1.53
(37.0–40.0)
41.5 ± 2.12
(40.0–43.0)
47.7 ± 7.26
(36.0–56.0)
27.9 ± 5.03
(19.0–36.0)
52.6 ± 4.50
(45.0–60.0)
31.0 ± 5.20
(25.0–34.0)
30.0 48.0 ± 7.94
(42.0–57.0)
N=3
28.8 ± 4.05
(23.0–35.0)
20.8 ± 6.69
(13.0–36.0)
VT 12.3 ± 1.53
(11.0–14.0)
13.5 ± 0.71
(13.0–14.0)
15.9 ± 2.69
(13.0–22.0)
11.1 ± 1.13
(10.0–13.0)
13.7 ± 2.11
(9.0–17.0)
13.0 ± 5.29
(9.0–19.0)
13.0 12.5 ± 2.38
(10.0–15.0)
12.0 ± 1.94
(9.0–15.0)
11.4 ± 2.30
(8.0–15.0)
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 10/71

Table 3 Cranial osteological variation among Chiropterotriton species based on characters and character states defined by Darda & Wake (2015).Each species is
represented by a single µCT-scanned specimen except C. chiropterus, for which there are an additional four cleared-and-stained (c&s) specimens. States that are not observed
in these specimens are omitted; for example, character 6, state c. All specimens show the same state for characters 11 (squamosal process absent) and 12 (vomer preorbital
process present). Each species name is followed by the specimen’s museum catalog number, sex (F, female; M, male) and snout-vent length. Instances in which two states are
listed for a given character (*) represent right-left asymmetry in that specimen.
Species Character
1. Septomaxilla
development
2. Nasal-
premaxilla
articulation
3. Nasal-maxilla
articulation
4. Nasal-
prefrontal
articulation
5. Nasal-
frontal
articulation
6. Frontal-frontal
articulation
7. Parietal-parietal
articulation
8. Frontoparietal
fontanel
9. Parietal
process
10. Otic process
(a)
ab-
sent
(b)
pre-
sent
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(c)
over-
lap
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(c)
over-
lap
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(c)
over-
lap
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
over-
lap
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(d)
inter-
digitate
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(d)
inter-
digitate
(a)
exten-
sive
(b)
re-
duced
(c)
ab-
sent
(a)
ab-
sent
(b)
pre-
sent
(a)
ab-
sent
(b)
one
(c)
two
C. ceronorum,
sp. nov.
X X XX XX
*X*XX X X X
USNM 224212,
M, 36.2 mm
C. perotensis,
sp. nov.
XX XX
*X*XX
*X*X*X*XXX
MVZ 200693,
F, 31.1 mm
C. totonacus,
sp. nov.
XX X X X XX XX X
MVZ 163945,
F, 35.8 mm
C. melipona,
sp. nov.
XX XXXXXXX X
MVZ 178706,
M, 28.5 mm
C. casasi,
sp. nov.
X XXXXX X XXX
MVZ 92874,
M, 42.0 mm
C. chiropterus X XXXXX X XX X
MVZ 85602,
M, 38.9 mm
C. chiropterus,
c&s
XX XXXX X XX X
MVZ 85596,
M, 40.0 mm
C. chiropterus,
c&s
XX XXXXX
*X*XX X
MVZ 85632, F,
34 mm
C. chiropterus,
c&s
X XXXXX X XX X
MVZ 85594,
M, 36 mm
(Continued)
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 11/71

Table 3 (continued).
Species Character
1. Septomaxilla
development
2. Nasal-
premaxilla
articulation
3. Nasal-maxilla
articulation
4. Nasal-
prefrontal
articulation
5. Nasal-
frontal
articulation
6. Frontal-frontal
articulation
7. Parietal-parietal
articulation
8. Frontoparietal
fontanel
9. Parietal
process
10. Otic process
(a)
ab-
sent
(b)
pre-
sent
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(c)
over-
lap
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(c)
over-
lap
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(c)
over-
lap
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
over-
lap
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(d)
inter-
digitate
(a)
sepa-
rate
(b)
abut
(d)
inter-
digitate
(a)
exten-
sive
(b)
re-
duced
(c)
ab-
sent
(a)
ab-
sent
(b)
pre-
sent
(a)
ab-
sent
(b)
one
(c)
two
C. chiropterus,
c&s
XX XXXX X XX X
MVZ 85613,
M, 37.7 mm
C. orculus XX XX XX
*X*X*X*XXX
MVZ 138783,
M, 38.9 mm
C. lavae XX XX XX
*X*XXXX
MVZ 163912,
M, 33.8 mm
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 12/71

morphological characters through morphometric and osteological comparisons
(Tables 2 and 3).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum sp. nov.
Ceron Family Salamander, Salamandra de los Cerón
Figures 4A–4C,5A,6B,7B,8B.
Chresonymy
Chiropterotriton chiropterus (part)—Gadow, 1905.
Chiropterotriton sp. I.—Darda, 1994 (population 22); Parra-Olea, 2003;Raffaëlli, 2007;
Raffaëlli, 2013;Rovito & Parra-Olea, 2015;García-Castillo et al., 2017;García-Castillo
et al., 2018.
Figure 2 Skull of the holotype of Chiropterotriton casasi sp. nov. seen in (A) dorsal, (B) ventral and
(C) lateral views. Images are derived from a µCT scan of MVZ 92874, an adult male. Arrows point to the
septomaxillary bone. Abbreviations: AP, ascending process of the premaxilla; CO, columella; CP, cor-
onoid process of the prearticular; DE, dentary; FP, facial process of the maxilla; FR, frontal; MX, maxilla;
NA, nasal; NL, foramen of the nasolacrimal duct; OC, otic capsule; OR, orbitosphenoid; PA, parietal;
PF, prefrontal; PM, premaxilla; PO, preorbital process of the vomer; PR, prearticular; PS, parasphenoid;
QU, quadrate; SQ, squamosal; VO, vomer. Scale bar, 1 mm. Full-size

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8800/fig-2
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 13/71

Holotype: USNM 224212, an adult male from ca. 1 km NE Santa Cruz Texmalaquilla
(4.7 mi by road NE of Atzitzintla), on south slope of Pico de Orizaba, Puebla, Mexico,
3,110 masl, 18.9484N, 97.2802W. Collected 3 September 1975 by R.W. McDiarmid.
Paratypes: Twenty specimens, all from Puebla, Mexico. Ten males: MVZ 201393,
Santa Cruz Texmalaquilla, S side of Mt. Orizaba; USNM 224202, 224207–08, 224211,
224218–20, 224230 and 224236, same data as holotype. Ten females: USNM 224240–41,
224247, 224250, 224252–53, 224257, 224259 and 224275–76, same data as holotype.
Referred specimens: Two hundred thirty-two specimens, all from Mexico. Santa Cruz
Texmalaquilla, Puebla: MVZ 201387–92; USNM 224193–201, 224203–06, 224209–10,
224213–17, 224221–29, 224231–35, 224237–39, 224242–46, 224248–49, 224251,
224254–56, 224258 and 224260–74. Xometla, Veracruz: CAS 98934–36, 98939, 98953,
98957; KU 106641–65; IBH 30987–88; LACM 117161–230; MVZ 114378–82, 138759,
138761–63, 143910–17, 163583–97, 163601–06, 163612, 184830, 195827–30, 198914–17,
198919, 198921, 231345–47, 233032–34; and USNM 492145–47.
Diagnosis: This medium-sized species of plethodontid salamander is phylogenetically
close to Chiropterotriton perotensis, C. totonacus and C. lavae; mean SVL 33.9 mm in
ten adult males (range 30.6–36.2) and 34.9 mm in ten adult females (range 33.3–38.4).
The head is moderately wide; HW averages 15% of SVL in both males and females
(range 14–16%). In males, the snout is broad and truncated. Jaw muscles are pronounced
and visible as a bulging mass immediately behind the eyes. Eyes are moderately
protuberant and extend laterally beyond the jaw margin in ventral view. There are few
maxillary teeth in males (mean MT 11.0, range 7–18) but they are more numerous in
females (mean MT 47.7, range 36–56). There are few vomerine teeth in males (mean VT
13.0, range 11–17) and females (mean VT 15.9, range 13–22), and they are arranged in a
curved line that does not extend past the outer margin of the internal choanae. The tail is
moderately long; mean TL equals 1.0 of SVL in males (range 0.89–1.12) and 0.97 of
SVL in females (range 0.85–1.07). Limbs are moderately long; FLL + HLL averages 54% of
SVL in males (range 48–57%) and 50% in females (range 45–54%). Adpressed limbs
approach closely or overlap slightly in males (mean LI 0.0, range −0.5 to 1) but they are
separated by as many as two costal folds in females (mean LI 1.5, range 1–2). Digits are
slender and expanded distally, with distinct subterminal pads and moderate webbing
at the base. All digits are discrete, including the first, which extends beyond the margins of
the webbing. The outermost toes are particularly well developed. The smallest male with a
mental gland is 30.6 mm SVL. The mental gland is prominent and oval (nearly round)
to round. Parotoid glands are not evident.
Comparisons: Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. perotensis by its larger adult
body size (mean SVL 33.9 mm in male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 29.7 mm
in male and 31.7 mm in female C. perotensis), longer limbs (mean LI 0.0 in male and
1.5 in female C. ceronorum vs. 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis), longer head
(mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.1 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 6.6 mm in male
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 14/71

Figure 3 Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny of the genus Chiropterotriton based on two
mitochondrial markers. Both ML and Bayesian measures of nodal support are indicated by bootstrap
proportions (BS; above) and posterior probabilities (PP; below), respectively. Asterisks indicate statis-
tically significant support in both analyses (PP > 0.95, BS > 70). Numbers in parentheses refer to localities
from Fig. 1.Full-size

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8800/fig-3
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 15/71

and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis), broader head (mean HW 5.1 mm in both male and
female C. ceronorum vs. 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female C. perotensis), broader
feet (mean FW 3.8 mm in male and 3.5 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 2.6 mm in
both male and female C. perotensis), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 11.0 in male and
47.7 in female C. ceronorum vs. 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female C. perotensis) and more
vomerine teeth (mean VT 13.0 in male and 15.9 in female C. ceronorum vs. 9.0 in male and
11.1 in female C. perotensis).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. totonacus in its slightly smaller adult body
size (mean SVL 33.9 mm in male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 35.7 mm in male
and 35.5 mm in female C. totonacus), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in male and 0.97
in female C. ceronorum vs. 1.16 in male and 1.20 in female C. totonacus), shorter limbs
(mean LI 0.0 in male and 1.5 in female C. ceronorum vs. −0.6 in male and 0.0 in female
C. totonacus) and fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female
C. ceronorum vs. 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female C. totonacus).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. melipona by its larger adult body size
(mean SVL 33.9 mm in male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 29.2 mm in male and
28.5 mm in female C. melipona), longer limbs in males (mean LI 0.0 in C. ceronorum vs.
2.3 in C. melipona), longer head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.1 mm in female
C. ceronorum vs. 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female C. melipona), broader head
Figure 4 Photographs of heads, hands and feet of preserved specimens of eight species of
Chiropterotriton.(A–C) C. ceronorum, holotype, USNM 224212; (D–F) C. perotensis, paratype, MVZ
186711; (G–I) C. totonacus, holotype, MVZ 163945; (J–L) C. melipona, paratype, MVZ 178706;
(M–O) C. casasi, holotype, MVZ 92874; (P–R) C. chiropterus, neotype, MVZ 85590; (S–U) C. orculus,
MVZ 138776; (V–X) C. lavae, MVZ 106436. Right hands and feet are seen in dorsal view.
Full-size

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8800/fig-4
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 16/71

(mean HW 5.1 mm in both male and female C. ceronorum vs. 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm
in female C. melipona), broader feet (mean FW 3.8 mm in male and 3.5 mm in female
C. ceronorum vs. 2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female C. melipona), more maxillary teeth
(mean MT 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum vs. 9.5 in male and 31.0 in
Figure 5 Photographs of live and preserved specimens of eight species of Chiropterotriton.
(A) C. ceronorum sp. nov., IBH 30988; (B) C. perotensis sp. nov., IBH 30745; (C) C. totonacus sp.
nov., IBH 31031; (D) C. melipona sp. nov., IBH 30112; (E) C. casasi sp. nov., paratype, MVZ 92876;
(F) C. chiropterus, CARIE 0719; (G) C. orculus, IBH 30997; (H) C. lavae, IBH 22365.
Full-size

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8800/fig-5
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 17/71

female C. melipona) and more vomerine teeth (mean VT 13.0 in male and 15.9 in female
C. ceronorum vs. 11.0 in male and 13.0 in female C. melipona).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. casasi in its smaller adult body size
(mean SVL 33.9 mm in male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 37.8 mm in male and
40.9 mm in one female C. casasi), shorter head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.1 mm
in female C. ceronorum vs. 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi), narrower
head (mean HW 5.1 mm in both male and female C. ceronorum vs. 5.8 mm in male
and 5.9 mm in one female C. casasi), longer limbs in males (mean LI 0.0 in C. ceronorum
vs. 0.8 in C. casasi), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female
C. ceronorum vs. mean 9.0 in males and 30 in one female C. casasi) and more vomerine
teeth (mean VT 13.0 in male and 15.9 in female C. ceronorum vs. mean 9.0 in males and 13
in one female C. casasi).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. chiropterus in its smaller adult body size in
males (mean SVL 33.9 mm in C. ceronorum vs. 37.5 mm in C. chiropterus), shorter
Figure 6 Skulls of eight Chiropterotriton species seen in dorsal view. (A) C. casasi sp. nov.—holotype,
MVZ 92874, an adult male; (B) C. ceronorum sp. nov.—holotype, USNM 224212, an adult male; (C)
C. lavae—neotype, MVZ 163912, an adult male; (D) C. melipona sp. nov.—paratype, MVZ 178706, an
adult male; (E) C. orculus—neotype, MVZ 138783, an adult male; (F) C. perotensis sp. nov. —paratype,
MVZ 200693, an adult male; (G) C. totonacus sp. nov.—holotype, MVZ 163945, an adult female; (H)
C. chiropterus—MVZ 85602, an adult male. Arrows point to the prominent frontoparietal fontanel in the
cranial roof in (D) and (F), to the unusually narrow ascending processes of the premaxillary bone at the
rostral end of the skull in (D) and (G), and to the tiny septomaxillary bones adjacent to the external nares
in (E) and (H). All skulls are depicted at the same length; scale bar, 1 mm. Anterior is at the top. Images
are derived from µCT scans. Full-size

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8800/fig-6
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 18/71

tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in male and 0.97 in female C. ceronorum vs. 1.25 in male and 1.19 in
female C. chiropterus), longer limbs (mean LI 0.0 in male and 1.5 in female C. ceronorum
vs. 0.3 in male and 2.0 in female C. chiropterus) and fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT
11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum vs. 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female
C. chiropterus).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. orculus in its smaller adult body size
(mean SVL 33.9 mm in male and 34.9 in female C. ceronorum vs. 35.9 mm in male
and 39.0 in female C. orculus), longer limbs (mean LI 0.0 in male and 1.5 in female
C. ceronorum vs. 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female C. orculus), more maxillary teeth (mean MT
11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum vs. 8.2 in male and 28.8 mm in female
C. orculus) and more vomerine teeth (mean VT 13.0 in male and 15.9 in female
C. ceronorum vs. 8.6 in male and 12.0 in female C. orculus).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. lavae in being slightly larger (mean SVL
33.9 mm in male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm
in female C. lavae), a shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in male and 0.97 in female
Figure 7 Skulls of eight Chiropterotriton species seen in ventral view. (A) C. casasi sp. nov.—holotype,
MVZ 92874, an adult male; (B) C. ceronorum sp. nov.—holotype, USNM 224212, an adult male;
(C) C. lavae—neotype, MVZ 163912, an adult male; (D) C. melipona sp. nov.—paratype, MVZ 178706,
an adult male; (E) C. orculus—neotype, MVZ 138783, an adult male; (F) C. perotensis sp. nov.—paratype,
MVZ 200693, an adult male; (G) C. totonacus sp. nov.—holotype, MVZ 163945, an adult female;
(H) C. chiropterus—MVZ 85602, an adult male. Arrows point to the long vs. short preorbital process of
the vomer in (A) and (F), respectively; and to the unusually small parasphenoid tooth patch in (C) vs. the
much larger patch in (F). All skulls are depicted at the same length; scale bar, 1 mm. Anterior is at the top.
Images are derived from µCT scans. Full-size

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8800/fig-7
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 19/71

Figure 8 Skulls of eight Chiropterotriton species seen in lateral view. (A): C. casasi sp. nov.—holotype,
MVZ 92874, an adult male; (B): C. ceronorum sp. nov.—holotype, USNM 224212, an adult male;
(C) C. lavae—neotype, MVZ 163912, an adult male; (D) C. melipona sp. nov.—paratype, MVZ 178706,
an adult male; (E) C. orculus—neotype, MVZ 138783, an adult male; (F) C. perotensis sp. nov.—paratype,
MVZ 200693, an adult male; (G) C. totonacus sp. nov.—holotype, MVZ 163945, an adult female;
(H) C. chiropterus—MVZ 85602, an adult male. Arrows point to prominent dorsal crests on the otic
capsule in (A), (C) and (H); to the high vs. low coronoid process on the prearticular bone of the lower jaw
in (C) and (D), respectively; to the tiny septomaxillary bones in (B), (E) and (H); and to the posterior
portion of the maxillary bone, which typically is dorsoventrally expanded and edentulous in males (A) vs.
narrow and toothed in females (G). All skulls are depicted at the same length; scale bar, 1 mm. Anterior is
to the left. Images are derived from µCT scans. Full-size

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8800/fig-8
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 20/71

C. ceronorum vs. 1.19 in male and 1.02 in female C. lavae), shorter limbs (mean LI 0.0 in
male and 1.5 in female C. ceronorum vs. −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae), more
maxillary teeth (mean MT 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum vs. 7.0 in
male and 20.8 in female C. lavae), and more vomerine teeth (mean VT 13.0 in male
and 15.9 in female C. ceronorum vs. 8.9 in male and 11.4 in female C. lavae).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. aureus by its larger adult body size
(mean SVL 33.9 mm in male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 28.5 mm in one male
and 26.8 mm in female C. aureus), a shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in male and 0.97 in
female C. ceronorum vs. 1.28 in one male and 1.16 in female C. aureus), longer limbs
(mean LI 0.0 in male and 1.5 in female C. ceronorum vs. 2.0 in one male and 2.3 in
female C. aureus), longer head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.1 mm in female
C. ceronorum vs. 6.4 mm in one male and 6.0 mm in female C. aureus), broader head
(mean HW 5.1 mm in both male and female C. ceronorum vs. 4.0 mm in one male
and 3.6 mm in female C. aureus), broader feet (mean FW 3.8 mm in male and 3.5 mm in
female C. ceronorum vs. 2.4 mm in one male and 1.8 mm in female C. aureus), and
more maxillary teeth (mean MT 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum vs. 10.0 in
one male and 38.3 in female C. aureus).
Chiropterotriton ceronorum differs from C. nubilus by its larger adult body size size
(mean SVL 33.9 mm in male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 29.4 mm in one
male and 30.5 mm in female C. nubilus), a shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in male and
0.97 in female C. ceronorum vs. 1.37 in one male and 1.12 in female C. nubilus), longer
limbs in males (mean LI 0.0 in male C. ceronorum vs. 2.0 in one male C. nubilus), longer
head in males (mean HL 7.5 mm in male C. ceronorum vs. 6.6 mm in one male C. nubilus),
broader head (mean HW 5.1 mm in both male and female C. ceronorum vs. 4.0 mm
in one male and 4.4 mm in female C. nubilus), and broader feet (mean FW 3.8 mm in male
and 3.5 mm in female C. ceronorum vs. 2.6 mm in male and 2.3 mm in female C. nubilus).
Description of holotype. SVL 36.2 mm, TL 34.3 mm, AX 17.9 mm, SW 3.4 mm, HL
8.1 mm, HW 5.3 mm, HD 2.6 mm, projection of snout beyond mandible 0.8 mm, distance
from anterior rim of orbit to snout 2.0 mm, interorbital distance 2.6 mm, eyelid length
1.8 mm, eyelid width 1.3 mm, horizontal orbit diameter 1.6 mm, nostril diameter 0.3 mm,
FLL 10.0 mm, HLL 10.3 mm, snout-to-forelimb length 11.5 mm, snout to anterior
angle of vent 35.2 mm, tail width at base 2.4 mm, tail depth at base 2.6 mm, FW 4.6 mm,
length of fifth toe 0.7 mm, length of third (longest) toe 1.3 mm, mental gland length
2.0 mm, mental gland width 1.7. Numbers of teeth: premaxillary 3, maxillary 5-4 (right-
left) and vomerine 5-6 (right-left). Adpressed limbs are separated by two costal folds.
Variation: Specimens of C. ceronorum from Xometla are smaller and have a longer tail
than those from the type locality: mean SVL 33.9 mm in males and 34.9 mm in females
from Texmalaquilla vs. 31.0 mm in males and 32.0 mm in females from Xometla; and
mean TL/SVL 1.0 in males and 0.97 in females from Texmalaquilla vs. 1.17 in males and
1.08 in females from Xometla.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 21/71

Coloration in life: These notes are based on study of a series of diapositives taken by
Gabriela Parra-Olea from near Xometla and by Roy W. McDiarmid from the vicinity of
Santa Cruz Texmalaquilla. Colors are from Köhler (2012).
The single Xometla specimen is generally dark brown and lacks a dorsal stripe or band.
Dorsal and lateral coloration reddish brown (Mahogany Red, 34) anteriorly becoming
brown (Brussels Brown, 33) medially and posteriorly. Lateral and ventral surfaces grayish
(Smoke Gray, 266). Face and cheeks as well as limbs bright gray-brown (Smoke Gray,
267, to Light Drab, 269). Snout Ground Cinnamon (270) to True Cinnamon (28) to
Vinaceous (247) at its tip. Upper eyelid Cream Yellow (82) at rim. Iris Cream Yellow (82)
to bright Trogon Yellow (81) dorsally but much darker and brownish ventrally. Manus and
pes bright light gray (Pale Neutral Gray, 296) but essentially colorless at the digit tips,
which are transparent and show underlying reddish blood vessels.
The Texmalaquilla specimens (nine) all have dark to very dark basic ground color
dorsally and laterally (venter not visible). Usually a dorsal band or stripe is present that
extends from the posterior surface of the head (over the anterior extension of the epaxial
muscles) to the tail tip. The band is almost uninterrupted in some specimens but is
discontinuous or contains numerous spots or flecks of darker color in others. The stripe
can be very bright and can be rich reddish (Pratt’s Rufous, 72), orange-brown (Flesh
Ocher, 57, to Orange Rufous, 56) to Salmon Color (58) and Dark Salmon Color (59).
In others it is Clay Color (18, 20).
Coloration in preservative: The holotype is a uniform dark tannish brown dorsally,
becoming paler laterally and very pale cream color ventrally. The dark tannish brown
extends to the tip of the tail. Limbs are yellowish. Mental gland is beige. Nine paratypes
are uniform dorsally, ranging from golden tan to very dark gray; in some, the tail is slightly
paler than the dorsum. These nine paratypes have lateral surfaces paler than dorsal,
and ventral surfaces are much lighter than lateral surfaces. The remaining eleven paratypes
have a stripe of some sort. The stripe is always paler than immediately adjacent lateral
parts, but it can be very obscure and seen mainly in the tail or it can extend all the way
from the nape to the tip of the tail. The stripe is bright yellow in some individuals but
typically is darker; in some specimens there is a suffusion of black in the middle of the
stripe. All individuals are paler ventrally, but in some very dark animals the venter is dark
gray and only the gular area is pale. The mental gland is usually pale.
Osteology: This account is based on examination of a µCT scan of the anterior skeleton of
USNM 224212, an adult male, 36.2 mm SVL (Figs. 6 and 7;Table 3). The skull is robust
in its degree of ossification, although many roofing bones are extremely thin. Paired
frontals and parietals are for the most part well-articulated with one another; there is only a
narrow but elongate frontoparietal fontanel, mostly along the midline. Anteriorly, the
frontals articulate with the nasal and prefrontal bones, as well as with the ascending
processes of the single premaxilla. The ascending processes never contact one another but
gradually widen as they establish an articulation with the frontals, thereby enclosing
the internasal fontanel. The palatal shelf of the premaxilla is very narrow and barely
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 22/71

evident. Paired septomaxillary bones are present but small. The nasal bone is triangular but
very thin, and somewhat larger than the prefrontal, which is more rectangular in shape.
Both bones are overlapped by the facial process of the maxilla, but where the three
bones meet the foramen for the nasolacrimal duct has eroded the facial process and the
prefrontal but not the adjacent nasal. The anterior, toothed portion of the maxilla
comprises only around 40% of the length of the bone; the remaining 60% is edentulous
and saber-shaped. In dorsal view, the posterior tip of each maxilla doesn’t bow out
laterally as they do in some congeners (e.g., C. orculus). There are five maxillary teeth on
the right side and seven on the left. There is but a single, short premaxillary tooth.
The orbitosphenoid, while relatively large, is only weakly articulated to the parasphenoid
and frontal and mostly separated from the parietal.
The otic capsule bears a distinct crest that extends anteriorly from the midpoint of the
lateral semicircular canal to about the anterior third of the anterior semicircular canal.
A narrow, spine-like tab is reflected ventromedially from the posterolateral margin of the
parietal, ending at about the middle of the vertical extent of the orbitosphenoid.
The squamosal is robust and expanded anteroventrally. The quadrate is stout. A stubby,
thick-based stylus is present on the operculum. Paired vomers are well developed but
barely articulate at the midline posterior to the internasal fontanel. The preorbital process
of each vomer is elongate, twisted and somewhat expanded laterally. Each side bears six
vomerine teeth, which are deployed medially and do not extend onto the preorbital
process. The median parasphenoid bone is triangular, but its caudal end is slightly bowed
posteriorly. Paired parasphenoid tooth patches are separate at the midline; each bears
approximately 60 teeth. The mandible is relatively stout. The articular bone is well ossified.
The prearticular bone is well developed and bluntly rounded anteriorly, with a high
coronoid process. There are 15 or 16 teeth on each dentary bone.
Digital formulae are 1-2-3-2 on each side. The terminal phalanx is barely expanded on
each finger. Mesopodial cartilages are not mineralized.
Distribution and ecology: Chiropterotriton ceronorum occurs on the southern slopes of
Pico de Orizaba in the states of Puebla and Veracruz at elevations that range from 2,600 to
approximately 3,100 masl. Specimens have been found in arboreal bromeliads as well
as under terrestrial cover objects.
Remarks: Chiropterotriton ceronorum is found in sympatry with Pseudoeurycea gadovii,
P. leprosa,Thorius spilogaster and T. lunaris. Much of the natural habitat has been
destroyed in recent years, making the species difficult to find. This species occurs at higher
elevations than the nearby (to the NE) Chiropterotriton chiropterus.
Conservation status: Chiropterotriton ceronorum was very common during the 1970s, but
is now very difficult to find, probably because of extensive habitat modification. On two
visits to the area in 2015, no individuals of this species were seen while all the species
with which it is known to co-occur were found. The remaining forest in the area where
it lives is severely fragmented with ongoing degradation. We recommend that it be
designated as Critically Endangered (CR) based on criterion B1ab(iii) (extent of
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 23/71

occurrence <100 km
2
, severely fragmented range and continuing decline in area, extent,
and quality of habitat).
Etymology: The species name honors members of the Ceron family of Cuautlalpan,
Veracruz, who have assisted generations of herpetologists in collecting salamanders in the
general region of Pico de Orizaba.
Chiropterotriton perotensis, sp. nov.
Valle Alegre Salamander, Salamandra de Valle Alegre
Figures 4D–4F,5B,6F,7F,8F.
Chresonymy
Chiropterotriton chiropterus (part).—Smith & Taylor, 1948;Wake, Papenfuss & Lynch,
1992.
Chiropterotriton sp. H.—Darda, 1994;Parra-Olea, 2003;Raffaëlli, 2007;Raffaëlli, 2013;
Rovito & Parra-Olea, 2015;García-Castillo et al., 2017;García-Castillo et al., 2018.
Chiropterotriton sp.—Rovito et al., 2015a.
Holotype: MVZ 200693, an adult female from 14.4 km S (by road surfaced with rocks) Las
Vigas de Ramírez at Microwave Station, Valle Alegre, Veracruz, Mexico, 3,020 masl,
19.56917N, 97.09528W (EPE = max. error distance 1.142 km). Collected 26 August 1982
by D.M. Darda and S. Sessions.
Paratypes: Nineteen specimens, all from Veracruz, Mexico. Twelve males: MVZ 114356
and 114359, road from Las Vigas de Ramírez to microwave station on N Flank Cofre
de Perote, 11.6 km S (by road) Las Vigas; MVZ 173428–29, Las Vigas de Ramírez,
microondas road; MVZ 178661 and 178663–65, 8–15.5 km S (via microondas road) Las
Vigas de Ramírez; MVZ 200681–83 and 200698, 14.4 km S (by Rock Rd.) Las Vigas de
Ramírez at microwave station. Seven females: MVZ 173438–39, Las Vigas de Ramírez,
microondas road; MVZ 186711, road to microwave station, 15 km S (by road) Las Vigas de
Ramírez; MVZ 200691, 200694–95 and 200702, 14.4 km S (by Rock Rd.) Las Vigas de
Ramírez at microwave station.
Referred specimens: Seventy-two specimens, all from Veracruz, Mexico. IBH 16778–82,
22384, 22391, 22395, 22568, 23062, 23066, 23072, 29853, 29857, 29863–64, 29866,
29872, 30840–41, 30844, 30847, 31032–39 and 31055–62; KU 100747–54; MVZ 114351,
114355, 114357, 114358, 173440–41, 178659–60, 178662, 178666–68, 200684–86,
200688–90, 200692, 200695–97, 200699–701 and 200703.
Diagnosis: This is a small but stout species of plethodontid salamander that is
phylogenetically related to Chiropterotriton lavae,C. ceronorum and C. totonacus; mean
SVL 29.7 mm in 12 adult males (range 26.5–32.8) and 31.7 mm in eight adult females
(range 27.4–34.3). The head is moderately wide; HW averages 14% of SVL in both males
and females (range 13–15%). The snout is short. Eyes are small and typically do not
protrude laterally beyond the jaw margin in ventral view; they are less prominent than in
most other species of Chiropterotriton. Jaw muscles caudal to the eyes are variably
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 24/71

developed but generally pronounced. There are few maxillary teeth in males (mean MT
7.2, range 2–17) and moderate numbers in females (mean MT 27.9, range 19–36).
There are few vomerine teeth in both males (mean VT 9.0, range 7–12) and females (mean
VT 11.1, range 10–13), which are arranged in a curved line that does not extend lateral to
the outer margin of the internal choana. The tail is moderately sized; mean TL equals
1.03 of SVL in males (range 0.92–1.16) and 1.0 of SVL in females (range 0.79–1.11). Limbs
are short; FLL + HLL averages 47% of SVL in males (range 44–50%) and 43% of SVL in
females (range 41–46%). Adpressed limbs are widely separated—they never overlap—in
both males (mean LI 2.5, range 1–3) and females (mean LI 3.3, range 2–4). Manus and pes
are relatively small for the genus. Digital webbing ranges from absent to slight; when
present, it is limited to the metatarsal region. The first digit is small and usually included
within the webbing, although a small portion of it may be free at the tip. The outermost
digit is less prominent than in other species; digit 5 (pes) is distinctly shorter than
digits 2–4. Subterminal pads are present but not prominent. An oval-shaped mental
gland is present in males but is not particularly prominent. The smallest male with a
mental gland is 29.3 mm SVL. Paratoid glands are present in many individuals and
prominent in some.
Comparisons: Chiropterotriton perotensis differs from C. ceronorum in its smaller adult
body size (mean SVL 29.7 mm in male and 31.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 33.9 mm in
male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum), shorter limbs (mean LI 2.5 in male and
3.3 in female C. perotensis vs. 0.0 in male and 1.5 in female C. ceronorum), shorter head
(mean HL 6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 7.5 mm in male and
7.1 mm in female C. ceronorum), narrower head (mean HW 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm
in female C. perotensis vs. 5.1 mm in both male and female C. ceronorum), narrower
feet (mean FW 2.6 mm in both male and female C. perotensis vs. 3.8 mm in male and
3.5 mm in female C. ceronorum), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.2 in male and 27.8 in
female C. perotensis vs. 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum) and fewer vomerine
teeth (VT 9.0 in male and 11.1 in female C. perotensis vs. 13.0 in male and 15.9 in
female C. ceronorum).
Chiropterotriton perotensis differs from C. totonacus in its smaller adult body size (mean
SVL 29.7 mm in male and 31.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 35.7 mm in male and
35.5 mm in female C. totonacus), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in both male and female
C. perotensis vs. 1.16 in male and 1.20 in female C. totonacus), shorter limbs (mean LI
2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis vs. −0.6 in male and 0.0 in female C. totonacus),
shorter head (mean HL 6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 8.5 mm in
male and 7.6 mm in female C.totonacus), narrower head (mean HW 4.2 mm in male
and 4.4 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 5.2 mm in both male and female C. totonacus),
narrower feet (mean FW 2.6 mm in both male and female C. perotensis vs. 4.2 mm in male
and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.2 in male and
27.9 in female C. perotensis vs. 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female C. totonacus) and fewer
vomerine teeth (mean VT 9.0 in male and 11.1 in female C. perotensis vs. 11.6 in male and
13.7 in female C. totonacus).
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 25/71

Chiropterotriton perotensis, while very similar in morphological proportions to
C. melipona, differs by its shorter limbs in females (mean LI 3.3 in C. perotensis vs. 1.8 in
C. melipona), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female C. perotensis
vs. 9.5 in male and 31.0 in female C. melipona) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 9.0 in
male and 11.1 in female C. perotensis vs. 11.0 in male and 13.0 in female C. melipona).
Chiropterotriton perotensis differs from C. casasi in its smaller adult body size (mean
SVL 29.7 mm in male and 31.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 37.8 mm in male and
40.9 mm in one female C. casasi), shorter limbs (mean LI 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female
C. perotensis vs. 0.80 in male and 1.0 in one female C. casasi), shorter head (mean HL
6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one
female C.casasi), narrower head (mean HW 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female
C. perotensis vs. 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in one female C. casasi), narrower feet
(mean FW 2.6 mm in both male and female C. perotensis vs. 3.7 mm in both male and
one female C. casasi), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female
C. perotensis vs. 9.0 in male and 30.0 in one female C. casasi) and fewer vomerine teeth in
females (mean VT 11.1 in C. perotensis vs.13.0 in one C. casasi).
Chiropterotriton perotensis differs from C. chiropterus by its smaller adult body size
(mean SVL 29.7 mm in male and 31.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 37.5 mm in male
and 33.5 mm in female C. chiropterus), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in both male and
female C. perotensis vs. 1.25 in male and 1.19 in female C. chiropterus), shorter limbs
(mean LI 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis vs. 0.30 in male and 2.0 in female
C. chiropterus), shorter head (mean HL 6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis
vs. 8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female C.chiropterus), narrower head (mean HW
4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 5.6 mm in male and 4.8 mm in
female C. chiropterus), narrower feet (mean FW 2.6 mm in both male and female
C. perotensis vs. 3.7 mm in male and 3.1 mm in female C. chiropterus), fewer maxillary
teeth (mean MT 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female C. perotensis vs. 12.6 in male and 48.0 in
female C. chiropterus) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 9.0 in male and 11.1 in female
C. perotensis vs. 10.6 in male and 12.5 in female C. chiropterus).
Chiropterotriton perotensis differs from C. orculus in its smaller adult body size
(mean SVL 29.7 mm in male and 31.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 35.9 mm in male and
39.0 mm in female C. orculus), slightly shorter limbs (mean LI 2.5 in male and 3.3 in
female C. perotensis vs. 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female C. orculus), shorter head (mean HL
6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in
female C.orculus), narrower head (mean HW 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female
C. perotensis vs. 5.0 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female C. orculus), narrower feet (mean
FW 2.6 mm in both male and female C. perotensis vs. 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in
female C. orculus) and fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female
C. perotensis vs. 8.2 in male and 28.8 in female C. orculus).
Chiropterotriton perotensis differs from C. lavae in having a smaller adult body size in
males (mean SVL 29.7 mm in C. perotensis vs. 32.4 mm in C. lavae), shorter limbs
(mean LI 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis vs. −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female
C. lavae), a slightly narrower head (mean HW 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 26/71

C. perotensis vs. 4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae), a shorter head (mean HL
6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 7.5 mm in male and 7.0 mm in
female C. lavae), narrower feet (FW 2.6 mm in both male and female C. perotensis vs.
3.7 mm in male and 3.3 mm in female C. lavae) and more maxillary teeth in females (mean
MT 27.9 in C. perotensis vs. 20.8 in C. lavae).
Chiropterotriton perotensis differs from C. aureus in its smaller adult body size (mean
SVL 29.7 mm in male and 31.7 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 28.5 mm in male and
26.8 mm in female C. aureus), shorter tail in males (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in both male
and female C. perotensis vs. 1.28 in male and 1.16 in female C. aureus), broader head
(mean HW 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female C. perotensis vs. 4.0 mm in male and
3.6 mm in female C. aureus), broader feet in females (mean FW 2.6 mm in female
C. perotensis vs. 1.8 mm in female C. aureus), fewer maxillary teeth in females (mean MT
27.9 in female C. perotensis vs. 38.3 in female C. aureus) and fewer vomerine teeth in males
(mean VT 9.0 in male C. perotensis vs. 15.0 in male C. aureus).
Chiropterotriton perotensis differs from C. nubilus in having a shorter tail (mean
TL/SVL 1.0 in both male and female C. perotensis vs. 1.37 in male and 1.12 in female
C. nubilus), shorter limbs (mean LI 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis vs. 2.0 in
male and 1.5 in female C. nubilus), and fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.2 in male and
27.9 in female C. perotensis vs. 13.0 in male and 41.5 in female C. nubilus).
Description of holotype: SVL 31.1 mm, TL 30.7 mm, AX 16.4 mm, SW 3.1 mm, HL
6.8 mm, HW 4.2 mm, HD 2.0 mm, projection of snout beyond mandible 0.4 mm, distance
from anterior rim of orbit to snout 1.7 mm, interorbital distance 1.8 mm, eyelid length
2.2 mm, eyelid width 0.8 mm, horizontal orbit diameter 1.4 mm, FLL 6.5 mm, HLL
6.7 mm, snout-to-forelimb length 8.8 mm, snout to anterior angle of vent 29.5 mm, tail
width at base 2.1 mm, tail depth at base 2.6 mm, FW 2.5 mm, length of fifth toe 0.5 mm,
length of third (longest) toe 1.2 mm. Numbers of teeth: premaxillary 6, maxillary
15-16 (right-left) and vomerine 7-6 (right-left). Adpressed limbs are separated by 4 costal
folds.
Coloration in life: Color notes in life are not available for specimens in the type series, but
notes were recorded for the following referred specimens. IBH 29853, 29857, 29863, 29864,
29866 and 29872, 15 km S of Las Vigas on road to Valle Alegre: General coloration
dark with a dark reddish brown dorsal stripe in some and obscure brown to grayish brown
stripe in others. The reddish stripe is brightest laterally with darker pigment medially.
Small guanophores are abundantly distributed over the mainly very dark pigment dorsally.
The iris is golden brown to dark brown. The venter is dark to very dark. In one adult there
is a complete melanophore network; in another, dense punctuations. Some white
guanophores are prominent in the darker individual. IBH 22384, 22395, 23062, 23066 and
23072, 15.9 km on microondas road, Las Vigas: Adults are very dark dorsally—almost
black—with a fine speckling of obscure white overlying the ground color. Fine background
mottling of dark brown on black. Limbs are black with some paler highlights medially,
but become brown distally. The iris is dark brownish black. The venter is dark, dense
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 27/71

mainly punctate melanophores, with a very fine superficial sprinkling of white
ventrolaterally. The gular area is slightly paler. Juveniles have an indistinct brown stripe,
which is less apparent in larger animals.
Coloration in preservative: The holotype is a uniform dark brown dorsally and laterally,
becoming blackish brown on the tail. The venter is much paler than the dorsum, becoming
dark brown under the tail. Limbs are dark brown. There is no other distinguishing
color. Two of the paratypes have a hint of a dorsal stripe, which is slightly paler than
surrounding areas. The manus and pes are paler, but in general are brown to blackish
brown.
Osteology: This account is based on examination of a µCT scan of the anterior skeleton of
MVZ 200693, an adult female, 31.1 mm SVL (Figs. 6–8;Table 3). The skull is compact.
Individual cranial roofing bones are for the most part well developed, although there is a
marked frontoparietal fontanel that begins at the frontal-parietal border and extends
posteriorly along the midline. The frontal is fairly robust. Anteriorly, it is solidly articulated
with the ascending processes of the single premaxilla, which arise separately and remain
distinct along their entire length. The processes expand laterally where they articulate
with the frontal bones. The premaxilla lacks a palatal shelf and there are no septomaxillary
bones. The nasal bone is triangular but very thin. It is considerably larger than the
rectangular prefrontal, which is distinct but small. A foramen for the nasolacrimal duct has
eroded the anteroventral margin of the prefrontal, the posteroventral margin of the nasal,
and the dorsal edge of the facial process of the maxilla. The anterior, toothed portion of
the maxilla comprises approximately 75–80% of the length of the bone; the remaining
edentulous portion is thinner and cleaver-like. The facial process of the maxilla extends
rostrally. There are 16 maxillary teeth on the left side and 17 on the right. There are seven
premaxillary teeth. The orbitosphenoid is moderately well developed and relatively
large, but it is only weakly articulated to the parasphenoid and frontal and separated from
the parietal.
The otic capsule bears a modest dorsal crest above the anterior semicircular canal but
there is no distinct otic process. A well-developed tab extends ventromedially from the
posterolateral surface of the parietal. It is relatively long and spine-like and extends
through about two-thirds of the vertical extent of the orbitosphenoid. The squamosal bone
is relatively stout, roughly triangular, and abuts the otic capsule along a broad front that
subtends the lateral semicircular canal. The quadrate bone is relatively small and
inconspicuous. The columella bears a distinct stylus. Bodies of the vomer are well ossified
but also well separated at the midline. Each preorbital process is short, ending at the lateral
edge of the internal naris. There are nine vomerine teeth on the right side and six on
the left; a few are deployed on the preorbital process. The parasphenoid is fairly broad
anteriorly; its posterior border is straighter (less rounded) than in some other species.
Paired parasphenoid tooth patches meet at the midline both anteriorly and posteriorly, but
not in between. There are approximately 105 fully developed teeth on each side and
smaller, less-developed teeth along each lateral margin. The mandible is robust.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 28/71

The articular is only partly ossified. The prearticular is relatively small and has a low
coronoid process. Teeth are small and very numerous on each dentary bone, but a reliable
count cannot be made from the CT scan.
Digital formulae are 1-2-3-2 on each side. The distal tip of the terminal phalanx is
slightly expanded on each finger. Mesopodial cartilages are not mineralized.
Distribution and ecology: Chiropterotriton perotensis is found on Cofre de Perote,
Veracruz, Mexico, both in pine-and-fir forest and from the tree line to the summit.
Elevations range from 2,950 to 4,015 m. Specimens have been found under terrestrial
objects and active on road banks and boulders at night. The species occurs in sympatry
with Aquiloeurycea cephalica,Isthmura naucampatepetl,Pseudoeurycea leprosa and
P. melanomolga.
Remarks: Allozymes of this species were studied by Darda (his unnamed species H)
(1994), who also reported a sympatric species (his species D). These two were separated by
four fixed differences (out of 17 proteins studied). Parra-Olea (2003) was unable to obtain
mtDNA sequence from his remaining (ground and degraded) tissue samples and did
not find additional specimens. We consider the dissected carcasses to be inadequate for
preparation of a formal description, but we note the presence of a likely additional species
of Chiropterotriton at the Las Lajas locality. Like C. perotensis, this unnamed species is
small, but apparently more slender and lighter in coloration. The two are not sister-taxa.
We think that the specimens reported as Chiropterotriton chiropterus from 11,000 feet
on Cofre de Perote by Smith & Taylor (1948) belong to C. perotensis.
Conservation status: We recommend that the species be designated as Endangered based
on criterion B1ab(iii) (extent of occurrence <5,000 km
2
, habitat severely fragmented with
continuing decline in area, extent, and quality of habitat; IUCN, 2012).
Etymology: The species name is a noun in the genitive case. It refers to the Cofre de Perote
volcano, where the species is found.
Chiropterotriton totonacus, sp. nov.
Cruz Blanca Salamander, Salamandra de Cruz Blanca
Figures 4G–4I,5C,6G,7G,8G.
Chresonymy
Chiropterotriton sp. E.—Darda, 1994.
Chiropterotriton chiropterus (part).—Taylor & Smith, 1945;Smith & Taylor, 1948;
Wake, Papenfuss & Lynch, 1992.
Holotype: MVZ 163945, an adult female from 6 km W Las Vigas de Ramírez, Veracruz,
Mexico, 2,420 masl, 19.635N, 97.159166W (EPE = max. error distance 5.71 km).
Collected 25 July 1979 by D.B. Wake.
Paratypes: Nineteen specimens, all from Veracruz, Mexico. Ten males: MVZ 163947–49,
163989–90, 163993, 171903, 171905, 171907 and 171909, 6 km W Las Vigas de Ramírez.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 29/71

Nine females: MVZ 136981–82, 136986, pine forest along Mexican Hwy. 140, 4 km W
Las Vigas de Ramírez; MVZ 138703–04, 138716 and 138765, Mexican Hwy. 140, 4.5 km
W (by road) Las Vigas de Ramírez; MVZ 163943 and 171910, 6 km W Las Vigas de
Ramírez.
Referred specimens: Fifty-three specimens, all from Veracruz, Mexico. IBH0122, 30998
and 31030–31031; MVZ 136983–85, 137029, 138702, 138705–15, 138717–19, 163942,
163944, 163946, 163991–92, 163994, 171904, 171906, 171908 and 171911–31.
Diagnosis: This medium-sized species of plethodontid salamander is phylogenetically
close to Chiropterotriton lavae,C. perotensis and C. ceronorum; mean SVL 35.7 mm in ten
adult males (range 32.0–38.6) and 35.5 mm in ten adult females (range 31.8–38.3).
The head is moderately wide; HW averages 15% of SVL in both sexes (range 14–16).
Jaw muscles are prominent in both sexes. Adult males have a broad, blunt snout with
pronounced nasolabial protuberances that extend below the lip. Eyes are large and
prominent and extend laterally beyond the jaw margin in ventral view. There are
numerous maxillary teeth in males (mean MT 32.9, range 18–48) and even more teeth in
females (mean MT 52.6, range 45–60). There are few vomerine teeth in both males
(mean VT 11.6, range 10–15) and females (mean VT 13.7, range 9–17), which are arranged
in a curved line that does not extend past the lateral margin of the internal choana. The tail
is long and slender and typically exceeds SVL; mean TL equals 1.16 of SVL in males
(range 0.92–1.24) and 1.20 in females (range 1.06–1.38). Limbs are moderately long; FLL +
HLL averages 59% of SVL in males (range 55–64%) and 57% in females (range 53–62%).
Adpressed limbs closely approach or overlap in males (mean LI −0.6, range −1to1)
and females (mean LI 0.0, range −1 to 1). The manus and pes are relatively wide; digital tips
are somewhat expanded and there are distinct subterminal pads. Digital webbing
extends to the base of the terminal phalanx. The first (innermost) digit, while distinct, is
included in the web except at its tip. Mental glands are large, oval-shaped and relatively
prominent in males. The smallest male with a mental gland is 32.0 mm SVL. Parotoid
glands are well marked in some individuals but less evident in others.
Comparisons: Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. ceronorum in its larger adult
body size (mean SVL 35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 33.9 mm in
male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum), longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.16 in male
and 1.20 in female C. totonacus vs. 1.0 in male and 0.97 in female C. ceronorum), longer
limbs (mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.0 in female C. totonacus vs. 0.0 in male and 1.5 in
female C. ceronorum), longer head (mean HL 8.5 mm in male and 7.6 mm in female C.
totonacus vs. 7.5 mm in male and 7.1 mm in female C. ceronorum), slightly larger feet
(mean FW 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 3.8 mm in male and
3.5 mm in female C. ceronorum), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 32.9 in male and
52.6 in female C. totonacus vs. 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum) and fewer
vomerine teeth (mean VT 11.6 in male and 13.7 in female C. totonacus vs. 13.0 in male and
15.9 in female C. ceronorum).
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 30/71

Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. perotensis in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 29.7 mm in male and
31.7 mm in female C. perotensis), longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.16 in male and 1.20 in female
C. totonacus vs. 1.0 in both male and female C. perotensis), longer limbs (mean LI −0.60 in
male and 0.0 in female C. totonacus vs. 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis),
longer head (mean HL 8.5 mm in male and 7.6 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 6.6 mm in
male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis), broader head (mean HW 5.2 mm in both
male and female C. totonacus vs. 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female C. perotensis),
larger feet (mean FW 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 2.6 mm in
both male and female C. perotensis), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 32.9 in male and
52.6 in female C. totonacus vs. 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female C. perotensis) and more
vomerine teeth (mean VT 11.6 in male and 13.7 in female C. totonacus vs. 9.0 in male and
11.1 in female C. perotensis).
Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. melipona in its larger adult body size
(mean SVL 35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 29.2 mm in male and
28.5 mm in female C. melipona), longer tail in females (mean TL/SVL 1.20 in C. totonacus
vs. 1.11 in C. melipona), longer limbs (mean LI −0.60 in male and 0.0 in female
C. totonacus vs. 2.3 in male and 1.8 in female C. melipona), longer head (mean HL 8.5 mm
in male and 7.6 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female
C. melipona), broader head (mean HW 5.2 mm in both male and female C. totonacus vs.
4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. melipona), larger feet (mean FW 4.2 mm in
male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female
C. melipona) and more maxillary teeth (mean MT 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female
C. totonacus vs. 9.5 in male and 31.0 in female C. melipona).
Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. casasi in its smaller adult body size (mean
SVL 35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 37.8 mm in male and
40.9 mm in one female C. casasi), longer limbs (mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.0 in female
C. totonacus vs. 0.80 in male and 1.0 in one female C. casasi), narrower head (mean HW 5.2
mm in both male and female C. totonacus vs. 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in one female
C. casasi), larger feet (mean FW 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus vs.
3.7 mm in both male and one female C. casasi) and fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 32.9 in
male and 52.6 in female C. totonacus vs. 9.0 in male and 30 in one female C. casasi).
Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. chiropterus in its smaller adult body size in
males (mean SVL 35.7 mm in C. totonacus vs. 37.5 mm in C. chiropterus), shorter tail
(mean TL/SVL 1.16 in male and 1.20 in female C. totonacus vs. 1.25 in male and 1.19 in
female C. chiropterus), longer limbs (mean LI −0.60 in male and 0.0 in female C. totonacus
vs. 0.3 in male and 2.0 in female C. chiropterus), longer head (mean HL 8.5 mm in
male and 7.6 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female
C. chiropterus), larger feet in males (mean FW 4.2 mm in C. totonacus vs. 3.7 mm
in C. chiropterus), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female
C. totonacus vs. 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female C. chiropterus) and more vomerine teeth
(mean VT 11.6 in male and 13.7 in female C. totonacus vs. 10.6 in male and 12.5 in female
C. chiropterus).
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 31/71

Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. orculus in its smaller adult body size in
females (mean SVL 35.5 mm in C. totonacus vs. 39.0 mm in C. orculus), longer tail (mean
TL/SVL 1.16 in male and 1.20 in female C. totonacus vs. 1.0 in both male and female
C. orculus), longer limbs (mean LI −0.60 in male and 0.0 in female C. totonacus vs. 1.9 in
male and 2.9 in female C. orculus), longer head in males (mean HL 8.5 mm in C. totonacus
vs. 7.4 mm in C. orculus), larger feet (mean FW 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in female
C. totonacus vs. 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in female C. orculus), more maxillary teeth
(mean MT 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female C. totonacus vs. 8.2 in male and 28.8 in female
C. orculus) and more vomerine teeth (mean VT 11.6 in male and 13.7 in female
C. totonacus vs. 8.6 in male and 12.0 in female C. orculus).
Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. lavae in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in
female C. lavae), longer tail in females (mean TL/SVL 1.20 in C. totonacus vs. 1.02 in
C. lavae), longer limbs in females (mean LI 0.0 in C. totonacus vs. 0.6 in C. lavae), longer
head (mean HL 8.5 mm in male and 7.6 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 7.5 mm in male and
7.0 mm in female C. lavae), slightly broader head (mean HW 5.2 mm in both male
and female C. totonacus vs. 4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae), larger feet
(mean FW 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 3.7 mm in male and
3.3 mm in female C. lavae), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 32.9 in male and 52.6 in
female C. totonacus vs. 7.0 in male and 20.8 in female C. lavae) and more vomerine teeth
(mean VT 11.6 in male and 13.7 in female C. totonacus vs. 8.9 in male and 11.4 in female
C. lavae).
Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. aureus in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 28.5 mm in one male and
26.8 mm in female C. aureus), longer limbs (mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.0 in female
C. totonacus vs. 2.0 in one male and 2.3 in female C. aureus), longer head (mean HL
8.5 mm in male and 7.6 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 6.4 mm in one male and 6.0 mm
in female C. aureus), larger feet (mean FW 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in female
C. totonacus vs. 2.4 mm in one male and 1.8 mm in female C. aureus), more maxillary teeth
(mean MT 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female C. totonacus vs. 10.0 in one male and 38.3 in
female C. aureus) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 11.6 in male and 13.7 in female
C. totonacus vs. 15.0 in one male and 12.3 in female C. aureus).
Chiropterotriton totonacus differs from C. nubilus in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 29.4 mm in one male and
30.5 mm in female C. nubilus), longer limbs (mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.0 in female
C. totonacus vs. 2.0 in one male and 1.5 in female C. nubilus), larger feet (mean FW 4.2 mm
in male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus vs. 2.6 mm in one male and 2.3 mm in female
C. nubilus), and more maxillary teeth (mean MT 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female
C. totonacus vs. 13.0 in one male and 41.5 in female C. nubilus).
Description of holotype: SVL 35.8 mm, TL 49.2 mm, AX 18.3 mm, SW 3.7 mm, HL
7.7 mm, HW 5.3 mm, HD 2.4 mm, projection of snout beyond mandible 0.7 mm, distance
from anterior rim of orbit to snout 2.2 mm, interorbital distance 2.0 mm, eyelid length
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 32/71

2.2 mm, eyelid width 1.2 mm, nostril diameter 0.2 mm, FLL 9.9 mm, HLL 11.5 mm, snout-
to-forelimb length 12.4 mm, snout to anterior angle of vent 33.5 mm, tail width at base
3.0 mm, tail depth at base 2.7 mm, FW 4.6 mm, length of fifth toe 0.8 mm, length of
third (longest) toe 1.8 mm. Numbers of teeth: premaxillary 6, maxillary 27-23 (right-left)
and vomerine 7-7 (right-left). Tips of adpressed limbs meet.
Coloration in life: No color information is available for the type series in life; this
description is based on photos of three recently collected specimens (IBH 31030, 31031, IBH
30998). Dorsal background very dark brownish gray. Broad, reddish-brown dorsal band
with background color showing only along midline (IBH 31030), broken and irregular
(IBH 30998), or completely absent (IBH 31031). Small, pale gray specks present in some
specimens. Dorsal surface of tail similar to dorsal coloration on body. IBH 30998 has two
orangish-brown blotches at base of tail. Head dark gray with brown blotches or gray specks,
similar to dorsal coloration. Paratoid region brownish in specimens with a regular or
irregular dorsal band present, gray in IBH 31031 Flanks and upper surface of limbs medium
gray with small pale gray and brown flecks, numerous in some specimens while nearly
absent in others; toe tips reddish. Gular region pale gray; ventral surface of body, tail, and
limbs medium gray. Iris dark golden-brown.
Coloration in preservative: The holotype is medium brown with an obscure dorsal stripe,
darker brown along the margin and more reddish brown on the stipe with a narrow darker
median line. The head is medium brown with a light bar extending between the eyes
and snout mottled with dark cream and brown. Limbs mottled with light brown upper
limbs especially near the body, darker lower limbs with light tan digits. The venter is
mainly pale with some mottled darker brown. The gular region is mottled with dark cream
and brown. Undersides of the tail are paler than its lateral surfaces. One specimen
(MVZ 163943) has a distinct yellowish stripe bordered laterally by a very dark band of
pigment, with the stripe extending to the tip of the tail. Most others are uniformly pale
brown to tan dorsally with some darker brown. One individual (MVZ 163947) is generally
paler gray brown.
Osteology This account is based on examination of a µCT scan of the anterior skeleton of
MVZ 163945, an adult female, 35.8 mm SVL (Figs. 6–8;Table 3). The skull is relatively
broad and somewhat ovoid in dorsal and ventral views. Many of the dermal investing
bones are thin and weakly ossified, especially anteriorly. Paired frontal bones extend
anterolaterally, but they are largely eroded anteromedially except for a pair of anteriorly
directed spikes along the midline (one per side). Each frontal has a posterolateral tab
that overlaps the adjacent parietal, but otherwise these bones only weakly articulate with
one another, leaving a moderately sized frontoparietal fontanel. The single premaxilla
is delicate and lacks a palatal shelf. Ascending processes initially approach one another but
then diverge posterodorsally until they articulate with the weak anterior end of the frontal
bone. They enclose a huge internasal fontanel, but unlike in many congeners they are
not expanded posteriorly. There are no septomaxillary bones. The nasal bone is triangular
but irregular in outline. It barely articulates with the facial process of the maxilla and with
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 33/71

the frontal but is separate from the prefrontal, which is relatively small—smaller than the
nasal. The foramen of the nasolacrimal duct has eroded the anteroventral margin of the
prefrontal, the posterior margin of the nasal and the dorsal margin of the facial process
of the maxilla. Teeth are deployed along nearly the entire length of the maxillary bone,
leaving only a small edentulous portion at its posterior tip. There are 21 maxillary
teeth on each side and six premaxillary teeth. The orbitosphenoid is shortened
anteroposteriorly and rather thin. It is only weakly articulated to the parasphenoid and
is mostly separated from both the frontal and the parietal.
Otic capsules lack crests except for a slight projection along the anterolateral margin of
each lateral semicircular canal. However, the anteromedial edge of each capsule is
overlapped by a bony shelf that extends from the posterolateral portion of the adjacent
parietal bone. A relatively large, triangular tab descends from the posterolateral margin of
the parietal. The tab is sharply reflected ventromedially and ends in a rounded point
at about the midpoint of the vertical extent of the orbitosphenoid. The roughly triangular
squamosal articulates with the otic capsule dorsally. The quadrate bone is relatively
small and incompletely ossified. The columella bears a pronounced stylus. Paired vomers
are relatively large, but the body of each bone is very weakly ossified anteriorly. They do
not articulate at the midline. Preorbital processes are very long. There are six teeth on
the left side and five on the right; one or two are deployed at the base of each preorbital
process. The parasphenoid bone is triangular. Paired parasphenoid tooth patches
progressively broaden posteriorly and then round off caudally. There are 80–85 teeth
in each patch. The mandible is relatively weak. The articular bone is poorly ossified.
The prearticular bone is small, with a relatively low coronoid process. Each dentary bone
bears 24 teeth.
Digital formulae are 1-2-3-2 right and 1-2-2-2 left. The distal tip of the terminal phalanx
is slightly expanded on each finger. Mesopodial cartilages are not mineralized.
Distribution and ecology: Chiropterotriton totonacus is known from Veracruz, Mexico,
along the ridge between Cruz Blanca and Las Vigas at elevations between 2,200 and
2,450 masl, and from La Joya at 2,000 masl. It occurs in mossy pine forest and is terrestrial.
Recently collected specimens were found under logs in disturbed pine forest.
Remarks: This species occurs in sympatry at the upper end of its range above Las Vigas
with P. leprosa and Thorius munificus, and at the lower end of its range near La Joya
with Chiropterotriton lavae, Pseudoeurycea lynchi, Thorius minydemus, and Isthmura
gigantea, and throughout is range with Aquiloeurycea cephalica. We think this is Darda’s
(1994) species E (his population 7), which he assigned to C. chiropterus. It differs from
C. lavae by two fixed allozymic differences and a Nei D value of 0.148, but we have no
samples of a second species (in addition to C. lavae) from La Joya so our assignment of
Darda’s material must be viewed as tentative. He had no specimens from the area west
of Las Vigas or Cruz Blanca. If we assume that Darda’s species E is assignable to
C. totonacus, it is surprising that it is so distinct from C. perotensis (seven fixed differences,
Nei D= 0.725). It is closer to Darda’s species C from Puerto del Aire (3 fixed differences)
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 34/71

and I from regions to the south of Pico de Orizaba (5 fixed differences), the latter here
named C. ceronorum. We are not yet prepared to deal with species C at this time.
Chiropterotriton totonacus has long been known from the Las Vigas-Cruz Blanca area,
and from Toxtlacoaya, above La Joya (Taylor & Smith, 1945;Smith & Taylor, 1948).
The species was reported to occur under clumps of dead grass, under and in rotten logs,
under loose bark, and in stump holes that had filled with pine needles and loose earth.
Conservation status: Most of the pine forest around Las Vigas de Ramírez has been cut
down or fragmented into very small patches. Recently, we found three specimens (one in
2016 and two in 2017) in a secondary pine forest near the type locality at Cruz Blanca.
This secondary forest, which is highly disturbed and has few logs or cover objects where
salamanders could be found, is the only place where the species is currently known to
occur given that nearly all forest from the type locality has been logged. The largest extent
of remaining forest in the area is in the “Bosque Estatal San Juan del Monte”, but
C. totonacus has not been found there despite survey efforts. Based on its scarcity and very
limited geographic range, we recommend that this species be designated as Critically
Endangered under IUCN Red List criterion B1ab(iii) (extent of occurrence <100 km
2
,
distribution severely fragmented with continuing decline in area, extent, and quality of
habitat; IUCN, 2012).
Etymology: The specific epithet refers to the native Totonac culture of the central region of
Veracruz where Chiropterotriton totonacus is found.
Chiropterotriton melipona, sp. nov.
Xicotepec Salamander, Salamandra de Xicotepec
Figures 4J–4L,5D,6D,7D,8D.
Chresonymy
Chiropterotriton sp. F.—Darda, 1994;Parra-Olea, 2003;Raffaëlli, 2007;Raffaëlli, 2013;
Rovito & Parra-Olea, 2015;García-Castillo et al., 2017;García-Castillo et al., 2018.
Holotype: MVZ 200726, an adult male from Xicotepec de Juárez, 3.3 km S of Hotel
Mi Ranchito on Mexican Hwy. 130, 2.1 km E on road to La Unión, Puebla, México,
1,080 masl, 20.227755N, 97.953269W (EPE = max. error distance 1.0 km). Collected
8 December 1983 by D.M. Darda and P.A. Garvey.
Paratypes: Seven specimens, all from Puebla, Mexico. Four males: MVZ 178706 and
178708, 3.9 km S of Xicotepec de Juárez on Mexican Hwy. 130; MVZ 200723–24,
Xicotepec de Juárez, Mexican Hwy. 130, 21 km E on road to La Unión. Three females:
MVZ 178707, 3.9 km S of Xicotepec de Juarez on Mexican Hwy. 130; MVZ 185972, 2.2 km
on road to Patla from junction with Mexican Hwy. 130 SW out of Xicotepec de Juárez;
MVZ 200725, Xicotepec de Juárez, Mexican Hwy. 130, 21 km E on road to La Unión.
Referred specimens: Two specimens: IBH 30112 and MVZ 133019, Cuetzalan, Puebla,
Mexico.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 35/71

Diagnosis: This is a small species of plethodontid salamander phylogenetically related to
Chiropterotriton chiropterus; mean SVL 29.2 mm in four adult males (range 26.4–31.4) and
28.5 mm in three adult females (range 27.1–29.8). The head is moderately wide;
HW averages 15% of SVL in both males and females (range 14–15%). Adults have a
broad, bluntly rounded snout and adult males have moderately developed nasolabial
protuberances. Eyes are large and prominent and extend laterally beyond the jaw margin
in ventral view. There are few maxillary teeth in males (mean MT 9.5, range 7–12) and
moderate numbers of teeth in females (mean MT 31.0, range 25–34). There are few
vomerine teeth in both males (mean VT 11.0, range 8–15) and females (mean VT
13.0, range 9–19), which are arranged in a row that does not extend lateral to the outer
margin of the internal choana. The tail is long and slender and exceeds SVL in all adults
with complete tails; mean TL/SVL 1.16 in males (range 1.10–1.22) and 1.11 in females
(range 1.03–1.18). Limbs are short; FLL + HLL averages 46% of SVL in males (range
39–50) and 49% in females (range 46–52). Adpressed limbs are widely separated and never
overlap in males (mean LI 2.3, range 2–2.5) and females (mean LI 1.8, range 1.0–2.5).
Manus and pes are relatively small; digits are slender and their tips only slightly expanded.
Digital webbing ranges from slight to absent and is limited to the metatarsal region.
The first digit is distinct but largely included in the webbing. Subterminal pads are small
but well developed. A relatively small, rounded to oval-shaped mental gland present in
most adult males. The smallest adult male (pigmented testes) is 26.4 mm SVL; the smallest
male with a mental gland is 28.5 mm SVL. Parotoid glands are not evident.
Comparisons: Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. ceronorum in its smaller adult
body size (mean SVL 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in female C. melipona vs. 33.9 mm in
male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.16 in male
and 1.11 in female C. melipona vs. 1.0 in male and 0.97 in female C. ceronorum), shorter
head (mean HL 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female C. melipona vs. 7.5 mm in male
and 7.1 mm in female C. ceronorum), narrower head (mean HW 4.3 mm in male and
4.2 mm in female C. melipona vs. 5.1 mm in both male and female C. ceronorum), shorter
limbs in males (mean LI 2.3 in C. melipona vs. 0.0 in C. ceronorum), narrower feet
(mean FW 2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female C. melipona vs. 3.8 mm in male and
3.5 mm in female C. ceronorum), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 9.5 in male and 31.0
in female C. melipona vs. 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum) and fewer
vomerine teeth (mean VT 11.0 in male and 13.0 in female C. melipona vs. 13.0 in male and
15.9 in female C. ceronorum).
Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. perotensis in its slightly smaller adult body
size (mean SVL 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in female C. melipona vs. 29.7 mm in male
and 31.7 mm in female C. perotensis), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.16 in male and 1.11
in female C. melipona vs. 1.0 in both male and female C. perotensis), shorter head
(mean HL 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female C. melipona vs. 6.6 mm in male and
6.7 mm in female C. perotensis), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 9.5 in male and 31.0 in
female C. melipona vs. 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female C. perotensis) and fewer vomerine
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 36/71

teeth (mean VT 11.0 in male and 13.0 in female C. melipona vs. 9.0 in male and 11.1
in female C. perotensis).
Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. totonacus in its smaller adult body size
(mean SVL 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in female C. melipona vs. 35.7 mm in male and
35.5 mm in female C. totonacus), shorter head (mean HL 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in
female C. melipona vs. 8.5 mm in male and 7.6 mm in female C. totonacus), narrower
head (mean HW 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. melipona vs. 5.2 mm in both
male and female C. totonacus), shorter limbs (mean LI 2.3 in male and 1.8 in female
C. melipona vs. −0.6 in male and 0.0 in female C. totonacus), narrower feet (mean FW
2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female C. melipona vs. 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in
female C. totonacus) and more maxillary teeth (mean MT 9.5 in male and 31.0 in female
C. melipona vs. 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female C. totonacus).
Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. casasi in its smaller adult body size
(mean SVL 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in female C. melipona vs. 37.8 mm in male and
40.9 mm in one female C. casasi), shorter tail in males (mean TL/SVL 1.16 in C. melipona
vs. 1.0 in C. casasi), shorter head (mean HL 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female
C. melipona vs. 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi), narrower head
(mean HW 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. melipona vs. 5.8 mm in male and
5.9 mm in one female C. casasi), shorter limbs (mean LI 2.3 in male and 1.8 in female
C. melipona vs. 0.8 in male and 1.0 in one female C. casasi) and narrower feet (mean FW
2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female C. melipona vs. mean 3.7 mm in both male and one
female C. casasi).
Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. chiropterus in its smaller adult body size
(mean SVL 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in female C. melipona vs. 37.5 mm in male and
33.5 mm in female C. chiropterus), shorter tail in males (mean TL/SVL 1.16 in C. melipona
vs. 1.25 in C. chiropterus), shorter head (mean HL 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in
female C. melipona vs. 8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus), narrower
head (mean HW 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. melipona vs. 5.6 mm in male
and 4.8 mm in female C. chiropterus), shorter limbs in males (mean LI 2.3 in C. melipona
vs. 0.3 in C. chiropterus), narrower feet (mean FW 2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in
female C. melipona vs. 3.7 mm in male and 3.1 mm in female C. chiropterus) and fewer
maxillary teeth (mean MT 9.5 in male and 31.0 in female C. melipona vs. 12.6 in male and
48.0 in female C. chiropterus).
Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. orculus in its smaller adult body size
(mean SVL 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in female C. melipona vs. 35.9 mm in male and
39.0 mm in female C. orculus), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.16 in male and 1.11 in female
C. melipona vs. 1.02 in both male and female C. orculus), shorter head (mean HL
6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female C. melipona vs. 7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in
female C. orculus), narrower head (mean HW 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female
C. melipona vs. 5.0 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female C. orculus), shorter limbs in males
(mean LI 2.3 in C. melipona vs. 1.9 in C. orculus), narrower feet (mean FW 2.4 mm in
male and 2.6 mm in female C. melipona vs. 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in female
C. orculus), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 9.5 in male and 31.0 in female C. melipona vs.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 37/71

8.2 in male and 28.8 in female C. orculus) and more vomerine teeth (mean VT 11.0 in male
and 13.0 in female C. melipona vs. 8.6 in male and 12.0 in female C. orculus).
Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. lavae in its smaller adult body size (mean SVL
29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in female C. melipona vs. 32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm
in female C. lavae), shorter head (mean HL 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female
C. melipona vs. 7.5 mm in male and 7.0 mm in female C. lavae), narrower head (mean HW
4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. melipona vs. 4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in
female C. lavae), shorter limbs (mean LI 2.3 in male and 1.8 in female C. melipona
vs. −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae), narrower feet (mean FW 2.4 mm in male and
2.6 mm in female C. melipona vs. 3.7 mm in male and 3.3 mm in female C. lavae), more
maxillary teeth (mean MT 9.5 in male and 31.0 in female C. melipona vs. 7.0 in male
and 20.8 in female C. lavae) and more vomerine teeth (mean VT 11.0 in male and 13.0 in
female C. melipona vs. 8.9 in male and 11.4 in female C. lavae).
Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. aureus in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in female C. melipona vs. 28.5 mm in one male and
26.8 mm in female C. aureus), shorter tail in females (mean TL/SVL 1.11 in female
C. melipona vs. 1.16 in female C. aureus), wider head (mean HW 4.3 mm in male and
4.2 mm in female C. melipona vs. 4.0 mm in one male and 3.6 mm in female C. aureus),
longer limbs in females (mean LI 1.8 in female C. melipona vs. 2.3 in female C. aureus), and
wider feet in females (mean FW 2.6 mm in female C. melipona vs. 1.8 mm in female
C. aureus).
Chiropterotriton melipona differs from C. nubilus in having a shorter head (mean HL
6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female C. melipona vs. 6.6 mm in one male and 7.4 mm in
female C. nubilus), and fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 9.5 in male and 31.0 in female
C. melipona vs. 13 in one male and 41.5 in female C. nubilus).
Description of holotype: SVL 28.5 mm, TL 31.4 mm, AX 15.5 mm, SW 3.3 mm, HL
6.3 mm, HW 4.1 mm, HD 2.1 mm, projection of snout beyond mandible 0.7 mm, distance
from anterior rim of orbit to snout 1.5 mm, interorbital distance 1.4 mm, distance between
corners of eyes 2.2 mm, interorbital width 1.3 mm, eyelid length 1.7 mm, eyelid width
0.9 mm, nostril diameter 0.2 mm, FLL 5.1 mm, HLL 6.1 mm, snout-to-forelimb length
8.4 mm, distance from snout to anterior angle of vent 24.4 mm, snout to gular fold distance
6.3 mm, tail depth at base 2.7 mm and FW 2.2 mm. Numbers of teeth: premaxillary 3,
maxillary 4-4 (right-left) and vomerine 7-8 (right-left). Adpressed limbs are separated by
2.5 costal folds.
Coloration in life: Color notes in life are not available for the type series of this species,
thus we describe coloration from a photo of one of the referred specimens (IBH 30112).
The head is dark brown with numerous pale gray specks on the rostrum, sides of head,
interocular region, and eyelids. This brown coloration with gray specks extends from
behind each eye in an inverted triangle to the nuchal region. Both sides of this triangle in
parotoid region are orangish-brown. Orange-brown coloration extends in a band along
dorsum and along the dorsal side of tail, where it is more yellowish along midline and
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 38/71

orangish-brown along edges. Flanks are dark brown with numerous pale gray specks.
Limbs gray-brown with some pale yellow-brown specks; manus and pes grayish. Sides of
tail dark brown. Iris coppery.
Coloration in preservative: The holotype, while faded, is generally bright yellow to
yellowish tan. The snout is pale yellow with scattered brown pigment. A broad, bright
yellow dorsal stripe extends from the eyes to the tip of the tail. It is bordered by a dark
stripe that arises at the eye and extends posteriorly onto the tail. This dark stripe, in turn, is
bordered by a pale brown stripe that becomes paler ventrolaterally. The venter is very pale,
almost pigmentless. The tail has some light brown pigment along its lateral margins.
Paratypes all faded but yellowish tan with a pale yellowish tan dorsal stripe evident in all
individuals to some degree. Dorsal stripe always bordered by a thin dorsal lateral light
brown stripe. Venter very pale. Manus and pes are pale.
Osteology: This account is based on examination of a µCT scan of the anterior skeleton of
MVZ 178706, an adult male, 28.5 mm SVL, which may be sexually immature and not
representative of the adult condition (Figs. 6–8;Table 3). The skull is weakly developed
and delicate, both in general and relative to other members of the genus such as
C. chiropterus, and even C. casasi. Cranial roofing bones are very thin. Frontals are weakly
articulated with each other and with the paired parietals, leaving a relatively large
frontoparietal fontanel that extends both anteroposteriorly (in the midline) and
transversely (at the frontal-parietal interface). Paired ascending processes of the single
premaxilla begin diverging immediately dorsal to the dental process. They continue to
diverge posterolaterally and ultimately articulate in grooves on the anterior part of the
paired frontals, enclosing a large internasal fontanel. Unlike in many other congeners,
they remain thin and are not expanded at their dorsal ends. A palatal shelf is barely evident
on the premaxillary. Tiny paired septomaxillae lie approximately at the level of the
articulation between premaxilla and maxilla. Nasal bones are expansive but otherwise
weakly developed, with indistinct borders anteriorly and weak articulations with adjacent
bones, including both the prefrontal and the maxilla. The prefrontal is well articulated with
the facial process of the maxilla ventrally and overlaps the frontal dorsally. A foramen
for the passage of the nasolacrimal duct is framed by the anterior margin of the prefrontal,
the posterolateral margin of the nasal, and the dorsal midportion of the facial process
of the maxilla. There are five large teeth on the anterior portion of each maxilla.
The posterior half of the bone lacks teeth and resembles a shallow cleaver. There are three
premaxillary teeth. The orbitosphenoid is fairly well developed, although not well
articulated with the parietal. In general, the braincase is moderately well developed.
There is a nascent bony crest on the otic capsule above the anterior semicircular canal
where it abuts a bony shelf that extends posterolaterally from the parietal. The parietal also
bears a moderately developed, posterolateral tab that is sharply directed ventomedially.
The tab is triangular and ends in a rounded point at a level about halfway through the
vertical extent of the orbitosphenoid. The squamosal is a roughly triangular bone that
articulates dorsally with the otic capsule opposite the lateral semicircular canal. In lateral
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 39/71

view, its ventral portion appears to buttress the otic capsule ventral to the lateral
semicircular canal, but when viewed from different angles these bones can be seen to be
well separated. The quadrate bone is relatively small and inconspicuous. The columellar
stylus is distinct, cylindrical and long. Paired vomers are relatively robust; they barely
articulate in the midline posterior to the internasal fontanel. Preorbital processes are
very long. There are four-to-six vomerine teeth on each side; two or three of these are
deployed at the base of each preorbital process. The parasphenoid bone is broadly
triangular. Paired parasphenoid tooth patches are well separated from each other and from
the vomerine teeth anteriorly. Each patch bears approximately 75 teeth. The mandible
is unremarkable. The articular bone is poorly ossified. The prearticular bone has a
coronoid process of moderate height. There are seven teeth on the right dentary bone and
eight on the left.
Digital formula is 1-2-3-2 on each side. There is a slightly expanded knob at the tip of
the terminal phalanx on the two longest fingers of each hand (digits 3 and 4). Mesopodial
cartilages are not mineralized.
Distribution and ecology: Chiropterotriton melipona is known from the Sierra Norte in
the northernmost part of Puebla near Cuetzalan, Xocoyolo and Xicotepec de Juarez at
elevations between 690 and 1,420 masl. It likely occurs between known localities near
Cuetzalan and Xicotepec. This range includes the lowest elevational record of any
known species of the genus. The species is arboreal and has been collected from
banana plants and bromeliads and has been found in sympatry with Aquiloeurycea
quetzalanensis.
Remarks: This species was included in Darda’s (1994) electrophoretic study as population
19, new species F. It was most similar to populations 12 (C. lavae; three fixed differences,
Nei D= 0.22) and 19 (new species F, sympatric with C. lavae; three fixed differences,
Nei D= 0.23). The lowland population from near Cuetzalan is discussed and illustrated by
Raffaëlli (2013). We think the specimens he describes are assignable to C. melipona.
He reports them at 780 masl, in the outer leaves of bananas.
Conservation status: Most mature forest at known localities for this species has been
cut down, and the species has recently been found in small patches of forest and secondary
vegetation, as well as cafetales. Because of the highly fragmented nature and decreasing
quality of forest habitat within its range, we recommend that the species be designated as
Endangered based on IUCN criterion B1ab(iii) (extent of occurrence <5,000 km
2
,
distribution severely fragmented continuing decline in extent, and quality of habitat;
IUCN, 2012).
Etymology: Xicotepec, the name of the type locality, comes from the Nahuatl language and
means “place of the jicotes.”Jicotes are stingless bees of the genus Melipona. The name
used for this species is a noun in apposition referring to the genus Melipona.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 40/71

Chiropterotriton casasi, sp. nov.
Tlapacoyan Salamander, Salamandra de Tlapacoyan
Figures 2,4M–4O,5E,6A,7A,8A.
Holotype: MVZ 92874, an adult male from 13 mi SW Tlapacoyan, Veracruz, Mexico,
19.868483N, 97.301500W (EPE = max. error distance 2 km). The elevation is between
1,450 and 1,550 masl. Collected 26 December 1969 by R. Altig.
Paratypes: Four males, MVZ 92875 and 92877–79, and one female, MVZ 92876, all from
the type locality.
Diagnosis: This is a relatively large species of Chiropterotriton that stands out from
other species considered here in being relatively stout and long legged, and being
morphologically distinct; mean SVL 37.8 mm in four adult males (range 34.5–42.0). Only
one female has been collected, SVL 40.9 mm. The head is moderately wide; HW averages
16% of SVL in males (range 13–17%) and 14% in the female. In males, the snout is
broad and truncated. Jaw muscles are pronounced and visible as a bulging mass
immediately caudal to the eyes. Eyes are moderately protuberant and extend laterally
beyond the jaw margin in ventral view. There are few maxillary teeth in males (mean MT
9.0, range 6–13) but they are more numerous in the female (MT 30). There are few
vomerine teeth in males (mean VT 9.0, range 8–11) and the female (VT 13), which are
arranged in a row that extends to, or just lateral to, the inner margin of the internal choana.
The tail is moderately long; mean TL equals 1.0 of SVL in males (range 0.90–1.15).
Limbs are short and slender; FLL + HLL averages 57% of SVL in males (range 55–60) and
55% in the female. Adpressed limbs approach closely in males (mean LI 0.8, range 0.0–1)
and are separated by one costal fold in the female. Digits are long and slender with
blunt tips, distinct subterminal pads, and moderate webbing that extends onto the
penultimate phalanx of the third toe. Digits II–V are discrete, while digit I is very short and
does not extend beyond the webbing. The outermost toes are particularly well developed.
The mental gland is oval-shaped in adult males. The smallest male with a mental
gland is 37.2 mm SVL. Parotoid glands are not evident.
Comparisons: Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. ceronorum in its larger adult
body size (mean SVL 37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 33.9 mm
in male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum), longer head (mean HL 8.3 mm in
male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 7.5 mm in male and 7.1 mm in female
C. ceronorum), broader head (mean HW 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in one female
C. casasi vs. 5.1 mm in both male and female C. ceronorum) and shorter limbs in males
(mean LI 0.8 in C. casasi vs. 0.0 in C. ceronorum).
Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. perotensis in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 29.7 mm in male and 31.7 mm in
female C. perotensis), longer head (mean HL 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one
female C. casasi vs. 6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis), broader head
(mean HW 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 4.2 mm in male and
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 41/71

4.4 mm in female C. perotensis), longer limbs (mean LI 0.8 in male and 1.0 in one
female C. casasi vs. 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis), and larger feet (mean FW
3.7 mm in both male and one female C. casasi vs. 2.6 mm in both male and female
C. perotensis).
Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. totonacus in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in
female C. totonacus), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in male C. casasi vs. 1.16 in male
C. totonacus; the only female specimen of C. casasi has a broken tail), longer head in
females (mean HL 8.6 mm in one C. casasi vs. 7.6 mm in C. totonacus), broader head in
females (mean HW 5.9 mm in one C. casasi vs. 5.2 mm in C. totonacus), shorter
limbs (mean LI 0.8 in male and 1.0 in one female C. casasi vs. −0.6 in male and 0.0 in
female C. totonacus), narrower feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in both male and one female
C. casasi vs. 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus) and fewer maxillary teeth
(mean MT 9.0 in male and 30 in one female C. casasi vs. 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female
C. totonacus).
Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. melipona in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in
female C. melipona), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.04 in male C. casasi vs. 1.16 in male
C. melipona; the only female specimen of C. casasi has a broken tail), longer head
(mean HL 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 6.3 mm in male and
6.4 mm in female C. melipona), broader head (mean HW 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in
one female C. casasi vs. 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. melipona), longer
limbs (mean LI 0.8 in male and 1.0 in one female C. casasi vs. 2.3 in male and 1.8 in female
C. melipona) and broader feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in both male and one female C. casasi vs.
2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female C. melipona).
Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. chiropterus in its larger adult body size in
females (mean SVL 40.9 mm in one C. casasi vs. 33.5 mm in C. chiropterus), shorter tail
(mean TL/SVL 1.04 in male C. casasi vs. 1.25 in male C. chiropterus; the only female
specimen of C. casasi has a broken tail), longer head (mean HL 8.3 mm in male and
8.6 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus),
narrower head (mean HW 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 5.6 mm
in male and 4.8 mm in female C. chiropterus), shorter limbs in males (mean LI 0.8 in
C. casasi vs. 0.3 in C. chiropterus) and fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 9.0 in male and
30 in one female C. casasi vs. 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female C. chiropterus).
Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. orculus in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm
in female C. orculus), longer head (mean HL 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one
female C. casasi vs. 7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in female C. orculus), broader head
(mean HW 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 5.0 mm in male and
5.2 mm in female C. orculus) and longer limbs (mean LI 0.8 in male and 1.0 in one female
C. casasi vs. 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female C. orculus).
Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. lavae in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 42/71

female C. lavae), shorter tail in males (mean TL/SVL 1.04 in C. casasi vs. 1.19 in C. lavae),
longer head (mean HL 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 7.5 mm in
male and 7.0 mm in female C. lavae), broader head (mean HW 5.8 mm in male and
5.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae), shorter
limbs (mean LI 0.8 in male and 2.0 in one female C. casasi vs. −0.6 in male and 0.6 in
female C. lavae) and more maxillary teeth in females (mean MT 30 in one C. casasi vs. 20.8
in C. lavae).
Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. aureus in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 28.5 mm in one male and
26.8 mm in female C. aureus), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in male C. casasi vs. 1.28 in
one male C. aureus; the only female specimen of C. casasi has a broken tail), longer
head (mean HL 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 6.4 mm in one male
and 6.0 mm in female C. aureus), broader head (mean HW 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm
in one female C. casasi vs. 4.0 mm in one male and 3.6 mm in female C. aureus),
longer limbs (mean LI 0.8 in male and 1.0 in one female C. casasi vs. 2.0 in one male and
2.3 in female C. aureus), and wider feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in both male and one female
C. casasi vs. 2.4 mm in one male and 1.8 mm in female C. aureus).
Chiropterotriton casasi differs from C. nubilus in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 29.4 mm in one male and
30.5 mm in female C. nubilus), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.0 in male C. casasi vs. 1.37 in
one male C. nubilus; the only female specimen of C. casasi has a broken tail), longer head
(mean HL 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi vs. 6.6 mm in one male
and 7.4 mm in female C. nubilus), broader head (mean HW 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in
one female C. casasi vs. 4.0 mm in one male and 4.4 mm in female C. nubilus), longer
limbs (mean LI 0.8 in male and 1.0 in one female C. casasi vs. 2.0 in one male and 1.5 in
female C. nubilus), wider feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in both male and one female C. casasi
vs. 2.6 mm in one male and 2.3 mm in female C. nubilus) and fewer maxillary teeth in
females (mean MT 30.0 in female C. casasi vs. 41.5 in female C. nubilus).
Description of holotype: SVL 42.0 mm, TL 37.6 mm, AX 20.4 mm, SW 3.8 mm,
HL 8.8 mm, HW 5.6 mm, HD 2.8 mm, projection of snout beyond mandible 0.2 mm,
distance from anterior rim of orbit to snout 1.7 mm, interorbital distance 2.4 mm,
eyelid length 2.1 mm, eyelid width 1.1 mm, horizontal orbit diameter 2.1 mm, nostril
diameter 0.4 mm, FLL 10.7 mm, HLL 12.6 mm, snout-to-forelimb length 11.4 mm,
distance from snout to anterior angle of vent 36.6 mm, tail width at base 3.3 mm, tail depth
at base 3.9 mm, FW 4.0 mm, length of fifth toe 0.8 mm, length of longest (third) toe
1.2 mm, mental gland length 1.3 mm, mental gland width 1.3. Numbers of teeth:
premaxillary 4, maxillary 4-4 (right-left) and vomerine 4-4 (right-left). Adpressed limbs
are separated by 0 costal folds.
Coloration in life: No data.
Coloration in preservative: Faded brown, dorsally and laterally. No sign of dorsal stripe.
Limbs mottled. Head is uniform pale brown with some mottling on the snout.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 43/71

The paratypes present some variation. The entire body of MVZ 92876 is mottled with
faded pale and dark brown. A pale band extends between the anterior part of the eyes; the
snout is very mottled. Posteriorly, the body is strongly mottled; the anterior part of
the tail has an irregularly bordered light dorsal stripe. MVZ 92875 is less boldly mottled
but has some mottling. All of them have a paler venter than dorsum. MVZ 92877 also has a
pale bar that extends between the eyes.
Osteology: This account is based on examination of a µCT scan of the anterior
skeleton of MVZ 92874, an adult male, 42.0 mm SVL (Figs. 6–8;Table 3). The skull is
robust and well developed. Notable features include the complete articulation of the
paired frontals and parietals—there is no frontoparietal fontanel—and a robust
premaxillary bone with paired ascending processes that broaden laterally as each
approaches a solid articulation with the frontal bone on the same side. A distinct, albeit
narrow palatal shelf is present on the premaxilla, and the two ascending processes
enclose a distinct fontanel. Tiny paired septomaxillae bones are well separated from all
other bones. The triangular nasal is weakly developed anteriorly, where the bone is very
thin and has an irregular edge. It is partially overlapped laterally by the facial process of
the maxilla. A large prefrontal articulates anteriorly with the nasal bone, its ventral
portion is overlapped by the facial process of the maxilla, and it bears an ascending,
pointed tab that overlaps the frontal extensively. The anteroventral margin of the
prefrontal and the adjacent portion of the facial process of the maxilla are eroded by a
foramen that allows passage of the nasolacrimal duct. Otherwise, the facial process of
the maxillary bone is broad and robust and solidly articulated with adjacent bones.
The maxillary bone resembles that in Aneides (Wake, 1963); the toothed portion is
confined to the anterior 45–50% of the bone, whereas posteriorly the bone is
cleaver-shaped with an extended posterior tip. There is a distinct, relatively broad palatal
shelf on the lingual side. There are few maxillary teeth—five on each side—but they are
large, sharp and recurved, with highly reduced anterior cusps. There are three
premaxillary teeth. They appear unicuspid and sharp but are shorter than the maxillary
teeth. The well-developed orbitosphenoid is solidly articulated with neighboring bones,
forming a relatively stout braincase.
A prominent bony crest overlies the anterior semicircular canal dorsally. It is derived
from the posterolateral portion of the parietal and the anteromedial portion of the otic
capsule. An additional, crest-like spur emerges at right angles from this crest and is
directed posterolaterally. A second, smaller crest similarly overlies the posterior
semicircular canal. The parietal bears a very large and well-developed posterolateral tab
that is sharply reflected ventromedially, extending nearly two-thirds down the vertical
extent of the orbitosphenoid. The very robust squamosal articulates dorsally with the otic
capsule opposite the lateral semicircular canal. As in other species, the shape of its
curved anterior margin conforms closely with, but is nevertheless separate from, the lateral
face of the otic capsule. The quadrate is small and inconspicuous, but appears to be
well developed. There is a short, stout stylus on the columella, which otherwise is just a
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 44/71

rounded ossicle. Bodies of the paired vomers articulate tightly at the midline posterior to
the internasal fontanel. Preorbital processes are long. There are four vomerine teeth on the
right side and five on the left; one or two teeth are deployed at the base of each preorbital
process. The unpaired parasphenoid bone is robust. It is narrow anteriorly but gradually
widens posteriorly until very near the caudal end where it reaches its maximum width.
Paired parasphenoid tooth patches are well separated from one another medially and from
the vomerine teeth rostrally. There are approximately 95–100 teeth in each patch.
The mandible is robust. The articular is fully ossified and appears to be fused to the
prearticular bone. The height of the large coronoid process on the prearticular exceeds that
of the dentary bone ventral to it. There are six sharply recurved and somewhat enlarged
teeth on each dentary bone.
Only the distal portion of each forelimb is visible in the CT scan. Digital formulae are
1-2-3-2 on each side. Mesopodial cartilages are not mineralized.
Distribution and ecology: Chiropterotriton casasi is known only from the type locality.
Vegetation at this locality now consists of secondary forest and thicket, but was likely
cloud forest in the past. The species could occur somewhat more widely, but little intact
forest remains in the vicinity of the type locality.
Remarks: The phylogenetic position of Chiropterotriton casasi relative to congeners is
unknown due to the lack of tissue samples for genetic analyses. Geographically associated
species include C. chiropterus, C. melipona, C. perotensis,C. totonacus,C. ceronorum
and C. lavae. We have searched repeatedly in the vicinity of the type locality and have
found another, unnamed, species of Chiropterotriton, but not this species.
Conservation status: Chiropterotriton casasi has not been seen since the original collection
in 1969, and nearly all of the primary forest at the type locality has been cut down.
Efforts to find this species at the type locality in recent years have not been successful.
We recommend that it be designated as Critically Endangered based on criterion B1ab(iii)
(extent of occurrence <100 km
2
, distribution severely fragmented and known from
only one locality, continuing decline in extent and quality of habitat; IUCN, 2012).
Concerted efforts should be made to locate extant populations of this species in remaining
habitat patches near the type locality.
Etymology: The species name honors Gustavo Casas Andreu, a Mexican herpetologist
who has dedicated his career to describe the biodiversity of Mexican amphibians and
reptiles.
REDESCRIPTIONS
Original descriptions of Chiropterotriton chiropterus (Cope, 1863) and C. orculus (Cope,
1865) were extremely brief and contained relatively little information about the species’
morphology. We provide more detailed redescriptions of both of these species, including
the designation of a neotype for each. Common names declared for these species are from
Liner & Casas-Andreu (2008).
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 45/71

Chiropterotriton chiropterus Cope, 1863
Common Flat-footed Salamander, Salamandra de Pie Plano Común
Figures 4P–4R,5F,6H,7H,8H.
Chresonymy
Chiropterotriton sp. J.—Darda, 1994 (population 23, 24)
Chiropterotriton sp.—Wake, 1987;Papenfuss & Wake, 1987;Lynch & Wake, 1989;Wake,
Papenfuss & Lynch, 1992
Neotype: MVZ 85590, an adult male from 1.4 mi southwest by road southwest edge of
Huatusco de Chicuellar, Veracruz, Mexico, 19.141388N, 96.98083W (EPE = max. error
distance 1.202 mi). The estimated elevation is 1,400 masl. Collected 16 January 1969 by R.
W. McDiarmid and R.D. Worthington.
Additional specimens examined: Twelve specimens, all from 1.4 mi southwest by road
southwest edge of Huatusco de Chicuellar, Veracruz, Mexico. Eight males: MVZ
85588–89, 85591–92, 85594, 85599, 85613, and 85602; and four females: MVZ 85597–98,
85605 and 85632.
Diagnosis: This is a medium-sized species of plethodontid salamander phylogenetically
related to C. melipona; mean SVL 37.5 mm in eight adult males (range 36.1–38.8) and
33.5 mm in four adult females (range 30.7–36.7). The head is moderately wide; HW
averages 15% of SVL in both males and females (range 14–16). The snout is broad and
bluntly rounded in males. Jaw muscles are relatively pronounced. Eyes are moderately
protuberant and extend laterally beyond the jaw margin in ventral view. There are few
maxillary teeth in males (mean MT 12.6, range 9–17) but many in females (mean MT
48.0, range 42–57). There are few vomerine teeth in both males (mean VT 10.6, range
9–12) and females (mean VT 12.5, 10–15), which are arranged in a row that does not reach
or barely reaches the inner margin of the internal choana. The tail is long and slender
and exceeds SVL by a considerable amount in nearly all specimens; mean TL equals 1.25 of
SVL in males (range 1.13–1.38) and 1.19 in females (1.01–1.26). Limbs are short to
moderate length; FLL + HLL averages 52% of SVL in males (range 48–54%) and 50% in
females (range 47–53%). Adpressed limbs closely approach or overlap slightly in males
(mean LI 0.3, range −0.5 to 1) but are more widely separated in females (mean LI 2.0, range
1.5–2.5). Manus and pes are relatively small, digits are slender. Subterminal pads are
small but well developed. Digital webbing ranges from slight to absent and is limited to the
metatarsal region. The first digit is distinct but largely included in the webbing. Digital
tips are only slightly expanded. The mental gland is oval-shaped and not especially
prominent in males. The smallest mature male (pigmented testes) is 36.1 mm SVL; the
smallest male with a mental gland is 33.3 mm SVL. Parotoid glands are not evident.
Comparisons: Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. ceronorum in its larger adult
body size in males (mean SVL 37.5 mm in C. chiropterus vs. 33.9 mm in C. ceronorum),
longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.25 in male and 1.19 in female C. chiropterus vs. 1.0 in male and
0.97 in female C. ceronorum), shorter limbs (mean LI 0.3 in male and 2.0 in female
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 46/71

C. chiropterus vs. 0.0 in male and 1.5 in female C. ceronorum), longer head (mean HL
8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 7.5 mm in male and 7.1 mm in
female C. ceronorum), broader head in males (mean HW 5.6 mm in C. chiropterus vs.
5.1 mm in C. ceronorum) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 10.6 in male and 12.5 in
female C. chiropterus vs. 13.0 in male and 15.9 in female C. ceronorum).
Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. perotensis in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 37.5 mm in male and 33.5 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 29.7 mm in male and
31.7 mm in female C. perotensis), longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.25 in male and 1.19 in female
C. chiropterus vs. 1.0 in both male and female C. perotensis), longer limbs (mean LI 0.3 in
male and 2.0 in female C. chiropterus vs. 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis),
longer head (mean HL 8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 6.6 mm
in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis), broader head (mean HW 5.6 mm in
male and 4.8 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female
C. perotensis), broader feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in male and 3.1 mm in female C. chiropterus
vs. 2.6 mm in both male and female C. perotensis), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT
12.6 in male and 48.0 in female C. chiropterus vs. 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female
C. perotensis) and more vomerine teeth (mean VT 10.6 in male and 12.5 in female
C. chiropterus vs. 9.0 in male and 11.1 in female C. perotensis).
Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. totonacus in its larger adult body size in
males (mean SVL 37.5 mm in C. chiropterus vs. 35.7 mm in C. totonacus), longer tail (mean
TL/SVL 1.25 in male and 1.19 in female C. chiropterus vs. 1.16 in male and 1.20 in
female C. totonacus), shorter limbs (mean LI 0.3 in male and 2.0 in female C. chiropterus
vs. −0.60 in male and 0.0 in female C. totonacus), shorter head (mean HL 8.1 mm in male
and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 8.5 mm in male and 7.6 mm in female C.
totonacus), narrower feet in males (mean FW 3.7 mm in C. chiropterus vs. 4.2 mm in
C. totonacus), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female
C. chiropterus vs. 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female C. totonacus ) and fewer vomerine teeth
(mean VT 10.6 in male and 12.5 in female C. chiropterus vs. 11.6 in male and 13.7 in female
C. totonacus).
Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. melipona in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 37.5 mm in male and 33.5 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 29.2 mm in male and
28.5 mm in female C. melipona), longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.25 in male and 1.19 in female
C. chiropterus vs. 1.16 in male and 1.11 in female C. melipona), longer head (mean HL
8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in
female C. melipona), wider head (mean HW 5.6 mm in male and 4.8 mm in female
C. chiropterus vs. 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. melipona), longer limbs in
males (mean LI 0.3 in C. chiropterus vs. 2.3 in C. melipona), wider feet (mean FW 3.7 mm
in male and 3.1 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female
C. melipona) and more maxillary teeth (mean MT 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female
C. chiropterus vs. 9.5 in male and 31.0 in female C. melipona).
Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. casasi in its smaller adult body size in
females (mean SVL 33.5 mm in C. chiropterus vs. 40.9 mm in one C. casasi), longer tail in
males (mean TL/SVL 1.25 in C. chiropterus vs. 1.04 in C. casasi), shorter head (mean HL
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 47/71

8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one
female C. casasi), broader head (mean HW 5.6 mm in male and 4.8 mm in female
C. chiropterus vs. 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in one female C. casasi), longer limbs in
males (mean LI 0.3 in C. chiropterus vs. 0.8 in C. casasi) and more maxillary teeth (mean
MT 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female C. chiropterus vs. 9.0 in male and 30 in one female
C. casasi).
Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. orculus in its longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.25
in male and 1.19 in female C. chiropterus vs. 1.02 in both male and female C. orculus),
longer head in males (mean HL 8.1 mm in C. chiropterus vs. 7.4 mm in C. orculus), wider
head in males (mean HW 5.6 mm in C. chiropterus vs. 5.0 mm in C. orculus), longer limbs
(mean LI 0.3 in male and 2.0 in female C. chiropterus vs. 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female
C. orculus), wider feet in males (mean FW 3.7 mm in C. chiropterus vs. 3.2 mm in
C. orculus) and more maxillary teeth (mean MT 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female
C. chiropterus vs. 8.2 in male and 28.8 in female C. orculus).
Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. lavae in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
37.5 mm in male and 33.5 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm
in female C. lavae), longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.25 in male and 1.19 in female
C. chiropterus vs. 1.19 in male and 1.02 in female C. lavae), shorter limbs (mean LI 0.3 in
male and 2.0 in female C. chiropterus vs. −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae), longer
head (mean HL 8.1 mm in male and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 7.5 mm in
male and 7.0 mm in female C. lavae), broader head (mean HW 5.6 mm in male and
4.8 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae), more
maxillary teeth (mean MT 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female C. chiropterus vs. 7.0 in male
and 20.8 in female C. lavae) and more vomerine teeth (mean VT 10.6 in male and 12.5
in female C. chiropterus vs. 8.9 in male and 11.4 in female C. lavae).
Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. aureus in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 37.5 mm in male and 33.5 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 28.5 mm in one male, mean
26.8 mm in females C. aureus), relatively longer limbs in males (mean LI 0.3 in male
C. chiropterus vs. 2.0 in one male C. aureus), longer head (mean HL 8.1 mm in male and
7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 6.4 mm in one male, mean 6.0 mm in female
C. aureus), broader head (mean HW 5.6 mm in male and 4.8 mm in female C. chiropterus
vs. 4.0 mm in one male, 3.6 mm in female C. aureus), and larger feet (mean FW 3.7 mm
in male and 3.1 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 2.4 mm in one male, 1.8 mm in
females of C. aureus).
Chiropterotriton chiropterus differs from C. nubilus in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 37.5 mm in male and 33.5 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 29.4 mm in one male, mean
30.5 mm in females C. nubilus), relatively longer limbs in males (mean LI 0.3 in male
C. chiropterus vs. 2.0 in one male C. nubilus), longer head in males (mean HL 8.1 mm in
C. chiropterus vs. 6.6 mm in one male C. nubilus), broader head (mean HW 5.6 mm in
male and 4.8 mm in female C. chiropterus vs. 4.0 mm in one male, 4.4 mm in female
C. nubilus), and larger feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in male and 3.1 mm in female C. chiropterus
vs. 2.6 mm in one male and 2.3 mm in females of C. nubilus).
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 48/71

Description of neotype: SVL 38.8 mm, TL 46.0 mm, AX 20.8 mm, SW 4.1 mm, HL
8.0 mm, HW 5.4 mm, HD 2.8 mm, projection of snout beyond mandible 0.4 mm, distance
from anterior rim of orbit to snout 1.8 mm, interorbital distance 2.4 mm, eyelid length
2.7 mm, eyelid width 1.2 mm, horizontal orbit diameter 1.7 mm, nostril diameter 0.4 mm,
FLL 9.5 mm, HLL 10.8 mm, snout-to-forelimb length 10.2 mm, distance from snout
to anterior angle of vent 36.7 mm, tail width at base 2.8 mm, tail depth at base 2.7 mm, FW
3.6 mm, length of fifth toe 0.9 mm, length of longest (third) toe 1.5 mm, mental gland
length 1.3 mm, mental gland width 1.3. Numbers of teeth: premaxillary 5, maxillary
6-10 (right-left) and vomerine 5-5 (right-left). Adpressed limbs are separated by 0 costal
folds.
Coloration in life: Data have been derived from diapositives of seven specimens from
Huatusco taken by Roy W. McDiarmid. This is a generally brightly colored species in
which yellowish colors predominate. It is generally pale laterally and ventrally. A dorsal
light band is generally present that extends onto the tail, sometimes to the tip, but
there are some darker specimens that lack an obvious stripe. Coloration varies extensively
from one specimen to the next with respect to the nature of the dorsal band and its
coloration. In one large adult, the color is a relatively intense Orange Rufous (5) at the
origin of the band, behind the eyes, but it becomes lighter and yellower posteriorly and on
the sides of the head and neck, from Tawny Olive (17) to Pale Horn Color (11), then
Yellow Ochre (14). Over the shoulder and more posteriorly, yellowish-to-cream spots
(Light Buff, 2) form in a dorsolateral ragged line, with the dorsomedial stripe becoming
Light Neutral Gray (297) grading into Pale Neutral Gray (296) and extending onto the tail
as Pale Mauve (204) with speckles of Cinnamon Drab (50). The limbs are yellowish
(Chamois, 84). The iris is dark ventrally but has a yellow-gold highlight. The dorsal eyelid
is pale and colorless. A faint light cream bar extends between the eyes.
Another specimen is more colorful dorsally. The head is complexly colored with a
bright snout (Salmon Color, 82) to the midpoint between the eyes. A dark bar extends
between the eyes, beginning on the eyelid, and an inverted triangular dark area extends
posteriorly to the anterior boundary of the epaxial muscles. The temporal region of the
head back over the shoulders is light in coloration (Chamois, 84) and there is a lateral
excursion of the color over the shoulder region. The base of the tail becomes brighter and
rich reddish brown (Carmine, 64). The limbs are a bright mottling of gray and yellow
(Cream Yellow, 82, to Chamois 84).
Some animals are darker than the above but most have a light, bright dorsal coloration
in the tan-to-yellow range with some brighter orange on the snout. In some the dorsal
coloration is pale to very pale. There is usually a bar between the eyes and a ventrolateral
excursion of the dorsal band in front of and over the shoulders.
Coloration in preservative: The dorsum is a relatively pale brown, either uniform or with
an indistinct, broad brown dorsal stripe bordered by thin, darker-brown dorsolateral
lines that extend from the nape to the base of the tail. The dorsal surface of the tail is a
relatively pale brown with some darker mottling; the head sometimes has a small amount
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 49/71

of darker mottling. The venter and gular region are a uniform pale tan; the ventral side of
the tail is a uniform, slightly darker brown.
Osteology: This account is based primarily on examination of a µCT scan of the skull
of MVZ 85602, an adult male, 38.9 mm SVL (Figs. 6–8;Table 3). In addition, four
cleared-and-stained specimens were scored for osteological characters evaluated by
Darda & Wake (2015). The skull is well developed. The cranial roof is complete: paired
frontals and parietals articulate across the midline—there is no frontoparietal fontanel—
although tabs that extend posteriorly from the frontals to overlap the parietals, which
are present in some congeners, are absent. Rostral bones articulate firmly with one another,
including many overlapping articulations, such as the prefrontal and nasal by the maxilla.
Ascending processes of the single premaxilla are separate along their entire length and
broaden laterally as they approach their articulation with the frontals. A very small
septomaxilla is present on each side. The nasal is large, including an anteromedial
protrusion that forms a medial wall to the external naris and nearly contacts the premaxilla
at its rostral articulation with the maxilla. The prefrontal is robust; dorsally, it overlaps the
frontal bone whereas ventrally it is overlapped by the facial process of the maxilla.
The foramen for the nasolacrimal duct has eroded abutting portions of the facial
process of the maxilla, the nasal and the prefrontal. The five teeth on the left maxilla
and six on the right are confined to the anterior 50% of each bone. The remaining
(edentulous) portion of each maxilla is cleaver-like. There are four premaxillary teeth.
The orbitosphenoid is fully articulated with the frontal and parietal dorsally and the
parasphenoid ventrally, thus forming a solid braincase.
There are two large (elevated) crests on each otic capsule. One arises dorsal to the
anterior semicircular canal. The other emerges at right angles from the midpoint of the
first crest and extends posterolaterally towards the lateral semicircular canal. A moderately
sized tab emerges from the posterolateral edge of the parietal and is sharply reflected
ventromedially, extending at least halfway down the vertical extent of the orbitosphenoid.
The squamosal, while typical for Chiropterotriton, bears a distinctive longitudinal ridge on
its lateral face. The quadrate, while robust, is nevertheless small and inconspicuous.
The columellar stylus is well developed for Chiropterotriton; it comprises a short but
distinct rod that is directed towards but does not contact the squamosal. Paired vomers
articulate medially both anteriorly and posteriorly, partially obliterating the internasal
fontanel in ventral view. Preorbital processes of the vomer are spine-like—elongate and
pointed—and completely lack teeth. There are five vomerine teeth on the right side and six
on the left. The parasphenoid bone is relatively narrow posteriorly. Paired parasphenoid
tooth patches are separated across midline; each bears 45–50 teeth. The mandible is
robust. The articular bone is robust and solidly articulated with the prearticular and the
dentary. The prearticular is well developed; the coronoid process is very high. There are 10
teeth on the right dentary bone and 11 on the left.
Digital formulae are 1-2-3-2 on each side. The distal tip of the terminal phalanx is
greatly expanded on each finger except the first. Mesopodial cartilages are not mineralized.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 50/71

Distribution and ecology: Chiropterotriton chiropterus is found from the vicinity of
the type locality near Huatusco, Veracruz, south to the Sierra de Juárez, Oaxaca.
Geographically associated species include C. orculus,C. perotensis,C. ceronorum and
C. lavae. The species occurs at higher elevations in Oaxaca than in Veracruz and the overall
elevational range is from 1,400 to 2,170 masl.
Remarks: Populations from the Sierra de Juárez, Oaxaca, were previously considered to
represent an undescribed species (Chiropterotriton sp. J) based on allozyme data
(Darda, 1994), but that study lacked specimens of topotypic C. chiropterus. Mitochondrial
DNA sequenced data showed that Chiropterotriton sp. J is most closely related to
C. chiropterus. Based on examination of a series of specimens from the north slope of Cerro
Pelón, Oaxaca, we are unable to find any discrete morphological differences between
these populations that would support the recognition of C. sp. J as a distinct species.
We therefore assign populations from Oaxaca previously referred to Chiropterotriton sp. J
to C. chiropterus. With the assignment of the Oaxacan populations to this species, it now
has by far the widest geographic range of any species of the genus, approximately 200 km
in direct linear distance.
Conservation status: Chiropterotrition chiropterus is designated as Critically Endangered
by the most recent IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Parra-Olea, Wake & Hanken,
2008).
Chiropterotriton orculus Cope, 1865
Cope’s Flat-footed Salamander, Salamandra de Pie Plano de Cope
Figures 4S–4U,5G,6E,7E,8E.
Chresonymy
Spelerpes orculus—Cope, 1865: 196. Syntypes: USNM or ANSP, not now present in either
collection. Type locality: "Mexican Table Land" (Frost, 2019).
Spelerpes chiropterus (part)—Cope, 1869: 106; Taylor & Smith, 1945;Smith & Taylor,
1948.
Chiropterotriton orculus—Darda, 1994;Raffaëlli, 2007;Raffaëlli, 2013.
Neotype: MVZ 138783, an adult male from the ridge between Popocatepetl and
Iztaccihuatl, along Mexican Hwy. 196, 16.2 km by road east jct Mexican Hwy. 115, Mexico,
Mexico, 3,300 masl, 19.0973N, 98.6829W. Collected 26 July 1976 by J.F. Lynch,
D.B. Wake and M.E. Feder.
Additional specimens examined: Nineteen specimens, all from the ridge between
Popocatepetl and Iztaccihuatl, México, Mexico. Nine males: MVZ 76161, 138694,
138696–97, 138700, 138778, 138784, 138804 and 200630; and ten females: MVZ 138686,
138688, 138776–77, 138779, 138781, 138793, 138796–97 and 200629.
Diagnosis: This is a medium-sized species of Chiropterotriton; mean SVL 35.9 mm in ten
adult males (range 33.6–38.9) and 39.0 mm in ten adult females (range 34.9–43.0).
The head is moderately wide; HW averages 14% of SVL in males (range 13–15) and 13% in
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 51/71

females (range 12–14). Jaw muscles are prominent in both males and females. Adult males
have a broad, bluntly rounded snout with broad and moderately developed nasolabial
protuberances. Eyes are large and relatively prominent and extend slightly beyond the
jaw margin in ventral view. There are few maxillary teeth in males (mean MT 8.2, range
5–11) and moderate numbers in females (mean MT 28.8, range 23–35). There are few
vomerine teeth in both males (mean VT 8.6, 5–11) and females (mean VT 12.0, range
9–15), which are arranged in a curved row that does not extend lateral to the outer
margin of the internal choana. The tail is moderately long and slightly exceeds snout-vent
length in most specimens; mean TL/SVL equals 1.02 in both males (range 0.86–1.15) and
females (range 0.87–1.12). Limbs are short to moderately long in both females and
males; FLL + HLL averages 51% of SVL in males (range 43–56) and 47% in females (range
44–50). Adpressed limbs approach closely in males (mean LI 1.9, range 0.0–3.0) but
are widely separated in females (mean LI 2.9, range 2.0–3.0). The manus and pes are
relatively small, digits are broad. Subterminal pads are well developed. Digital webbing
ranges from slight to moderate, extending to the base of the penultimate phalanx on
the third toe. The first digit is distinct but barely emerges from the webbing. Digital tips are
only slightly expanded. The mental gland is prominent, relatively large and oval (nearly
round) in males. The smallest mature male is 33.6 mm SVL.
Comparisons: Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. ceronorum in its larger adult body
size (mean SVL 35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 33.9 mm in male
and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum), shorter limbs (mean LI 1.9 in male and 2.9 in
female C. orculus vs. 0.0 in male and 1.5 in female C. ceronorum), fewer maxillary teeth
(mean MT 8.2 in male and 28.8 in female C. orculus vs. 11.0 in male and 47.7 in female
C. ceronorum) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 8.6 in male and 12.0 in female
C. orculus vs. 13.0 in male and 15.9 in female C. ceronorum).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. perotensis in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 29.7 mm in male and 31.7 mm
in female C. perotensis), slightly longer limbs (mean LI 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female
C. orculus vs. 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis), longer head (mean HL 7.4 mm in
male and 8.0 mm in female C.orculus vs. 6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female
C. perotensis), broader head (mean HW 5.0 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female C. orculus
vs. 4.2 mm in male and 4.4 mm in female C. perotensis), larger feet (mean FW 3.2 mm
in male and 3.4 mm in female C. orculus vs. 2.6 mm in both male and female
C. perotensis) and more maxillary teeth (mean MT 8.2 in male and 28.8 in female
C. orculus vs. 7.2 in male and 27.9 in female C. perotensis).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. totonacus in its larger adult body size in
females (mean SVL 39.0 mm in C. orculus vs. 35.5 mm in C. totonacus), shorter tail (mean
TL/SVL 1.02 in both male and female C. orculus vs. 1.16 in male and 1.20 in female
C. totonacus), shorter limbs (mean LI 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female C. orculus vs. −0.60 in
male and 0.0 in female C. totonacus), shorter head in males (mean HL 7.4 mm in C. orculus
vs. 8.5 mm in C. totonacus), narrower feet (mean FW 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in
female C. orculus vs. 4.2 mm in male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus), fewer maxillary
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 52/71

teeth (mean MT 8.2 in male and 28.8 in female C. orculus vs. 32.9 in male and 52.6 in
female C. totonacus) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 8.6 in male and 12.0 in female
C. orculus vs. 11.6 in male and 13.7 in female C. totonacus).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. melipona in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm
in female C. melipona), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.02 in both male and female
C. orculus vs. 1.16 in male and 1.11 in female C. melipona), longer head (mean HL 7.4 mm
in male and 8.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female
C. melipona), broader head (mean HW 5.0 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female C. orculus
vs. 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. melipona) and broader feet (mean FW 3.2 mm
in male and 3.4 mm in female C. orculus vs. 2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female
C. melipona).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. casasi in its smaller adult body size (mean SVL
35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in
one female C. casasi), shorter head (mean HL 7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in female
C. orculus vs. 8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi), narrower head (mean
HW 5.0 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female C. orculus vs. 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in
one female C. casasi) and shorter limbs (mean LI 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female C. orculus
vs. 0.8 in male and 1.0 in one female C. casasi).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. chiropterus in its shorter tail (mean TL/SVL
1.02 in both male and female C. orculus vs. 1.25 in male and 1.19 in female C. chiropterus),
shorter head in males (mean HL 7.4 mm in C. orculus vs. 8.1 mm in C. chiropterus),
narrower head in males (mean HW 5.0 mm in C. orculus vs. 5.6 mm in C. chiropterus),
shorter limbs (mean LI 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female C. orculus vs. 0.3 in male and 2.0 in
female C. chiropterus), narrower feet in males (mean FW 3.2 mm in C. orculus vs. 3.7 mm
in C. chiropterus) and fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 8.2 in male and 28.8 in female
C. orculus vs. 12.6 in male and 48.0 in female C. chiropterus).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. lavae in its larger adult body size (mean
SVL 35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm
in female C. lavae), shorter tail in males (mean TL/SVL 1.02 in C. orculus vs. 1.19 in
C. lavae), shorter limbs (mean LI 1.9 in male and 2.9 in female C. orculus vs. −0.60 in male
and 0.6 in female C. lavae) and more maxillary teeth (mean MT 8.2 in male and 28.8 in
female C. orculus vs. 7.0 in male and 20.8 in female C. lavae).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. dimidiatus in its larger adult body size
(mean SVL 35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 24.6 mm in male and
25.8 mm in female C. dimidiatus), longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.02 in both male and
female C. orculus vs. 0.89 in male and 0.87 in female C. dimidiatus), longer limbs (mean LI
1.90 in male and 2.90 in female C. orculus vs. 3.8 in male and 4.9 in female C. dimidiatus),
longer head (mean HL 7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 5.2 mm in
male and 5.0 mm in female C. dimidiatus), broader head (mean HW 5.0 mm in male and
5.2 mm in female C. orculus vs. 3.4 mm in male and 3.5 mm in female C. dimidiatus),
broader feet (mean FW 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in female C. orculus vs. 1.7 mm in
both male and female C. dimidiatus), more maxillary teeth (mean MT 8.2 in male and 28.8
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 53/71

in female C. orculus vs. 3.8 in male and 17.0 in female C. dimidiatus) and more vomerine
teeth (mean VT 8.6 in male and 12.0 in female C. orculus vs. 5.6 in male and 8.3 in female
C. dimidiatus).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. chico in its smaller adult body size in males
(mean SVL 35.9 mm in C. orculus vs. 38.4 mm in C. chico), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL
1.02 in both male and female C. orculus vs. 1.18 in male and 1.12 in female C. chico),
shorter limbs (mean LI 1.90 in male and 2.90 in female C. orculus vs. 0.6 in male and 2.1 in
female C. chico), shorter head (mean HL 7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in female C. orculus
vs. 8.8 mm in male and 8.7 mm in female C. chico), narrower head (mean HW 5.0 mm
in male and 5.2 mm in female C. orculus vs. 5.6 mm in male and 5.7 mm in female
C. chico), narrower feet (mean FW 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in female C. orculus vs.
4.1 mm in male and 4.2 mm in female C. chico) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 8.6 in
male and 12.0 in female C. orculus vs. 13.6 in male and 15.6 in female C. chico).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. arboreus in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 33.4 mm in male and 32.2 mm
in female C. arboreus), longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.02 in both male and female C. orculus
vs. 0.83 in male and 0.87 in female C. arboreus) and shorter limbs (mean LI 1.90 in male
and 2.90 in female C. orculus vs. 0.20 in male and 1.0 in female C. arboreus).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. terrestris in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 24.2 mm in male and 23.0 mm
in female C. terrestris), longer head (mean HL 7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in female
C. orculus vs. 5.7 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female C. terrestris), broader head (mean HW
5.0 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female C. orculus vs. 3.5 mm in male and 3.3 mm in
female C. terrestris) and broader feet (mean FW 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in female
C. orculus vs. 1.9 mm in male and 1.7 mm in female C. terrestris).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. aureus by being larger (mean SVL 35.9 mm in
male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 28.5 mm in one male, mean 26.8 mm in
female C. aureus), with a shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.02 in both male and female
C. orculus vs. 1.28 in one male, mean 1.16 in female C. aureus), relatively shorter limbs in
females (mean LI 2.9 in female C. orculus vs. 2.3 in female C. aureus), larger head (mean
HL 7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 6.4 mm in one male, mean 6.0 mm
in female C. aureus), broader head (mean HW 5.0 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female
C. orculus vs. 4.0 mm in one male, 3.6 mm in female C. aureus), and broader feet (mean
FW 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in female C. orculus vs. 2.4 mm in one male, mean 1.8 mm
in female C. aureus).
Chiropterotriton orculus differs from C. nubilus in being larger (mean SVL 35.9 mm in
male and 39.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 29.4 mm in one male, mean 30.5 mm in
female C. nubilus), with a shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.02 in both male and female
C. orculus vs. 1.37 in one male, mean 1.12 in female C. nubilus), relatively shorter limbs in
females (mean LI 2.9 in female C. orculus vs. 1.5 in female C. nubilus), longer head (mean HL
7.4 mm in male and 8.0 mm in female C. orculus vs. 6.6 mm in one male, mean 7.4 mm
in female C. nubilus), broader head (mean HW 5.0 mm in male and 5.2 mm in female
C. orculus vs. 4.0 mm in one male, mean 4.4 mm in female C. nubilus), and broader feet
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 54/71

(mean FW 3.2 mm in male and 3.4 mm in female C. orculus vs. 2.6 mm in one male, mean
2.3 mm in female C. nubilus).
Description of neotype: SVL 38.9 mm, TL 33.6 mm, AX 20.5 mm, SW 4.0 mm, HL
8.1 mm, HW 5.5 mm, HD 2.4 mm, projection of snout beyond mandible 0.6 mm, distance
from anterior rim of orbit to snout 2.3 mm, interorbital distance 2.3 mm, eyelid length
3.5 mm, eyelid width 1.6 mm, horizontal orbit diameter 1.8 mm, nostril diameter 0.3 mm,
FLL 9.3 mm, HLL 9.6 mm, snout-to-forelimb length 9.5 mm, distance from snout to
anterior angle of vent 33.8 mm, tail width at base 3.1 mm, tail depth at base 3.2 mm, FW
3.5 mm, length of fifth toe 0.5 mm, length of longest (third) toe 1.2 mm, mental gland
length 1.3 mm, mental gland width 1.3. Numbers of teeth: premaxillary 4, maxillary
4-5 (right-left) and vomerine 5-4 (right-left). Adpressed limbs are separated by 2 costal
folds.
Coloration in life: No information is available for the neotype or topotypic
individuals; this description is based on photos of specimens from Lagunas de Zempoala.
The background dorsal color is very dark gray. A broad dorsal band is typically present,
varying in color from reddish brown to tan or nearly golden brown; the background
color is visible only along midline. This coloration continues onto the tail, although the
band is less regular and somewhat broken up in many individuals. The head is very dark
brown, with splotches of brown similar in coloration to those on the dorsum. Small,
pale-gray specks often present on both head and tail. The dorsal band is bordered by very
dark gray. Some individuals lack a dorsal band and are very dark-brownish-grey dorsally
with pale flecks throughout. Flanks are dark gray with pale gray specks, which are
numerous on the body with some on the sides of the head and few to none on the sides of
the tail. Upper side of limbs either similar in coloration to flanks or slightly paler. The iris is
coppery.
Coloration in preservative: The dorsum, head and tail are a uniform medium brown.
The upper side of the limbs and feet are paler brown. The venter, gular region and
underside of the forelimbs are tan to pale brown; the underside of the hind limbs and tail
are slightly darker brown.
Osteology: This account is based on examination of a µCT scan of the anterior skeleton of
the neotype: MVZ 138783, an adult male, 38.9 mm SL (Figs. 6–8;Table 3). The skull is
compact and robust, especially anteriorly. The snout is blunt in lateral view. Cranial
roofing bones are moderately well ossified. Paired frontals articulate across the midline
anteriorly for about two thirds of their length but then separate to participate in a relatively
large frontoparietal fontanel, which includes about three fourths of the length of the
parietals. Posteriorly extending tabs of the frontals overlap the parietals anteriorly.
Ascending processes of the single premaxilla approach one another medially but remain
separate for their entire length. They twist and broaden greatly as they ascend before
establishing a firm articulation with the frontal. The dental process of the premaxilla is
deep (high) but no palatal shelf is evident. Septomaxillae are present on both sides; they are
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 55/71

very small but nevertheless well developed for Chiropterotriton. The nasal bone is broadly
triangular, but also thin and less well-developed anteromedially. It barely abuts the
premaxilla medially and the maxilla laterally; is separated from the prefrontal
posterolaterally; and slightly overlaps the frontal posteriorly. The prefrontal is broad,
compact and almost quadrangular. The foramen for the nasolacrimal duct has eroded the
ventral margin of the prefrontal and the dorsal margin of the facial process of the
maxilla, but the nasal is not involved. The maxilla is edentulous posteriorly for about 55%
of its length. Its posterior tip flares laterally beyond the margin of the lower jaw in dorsal
view. There are five large maxillary teeth on each side and four premaxillary teeth.
The orbitosphenoid, while moderately well-developed, is articulated solidly to the
parasphenoid, weakly to the frontal, and not at all to the parietal. The oculomotor foramen
is absent on the right side.
There are no prominent crests on the dorsal surface of either otic capsule.
The posterolateral tab of the parietal is well-developed but relatively short and triangular; it
is reflected ventromedially and ends in a rounded point about halfway down the
vertical extent of the orbitosphenoid. The squamosal bone is more elongate and less
triangular than in other Chiropterotriton; its dorsal tip articulates with a small portion of
the otic capsule opposite the lateral semicircular canal. The quadrate is small and
inconspicuous. The stylus on the columella is short and stout. Paired bodies of the
vomer are reasonably well developed but they barely articulate medially posterior to the
internasal fontanel. Postorbital processes of are long, thin and slightly curved. There are six
vomerine teeth on the right side and six on the left; one or two teeth are deployed at
the base of each preorbital process. The parasphenoid expands posteriorly but truncates
abruptly at its caudal border. Each lateral edge is sculpted by a shallow notch opposite the
jaw articulation, and by an erosion of bone (and teeth) opposite the ventromedially
directed parietal tab. It has an unusual shape along the lateral margin. Paired parasphenoid
tooth patches are separated across the midline; each bears 50–52 fully developed teeth,
but there are many additional developing teeth along the lateral margin. The mandible is
solid. The articular bone is well developed and may be at least partly fused to the
pre-articular on each side. The prearticular has a relatively high coronoid process.
There are approximately 12 teeth on each dentary bone.
Digital formulae are 1-2-3-2 on each side. There is a tiny expanded knob at the tip of
each terminal phalanx. Mesopodial cartilages are not mineralized.
Distribution and ecology: Chiropterotriton orculus is restricted to the central and eastern
portion of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (La Marquesa, Desierto de los Leones,
Ajusco, Lagunas de Zempoala, Iztaccihuatl, Popocatépetl, Rio Frio and La Malinche).
It occurs in pine and fir forest and is terrestrial; it is typically found under the bark of logs
or inside rotting logs. This widely distributed species ranges between 2,500 and 3,500 masl.
Remarks: This species was raised from synonymy with C. chiropterus by Darda (his species
G, population 20). While it is relatively widespread, we are unsure of its northeastern
limits. Population G is from near Chignahuapan, Puebla. We also include Darda’s sp.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 56/71

A (Desierto de Los Leones, DF) and B (Rio Frio, Mexico) in our current understanding of
this taxon.
Conservation status: Chiropterotriton orculus is designated as Vulnerable by the most
recent IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (Parra-Olea & Wake, 2008). The species
remains relatively common near Lagunas de Zempoala.
OTHER SPECIES OF CHIROPTEROTRITON FROM CENTRAL VERACRUZ
In addition to the recently described C. aureus and C. nubilus,C. lavae also occurs in the
mountains of central Veracruz. While Taylor’s (1942) original description of this species
was relatively thorough, we provide a brief overview of this species for comparative
purposes using additional specimens collected since the type series. We also examined the
holotype and several paratypes of this species to provide additional information not
contained in Taylor’s description.
Chiropterotriton lavae (Taylor, 1942)
Chresonymy
Bolitoglossa lavae—Taylor, 1942.Holotype: EHT-HMS 28937, now FMNH 100118. Type
locality: “2 miles west of La Joya-Veracruz”, Mexico.
Pigmy Flat-footed Salamander, Salamandra de pie plano pigmea
Figures 4V–4X,5H,6C,7C,8C.
Specimens examined: Nineteen specimens, all from La Joya, Veracruz, Mexico. Ten males:
MVZ 163912–13, 163915, 171873–74, 173394–95, 173398, 178685 and 192789; and nine
females: MVZ 106537, 106548, 171876, 171881, 171885, 171901, 192788, 197788 and
200638.
Diagnosis: This is a medium-sized species of plethodontid salamander phylogenetically
related to Chiropterotriton totonacus, C. perotensis and C. ceronorum; mean SVL
32.4 mm in ten adult males (range 31.1–33.8) and 31.6 mm in nine adult females (range
27.9–34.9). The head is moderately wide; HW averages 15% of SVL in males (range 14–17)
and 15% in females (range 14–16). Jaw muscles are prominent in both males and
females. Adult males and females have a bluntly rounded snout with moderately developed
nasolabial protuberances. Eyes are large and prominent and extend laterally well beyond
the jaw margin in ventral view. There are few maxillary teeth in males (mean MT 7.0,
range 1–10) and moderate numbers in females (mean MT 20.8, range 13–36). There are
few vomerine teeth in both males (mean VT 8.9, 7–10) and females (mean VT 11.4, range
8–15), which are arranged in a short row that does not reach or barely reaches the
inner margin of the internal choana. The tail is moderately long and slightly exceeds SVL
in most specimens; mean TL/SVL equals 1.19 in males (range 1.11–1.27) and 1.02 in
females (range 0.85–1.15). Limbs are moderately to very long in both females and males;
FLL + HLL averages 59% of SVL in males (range 53–65) and 54% in females (range 50–59).
Adpressed limbs closely approach or overlap in males (mean LI −0.60, range −1.0 to 0.0)
but are more separated in females (mean LI 0.6, range 0.0–2.0). The manus and pes
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 57/71

are moderate in size. Subterminal pads are well developed. Digital webbing is modest,
reaching only to the base of the penultimate phalanx on the third toe. The first digit is
included entirely in webbing. Digital tips are slightly expanded. The mental gland is oval
(nearly round), somewhat prominent and moderately sized in males. The smallest male
with a mental gland is 31.2 mm SVL.
Comparisons: Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. ceronorum in its slightly smaller adult
body size (mean SVL 32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in female C. lavae vs. 33.9 mm in
male and 34.9 mm in female C. ceronorum), longer tail (mean TL/SVL 1.19 in male and
1.02 in female C. lavae vs. 1.0 in male and 0.97 in female C. ceronorum), longer limbs
(mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae vs. 0.0 in male and 1.5 in female
C. ceronorum), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.0 in male and 20.8 in female C. lavae vs.
11.0 in male and 47.7 in female C. ceronorum) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 8.9 in
male and 11.4 in female C. lavae vs. 13.0 in male and 15.9 in female C. ceronorum).
Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. perotensis in its larger adult body size in males
(mean SVL 32.4 mm in C. lavae vs. 29.7 mm in C. perotensis), longer limbs (mean LI −0.6
in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae vs. 2.5 in male and 3.3 in female C. perotensis),
slightly wider head (mean HW 4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae vs. 4.2 mm
in male and 4.4 mm in female C. perotensis), longer head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male
and 7.0 mm in female C. lavae vs. 6.6 mm in male and 6.7 mm in female C. perotensis),
wider feet (FW 3.7 mm in male and 3.3 mm in female C. lavae vs. 2.6 mm in both male and
female C. perotensis) and slightly fewer maxillary teeth in females (mean MT 20.8 in
C. lavae vs. 27.9 in C. perotensis).
Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. totonacus in its smaller adult body size (mean SVL
32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in female C. lavae vs. 35.7 mm in male and 35.5 mm in
female C. totonacus), shorter tail in females (mean TL/SVL 1.02 in C. lavae vs. 1.20 in
C. totonacus), shorter limbs in females (mean LI 0.6 in C. lavae vs. 0.0 in C. totonacus),
shorter head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.0 mm in female C. lavae vs. 8.5 mm in
male and 7.6 mm in female C. totonacus), slightly narrower head (mean HW 4.9 mm in
male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae vs. 5.2 mm in both male and female C. totonacus),
narrower feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in male and 3.3 mm in female C. lavae vs. 4.2 mm in
male and 4.0 mm in female C. totonacus), fewer maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.0 in male and
20.8 in female C. lavae vs. 32.9 in male and 52.6 in female C. totonacus) and fewer
vomerine teeth (mean VT 8.9 in male and 11.4 in female C. lavae vs. 11.6 in male and 13.7
in female C. totonacus).
Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. melipona in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in female C. lavae vs. 29.2 mm in male and 28.5 mm in
female C. melipona), longer head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.0 mm in female
C. lavae vs. 6.3 mm in male and 6.4 mm in female C. melipona), broader head (mean HW
4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae vs. 4.3 mm in male and 4.2 mm in
female C. melipona), longer limbs (mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae vs. 2.3
in male and 1.8 in female C. melipona), broader feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in male and
3.3 mm in female C. lavae vs. 2.4 mm in male and 2.6 mm in female C. melipona), fewer
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 58/71

maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.0 in male and 20.8 in female C. lavae vs. 9.5 in male and 31.0
in female C. melipona) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 8.9 in male and 11.4 in female
C. lavae vs. 11.0 in male and 13.0 in female C. melipona).
Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. casasi in its smaller adult body size (mean SVL
32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in female C. lavae vs. 37.8 mm in male and 40.9 mm in
one female C. casasi), longer tail in males (mean TL/SVL 1.19 in C. lavae vs. 1.04 in
C. casasi), shorter head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.0 mm in female C. lavae vs.
8.3 mm in male and 8.6 mm in one female C. casasi), narrower head (mean HW 4.9 mm in
male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae vs. 5.8 mm in male and 5.9 mm in one female
C. casasi), longer limbs (mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae vs. 0.8 in male and
1.0 in one female C. casasi) and fewer maxillary teeth in females (mean MT 20.8 in C. lavae
vs. 30 in C. casasi).
Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. chiropterus in its smaller adult body size (mean
SVL 32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in female C. lavae vs. 37.5 mm in male and 33.5 mm in
female C. chiropterus), shorter tail (mean TL/SVL 1.19 in male and 1.02 in female
C. lavae vs. 1.25 in male and 1.19 in female C. chiropterus), longer limbs (mean LI −0.6 in
male and 0.6 in female C. lavae vs. 0.3 in male and 2.0 in female C. chiropterus), shorter
head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.0 mm in female C. lavae vs. 8.1 mm in male
and 7.3 mm in female C. chiropterus), narrower head (mean HW 4.9 mm in male and
4.7 mm in female C. lavae vs. 5.6 mm in male and 4.8 mm in female C. chiropterus), fewer
maxillary teeth (mean MT 7.0 in male and 20.8 in female C. lavae vs. 12.6 in male and 48.0
in female C. chiropterus) and fewer vomerine teeth (mean VT 8.9 in male and 11.4 in
female C. lavae vs. 10.6 in male and 12.5 in female C. chiropterus).
Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. orculus in its smaller adult body size (mean SVL
32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in female C. lavae vs. 35.9 mm in male and 39.0 mm
in female C. orculus), longer tail in males (mean TL/SVL 1.19 in C. lavae vs. 1.02 in
C. orculus) and longer limbs (mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae vs. 1.9 in
male and 2.9 in female C. orculus).
Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. aureus in its larger adult body size (mean SVL
32.4 mm in male and 31.6 mm in female C. lavae vs. 28.5 mm in one male, mean 26.8 mm
in female C. aureus), larger head (mean HL 7.5 mm in male and 7.0 mm in female C. lavae
vs. 6.4 mm in one male, mean 6.0 mm in female C. aureus), broader head (mean HW
4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in female C. lavae vs. 4.0 mm in one male, 3.6 mm in female
C. aureus), longer limbs (mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae vs. 2.0 in one
male, mean 2.3 in female C. aureus), and broader feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in male and
3.3 mm in female C. lavae vs. 2.4 mm in one male, mean 1.8 mm in female C. aureus).
Chiropterotriton lavae differs from C. nubilus in its larger adult body size in males
(mean SVL 32.4 mm in lavae vs. 29.4 mm in one male C. nubilus), shorter tail (mean TL/
SVL 1.19 in male and 1.02 in female C. lavae vs. 1.37 in one male, mean 1.12 in
female C. nubilus), broader head (mean HW 4.9 mm in male and 4.7 mm in female
C. lavae vs. 4.0 mm in one male, mean 4.4 mm in female C. nubilus), relatively longer limbs
(mean LI −0.6 in male and 0.6 in female C. lavae vs. 2.0 in one male, mean 1.5 in female
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 59/71

C. nubilus), and broader feet (mean FW 3.7 mm in male and 3.3 mm in female C. lavae vs.
2.6 mm in one male, mean 2.3 mm in female C. nubilus).
Measurements of holotype: Adult female, SVL 33.5 mm, TL 40.7 mm, AX 18.1 mm,
SW 4.8 mm, HL 7.7 mm, HW 5.6 mm, HD 2.9 mm, interorbital distance 2.1 mm, eyelid
length 1.3 mm, FLL 9.2 mm, HLL 9.7 mm, snout-to-forelimb length 10.2 mm, snout to
anterior angle of vent 33 mm, length of fifth toe 0.9 mm, distance from eye to nostril 1.2,
internarial distance 2.0, FW 4.0, length of longest (third) toe 1.6 mm. Numbers of teeth:
premaxillary 6, maxillary 16-14 (right-left) and vomerine 6-6 (right-left). Taylor (1942)
listed 28 maxillary and premaxillary teeth on each side but counted missing teeth, while we
count only ankylosed teeth that are present. Adpressed limbs touch.
Coloration in life: Dorsal coloration highly variable. Background dorsal color dark brown;
some individuals have a broad, continuous dorsal band of yellow, reddish-brown or
orangish-brown to pale brown stretching from posterior portion of head to tip of tail, while
in other individuals this dorsal band is either irregular, reduced to paler brown or
golden-brown blotches or streaks, or absent. Head dark brown, often with golden-brown
specks, especially between eyes and snout. Flanks, sides of tail, and dorsal side of limbs and
feet dark brown, typically uniform along dorsal edge but often with paler brown or
golden-brown flecks or tan streaks below; toe tips reddish. Venter dark gray to paler gray,
with some white speckling in some individuals. Iris golden-brown.
Coloration in preservative: The dorsum, tail and head are relatively pale to dark brown,
often with a paler, broad dorsal band that is bordered by darker brown coloration.
The paler background color is often faintly mottled with darker brown. The venter is a
uniform tan to pale brown; the underside of the tail and limbs are a slightly darker brown.
The gular region is tan to pale brown, sometimes with a small amount of mottling.
Osteology: This account is based on examination of a µCT scan of the anterior skeleton of
MVZ 163912, an adult male, 33.8 mm SVL (Figs. 6–8). The skull is well developed.
The cranial roof is for the most part complete and solidly articulated. There is no
frontoparietal fontanel, although there are slight gaps medially between the paired frontals
and paired parietals. Ascending processes of the single premaxillary bone remain separate
along their entire length; each broadens laterally as it approaches its dorsal articulation
with the adjacent frontal. A very narrow palatal shelf is present on each side of the
premaxilla but absent medially. There are no septomaxillary bones. The nasal bone is
large and triangular, but also very thin and poorly ossified. The prefrontal bone is
rectangular and robust; its ventral portion is overlapped extensively by the facial process of
the maxilla. The foramen of the nasolacrimal duct has eroded the prefrontal along its
anteroventral margin and the dorsal margin of the facial process of the maxilla; the nasal
abuts the foramen but is eroded minimally, if at all. The maxillary bone is saber-like in
lateral view, not cleaver-like as in many other Chiropterotriton. Its posterior, edentulous
portion comprises about 60% of the length of the bone. There are four maxillary teeth on
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 60/71

each side and two premaxillary teeth. The teeth are thin and poorly developed.
The orbitosphenoid is very thin and delicate. It is solidly articulated to the parasphenoid
but weakly articulated to the frontal and parietal.
A prominent bony ridge overlies the anterior semicircular canal dorsally. It is derived
from the posterolateral portion of the parietal bone and the anteromedial portion of
the otic capsule. An additional, crest-like spur emerges at right angles from this crest and is
directed posterolaterally. A second ridge similarly overlies the posterior semicircular
canal. The squamosal bone is robust and roughly triangular. A well-developed, spine-like
tab on the ventrolateral margin of each parietal is sharply reflected ventromedially and
extends nearly the full vertical extent of the orbitosphenoid. The quadrate is small
and inconspicuous and incompletely ossified. There is a stubby, stout stylus on the
columella, with a limited free portion. Paired vomers are weakly ossified; they approach
one another across the midline posterior to the internasal fontanel but do not
articulate. Preorbital processes are needlelike—thin and elongate. There are four vomerine
teeth on each side; one tooth is deployed at the base of the preorbital process, but only on
the left side. The parasphenoid bone is relatively wide anteriorly. Each lateral edge is
sculpted by a deep notch opposite the jaw articulation. Paired parasphenoid tooth
patches are widely separated across the midline; each contains approximately 50 teeth.
The mandible is stout. The articular is well ossified. The prearticular is very thin in its
central portion but has a moderately high coronoid process. There are eight teeth on each
dentary bone. The posterior teeth are sharply recurved and needlelike.
Digital formulae are 1-2-3-2 on each side. Phalanges appear to be slightly thinner than
in other Chiropterotriton. There is a slightly expanded knob at the tip of each terminal
phalanx of digits 2–4. Mesopodial cartilages are not mineralized.
Distribution and ecology: Chiropterotriton lavae is known only from forested areas
between the towns of Toxtlacoaya and La Joya, along the road from Perote to Xalapa,
Veracruz, Mexico. It occurs in bromeliads in the cloud forest and has been found in
somewhat disturbed habitat in and around La Joya. This narrowly distributed species is
known only between 2,000 and 2,200 masl.
Remarks: As part of the redescription of this species, we examined the holotype and part of
the series of paratypes atthe Field Museum of Natural History. The portion of the type series
examined corresponds closely in morphology to the specimens that we examined.
There has long been a suspicion that two species of Chiropterotriton occur in the vicinity
of La Joya. For example, Smith & Taylor (1948) report Chiropterotriton chiropterus
(almost certainly not that species) from Toxtlacoaya, and they also report C. lavae from
that site. This small village is at the western edge of La Joya. Darda (1994) also reports two
species from La Joya, C. lavae and his new species E (which we tentatively assign to
C. totonacus in this paper). We have only found one species in the La Joya region.
Conservation Status: Chiropterotriton lavae is designated as Critically Endangered by the
most recent IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group,
2016). Much of the habitat where it occurs is highly disturbed or has been converted to
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 61/71

pasture, but this species remains relatively common even in disturbed forest where there
are bromeliads.
DISCUSSION
Since its initial designation by Taylor (1944),Chiropterotriton has proven to be a
problematic taxon. As originally conceived, the genus contained small montane species of
tropical salamanders with broad hands and feet and the outermost digit relatively well
developed. Species ranged from terrestrial to arboreal and occurred at relatively high
elevations (9,000 to 11,000 feet, or roughly 2,750 to 3,350 m). With a largely Mexican
distribution, the initial ten species nevertheless extended geographically to Honduras.
Later, species from as far south as Costa Rica were added to the genus. Today, the taxon is
restricted to Mexico, north and west of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec but mainly in eastern
Mexico (as far west as southeastern Coahuila, central San Luis Potosi and Queretaro,
and western Distrito Federal and Morelos). The known elevational range is both lower (to
about 690 m below Xicotepec de Juarez, Veracruz) and higher (to at least 4,015 m on Cofre
de Perote) than was known when Taylor worked. Species further to the south once
considered congeneric are now assigned to the distantly related genera Cryptotriton,
Dendrotriton and Nototriton. While most species are small, C. magnipes reaches about
60 mm SVL. Darda’s (1994) southern group is the most taxonomically difficult group in
the genus, and even after our description of four new members of it herein (C. casasi stands
out as morphologically unique among the taxa named, and we cannot determine at this
time to which group it belongs) there is still taxonomic work remaining. Moreover,
opportunities exist for additional research investigations, especially cytological.
Chromosomal heteromorphism is reported for a few species of Chiropterotriton, including
potential sex chromosomes and supernumerary chromosomes (Sessions & Kezer, 1991).
Similarly, genome size has been studied in only four species. Known values are at the
smaller end of the size range for the tropical salamander radiation; average C-value per
species ranges from 24.7 to 28.5 pg DNA (Sessions & Kezer, 1991).
Despite the passage of nearly 50 years between the description of C. magnipes and
C. miquihuanus, it has long been known based on both morphological and molecular
evidence that a great deal of additional diversity exists within the genus (Rabb, 1958;
Darda, 1994;Parra-Olea, 2003). The recent descriptions of three species identified as
distinct in previous morphological or molecular analyses (C. chico, C. cieloensis and
C. infernalis) went some way towards formalizing the known but undescribed diversity of
Chiropterotriton, while the descriptions of three more species not included in previous
analyses (C. aureus, C. miquihuanus, and C. nubilus) showed that there is still previously
undocumented diversity left to discover. Of the five species we describe here, four
were previously identified as distinct, while the fifth (C. casasi) has not been included in
any previous analysis. These five species add to the already high diversity of the eastern
portion of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB).
Using allozyme data, Darda (1994) provided the first in-depth taxonomic study of the
genus Chiropterotriton that included molecular data. Darda’sC. chiropterus complex
(the southern clade) was formed by C. chiropterus (represented in his study by sp. E from
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 62/71

La Joya, Veracruz) and C. orculus (represented by sp. G from Chignahuapan, Puebla), plus
nine undescribed taxa: C.spA,C. sp B, and C. sp F, from Puebla; C.spC,C.spD,C.spH,
and C. sp I from Veracruz; and C. sp. J and C. sp. K from Oaxaca. Once sequences of
mitochondrial genes became available, Parra-Olea (2003) defined the type localities for
C. chiropterus and C. orculus.Parra-Olea (2003) assigned the name C. chiropterus to
populations from Huatusco, Veracruz, leaving Darda’s sp. E as an undescribed species.
She also assigned the name C. orculus to populations from the central region of the
Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (TMVB) including Darda’s sp. A and sp. B, indicating that
sp. G from Chignahuapan might represent an undescribed taxon. No further taxonomic
work was performed on this complex until now. Based on our analyses, including
molecular and morphological data, here we describe four of these taxa: C. totonacus
(sp. E from La Joya Veracruz), C. melipona (sp. F from Xicotepec, Veracruz), C. perotensis
(sp. H and sp. D from Las Vigas, Veracruz) and C. ceronorum (sp. I from Santa Cruz
Texmalaquilla, Puebla). We assign C. sp. J from La Esperanza, Oaxaca, as part of
C. chiropterus.
Phylogenetic evidence, based first on allozyme data (Darda, 1994) and continuing
with mtDNA data from the work of Parra-Olea (2003) to the present study has been
indispensable to working out species limits within the genus. One of the most problematic
taxonomic issues with the genus Chiroperotriton was the status of C. chiropterus. The fact
that the original description contained little morphological information, combined with
an imprecise type locality and lost holotype, made assignment of populations to this
species difficult. At different times, this name has been applied to populations ranging
from Tamaulipas south through San Luis Potosí, Querétaro, Hidalgo, and Veracruz.
Furthermore, the species is relatively generalized in morphology, resembling a number of
other small to medium-sized members of the genus. Our designation of a neotype
formalized the assignment of the name C. chiropterus for populations from the region of
Huatusco, Veracruz, following Parra-Olea (2003). Inclusion of samples from Huatusco in
both phylogenetic and morphological analyses allowed us to distinguish several of the
new species from the eastern edge of the TMVB. Furthermore, while Parra-Olea (2003)
restricted C. chiropterus to the vicinity of Huatusco, we now understand that it ranges
south to northern Oaxaca. Rather than being microendemic, it now has one of the largest
ranges of any Chiropterotriton. Similarly, while Darda (1994) restricted C. orculus to a
single population based on allozyme data, our results support the status of C. orculus as a
more widely ranging species throughout the eastern TMVB.
Of the species identified as undescribed in previous analyses (Darda, 1994;Parra-Olea,
2003), only Chiropterotriton sp. C, sp. G, and sp. K have not been either described or
assigned to an existing species. We believe that C. sp. C (from Puerto del Aire, Veracruz)
likely represents a distinct species but currently lack sufficient material to describe it. Major
declines in salamander abundance have occurred at this site (Rovito et al., 2009) and
no Chiropterotriton have been found in recent years. Chiropterotriton sp. G is similar to
C. orculus in external morphology and was assigned to that species by Darda (1994), but
Parra-Olea (2003) reversed this decision and applied the name C. orculus to populations
around Mexico City. Additional morphological analyses are necessary to determine if
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 63/71

C. sp. G represents a distinct species or can be assigned to the wider-ranging C. orculus.
The case of C. sp. K, however, is more difficult. This species, collected only once in 1980,
has not been seen over the course of many visits to Cerro San Felipe, Oaxaca. While it is
possible that the locality is in error, many other species at this site have undergone
catastrophic declines (Parra-Olea, García-París & Wake, 1999;Rovito et al., 2009).
Chiropterotriton sp. K may be present on Cerro San Felipe at greatly diminished
abundance, or it may simply exist on a part of the mountain that has not been checked on
subsequent visits; the locality of the known specimens is not specific enough to determine
exactly where they were collected. Concerted field efforts covering different parts of
Cerro San Felipe are needed to confirm that C. sp. K does indeed exist at the locality. While
the descriptions of C. perotensis (sp. D and sp. H), C. totonacus (sp. E), C. ceronorum (sp. I)
and C. melipona (sp. F), together with the assignment of C. sp. J to C. chiropterus,
nearly deal with all the identified but undescribed diversity within the genus, we
continue to discover populations that likely represent additional, undescribed species of
Chiropterotriton from eastern portions of the TMVB. A final issue is the status of a
population from the Sierra Madre del Sur of Oaxaca, known from a single long-preserved
specimen in the American Museum of Natural History (Darda, 1994).
These five new species increase the content of Chiropterotriton from 18 to 23.
This represents a considerable increase in the somewhat slow but steady rise in species
descriptions trajectory that began in the 1980s when molecular data became readily
available. With the use of protein electrophoresis data, 19 new species of salamanders were
described from Mexico (Hanken & Wake, 1994,1998,2001;Hanken, Wake & Freeman,
1999) and with the use of mitochondrial markers 31 new species have been described from
Mexico since 2001 (Parra-Olea, Papenfuss & Wake, 2001;Parra-Olea, García-París &
Wake, 2002;Parra-Olea, Canseco-Márquez & García-París, 2004;Parra-Olea et al., 2004,
2005a,2005b,2010,2016;Brodie, Mendelson & Campbell, 2002;Canseco-Marquez &
Parra-Olea, 2003;Canseco-Márquez & Gutiérrez-Mayén, 2005;Rovito et al., 2012,2015b;
Rovito & Parra-Olea, 2015;García-Castillo et al., 2017,2018;Sandoval-Comte et al., 2017).
Thus, almost 40% of Mexican bolitoglossines have been described using molecular
characters in combination with morphological and ecological traits. The number of
described species in Chiropterotriton alone has nearly doubled over the course of 5 years,
and we expect that additional fieldwork in the TMVB and Sierra Madre Oriental will reveal
additional species.
CONCLUSIONS
The genus Chiropterotriton, an endemic group of Mexican salamanders, has been a
taxonomic challenge to researchers for many years. Previously published molecular data
indicated that a number of undescribed species were present, but lack of a thorough
morphological analysis had stalled the advances in the description of the diversity of this
group. This article is a big step towards this goal. Herein we describe five new species of
Chiropterotriton and redescribed two more, based on molecular and morphological data,
increasing considerably the known diversity of the genus. However, more work is still
needed for the description of several more taxa when additional data are available.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 64/71

APPENDIX
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Ángel Soto-Pozos, Maria Delia Basanta and Omar Becerra-Soria for valuable help
during fieldworkof2016–2018; Laura Marquez Valdelamar and Andrea Jimenez Marin
for their help in laboratory work; Carol Spencer for help provided with specimen
photographs, and Eduardo Pineda for tissues and photographs of C. chiropterus specimens
from Colección de Referencia de Anfibios y Reptiles del Instituto de Ecología, A.C (CARIE).
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DECLARATIONS
Funding
Research was supported by grants from Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e
Innnovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT-UNAM) IN203617 to Gabriela Parra Olea; CONACyT
Ciencia Básica Grant #221614 (CB-2013-01), Langebio-Cinvestav; a UC Mexus-
CONACyT postdoctoral fellowship to Sean M. Rovito; National Science Foundation:
EF-0334846 and DBI-1702263 to James Hanken; and National Science Foundation:
DEB-0613802 to David B Wake. CONACyT provided a scholarship grant (CVU/Becario
413761/262662) to Mirna Garcia Castillo. Putnam Expeditionary Fund of the Museum of
Comparative Zoology and the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies,
Harvard University, supported James Hanken. This publication was supported by a grant
from the Wetmore-Colles Fund of the Museum of Comparative Zoology to James Hanken.
Appendix 1 Specimens examined for morphological comparisons.
Chiropterotriton casasi sp.nov.: Mexico, Veracruz: MVZ 92874–78, 13 mi SW Tlapacoyan
Chiropterotriton ceronorum sp.nov.: Mexico, Puebla: USNM 224202, 224207–08, 224211–12, 224218–20, 224230, 224236, 224240–41, 224247,
224250, 224252–53, 224257, 224259, 224275–76, Santa Cruz Texmalaquilla (4.7 mi by road NE of Atzitzintla), ca. 1 km NE of, on south slope of Pico
de Orizaba
Chiropterotriton chiropterus:Mexico, Veracruz: MVZ 85588–92, 85594, 85597–99, 85605, 85613, 85632, 1.4 mi SW (by road) SW edge of Huatusco
de Chicuellar
Chiropterotriton lavae: Mexico, Veracruz: MVZ 106537, 106548, W edge of La Joya, along Hwy. 140; MVZ 163912–13, 163915, 171873–74, 171876,
171881, 171885, 171901, 173394–95, 173398, 192788–89, 197788, La Joya; 178685, La Joya, Mexico Hwy. 140; MVZ 200638 forest W of La Joya
Chiropterotriton melipona sp.nov.: Mexico, Puebla: MVZ 178706–08, 3.9 km S Xicotepec de Juárez on Hwy. 130; MVZ 185972, 2.2 km on road to
Patla from junction with Hwy. 120 SW out of Xicotepec de Juárez; MVZ 200724–26, 3.3 km S of Hotel M Ranchito on Mexico Hwy. 130, 2.1 km E on
road to La Unión, Xicotepec de Juárez
Chiropterotriton orculus: Mexico, Estado de México: MVZ 76161, 138686, 138688, 138694, 138696–97, 138700, 138776–79, 138781, 138783–84, 138793,
138796–97, 138804, 200629–30, ridge between Volcanoes Popocatepetl and Iztaccihuatl, along Mexico Hwy. 196, 16.2 km E (by road) Hwy. 115
Chiropterotriton perotensis sp.nov.: Mexico, Veracruz: MVZ 114356, 114359, road from Las Vigas de Ramírez to Microwave Station on N Flank
Cofre de Perote, 11.6 km S (by road) Las Vigas; MVZ 173428–29, 173438–39, Las Vigas de Ramírez, Microondas road; MVZ 178661, 178663–65,
8–15.5 km S (via Microondas Rd.) Las Vigas de Ramírez; MVZ 186711, road to Microwave Station, 15 km S (by road) Las Vigas de Ramírez; MVZ
200681–83, 200691, 200693–95, 200698, 200702 14.4 km S (by Rock Rd.) Las Vigas de Ramírez at Microwave Station
Chiropterotriton totonacus sp.nov.: MVZ 136981–82, 136986, pine forest along Mexico Hwy. 140, 4 km W Las Vigas de Ramírez; MVZ 138703–04,
138716, 138765, Mexico Hwy. 140, 4.5 km W (by road) Las Vigas de Ramírez; MVZ 163943, 163945, 163947–49, 163989–90, 163993, 171903,
171905, 171907, 171909–10, 6 km W Las Vigas de Ramírez
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 65/71

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish,
or preparation of the manuscript.
Grant Disclosures
The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:
Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigación e Innnovación Tecnológica
(PAPIIT-UNAM): IN203617.
CONACyT Ciencia Básica: #221614 (CB-2013-01).
UC Mexus-CONACyT.
National Science Foundation: EF-0334846 and DBI-1702263.
National Science Foundation: DEB-0613802.
CONACyT: CVU/Becario 413761/262662.
Putnam Expeditionary Fund of the Museum of Comparative Zoology and the David
Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.
Wetmore-Colles Fund.
Competing Interests
Gabriela Parra Olea is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.
Author Contributions
Gabriela Parra Olea conceived and designed the experiments, performed the
experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed
drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Mirna G. Garcia-Castillo conceived and designed the experiments, performed the
experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed
drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Sean M. Rovito conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments,
analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the
paper, and approved the final draft.
Jessica A. Maisano conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments,
analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the
paper, and approved the final draft.
James Hanken conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments,
analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the
paper, and approved the final draft.
David B. Wake conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments,
analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the
paper, and approved the final draft.
Animal Ethics
The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body
and any reference numbers):
Animal use was approved by the University of California, Berkeley, IACUC protocol
#R093-0205 to DBW.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 66/71

Field Study Permissions
The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving
body and any reference numbers):
Collection permits were provided by the Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos
Naturales (SEMARNAT): SGPA/DGVS/00947/16, SGPA/DGVS/03038/17 and
FAUT-0303, issued to Gabriela Parra-Olea.
DNA Deposition
The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:
The sequences of Chiropterotriton are available at GenBank: MN914712–MN914747
and MN920423–MN920429. A fasta file is also available as a Supplemental File.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
Raw data is available as a Supplemental File.
The CT data are available at MorphoSource:
Chiropterotriton chiropterus:https://www.morphosource.org/Detail/SpecimenDetail/
Show/specimen_id/27352.
C. orculus:https://www.morphosource.org/Detail/SpecimenDetail/Show/specimen_id/
27372.
C. lavae:https://www.morphosource.org/Detail/SpecimenDetail/Show/specimen_id/
27387.
C. totonacus:https://www.morphosource.org/Detail/SpecimenDetail/Show/specimen_
id/27391.
C. melipona:https://www.morphosource.org/Detail/SpecimenDetail/Show/specimen_
id/27394.
C. perotensis:https://www.morphosource.org/Detail/SpecimenDetail/Show/specimen_
id/27399.
C. casasi:https://www.morphosource.org/Detail/SpecimenDetail/Show/specimen_id/
27354.
C. ceronorum:https://www.morphosource.org/Detail/SpecimenDetail/Show/specimen_
id/27400.
New Species Registration
The following information was supplied regarding the registration of a newly described
species:
Publication LSID:
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B4B9DFF-E12B-430D-A541-BA0EBB9B90E6
Chiropterotriton casasi sp. nov. LSID:
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:248D1A23-66B7-4672-8AA3-44C4058D4F4F
Chiropterotriton ceronorum sp. nov. LSID:
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:5BE9F6D2-CACD-41F7-8E1C-09C5E0FE140A
Chiropterotriton melipona sp. nov. LSID:
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 67/71

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:ED19C47F-B804-4FFB-A004-A258625E3E25
Chiropterotriton perotensis sp. nov. LSID:
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:54AB015C-5CCD-46C7-B260-8BACA8D02C68
Chiropterotriton totonacus sp. nov. LSID:
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:831CB0EF-5D91-4DEC-A4B1-76714D9C21AD.
Supplemental Information
Supplemental information for this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/
peerj.8800#supplemental-information.
REFERENCES
Brodie ED Jr, Mendelson JR III, Campbell JA. 2002. Taxonomic revision of the Mexican
plethodontid salamanders of the genus Lineatriton, with the description of two new species.
Herpetologica 58(2):194–204 DOI 10.1655/0018-0831(2002)058[0194:TROTMP]2.0.CO;2.
Canseco-Marquez L, Parra-Olea G. 2003. A new species of Pseudoeurycea (Caudata:
Plethodontidae) from northern Oaxaca, Mexico. Herpetological Journal 13:21–26.
Canseco-Márquez L, Gutiérrez-Mayén G. 2005. New species of Pseudoeurycea (Caudata:
Plethodontidae) from the mountains of the Mixteca region of Oaxaca, Mexico.
Journal of Herpetology 39(2):181–186 DOI 10.1670/207-03A.
Campbell JA, Streicher JW, Cox CL, Brodie ED. 2014. A new salamander of the genus
Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae) from the Sierra Madre Oriental of Tamaulipas,
Mexico. South American Journal of Herpetology 9(3):228–235 DOI 10.2994/SAJH-D-14-00042.1.
Cope ED. 1863. On Trachycephalus,Scaphiopus and other Batrachia. Proceedings of the Academy of
Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 15:43–54.
Cope ED. 1865. Third contribution to the herpetology of tropical America. Proceedings of the
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 17:185–198.
Cope ED. 1869. A review of the species of Plethodontidae and Desmognathidae. Proceedings of the
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 21:93–118.
Darda D. 1994. Allozyme variation and morphological evolution among Mexican salamanders of
the genus Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae). Herpetologica 50:164–187.
Darda D, Wake DB. 2015. Osteological variation among extreme morphological forms in the
Mexican salamander genus Chiropterotriton (Amphibia: Plethodontidae): morphological
evolution and homoplasy. PLOS ONE 10(6):e0127248 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0127248.
Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space
complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5(1):1–19 DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113.
Frost D. 2019. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.0. Available at
http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/index.php.
Gadow H. 1905. The distribution of Mexican amphibians and reptiles. Proceedings of the Zoological
Society of London 1905:191–244.
García-Castillo MG, Rovito SM, Wake DB, Parra-Olea G. 2017. A new terrestrial species of
Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae) from central Mexico. Zootaxa 4363(4):489–505
DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.4363.4.2.
García-Castillo MG, Soto-Pozos ÁF, Aguilar-López JL, Pineda E, Parra-Olea G. 2018. Two new
species of Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae) from central Veracruz, Mexico.
Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 12(2):37–54.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 68/71

Hanken J, Wake DB. 1994. Five new species of minute salamanders, genus Thorius (Caudata:
Plethodontidae), from northern Oaxaca, Mexico. Copeia 1994(3):573–590 DOI 10.2307/1447174.
Hanken J, Wake DB. 1998. Biology of tiny animals: systematics of the minute salamanders
(Thorius: Plethodontidae) from Veracruz and Puebla, Mexico, with descriptions of five new
species. Copeia 1998(2):312–345 DOI 10.2307/1447427.
Hanken J, Wake DB. 2001. A seventh species of minute salamander (Thorius: Plethodontidae)
from the Sierra de Juárez, Oaxaca, México. Herpetologica 57:515–523.
Hanken J, Wake DB, Freeman HL. 1999. Three new species of minute salamanders (Thorius:
Plethodontidae) from Guerrero, Mexico, including the report of a novel dental polymorphism in
urodeles. Copeia 1999(4):917–931 DOI 10.2307/1447967.
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees.
Bioinformatics 17(8):754–755 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754.
IUCN. 2012. IUCN red list categories and criteria: Version 3.1. Second Edition. Gland and
Cambridge: IUCN, 32.
IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. 2016. Chiropterotriton lavae. The IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species 2016. e.T59226A53978402. Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.
2016-1.RLTS.T59226A53978402.en.
Köhler G. 2012. Color catalogue for field biologists. Offenbach: Herpeton.
Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S. 2012. PartitionFinder: combined selection of
partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and
Evolution 29(6):1695–1701 DOI 10.1093/molbev/mss020.
Liner EA, Casas-Andreu G. 2008. Standard Spanish, English and scientific names of the
amphibians and reptiles of Mexico. Herpetological Circular 38:1–162.
Lynch JF, Wake DB. 1989. Two new species of Pseudoeurycea (Amphibia: Caudata) from Oaxaca,
Mexico. Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County 411:11–22.
Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2018. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis.
Version 3.40. Available at http://mesquiteproject.org.
Maxson LR, Wake DB. 1981. Albumin evolution and its phylogenetic implications in the
plethodontid salamander genera Pseudoeurycea and Chiropterotriton.Herpetologica 37:109–117.
Meyer CP. 2003. Molecular systematics of cowries (Gastropoda: Cypraeidae) and diversification
patterns in the tropics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79(3):401–459
DOI 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00197.x.
Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of
large phylogenetic trees. In: Gateway Computing Environments Workshop, GCE 2010.
Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB. 1987. Two new species of plethodontid salamanders (genus Nototriton)
from Mexico. Acta Zoologica Mexicana 21:1–16.
Parra-Olea G, García-París M, Wake DB. 1999. Status of some populations of Mexican
salamanders (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). Revista de Biología Tropical 47:217–223.
Parra-Olea G, Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB. 2001. New species of lungless salamanders of the genus
Pseudoeurycea (Amphibia: Caudata: Plethodontidae) from Veracruz, Mexico. Scientific Papers
Natural History Museum, The University of Kansas 20:1–9.
Parra-Olea G, García-París M, Wake DB. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships among the
salamanders of the Bolitoglossa macrinii species group (Amphibia: Plethodontidae), with
descriptions of two new species from Oaxaca (Mexico). Journal of Herpetology 36(3):356–366
DOI 10.1670/0022-1511(2002)036[0356:PRATSO]2.0.CO;2.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 69/71

Parra-Olea G. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Chiropterotriton (Caudata:
Plethodontidae) based on 16S ribosomal mtDNA. Canadian Journal of Zoology
81(12):2048–2060 DOI 10.1139/z03-155.
Parra-Olea G, Canseco-Márquez L, García-París M. 2004. A morphologically distinct new species
of Pseudoeurycea (Caudata: Plethodontidae) from the Sierra Madre Oriental of Puebla, Mexico.
Herpetologica 60(4):478–484 DOI 10.1655/03-76.
Parra-Olea G, García-París M, Hanken J, Wake DB. 2004. A new species of arboreal salamander
(Caudata: Plethodontidae: Pseudoeurycea) from the mountains of Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of
Natural History 38(16):2119–2131 DOI 10.1080/00222930310001617724.
Parra-Olea G, García-París M, Hanken J, Wake DB. 2005a. Two new species of Pseudoeurycea
(Caudata: Plethodontidae) from the mountains of northern Oaxaca, Mexico. Copeia
2005(3):461–469 DOI 10.1643/CH-04-112R.
Parra-Olea G, García-París M, Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB. 2005b. Systematics of the Pseudoeurycea
bellii (Caudata: Plethodontidae) species complex. Herpetologica 61(2):145–158 DOI 10.1655/03-02.
Parra-Olea G, Wake D. 2008. Chiropterotriton orculus: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
2008. e.T59230A11903382. Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.
T59230A11903382.en.
Parra-Olea G, Wake D, Hanken J. 2008. Chiropterotriton chiropterus: The IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species. Version 2012.2.
Parra-Olea G, Rovito SM, Marquez-Valdelamar L, Cruz G, Murrieta-Galindo R, Wake DB.
2010. A new species of Pseudoeurycea from the cloud forest in Veracruz, México. Zootaxa
27:57–68.
Parra-Olea G, Rovito SM, García-París M, Maisano JA, Wake DB, Hanken J. 2016. Biology of
tiny animals: three new species of minute salamanders (Plethodontidae: Thorius) from Oaxaca,
Mexico. PeerJ 4:e2694 DOI 10.7717/peerj.2694.
Rabb GB. 1958. On certain Mexican salamanders of the plethodontid genus Chiropterotriton.
Occasional Papers Museum of Zoology University of Michigan 587:1–37.
Rabb GB. 1965. A new salamander of the genus Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae) from
Mexico. Breviora 235:1–8.
Raffaëlli J. 2007. Les Urodèles du Monde. Plumelec: Penclen Editions, 377.
Raffaëlli J. 2013. Les Urodèles du Monde: Deuxieme Edition. Plumelec: Penclen Editions, 473.
Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. 2018. Posterior summarisation in
Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67(5):901–904
DOI 10.1093/sysbio/syy032.
Rovito SM, Parra-Olea G, Vásquez-Almazán CR, Papenfuss TJ, Wake DB. 2009. Dramatic
declines in neotropical salamander populations are an important part of the global amphibian
crisis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
106(9):3231–3236 DOI 10.1073/pnas.0813051106.
Rovito SM, Parra-Olea G, Lee D, Wake DB. 2012. A new species of Bolitoglossa (Amphibia,
Caudata) from the Sierra de Juárez, Oaxaca, Mexico. ZooKeys 185:55–71
DOI 10.3897/zookeys.185.1146.
Rovito SM, Parra-Olea G. 2015. Two new species of Chiropterotriton (Caudata: Plethodontidae)
from northern Mexico. Zootaxa 4048(1):57–74 DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.4048.1.3.
Rovito SM, Parra-Olea G, Recuero E, Wake DB. 2015a. Diversification and biogeographical
history of Neotropical plethodontid salamanders. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
175(1):167–188 DOI 10.1111/zoj.12271.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 70/71

Rovito SM, Vásquez-Almazán CR, Papenfuss TJ, Parra-Olea G, Wake DB. 2015b. Biogeography
and evolution of Central American cloud forest salamanders (Caudata: Plethodontidae:
Cryptotriton), with the description of a new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
175(1):150–166 DOI 10.1111/zoj.12268.
Sandoval-Comte A, Pineda E, Rovito SM, Luría-Manzano R. 2017. A new species of Isthmura
(Caudata: Plethodontidae) from the montane cloud forest of central Veracruz, Mexico. Zootaxa
4277(4):573–582 DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.4.7.
Sessions SK, Kezer J. 1991. Evolutionary cytogenetics of bolitoglossine salamanders (Family
Plethodontidae). In: Green DM, Sessions SK, eds. Amphibian Cytogenetics and Evolution.
San Diego: Academic Press, 89–130.
Smith HM, Taylor EH. 1948. An annotated checklist and key to the Amphibia of Mexico.
Science Bulletin of the United States National Museum 18:38–46.
Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large
phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313 DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.
Taylor EH. 1942. New Caudata and Salientia from México. University of Kansas Science Bulletin
28:295–323.
Taylor EH. 1944. The genera of plethodont salamanders in Mexico. University of Kansas Science
Bulletin 30:189–232 DOI 10.5962/bhl.part.6508.
Taylor EH, Smith HM. 1945. Summary of the collections of amphibians made in México under the
Walter Rathbone Bacon traveling scholarship. Proceedings of the United States National Museum
95(3185):521–613 DOI 10.5479/si.00963801.95-3185.521.
Wake DB. 1963. Comparative osteology of the plethodontid salamander genus Aneides.Journal of
Morphology 113:77–118.
Wake DB, Lynch J. 1976. The distribution, ecology, and evolutionary history of plethodontid
salamanders in tropical America. Bulletin Natural History Museum Los Angeles County 25:1–65.
Wake DB. 1987. Adaptive radiation of salamanders in Middle American cloud forests.
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74(2):242–264 DOI 10.2307/2399397.
Wake DB, Papenfuss TJ, Lynch JF. 1992. Distribution of salamanders along elevational transects
in Mexico and Guatemala. Tulane Studies in Zoology and Botany 1:303–319.
Zhang P, Papenfuss TJ, Wake MH, Qu L, Wake DB. 2008. Phylogeny and biogeography of the
family Salamandridae (Amphibia: Caudata) inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49(2):586–597 DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.08.020.
Parra Olea et al. (2020), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.8800 71/71