PreprintPDF Available
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Abstract

The term “conversion therapy” is most widely used to describe practices attempting to change, suppress, or divert one’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Such practices are also called: reorientation therapy, reparative therapy, sexual orientation change efforts, ex-gay/ex-trans therapy, gay cure therapy, or more recently, support for unwanted same-sex attraction or transgender identities. To discover global prevalence of both conversion therapy and various methods of practicing attempted therapy a survey was distributed online. The survey was developed by combining existing measurement tools with newly designed questions to gauge experiences with conversion therapy. The survey consisted of a series of 44 questions covering a range of topics, including personal experience with conversion therapy, types of therapy experienced, long-term impacts, mental health, human rights, faith, and others. The survey was provided in several languages, including English, Arabic, Traditional and Simplified Chinese, and others. Any Hornet user was able to voluntarily participate in the survey. 8092 individuals from over 100 countries participated in the survey, ranging in age from under 18 to 85+. 8092 individuals from over 100 countries participated in the survey, ranging in age from under 18 to 85+. Of the 5820 individuals who responded to the question “Does conversion therapy happen in your country?”, 1851 participants responded “yes,” that they were aware conversion therapy occurs in the country where they live, and 1227 (21.08%) and 1263 (21.70%) responding that they were unsure or maybe, respectively. 1627 (20.09%) of respondents indicated that either they or someone they know (family member, friend, etc.) have been in conversion therapy. The majority of practitioners who led conversion therapy were mental health providers, followed by religious authorities or their associates. These findings with a large global sample reveal that the practice of conversion therapy continues to be utilized around the world despite broad consensus on its harmful effects and lack of scientific justification.
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/9ew78
!
The Global State of Conversion Therapy - A Preliminary Report
and Current Evidence Brief
!
!
! 2
This brief draws on data collected from a collaborative effort between the LGBT
Foundation and Hornet Gay Social Network to conduct a rapid survey of a global, non-
representative sample of LGBTQ+ individuals regarding their exposure to conversion
therapy.
What is so-called “conversion therapy”?
The term “conversion therapy” is most widely used to describe practices attempting to
change, suppress, or divert one’s sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender
expression. Such practices are also called: reorientation therapy, reparative therapy,
sexual orientaion change efforts, ex-gay/ex-trans therapy, gay cure therapy, or more
recently, support for unwanted same-sex attraction or transgender identities.
Throughout history, members of the LGBTQ+ community have been subjected to efforts
to convert or change their identities, either forcefully or by coerced choice . In the US
1
alone, 19 states and numerous local jursidictions have implemented bans on conversion
therapy for minors, and it is estimated that almost 700,000 LGBTQ+ adults have
experienced some form of conversion therapy. More than 75,000 youth (ages 13-17) will
receive some form of conversion therapy before the age of 18 . Countless professional
2
associations and multinational organizations the American Medical Association
(AMA) , American Psychological Association (APA) , and the Pan American Health
3 4
Organization (PAHO)/World Health Organization (WHO) have publicly announced
5
opposition to the practice, as it lacks medical and scientific justification, and have
condemned its use around the world. Additionally, 24 countries have taken steps
towards limiting the use of this intervention, from complete bans to those that only
prohibit the practice for minors. But to date, no analysis has looked at the burden of
conversion therapy globally.
The term conversion “therapy” is itself a misnomer, given that this practice has been
shown to have negative long-term health impacts. The practice aims to “convert” the
patient from what is seen to be their homosexual lifestyle, and to eventually have them
Murphy, T. F. (1991). The ethics of conversion therapy. Bioethics, 5(2), 123-138.
1
Christy Mallory, Taylor Brown & Kerith Conron, The Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law, UCLA
2
School of Law, Conversion therapy and LGBT youth (Jan. 2018)
American Medical Association, “LGBTQ Change Efforts (so-called “conversion therapy”) https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/
3
2019-12/conversion-therapy-issue-brief.pdf
American Psychological Association. (2009). APA task force on appropriate therapeutic responses to sexual orientation. Report of
4
the Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation, 1-130
Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) (2012) Cures for An Illness that Does Not Exist https://www.paho.org/hq/
5
dmdocuments/2012/Conversion-Therapies-EN.pdf
! 3
pursue a heterosexual, cis-gender identity that adheres to existing social norms and
expectations. Broadly speaking, conversion therapy falls into four distinct categories:
psychotherapuetic, medical, faith-based, and punitive. Practitioners who employ these
approaches range from professional counselors and medical providers with public or
private practices, to religious organizations, parents, school personnel, and even
government agents (police, military, etc.). Numerous studies have found associations
between experiences of conversion therapy and depression , suicidality (Ryan et al
6 7
2018), and other health outcomes (APA 2009). The persistence of these practices
8
remains a stain on the world’s progress toward full equality for LGBTQ+ individuals and
serves to undermine future efforts on this front.
To better combat the practice of conversion therapy, it is first necessary to understand
its scope, geography, and methods.
What is the Status of Conversion Therapy Globally?
A survey was developed and integrated into the online social networking platform
Hornet, and users were prompted to voluntarily participate in a series of questions
regarding numerous topics. The survey was developed by combining existing
measurement tools with newly designed questions to gauge experiences with
conversion therapy. The survey consisted of a series of 44 questions covering a range
of topics, including personal experience with conversion therapy, types of therapy
experienced, long-term impacts, mental health, human rights, faith, and others. The
survey was provided in several languages, including English, Arabic, Traditional and
Simplified Chinese, and others. The survey was made available beginning on April 8,
2020. Any Hornet user was able to voluntarily participate in the survey. !
!
8092 individuals from over 100 countries participated in the survey, ranging in age from
under 18 to 85+. Of the 5820 individuals who responded to the question “Does
conversion therapy happen in your country?”, 1851 participants responded “yes,” that
they were aware conversion therapy occurs in the country where they live, and 1227
(21.08%) and 1263 (21.70%) responding that they were unsure or maybe, respectively.
1627 (20.09%) of respondents indicated that either they or someone they know (family
Ariel Shidlo & Michael Schroeder, Changing Sexual Orientation: A Consumers’ Report, 33 Professional Psychology: Research and
6
Practice 3, 249-59 (2002).
Ryan, C., Toomey, R. B., Diaz, R. M., & Russell, S. T. (2018). Parent-initiated sexual orientation change efforts with LGBT
7
adolescents: Implications for young adult mental health and adjustment. Journal of Homosexuality, DOI:
10.1080/00918369.2018.1538407.
American Psychological Association, supra note 3
8
! 4
member, friend, etc.) have been in conversion therapy. Additional preliminary findings
broken down by topic are included below.
The Practice of Conversion Therapy
Participants report being exposed to a wide array of practices related to conversion
therapy. The breadth of these practices aligns with the previously mentioned
classifications: psychotherapeutic, medical, faith-based, and punitive. Using existing
information about conversion therapy, 28 options were provided in the survey, but since
fourteen individuals who had responded that conversion therapy existed in their country
specified “none of these,” these options may not have been exhaustive in nature.
Perpetrators
The majority of practitioners who led conversion therapy were mental health providers,
followed by religious authorities or their associates. Perhaps most concerning were the
~5% of respondents who indicated that government agents employed these harmful
! 5
techniques. Additionally, 4% of reports involved school personnel, which may put
LGBTQ+ youth at further risk.
Motivation to Seek
Conversion Therapy
Nearly a quarter of
respondents expressed
that they had sought out
conversion therapy on
their own, while the rest
responded that the
decision was largely
outside of their control or
made on their behalf by
their school, family, or
employer. The results for
these questions reflect
patterns similar to those
in the previous section.
This survey did not,
however, ask further
questions regarding
coercion or forced
participation, but given
that there were reports of
punitive measures taken,
it is important to consider
this possibility.
! 6
The Lasting Impact of Conversion Therapy
In addition to the major multilateral organizations that have put forward statements and
recommendations regarding the practice of conversion therapy, countless professional
medical and mental health organizations have denounced the practice. These
resounding condemnations are due to the lack of medical justification for conversion
therapy, the discrimination and pervasive societal bias that such practices perpetuate,
and the vulnerability to long-term, negative health impacts such as depression, anxiety,
substance use disorder, homelessness, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress disorder,
and others. Minors are particularly susceptible, given their developing sense of self and
vulnerability to coercion from family, peers, or other authority figures. This survey sought
to collect additional quantitative data on a wide range of impacts resulting from
conversion therapy.
Discussion
!
Participants reported being subjected to a range of different conversion therapy
practices, all of which fall under the outlined categories (psychotherapuetic, medical,
religious, and punitive). They also reported an array of practitioners who provided the
therapy. Of particular concern, the indication that government actors are taking an
active role in perpetuating this harmful practice may warrant further investigation. Long-
term health impacts reported by individuals included suicidality, anger, depression,
! 7
unwanted memories, and avoiding reminders of conversion therapy. !
Some limitations of this first
investigative effort to better
understand the global extent
of conversion therapy include
that this initial survey was only
offered in a few languages,
thus participation was limited
to those who know those
languages. Using an
application-based survey
disproportionately selects for
those who have access to the
resources necessary to use
the application, such as a
cellphone or computer,
internet or network, and
others. Furthermore, given
that there are areas of the
world that actively limit,
monitor, or censor the use of
the internet, access to digital
applications may be restricted.
Lastly, individuals who are not
“out” may choose to avoid
using such applications out of
fear for their safety, among
other reasons.
These findings with a large
! 8
global sample reveal that the practice of conversion therapy continues to be utilized
around the world despite broad consensus on its harmful effects and lack of scientific
justification. The results underscore the necessity for continued data collection to better
understand the scope, geography, and methods of conversion therapy practices.
!
Authors:!
Tyler Adamson
Sarah Wallach, Johns Hopkins University
Alex Garner, Senior Health Innovation Strategist, Hornet
Marguerite Hanley, Program Director, Tech4HIV!
Sean Howell, CEO, LGBT Foundation
!
Special thanks: !
Stef Baral, Chris Beyrer
https://lgbt-token.org/conversion-therapy-research-torture-study/
! 9
Appendix:
Region
Yes
No
Maybe
Unsure
Tot a l
All
1708
1395
1206
1186
5495
Europe
305
524
271
341
1441
LATAM
362
144
193
126
825
Asia
832
649
687
622
2790
N.America
172
37
38
62
309
Africa
37
41
17
35
130
What occurred during your experience of conversion therapy?
n (%)
TempoT Talk therapy or
psychoanalysis
113
(12.99%)
23
(2.64%
)
Excessive exercise
31
(3.56%)
46
(5.29%
)
! 10
Hypnosis
32
(3.68%)
27
(3.10%
)
Electric Shock
22
(2.53%)
33
(3.79%
)
Praying and bible study
44
(5.06%)
17
(1.95%
)
Use of drugs, medications, or
hormones
28
(3.22%)
25
(2.87%
)
Surgery (ex: castration, transplant,
etc.)
16
(1.84%)
21
(2.41%
)
Other medical procedures
19
(2.18%)
42
(4.83%
)
Heterosexual sex therapy
28
(3.22%)
24
(2.76%
)
Heterosexual conditioning (ex:
watching heterosexual porn, going to
strip clubs, etc)
23
(2.64%)
22
(2.53%
)
Exorcism
26
(2.99%)
13
(1.49%
)
Same-sex bonding
37
(4.25%)
22
(2.53%
)
Participating in traditionally gender-
specific activities (ex:sports, hunting,
cooking, playing with dolls, etc.)
55 (6.32)
23
(2.64%
)
Fasting
44
(5.06%)
14
(1.61%
)
Who provided or led the conversion therapy?
n (%)
TempoT Public mental health
provider
227
(13.83%)
96
(5.85%
)
! 11
Private mental health provider
309
(18.83%)
120
(7.31%
)
Religious authority or who acted on
their behalf
230
(14.02%)
73
(4.45%
)
Traditional Healer
80
(4.88%)
61
(3.72%
)
Conversion therapy camp
78
(4.75%)
72
(4.39%
)
Unsure
121
(7.37%)
114
(6.95%
)
None of these
60
(3.66%)
If you or someone you know has experience with conversion therapy, why did you/
they enter conversion therapy?
n (%)
It was a result of family pressure
325
(21.97%
)
It was their school’s decision
74
(5.0%)
It was a result of community (ex:
neighbors, friends) pressure
163
(11.01%
)
It was recommended by a
mental health or medical
professional
143
(9.66%
)
It was my/their own decision
391
(26.42%
)
It was the government’s decision
60
(4.05%
)
It was their religious leader or religious
community’s decision or
recommendation
176
(11.89%
)
None of these
95
(6.42%
)
It was their employer’s decision
53
(3.58%)
Because of your experience of conversion therapy, have you experienced any of the
following?
n
! 12
TempoT Temporary physical harm
42
Intrusive imagery
30
Permanent physical harm
17
Suicidal thoughts
42
Anger
48
Suicidal attempt(s)
27
Depression
56
Self-hatred
39
Anxiety
59
Helplessness
39
Confusion
54
Shame
57
Guilt
51
Loss of familial relationships
29
Grief
22
Flashbacks
25
Hopelessness
33
Loss of housing
19
Loss of faith
33
Loss of friendships
28
Poor self-esteem
44
Drug and/or substance use
18
Social isolation
40
Loss of employment
19
Difficulties with intimacy
41
None of these
28
In the past month, how
much were you bothered
by:
Not at all
A lit tle bit
Moderatel
y
Quite a bit
Extremel
y
Repeated, disturbing, and
unwanted memories of the
conversion therapy
78 (47.85%)
45
(27.61%)
23
(14.11%)
8 (4.91%)
9 (5.52%)
Repeated, disturbing
dreams of the conversion
therapy
87 (58.78%)
32
(21.62%)
18
(12.16%)
6 (4.05%)
5 (3.38%)
Suddenly feeling or acting
as if the conversion
therapy were actually
happening again (as if you
were actually back there
reliving it)
75 (52.82%)
33
(23.24%)
22
(15.49%)
10 (7.04%)
2 (1.41%)
Feeling very upset when
something reminded you
of the conversion therapy?
60 (43.48%)
42
(30.43%)
20
(14.49%)
12 (8.70%)
4 (2.90%)
! 13
Having strong physical
reactions when something
reminded you of the
conversion therapy (ex:
heart pounding, trouble
breathing, sweating, etc.)?
67 (50.38%)
36
(27.07%)
19
(14.29%)
2 (1.50%)
9 (6.77%)
Avoiding memories,
thoughts, or feelings
related to the conversion
therapy?
58 (43.28%)
33
(24.63%)
21
(15.67%)
11 (8.21%)
11
(8.21%)
Avoiding external
reminders of the
conversion therapy (ex:
people, places,
conversations, activities,
objects, or situations)?
58 (45.67%)
35
(27.56%)
12
(9.45%)
9 (7.09%)
13
(10.24%)
Trouble remembering
important parts of the
conversion therapy?
66 (50.77%)
28
(21.54%)
17
(13.08%)
10 (7.69%)
9 (6.92%)
Having strong negative
beliefs about yourself,
other people, or the world
(ex: having thoughts such
as - I am bad, there is
something seriously wrong
with me, no one can be
trusted, the world is
completely dangerous)?
47 (36.43%)
40
(31.01%)
18
(13.95%)
14
(10.85%)
10
(7.75%)
Blaming yourself or
someone else for the
conversion therapy or what
happened after it?
54 (42.19%)
33
(25.78%)
20
(15.63%)
13
(10.16%)
8
(6.251%)
Having strong negative
feelings such as fear,
horror, anger, guilt, or
shame?
47 (37.60%)
33
(26.40%)
21
(16.80%)
15 (12.0%)
9 (7.20%)
Loss of interest in activities
you used to enjoy?
44 (36.07%)
36
(29.51%)
19
(15.57%)
8 (6.56%)
15
(12.30%)
Feeling distant or cut off
from other people?
37 (30.58%)
32
(26.45%)
23
(19.01%)
14 (11.57%)
15
(12.40%)
Trouble experiencing
positive feelings (ex: being
unable to feel happiness or
have loving feelings for
people close to you)?
43 (36.13%)
29
(24.37%)
24
(20.17%)
15
(12.61%)
8 (6.72%)
! 14
Irritable behavior, angry
outbursts, or acting
aggressively?
35 (29.91%)
42
(35.90%)
19
(16.24%)
11 (9.40%)
20
(8.55%)
Taking too many risks or
doing things that could
cause you harm?
46 (39.66%)
30
(25.86%)
19
(16.38%)
13 (11.21%)
8 (6.90%)
Being "super alert" or
watchful or on guard?
33 (28.70%)
36
(31.30%)
17
(14.78%)
14
(12.17%)
15
(13.04%)
Feeling jumpy or easily
startled?
41 (35.65%)
33
(28.70%)
18
(15.65%)
14
(12.17%)
9 (7.83%)
Having difficulty
concentrating?
28 (24.35%)
38
(33.04%)
17
(14.78%)
16
(13.91%)
16
(13.91%)
Trouble falling or staying
asleep?
33 (28.45%)
37
(31.90%)
16
(13.79%)
12
(10.34%)
18
(15.52%)
... 3 CTPs are performed by licensed health care providers (e.g., psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychotherapists) and unlicensed practitioners. 6 They have also been performed by ex-gay ministries (e.g., EXODUS) and religious leaders (e.g., pastoral counsellors). 7 CTP attempts may also involve parents, government agencies, and school personnel. ...
... 7 CTP attempts may also involve parents, government agencies, and school personnel. 6 They may be performed one-on-one in an office or in groups at retreats or conferences. 4 Providers may perform CTPs for money or for free. ...
... 4 CTPs can include the use of aversive stimuli, individual talk therapy, participation in activities that are typically gendered by social norms and processes (e.g., sports, hunting, fishing, cooking, playing with dolls, etc.), forced sex, and praying and bible study. 6 The harms of conversion therapy There is no credible scientific research that proves CTPs are psychologically safe or effective. 8 Many medical and human rights associations (e.g., World Health Organization, Canadian Psychological Association, Canadian Psychiatric Association, American Medical Association, American Psychological Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Amnesty International) have denounced and discredited the effectiveness of CTPs. ...
Article
Background: Conversion therapy practices (CTPs) are discredited efforts that target lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, Two-Spirit, or other (LGBTQ2S+) people and seek to change, deny, or discourage their sexual orientation, gender identity, and/or gender expression. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of CTPs across Canadian provinces and territories and identify whether CTP bans reduce the prevalence of CTPs. Methods: We collected 119 CTPs from 31 adults (18+) in Canada who have direct experience with CTPs, know people who have gone to CTPs, or know of conversion therapy practitioners using a 2020 anonymous online survey. Mapping analysis was conducted using ArcGIS Online. CTP prevalence was compared between provinces/territories with and without bans using chi-square tests. Results: Three provinces and eleven municipalities had CTP bans. The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories with bans was 2.34 per 1,000,000 population (95% CI 1.65, 3.31). The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories without bans was 4.13 per 1,000,000 population (95% CI 3.32, 5.14). Accounting for the underlying population, provinces/territories with the highest prevalence of CTPs per 1,000,000 population were New Brunswick (6.69), Nova Scotia (6.50), and Saskatchewan (6.37). Conclusions: Findings suggest only 55% of Canadians were protected under CTP bans. The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories without bans was 1.76 times greater than provinces/territories with bans. CTPs are occurring in most provinces/territories, with higher prevalence in the west and the Atlantic. These findings and continued efforts to monitor CTP prevalence can help inform policymakers and legislators as society is increasingly acknowledging CTPs as a threat to the health and well-being of LGBTQ2S+ people.
... 3 CTPs are performed by licensed health care providers (e.g., psychologists, psychiatrists, and psychotherapists) and unlicensed practitioners. 6 It has also been performed by ex-gay ministries (e.g., EXODUS) and religious leaders (e.g., pastoral counsellors). 7 CTP attempts may also involve parents, government agencies, and school personnel. ...
... 7 CTP attempts may also involve parents, government agencies, and school personnel. 6 It may be performed one-on-one in an office or in groups at retreats or conferences. 4 Providers may perform CTPs for money or for free. ...
... 4 CTPs can include the use of aversive stimuli, individual talk therapy, participation in activities that are typically gendered by social norms and processes (e.g., sports, hunting, fishing, cooking, playing with dolls, etc.), forced sex, and praying and bible study. 6 The harms of conversion therapy There is no credible scientific research that proves CTPs are psychologically safe or effective. 8 Many medical and human rights associations (e.g., World Health Organization, Canadian Psychological Association, Canadian Psychiatric Association, American Medical Association, American Psychological Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Amnesty International) have denounced and discredited the effectiveness of CTPs. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Conversion therapy practices (CTPs) are discredited efforts that target lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, Two-Spirit, or other (LGBTQ2S+) people and seek to change, deny, or discourage their sexual orientation, gender identity, and/or gender expression. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of CTPs across Canadian provinces and territories and identify whether CTP bans reduce the prevalence of CTPs. Methods: We collected 119 CTPs from 31 adults (18+) in Canada who have direct experience with CTPs, know people who have gone to CTPs, or know of conversion therapy practitioners using a 2020 anonymous online survey. Mapping analysis was conducted using ArcGIS Online. CTP prevalence was compared between provinces/territories with and without bans using chi-square tests. Results: Three provinces and eleven municipalities had CTP bans. The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories with bans was 2.34 per 1,000,000 population (95% CI 1.65, 3.31). The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories without bans was 4.13 per 1,000,000 population (95% CI 3.32, 5.14). Accounting for the underlying population, provinces/territories with the highest prevalence of CTPs per 1,000,000 population were New Brunswick (6.69), Nova Scotia (6.50), and Saskatchewan (6.37). Conclusions: Findings suggest only 55% of Canadians were protected under CTP bans. The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories without bans was 1.76 times greater than provinces/territories with bans. CTPs are occurring in most provinces/territories, with higher prevalence in the west and the Atlantic. These findings and continued efforts to monitor CTP prevalence can help inform policymakers and legislators as society is increasingly acknowledging CTPs as a threat to the health and well-being of LGBTQ2S+ people.
... xvii, 2), and, in the case of behavior therapists specifically, developing cruel and inhumane so-called "treatments" to "cure" clients of their same-gender attraction (e.g., Barlow et al., 1972;Feldman & MacCulloch, 1971). Despite most reputable professional associations discrediting them (including the Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies; ABCT, 2022), these sexual orientation change practices continue to torment sexual minorities across the world today (Adamson et al., 2020;Higbee et al., 2022). ...
... These formal practices are often the focus of media discussions surrounding conversion practices and are rooted in an historical legacy of viewing sexual minority identities and same-sex behaviors as pathologies. However, these formal conversion practices are becoming less prevalent, particularly in the context of formal practices targeting a person's sexual orientation (Adamson et al., 2020). This is likely because they are increasingly viewed as socially unacceptable and are subject to legal and ethical regulation. ...
Chapter
Sexuality and gender identity are crucial aspects of human personal identity and experience. Both significantly affect the individual self-perception, any personal belief, thinking, social being, and connections with the family and community. Sexual variations (e.g., LGBTQIA+: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual) are common expressions of sexuality beyond the binary model based on the heteronormative conception. Also, gender identity may be not aligned with the sex assigned at birth (biological) and this may lead to specific health needs among persons requiring an affirmative trail of their own gender identity. Non-binary expressions of gender and sexuality are often associated with variable social stigma and oppression with consequent psychosocial distress and mental health issues (including depression, anxiety, adjustment disorders, eating disorders, substance abuse as well as non-suicidal self-injury) for variants people experiencing minority stress. Minority stress may include any experienced childhood adverse event, non-acceptance in the family, school, peers-group, and workplaces. Clinicians and psychiatrists need to consider these specific health and mental health needs as well as psychotherapies should be focused on affirmative approaches. In addition, educational interventions aimed at contrasting social and cultural oppression should be encouraged in order to reduce the impact of minority stress on LGBTQIA+ people and their psychological burden.
Article
Full-text available
This article first describes the mechanism of any self-fulfilling prophecy through discussion of its four conditions: credibility, employment, employment sensitivity, and realization. Each condition is illustrated with examples specific to the medical context. The descriptive account ends with the definition of self-fulfilling prophecy and an expansion on collective self-fulfilling prophecies. Second, the normative account then discusses the moral relevance of self-fulfilling prophecies in medicine. A self-fulfilling prophecy is typically considered problematic when the prediction itself changes the predicted outcome to match the prediction (transformative self-fulfillment). I argue that also self-fulfilling prophecies that do not change the outcome but change the ways in which the outcome was realized (operative self-fulfillment), have significant ethical and epistemic ramifications. Because it is difficult to distinguish, retrospectively, between a transformative and an operative self-fulfilling prophecy, and thus between a false or true positive, it becomes equally difficult to catch mistakes. Moreover, since the prediction necessarily turns out true, there is never an error signal warning that a mistake might have been made. On the contrary, accuracy is seen as the standard for quality assurance. As such, self-fulfilling prophecies inhibit our ability to learn, inviting repetition and exacerbation of mistakes. With the rise of automated diagnostic and prognostic procedures and the increased use of machine learning and artificial intelligence for the development of predictive algorithms, attention to self-fulfilling feedback loops is especially warranted. This account of self-fulfilling prophecies is practically relevant for medical research and clinical practice. With it, researchers and practitioners can detect and analyze potential self-fulfilling mechanisms in any medical case and take responsibility for their ethical and epistemic implications.
Article
Sexual Orientation Change Efforts (SOCE) have been reported worldwide and have adverse psychiatric consequences. However, no data are available for India or Kerala. We assessed the prevalence of SOCE, its characteristics, and mental health aspects among LGBT+ individuals in Kerala. This cross-sectional survey used snowball sampling. An online questionnaire collected sociodemographic information and history and characteristics of SOCE. Religiosity and SOCE-associated distress were evaluated using 6-point Likert scales. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) screened for depressive symptoms; its ninth question assessed death wishes and self-harm thoughts. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7) screened for anxiety symptoms. Participants' (n = 130) mean age was 26.80 ± 7.12 years. Most common biological sex (63.1%) and gender identity (50.8%) were male, and sexual orientation was gay(42.3%). Prevalence of SOCE was 45.4%. In SOCE group, 39% reported very severe distress. SOCE was most commonly self-prompted (47.5%), performed through psychotherapy (28.8%), and performed by doctors (28.8%). SOCE group had significantly higher religiosity scores (t = 2.61, p = .01). Among cisgender men, 48.48% had SOCE history, against 28.57% among cisgender women (χ2 = 3.19, p = .07). SOCE is highly prevalent among the LGBT+ community in Kerala, with high associated distress. Multi-level approaches are necessary to mitigate this problem.
Preprint
Full-text available
Conversion therapy practices (CTPs) are discredited efforts that target lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer, Two-Spirit, or other (LGBTQ2S+) people and seek to change, deny, or discourage their sexual orientation, gender identity, and/or gender expression. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of CTPs across Canadian provinces and territories and identify whether CTP bans are associated with decreasing prevalence. We analyzed 119 CTPs reported from 31 adults (18+) in Canada who have direct experience with CTPs, know people who have gone to CTPs, or know of conversion therapy practitioners by using a 2020 anonymous online survey. Mapping analysis was conducted using ArcGIS Online. CTP prevalence was compared between provinces/territories with and without bans using chi-square tests. We found 3 provinces and 11 municipalities had CTP bans. The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories with a ban is 2.34 per 1,000,000 population (95% CI 1.65, 3.31). The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories without a ban is 4.13 per 1,000,000 population (95% CI 3.32, 5.14). Accounting for the underlying population, provinces/territories with the highest prevalence of CTPs are New Brunswick (6.69), Nova Scotia (6.50), and Saskatchewan (6.37). Findings suggest only 55% of Canadians are protected under CTP bans. The prevalence of CTPs in provinces/territories without a ban is 1.76 times greater than in provinces/territories with a ban. CTPs are occurring in most provinces/territories, with higher prevalence in the west and the Atlantic. Findings will help inform policymakers and legislators as they are increasingly acknowledging CTPs as a threat to the health and well-being of LGBTQ2S+ people.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.