Available via license: CC BY
Content may be subject to copyright.
201
© Jikia M., Demetrashvili S., 2020
МІЖНАРОДНЕ ПРАВО
Jikia Mariam,
Doctor of Law, Professor,
Head of Quality Assurance Department,
Faculty of Law and International Relations,
Georgian Technical University,
Georgia, Tbilisi
е-mail: mariamjiqia@gmail.com
ORCID 0000-0001-7810-4780
Jikia M., Demetrashvili S. © Jikia M., Demetrashvili
S., 2020
Demetrashvili Sophio,
Doctor of Law,
Associate Professor of Public Law Department,
Faculty of Law and International Relations,
Georgian Technical University,
Georgia, Tbilisi
е-mail: s.demetrashvili92@gmail.com
ORCID 000-0002-3675-5769
doi: 10.21564/2414-990x.148.198106
UDC 342.565.2
PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION
OF MINORITIES IN ROMANIA –
CURRENT CHALLENGES
Presented article is prepared within the Research Project “Law of Political Parties” held by the
faculty of Law and International Relations of Georgian Technical University. Тhe purpose of the article
is to analyze the main mechanisms that guarantees the parliamentary representation of national and
ethnic minorities in Romania. Authors review in detail the correlation of concept of equality principle and
positive discrimination in regard with national and ethnic minorities. Clear distinction is given between
Hungarian minority, as a successfully political movement and all other minorities, which were able to
gain mandates only through positive discrimination. In conclusion authors underline some advantages of
МІЖНАРОДНЕ ПРАВО
ISSN 2414-990X. Проблеми законності. 2020. Вип. 148
202
Romanian electoral system, but also refer to weaknesses, which should be eliminated and suggest some
recommendations for possible improvements.
Keywords: Parliamentary Representation; Minority Elections; Political Rights; Romania.
Джикія Маріам, доктор юридичних наук, професор, начальник відділу контролю якості,
факультет права і міжнародних відносин, Грузинський технічний університет, Грузія, м. Тбілісі.
e-mail: mariamjiqia@ciu.edu.ge , marijiqia@gmail.com ; ORCID 0000-0001-7810-4780;
Деметрашвілі Софіо, доктор юридичних наук, доцент кафедри публічного права, факуль-
тет права і міжнародних відносин, Грузинський технічний університет, Грузія, м. Тбілісі.
e-mail: s.demetrashvili92@gmail.com ; ORCID 0000-0002-3675-5769
Представництво меншин у румунському парламенті: поточні проблеми
Статтю підготовлено в рамках дослідницького проєкту «Право політичних партій», який
реалізується факультетом права і міжнародних відносин Грузинського технічного університету.
Основною метою публікації є аналіз механізмів, що гарантують представництво національних і
етнічних меншин у парламенті Румунії. Докладно розглянуто співвідношення концепції рівності
і позитивної дискримінації по відношенню до національних та етнічних меншин. Чітке розмежу-
вання проводиться між угорською меншиною як успішним політичним рухом і всіма іншими мен-
шинами, які змогли отримати мандати тільки завдяки позитивній дискримінації. Зазначено певні
переваги румунської виборчої системи, а також окреслено недоліки, які потребують усунення.
Сформульовано рекомендації, спрямовані на поліпшення цієї системи.
Ключові слова: вибори; представництво в парламенті; політичні права меншин; Румунія.
1. Introduction
Since national and local representation of diverse groups and their interests in
a country is the key feature of modern democracy, free and fair elections is the main
means of implementation of abovementioned. Though free and fair elections not
always guarantee that the interests of all groups will be taken into consideration.
The consideration of national, ethnic, and religious minorities is especially
important in the regions, where the main reason of conflict was abovementioned
grounds; it’s important to minimize undesirable consequences for peaceful
co-existence.
Minority issues are political ones and they require political solutions. Minority
groups can never form majority in central government unless the good-will, self-
interest and moral responsibility of the states. The importance of the participation
of minorities in public life has been highlighted by many international organizations
through legally binding treaties [6, р. 6].
Presented article aims to analyze the parliamentary representation of national
and ethnic minorities in Romania, in particular whether Romanian system is an
effective one for the representation of minority interests and can we spread the same
model for other Central and East European Countries.
2. The principle of equality
The principle of equality in elections is one of the manifestations of the political
equality of citizens, the guarantees of which are the equal expression of votes, equal
electoral powers and equal opportunities [1, р. 146].
203
Jikia M., Demetrashvili S. Parliamentary representation of minorities in Romania – current challenges
ISSN 2414-990X. Problems of legality. 2020. Issue 148
Equal representation means that all voters have an equal number of electoral
votes, which in turn means the exclusion of a plurality of votes. But this principle,
primarily serves the idea “one voter – one vote”.
Electoral districts can be single-mandate and multi-mandate. In single-mandate
districts only one candidate is elected, and in the multi-mandate districts – several.
With the exception of the two types of districts mentioned above, in some
exceptional cases we have a single constituency system (the Netherlands) and a
mixed constituency system (Japan) [2, р. 46].
The principle of equality is linked to a “plurality”, which implies several vote
for one citizen. Similar practices exist in local government elections in Australia and
New Zealand. It means, that a concrete segment of the population, in particular large
property owners, has several votes, which is quite controversial to the principle of
democracy [2, р. 48].
Equal powers can exist only if the boundaries of the districts are determined by
the same criteria, namely by the total number of voters.
All candidates and parties participating in the elections must be guaranteed
equal opportunities by the state [1, р. 147].
Equal opportunities in different states can be interpreted differently, in particular
rigid and proportional equality.
In strict equal opportunities, all candidates or parties are equally supported
by the state, no matter how many representatives they have in parliament and
how many supporters they have. In the case of proportional equal opportunities,
however, specific circumstances warrant differentiated assistance (representation in
parliament, number of electorate) [3, р. 447].
State support includes funding, the use of mass media, the creation of conditions
appropriate to the election campaign, and etc. [1, р. 147].
With regard to the principle of equality, the quotas provided in the laws of a
number of countries that grant privileges to national and ethnic minorities are very
interesting.
In 1990, representatives of the Turkish minority organization in Bulgaria gained
9 % proportional mandates; In 2002, the Albanian representation in the Macedonian
Parliament was 26 out of 120 MPs. According to the constitution of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Muslims, Serbs and Croats should be proportionally represented in
the representative body [4, р. 61].
In some countries where ethnic minority parties are prohibited, minority
groups are elected only within the political parties, which is the only way to gain a
parliamentary mandate (Turkey) [4, р. 61].
3. Electoral System and Legal Framework in Romania
The Romanian Parliament is composed of two chambers – a lower chamber
(the House of Deputies) and an upper chamber (the Senate). Both chambers of
Parliament are directly elected through a system of pure proportional representation.
Each Romanian citizen has 2 votes, one vote for the lower chamber and one vote
for the upper chamber. The Romanian Parliament is elected for 4 years. A total of
МІЖНАРОДНЕ ПРАВО
ISSN 2414-990X. Проблеми законності. 2020. Вип. 148
204
311 single-member districts for the Chamber of Deputies, and 135 single-member
districts for the Senate, are established across 42 counties on the basis of a legally
established quota, in particular 1 deputy for 70000 and 1 senator for 160000 citizens.
Candidates are elected either by obtaining an absolute majority of votes or through
mandate allocation designed to ensure proportional representation at the national
and county levels.
The Romanian Parliament is composed of two chambers – a lower chamber
(the House of Deputies) and an upper chamber (the Senate). Both chambers of
Parliament are directly elected through a system of pure proportional representation.
Each Romanian citizen has 2 votes, one vote for the lower chamber and one vote
for the upper chamber.
Mandates are first assigned to candidates who obtain an absolute majority
of valid votes cast in their single-member districts. The remaining seats are
distributed by the greatest remainder formula, first at the county level and then
nationally among the parties or organizations that cross the national threshold:
five per cent of valid votes cast nationwide or, alternatively, six deputy and three
senate seats won by absolute majority. The additional allocation of mandates to
ensure the proportional representation of each party or coalition results in the total
number of mandates changing from one election to another [7, р. 5].
Minority Party that does not meet the national threshold, the candidate with
the largest number of votes nationwide obtains a seat in the lower house, if the
number of votes received by the respective party exceeds 10% of the nationwide
natural threshold. The nationwide natural threshold is the total number of valid
votes cast divided by the number of single-member districts for the Chamber of
Deputies [7, р. 5].
As for the legal framework, its an adequate one for democratic elections.
However, a consolidated election code that would regulate all types of elections has
not been adopted.
After the overthrowing Ceausescu regime in December 1989, the idea of
parliamentary representation of national minorities was born in Romania. The first
elections after Ceausescu were held in May 1990.
“Decree-Law no. 92/1990 for the election of the Parliament and the President of
Romania (adopted by CPUN on March 1990) stipulated the right of ethnic parties
to one seat in the House of Deputies if they were to fail to obtain any MPs through
the normal procedure (Decree-Law 1990, Art. 4)” [4, р. 64].
The importance of Decree-Law 92/1990 adopted before the Constitution of
1991, was its content, which included the regulation election procedure, functions
of Parliament and the President until the adoption of the new Constitution.
New Constitution of Romania, adopted in 1991, included the principle of
positive discrimination for parliamentary representation of minorities. This issue was
also incorporated in detail in electoral law no. 68/1992, which replaced Decree-Law
92/1990 and with some amendments, is still valid today.
205
Jikia M., Demetrashvili S. Parliamentary representation of minorities in Romania – current challenges
ISSN 2414-990X. Problems of legality. 2020. Issue 148
Presently, Parliamentary elections are primarily regulated by the 1991
Constitution, amended in 2003, and the 2008 Law for the Election to the Chamber
of Deputies and the Senate (Election Law). Additional legislation includes the 2003
Law on Political Parties, the 2006 Law on Financial Activity of Political Parties and
Electoral Campaigns (Political Finance Law) supplemented by a 2007 government
decision on its application, and the 2002 Law on Radio and Television Broadcasting
(Broadcasting Law) [7, р. 6].
4. Representation of Minorities
Romania is one of the largest countries in South Eastern Europe with nearly 23
million population. Twenty groups are officially recognized as national minorities,
based on the definition in the Election Law. The Election Law defines national
minorities as groups represented in the Council of National Minorities, a government
consultative body. They are Albanians, Armenians, Bulgarians, Croats, Czechs,
Germans, Greeks, Italians, Jews, Macedonians, Hungarians, Lipovan Russians, Poles,
Roma, Ruthenians, Serbs, Slovaks, Tatars, Turks, and Ukranians. Czechs and Slovaks
are represented by the same organization.
The largest groups are ethnic Hungarians and Roma. The Hungarian minority
forms a majority of voters in two counties: Harghita and Covasna. The geographical
distribution of Roma is relatively uniform, with larger concentrations in the counties
of Mures, Calarsasi, and Zalau [7, р. 18].
Minority groups enjoy constitutionally guaranteed representation in the
parliament under the terms of the Election Law [2, Аrt. 62 (2)]. While providing an
alternate threshold for minority organizations not successful in crossing the national
threshold, the Election Law also allows for preferential treatment of organizations
representing national minorities.
According to Electoral Law of Romania, if two or more organizations claim to
represent the same minority, then the organization that receives the highest number
of votes gets the MP seat accorded to that minority. In the Elections held in 1992
and 1996 the MP seat for a successful ethnic party was awarded to the candidate
who received the highest number of votes in his constituency, as compared to all
other constituencies where the respective ethnic party run candidates. This means
the MP elected for one minority was not always the candidate supported by the
ethnic party’s leadership. This rule was amended and, in the elections, held in 2000,
the ethnic parties were allowed to present the same candidate (or the same list of
candidates) in all 42 constituencies of Romania. This practice is strictly forbidden
for all other political parties [4, р. 64].
In Romania, the ethnic parties first compete with all other parties and in
the process of counting the ballots, the principle of positive discrimination starts
working.
After adopting the Constitution, the first parliamentary elections were held
in 1992, where threshold was introduced for the accession of political parties into
Parliament:
• 3 % in the 1992 and 1996 elections.
МІЖНАРОДНЕ ПРАВО
ISSN 2414-990X. Проблеми законності. 2020. Вип. 148
206
• 5 % from 2000 elections (8.9 or 10 % for coalitions).
Abovementioned threshold meant that no minority group (except the
Hungarians) would be able to meet it and therefore their only possibility of being
represented in Parliament remained the positive discrimination system [4, р. 64].
UDMR (Uniunea Democrata Maghiara din Romania) was the only national
minority organization that always overcomes the electoral threshold and doesn’t
need to rely on the principle of positive discrimination.
It’s a fact that there is no other Hungarian organization that was able to be a
serious competitor for UDMR. The number of votes and the territorial distribution
shows that mostly all Hungarian voters support the UDMR. Due to the voting
history the number of future MPs of UDMR is highly predictable, as are the
electoral districts from which they will be elected.
The previous 2 parliamentary elections show the same, in particular:
2012
Political Party Senate Chamber
of Deputies
Social-Liberal Union 122 273
Right Romania Alliance 24 56
People’s Party 21 47
Democratic Union of Hungarians in
Romania 9 18
Other National Minority Organizations
that Received at Least 10% of the natural
Threshold
0 18
2016
Political Party Senate Chamber
of Deputies
Social Democratic Party 67 154
National Liberal Party 30 69
Union for Salvation of Romania 13 30
Democratic Union of Hungarians in
Romania 9 21
Alliance of Liberals and Democrats 9 20
People’s Movement Party 8 18
Other National Minority Organizations
that Received at Least 10% of the natural
Threshold
0 17
207
Jikia M., Demetrashvili S. Parliamentary representation of minorities in Romania – current challenges
ISSN 2414-990X. Problems of legality. 2020. Issue 148
According to the statistical information, the Roma minority is the second
largest minority group. Unlike the Hungarian and other minority groups, Roma are
geographically dispersed throughout the country [8, р. 23].
The Roma minority has been represented in Parliament since 1992. In 2000, two
Roma were elected to Parliament, representing the Roma Party and the PSD. In
2004, two Roma organizations registered candidate lists, the PRSD and the AURR.
Organizations representing the Roma often appear to lack political experience, and
subsequently fail to understand the election process adequately [8, р. 23].
Voter turnout among the Roma community is lower than the national average.
The cause of the abovementioned is nonexistence of identity documents. According
to some statistical information, nearly 20 % of Roma do not have identity documents
and are therefore unable to vote [8, р. 23]. Other problem is that Roma communities
were relocated to new settlements but remain registered in their old place of
residence, thus encountering difficulties in exercising their right to vote [8, р. 24].
Despite the Electoral Law and principle of positive Discrimination, there are
some problems during the formation process of Parliament. Oana Manolescu, who
is the MP of the Albanian minority, was accused of being of Romanian ethnic origin
by UCAR, the first Albanian ethnic party established in Romania. The contestation
was denied by the lower chamber’s validation committee because she was allowed
to run for UCAR in the Dolj constituency in 1996. It was UCAR’s strategy to win
more votes to appoint her as a candidate, but the strategy failed when she received
more votes in her constituency that the candidate chosen by the party leadership
in her constituency; she was elected as MP. Later, she founded her own Albanian
organization (LAR), received more votes in 2000 than her former party, and was
re-elected to Parliament [4, р. 68].
Another Case is Ileana Stana-Ionescu Case, who was elected on the list of the
Italian CIR, the only ethnic party that chose not to present the same candidate in
all constituencies in 2000. CIR received 21,263 votes nationwide and Mrs. Ionescu
gained the MP seat because she obtained 2,943 votes in her district, more than any
other candidate of CIR in all the other electoral districts in Romania. Yet LCIR, the
other Italian Party, contested her win, which put forward the same candidate in all
constituencies and received a total of 16,266 votes. LCIR argued that their candidate
received more votes than Mrs. Ionescu and that she should then be the MP for the
Italian community, but after a review the law was interpreted in favour of CIR and
Ileana Stana-Ionescu [4, р. 68].
One of the problematic cases was the Gheorghe Firczak Case, who was a
schoolteacher with political ambitions from Deva in the district of Hunedoara. In
1996 he represented Free-Democrat Hungarian Party of Romania, but neither he
nor his party received enough votes to enter Parliament. Later, he represented the
Social-Democrat Party and finally he founded the Union of Ruthenian’s in Romania
and become its first president. In November 2000 he became MP for this minority.
The legitimacy of Gheorghe Firczak’s election to Parliament was contested by the
entire opposition, but despite his unbelievable transformation from Hungarian into
МІЖНАРОДНЕ ПРАВО
ISSN 2414-990X. Проблеми законності. 2020. Вип. 148
208
Ruthenian in just four years he was also validated by Parliament after a few weeks
[4, р. 69].
5. Conclusion
Considering abovementioned legal framework and existing cases, the
Parliamentary representation of minorities in Romania is definitely an interesting
case, but it’s not applicable to all Central European Countries. It’s Obvious that the
Romanian System has its advantages, in particular:
• It’s easier to administrate;
• It ensures a broad representation of minorities;
• It stimulates competition between ethnic parties.
Despite advantages the Romanian model needs some reforms for better
and effective representation of minorities in legislative body. There are some
recommendations for improvement:
• Relevant legislation should be included in a comprehensive election code.
This would eliminate inconsistencies between relevant statutes and incorporate into
law desirable practices that have thus far been only partially implemented through
Government ordinance or instructions from the election administration.
• Provisions in the Election Law should be worded in a way which ensures that
each recognized national minority is eligible for a special seat.
• Removing provisions which include different requirements for national
minority organizations already represented in parliament and for extra parliamentary
organizations.
• Effective action should be taken to ensure that currently disenfranchised
Roma citizens are provided appropriate identification and residency documents to
ensure their electoral rights.
• To intensify the Voter education among the Roma community.
References
1. Demetrashvili, A., Kobakhidze, I. (2011). Constitutional Law, Tbilisi.
2. Melkadze, O. (2012). Electoral Law: Theory and Practice, Tbilisi.
3. Leahu, C.A. (2015). Principles of Romanian Electoral Law.
4. Alionescu, C.C. (2001). Parliamentary Representation of Minorities in Romania. Southeast
European Politics, June 2004, Vol. V, No. 1. URL: http://www.seep.ceu.hu/archives/issue51/alionescu.pdf.
5. Edwards, G.E. (1998). Hungarian National Minorities: Recent Developments and Perspectives.
International Journal on Minority and Group rights, 5.
6. Walsh, N. (2000). Minority Self-Government in Hungary: Legislation and Practice. Journal on
Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe.
7. OSCE, Report on Parliamentary Elections in Romania 2012. URL: https://www.osce.org/
odihr/elections/98757?download=true.
8. OSCE, Report on Parliamentary and Presidential Elections in Romania 2004. URL: https://
www.osce.org/odihr/elections/romania/41455?download=true.
9. OSCE, Report on Parliamentary and Presidential Elections in Romania 2000. URL: https://
www.osce.org/odihr/elections/romania/16256?download=true.
10. OSCE, Report on Parliamentary and Presidential Elections in Romania 1996. URL: https://
www.osce.org/odihr/elections/romania/16254?download=true.
209
Jikia M., Demetrashvili S. Parliamentary representation of minorities in Romania – current challenges
ISSN 2414-990X. Problems of legality. 2020. Issue 148
Legal Documents
11. Constitution of Romania (21/11/1991). URL: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/
ro/ro021en.pdf.
12. Law No. 35/2008 for the election to the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate and for the
amendment and completion of Law No. 67/2004 for the election of local public administration
authorities, of Law No. 215/2001 on the local public administration, and of Law No. 393/2004 on the
Statute of local electees (13/03/2008).
13. Romanian Government Decision No. 984/2008 on the approval of the budget and expenses
necessary for the preparation, organization and conduct of the 2008 elections to the Chamber of
Deputies and the Senate.
14. Romanian Government Decision No. 986/2008 on the settlement of measures for the
organization and conduct of the 2008 elections to the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate.
Джикия Мариам, доктор юридических наук, профессор, начальник отдела контроля каче-
ства, факультет права и международных отношений, Грузинский технический университет, Гру-
зия, г. Тбилиси.
e-mail: mariamjiqia@ciu.edu.ge , marijiqia@gmail.com ; ORCID 0000-0001-7810-4780;
Деметрашвили Софио, доктор юридических наук, доцент кафедры публичного права,
факультет права и международных отношений, Грузинский технический университет, Грузия,
г. Тбилиси.
e-mail: s.demetrashvili92@gmail.com ; ORCID 0000-0002-3675-5769
Представительство меньшинств в румынском парламенте – текущие проблемы
Данная статья подготовлена в рамках исследовательского проекта «Право политических
партий», который реализуется факультетом права и международных отношений Грузинского
технического университета. Основной целью статьи является анализ механизмов, гаранти-
рующих представительство национальных и этнических меньшинств в парламенте Румынии.
Авторы подробно рассматривают соотношение концепции равенства и позитивной дискримина-
ции по отношению к национальным и этническим меньшинствам. Четкое различие проводится
между венгерским меньшинством, как успешным политическим движением и всеми другими мень-
шинствами, которые смогли получить мандаты только благодаря позитивной дискриминации.
Отмечены определенные преимущества румынской избирательной системы, а также выделены
недостатки, требующие устранения, а также предложены рекомендации, направленные на улуч-
шение этой системы.
Ключевые слова: выборы; представительство в парламенте; политические права мень-
шинств; Румыния.
Рекомендоване цитування: Jikia M., Demetrashvili S. Parliamentary representation of
minorities in romania – current challenges. Проблеми законності. 2020. Вип. 148. С. 201–209. doi:
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.148.198106.
Suggested Citation: Jikia, M., Demetrashvili, S. (2020). Parliamentary representation of
minorities in romania – current challenges. Problemy zakonnosti – Problems of Legality, issue 148,
201–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.148.198106.
Надійшла до редколегії 01.02.2020 р.