ArticlePDF Available

Realising the Value of Green Space: A Planners' Perspective on the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The COVID-19 virus has quickly become a top risk for public health worldwide, with quarantine and self-isolation as its main measures of prevention. While it is necessary to prevent further infections and protect the population, the considerable impact of such measures on health and wellbeing of people is undeniable. Lockdown measures have limited the access of people to services and facilities outside of their local areas, whilst lowering the intensity of their usual physical activity. As a result, the greenspace within neighbourhoods has become more important than ever in hosting people’s outdoor activities. Difficult and uncertain times as these show the importance of urban planning and design and the need for the inclusion of greenspace when planning and designing neighbourhoods. In this viewpoint, we elaborate our perspective, as planners, on the proximity and quality considerations of greenspace, which can have significant impacts on physical and mental health of individuals and communities during this pandemic. We also discuss the ways with which planning can improve greenspace for a healthier post-pandemic time.
Content may be subject to copyright.
https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.37
Negar Ahmadpoor and Sina Shahab
Viewpoint
Realising the value of green space:
a planners’ perspective on the
COVID-19 pandemic
Negar Ahmadpoor is a Lecturer in Urban Planning and Design, Anglia Ruskin University, Department of
Architecture and Built Environment, Chelmsford Campus, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ, United
Kingdom; Sina Shahab is a Lecturer at the School of Geography and Planning, Cardi University, Glamorgan
Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardi, Wales, CF10 3WA, United Kingdom; email: negar.ahmadpoor@anglia.
ac.uk; shahabs@cardi.ac.uk
While the current trends of rapid urbanisation and globalisation have improved
the lives of many people worldwide in the last few decades, the negative side eects
of such trends are becoming more apparent. Physical and mental health issues, for
example, are emerging at a rapid pace and health systems around the world, particu-
larly in densely populated areas, often do not have adequate capacity to address the
issues (Barton and Rogerson, 2017; Douglas et al., 2017). The COVID-19 pandemic
has exacerbated these issues further as millions of people around the world have been
living under various degrees of travel restriction that might last for a considerable
period of time (Pfeerbaum and North, 2020). In an attempt to curb health-related
issues, planning and design interventions concerning the allocation of space in urban
settings have recently gained traction (Barton and Grant, 2013). Access to green space
has been identified as a necessary component of healthy urban life as such spaces
are proved to have positive impacts on the health and well-being of individuals and
communities (Sallis et al., 2016; PHE, 2017; Sanchez and Liamputtong, 2017; WHO,
2017). Previous studies have identified the positive correlation between increased
health issues and the absence of green space in urban contexts (Barton and Rogerson,
2017). Type-II diabetes and heart diseases are some of the so-called ‘lifestyle diseases’
that are prevalent in areas where green space is absent. This is often due to poor
planning and design interventions, as well as the neglect or lack of knowledge of
their necessity. The England Healthy New Towns programme implemented by the
National Health Service (NHS) of England emphasises the value of including green
space when planning and designing urban communities, as it aids with the prevention
of health issues (NHS, 2017).
The COVID-19 virus has quickly become a top risk for public health world-
wide, with quarantine and self-isolation as its main measures of prevention. While
it is necessary to prevent further infections and protect the population, the consider-
able impact of such measures on the health and well-being of people is undeniable
(Pfeerbaum and North, 2020). Lockdown measures have limited the access of people
2Negar Ahmadpoor and Sina Shahab
to services and facilities outside their local areas, whilst lowering the intensity of their
usual physical activity. As a result, the green space within neighbourhoods has become
more important than ever in hosting people’s outdoor activities (see Figure 1). Dicult
and uncertain times as these show the importance of urban planning and design
and the need for the inclusion of green space when designing neighbourhoods. Of
particular importance are the proximity and quality considerations of green space,
which can have significant impacts on the physical and mental health of individuals
and communities.
The proximity of green space
Proximity to green space (i.e. the state of being near to green space) is one of the focus
areas when studying their eects. Existing studies have explored the correlation between
the access of individuals to green space and their levels of health and well-being. There
is a consensus among scholars that access to green space in urban areas positively aects
individuals, resulting in higher levels of physical activity and healthier habits and behav-
iours, as well as improved health outcomes (Barton and Rogerson, 2017). There has
been research which attempts to answer the question of the correct proximity of green
space to residential areas that are most beneficial to the surrounding population (Ord
et al., 2013). The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the existing issues of urban
planning and design that have failed to address the scarcity of green space. During
the pandemic, many countries restricted travel and only allowed people to stay in their
locality. However, urban green space is not equally distributed among individuals and
communities. Those who live near green space can receive the full benefits associated
with green space, but not all people have a neighbourhood park within a ten-minute
Figure 1 People in Chelmsford Central Park, Essex, UK
Source: Authors
3Realising the value of green space
walk from home. Such proximity is of particular importance for older people, children
and people with disabilities. The communities where green space was not prioritised or
accounted for will not be able to reap the benefits required for their physical and mental
health needs.
Similar to other public goods, public parks will be underprovided without inter-
ventions in the market. In other words, given that public parks do not bring monetary
value and take up large swaths of land, there is little incentive for self-interested private
developers to provide them within a free market with no government intervention. As
a result, the land uses that create higher land values (e.g. housing and commercial
uses) are often prioritised, at the cost of shrinking green and open spaces. This has
led to a shortage of green space in many city centres, which also comes with reduced
levels of mental health and physical activity (Ord et al., 2013). In a situation where
travelling outside people’s locality is discouraged or prohibited, access to green space
has become even more challenging, or even impossible, for some people (see Figure 2).
This can potentially lead to major impacts on people who are isolated and do not have
space for a proper outlet. Although this is a more serious issue ‘during’ the pandemic,
it will not simply disappear ‘after’ the pandemic, when the restrictions are lifted. The
negative eects might not be easily noticeable, yet the issue will persist, and planning
policies should be implemented to help create green space for neighbourhoods that do
not contain them. This pandemic has brought to our attention the impacts of social
inequality on public health and exposed the social and economic dierences of quality
of life. Those people who live in deprived areas are disproportionately influenced by
lack of access to green space (The Guardian, 2020). Also, large numbers of people are
observed entering parks sometimes against guidelines, which highlights the problem
of not having enough green space at a local level for a rapidly growing population (see
Figure 3). The proximity of green space is not the only concern when designing and
planning an urban green space; the quality of the space is just as important.
The quality of green space
The other factor that is accounted for when looking at green space is its quality.
Studies show that quality is just as important as the amount of space available, if not
more important (Feng and Astell-Burt, 2018). This information is valuable for urban
planning as it allows us to compare green space in wealthy and poorer communities,
allowing us to dierentiate the data and better understand how to improve the well-
being of communities. Communities with lower socio-economic status are usually
surrounded by poorer-quality green space and receive fewer benefits that are obtained
from green space. This means that just because a neighbourhood has many parks
or large parks in its proximity, it does not automatically acquire all of the benefits
that come with green space. For example, when a park is large, but is littered and all
4Negar Ahmadpoor and Sina Shahab
of its commodities are poorly maintained, it is much less eective at delivering the
positives associated with green space. On the contrary, a smaller park that is regularly
cleaned and well maintained will be much more eective in providing benefits to the
surrounding population. The result of a study conducted by Sugiyama et al. (2008)
showed that individuals who had perceived the quality of their local green space
as high often had higher physical and mental scores. They used survey data along
with mental and physical health scores. The scores were derived from several varia-
bles: perceived quality of neighbourhood green space, walking for recreation and
transport, social coherence, local social interaction and socio-demographic variables.
This contrasts with the present situation of the COVID-19 pandemic in which public
services (e.g. schools and community centres) are cut back to protect the citizens and
people are left with limited opportunities for socialising and support. Yet the adverse
eect is the increase of stress, anxiety and other mental issues. These studies show that
planning and design intervention can alleviate the pressure on the health system by
having positive eects on community members, simply through the use of available
green space. Although it is dicult to calculate an exact monetary value of the avail-
ability of green space, for example in terms of a reduction in the need for medical
services, the studies show that average community health will improve along with the
Figure 2 People who do not have
access to local green space use
their balconies for their physical
activities, Chelmsford, Essex, UK
Source: Authors
Figure 3 Large numbers of people using green space in
Chelmsford Central Park, Essex, UK
Source: Authors
5Realising the value of green space
availability of quality green space. Yet the last decade has seen major budget cuts to
parks, meaning that not only is quantity a problem in countries like the UK, but also
that quality is suering (The Guardian, 2020). As lack of funding at a local-authority
level is forcing sta cuts and reducing basic maintenance of benches, tables and
playgrounds, the quality of green space rapidly declines. Now, during a pandemic, at
a time when green space is extremely valuable to keep up the morale of communi-
ties, the value of proper planning, designing and managing of green space is evident.
Lessons to learn from the pandemic about the necessity and
value of green space
What is obvious from this collection of studies is that, without a doubt, green space
provides benefits for people’s health and well-being that are dicult to obtain in other
ways. Hopefully, this pandemic will increase the appreciation of parks, trails and nature
in general, resulting in green space being more highly considered in future urban
planning and design. The NHS in England has already begun looking into the impor-
tance of healthy towns, but it should be implemented on a larger scale to promote
healthy lifestyles and habits. After the pandemic, and once social distancing is a thing
of the past, initiatives such as community gardens would greatly benefit all citizens, as
shown in numerous studies. Some of the benefits from community gardens are social
Figure 4 Realising the potentials of urban green space through planning and design interventions
that can lead to a healthier post-pandemic world
Source: Authors
6Negar Ahmadpoor and Sina Shahab
cohesion, improved physical capability and healthier eating and living habits, among
many others (Sanchez and Liampattong, 2017). In addition to improving future urban
planning, cities should look into creating green space in existing communities in areas
where a shortage of green space has been identified. This would increase the overall
health of the community and improve living standards. The urban lifestyle is defined
by rumbling grey cities with skyscrapers and massive buildings; however, it is undeni-
able that humans require green space to properly function and maintain good mental
and physical health. In a post-pandemic world, urban planners and designers must
prioritise green space in their plans and designs.
References
BARTON, H. and GRANT, M. (2013), ‘Urban planning for healthy cities’, Journal of Urban Health,
90, 129–41.
BARTON, J. and ROGERSON, M. (2017), ‘The importance of greenspace for mental health’,
BJPsych International, 14, 79–81.
DOUGLAS, O., LENNON, M. and SCOTT, M. (2017), ‘Green space benefits for health and well-
being: a life-course approach for urban planning, design and management’, Cities, 66,
53–62.
FENG, X. and ASTELL-BURT, T. (2018), ‘Residential green space quantity and quality and
symptoms of psychological distress: a 15-year longitudinal study of 3897 women in
postpartum’, BMC Psychiatry, 18, 348.
THE GUARDIAN (2020), ‘Coronavirus exposes how riddled Britain is with racial inequality’,
20 April, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/20/coronavirus-
racial-inequality-uk-housing-employment-health-bame-covid-19 (accessed 15 June 2020).
NHS ENGLAND (2017), Healthy New Towns Programme, https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/
innovation/healthy-new-towns (accessed 10 June 2020).
LEE, A. C. K., JORDAN, H. C. and HORSLEY, J. (2015), ‘Value of urban green spaces in promoting
healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning’, Risk Management and Healthcare Policy,
8, 131–37.
ORD, K., MITCHELL, R. and PEARCE, J. (2013), ‘Is level of neighbourhood green space associated
with physical activity in green space?’, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical
Activity, 10, https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-127.
PFEFFERBAUM, B. and NORTH, C. S. (2020), ‘Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic’, New
England Journal of Medicine, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2008017
(accessed 8 June 2020).
PHE (PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND) (2017), Spatial Planning for Health: An Evidence Resource for Planning
and Designing Healthier Places, London, Public Health England.
RICHARDSON, E. A., PEARCE, J., MITCHELL, R. and KINGHAM, S. (2013), ‘Role of physical activity
in the relationship between urban green space and health’, Public Health, 127, 318–24.
7Realising the value of green space
SALLIS, J. F., CERIN, E., CONWAY, T. L., ADAMS, M. A., FRANK, L. D., PRATT, M. and DAVEY, R.
(2016), ‘Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-
sectional study’, The Lancet, 387, 2207–17.
SANCHEZ, E. L. and LIAMPUTTONG, P. (2017), ‘Community gardening and health-related
benefits for a rural Victorian town’, Leisure Studies, 36, 269–81.
SUGIYAMA, T., LESLIE, E., GILES-CORTI, B. and OWEN, N. (2008), ‘Associations of neighbour-
hood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local
social interaction explain the relationships?’, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health,
62, e9.
WHO (2017), Urban Green Space Interventions and Health: A Review of Impacts and Eectiveness,
http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0010/337690/FULL-REPORT-for-LLP.
pdf ?ua=1 (accessed 16 May 2020).
... Some studies have investigated the effect of green spaces on public health during the pandemic. Access to green space in urban areas improves physical activity, healthy habits and behaviors, as well as the wellbeing of residents (Ahmadpoor & Shahab, 2021). The results indicated that the communities with less access to green spaces exhibit a higher incidence rate. ...
... 3) reusing and retrofitting abandoned urban spaces to create small green ones ; 4) diversifying urban green spaces in terms of activities that can be done by users (Dempsey & Dobson, 2021); 5) increasing the construction of different types (vertical gardens, green roofs, etc.) of public green spaces in high-density areas with an elderly population to reduce commuting time for the elderly (Ahmadpoor & Shahab, 2021;Luo et al., 2021); 6) making workplaces greener to decrease stress and fatigue in built environments (Xie et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Human life has faced fundamental challenges in many aspects due to the spread of the Coronavirus disease in the world, resulting in rethinking urban design and planning policies and theories to make cities more resilient and healthier. Numerous studies have been conducted in this field due to the pivotal role of the built environment in improving public health. The present study aims to assess the role of the influential components of the built environment in the outbreak of Covid-19 by conducting a systematic literature review. The studies were searched through the Scopus database and screened and reviewed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Totally, 145 studies among 13,002 met the predetermined criteria. The results were expressed in 11 themes including mobility, density, soundscape, public spaces, green spaces, housing, land use, socio-economic qualities, environmental qualities, tourism, and smartness.
... 101,102 Greenery and natural environments are associated with mental health. 103 If cities are going to develop resilient and sustainable recoveries after the pandemic, 104 increasing the number and quality of green and natural spaces that are well maintained and connected will be an important step in restoring well-being. 105,106 Transport and mobility Deep reductions in transit use have led to more walking and cycling during the pandemic. ...
Article
Among the many detrimental impacts of COVID-19 is diminished well-being. The dimensions of well-being extend beyond a person or household because well-being also pertains to interconnections with society. Canadian cities have been especially hard hit by the pandemic and sustained the brunt of the fallout, but they will recover. The pandemic has heightened awareness of the need for improved urban planning and design for citizen well-being. This paper presents a scoping literature review (2020–1) to portray the impacts and learnings of COVID-19 on cities. The review discusses the impacts the pandemic has had on health and well-being and highlights, for example, the unique vulnerabilities of younger age groups. The findings from the literature review discuss how cities, centres of growth and vibrancy, can improve well-being and resilience. The areas of improvement are categorised in terms of buildings, transport and mobility, green spaces and open areas, and new and expanded digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI). Then, the recommendations outline proactive governance strategies such as making well-being a strategic priority, meaningful and inclusive citizen engagement and multisectoral collaboration, agile governance and leveraging best practices. The innovations and responsive approaches demonstrated by cities during the pandemic can be redeployed post-pandemic via partnerships to develop sustainable and resilient recovery plans.
... 101,102 Greenery and natural environments are associated with mental health. 103 If cities are going to develop resilient and sustainable recoveries after the pandemic, 104 increasing the number and quality of green and natural spaces that are well maintained and connected will be an important step in restoring well-being. 105,106 Transport and mobility Deep reductions in transit use have led to more walking and cycling during the pandemic. ...
Article
Among the many detrimental impacts of COVID-19 is diminished well-being. The dimensions of well-being extend beyond a person or household because well-being also pertains to interconnections with society. Canadian cities have been especially hard hit by the pandemic and sustained the brunt of the fallout, but they will recover. The pandemic has heightened awareness of the need for improved urban planning and design for citizen well-being. This paper presents a scoping literature review (2020–1) to portray the impacts and learnings of COVID-19 on cities. The review discusses the impacts the pandemic has had on health and well-being and highlights, for example, the unique vulnerabilities of younger age groups. The findings from the literature review discuss how cities, centres of growth and vibrancy, can improve well-being and resilience. The areas of improvement are categorised in terms of buildings, transport and mobility, green spaces and open areas, and new and expanded digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI). Then, the recommendations outline proactive governance strategies such as making well-being a strategic priority, meaningful and inclusive citizen engagement and multisectoral collaboration, agile governance and leveraging best practices. The innovations and responsive approaches demonstrated by cities during the pandemic can be redeployed post-pandemic via partnerships to develop sustainable and resilient recovery plans. Keywords: built environment; cities; COVID-19; green spaces; health and well-being; local governance and municipalities; urban
... 5 must be implemented and distributed evenly throughout urban areas [24] [25]. In addition to achieving an area of 30% of the total area, fulfillment of green open space in the implementation of the green city concept is also based on the need for green open space per person per square meter [26][27] [28]. Along with the development of Samarinda City and the various problems it faces, the implementation of the green city concept needs to be carried out because it is in accordance with the principles of urban planning. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The rapid growth and development of the city has been experienced by various regions, one of which is Samarinda City, which is the capital of East Kalimantan Province. As a result of the development of Samarinda City, causing environmental problems accompanied by other negative impacts. To deal with and solve these problems, the method determined by the Samarinda City government is by implementing the green city concept. One of them is the development of green open space as an indicator of the green city concept. Through observation, interviews and documentation, the results of the research were (1) only about 10% of Samarinda City’s green open spaces, (2) the constraints faced were limited land, insufficient budget, land acquisition, violations of provisions on land and building use, lack of coordination between implementers of RTH providers, as well as the lack of compliance and understanding of the public regarding green open spaces, (3) The strategy implemented by the Samarinda City Government in implementing the green city concept is, providing green open space through the ProBebaya program, increasing community compliance and implementing private green open space regulations, providing sanctions, and socialization of the importance of green open space.
... In terms of epidemic risk, the implementation of both the so-called green infrastructure [RONCHI et al. 2020] and green spaces themselves in cities is extremely important. Over the past year, the problem of uneven distribution of green space in cities and excessive reduction of this green space by commercial investments has been observed [AHMADPOOR, SHAHAB 2021]. At the same time, Venter and colleagues [VENTER et al. 2020] note that in defining the role of green spaces in the context of COVID-19, conclusions in this regard must be made carefully, taking into account the specificities of the pandemic situation. ...
Article
The ongoing public health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the link between community safety and health and the urban environment and has raised many challenges for cities that want to continue to provide a safe living environment. The Coronavirus pandemic has provoked many controversy and questions about its impact on urban forms. The goal of research was to document the status of knowledge and emerging research paths in the year following the COVID pandemic’s disclosure. The study includes a scoping review to determine the relationship between urban planning and the epidemic risk. Literature research showed that compact structures, because of their proximity to health centers, give higher epidemic safety. Accessibility to vital services prepares cities and their residents for unanticipated threats. The promotion of a dispersion strategy, with social distance regulations already in place, can lead to the rise of prejudice and xenophobia. Urban planners and architects should also pay more attention to urban geometry, building configuration, communication networks, or green spaces. In order to strengthen urban resilience, appropriate infrastructure, the implementation of new technologies, and the construction of urban systems and structures are essential.
... In this respect, what appears particularly important is not only the higher safety of an enclosed, controlled outdoor space-since COVID-19 does not spread outdoors as effectively as indoor [17]-as much as the possibility of having continuous access to such spaces during a lockdown. In this regard, lockdown periods have made even more visible the importance of urban green spaces [2,90]. Neighbourhood-scale green areas conveniently located at walking distance for residents are certainly a feature of many European or North American cities, where density does not allow for enjoyable outdoor spaces within the inner part of the block, usually pierced by deep and narrow courtyards. ...
Chapter
The initial containment of the COVID-19 pandemic in China has been attributed by media and experts to the strict implementation of a generalised lockdown in Chinese cities, according to a system of policies and practices that, with some changes and updates, have been enforced until the present. This chapter addresses the problem of urban resilience in a pandemic context from the perspectives of architecture and urban morphology, focusing on the most diffused typology of urban blocks in contemporary China. After a detailed overview of significant settlement types, the chapter explores how the specific typo-morphology of large-scale gated communities, frequently encompassing a whole urban superblock, has proven its resilience during the ongoing pandemic. By mixing a typo-morphological reading with empirical observations, the article highlights how selected features of Chinese gated communities have helped residents deal with intermittent lockdowns. They include the combined factors of access restrictions and movement control, essential features of a gated community; the presence of generous outdoor space, also possible considering the large dimension of such settlements; the availability of commercial activities and other basic services within the compound.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the importance of public spaces. Accessing public spaces during the pandemic improves physical health, reduces feelings of loneliness, and lessens depression. However, not all public spaces can provide an effective response during the pandemic. The public spaces’ ability to respond to the pandemic varies depending on their resilience level, which refers to the capability of those spaces to adapt to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and maintain functionality to meet users’ needs during this crisis. By investigating the response of existing public spaces to the COVID-19 pandemic and identifying and examining the criteria of pandemic resilience, this study aims to explore and improve public spaces’ capability to respond effectively during the pandemic. One hundred and sixty nine public spaces in three regions in Chongqing City in China are studied. Four main criteria involving 9 sub-criteria of pandemic resilience that can be integrated into public spaces’ planning and design are studied. Three questionnaire surveys are used in this study to examine how public spaces adapt to the pandemic and evaluate the pandemic resilience criteria. The questionnaire data is analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The pandemic resilience criteria are assessed and analyzed using a Geographic Information System (GIS). The study utilized the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to assign weights to the criteria of pandemic resilience. Weighted overlay analysis (WOA) is applied to assess the pandemic resilience level in public spaces. Results indicate various possibilities for pandemic resilience depending on the characteristics of the area. However, these resilience levels are inadequate to respond effectively to the pandemic, resulting in diminished utilization of public spaces during the COVID-19 pandemic across all studied regions compared to the periods preceding the pandemic and after the complete reopening. This study presents a remarkable source for strengthening the resilience of cities against pandemic emergencies.
Article
Full-text available
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, understanding its impacts on cities has received much attention in science and policy circles. This paper systematically reviews the literature on the interface of the pandemic and urban sustainability. The objective is to portray the impacts brought by the COVID-19 outbreak in urban environments within the sustainability framework and to detect trends and challenges for future research. The paper follows a methodology that integrates both bibliometric and systematic review approaches. The first approach relies on bibliometric analysis to provide an overview of the landscape of main trends on this nexus. The second approach presents a content analysis that deepens the work by outlining the impacts of the pandemic and the challenges that emerged on five different key topics for urban sustainability. The role of resilient urban planning is discussed as an integrative concept to face diverse challenges in the construction of sustainable cities in a post-pandemic scenario. Likewise, the study deliberates on future research topics related to resilient urban planning, social equity, healthy urban environments, sustainable mobility, and circular economy. This review serves as a guide for researchers and urban planners to understand emerging challenges and future research trends in urban sustainability.
Article
Full-text available
Background Experiments and large-scale epidemiological studies indicate the importance of green space for mental health. However, little research has been conducted to elucidate whether these mental health benefits are more dependent upon the quantity or quality of the green space. Methods Symptoms of psychological distress were measured in 3897 women who did not change neighbourhood up to 15 years postpartum using the Kessler 6 psychological distress scale from 2004 onwards. The percentage land-use of the neighbourhood was used to ascertain a measure of green space quantity. A Likert scale was used to measure green space quality in response to the statement “there are good parks, playgrounds and play spaces in this neighbourhood.” Multilevel negative binomial growth curve regression models were used to examine the patterning of symptoms of psychological distress across the postpartum period in relation to green space quantity and quality, adjusting for person-level and geographical markers of confounding. The same variables were also fitted in multilevel logistic regressions to examine the odds of reporting serious mental illness (as defined by K6 scores ≥ 13 out of 24). Results Symptoms of psychological distress were fewer among women who agreed (rate ratio (RR) 0.95, 95%CI 0.91 to 0.98) and strongly agreed (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.85 to 0.93) local parks were good quality. The odds of reporting serious mental illness were also lower among women who agreed (odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.00) and strongly agreed (OR 0.74, 95%CI 0.64 to 0.86) local parks were good quality. No association was found between green space quantity and symptoms of psychological distress or the odds of reporting serious mental illness. Conclusions This study suggests it may be how mothers perceive green space nearby and what those spaces enable them to do, rather than simply how much there is overall, that is important for promoting mental health in the postpartum period. In conclusion, community consultation is likely to be a crucial part of strategies that maximise the health benefits of urban greening for everyone.
Article
Full-text available
There is an urgent global need for accessible and cost-effective pro-mental health infrastructure. Public green spaces were officially designated in the 19th century, informed by a belief that they might provide health benefits. We outline modern research evidence that greenspace can play a pivotal role in population-level mental health.
Article
Full-text available
In recognition that the coming century will see a substantial majority of the world's population living in urban areas, the World Health Organisation and the United Nations have developed policy frameworks and guidance which promote the increased provision of urban green space for population health. However, these undertakings do not provide specific guidance for urban policy in terms of the particular design attributes required to tackle lifestyle illnesses and to promote well-being in urban populations. Furthermore, green spaces have generally been treated as a homogenous environment type. In order to address these weaknesses, this paper collates and reviews the evidence linking health, well-being and green space using a life-course approach. The literature generally endorses the view that urban green spaces, as part of the wider environmental context, promote health and well-being across the life course. Based on the evidence, cohort-specific and cross-cutting design interventions are identified and a general integrated green space framework for health and well-being is proposed. This analytical lens facilitates distillation of a vast quantum of research and the formulation of specific planning and design guidance for the provision of more inclusive green spaces that respond to the varying needs of people across all life-course stages.
Article
Full-text available
There has been considerable work done in recent years exploring the value of urban green space for health and wellbeing. Urban green spaces provide environmental benefits through their effects on negating urban heat, offsetting greenhouse gas emissions, and attenuating storm water. They also have direct health benefits by providing urban residents spaces for physical activity and social interaction, and allowing psychological restoration to take place. Consequently, there is a real need to understand the mechanisms by which these benefits accrue. Previously, much of the focus has been on the characteristics of the urban green space that are likely to influence its use, such as its accessibility, quality, facilities, attractiveness, and security. This assumes a causal relationship, when in reality the relationship is more complex and multifactorial. It is more likely that it is the functionality of the green space, be it for exercise or sociocultural activities, rather than its character, which translates to the reported benefits. Challenges exist, such as competing urban planning priorities, economic considerations, and market forces. There is thus a need for urban planning to match the health benefits sought with the needs of the community and the functionality that the urban green space will serve.
Article
Full-text available
There is accumulating evidence that greater availability of green space in a neighbourhood is associated with health benefits for the local population. One mechanism proposed for this association is that green space provides a venue for, and therefore encourages, physical activity. It has also been suggested that socio-economic health inequalities may be narrower in greener areas because of the equalised opportunity for physical activity green spaces provide. However, research exploring associations between the availability of green space and physical activity has produced mixed results. Limits to the assessment of the type and amount of physical activity which occurs specifically in green space may account for these mixed findings. This observational study was therefore concerned with the extent to which green space is a venue for physical activity and whether this could account for narrower socio-economic health inequalities in greener neighbourhoods. Secondary analysis of cross sectional data on 3679 adults (16+) living in urban areas across Scotland matched with a neighbourhood level measure of green space availability. Associations between green space availability and both total physical activity, and activity specifically within green space, were explored using logistic regression models. Interactions between socio-economic position and physical activity were assessed. All models adjusted for age, sex and household income. The availability of green space in a neighbourhood was not associated with total physical activity or that specifically in green space. There was no evidence that income-related inequalities in physical activity within green space were narrower in greener areas of Scotland. Physical activity may not be the main mechanism explaining the association between green space and health in Scotland. The direct effect of perceiving a natural environment on physiological and psychological health may offer an alternative explanation.
Article
Community gardens are growing in popularity as a strategy to effectively deal with population health at a local level. There is a need to gather information about the health-related benefits of community gardens for people living in a rural locale. This paper discusses the health-related benefits of rural community gardens. We adopted a qualitative approach to examine these issues. Ten participants, eight females and two males, aged between 50 and 82, who have participated in a community garden located in South Gippsland, Victoria, for a minimum of 12 months, took part in this study. Semi-structured interviews that lasted between 30 and 60 min were conducted to explore the perspectives and lived experiences of the participants. Thematic analysis was utilised to analyse the data. We situate our discussion in this paper within the therapeutic landscape theory. Findings indicate that there is a range of health-related benefits associated with participation in rural community gardens, including physical, nutritional, social and psychological. Despite these benefits, the participants wished to see some improvements that could attract more people in rural areas to participate in community gardens. Given the paucity of research available regarding rural community gardens, future research should continue to develop an understanding of these rural sites, especially given the ever-growing popularity of community gardens Australia-wide.
Article
Background: Physical inactivity is a global pandemic responsible for over 5 million deaths annually through its effects on multiple non-communicable diseases. We aimed to document how objectively measured attributes of the urban environment are related to objectively measured physical activity, in an international sample of adults. Methods: We based our analyses on the International Physical activity and Environment Network (IPEN) adult study, which was a coordinated, international, cross-sectional study. Participants were sampled from neighbourhoods with varied levels of walkability and socioeconomic status. The present analyses of data from the IPEN adult study included 6822 adults aged 18-66 years from 14 cities in ten countries on five continents. Indicators of walkability, public transport access, and park access were assessed in 1·0 km and 0·5 km street network buffers around each participant's residential address with geographic information systems. Mean daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity were measured with 4-7 days of accelerometer monitoring. Associations between environmental attributes and physical activity were estimated using generalised additive mixed models with gamma variance and logarithmic link functions. Results: Four of six environmental attributes were significantly, positively, and linearly related to physical activity in the single variable models: net residential density (exp[b] 1·006 [95% CI 1·003-1·009]; p=0·001), intersection density (1·069 [1·011-1·130]; p=0·019), public transport density (1·037 [1·018-1·056]; p=0·0007), and number of parks (1·146 [1·033-1·272]; p=0·010). Mixed land use and distance to nearest public transport point were not related to physical activity. The difference in physical activity between participants living in the most and least activity-friendly neighbourhoods ranged from 68 min/week to 89 min/week, which represents 45-59% of the 150 min/week recommended by guidelines. Interpretation: Design of urban environments has the potential to contribute substantially to physical activity. Similarity of findings across cities suggests the promise of engaging urban planning, transportation, and parks sectors in efforts to reduce the health burden of the global physical inactivity pandemic. Funding: Funding for coordination of the IPEN adult study, including the present analysis, was provided by the National Cancer Institute of National Institutes of Health (CA127296) with studies in each country funded by different sources.
Article
OBJECTIVES: Local availability of green space has been associated with a wide range of health benefits. Possible causative mechanisms underpinning the green space and health relationship include the provision of physical activity opportunities, the stress-relieving effects of nature and the facilitation of social contacts. This study sought to investigate whether urban green space was related to individual-level health outcomes, and whether levels of physical activity were likely to be a mediating factor in any relationships found. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of anonymized individual health survey responses. METHODS: Neighbourhood-level green space availability was linked to 8157 respondents to the New Zealand Health Survey 2006/07 on the basis of their place of residence. Adjusted multilevel models were constructed for four health outcomes which are plausibly related to green space via physical activity: cardiovascular disease; overweight; poor general health; and poor mental health (Short Form 36). RESULTS: The greenest neighbourhoods had the lowest risks of poor mental health [odds ratio (OR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-1.00]. Cardiovascular disease risk was reduced in all neighbourhoods with >15% green space availability (e.g. OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99 for those with 33-70% green space), However, a dose-response relationship was not found. Green space availability was not related to overweight or poor general health. Overall, levels of physical activity were higher in greener neighbourhoods, but adjustment for this only slightly attenuated the green space and health relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Neighbourhood green space was related to better cardiovascular and mental health in a New Zealand Health Survey, independent of individual risk factors. Although physical activity was higher in greener neighbourhoods, it did not fully explain the green space and health relationship.