PreprintPDF Available

FoWOP Response to the Covid-19 Crisis

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Abstract

What is the response of work psychologists to the current Covid-19 crisis? What do work psychologists have to offer in these times of uncertainty? The Future of Work and Organizational Psychology (FoWOP) Movement calls for academics worldwide to contribute to sustainable solutions for workplaces, the economy, and individuals. The current crisis offers possibilities in the midst of all horror unfolding - a chance for change - a chance to reorganize the workplace and the economy in a fundamentally different way, that protects the dignity of each individual human being and the planet. this piece is a brief call for contributions. Please do get in touch with us!
FoWOP Response to the Covid-19 Crisis
The Movement for the Future of Work and Organizational Psychology FoWOP
(www.futureofwop.com) is a collective of academics across the world in the field of work psychology
who are actively contributing to a future of academic WOP that is sustainable, relevant to society,
and protecting and promoting the integrity and dignity of individuals within and beyond the
workplace. This also includes the well-being and equality of academics.
At the moment, the world is facing the Covid-19 crisis, which has caused countries to shut down,
with a number of implications for work, people at work, and the psychology of work. Work
psychologists have responded to the emerging crisis in a variety of ways. For instance, psychologists
have been in the media to talk about Coronavirus anxiety (APA, 2020), the result of Corona for jobs
and job loss (BBC, 2020a), and how to build emotional resilience during times of Corona
(Washington Post, 2020). However, beyond anything, work psychologists have responded by
advising how to remain productive while working from home (BBC, 2020b). As many people in the
Western world are now forced to work from home, it is imperative for psychologists to help
individuals with retaining one’s sanity despite being locked up at home, and having to work and be
productive at the same time. While there is nothing necessarily wrong with helping individuals to
cope with the new situation of being locked up at home and having to work, we also have to bear in
mind two essential things. First, as noted elsewhere as well (Jaffe, 2020), there is a strong tendency
to think that the Corona pandemic is a temporary glitch in the system, and that we have to assume
‘normalcy’ during this situation, while we wait until the system and our society will return to normal
again. Hence, the current state is implicitly perceived to be a temporary break from our normal
patterns, and that as soon as the virus is controlled (e.g., as soon as there is a vaccine against
Corona), we can return to our normal lives, and resume where we left off. Second, and also noted
elsewhere, the focus on individual responsibility (e.g., in this case to be individually productive while
working from home), ‘functions as ideology the moment it serves to obfuscate the big question of
how to change our entire economic and social system’ (Žižek, 2020). Too often, work psychologists
have been excellent in pointing to the role individuals can play in maintaining the system and
protecting one’s well-being (e.g., through mindfulness), while ignoring the role of society and social
structures in determining our behaviour and well-being. However, in this Corona-crisis, we can no
longer ignore the structures, as it is the structures provided by our governments which now literally
define the space in which we can live and function.
Hence, we have to ask 2 questions to ourselves as work psychologists here: 1) what is our
response as FoWOP community to the Corona-crisis? In the tradition of FoWOP, we are always
critical, and focused on promotion of health and equality, while using the best methods to reach our
conclusions. 2) What can we provide as FoWOP community to academics and practitioners in the
field of WOP, as well as individuals, organizations and governments globally? We have to distinguish
two axes here which are relevant to our thinking about Corona and work psychology. The first axis
determines the individual vs. structural response. The second axis determines the immediate vs.
medium/long-term response. This produces a fourfold response from FoWOP: what can we do now
and in the medium/long-term to protect our individual sanity, and what can we do immediately and
in the medium/long-term to address the structures underpinning the emergence and global spread,
as well as the leadership responses and management of the Corona-crisis.
In sum, we will try to collect evidence and answers to the questions below. If you are interested in
contributing to these debates, please do reach out to Zoe Sanderson (zoe.sanderson@bristol.ac.uk)
or Gazi Islam (gazi.islam@grenoble-em.com).
Individuals in the Corona-crisis
What can we do as individuals in the long run?
What are the underlying structures that explain the Corona crisis from a psychological viewpoint?
What can we do to address those structures in the medium/long term?
What does this ‘after the crisis’ actually mean?
... Пројекти су примарно усмерени на подршку у долажењу до добро заснованих и потврђених интервенција, али и до знања на основу којих би психолози рада могли да заступају прилагођавање постојећих и увођење нових политика и примеренијег правног уређења света рада. Покрет за будућност психологије рада и организације покренуо је организован одговор на кризу из перспективе критичке психологије рада (Sanderson et al, 2020). Средином маја 2020. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
This work is the result of a qualitative study that investigated experiences and quality of life of participants from different age groups during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in Serbia and the ensuing state of emergency. The research aim was to examine the changes in lifestyle, taking into consideration the life context before the pandemic, emotional reactions, predominant coping strategies and resources for overcoming the crisis, as well as future expectations on a personal and collective level. By relying on semi-structured interviews data from 54 persons (38 women): 15 emerging adults (18 to 26 years old), 23 adults (31–58 years old), and 16 older adults (65–87 years old) were obtained, transcribed and analyzed relying on the principlеs of thematic analysis. The findings indicate that, in the context of jeopardized needs and dissatisfaction with specific circumstances during the crisis, participants’ mental health was primarily preserved through social support and use of adaptive coping strategies oriented towards an active adjustment or psychological reconstruction of the attitudes towards the crisis. https://nauka.f.bg.ac.rs/en/archives/382
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.