ArticlePDF Available

Mental Health Consequences during the Initial Stage of the 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain

Authors:
Clara González Sanguino at University of Valladolid
Clara González Sanguino
Berta Ausín at Complutense University of Madrid
Berta Ausín
Miguel Angel Castellanos at Complutense University of Madrid
Miguel Angel Castellanos
Jesus Saiz at Complutense University of Madrid
Jesus Saiz
Show all 7 authorsHide
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation

Abstract

The pandemic caused by Covid-19 has been an unprecedented social and health emergency worldwide. This is the first study in the scientific literature reporting the psychological impact of the Covid-19 outbreak in a sample of the Spanish population. A cross-sectional study was conducted through an online survey of 3480 people. The presence of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was evaluated with screening tests from 14 March. Sociodemographic and Covid-19-related data was collected. Additionally, spiritual well-being, loneliness, social support, discrimination and sense of belonging were assessed. Descriptive analyses were carried out and linear regression models compiled. The 18.7% of the sample revealed depressive, 21.6% anxiety and 15.8% PTSD symptoms. Being in the older age group, having economic stability and the belief that adequate information had been provided about the pandemic were negatively related to depression, anxiety and PTSD. However, female gender, previous diagnoses of mental health problems or neurological disorders, having symptoms associated with the virus, or those with a close relative infected were associated with greater symptomatology in all three variables. Predictive models revealed that the greatest protector for symptomatology was spiritual well-being, while loneliness was the strongest predictor of depression, anxiety and PTSD. The impact on our mental health caused by the pandemic and the measures adopted during the first weeks to deal with it are evident. In addition, it is possible to identify the need of greater psychological support in general and in certain particularly vulnerable groups.
Content uploaded by Berta Ausín
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Berta Ausín on Jun 19, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Share your article!
As co-author of the article Mental Health
Consequences during the Initial Stage of the 2020
Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain, we are
pleased to let you know that the final version –
containing full bibliographic details – is now
available online.
To help you and the other authors access and share
this work, we have created a Share Link – a
personalized URL providing 50 days' free
access to the article. Anyone clicking on this link
before August 08, 2020 will be taken directly to the
final version of your article on ScienceDirect, which
they are welcome to read or download. No sign up, registration or fees are
required.
Your personalized Share Link:
https://authors.elsevier.com/c/1bGFh3AAzzWyUU
... Various COVID-19-related risks and protective factors have been highlighted. Risk factors for psychological distress included being women, younger age, having a low socioeconomic or educational status, having a higher risk of contracting the disease, being under social isolation, and being a health worker, especially frontline 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18 . In contrast, access to medical resources, updated information on the disease, and the employment of protective measures have been cited as protective factors 7 . ...
... Women, potentially due to increased caregiving responsibilities and greater psychological vulnerability during the pandemic, reported higher levels of distress 12,13,17,18,41 . The social isolation experienced by single individuals and the potential support system available to married individuals may explain the differences in distress levels 9,14 . Those with higher education might have had better access to resources and coping strategies, whereas those with lower educational attainment might have faced greater job insecurity, contributing to their distress 18,41,42 . ...
... Education and technical professionals, including students, teachers, and engineers, reported higher distress, possibly due to unique occupational stressors. Individuals with pre-existing psychiatric disorders reported higher distress, highlighting their heightened vulnerability during the pandemic, as documented in various studies 14,15,16 . Public health strategies should aim to strengthen support systems for all essential workers, providing resources and interventions to maintain their mental health during crises. ...
Psychological distress and the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of personality and coping strategies
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2024
  • CAD SAUDE PUBLICA
Personality traits and coping strategies significantly predict predisposition to psychopathology. This study aimed to examine the predictive role of coping strategies in psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in a sample of Portuguese individuals, considering personality and sociodemographic variables. Data were collected using Google Forms from 2402 individuals (86.8% women; mean age ± SD = 36.80 ± 11.80) between March and June 2020, found primarily through Facebook. The evaluation instruments included the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), NEO Five-Factor Inventory, and Brief-COPE. Younger adults, females, single individuals, and those with lower education experienced higher distress. Neuroticism was strongly associated with all dimensions of psychological distress and the overall BSI. Maladaptive coping strategies (self-distraction, denial, self-blame, behavioral disengagement) were positively correlated with distress, whereas agreeableness and positive reframing were negatively correlated. Regression analysis showed that gender, age, education, and psychiatric diagnosis predicted 12% of distress; adding neuroticism increased prediction to 34% and coping strategies to 37%, with self-blame among coping strategies being the strongest predictor. Personality traits and coping strategies were significant predictors of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings emphasize the need for interventions that target neuroticism and maladaptive coping strategies to improve mental health outcomes during public crises.
View
... Second, the database used in this study only contained data up to December 2020; therefore, the study could not assess the long-term impact of the pandemic on the outcomes of interest. Third, previous studies have suggested that demographic and socioeconomic factors are associated with mental health outcomes during the pandemic 1,2,4,27,28,31,32 . However, our analysis could only stratify by sex and age due to data limitations and sample size constraints. ...
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on utilization of mental health services among children and adolescents using an interrupted time series analysis
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2025
This study aimed to examine the impact of both the initial state of emergency (SOE) imposed from April to May 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the COVID-19 outbreak itself on the utilization of mental health services among children and adolescents in Japan during the recent pandemic. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of the number of mental health visits and average incurred medical expenses, stratified by sex and age group, using monthly medical claims data on 3,029,048 patients for the period from January 2016 to December 2020. It was demonstrated that the SOE resulted in a reduced number of visits for mental health services. After the second outbreak of COVID-19 in Japan, which occurred after the SOE, the number of initial visits and the average incurred medical expenses for mental health services increased notably among girls and adolescent females. The findings of this study suggest that: (1) the provision of mental health services for potential patients with mental disorders was insufficient during the pandemic, and (2) the mental health of girls and adolescent females deteriorated during the pandemic. Early screening and treatment of potentially vulnerable patients with mental disorders should be enhanced during a pandemic.
View
... The literature highlights the heterogeneity in the prevalence of mental health impacts on the population during the COVID-19 pandemic across different regions and countries [21][22][23][24][25]. In the early stages of the pandemic, several authors reported lower prevalence of psychological distress in Spain compared to those found in this study [26], while other studies revealed findings similar to ours [27,28]. ...
Evolution of Well-Being and Associated Factors during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2025
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was a global public health crisis with an unparalleled impact worldwide, presenting a significant challenge for both physical and mental health. The main objective of this study was to analyze the risk of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic and how this was affected by sociodemographic factors, pandemic fatigue, risk perception, trust in institutions, and perceived self-efficacy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Region of Murcia through two online surveys completed by 1000 people in June 2021 (Round 1) and March 2022 (Round 2). Risk of depression was measured using the 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) questionnaire, and descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the risk of depression. Results: In Round 1, 35.2% of the sample presented a risk of depression, which increased to 39.1% in Round 2. Those at greater risk were women, individuals with lower socioeconomic status, those with less family support, lower trust in institutions, higher perceived risk of contracting the disease, and higher levels of pandemic fatigue. Conclusions: Identifying vulnerable populations facing mental health issues can help the authorities and institutions that are responsible for managing public health crises to develop and implement inclusive strategies and interventions tailored to the population's needs.
View
... Participants from the younger age group (≤40 years) presented with more depressive symptoms (Ahmed et al., 2020). Student status was also a major risk factor for developing more depressive symptoms as compared to other occupational statuses, namely, employment or retirement (González-Sanguino et al., 2020). Four studies also identified lower education levels as an associated factor with greater depressive symptoms (Gao et al., 2020;Mazza et al., 2020;Olagoke et al., 2020;C. ...
Youth lenses on coping in a post-COVID world, Insights from the Youth as Researchers Initiative
Conference Paper
Full-text available
  • Jan 2024
This publication ultimately aims to provide youth-led research the visibility it deserves. Youth-led research is undoubtedly a stepping stone to understanding youth realities and advancing concrete solutions. After all, who can better understand and express the realities of young people than youth themselves? As one young author stated: ‘The Youth as Researchers has the potential to illuminate inspirational stories and narratives about young people's struggles and triumphs’.We are grateful to all the young authors for their laborious work and for sharing with UNESCO the views of the young respondents who engaged in their research. We are equally grateful to the YAR Editorial Board and peer reviewers for their important contributions. UNESCO is committed to bringing the ideas of youth to decision-makers, to make them count and to generate policy solutions. UNESCO will also continue supporting decision-makers in integrating this knowledge into tangible policy reform and action.
View
... During COVID-19 outbreak, people experienced disruption to normal life activities, fear of infection due to the high risk of contagion linked with COVID-19, side effects of vaccination, social alienation, lack of availability of daily necessities, financial loss, job uncertainty etc [51,52]. Such stressors are associated with detrimental psychological effects, and elevated stress, anxiety, and depression [52,53] causing sleep problems [54], thus indicating the strong link between the neural pathways that control sleep and those controlling mood and essential brain functions [55]. Increased screen time due to long work hours, trying to stay updated with COVID-19 related news or higher consumption of digital entertainment in leisure time may impair melatonin secretion resulting in irregular sleep patterns and circadian misalignment. ...
Insomnia during the COVID-19 pandemic: prevalence and correlates in a multi-ethnic population Singapore
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2024
  • BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Background Globally, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a significant impact on mental health. Sudden lifestyle changes, threatening information received through various sources, fear of infection and other stressors led to sleep disturbances such as insomnia. The current study aimed to assess the prevalence of insomnia and its associated risk factors during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic among Singapore residents. Methods A cross-sectional study conducted online and in person, from May 2020 to June 2021, recruited Singapore citizens and permanent residents, aged 21 years and above, fluent in English, Chinese or Malay language. Respondents answered an interviewer-administered questionnaire, including Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Physical Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), stress scale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS), chronic conditions checklist and COVID-19 related stressors (exposure to COVID-19, current and future perceived risk of infection). Chi-squared test followed by stepwise logistic regression analysis were conducted to determine factors associated with insomnia. Results The study recruited 1129 respondents. Prevalence of insomnia was noted to be 7.4% in the sample. Insomnia was significantly associated with psychological distress- depression (p < 0.001) and anxiety (p < 0.001), financial loss as a source of stress (p < 0.012), ever been diagnosed with asthma (p < 0.001) and backache (p < 0.002). Conclusion Insomnia was prevalent and associated with higher level of psychological distress among Singapore residents. These findings can be utilised to design effective targeted interventions like cognitive behavioural therapy, therapist assisted relaxation and meditation programs to improve sleep and reduce psychological distress. Interventions like these can be delivered via smartphone applications enabling easy access, delivery, and utilization by the vulnerable groups. Overall, these strategies would not only help people maintain better mental health and sleep quality during a pandemic but also build resilience, enhancing society’s ability to cope with future crises.
View
A digitális jóllét pozitív pszichológiai megközelítésben
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2025
A digitalizálódó világban a jóllét témakörében is új távlatok jelentek meg. A technológiai eszközök mentális egészségre gyakorolt negatív hatásainak vizsgálatán túl egyre gazdagabb irodalom áll rendelkezésre a jóllétet fokozó digitális megoldásokkal kapcsolatban. Tanulmányunkban bemutatjuk az elmúlt években született, a digitális jóllét, és különösen a pozitív pszichológia tudományterületén belül megjelenő, a pozitív technológia területén elérhető eredményeket. A témakörhöz kapcsolódó fontos, új fogalmak meghatározása mellett ismertetünk konkrét, tudományosan vizsgált, technológiai jóllétfejlesztő alkalmazásokat is, a mobilapplikációktól kezdve a mesterséges intelligenciára épülő eszközökig. Áttekintésünk alapján arra következtettünk, hogy a digitális jóllét célzott vizsgálata ma már megkerülhetetlen a jóllétkutatásokban, hiszen az ehhez kapcsolódó eszközök észrevétlenül is egyre inkább az életünk részévé válnak. Ezzel párhuzamosan arra is rámutatunk, hogy a ma elérhető eszközök kis százalékán végeztek tudományos hatásvizsgálatokat, így az ebben való felzárkózás, valamint a szabályozások kidolgozása várhatóan a következő évek fontos feladata lesz.
View
View
Evaluación del estado de ánimo de los equipos docentes. Un estudio de la situación del sistema educativo español
Article
Full-text available
  • Jan 2025
El estudio aborda la salud mental y el estado de ánimo de los docentes (hombres y mujeres) en España. Se destaca la importancia del bienestar emocional y psicológico del profesorado, fundamental para el desempeño educativo y el ambiente en las aulas. Se utilizó un cuestionario de autorreporte distribuido a 3.790 docentes, cubriendo diversas variables contextuales y demográficas que se recopilaron en 58 preguntas entre las que se incluía el test PHQ-9. La metodología incluyó un muestreo no probabilístico y el análisis estadístico descriptivo se realizó con el software estadístico SPSS (v.23). Los resultados indican que un porcentaje significativo de docentes experimenta niveles depresivos de moderados a severos, percepción de maltrato y estado de ánimo negativo, exacerbados por la pandemia. Las variables estudiadas en este trabajo, y que tienen una influencia moderada en el estado de ánimo, incluyen la edad, el sexo, el tipo de centro, la experiencia docente y la etapa educativa. El estudio concluye que la salud mental de los docentes es una prioridad que necesita atención urgente. Se sugiere la implementación de programas de apoyo psicológico y la mejora de las condiciones laborales. El reconocimiento del impacto significativo de factores externos sobre el bienestar docente es crucial para políticas educativas efectivas.
View
Perspective Chapter: What Happens When You Don’t Recover from COVID-19?
Chapter
Full-text available
  • Jan 2025
The immense impact of COVID-19 would not have been anticipated by 7.5 billion people worldwide a few years ago. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the initial detectable instance of COVID-19 was identified in the Wuhan province of China in December 2019. Subsequently, on January 30, 2020, WHO declared the disease a global emergency. Others, however, contended that the virus had been unnoticedly disseminated across the region for several months prior to the pandemic. The single-stranded RNA virus has the potential to induce severe respiratory complications and is transmitted via aerosol droplets. According to the initial investigations conducted by the CDC, the infectivity (R0) of the novel strain of the Coronavirus is estimated to be 2.5. This indicates that, on average, one infected individual could transmit the virus to 2.5 noninfected individuals. The annual aR0 for the prevalent influenza virus is less than one. Due to the absence of effective treatment and the prospect of the vaccine in 2021, the global community has been subjected to the catastrophic effects of COVID-19. Based on the statistical data regarding the pandemic that was published by Johns Hopkins University in the United States as of 30 June 2020, the global cumulative number of fatalities accounted for 502,123, while the confirmed cases numbered 10,245,217. To date, the COVID-19 pandemic remains a significant threat to worldwide public health and safety while exerting a considerable influence on socioeconomic progress on a global scale.
View
The Triad of COVID-19 in Children: Acute COVID-19, Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome, and Long COVID-Part II
Article
  • Jan 2025
  • Pediatr Ann
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is now known to be caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has been a public health threat since early 2020 and has affected millions of people worldwide. Many studies have now shown that this virus exhibits a milder infection in children compared to adults. Acute COVID-19 infection, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), and long COVID have been recently well-established in the pediatric population with a myriad of systemic manifestations. This section of the review will focus on the following systems—neurology, psychiatry, endocrinology, hematology, and oncology—under three broad lenses, such as acute COVID-19, MIS-C, and long COVID. [ Pediatr Ann . 2025;54(1):e40–e44.]
View
Is Belonging to a Religious Organization Enough? Differences in Religious Affiliation Versus Self-Ratings of Spirituality on Behavioral and Psychological Variables in Individuals with Heart Failure
Article
Full-text available
  • May 2020
In the United States, heart failure (HF) affects approximately 6.5 million adults. While studies show that individuals with HF often suffer from adverse symptoms such as depression and anxiety, studies also show that these symptoms can be at least partially offset by the presence of spiritual wellbeing. In a sample of 327 men and women with AHA/ACC classification Stage B HF, we found that more spirituality in patients was associated with better clinically-related symptoms such as depressed mood and anxiety, emotional variables (affect, anger), well-being (optimism, satisfaction with life), and physical health-related outcomes (fatigue, sleep quality). These patients also showed better self-efficacy to maintain cardiac function. Simply belonging to a religious organization independent of spiritualty, however, was not a reliable predictor of health-related benefits. In fact, we observed instances of belonging to a religious organization unaccompanied by parallel spiritual ratings, which appeared counterproductive.
View
Stress, anxiety, and depression levels in the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak in a population sample in the northern Spain
Article
Full-text available
  • Apr 2020
The SARS-CoV-2 virus reached Spain in March 2020, and a nationwide state of alert was declared on March 14th, leading to the confinement of the entire population. The current study was conducted in the Basque Autonomous Community in northern Spain. The authors analyzed stress, anxiety, and depression with the arrival of the virus and the levels of symptoms according to age, comorbidity, and confinement. Levels of anxiety, stress, and depression were measured in a sample of 976 adults, using the DASS scale (Depression Anxiety, and Stress Scale). Although levels of symptoms were generally low at the start of the alert, younger individuals with chronic diseases reported more symptoms than the rest of the population. The study also detected higher levels of symptoms after the stay-at-home order was issued. Such symptoms are predicted to increase as the confinement continues. The authors propose psychological interventions for prevention and treatment in order to mitigate the pandemic’s psychological impacts.
View
Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China
Article
Full-text available
Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is a public health emergency of international concern and poses a challenge to psychological resilience. Research data are needed to develop evidence-driven strategies to reduce adverse psychological impacts and psychiatric symptoms during the epidemic. The aim of this study was to survey the general public in China to better understand their levels of psychological impact, anxiety, depression, and stress during the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. The data will be used for future reference. Methods: From 31 January to 2 February 2020, we conducted an online survey using snowball sampling techniques. The online survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms in the past 14 days, contact history with COVID-19, knowledge and concerns about COVID-19, precautionary measures against COVID-19, and additional information required with respect to COVID-19. Psychological impact was assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: This study included 1210 respondents from 194 cities in China. In total, 53.8% of respondents rated the psychological impact of the outbreak as moderate or severe; 16.5% reported moderate to severe depressive symptoms; 28.8% reported moderate to severe anxiety symptoms; and 8.1% reported moderate to severe stress levels. Most respondents spent 20–24 h per day at home (84.7%); were worried about their family members contracting COVID-19 (75.2%); and were satisfied with the amount of health information available (75.1%). Female gender, student status, specific physical symptoms (e.g., myalgia, dizziness, coryza), and poor self-rated health status were significantly associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Specific up-to-date and accurate health information (e.g., treatment, local outbreak situation) and particular precautionary measures (e.g., hand hygiene, wearing a mask) were associated with a lower psychological impact of the outbreak and lower levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, more than half of the respondents rated the psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and about one-third reported moderate-to-severe anxiety. Our findings identify factors associated with a lower level of psychological impact and better mental health status that can be used to formulate psychological interventions to improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic.
View
Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Article
  • May 2020
Background COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to significantly affect the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs), who stand in the frontline of this crisis. It is, therefore, an immediate priority to monitor rates of mood, sleep and other mental health issues in order to understand mediating factors and inform tailored interventions. The aim of this review is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on the prevalence of depression, anxiety and insomnia among HCWs during the Covid-19 outbreak. Methods A systematic search of literature databases was conducted up to April 17th, 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed full-text articles according to predefined criteria. Risk of bias for each individual study was assessed and data pooled using random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence of specific mental health problems. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO and is available online. Findings Thirteen studies were included in the analysis with a combined total of 33,062 participants. Anxiety was assessed in 12 studies, with a pooled prevalence of 23·2% and depression in 10 studies, with a prevalence rate of 22·8%. A subgroup analysis revealed gender and occupational differences with female HCPs and nurses exhibiting higher rates of affective symptoms compared to male and medical staff respectively. Finally, insomnia prevalence was estimated at 38·9% across 5 studies. Interpretation Early evidence suggests that a considerable proportion of HCWs experience mood and sleep disturbances during this outbreak, stressing the need to establish ways to mitigate mental health risks and adjust interventions under pandemic conditions.
View
View
A Longitudinal Study on the Mental Health of General Population during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China
Article
  • Apr 2020
In addition to being a public physical health emergency, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affected global mental health, as evidenced by panic-buying worldwide as cases soared. Little is known about changes in levels of psychological impact, stress, anxiety and depression during this pandemic. This longitudinal study surveyed the general population twice - during the initial outbreak, and the epidemic's peak four weeks later, surveying demographics, symptoms, knowledge, concerns, and precautionary measures against COVID-19. There were 1738 respondents from 190 Chinese cities (1210 first-survey respondents, 861 second-survey respondents; 333 respondents participated in both). Psychological impact and mental health status were assessed by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), respectively. IES-R measures PTSD symptoms in survivorship after an event. DASS -21 is based on tripartite model of psychopathology that comprise a general distress construct with distinct characteristics. This study found that there was a statistically significant longitudinal reduction in mean IES-R scores (from 32.98 to 30.76, p<0.01) after 4 weeks. Nevertheless, the mean IES-R score of the first- and second-survey respondents were above the cut-off scores (>24) for PTSD symptoms, suggesting that the reduction in scores was not clinically significant. During the initial evaluation, moderate-to-severe stress, anxiety and depression were noted in 8.1%, 28.8% and 16.5%, respectively and there were no significant longitudinal changes in stress, anxiety and depression levels (p>0.05). Protective factors included high level of confidence in doctors, perceived survival likelihood and low risk of contracting COVID-19, satisfaction with health information, personal precautionary measures. As countries around the world brace for an escalation in cases, Governments should focus on effective methods of disseminating unbiased COVID-19 knowledge, teaching correct containment methods, ensuring availability of essential services/commodities, and providing sufficient financial support.
View
Impact on Mental Health and Perceptions of Psychological Care among Medical and Nursing Staff in Wuhan during the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease Outbreak: a Cross-sectional Study
Article
  • Mar 2020
The severe 2019 outbreak of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was first reported in Wuhan, would be expected to impact the mental health of local medical and nursing staff and thus lead them to seek help. However, those outcomes have yet to be established using epidemiological data. To explore the mental health status of medical and nursing staff and the efficacy, or lack thereof, of critically connecting psychological needs to receiving psychological care, we conducted a quantitative study. This is the first paper on the mental health of medical and nursing staff in Wuhan. Notably, among 994 medical and nursing staff working in Wuhan, 36.9% had subthreshold mental health disturbances (mean PHQ-9: 2.4), 34.4% had mild disturbances (mean PHQ-9: 5.4), 22.4% had moderate disturbances (mean PHQ-9: 9.0), and 6.2% had severe disturbance (mean PHQ-9: 15.1) in the immediate wake of the viral epidemic. The noted burden fell particularly heavily on young women. Of all participants, 36.3% had accessed psychological materials (such as books on mental health), 50.4% had accessed psychological resources available through media (such as online push messages on mental health self-help coping methods), and 17.5% had participated in counseling or psychotherapy. Trends in levels of psychological distress and factors such as exposure to infected people and psychological assistance were identified. Although staff accessed limited mental healthcare services, distressed staff nonetheless saw these services as important resources to alleviate acute mental health disturbances and improve their physical health perceptions. These findings emphasize the importance of being prepared to support frontline workers through mental health interventions at times of widespread crisis.
View
The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China
Article
  • Mar 2020
  • PSYCHIAT RES
A COVID-19 epidemic has been spreading in China and other parts of the world since December 2019. The epidemic has brought not only the risk of death from infection but also unbearable psychological pressure. We sampled college students from Changzhi medical college by using cluster sampling. They responded to a questionnaire packet that included the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) and those inquiring the participants’ basic information. We received 7,143 responses. Results indicated that 0.9% of the respondents were experiencing severe anxiety, 2.7% moderate anxiety, and 21.3% mild anxiety. Moreover, living in urban areas (OR = .810, 95% CI = .709 - .925), family income stability (OR = .726, 95% CI = .645 - .817) and living with parents (OR = .752, 95% CI = .596 - .950) were protective factors against anxiety. Moreover, having relatives or acquaintances infected with COVID-19 was a risk factor for increasing the anxiety of college students (OR = 3.007, 95% CI = 2.377 - 3.804). Results of correlation analysis indicated that economic effects, and effects on daily life, as well as delays in academic activities, were positively associated with anxiety symptoms (P < .001). However, social support was negatively correlated with the level of anxiety (P < .001). It is suggested that the mental health of college students should be monitored during epidemics.
View
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence
Article
  • Feb 2020
The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
View
View