Established Adulthood: A New Conception of Ages 30 to 45
Clare M. Mehta
Department of Psychology
Division for Adolescent Medicine
Boston Children’s Hospital
Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
Department of Psychology
Carlie G. Palmer and Larry Nelson
Department of Family Life
Brigham Young University
Clare M. Mehta, Department of Psychology, Emmanuel College; Jeffrey Jensen Arnett,
Department of Psychology Clark University; Carlie G. Palmer, Department of Family Life,
Brigham Young University; Larry Nelson, Department of Family Life Brigham Young
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Clare M. Mehta,
Department of Psychology, Emmanuel College, 400 the Fenway Boston, MA 02115.
In developed countries, the years from age 30 to 45 are for many the most intense,
demanding, and rewarding years of adult life. During this period of the lifespan most adults must
negotiate the intersecting demands of progressing in a chosen career, maintaining an intimate
partnership, and caring for children. Successes or difficulties in meeting these simultaneous
demands have the potential to profoundly influence the direction of a person’s adult life. As
such, we believe that it is of critical importance to better understand this developmental period
that we call established adulthood. This paper provides a new theoretical conceptualization of
established adulthood, outlining its distinctiveness from emerging adulthood and midlife in terms
of physical health, well-being, cognitive development, and the Career-and-Care-Crunch of
competing work and family responsibilities. We also consider variations in the timing and
experience of established adulthood, including variations by gender and social class, and provide
suggestions for future research. As economic and social arrangements continue to evolve, so too
will this developmental period, providing fertile ground for developmental theory and research.
Keywords: adulthood, work-life balance, developmental theory, career development, marriage,
Established Adulthood: A New Conception of Ages 30 to 45
Over the past several decades, psychological theory and research has made substantial
progress in charting most segments of the adult lifespan. The theory of emerging adulthood
focused on how the years from age 18 to 29 have changed across developed countries and
conceptualized these years as a new life stage (Arnett, 2000; 2015). The landmark MIDUS
longitudinal study explored features of midlife in the United States and in Japan, generating new
interest in the distinctive characteristics of ages 45 to 65 (Brim, Ryff, & Kessler, 2004; Ryff,
Kitayam, Karasawa, Markus, Kawakami, & Coe, 2008), and theoretical work has highlighted
midlife as a crossroads between growth and decline (Lachman, Tesshale, & Agrigoroaei, 2015).
Finally, worldwide societal recognition of the consequences of steadily increasing longevity has
led to growing theoretical and research attention to the later years of adulthood (Kunkel, Brown,
& Whittington, 2014).
Despite an increased focus on adulthood in psychological science, one period of the adult
lifespan has been largely overlooked. This is the period from age 30 to 45, when most people are
deeply absorbed in career development while fulfilling the responsibilities of an intimate
partnership and caring for children. Although there is abundant research on key aspects of this
developmental phase, including career development, marital satisfaction, divorce, and parenting,
these aspects of development have not been integrated into a compelling developmental theory.
Hence, the purpose of this paper is to provide a new conceptualization of the years from roughly
age 30 to 45. We propose to call this developmental period established adulthood.
There are a number of reasons why a comprehensive developmental theory of established
adulthood is needed. First, there is no current common nomenclature for this period of the
lifespan. It is sometimes referred to as part of “young adulthood,” but that term has been applied
as young as age 18 and as old as age 45 (Arnett, 2015). It is sometimes referred to as part of
“middle adulthood,” but midlife theory and research more often focuses on ages 40 or 45 to 60
and can extend as high as age 65 (Lachman, 2004; Lachman et al., 2015). Without an agreed
upon term for the period after emerging adulthood but before midlife, it is hard to compile the
research base necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of it. Second, we believe that it
is imperative to build a developmental theory of this period because the years from 30 to 45 are
often the most intense and demanding years of adult life in developed countries, when
obligations are high in both work and family domains. Moreover, successes or difficulties in
handling the intensity of the intersection of these developmental tasks has the potential to
influence profoundly the rest of a person’s adult life. Consequently, a better understanding of this
developmental period has implications for supporting established adults through policy or
therapeutic interventions, as they navigate what has been described as the “rush hour of life”
(Knecht & Freund, 2016).
In proposing the concept of established adulthood, we first examine its theoretical place
in the lifespan. We then examine how established adulthood is distinct from emerging adulthood
and midlife in terms of physical health, well-being, and cognitive development. Next, we focus
on the intersection of work and family responsibilities during ages 30 to 45 as the central
developmental challenge of these years. We then consider variations in the timing and experience
of established adulthood, including variations by gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, as
well as other variations, such as having children early or remaining single without children.
Finally, in the last section of the paper, we propose some initial research questions.
From the outset, it should be noted that due to space limitations we are unable to describe
all aspects of this new conceptualization of ages 30 to 45, and we focus mainly on developed
countries. Space limitations have also led us to focus on salient developmental tasks. As
development is dynamic and not static, it is important to remember that these tasks represent
developmental processes. For example, becoming a parent is not a single life event, but an
ongoing developmental process during which identity, behavior, and interactions with a person’s
immediate (e.g. the workplace) and distal (e.g. larger social structures) contexts evolve. We are
also limited to building our theory by reviewing extant research that, like most psychological
research, has been conducted mainly with samples that are predominantly White, middle class,
and Western (Arnett, 2008). Race, ethnicity, gender, social class, and cultural context are likely
to be hugely influential in people’s experiences of established adulthood and should be a focus of
research in the new field.
Phase, Period, Conception, or Life Stage?
Is established adulthood a phase, period, conception, or life stage? For decades there has
been a lively debate in developmental psychology over the usefulness of life stage concepts
(Arnett, 2016; Elder & Shanahan, 2006). Until this debate was initiated in the 1980s, psychology
had a long and unfortunate history of proposing universal life stage theories based on a tiny
segment of the human population. Critics rightly called the assumptions of those theories into
question. We hope that psychology has now decisively moved beyond universal assumptions and
that there is widespread recognition that the historical and cultural context of human
development is of crucial importance across the lifespan (Jensen, 2015). We are certainly not
proposing established adulthood as a universal, one-size-fits-all theory. We acknowledge that
many may not experience established adulthood as we outline it here. Rather, we are proposing
established adulthood as a potentially useful heuristic for conceptualizing a fascinating and
important period of adult development that has either been neglected or combined with other
periods of the lifespan in developmental research.
We view life stage concepts as cultural constructions that provide a useful map of
culturally-expected developmental risks and challenges in each portion of the lifespan (Arnett,
2016). Developmental change in adulthood is continuous rather than separated into phases, and
does not occur within strict time frames as it does in childhood and adolescence (Hooker, 2015;
Hoare, 2006). This is because during adulthood sociocultural processes have a greater influence
on development than biological processes or institutional structures such as schools (Baltes 1987;
Hooker 2015). This means that variations in our contexts, experiences, life choices, and social
roles lead us to become more, not less, heterogenous as we age (Hoare, 2006). Consequently, the
age range of 30 to 45 for the period of established adulthood is approximate, and is likely to vary
by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), culture, country, developmental contexts,
individual choices, and historical context. These factors are also likely to influence people’s
experience of established adulthood. While we outline here some of the developmental tasks and
concerns that we believe are salient for those in this age period, we acknowledge that these tasks
will not be relevant to all groups of people. Specifically, not all people will experience the
normative route through established adulthood as we outline it here. We hope that researchers
will investigate this period of development to document its many variations.
It should also be noted that the specific term “life stage” has a long history in
developmental psychology, usually denoting qualitative change from one stage to another, for
example from concrete to formal operations in Piagetian theory. That is not how we are using
“life stage” here; we see life stages simply as conceptual frameworks that may or may not entail
qualitative change but are useful ways of delineating the main developmental issues and
challenges of each phase of life. However, for those who prefer a more restrictive use of “life
stage,” established adulthood might not meet the requirements to be a developmental stage and
may thus be better viewed as a phase of adult development.
In this spirit, and with these caveats, we believe that proposing established adulthood as a
new concept has the potential to clarify the developmental issues and processes prominent during
the years 30 to 45 and draw together the large but disconnected body of research that has focused
on topics such as parenting young children, career development, and work-family balance. We
also hope that proposing this new life stage concept will inspire research focused specifically on
the experiences of those aged 30-45. Our model is the theory of emerging adulthood, which
drew together existing literature on topics such as the school-to-work transition and leaving the
parental home and has inspired thousands of studies on ages 18-29 since it was proposed 20
years ago (Arnett, 2000). We hope that proposing an integrated developmental conception of
established adulthood will have a comparable effect of inspiring research on development at ages
30 to 45.
Distinction Between Emerging and Established Adulthood
Although an adult life phase of family formation and career development was recognized
by early developmental theorists such as Havighurst (1953) and Levinson (Levinson et al.,
1978), a number of important demographic changes have taken place over the past half century
that have shaped the current structure of established adulthood, making it demographically
distinct from emerging adulthood and situating it roughly in the age period of 30 to 45. In
developed countries, work and family life transitions that historically took place when people
first reached their twenties are now typically taking place when people reach their thirties
(Arnett, 2015). Across developed countries, more people are obtaining tertiary education or
training well into their twenties, and finishing education is typically followed not by entry into a
stable long-term job but by years of frequent job changes with commitment to a career not
occurring until the thirties. For example, in the United States the median number of job changes
from age 18 to 29 is ten, a far higher number than in any subsequent decade (Bureau of Labor
Statistics, 2019a; U.S. Department of Labor, 2012). Additionally, in contrast to the high rates of
unemployment in the twenties, by age 30 unemployment falls to a stable rate maintained through
the forties and fifties, across developed countries (OECD, 2019a). In sum, in contrast to the
exploration, information gathering, and career preparation that typically takes place during
emerging adulthood, established adults tend to commit to an occupational path that includes
gaining greater expertise, taking on greater responsibilities, and moving up in an organizational
hierarchy (Day, Harrison, & Halpin, 2012).
While this pattern of career development is common, it is important to note that there are
likely to be exceptions based on race, ethnicity, gender, and social class. Longstanding structural
and systemic racism across Western countries often impedes the career development of people of
color (APA 2007). For example, in the United States people of color are disproportionately
unemployed, underemployed, and in precarious, low paying jobs (Bureau of Labor Statistics,
2011; 2019b). This means that during established adulthood, while most of their White
counterparts are enjoying stability and advancement in their careers, people of color may
continue to experience career instability and stagnation (Doede, 2016).
In the family domain as well, there has been a normative upward age shift toward
commitment and stability occurring around age 30. Across developed countries the median age
of first marriage is higher than ever before, around age 30 for women and 32 for men (OECD,
2019b). Most developing countries are trending in the same direction. Similar shifts have taken
place internationally in the median age of first childbirth, which is also now around 30 for
women in developed countries and is rising in developing countries (OECD, 2019c). Between
2000 and 2014, the proportion of first births to women in developed countries aged 30–34 rose
28% and first births to women aged 35 and over rose 23%, whereas births among younger
women declined (OECD Family Database, 2018).
In the family as in the work domain, demands are likely to vary by race, ethnicity, and
socioeconomic background. For instance, Latinx and African American women have lower
median ages of first childbirth than Whites and Asian Americans (Matthews & Hamilton, 2016),
and are more likely to be single mothers (Hummer & Hamilton, 2010). The stresses of
established adulthood may therefore be compounded in these groups.
Distinction Between Established Adulthood and Midlife
In contrast to the early theories of Havighurst (1953) and Levinson (Levinson et al.,
1978), little modern theory has distinguished between established adulthood and midlife. Instead,
the years of “middle adulthood” have been often stretched to extend from as low as age 30 to as
high as age 65 (Lachman, 2004; Lachman et al., 2015). However, we believe that range is too
large to be developmentally meaningful and that it is more coherent and compelling to
distinguish established adulthood (roughly ages 30-45) from middle adulthood (roughly ages 45-
Established adulthood is developmentally distinct from midlife in a number of ways.
Established adults are typically gaining expertise in their chosen field and seeking to rise in their
work status and achievements, whereas most midlife adults have reached the peak of their career
arc (Riza, Ganzach, & Liu, 2016). Established adults often have young children who are living at
home and a large part of their daily lives is devoted to caring for those children. In contrast,
adults at midlife more often have older children, who have left the family home or, if still at
home, require less physically demanding care from parents. Midlife adults are also more likely
than established adults to experience age-related physiological changes, such as menopause for
women and andropause for men.
Notable Features of Established Adulthood
Like other developmental phases, established adulthood has distinctive features that are
more prominent during this period than during other periods of life. Table 1 summarizes a range
of distinctive features of established adulthood as compared to emerging adulthood and midlife.
Below, to illustrate the utility of viewing established adulthood as a separate phase of the adult
lifespan, we briefly summarize the distinctiveness of the years from 30 to 45 in terms of physical
health, well-being, and cognitive development, then highlight the collision of developmental
tasks in the work and family domains.
Physical Health and Well-Being
Physical strength and stamina generally decline after the twenties. By the early thirties,
the peak of athletic performance has passed, and it takes longer to recover from injuries than in
the twenties (Bruner et al., 2010; Houglum et al., 2010). Primary aging leads to declines in the
basal metabolic rate, and because fewer calories are burned when a person is resting, weight gain
and obesity increase (Peitilainen et al., 2008). Nevertheless, most people experience good
physical functioning during established adulthood, and the years from age 30 to 45 are in some
respects the physically healthiest of the entire lifespan. During these years the immune system is
strong and susceptibility to most infectious diseases is low. Established adults are not yet at risk
for the types of diseases that commonly occur in middle and later adulthood, most notably cancer
and heart disease. Furthermore, established adults have healthier eating and sleeping patterns
than emerging adults (Braveman, Egerter, & Williams, 2011) and are far less likely to engage in
risky behaviors that may endanger health, including risky driving, substance use, and risky
sexual behavior (Arnett, 2015).
The literature on well-being across the adult lifespan is complex and difficult to interpret
(Arnett, 2018). Probably the best data come from the MIDUS study, which surveyed a national
sample of adults ages 25-74 in the United States on multiple domains of life satisfaction,
including marriage, work, relationships with children, and finances (Lachman, 2004; Lachman et
al., 2015). While overall life satisfaction was more or less flat across age groups, each domain
showed a different pattern of change with age. During the age period of 30-45, satisfaction was
highest in the domains of marriage and relationships with children and lowest for finances and
sexuality. In 10-year longitudinal data from the study, positive affect was lower across ages 25-
39 than at ages 50 and above. However, emerging and established adults were both more
optimistic about the future than their elders were; expected future life satisfaction was highest at
ages 25-39 and fell steadily after age 40. More research is needed to better understand
trajectories of health and well-being in established adulthood across countries and cultures.
In many ways, cognitive development is enhanced during established adulthood. The
landmark Seattle Longitudinal Study showed that intelligence rises through the thirties and early
forties in nearly all domains, including Spatial Orientation, Inductive Reasoning, and Verbal
Ability (Schaie, 2013). The one exception is Perceptual Speed, an aspect of fluid intelligence that
declines steadily from the mid-twenties onward.
Established adulthood is also the period when expertise—extensive knowledge and skills
in a specific field—is most likely to be reached (Chi, Glaser, & Farr, 2014). This is because it
takes about 10 years of study or practice in a field to attain expertise, and most people begin
steady work in a specific field in their twenties. The development of expertise in established
adulthood is not confined to high-SES fields. A study of food-services workers found that
expertise—defined in terms of knowledge (of menu items and food presentation); organizational
skills (such as handling orders efficiently); and social skills (such as confidence in interacting
with customers)—increased from the 20s to the 30s and 40s (Perlmutter et al., 1990). Attaining
expertise enables people to move from problem solving to problem finding, as they use their
acquired knowledge and skills to think in new ways (Hu, Shi, Han, Wang, & Adey, 2010).
Because creativity requires a base of expertise, its peak comes only after expertise has
been sufficiently developed, usually in the thirties. Consequently, during established adulthood,
creativity has the potential to flourish as established adults are able to combine expertise with
openness to new ideas, tolerance for ambiguity, and a willingness to take intellectual risks
(Sternberg, 2016). A number of studies of people with exceptional accomplishments have found
that their creative achievements rise during established adulthood and peak in the late thirties or
early forties, then gradually decline through middle and late adulthood (Simonton, 2010). Even
though expertise continues to rise through middle adulthood and beyond, “familiarity breeds
rigidity” (Mednick, 1963), and beyond established adulthood, expertise tends to steer people
down the same cognitive paths rather than inspiring creative new ideas.
The Career-and-Care-Crunch: The Developmental Challenge at the Heart of Established
In all societies, work and family are the two main domains of adult life. Work and family
are varyingly defined. “Work” may be inside or outside of the home. “Family” may entail
marriage and caring for children, caring for children outside of marriage, marrying but not
having children, remaining unmarried and serving as a devoted aunt or uncle, or serving as a
caretaker for aging parents. Across the forms that work and family may take, contemporary
adulthood brings a pile-up of demands from age 30 to 45 as people pursue multiple work and
family goals simultaneously. While some goals may be interdependent such that success in one
domain facilitates success in others (e.g. securing a good job may generate resources to provide
for children), others may be incompatible, placing competing demands on insufficiently available
resources (e.g. working toward advancement at work may reduce time with family; Riediger,
Freund, & Baltes, 2005).
Important changes in work and family demands that have occurred in recent decades
have led to this pile up of demands and competing goals during the 30s and 40s. We believe that
this merits recognition, and it is part of the impetus for conceptualizing a theory of established
adulthood. To summarize the demographic patterns presented earlier: The twenties are often
devoted to obtaining education and sampling occupational paths before making an occupational
commitment at around age 30. First marriages also typically take place around age 30, and
couples often feel a need, desire, and obligation to spend time together in order to develop a solid
relational foundation for the future (Cherlin, 2010). The birth of the first child also takes place
around age 30 across developed countries. Consequently, established adulthood brings a
simultaneous collision of demands, goals, and aspirations as people attempt to progress at work
and achieve a deep level of intimacy in a long-term romantic relationship while also responding
to the relentless demands of caring for one or more young children. We call this the Career-and-
The competing demands of work and family for adults have long been studied as work-
family balance or work-family conflict (e.g., Wayne, Butts, Casper, & Allen, 2017).
This literature generally supports the idea proffered here: That conflicts between demands of
work and family increase from the twenties to the thirties and forties and then decline in later
decades (Huffman et al., 2013). Consequently, during this period people must adjust the extent to
which they engage in boundary management, separating or integrating the boundaries between
their work and home life (Kossek, Lautsch, & Eaton, 2006).
We propose the new term Career-and-Care-Crunch to draw attention to our theoretical
proposal that the Crunch peaks in established adulthood. As part of this conception, we recognize
that the psychosocial demands entailed may go beyond child care and include relations with
parents, friends, community organizations, and even pets. Furthermore, our Crunch concept
highlights that the conflict at ages 30-45 is not just between work and family domains but
between multiple demands within the family domain. The term also underscores that the
intersecting demands at this age period often require something to be sacrificed and people may
find themselves feeling like they are coming up short in work or family or both. Consequently,
we believe that these competing demands are best described as a Crunch.
Romantic Partnerships and the Crunch
The impact of the Crunch is perhaps most evident in research on established adults’ long
term romantic relationships, typically marriage. The period following entry to marriage tends to
be high in terms of happiness and marital satisfaction, and newlywed couples often behave in
ways consistent with idealized conceptions of the soul-mate marriage by downplaying negative
feelings, avoiding conflict, and highlighting the positive characteristics of their partner and their
relationship (Cherlin, 2010; Huston, Coughlin, Houts, Smith & George, 2011). During this
period couples spend a good deal of time together, as they work to establish marital intimacy.
When long-term romantic partners become parents, however, additional strain is placed
on the intimate partnership. The transition to parenthood, lasting from conception until the child
is one year of age, is a major life-altering change (Fillo, Simpson, Rholes, & Kohn, 2015;
Goldberg, 2010; Sheedy & Gambrel, 2019; Young, Roberts, & Ward, 2019). The birth of a child
requires a romantic partnership comprised of two people to evolve into a three-person family
system and requires adults to take on a new role and identity as parent (Goldberg, 2010). While
the transition to parenthood can bring joy and excitement, it also brings challenges and stressors
that may leave parents feeling exhausted, overwhelmed, and isolated (Mickelson & Biehle, 2017;
Nazarina-Roy, Schumm, & Britt, 2014). New parents must often return to work within a few
weeks or months of the birth and abruptly learn to negotiate the competing demands of work and
family life (Borelli, Nelson, River, Birken, & Moss-Racusin, 2017). It is no surprise then that
new parents typically experience decreases in relationship satisfaction and intimacy, which may
increase relationship conflict (Mickelson & Biehle, 2017). Furthermore, divorce risk rises steeply
in the early years of parenthood (Gottman, 2014). In sum, the Crunch entails not just a conflict
between work and family demands but a conflict within the family between the demands of child
care and the demands of maintaining an intimate partnership.
A Gendered Crunch: The Harsher Challenge for Women
A half century after the rise of feminism, gender roles in most developed countries are
less sharply defined than previously, and in established adulthood heterosexual couples often
share many of the duties that traditionally fell to one gender or the other (Gottman & Gottman,
2017). Historically, few fathers in developed countries involved themselves in the daily duties of
child care. For example, according to national U.S. data, as recently as 1965 men spent only 10
minutes per day with their children, compared to 85 minutes for women (Cotter & Pepin, 2017).
By 2016, men’s time with children had risen substantially, to about 58 minutes.
Nevertheless, American mothers’ time with children – 90 minutes per day in 2016 –
remains higher than fathers’, and mothers in heterosexual relationships still provide the majority
of child care in infancy and beyond (Nazarina-Roy, Schumm & Britt, 2014). This may reflect
that women, rather than men, continue to be socialized into caregiving roles from a young age
(Fillo, Simpson, Rholes & Kohn, 2015). Several studies have found that gender roles in
developed countries become more traditional following the birth of the first child (Dew &
Wilcox, 2011; Le et al., 2017). Developed countries vary, but even in the northern European
countries, where ideologies of parenting promoting gender equality are strongest, young mothers
are far more likely than young fathers to take parental leave and to have the main responsibilities
for parenting (OECD, 2018d).
Women make a greater contribution not only to child care but to household work in
heterosexual couples. The number of hours men spend on housework remains largely unchanged
during the transition to parenthood. Women do more housework and childcare than men do even
when they make more money than their husbands (OECD, 2017; Wang, 2019). It is no surprise
then that the division of labor in childcare and household tasks is often a source of conflict for
new parents (Nazarina-Roy, Schumm & Britt, 2014).
A key consequence of the gendered Crunch is the “motherhood wage penalty.” Women
who have children make less money than women in the same profession who do not have
children, whereas men experience no comparable penalty and may even experience a wage
enhancement compared to men without children (Budig, Misra, & Boeckmann, 2016). The
motherhood penalty is due primarily to leaving the work force temporarily or reducing
employment hours, thus forgoing crucial years of building expertise, and is highest for women
with the most education (England et al., 2016). Women experience the motherhood penalty
across developed countries, although it is smaller in countries that provide high-quality,
affordable child care (Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2017).
Social Class and the Crunch: The Special Case of the United States
In some developed countries, universal social policies such as paid parental leave and
government-funded child care reduce class differences in the experience of the Crunch
(Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2017). However, the United States has the greatest inequalities of
wealth of any developed country and the least generous social programs, so many aspects of life,
including the Crunch, are more deeply influenced by social class (Glass et al., 2016).
Specifically, the lower the social class status in the United States, the more likely it is that the
Crunch will take place early, and alone.
In recent decades, the rise in the median age of first childbirth to around age 30 has taken
place mainly among women in the highest social class, i.e., who have a college degree
(Hymowitz, Carroll, Wilcox, & Kaye, 2013). In contrast, among those who have only some
college, or a high school diploma or less, median age at first childbirth is only in the mid-
twenties. Furthermore, a large and growing social class disparity has developed in recent decades
in the likelihood that the first birth will take place in the context of marriage. Among young
Americans with a college education, only 12% of first births take place outside of marriage,
compared to 58% for those with a high school diploma or some college and 83% for those with
less than a high school diploma (Hymowitz et al., 2013). Unmarried parents may be cohabiting,
but in the U.S. cohabiting relationships are three times as likely as marital relationships to
dissolve within five years of the birth of a first child.
The main consequence of an earlier Crunch is that the demands of raising children may
occur before new parents have had time to finish their education, try different occupational
options and establish a definite direction, and develop expertise in their field. The likely result is
that long-term career development will be impaired. Similarly, for single parents, the Crunch of
trying to make occupational progress while caring for a young child is intensified and prospects
for success are less promising when there is no partner with whom to share the responsibilities of
child and household on a daily basis. The stress of being a single parent is compounded by
financial stress; single mothers in particular often have low incomes, partly because they have
less education (Garrett-Peters & Burton, 2016). Furthermore, given the many challenges and
strains faced by couples in adjusting to and caring for a child, it is not hard to see how difficult it
must be for a single parent to handle these challenges primarily alone.
Another distinctive feature of the United States is that social class and ethnicity are
deeply intertwined. African Americans and Latinx persons are more likely than people in other
ethnic groups to grow up poor and have lower educational attainment. They also have lower
median ages of first childbirth than Whites or Asian Americans do, and are more likely to be
single mothers. In part because of this, African American and Latina single mothers often receive
child care assistance from their own mothers (Taylor & Conger, 2017). In short, the timing and
content of the Crunch varies among American ethnic groups, and this variation should be an
important focus of research in a new field of established adulthood.
Variations in Established Adulthood
Although most established adults in developed countries experience the Crunch, there are
diverse alternative paths through established adulthood. In addition to the variations by gender
and social class just described, we briefly describe several other variations here.
Variation 1: The Single Life
Although the timing of entry to marriage is later than in the past, it remains true that over
80% of young people in developed countries enter marriage or another committed long-term
partnership by their 30s (Fletcher et al., 2015). Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of
established adults remain unmarried past age 40. Some may not find a partner with whom they
are willing to commit to a long-term relationship (DeLyser, 2014), whereas others may remain
“single by choice” (DePaulo, 2006). Generally, health and happiness are high for people who
remain single throughout established adulthood. Their life satisfaction is not as high as for
happily married people, but it is higher than for established adults who are separated, divorced,
or unhappily married (DePaulo, 2012). Rates of established adults who remain single are rising
in Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea, apparently due to young women’s resistance
to the cultural expectations of duty and submission imposed on them following marriage and
(especially) motherhood (Rosenberger, 2007; Yamada, 2017). Marriage rates are also declining
in China due to the imbalance in the ratio of women to men created by years of the one-child
policy that favored male children over females (Hudson & Den Boer, 2002; Nelson & Chen,
2007). Given the increasing numbers of persons who are single during established adulthood,
there is a need to investigate the correlates and outcomes of singlehood in future research, in
diverse countries and cultures.
Variation 2: Coupled but No Children
Another prominent variation in established adulthood is the growing number of people in
developed countries who are choosing to remain “child free.” While men may occasionally be
questioned about the decision to remain child free, sociocultural expectations around
childbearing for women and beliefs that motherhood is a central component of the female role
mean that women who choose not to have children are often stigmatized and face social
exclusion and discrimination (Doyle, Pooley, & Breen, 2013). In addition, child-free couples are
often not regarded as a “family,” both socioculturally and in the research literature (Pelton &
Hertlein, 2011). Although more same-gender partners in the past have children, in the United
States only about 8% of male same-gender partners and 24% of female same-gender partners
have one or more children (Goldberg & Conron, 2018).
It is important to note that while some established adults may be child-free voluntarily,
there are others who wish to have children but cannot, for reasons including fertility issues,
economic constraints, or reproductive choices based on susceptibility to genetic disease. For
many, being involuntarily childless is an emotionally painful experience that entails feelings of
shame, grief, and loss (Bell, 2013; Koert & Daniluk, 2017). Ultimately, however, most couples
who do not choose to overcome involuntary childlessness via adoption carve out new and
fulfilling adult identities for themselves that do not include parenthood (Pelton & Hertlein,
2011). Furthermore, their marital satisfaction is higher than for couples with children (Nelson,
Kushlev, & Lyubomirsky, 2014).
Variation 3: One Full-Time Parent
Although there are more dual-earner couples than ever across developed countries,
there are some established adult couples in which one partner works outside of the home while
the other works inside the home providing household work and childcare. This arrangement may
be due to culturally or religiously based beliefs, to job loss or other economic factors, or may be
a response to a trend in developed countries toward “intensive” parenting (Cranney & Miles,
2017; Sherman, 2009). Regardless of the reason, the Crunch may look different for established
adult parents where only one person works outside of the home. Specifically, while the working
parent may still participate in childcare and housework, some of the stresses associated with the
multiple demands of work and home may be reduced as each partner primarily focuses energy
and attention in one domain. However, the non-employed parent gives up crucial years of career
progress and expertise-building that will be difficult to make up when re-entering the work world
(Budig et al., 2016).
Variation 4: No Career, Just a Job
In a similar vein, it may be that the nature of the Crunch is different for established adults
whose goals for work are practical, focused on making a living and bringing in a paycheck.
People who are not pursuing an upward career trajectory may experience a less intense Crunch.
However, the resulting economic stress due to lower wages and higher likelihood of periods of
unemployment or underemployment could compound the Crunch. What, then, does established
adulthood look like for those in low-skilled jobs—servers in restaurants, drivers of delivery
trucks, clerks at check-out counters? These are among the questions to be investigated by
researchers in established adulthood.
Variation 5: Thriving and Arriving Versus Regret and Renovation
Variations in development during established adulthood may be connected to choices
made in the twenties. For example, work on “ourishing and oundering” in
emerging adulthood suggests that some people may be better equipped than others
to navigate the Crunch in established adulthood (e.g., Nelson & Padilla-Walker, 2013).
Those who experienced events or made choices in their twenties that led to positive
relationships, strong internalized values and identity, education or training credentials, a strong
financial foundation, and hope for the future may find that their thirties are characterized by
thriving and arriving (meeting future goals). For others, who experienced events or made
choices in emerging adulthood that led to debt, broken relationships, a lack of education and
direction, and, in some cases, addiction or a criminal record, may find that their thirties are
characterized by regret and renovation (digging out of the past), making navigating the Crunch
more challenging. Consequently, it is critical to gain a better understanding of
development during established adulthood by recognizing that development
in the thirties and forties is a continuation of developmental processes that
began earlier in life.
There is not enough space in this paper to devote much to policy prescriptions, but given
the prominence of the Crunch in established adulthood it seems appropriate to discuss at least
one policy response to it briefly. The most obvious policy to support established adults during the
Crunch is paid family leave and high-quality government-subsidized child care following the
birth of a child. One study examined well-being in relation to parental status using data across 22
economically developed countries, including the United States, Canada and a number of
European countries (Glass et al., 2016). In most countries, being a parent was negatively related
to well-being. However, in countries that provided the most social welfare benefits to parents, the
relation was reversed, and being a parent was related to higher well-being. The United States had
the fewest social welfare benefits for parents, and consequently had the largest parental
“happiness penalty” of any country. Policies that support parenting may be especially important
for people of color in the United States who are disproportionately engaged in precarious
employment (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011; 2019b) and who may also be single parents
(Hummer & Hamilton, 2010).
Although paid parental leave is a welcome and necessary policy response to the Crunch,
it is no panacea. One concern is that it is nearly always the mother who takes the leave, across
countries. If fathers take any leave at all, they do so for a shorter period than mothers do (OECD,
2018d). Policy that favors leave for mothers may be partly in response to the fact that it is the
mother who carried the child and gave birth and is thus likely to need a period of time to recover
physically. However, such policies result in women’s career trajectories flattening or falling to a
greater extent than men’s during the Crunch years. This may especially be the case if they have
more than one child. For these reasons, studies of the “motherhood wage penalty” have
concluded that providing affordable child care is a more effective social welfare policy than paid
parental leave in easing the Crunch (Budig et al., 2016).
The worth of any theoretical idea should be measured in how much research it inspires.
Many possible research questions can be generated by the idea of established adulthood. Here
are a few examples.
1. How does the experience of established adulthood vary according to culture, race,
ethnicity, and socioeconomic status?
The field of psychology in general has disproportionately focused on the experience of
White, North American, college educated, affluent adults (Arnett, 2008). As such, it is imperative
that researchers investigate the age period of 30-45 in different populations, especially
populations that have been historically marginalized. To that end, important research questions
are: Does established adulthood in some form exist across cultures? How is established
adulthood experienced by people of color in the U.S. and in other countries with racial
disparities? How does social class influence the timing and intensity of developmental demands
common to established adulthood? How do intersectional identities interact to shape established
2. What developmental processes take place alongside central life tasks in established
adulthood? Many of the features of established adulthood described above represent processes
rather than static developmental outcomes. An important research question is how these
processes unfold and influence one another as well as how they influence broader developmental
trajectories. For example, how do romantic relationships impact an individual’s identity and
psychological functioning, and how do they connect to other developmental tasks relating to
career progress or child care? Do established adults develop different coping skills, establish new
forms of self-regulation, or pursue their developmental tasks in a different way than in other
phases of adult life in order to manage the demands of the Crunch? Similar questions around
developmental processes can be asked for the other developmental features of established
adulthood that we presented above.
3. What happens to the optimism of emerging adulthood once people reach established
adulthood? It is well-known that emerging adulthood is a time when optimism is high. Nearly all
emerging adults believe that they will attain the kind of life they envision, even if their current
lives are not going well (Arnett, 2015). This vision typically includes all the elements of what
eventually becomes the Crunch: a rising career trajectory, an intimate partnership, and one or
more children. Once they have reached established adulthood, how do people compare and
reflect on their current lives in relation to what they had planned and hoped for as emerging
adults? Do established adults in the midst of the Crunch begin to regret occupational choices
and/or family choices (e.g., choice of spouse, timing of marriage or childbearing)? If so, how do
they respond to these regrets?
4. What is the degree and nature of stress in established adulthood? It will be important to
follow emerging adults longitudinally as they enter established adulthood and see how their
stress levels change as they take on the Crunch. It is also important to explore the nature and
degree of established adults’ stress during this process, with qualitative research that goes beyond
questionnaires. To what extent is stress engaging and fortifying, and at what point does it become
unpleasant or overwhelming? Is there a stress-reward curve that is like the Yerkes-Dodson
anxiety-performance curve, such that stress in established adulthood is rewarding up to a certain
optimal level, then becomes aversive? Stress should also be compared among established adults
who take diverse paths, e.g., comparing those who experience the full Crunch to those who
remain single or coupled but without children.
5. How do relations with parents change? To what extent do established adults rely on their
parents to help relieve the Career-and-Care-Crunch? Are established adults who experience the
Crunch closer to their parents during these years than established adults who do not have
children and thus have less need for their parents help, or does the necessity of reliance on
parents more often breed ambivalence and resentment?
6. What becomes of friendships? How do friendships in established adulthood vary? Do
established adults who experience the Crunch have fewer friendships than other established
adults, because they have less time, or just different friendships, i.e., with other parents who have
children of the same age?
7. What are the rewards and costs of diverse pathways through established adulthood? As
noted, there are many possible routes through the years from age 30 to 45. What do established
adults say about the rewards and costs of each of these options, including their own? Do their
perceptions depend on whether they have chosen their option or would have in fact preferred a
In one sense, some form of established adulthood has always been a part of adult
development, because in all societies most people have married, had children, and worked.
However, a new conception of established adulthood is warranted because of how these roles are
changing. Most adults have always had children, but in the past, bearing and caring for and
providing for children dominated nearly all of adult life. The advent of emerging adulthood and a
longer adult lifespan mean that today parenting is concentrated during the thirties and early
forties, followed by several decades when the responsibilities of caring for children have waned.
Nearly all adults have always worked, but only in recent decades have both men and women
worked outside the home and had similar ambitions for career development. Responsibilities
related to parenthood may collide with increased responsibilities at work as people climb the
occupational ladder. This concentrates the Career-and-Care-Crunch at ages 30 to 45 and requires
adult partners to engage in negotiation and compromise, frequently along with sacrifice and
We hope that our conceptualization of established adulthood and the Crunch at the heart
of it will promote new developmental research on a neglected age period. However, this idea has
potential beyond the research arena. Understanding established adulthood as a distinct time of
life has implications not only for people experiencing or about to experience the Crunch, but also
for therapists and other mental health professionals working with established adults.
Additionally, understanding established adulthood as a unique developmental period with
developmental antecedents and consequences can inform policy makers who have the power to
promote programs that would alleviate the Crunch and enhance the likelihood of the “thriving
and arriving” outcome.
We have proposed the idea of established adulthood in this paper with the goal of
drawing attention to this fascinating and dynamic time of life and with the hope of inspiring
increased investigation of its developmental norms and variations, including variations by race,
ethnicity, social class, gender, and culture. There has been room in this paper for only a sketch of
a theory, and there is much to be filled in with further theorizing and research. The changes in the
life tasks and responsibilities at ages 30-45 in recent decades are likely to continue to evolve with
societies’ economic changes and continuing changes in family arrangements and gender roles.
Researchers who investigate this developmental period are sure to have much to observe and
explore in the decades to come.
Almeida, D. M. (2005). Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via
diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 64-68.
American Psychological Association. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic
Status. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from
Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the
twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
Arnett, J.J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American.
American Psychologist, 63(7), 602-614.
Arnett, J.J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the
twenties (2nd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
Arnett, J. J. (2016). Life stage concepts across history and cultures: Proposal for a new field on
indigenous life stages. Human Development, 59(5), 290-316.
Arnett, J.J. (2018). Happily stressed: The complexity of well-being in midlife.
Journal of Adult Development, 25, 270-278.
Arnett, J.J., & Schwab, J. (2014). The Clark University Poll of Established Adults:
Busy, happy, stressed—and still dreaming big. Worcester, MA: Clark University.
Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the
dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.
Barber, L. K., & Jenkins, J. S. (2014). Creating technological boundaries to protect bedtime:
Examining work–home boundary management, psychological detachment and sleep. Stress and
Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 30, 259–264.
Bell, K. (2013). Constructions of “infertility” and some lived experiences of involuntary
childlessness. Journal of Women & Social Work, 28, 284–295.
Borelli, J, Nelson-Coffey, S., River, L., & Moss-Racusin, C. (2017). Bringing work home:
Gender and parenting correlates of work-family guilt among parents of toddlers. Journal of Child
& Family Studies, 26, 1734–1745. doi :8443/10.1007/s10826-017-0693-9
Braveman, P., Egerter, S., & Williams, D. R. (2011). The social determinants of health: Coming
of age. Annual Review of Public Health, 32, 381–398.
Brim, O.G., Ryff, C.D., & Kessler, R.C. (2004). The MIDUS study: An overview. In O.G. Brim,
C.D. Ryff, & R.C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of wellbeing at midlife
(pp. 1-34). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Budgeon, S. (2016). The ‘problem’ with single women: Choice, accountability and social
change. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), 401–418. https://doi-
Budig, M. J., Misra, J., & Boeckmann, I. (2016). Work–family policy trade-offs for mothers?
Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work and
Occupations, 43(2), 119-177.
Bruner, M. W., Erickson, K., Wilson, B., & Côté, J. (2010). An appraisal of athlete development
models through citation network analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 133–139.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2011) Earnings and employment by occupation, race, ethnicity, and
sex, 2010. Retrieved from on https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2011/ted_20110914.htm.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017). Number of jobs, labor market experience, and earnings
growth among Americans at 50: Results from a longitudinal survey. Retrieved from
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019a). Median years of tenure with current employer for
employed wage and salary workers by age and sex, selected years, 2008-2018. Retrieved
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019b). Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity, 2018.
Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/race-and-ethnicity/2018/home.htm
Cherlin, A. J. (2010). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in
America today. New York: Vintage.
Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.) (2014). The nature of expertise. New York, NY:
Cotter, D., & Pepin, J. A. (2017). Trending toward traditionalism? Changes in youths’
gender ideology. Online symposium, Council on Contemporary Families. Retrieved from
Cranney, S., & Miles, A. (2017). Desperate housewives? Differences in work satisfaction
between stay-at-home and employed mothers, 1972-2012. Journal of Family Issues, 38, 1604–
Cukrowska-Torzewska, E. (2017). Cross-country evidence on motherhood employment and
wage gaps: The role of work–family policies and their interaction. Social Politics:
International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 24(2), 178-220.
Daniel, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2016). Crossing the borders: The relationship between boundary
management, work–family enrichment and job satisfaction. The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 27, 407–426. https://doi-
Day, D. V., Harrison, M. M., & Halpin, S. M. (2012). An integrative approach to leader
development: Connecting adult development, identity, and expertise. New York:
Demey, D., Berrington, A., Evandrou, M., & Falkingham, J. (2011). The changing demography
of mid-life, from the 1980s to the 2000s. Population Trends, 145, 16–34. Retrieved from
Demey, D., Berrington, A., Evandrou, M., & Falkingham, J. (2014). Living alone and
psychological well-being in mid-life: Does partnership history matter? Journal of Epidemiology
and Community Health, 68, 403–410. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202932
DePaulo, B. (2006). Singled out: How singles are stereotyped, stigmatized, and ignored, and
still live happily ever after. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
DePaulo, B. M. (2012). Single people. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dew, J., & Wilcox, W. B. (2011). If momma ain’t happy: Explaining declines in marital
satisfaction among new mothers. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 73, 1–12.
Doede, M. S. (2016). Black Jobs Matter: Racial inequalities in conditions of employment and
subsequent health outcomes. Public Health Nursing, 33, 151–158. doi: 10.1111/phn.12241
Doyle, J., Pooley, J. A., & Breen, L. (2013). A phenomenological exploration of the childfree
choice in a sample of Australian women. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 397–407.
Elder, G.H., Jr., & Shanahan, M.J. (2006). The life course and human development. In
W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 665-715).
New York: Wiley.
Eck, B. A. (2014). Compromising positions: Unmarried men, heterosexuality, and two-phase
masculinity. Men & Masculinities, 17, 147–172.doi 8443/10.1177/1097184X14533642
England, P., Bearak, J., Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2016). Do highly paid, highly skilled
women experience the largest motherhood penalty? American Sociological
Review, 81(6), 1161-1189.
Fillo, J., Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Kohn, J. L. (2015). Dads doing diapers: Individual and
relational outcomes associated with the division of childcare across the transition to
parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 298–316.
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2015). Pair-bonding,
romantic love, and evolution: The curious case of homo sapiens. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 10, 20–36.
Garrett-Peters, R., & Burton, L. M. (2016). Tenuous ties: The nature and costs of kin support
among low-income rural black mothers. Women, Gender, and Families of Color, 4, 4–35.
Glass, J., Simon, R. W., & Andersson, M. A. (2016). Parenthood and happiness: Effects of
work-family reconciliation policies in 22 OECD countries. American Journal of
Sociology, 122(3), 886-929.
Goldberg, A. E. (2010). The transition to adoptive parenthood. In T. W. Miller (Ed.), Handbook
of stressful transitions across the lifespan (pp. 165-184). New York, NY, US: Springer Science +
Goldberg, S.K., & Conron, K.J. (2018). How many same-sex couples in the U.S. are raising
children? The Williams Institute. Retrieved from
Gottman, J. M. (2014). What predicts divorce?: The relationship between marital processes
and marital outcomes. New York: Psychology Press.
Gottman, J., & Gottman, J. (2017). The natural principles of love. Journal of Family Theory &
Review, 9, 7–26.
Havighurst, R. J. (1953). Human development and education. Oxford: Longmans, Green.
Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education. New York: David McKay.
Hoare, C. (2006) Growing a discipline at the borders of thought. In C. Hoare, (Ed.), Handbook of
Adult Development and Learning: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 3-26).
Oxford, UK: University Press.
Hooker, K. (2015). Towards a new synthesis for development in adulthood. Research in Human
Development, 12, 229–236. doi:8443/10.1080/15427609.2015.1068036
Houglum, P. A. (2010). Therapeutic exercise for musculoskeletal injuries. Champaign, IL: Human
Hu, W., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X., & Adey, P. (2010). Creative scientific problem finding
and its developmental trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 46–52.
Hudson, V. M., & Den Boer, A. (2002). A surplus of men, a deﬁcit of peace: Security and sex ratios in
Asia’s largest states. International Security, 26, 5–39.
Huffman, A., S. Culbertson, S., B. Henning, J., & Goh, A. (2013). Work-family conflict across the
lifespan. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(7/8), 761-780.
Hummer, R. A., & Hamilton, E. R. (2010). Race and ethnicity in fragile families. Future of
Children, 20, 113–131. doi:10.1353/foc.2010.0003
Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial
crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 237–252. doi:8443/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.124
Hymowitz, K., Carroll, J. S., Wilcox, W. B., & Kaye, K. (2013). Knot yet: The benefits and costs
of delayed marriage in America. Charlottesville, VA: National Marriage Project.
Jensen, L. A. (2015). Cultural-developmental scholarship for a global world: An introduction.
In L. A. Jensen (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Development and Culture: An
Interdisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kinnunen, U., Rantanen, J., de Bloom, J., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., & Korpela, K. (2016). The role
of work–nonwork boundary management in work stress recovery. International Journal of Stress
Management, 23, 99–123. doi:10.1037/a0039730
Knecht, M., & Freund, A. M. (2016). Boundary management: A time-sampling study on
managing work and private life in middle adulthood. Research in Human Development, 13, 297–
Koert, E., & Daniluk, J. C. (2017). When time runs out: reconciling permanent childlessness
after delayed childbearing. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology, 35, 342–352.
Kossek E.E. , Lautsch B.A., & Eaton S.C. (2006) Telecommuting, control, and boundary
management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347-367. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.07.002.
Kunkel, S. R., Brown, J. S., & Whittington, F. J. (2014). Global aging: Comparative
perspectives on aging and the life course. New York, NY: Springer.
Lachman, M. E. (2004). Development in midlife. Annual Review of Psychology., 55, 305-331.
Lachman, M. E., Teshale, S., & Agrigoroaei, S. (2015). Midlife as a pivotal period in the life
course: Balancing growth and decline at the crossroads of youth and old
age. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(1), 20-31. doi:
Lahad, K. (2014). The single woman’s choice as a zero-sum game. Cultural Studies, 28,
240–266. doi :8443/10.1080/09502386.2013.798341
Le, Y., McDaniel, B. T., Leavitt, C. E., & Feinberg, M. E. (2017). Longitudinal associations
between relationship quality and coparenting across the transition to parenthood: A dyadic
perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 918-926. doi:10.1037/fam0000217
Levinson, D. (1986). A conception of adult development. American Psychologist, 41, 3–13.
Levinson, D., Darrow, C., Klein, E., Levinson, M., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man’s
life. New York: Knopf.
Mathews, T.J., Hamilton, B.E. (2016) Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000–
2014. NCHS data brief, no 232. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Mednick, S. A. (1963). Research creativity in psychology graduate students. Journal of
Consulting Psychology, 27, 265–266.
Mickelson, K.D. & Biehle, S.N. (2017). Gender and the transition to parenthood: Introduction
to the special issue. Sex Roles, 76, 271-275. doi:/10.1007/s11199-016-0724-9
Nazarinia-Roy, R., Schumm, W. R., & Britt, S. L. (2014). Transition to parenthood. New York,
NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
Nelson, L. J., & Chen, X. (2007). Emerging adulthood in China: The role of social and cultural factors.
Child Development Perspectives, 1, 86–91.
Nelson, L. J., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2013). Flourishing and floundering in emerging-adult
college students. Emerging Adulthood, 1, 67-78.
Nelson, S. K., Kushlev, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). The pains and pleasures of parenting:
When, why, and how is parenthood associated with more or less
well-being? Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 846.
OECD (2018a). Age of mothers at childbirth and age-specific fertility. Retrieved
OECD (2018b). Share of births outside of marriage. OECD Family Database. Retrieved from
OECD (2018c). Further information on the living arrangements of children. Retrieved from
OECD (2018d). Trends in parental leave policies since 1970. Retrieved from
OECD (2019a). Employment profiles over the life course. Retrieved from
OECD (2019b). Marriage and divorce rates. Retrieved from
OECD (2019c). Age of mothers at childbirth and age-specific fertility. Retrieved from
Onstad, K. (2011, July 14). Miranda July is totally not kidding. The New York Times. Retrieved
Peitilainen, K. H., Kaprio, J., Borg, P., Plasqui, G., Yki-Järvinen, H., Kujala, U. M., &
Rissanen, A. (2008). Physical inactivity and obesity: A vicious circle. Obesity,
Pelton, S., & Hertlein, K. (2011). A proposed life cycle for voluntary childfree couples. Journal
of Feminist Family Therapy, 23, 39–53. doi:10.1080/08952833.2011.548703
Perlmutter, M., Kaplan, M., & Nyquist, L. (1990). Development of adaptive competence in
adulthood. Human Development, 33, 185–197.
Pickens, C., & Braun, V. (2018). “Stroppy bitches who just need to learn how to settle”?
Young single women and norms of femininity and heterosexuality. Sex Roles, 79, 431–448.
Riediger, M., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2005). Managing life through personal goals:
Intergoal facilitation and intensity of goal pursuit in younger and older adulthood. Journals of
Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 60, 84 – 91. doi:
Riza, S.D., Ganzach, Y., & Liu, Y. (2018). Time and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of
the differential roles of age and tenure. Journal of Management, 44, 2558-2579.
Rosenberger, N. (2007). Rethinking emerging adulthood in Japan: Perspectives from long-term single
women. Child Development Perspectives, 1, 92–95.
Ryff, C.D., Kitayam, S., Karasawa, M., Markus, H., Kawakami, N., & Coe, C. (2008). Survey of
Midlife in Japan April-September, 2008 (ICPSR 30822). Retrieved from:
Schaie, K. W. (2013). Developmental influences on adult intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal
Study, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sheedy, A., & Gambrel, L. E. (2019). Coparenting negotiation during the transition to
parenthood: A qualitative study of couples’ experiences as new parents. American
Journal of Family Therapy. Advance online publication.
Sherman, J. (2009). Bend to avoid breaking: Job loss, gender norms, and family stability in rural America.
Social Problems, 56, 599–620. doi:8443/10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.599
Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity in highly eminent individuals. The Cambridge handbook of
creativity, (pp. 174-188). London: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2016). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity,
and the Arts. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000095
Taylor, Z. E., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Promoting strengths and resilience in
single‐mother families. Child Development, 88(2), 350–358.
U.S. Department of Labor (2012). Number of jobs held, labor market activity, and earnings
growth among the youngest Baby Boomers: Results from a longitudinal survey
summary. Economic News Release, Table 1. Retrieved from
Wang, W. (2019). The happiness penalty for breadwinning moms. Institute for Family Studies. Retrieved
Wayne, J. H., Butts, M. M., Casper, W. J., & Allen, T. D. (2017). In search of balance: A conceptual and
empirical integration of multiple meanings of work–family balance. Personnel Psychology, 70(1),
Yamada, M. (2017). Can we overcome the obstacles of marriage through romantic love?
Annals of Family Studies, 41, 35-39.
Young, C., Roberts, R., & Ward., L. (2019) Application of resilience theories in the transition to
parenthood: A scoping review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 37, 139-160. doi: