PreprintPDF Available

Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery, and the Aftermath

Authors:
  • Bansal Hospital
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page1
REVIEW ARTICLE
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19:
Morbidity, Recovery, and the Aftermath
Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Hindu Rao Hospital & NDMC
Medical College, New Delhi, India
ABSTRACT
THE INFECTIVITY AND PATHOGENESIS: SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of Covid-19, involves Angiotensin-
converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on type II alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells in lungs. Apart from, the upper and
lower respiratory tracts, the disease affects the gastrointestinal system prominently, as evidenced by the
significant GI symptoms, early in the course of the disease. In addition, the virus infects ACE2-bearing cells in
other organs including the heart and blood vessels, brain, and kidneys.
CLINICAL FEATURES AND MORBIDITY: The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies from asymptomatic or pauci-
symptomatic presentation to moderate to severe states characterized by respiratory failure necessitating
mechanical ventilation and ICU support and those manifesting critical clinical condition with complications like
sepsis, septic shock, and multiple organ dysfunction failure. The CT chest is an important tool for early
identification of COVID-19 pneumonia as well as for prognostic purposes.
THE RECOVERY AND RESIDUAL DAMAGE: The recovery and other outcomes vary depending on age and other
aspects including sex, comorbidities, and genetic factors. The outlook for older adults, who account for a
disproportionate share of critical disease, is unfavorable, and most of those who survive are unlikely to return
to their previous level of functioning. The disease affects their long-term health and quality of life as well as
brings in propensity for truncated post-disease survival.
COVID-19 AFTERMATH AND FOLLOW UP: The patients discharged from hospital following severe COVID-19,
continue to suffer with lingering impact of the disease as well as that of the emergency treatments that saved
their life. The post-infection reduced exercise tolerance and other subtle factors, like post viral fatigue syndrome,
post-traumatic stress disorder, impaired concentration, delirium, and disturbed sleep-wake cycle often underly
the functional impairment. In fact, there is need of step-down care and later a multidisciplinary support involving
regular clinical assessment, respiratory review, physiotherapy, nutritional advice, and psychiatric support.
CONCLUSION: THE LIFE AFTER COVID-19: After recovery from the disease, the virus SARS-CoV-2, may persist for
uncertain period. In addition, the chance of reinfection cannot be ruled out. The vitamin D supplementation may
be helpful. In general, the quality of life (QOL) in ICU survivors improves but remains lower than general
population levels, but most of the patients adapt well to their level of self-sufficiency and QOL. Also, the debility
due to co-morbidities may further compromise the activity of daily living and QOL issues. The Age and severity
of illness appear to be the major predictors of post-discharge physical functioning.
KEYWORDS
ACE2, Acute Covid-19 cardiovascular syndrome, Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Covid-19, Cytokine Storm
Syndrome, SARS-CoV-2.
1. THE INFECTIVITY AND PATHOGENESIS
1.1 The Agent and Infectivity:
The causative agent of Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 involves Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on the
host tissues to invade and infect. The analysis of the ACE2-RNA expression profile indicates that the ACE2-virus
receptor expression is mainly concentrated in type II alveolar cells (AT2) in lungs. Further, it is more widespread
in males than females, and the Asian men have a higher ACE2- expressing cell ratio than white and African
American subjects (1). In addition, the virus is able to infect ACE2-bearing cells in other organs, including the
gastrointestinal tract, heart and blood vessels, and kidneys. The ACE2-expressing AT2, in addition, also express
various other genes that positively regulate viral entry, replication and transmission. Once inside the airways,
the SARS-CoV-2 through its S protein on viral surface, is able to recognize and stick to the ACE2 receptors,
followed by the virus infecting the ACE2-bearing cells lining the upper as well as the lower respiratory tracts.
With the dying cells sloughing down and filling the airways, the virus is carried deeper into the lungs as the thin
layer of surfactant coating the airways becomes even thinner and the brush border less efficient to defend from
the invading virus. The virus is able to transmit while still confined to the upper airways, before invading the
lower respiratory tract and lungs and causing symptoms (2). The virus infects the gastrointestinal (GI) system
prominently, at least in the early phase, as evidenced by the significant GI symptoms (3). It is able to infect and
multiply in the intestinal epithelial cells (4). It appears that further intestinal invasion is effectively stalled by the
fast dividing intestinal epithelial cells with help of the gut microbiota (5).
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page2
1.2 Immune Response and Pathogenesis:
With the viral infection, the first response of the human body is to destroy the virus and prevent its replication.
The virus invasion and intracellular replication leading to the disease manifestation, however, depends on
various host factors. With the weakened immunity with aging, due to co-morbidities like cardiometabolic
diseases and other factors which alter the immunity and compromise the defence system, the body is unable to
stall the virus, aggravating the disease process. The infection activates the immune system leading to
inflammation and pyrexia, and in severe cases, may damage the host tissues and organs. The blood vessels get
inflamed and leaky, leading to pulmonary edema in lungs. In the critical disease, the SARS-CoV-2 infection
extensively damages the alveolar tissue and triggers an overreaction of the immune system accompanied by the
excessive cytokine release, which apart from damaging the host tissues, leads to increased susceptibility to
infectious bacteria, septic shock and multi-organ dysfunctions (Figure 1).
Fig 1. The host immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and Covid-19
1.3 Other Factors Related to Pathogenesis:
Due to the interaction of multiple factors, which may include gender-associated and genetic linked susceptibility,
the Covid-19 is a disease with variable clinical presentations, requiring a close clinical follow up, meticulous
monitoring and ensuring availability of various therapeutic options including mechanical ventilatory support (6).
Such a precarious clinical scenario from virtually asymptomatic to mild to moderate, and severe to critical
presentation of the disease with a high infectivity and fast changing prognosis, may make the therapeutic
decisions in individual cases challenging with a high error factor on part of the care providers. The propensity to
get infected themselves, adds further to the difficulties faced by the medical and paramedical workers.
2. CLINICAL FEATURES AND MORBIDITY
2.1 The Clinical Spectrum of Covid-19
The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies from asymptomatic or pauci-symptomatic presentation (Stage I) to
moderate to severe states (Stage II a and IIb) characterized by respiratory failure necessitating mechanical
ventilation and ICU support and those manifesting critical clinical condition (Stage III) with complications like
sepsis, septic shock, and multiple organ dysfunctions (Figure 2).
Fig 2. The spectrum and clinical stages of Covid-19.
The mild to moderate disease occurs in approximately in 81% of cases. The severe disease with dyspnoea and
acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and lung infiltrates appearing within 48 hours occurs in 14% of cases.
Whereas, the critical COVID-19 illness accompanied by respiratory failure, septic shock, and multiple organ
dysfunction (MOD) or failure (MOF) has been documented in approximately 5% of cases (7).
The transition from milder symptoms to severe disease and ARDS has been related to an uncontrolled cytokine
release by the hyperactive immune response. In patients, going to have the worst outcomes with COVID-19
infections, the immune system becomes overactive with excessive stimulation of T cells and macrophages,
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page3
resulting in cytokine storm with release of a large amount of proinflammatory cytokines including interleukins
(IL) - 1, 6, 12 and 18. The excessive or uncontrolled levels of cytokines released, further activate more immune
cells, resulting in hyperinflammation and the cytokine release syndrome (CRS).
The Clinical Features of Covid-19
The most common sign is pyrexia, which is present in nearly 9 in 10 of those infected (8). About 7 in 10 have a
dry cough, of which nearly a third have cough with mucus. Tiredness and feeling of lethargy are common. Less
commonly, there is sore throat, headache, muscle-aches and arthralgias. There may be nausea, vomiting or
diarrhoea. Anorexia may be present, as are ageusia and anosmia. Some may complain dyspnoea, shortness of
breath and a tight band wrapped around the chest. A skin rash - viral exanthema, may occur especially in younger
patients, as may be spots of swelling and redness. A specific finding called Covid toes, occasionally present
especially in children, is superficial small clots in blood vessels close to the skin in toes and fingers. The clinical
course of the disease, in general, depends on the host’s immune response. It is to be noted that the patients
need a drug to boost the immune system early on in the disease, and later one to tamp it down if the disease
progresses and cytokine begin to rise. The drugs that target the immune system to lower the risk of cytokine
storm, may also tamp down the immune response, making it hard to clear the virus in the long run.
2.2 Lab and Radiological Investigations
The patients may present with lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia. There are raised CRP and elevated liver
enzymes. Raised lactate dehydrogenase is a bad prognostic sign as it tends increase in cytokine storm (9).
Abnormal coagulation parameters, such as elevated D-dimers and fibrinogen concentrations, and prolongation
of prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are associated with unfavourable
prognosis (10). The radiological investigations like x-ray and CT imaging of chest are of particular significance
relating to the diagnosis, defining the extent of pulmonary involvement and disease prognosis (11).
The CT Imaging in COVID-19 Patients
The CT chest is an important tool for detecting pneumonia in asymptomatic or with mildly symptomatic patients
with COVID-19 patients who are covert transmitters and can deteriorate clinically in a short period (12). The
typical imaging findings are ground glass opacities (GGO) with peripheral distribution, unilateral or bilateral,
involving one or more lobes particularly the lower lobes, often combined with subpleural curvilinear line and
fine reticulation (13). The CT abnormalities in COVID-19 pneumonia more frequently exhibit a peripheral
predominance, with less frequent pleural effusion and lymphadenopathy.
On follow up, the maximum lung involvement peaks at approximately 10 days from the onset of initial
symptoms. There are 4 stages on the CT chest - Stage 1 (0-4 days): ground glass opacities; Stage-2 (5-8d days):
increased crazy-paving pattern; Stage-3 (9-13days): consolidation; and Stage-4 (≥14 days): gradual resolution of
consolidation (14). In a series of 919 patients, the CT findings in the intermediate stage of the disease were
characterized by an increase in the number and size of GGOs, a progressive transformation of GGO into
multifocal consolidation, with septal thickening and development of a crazy-paving pattern (15). The presence
of centrilobular nodules, mucoid impactions and unilateral segmental or lobar consolidations suggest a bacterial
origin of pneumonia, or superinfection.
2.3 The Complications during Covid-19 Illness
Often the infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 is an asymptomatic or mild disease and recover by themselves. But,
approximately 1 to 5% of all COVID-19 patients are moderately severe, severe, or critically ill, and may suffer
from various disease related complications (Figure 3).
Fig 3. Complications related to severe Covid-19 infection
These patients need hospitalization for advanced treatment, apart from symptomatic and supportive, with
antiviral drugs, antibiotics and other drugs and assisted respiratory support in a special medical facility or an
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page4
intensive care unit - ICU (16). The survival odds and the potential for long-term complications, influence the
decisions in ICU care, which are difficult and grey areas clinicians as well as the family members.
2.3.1 The abnormal clotting or thrombosis
In the severe or lethal form of COVID-19, there occur widely scattered thrombi in multiple organs early in course
of the disease. The abnormal clotting plays a major role in morbidity and mortality and occurs at various sites
involving small veins like in Covid toes and the large vessels in the legs leading to deep vein thrombosis (DVT),
in the lungs causing to pulmonary embolism (PE) and in cerebral arteries resulting in a stroke. The etiopathology
of thrombosis in Covid-19 is not fully explained, but it appears that the disease may predispose to the venous
and arterial thromboembolic events due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, immobilisation and diffuse
intravascular coagulation (DIC). Added to this, is hypotension and shock, ventilator use, and multiple drug
treatments themselves affecting the various organs adversely including the lungs, heart, brain, liver, and kidneys.
Using medicines to prevent clotting may end up causing severe bleeding, further adding to the insult.
There has been reported a remarkably high incidence of thrombotic complications manifesting as acute PE, DVT
or ischemic stroke, apart from acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, and systemic arterial embolism.
In a Dutch study, 31% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 suffered with thrombosis clots while on
antiplatelets like aspirin or clopidogrel (17). Further, in a very recent study, the US investigators led by Oxley T,
et al, have reported five cases of large vessel stroke over a 2-week period in COVID-19 patients under age 50
years, representing a sevenfold increase from what can be normally expected. The study links Covid-19 infection
to large vessel stroke in young adults (18).
2.3.2 Acute Covid-19 cardiovascular syndrome (ACovCS)
The ACovCS describes the impact of the disease on cardiovascular system. The ACovCS is a myocarditis-like
syndrome associated with acutely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in the absence of obstructive
coronary artery disease. The acute myocardial injury, the fulminant myocarditis, evidenced as elevated troponin,
occurs in 20-30% of hospitalized Covid-19 patients (19). The ACovCS involves demand ischemia, microvascular
ischemic injury, myocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, and myocardial infarction (MI). The details of the
mechanisms of ACovCS are not clear. The endomyocardial biopsy of a patient with ACovCS and cardiogenic shock
showed low-grade myocardial inflammation, with localization of SARS-CoV-2 within macrophages but not
cardiomyocytes. Given the exposure risks involved in these patients, the acute myocardial injury is advised to
be managed conservatively, with rest and abstinence from aerobic activity for a period of 3-6 months until
normalization of troponin or resolution of myocardial inflammation on magnetic resonance imaging (20).
2.3.3 Respiratory Distress and Ventilatory support
There is a high mortality rate in ventilated Covid-19 patients. In a large study, involving 3,883 COVID-19 patients,
the mortality was a high as two thirds among Covidf-19 patients who required ventilation. As per the United
Kingdom's Intensive Care study, 66.3% patients who required mechanical ventilation died, compared with 19.4%
of the patients who required basic respiratory support. The new ICNARC (Intensive Care National Audit &
Research Centre) findings are consistent with other previous reports from smaller case series. For example, a
single-center study involving 52 patients treated in Wuhan, China, showed that 37 (71%) required mechanical
ventilation and 32 (61.5%) died within 28 days of ICU admission (21). Another study from Seattle, also found
that a higher proportion of COVID-19 patients, over 50%, requiring mechanical ventilation died compared to
about 35% patients without coronavirus who had viral pneumonia and who needed ventilation (22).
The COVID-19 pneumonia is a specific disease with dissociation between the severity of hypoxemia and the
maintenance of relatively good respiratory mechanics. The lungs of COVID-19 patients tend to be more elastic
and compliant than those of other ARDS patients so it is possible to allow patients to take slightly bigger breaths
with a bit more tidal volume in each breath and allow them to be less sedated, more awake, and more in sync
with the ventilator. They may be able to be extubated earlier. In this light, the mechanical ventilation protocols
and strategies need revision and modification. It has been advocated that some COVID-19 patients might need
gentler positive end-expiratory pressure because they present with an atypical form of ARDS (23). The
respiratory distress in Covid-19 is of two types, Type 1: Near normal pulmonary compliance with isolated viral
pneumonia, non-ARDS patients, and Type 2: Decreased pulmonary compliance and present with ARDS.
In the Type 1, the lung’s gas volume is high, the recruitability is minimal, and the hypoxemia is likely due to the
loss of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and impaired regulation of pulmonary blood flow. High PEEP and
prone positioning do not improve oxygenation through recruitment of collapsed areas, but redistribute
pulmonary perfusion, improving the ventilation/perfusion (VA/Q) relationship. In the Type 1 patients, PEEP
levels should be kept lower with higher tidal volume, the respiratory rate should not exceed 20 breaths/min,
closely monitored, but too much interventions should be avoided, in general. Whereas, the Type 2 is present in
2030% of the COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, manifesting severe hypoxemia is associated with
compliance values < 40 ml/cmH2O, indicating severe ARDS (24). In the Type 2 patients, the standard treatment
for severe ARDS should be applied with lower tidal volume, prone positioning, and relatively high PEEP.
Regarding alternate methods of advanced respiratory support, like Extracorporeal membrane
oxygenation (ECMO), which are special interventions for when standard therapy is not successful. The ECMO
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page5
therapy is not realistic and an impractical alternative (25). Further, it is expensive and has associated
complications and a high mortality rate in patients on ECMO.
2.3.4 The Cytokine Storm Syndrome (CSS)
The Pathophysiology of CSS: As the SARS-CoV-2 virus attacks the ACE2 bearing alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells, the
macrophages are recruited and increase cytokine production and attract additional immune cells to the affected
area such as T-helper cells CD4 and CD8 which work to combat the infection. Pattern recognition receptors
(PRRs) of the immune cells recognize the virus and signal release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines such as
interferon gamma (IFN-g), tumor necrosis factors (TNFs), interleukins (ILs), and chemokines. IFN-g activates
macrophages which produce IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10. Once the virus is cleared, the immune pathways go
quiescent. In event of defective immune response to Covod-19 infection, however, this process does not shut
down and leads to overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, TNF, IL-6, and IL-1β causing cytokine storm.
The CSS is associated with an increased vascular hyperpermeability along with activation of coagulation
pathways, which predispose to the development of micro-thrombosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation
(DIC), and ultimately multi-organ dysfunction (26).
Normally, thrombin promotes clot formation by activating platelets and by converting fibrinogen to fibrin. The
thrombin generation is regulated by negative feedback loops and physiological anticoagulants, such as
antithrombin III, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and the protein C system. During hyper-inflammation, the
feedback loops can be impaired leading to unabated production of thrombin and reduced anticoagulant
concentrations due to reduced production and increased consumption. The defective procoagulant
anticoagulant balance leads to the activation of coagulation pathways (27). On the other hand, the excess
thrombin further augments inflammation via proteinase-activated receptors (PARs), especially PAR-1. In
addition, the defective immune response to Covid-19 infection predisposes to secondary bacterial infection in
setting of severe Covid-19 pneumonia (28).
The patients with CSS present with, apart from a surge in IL-6, IL-1, TNF-α and IFN-g, elevated C-reactive protein,
serum lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, and ferritin levels. The CSS in Covid-19 pneumonia in setting of
hospitalised patients is associated with unfavourable prognosis. Various therapeutic modalities have been tried.
The prophylactic use low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) may be recommended for prevention of venous
thromboembolism, especially in those with significantly raised d-dimer concentrations. The LMWH has anti-
inflammatory properties, which may be beneficial in Covid-19 (29). The IL-inhibitors such as, tocilizumab (IL-1
inhibitor) may be tried, which has a large therapeutic window and a short half-life. The concentrated globulin
prepared from pooled human plasma may be useful. The convalescent plasma collected from recovered COVID-
19 patients is being studied as a potential treatment. The immunosuppression with corticosteroids, is
controversial but may be useful in treating hyperinflammation.
3. THE RECOVERY AND RESIDUAL DAMAGE
3.1 The Fatality and Other Severity Outcomes:
The CFR (case fatality rate) from Covid-19 increases with age, the overall death rate being 1.4% in those with
no comorbid conditions, rises sharply to 4% for those in their 60s, 8.6% for people in their 70s and 13.4% for
those age 80 and older. The CFR is higher among males compared to females (4.7% vs. 2.8%). By occupation,
patients who reported being retirees had the highest CFR at 8.9%. The patients with comorbid conditions had
much higher rates: 13.2% for those with cardiovascular disease, 9.2% for diabetes, 8.4% for hypertension, 8.0%
for chronic respiratory disease, and 7.6% for cancer. The data on the progression of disease indicate that that
the time period from onset to the development of severe disease, including hypoxia, is 1 week. Among patients
who have died, the time from symptom onset to outcome ranges from 2-8 weeks (30).
The recovery and other outcomes vary depending on age and other factors (31). The outlook for older adults,
who account for a disproportionate share of critical disease, is not favourable, and most of those who survive
are unlikely to return to their previous level of functioning (32). The disease affects their long-term health
prospects and quality of life (QOL) as well as brings in propensity of truncated post-disease survival.
3.2 Recovery Estimates for Covid-19:
About 8 in 10 people who get COVID-19, are asymptomatic or suffer with mild illness. The early estimates predict
that the overall COVID-19 recovery rate is between 97% and 99.75%. It may take 2 weeks for to recover from
illness in mild cases. For those with severe or critical cases, recovery can take up to 6 weeks. For Severe Illness
need to stay in the hospital may last 2 weeks or more (33). In general, the recovery depends on how a person’s
immune system responds to COVID-19. Reinfection may occur, after recovery. One early study on monkeys
found that they did not get infected a second time.
According to the preliminary data from a recent UK study, involving 775 patients with COVID-19 admitted to
critical care; 79 died, 86 survived and were discharged to another location, and 609 were still being treated in
critical care, with uncertain prognosis (34). Another, small study of 24 critically ill COVID-19 patients treated in
Seattle hospitals, documented that over 50% died within 18 days. Of those who survived, three remained on
ventilators in intensive care units, four left the ICU but stayed in the hospital, and five were discharged home.
Many COVID-19 patients who need a ventilator never recover (35). The survival rates may vary across studies
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page6
and countries. A report from London’s Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre found that 67% of
reported COVID-19 patients from England, Wales, and Northern Ireland receiving advanced respiratory support
died (36). Those least likely to recover seem to be frail older patients with other pre-existing illnesses such as
chronic lung disease or heart disease. The ARDS mortality is usually between 30% and 40%. For older people,
who tend to have more infections, mortality rates are as high as up to 60% or more.
3.3 The Effect of ARDS on lungs:
The Covid-19 directly impacts the lungs and damages the alveoli. There occurs damage to the wall and the lining
of the alveolus and capillaries. The debris from the damage, which is plasma protein accumulates on the alveolus
wall and thickens the lining and impairs the oxygen transfer to the red blood cells. As the alveoli are damaged,
there occurs influx of inflamed cells and protein leak, leading to pneumonia, further impairing the oxygen intake
and exchange by the lungs. The immediate assault on the body by the disease, is extensive. It targets the lungs,
and through hypoxia and widespread inflammation damages the heart, kidneys, brain, and other organs. Even
after coming off the ventilator, the patient often needs assistance in form of oxygen therapy, through a mask or
a continuous positive airway pressure (Cpap) ventilator. The Covid-19 survivors, who have spent time on a
ventilator often suffer with muscle wastage and long-term disability and may need retraining to breathe. The
breathing exercises are to be advised to the recovering Covid-19 patients (37).
Although it is too early to say about lasting disabilities in COVID-19 survivors, the clues come from studies of
severe pneumonia and ARDS. Though, most of the pneumonia and ARDS patients eventually recover their lung
function, the conditions may lead to scarring resulting in long-term breathing problems. In addition, in the
recovered patients, the prolonged inflammation seems to increase the risk of future illnesses, including coronary
heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease. The people hospitalized for pneumonia have a risk of heart disease
about four times as high as that of age-matched controls in the year after the discharge, and about 1.5 times as
high in each of the next 9 years.
3.4 The Disabilities and Rehab Measures:
The older adults are at greatest risk of both severe disease and long-term impairment. The best practices for
geriatric care are difficult to be followed in setting of the highly infectious disease in the hospital and ICU. During
ICU care, the aim is to keep patients as lucid and mobile as possible, which can reduce the muscular weakness
and allow to wean off early from the ventilator and has a positive effect on their long-term odds. The disease is
highly infectious, and the rehabilitation measures can be challenging tasks.
Further, the patients who spend long time in an ICU, regardless of their illness, are prone to a set of physical,
cognitive, and mental health difficulties known as postintensive care syndrome. An associated factor for
hospitalized patients is risk of delirium, a state of confused thinking that can lead to long-term cognitive
impairments such as memory deficits. The Covid-19, like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle
East respiratory syndrome (MERS), can directly damage the brain or the associated wide-spread inflammation
can compromise the cerebral blood flow to cause neuronal deficit.
In addition, the commonly prescribe sedative drugs to suppress violent coughing and help patients tolerate the
distress associated with endotracheal tube or benzodiazepines to allay anxiety can increase the risk and intensity
of delirium. To overcome this and improve patient care and outcomes, many ICUs, now adopt a frequent
interruption of narcotics and sedatives plus a decrease of ventilator pressure to test whether patients can wake
up, breathe, and tolerate the ventilator without drugs. This practice, of course, requires close monitoring and
risk of exposure to the Covid-19 infection. Early reports from the ICUs care, suggested that the Covid-19 patients
should be put on ventilators early in the course of the disease. But there are the downsides of early ventilation
(38). It may be possible to differentiate the subtypes and stage of respiratory failure in Covid-19 patients, who
are more likely to need to ventilatory support.
3.5 Post-Recovery Complications:
There are immediate as well as the delayed post-recovery complications. Those patients who have suffered with
high fevers or severe diarrheal illness can remain mildly dehydrated and suffer with electrolytes disturbance,
and various fallouts. They may not tolerate nutrition as well and get suboptimal nutrition and suffer with weight
loss and emaciation. Frailty is common, associated with ongoing fatigue and lethargy. The long-term
complications include myocarditis and cardiomyopathy, which can exacerbate their propensity to coronary
artery disease. There occurs an increased risk for future illnesses, including MI, stroke, and kidney disease. With
other pre-existing illnesses like diabetes, there is more risk for complications.
In addition, the underlying conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other chronic lung
diseases are exacerbated. Some of these patients may have significant scarring of the lungs and suffer with
reduced lung function. Those who remain for a long period on a ventilator are prone to respiratory and extra-
respiratory muscle atrophy and weakness. Their immune system is less robust, and they are prone to infections.
In addition, many of them may suffer with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), impaired concentration,
delirium and disturbed sleep-wake cycle afterwards. A study of people hospitalized for SARS found that more
than one-third had moderate to severe symptoms of depression and anxiety one year later (39).
4. COVID-19 AFTERMATH AND FOLLOW UP
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page7
4.1 The Post-Discharge Period:
The patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19, after discharge suffer with lingering impact of the disease as
well as that of the emergency treatments that allowed them to survive it. The post-infection reduced exercise
tolerance suggests that there may be more subtle factors, like post viral fatigue, underlying the functional
impairment. In fact, there is need of step-down care while in the hospital before discharge to home or the
community care with primary care support (40). Later, the additional inputs are likely to be multidisciplinary for
regular clinical assessment, recomposing respiratory review, physiotherapy, nutritional advice, and psychiatric
support as the discharged patients regain their health.
4.2 The Post-Discharge Follow Up:
About 50% of patients admitted to hospital will require no further input on discharge. 45% will need some form
of low level medical or social input for recovery, and a predicted 5% of patients will require more focused,
ongoing intense rehabilitation (Figure 4). In general, a combination of physical interventions such physiotherapy
Fig 4. The Covid-19: Post-discharge follow up, Evaluation and interventions
and graded exercise programmes, good nutrition and clinically validated mental health support interventions
such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) focusing on changing the automatic negative thoughts that can
contribute to and worsen emotional difficulties, depression, and anxiety, and possibly antidepressants may
provide benefits. A designed care approach for severe Covid-19 discharged patients may include monitoring
them using computers and smartphones and treating them remotely in hopes of preventing readmission to the
hospital, and planning visits at home on case to case basis.
A two year follow up study involving 106 patients aged 80 years or over, has documented that 40 (37.7%) died
in the ICU and 66 (62.2%) patients were discharged alive from the ICU. Out of this, 25 patients died before the
one-year evaluation. Of the 33 survivors at one year, seven refused the evaluation. Of the 26 remaining patients,
three had dementia and the self-sufficiency could be assessed by the relatives. QOL was assessed in the rest,
who were found to have significantly higher scores for psychological health, social relationships, environment,
fear of death and dying, expectations about past, present, and future activities, and intimacy (friendship and
love). Of the 23 patients, 18 agreed for another ICU admission should the need arise (41).
5. CONCLUSION: THE LIFE AFTER COVID-19
5.1 The Recovery and SARS-CoV-2 virus:
During the recovery period, the viral particles can be found not only in the nasal passages, throat, and respiratory
tract, but also in tears, stool, the kidneys, liver, pancreas, and heart. They have been found in the cerebrospinal
fluid (CSF) in a patient with meningitis. the virus could persist in the body for up to two weeks or more after
symptoms had vanished. The virus has been shown to survive in a Chinese patient’s respiratory tract for 37 days,
well above the average of 24 days for those with critical disease status (42). There are further reports from China
that 14% of recovering patients were retested positive (43). It is possible that the virus may persist as a latent
infection, like chickenpox, lying dormant in the body, re-emerging periodically as shingles, or become a chronic
infection, like hepatitis B, living within the body for a sustained period of time, causing long-term damage.
5.2 Recovery from Covid-19 and Vitamin D:
Vitamin D levels are often low in the aging population, which is also the most vulnerable group of population for
COVID-19. Vitamin D has been shown to protect against acute respiratory infections (44). A team of researchers
have found the link between low levels of vitamin D and Covid-19 mortality rates across Europe. They found that
levels of vitamin D among citizens of 20 countries in Europe was strongly associated with the mortality caused
by Covid-19 and advised vitamin D supplementation to protect against COVID19 infection (45).
5.3 Post-Discharge Period: Things that Matter:
The human lifespan has increased across the globe as a result of economic progress, technological advances,
and improved healthcare. Simultaneously, there has been a steady increase in the proportion of elderly
individuals in different societies. As the natural fallout of a growing number of elderly and very elderly patients
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page8
are being admitted to the ICU. Compared with the general population, ICU survivors report lower QOL prior to
ICU admission. After hospital discharge, QOL in ICU survivors improves but remains lower than general
population levels. Age and severity of illness are major predictors of physical functioning (46).
The critical care seeks to ensure survival as well as restore to the pre-admission level of function and QOL. Few
data are available on QOL in elderly and very elderly ICU survivors compared to the general population. The
study by Tabah et al, inferred that in the highly selective cohort of the elderly patients one year after ICU
discharge, the patients were satisfied with their level of self-sufficiency and QOL (41). Further, the QOL, physical
health, sensory abilities, self-sufficiency, and social participation had slightly lower ratings than other domains
like social relationships, environment, and death related issues.
FOOTNOTES
1. Affiliation Senior Consultant and Faculty, Department of Medicine, Hindu Rao Hospital and NDMC Medical College,
New Delhi, India. Email: drvinodnikhra@gmail.com Alt. email: drvinodnikhra@rediffmail.com
2. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0859-5232 3. Disclosures None.
4. The Figures 1 - 4 in this Review Article are subject to Copyright by Dr Vinod Nikhra.
REFERENCES
1. Yu Zhao, Zixian Zhao, Yujia Wang, et al. 2020. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the receptor of SARS-CoV-2. 09 April 2020
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.26.919985.
2. Guo YR, Cao QD, Hong ZS, et al. The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak - an
update on the status. Mil Med Res. 13 March 2020, 7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00240-0.
3. Tian Y, Rong L, Nian W, He Y. Review article: gastrointestinal features in COVID‐19 and the possibility of faecal transmission. Alimentary
Pharm & Thera, 29 March 2020, 51:9; 843-51, DOI: 10.1111/apt.15731.
4. Lamers MM, Beumer J, van der Vaart J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 productively infects human gut enterocytes. Science, 01 May 2020, eabc1669,
DOI: 10.1126/science.abc1669.
5. Nikhra V. The Trans-zoonotic Virome interface: Measures to balance, control and treat epidemics. Ann Biomed Sci Eng. 09 April 2020;
4: 020-027. DOI: 10.29328/journal.abse.1001009.
6. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al., for the China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease
2019 in China. 30 April 2020. N Engl J Med, 382; 1708-1720. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.
7. McIntosh K, Hirsch MS, Bloom A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Epidemiology, virology, clinical features, diagnosis, and
prevention. Literature review current through: Mar 2020, last updated: Apr 20, 2020. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/coronavirus-
disease-2019-covid-19-epidemiology-virology-clinical-features-diagnosis-and-prevention.
8. Fu L, Wang B, Yuan T, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A systematic review and meta-
analysis. Journal of Infection J Infect. 10 April 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.041.
9. Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, et al. Factors associated with hospitalization and critical illness among 4,103 patients with COVID-19 disease
in New York City. Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine, 2020 DOI:10.1101/2020.04.08.20057794.
10. N. Tang, D. Li, X. Wang, Z. Sun. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus
pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost (2020), 10.1111/jth.14768.
11. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutiérrez-Ocampo E, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 13 March 2020, 101623. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623.
12. Meng H, Xiong R, He R, et al. CT imaging and clinical course of asymptomatic cases with COVID-19 pneumonia at admission in Wuhan,
China. J Infect. 12 April 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.004.
13. Hani C, Trieu NH, Saab I. et al. Thoracic imaging COVID-19 pneumonia: A review of typical CT findings and differential diagnosis.
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 05 May 2020, 101:5; 263-268 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2020.03.014.
14. Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, et al. Time Course of Lung Changes on Chest CT During Recovery From 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia.
February 2020, RSNA Radiology, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200370.
15. Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of imaging findings in 919 Patients.
AJR Am J Roentgenol (2020), DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.23034.
16. Murthy S, Gomersall CD, Fowler RA. Care for Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19. JAMA. March 11, 2020, 323:15; 1499-1500.
doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3633.
17. Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, van der Meer NJM, et al. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb
Res. 2020 Apr 10, doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.013.Paradoxically, the clots occur at higher rates in the patients on antiplatelets.
18. Oxley TJ, Mocco J, Majidi S, et al. Large-Vessel Stroke as a Presenting Feature of Covid-19 in the Young. NEJM Corres. 28 April 2020. DOI:
10.1056/NEJMc2009787.
19. C. Chen, Y. Zhou, D.W. Wang. SARS-CoV-2: a potential novel etiology of fulminant myocarditis. Herz, 05 March 2020, 13. DOI:
10.1007/s00059-020-04909-z.
20. Hendren NS, Drazner MH, Bozkurt B, Cooper LT, Jr. Description and Proposed Management of the Acute COVID-19 Cardiovascular
Syndrome. Circulation 16 April 2020, https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047349.
21. Yu Y, Shu H, Xia J, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-
centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Resp Med, 24 Feb 2020, 8:5; P475-481, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-
2600(20)30079-5.
22. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, et al. Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region Case Series. NEJM, 30 March 2020,
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500.
23. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Rossi S. COVID-19 pneumonia: ARDS or not?. Crit Care, 24, Article no. 154. 16 April 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02880-z.
24. Maiolo G, Collino F, Vasques F, et al. Reclassifying acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018, 197:12; 1586
95.
25. Henrya BM, Lippib G. Poor survival with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Pooled analysis of early reports. J Crit Care. 01 April 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.03.011.
26. Porter, DL, Maloney D G. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS). UpToDate. Retrieved from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/cytokine-
release-syndrome-crs? Last updated: 06 April 2020.
27. Jose RJ, Manuel A. COVID-19 cytokine storm: the interplay between inflammation and coagulation. Lancet Resp Med. Corres. 27 April
2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30216-2.
Identifying Patterns in Covid-19: Morbidity, Recovery and the Aftermath - Dr Vinod Nikhra M.D.
Page9
28. Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus
pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18: 844-847.
29. Tang N, Huan B, Xing C, et al. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients
with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost. 24 March 2020, 18; 10941099.
30. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). 28 February 2020. https://www.who.int/publications-
detail/report-of-the-who-china-joint-mission-on-coronavirus-disease-2019-(covid-19).
31. Porcheddu R, Serra C, Kelvin D, Kelvin N, Rubino S. Similarity in Case Fatality Rates (CFR) of COVID19/SARS-COV-2 in Italy and China. J
Infect Dev Ctries 2020; 14: 1258.
32. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients
Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA, 22 April 2020. DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.6775.
33. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective
cohort study. The Lancet 2020; 395: 105462.
34. Perez-Guzman PNP, Daunt A, Mukherjee S, et al. Report 17: Clinical characteristics and predictors of outcomes of hospitalised patients
with COVID-19 in a London NHS Trust: a retrospective cohort study. Imperial College COVID-19 response team. 29 April 2020, DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25561/78613.
35. Vincent J-L, Taccone FS. Understanding pathways to death in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med. 06 April 2020. pii: S2213-
2600(20)30165-X. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30165-X.
36. Harrison DA, Parry GJ, Carpenter JR, et al. A new risk prediction model for critical care: The Intensive Care National Audit & Research
Centre (ICNARC) model. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35:4; 1091-98.
37. Which breathing techniques help with COVID-19? Official Q & A. Medically reviewed by Drugs.com Last updated on 08 April 2020.
https://www.drugs.com/medical-answers/breathing-techniques-covid-19-3536315/
38. Harman EM. Ed. Pinsky MR. What are the disadvantages to mechanical ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory distress
syndrome (ARDS)? Drugs & Diseases > Critical Care > Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Q&A, Updated: 27 March 2020.
https://www.medscape.com/answers/165139-43338/what-are-the-disadvantages-to-mechanical-ventilation-in-the-treatment-of-
acute-respiratory-distress-syndrome-ards.
39. Mak IWC, Chu CM, Pan PC, et al. Long-term psychiatric morbidities among SARS survivors. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009, 31:4; 31826.
doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.03.001.
40. Guidance for stepdown of infection control precautions within hospitals and discharging COVID-19 patients from hospital to home
settings. 09 April 2020. https://icmanaesthesiacovid-19.org/news/stepdown-of-infection-control-precautions-and-discharging-covid-
19-patients-to-home-settings.
41. Tabah A, Philippart F, Timsit JF. et al. Quality of life in patients aged 80 or over after ICU discharge. Crit Care 14, R2 (2010).
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8231.
42. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective
cohort study. Lancet, 28 March 2020, 395:10229, 1054-1062, DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3.
43. Chen Y, Bai W, Liu B, et al. Re-evaluation of Nucleic Acid Retested Positive Cases in the Recovered COVID-19 Patients: Report from a
Designated Transfer Hospital in Chongqing, China, ResearchGate, March 2020, DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-17321/v1.
44. Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Greenberg L, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: individual participant
data meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2019, 23:2; 1-44. doi: 10.3310/hta23020.
45. Ilie PC, Stefanescu S, Smith L. The role of Vitamin D in the prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 infection and mortality. Research
Squqre. 06 May 2020, Preprint, DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-21211/v1.
46. Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Sedrakyan A, et al. Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature. Intensive
Care Med. 2005, 31:5; 611-20.
---000---
... In 2014, Veugelers and Ekwaru asserted that the statistical calculations to determine recommendations for vitamin D were incorrectly interpreted, leading to a US RDA (600IU, or 700IU/day for those over 70) that is off by a factor of more than 10. 87, 96 Heaney, et al., supported the higher level in a reply, citing a recent supplementation study which supported an RDA closer to 7000IU/day. 97 All three groups used the goal of 20ng/ml for musculoskeletal health. ...
Article
Full-text available
As the world’s attention has been riveted upon the growing COVID-19 pandemic, many researchers have written brief reports supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is related to the incidence and severity of COVID-19. The clear common thread among the top risk groups - vitamin D deficiency – may be being overlooked because of previous overstated claims of vitamin D benefits. However, the need to decrease COVID-19 fatalities among high-risk populations is urgent. Early researchers reported three striking patterns. Firstly, the innate immune system is impaired by vitamin D deficiency, which would predispose sufferers to viral infections such as COVID-19. Vitamin D deficiency also increases the activity of the X-chromosome-linked ‘Renin-Angiotensin’ System, making vitamin D deficient individuals (especially men) more susceptible to COVID-19’s deadly “cytokine storm” (dramatic immune system overreaction). Secondly, the groups who are at highest risk for severe COVID-19 match those who are at highest risk for severe vitamin D deficiency. This includes the elderly, men, ethnic groups whose skin is naturally rich in melanin (if living outside the tropics), those who avoid sun exposure for cultural and health reasons, those who live in institutions, the obese, and/or those who suffer with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. And thirdly, the pattern of geographical spread of COVID-19 reflects higher population vitamin D deficiency. Not only within the USA but throughout the world, COVID-19 fatality rates parallel vitamin D deficiency rates. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, and RSMLDS, with targeted Google searches providing additional sources. Although randomized controlled trial results may be available eventually, the correlational and causal study evidence supporting a link between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 risks is already so strong that it supports action. The 141 authorial groups writing primarily about biological plausibility detailed how vitamin D deficiency can explain every risk factor and every complication of COVID-19, but agreed that other factors are undoubtedly at work. COVID-19 was compared with dengue fever, for which oral vitamin D supplements of 4000IU for 10 days were significantly more effective than 1000IU in reducing virus replication and controlling the “cytokine storm” (dramatic immune system over-reaction) responsible for fatalities. Among the 47 original research studies summarized here, chart reviews found that serum vitamin D levels predicted COVID-19 mortality rates (16 studies) and linearly predicted COVID-19 illness severity (8 studies). Two causal modeling studies and several analyses of variance strongly supported the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is a causal, rather than a bystander, factor in COVID-19 outcomes. Three of the four studies whose findings opposed the hypothesis relied upon disproven assumptions. The literature review also found that prophylactically correcting possible vitamin D deficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic is extremely safe. Widely recommending 2000IU of vitamin D daily for all populations with limited ability to manufacture vitamin D from the sun has virtually no potential for harm and is reasonably likely to save many lives.
... 68 69,72,73,116,118,123,[229][230][231][232] However, most authors recommend widespread daily vitamin D supplementation (most often with 1000 -5000IU per day) to prevent and decrease the severity of Covid-19, at least until the pandemic abates. 1,9,26,38,45,47,49,62,63,105,107,111,112,114,119,122,125,163,169,170,176,188,190,195,196,208,212,217,220,[233][234][235][236][237][238][239][240][241][242][243][244][245][246][247] Word Cloud of recommendations from authors of 46 studies ...
Preprint
Full-text available
As the world's attention has been riveted upon the growing Covid-19 pandemic, many researchers have written brief reports supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is related to the incidence and severity of Covid-19.
Article
Full-text available
As the world’s attention has been riveted upon the growing COVID-19 pandemic, many researchers have written brief reports supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is related to the incidence and severity of COVID-19. The clear common thread among the top risk groups - vitamin D deficiency – may be being overlooked because of previous overstated claims of vitamin D benefits. However, the need to decrease COVID-19 fatalities among high-risk populations is urgent. Early researchers reported three striking patterns. Firstly, the innate immune system is impaired by vitamin D deficiency, which would predispose sufferers to viral infections such as COVID-19. Vitamin D deficiency also increases the activity of the X-chromosome-linked ‘Renin-Angiotensin’ System, making vitamin D deficient individuals (especially men) more susceptible to COVID-19’s deadly “cytokine storm” (dramatic immune system overreaction). Secondly, the groups who are at highest risk for severe COVID-19 match those who are at highest risk for severe vitamin D deficiency. This includes the elderly, men, ethnic groups whose skin is naturally rich in melanin (if living outside the tropics), those who avoid sun exposure for cultural and health reasons, those who live in institutions, the obese, and/or those who suffer with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. And thirdly, the pattern of geographical spread of COVID-19 reflects higher population vitamin D deficiency. Not only within the USA but throughout the world, COVID-19 fatality rates parallel vitamin D deficiency rates. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, and RSMLDS, with targeted Google searches providing additional sources. Although randomized controlled trial results may be available eventually, the correlational and causal study evidence supporting a link between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 risks is already so strong that it supports action. The 141 authorial groups writing primarily about biological plausibility detailed how vitamin D deficiency can explain every risk factor and every complication of COVID-19, but agreed that other factors are undoubtedly at work. COVID-19 was compared with dengue fever, for which oral vitamin D supplements of 4000IU for 10 days were significantly more effective than 1000IU in reducing virus replication and controlling the “cytokine storm” (dramatic immune system over-reaction) responsible for fatalities. Among the 47 original research studies summarized here, chart reviews found that serum vitamin D levels predicted COVID-19 mortality rates (16 studies) and linearly predicted COVID-19 illness severity (8 studies). Two causal modeling studies and several analyses of variance strongly supported the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is a causal, rather than a bystander, factor in COVID-19 outcomes. Three of the four studies whose findings opposed the hypothesis relied upon disproven assumptions. The literature review also found that prophylactically correcting possible vitamin D deficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic is extremely safe. Widely recommending 2000IU of vitamin D daily for all populations with limited ability to manufacture vitamin D from the sun has virtually no potential for harm and is reasonably likely to save many lives.
Article
Full-text available
As the world’s attention has been riveted upon the growing COVID-19 pandemic, many researchers have written brief reports supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is related to the incidence and severity of COVID-19. The clear common thread among the top risk groups - vitamin D deficiency – may be being overlooked because of previous overstated claims of vitamin D benefits. However, the need to decrease COVID-19 fatalities among high-risk populations is urgent. Early researchers reported three striking patterns. Firstly, the innate immune system is impaired by vitamin D deficiency, which would predispose sufferers to viral infections such as COVID-19. Vitamin D deficiency also increases the activity of the X-chromosome-linked ‘Renin-Angiotensin’ System, making vitamin D deficient individuals (especially men) more susceptible to COVID-19’s deadly “cytokine storm” (dramatic immune system overreaction). Secondly, the groups who are at highest risk for severe COVID-19 match those who are at highest risk for severe vitamin D deficiency. This includes the elderly, men, ethnic groups whose skin is naturally rich in melanin (if living outside the tropics), those who avoid sun exposure for cultural and health reasons, those who live in institutions, the obese, and/or those who suffer with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. And thirdly, the pattern of geographical spread of COVID-19 reflects higher population vitamin D deficiency. Not only within the USA but throughout the world, COVID-19 fatality rates parallel vitamin D deficiency rates. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, and RSMLDS, with targeted Google searches providing additional sources. Although randomized controlled trial results may be available eventually, the correlational and causal study evidence supporting a link between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 risks is already so strong that it supports action. The 141 authorial groups writing primarily about biological plausibility detailed how vitamin D deficiency can explain every risk factor and every complication of COVID-19, but agreed that other factors are undoubtedly at work. COVID-19 was compared with dengue fever, for which oral vitamin D supplements of 4000IU for 10 days were significantly more effective than 1000IU in reducing virus replication and controlling the “cytokine storm” (dramatic immune system over-reaction) responsible for fatalities. Among the 47 original research studies summarized here, chart reviews found that serum vitamin D levels predicted COVID-19 mortality rates (16 studies) and linearly predicted COVID-19 illness severity (8 studies). Two causal modeling studies and several analyses of variance strongly supported the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is a causal, rather than a bystander, factor in COVID-19 outcomes. Three of the four studies whose findings opposed the hypothesis relied upon disproven assumptions. The literature review also found that prophylactically correcting possible vitamin D deficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic is extremely safe. Widely recommending 2000IU of vitamin D daily for all populations with limited ability to manufacture vitamin D from the sun has virtually no potential for harm and is reasonably likely to save many lives.
Article
Full-text available
As the world's attention has been riveted upon the growing COVID-19 pandemic, many researchers have written brief reports supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is related to the incidence and severity of COVID-19. The clear common thread among the top risk groups—vitamin D deficiency—may be being overlooked because of previous overstated claims of vitamin D benefits. However, the need to decrease COVID-19 fatalities among high-risk populations is urgent. Early researchers reported three striking patterns. Firstly, the innate immune system is impaired by vitamin D deficiency, which would predispose sufferers to viral infections such as COVID-19. Vitamin D deficiency also increases the activity of the X-chromosome-linked “Renin-Angiotensin” System, making vitamin D deficient individuals (especially men) more susceptible to COVID-19's deadly “cytokine storm” (dramatic immune system overreaction). Secondly, the groups who are at highest risk for severe COVID-19 match those who are at highest risk for severe vitamin D deficiency. This includes the elderly, men, ethnic groups whose skin is naturally rich in melanin (if living outside the tropics), those who avoid sun exposure for cultural and health reasons, those who live in institutions, the obese, and/or those who suffer with hypertension, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. And thirdly, the pattern of geographical spread of COVID-19 reflects higher population vitamin D deficiency. Both within the USA and throughout the world, COVID-19 fatality rates parallel vitamin D deficiency rates. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, and RSMLDS, with targeted Google searches providing additional sources. Although randomized controlled trial results may be available eventually, the correlational and causal study evidence supporting a link between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 risks is already so strong that it supports action. The 141 author groups writing primarily about biological plausibility detailed how vitamin D deficiency can explain every risk factor and every complication of COVID-19, but agreed that other factors are undoubtedly at work. COVID-19 was compared with dengue fever, for which oral vitamin D supplements of 4,000 IU for 10 days were significantly more effective than 1,000 IU in reducing virus replication and controlling the “cytokine storm” (dramatic immune system over-reaction) responsible for fatalities. Among the 47 original research studies summarized here, chart reviews found that serum vitamin D levels predicted COVID-19 mortality rates (16 studies) and linearly predicted COVID-19 illness severity (8 studies). Two causal modeling studies and several analyses of variance strongly supported the hypothesis that vitamin D deficiency is a causal, rather than a bystander, factor in COVID-19 outcomes. Three of the four studies whose findings opposed the hypothesis relied upon disproven assumptions. The literature review also found that prophylactically correcting possible vitamin D deficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic is extremely safe. Widely recommending 2,000 IU of vitamin D daily for all populations with limited ability to manufacture vitamin D from the sun has virtually no potential for harm and is reasonably likely to save many lives.
Article
Full-text available
Intestinal organoids as an infection model Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes an influenza-like disease with a respiratory transmission route; however, patients often present with gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Moreover, the virus has been detected in anal swabs, and cells in the inner-gut lining express the receptor that SARS-CoV-2 uses to gain entry to cells. Lamers et al. used human intestinal organoids, a “mini-gut” cultured in a dish, to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 readily replicates in an abundant cell type in the gut lining—the enterocyte—resulting in the production of large amounts of infective virus particles in the intestine. This work demonstrates that intestinal organoids can serve as a model to understand SARS-CoV-2 biology and infectivity in the gut. Science , this issue p. 50
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Aimed to characterize the CT imaging and clinical course of asymptomatic cases with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods Asymptomatic cases with COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by SARS-COV-2 nucleic acid testing in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were retrospectively enrolled. The characteristics of CT imaging and clinical feature were collected and analyzed. Results 58 asymptomatic cases with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to our hospital between Jan 1, 2020 and Feb 23, 2020 were enrolled. All patients had history of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. On admission, patients had no symptoms and laboratory findings were normal. The predominant feature of CT findings in this cohort was ground glass opacity (GGO) (55, 94.8%) with peripheral (44, 75.9%) distribution, unilateral location (34, 58.6%) and mostly involving one or two lobes (38, 65.5%), often accompanied by characteristic signs. After short-term follow-up, 16 patients (27.6%) presented symptoms with lower lymphocyte count and higher CRP, mainly including fever, cough and fatigue. The evolution of lesions on CT imaging were observed in 10 patients (17.2%). The average days of hospitalization was19.80±10.82 days, and was significantly longer in progression patients (28.60±7.55 day). Conclusion CT imaging of asymptomatic cases with COVID-19 pneumonia has definite characteristics. Since asymptomatic infections as “covert transmitter”, and some patients can progress rapidly in the short term. It is essential to pay attention to the surveillance of asymptomatic patients with COVID-19. CT scan has great value in screening and detecting patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, especially in the highly suspicious, asymptomatic cases with negative nucleic acid testing.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background: Little is known about factors associated with hospitalization and critical illness in Covid-19 positive patients. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 treated at a single academic health system in New York City between March 1, 2020 and April 2, 2020, with follow up through April 7, 2020. Primary outcomes were hospitalization and critical illness (intensive care, mechanical ventilation, hospice and/or death). We conducted multivariable logistic regression to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes, and maximum information gain decision tree classifications to identify key splitters. Results: Among 4,103 Covid-19 patients, 1,999 (48.7%) were hospitalized, of whom 981/1,999 (49.1%) have been discharged home, and 292/1,999 (14.6%) have died or were discharged to hospice. Of 445 patients requiring mechanical ventilation, 162/445 (36.4%) have died. Strongest hospitalization risks were age ≥75 years (OR 66.8, 95% CI, 44.7-102.6), age 65-74 (OR 10.9, 95% CI, 8.35-14.34), BMI>40 (OR 6.2, 95% CI, 4.2-9.3), and heart failure (OR 4.3 95% CI, 1.9-11.2). Strongest critical illness risks were admission oxygen saturation <88% (OR 6.99, 95% CI 4.5-11.0), d-dimer>2500 (OR 6.9, 95% CI, 3.2-15.2), ferritin >2500 (OR 6.9, 95% CI, 3.2-15.2), and C-reactive protein (CRP) >200 (OR 5.78, 95% CI, 2.6-13.8). In the decision tree for admission, the most important features were age >65 and obesity; for critical illness, the most important was SpO2<88, followed by procalcitonin >0.5, troponin <0.1 (protective), age >64 and CRP>200. Conclusions: Age and comorbidities are powerful predictors of hospitalization; however, admission oxygen impairment and markers of inflammation are most strongly associated with critical illness.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To better inform efforts to treat and control the current outbreak with a comprehensive characterization of COVID-19. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI (Chinese Database) for studies published as of March 2, 2020, and we searched references of identified articles. Studies were reviewed for methodological quality. A random-effects model was used to pool results. Heterogeneity was assessed using I². Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. Results 43 studies involving 3600 patients were included. Among COVID-19 patients, fever (83.3% [95% CI 78.4–87.7]), cough (60.3% [54.2–66.3]), and fatigue (38.0% [29.8–46.5]) were the most common clinical symptoms. The most common laboratory abnormalities were elevated C-reactive protein (68.6% [58.2–78.2]), decreased lymphocyte count (57.4% [44.8–69.5]) and increased lactate dehydrogenase (51.6% [31.4–71.6]). Ground-glass opacities (80.0% [67.3–90.4]) and bilateral pneumonia (73.2% [63.4–82.1]) were the most frequently reported findings on computed tomography. The overall estimated proportion of severe cases and case-fatality rate (CFR) was 25.6% (17.4–34.9) and 3.6% (1.1–7.2), respectively. CFR and laboratory abnormalities were higher in severe cases, patients from Wuhan, and older patients, but CFR did not differ by gender. Conclusions The majority of COVID-19 cases are symptomatic with a moderate CFR. Patients living in Wuhan, older patients, and those with medical comorbidities tend to have more severe clinical symptoms and higher CFR.
Preprint
Full-text available
Background/Aims: WHO declared SARS-Cov-2 a global pandemic. The aims of this paper are to assess if there is any association between mean levels of vitamin D in various countries and cases respectively mortality caused by COVID-19. Methods: We have identified the mean levels of vitamin D for 20 Europeans Countries for which we have also got the data regarding the morbidity and mortality caused by COVID-19. Results: The mean level of vitamin D (average 56mmol/L, STDEV 10.61) in each country was strongly associated with the number of cases/1M (mean 295.95, STDEV 298.73 p=0.004, respectively with the mortality/1M (mean 5.96, STDEV 15.13, p < 0.00001). Discussion: Vitamin D levels are severely low in the aging population especially in Spain, Italy and Switzerland. This is also the most vulnerable group of population for COVID-19. Conclusions: We believe, that we can advise Vitamin D supplementation to protect against SARS-CoV2 infection.