PreprintPDF Available

COVID-19 in Iran, a comprehensive investigation from exposure to treatment outcomes

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Abstract and Figures

Background There is a growing need for information regarding the recent coronavirus disease of 2019 (Covid-19). We present a comprehensive report of Covid-19 patients in Iran. Methods One hundred hospitalized patients with Covid-19 were studied. Data on potential source of exposure, demographic, clinical, and paraclinical features, therapy outcome, and post-discharge follow-up were analyzed. Results The median age of the patients was 58 years, and the majority of the patients (72.7%) were above 50 years of age. Fever was present in 45.2% of the patients on admission. The most common clinical symptoms were shortness of breath (74%) and cough (68%). Most patients had elevated C-reactive protein (92.3%), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (82.9%), lymphocytopenia (74.2 %) on admission. Lower lobes of the lung were most commonly involved, and ground-glass opacity (81.8%) was the most frequent finding in CT scans. The administration of hydroxychloroquine improved the clinical outcome of the patients. Lopinavir/ritonavir was efficacious at younger ages. Of the 70 discharged patients, 40% had symptom relapse, (8.6%) were readmitted to the hospital, and 3 patients (4.3%) died. Conclusions This report demonstrates a heterogeneous nature of clinical manifestations in patients affected with Covid-19. The most common presenting symptoms are non-specific, so attention should be made on broader testing, especially in age groups with the greatest risk and younger individuals who can serve as carriers of the disease. Hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir (in younger age group) can be potential treatment options. Finally, patients discharged from the hospital should be followed up because of potential symptom relapse.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
Preprint:Pleasenotethatthisarticlehasnotcompletedpeerreview.
COVID-19inIran,acomprehensiveinvestigationfrom
exposuretotreatmentoutcomes
CURRENTSTATUS:UND ERREVI EW
MohammadAliAshraf
ShirazUniversityofMedicalSciences
NasimShokouhi
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
ElhamShirali
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
FatemeDavari-tanha
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
OmeedMemar
AcademicDermatologyandSkinCancerInstitute,Chicago,IL
AlirezaKamalipour
UniversityofCaliforniaSanDiego
AyeinAzarnoush
AlborzUniversityofMedicalSciences
AvinMabadi
IranUniversityofMedicalSciences
AdeleOssareh
ShahidBeheshtiUniversity
MiladSanginabadi
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
TalatMokhtariAzad
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
LeilaAghaghazvini
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
2
SaraGhaderkhani
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
TaherehPoordast
ShirazUniversityofMedicalSciences
AliehPourdast
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
PershangNazemi
TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences
nazemipershang@gmail.comCorrespondingAuthor
ORCiD:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-7923
10.21203/rs.3.rs-26339/v1
SUBJECTAREAS
InfectiousDiseases
KEYWORDS
Coronavirusdisease2019(COVID-19);2019-nCoV;SARS-CoV-2;Iran;clinical
characteristics;treatmentoutcomes
3
Abstract
BackgroundThereisagrowingneedforinformationregardingtherecentcoronavirusdiseaseof2019
(Covid-19).WepresentacomprehensivereportofCovid-19patientsinIran.
MethodsOnehundredhospitalizedpatientswithCovid-19werestudied.Dataonpotentialsourceof
exposure,demographic,clinical,andparaclinicalfeatures,therapyoutcome,andpost-discharge
follow-upwereanalyzed.
ResultsThemedianageofthepatientswas58years,andthemajorityofthepatients(72.7%)were
above50yearsofage.Feverwaspresentin45.2%ofthepatientsonadmission.Themostcommon
clinicalsymptomswereshortnessofbreath(74%)andcough(68%).MostpatientshadelevatedC-
reactiveprotein(92.3%),elevatederythrocytesedimentationrate(82.9%),lymphocytopenia(74.2%)
onadmission.Lowerlobesofthelungweremostcommonlyinvolved,andground-glassopacity
(81.8%)wasthemostfrequentfindinginCTscans.Theadministrationofhydroxychloroquine
improvedtheclinicaloutcomeofthepatients.Lopinavir/ritonavirwasefficaciousatyoungerages.Of
the70dischargedpatients,40%hadsymptomrelapse,(8.6%)werereadmittedtothehospital,and3
patients(4.3%)died.
ConclusionsThisreportdemonstratesaheterogeneousnatureofclinicalmanifestationsinpatients
affectedwithCovid-19.Themostcommonpresentingsymptomsarenon-specific,soattentionshould
bemadeonbroadertesting,especiallyinagegroupswiththegreatestriskandyoungerindividuals
whocanserveascarriersofthedisease.Hydroxychloroquineandlopinavir/ritonavir(inyoungerage
group)canbepotentialtreatmentoptions.Finally,patientsdischargedfromthehospitalshouldbe
followedupbecauseofpotentialsymptomrelapse.
Introduction
Coronavirusesarethesecondcauseofthecommoncoldafterrhinoviruses.1Humancoronavirus
pathogenscancauseawiderangeofdiseasesfromthecommoncoldtoseverepneumonia.Two
previouslarge-scalepandemicsofcoronavirusinfectionsin2002–2003[coronavirus-severeacute
respiratorysyndrome(SARS)]and2012[coronavirus-MiddleEastrespiratorysyndrome(MERS)]had
severeglobalhealthimpacts.2,3Therecentcoronavirusdiseaseof2019(COVID-19)hasstrickenthe
4
globalhealthandtheeconomyevenmorethanthepreviousones.Ithasspreadtomorethan209
countries/territoriesandhasinfectedmorethanamillionpeoplearoundtheworld.Iranhasbeenone
ofthemostseverelyaffectedcountriesbythevirus.4,5
Previousstudiesdescribedtheclinicalanddemographiccharacteristicsofthedisease.Information
regardingthetransmissionpatternismostlyrelatedtoChina.Thereisalso,alackofinformation
aboutthepotentialtreatmentoutcomes,andpost-hospitalizationfollow-upintheliterature.69
ThisstudyisoneofthefirstreportsofCOVID-19patientsfromIran.Wereporteddetailedinformation
aboutthepotentialsourceofexposure,householdcontactinformation,outcomesofpotential
therapies,andpost-dischargefollow-up,aswellasdemographic,clinical,andparaclinical
characteristics.
Methods
Patientsandstudyoverview
MedicalrecordsofsuspectedcasesofCOVID-19fromFebruary22,2020,toMarch5,2020,admitted
totheYAShospitalaffiliatedtoTehranUniversityofMedicalSciences,werereviewed.Ourhospital
wasthefirstcenterinTehrantocareforadultCOVID-19patients.Asuspectedcasewasdefinedasa
flu-likesyndrome/orsymptomaticpatientalongwithradiologicpulmonaryfindings.Dataofpatients
forwhomtheresultsofreverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction(RT-PCR)werenotavailable
wasexcludedfromthestudy.COVID-19wasconfirmedusingRT-PCRofnasopharyngealspecimens.
ThisstudywasapprovedbytheTehranUniversityofMedicalSciences(TUMS)ethicscommittee
(IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1398.1036).Informedconsentwasobtainedfromallpatientsortheirfirst-degree
relativesinunconsciouspatients.
Datasources
Patientswhocametothehospitalwereexaminedbyaninfectious-diseasespecialist,andclassified
intothreegroupsaccordingtodiseaseseveritybasedonIran’snationalguidelineforthediagnosis
andtreatmentofCOVID-19inoutpatientsandinpatients(Fig.1).10Patientsassignedtomoderateor
severeinfectiongroupwereadmittedtothehospital.
Patients’occupation,travelhistorywithinthepast14days,householdcontactinformation,
5
demographiccharacteristics,potentialsourceofexposure,influenzavaccinationhistory,currentlist
ofmedications,pastmedicalhistory,socialhistory,andtheuseofpreventivemeasureswere
determined.
Historyofpresentillnessandcomprehensivereviewofsystemsweretaken,andacompletephysical
examinationwasdone.Clinicallaboratorystudiesandchestcomputedtomography(CTscan)were
requestedonthefirstdayofadmissionaccordingtoinfectiousdiseasespecialistrecommendations.
Wecollectedhospitalizationdatausingpatients’papermedicalrecords.
AvailableCTscanswerereportedbyaradiologistandscoredforseverityandlocationofinvolvement.
Thefinalreportswerereviewedbyaninfectiousdiseasespecialistandapulmonologist.
Themaintreatmentmedicationsincludedoseltamivir(75mgtwicedaily),hydroxychloroquine
(200mgtwicedaily/400mgsingledosewhencombinedadministrationwithLopinavir-Ritonavir),
Lopinavir-Ritonavir(400mgLopinavir-100mgRitonavirtwicedaily),andRibavirin(1200mgtwice
daily)accordingtothenationalguideline.10
Also,weconductedatelephonesurveyofpatientswhoweredischargedfromthehospital.A
questionnairewasdevelopedtofollowpatientsfor14dayspost-discharge.Weaskedpatientsabout
theepisodesofsymptomrelapse,theneedforhospitalreadmission,andwhethertheycompleted14
daysofhomequarantineafterdischarge.DischargedpatientswerefolloweduptoMarch19,2020.
Studyoutcomes
Thecriticalsituationofthepatients,whichwasdefinedasadmissiontoanintensivecareunit,theuse
ofmechanicalventilation,ordeath,wasconsideredasaprimarycompositeendpoint.Wecompared
demographiccharacteristics,hospitalizationdata,andpotentialtreatmentoutcomesincriticallyill
andnon-criticallyillpatients.Post-dischargefollow-upwasreportedfromthedischargedpatients.
Studydefinitions
IndexpatientwasdefinedasthefirstpersoninahouseholddiagnosedwithCovid19usingRT-PCR.
Theincubationperiodwascalculatedfromthetimebetweenthelastpotentialexposureandthetime
showingthefirstdiseasesymptoms.
Lunglobarscoreswerecalculatedusingascoringsystemgivingeachfivelobesascoregradedfrom
6
0–4accordingtotheseverityoftheinvolvedlobe.(0 = notinvolved;1 = upto25%involvement;2 = 
26–50%involvement;3 = 51–75%involvement;4 = 76–100%involvement).Thesumofalllobar
scorescombinedisdefinedasthetotallungscore,whichestimatestheseverityoftheentirelung
involvement(providesascorebetween0–20).Lowerlobesscorewasdefinedasthesumsofright
lowerlobeandleftlowerlobescores(providesascorebetween0–8).Themiddlelobescorewas
definedastherightmiddlelobescore(providesascorebetween0–4).Upperlobesscorewasdefined
asthesumsofrightupperlobeandleftupperlobescores(providesascorebetween0–8).
Laboratoryconfirmation
LaboratoryconfirmationofSARS-CoV2wasperformedintheNationalInfluenzaCenterlocatedatthe
SchoolofPublicHealth,TehranUniversityofMedicalSciences.Nasopharyngealswabspecimenswere
collectedfromhospitalizedpatientsusingDacronsterileswabsandplacedin2ccviraltransport
mediaandsenttothelaboratoryincoldcondition.AllsamplesweresubjectedtoRNAextractionwith
HighPureViralNucleicAcidKit(Roche,Germany)accordingtothemanufacturer’sinstructions.Real-
Time(RT)-PCRwasusedtodetectthepresenceofSARS-CoV2withkits(ModularDxKit,WuhanCoVE
&RdRPgenes)providedbyWHOtargetingtheEregionforscreeningandRNAdependentRNA
polymeraseforconfirmation.InvitrogenSuperScriptIIIOne-StepRT-PCRSystemwithPlatinumTaq
DNAPolymerasewasusedforPCR.Foreachreaction,12.5µlreactionmix,1µlRTenzyme,0.5µl
primer,probemixand5.6µlPCRgradewaterwasaddedto5µlRNAtemplate.Cyclingconditionsfor
amplificationofEandRdRPgeneswere50°Cfor30min,95°Cfor2minthen45cyclesof95°Cfor
15secand58°Cfor30sec.Acyclethresholdvalueoflessthan36Ctwasdefinedasapositivetest
result.11
Statisticalanalysis
Non-parametrictests(includingFisher’sexacttest,Mann-WhitneyUtest,andFriedmantest)were
usedtoanalyzedata.CrosstabulationandFisher’sexacttestwereusedtoinvestigatetherelation
betweenthebinaryvariables.Mann-WhitneyUtestwasappliedtocomparethequantitativevariables
betweenthetwogroups,andthemedianandinterquartilerange(IQR)werepresentedwiththe
results.IntheCTscananalysis,theFriedmantestwasusedtocomparebetweendifferentlunglobes
7
involvementandcomparisonoftripleaccumulativescores.Inaddition,logisticregressionwasusedto
estimatetheeffectofthetreatmentonanoddsratio(OR)scaleusingthebackwardWaldelimination
ofvariables.Intheregressionmodel,theresponsevariablewasconsideredasabinaryvariablewith
either0or1(1incaseofdischargeandrecovery,and0incaseofdeath).Alloftheadministered
medications(hydroxychloroquine,lopinavir/ritonavir,ribavirin,andantibiotics)wereenteredintothe
regressionmodelasbinaryandindependentvariables.Patients’ageandcoexistingdisorders
(includinghypertension,diabetes,andCOPD/asthma)wereconsideredascovariatevariables,andthe
interactionbetweenageandpatient’scondition(criticallyillvs.non-criticallyill),andmedications
(hydroxychloroquine,lopinavir/ritonavir,andribavirin)wereincludedinthemodel.Also,inorderto
examinethesimultaneouseffectofhydroxychloroquineandazithromycin,theinteractionofthese
twovariableswasconsideredinthemodel.AllanalysiswasperformedusingSPSSsoftware,version
23(IBM).
Results
Inthisstudy,weincluded100hospitalizedpatientsoutof185admittedpatientsfromFebruary22,
2020,toMarch5,2020.Figure1showsthedistributionoftheindexpatientsin22districtsofTehran
andthesurroundingareas/cities.District2wasthemostaffecteddistrictinTehran,followedby
district12,5,8,and3.Findingsshowthat37%ofthepatientseitherlivedinorvisitedthese
neighboringareaswithinthe14dayspriortoadmission.Fiveofthesepatientswerelinkedtothecity
ofQom,theepicenterofthediseaseinIran.12Recentpotentialexposures,householdcontact
information,demographics,clinicalcharacteristics,laboratory,andradiologicfindings,andpatients’
outcomeswereextractedasshowninTable1.
Pre-hospitalizationanddemographicinformation
Themedianageofthepatientswas58years(range,26–93).Themajorityofthepatients(72.7%)
wereabove50yearsofage.Criticallyillpatientswereolderthanthenon-criticallyillgroup(100%
vs.67.9%;P = 0.005).Malesconstitutedthemajorityofthepatients(64.6%).Themedianoffamily
memberswas2persons(IQR,2–3)inahousehold.Atotalof126familymembers(55%female,45%
male)wereidentifiedtoliveinahouseholdwithindexpatients;63%wereabove50yearsofage.
8
Accordingtojobclassification,28patients(28%)hadlowexposureriskoccupations,25(25%)had
highexposureriskoccupations,and5ofthem(5%)weremedicalstaff.Mostpotentialexposures
werecontactwithasuspectedfamilymember(22%)andcontactwithunderagefamilymemberswho
hadupperrespiratoryinfectionsymptoms(8%).Nineteenpatients(19%)wholivedinTehranhada
recenthistoryofdomestictravel,and3(3%)hadrecentoverseastravel.Noneofthepatients
recentlytraveledtoorfromChina(Table1).
Clinicalandparaclinicalfindings
Themedianincubationperiodwas7days(IQR,5–7).Feverwaspresentin45.2%ofthepatientson
admission.Themostcommonclinicalsymptomswereshortnessofbreath(74%),cough(68%),and
myalgia(18%).Decreaselevelofconsciousnesswasevidentin33%amongcriticallyillpatients,as
comparedwith0%amongthenon-criticallyillgroup(P < 0.001).Furthermore,respiratoryratewas
higherincriticallyillpatientscomparedwithnon-criticallyillgroup(medianof25.5vs.19/minutes;P 
= 0.02).Thepresenceofacoexistingdisorderwashigherinthecriticallyillgroupbutwasnot
statisticallysignificant(73.3%vs.60%,relativeriskforthecriticallyillgroup,0.59;95%confidence
interval[CI],0.20–1.73;P = 0.25).
Laboratorytestsonadmissionshowthat74.2%ofthepatientshadlymphocytopenia,92.3%had
elevatedC-reactiveprotein,82.9%hadelevatederythrocytesedimentationrate,and75%had
elevatedlactatedehydrogenaselevels.Themedianlevelofwhite-cellcountandmedianneutrophil
countwerestatisticallydifferentintwogroupsofcriticallyandnon-criticallyillpatients.(P = 0.001
andP < 0.001,respectively).Abnormalcreatininelevelpercentagewashigherincriticalpatients
comparedtonon-criticalones(relativeriskforthecriticallyillgroup,4.53;95%confidenceinterval
[CI],1.75–11.73,P = 0.004).
Intotal,55CTscanswerereviewedandscoredbyanexpertradiologist.Non-parametricFriedman
testshowsdifferentinvolvementintermsoflobarpredominance.Rightlowerandleftlowerlobes
werethemostinvolvedlobesfollowedbytherightmiddlelobe,rightupperlobe,andleftupperlobe,
respectively(P < 0.001).Also,thetestshowsadifferenceinthreecumulativescores.MedianLower
lobesscorewasthehighestscorefollowedbymedianupperlobesscoreandmedianmiddlelobe
9
score,respectively(P < 0.001).Ground-glassopacitywasthemostcommonradiologyfinding
(81.8%),followedbymixedpattern(ground-glassopacity + consolidation)andcrazypaving
appearance,whichwerefoundequallyintheresults(18.2%).Bothgroups(criticallyillvs.non-
criticallyill)hadsimilarCTscanfindings.
Treatmentandclinicaloutcomes
Allofthepatientsreceivedoseltamivirasarecommendedmedicationaccordingtothenational
guideline.Othermainadministeredmedicationsincludedhydroxychloroquine(94%),
lopinavir/ritonavir(60%),andribavirin(12%)wasadministeredinthepatients.Intravenousantibiotics
werealsoadministeredasshowninTable1.Allpatientsreceivedsupplementaryoxygentherapy
basedonpatients’conditions.Intravenousfluidtherapywasgivenforroutinemaintenance,as
mentionedbysolutiontypeandvolume(Table1).Intotal,19patientswerealreadytakinglosartan
andangiotensin-converting-enzymeinhibitors(ACEinhibitors)duetohypertension,whichcontinued
duringhospitalizationcourse(16%losartanvs.3%ACEinhibitors).Mechanicalventilationwasusedin
13%ofthepatients(2%non-invasiveventilationvs.12%invasiveventilation).
Hydroxychloroquine(OR = 61.859;95%CIforOR,9.009-424.722)andtheinteractionof
lopinavir/ritonavir*age*severity(OR = 0.922;95%CIforOR,0.887–0.958)hadasignificanteffecton
theoddsratio.However,theinteractionofazithromycinbyhydroxychloroquinedidnothavea
significanteffectonthemodel(OR = 0.917;95%CIforOR,0.00-4.34*109).Table2showsthefirst
andthelaststepofthebackwardeliminationinregressionanalysis.ThevalueofNagelkerke’sR2for
thefinalmodelwas0.840,andCoxandSnell’sR2was0.630,whichbothvaluesshowedthegoodness
offitinourmodel.
Ofthe185patientsadmittedtothehospitalduringthestudyperiod,only100patientswereeligible.
Ofthese100,12patients(12%)died,and70patients(70%)dischargedatthedateofdatacutoff.
Thecausesofdeathwereasfollows:fivepatientsduetoacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome,2
patientsdiedofsepticshock,2patientsdiedduetocardiacarrhythmia,and1diedofpneumothorax.
Thetworemainingpatientsdiedofsuddencardiacarrest.
Post-dischargefollow-up
10
Seventypatientswerefollowedwithin14daysofdischargedate.Thirty-sixpatients(51.4%)had
observed14daysofhomequarantinepost-discharge.Symptomshadrelapsedin40%ofthepatients.
Shortnessofbreath(13%)andcough(13%)werethemostcommonsymptomsofrelapseafter
discharge.Sixofthepatients(8.6%)werereadmittedtothehospital,and3patients(4.3%)diedpost-
discharge(Table3).
Discussion
OurhospitalwasthefirstcentertocareforthenewCOVID-19casesappearinginTehran,Iran.We
presentedthefirst100casesofCOVID-19patientsinTehran.Weidentifiedthemostcommonsource
ofexposure,detailedclinicalandparaclinicalfindings,theclinicaloutcomeofcommonproposed
antiviraltherapies,andpost-dischargefollow-up.
Themostimportantfindingsconsistedofthepositiveeffectofhydroxychloroquineand
lopinavir/ritonavironthediseaseoutcome.Ourfindingsareinconcordancewithpreviousstudies,
wherehydroxychloroquineshowedefficacyindiseaseoutcome.13,14Furthermore,Caoetal.
concludedthatlopinavir/ritonavirisnotefficaciousforCOVID-19;however,thedatawasnotassessed
inrelationtoindividualpatientparameters.15Ourregressionmodelidentifiedageasadeterminant
inresponsivenesstolopinavir/ritonavir,withefficacybeingrelatedtoyoungerages.Agehasbeen
identifiedasanimportantdeterminantinthemortalityfromCOVID-19,butweshowthatyoungerage
isalsoadeterminantintheresponsivenesstoanti-viraltherapywithlopinavir/ritonavir.Wealsoused
themodeltodeterminetheefficacyofacombinedazithromycin/hydroxychloroquineregimenand
foundthatthecombinationwasnotsignificantinclinicaloutcomes.Thisiscontrarytocurrent
protocolsandapreviousstudy.16
Thesecondmostsignificantfindingwassymptomrelapsein40%ofpatientsafterdischarge.The
mostcommonrelapsedsymptomswerecough(18.6%)andshortnessofbreath(18.6%).Sixpatients
(8.6%)werereadmittedtothehospital,and3patients(4.3%)diedafterdischarge.Thisemphasizes
theneedforaclosefollow-upaftersymptomimprovement.Lanetal.showedthatcertainpatients
couldrecoverandtestnegative,onlytotestpositiveagain.17,18Thisphenomenonmightunderlie
11
thesymptomreboundinourpatientsandmightindicatethatpatientsarestillasourceof
transmissionafterrecoveringfromCOVID-19.
ThenextsignificantfindinginourstudywasagreaterprevalenceofCOVID-19inhigher
socioeconomicneighborhoods.WewouldhaveexpectedthelowersocioeconomicsegmentsinTehran
tobemoreimportantintransmission,butinourstudy,wefoundthecontrary.Thismaybeexplained
bythegreaternumberofcrowdedareaslikeshoppingmallsandhospitalsinaffluentareasin
comparisontothelessaffluentareas.
Furthermore,themajorityofthepatientsdidnotfollowWHOpreventivemeasures;only5%used
medicalmasks,9%usedanalcohol-basedhandrub,and37%washedtheirhandsregularly.19This
emphasizestheimportanceofpreventivemeasures.
Feverwaspresentinlessthanhalf(45.2%)ofthepatientsonadmission,whilethemostcommon
clinicalsymptomswereshortnessofbreath(74%)andcough(68%).Ourdataonfeverissimilarto
Guanetal.whoreported43.8%feveronadmissionanddiffersfromChenetal.andWangetal.who
reported83%and98.6%,respectively.68Thismightindicatethatfeverisnotaspecificfindingin
COVID-19.However,thecoughhasbeenaconsistentprominentclinicalsymptominCOVID-19.
Theseverityofdiseasewasdirectlyrelatedtopatientsageover50years,higherrespiratoryrate,and
decreasedlevelofconsciousness.Thisisconsistentwithpreviousstudies.20,21Also,therateofco-
existingwashigheramongmorecriticalgroup.Thisfindingisconsistentwithameta-analysisof17
studieswerehypertension,COPD,diabetes,andcardiovasculardiseasewerehigheramongcritically-
illpatients.22
Lymphocytopeniawasacommonlaboratoryfinding.Itmayserveasamorespecificmarkeratthe
beginningofthisinfectionconsideringpreviousstudies.68However,itwasabsentin25%ofour
studypopulation.
Abnormalcreatininelevels,higherwhitecellcount,andhigherneutrophilcountwereseeninour
criticallyillpatients.Thismaybeexplainedbydirectrenalinvolvement,orfluidimbalancesecondary
tothecriticallyillstatusofthepatients.23IncreasedWBCcountincriticallyillpatientswiththe
12
predominanceofneutrophilscanbeasignofsecondarybacterialinfection.
ChestCTscansanalysisrevealedhigherinvolvementinbothlowerlunglobescomparedwithright
middleandupperlunglobes.Themostcommonfindingwasground-glassopacity(81.8%).24The
presenceofground-glassopacityandbilaterallowerlobeinvolvementisthemostcommon
radiographicfindingsofthesepatients,similartoXuEtal.,andcanbeusedasadiagnosticfactorfor
COVID-19.25
Limitations
First,wedidnothaveaccesstoreviewallCTscanssincesomewereperformedatoutsidereferring
hospitals.Second,thelimitednumberoflaboratorystudieswereduetothehighpatientloadand
limitedresources.Third,manypatientswereexcludedduetothelackofPCRkitsattheonsetofthe
epidemicinTehran.Fourth,somepatientmedicalrecordswerenotcompleteduetotheemergency
situation.Fifth,manyofthepatientswereunabletorememberinitialexposure.Sixth,wecouldnot
determinethecauseofdeathinpatientswhodiedpost-discharged.
Conclusion
COVID-19canpresentwithaheterogeneouspatternofnon-specificfindingsbutaffectsolder
individualsmoreadversely.Thereisahighriskofdiseaserelapseandnecessitatesclosemonitoring
ofdischargedpatients.Therushisontofindaneffectivetherapy.Themedicalcommunityisactively
testingnumerousrepurposedandnoveldrugs.
Declarations
Ethicsapprovalandconsenttoparticipate.
ThisstudywasapprovedbytheTehranUniversityofMedicalSciences(TUMS)ethicscommittee
(IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1398.1036).
Consentforpublication.
Informedconsentwasobtainedfromallpatientsortheirfirst-degreerelativesinunconscious
patients.
Availabilityofdataandmaterials.
Thedatasetsusedand/oranalysedduringthecurrentstudyareavailablefromthecorresponding
authoronreasonablerequest.
13
Competinginterests.
Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenocompetinginterests.
Funding.
Thisprojectwasnotfundedbyanyorganization
Authors’contributions.
MSandLAinterpretedthedataregardingradiologicfindingsinthisstudy.SA,TP,AP,andPNmade
substantialcontributionsinthedesigningandtheconceptofthestudy.AA,AM,andAShad
contributioninacquisitionandanalysisofthedata.TMAhadaroleinwritingthemanuscriptand
interpretationthedataregardingthePCRconfirmationofthepatients.MAhadmajorcontributionin
interpretationofdataandwritingthemainmanuscript.OMandAKhadsubstantiallyrevisedthe
manuscript.NS,ES,FDhadmajorrolesinacquisitionandinterpretationregardinglabfindingsand
post-dischargefollow-updata.
Everyauthorthoroughlyreadtheentiremanuscriptandcheckedfortheaccuracyofthedata,
protocolmethod,andanalysis.
Acknowledgements.Weappreciateallthehospitalstafffortheirsupportanddedicationtopatients
care,andallthepatientswhoconsentedtotheirinformationbeingreported.
References
1.  G r eenbergS.Update o n H u m a nRhinovirusandCoro n a v i r u s I n f e ctions.Seminarsin
RespiratoryCriticalCa r e M e d i c i n e .2016;37(04):55 5 7 1 .
2.  K s iazekT,ErdmanD,G o l d s m i t h C ,ZakiS,PeretT,Em e r y S , e t a l . ANovel
CoronavirusAssociate d w i t h S e v ereAcuteRespiratory S y n d r o m e.NEnglJMed.
2003;348(20):1953–66.
3.  A r abiY,BalkhyH,Hay d e n F , B o u chamaA,LukeT,B a i l l i e J , e t a l . M iddleEast
RespiratorySyndrom e N e w E nglandJournalofMe d i c i n e . 2 0 1 7;376(6):58494 .
4.  Z h uangZ,ZhaoS,Lin Q , C a o P , L ouY,YangL,etal.Pre l i m i n a r y e s timationofthe
novelcoronavirusdise a s e ( C O V I D -19)casesinIran:A m o d e l l i n g a nalysisbasedon
14
overseascasesand a i r t r a v e l d ata.InternationalJourn a l o f I n f e c t i o usDiseases.
2020;94:29–31.
5.  T u iteA,BogochI,Sherb o R , W a t t s A,FismanD,KhanK . E s t i m a t i o n ofCoronavirus
Disease2019(COV I D - 1 9 ) B u r d enandPotentialforIn t e r n a t i o n a l D isseminationof
InfectionFromIran.A n n I n t e r n M ed.2020.DOI:10.7 3 2 6 / m 2 0-0696.
6.  G u anW,NiZ,HuY,Lia n g W , O u C ,HeJ,etal.ClinicalCha r a c t e r i s t i c s o fCoronavirus
Disease2019inChin a . N E n g l J Med.2020.DOI:10 . 1 0 5 6 / N E JMoa2002032.
7.  W angD,HuB,HuC, Z h u F , L i u X ,ZhangJ,etal.ClinicalC h a r a c t e r i s t ic sof138
HospitalizedPatientsW i t h 2 0 1 9 N ovelCoronavirusInfe c t e d P n e u moniainWuhan,
China.JAMA.2020;3 2 3 ( 1 1 ) : 1 061.
8.  C h enN,ZhouM,Dong X , Q u J , G o ngF,HanY,etal.Ep i d e m i o l o g i c alandclinical
characteristicsof99 c a s e s o f 2 019novelcoronavir u s p n e u m oniainWuhan,China: a
descriptivestudy.The L a n c e t . 2 0 20;395(10223):5 0 7 1 3 .
9.  L i p sitchM,SwerdlowD , F i n e l l i L . D e f iningtheEpidemiolog y o f C o v i d - 1 9Studies
Needed.NEnglJMe d . 2 0 2 0 ; 3 82(13):11946.
10.  H e a lt handTreatmentDe p u t y o f t h e MinistryofHealthand M e d i c a l E ducation.
(2020).Guidelinefor t h e d i a g n o sisandtreatmentof C O V I D - 1 9 i n outpatientsand
inpatients.http://dme. b e h d a s h t . g ov.ir/uploads/Felo_Ta s h k i s h . p d f .
11.  C o r m anV,LandtO,Kaise r M , M o l e n kampR,MeijerA,C h u D , e t a l . Detectionof2019
novelcoronavirus(20 1 9 - n C o V ) byreal-timeRT-PCR.E u r o s u r v e i l l a nce.2020;25(3).
12.  T h e M inistryofHealthand M e d i c a l E d ucation.(2020).Dea t h o f t w o n ewcoronavirus
patientsinQom.
https://behdasht.gov. i r / % D 8 % A 7%D8%AE%D8% A 8 % D 8 % A7%D8%B1/%D 9 % 8 1 % D 9%88%D8%AA-
%D8%AF%D9%8 8 - % D 8 % A8%DB%8C%D9 % 8 5 % D 8 %A7%D8%B1-
%D9%85%D8% A 8 % D 8 % AA%D9%84%D8 % A 7 - % D 8 %A8%D9%87-
15
%DA%A9%D8%B 1 % D 9 % 88%D9%86%D8 % A 7 % D 9 %88%DB%8C% D 8 % B 1 % D9%88%D8%B 3 -
%D8%AC%D8%A F % D B % 8 C%D8%AF-%D8% A F % D 8 % B1-%D9%82%D 9 % 8 5 .
13.  G a o J, TianZ,YangX.Brea k t h r o u g h . Chloroquinephospha t e h a s s h o wnapparent
efficacyintreatment o f C O V I D - 1 9 associatedpneum o n i a i n c l i n i c a lstudies.
BioScienceTrends.2 0 2 0 ; 1 4 ( 1 ):723.
14.  C o l s o nP,RolainJ,LagierJ,B r o u q u i P , R a oultD.Chloroquinea n d h y d r o x y chloroquine
asavailableweapon s t o f i g h t C O VID-19.IntJAntimicrob A g e n t s . 2 0 20;55(4):10593 2 .
15.  C a o B ,WangY,WenD,L i u W , W a n gJ,FanG,etal.ATria l o f L o p i n a v i r Ritonavirin
AdultsHospitalizedwith S e v e r e C o vid-19.NEnglJMed . 2 0 2 0 .
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2001282.
16.  G a u t r etP,LagierJ,ParolaP , H o a n g V , MeddebL,MailheM , e t a l . H y droxychloroquine
andazithromycinas a t r e a t m e ntofCOVID-19:results o f a n o p e n-labelnon-
randomizedclinicaltria l . I n t J A n t i m i c r obAgents.2020;:1 0 5 9 4 9 .
DOI:10.1016/j.ijantim i c a g . 2 0 2 0 .105949.
17.  L a n L ,XuD,YeG,XiaC,W a n g S , L i Y ,etal.PositiveRT-PCRT e s t R e s u l t s in Patients
RecoveredFromC O V I D - 1 9 . J A M A.2020;323(15 ) : 1 5 0 2 .
18.  Z h a n gJ,YanK,YeH,LinJ,Z h e n g J , C a iT.SARS-CoV-2turned p o s i t i v e i n a
dischargedpatientw i t h C O V I D - 1 9 arousesconcernre g a r d i n g t h epresentstandard
fordischarge.Interna t i o n a l J o u r n a lofInfectiousDiseases . 2 0 2 0 .
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.007.
19.  W o r l d HealthOrganization. ( 2 0 2 0 ) R a tionaluseofpersona l p r o t e c t i v e equipmentfor
coronavirusdisease 2 0 1 9 ( C O VID-19):interimguida n c e .
https://apps.who.int/iris / b i t s t r e a m / handle/10665/331 2 1 5 / W H O-2019-nCov-
IPCPPE_use-2020.1 - e n g . p d f .
20.  M a o L,WangM,ChenS , H e Q , C h a ngJ,HongC,etal.N e u r o l o g i c a l Manifestationsof
16
HospitalizedPatientsw i t h C O V I D - 1 9 inWuhan,China:a r e t r o s p e c t i v ecaseseries
study.2020;.DOI:10.1101/2020.02.22.20026500.
21.  Z h o u F,YuT,DuR,FanG , L i u Y , L i u Z , etal.Clinicalcoursean d r i s k f a c t o rsfor
mortalityofadultinpa t i e n t s w i t h C O VID-19inWuhan,Ch i n a : a r e t r o spectivecohort
study.TheLancet.20 2 0 ; 3 9 5 ( 10229):105462 .
22.  T a b r iz iR,LankaraniK,Now r o u z i - s o h r a biP,Shabani-Borujen i M , R e z a e iS,Hosseini-
bensenjanM,etal.T h e r o l e o f c omorbiditiesandclinica l p r e d i c t o r s ofseveredisease
inCOVID-19:asystem a t i c r e v i e w andmeta-analysis. 2 0 2 0 ; . D O I:
https://doi.org/10.11 0 1 / 2 0 2 0 .04.21.2007463 3 .
23.  C h e n gY,LuoR,WangK, Z h a n g M , WangZ,DongL,et a l . K i d n e y i m pairmentis
associatedwithin-hos p i t a l d e a t h o fCOVID-19patients.2 0 2 0 ; .
DOI:10.1101/2020.02.18.20023242.
24.  L i K , W uJ,WuF,GuoD,Ch e n L , F a n g Z,etal.TheClinicaland C h e s t C T F eatures
AssociatedwithSeve r e a n d C r i t i c alCOVID-19Pneumo n i a . I n v e s t R adiol.2020;:1.
DOI:10.1097/rli.0000000000000672.
25.  X u Y , DongJ,AnW,LvX,Y i n X , Z h a n g J,etal.Clinicalandcom p u t e d t o m ographic
imagingfeaturesof n o v e l c o r o n aviruspneumoniac a u s e d b y S ARS-CoV-2.JInfect.
2020;80(4):394–400.
26.  O c c u pationalSafetyandH e a l t h A d m inistration.(2020).Gu i d a n c e f o r preparing
workplacesforCOV I D - 1 9 . ( S t a n dardNo.39900 3 ) .
https://www.osha.g o v / P u b l i c a t i o n s/OSHA3990.pdf.
Tables
Table1.Demographiccharacteristicsandparaclinicalfindingsofhospitalizedpatients,Comparedbetweencriticallyillpatientsandnon-criticallyillpatients.
Variable
17
Exposurehistory—no./totalno.(%)
ContactwithsuspectedCOVID-19familymember

Contactwithmedicalstaffinfamilymember

contactwithunderagewithupper
respiratoryinfectionsymptoms
Contactwithanimals
Theuseofpreventingmeasures—no./totalno.(%)a
Usedtowearmedicalmasks
Usedanalcohol-basedhandrub
Usedtowashhandsregularly
Hadpersonalknowledgeabout
thediseasesymptom
Travelhistorywithin14daysbeforetheonsetofthesymptoms—no./totalno.(%)
Domestictravelhistory
Internationaltravelhistory(exceptchina)
Traveltochina
Socialhistory—no./totalno.(%)
Smoker
Vaccinationhistory
IndexpatientsJobclassification—no./totalno.(%)b
Lowexposureriskoccupations
18
Highexposureriskoccupation
Medicalstaff
Demographicinformation
Age
median(IQR)—yr
Distribution—no./totalno.(%)
>50—no.(%)
Malesex—no./totalno.(%)
Medianhospitalizationperiod(IQR)—days
Medianincubationperiod(IQR)—days
Vitalsignsonadmission
Feveronadmission—no./totalno.(%)c
Mediantemperature(IQR)—°C
Distributionoftemperature—no./totalno.(%)
≥37.8°C
Peripheralcapillaryoxygensaturation(SpO2)%—no./totalno.(%)
SpO2<93%
Medianrespiratoryrate(IQR)—/minutes
Medianheartrate(IQR)—/minutes
Bloodpressure
Mediansystolicbloodpressure(IQR)—mmHg
Mediandiastolicbloodpressure(IQR)—mmHg
Clinicalsymptoms—no./totalno.(%)
19
Cough
Sputumproduction
Shortnessofbreath
Myalgia
Headache
Fatigue
Pleuriticchestpain
Rhinorrhea
Sorethroat
Nauseaorvomiting
Diarrhea
Decreaselevelofconsciousness
Coexistingdisorder—no./totalno.(%)
Any
Diabetes
Hypertension
Ischemicheartdisease
Chronicobstructivepulmonarydisease/asthma
Hypothyroidism
Others
Laboratoryfindings
White-cellcount
Median(IQR)—permm3
20
Distribution—no./totalno.(%)
<4000permm3
4000-10000permm3
>10000permm3
Lymphocytecountd
Median(IQR)—permm3
Distribution—no./totalno.(%)
<1500permm3
Neutrophilcount
Median(IQR)—permm3
Distribution—no./totalno.(%)
>1800permm3
1800-7800permm3
<7800permm3
Plateletcounte
Median(IQR)—permm3
<150000permm3
Distributionofotherfindings—no./totalno.(%)
Erythrocytesedimentationratef
21
Median(IQR)—mm/hour
Elevatedmm/hour
C-reactiveprotein
Median(IQR)—mg/liter
>6mg/liter
Lactatedehydrogenase
Median(IQR)—U/liter
>480U/liter
Aspartateaminotransferase
Median(IQR)—U/liter
>40U/liter
Alanineaminotransferase
Median(IQR)—U/liter
>40U/liter
Alkalinephosphatase
Median(IQR)—U/liter
>140U/liter
Creatininekinase
>170U/liter
Creatinine
Median(IQR)—μmol/liter
≥133μmol/liter
22
Prothrombintime
Median(IQR)—second
>13second
Partialthromboplastintime
Median(IQR)—second
>39second
Internationalnormalizedratio
>1.2
Bloodgas—no./totalno.(%)
Metabolicacidosis
Respiratoryacidosis
Metabolicalkalosis
Respiratoryalkalosis
MetabolicacidosisandRespiratoryacidosis
MetabolicacidosisandRespiratoryalkalosis
MetabolicalkalosisandRespiratoryacidosis
MetabolicalkalosisandRespiratoryalkalosis
Minerals
Mediansodium(IQR)—mmol/liter
Medianpotassium(IQR)—mmol/liter
Radiologicfindingsg
Lobarpredominance—no./totalno.(%)
23
Rightupperlobe
Rightmiddlelobe
Rightlowerlobe
Leftupperlobe
Leftlowerlobe
Scoring
Lobarscores
Medianrightupperlobescore(IQR)
Medianrightmiddlelobescore(IQR)
Medianrightlowerlobe(IQR)
Medianleftupperlobescore(IQR)
Medianleftlowerlobescore(IQR)
Cumulativescores
Mediantotalscore(IQR)
Medianlowerlobesscore(IQR)
Medianmiddlelobescore(IQR)
Medianupperlobesscore(IQR)
Anatomicdistribution—no./totalno.(%)
peripheral(subpleural)predominance
Central/perihilarpredominance
Unilateral
Bilateral
Attenuation
24
Ground-glassopacity
Mixed
(ground-glassopacityandconsolidation)
Crazypavingappearance
Othersigns
Reticulation
Cavitation
Bronchiectasis
Pleuraleffusion
Lymphadenopathy
Treatments
Admissiontointensivecareunit—no.(%)
Mechanicalventilation—no.(%)
Non-invasiveventilation
Invasiveventilation
Medications
Oseltamivir—no./totalno.(%)
Hydroxychloroquine—no./totalno.(%)
Lopinavir/Ritonavir—no./totalno.(%)
Ribavirin—no./totalno.(%)
Systemicglucocorticoids—no./totalno.(%)
Losartan—no./totalno.(%)
25
ACEinhibitor—no./totalno.(%)
Levofloxacin—no./totalno.(%)
Vancomycin—no./totalno.(%)
Azithromycin—no./totalno.(%)
Ceftriaxone—no./totalno.(%)
Piperacillin-tazobactam—no./totalno.(%)
Meropenem—no./totalno.(%)
Imipenem—no./totalno.(%)
Ciprofloxacin—no./totalno.(%)
Intravenousfluidtherapy
Solutiontype—no./totalno.
Dextrose3.3%-sodiumchloride0.3%
Sodiumlactate
Sodiumchloride0.9%
Sodiumchloride0.45%
Dextrose5%-saline0.9%
MedianSolutionamount(IQR)—cc/24hours
Clinicaloutcomeathospitalizationdatacutoff—no./totalno.(%)
Stillhospitalized
Dischargedfromhospital
Death
aPreventivemeasuresconsistedofwearingamedicalfacialmaskwhenincontactwiththepublic.2.Touseanalcohol-basedhandrub3.Towashhandsregularlyaccordingtotheworldhealthorganization(WHO)guideline.
26
bThepatient’soccupationriskwasclassifiedintothreegroups.1.Lowexposureoccupationsthatdonotrequireclosecontact(atleastwithin6feet)withthegeneralpublic.2.Highexposureoccupationsthathavefrequentclosecontact(atleastwithin6feet)withthegeneralpublic.3.Medicalstaffoccupationwasdefinedasajobinwhichpeopleworkincloseproximity(atleastwithin6feet)topatientsknownorsuspectedofCOVID-19infection.
cFeverwasdefinedasanaxillarybodytemperatureof37.8°Corabove.
dLymphocytopeniawasdefinedaslymphocytecountlessthan1500.
eThrombocytopeniawasdefinedasaplateletcountoflessthan150000.
fESRnormalrangeisdependentonageandsexofthepatientsanddefinedasfollows:Formaleindividuals50>yearsofage,thenormalrangeisbelow15;for>50and<85yearsofage,thenormalrangeisbelow20;andfor>85yearsofage,thenormalrangeisbelow30.Forfemaleindividuals50>yearsofage,thenormalrangeisbelow20;for>50and<85yearsofage,thenormalrangeisbelow30;andfor>85yearsofage,thenormalrangeisbelow42.AnyvaluesabovethenormallimitsweredefinedaselevatedESRinthetable.
gDataregardingCTscanweremissingfor45patientsduetothefactthattheywereperformedatoutsidereferringhospitals.
Table2.TheResultsofLogisticRegressionUsingaBackwardWaldEliminationofVariables(Response:Outcome)a

Regressioncoefficient(B) Standarderror(S.E.) Pvalue
Step1   
age -0.006 0.023 0.81
hospitalizationperiod -0.005 0.259 0.98
Hydroxychloroquine(1) 5.138 2.944 0.08
Ribavirin(1) -1.854 4.555 0.68
Lopinavir/Ritonavir(1) 0.858 1.829 0.64
Intravenous
antibiotics(1)
-1.212 3.085 0.69
Hydroxychloroquine(1)
byagebyseverity(1)
0.332 758.358 1.00
Lopinavir/Ritonavir(1) -0.639 766.387 1.00
27
byagebyseverity(1)
Ribavirin(1)byageby
severity(1)
0.236 110.643 1.00
Diabetes(1) -2.310 1.750 0.19
Hypertension(1) 2.513 2.062 0.22
Chronicobstructive
pulmonary
disease/asthma(1)
34.177 10895.718 1.00
Azithromycin(1)by
Hydroxychloroquine(1)
-0.087 11.366 0.99
AgebyAzithromycin(1)by
Hydroxychloroquine(1)
0.028 0.207 0.89
Step13   
Hydroxychloroquine(1) 4.125 0.983 <0.001
Lopinavir/Ritonavir(1)
byagebyseverity(1)
-0.081 0.020 <0.001
aComplete13stepsofLogisticRegressionisprovidedintheelectronicsupplementarymaterial(supplementarytable2).
Table3.Post-dischargeFollow-up.
Variable DischargedPatients
Observinghomequarantineafter
discharge—no./totalno.(%)b
36/70(51.4)
28
Post-dischargesymptomrelapse—no./totalno.(%)
Any 28/70(40)
Fever 3/70(4.3)
Sorethroat 3/70(4.3)
Lossofappetite 2/70(2.9)
Dizziness 2/70(2.9)
Shortnessofbreath 13/70(18.6)
Cough 13/70(18.6)
Fatigue 4/70(5.7)
Myalgia 3/70(4.3)
Nauseaorvomiting 4/70(5.7)
Post-dischargeoutcome—no./totalno.(%)
Hospitalreadmission 6/70(8.6)
Deathc3/70(4.3)
Recovery 61/70(87.1)
aOnlydischargedpatientswereeligibleforthetelephonesurvey(N=70).
bThepatientswereaskedwhethertheycompleted14daysofhomequarantineafterdischarge.
cWecouldnotdeterminethecauseofdeathinpatientswhodiedpost-discharged.
Figures
29
Figure1
FlowChartwithanOverviewofStudySteps.Patientswereclassifiedintothreegroupsof
mild,moderate,andseveredisease.Treatmentregimenandadmission/dischargecriteria
wereaccordingtoIran’snationalguidelinefornovelcoronavirusinfection.Thedefinitionof
30
mild,moderate,andseverediseasewasasbelowaccordingtothenationalguideline:
Patientswithaflu-likesyndromewith/withoutfever,whodidnothaveanysignsof
infiltrationinlungimagingwereclassifiedashavingmilddisease.Themoderategroupwas
definedassymptomaticpatientswithpulmonaryinfiltrationoratleastoneoftheadmission
criteria,asexplainedinthefigure.Theseveregroupconstitutedpatientswhohaveatleast
oneofthefollowingcriteria:1.Reducedconsciousness;2.Respiratoryrate(RR)≥30;3.
Bloodpressure(BP)BP<90/60;4.Multilobularinfiltration;5.Hypoxemia.
Figure2
DiseaseDistributionMapinTehranandSurroundingAreas/Cities.Thismapshowsthe
distributionofallRT-PCRconfirmedindexpatientsin22districtsofTehranandsurrounding
areas.Wedidnothaveaccesstotheaddressoftwopatientsinthestudy.*Qomismarked
astheepicenterofCovid-19inIran.
SupplementaryFiles
31
Thisisalistofsupplementaryfilesassociatedwiththispreprint.Clicktodownload.
electronicsupplementarymaterial.docx
... Overall, 5 articles (total participants = 345) were included in the present analysis (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). The majority portion of COVID-19 patients were treated by chloroquine, oseltamivir, and, lopinavir/ritonavir according to Iranian Ministry of health guidelines as well as some minor modifications (20,24,26). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess association of mortality in COVID-19 patients on Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs). A secondary objective is to assess associations with higher severity of the disease in COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods: We searched multiple COVID-19 databases (WHO, CDC, LIT-COVID) for longitudinal studies globally reporting mortality and severity published before January 18th, 2021. Meta-analyses were performed using 53 studies for mortality outcome and 43 for the severity outcome. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios were generated to describe overall effect size using random effect models. To account for between study results variations, multivariate meta-regression was performed with preselected covariates using maximum likelihood method for both the mortality and severity models. Result: Our findings showed that the use of ACEIs/ARBs did not significantly influence either mortality (OR = 1.16 95% CI 0.94–1.44, p = 0.15, I ² = 93.2%) or severity (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.94–1.48, p = 0.15, I ² = 91.1%) in comparison to not being on ACEIs/ARBs in COVID-19 positive patients. Multivariate meta-regression for the mortality model demonstrated that 36% of between study variations could be explained by differences in age, gender, and proportion of heart diseases in the study samples. Multivariate meta-regression for the severity model demonstrated that 8% of between study variations could be explained by differences in age, proportion of diabetes, heart disease and study country in the study samples. Conclusion: We found no association of mortality or severity in COVID-19 patients taking ACEIs/ARBs.
Article
Full-text available
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) share a target receptor with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The use of ACEIs/ARBs may cause angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor upregulation, facilitating the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells. There is concern that the use of ACEIs/ARBs could increase the risks of severe COVID-19 and mortality. The impact of discontinuing these drugs in patients with COVID-19 remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the association between the use of ACEIs/ARBs and the risks of mortality and severe disease in patients with COVID-19. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and MedRxiv.org from December 1, 2019, to June 20, 2020. We also identified additional citations by manually searching the reference lists of eligible articles. Forty-two observational studies including 63,893 participants were included. We found that the use of ACEIs/ARBs was not significantly associated with a reduction in the relative risk of all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.75–1.00; I2 = 57%, p = 0.05]. We found no significant reduction in the risk of severe disease in the ACEI subgroup (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.88–1.02, I2 = 50%, p = 0.18), the ARB subgroup (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.94–1.13, I2 = 62%, p = 0.48), or the ACEI/ARB subgroup (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.65–1.08, I2 = 67%, p = 0.16). Moreover, seven studies showed no significant difference in the duration of hospitalization between the two groups (mean difference = 0.33, 95% CI = −1.75 to 2.40, p = 0.76). In conclusion, the use of ACEIs/ARBs appears to not have a significant effect on mortality, disease severity, or duration of hospitalization in COVID-19 patients. On the basis of the findings of this meta-analysis, there is no support for the cessation of treatment with ACEIs or ARBs in patients with COVID-19.
Article
Background The association of ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) with disease severity of patients with COVID-19 is still unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate if ACEI/ARB use is associated with the risk of mortality and severe disease in patients with COVID-19. Methods We searched all available clinical studies that included patients with confirmed COVID-19 who could be classified into an ACEI/ARB group and a non-ACEI/ARB group up until 4 May 2020. A meta-analysis was performed, and primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and severe disease. Results ACEI/ARB use did not increase the risk of all-cause mortality both in meta-analysis for 11 studies with 12 601 patients reporting ORs (OR=0.52 (95% CI=0.37 to 0.72), moderate certainty of evidence) and in 2 studies with 8577 patients presenting HRs. For 12 848 patients in 13 studies, ACEI/ARB use was not related to an increased risk of severe disease in COVID-19 (OR=0.68 (95% CI=0.44 to 1.07); I ² =95%, low certainty of evidence). Conclusions ACEI/ARB therapy was not associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality or severe manifestations in patients with COVID-19. ACEI/ARB therapy can be continued without concern of drug-related worsening in patients with COVID-19.
Article
Full-text available
Objective Antirheumatic disease therapies have been used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and its complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to describe the current evidence. Methods A search of published and preprint databases in all languages was performed. Included studies described ≥1 relevant clinical outcome for ≥5 patients who were infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and were treated with antirheumatic disease therapy between January 1, 2019 and May 29, 2020. Pairs of reviewers screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A meta‐analysis of effect sizes using random‐effects models was performed when possible. Results The search identified 3,935 articles, of which 45 were included (4 randomized controlled trials, 29 cohort studies, and 12 case series). All studies evaluated hospitalized patients, and 29 of the 45 studies had been published in a peer‐reviewed journal. In a meta‐analysis of 3 cohort studies with a low risk of bias, hydroxychloroquine use was not significantly associated with mortality (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.41 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.83, 2.42]). In a meta‐analysis of 2 cohort studies with some concerns/higher risk of bias, anakinra use was associated with lower mortality (pooled HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.12, 0.52]). Evidence was inconclusive with regard to other antirheumatic disease therapies, and the majority of other studies had a high risk of bias. Conclusion In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, hydroxychloroquine use was not associated with benefit or harm regarding COVID‐19 mortality. The evidence supporting the effect of other antirheumatic disease therapies in COVID‐19 is currently inconclusive.
Article
Full-text available
An outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China caused by SARS-CoV-2 has led to a serious epidemic in China and other countries, resulting in worldwide concern. With the active efforts from prevention and control, the quantity of discharged patients is escalating. How to manage these patients normatively is still challenging. We hereby reported an asymptomatic discharged patient with COVID-19 who was retested positive for SARS-CoV-2, which arouses concern regarding the present discharge standard of COVID-19.
Article
Full-text available
As of March 1, 2020, Iran had reported 987 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases, including 54 associated deaths. At least six neighboring countries (Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Afghanistan, and Pakistan) had reported imported COVID-19 cases from Iran. In this study, air travel data and the numbers of cases from Iran imported into other Middle Eastern countries were used to estimate the number of COVID-19 cases in Iran. It was estimated that the total number of cases in Iran was 16 533 (95% confidence interval: 5925–35 538) by February 25, 2020, before the UAE and other Gulf Cooperation Council countries suspended inbound and outbound flights from Iran.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods: We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results: The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions: During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.).
Article
Background Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have been found to be efficient on SARS-CoV-2, and reported to be efficient in Chinese COV-19 patients. We evaluate the role of hydroxychloroquine on respiratory viral loads. Patients and methods French Confirmed COVID-19 patients were included in a single arm protocol from early March to March 16th, to receive 600mg of hydroxychloroquine daily and their viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs was tested daily in a hospital setting. Depending on their clinical presentation, azithromycin was added to the treatment. Untreated patients from another center and cases refusing the protocol were included as negative controls. Presence and absence of virus at Day6-post inclusion was considered the end point. Results Six patients were asymptomatic, 22 had upper respiratory tract infection symptoms and eight had lower respiratory tract infection symptoms. Twenty cases were treated in this study and showed a significant reduction of the viral carriage at D6-post inclusion compared to controls, and much lower average carrying duration than reported of untreated patients in the literature. Azithromycin added to hydroxychloroquine was significantly more efficient for virus elimination. Conclusion Despite its small sample size our survey shows that hydroxychloroquine treatment is significantly associated with viral load reduction/disappearance in COVID-19 patients and its effect is reinforced by azithromycin.
Article
Background: No therapeutics have yet been proven effective for the treatment of severe illness caused by SARS-CoV-2. Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial involving hospitalized adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, which causes the respiratory illness Covid-19, and an oxygen saturation (Sao2) of 94% or less while they were breathing ambient air or a ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen (Pao2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) of less than 300 mm Hg. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg and 100 mg, respectively) twice a day for 14 days, in addition to standard care, or standard care alone. The primary end point was the time to clinical improvement, defined as the time from randomization to either an improvement of two points on a seven-category ordinal scale or discharge from the hospital, whichever came first. Results: A total of 199 patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent randomization; 99 were assigned to the lopinavir-ritonavir group, and 100 to the standard-care group. Treatment with lopinavir-ritonavir was not associated with a difference from standard care in the time to clinical improvement (hazard ratio for clinical improvement, 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 1.72). Mortality at 28 days was similar in the lopinavir-ritonavir group and the standard-care group (19.2% vs. 25.0%; difference, -5.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -17.3 to 5.7). The percentages of patients with detectable viral RNA at various time points were similar. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, lopinavir-ritonavir led to a median time to clinical improvement that was shorter by 1 day than that observed with standard care (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.91). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the lopinavir-ritonavir group, but serious adverse events were more common in the standard-care group. Lopinavir-ritonavir treatment was stopped early in 13 patients (13.8%) because of adverse events. Conclusions: In hospitalized adult patients with severe Covid-19, no benefit was observed with lopinavir-ritonavir treatment beyond standard care. Future trials in patients with severe illness may help to confirm or exclude the possibility of a treatment benefit. (Funded by Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development and others; Chinese Clinical Trial Register number, ChiCTR2000029308.).
Article
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) virus is spreading rapidly, and scientists are endeavoring to discover drugs for its efficacious treatment in China. Chloroquine phosphate, an old drug for treatment of malaria, is shown to have apparent efficacy and acceptable safety against COVID-19 associated pneumonia in multicenter clinical trials conducted in China. The drug is recommended to be included in the next version of the Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Pneumonia Caused by COVID-19 issued by the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China for treatment of COVID-19 infection in larger populations in the future.
Article
Human rhinovirus (HRV) and coronavirus (HCoV) infections are associated with both upper respiratory tract illness ("the common cold") and lower respiratory tract illness (pneumonia). New species of HRVs and HCoVs have been diagnosed in the past decade. More sensitive diagnostic tests such as reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction have expanded our understanding of the role these viruses play in both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed hosts. Recent identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome viruses causing serious respiratory illnesses has led to renewed efforts for vaccine development. The role these viruses play in patients with chronic lung disease such as asthma makes the search for antiviral agents of increased importance. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.