- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Marine Biology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Vol.:(0123456789)
1 3
Marine Biology (2020) 167:76
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03685-y
ORIGINAL PAPER
Environmental drivers ofoceanic foraging site delity incentral place
foragers
DahliaFoo1 · MarkHindell1· CliveMcMahon2· SimonGoldsworthy3· FredBailleul3
Received: 10 September 2019 / Accepted: 27 March 2020 / Published online: 5 May 2020
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Finding food is crucial to the survival and reproductive success of individuals. Fidelity to previous profitable foraging sites
may bring benefits to individuals as they can allocate more time to foraging rather than searching for prey. We studied how
environmental conditions influence when lactating long-nosed fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) adopt a risky (low fidelity)
or conservative (high fidelity) foraging strategy at two intra-annual temporal scales when foraging in a highly variable oce-
anic environment. Core foraging areas (CFAs; n = 534; 30 × 30km cells) of consecutive foraging trips were obtained from
geolocation tracks of 12 females from summer to winter in 2016 (n = 5) and 2017 (n = 7). We used the spatial variability
(standard deviation) of CFAs between or among oceanic foraging trips as a proxy for individual foraging site fidelity (IFSF).
Over the entire oceanic foraging period (n = 12), IFSF in the latitudinal axis increased with stronger sea-surface temperature
gradient (SSTgrad), but decreased with greater SSTgrad and sea-surface height gradient variability. Over a period of two
consecutive oceanic foraging trips (n = 66), IFSF decreased with greater SSTgrad variability in the earlier foraging trip. LNFS
show evidence that they use IFSF as a strategy to potentially optimise food acquisition, and that this behaviour is influenced
by mesoscale oceanographic parameters.
Introduction
The marine environment is highly dynamic with physical
parameters determining the spatial and temporal distribu-
tion of primary productivity, thereby resulting in patchily
distributed food resources. Marine predators, therefore, face
the challenge of locating the prey which their survival and
reproductive success depend on in this heterogeneous envi-
ronment (Oosthuizen etal. 2015). From an optimal foraging
perspective, there may be long-term breeding and survival
benefits (Bradshaw etal. 2004) for animals which use prior
knowledge about where food is (i.e., predictable) and return
to the same foraging area, rather than randomly searching
for food (Call etal. 2008). Indeed, many marine species,
such as sea birds (Weimerskirch 2007), sharks (Espinoza
etal. 2011), whales (Yates etal. 2007), turtles (Tucker etal.
2014), and seals (Oksanen etal. 2014; Arthur etal. 2015;
Abrahms etal. 2018a), display individual foraging site fidel-
ity. However, repeated use of the same foraging patch may
lead to prey depletion and/or the prey distribution and the
density may have changed over time, thereby resulting in site
fidelity being a sub-optimal foraging strategy (Pichegru etal.
2010; McIntyre etal. 2017; McHuron etal. 2018). Thus,
this illustrates a trade-off between a conservative strategy
of sticking to what one already knows and another riskier
strategy of switching and searching for new and potentially
more profitable foraging patches.
Income-breeding marine predators provisioning off-
spring (Houston etal. 2007), such as fur seals (Staniland and
Boyd 2003), sea lions (Womble etal. 2009), and seabirds
(Croll etal. 2006; Rayner etal. 2010), can be considered as
Responsible Editor: D.E. Crocker.
Reviewed by B. Abrahms and undisclosed experts.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this
article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s0022 7-020-03685 -y) contains
supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
* Dahlia Foo
dahlia.foo@utas.edu.au
1 Institute forMarine andAntarctic Studies, University
ofTasmania, Hobart, TAS7004, Australia
2 Sydney Institute ofMarine Science, Mosman, NSW2088,
Australia
3 Aquatic Sciences Centre, South Australian
Research andDevelopment Institute, WestBeach,
SouthAustralia5024, Australia
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.