An international group of archaeologists specializing in cave art explain the diffi- culties they faced to publish their response to another paper, previously published in Science (Hoffmann et al. 2018), reporting a Neanderthal origin of some Spanish cave pain- tings according to Uranium-thorium method. In their reply, they underlined the diffe- rent sources of error that lead to overestimate the dates and summarized the contra- dictions with archeological arguments. Some American reviewers put more trust in ar- cheometry than in European arqueology, which is unfamiliar to them. Thus, the paper passed through the hands of many reviewers and it took more than one year to finally publish it in Journal of Human Evolution. This whole process illustrates the lack of trans- parency in peer review procedures -although apparently objective and neutral- when renowned authors are concerned.