ArticlePDF Available

Reply of “The outbreak of COVID-19 -An overview”

Authors:
Letter to the editor
J Chin Med Assoc
www.ejcma.org 1
*Address Correspondence. Dr. Yu-Jiun Chan, Division of Microbiology,
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General
Hospital, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201, Section 2, Shi-Pai Road, Taipei
112, Taiwan, ROC. E-mail address: yjchan@vghtpe.gov.tw (Y.-J. Chan).
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest
related to the subject matter or materials discussed in this article.
Journal of Chinese Medical Association. (2020) XXX: 00-00.
Received April 10, 2020; accepted April 10, 2020.
doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000331.
Copyright © 2020, the Chinese Medical Association. This is an open access
article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Reply to “The outbreak of COVID-19: An overview”
Yi-Chi Wua, Ching-Sung Chena, Yu-Jiun Chana,b,c,*
aDivision of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei,
Taiwan, ROC; bDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC;
cInstitute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
DEAR EDITOR,
We appreciate the comments by Tseng et al1 on our recent
article Wu et al2 published in the current issue of the Journal
of the Chinese Medical Association. Indeed, it is very crucial to
protect health care workers (HCWs) in this pandemic. Not only
HCWs safeguard patient care, but also they are at high risk of
contracting this contagious disease. Studies indicate that 3.8%
(1716/44 672) of HCWs during the outbreak in China (as of
February 11, 2020) were infected and 14.8% of conrmed cases
were classied as severe or critical.3,4 A random sample survey
in March 2020, in Noord-Brabant, Netherlands, revealed nearly
4% of the hospital staff is infected with this novel coronavirus,
but the percentages vary per hospital (0%-10%).5 Mortality did
happen even among young doctors. As we emphasized in pre-
vious overview and the authors concur that “stringent protec-
tion procedures should be conducted for high-risk procedures.2
Endotracheal tube intubation by all means is one of the most
dangerous maneuver. It has been shown that aerosol might be
generated during intubation and viral-containing droplets can
oating or contaminate different surfaces for many hours.6
Particularly, viral loads are high in the early stage of symptom
onset and lung-derived samples (such as sputum or aspirate)
contain high viral load when the patient’s condition deteriorates
and need intubation.7,8
It has been shown that surgical face masks can effectively
prevent viral spreading of many respiratory viruses, including
the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-
CoV-2).9 However, surgical face masks need to be removed
during intubation. The authors invented a transparent acrylic
“aerosol box” to protect the person who conducts intubation
from aerosol spreading or droplet contamination. This device
seems promising in reducing the chance of infection during intu-
bation. It would be very informative if the authors could dem-
onstrate or show experimental data that how effective “the box”
can contain viral-containing droplets inside the box and protect
people from infection.
REFERENCES
1. Tseng YJ, Lai HY. Protecting against COVID-19 aerosol infection during
intubation. J Chin Med Assoc 2020;83:(in press)
2. Wu YC, Chen CS, Chan YJ. The outbreak of COVID-19: an overview. J
Chin Med Assoc 2020;83:217–20.
3. Chang D, Xu H, Rebaza A, Sharma L, Cruz CSD. Protecting health-
care workers from subclinical coronavirus infection. Lancet Respir Med
2020;8:e13.
4. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China. JAMA 2020.
[Epub ahead of print]
5. Results of Random Sample Test: 4% of Hospital Staff Infected With
Coronavirus. RIVM Committed to health and sustainability. 2020. Available
at https://www.rivm.nl/en/news/result-of-random-sample-4-hospital-staff-
infected-with-coronavirus
6. Doremalen NV, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A,
Williamson BN, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as
compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1564–7.
7. Wolfel R, Corman VM, Guggemos W, Seilmaier M, Zange S, Muller
MA, et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-
2019. Nature 2020. [Epub ahead of print]
8. Liu Y, Yan LM, Wan L, Xiang TX, Le A, Liu JM, et al. Viral dynamics
in mild and severe cases of COVID-19. Lancet Infect Dis 2020. [Epub
ahead of print]
9. Leung HL, Chu KW, Shiu YC, Chan KH, McDevitt JJ, Hau JP, et al.
Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efcacy of face masks.
Nat Med 2020. [Epub ahead of print]
<zdoi:doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000331>
... Since COVID-19 can be transmitted through contact, protecting hands is one of the most important measures to avoid this infection [34]. The most common adverse skin reactions in healthcare workers due to glove use for approximately 10 h were reported as dry skin (55.7%), itching (31.2%) and rash (23.0%) [16]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study is the first to investigate fungal infections resulting from prolonged use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among healthcare workers at Kütahya Health Sciences University Evliya Çelebi Training and Research Hospital, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research aimed to isolate, molecularly type, and assess the antifungal susceptibility of superficial fungal infection agents associated with PPE use. Additionally, the relationship between these fungi and PPE use was evaluated through a questionnaire. Samples were collected from 100 healthcare workers experiencing skin issues. Among them, all N95/FFP2 mask users, 44.3% of glove users, 36.1% of surgical mask users, and 22.9% of hair cap users reported skin reactions, with acne (n = 34) being the most common. Identified fungal isolates included Trameteshirsuta, Penicilliumchrysogenum, Aspergillusfumigatus, Rhodotorula sp., Candida sp., Pichiafermentans, and the dermatophyte Microsporumferrugineum. Antifungal susceptibility tests revealed 47.6% resistance to fluconazole and 76.2% resistance to voriconazole (n = 16). This study provides the first institutional data on PPE-associated fungal infections and antifungal resistance in healthcare settings. These findings highlight the dermatological risks of prolonged PPE use. To mitigate these effects, healthcare institutions should prioritize high-quality materials, establish optimal usage guidelines, and provide continuous training on self-protection.
... The present research is a systematic review and meta-analysis study based on PRISMA guidelines (18) The inclusion criteria entailed randomized controlled trials studies, different factor replacement therapies, and types of clotting factor concentrates. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria were the management of hemophilia patients with an inherited or acquired hemostati c defect other than hemophilia, history of inhibitors, low platelet count, and diagnosis of cirrhosis. ...
... COVID-19 evolved into a pandemic phenomenon staggeringly fast and put the world to a standstill by the sixth month of the first reported case in China [1,2]. Hospitals and healthcare facilities experienced unprecedented situation to tackle ailing cases which incurred the risk of affecting the healthcare providers. ...
Article
Background: The phenomenon of breakthrough infection during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns regarding the efficacy of the vaccinations and healthcare providers are exposed to instances on a regular basis for professional reasons, putting them at risk. This study was aimed to look into the SARS-CoV-2 IgG status among the healthcare providers, reported with breakthrough infections. Methods: The study involved 78 healthcare providers (e.g., doctors, nurses, Lab personnel, support staffs) from a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka city. Blood samples were collected from participants who had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, regardless of the incidence of breakthrough infection. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level was estimated using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Result: Out of the 78 participants, 31 had experienced breakthrough infection. The mean (±SD) SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibody level was 13.42±10.68×104 BAU/ mL. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels of the infected subjects were significantly higher than those without breakthrough infections (p=0.024). The highest IgG levels was observed in participants who received three vaccine doses (15.71±11.36×104 BAU/mL), followed by two doses (9.48±8.09×104 BAU/mL) and one dose (5.91±2.27×104 BAU/mL). Participants who experienced breakthrough infections after receiving the third dose demonstrated significantly higher IgG levels (p=0.035). Conclusion: Healthcare providers studied demonstrated substantial number of participants developing breakthrough infection and those had significantly higher level of endpoint SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody. A dose dependent antibody response following vaccination could not be excluded.
... COVID-19 is also known as Coronavirus disease. Initially, reported in the Chinese state of Wuhan in late December 2019, the highly infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome has rapidly spread throughout the world in a short span of time and led to a major public health issue (1) . Scheduled orthodontic appointments, and most orthodontic problems were deemed nonemergent. ...
... COVID-19 evolved into a pandemic phenomenon staggeringly fast and put the world to a standstill by the sixth month of the first reported case in China [1,2]. Hospitals and healthcare facilities experienced unprecedented situation to tackle ailing cases which incurred the risk of affecting the healthcare providers. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The phenomenon of breakthrough infection during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns regarding the efficacy of the vaccinations and healthcare providers are exposed to instances on a regular basis for professional reasons, putting them at risk. This study was aimed to look into the SARS-CoV-2 IgG status among the healthcare providers, reported with breakthrough infections. Methods: The study involved 78 healthcare providers (e.g., doctors, nurses, Lab personnel, support staffs) from a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka city. Blood samples were collected from participants who had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, regardless of the incidence of breakthrough infection. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level was estimated using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Result: Out of the 78 participants, 31 had experienced breakthrough infection. The mean (±SD) SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibody level was 13.42±10.68×104 BAU/ mL. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels of the infected subjects were significantly higher than those without breakthrough infections (p=0.024). The highest IgG levels was observed in participants who received three vaccine doses (15.71±11.36×104 BAU/mL), followed by two doses (9.48±8.09×104 BAU/mL) and one dose (5.91±2.27×104 BAU/mL). Participants who experienced breakthrough infections after receiving the third dose demonstrated significantly higher IgG levels (p=0.035). Conclusion: Healthcare providers studied demonstrated substantial number of participants developing breakthrough infection and those had significantly higher level of endpoint SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody. A dose dependent antibody response following vaccination could not be excluded.
Article
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. This disease progresses through different stages, and its common symptoms include fever, malaise, dry cough, dyspnea, and pneumonia. Since its discovery in Wuhan, Hubei, China, in December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 transmission has rapidly spread. Unfortunately, the number of cases is increasing beyond expectations, making the spread of confirmed COVID-19 cases easier. To detect specific symptoms in a large population, the relationship between gene variants and patients with COVID-19 can be determined. The data of COVID-19 variations can be obtained from the Ensembl Genome Browser. Herein, the gene associated with 19 variants was selected according to the Haploreg 4.1 version. Additionally, protein expression of missense genes variants using the GTEx portal to determine 2 selected variants: rs200553089 encode the TLR7 gene and rs1061622 encode the TNFRSF1B gene, respectively. The highest protein expression of the TLR7 gene is found in lymphocyte cells, while TNFRSF1B shows the highest expression in the whole blood system. According to the data obtained from the Ensembl Genome Browser, the two most prevalent populations for SNP rs19085059, which is associated with the GPHN gene, are in Africa and East Asia, while SNP rs74956615, linked to the RAVER1 gene, is most prevalent in East Asia. The allele frequency for the TLR7 gene cannot be found in five countries, except in America. Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Single nucleotide polymorphism, Variants.
Article
This article explores the digital religious engagement among Indonesian Muslim digital natives during the global covid -19 pandemic. The study employed a mixed methods approach, utilizing an explanatory sequential design with 350 participants. This study shows that the social distancing strategy during the pandemic has accelerated digital religious engagement and led to the emergence of mediatized religious practices through the following features: (1) higher participation in attending virtual religious events; (2) the increasing participation in communal prayer (duas) held virtually; (3) the increasing use of smartphone-based Islamic apps to connect with religious texts and discourses; and (4) the increasing internet and social media utilization as a medium for acquiring Islamic knowledge. These digital religious practices have increasingly become a norm, especially for Indonesian Muslim digital natives, shown by changes in religious practice and the growing use of the internet for religious practices as a specific feature of a mediatized religion.
Article
Full-text available
Ideological and financial motivations have undermined science for decades. In this narrative review, we explore how organizations and governments used misinformation, disinformation, censorship, and secrecy to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. Various rationales for employing censorship and secrecy during the COVID-19 pandemic are examined including how organizations and governments create confusion about the risks associated with their products and blame avoidance to shift responsibility and to avoid accountability for their actions. Methods of censorship employed during the COVID-19 pandemic are reviewed, examples are provided, and the consequences of these actions are reviewed. Information included in this review was obtained from scientific papers, government documents, mass media articles, books, and personal accounts of physicians and scientists. We examine how the use of censorship and secrecy created a challenge for scientists, physicians, politicians, and the general public in trying to understand COVID-related topics. Finally, strategies for managing censorship and secrecy during a pandemic are presented.
Article
Full-text available
We identified seasonal human coronaviruses, influenza viruses and rhinoviruses in exhaled breath and coughs of children and adults with acute respiratory illness. Surgical face masks significantly reduced detection of influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols, with a trend toward reduced detection of coronavirus RNA in respiratory droplets. Our results indicate that surgical face masks could prevent transmission of human coronaviruses and influenza viruses from symptomatic individuals.
Article
Full-text available
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory tract infection that emerged in late 20191,2. Initial outbreaks in China involved 13.8% cases with severe, and 6.1% with critical courses³. This severe presentation corresponds to the usage of a virus receptor that is expressed predominantly in the lung2,4. By causing an early onset of severe symptoms, this same receptor tropism is thought to have determined pathogenicity, but also aided the control, of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003⁵. However, there are reports of COVID-19 cases with mild upper respiratory tract symptoms, suggesting the potential for pre- or oligosymptomatic transmission6–8. There is an urgent need for information on body site-specific virus replication, immunity, and infectivity. Here we provide a detailed virological analysis of nine cases, providing proof of active virus replication in upper respiratory tract tissues. Pharyngeal virus shedding was very high during the first week of symptoms (peak at 7.11 × 10⁸ RNA copies per throat swab, day 4). Infectious virus was readily isolated from throat- and lung-derived samples, but not from stool samples, in spite of high virus RNA concentration. Blood and urine never yielded virus. Active replication in the throat was confirmed by viral replicative RNA intermediates in throat samples. Sequence-distinct virus populations were consistently detected in throat and lung samples from the same patient, proving independent replication. Shedding of viral RNA from sputum outlasted the end of symptoms. Seroconversion occurred after 7 days in 50% of patients (14 days in all), but was not followed by a rapid decline in viral load. COVID-19 can present as a mild upper respiratory tract illness. Active virus replication in the upper respiratory tract puts the prospects of COVID-19 containment in perspective.
Article
We noted that the DCt values of severe cases were significantly lower than those of mild cases at the time of admission (appendix). Nasopharyngeal swabs from both the left and right nasal cavities of the same patient were kept in a sample collection tube containing 3 mL of standard viral transport medium. All samples were collected according to WHO guidelines.5 The mean viral load of severe cases was around 60 times higher than that of mild cases, suggesting that higher viral loads might be associated with severe clinical outcomes. We further stratified these data according to the day of disease onset at the time of sampling. The DCt values of severe cases remained significantly lower for the first 12 days after onset than those of corresponding mild cases (figure A). We also studied serial samples from 21 mild and ten severe cases (figure B). Mild cases were found to have an early viral clearance, with 90% of these patients repeatedly testing negative on RT-PCR by day 10 post-onset. By contrast, all severe cases still tested positive at or beyond day 10 post-onset. Overall, our data indicate that, similar to SARS in 2002–03,6 patients with severe COVID-19 tend to have a high viral load and a long virus-shedding period. This finding suggests that the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 might be a useful marker for assessing disease severity and prognosis.
Protecting healthcare workers from subclinical coronavirus infection
  • D Chang
  • H Xu
  • A Rebaza
  • L Sharma
  • Csd Cruz
Chang D, Xu H, Rebaza A, Sharma L, Cruz CSD. Protecting healthcare workers from subclinical coronavirus infection. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8:e13.
Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks
  • H L Leung
  • K W Chu
  • Y C Shiu
  • K H Chan
  • J J Mcdevitt
  • J P Hau
Leung HL, Chu KW, Shiu YC, Chan KH, McDevitt JJ, Hau JP, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat Med 2020. [Epub ahead of print] <zdoi:doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000331>
The outbreak of COVID-19: an overview.
  • Wu