ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

For the first time, European steelmakers consider the phase-out of blast furnaces for primary steelmaking. This marks a watershed for the steel industry and it would be a crucial step for European climate action. The article reviews activities for low-carbon steelmaking of European steelmakers.
ENVIRONMENT 59
www.steeltimesint.com May/June 2019
1 Lund University, Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Box 118, 22100 Lund, Sweden
2 Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Breslauer Str. 48, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
Can we fi nd a market for green steel?
The race is on to  nd an alternative and greener way to make steel away from the  re and brimstone
associated with traditional methods. Higher prices for ‘green steel’,however, will mean that new
markets must be found, argues Marlene Arens1,2, Valentin Vogl1
FOR the  rst time, European steelmakers
consider the phase-out of blast furnaces
for primary steelmaking. This marks a
watershed for the steel industry and it
would be a crucial step for European
climate action. The Paris Agreement sets
the pace for climate action. It reaf rms the
goal to keep global warming to well below
2 °C versus pre-industrial levels and that
efforts should be pursued to stay below 1.5
°C. The latter means that carbon neutrality
must be achieved globally by mid-century,
whereas the 2 °C target means net-zero
between 2070 and 2085.
The EU’s current 2050 goal is an 80
- 95% emission reduction against 1990
levels, but in an attempt to bring policy
in line with the Paris Agreement, the
Commission has suggested a new net-zero
emissions target by 2050. Some countries
passed their own targets with increased
ambition, such as Sweden’s carbon
neutrality by 2045 and Germany’s carbon
neutrality by 2050.
The steel industry is one of the largest
industrial greenhouse gas emitters
and accounts for about 5-7% of total
anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions.
Converting an existing steel plant into one
without carbon dioxide emissions is far
from trivial. Europe is home to only a few
dozen blast furnaces, but each is built to
last for two decades or more and each is
worth hundred millions of Euros. Still, the
answer to the question which future these
industrial giants might have in Europe has
changed in recent years, but it is obvious
that reaching future climate targets requires
action today.
Back in the mid-2000s the answer
seemed to lie in carbon capture and
storage (CCS). The 40 million Euro Ulcos
project aimed at reducing carbon dioxide
emissions in the steel industry by at least
50% through capturing  ue gases from
steel plants and transporting the carbon
dioxide to safe underground storage sites.
Three out of the four selected technologies
within that project relied on carbon
capture and storage but so far, CCS in the
EU steel industry has not made it beyond
the research and development phase. The
economic crisis in 2009 and the years
after pushed economic survival on top of
the agenda, but CCS also faced a major
barrier as public acceptance declined and
citizens grew increasingly concerned about
living on top of carbon dioxide storage
sites. Consequently, carbon capture and
storage stepped down the agenda and the
development of the Ulcos technologies
dwindled.
Yet, in recent years and months there is
ENVIRONMENT
59
Green steel Marlene.indd 1 22/05/2019 16:06:13
ENVIRONMENT
60
www.steeltimesint.com
May/June 2019
growing news on replacing coal-based blast
furnaces with iron- and steelmaking based
on hydrogen.
SSAB in a consortium with LKAB and
Vattenfall
In April 2016, three Swedish companies
formed the HYBRIT consortium that
aims at carrying through the transition
to fossil-free steelmaking in Sweden and
Finland. The partners are the steelmaker
SSAB, Europe’s single iron ore mining
company LKAB, and the power company
Vattenfall. In their vision, ironmaking will be
based on a direct reduction process using
renewable hydrogen produced through
electrolysis, and using electric arc furnaces
for steelmaking.
A pre-feasibility study was conducted
between 2016 and 2017, and is now
followed-up by a four year research
programme. This rst research programme
contains research in fossil-free mining
and pelletising, electrolysis and hydrogen
storage, as well as iron- and steelmaking
with renewable hydrogen. In parallel, a
direct reduction pilot plant with a capacity
of about 1 ton per hour is being built
in the northern Swedish city of Luleå,
where trial runs are set to start in 2020.
A demonstration plant as the subsequent
stage is scheduled for 2025. All of these
activities are supported by the Swedish
Energy Agency.
In 2025, SSAB will replace its two blast
furnaces with a total capacity of 1.8 Mt
in Oxelösund with electric arc furnace
steelmaking. By 2040, Sweden’s third and
last blast furnace in Luleå is scheduled to
be replaced, as well as the two Finnish blast
furnaces in Raahe. In parallel, hydrogen
direct reduction plants will be built to
supply iron to the arc furnaces.
voestalpine
Four European steelmakers now suggest
hydrogen as the way forward to cut
carbon dioxide emissions. In summer
2016, voestalpine announced a strategic
co-operation with a power utility on
renewable energy and the provision of
hydrogen. “voestalpine plans to consistently
decarbonise steel production step by step
and make the shift in the long term from
coal to a possible utilisation of CO2-
neutral hydrogen”, Wolfgang Eder, CEO
of voestalpine stated. However, already
three years earlier, in 2013, voestalpine
announced an investment in a 2-million-
tonne natural gas-based direct reduction
plant in Corpus Christi, Texas, as being
a fundamental step in achieving the
company’s internal energy and climate
goals. The plant started operation in
October 2016 and half of its production
is shipped to the company’s Austrian
plants. The consecutive step of shifting
from natural gas-based direct reduction to
hydrogen-based steelmaking is not a big
step, industry experts claim.
Next to the natural-gas based direct
reduction facility in the US, voestalpine
announced the development of the back
then world’s largest PEM electrolyser, a
low-temperature electrolysis, in 2017. It
is located at Linz and is partly funded by
the European Union under the H2Future
project. It has a capacity of 6 MW and will
produce 1200 m³ of hydrogen per hour. Full
operation is scheduled for spring 2019.
The third pillar of voestalpine’s
decarbonisation pathway is the hydrogen
plasma smelting reduction research
activities in Donawitz that aims at directly
producing steel from iron ore nes. An
upscaling from 100g to a 50kg batch
operation is planned, leaving still some way
to go until a commercial scale is achieved.
Plasma smelting reduction would replace
current blast furnaces and basic oxygen
furnaces as well as coke and sinter making.
Salzgitter
Salzgitter, a German steelmaking company,
proposes a tighter schedule for its transition
to hydrogen. Already by 2025, the
company aims to reduce its carbon dioxide
emissions by 25%. By 2030, carbon dioxide
emissions shall be cut by 50% and by 2050,
the target is 90-95%. While voestalpine
sets its sights on plasma smelting reduction,
Salzgitter goes for hydrogen-based direct
reduction plants. Direct reduction plants fed
with natural gas are commercially available
and a proven technology. Feeding them
with hydrogen is expected to be possible.
Direct reduction plants replace blast
furnaces as well as coke and sinter making.
For steelmaking, current basic oxygen
furnaces have to be replaced with electric
arc furnaces.
In October 2018, Salzgitter announced
the development of a reversible high-
temperature SOEC electrolysis that should
be ready for green hydrogen production
by 2020. In regular operation, the plant
shall produce 200 standard cubic metres of
hydrogen per hour. Salzgitter includes green
electricity production in its project: next to
the electrolysis, seven wind turbines shall
be erected, three directly located on the
steel site. The hydrogen will be used in the
annealing facility, but in the long term, it
shall be used to replace coal in ironmaking.
ThyssenKrupp
In January 2019, ThyssenKrupp announced
a strategy based on hydrogen. While their
agship project until then, carbon2chem,
aimed at carbon capture and usage, they
now focus on hydrogen-based direct
reduction plants. These are planned to
replace all their blast furnaces by 2050.
The transition phase shall start in 2021
evaluating the extraction and consumption
of hydrogen in current blast furnace
based steelmaking. The company plans
Green steel Marlene.indd 2 22/05/2019 16:06:15
www.steeltimesint.com
investments of 10 billion Euros until 2050. As Germany’s largest
steelmaker, ThyssenKrupp has a signicant impact on the low-carbon
transition in this industry.
ArcelorMittal
The latest announcement on hydrogen in steelmaking came from
ArcelorMittal in March 2019. The company will build a direct
reduction facility next to its MIDREX plant in Hamburg, Europe’s
single natural gas-based direct reduction facility. They envision
demonstration scale with a capacity of 100kt/yr. In a rst step, the
hydrogen will be provided from the top-gas of the current MIDREX
plant (grey hydrogen). Later on hydrogen produced from renewable
energies may be used (green hydrogen). In contrast to its competitors,
the site of ArcelorMittal Hamburg already has an electric arc furnace
and experience in natural gas-based steelmaking. Using grey hydrogen
allows for economical operation, the company claims.
Outlook
With the announcements of ThyssenKrupp and ArcelorMittal, two
large-scale steelmaking companies have now joined the group of
smaller, but forerunning steelmaking companies that render the
possibility to substitute the use of coal with hydrogen. This is a
double milestone. For the rst time European steelmakers consider
the phase-out of coal-based blast furnaces for primary steelmaking.
Furthermore, these companies represent the majority of European
primary steelmaking companies. The carbon dioxide reductions now
discussed are more in line with the Paris Agreement than any other
propositions. The Ulcos project, for instance, aimed at carbon dioxide
reductions of 50% compared to steelmaking processes at that time.
Ironmaking based on renewable hydrogen has the potential to cut
carbon dioxide emissions by up to 95%.
However, not a single tonne of low-carbon primary steel is on the
market so far, and companies have not undertaken investments in
commercial plants up to now. Yet, ArcelorMittal claims that running
its direct reduction plant with grey hydrogen allows for economical
operation already today.
The next years or maybe even months may be crucial. Major blast
furnace capacities are due for relining. Once they have undergone this
renewal, they ought to run for another two decades. Yet, to reach
future climate targets, action should start today. With its Innovation
Fund, the European Commission aims to support the low-carbon
transition of the steel industry, but investment support is not enough.
The operating costs of green hydrogen-based steelmaking still exceeds
the current coal-based process despite the European Emission Trading
System (EU ETS) or - in other words - due to the vast exemptions
given under the EU ETS. If the EU and European steelmakers strive for
a low-carbon transition, they need to nd a market for green steel,
since it comes with a higher price tag.
63 I am
aggressive!
But that’s
no problem
for our
corrosion-
resistant fans.
With special alloys and
gas-tight shaft seals,
we protect our fans from
corro- sive gases containing
sulphur, hydrochloric acid,
chlorine and fl uorine.
n Long service life
n High availability
n Very reliable
We make air work for you.
Process gas cleaning plants
Process gas dust collection
Secondary fuel technology
Process and hot gas fans
Vapour exhaust plants
Belt drying plants
Steel Times Int 05_06_19.indd 1 04.03.19 09:11
Green steel Marlene.indd 3 22/05/2019 16:06:20
... More specifically, steel production is one of the classic indicators of powerful states (Kennedy, 2017). Green steel -that is steel made without using coal, but electricity generated by renewables -is becoming a reality (Arens & Vogl, 2020). It can, therefore, be considered an opportunity to study the potential of solar energy to contribute to the power of a state, and thus also the implications of potential power shifts that come with building up solar capacity. ...
... To bring the two together in the form of green steel production, building up an immense energy infrastructure would be required, which comes with constraints in terms of the availability of i) resource and ii) human capital (ibid.). However, they conclude that green steel production on the basis of Australia's rich solar energy resources may be a possibility; therefore, the authors consider it a chance to engage successfully in industrial competition with steel producers in other parts of the world, particularly China (ibid.; Arens & Vogl, 2020). While this leaves many questions open, the Source: IEA, 2022. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
In this chapter, we address the role of renewable energy for achieving sustainable development in the sense of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We make the argument that renewable energy has been intimately attached to the evolution and understanding of the concept of sustainable development. From the start, renewables played an important part as a possible solution to the question of how to reconcile global environmental and development issues. Solar energy is no different in that regard, but earlier and stronger than other forms of renewables it promises to reconcile environmental issues with the need for development. It is widely believed that this nexus between renewables and sustainable development will help to overcome geopolitical power struggles. Throughout the text, we therefore present geopolitics as an important background variable for the evolution of sustainable development and renewables. Moreover, in view of increasing global efforts to achieve sustainable development through renewables, we present possible geopolitical tradeoffs stemming from sustainable development and renewables. In particular, we shed light on the potential of solar energy to play into geopolitics. We ask new requirements for global governance in the field of sustainable development.
... The main problem, however, is that producing green steel, i.e., producing steel avoiding or limiting CO 2 emission, is an expensive practice, whose cost is then reflected in the price of the finished product, which is higher than the one produced with traditional steel and thus out of the market. Hence, one of the main challenges is to devise a strategy for creating and delineating a competitive market for green steel [14]. ...
Chapter
This paper examines the iron and steel industry’s efforts to reduce carbon emissions and achieve environmental sustainability goals in line with global climate change policies. The paper investigates the potential for product-service solutions as a viable business model option to reduce the sector’s environmental impact. By taking into account articles from the literature, funded research projects documentation and websites of some of the most important European plant manufacturers or service providers for the steel industry, the study aims to understand the state of the art of the steel sector in terms of servitization and identifies servitization opportunities that can assist steelmakers in achieving sustainability goals, through the deployment of green technologies and improvement in the steel processes sustainability. The study finally discusses the adoption of servitization solutions that could be used, along with other technological strategies, to guide steelmakers or steel technology producers in partially changing their business model to meet the environmental targets set by policymakers.KeywordsSteel productionServitizationSustainabilityCircular economy
... The energy market always has a very big impact on the steel industry, especially when it comes to prices of energy, because this industry consumes a very large amount of the worldwide production of energy (about 5%) [52]. The benefits of energy efficiency are very important to the steel sector and this is a commonly accepted fact [93][94][95][96][97]. Additionally, it is very important to improve the productivity and competitiveness that are associated with improving energy management in steel-producing plants. ...
Article
Full-text available
The analyses presented in the publication allowed, on the basis of the data collected, development of an econometric model for the Polish steel industry from the point of view of the relationship between heat and energy management in the steel production process. The developed model is the main novelty of the paper. The main objective of the study was to develop an econometric model of Poland’s heat and energy economy. The following research questions were raised: Is there an econometric model describing heat consumption (intensity) in the steel industry in Poland in relation to steel production and the energy economy? What are the relations between heat intensity and energy prices and steel production in Poland? How might the current energy crisis affect steel production? In the analysis we used data of energy and heat management in the Polish steel industry. An econometric model was developed of the dependence of heat consumption (Yt) on electricity prices (X1t) and steel production (X2t) in Poland. The authors took advantage of open access to data. Annual volumes of heat consumption in steel production processes in Poland were analysed as a function of the annual volume of steel production and the prices of electricity, which are consumed in technological processes in steel mills. We analyzed data for years 2004–2020. The analyses carried out showed that there is an inversely proportional relationship between electricity prices and the intensity of heat consumption by the steel industry. Research shows that rising energy prices lead to lower steel production. This is a dangerous phenomenon for the steel industry in the context of the current energy crisis caused by the pandemic and war in Ukraine. We think that the significance of our results is connected with the fact that the developed model is a useful analytical tool, as it not only allows the analysis of historical data, but can also be used to predict how steel industry parameters will change in the future under the influence of changes in external factors, such as energy prices. This gives a wide range of analytical possibilities for the use of the model.
... There is increasing debate on using hydrogen instead of coal and thus potentially making this process greenhouse-gasneutral [32]. A pilot plant for steel production with hydrogen is being built in Sweden [33]. In Germany, steel manufacturers are trying to replace some of the coal in the blast furnace with hydrogen. ...
Article
Full-text available
Sustainable chemicals and materials management deals with both the risks and the opportunities of chemicals and products. It is not only focused on hazards and risks of chemicals for human health and the environment but also includes the management of material flows from extraction of raw materials up to waste. It becomes apparent meanwhile that the ever-growing material streams endanger the Earth system. According to a recent publication of Persson et al., the planetary boundaries for chemicals and plastics have already been exceeded. Therefore, sustainable chemicals and materials management must become a third pillar of international sustainability policy. For climate change and biodiversity, binding international agreements already exist. Accordingly, a global chemicals and materials framework convention integrating the current fragmented and non-binding approaches is needed. The impacts of chemicals and materials are closely related to climate change. About one third of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are linked to the production of chemicals, materials and products and the growing global transport of goods. Most of it is assigned to the energy demand of production and transport. GHG emissions must be reduced by an expansion of the circular economy, i.e., the use of secondary instead of primary raw materials. The chemical industry is obliged to change its feedstock since chemicals based on mineral oil and natural gas are not sustainable. Climate change in turn has consequences for the fate and effects of substances in the environment. Rising temperature implies higher vapor pressure and may enhance the release of toxicants into the atmosphere. Organisms that are already stressed may react more sensitively when exposed to toxic chemicals. The increasing frequency of extreme weather events may re-mobilize contaminants in river sediments. Increasing chemical and material load also threatens biodiversity, e.g., by the release of toxic chemicals into air, water and soil up to high amounts of waste. Fertilizers and pesticides are damaging the biocoenoses in agrarian landscapes. In order to overcome these fatal developments, sustainable management of chemicals and materials is urgently needed. This includes safe and sustainable chemicals, sustainable chemical production and sustainable materials flow management. All these three sustainability strategies are crucial and complement each other: efficiency, consistency and sufficiency. This obligates drastic changes not only of the quantities of material streams but also of the qualities of chemicals and materials in use. A significant reduction in production volumes is necessary, aiming not only to return to a safe operating space with respect to the planetary boundary for chemicals, plastics and waste but also in order to achieve goals regarding climate and biodiversity.
Chapter
The water industry is facing significant challenges due to the effects of climate change and energy crises. To address these issues, the water sector is undergoing a digital transformation, leveraging digital technologies and methods, such as artificial intelligence and smart sensors, to improve sustainable supply, distribution, and treatment of water resources. Water supply systems are a crucial piece of the water industry which has the demanding task of collecting water, transporting it and distributing it to various users. An example of how digitalisation supports the suitable use of water is hereafter proposed through a real case study. Exploiting the digital information with a proper hydraulic model and an innovative control algorithm allows for enhancing the hydraulic and energy performance of the water supply systems analysed. In fact, accurate management of the pressure in the mountain distribution network leads to a significant decrease in water losses and also to reduced energy consumption.KeywordsWater Supply SystemsDigitisationHydraulic ModellingOptimal Pressure ControlSustainabilityWater Smart Systems
Chapter
Hydrogen is the cleanest, most existing fossil fuel and is expected to be phased out progressively by hydrogen energy systems. An ecologically friendly and renewable energy carrier, it is very important. Possibly in the future, differential analysis of the situation and the basic assessment requirements to improve the exhibition of hydrogen energy structures and to address the major economic challenges of hydrogen are also being explored. In a bid to lower the cost of hydrogen delivery, the demand for a more accessible photocatalyst, which can effectively separate water from hydrogen, has gradually been met. Scientists and the industry favor graphitic carbon nitride (g‐C 3 N 4 ), a dual‐component polymer with exceptional cognitive characteristics including low‐cost union and high durability, special electrical properties, responsive volume, quantum yield, non‐toxic, non‐ferrous metals, low bandgap strength, and electron‐rich structures. It has concentrated in numerous spaces of examination due to its surprising sound properties, like the usability of room and hydrogen co‐activity. Even though semiconductor realistic carbon without nitride metal (g‐CN or g‐C 3 N 4 ) showed critical ability in H 2 production by water splitting due to its two‐dimensional structure and band‐energy hole, its specific surface area (SSA) concern and the costly element's abundance hampered its photocatalytic and water‐splitting productivity. The utilization of g‐CN in H 2 with high SSA transformations, power modules, sun‐oriented cells, supercapacitors, and lithium batteries offers new freedoms. This record gives an examination of the effect of ecological testing on hydrogen‐producing innovation from sustainable and non‐renewable sources, with an accentuation on its utilization.
Chapter
Full-text available
Interest in biohydrogen (bioH 2 ) production from dark fermentation (DF) has increased due to green routes involving reusing by‐products, wastewater, and residues from agroindustry. Moreover, bioH 2 as an energy carrier of the future leads to clean combustion with the formation of a single product (water) and also releases 242 kJ mol −1 or 121 kJ g −1 energy per mass unit. As a result, it could be transformed into electrical energy using a fuel cell or an internal combustion engine. However, several studies state that the yield of bioH 2 production in anaerobic reactors by dark fermentation (DF) is still low when compared to the yields of conventional hydrogen processes and technologies such as water electrolysis CH 4 reform, and gasification coal, among others. Therefore, in the literature, different anaerobic technologies have been investigated, for example, changing the conventional systems to high‐rate reactors and studies on the pre‐treatment of inoculum, types of substrates, and genetic modifications of hydrogen‐producing microorganisms. Therefore, this chapter shows the principal biochemical routes and main types of reactors used in wastewater‐fed bioH 2 ‐producing systems. Finally, essential recommendations are highlighted.
Article
Full-text available
Globally, iron and steel production is responsible for approximately 6.3% of global man-made carbon dioxide emissions because coal is used as both the combustion fuel and chemical reductant. Hydrogen reduction of iron ore offers a potential alternative ‘near-zero-CO2’ route, if renewable electrical power is used for both hydrogen electrolysis and reactor heating. This paper discusses key technoeconomic considerations for establishing a hydrogen direct reduced iron (H2-DRI) plant in New Zealand. The location and availability of firm renewable electricity generation is described, the experimental feasibility of reducing locally-sourced titanomagnetite ironsand in hydrogen is shown, and a high-level process flow diagram for a counter-flow electrically heated H2-DRI process is developed. The minimum hydrogen composition of the reactor off-gas is 46%, necessitating the inclusion of a hydrogen recycle loop to maximise chemical utilisation of hydrogen and minimize costs. A total electrical energy requirement of 3.24 MWh per tonne of H2-DRI is obtained for the base-case process considered here. Overall, a maximum input electricity cost of no more than US80perMWhattheplantisrequiredtobecostcompetitivewithexistingcarbothermicDRIprocesses.Productioncostsavingscouldbeachievedthroughrealisticfutureimprovementsinelectrolyserefficiency(US80 per MWh at the plant is required to be cost-competitive with existing carbothermic DRI processes. Production cost savings could be achieved through realistic future improvements in electrolyser efficiency (∼ US5 per tonne of H2-DRI) and heat exchanger (∼US$3 per tonne). We conclude that commercial H2-DRI production in New Zealand is entirely feasible, but will ultimately depend upon the price paid for firm electrical power at the plant.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.