Content uploaded by Sabina Hodzic
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Sabina Hodzic on Apr 20, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Industries:
37%
Others
7% Human health/social
work activities
28% Education
17%
Professional/
Academic/
Technical
Services
10%
Public
Administration/
Defence
No (62%)Yes (38%)
Leadership position:
Other (4%)
Home (12%)
Office (84%)
Workplace preference:
Other (4%)Germany (17%)
Austria (33%) France (25%)
Spain (17%)
Country:
Yes (66%) No (34%)
Previous telework experience:
n=607 (registered for study)
n=110 (completed first 3 weeks, this subsample was used for the analyses)
Ø 36.4 years old (SD=9.1); 69% female, 31% male
ABOUT THE SAMPLE
THE FIRST WEEK
25% experienced lack of
companionship from their colleagues
at least several times a day
52% felt that they could completely
rely on their colleagues when the job
got tough
62% experienced support by their
supervisor in a considerable way or
better
33% didn't report any problems
accessing required files, whereas
42%had those kind of technical
problems at least once a day
40% never felt isolated
The lines indicate
statistical signicance.
All values refer to the
average of the
mentioned groups
across all three weeks.
Employees in leadership positions
did not differ from those without
leadership positions regarding
- social support among colleagues,
- social isolation,
- negative emotions,
- positive emotions,
- technical problems.
3.81
Yes
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)
3.14
No
Coordinating with others
5.29
Yes
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 7 (highest)
4.88
No
Perceived productivity
LEADERSHIP
POSITION:
Employees with and without
previous telework experience did
not differ regarding
- coordinating with others,
- social support among colleagues,
- social support by supervisor,
- social isolation,
- negative emotions,
- positive emotions,
- perceived productivity.
1.98
Yes
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)
2.32
No
Technical problems
PREVIOUS TELEWORK
EXPERIENCE:
Employees who reported higher and
lower relationship quality with their
leaders did not differ regarding
- coordinating with others,
- social isolation,
- negative emotions,
- positive emotions,
- perceived productivity.
3.29
High
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 4 (highest)
3.05
Low
Social support (colleagues)
3.20
High
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 4 (highest)
2.57
Low
Social support (supervisor)
LEADER-MEMBER
RELATIONSHIP QUALITY:
DIFFERENCES AMONG EMPLOYEES
3.51
3.25
Week 1
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)
Week 3Week 2
COORDINATING WITH
OTHERS:
3.42 3.30
3.22
Week 1 Week 3Week 2
NEGATIVE
EMOTIONS:
3.07
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 6 (highest)
3.15
3.33
Week 1 Week 3Week 2
SOCIAL SUPPORT AMONG
COLLEAGUES:
3.10
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 4 (highest)
2.93
3.08
Week 1 Week 3Week 2
SOCIAL SUPPORT BY
SUPERVISOR:
2.88
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 4 (highest)
2.07
2.32
Week 1 Week 3Week 2
TECHNICAL
PROBLEMS:
1.92
answer scale:
1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)
The lines indicate
statistical signicance.
There were no signicant
changes over time in
- social isolation,
- positive emotions,
- perceived productivity.
CHANGES OVER TIME
- Coordinating with others: "This week, my job often required that I coordinate with other people regarding our schedules."
- Social support (colleagues): "How much could you rely on your colleagues during this week when the job got tough?"
- Social support (supervisor): "How much could you rely on your supervisor during this week when the job got tough?"
- Social isolation: "How often did you feel alone during this week?"
- Negative emotions: "Please indicate how much did you feel annoyed this week."
- Positive emotions: "Please indicate how much did you feel happy this week."
- Perceived productivity: "Overall, how would you rate your performance on quality of work done during this week?"
- Technical problems: "During this week how often did you experience issues and/or problems with accessing les?"
- Leader-member relationship quality: "How well does your leader understand your job problems and needs?"
EXAMPLES FOR USED ITEMS/SCALES
TELEWORK IN TIMES OF COVID-19
a weekly study
March/April 2020 (start: 16/03/2020)
preliminary results after three weeks