We analyzed 42 resolutions from 2016 on animal cruelty from the Council of the General Judiciary. Regarding the complainant : 56.4% are civilians, 23% law enforcement, 20,5% animal protection organizations, 10,3% attorney general, and 2,6% by an animal law firm. When the compliant are civilians, men account for 58,8% and 88,9% if they are the offenders. 3 of the offenders had previous crime
... [Show full abstract] records and one was suspicious of DV.
In 21% of the cases animal abuse was perpetrated in the presence of minors, which is aggravated animal cruelty, but in none of the cases that was considered relevant. Other co-ocurrent crimes were threats, defamation, injuries, damages and DV.
Regarding the typology of animal abuse: 35% was neglect, 20% bludgeoning/kicking/punching, 10% thrown out of a window/cliff, and 7,5% shooting. In the shooting cases, no specific provisions were made. In 71% of the cases, the final result was death.
Regarding the sentences: 53% were sentenced to prison, but wasn’t taken into effect in none of the cases. Other sentences included paying for the veterinary costs, and compensation for moral damage. The fines and compensations are really low.