PreprintPDF Available

Coronavirus / COVID-19 - What's Next? Future of Work, Business, and Law: Automation, Transparency, Blockchain, Education, and Inspiration

Authors:
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.

Abstract

We are all wondering: what's next? This paper poses and answers 10 questions. These are predictions for the COVID-19 era and beyond based on my research.
Draft date: April 20, 2020
Page 1 of 5
COVID-19 - WHAT'S NEXT
FUTURE OF WORK, BUSINESS, AND LAW:
AUTOMATION, TRANSPARENCY, BLOCKCHAIN, EDUCATION, AND INSPIRATION
Adam J. Sulkowski
Associate Professor
Babson College
We are all wondering: what's next? This paper poses and answers 10 questions.
These are predictions for the COVID-19 era and beyond based on my research.1
Question One: will the novel coronavirus / COVID19 accelerate automation?
Answer: yes. Automation has already evolved beyond manufacturing to other business
processes. This trend is likely to accelerate as a result of the pandemic. Some of the under-
appreciated potential of blockchain - or distributed ledger technology - relates to maintaining
credible records, certification, and self-executing smart contracts. We are now acutely aware of
how quality certification in a supply chain can be a vital matter of life-or-death. We worry about
the viability of supply chains that rely on people who can get sick. So it seems a reasonable to
expect to see more blockchain-enabled automation in supply chains, with several
implications explored in my recent article in Blockchain, Business Supply Chains,
Sustainability, and Law: The Future of Governance, Legal Frameworks, and Lawyers?2
However, the pandemic has also highlighted the pitfalls of automation described in the article.
Among them, there will be a greater need to (1) proactively ponder contingencies and
consequences (as I advocated with Joan MacLeod Heminway in Blockchains, Corporate
Governance, and the Lawyer’s Role3 and with Gerlinde Berger-Walliser and Paul
Shrivastava in Using Proactive Legal Strategies for Corporate Environmental Sustainability,4
and (2) preserve a role for human discretion when the unforeseeable happens.
Question Two: will some of us keep working from home?
Answer: to some extent, for some of us, yes, this trend is likely to continue. Also, some
administrative structures are likely to erode. Again, this trend was foreseeable prior to March of
2020: the same advances mentioned above can be used to automate the sets of rules-and-
agreements that define our work relationships. Some administrative oversight and support
1 Please send feedback to asulkowski@babson.edu. Thanks to Jason Cipriano, Global Head of Supplier Relationship
Management (SRM/VM) & Vice President, Sourcing & Procurement, for his valuable input, including the
qualification that some of these anticipated trends have (to date) not occurred quite as fast as some had expected.
2 Sulkowski, A. J. (2019). Blockchain, Business Supply Chains, Sustainability, and Law: The Future of Governance,
Legal Frameworks, and Lawyers? Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 43 (2), 303-345.
3 Heminway, J. M., Sulkowski, A. J. (2019). Blockchains, Corporate Governance, and the Lawyer’s Role. Wayne
Law Review, 65 (17), 17-55.
4 Berger-Walliser, G., Sulkowski, A. J., & Shrivastava, P. (2017). Using Proactive Legal Strategies for Corporate
Environmental Sustainability. Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 6 (1), 1- 35.
Draft date: April 20, 2020
Page 2 of 5
roles will likely be automated away, especially as we realize the efficiencies of working
remotely. On the other hand, once again, the current crisis highlights the need to
proactively ponder what ethical standards we want to hardcode (whether intentionally, or
de facto, through omission), as described in Tao of DAO: Hardcoding Business Ethics on
Blockchain.5
Question Three: will demand for greater transparency in government continue?
Answer: depends on the government, but generally yes. In the USA, there have been demands
for greater transparency, even from governments that are widely seen to have responded the
COVID-19 outbreak comparatively effectively, such as California. In a recent article, City
Sustainability Reporting: An Emerging and Desirable Legal Necessity,6 I reviewed the
evolution of the materiality standard and steps taken by the SEC, and suggested that reporting on
a wider array of societal, environmental, and governance data is becoming a necessity for those
local governments that have issued about $4 trillion in securities. So, regardless of the pandemic,
I see this trend continuing.
Question Four: will we demand more transparency from businesses as well?
Answer: yes. We already see investors suing companies for misleading statements or lack of
disclosure of risks related to the pandemic. I have been researching and writing about
transparency since 2005, including how it relates to reputation,7 to financial performance,8 to
firm size,9 to share price and returns to investors,10 to real estate law,11 and to employee
happiness,12 plus differences in how we discuss such practices across cultures,13 and the extent to
5 Sulkowski, A. J. (2020). The Tao of DAO: Hardcoding Business Ethics on Blockchain. Business & Finance Law
Review, 3 (2), 146-169.
6 Sulkowski, A. J. (2016). City Sustainability Reporting: An Emerging and Desirable Legal Necessity. Pace
Environmental Law Review, 33 (2), 278-299.
7 Hughey, C. & Sulkowski, A.J. (2012). More Disclosure = Better CSR Reputation? An Examination of CSR
Reputation Leaders and Laggards in the Global Oil & Gas Industry. Journal of the Academy of Business and
Economics, 12 (2), 24-34.
8 Wu, J., Liu, L. & Sulkowski, A.J. (2011). Environmental Disclosure, Firm Performance, and Firm
Characteristics: An Analysis of S&P 100 Firms. Journal of the Academy of Business and Economics, 10 (4), 73-84.
9 Lu, W., Wang, W.-J., Sulkowski, A. J., Wu, J. (2011). The Relationships Among Environmental Management,
Firm Value and Other Firm Attributes: Evidence From Chinese Manufacturing Industry, International Journal of
Environment and Sustainable Development, 10 (1), 78-95.
10 Sulkowski, A.J., Barboza, J. P., Vaillancourt, J. & Studnicka, A. (2011). What Aspects of CSR Really Matter: An
Exploratory Study Using Workplace Mortality Data. International Academy of Business and Economics
Proceedings.
11 Sulkowski, A. J. (2010). The Growing Trend of Voluntary Corporate Responsibility Disclosure and Its
Implications for Real Estate Attorneys. Real Estate Law Journal, 38 (4), 471-481.
12 Walsh, C. & Sulkowski, A.J. (2010). A Greener Company Makes for Happier Employees More So Than Does a
More Valuable One: A Regression Analysis of Employee Satisfaction, Perceived Environmental Performance and
Firm Financial Value. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 11 (4), 274-282; see also Sulkowski, A.J. & Walsh,
C. (2011). Employee Satisfaction and Environmental Reputation. Ökologisches Wirtschaften, 2/2011, 12-13.
13 Sulkowski, A. J., Parashar, S.P. & Wei, L. (2008). Corporate Responsibility Reporting in China, India, Japan,
and the West: One Mantra Does Not Fit All. New England Law Review, 42 (4), 787-808.
Draft date: April 20, 2020
Page 3 of 5
which reporting on societal, environmental, and governance practices is an evolving legal
expectation.14
I expect more research into the relationship between various firm characteristics, measures of
performance, and transparency15 - including in the context of China.16
Question Five: will private sector managers continue to promote new norms?
Answer: yes, and some have been embracing this, with positive effects for both
shareholders and other stakeholders. Together with Mel Edwards and Ed Freeman (the father
of stakeholder theory), we pointed out the trend and benefits of shaking stateholders out of
complacency in our article, Shake Your Stakeholder: Firm Initiated Interactions to Create
Shared Sustainable Value.17
Question Six: are trends in technology and transparency changing the role of lawyers?
Answer: yes. We described the need to for lawyers to adopt a more proactive mindset in articles
with Joan MacLeod Heminway - Blockchains, Corporate Governance, and the Lawyer’s Role18
- and with Gerlinde Berger-Walliser and Paul Shrivastava in Using Proactive Legal Strategies
for Corporate Environmental Sustainability.19 Undoubtedly, greater gathering, use of, and
intended (or unintended, or even coerced) disclosure of data creates legal risk of which attorneys
should be aware.20
Question Seven: do our laws and legal system need updating?
Answer: yes, and this realization has already broadened and accelerated. Fundamental
assumptions of what is a government-guaranteed right vs. a privilege, or in the realm of "things
that should be earned" have been challenged, in terms of our health and incomes. Technological
change and platform capitalism (or "the gig economy") already resulted in disputes about these
issues. We are overdue for re-imagining some fundamental mental models - legal
14 Sulkowski, A. J. & Waddock, S. (2013). Beyond Sustainability Reporting: Integrated Reporting Is Practiced,
Required & More Would Be Better. University of St. Thomas Law Review, 10 (4) 1060-1123.
15 Sulkowski, A. J. & White, D. S. (2009). Financial Performance, Pollution Measures and the Propensity to Use
Corporate Responsibility Reporting: Implications for Business and Legal Scholarship. Colorado Journal of
International Environmental Law and Policy, 21 (3), 491-514.
16 Wu, J., Liu, L. & Sulkowski, A.J. (2011). Environmental Disclosure, Firm Performance, and Firm
Characteristics: An Analysis of S&P 100 Firms. Journal of the Academy of Business and Economics, 10 (4), 73-84.
17 Sulkowski, A. J., Edwards, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2018). Shake Your Stakeholder: Firm Initiated Interactions to
Create Shared Sustainable Value. Organization & Environment, 31 (3), 223-241.
18 Heminway, J. M., Sulkowski, A. J. (2019). Blockchains, Corporate Governance, and the Lawyer’s Role. Wayne
Law Review, 65 (17), 17-55.
19 Berger-Walliser, G., Sulkowski, A. J., & Shrivastava, P. (2017). Using Proactive Legal Strategies for Corporate
Environmental Sustainability. Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 6 (1), 1- 35.
20 Sulkowski, A. J. (2007). Cyber-Extortion: Duties and Liabilities Related to the Elephant in the Server Room.
Journal of Law, Technology and Policy, (1), 21-63.
Draft date: April 20, 2020
Page 4 of 5
definitions, categories, relations, and implications - that are already quaint and obsolete
as argued in Industry 4.0 Era Technology (AI, Big Data, Blockchain, DAO): Why The Law
Needs New Memes.21 On a related note, there are also opportunities to remove perverse
incentives in obsolete legal structures, as I explained with Mystica Alexander and William
Wiggins.22 On the other hand, some traditions23 and little used statutes24 should arguably be
reinvigorated and used.
Question Eight: does education need to change? Specifically, do business and other
professional schools need to evolve?
Answer: yes. We need more holistic and experiential approaches. Specific innovations in these
directions are described in a chapter in the book, Handbook of Sustainability in Management
Education25 and in A Path to Developing More Insightful Business School Graduates: A
Systems-Based, Experiential Approach to Integrating Law, Strategy, and Sustainability in
Academy of Management Learning & Education.26
Question Nine: what about fundamental questions of meaning and happiness, and what we
use as key performance indicators (of us, our organizations, and economies)?
Answer: this trend has also been accelerated, but whether questioning leads to the adoption of
new mindsets and key performance metrics is less clear. Anyone watching stock market indices
soar on the same day that millions of job losses and tens of thousands of deaths are announced
has probably wondered whether about what we measure, how we track numbers, and whether
that will change. It was none other than the inventor of GDP that argued against its use as
measure of economic success, as pointed out with Sandra Waddock in our article, Midas,
Cassandra & the Buddha: Curing Delusional Growth Myopia by Focusing on Thriving in the
Journal of Corporate Citizenship,27 as well as in the article below. As we reevaluate what
brings joy and meaning in the current moment, and question mainstream measures of economic
21 Sulkowski, A. J. (2019). Industry 4.0 Era Technology (AI, Big Data, Blockchain, DAO): Why The Law Needs New
Memes, Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 29 (1).
22 Alexander, M., Sulkowski, A. J., & Wiggins, W. (2016). Sustainability & Tax Policy: Fixing a Patchwork of
Policies with a Coherent Federal Framework. Virginia Environmental Law Review, 35 (1), 1-58.
23 Sulkowski, A. J. & Greenfield, K. (2006). A Bridle, a Prod, and a Big Stick: An Evaluation of Class Actions,
Shareholder Proposals, and the Ultra Vires Doctrine as Methods for Controlling Corporate Behavior. St. John’s
Law Review, 79 (4), 929-954.
24 Sulkowski, A. J. (2009). Ultra Vires Statutes: Alive, Kicking, and a Means of Circumventing the Scalia Standing
Gauntlet in Environmental Litigation. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 24 (1), 75-118.
25 Sulkowski, A. J. (2017). University Experiential Learning Partnerships as Living Laboratories for Sustainability.
Peer-reviewed chapter in book: SUSTAINABILITY IN MANAGEMENT EDUCATION: IN SEARCH OF A
MULTIDISCIPLINARY, INNOVATIVE AND INTEGRATED APPROACH THROUGH UNIVERSITY
LEADERSHIP, SCHOLARSHIP AND PARTNERSHIPS (Edward A. Arevalo and Shelley F. Mitchell, eds.),
Edward Elgar.
26 Bagley, C. E., Sulkowski, A. J., Nelson, J. S., Waddock, S., & Shrivastava, P. (published online November 7,
2019). A Path to Developing More Insightful Business School Graduates: A Systems-Based, Experiential Approach
to Integrating Law, Strategy, and Sustainability, Academy of Management Learning & Education (in press).
27 Sulkowski, A. J. & Waddock, S. (2016). Midas, Cassandra & the Buddha: Curing Delusional Growth Myopia by
Focusing on Thriving. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 61, 15-43.
Draft date: April 20, 2020
Page 5 of 5
success, we can anticipate more curiosity about the relationship between happiness,
consumption, and environmentally damaging activities of the early 21st Century. We should
expect more research along the lines of what D. Steven White and I published, including A
Happiness Kuznets Curve? Using Model-Based Cluster Analysis to Group Countries Based on
Happiness, Development, Income, and Carbon Emissions,28 and similar studies.29
Question Ten: any ideas where to look for inspiration? For a small business owner?
Answer: the most creative and inspiring entrepreneurship stories often occur in contexts of
hardship or even where private business ownership is prohibited. The following case studies
have all won awards and include references for further reading:
- first, how contaminated land can be turned into a business and community redevelopment
opportunity: Sid Wainer & Son: A Growing Realization (2011 ALSB distinguished proceedings
award winner).30 For more on brownfielding, see There's Gold in Them Thar Brownfields: the
Legal Framework of Brownfield Redevelopment and Some Tips for Getting Started.31
- second, how taking a risk on a new business (and being open to radically new pivots) in an
economically struggling former milltown can result in a set of thriving businesses: The Rail
Trail Flatbread Co. (2017 USASBE case study award winner).
- third, the secrets-to-success of a former tailor making less than $1-per-day in the provinces
of Cuba who started, owns, and runs a hospitality business in Havana that was recently
rated as the #7 specialty accommodation in Cuba: Rodolfo’s Casa Caribe in Cuba: Business,
Ethical & Legal Challenges of Investing in a Start-Up in Havana (2016 ALSB international
case study award winner).32
- for more stories of entrepreneurship in contexts that seem extremely adverse, please see my
website, www.Extreme-Entrepreneurship.com, where I am collecting such stories for an
upcoming book.
28 Sulkowski, A. J. & White, D. S. (2016). A Happiness Kuznets Curve? Using Model-Based Cluster Analysis to
Group Countries Based on Happiness, Development, Income, and Carbon Emissions. Environment, Development
and Sustainability, 18 (4), 1095-1111.
29 White, D. S. & Sulkowski, A. J. (2010). Relative Ecological Footprints Based on Resource Usage Efficiency Per
Capita: Macro-level Segmentation of 121 Countries. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 2 (2), 224-240;
Sulkowski, A. J. & White, D. S. (2009). Consumption of Energy, CO2 Emissions and Materials Usage Efficiency
per Capita: A Cluster Analysis of Europe and Eurasia. Global Management Journal, 1 (1), 55-65.
30 Sulkowski, A. J. & Vardaro, N. (2011). Sid Wainer & Son: A Growing Realization. Academy of Legal Studies in
Business.
31 Sulkowski, A. J. (2010). There’s Gold in Them Thar Brownfields: The Legal Framework of Brownfielding and
Some Tips on for Getting Started. Real Estate Law Journal, 39 (1) 100-112.
32 Sulkowski, A. J. (2017). Rodolfo’s Casa Caribe in Cuba: Business, Ethical & Legal Challenges of Investing in a
Start-Up in Havana. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 34 (1), 127162.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
This essay surveys legal issues raised by the wave of technological innovations that are defining the present era, known as Industry 4.0. These include the standards governing the gathering, keeping, use, and transfer of data, defining relationships when technology enables novel employment interactions, and fundamental questions about liability and legal personhood. After examining these distinct directions for future research, the essay concludes by urging that those of us in the legal profession—academics, practicing attorneys, judges, and policy-makers—become uncharacteristically proactive. It is explained that, absent our proactive involvement, advances in technology alone are not likely to bring about fundamental progress away from fundamental societal problems rooted in the 1st Industrial Revolution.
Article
Full-text available
Significant aspects of firm governance can (and likely will) be conducted on blockchains in coming years. This transition has already begun in some respects. The actions of early adopters illustrate that moving governance to blockchains will require legal adaptations. These adaptations are likely to be legislative, regulatory, and judicial. Firm management, policy-makers, and judges will turn to legal counsel for education and guidance. This article describes blockchains and their potentially expansive use in several aspects of the governance of publicly traded corporations and outlines ways in which blockchain technology affects what business lawyers should know and do—now and in the future. Specifically, this article describes the nature of blockchain technology and ways in which the adoption of that technology may impact shareholder recordkeeping and voting, insider trading, and disclosure-related considerations. The article then reflects on implications for business lawyers and the practice of law in the context of corporate governance.
Article
Full-text available
This article discusses the problems of current measures of business and economic success and suggests an alternative approach. The mythological memes of Midas, Cassandra, and the Buddha are offered as a means to frame mindsets and to articulate a necessary shift in focus and reprioritization of key performance indicators.Indicators of well-being and technologies for eliminating negative environmental impacts exist. The key problem is that humanity – at every level – has its attention focused on delusional measures of success. A refocus onto measures of ecological and human thriving is an essential step – a sine qua non – for adjusting civilization, including business activity, such that it can survive into the 22nd Century and beyond.A key challenge is that financial growth metrics are deeply embedded in current systems and in the mindsets of people at all levels of current hierarchies. The goal of shifting mindsets and measures of success requires the engagement of many sectors of society, beginning with educational institutions and including managers in the private and public sectors. At the individual, firm, and societal levels, indicators of ecological health and human thriving must be elevated and treated as key measures of success. The stakes of current ecological and societal problems involve the lives and well-being of billions of people. The memes and metaphors discussed here provide a novel way to frame and discuss issues and solutions whose implementation are overdue and desperately needed at the individual, organizational, and collective levels.
Article
Full-text available
This exploratory study uses model-based cluster analysis to group sixty-one countries based on statistical similarities in terms of happiness, development, income, and carbon emissions. Model-based cluster analysis is appropriate for an initial identification of a pattern that is worthy of further investigation. A key finding is that there may be a Kuznets curve for happiness. The Kuznets curve graphs the proposition that, as an economy develops, economic inequality first increases and then decreases. Similarly, the authors find that clusters of countries at the extremes of the lowest and highest average levels of development and income have the highest self-reported levels of happiness. Clusters of countries in the middle of the development and income spectrum have the comparatively lowest average levels of happiness. Further, carbon emissions are not perfectly associated with happiness. For example, between two clusters with the highest average levels of development, income, and happiness there is a 43 % difference in carbon emissions. A highly developed cluster has roughly the same mean carbon emissions as a cluster with 83 % less income, and the least developed cluster has 93 % of the happiness as the most developed cluster yet 86 % less carbon emissions. Despite limitations of both data and methodology, the overall pattern—that there may be a happiness Kuznets curve and that development, income, and carbon emissions are not associated lockstep with happiness—contributes to the literature on decoupling development from growth in emissions.
Article
Full-text available
Ninety-five percent of the Global Fortune 250, along with thousands of other companies worldwide, voluntarily report on their environmental, societal, and economic impacts. The practice is variously known as sustainability reporting, corporate responsibility (CR) reporting, corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting, citizenship reporting, environmental, societal, and governance (ESG) reporting, or triple bottom line (TBL) reporting. A growing number of countries now mandate or provide guidance related to this practice to some extent. For example, in the United States, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act explicitly requires publicly traded companies to disclose data related to their supply chains of certain minerals. Should greater disclosures be explicitly and specifically required? Should companies begin greater disclosures for their own benefit? Do the basic principles of existing laws already require a greater amount of disclosure in our current context? If so, what would be gained from greater and more explicit guidance from legislators or regulators such as the SEC? We seek to answer these questions. This article summarizes the history, current state, and motivations and impacts of sustainability reporting and regulation-by-disclosure, along with data on the present needs of investors and recent market trends. It also reviews the definition of materiality under U.S. securities laws and regulations – the key to understanding what data a company must publicly disclose for the benefit of investors. Based on our review of recent history, the current needs of investors, and the definition of materiality, it is clear that existing laws and related rules already require greater disclosure of data on environmental and societal impacts than commonly understood. The article concludes with recommendations for managers, their attorneys, accountants, and policymakers, and provokes further questions for constructive scholarship in the fields of business and law.
Article
Full-text available
Most studies investigating the environmental impact of business activities across countries do so from a macroeconomic vantage point. While this widely accepted methodology has its merits, the purpose of this research is to present an alternative form of analysis focusing on consumption per capita. The three consumption measures are energy use per capita, CO2 emissions per capita, and paper and paperboard consumption per capita. Using model-based cluster analysis, three distinct clusters are identified among the forty-five countries investigated across Europe and Eurasia. Finally, business concerns associated with the findings are presented and discussed. The paper contributes to the management literature in three ways. First, it proposes that consumption-based measures may provide a better picture of current and future environmental impact. Next, it introduces the discipline to the technique of model-based cluster analysis. And finally, it provides insight into the business consequences associated with patterns of consumption in both developed and developing economies.