ArticlePDF Available

Role of psychopathic personality traits on the micro-structure of free-operant responding: impacts on goal-directed but not stimulus-drive responses in extinction

Authors:

Abstract

The current study explored effects of psychopathic personality traits on micro-structure of free-operant responding. Non-clinical participants were recruited, and responded on a multiple random-ratio (RR) random-interval (RI) schedule for points, prior to being placed into extinction. They completed the TriPM to measure psychopathic personality, and were divided into those scoring lower and higher on the sub-scales of the TriPM (meanness, boldness, disinhibition). Responding was higher on RR than RI schedules, with no difference between rates of bout-initiation, but higher rates of within-bout responding the RR schedule. Extinction reduced responding after an initial response burst. No personality traits impacted acquisition of overall free-operant responding, nor its microstructure. However, meanness retarded the course of extinction after promoting an initial response burst. The results suggest psychotics are more goal-directed, consistent with meanness being associated with aggression and low tolerance to frustration, potentiating frustrative non-reward effects.
... Two different response components have appeared with relative consistency in investigations of the structure of schedule-controlled behaviour, using a variety of experimental procedures and analytic techniques: 'bout-initiation' and 'within-bout' responding. These two different elements of free-operant performance are sensitive to different aspects of the prevailing contingency (Killeen et al., 2002;Reed, 2015;Reed et al., 2018;Shull, 2011), and appear to map onto unconscious stimulus-driven habits, and conscious goal-directed actions (Chen, Osborne, & Reed, 2020;Reed, 2020). ...
Article
Four experiments explored the impact of focused-attention mindfulness training on human performance on free-operant schedules of reinforcement. In each experiment, human participants responded on a multiple random ratio (RR), random interval (RI) schedule. In all experiments, responding was higher on RR than RI schedules, despite equated rates of reinforcement. A 10-min focused-attention mindfulness intervention (focused attention) produced greater differentiation between schedules than relaxation training (Experiments 1, 2, and 4), or no intervention (Experiment 3). Focused-attention mindfulness improved learning when the schedules associated with components of the multiple schedule were reversed. This occurred irrespective of whether the focused-attention mindfulness was before (Experiment 2) or after (Experiments 3 and 4) initial training, or whether compared to relaxation (Experiments 2 and 4) or no intervention (Experiment 3). In Experiment 4, following multiple RR, RI training, focused-attention mindfulness increased sensitivity to contingency reversal and did not interfere with previous training in a group that did not receive a contingency reversal. In contrast, relaxation training did not facilitate reversal learning and interfered with previous learning. The results suggest that focused-attention mindfulness improves awareness of operative contingencies by focusing participants on the present, rather than reducing interference from previous learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
... Two different response components have appeared with relative consistency in investigations of the structure of schedule-controlled behaviour, using a variety of experimental procedures and analytic techniques: 'bout-initiation' and 'within-bout' responding. These two different elements of free-operant performance are sensitive to different aspects of the prevailing contingency (Killeen et al., 2002;Reed, 2015;Reed et al., 2018;Shull, 2011), and appear to map onto unconscious stimulus-driven habits, and conscious goal-directed actions (Chen, Osborne, & Reed, 2020;Reed, 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and objectives The current study examines the extent to which mindfulness impacts on operant conditioning processes, and explores the suggestion that mindfulness training serves to make humans more sensitive to the current reinforcement contingencies with which they are presented. In particular, the effect of mindfulness on the micro-structure of human schedule performance was explored. It was expected that mindfulness might impact bout-initiation responding to a greater degree than within-bout responding, premised on the assumption that bout-initiation responses are habitual and not under conscious control, but within-bout responses are goal-directed and conscious. Methods Nonclinical participants experienced one of three brief (15min) interventions: focused attention breathing exercise (mindfulness), an unfocused attention breathing exercises, or no intervention. They then responded on a multiple random ratio (RR) random interval (RI) schedule. Results In the no intervention and unfocused attention groups, overall and within-bout response rates were higher on the RR than the RI schedule, but bout-initiation rates were the same on the two schedules. However, for the mindfulness groups all forms of responding were higher for the RR than the RI schedule. Previous work has noted that habitual, and/or unconscious or fringe-conscious events, are impacted by mindfulness training. Limitations A nonclinical sample may limit generality. Conclusions The current pattern of results suggests that this is also true in schedule-controlled performance, and offers an insight into the manner in which mindfulness alongside conditioning-based interventions, to bring all responses under conscious control.
Preprint
Full-text available
Most studies have been criticized for failing to capture the important features of consciousness in human nature. Conscious intention can be a promising pointcut to grasp consciousness and orient voluntary action. The current study adopted a random ratio (RR), yoked random interval (RI) reinforcement learning schedule instead of the previous highly repeatable and single decision point paradigms, aimed to induce voluntary action with the conscious intention that evolves from the interaction between short-range-intention and long-range-intention. Readiness potential (RP) -like-EEG amplitude and inter-trial-EEG variability decreased significantly prior to voluntary action compared to cued action, for inter-trial-EEG variability, mainly featured during the earlier stage of neural activities. Notably, (RP) -like-EEG amplitudes decreased significantly prior to higher RI-reward rates responses in which participants formed a higher plane of conscious intention. The present study suggests the possible contribution of conscious intention-based processes to the neural activities from the earlier stage prior to voluntary action by a novel experimental paradigm.
Preprint
Full-text available
Long-range intentions are a vital feature of real-world voluntary action, but have not been extensively studied in relation to their neural correlates. The current study adopted a procedure instead that previous highly repeatable and single decision point paradigms, in which voluntary action (generated by a random ratio (RR), yoked random interval (RI) reinforcement schedule) could be compared with a yoked condition in which participants responded to an external cue. Participants were required to reach the highest reward rates they could in the RI schedule, which offered an indicator of the extent to which long-range intentions have been formed. A classical RP amplitude occurred preceding participants’ keypress action in the current study. EEG amplitudes and EEG variability decreased significantly prior to voluntary action, compared to externally triggered action. These results extend previous findings regarding voluntary action arising from a particular set of long-range intention-based processes, rather than the outcome of stochastic neural fluctuations. Notably, EEG amplitudes decreased significantly differently prior to higher RI-reward rates (i.e., higher plane of long-range intentions formed). The novel experimental paradigm suggests a possible contribution of long-range intentions on the neural activities stage prior to voluntary action.
Article
Full-text available
Two experiments examined the impact of depression and anxiety on the microstructure of human schedule responding. Human participants responded by pressing a computer key for points on a multiple random ratio (RR) random interval (RI) schedule. The RI schedule was yoked to the RR schedule in terms of reinforcement rate within subject. Overall response rates were higher on the RR compared to the RI schedule. In both experiments, the presence of psychometrically-measured depressive traits reduced overall levels of responding. Depressive traits also decreased within-bout responding, but increased levels of bout-initiation responding. These findings regarding the microstructure of responding were not noted for anxiety traits. These results suggest that depression impacts learning by working through a number of different mechanisms – both impacting the perceived value of the reinforcer, and possibly by creating a bias to attend and process external cues associated with reinforcement which are taken to control response-initiation rates.
Article
Full-text available
Killeen and Hall (2001) showed that a common factor called strength underlies the key dependent variables of response probability, latency, and rate, and that overall response rate is a good predictor of strength. In a search for the mechanisms that underlie those correlations, this article shows that (a) the probability of responding on a trial is a two-state Markov process; (b) latency and rate of responding can be described in terms of the probability and period of stochastic machines called clocked Bernoulli modules, and (c) one such machine, the refractory Poisson process, provides a functional relation between the probability of observing a response during any epoch and the rate of responding. This relation is one of proportionality at low rates and curvilinearity at higher rates.
Article
The differential effects of reinforcement contingencies and contextual variables on human performance were investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, adult human subjects operated a joystick in a video game in which the destruction of targets was arranged according to a yoked variable-ratio variable-interval schedule of reinforcement. Three variables were examined across 12 conditions: verbal instructions, shaping, and the use of a consummatory response following reinforcement (i.e., depositing a coin into a bank). Behavior was most responsive to the reinforcement contingencies when the consummatory response was available, responding was established by shaping, and subjects received minimal verbal instructions about their task. The responsiveness of variable-interval subjects' behavior varied more than that of variable-ratio subjects when these contextual factors were altered. Experiment 2 examined resistance to instructional control under the same yoked-schedules design. Conditions varied in terms of the validity of instructions. Performance on variable-ratio schedules was more resistant to instructional control than that on variable-interval schedules.