MethodPDF Available

Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ): Copy of questionnaire and scoring instructions

Authors:

Abstract

Freely available for use. The Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ; Becerra, Preece, & Gross, 2020) is a 16-item self-report measure of beliefs about emotions. Based on Ford and Gross’s (2019) theoretical framework, the EBQ assesses two main categories of beliefs about emotions: beliefs about the controllability of emotions and beliefs about the usefulness of emotions. These beliefs are assessed for negative emotions and positive emotions.
Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ)
Becerra, Preece, & Gross
This questionnaire asks about your beliefs about emotions in general. Some questions ask about
negative emotions (e.g., sadness, fear, and anger). Other questions ask about positive emotions
(e.g., happiness, joy, and amusement). For each statement, please rate how much you agree
or disagree that the statement is true in general. Circle one answer for each statement.
---
---
---
---
1
Once people are experiencing negative
emotions, there is nothing they can do about
modifying them.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2
People cannot control their positive
emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
There is very little use for negative
emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4
Positive emotions are very unhelpful to
people.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
5
It doesn’t matter how hard people try, they
cannot change their negative emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
6
People cannot learn techniques to
effectively control their positive emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
7
People don’t need their negative emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
There is very little use for positive
emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
People cannot control their negative
emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
It doesn’t matter how hard people try, they
cannot change their positive emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
11
Negative emotions are harmful.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
12
People don’t need their positive emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
13
People cannot learn techniques to
effectively control their negative emotions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
14
Once people are experiencing positive
emotions, there is nothing they can do about
modifying them.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
15
The presence of negative emotions is a bad
thing for people.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
16
Positive emotions are harmful.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Strongly
disagree
Neither
agree nor
disagree
Strongly
agree
EBQ Scoring Instructions
The EBQ (Becerra, Preece, & Gross, 2020) is a 16-item self-report measure of beliefs about
emotions. Based on Ford and Gross’s (2019) theoretical framework, the EBQ assesses two
main categories of beliefs about emotions: beliefs about the controllability of emotions and
beliefs about the usefulness of emotions. These beliefs are assessed for negative emotions and
positive emotions. Four subscale scores and three composite scores are designed to be derived
from the measure, with higher scores indicating more maladaptive beliefs about emotions (i.e.,
stronger beliefs that emotions are uncontrollable and useless). The table below describes each
of these scores and how to calculate them.
Subscale/composite
How to calculate
Content measured
Subscale scores
Negative-Controllability
Sum items 1, 5, 9, 13.
Beliefs about how uncontrollable
negative emotions are.
Positive-Controllability
Sum items 2, 6, 10, 14.
Beliefs about how uncontrollable
positive emotions are.
Negative-Usefulness
Sum items 3, 7, 11, 15.
Beliefs about how useless (e.g.,
undesirable, unimportant, or harmful)
negative emotions are.
Positive-Usefulness
Sum items 4, 8, 12, 16.
Beliefs about how useless (e.g.,
undesirable, unimportant, or harmful)
positive emotions are.
Composite scores
General-Controllability
Sum Negative-Controllability
and Positive-Controllability
subscales
Beliefs about how uncontrollable
negative and positive emotions are.
General-Usefulness
Sum Negative-Usefulness and
Positive-Usefulness subscales
Beliefs about how useless (e.g.,
undesirable, unimportant, or harmful)
negative and positive emotions are.
Total scale
Sum all items
Overall marker of maladaptive beliefs
about emotions; composite of beliefs
about how uncontrollable and useless
negative and positive emotions are.
Contacts:
A/Prof. Rodrigo Becerra (rodrigo.becerra@uwa.edu.au).
Dr. David Preece (david.preece@curtin.edu.au).
Prof. James Gross (gross@stanford.edu).
References:
Becerra, R., Preece, D. A., & Gross, J. J. (2020). Assessing beliefs about emotions: Development and
validation of the Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire. PLOS ONE.
Ford, B. Q., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Why beliefs about emotion matter: An emotion-regulation
perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 74-81.
... Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ): This 16-item measure [9] assesses two main categories of beliefs about negative and positive emotions: beliefs about their controllability and beliefs about their usefulness. The scale has three composite scores (total score, controllability, and usefulness), with each scale ranging from 8 to 56, and higher scores indicating more maladaptive beliefs about emotions (e.g., stronger beliefs that emotions are uncontrollable and not useful). ...
Article
Full-text available
Objectives Eating disorders (EDs) have a worldwide prevalence of 7.8%, with towering mortality rates and high healthcare costs. The current recommended treatment for EDs principally works by directly targeting ED thoughts and behaviours, but recovery rates are low. A multifaceted link between difficulties with emotions and EDs is now widely established, and newer third-wave therapies that aim to address these underlying emotion difficulties are promising. The current study piloted an online emotion self-help intervention which was co-developed with clinicians and people with lived experienced of EDs. The intervention aimed to specifically address difficulties with emotion identification and regulation, as well as unhelpful beliefs about emotions, which are believed to give rise to and maintain ED thoughts and behaviours. Method We recruited 39 people with self-reported EDs to test this intervention over a one-week period. Our participants were asked to complete a series of questionnaires measuring emotion processes and psychopathology on Day 1 (T1) before being given access to the intervention. Participants were then asked to practice the newly acquired skills for seven days, before taking the same questionnaires on Day 9 (T2). We also asked participants to qualitatively report on their experience of the intervention. Results We found significant improvements in ED psychopathology (ED-15), depression (PHQ-9), and anxiety (GAD-7) pre- to post-intervention, with medium to large effect sizes. All our emotion variables namely alexithymia (TAS-20), difficulties regulating emotions (DERS-SF), and unhelpful beliefs about emotions (EBQ) also showed significant changes post-intervention with medium to large effect sizes. Most importantly, changes in emotion regulation processes were linked to improved eating psychopathology. The qualitative analysis corroborated this finding, highlighting how the intervention helped them form new beliefs about emotions, which helped them reduce ED behaviours. Discussion Significant improvements in emotion processing and regulations, as well as psychopathology, along with positive qualitative feedback, suggest that the intervention effectively met its aims of increasing awareness of the link between emotions and eating psychopathology, providing help to identify and regulate emotions, and normalising emotional experiences. While our results are promising, further research is required to assess its effectiveness longer term and in clinical settings.
Preprint
Full-text available
Objectives Eating disorders (EDs) have a worldwide prevalence of 7.8%, with towering mortality rates and high healthcare costs. The current recommended treatment for EDs principally works by directly targeting ED thoughts and behaviours, but recovery rates are low. A multifaceted link between difficulties with emotions and EDs is now widely established, and newer third-wave therapies that aim to address these underlying emotion difficulties are promising. The current study piloted an emotion self-help intervention which was co-developed with clinicians and people with lived experienced of EDs. The intervention aimed to specifically address difficulties with emotion identification and regulation, as well as unhelpful beliefs about emotions, which are believed to give rise to and maintain ED thoughts and behaviours. Method We recruited 39 people with self-reported EDs to test this intervention over a one-week period. Our participants were asked to complete a series of questionnaires measuring emotion processes and psychopathology on Day 1 (T1) before being given access to the intervention. Participants were then asked to practice the newly acquired skills for seven days, before taking the same questionnaires on Day 9 (T2). We also asked participants to qualitatively report on their experience of the intervention. Results We found significant improvements in ED psychopathology (ED-15), depression (PHQ-9), and anxiety (GAD-7) pre- to post-intervention, with medium to large effect sizes. All our emotion variables namely alexithymia (TAS-20), difficulties regulating emotions (DERS-SF), and unhelpful beliefs about emotions (EBQ) also showed significant changes post-intervention with medium to large effect sizes. Most importantly, changes in emotion regulation processes were linked to improved eating psychopathology. The qualitative analysis corroborated this finding, highlighting how the intervention helped them form new beliefs about emotions, which helped them reduce ED behaviours. Discussion Significant improvements in emotion processing and regulations, as well as psychopathology, along with positive qualitative feedback, suggest that the intervention effectively met its aims of increasing awareness of the link between emotions and eating psychopathology, providing help to identify and regulate emotions, and normalising emotional experiences. While our results are promising, further research is required to assess its effectiveness longer term and in clinical settings.
Article
Full-text available
People’s beliefs about emotions may be grouped into two main categories: beliefs about the controllability of emotions and beliefs about the usefulness of emotions. These beliefs influence emotion regulation efforts and mental health, so the assessment of these beliefs is important. However, few psychometric measures are available, particularly for assessing the usefulness dimension. In this study (N = 161), we address this issue by developing and conducting an initial validation of a 16-item self-report measure called the Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ). Confirmatory factor analyses found its structure to consist of three first-order factors: a controllability factor spanning both negatively and positively valenced emotions (General-Controllability), and two valence-specific usefulness factors (Negative-Usefulness, Positive-Usefulness). All first-order factors also loaded together on a higher-order factor, representing an overall maladaptive beliefs about emotions construct. All subscale and composite scores had good levels of internal consistency. Correlational and regression analyses found that EBQ scores related in expected ways with other measures, and were significant predictors of emotion regulation abilities and psychopathology. We conclude that the beliefs about emotions construct is multidimensional, and the EBQ appears to be a promising new tool to assess it.
Article
The world is complicated, and we hold a large number of beliefs about how it works. These beliefs are important because they shape how we interact with the world. One particularly impactful set of beliefs centers on emotion, and a small but growing literature has begun to document the links between emotion beliefs and a wide range of emotional, interpersonal, and clinical outcomes. Here we review the literature that has begun to examine beliefs about emotion, focusing on two fundamental beliefs, namely whether emotions are good versus bad and whether emotions are controllable versus uncontrollable. We then consider one underlying mechanism that we think may link these emotion beliefs with downstream outcomes, namely emotion regulation. Finally, we highlight the role of beliefs about emotion across various psychological disciplines and outline several promising directions for future research.