ArticlePDF Available

Effects of Evaporator and Condenser in the Analysis of Adsorption Chillers

MDPI
Energies
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

In a survey of the literature from the last 20 years, 20% of the numerical models used to analyze the performance of adsorption chillers assumed the evaporator and condenser were ideal, with a fixed evaporation temperature and condenser temperature, and ignored interactions between the adsorption bed and evaporator/condenser. Even when the interaction with the evaporator and condenser was included, the other 80% of studies modeled the adsorption bed based on the LPM (lumped parameter method), which ignores the geometry effect and contact resistance of the bed, and thus reduces the accuracy of the analysis. As a consequence, these earlier numerical studies overestimated the system performance of the adsorption chiller. In this study, we conducted a refined numerical approach which avoids these limitations, producing estimates in close agreement with experimental results. Compared with our approach, the models with ideal treatment of evaporator and condenser overestimated COP (coefficient of performance) and SCP (specific cooling power) by as much as 16.12% and 24.64%, respectively. The models based on LPM overestimated COP and SCP by 22.82% and 11.28%, compared to our approach.
Content may be subject to copyright.
energies
Article
Eects of Evaporator and Condenser in the Analysis
of Adsorption Chillers
Woo Su Lee, Moon Yong Park, Xuan Quang Duong , Ngoc Vi Cao and Jae Dong Chung *
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea; kanzest@gmail.com (W.S.L.);
cavalier94@naver.com (M.Y.P.); duongquang.mt@gmail.com (X.Q.D.); caongocvi@gmail.com (N.V.C.)
*Correspondence: jdchung@sejong.ac.kr; Tel.: +82-2-3408-3776; Fax: +82-2-3408-4333
Received: 11 March 2020; Accepted: 11 April 2020; Published: 13 April 2020


Abstract:
In a survey of the literature from the last 20 years, 20% of the numerical models used to
analyze the performance of adsorption chillers assumed the evaporator and condenser were ideal,
with a fixed evaporation temperature and condenser temperature, and ignored interactions between
the adsorption bed and evaporator/condenser. Even when the interaction with the evaporator and
condenser was included, the other 80% of studies modeled the adsorption bed based on the LPM
(lumped parameter method), which ignores the geometry eect and contact resistance of the bed,
and thus reduces the accuracy of the analysis. As a consequence, these earlier numerical studies
overestimated the system performance of the adsorption chiller. In this study, we conducted a refined
numerical approach which avoids these limitations, producing estimates in close agreement with
experimental results. Compared with our approach, the models with ideal treatment of evaporator
and condenser overestimated COP (coecient of performance) and SCP (specific cooling power) by
as much as 16.12% and 24.64%, respectively. The models based on LPM overestimated COP and SCP
by 22.82% and 11.28%, compared to our approach.
Keywords: adsorption chiller; numerical analysis; evaporator; condenser
1. Introduction
Demand for cooling has rapidly increased due to global warming and economic development.
There are many types of refrigerator systems that can be employed to address this demand. Among
them, the vapor compression refrigerator has been most commonly used. However, its operation
negatively impacts the environment and consumes an excessive amount of electric power. As a result,
many researchers have focused on the development of eco-friendly refrigeration systems. Among
these, heat-driven refrigerators, such as absorption, desiccant, and adsorption cooling system, have
been highly attractive.
The adsorption chiller operates using reversible adsorption and desorption processes, in a cycle
of preheating, heating, pre-cooling, and cooling. During the pre-heating process, the sorption bed
is isolated from both the condenser and the evaporator by closing the connecting valves. Because
desorption is an endothermic process, heat must be supplied to maintain the desorption process.
When the pressure of the sorption bed reaches that of the condenser, the valve connecting the sorption
bed and the condenser is opened and the desorbed refrigerant flows to the condenser. During the
pre-cooling process, the sorption bed is again isolated by closing the connecting valves. Because of
the exothermic nature of adsorption, the heat needs to be removed by the cold heat source. When the
pressure of the sorption bed reaches that of the evaporator, the valve connecting to the evaporator is
opened and the evaporated refrigerant vapor moves towards the sorption bed.
Energies 2020,13, 1901; doi:10.3390/en13081901 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies
Energies 2020,13, 1901 2 of 14
To understand the adsorption chiller process in more detail, a number of researchers have been
conducting studies, investigating adsorbents [
1
3
], the geometry of the heat exchanger [
4
6
], advanced
cycle [710], and operating conditions [1113].
From the literature survey, the research target of numerical analyses was confined to the adsorption
bed due to the limitation in numerical analysis. From a literature survey of the last 20 years, 20% of
the published papers were found to belong to this category. Although they rigorously modeled the
adsorption bed, they did not include modeling of the evaporator or condenser.
Adsorption beds have the same role as the compressor in a conventional refrigerator. Due
to the reversibility of adsorption and desorption processes, outlet temperature is unstable and
fluctuates [
14
,
15
]. For accurate prediction of coecient of performance (COP), the change of chilled-out
temperature of the evaporator should be included in the modeling, and the analysis of evaporators
and condensers is important.
Previous numerical studies [
1
,
3
,
5
,
6
] covered many interesting issues and practical improvement
of adsorption cooling systems. However, there has been no report on the impact of assumption on the
evaporator and condenser. The isotherm of the sorbent is a function of pressure and temperature [
3
].
Thus, the idealized evaporator temperature distorts the evaluation of the system performance.
The other 80% of published papers included modeling of the evaporator or condenser. However,
modeling of the adsorption bed, which is the most crucial component in the adsorption chiller, was
based on the lumped parameter method (LPM), i.e., the adsorption bed, and the evaporator and
condenser were modeled by assuming there was no spatial variation. Thus, the LPM-based analyses
cannot include the eects of geometric features and the interaction between the sorbent material and
the metallic finned tube. Note that geometric factors such as fin height, fin spacing, tube diameter,
and thickness, are highly influential on the system performance, thus plenty of previous studies
have conducted the optimization of geometric factors. The LPM, which assumes no special variation,
armatively deteriorates the accuracy of the analysis.
Most of LPM-based analyses were for macrosystems such as recovery cycles and multi-stages.
They have advantages in understanding system arrangement and the eect of each composition.
However, essentially, LPM-based analyses suer from low accuracy due to the excessive simplification
of the adsorption bed, which is the most important part of adsorption cooling system.
In this study, we numerically analyzed an adsorption chiller with a SWS-1 L +water working pair
based (1) on a rigorous CFD simulation for the adsorption bed, and (2) also including the evaporator
and condenser. Model validity was checked by the comparison with experiments. For the present
approach and the previous approaches, a close examination on the accuracy of system performance
prediction was conducted. This approach provided detailed information over time and space and also
enabled a much closer estimate of system performance.
2. Numerical Method
2.1. Mathematical Model
Figures 1and 2show the schematics of the 2-bed adsorption chiller, and the current numerical
model, respectively. The numerical model includes the following assumptions.
(1)
The particles in the adsorption bed are all spherical with a uniform size and porosity.
(2)
Thermal equilibrium between the adsorbed and vapor phases is assumed.
(3)
A two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric model is assumed.
(4)
Refrigerant vapor is an ideal gas and the adsorbed phase is liquid.
(5)
There is no heat loss through the chamber wall and the eect of radiation is negligible.
(6)
The thermo-physical properties of the thermal fluid, tube, fins, dry adsorbent, adsorbate liquid,
and gas are constant, except for the density of the adsorbate gas.
Energies 2020,13, 1901 3 of 14
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 14
Figure 1. The schematic of the 2-bed adsorption chiller with two adsorption beds, evaporator, and
condenser.
Figure 2. Current numerical model of adsorption bed with a circular fin-tube heat exchanger.
2.2. Energy and Mass Balance Equations
2.2.1. Adsorption Bed
Our recent research showed that inter- and intra-particle mass transfer kinetics have a large
influence on system performance, and therefore it is highly recommended that models be chosen
considering a valid diffusion ratio range (Hong et al. [16]). Given a sufficiently large value of Deq/rp,
the non-isobaric model and linear driving force (LDF) model were used for the inter- and intra-
particle mass transfer models, respectively.
Non-isobaric model (Hong et al. [3], Niazmand et al. [4], Hong et al. [13]):
 
v
t v v 0
ads q
u
tt
 
  

(1)
Figure 1.
The schematic of the 2-bed adsorption chiller with two adsorption beds, evaporator,
and condenser.
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 14
Figure 1. The schematic of the 2-bed adsorption chiller with two adsorption beds, evaporator, and
condenser.
Figure 2. Current numerical model of adsorption bed with a circular fin-tube heat exchanger.
2.2. Energy and Mass Balance Equations
2.2.1. Adsorption Bed
Our recent research showed that inter- and intra-particle mass transfer kinetics have a large
influence on system performance, and therefore it is highly recommended that models be chosen
considering a valid diffusion ratio range (Hong et al. [16]). Given a sufficiently large value of Deq/rp,
the non-isobaric model and linear driving force (LDF) model were used for the inter- and intra-
particle mass transfer models, respectively.
Non-isobaric model (Hong et al. [3], Niazmand et al. [4], Hong et al. [13]):
 
v
t v v 0
ads q
u
tt
 
  

Figure 2. Current numerical model of adsorption bed with a circular fin-tube heat exchanger.
2.2. Energy and Mass Balance Equations
2.2.1. Adsorption Bed
Our recent research showed that inter- and intra-particle mass transfer kinetics have a large
influence on system performance, and therefore it is highly recommended that models be chosen
considering a valid diusion ratio range (Hong et al. [
16
]). Given a suciently large value of D
eq
/r
p
,
the non-isobaric model and linear driving force (LDF) model were used for the inter- and intra-particle
mass transfer models, respectively.
Non-isobaric model (Hong et al. [3], Niazmand et al. [4], Hong et al. [13]):
εt∂ρv
t+·ρv
uv+ρads
q
t=0 (1)
Energies 2020,13, 1901 4 of 14
The distribution of the velocity of water vapor (
*
uv
) in the adsorption bed follows the porous
model, expressed as Darcy’s law:
*
uv=Kapp
µvP(2)
The apparent permeability, K
app
, was obtained using the following equations. (Bird et al. [
17
], Lee
and Thodos [18], Ruthven [19]):
Kapp =Kd+εbµv
τPDeq (3)
Kd=εb3dp2
150(1εb)2(4)
Deq =
1
0.02628 T3/MV
Pσ2
+1
48.5dpore pTb/Mv
1
(5)
τ=εb0.4 (6)
dpore =0.6166dp(7)
where σand are σ=2.641Å and =2.236.
When substituting Equation (2) into Equation (1), the following equation can be obtained:
εt
P
RvT
t+· ρvKapp
µP!+ρads q
t=0 (8)
LDF model (Hong et al. [16]):
q
t=15Dso
rp2exp Ea
RuTb!(qq)(9)
The pre-exponent constant, D
so
, and the activation energy of diusion, E
a
, were 0.000254 m/s
2
and 42,000 J/s, respectively. The adsorption amount is expressed in isotherms and the isotherm of
SWS-1 L from Saha et al. [20] was used:
q=1.6 ×1012Cq
1+2×1012Cq1.11/1.1 (10)
Cq=Pexp H
RvTb!(11)
The heat transfer equation in the adsorption bed is expressed as:
ρCpTb
t+·ρvCp,v *
uvTb=·(kbTb)+ρadsHq
t(12)
where ρCpis the heat capacity of the entire bed, including the adsorbent and the refrigerant.
ρCp=εtρvCp,v+ρads Cp,ads +qCp,b(13)
εt=εb+ (1εb)εp(14)
The second term on the right-hand side in Equation (12),
ρadsHq
t
, is the heat generated by
adsorption and desorption.
Energies 2020,13, 1901 5 of 14
The energy equation for the heat transfer fluid is as follows:
ρCpTf
t+
ZρfCp,fufTf=
Z kfTf
Z!+4
dihTc,R=RiTf(15)
The last term is a heat exchange term. The convective heat transfer coecient, h, is obtained from
the following correlations:
Nu =0.023Re0.8Prnn=0.3 forcoolingphase
n=0.4 forheatingphase (16)
The energy equation for the copper fin-tube is as follows:
ρCp,c Tc
t=(kcTc)(17)
2.2.2. Evaporator
The evaporator is connected to the adsorption bed during the adsorption process and allows the
evaporated refrigerant vapor to move towards the adsorption bed. Therefore, the energy equilibrium
equation of the evaporator is expressed as (Miyazaki et al. [21]):
mCpeva
dTeva
dt =θhfg mads
dqads
dt !+.
mCpchill(Tchill,in Tchill,out )Cp(Tcon Teva)mads
dqdes
dt (18)
Note that the evaporator was modeled by LPM, like in most previous research. The novelty in
this work was to model the sorption bed from the refined CFD simulation, and simultaneously include
the eect of the evaporator and condenser.
The term on the left-hand side in Equation (18) is the heat capacity, showing the internal energy
of the entire evaporator. The first term on the right-hand side shows the cooling energy generated
by the latent heat of evaporation.
θ
is equal to 1 or 0 during adsorption (or desorption) and the
switching period, respectively. The second term on the right-hand side is the heat exchange between
the evaporator and chilled water, and the last term is the heat needed to lower the temperature of the
regenerated refrigerant from Tcon to Teva.
2.2.3. Condenser
The condenser is connected to the adsorption bed during the desorption process to condense the
desorbed vapor. The regenerated fluid is sent to the evaporator through the U-tube. The condenser
energy equilibrium equation is as follows (Miyazaki et al. [21]):
mCpcon
dTcon
dt =θhfg mads
dqdes
dt !+.
mCpcon(Tcool,in Tcool,out )Cp(Tdes Tcon)mads
dqdes
dt (19)
The term on the left-hand side is heat capacity reflecting the internal energy of the entire condenser.
The first term on the right-hand side is the latent heat of evaporation. The second term is the heat
exchange between condenser and cooling water, and the last term is the heat needed to lower the
refrigerant temperature from Tdes to Tcon.
Energies 2020,13, 1901 6 of 14
2.2.4. Outlet temperature
The log mean temperature dierence (LMTD) determines the outlet temperature of the evaporator
and condenser (Miyazaki et al. [21]):
Tchill,out =Teva + (Tchill,in Teva)exp
(UA)eva
.
mCpchill
(20)
Tcool,out =Tcon + (Tcool,in Tcon)exp
(UA)con
.
mCpcool
(21)
where Uis the overall heat transfer coecient and Ais the heat transfer area.
2.2.5. Mass balance equation
The mass balance equations are expressed as follows (Miyazaki et al. [21]):
dmeva
dt =mads"dqads
dt +dqdes
dt #(22)
2.3. Initial and Boundary Conditions
Initial condition for adsorption process:
Tinitial =Tads =303.15K
Pinitial =Pads =1633Pa
qinitial =qads =0.13kg/kg
(23)
Initial condition for desorption process:
Tinitial =Tdes =353.15K
Pinitial =Pdes =4144Pa
qinitial =qdes =0.13kg/kg
(24)
Boundary condition:
R=Ri, 0 ZZo:h(TcTf)=kcTc
R(25)
R=Rm, 0 ZZo:kcTc
R=T
1/hCR =kbTb
R,P
R=0 (26)
R=Ro, 0 ZZo:Tb
R=0, "P
R=0 forthepre-heatingandpre-coolingphase
P=PevaorPcon fortheheatingandcoolingphase (27)
RmRRoatfin-absorbentboundary : kcTc
Z=T
1/hCR =kbTb
Z,P
Z=0 (28)
"Tf=Tads at Z =0(cooling phase)
Tf=Tdes at Z =0(heating phase)(29)
where 1/h
CR
is the contact resistance between the adsorption bed and the tube (or fin), empirically
obtained by Zhu and Wang [22] as follows:
1
hCR =0.00122T20.1699T+8.15×103(30)
Energies 2020,13, 1901 7 of 14
2.4. Performance Index
The coecient of performance (COP) and specific cooling power (SCP) were selected as
performance indicators, and were defined as the following:
COP =Qeva
Qin (31)
SCP =Qeva
madstcycle (32)
where Q
eva
denotes the input heat energy supplied to the sorption bed during the desorption process,
mb is the total mass of the solid sorbent, and t
cycle
means cycle time. When the evaporator and the
condenser were assumed to be ideal, as in most previous studies, the cooling energy, Q
eva
, was obtained
as the amount of adsorbed vapor (Equation (33)). However, when the evaporator and the condenser
are included in the modeled analysis, the cooling energy should be obtained by using the temperature
dierence between the inlet chilled water and the outlet chilled water of the evaporator (Equation (34)).
Qeva =LvZtads
tdes Zinterface ρv*
uv·d*
Adt (33)
Qeva =Ztads
tdes n.
mCpchill(Tchill,in Tchill,out )odt (34)
Qin =Ztdes
tads n.
mCpcool(Tcool,in Tcool,out )odt (35)
where Lvis the latent heat and is expressed as follows:
Lv=L(Teva)CP,ads (Teva Tcon)(36)
2.5. Numerical Procedure
The detailed numerical procedures used in the two models, i.e., the previous studies which
assumed an ideal evaporator and condenser and the newly proposed model, are shown in Figures 3
and 4. The separate analysis of each adsorption bed and its integration with an evaporator and
condenser avoids the over-simplified assumptions in the previous model and enables an accurate
estimation of bed behavior and evaporator outlet temperature, which results in a more accurate
estimation of system performance.
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 14
2.4. Performance Index
The coefficient of performance (COP) and specific cooling power (SCP) were selected as
performance indicators, and were defined as the following:
eva
in
COP Q
Q
(31)
eva
cycle
SCP
ads
Q
mt
(32)
where Qeva denotes the input heat energy supplied to the sorption bed during the desorption process,
mb is the total mass of the solid sorbent, and tcycle means cycle time. When the evaporator and the
condenser were assumed to be ideal, as in most previous studies, the cooling energy, Qeva, was
obtained as the amount of adsorbed vapor (Equation (33)). However, when the evaporator and the
condenser are included in the modeled analysis, the cooling energy should be obtained by using the
temperature difference between the inlet chilled water and the outlet chilled water of the evaporator
(Equation (34)).
ads
des
eva v v v
interface
t
t
Q L u d Adt


(33)
 
 
 
ads
des
eva p chill,in chill,out
chill
t
t
Q mC T T dt
(34)
 
 
 
des
ads
in p cool,in cool,out
t
cool
t
Q mC T T dt
(35)
where Lv is the latent heat and is expressed as follows:
P,ads eva con
( ) ( )
v eva
L L T C T T 
(36)
2.5. Numerical Procedure
The detailed numerical procedures used in the two models, i.e., the previous studies which
assumed an ideal evaporator and condenser and the newly proposed model, are shown in Figures 3
and 4. The separate analysis of each adsorption bed and its integration with an evaporator and
condenser avoids the over-simplified assumptions in the previous model and enables an accurate
estimation of bed behavior and evaporator outlet temperature, which results in a more accurate
estimation of system performance.
Figure 3. Flowchart of performance evaluation strategy based on the numerical method with an ideal
evaporator and condenser.
Figure 3.
Flowchart of performance evaluation strategy based on the numerical method with an ideal
evaporator and condenser.
Energies 2020,13, 1901 8 of 14
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 14
Figure 4. Flowchart of performance evaluation strategy based on the present model including realistic
evaporator and condenser.
3. Results and Discussion
The governing equations subject to the given boundary conditions were solved using STAR-
CCM+v12, a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program, and additional user-
supplied codes. The grid dependence was thoroughly tested for 2000~9600 hexagonal grids, and the
test results indicated that 4400 grids were sufficient to obtain grid-independent results. The first-
order temporal discretization was used to solve the implicit unsteady problem. A hybrid-scheme and
a central difference scheme were used for the convection and diffusion terms, respectively. The
resulting discretized equations were solved using a GaussSeidel algorithm for every time step. Time
steps of 0.01 s were used for the isosteric phase and 0.5 s was used for the isobaric phase. The
computation time was approximately 24 h for a typical model running on an Intel Core i7-8700 CPU
@3.20Ghz, which was two times longer than the earlier model with an ideal evaporator and condenser
because two beds were simultaneously analyzed, as described in Figure 4.
All results were obtained after an initial couple of cycles, which ensured that the system had
reached a quasi-equilibrium state.
The parameters and operating conditions required for the analysis are summarized in Table 1.
The properties of the evaporator and condenser such as overall heat transfer coefficient are given in
Miyazaki et al. [21].
Table 1. Parameter values and operating conditions of the adsorption chiller.
Parameter
Values
Fin pitch
1.68 mm
Fin thickness
0.06 mm
Fin height
6.82 mm
Inner diameter of tube
9.6 mm
Outer diameter of tube
8.8 mm
Fluid velocity
1 m/s
Heating temperature
80
Cooling temperature
30
Cycle time
900 s
Density
700 kg/m3
Specific heat
900 J/kgK
Thermal conductivity
0.2 W/mK
Heat of adsorption
2760 kJ/kg
Total porosity
0.6352
Figure 4.
Flowchart of performance evaluation strategy based on the present model including realistic
evaporator and condenser.
3. Results and Discussion
The governing equations subject to the given boundary conditions were solved using
STAR-CCM+v12, a commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program, and additional
user-supplied codes. The grid dependence was thoroughly tested for 2000~9600 hexagonal grids,
and the test results indicated that 4400 grids were sucient to obtain grid-independent results. The
first-order temporal discretization was used to solve the implicit unsteady problem. A hybrid-scheme
and a central dierence scheme were used for the convection and diusion terms, respectively. The
resulting discretized equations were solved using a Gauss–Seidel algorithm for every time step. Time
steps of 0.01 s were used for the isosteric phase and 0.5 s was used for the isobaric phase. The
computation time was approximately 24 h for a typical model running on an Intel Core i7-8700 CPU
@3.20Ghz, which was two times longer than the earlier model with an ideal evaporator and condenser
because two beds were simultaneously analyzed, as described in Figure 4.
All results were obtained after an initial couple of cycles, which ensured that the system had
reached a quasi-equilibrium state.
The parameters and operating conditions required for the analysis are summarized in Table 1.
The properties of the evaporator and condenser such as overall heat transfer coecient are given in
Miyazaki et al. [21].
Table 1. Parameter values and operating conditions of the adsorption chiller.
Parameter Values
Fin pitch 1.68 mm
Fin thickness 0.06 mm
Fin height 6.82 mm
Inner diameter of tube 9.6 mm
Outer diameter of tube 8.8 mm
Fluid velocity 1 m/s
Heating temperature 80 °C
Cooling temperature 30 °C
Cycle time 900 s
Density 700 kg/m3
Specific heat 900 J/kgK
Thermal conductivity 0.2 W/mK
Heat of adsorption 2760 kJ/kg
Total porosity 0.6352
Energies 2020,13, 1901 9 of 14
3.1. Validation
The cooling capacity of the present model was compared to the results of an experiment
by
Chang et al. [23]
. The numerical analysis was conducted under the operating conditions of
Theat =60–90 °C
,T
cool
=30
°C
,T
chill
=14
°C
,T
eva
=15
°C
,t
cycle
=12 min,
.
mcool
=0.6 kg/s,
.
mheat=0.48 kg/s.
The details of the geometrical shapes of the adsorber, evaporator, and condenser are given in
Chang et al. [23].
Figure 5shows that there is close agreement between the present numerical model and the prior
experiment, however, the predictions by LPM or with ideal treatment of the evaporator and condenser
are considerably dierent than the experiment. Most of the earlier studies, about 80%, are based on
LPM. The assumption that there is no spatial variation in the adsorption bed, a component which is
highly influential on the performance of the adsorption chiller, inherently limits the accuracy of the
model. Also, detailed analyses of the eects of geometric features (fin height, fin spacing, tube diameter,
and thickness) and the interaction between sorbent material and metallic finned tube, are not feasible
in the LPM. The remaining 20% of the studies treat the evaporator and condenser as ideal, even though
the adsorption bed was rigorously modeled. In those models, the evaporator and condenser did not
interact with the adsorption bed and it is assumed that the evaporator temperature and condenser
temperature were fixed, i.e., they assumed an ideal evaporator and condenser. As a consequence, these
models inherently overestimated performance, which is the reason most previous numerical results
showed higher system performance than the experiment.
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 14
3.1. Validation
The cooling capacity of the present model was compared to the results of an experiment by
Chang et al. [23]. The numerical analysis was conducted under the operating conditions of Theat = 60
90 , Tcool = 30 , Tchill = 14 , Teva = 15 , tcycle = 12 min,
cool
m
= 0.6 kg/s,
heat
m
= 0.48 kg/s. The details
of the geometrical shapes of the adsorber, evaporator, and condenser are given in Chang et al. [23].
Figure 5 shows that there is close agreement between the present numerical model and the prior
experiment, however, the predictions by LPM or with ideal treatment of the evaporator and
condenser are considerably different than the experiment. Most of the earlier studies, about 80%, are
based on LPM. The assumption that there is no spatial variation in the adsorption bed, a component
which is highly influential on the performance of the adsorption chiller, inherently limits the accuracy
of the model. Also, detailed analyses of the effects of geometric features (fin height, fin spacing, tube
diameter, and thickness) and the interaction between sorbent material and metallic finned tube, are
not feasible in the LPM. The remaining 20% of the studies treat the evaporator and condenser as ideal,
even though the adsorption bed was rigorously modeled. In those models, the evaporator and
condenser did not interact with the adsorption bed and it is assumed that the evaporator temperature
and condenser temperature were fixed, i.e., they assumed an ideal evaporator and condenser. As a
consequence, these models inherently overestimated performance, which is the reason most previous
numerical results showed higher system performance than the experiment.
Figure 5. A comparison of cooling capacity per 24.5 kg of sorbent mass from three numerical models,
and experimental results (Chang et al. [23]).
3.2. Effect of Evaporator/Condenser Model
Figure 6 compares the Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model of an ideal
evaporator and condenser, i.e., with a fixed evaporation temperature (15 ) and condenser
temperature (30 ). During the isosteric phase in processes (A) and (C), the valves are disconnected
from the evaporator and condenser and the adsorption bed is isolated. Thus, except for the starting
(4 and 4’) and end points (1 and 1’), there is no difference between the models.
The processes (B) and (D) are the heating and cooling phases, which are desorbing or adsorbing
the vapor. In contrast to the real pressure behavior, which was properly estimated in the present
model, the pressure in the idealized model is assumed to be constant at the saturation pressure
corresponding to the temperature of the evaporator, 15 , or the condenser, 30 .
Figure 7 shows the isotherm of the adsorbent SWS-1 L and compares the adsorption and
desorption amounts corresponding to the ideal and real pressures of the condenser and evaporator.
Figure 5.
A comparison of cooling capacity per 24.5 kg of sorbent mass from three numerical models,
and experimental results (Chang et al. [23]).
3.2. Eect of Evaporator/Condenser Model
Figure 6compares the Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model of an ideal evaporator
and condenser, i.e., with a fixed evaporation temperature (15
°C
) and condenser temperature (30
°C
).
During the isosteric phase in processes (A) and (C), the valves are disconnected from the evaporator
and condenser and the adsorption bed is isolated. Thus, except for the starting (4 and 4’) and end
points (1 and 1’), there is no dierence between the models.
Energies 2020,13, 1901 10 of 14
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 14
In the model with ideal treatment of the evaporator and condenser, the pressure during the
adsorption and desorption process is constant, shown in the bold dashed line in Figure 7, which
causes constant q*. On the other hand, in the present model, relative pressure varies from 0.09 to 0.11
during the desorption process and varies from 0.31 to 0.4 during the adsorption process, as described
in the hatched region in Figure 7. A larger variation is observed during the adsorption process, which
results in 4.2% less adsorption and 1.8% less desorption compared to the ideal evaporator and
condenser. This difference is the reason that most previous numerical results overestimated system
performance. In the model based on an ideal evaporator and condenser, COP was estimated to be
0.523, which is an overestimate of 16.12%, and SCP was 637 W/kg, which is an overestimate of 24.64%,
compared to the present model.
Figure 6. Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model based on ideal treatment of the
evaporator and condenser.
Figure 7. Comparison of adsorption and desorption interval for the two models in Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model based on ideal treatment of the
evaporator and condenser.
The processes (B) and (D) are the heating and cooling phases, which are desorbing or adsorbing
the vapor. In contrast to the real pressure behavior, which was properly estimated in the present model,
the pressure in the idealized model is assumed to be constant at the saturation pressure corresponding
to the temperature of the evaporator, 15 °C, or the condenser, 30 °C.
Figure 7shows the isotherm of the adsorbent SWS-1 L and compares the adsorption and desorption
amounts corresponding to the ideal and real pressures of the condenser and evaporator. In the model
with ideal treatment of the evaporator and condenser, the pressure during the adsorption and desorption
process is constant, shown in the bold dashed line in Figure 7, which causes constant q*. On the other
hand, in the present model, relative pressure varies from 0.09 to 0.11 during the desorption process and
varies from 0.31 to 0.4 during the adsorption process, as described in the hatched region in Figure 7.
A larger variation is observed during the adsorption process, which results in 4.2% less adsorption and
1.8% less desorption compared to the ideal evaporator and condenser. This dierence is the reason that
most previous numerical results overestimated system performance. In the model based on an ideal
evaporator and condenser, COP was estimated to be 0.523, which is an overestimate of 16.12%, and
SCP was 637 W/kg, which is an overestimate of 24.64%, compared to the present model.
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 14
In the model with ideal treatment of the evaporator and condenser, the pressure during the
adsorption and desorption process is constant, shown in the bold dashed line in Figure 7, which
causes constant q*. On the other hand, in the present model, relative pressure varies from 0.09 to 0.11
during the desorption process and varies from 0.31 to 0.4 during the adsorption process, as described
in the hatched region in Figure 7. A larger variation is observed during the adsorption process, which
results in 4.2% less adsorption and 1.8% less desorption compared to the ideal evaporator and
condenser. This difference is the reason that most previous numerical results overestimated system
performance. In the model based on an ideal evaporator and condenser, COP was estimated to be
0.523, which is an overestimate of 16.12%, and SCP was 637 W/kg, which is an overestimate of 24.64%,
compared to the present model.
Figure 6. Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model based on ideal treatment of the
evaporator and condenser.
Figure 7. Comparison of adsorption and desorption interval for the two models in Figure 6.
Figure 7. Comparison of adsorption and desorption interval for the two models in Figure 6.
Energies 2020,13, 1901 11 of 14
3.3. Eect of Bed Model
For the rough design purpose in system scale analysis, LPM has an advantage because the refined
model in beds requires special treatment and much longer computation time (Duong et al. [
24
]).
However, LPM is not enough when higher accuracy or detailed information in beds is required during
the process. Figure 8shows a Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model based on LPM.
The result of LPM was obtained for the same device geometry and operating condition in the present
model. The only dierence is the treatment of the bed simulation. The processes (A) and (C) are the
isosteric phase and the processes (B) and (D) are the heating and cooling phase of the desorbing or
adsorbing vapor. Both models allow variable pressure, based on the temperature of evaporation or
condensation. However, because the adsorption bed behaviors are dierent depending on the bed
model, processes (B) and (D) in Figure 8are significantly dierent. The resulting COP in the model
based on LPM for all components was 0.553, which was 22.82% higher than the present model, and
SCP was 568 W/kg, which was 11.28% higher than the present model.
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 14
3.3. Effect of Bed Model
For the rough design purpose in system scale analysis, LPM has an advantage because the
refined model in beds requires special treatment and much longer computation time (Duong et al.
[24]). However, LPM is not enough when higher accuracy or detailed information in beds is required
during the process. Figure 8 shows a Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model based
on LPM. The result of LPM was obtained for the same device geometry and operating condition in
the present model. The only difference is the treatment of the bed simulation. The processes (A) and
(C) are the isosteric phase and the processes (B) and (D) are the heating and cooling phase of the
desorbing or adsorbing vapor. Both models allow variable pressure, based on the temperature of
evaporation or condensation. However, because the adsorption bed behaviors are different
depending on the bed model, processes (B) and (D) in Figure 8 are significantly different. The
resulting COP in the model based on LPM for all components was 0.553, which was 22.82% higher
than the present model, and SCP was 568 W/kg, which was 11.28% higher than the present model.
Figure 8. Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model based on the lumped parameter
method (LPM) for all components of the bed, evaporator, and condenser.
In contrast to the LPM, the present model includes the effects of geometric features (fin height,
fin spacing, tube diameter, and thickness) and considers the contact resistance between the sorbent
material and metallic finned tube, which affirmatively enhances the accuracy of the analysis. There
were a lot of studies on geometric optimization in adsorption beds [4,13,2527]. Also, recent coating
technology has made it possible to reduce contact resistance and tremendously enhance performance
(Rezk [28], Girnik and Aristov [29]). The LPM cannot accommodate all these effects, thus has to limit
to estimate the real system performance.
In summary, Figure 9 shows how much the accuracy of COP improved as the model became
more precise.
Figure 8.
Clapeyron diagram of the present model and the model based on the lumped parameter
method (LPM) for all components of the bed, evaporator, and condenser.
In contrast to the LPM, the present model includes the eects of geometric features (fin height,
fin spacing, tube diameter, and thickness) and considers the contact resistance between the sorbent
material and metallic finned tube, which armatively enhances the accuracy of the analysis. There
were a lot of studies on geometric optimization in adsorption beds [
4
,
13
,
25
27
]. Also, recent coating
technology has made it possible to reduce contact resistance and tremendously enhance performance
(Rezk [
28
], Girnik and Aristov [
29
]). The LPM cannot accommodate all these eects, thus has to limit
to estimate the real system performance.
In summary, Figure 9shows how much the accuracy of COP improved as the model became
more precise.
Energies 2020,13, 1901 12 of 14
Energies 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 14
Figure 9. Accuracy improvement in coefficient of performance (COP) and specific cooling power
(SCP).
4. Conclusions
In this study, we proposed a novel numerical model for an adsorption chiller including (1) the
proper interaction with the evaporator and condenser, and also (2) a rigorous treatment of the
adsorption bed. The proposed numerical model was compared with results from experiments and
showed close agreement.
Properly accounting for the interaction between the adsorption bed and the evaporator and
condenser enhanced the model’s accuracy. Previous models have used a fixed evaporation
temperature and condenser temperature, which did not interact with the adsorption bed, which is
why the earlier numerical models have normally overestimated system performance.
The model based on an ideal evaporator and condenser resulted in a COP of 0.523, which led to
an overestimate of 16.12%, and a SCP of 637 W/kg, which was an overestimate of 24.64%, compared
to the present model.
Even when the interaction with the evaporator and condenser was included, excessive
simplification of the adsorption bed in previous LPM analyses distorted the actual performance. This
is because LPM failed to reflect the geometry effect and contact resistance of the bed, the component
which is most influential on adsorption chiller system performance. As a result, the estimated COP
was 0.553, and the SCP was 568 W/kg, which were 22.82% and 11.28% higher respectively, than the
present model.
Considering the many studies on the geometric optimization of the adsorption bed, and recent
coating technology to enhance system performance, producing an accurate estimation of adsorption
chiller performance requires not only proper interaction with the evaporator and condenser, but also
rigorous modeling of the adsorption bed.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, writingreview and editing, J.D.C.; validation, X.Q.D.
and N.V.C.; formal analysis, investigation and writingoriginal draft preparation, W.S.L. and M.Y.P.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2017R1D1A1B05030422)
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figure 9.
Accuracy improvement in coecient of performance (COP) and specific cooling power (SCP).
4. Conclusions
In this study, we proposed a novel numerical model for an adsorption chiller including (1) the
proper interaction with the evaporator and condenser, and also (2) a rigorous treatment of the
adsorption bed. The proposed numerical model was compared with results from experiments and
showed close agreement.
Properly accounting for the interaction between the adsorption bed and the evaporator and
condenser enhanced the model’s accuracy. Previous models have used a fixed evaporation temperature
and condenser temperature, which did not interact with the adsorption bed, which is why the earlier
numerical models have normally overestimated system performance.
The model based on an ideal evaporator and condenser resulted in a COP of 0.523, which led to
an overestimate of 16.12%, and a SCP of 637 W/kg, which was an overestimate of 24.64%, compared to
the present model.
Even when the interaction with the evaporator and condenser was included, excessive
simplification of the adsorption bed in previous LPM analyses distorted the actual performance. This
is because LPM failed to reflect the geometry eect and contact resistance of the bed, the component
which is most influential on adsorption chiller system performance. As a result, the estimated COP
was 0.553, and the SCP was 568 W/kg, which were 22.82% and 11.28% higher respectively, than the
present model.
Considering the many studies on the geometric optimization of the adsorption bed, and recent
coating technology to enhance system performance, producing an accurate estimation of adsorption
chiller performance requires not only proper interaction with the evaporator and condenser, but also
rigorous modeling of the adsorption bed.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, J.D.C.; validation, X.Q.D. and N.V.C.;
formal analysis, investigation and writing—original draft preparation, W.S.L. and M.Y.P. All authors have read
and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding:
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2017R1D1A1B05030422)
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Energies 2020,13, 1901 13 of 14
References
1.
Freni, A.; Bonaccorsi, L.; Proverbio, E.; Maggio, G.; Restuccia, G. Zeolite synthesised on copper foam for
adsorption chillers: A mathematical model. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2009,120, 402–409. [CrossRef]
2.
Askalany, A.A.; Saha, B.B.; Ahmed, M.S.; Ismail, I.M. Adsorption cooling system employing granular
activated carbon-R134a pair for renewable energy applications. Int. J. Refrig.
2013
,36, 1037–1044. [CrossRef]
3.
Hong, S.W.; Ahn, S.H.; Chung, J.D.; Bae, K.J.; Cha, D.A.; Kwon, O.K. Characteristics of FAM-Z01 compared
to silica gels in the performance of an adsorption bed. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016,104, 24–33. [CrossRef]
4.
Niazmand, H.; Talebian, H.; Mahdavikhah, M. Bed geometrical specifications eects on the performance of
silica/water adsorption chillers. Int. J. Refrig. 2012,35, 2261–2274. [CrossRef]
5.
Mahdavikhah, M.; Niazmand, H. Eects of plate finned heat exchanger parameters on the adsorption chiller
performance. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013,50, 939–949. [CrossRef]
6.
Hong, S.W.; Kwon, O.K.; Chung, J.D. Application of an embossed plate heat exchanger to adsorption chiller.
Int. J. Refrig. 2016,65, 142–153. [CrossRef]
7.
Khan, M.Z.I.; Alam, K.C.A.; Saha, B.B.; Hamamoto, Y.; Akisawa, A.; Kashiwagi, T. Parametric study of a
two-stage adsorption chiller using re-heat—The eect of overall thermal conductance and adsorbent mass
on system performance. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2006,45, 511–519. [CrossRef]
8.
Uyun, A.S.; Akisawa, A.; Miyazaki, T.; Ueda, Y.; Kashiwagi, T. Numerical analysis of an advanced three-bed
mass recovery adsorption refrigeration cycle. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2009,29, 2876–2884. [CrossRef]
9.
Miyazaki, T.; Akisawa, A.; Saha, B.B. The performance analysis of a novel dual evaporator type three-bed
adsorption chiller. Int. J. Refrig. 2010,33, 276–285. [CrossRef]
10.
Duong, X.Q.; Cao, N.V.; Hong, S.W.; Ahn, S.H.; Chung, J.D. Numerical study on the combined heat and mass
recovery adsorption cooling cycle. Energy Technol. 2018,6, 296–305. [CrossRef]
11.
Ng, K.C.; Thu, K.; Saha, B.B.; Chakraborty, A. Study on a waste heat-driven adsorption cooling cum
desalination cycle. Int. J. Refrig. 2012,35, 685–693. [CrossRef]
12.
Zajaczkowski, B. Optimizing performance of a three-bed adsorption chiller using new cycle time allocation
and mass recovery. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016,100, 744–752. [CrossRef]
13.
Hong, S.W.; Ahn, S.H.; Kwon, O.K.; Chung, J.D. Optimization of a fin-tube type adsorption chiller by design
of experiment. Int. J. Refrig. 2015,49, 49–56. [CrossRef]
14.
Li, S.; Wu, Y. Theoretical research of a silica gel–water adsorption chiller in a micro combined cooling, heating
and power (CCHP) system. Appl. Energy 2009,86, 958–967. [CrossRef]
15.
Schicktanz, M.; Nunez, T. Modelling of an adsorption chiller for dynamic system simulation. Int. J. Refrig.
2009,32, 588–595. [CrossRef]
16.
Hong, S.W.; Ahn, S.H.; Kwon, O.K.; Chung, J.D. Validity of intra-particle models of mass transfer kinetics in
the analysis of a fin-tube type adsorption bed. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2014,28, 1985–1993. [CrossRef]
17. Bird, R.B.; Stewart, W.E.; Lightfoot, E.N. Transport Phenomena; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1960.
18.
Lee, H.; Thodos, G. Generalized treatment of self-diusivity for the gaseous and liquid states of fluids. Ind.
Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1983,22, 17–26. [CrossRef]
19. Ruthven, D.M. Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Process; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1984.
20.
Saha, B.B.; Chakraborty, A.; Koyama, S.; Aristov, Y.I. A new generation cooling device employing
CaCl2-in-silica gel–water system. Int. J. Heat. Mass. Transf. 2009,52, 516–524. [CrossRef]
21.
Miyazaki, T.; Akisawa, A.; Saha, B.B.; El-Sharkawy, I.I.; Chakraborty, A. A new cycle time allocation for
enhancing the performance of two-bed adsorption chillers. Int. J. Refrig. 2009,32, 846–853. [CrossRef]
22.
Zhu, D.; Wang, S. Experimental investigation of contact resistance in adsorber of solar adsorption refrigeration.
Sol. Energy 2002,73, 177–185. [CrossRef]
23.
Chang, W.S.; Wang, C.C.; Shieh, C.C. Experimental study of a solid adsorption cooling system using flat-tube
heat exchangers as adsorption bed. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2007,27, 2195–2199. [CrossRef]
24.
Duong, X.Q.; Cao, N.V.; Lee, W.S.; Chung, J.D. Module integration in an adsorption cooling system. Appl.
Therm. Eng. 2019,155, 508–514. [CrossRef]
25.
Rogala, Z. Adsorption chiller using flat-tube adsorbers—Performance assessment and optimization. Appl.
Therm. Eng. 2017,121, 431–442. [CrossRef]
Energies 2020,13, 1901 14 of 14
26.
Mitra, S.; Muttakin, M.; Thu, K.; Saha, B.B. Study on the influence of adsorbent particle size and heat
exchanger aspect ratio on dynamic adsorption characteristics. Appl. Therm. Eng.
2018
,133, 764–773.
[CrossRef]
27.
Kowsari, M.M.; Niazmand, H.; Tokarev, M.M. Bed configuration eects on the finned flat-tube adsorption
heat exchanger performance: Numerical modeling and experimental validation. Appl. Energy
2018
,213,
540–554. [CrossRef]
28.
Rezk, A.; Al-Dadah, R.K.; Mahmoud, S.; Elsayed, A. Eects of contact resistance and metal additives in
finned-tube adsorbent beds on the performance of silica gel/water adsorption chiller. Appl. Therm. Eng.
2013
,
53, 278–284. [CrossRef]
29.
Girnik, I.S.; Aristov, Y.I. Making adsorptive chillers more fast and ecient: The eect of bi-dispersed
adsorbent bed. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016,106, 254–256. [CrossRef]
©
2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
... Generally, desorption time is shorter than adsorption time. In our previous study [14], a 10% performance increase was obtained when the time ratio of adsorption to desorption was optimized in the low-temperature range (55-60 • C), and a significant performance improvement of more than 30% was achieved at relatively high temperatures (above 65 • C). However, no systematic research of time allocation, particularly in a multi-bed adsorption cooling system, has been conducted. ...
... For example, there have been detailed modeling studies of adsorbent beds [15][16][17], and advanced 3-bed models including evaporators and condensers [11,18,19]. Recently, we studied the effects of an evaporator and condenser using a rigorous bed model, which provided a more realistic comparison to the standard ideal model [14]. ...
... The analyses are particularly timeconsuming if a rigorous treatment of each bed is required, including the interactions between beds and the evaporator/condenser. In this study, based on our previous works [14], we propose using a regression model with artificial intelligence (AI) to find the optimal time setting for a 3-bed 2-evaporator adsorption cooling system, using a deep learning architecture as a tool to optimize the system. Five variables were chosen to examine the performance of the 3-bed 2-evaporator adsorption cooling system: the adsorption/desorption time ratio (f ad ), high/low evaporator time ratio (f p ), cycle time (τ), and the time lag between each adsorption bed (δ 2 , δ 3 ). ...
Article
Full-text available
3-bed adsorption cooling systems have the advantage of maintaining a uniform chilled water temperature. Because the number of parameters in a 3-bed system is very large, using artificial neural networks (ANN) is often suggested as an alternative to conducting experiments in many recent studies. We systematically determined the optimal time allocation for a 3-bed, 2-evaporation adsorption cooling system, using ANN with five variables, i.e., adsorption/desorption time ratio (f ad), high/low evaporator time ratio (f p), cycle time (τ), and the time lag between each adsorption bed (δ 2 , δ 3). Each case was methodically modeled using a process that our research team had previously developed and verified. When the coefficient of performance (COP) and specific cooling power (SCP) estimated by ANN were compared with the actual results, errors were within ±4%. Finally, the best strategy for each performance indicator, i.e., COP, SCP, and standard deviation of chilled-out temperature, was proposed for the 5 operating parameters of f ad , f p , τ, δ 2 , and δ 3. The cycle time was found to have 42.9% relative importance for the COP, and 33.1% relative importance for the SCP, but the most influential factor to the SCP was the high/ low pressure evaporator time ratio with a relative importance of 33.3%.
... This increase is not negligible at the typical operating conditions of adsorption chillers; thus, nucleate boiling at low pressure occurs with exchanger wall temperature fluctuations and at high superheat [6]. However, high superheat is inefficient and increases the evaporator temperature and leads to a consequent performance reduction [7]. To avoid such a phenomenon, different types of evaporation processes can be adopted in the evaporators of adsorption devices. ...
... T chw,in ( • C) 7 ...
Article
Full-text available
In this work, the performance of an innovative evaporator based on water falling film was investigated. The studied evaporator has been equipped with a recirculation system to maximise the wetted surface. Tests have been carried out in a lab-scale adsorption unit connected to a test bench recently realised at Politecnico di Milano labs for evaluating heat transfer performances under realistic operating conditions. Several ad/desorption cooling cycles were performed, setting different liquid refrigerant initial contents (0.9–1.5 kg), different chilled water inlet temperatures (7–20 °C) and flow rates (200–1000 L/h) and different adsorbent bed temperatures (25–30 °C). Evaporation performance has been determined in delivered cooling capacity. Moreover, the experimental data were used to calculate the overall evaporator heat transfer conductance (UA). Experiments showed how the heat duty peaks are mainly due to the thermal level of the chilled water that enters the evaporator, not the water content inside it because this value only affects the duration of the process. Instead, the UA value does not depend on the evaporator inlet chilled water temperature and initial mass content inside the evaporator. UA is 540–570 W/K for temperatures of chilled water entering the evaporator, equal to 10–20 °C, and mass of refrigerant of 0.9–1.5 kg.
... The only output variable was MB dye removal. Log-Sigmoid (log-sig) for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd hidden layers, Tan-Sigmoid (tan-sig) for the 4th, 5th, and 6th hidden layers, and purely (linear) for the output layer were the activation functions of the MB dye adsorption best-fit ANN model 101 . Figure 16represented the results of the MSE error vs. the epoch number, which was a sign of the best validation performance of the MB dye adsorption by NDULB optimal ANN model with 12 epochs 102 . ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the removal of methylene blue (MB) dye from aqueous solutions using a novel adsorbent, green algae (Ulva lactuca)-derived biochar-ammonia (NDULB), produced through activation with 85% sulfuric acid and hydrothermal treatment with ammonium hydroxide. The characterization of NDULB was carried out through various techniques, including BET surface area analysis and scanning electron microscopy, confirming its high surface area and effective porosity for dye adsorption. This work thoroughly examines the effects of initial MB dye concentration, solution pH, contact time, and NDULB dose on adsorption. The adsorption data were modeled using Langmuir, Freundlich, Tempkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherms, with the Freundlich model showing the best fit, indicating multilayer adsorption on a heterogeneous surface. According to the investigation’s findings, with an initial MB concentration of 200 ppm and an NDULB dosage of 1.25 g L⁻¹, the adsorption capacity at equilibrium (qe) is 966.31 mg g⁻¹. Kinetic analysis revealed that the pseudo-second-order model provided the best fit for the experimental data, suggesting chemisorption as the dominant adsorption mechanism. The artificial neural network modeling has been studied and reported. The study clarifies the effects of multiple variables on adsorption, which might lead to key insights to enlighten the development of effective wastewater treatment strategies. The study demonstrates that NDULB offers a promising, sustainable alternative for MB dye removal in wastewater treatment, with significant implications for large-scale application.
... An important component of this heat pump is the evaporator, and its proper functioning can represent a bottleneck situation for the entire system (Lee et al. (2020)). As previously mentioned, water can be used as refrigerant for adsorption heat pumps, forcing the evaporator to work in sub-atmospheric conditions (pressures that can be in the range 0.5 -5 kPa (Thimmaiah et al. (2017))). ...
... Water is well known as the heat transfer fluid and refrigerant due to its properties which have higher heat capacity [26]. Extensive studies of water evaporation have been studied in the literature but the scope is for atmospheric pressure conditions and data on the vacuum condition is still limited [27,28]. Previously in our study, a low pressure flooded type evaporator performance was also evaluated but the focus was on the optimization of adsorption/desorption cycle time and the effects were measured based on evaporator cooling power and SCP [29]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Adsorption Cooling System gives an alternative to the commercial vapor compression refrigeration cycles due to their benefits of having a very environmentally friendly and promising energy-saving system. An adsorption cooling system consists of four main components which are thecondenser, evaporator, expansion valve, and adsorption bed for the system to effectively function. One of the factors that affect the efficiency of the system is the performance of the evaporator itself as the system operates at sub-atmospheric pressure and the performance is mediocre when using conventional evaporators. Due to the low-pressure condition, hydrostatic pressure may affect the saturated temperature of the water refrigerant in a flooded type evaporator. Therefore, in this study, the performance of the evaporator was investigated based on the water height variation. The highest heat transfer coefficient and evaporation heat transfer rate are achieved when the water is set at the heat exchanger tube diameter level. Furthermore, 0.1 kg of silica gel adsorbent is used to obtain the maximum of 250 W/kg of Specific Cooling Power when the heat transfer fluid is set to 20 ºC.
Article
Full-text available
Adsorption refrigeration technology is being increasingly investigated over the past few decades as a sustainable technology option for meeting the fast-growing cooling needs for refrigeration and air-conditioning. What is attractive about adsorption technology is the opportunity to use low grade thermal energy such as solar heat and industrial waste heat. The present study is an attempt to provide readers a comprehensive update on status and challenges of adsorption refrigeration. The effects of working parameters like evaporator temperature, condenser temperature, regeneration temperature, cycle time, and inter-stage pressure on coefficient of performance and specific cooling power are covered with an objective to include experimental as well as theoretical research work reported thus far. Research work consolidated in this study includes the integrated cycles of adsorption cooling, adsorber design with extended surfaces, multi-stage and/or multi-bed scheme, and heat and/or mass recovery scheme either in combination or individually for thermal performance enhancement. Furthermore, work on a state of the art of various commercially available adsorption chillers highlighting their cooling capacity, working temperature range, novelties, and applications are reported in detail. This review also reveals an opportunity for research in optimizing the mechanism, design, orientation of the heat exchangers, functioning, and customizing the vapour adsorption refrigeration system for widespread applications in various sectors like automobiles and agriculture. Authors present this study with an expectation to provide beginners a quick review in the area of adsorption cooling technology.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper a new cycle time allocation for a three-bed silica-gel/water adsorption chiller is proposed and analyzed analytically. In this operating cycle lengths of all the phases are adjusted in such way that it become possible to introduce mass recovery process. The result is increased cooling capacity and overall system performance. This new cycle time allocation is especially suitable for three-bed chillers driven with 60-65°C heat source, because within this hot water temperature range the improvement of performance is the largest. The COP and SCP were calculated for particular chiller described in the literature. Thanks to mass recovery the COP of analyzed chiller increased by 35% (from 0.268 to 0.362) at Thtf,in = 65°C, and by 15% (from 0.350 to 0.405) at Thtf,in = 85°C. Numerical optimization allowed to determine that at Thtf,in = 85°C optimal mass recovery time is 8-12 s and the switching time is 27-35 s, while at Thtf,in = 65°C optimal mass recovery time is 11-13 s and the switching time is 45-53 s. The COP of chiller running new operating cycle and cooled with Tcool,in = 30°C is comparable to the performance of chiller running conventional operating cycle and cooled with Tcool,in = 25°C. The SCP at Tcool,in = 30°C and new allocation is comparable to the SCP at Tcool,in = 27.5°C and conventional operating cycle.
Article
A numerical analysis was conducted to estimate the system performance of an adsorption cooling chiller composed of multi-modules. Each module was composed of multi-tubes and each tube was composed of hundreds of fins. To accurately estimate system performance, a new approach was suggested, involving a full scale analysis of one tube. Also an examination of system integration depending on the arrangement of the modules was conducted. Two factors, i.e., (i) temperature drop in the serial arrangement and (ii) reduced flow rate in the parallel arrangement, compete, and ultimately a combined serial-parallel arrangement gives the highest overall system performance. The obtained system performance of COP and SCP were much lower than those modeled with one fin pitch space, the method normally used in previous studies, whose results always over-estimated the system performance compared to experiments.
Article
Adsorption heat exchanger comprises of the adsorbent granules/particles packed in between heat exchanging surfaces. The refrigerant vapor flow as well as heat transfer occurs through the adsorbent column. A 2-dimensional transient CFD study is employed to simulate the adsorption dynamics of ethanol vapor on loosely packed activated carbon. The adsorbent chosen for this study is activated carbon and the refrigerant is ethanol. In this paper, the efficacy of the refrigerant vapor transport through the porous adsorbent bed is studied in terms of flow resistance and thermal diffusion along with the mass diffusion through adsorbent particles. Three heat exchanging domains with same area but different aspect ratios (fin height to fin pitch ratio) along with two particle sizes are evaluated. The dynamic uptake predicted by this CFD study shows strong dependency on flow resistance of porous media for smaller particle size whereas a weak dependency on thermal and intra-particle mass diffusion is observed for larger particles. Furthermore, a comparison on the adsorption dynamics predicted by the present CFD study and the lumped kinetics model is carried out to determine the validity of the lumped model with respect to the adsorber geometry and particle size.
Article
A numerical simulation of the performance of a fin-tube-type adsorption bed with silica gel/water working pairs was conducted. Three models of the heat recovery cycle, the mass recovery cycle, and a combined heat and mass recovery cycle were closely examined. The main goals were to determine 1) the conditions under which these advanced cycles were most effective and 2) the optimum recovery time. Mass recovery enhanced both the coefficient of performance (COP) and specific cooling power (SCP) by up to 24 and 37.5 %, respectively, at 60 °C, and the enhancements of the COP and SCP were 5.0 and 16.0 %, respectively, at 90 °C. Heat recovery increased the COP by 12.56 %, but reduced the SCP by 10.84 % at 60 °C, whereas, at 90 °C, the COP increased by 11.83 % and SCP decreased by 5.96 %. The mass recovery is more influential at a low heating temperature than that at a high heating temperature. Therefore, in the combined heat and mass recovery cycles, the main contribution to the enhancement of the COP comes from mass recovery at lower water temperature. However, at a high heating temperature, the COP increases mainly due to heat recovery.
Article
A three dimensional numerical scheme has been developed to examine geometrical configuration effects on the performance of a single bed adsorption chiller with a trapezoidal aluminum finned flat-tube heat exchanger (FFT HEx). A mathematical distributed model along with the linear driving force (LDF) model and Darcy's law have been considered to take into account the effects of heat and both intra/inter-grain mass transfer resistances. The developed numerical scheme has also been validated experimentally by using a composite sorbent SWS-1L and water as a working pair. Additionally, rectangular beds with identical working conditions and bed dimensions as the tested trapezoidal beds have been examined in similar details to identify, which type of the fin geometry provides a superior performance. It was found that in this particular HEx, the heat transfer resistance is mainly influenced by both of the fin pitch and height, while the inter-grain mass transfer resistance is independently controlled by the bed length. This fact makes the role of the fin pitch and fin height almost interchangeable with respect to the cycle time and specific cooling power (SCP) especially in rectangular beds. However, the coefficient of performance (COP) is more influenced by the fin height than the fin pitch. In addition, higher SCP can be achieved at smaller bed dimensions at the expense of lower COP. Moreover, it was found that using rectangular bed is more appropriate, since its SCP is either the same or higher than its corresponding trapezoidal bed especially at shorter bed lengths, while COP remains almost the same for both bed types in all considered ranges of bed dimensions. Finally, a bed designing procedure has been proposed for proper designing of effective adsorption HExs based on the performed parametric studies.
Article
The performance of two-bed silica gel-water adsorption chiller using flat-tube adsorbers is modelled in wide range of operating conditions: heating water inlet temperature in the range of 50 - 90 C, cooling water inlet temperature in the range of 20 - 35 C, chilled water inlet temperatures of 10 C and 15 C, switching time 420 s and silica gel grain size 0.3 mm. In order to improve Coefficient of Performance (COP) and Specific Cooling Power (SCP) of the chiller optimization of fin height and spacing of the flat-tube heat exchanger is carried out. Flat-tube heat exchangers are found to be suitable for application as silica gel-water adsorbers. They are characterized by distintcive SCP (up to 750 ). Optimization of flat-tube adsorbers geometry led to improvement of COP up to 3.7% and SCP up to 6.3%.
Article
This paper investigates the characteristics of ferroaluminophosphate (FAM-Z01) compared to various types of conventional silica gels in the performance of an adsorption bed. FAM-Z01 has high potential to replace silica gel due to some key advantages, including a low heating temperature and high adsorption rate resulting from its S-shaped isotherm. We conducted a performance simulation on a fin-tube type adsorption bed with FAM-Z01/water and silica gel/water working pairs and compared the results in terms of coefficient of performance (COP) and specific cooling power (SCP). In the partial pressure range of typical operating condition for silica gels, there was no advantage with FAM-Z01. However, in the partial pressure range of 0.14 < P/P0 < 0.29, which corresponds to a lower evaporation temperature (15°C → 10°C) and lower heating temperature (80°C → 70°C) compared to the typical operating condition for silica gels, the COP of FAM-Z01 was almost similar (3.72 % decreased) to that of Type-RD silica gel, while the SCP was significantly increased by 35.0 %. This indicates that without a change of system efficiency, FAM-Z01/water has a high cooling capacity with small size as compared to Type-RD silica gel/water. This confirms that the adsorbent FAM-Z01 has a high potential to address one of the adsorption chiller’s disadvantages, i.e., system size.
Article
The present research conducted a parametric study on an embossed plate heat exchanger (plate HX) type adsorption chiller with SWS-1L and water pair, using a numerical method. The plate HX has a relatively high heat transfer capacity and compact size, and this study is a first attempt to apply the plate HX as a new type of adsorption chiller, as an improved alterative to the fin-tube type heat exchanger. A feasibility study was conducted on the base model and the result is comparable to the value for existing fin-tube type adsorption chillers. Furthermore, a parameter study was conducted for seven important design parameters, embossing diameter ratio, embossing height, embossing pitch, bed thickness, plate thickness, heating temperature and heat transfer fluid velocity. The results provided guidelines for the optimal designs of plate HX type adsorption chiller. The optimal values of COP and SCP were 0.5118 and 662.8 W kg-1, respectively. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and International Institute of Refrigeration. All rights reserved.
Article
This study presents a numerical investigation of the heat and mass transfer kinetics of a fin-tube type adsorption bed using a twodimensional numerical model with silica-gel/water as the adsorbent and refrigerant pair. The performance is strongly affected by the heat and mass transfer in the adsorption bed, but the details of the mass transfer kinetics remain unclear. The validity of intra-particle models used to simulate mass transfer kinetics such as the equilibrium, LDF, and solid-diffusion models are examined, and the valid ranges of the diffusion ratio for each model are proposed. An intra-particle diffusion model should be carefully implemented; otherwise, seriously distorted results may be produced, i.e., over-estimation for the equilibrium model and under estimation for the LDF model.