ArticlePDF Available

Reuse of N95 Masks

Authors:
Journal Pre-proofs
News & Highlights
Reuse of N95 Masks
Dana Mackenzie
PII: S2095-8099(20)30087-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.04.003
Reference: ENG 404
To appear in: Engineering
Please cite this article as: D. Mackenzie, Reuse of N95 Masks, Engineering (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.eng.2020.04.003
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover
page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version
will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are
providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors
may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Engineering xx (xxxx)
2095-8099/© 2020 THE AUTHOR. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher
Education Press Limited Company. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
News & Highlights
Reuse of N95 Masks
Dana Mackenzie
Senior Technology Writer
dave.egerter@gmail.com
As the COVID-19 pandemic enters its second month (April 2020) in the United States, one
of the simplest pieces of medical equipment is in desperately short supply: medical-grade
protective facemasks, typically engineered and specified for a single use only. Now, to meet the
critical and quickly intensifying need, Chinese and American engineers are devising new
procedures for decontaminating and reusing masks that hospitals already have on hand (Fig. 1)
[1]. Although some of these procedures require specialized equipment, others are simple enough
to use at home (Fig. 2) [2,3].
Fig. 1. N95 masks, like the “CLEAN” ones shown here, are being reused at Duke University Hospitals
(Durham, North Carolina) after decontamination using a Bioquell (Horsham, Pennsylvania) Z-2 device (see
Fig. 2) that uses hydrogen peroxide vapor for sterilization [1]. Credit: Duke University, with permission.
D. Mackenzie / Engineering xx (xxxx)
2
Fig. 2. The “regeneration treatment” decontamination process for mask reuse developed by Professor Jian-
Feng Chen and colleagues at Beijing University of Chemical Technology is recommended only for non-
medical, household use [2,3], per the instructions provided in this graphic. Credit: Courtesy of J-F Chen.
How do you kill a virus? It is not very hard, as long as the virus is not in a human body.
“The simplest way is to take a mask and let it sit out for two weeks,” said Michael Mina, an
assistant professor of epidemiology at Harvard University’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
“We know the virus tends to die out after ten days or so.” However, such a slow solution is not
especially practical.
Five fast ways to kill a virus are to irradiate it, fumigate it, heat it in hot water, steam it, or
bake it. Each of these approaches seems to be effective, but that is not the only criterion for a
successful decontamination. It is also important for masks to come out of the decontamination
process as good as new. According to a technical bulletin from 3M (Maplewood, MN), the
largest manufacturer of N95 masks in the United States, there are four criteria a good
decontamination method should satisfy: it should be effective against the target organism,
such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19; not damage the respirator’s filtration;
not affect the respirator’s fit; and be safe for the person wearing it [4].
Some obvious methods fail these tests. Microwaving, for example, can partially melt the
masks [5]. Alcohol and bleach destroy the static charge within the mask, which is vital to its
proper function [5,6]. The active layer of an N95 mask is 90% empty space, so the fibers need
help to trap 95% of the particles that pass through—they get that help from static electricity
[6,7].
1. Ultraviolet Radiation and Fumigation
The first of the five methods mentioned above, ultraviolet radiation (UV), is now being
employed at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Lincoln, Nebraska [8,9]. Their
procedure places two towers, each containing eight ultraviolet C (UVC) bulbs, in a room with
D. Mackenzie / Engineering xx (xxxx)
3
walls coated with reflective paint (Fig. 3) [9]. The masks are hung from clotheslines, and the
room has a capacity of 90 masks. Testing shows that 15 min of UVC radiation is enough to kill
the virus [9].
Fig. 3. The University of Nebraska Medical Center uses UV radiation to sterilize N95 masks for reuse by
medical personnel [9]. Used masks are hung on clotheslines between two towers that each shine eight UVC
bulbs; a 15 min exposure suffices for sterilization, and 90 masks may be treated at one time. Credit: University
of Nebraska, with permission.
A second alternative is fumigation. Duke University Hospitals (Durham, North Carolina)
are now using—and testing—systems manufactured by Bioquell, Inc. (Horsham, Pennsylvania),
which exposes the masks to vaporized hydrogen peroxide [1]. Depending on the machine used,
the amount of hydrogen peroxide gradually builds up to 300–750 ppm (1 ppm = 1 ×10−6) and is
held there for 20 min. The most time-consuming part of the procedure is de-gassing; it usually
takes 4 h before the decontamination room is safe to enter. But the masks are safe to wear after
that, because the hydrogen peroxide decomposes into oxygen and water. Using the Bioquell Z-2
hydrogen peroxide vapor generator (Fig. 4), the Duke staff can disinfect 1250 masks per cycle,
and 2500 per 12 h shift [1].
D. Mackenzie / Engineering xx (xxxx)
4
Fig. 4. Using a Bioquell (Horsham, Pennsylvania) hydrogen peroxide vapor generator, Duke University
Hospitals staff can disinfect, for reuse, 1250 masks per cycle, and 2500 per 12 h shift [1]. A larger version of
the set up manufactured and operated by Battelle (Columbus, Ohio) can process 80 000 used masks per day,
enough to supply multiple hospitals and even hospital systems [10]. Credit: Duke University, with permission.
But both the UV and hydrogen peroxide methods require equipment that not all hospitals
have on hand. “I worry that places around the globe will not have enough masks, and reuse will
be incredibly important,” said Mina. “I would encourage my colleagues to think about solutions
that will work for hospitals without high-tech resources.”
2. Hot Water Heating and Steaming
For settings without such resources, three potential solutions are heating in hot water,
steaming, and baking. By mid-February 2020, a Beijing University of Chemical Technology
team led by Jian-Feng Chen, professor and director of the state key laboratory of organic–
inorganic composites, had developed a “regeneration treatment” for reusing disposable masks
[2,3]. Designed specifically for household use, the method involves two steps (Fig. 2). The first
step calls for steeping used masks in hot water at a temperature > 56 °C (typically 60–80 °C) for
30 min. The temperature and timing are based on guidance from the National Health
Commission of the People’s Republic of China for killing the COVID-19 coronavirus [2]. In the
second step, essential to restoring the electrostatic charge critical to their filtering function, the
masks are dried with a standard—but non-static—hair dryer for 10 min. Successful regeneration
is confirmed by sprinkling the mask with small scraps of paper—if the paper sticks, the
electrostatic charge has been restored.
Using this method, the group found that mask performance is maintained for filtering
efficiency and resistance to airflow after one decontamination and, with surgical masks, after ten
cycles of decontamination (Table 1) [2]. The group notes, however, that this method is
recommended only for individuals at low risk for infection and without access to new masks, and
not for healthcare professionals [2,3].
Table 1.
D. Mackenzie / Engineering xx (xxxx)
5
Filterability for 0.1 μm particles in new and used (8 h) masks after regeneration treatment [2],
tested per China National Standard GB 2626-2006.
Mask type
Status
Sample
size
Filterability for 0.1 μm
particles, mean (range), %
Example
photographs
New
3
98.6 (97.4–99.9)
KF94
(Air Puri)
Regenerated,
1 cycle
3
98.1 (97.7–98.5)
New
5
46.5 (45.8–46.8)
Disposable
medical
(Hubei Lexin)
Regenerated,
1 cycle
5
46.0 (44.3–47.2)
New
5
76.9 (73.9–78.5)
Regenerated,
1 cycle
5
75.5 (74.9–77.0)
Disposable
surgical
(Henan Yubei)
Regenerated,
10 cycles
5
76.2 (73.7–77.9)
In March 2020, the Chen group extended their mask reuse investigations to the clinical
setting by using an autoclave, which most hospitals and many clinics already commonly have on
hand to sterilize surgical equipment. “It is well accepted that 30 min of pressurized steam at
121 °C kills almost all pathogens,” Chen said. Chen also noted that steam sterilization is
recognized by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as the most widely available
and dependable method for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities [11].
The group’s initial experiments with autoclave sterilization followed by “charging” suggest
that used masks retain their filtering effectiveness after decontamination. “We tested regenerated
N95 masks previously used for 8 h by volunteers in our university and the average filterability
for 0.1 μm particles was maintained at over 99%,” said Dan Wang, a scientist in Chen’s group.
Chen, Wang, and colleagues are currently working to optimize the technological parameters of
their autoclave-based method, with testing—including a qualitative one for fit—to determine
how the process may affect other functional and performance requirements for N95 masks. “The
testing of masks actually used by healthcare personnel is important to demonstrate the method’s
effectiveness and suitability for widespread use,” Chen said.
3. Baking and Comparisons
Finally, a group at Stanford University and 4C Air, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA), led by Stanford
professor of materials science and engineering Yi Cui, has experimented with baking [6,7]. Their
current standard is to bake the masks at 75 °C for 30 min. “Some people have suggested that
higher humidity helps kill the virus even faster,” Cui said, so they are also experimenting with
D. Mackenzie / Engineering xx (xxxx)
6
different levels of humidity as well as different temperatures. Temperatures of 85 °C or 100 °C
also seem to work well, but “125 °C is too high,” Cui said. At that temperature the performance
of the polypropylene starts to degrade.
One remaining uncertainty about baking is its effectiveness at killing the virus. Previous
research was conducted on viruses “in liquid buffer or culture medium,” said Jing Jin, a scientist
at Vitalant Research Institute in San Francisco who collaborates with Cui. To make sure that
baking will actually kill virus in the clinic, Jin is currently studying the effect of dry heat on
viruses on polypropylene cloth. Although she does not expect her final results until mid-April,
she said, “I am very confident that 75 °C for 30 min is enough.”
Assuming that all the methods are equally effective at killing viruses, the choice comes
down to other considerations. So, Cui and his collaborators (including the Nobel Prize-winning
physicist and Stanford professor of physics and molecular biology Steven Chu, who co-founded
4C Air with Cui) compared the effect of irradiation, steaming, and baking on mask performance.
When exposed to UV light, the masks retained their performance (filtering efficiency and
pressure drop) over ten cycles of decontamination, but “degraded quite a bit” after 20 cycles, Cui
said. “We are cautious on UV, also, because the penetration depth might be limited. The mask
has a three-dimensional structure, so something could be trapped deep inside, and you would
have to use a very high dose to disinfect that.”
For steam heating, Cui used 10 min cycles with steam from a boiling beaker as compared to
the 30 min cycles of autoclaving used by Chen’s group. Cui said they saw no reduction in
performance after three 10 min cycles, but after ten 10 min cycles the filtration rate was down to
80%. In effect, it was no longer a N95 mask.
As noted above, the Beijing team is still assessing the effectiveness of autoclaving after
multiple treatments. If there is a discrepancy between the Cui group’s results and those of the
Chen group, it might be attributable to the fact that Cui’s group did not “charge” the mask with a
hair dryer between cycles and/or differences in the steaming process between the two groups. So,
at present, it appears that the Chen group’s autoclaving method will work at least once, but its
effectiveness for decontaminating a mask multiple times remains to be confirmed.
Dry heat performed best in the Cui group’s tests. It was the only one of the three methods
for which the mask retained its filtering efficiency, its pressure difference, and its fit even after
20 cycles. Cui’s group did not test hydrogen peroxide fumigation, but the Duke University
Hospitals investigators plan to decontaminate and reuse their N95 masks up to 30 cycles [1],
with the limiting factor being degradation of the elastic straps (after 30 cycles, the masks might
no longer fit properly).
4. Supply and Demand
On an emergency basis, the US Food and Drug Administration on 29 March approved a
much larger version of Duke’s Bioquell device, which was itself approved in 2016.
Manufactured and operated by Battelle (Columbus, Ohio), the larger version (basically a
modified shipping container fitted with racks to hold the masks and a hydrogen peroxide
vaporizer) may be used for up to 20 cycles of mask decontamination and reuse [10]. Already
deployed in Massachusetts, Ohio, and New York, the Battelle systems can clean 80 000 masks
per day, enough to supply multiple hospitals and even hospital systems [12].
As of 27 March, however, 3M continued to insist, that “no disinfection method has met all
four” of the criteria mentioned above, when repeated five to ten times [4]. In an early April
D. Mackenzie / Engineering xx (xxxx)
7
update [13], the manufacturer states that while hydrogen peroxide and other decontamination
methods are still being evaluated, baking, steaming, or autoclaving are not recommended “due to
significant filter degradation.”
In any case, the urgent need to address rapidly depleting mask supplies is clear. At the
beginning of March 2020, the US Strategic National Stockpile contained about 42 million masks,
barely 1% of the projected annual need in a pandemic [14]. If the projected 3.5 billion masks
were indeed needed, this “stockpile” would be depleted in half a week.
On the supply side, 3M previously made 500 million masks per year worldwide. The
company has already doubled its production rate since the coronavirus epidemic began [15]. And
on 31 March, 3M committed to doubling their worldwide output yet again and producing 600
million masks annually in the United States [16]. Even so, comparing this source of supply (600
million) to the potential need (3.5 billion) there is a clear gap. It is highly likely that masks will
need to be reused, and multiple times. The United States is getting some help in closing the gap.
On 2 April, the city of Boston received a well-publicized shipment of 1.2 million masks from
China, with more reportedly on the way [17].
But even that generous gift is small compared to the number of masks that could be
potentially be made available through decontamination and reuse. And that strategy is benefiting
from the research of both American and Chinese scientists.
References
[1] Schwartz A, Stiegel M, Greeson N, Vogel A, Thomann W, Brown M, et al. Decontamination
and reuse of N95 respirators with hydrogen peroxide vapor to address worldwide personal
protective equipment shortages during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Appl
Biosaf 2020; in press.
[2] Cheng W. [Can't buy mask? It can be reused after regeneration treatment! ][Internet]. Beijing:
ScienceNet; 2020 Feb 14 [cited 2020 Apr 6]. Available from:
http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2020/2/435754.shtm. Chinese.
[3] Zhang Z, Xing Y. New reusable face masks in production [Internet]. Hong Kong: China
Daily; 2020 Mar 2 [cited 2020 Apr 6]. Available from:
https://www.chinadailyhk.com/article/122864.
[4] 3M. Disinfection of filtering facepiece respirators [Internet]. Technical Bulletin; 2020 Mar
[cited 2020 Apr 3]. Available from:
https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1816576O/disinfection-of-disposable-respirators-
technical-bulletin.pdf.
[5] Viscusi DJ, Bergman MS, Eimer BC, Shaffer RE. Evaluation of five decontamination
methods for filtering facepiece respirators. Ann Occup Hyg 2009;53(8):815–27.
[6] Liao L, Wang X, Yu X, Wang H, Zhao M, Wang Q, et al. Can N95 facial masks be used after
disinfection? And for how many times? [Internet]. Stanford: Learnly Anesthesia/Stanford
AIM Lab COVID-19 Evidence Service; [cited 2020 Apr 2]. Available from:
http://stanfordmedicine.app.box.com/v/covid19-PPE-1-2.
D. Mackenzie / Engineering xx (xxxx)
8
[7] Price A, Chu LF. Addressing COVID-19 face mask shortages (v 1.3), March 2020. [Internet].
Stanford: Learnly Anesthesia/Stanford AIM Lab COVID-19 Evidence Service; [cited 2020
Apr 2]. Available from: http://stanfordmedicine.app.box.com/v/covid19-PPE-1-2.
[8] Kolata G. As Coronavirus looms, mask shortage gives rise to promising approach [Internet].
New York: New York Times; 2020 Mar 20 [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/health/coronavirus-masks-reuse.html.
[9] Lowe JL, Paladino KD, Farke JD, Boulter K, Cawcutt K, Emodi M, et al. N95 filtering
facepiece respirator ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) process for decontamination
and reuse [Internet]. Lincoln: University of Nebraska; [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from:
https://www.nebraskamed.com/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19/n-95-decon-
process.pdf.
[10] Battelle CCDS Critical Care Decontamination SystemTM being deployed to meet urgent
need for personal protective equipment for nation’s healthcare workforce [Internet].
Columbus: Battelle Press Office; 2020 Mar 28 [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from:
https://www.battelle.org/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-detail/battelle-ccds-critical-
care-decontamination-system-being-deployed-to-meet-urgent-need-for-personal-protective-
equipment-for-nation-s-healthcare-workforce.
[11] Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities (2008) [Internet]. Atlanta:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016 Sep 18 [cited 2020 Apr 6]. Available from:
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/disinfection/sterilization/steam.html.
[12] Ostriker R. Boston hospitals getting ‘game-changer’ machine that sterilizes 80 000
protective masks a day [Internet]. Boston: Boston Globe; 2020 Apr 2 [cited 2020 Apr 4].
Available from: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/04/02/metro/boston-hospitals-getting-
game-changer-machine-that-sterilizes-80000-protective-masks-day.
[13] 3M. Decontamination methods for 3M N95 respirators [Internet]. Technical Bulletin; 2020
Apr [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from
https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1824869O/decontamination-methods-for-3m-n95-
respirators-technical-bulletin.pdf.
[14] Lovelace Jr B. HHS clarifies US has about 1% of facemasks needed for ‘full-blown’
coronavirus pandemic [Internet]. New York: CNBC; 2020 Mar 4 [cited 2020 Apr 4].
Available from: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/04/hhs-clarifies-us-has-about-1percent-of-
face-masks-needed-for-full-blown-pandemic.html.
[15] Gruley B, Clough R. How 3M plans to make more than a billion masks by end of year
[Internet]. New York: Bloomberg Businessweek; 2020 Mar 25 [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available
from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-03-25/3m-doubled-production-of-
n95-face-masks-to-fight-coronavirus.
D. Mackenzie / Engineering xx (xxxx)
9
[16] 3M. Putting healthcare workers first during the coronavirus outbreak [Internet].
Maplewood: 3M News Center; 2020 Apr 1 [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from:
https://news.3m.com/blog/3m-stories/3m-responds-2019-novel-coronavirus.
[17] Hightower K. New England Patriot’s plane delivers 1.2 million N95 masks from China to
Massachusetts [Internet]. New York: Time; 2020 Apr 2 [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from:
https://time.com/5814865/new-england-patriots-plane-masks/.
... Under natural conditions, respirators are resistant to degradation over short periods; thus, used respirators become hazardous waste, which poses a serious threat to biological health [14,15]. Therefore, effective and feasible disinfection methods of respirators to improve their reusability are urgently needed. 2 of 16 To date, the disinfection methods of respirators mainly include dry heat [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], water vapor [16,17,[23][24][25], chemical disinfectant [17,24], ultraviolet rays [16][17][18]23,24,26], hydrogen peroxide vapor [17,18,20,23,[26][27][28][29], microwave radiation [17][18][19], supercritical CO 2 [29], high pressure steam [17,18], gamma radiations [30,31], and ethylene oxide [17,26]. However, limitations of these methods persist. ...
... Under natural conditions, respirators are resistant to degradation over short periods; thus, used respirators become hazardous waste, which poses a serious threat to biological health [14,15]. Therefore, effective and feasible disinfection methods of respirators to improve their reusability are urgently needed. 2 of 16 To date, the disinfection methods of respirators mainly include dry heat [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], water vapor [16,17,[23][24][25], chemical disinfectant [17,24], ultraviolet rays [16][17][18]23,24,26], hydrogen peroxide vapor [17,18,20,23,[26][27][28][29], microwave radiation [17][18][19], supercritical CO 2 [29], high pressure steam [17,18], gamma radiations [30,31], and ethylene oxide [17,26]. However, limitations of these methods persist. ...
... Under natural conditions, respirators are resistant to degradation over short periods; thus, used respirators become hazardous waste, which poses a serious threat to biological health [14,15]. Therefore, effective and feasible disinfection methods of respirators to improve their reusability are urgently needed. 2 of 16 To date, the disinfection methods of respirators mainly include dry heat [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], water vapor [16,17,[23][24][25], chemical disinfectant [17,24], ultraviolet rays [16][17][18]23,24,26], hydrogen peroxide vapor [17,18,20,23,[26][27][28][29], microwave radiation [17][18][19], supercritical CO 2 [29], high pressure steam [17,18], gamma radiations [30,31], and ethylene oxide [17,26]. However, limitations of these methods persist. ...
Article
Full-text available
Filtering facepiece respirators have been widely used in the fields of occupational health and public hygiene, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, disposable respirators have been in high demand, and the waste generated from these disposable products poses a problem for the environment. Here, we aimed to test a practical decontamination method to allow for the reuse of KN95 respirators. In this study, three types of KN95 respirators were heated at 80 °C and 90 °C for different durations (15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, and 24 h). The filtration efficiencies of the tested KN95 respirators before and after heating were measured, and the changes in microstructure were imaged with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). In addition, a neural network model based on the nonlinear autoregressive with external input (NARX) to predict the filtration efficiency of the KN95 respirator was established. The results show that the temperature and time of dry heating affected particle prevention. The higher the temperature and the longer the heating time, the more obvious the decline in the filtration efficiency of the respirators. When the heating temperature reached 100 °C, the respirator may be no longer suitable for reuse. These results show that a dry heat temperature between 70 °C and 90 °C, and a heating time between 30 min and 2 h is assumed to be a suitable and effective decontamination method for respirators.
... NIOSH (2018) has listed the technical specifications of N95 respirators: an air filtration rate of more than 95 % non-oil particles, a fit that comfortably covers the nose and mouth without any gaps, an airflow rate of 85 L/minute, and minimum air leakage (3M, 2020;FDA, 2020;Qian et al., 1998;CDC, 2020;David et al., 2020). N95 respirators can be reused at least three times by sterilizing them using dry heat, hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV), and UV light (Fischer et al., 2020;Mackenzie, 2020). ...
Article
The corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to global shortages in disposable respirators. Increasing the recycling rate of masks is a direct, low-cost strategy to mitigate COVID-19 transmission. Photoactive decontamination of used masks attracts great attention due to its fast response, remarkable virus inactivation effect and full protection integrity. Here, we review state-of-the-art situation of photoactive decontamination. The basic mechanism of photoactive decontamination is firstly discussed in terms of ultraviolet, photothermal or photocatalytic properties. Among which, ultraviolet radiation damages DNA and RNA to inactivate viruses and microorganisms, and photothermal method damages them by destroying proteins, while photocatalysis kills them by destroying the structure. The practical applications of photoactive decontamination strategies are then fully reviewed, including ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, and unconventional masks made of functional nanomaterials with photothermal or photocatalytic properties. Their performance requirements are elaborated together with the advantages of long-term recycle use. Finally, we put forward challenges and prospects for further development of photoactive decontamination technology.
Article
The high demand for N95 and surgical masks made of nonbiodegradable petroleum-based materials due to SARS-CoV-2 challenges the recycling industry and is proving to be unsustainable. Although woven fabric masks present a longer lifetime, they are less effective in protecting against viral particulates. Here, through an at-home course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE), we demonstrate that alginate and soy-based materials are attractive alternatives for mask fabrication: stacking calcium ion-cross-linked alginate films with soy protein isolate sheets enables electrostatic and size-exclusion filtration. State-of-the-art aerosol testing confirmed this conclusion. Furthermore, because our synthetic and at-home analytical approach relies on cheap, abundant, and food-grade materials, and requires no equipment beyond kitchenware, it has the potential to be broadly adopted for practical and educational purposes.
Article
This manuscript presents a novel approach to the study of contemporary material culture using digital data. Scholars interested in the materiality of past and contemporary societies have been limited to information derived from assemblages of excavated, collected, or physically observed materials; they have yet to take full advantage of large or complex digital datasets afforded by the internet. To demonstrate the power of this approach and its potential to disrupt our understanding of the material world, we present a study of an ongoing global health crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, we focus on face-mask production during the pandemic across the United States in 2020 and 2021. Scraping information on homemade face-mask characteristics at multimonth intervals—including location and materials—we analyze the production of masks and their change over time. We demonstrate that this new methodology, coupled with a sociopolitical examination of mask use according to state policies and politicization, provides an unprecedented avenue to understand the changing distributions and social significances of material culture. Our study of mask making elucidates a clear linkage between partisan politics and decreasing disease mitigation effectiveness. We further reveal how time-averaged asssemblages drown out the political meanings of artifacts otherwise visible with finer temporal resolution.
Article
Full-text available
The threat of epidemic outbreaks like SARS-CoV-2 is growing owing to the exponential growth of the global population and the continual increase in human mobility. Personal protection against viral infections was enforced using ambient air filters, face masks, and other respiratory protective equipment. Available facemasks feature considerable variation in efficacy, materials usage and characteristic properties. Despite their widespread use and importance, face masks pose major potential threats due to the uncontrolled manufacture and disposal techniques. Improper solid waste management enables viral propagation and increases the volume of associated biomedical waste at an alarming rate. Polymers used in single-use face masks include a spectrum of chemical constituents: plasticizers and flame retardants leading to health-related issues over time. Despite ample research in this field, the efficacy of personal protective equipment and its impact post-disposal is yet to be explored satisfactorily. The following review assimilates information on the different forms of personal protective equipment currently in use. Proper waste management techniques pertaining to such special wastes have also been discussed. The study features a holistic overview of innovations made in face masks and their corresponding impact on human health and environment. Strategies with SDG3 and SDG12, outlining safe and proper disposal of solid waste, have also been discussed. Furthermore, employing the CFD paradigm, a 3D model of a face mask was created based on fluid flow during breathing techniques. Lastly, the review concludes with possible future advancements and promising research avenues in personal protective equipment.
Article
Full-text available
During the COVID-19 pandemic, different strategies emerged to combat shortages of certified face masks used in the healthcare sector. These strategies included increasing production from the original manufacturing sites, commissioning new production facilities locally, exploring and allowing the reuse of single-use face masks via various decontamination methods, and developing reusable mask alternatives that meet the health and safety requirements set out in European Standards. In this article, we quantify and evaluate the life-cycle environmental impacts of selected mask options available for use by healthcare workers in the UK, with the objective of supporting decision- and policy-making. We investigate alternatives to traditional single-use face masks like surgical masks and respirators (or FFP3 masks), including cloth masks decontaminated in washing machines; FFP3 masks decontaminated via vapour hydrogen peroxide, and rigid half masks cleaned with antibacterial wipes. Our analysis demonstrates that: (1) the reuse options analysed are environmentally preferential to the traditional “use then dispose” of masks; (2) the environmental benefits increase with the number of reuses; and (3) the manufacturing location and the material composition of the masks have great influence over the life-cycle environmental impacts of each mask use option, in particular for single-use options.
Article
Background Aerosol-borne diseases such as COVID-19 may outbreak occasionally in various regions of the world, inevitably resulting in short-term shortage and corresponding reuse of disposable respirators. Aim To investigate the effective disinfection methods, reusable duration, and frequency of N95 respirators. Methods Based on the self-built respirator simulation test system, and under combinations of experimental conditions of three N95 respirators × 0-200 nm NaCl aerosols × three simulated breathing flow rates (15, 50, and 85 L/min) × two disinfection methods (dry heating and UV radiation), this study continuously measured the changes in filtration efficiency of all respirators during multi-cycles of “8-hour simulated donning + disinfection” until the penetration ≥ 5%. Findings Multi-cycles of dry heating and UV radiation treatments on the reused (i.e., multiple 8-hour donning) N95 respirators have a minimal effect (<0.5%) on the respirator filtration efficiency, and even at 85 L/min, all tested N95 respirators are able to maintain filtration efficiencies ≥ 95% for at least 30 hours or 4 reuse cycles of “8-hour donning + disinfection”, while a lower breathing flow rate (15 L/min) plus the exhalation valve can further extend the N95 respirator usable duration up to 140 hours or 18 reuse cycles of “8-hour donning + disinfection”. As the respirator wearing time extends, aerosol penetration slowly increases in a quadratic function with a negative second-order coefficient, and the penetration increment during each cycle of 8-hour donning is less than 0.9%. Conclusion Multi-cycles N95 respirator reuse + dry heating or UV irradiation disinfection are feasible.
Article
Full-text available
As the world battles with the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, it also prepares for future global pandemics that threaten our health, economy, and survivor. During the outbreak, it became evident that use of personal protective equipment (PPE), specially face masks, can significantly slow the otherwise uncontrolled spread of the virus. Nevertheless, the outbreak and its new variants have caused shortage of PPE in many regions of the world. In addition, waste management of the enormous economical and environmental footprint of single use PPE has proven to be a challenge. Therefore, this study advances the theme of decontaminating used masks. More specifically, the effect of various decontamination techniques on the integrity and functionality of nanofiber-based N95 masks (i.e. capable of at least filtering 95% of 0.3 μm aerosols) were examined. These techniques include 70% ethanol, bleaching, boiling, steaming, ironing as well as placement in autoclave, oven, and exposure to microwave (MW) and ultraviolet (UV) light. Herein, filtration efficiency (by Particle Filtration Efficiency equipment), general morphology, and microstructure of nanofibers (by Field Emission Scanning Electron microscopy) prior and after every decontamination technique were observed. The results suggest that decontamination of masks with 70% ethanol can lead to significant unfavorable changes in the microstructure and filtration efficiency (down to 57.33%) of the masks. In other techniques such as bleaching, boiling, steaming, ironing and placement in the oven, filtration efficiency dropped to only about 80% and in addition, some morphological changes in the nanofiber microstructure were seen. Expectedly, there was no significant reduction in filtration efficiency nor microstructural changes in the case of placement in autoclave and exposure to the UV light. It was concluded that, the latter methods are preferable to decontaminate nanofiber-based N95 masks.
Article
Concerns have been raised regarding the availability of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-certified N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during an influenza pandemic. One possible strategy to mitigate a respirator shortage is to reuse FFRs following a biological decontamination process to render infectious material on the FFR inactive. However, little data exist on the effects of decontamination methods on respirator integrity and performance. This study evaluated five decontamination methods [ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), ethylene oxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP), microwave oven irradiation, and bleach] using nine models of NIOSH-certified respirators (three models each of N95 FFRs, surgical N95 respirators, and P100 FFRs) to determine which methods should be considered for future research studies. Following treatment by each decontamination method, the FFRs were evaluated for changes in physical appearance, odor, and laboratory performance (filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance). Additional experiments (dry heat laboratory oven exposures, off-gassing, and FFR hydrophobicity) were subsequently conducted to better understand material properties and possible health risks to the respirator user following decontamination. However, this study did not assess the efficiency of the decontamination methods to inactivate viable microorganisms. Microwave oven irradiation melted samples from two FFR models. The remainder of the FFR samples that had been decontaminated had expected levels of filter aerosol penetration and filter airflow resistance. The scent of bleach remained noticeable following overnight drying and low levels of chlorine gas were found to off-gas from bleach-decontaminated FFRs when rehydrated with deionized water. UVGI, ethylene oxide (EtO), and VHP were found to be the most promising decontamination methods; however, concerns remain about the throughput capabilities for EtO and VHP. Further research is needed before any specific decontamination methods can be recommended.
Can't buy mask? It can be reused after regeneration treatment!
  • W Cheng
Cheng W. [Can't buy mask? It can be reused after regeneration treatment! ][Internet]. Beijing: ScienceNet; 2020 Feb 14 [cited 2020
New reusable face masks in production
  • Z Zhang
  • Y Xing
Zhang Z, Xing Y. New reusable face masks in production [Internet].
Can N95 facial masks be used after disinfection? And for how many times?
  • L Liao
  • X Wang
  • X Yu
  • H Wang
  • M Zhao
  • Q Wang
Liao L, Wang X, Yu X, Wang H, Zhao M, Wang Q, et al. Can N95 facial masks be used after disinfection? And for how many times? [Internet]. Stanford: Learnly Anesthesia/Stanford AIM Lab COVID-19 Evidence Service; [cited 2020 Apr 2]. Available from: http://stanfordmedicine.app.box.com/v/covid19-PPE-1-2.
Addressing COVID-19 face mask shortages (v 1.3). [Internet] Stanford: Learnly Anesthesia/Stanford AIM Lab COVID-19 Evidence Service
  • A Price
  • L F Chu
Price A, Chu LF. Addressing COVID-19 face mask shortages (v 1.3), March 2020. [Internet].
Learnly Anesthesia/Stanford AIM Lab COVID-19 Evidence Service
  • Stanford
Stanford: Learnly Anesthesia/Stanford AIM Lab COVID-19 Evidence Service; [cited 2020
As Coronavirus looms, mask shortage gives rise to promising approach
  • G Kolata
Kolata G. As Coronavirus looms, mask shortage gives rise to promising approach [Internet].
N95 filtering facepiece respirator ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) process for decontamination and reuse
  • J L Lowe
  • K D Paladino
  • J D Farke
  • K Boulter
  • K Cawcutt
  • M Emodi
Lowe JL, Paladino KD, Farke JD, Boulter K, Cawcutt K, Emodi M, et al. N95 filtering facepiece respirator ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) process for decontamination and reuse [Internet]. Lincoln: University of Nebraska; [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from: https://www.nebraskamed.com/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19/n-95-deconprocess.pdf.
Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities
Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities (2008) [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016 Sep 18 [cited 2020 Apr 6]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/disinfection/sterilization/steam.html.