ArticlePDF Available

COVID-19 and gloves: when to wear and when not to wear

Authors:
  • West London NHS Trust

Abstract

The first rule of healthcare is to do no harm and some staff working in hospitals and in shops are wearing blue nitrile gloves. The aim is to protect themselves and people they come into contact with, but is indiscriminate use of gloves part of the problem rather than part of the solution?
Covid 19 and gloves: When to wear and when not to wear
The first rule of healthcare is to do no harm and some staff working in hospitals and in shops
are wearing blue nitrile gloves. The aim is to protect themselves and people they come into
contact with but is indiscriminate use of gloves part of the problem rather than part of the
solution?
How does Covid 19 spread?
The spread of infection within health care requires three elements:
1. A source of infecting organisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi);
2. A susceptible host;
3. A route of transmission of the organism from one person / site to another. This is
shown in figure one.
Figure one: Spread of infection (author’s own work)
Covid 19 is a coronavirus and it is thought to be transmitted through droplets generated by
coughing and sneezing and through contact with contaminated surfaces (DHSC et. al, 2020).
Droplet transmission: by large droplets during coughing, sneezing, talking and during
procedures which may generate droplets such as suctioning and bronchoscopy. The droplets
are propelled only a short distance through the air.
Airborne transmission: caused by dispersal of smaller micro organisms, e.g. viruses, or
airborne dust particles containing the infectious agent. These organisms can be widely
dispersed by air currents before being inhaled or deposited on the susceptible host, or in the
case of dust particles, onto horizontal surfaces and equipment Many viruses are spread by
airborne or droplet transmission (Rosa et al, 2013)
Standard infection control precautions
Standard infection control precautions are evidence based guidance that aim to provide staff
with evidence based guidance to prevent healthcare associated infections, figure two
illustrates these categories (Loveday et al, 2014).
1
Written for Peter Bradley 26th March 2020
Covid 19 and gloves: When to wear and when not to wear
Figure two: Actions to reduce infection risk
Hand washing
Hands must be washed or decontaminated before each and every episode of direct patient
contact and any activity that could contaminate hands. Alcohol hand rubs should only be
used on hands that are free of dirt and organic material. Cuts should be covered with a
waterproof dressing. Hands and wrists should be free of jewellery. Staff should use hand
creams regularly to protect their hands from the drying effects of frequent washing and
decontamination.
When you must wash your hands
Hands must be washed or decontaminated before each and every episode of direct patient
contact and any activity that could contaminate hands. The World Health Authority (2009) has
produced guidance on hand hygiene. This contains recommendations on when to wash your
hands. Health care workers must also decontaminate their hands before and after all patient
contact and whenever hands are visibly soiled. These recommendations which come from the
work of Sax and colleagues (2007) are shown in table one.
Table one: When to wash your hands
Before After
Each shift Each shift
Eating, drinking or handling food Direct contact with any blood and/or body
fluids
Performing a clinical procedure Using the toilet, blowing their nose,
coughing or sneezing
Before performing an aseptic technique Giving personal care
Providing care to a vulnerable
patients/site
Bed making
Removing protective clothing
Performing a clinical procedure
Any cleaning of the environment or
equipment
2
Written for Peter Bradley 26th March 2020
Covid 19 and gloves: When to wear and when not to wear
The problems associated with inappropriate glove use
The healthcare worker (HCW) who wears gloves inappropriately when not delivering clinical
care may touch a key board, answer a telephone and touch his or her face. The gloves can
provide the HCW with a false sense of security. If the HCW goes around the ward or unit
wearing gloves then the gloves can transmit the virus throughout the ward. Research
indicates that coronaviruses such as Covid 19 can live for extended periods on hard surfaces
(Otter et. al, 2016). A research study found that viruses can survive on gloves for 2-4 hours
(Casanova et. al, 2010). It’s unthinkable for an HCW to neglect to wash hands for that length
of time however people who are completing paperwork may wear gloves for considerable
amounts of time. It is important that staff remove gloves with care to avoid
contaminating their hands. Staff should wash their hands after removing gloves.
At present staff are using more gloves than ever before and there have been reports of delays
in obtaining supplies. Using gloves inappropriately can lead to a shortage of essential
equipment when it is needed to deliver care and that can cost lives.
The use of personal protective equipment
Gloves should be worn for all invasive procedures and all activities that carry a risk of
exposure to blood, body fluids, secretions and excretions including during equipment and
environmental decontamination (DHSC, 2020). Gloves should be worn once only and
changed between patients. Staff who are allergic to latex should use alternative products,
such as nitrile gloves (Loveday et al, 2014). Figure 3 author’s own work) summarises
guidance.
Figure 3: Guidance on glove use (author’s own work)
Additional guidance on the use of gloves when caring for people who have a Covid -19
infection or a suspected infection is shown in table two (DHSC, p 24, 2020)
3
Written for Peter Bradley 26th March 2020





 





 

!
"


#


!
"


#

$

$



%

%

Covid 19 and gloves: When to wear and when not to wear
Table two: Additional guidance on glove use when caring for people with Covid 19 infections
or suspected infections.
Activity Entry to cohort
area (only if
necessary)
Within 1 metre of
a patient with
possible/confirme
d
COVID-19
High risk units
where AGPs
are being
conducted eg:
ICU/ITU/HDU
Aerosol
generating
procedures(any
setting)
Gloves
Required
No Yes Yes Yes
Handwashing
Liquid soap products
Washing hands with a liquid soap or detergent will remove dirt, organic material and transient
micro-organisms. This method of hand decontamination is all that is required for most routine
health care related procedures. Bar soap should not be used in clinical areas as it can
harbour some micro-organisms.
Alcohol Hand Rub/Gel (with or without antibacterial additives)
Alcohol hand gel can be used to remove microorganisms from clean hands. . Alcohol hand
gel can also be used between tasks and between patients and is useful where adequate
facilities are not available Alcohol is inactivated in the presence of organic matter and
therefore is not used on soiled, grubby hands.
Antiseptic Detergents (e.g. Chlorhexidine)
An antiseptic detergent may be preferred when caring for a patient known to be colonised or
infected with an antibiotic resistant organism, e.g. MRSA, and prior to performing an aseptic
procedure or minor surgery. Aqueous, antiseptic hand washing agents are used to remove
organic contamination and reduce levels of resident flora, and with repeated use, maintain
low bacterial counts on the skin, e.g. under sterile gloves. Antiseptic products must not be
used routinely for hand washing. Prolonged, repeated use of antiseptic products can damage
skin and lead to an increased number of bacteria on the skin
When to wash your hands
The World Health Organisation’s five moments of hand hygiene provides practical guidance
on when to wash hands
https://www.who.int/infection-prevention/campaigns/clean-hands/5moments/en/
(author’s note can we please add to this article)
How to wash your hands
Some areas of the hands are more frequently missed than the others during hand
decontamination. It is important to pay attention to all areas of the hands, whilst washing, but
paying particular attention to the finger tips and nail area. These are the areas most in
contact with the patient and can be heavily contaminated with micro-organisms. Figure four,
below show areas of the hands most frequently missed.
4
Written for Peter Bradley 26th March 2020
Covid 19 and gloves: When to wear and when not to wear
Six stage handwashing technique
1. Palm to palm 2. Backs of hands
3. Interdigital spaces 4. Fingertips
Wet hands under running water, then apply the recommended amount of hand
cleanser, rub hands together vigorously to make a lather using following technique
(see page ):
Palm to palm (including wrists);
Right palm over left dorsum & left palm over right dorsum;
Palm to palm with fingers interlaced;
Backs of fingers to opposing palms with fingers interlaced;
Rotational rubbing of thumbs with thumbs clasped in opposite palms;
5
Written for Peter Bradley 26th March 2020
Covid 19 and gloves: When to wear and when not to wear
Rotational rubbing of finger tips in palms;
REPEAT EACH STEP 5 TIMES.
Rinse the hands thoroughly under running water;
Turn off taps using elbows or clean paper towels to prevent recontamination, and dry
hands thoroughly with clean paper towels.
If in patient’s home, dry hands first and turn taps off using paper towels or towel.
Dispose of paper towel into a foot operated pedal bin. Do not lift up the lid of the bin
with hands as this will re-contaminate them. If necessary, use hand towels to lift lid.
If in patient’s home, dispose of towels into domestic waste.
Reducing the viral burden
Infection control is a team effort and whilst wards where people who have Covid 19 infections
will have additional cleaning measures in place staff may be required to wipe down surfaces
in frequently touched areas more frequently.
Conclusion
Caring for patients with Covid 19 is a new experience for healthcare workers and our
knowledge of how the virus affects people is still developing. There is a sound body of
evidence that guides practice when dealing with infectious diseases and that includes the
appropriate use of personal protective equipment including gloves.
References
Casanova L, Rutala WA, Weber DJ and Sobsey MD. Coronavirus Survival on Healthcare
Personal Protective Equipment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:560-561
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20350196/
DHSC et.al, (2020). COVID-19: Guidance for infection prevention and control in healthcare
settings. Adapted from Pandemic Influenza: Guidance for Infection prevention and control in
healthcare settings. Issued jointly by the Department of Health and Social Care
(DHSC), Public Health Wales(PHW), Public Health Agency(PHA) Northern Ireland, Health
Protection Scotland (HPS) and Public Health England as official guidance.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_dat
a/file/874316/Infection_prevention_and_control_guidance_for_pandemic_coronavirus.pdf
Loveday HP, Wilson JA, Pratt RJ, Golsorkhi M, Tingle A, Bak A, Browne J, Prieto J, Wilcox M
(2014). epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated
infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect. 2014 Jan;86 Suppl 1:S1-70
http://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/S0195-6701%2813%2960012-2/fulltext
Otter, J.A. et al (2016). Transmission of SARS and MERS coronaviruses and influenza
virus in healthcare settings: the possible role of dry surface contamination
Journal of Hospital Infection, Volume 92, Issue 3, 235 - 250
https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/S0195-6701%2815%2900367-9/fulltext
Public Health England (2020). Collection Coronavirus (COVID-19): guidance. Updated 25th
March 2020
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/coronavirus-covid-19-list-of-guidance
Rosa G, Fratini M, Della Libera S, Iaconelli M, Muscillo M (2013). Viral infections acquired
indoors through airborne, droplet or contact transmission. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 49(2):124-
132.
http://www.scielosp.org/pdf/aiss/v49n2/a04v49n2.pdf
6
Written for Peter Bradley 26th March 2020
Covid 19 and gloves: When to wear and when not to wear
Sax H, Allegranzi B, Uckay I, Larson E Boyce J, Pittet D (2007). My five moments for hand
hygiene: a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand
hygiene. J Hosp Infection: 67:1: 9–21
http://microbiology.mtsinai.on.ca/coreEducModules/hand-hygiene-aug-2007.pdf
7
Written for Peter Bradley 26th March 2020
... Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Gobi menyatakan tidak terdapat bukti klinis yang menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan sarung tangan di luar kebutuhan medis dapat mencegah infeksi COVID-19 (Gunasekaran, 2020). Selain itu, berdasarkan artikel yang ditulis oleh Linda Nazarko, disebutkan bahwa sebaiknya penggunaan sarung tangan hanya dilakukan untuk aktivitas yang berisiko tinggi terpapar COVID-19 dan tidak digunakan pada aktivitas harian, seperti berbelanja kebutuhan pokok (Nazarko, 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Semarang merupakan kota dengan jumlah kasus COVID-19 tertinggi di Jawa Tengah. Guna mencegah penyebaran COVID-19, maka diberlakukan kebijakan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat (PKM). Namun, masih terdapat banyak masyarakat yang tidak patuh terhadap kebijakan tersebut sehingga jumlah kasus COVID-19 di Kota Semarang semakin meningkat. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang memiliki hubungan dengan kepatuhan masyarakat terhadap kebijakan PKM di Kota Semarang. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuantitatif dengan desain cross-sectional. Sebanyak 140 responden didapatkan melalui metode accidental sampling. Analisis data dilakukan secara univariat dan bivariat menggunakan uji statistik non-parametrik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sikap (p=0,039), sarana prasarana (p=0,002), pengawasan (p=0,002), dukungan tokoh masyarakat (p=0,000), dukungan kewenangan (p=0,018), kejelasan kebijakan (p=0,000), dan konsistensi kebijakan (p=0,040) merupakan faktor-faktor yang memiliki hubungan dengan kepatuhan masyarakat terhadap kebijakan PKM di Kota Semarang.
Article
Full-text available
Background The following systematic review explores the uses and understandings of physical, human-to-human touch engagements in healthcare professions. Given its central importance as both a diagnostic tool and a form of non-verbal communication, this review sought to understand the communicative, social and affective dimensions of touches a part of healthcare, medical or nursing interventions. We attempt to understand how touch communication seems to be structured in the literature, and what tends to be communicated via touch, but also to highlight how the dogmatic distinction between ‘instrumental’ and ‘expressive’ touches might have obscured a socio-affective matrix within all touches. Methods The synthesis produced was informed by 36 empirical studies involving either direct observation of touch practices, or recollection and discussion with healthcare professionals. The studies were selected from five databases in March 2022. In order to minimise risks of bias, the corpus was screened by two independent reviewers and underwent quality appraisal through the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The final dataset was then analysed, synthesised and presented according to the principles of thematic synthesis. Results We outline how medical touch has been mostly categorised as either ‘instrumental’ or ‘expressive’, with only the latter usually described as serving a communicative purpose, despite its lower incidence. We further highlight how touch seems to be operating across a fragile boundary between ‘reassuring presence’ and ‘control’, and thus requires carefulness by practitioners, and an understanding of boundaries. Then, we describe how the literature presented gender, cultural background and personal preference as elements influencing the use and perception of touch. Lastly, touch-mediated communication has been presented in some of the literature as a co-produced practice based on bodily, affective and contextual mutual attunement. Such an understanding radically reconfigures the patient as an active co-participant, as well as pushing against the conceptual boundary between instrumental and expressive touch, recognising how to affect cuts across human-made dichotomies. Conclusion We argue that communication might happen in all instances of touch, while also advocating for empirical work to outline and describe the adaptive physical dynamics (e.g. changes in speed, pressure, temperature) that regulate and alter even medical procedures for communicative purposes. We also discuss the need for social scientists to radically re-conceptualise not only the theoretical scaffolding behind medical touch, but also the methodologies deployed to investigate it—advocating for a renewed attention to bodily and interactional dynamics, particularly through the deployment of (micro-)phenomenological tools, broader ethnographical engagements, or sensors for automatic recognition of bio-signals. Limitations The review could be at risk of bias given it sampled only studies written in English, French, Italian, Spanish and Finnish, thus not highlighting potentially different cultural and theoretical perspectives emerging from non-EuroAmerican contexts. Moreover, only 36% of studies included discuss patients’ perspectives. Systematic review registration This review was not registered.
Chapter
Touch dominates our everyday lives, but it is surprising that it has only recently become the subject of research. In several occupations, touch is an instrumental, assistive or emotional tool for making a connection with the client, performing necessary procedures and generating positive psychophysical outcomes. This chapter foregrounds fundamental criteria for professional touch as a working skill and considers how touch embodies professional ethics. It introduces the conceptual framework, empirical material and theoretical underpinnings that frame the book. This chapter provides a brief overview of touch as an essential but unseen work tool and explores touch as a timely issue from COVID-19 to #metoo campaign. We introduce the key concepts of ‘body work’ and ‘emotional work’, and findings of recent neuroscientific research on touch. The chapter gives guidelines for understanding ‘professional touch’ as professional know-how and embodied ethics.
Article
Mortality salience is omnipresent in the life of consumers. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, when consumers retire, or when they consider products related to death such as life insurance. This research examines how consumers’ level of religious commitment and geographic location influence response to death primes in advertisements. Using terror management theory as a conceptual framework, three experiments examine differences between consumers sampled from countries in Asia and the Americas. Study 1 reveals that consumers sampled from an Asian (vs. American) country respond more positively to death primes (vs. no prime) in advertisements. Study 2 replicates these findings and shows that religious commitment moderates such effects, with lower religious commitment consumers being more reactive to death primes than higher religious commitment consumers. Study 3 confirms religion’s influence by priming religion and identifies perceived product need as mediating the relationship between the interaction of religion × death prime × country and advertised product evaluations. Practical implications for international advertising are provided.
Chapter
A century after the great Spanish flu wiped millions of people off the face of earth, the world is at loggerheads with yet another pandemic: the coronavirus disease 2019 or COVID-19. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes the COVID-19 infection. It is a single-stranded RNA virus in the coronavirus family (Coronaviridae) named from morphology. The SARS-CoV-2 infects human respiratory epithelial cells a thousand times more than the previous coronavirus strains and does so by interacting with human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors. The transmission modes include contact droplets from infected individuals, airborne transmission or indirect contacts on infected surfaces.
Article
Full-text available
Viruses with pandemic potential including H1N1, H5N1, and H5N7 influenza viruses, and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)/Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronaviruses (CoV) have emerged in recent years. SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and influenza virus can survive on surfaces for extended periods, sometimes up to months. Factors influencing the survival of these viruses on surfaces include: strain variation, titre, surface type, suspending medium, mode of deposition, temperature and relative humidity, and the method used to determine the viability of the virus. Environmental sampling has identified contamination in field-settings with SARS-CoV and influenza virus, although the frequent use of molecular detection methods may not necessarily represent the presence of viable virus. The importance of indirect contact transmission (involving contamination of inanimate surfaces) is uncertain compared with other transmission routes, principally direct contact transmission (independent of surface contamination), droplet, and airborne routes. However, influenza virus and SARS-CoV may be shed into the environment and be transferred from environmental surfaces to hands of patients and healthcare providers. Emerging data suggest that MERS-CoV also shares these properties. Once contaminated from the environment, hands can then initiate self-inoculation of mucous membranes of the nose, eyes or mouth. Mathematical and animal models, and intervention studies suggest that contact transmission is the most important route in some scenarios. Infection prevention and control implications include the need for hand hygiene and personal protective equipment to minimize self-contamination and to protect against inoculation of mucosal surfaces and the respiratory tract, and enhanced surface cleaning and disinfection in healthcare settings.
Article
Full-text available
Hand hygiene is a core element of patient safety for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections and the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Its promotion represents a challenge that requires a multi-modal strategy using a clear, robust and simple conceptual framework. The World Health Organization First Global Patient Safety Challenge 'Clean Care is Safer Care' has expanded educational and promotional tools developed initially for the Swiss national hand hygiene campaign for worldwide use. Development methodology involved a user-centred design approach incorporating strategies of human factors engineering, cognitive behaviour science and elements of social marketing, followed by an iterative prototype test phase within the target population. This research resulted in a concept called 'My five moments for hand hygiene'. It describes the fundamental reference points for healthcare workers (HCWs) in a time-space framework and designates the moments when hand hygiene is required to effectively interrupt microbial transmission during the care sequence. The concept applies to a wide range of patient care activities and healthcare settings. It proposes a unified vision for trainers, observers and HCWs that should facilitate education, minimize inter-individual variation and resource use, and increase adherence. 'My five moments for hand hygiene' bridges the gap between scientific evidence and daily health practice and provides a solid basis to understand, teach, monitor and report hand hygiene practices.
Article
The Department of Health commissioned a review of new evidence and we have updated the evidence base for making infection prevention and control recommendations. A critical assessment of the updated evidence indicated that the epic2 guidelines published in 2007 remain robust, relevant and appropriate, but some guideline recommendations required adjustments to enhance clarity and a number of new recommendations were required. These have been clearly identified in the text. In addition, the synopses of evidence underpinning the guideline recommendations have been updated.