ArticlePDF Available

Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei Province, China

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Importance While the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in more than 100 000 infected individuals in China and worldwide, there are few reports on the association of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with ocular abnormalities. Understanding ocular manifestations of patients with COVID-19 by ophthalmologists and others may facilitate the diagnosis and prevention of transmission of the disease. Objective To investigate ocular manifestations and viral prevalence in the conjunctiva of patients with COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants In this case series, patients with COVID-19 treated from February 9 to 15, 2020, at a hospital center in Hubei province, China, were retrospectively reviewed for ocular manifestations. During the period of treatment, the ocular signs and symptoms as well as results of blood tests and reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swabs for SARS-CoV-2 were noted and analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures Ocular signs and symptoms as well as results of blood tests and RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Results Of the 38 included patients with clinically confirmed COVID-19, 25 (65.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 65.8 (16.6) years. Among them, 28 patients (73.7%) had positive findings for COVID-19 on RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs, and of these, 2 patients (5.2%) yielded positive findings for SARS-CoV-2 in their conjunctival as well as nasopharyngeal specimens. A total of 12 of 38 patients (31.6%; 95% CI, 17.5-48.7) had ocular manifestations consistent with conjunctivitis, including conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, epiphora, or increased secretions. By univariate analysis, patients with ocular symptoms were more likely to have higher white blood cell and neutrophil counts and higher levels of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase than patients without ocular symptoms. In addition, 11 of 12 patients with ocular abnormalities (91.7%; 95% CI, 61.5-99.8) had positive results for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs. Of these, 2 (16.7%) had positive results for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR from both conjunctival and nasopharyngeal swabs. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, one-third of patients with COVID-19 had ocular abnormalities, which frequently occurred in patients with more severe COVID-19. Although there is a low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in tears, it is possible to transmit via the eyes.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients With Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei Province, China
Ping Wu, MD; Fang Duan, MD; Chunhua Luo,MD; Qiang Liu, MD; Xingguang Qu, MD;
Liang Liang, MD; Kaili Wu, MD
IMPORTANCE While the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in
more than 100 000 infected individuals in China and worldwide, there are few reports on the
association of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) with ocular
abnormalities. Understanding ocular manifestations of patients with COVID-19 by
ophthalmologists and others may facilitate the diagnosis and prevention of transmission of
the disease.
OBJECTIVE To investigate ocular manifestations and viral prevalence in the conjunctiva of
patients with COVID-19.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this case series, patients with COVID-19 treated from
February 9 to 15, 2020, at a hospital center in Hubei province, China, were retrospectively
reviewed for ocular manifestations. During the period of treatment, the ocular signs and
symptoms as well as results of blood tests and reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swabs for SARS-CoV-2 were noted
and analyzed.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Ocular signs and symptoms as well as results of blood tests
and RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2.
RESULTS Of the 38 included patients with clinically confirmed COVID-19, 25 (65.8%) were
male, and the mean (SD) age was 65.8 (16.6) years. Among them, 28 patients (73.7%) had
positive findings for COVID-19 on RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs, and of these, 2
patients (5.2%) yielded positive findings for SARS-CoV-2 in their conjunctival as well as
nasopharyngeal specimens. A total of 12 of 38 patients (31.6%; 95% CI, 17.5-48.7) had ocular
manifestations consistent with conjunctivitis, including conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis,
epiphora, or increased secretions. By univariate analysis, patients with ocular symptoms were
more likely to have higher white blood cell and neutrophil counts and higher levels of
procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase than patients without ocular
symptoms. In addition, 11 of 12 patients with ocular abnormalities (91.7%; 95% CI, 61.5-99.8)
had positive results for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs. Of these, 2
(16.7%) had positive results for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR from both conjunctival and
nasopharyngeal swabs.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, one-third of patients with COVID-19 had ocular
abnormalities, which frequently occurred in patients with more severe COVID-19. Although
there is a low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in tears, it is possible to transmit via the eyes.
JAMA Ophthalmol. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1291
Published online March 31, 2020.
Invited Commentary
Author Affiliations: Department of
Ophthalmology, The FirstCollege of
Clinical Medical Science, Yichang
Central People’s Hospital, China
Three Gorges University,Yichang,
China (P. Wu, Luo, Liu, Qu, Liang);
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State
Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology,
Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou,
China (Duan, K. Wu).
Corresponding Author: Liang Liang,
MD, Department of Ophthalmology,
The First College of Clinical Medical
Science, Yichang Central People’s
Hospital, China Three Gorges
University,183 Yiling St, Yichang
443003, China (liangliang419519@
163.com); Kaili Wu, MD,Zhongshan
Ophthalmic Center, State Key
Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun
Yat-senUniversity, 54 S Xianlie Rd,
Guangzhou 510060, China (wukaili@
maill.sysu.edu.cn).
Research
JAMA Ophthalmology | Brief Report
(Reprinted) E1
Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 03/31/2020
Since December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-
19) has been reported among patients in China. Cur-
rently, the disease is quickly spreading worldwide. The
pathogen of COVID-19 is a novelcoronavir us (severe acute re-
spiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [SARS-CoV-2]), identified as
a member of the Coronaviridae family. Another coronavirus,
named SARS-CoV-1, was responsible for severe acute respira-
tory syndrome.
1
Compared with SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2 has
a similar binding receptor and similar pathologic features sys-
temically and epidemiological characteristics.
1,2
Although there
is no direct evidence that SARS-CoV-1 replic ationresults in con-
junctivitis and other ocular diseases, reports have empha-
sized the eye as a potential site for virus transmission.
3
Simi-
larly, SARS-CoV-2 transmission through the eye has been
suspected.
Nevertheless, there are no reports in the medical litera-
ture at this time, to our knowledge, that identify a direct re-
lationship between SARS-CoV-2 and the eye. Researchers have
not reported ocular abnormalities nor have they stated in the
medical literature if there was conjunctivitis or viral pres-
ence detected in the tears of patients with COVID-19. The ob-
jective of this study was to evaluate ocular involvement sys-
tematically in patients highly suspected of having or confirmed
to have COVID-19.
Methods
From February 9 to 15, 2020, patients with COVID-19 hospi-
talized in Yichang Central People’s Hospital were diagnosed
based on the 5th edition of the National Guideline on Pre-
vention and Control of the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia
(PC-NCP) published by the National Health Commission of
China on February 8, 2020.
4
The patient symptoms, ocular
manifestations, chest computed tomographic scans, and
results of blood tests and reverse transcriptase–polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal and conjuncti-
val swabs for SARS-CoV-2 were noted and analyzed. This
study was approved by the ethics committee of Yichang Cen-
tral People’s Hospital, and all patients gave written informed
consent. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS
version 13.0 (SPSS Inc). Means for continuous variables were
compared using independent-group ttest when the data
were normally distributed; otherwise, the Mann-Whitney
test was used. Proportions for categorical variables were
compared using the χ
2
and Fisher exact test as appropriate.
For unadjusted comparisons, a 2-sided α of less than .05 was
considered statistically significant.
Results
Of the 38 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who were
recruited, 25 (65.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was
65.8 (16.6) years (Table 1). Among them, 28 patients (73.7%)
had positive findings for COVID-19 on RT-PCR from naso-
pharyngeal swabs, and of these, 2 patients (5.2%) yielded
positive findings for SARS-CoV-2 in their conjunctival as well
as nasopharyngeal specimens. The other 10 patients who
were hospitalized were judged to have COVID-19 by the
guideline of PC-NCP,
4
with fever and/or respiratory symp-
toms and lung computed tomography imaging features of
COVID-19 pneumonia.
A total of 12 of 38 patients (31.6%; 95% CI, 17.5-48.7) had
ocular manifestations consistent with conjunctivitis, includ-
ing conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, epiphora, and in-
creased secretions (Table 2). Among these 12 patients, there
were 4 cases judged as moderate, 2 cases judged as severe, and
6 cases judged as critical, which was graded according to the
guideline of PC-NCP
4
: moderate indicated fever and/or respi-
ratory symptoms and lung computed tomography imaging
findings; severe indicated dyspnea (respiratory frequency of
30 cycles per minute or greater), blood oxygen saturation of
93% or less, and an arterial partial pressure of oxygen to frac-
tion of oxygen inspiration ratio of 300 or less; and critical in-
dicated respiratory failure or shock or multiple organ
dysfunction/failure.
4
In these patients, 1 patient experienced
epiphora as the first symptom of COVID-19. None of them ex-
perienced blurred vision. By univariate analysis, patients with
ocular symptoms were more likely to have higher white blood
cell and neutrophil counts and higher levels of procalcitonin,
C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase than patients
without ocular symptoms (Table 1). In addition, 11 of 12 pa-
tients with ocular abnormalities (91.7%; 95% CI, 61.5-99.8)
had positive results for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR from naso-
pharyngeal swabs. Of these, 2 (16.7%) had positive results for
SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR from both conjunctival and naso-
pharyngeal swabs.
Discussion
Few previous investigations have evaluated ocular signs and
symptoms in patients infected with SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-
CoV-2. A few reports have evaluated for the presence of SARS-
CoV-2 in tear fluid.
3,5
Our investigation suggests that among
Key Points
Question What are the ocular manifestations and conjunctival
viral prevalence in patients from Hubei province, China, with
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Findings In this case series including 38 patients with COVID-19,
12 patients had ocular manifestations, such as epiphora,
conjunctival congestion, or chemosis, and these commonly
occurred in patients with more severe systemic manifestations.
Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction results were
positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in 28
nasopharyngeal swabs and 2 conjunctival swabs, and more
significant changes in blood test values appeared in patients with
ocular abnormalities.
Meaning These data may assist ophthalmologists and others to
understand the ocular manifestations of COVID-19, thus enhancing
the diagnosis and prevention of the transmission of the disease.
Research Brief Report Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)in Hubei Province, China
E2 JAMA Ophthalmology Published online March 31, 2020 (Reprinted) jamaophthalmology.com
Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 03/31/2020
patients with COVID-19, 31.6% (95% CI, 17.5-48.7) have ocu-
lar abnormalities, with most among patients with more se-
vere systemic manifestations or abnormal findings on blood
tests. These results suggest that ocular symptoms commonly
appear in patients with severe pneumonia.
Our results show a low prevalence (5.2%; 95% CI, 0.6-
17.8) of SARS-CoV-2 nucleotides in conjunctival specimens of
patients with COVID-19, consistent with previous studies on
severe acute respiratory syndrome.
3
Of note, we found only 1
patient presenting with conjunctivitis as the first symptom. Pre-
vious reports have shown the shedding of potentially infec-
tious virus can occur in people who have no fever and minor
or absent signs of infection.
6
Because unprotected eyes were
associated with an increased risk of transmission of
SARS-CoV-1,
7
in support of our current results, our results might
suggest that SARS-CoV-2 might be transmitted through the eye.
Table 1. Clinical Laboratory Resultsof Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Measure
Mean (SD)
Difference (95% CI)
P
valueTotal (N = 38)
Ocular symptoms
Yes (n = 12) No (n = 26)
Age, median (IQR), y 68 (53 to 76) 67 (52 to 76) 70 (62 to 79) −3.39 (−8.47 to 15.25) .28
Male, No. (%) 25 (65.8) 7 (58.3) 18 (69.2) −0.11 (−0.44 to 0.22) .51
Severe type, No. (%)
a
15 (39.4) 8 (66.7) 7 (26.9) 0.40 (0.08 to 0.71) .33
White blood cell count, /μL 7360 (4480) 10 900 (5580) 5730 (2690) 5160 (2460 to 7860) .009
Lymphocyte count, /μL 890 (500) 710 (480) 980 (490) −270 (−610 to 70) .12
White blood cell count to
lymphocyte count ratio
14.96 (20.23) 26.20 (25.36) 9.77 (15. 30) 16.43 (3.02 to 29.85) .06
Neutrophil count, /μL 5920 (4640) 9510 (5820) 4260 (2820) 5250 (2430 to 8070) .01
Monocyte count, /μL 500 (210) 620 (280) 440 (150) 170 (30 to 3100) .06
Platelet count, ×10
3
/μL 184.39
(77.28)
184.58
(89.70)
184.31
(72.80)
0.28 (−55.18 to 55.73) .99
PCT ≥0.05 ng/mL, No. (%) 15 (40.5) 8 (66.7) 7 (28.0)
b
0.39 (0.06 to 0.71) .03
CRP, mg/dL 5.17 (6.30) 8.55 (8.87) 3.61 (4.02) 4.95 (0.7 to 9.15) .04
D-dimer, μg/mL 1.76 (2.42) 2.96 (3.93)
c
1.35 (1.53)
d
1.62 (−0.35 to 3.59) .15
Creatine kinase, U/L 101.82
(85.81)
91.08 (58.35) 106.77
(96.53)
−15.69 (−77.03 to
45.66)
.61
Creatine kinase–MB, ng/mL 11.87 (5.67) 12.42 (4.94) 11.62 (6.05) 0.80 (−3.26 to 4.86) .35
LDH, U/L 281.11
(154.47)
381.7
(196.52)
234.65
(105.89)
147.10 (48.04 to
246.15)
.03
Alanine aminotransferase, U/L 31.08 (27.46) 39.83 (45.25) 27.04 (12.69) 12.79 (−6.43 to 32.02) .36
Aspartate aminotransferase,
U/L
35.58 (26.58) 45.33 (41.73) 31.08 (14.58) 14.26 (−4.20 to 32.71) .27
Urea nitrogen, mg/dL 41.24
(128.83)
20.21 (15.37) 50.94
(155.41)
−30.72 (−122.58 to
61.14)
.50
Creatinine, mg/dL 1.61 (2.84) 1.94 (3.81) 1.46 (2.34) 0.48 (−1.55 to 2.52) .63
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive
protein; IQR, interquartile range;
LDH, lactate dehydrogenase;
PCT,procalcitonin.
SI conversion factors: Toconvert
white blood cell count to ×10
9
per
liter, multiply by 0.001; lymphocyte
count to ×10
9
per liter, multiply by
0.001;neutrophil count to ×10
9
per
liter, multiply by 0.001; monocyte
count to ×10
9
per liter, multiply by
0.001;platelet count to ×10
9
per liter,
multiply by 1; CRP to milligrams per
liter, multiply by 10; D-dimer to
nanomoles per liter, multiply by
5.476; creatine kinase to microkatals
per liter, multiply by 0.0167; creatine
kinase–MB to micrograms per liter,
multiply by 1; LDH to microkatals per
liter, multiply by 0.0167; alanine
aminotransferase to microkatals per
liter, multiply by 0.0167; aspartate
aminotransferase to microkatals per
liter, multiply by 0.0167; urea
nitrogen to millimoles per liter,
multiply by 0.357;and creatinine to
micromoles per liter, multiply by
88.4.
a
Includes severe and critical cases of
COVID-19.
b
Data from 1 patient missing.
c
Data from 4 patients missing.
d
Data from 3 patients missing.
Table 2. Characteristics of 12 PatientsWith Ocular Manifestations
Patient
No./Sex/Age, y
Temperature
at ocular
examination, °C Respiratory symptoms Clinical type
a
Ocular manifestations
SARS-CoV-2 RNA test result
Nasopharyngeal
swab
Conjunctival
swab
1/F/80s 38.0 Dyspnea Severe Chemosis, epiphora Positive Negative
2/M/70s 38.0 Cough, expectorate Critical Secretion Positive Negative
3/M/50s 39.9 Cough, expectorate Critical Conjunctival hyperemia, secretion Positive Positive
4/F/80s 39.0 Dyspnea Severe Conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis,
epiphora, secretion
Positive Negative
5/F/60s 36.8 Cough Critical Chemosis, epiphora Positive Positive
6/M/60s 38.7 Cough, expectorate Critical Chemosis, epiphora, secretion Positive Negative
7/F/80s 36.5 None Moderate Chemosis, epiphora, secretion Positive Negative
8/F/70s 38.0 Cough Critical Chemosis, epiphora, secretion Positive Negative
9/M/60s 38.1 None Critical Chemosis, secretion Positive Negative
10/M/30s 39.6 Chest tightness Moderate Chemosis Positive Negative
11/M/40s 37.1 Cough Moderate Conjunctival hyperemia Negative Negative
12/M/70s 36.9 None Moderate Epiphora Positive Negative
Abbreviations: F,female; M, male; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2.
a
Graded by the National Guideline on Prevention and Control of the Novel
Coronavirus Pneumonia.
4
Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)in Hubei Province, China Brief Report Research
jamaophthalmology.com (Reprinted) JAMA Ophthalmology Published online March 31,2020 E3
Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 03/31/2020
Limitations of this study include a relatively small sample
size and absence of detailed ocular examinations to exclude in-
traocular disease owing to the logistical challenges of managing
these patients at this time. In addition, we only sampled once
from the eye of each patient, which can decrease the prevalence
owing to false-negatives. Regardless,these preliminar y results
are shared in an effort to inform ophthalmologists and others
around the world regarding ocular symptoms with COVID-19.
ARTICLE INFORMATION
Accepted for Publication: March 17, 2020.
Published Online: March 31, 2020.
doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1291
Open Access: This is an open access article
distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
©2020WuPetal.JAMA Ophthalmology.
Author Contributions: Drs Liang and K. Wu had full
access to all of the data in the study and take
responsibility for the integrity of the data and the
accuracy of the data analysis. Drs P. Wu and Duan
contributed equally to this study.Drs Luo, Liu, and
Qu contributed equally as senior authors.
Study concept and design: Liang, K. Wu.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:
P. Wu, Duan, Luo, Liu, Qu, Liang.
Drafting of the manuscript: P. Wu, Duan, Liang.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important
intellectual content: P. Wu, Luo, Liu, Qu, Liang,
K. Wu.
Statistical analysis:P.Wu.
Obtained funding: Liang, K. Wu.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Duan,
Luo, Liu, Qu, Liang.
Study supervision: Liu, Liang, K. Wu.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by
grants 81770896 (Dr K. Wu) and 81770920
(Dr Liang) from the National Natural Science
Foundation of China.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor:The funder had no
role in the design and conduct of the study;
collection, management, analysis, and
interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or
approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit
the manuscript for publication.
Additional Contributions: We thank Haijiang
Zhang, MD, Minxing Wu, MD,and Min Liu, MD
(Yichang Central People’sHospital, Yichang, China),
for collecting the data and preparing the Table.
None of these individuals received compensation
for their contributions.
REFERENCES
1. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterisation
and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus:
implications for virus origins and receptor binding.
Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565-574. doi:10.1016/
S0140-6736(20)30251-8
2. To KF,Lo AW. Exploring the pathogenesis of
severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): the
tissue distribution of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV)
and its putative receptor, angiotensin-converting
enzyme 2 (ACE2). J Pathol. 2004;203(3):740-743.
doi:10.1002/path.1597
3. Peiris JS, Yuen KY,O sterhausAD, Stöhr K. The
severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med.
2003;349(25):2431-2441. doi:10.1056/
NEJMra032498
4. National Health Commission of the People’s
Republic of China. The guideline on diagnosis and
treatment of the novel coronavirus pneumonia
(NCP): revised version of the 5th edition. Accessed
February 8, 2020.http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/
zhengcwj/202002/
d4b895337e19445f8d728fcaf1e3e13a.shtml
5. Loon SC, Teoh SC, Oon LL, et al. The severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus in tears. Br J
Ophthalmol. 2004;88(7):861-863. doi:10.1136/bjo.
2003.035931
6. Hoehl S, Berger A, Kortenbusch M, et al.
Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in returning
travelers from Wuhan, China. N Engl J Med. Published
online February 18, 2020.doi:10.1056/
NEJMc2001899
7. Raboud J, Shigayeva A, McGeer A, et al. Risk
factors for SARS transmission from patients
requiring intubation: a multicentre investigation in
Toronto,Canada. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10717.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010717
Research Brief Report Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)in Hubei Province, China
E4 JAMAOphthalmology Published online March 31, 2020 (Reprinted) jamaophthalmology.com
Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 03/31/2020
... Concerning the physiological mechanisms that occur during infection, these COVID-19-related ocular manifestations have been suggested to result from a direct impact of the virus on ocular tissues [38,39]. One study found that conjunctivitis was present in 1.1% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [40]. Another study found that conjunctivitis was present in 3.6% of COVID-19 patients in China [41]. ...
... Several research and case reports have established the existence of ocular discomfort in COVID-19 instances. For example, Wu et al. discovered that roughly 12% of COVID-19 patients exhibited ocular symptoms such as eye discomfort [40]. Also, a case report described a patient with COVID-19 who experienced eye pain, which was relieved with topical steroids [47]. ...
... Photophobia: A few case reports have described COVID-19 patients who experienced photophobia [40,42]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Since its emergence in early 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 infection has had a significant impact on the entire eye care system. Ophthalmologists have been categorized as a high-risk group for contracting the virus due to the belief that the eye may be a site of inoculation and transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. As a result, clinical ophthalmologists, optometrists, and eyecare professionals have had to familiarize themselves with the ocular manifestations of COVID-19, as well as its treatments and vaccines. The implementation of measures to prevent the transmission of the virus, such as restrictions, lockdowns, telemedicine, and artificial intelligence (AI), have led to substantial and potentially irreversible changes in routine clinical practice, education, and research. This has resulted in the emergence of a new mode of managing patients in a routine clinical setting. This brief review aims to provide an overview of various aspects of COVID-19 in ophthalmology, including the ocular manifestations related to the disease, the modes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection, precautions taken in ophthalmic practice to prevent the spread of the virus, drugs, and vaccines used in the treatment of COVID-19, the impact of the pandemic on patients, clinicians, and the eye care system as a whole, and the future of ophthalmology conditioned by this global pandemic experience.
... La síntesis lagrimal de IgA se puede dar luego de una exposición primaria del virus en la conjuntiva o como respuesta a una infección extraocular. (7,8,9) En resumen, a diferencia de las manifestaciones sistémicas de algunos casos, dadas por la tormenta de citocinas, cuando el aparato visual se pone en contacto con el virus se produce una serie de procesos mediados por un aumento de la secreción de IgA y de linfocitos (Ltregs) que regulan la actividad inflamatoria local minimizando el riesgo de daño en la visión. ...
... En este sentido, se han descrito cuadros inflamatorios e infecciosos oculares que anteceden a las manifestaciones generales y concomitan con ellas en la etapa aguda y en etapas subsiguientes. (8,12,13,14) Varios estudios reportan que cerca del 30 % de los pacientes con COVID-19 presenta manifestaciones oculares como conjuntivitis, dolor ocular, epífora, fotofobia, visión borrosa, queratoconjuntivitis, y otras relacionadas con córnea y segmento posterior. (13,15,16) La conjuntivitis ha sido descrita como una de las entidades más comunes. ...
... (21) Se han descrito similares características en individuos enfermos con síntomas sistémicos graves de COVID-19. (8,22,23,24) Investigadores húngaros reportaron la presencia de conjuntivitis folicular durante la etapa aguda de la enfermedad y hasta cuatro semanas después. También hacen alusión a hallazgos oftalmológicos tales como la quémosis, semimembranas y hemorragias conjuntivales asociadas a conjuntivitis virales en las unidades de cuidados intensivos. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Sars-Cov-2 virus, the etiological agent of Covid-19, causes systemic and ocular manifestations in humans. Due to the global repercussion that the pandemic has had, the multisystemic damage it causes and the presence of ocular manifestations, which could be the presentation of the disease, it is decided to carry out the present work to offer a theoretical reference about the ocular manifestations of Covid-19 and some therapeutic guidelines to consider. A bibliographic search was carried out in the Pubmed, Infomed, SciELO and academic Google databases, of articles in Spanish and English, which included new information related to the disease and its impact on eye health. Inflammatory and infectious processes of the visual apparatus, such as conjunctivitis and uveitis, are found with remarkable frequency. In the recovery stage, ocular findings associated with systemic immunosuppression, vasculitic and thromboembolic processes are presented. The indicated therapy does not usually differ from the conventional ones. First-line doctors play an essential role in the timely diagnosis of cases, since ocular manifestations can be the first sign of systemic disease.
... Furthermore, COVID-19 symptoms that do not manifest in past viral infections (e.g., anosmia and ageusia) have also been reported [7,8]. The wide range of reported features is thought to reflect the effects of COVID-19 on non-respiratory systems and indicates that signs of the disease may be observed in infected patients without apparent respiratory symptoms [9]. Therefore, we must continuously manage COVID-19. ...
... [168][169][170]. Subsequent studies have shown a wide variety of ophthalmic manifestations; the most common being conjunctivitis [171,172]. Retinochoroidal involvement is rare with isolated case reports demonstrating the presence of acute retinal vasculitis, neuroretinitis and panuveitis, toxoplasma retinochoroiditis, pars planitis, VKH, MEWDS, PIC, and retinopathy led by COVID-19 inflammatory syndrome or reactivation of previously quiescent uveitis, in the setting of acute COVID infection [42,44,[173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181]. The hypothesis for posterior segment inflammation in the eye involves COVID-19 related inflammation of endothelial cells using the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor and immune-mediated inflammation which eventually result in ischemic retinal vasculitis [182]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Posterior uveitis is a common chorioretinal pathology affecting all ages worldwide and is a frequent reason for referral to the retina clinic. The spectrum of etiologies for uveitis is very broad and includes infectious and auto-immune diseases. Inflammation can be confined to the eye or may be a part of systemic disease. A useful outline is therefore proposed to aid in the correct diagnosis of these challenging entities. The situation is further complicated by the fact that many neoplastic conditions resemble features of posterior uveitis; they are known as “masqueraders of uveitis”. Here, we summarize different posterior uveitides that present with rare findings, along with masqueraders that can be difficult to distinguish. These conditions pose a diagnostic dilemma resulting in delay in treatment because of diagnostic uncertainty. Methods An extensive literature search was performed on the MEDLINE/PUBMED, EBSCO and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from January 1985 to January 2022 for original studies and reviews of predetermined diagnoses that include posterior uveitic entities, panuveitis and masquerade syndromes. Results We described conditions that can present as mimickers of posterior uveitis (i.e., immune check-points inhibitors and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-like uveitis; leukemia and lymphoma associated posterior uveitis), inflammatory conditions that present as mimickers of retinal diseases (i.e., Purtscher-like retinopathy as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus; central serous chorioretinopathy masquerading inflammatory exudative retinal detachment), and uveitic conditions with rare and diagnostically challenging etiologies (i.e., paradoxical inflammatory effects of anti-TNF-α; post vaccination uveitis; ocular inflammation after intravitreal injection of antiangiogenic drugs). Conclusion This review of unique posterior uveitis cases highlights the overlapping features of posterior uveitis (paradoxical inflammatory effects of anti -TNF α and uveitis; Purtscher-like retinopathy as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus, …) and the nature of retinal conditions (ischemic ocular syndrome, or central retinal vein occlusion, amyloidosis, inherited conditions like retinitis pigmentosa, autosomal dominant neovascular inflammatory vitreoretinopathy (ADNIV), etc.…) that may mimic them is represented. Careful review of past uveitis history, current medications and recent vaccinations, detailed examination of signs of past or present inflammation, eventually genetic testing and/ or multimodal retinal imaging (like fluorescein angiography, EDI-OCT, OCT-angiography for lupus Purtscher-like retinopathy evaluation, or ICG for central serous retinopathy, or retinal amyloid angiopathy) may aid in correct diagnosis.
... Growing evidence suggests an association between the infection from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and eye disorders [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Early in the pandemic, the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through the ocular surface was suggested [7], and more recent findings confirmed this hypothesis [8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Growing evidence suggest an association between the infection from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and eye disorders. The aim of this review is to analyze the clinical presentation and diagnostic features of acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) and paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) associated with COVID-19 infection. The features are then compared with previous reports regarding these retinal disorders, to recognize possible specific characteristics and to assess the role of multimodal ophthalmic imaging. Methods: A literature search was performed by consulting PubMed, Scopus and Embase. The following terms were searched: "(COVID-19 OR SARS-CoV-2 OR coronavirus) AND ((acute macular neuroretinopathy) OR (paracentral acute middle maculopathy))". Inclusion criteria were as follow: 1) publication date from January 31st, 2020 to January 31st, 2022; 2) English language; 3) original research or case report; 4) free full-text availability. Results: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings in AMN patients were hyper-reflectivity (HR) of the outer plexiform layer (OPL), of the outer nuclear layer (ONL), and ellipsoid or interdigitate zones (EZ and IZ, respectively) disruption. In most cases, the presence of HR and EZ/IZ abnormalities resulted combined. When performed, OCT angiography (OCTA) identified attenuation of signal of the deep capillary plexus (DCP). The most common OCT finding in PAMM was an alteration of the inner nuclear layer (INL), associated with other areas of HR, while no signs of EZ/IZ disruption were detected. When performed, OCT-A showed the attenuation of signal of both the DCP, and the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) Discussione/Conclusion: In this review we reported a case series of AMN and PAMM in patients with a previous or concomitant infection from SARS-CoV-2. The microvascular changes in these cases are highlighted by the OCTA scans. Even if we are far from the determination of a direct link between COVID-19 and these retinal disorders, we could hypothesize that the vascular alterations associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection could be a possible risk factor for both AMN and PAMM.
Article
Objective: Our study aims to build on our understanding of COVID-19 by detailing a comprehensive look at the prevalence of different ocular manifestations related to COVID-19 infection. Design: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Eligible studies published between June 20, 2021, and May 11, 2023, were retrieved from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases as well as grey literature. Covidence was used to conduct the systematic review. Duplicate records were removed, and 2 independent reviewers screened records for relevance. After screening, a risk-of-bias assessment was carried out. Data were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed using STATA 14.0. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were computed based on heterogeneity. Results: Our meta-analysis included 43 articles with a total of 10,572 subjects. The results showed that COVID-19 patients had a significantly higher prevalence of conjunctivitis (effect size [ES] = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.07-0.15), ptosis (ES = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15-0.30), and ophthalmoplegia (ES = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74). Our results also indicate that COVID-19 patients have higher prevalence of cotton wool spots (ES = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.09), retinal hemorrhages (ES = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.06-0.18), and retinal vein tortuosity (ES = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.35). Conclusion: COVID-19 can exhibit extrapulmonary manifestations, affecting both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. Common anterior-segment findings include conjunctivitis, whereas posterior-segment findings may include cotton wool spots, retinal hemorrhages, and retinal vein tortuosity. Improving our understanding of the ocular manifestations of COVID-19 has the potential to facilitate quicker diagnosis and subsequent treatment.
Article
To compare the retinal vascular density (VD), choroidal vascularity index (CVI), and choroidal thickness (CHT) between patients infected with COVID-19 and healthy subjects using non-invasive optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and enhanced depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) technique. This case-control study was carried out on patients with COVID-19 and healthy controls. Patients' data were acquired immediately after active infection and three months later. The diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms and a positive PCR test. VDs in superficial and deep capillary plexuses (SCP and DCP) and CHT and CVI were measured and compared between groups. A total of 160 eyes from 80 patients (55% female, mean age 51 ± 13 years) and 80 controls (55% female, mean age 49 ± 12 years) were enrolled. In acute phase infection, the mean foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was 0.28 ± 0.06 mm2 and 0.22 ± 0.05 mm2 in patient and control groups, respectively (P<0.001). CVI was 61.06 ± 2.59 µm and 72.28 ± 3.84 µm in patients and control groups, respectively (P<0.001). After three months, the mean FAZ area was 0.28 ± 0.06 mm2 and 0.23 ± 0.05 mm2 in the patient and control groups, respectively (P<0.001). CVI was 60.93 ± 2.11 µm and 72.46 ± 3.80 µm in patients and control groups, respectively (P<0.001). Subfoveal CHT was not significantly different between groups (P=0.69). SCP and DCP VDs were significantly less in the patients' group (P<0.001). In the patients' group, the VDs in the DCP of the whole images and parafoveal DCP (P<0.001) were reduced significantly after three months in comparison to the acute phase, while the FAZ area, subfoveal CHT, and CVI were not significantly different. COVID-19 infection may be associated with acute and long-term changes of VDs in the retinal and choroidal vasculature without significant effect on the subfoveal CHT.
Article
Full-text available
In the 2003 Toronto SARS outbreak, SARS-CoV was transmitted in hospitals despite adherence to infection control procedures. Considerable controversy resulted regarding which procedures and behaviours were associated with the greatest risk of SARS-CoV transmission. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors for transmission of SARS-CoV during intubation from laboratory confirmed SARS patients to HCWs involved in their care. All SARS patients requiring intubation during the Toronto outbreak were identified. All HCWs who provided care to intubated SARS patients during treatment or transportation and who entered a patient room or had direct patient contact from 24 hours before to 4 hours after intubation were eligible for this study. Data was collected on patients by chart review and on HCWs by interviewer-administered questionnaire. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression models and classification and regression trees (CART) were used to identify risk factors for SARS transmission. 45 laboratory-confirmed intubated SARS patients were identified. Of the 697 HCWs involved in their care, 624 (90%) participated in the study. SARS-CoV was transmitted to 26 HCWs from 7 patients; 21 HCWs were infected by 3 patients. In multivariate GEE logistic regression models, presence in the room during fiberoptic intubation (OR = 2.79, p = .004) or ECG (OR = 3.52, p = .002), unprotected eye contact with secretions (OR = 7.34, p = .001), patient APACHE II score > or = 20 (OR = 17.05, p = .009) and patient Pa0(2)/Fi0(2) ratio < or = 59 (OR = 8.65, p = .001) were associated with increased risk of transmission of SARS-CoV. In CART analyses, the four covariates which explained the greatest amount of variation in SARS-CoV transmission were covariates representing individual patients. Close contact with the airway of severely ill patients and failure of infection control practices to prevent exposure to respiratory secretions were associated with transmission of SARS-CoV. Rates of transmission of SARS-CoV varied widely among patients.
Article
Full-text available
Prompting the first WHO global health alert for over a decade, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) was first recognised in South-East Asia in February 2003. With the causative agent now identified as a new strain of coronavirus, the medical world has gained important knowledge on the aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, pathogenesis, epidemiology, disease treatment and infection control with amazing speed. Despite this, major gaps remain in our understanding - the race is on to develop new cures and effective vaccines, and the long-term impact on health, society and economics are starting to unravel. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: A Clinical Guide meets the urgent need for a comprehensive, authoritative reference guide for everyone in the medical and scientific community engaged in the fight against SARS: Definitive book on SARS, clearly and accurately documenting the extraordinary medical and scientific events around this new epidemic. International experts in the field, with many contributors from the WHO and CDC. Will help reader to understand and prevent future outbreaks with a repeat of the same consequences.
Article
Full-text available
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a new infectious disease that caused a global outbreak in 2003. Research has shown that it is caused by a novel coronavirus. A series of cases is reported where polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing on tears had demonstrated the presence of the virus. Detection of ocular infection from tears using the PCR technique has been widely used by ophthalmologists to diagnose infections for other viruses. This is a case series report from cases classified as probable or suspect SARS cases. Tear samples were collected from 36 consecutive patients who were suspected of having SARS in Singapore over a period of 12 days (7-18 April 2003), and analysed by PCR using protocols developed by the WHO network of laboratories. Three patients with probable SARS (one female and two male patients) had positive results from their tear samples. Tear samples were used to confirm SARS in the female patient, who was positive only from her tears. The positive specimens were found in cases sampled early in their course of infection. This is the first case series reported with the detection of the SARS coronavirus from tears, and has important implications for the practice of ophthalmology and medicine. The ability to detect and isolate the virus in the early phase of the disease may be an important diagnostic tool for future patients and tear sampling is both simple and easily repeatable. Many healthcare workers are in close proximity to the eyes of patients and this may be a source of spread among healthcare workers and inoculating patients. Ophthalmic practices may need to change as more stringent barrier methods, appropriate quarantine, and isolation measures are vital when managing patients with SARS.
Article
Background: In late December, 2019, patients presenting with viral pneumonia due to an unidentified microbial agent were reported in Wuhan, China. A novel coronavirus was subsequently identified as the causative pathogen, provisionally named 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). As of Jan 26, 2020, more than 2000 cases of 2019-nCoV infection have been confirmed, most of which involved people living in or visiting Wuhan, and human-to-human transmission has been confirmed. Methods: We did next-generation sequencing of samples from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and cultured isolates from nine inpatients, eight of whom had visited the Huanan seafood market in Wuhan. Complete and partial 2019-nCoV genome sequences were obtained from these individuals. Viral contigs were connected using Sanger sequencing to obtain the full-length genomes, with the terminal regions determined by rapid amplification of cDNA ends. Phylogenetic analysis of these 2019-nCoV genomes and those of other coronaviruses was used to determine the evolutionary history of the virus and help infer its likely origin. Homology modelling was done to explore the likely receptor-binding properties of the virus. Findings: The ten genome sequences of 2019-nCoV obtained from the nine patients were extremely similar, exhibiting more than 99·98% sequence identity. Notably, 2019-nCoV was closely related (with 88% identity) to two bat-derived severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronaviruses, bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21, collected in 2018 in Zhoushan, eastern China, but were more distant from SARS-CoV (about 79%) and MERS-CoV (about 50%). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 2019-nCoV fell within the subgenus Sarbecovirus of the genus Betacoronavirus, with a relatively long branch length to its closest relatives bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21, and was genetically distinct from SARS-CoV. Notably, homology modelling revealed that 2019-nCoV had a similar receptor-binding domain structure to that of SARS-CoV, despite amino acid variation at some key residues. Interpretation: 2019-nCoV is sufficiently divergent from SARS-CoV to be considered a new human-infecting betacoronavirus. Although our phylogenetic analysis suggests that bats might be the original host of this virus, an animal sold at the seafood market in Wuhan might represent an intermediate host facilitating the emergence of the virus in humans. Importantly, structural analysis suggests that 2019-nCoV might be able to bind to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor in humans. The future evolution, adaptation, and spread of this virus warrant urgent investigation. Funding: National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shandong First Medical University.
Article
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is an emerging infectious disease associated with a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV. Pulmonary involvement is the dominant clinical feature but extra-pulmonary manifestations are also common. Factors that account for the wide spectrum of organ system involvement and disease severity are poorly understood and the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV infection remains unclear. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has recently been identified as the functional cellular receptor for SARS-CoV. Studies of the tissue and cellular distribution of SARS-CoV, and ACE2 protein expression, reveal new insights into the pathogenesis of this deadly disease. ACE2 is expressed at high level in the primary target cells of SARS-CoV, namely pneumocytes and surface enterocytes of the small intestine. Despite the fact that SARS-CoV can infect the lung and intestine, the tissue responses in these two organs are different. All other tissues and cell types expressing ACE2 may be potential targets of SARS-CoV infection. Remarkably, endothelial cells, which express ACE2 to a high level, have not been shown to be infected by SARS-CoV. There is also evidence that cell types without detectable ACE2 expression may also be infected by the virus. Furthermore, studies in a new human cell culture model have indicated that the presence of ACE2 alone is not sufficient for maintaining viral infection. Therefore, other virus receptors or co-receptors may be required in different tissues. Moreover, the interaction between SARS-CoV and the immunological or lymphoid system remains to be defined. It is clear that we are only at the dawn of our understanding of the pathogenesis of SARS. As our knowledge of the pathogenic mechanisms improves, a more rational approach to therapeutic and vaccine development can be designed in order to combat this new and fatal human disease.
doi:10.1056/ NEJMra032498 4. National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. The guideline on diagnosis and treatment of the novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP): revised version of the 5th edition
  • J S Peiris
  • K Y Yuen
  • A D Osterhaus
  • K Stöhr
Peiris JS, Yuen KY, Osterhaus AD, Stöhr K. The severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(25):2431-2441. doi:10.1056/ NEJMra032498 4. National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. The guideline on diagnosis and treatment of the novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP): revised version of the 5th edition. Accessed February 8, 2020. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/ zhengcwj/202002/ d4b895337e19445f8d728fcaf1e3e13a.shtml