ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Volatility is a statistical measure of stock price fluctuation. This study aims to investigate the effect of trading volume, firm size, inflation, and exchange rate on stock price volatility of the companies included in the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) from 2014 to 2018. By using a purposive sampling technique, the research sample is sixteen companies. This research employs panel regression with annual data. This study reveals that trading volume has a significant positive effect on stock price volatility. Firm size has a significant negative impact on stock price volatility. Meanwhile, the inflation and exchange rate do not affect stock price volatility.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Economics and Accounting Journal
Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan 2020
ISSN 2615-7888
73
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: bsutrisno.umj@gmail.com
http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJ
THE DETERMINANTS OF STOCK PRICE VOLATILITY IN
INDONESIA
Bambang Sutrisno
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
bsutrisno.umj@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Volatility reflects stock price fluctuation in a certain period. The objective of this
research is to examine the effect of trading volume, firm size, inflation, and exchange rate
on stock volatility of the Jakarta Islamic Index companies from 2014 to 2018. By using a
purposive sampling technique, the research sample is sixteen companies. This research
employs panel regression with annual data. This study reveals that the stock trading
volume significantly affects stock price volatility. Firm size is negatively related to price
volatility. Meanwhile, the inflation and exchange rate do not affect stock volatility.
Keywords: stock price volatility; trading volume; firm size; inflation; exchange rate
1. INTRODUCTION
Volatility means the price
fluctuation of security or commodity
for a specified period. Volatility is
identical to risk. The higher the
volatility, the higher the uncertainty
of the return. If the daily volatility is
very high, it gives space to make
trades or transactions to benefit from
the difference from the initial price
with the final price (margin) at the
time of the transaction; however, the
risk is also huge. Meanwhile, stock
price with low volatility means the
stock price movements are shallow.
In this condition, investors usually
cannot get profit, but they must hold
shares in the long run to obtain profit
(capital gain). Therefore, investors
who like to do trading strategies are
very fond of high volatility, but long-
term investors are very fond of low
volatility, but share prices increases
(Chan and Fong, 2000).
Macro and micro factors can
influence high and low stock price
volatility. Macro factors are factors
that affect the overall economy,
including interest rate, exchange rate,
inflation, money supply, oil prices,
and other factors that have an
essential impact on companies. On
the other hand, micro factors are
factors that have a direct impact on
the company itself, such as
management change, price,
availability of raw materials, and
other factors that can affect the profit
performance of individual
companies, including funding.
However, from these factors, it is
difficult to determine which factors
have the most dominant influence on
stock price volatility (Romli et al.,
2017).
The objective of this study is to
examine the impact of macro and
micro factors on the stock price
volatility. This research is essential
EAJ (Economics and Accounting Journal) - Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan 2020 - Sutrisno
74
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: bsutrisno.umj@gmail.com
http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJ
for the company to pay attention to
factors that can affect the volatility
of the company’s stock price so that
the firm can maintain share
performance. This study is also
beneficial to the investors in
investment decision making to see
what factors can affect the volatility
of the stock price.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Trading Volume
Trading volume is a vital aspect
for an investor because it reflects the
condition of shares traded on the
capital market affect the stock price.
Dewi and Suaryana (2016) state that
if there is no information about
stocks, investors are more likely to
keep holding their shares. Trading
volume will decrease because not
many shares are sold, then it will
result in low volatility. Vice versa, if
investors receive a lot of information
about a stock, then investors will sell
their shares a lot, this will result in
increased trading volume of shares.
As a result of the increase in trading
volume, the volatility also rises.
Chan and Fong (2000) found that
trading volume influences volatility
because the volume reflects the
information received by market
participants.
H1: Trading volume affects stock
price volatility.
2.2 Firm Size
Small company shares are more
liquid than a large company, causing
the stock price to be more volatile.
Hashemijoo et al. (2012) find that
company size significantly affects
stock volatility. The bigger the firm
size, the higher the diversification of
activities so that large companies
usually have more public
information and can reduce the level
of price volatility. Nasir et al. (2018)
find similar findings to Hashemijoo
et al. (2012).
H2: Company size affects stock
volatility.
2.3 Inflation
The higher the money supply will
lead to a higher discount rate and
lower stock prices. An increase in the
inflation rate will lead to tighter
economic policies and will hurt stock
prices. Hugida (2011) proves that
inflation affects stock price volatility.
The negative impact will encourage
investors to sell shares owned so that
it will result in increased volatility in
stock prices.
H3: Inflation affects stock price
volatility.
2.4 Exchange Rate
The exchange rate is the amount
of rupiah needed to get one unit of
foreign currency. The exchange rate
is one indicator that influences the
capital market and money market
activities. Yogaswari (2012) states
that the exchange rate affects price
volatility. If the dollar strengthens
and the rupiah weakens, then it is
likely that investors will tend to shift
their investment in US dollars in
foreign currency compared to
investing in stocks and vice versa.
H4: The exchange rate affects
stock price volatility.
3. RESEARCH METHOD
This study is explanatory
research. It is useful for examining
EAJ (Economics and Accounting Journal) - Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan 2020 - Sutrisno
75
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: bsutrisno.umj@gmail.com
http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJ
the impact of independent variables
on the dependent variable.
3.1 Data Collection Techniques
This research uses secondary
data from www.finance.yahoo.com,
www.idx.co.id, www.bps.go.id, and
www.bi.go.id.
3.2 Operational Definitions of
Variables
The dependent variable of this
research is stock price volatility. This
study applies four independent
variables, namely trading volume,
firm size, inflation, and exchange
rate. The calculation of each research
variable is explained as follows.
I employ range-based volatility
to calculate stock price volatility
(Sutrisno, 2017).
 

2
is stock price volatility, Ht is the
highest price, Lt is the lowest price,
and n is the number of days in a year.
The computation of trading
volume uses the following formula.


Firm size is calculated by using
the following formula.
  
The inflation rate is computed by
using this formula.
  

CPI is consumer perception index.
The formula of the exchange rate
is as follows.


3.3 Sample Collection Techniques
This study uses a purposive
sampling technique to determine the
research sample. The criteria for the
sample selection process are as
follows: (1) the companies are
consistently included in the Jakarta
Islamic Index from 2014 to 2018,
and (2) the companies have complete
data. The final sample is sixteen
firms for the last five years. This
study has eighty observations.
3.4 Data Analysis Techniques
This study employs panel
regression to hypotheses testing.
First, this study displays the
summary statistics of each variable.
Second, the study determines the
best estimation method. The next
step is the classical assumption tests.
The last stage is hypotheses testing
using probability value. The level of
significance in this study is 5%. This
study uses EViews 10 to process the
research data.
4. RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
Descriptive Statistics
Table 1 displays the summary
statistics of each variable. The
average stock price volatility is
3.06%. Meanwhile, the average
trading volume is 30.90%. Firm size,
inflation, and exchange rate have
mean values of 18.10, 5.34%, and
9.48, respectively.
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics
Variable
Me
an
Me
dian
Min
Ma
x
Std.
Dev.
Volatilit
y
0.03
06
0.03
05
0.05
37
0.01
75
0.00
82
Trading
0.30
0.29
0.91
0.02
0.15
EAJ (Economics and Accounting Journal) - Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan 2020 - Sutrisno
76
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: bsutrisno.umj@gmail.com
http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJ
Volume
90
56
53
98
06
Firm
Size
18.0
957
18.0
899
20.8
422
16.0
789
1.15
66
Inflation
0.05
34
0.03
61
0.08
38
0.03
02
0.02
49
Exchang
e Rate
9.47
53
9.50
19
9.53
21
9.40
83
0.04
83
Determining the Best Estimation
Method
This research employs the Chow
test, Hausman test, and Lagrange
Multiplier test (LM test) to choose
the best estimation method
(Ekananda, 2016). The results of the
Chow test, Hausman test, and LM
test are summarized in Table 2.
Chow test reveals that the best
estimation method to choose is the
fixed effect. The Hausman test states
that random effect is the best
estimation method to determine. LM
test explains that random effect is
chosen as the best estimation
method. Therefore, the random effect
is used to estimate panel data.
Table 2: Determination of the Best
Estimation Model
Prob.
Conclusion
Chow Test
0.0000
Fixed Effect
Model
Hausman
Test
1.0000
Random Effect
Model
LM Test
0.0298
Random Effect
Model
Classical Assumption Tests
This study does not use the
classical assumption tests because
the best estimation method chosen is
the random effect model. According
to Gujarati and Porter (2010),
equations that meet classical
assumption tests are only equations
that employ the generalized least
square (GLS) method. In EViews,
the estimation model that uses the
GLS method is an only random
effect; meanwhile, the fixed effect
and common effect employ ordinary
least square (OLS).
Hypotheses Testing
Table 3 summarizes the result of
panel regression. The regression
equation is as follows.
  




The results of the probability
value of each independent variable
can be described as follows:
1) Trading volume has a
significant positive effect on
price volatility because the
coefficient is positive, and its
probability value is less than
5%. Thus, hypothesis one is
accepted.
2) Firm size has a significant
negative effect on stock price
volatility because the
coefficient is negative, and its
probability value is smaller
than 5%. Hypothesis two is
accepted.
3) Inflation does not influence
stock volatility because its
probability value is more than
5%. Therefore, hypothesis
three is rejected.
4) The exchange rate does not
have an impact on price
volatility because its
probability value is bigger
than 5%. Thus, hypothesis
four is rejected.
The coefficient of determination
(R-squared) of this study is 16.35%.
It means that trading volume, firm
EAJ (Economics and Accounting Journal) - Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan 2020 - Sutrisno
77
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: bsutrisno.umj@gmail.com
http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJ
size, inflation, and exchange rate can
explain stock price volatility of
16.35%, while the rest (83.65%) is
explained by other variables not
included in the research model.
Table 3: The Result of Panel Regression
Variable
Coefficient
Prob.
Constanta
0.222466
0.6397
Trading Volume
0.011344
0.0297
Firm Size
-0.002834
0.0024
Inflation
0.024566
0.7992
Exchange Rate
-0.015343
0.7570
R-squared
0.163548
Discussion
The Effect of Trading Volume on
Stock Price Volatility
This study finds that trading
volume positively and significantly
affects stock volatility. The higher
the trading volume, the higher the
stock volatility. This finding is in
line with Chan and Fong (2000),
Hugida (2011), Dewi and Suaryana
(2016), Romli et al. (2017), and
Nasir et al. (2018). The small trading
volume indicates that investors are
not interested in investing. On the
reverse, the large trading volume
shows that many investors are
interested in making transactions to
buy and sell shares so that stock
prices are more volatile.
The Effect of Firm Size on Stock
Price Volatility
This study shows that company
size negatively affects stock price
volatility. The smaller the firm size,
the higher the volatility. This result is
similar to Anastassia and Firnanti
(2014) and Nasir et al. (2018). Small
stocks are more volatile than big
stocks, so that their stock price
fluctuates. A large amount of
company assets does not necessarily
have a positive relationship with the
volatility of the company's stock
prices. The larger the firm size, the
higher the diversification of
activities. This condition can reduce
the volatility level.
The Effect of Inflation on Stock
Price Volatility
Inflation has no significant
impact on price volatility. This study
supports Yogaswari et al. (2012) and
Romli et al. (2017). Investors who
want to invest in JII stocks need not
consider the inflation rate as long as
the inflation rate is under 10%.
Investors assume that investing in JII
stocks will continue to generate
profit because JII stocks are Islamic
stocks with high liquidity.
The Effect of Exchange Rate on
Stock Price Volatility
The exchange rate does not affect
stock volatility. This result is not
similar to Amin and Herawati
(2012). They find that the exchange
rate significantly and negatively
affects stock volatility. This different
result can be caused by the
difference in the research sample and
period. The insignificant exchange
rate informs that strengthening or
weakening the exchange rate does
not have an impact on stock
volatility. If the rupiah and dollar
EAJ (Economics and Accounting Journal) - Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan 2020 - Sutrisno
78
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: bsutrisno.umj@gmail.com
http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJ
strengthen, then investors tend to
divert their investment in the form of
shares compared to investing in
foreign exchange.
5. CONCLUSION
This study concludes that trading
volume shows a significant positive
effect on stock price volatility. Firm
size negatively affects stock
volatility. On the other hand,
inflation and the exchange rate have
no relationship with price volatility.
This study implies that the
companies included in JII from 2014
zto 2018 should pay more
attention to internal factors,
especially in trading volume and firm
size, so that they can maintain their
share performance. The investors
should consider the trading volume
and firm size in their investment
decision. This study has two
recommendations for future studies.
First, further studies can use another
proxy for price volatility, such as
squared returns. Second, future
research can use other factors that
affect stock price volatility.
REFERENCES
Amin, M. Z., & Herawati, T. D.
(2012). Pengaruh tingkat
inflasi, suku bunga SBI, nilai
kurs dolar (USD/IDR), dan
Indeks Dow Jones (DJIA)
terhadap pergerakan Indeks
Harga Saham Gabungan di
Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI)
(Periode 2008-2011).
Malang: Fakultas Ekonomi
dan Bisnis Universitas
Brawijaya.
Anastassia, & Firnanti, F. (2014).
Faktor-faktor yang
mempengaruhi volatilitas
harga saham pada perusahaan
publik nonkeuangan. Jurnal
Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 16(2),
95-102.
Chan, K., & Fong, W. (2000). Trade
size, order imbalance, and the
volatility-volume relation.
Journal of Financial
Economics, 57(2), 247-273.
Dewi, N. M., & Suaryana, I. G.
(2016). Pengaruh volume
perdagangan saham,
leverage, dan tingkat suku
bunga terhadap volatilitas
harga saham. E-Jurnal
Akuntansi Universitas
Udayana, 17(2), 1112-1140.
Ekananda, M. (2016). Analisis
Ekonometrika Data Panel
Edisi 2. Bogor: Mitra Wacana
Media.
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C.
(2010). Dasar-dasar
Ekonometrika. Jakarta:
Salemba Empat.
Hashemijoo, M., Ardekani, A. M., &
Younesi, M. (2012). The
impact of dividend policy on
share price volatility in the
Malaysian stock market.
Journal of Business Studies
Quarterly, 4(1), 111-129.
EAJ (Economics and Accounting Journal) - Vol. 3, No. 1, Jan 2020 - Sutrisno
79
* Corresponding author’s e-mail: bsutrisno.umj@gmail.com
http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EAJ
Hugida, L. (2011). Analisis faktor-
faktor yang mempengaruhi
volatilitas harga saham
(Studi pada perusahaan yang
terdaftar dalam indeks LQ45
periode 2006-2009.
Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Diponegoro.
Nasir, J. L., Diana, N., & Mawardhi,
M. C. (2018). Analisis faktor-
faktor yang mempengaruhi
volatilitas harga saham. E-
JRA, 7(9), 24-38.
Romli, H., Wulandari, M. F., &
Pratiwi, T. S. (2017). Faktor-
faktor yang mempengaruhi
volatilitas harga saham pada
PT Waskita Karya Tbk.
Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi
Global Masa Kini, 8(1), 1-5.
Sutrisno, B. (2017). Hubungan
volatilitas dan volume
perdagangan di Bursa Efek
Indonesia. Esensi: Jurnal
Bisnis dan Manajemen, 7(1),
15-26.
Yogaswari, D. D., Nugroho, A. B., &
Astuti, N. C. (2012). The
effect of macroeconomic
variables on stock price
volatility: Evidence from
Jakarta Composite Index,
agriculture, and basic
industry sector. International
Proceedings of Economics
Development Research, 46,
pp. 96-100.
... A high level of volatility gives space for traders to benefit from the difference from the initial price with the final price, however with a high return comes a high risk as well. Meanwhile, a low level of volatility means the price movements of a stock is shallow, thus making investors result in holding shares in a longer run to make profit [15]. ...
... Previous studies suggest that smaller firms tend to experience a higher level of volatility [10]. The larger the firm size, the higher the diversification of activities, thus larger companies tend to have more public information and can reduce price volatility [15]. ...
... To round things out, prior studies have found a link between trading volume (TVOL) and stock return Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research,volume 197 volatility [10]; [15]. By dividing the average monthly trading volume by the typical number of outstanding shares, we were able to calculate trading volume. ...
... Further, (2020) investigates Indonesian firms, showing that trading volume and firm size significantly affect volatility, while inflation and exchange rates do not. 18 This highlights that different markets may have unique volatility determinants. Add another layer by exploring how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted stock price volatility, identifying firm size, dividend payments, and trading volume as significant determinants. ...
... The reviewed literature highlights consistent determinants of stock price volatility, such as firm size, dividend policy, leverage, and trading volume, analyzed through methods like GARCH and linear regression. 15,[17][18][19] However, a gap exists in applying machine learning techniques, such as PCA and K-means clustering, to analyze volatility in emerging markets like Turkey's BIST100 index. Additionally, few studies combine machine learning clustering with panel regression to explore financial ratios' impact on volatility within distinct firm groups. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study conducts a comprehensive volatility analysis among firms listed on the BIST100 index using machine learning techniques and panel regression models. Focusing on the period from 2006 to 2023, the study excludes financial firms, resulting in a dataset of 46 companies. The methodology follows a two-step process: First, firms are clustered into low and high-volatility groups using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the K-means algorithm; second, panel regression models are applied to determine the financial ratios influencing stock price volatility. The Parkinson Volatility measure is used as the dependent variable, while independent variables include Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), liquidity ratios, firm beta, and leverage ratios. Results indicate that firm beta has a statistically significant positive impact on volatility across all models, while the current ratio negatively affects volatility in the model 1. These findings provide valuable insights for investors and policymakers regarding risk management in the Turkish stock market. Applying machine learning and advanced econometric techniques adds to the literature on volatility forecasting and financial decision-making.
... Research observing the stock price index volatility has been related to economic activity. Changes in several macroeconomic factors can cause increases and decrease in the stock price index, which is observed by measuring the volatility of the stock price index (Khalid & Khan, 2017;Setiawan, 2020;Sutrisno, 2020;Handika et al., 2021). Macroeconomic factors are claimed to influence the occurrence of stock market volatility and provide helpful information in estimating the volatility of the stock price index to assist investors in managing their portfolios by enabling the correct forecast of stock price movements. ...
... Inflation in Indonesia during the study period was not included in the very high inflation rate category. An inflation rate of less than 10% and no drastic changes in the inflation rate can still be accepted by the market so that changes are considered not to significantly affect stock market conditions (Yunita & Robiyanto, 2018;Sutrisno, 2020). In addition, Kumalasari (2016) revealed that inflation could be caused by pressure on the supply side or cost-push inflation, where its emergence is caused by increased product prices. ...
Article
Full-text available
Stock price changes within a certain period can be observed in the volatility of the stock price index. Changes in stock prices can be influenced by a country's macroeconomic conditions and global economic conditions. Macroeconomic factors include interest rates, inflation, exchange rates, and economic growth, while global economic uncertainty is observed using the Global Economic Policy Uncertainty (GEPU) index. This study examines the effect of macroeconomic variables and the GEPU index on the volatility of the stock price index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). A descriptive analysis method was used using time series data between Q1 2016 and Q4 2021. The results indicate that the interest rate has a negative and significant effect on the volatility of the stock price index. In contrast, the value of each GEPU index and exchange rate have a positive and significant effect on stock price index volatility. However, inflation and economic growth have a positive relationship and do not significantly affect the volatility of the stock price index.
... Sutrisno [75] extended the work done in Indonesia on the determinants of stock price volatility to include the effects of firm size on the volatility of stock price within the Jakarta Islamic Index Companies. Data were collected from sixteen companies across a period of five years from 2014 to 2018 and analysed using panel regression methods. ...
... The findings of this study also conformed to that of Chiang and Chan (2017) when they examined the impact of foreign ownership on the firm's stock return volatility between the period of 1994 to 2014 within the Taiwan capital market. The conclusion of this study negates the findings of Sutrisno [75] within the Indonesian market when they examined the determinants of stock price volatility within the Jakarta Islamic Index Companies from 2014 to 2018. Also, it does not align with the conclusion of Phan and Tran [66] when they concluded that both foreign and local state ownership has no impact on stock price volatility. ...
Article
Full-text available
Shareholders wealth volatility has exhibited different patterns in different global exchange markets including the Nigerian exchange. Unravelling attempts of the possible causes of this volatility have been made, as well as how the aforementioned are mitigated. These attempts are due to their implications on share valuation as well as the need to reduce market manipulations. Studies have shown that dividend decision has been one of the major puzzles yet unresolved regarding shareholders wealth volatility and there have been fewer studies in this regard, especially in developing economies like Nigeria. This study, therefore, examined the effect of dividend policy on shareholders wealth volatility of selected companies listed on the Nigerian Exchange. The study adopted ex-post facto research design. The population of the study is 162 companies listed in the Nigerian Exchange as at 31 December 2020. The study sample consisted of 49 companies randomly selected. Data for the period 2010-2020 were collected from the NSE, and Original Research Article Koleosho et al.; AJEBA, 22(7): 1-26, 2022; Article no.AJEBA.84337 2 companies' data on the Bloomberg Terminals and their official websites. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Inferential statistics resulted from Regression and Correlation analysis. The study found that the dividend policy exerted a statistically significant effect on Shareholders wealth Volatility (Adj.R 2 = 0.303, W (3, 2156) = 95.82, p = 0.000). Firm Size, Number of Shares Outstanding and Ownership Structure jointly and significantly controlled the effect of Dividend Policy on Shareholders Wealth Volatility (∆Adj.R 2 = 0.114, W (6, 2156) = 320.41, p = 0.000). The study concluded that dividend policy affects shareholders' wealth volatility. The study recommended that the companies should focus more on the payout ratio while investors should go for entities with constant dividend payout ratio. In addition, it further recommended that policy owners should enforce adherence to the minimum free float requirements of the Nigerian Exchange.
... The OLS regression model presented in Table 6 evaluates the impact of various factors on stock market volatility. The analysis identifies Trade Volume and Market Return as significant predictors, corroborating the findings of prior studies such as Chan and Fong (2000) [22] , Hugida (2011) [43] , Damiran, et al. (2022) [27] , and Sutrisno, (2020) [73] . In contrast, variables like Stock Market Capitalization and Trade Openness do not show significant effects. ...
... Previous work has explored macroeconomic drivers such as inflation (Thampanya et al. 2020;Aliyu 2012), business cycles (Corradi et al. 2013;Officer 1973), and exchange rates (Olweny and Omondi 2011;Kennedy and Nourzad 2016). Concurrently, the literature has also examined microeconomic factors influencing stock volatility, including stock trading volume (Sutrisno 2020;Narayan et al. 2013), firm sizes (Mazzucato and Semmler 2002), dividend policies (Baskin 1989;Hashemijoo et al. 2012;Hooi et al. 2015), and capital structure (Christie 1982). The current research enriches this domain by rigorously analyzing the cross-market impacts of carbon ETS markets on stock volatility. ...
Article
Full-text available
The carbon emission trading markets represent an emerging domain within China. The primary objective of this study is to explore whether carbon price volatility influences stock market volatility among companies subject to these emission trading regulations. Employing daily returns data from 293 publicly traded companies regulated by these emission trading markets, this study encompasses the national carbon market and eight pilot regional carbon markets spanning from August 2013 to October 2023. The results demonstrate that volatility in regional carbon prices positively impacts the stock volatility of companies in the corresponding emission trading region, indicating a volatility spillover effect. Moreover, this spillover effect is more pronounced in sectors marked by lesser carbon intensity than those with greater carbon intensity. The volatility transmission is more pronounced in coastal areas than in inland regions. However, no notable distinctions in volatility transmission are discerned between the periods before and throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Vector autoregression analyses substantiate that lagged carbon price fluctuations possess limited predictive capacity for contemporaneous equity market volatility and vice versa. The robustness of these outcomes is fortified by applying the E-GARCH model, which accounts for the volatility clustering phenomenon. As the first investigation into the volatility spillover effect between China’s emission trading market and corresponding stock markets, this study offers valuable insights into the investment strategies of retail investors, the formulation of carbon regulations by policymakers, and the carbon emission strategies of corporate managers.
... According to (Sutrisno, 2020;Mehmood et al., 2019), the corporation's size positively impacts stock volatility. The higher the diversification of activities. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explores the association between ERP adoption and stock price volatility (SPV). An ERP software reshapes information collected, processed, and disseminated. We examine whether ERP usage influences the stock price volatility of Egyptian firms. Our investigation is among the first to examine how ERP usage affects SPV, an overall outcome measure of a firm’s information environment. The Findings document that ERP has a significant and negative association with SPV. Stock price volatility (SPV) relationships have expanded the literature on ERP facts. ERP is essential for both strategic and operational logistics decisions. This study also gives strong evidence that ERP-adopted firms help to reduce the risk of stock price volatility and build a good relationship with the shareholders. Overall, it showed the financial effect of ERP in the emerging economy context of Egypt. OLS Regression Analysis 115 organizations in Egypt were edited in 1150 observations registered from 2011 to 2020 on the Egyptian Stock Exchange (ESE). The main results of tests are robust after analysis with a cluster of the standard errors by companies' change of critical variables.
... Volatilitas keuangan biasanya heteroskedastis atau berubah terhadap waktu. Sehingga semakin tinggi volatilitas, maka semakin tinggi ketidakpastian dari returns aset keuangan (Sutrisno, 2020;Virginia, Ginting, & Elfaki, 2018). GARCH (Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity) adalah model volatilitas yang sering digunakan untuk pemodelan dan peramalan volatilitas dari aset keuangan (Gulay & Emec, 2019;Nugroho, Susanto, & Rosely, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study applies the exponential transformation to the exogenous variables in the GARCH-X(1,1) model. The model assumes that the returns error is Normally and Student-t distributed. The data type used as an exogenous variable in the GARCH-X(1,1) model is Realized Volatility 10 minutes. Empirical analysis was carried out based on stock price index data FTSE100 and SP500 daily period from January 2000 to December 2021. Metropolis Adaptive Random Walk method was implemented in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to estimate the model parameters. The High Posterior Density interval at the 95% level indicates the significance of the exponential transformation for the exogenous variable in both cases assuming a distribution for the returns error. Moreover, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value indicates that the proposed model outperforms the basic GARCH-X(1,1) model, where the best fit model is given by the Student-t distributed model.
Article
Full-text available
Fluctuations in share prices indicates risk and uncertainty for investors, rendering the share less appealing to a significant number of them. This study aims to investigate the main factors influencing the volatility of share prices among insurance firms listed on the Kuwait Stock Exchange (KSE) during the period from 2016 to 2022. Utilizing the panel OLS regression technique, findings indicated that dividend yield, leverage, and company age all exhibited a notable negative influence on share price volatility, while the dividend payout ratio and company asset size did not demonstrate any significant impact.
Article
The study evaluated the effect of earnings measurements on the share price of consumer goods firms in Nigeria. The objectives of the study were to ascertain the effect of earnings per share, dividend per share, return on asset on share price of consumer goods firms in Nigeria. The study adopted an ex-post-facto research design, covering the period between 2012 and 2021. Secondary data were extracted from the annual reports and accounts of the sampled consumer goods firms in Nigeria. A multiple regression technique was used for the data analysis. From the analysis of the study, it was revealed that earnings per share and dividend per share has a positive and significant effect on the share price of consumer goods firms in Nigeria. Return on assets has a positive and nonsignificant effect on the share price of consumer goods firms in Nigeria. This implies that that earnings per share and dividend per share are the major determinants of share price. It was recommended therefore that consumer goods firms in Nigeria should strive to increase their earnings per share by ensuring that high profits are maintained so that the demands for their share price will continue to increase, which in turn cause a significant rise in their share price. They should strive to increase their dividend per share by ensuring that high revenue and profits are maintained. They should also balance the trade-off between dividend payout and retained earnings so that the demands for their share price will continue to increase, which in turn cause a significant rise in their quotation price. They should strive to make consistent profit to ensure that the return on asset of these companies continued to increase significantly.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.