Content uploaded by Karin Hannes
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Karin Hannes on Mar 18, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
Qualitative Inquiry towards Sustainability. European Congress of Qualitative Inquiry Proceedings 2020.
Abstract and Figures
The theme for this year’ conference was Qualitative Inquiry towards Sustainability. Inspired by conference participants’ voices and reflecting the United Nations’ (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all, we wanted this conference to be an opportunity to demonstrate how QI can address global challenges of the human experience - poverty, climate, injustice, degradation, environment, education, peace and justice. The UN hopes to achieve its SDGs by 2030. We hope QI will be an impact on this aspiration.
QI conferences are unique as they include research that engages with all aspects of the human experience. We have purposely chosen a theme that looks into the future and how QI can impact present and future lives. It builds on last year’s theme - Activism. This conference will provide spaces that allow participants to address agency, autonomy, representation, active living and quality of life within sustainability for all. We envisage that conference and workshop participants will have the space to reflect how research can directly impact the present and future human experience.
The conference was a unique cross-disciplinary event for sharing knowledge and seeking new collaboration and partnerships. It provided opportunities for addressing the common challenges that qualitative researchers face in their own geographical regions or research disciplines. Most importantly the congress was a lively event, providing ample opportunities for interacting with friends and colleagues and learning about the latest developments and innovations in qualitative inquiry. Following the example of ICQI, we offered spaces where participants and presenters felt comfortable experimenting with new ideas and critical thoughts and will push the boundaries of best practice in qualitative research.
QI conferences are committed to strengthen the European QI agenda. We invite contributions that address important issues, themes, reflexivity and processes that impact QI each year. This year's conference also included methodology workshops (Tuesday February 4, 2020) for students and scholars alike. We hope to welcome many of you to join us in evolving debates on what constitutes best processes in QI, in order to influence the direction, focus and atmosphere of future research to better the human experience at our next conference in Tromse (2021).
Figures - uploaded by Karin Hannes
Author content
All figure content in this area was uploaded by Karin Hannes
Content may be subject to copyright.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Inspired by a posthuman philosophy, this paper explores sustainable natureculture kindergarten praxis as a pragmatic transcorporeal collective engagement with the present and sustainable future events to come. The point of departure is the economic argument for implementing science, technology, engineering and mathematics education within early childhood education and care as a preparation for the challenges a science- and technology-driven society brings at the forefront. By exploring and experimenting with dataphilosophy as our theory-method and the concept of non-position, we embrace and critique technology and technological solutions in connection with kindergarten praxis and steer them towards new forms of solidarity and socially just pedagogies. Through the article, we ask (in)directly what kind of subject position digitalization as part of a sustainable future requires, and the inevitable questions this subject position regarding professionalism within early childhood education and care brings.
In this article, we present a comprehensive approach to analysis to assist researchers in conducting and analyzing photovoice studies. A screening of primary studies in four systematic reviews focusing on photovoice research revealed that the focus of analysis of researchers is the narrative provided with the photos from the participants, which undermines the potential of the photos themselves to provide meaning. In addition, the analytical effort of photovoice researchers is often limited to the interpretive phase in their projects. The question matrices we developed facilitate photovoice researchers who aim to give more weight to photos as an interpretive medium and wish to extend their analytical lens to different phases of a research cycle. They focus our analytical attention on three different sites—site of production, site of photo, and site of audiencing, and three different modalities—technological modality, compositional modality, and social modality. The matrices are designed to present an overview of the important dimensions that researchers might need to take into account when conducting photovoice research studies. We provide relevant examples to illustrate the potential risks and benefits of the analytical choices we make. Photovoice researchers should increase their awareness of the impact of our choices on the analytical process and avoid the analytical strategies that may disempower participants and reproduce existing power relationships.
The Nazi atrocities committed by researchers and physicians during the Second World War prompted the development of the Nuremberg Code to guide the ethics of modern medical experimentation utilizing voluntary human subjects. Since its inception, the Code has been viewed as one of the cornerstones of modern bioethical thought. This book examines the nature, scope and proper place of the Nuremberg Code in medical research. The ramifications of this important document are thoroughly discussed by a distinguished group of contemporary professionals from the fields of both medicine and law. The historical setting of the Code’s creation, some modern parallels, and the current attitude of German physicians toward the crimes of the Nazi era, are discussed in early chapters. The book progresses to a powerful account of the Doctors’ Trial at Nuremberg, its resulting verdict, and the Code’s development. The Code’s contemporary influence on both American and international law is examined in its historical context and discussed in terms of its universality: are the foundational ethics of the Code as valid today as when it was originally formed? The editors conclude with a chapter on foreseeable future developments.
Zwar liegen viele Studien zu den Besuchern von Kultureinrichtungen vor, die Selten- oder Nichtbesucher sind jedoch weitgehend unerforscht. Sie aber bilden die Mehrheit der Bevölkerung. Ihre Motivation zum Nichtbesuch steht daher im Mittelpunkt. Der Band gibt einen fundierten Überblick zum internationalen Stand der Nichtbesucherforschung. Darauf aufbauend werden umfangreiche quantitative und qualitative Analysen zu Gründen des Nicht-Besuches vorgenommen. Es folgt eine empirisch begründete, praxisorientierte Theorie zur Besuchergewinnung. Die Autoren legen damit die erste umfangreiche Arbeit zur Nichtbesucherforschung in Deutschland vor.
Der Inhalt
• Besucher- und Nichtbesucher
• Methodik der (Nicht)Besucherforschung
• (Nicht)Besucher quantitativ gesehen
• Nichtbesucher im Gespräch
Die Zielgruppen
• Lehrende und Studierende in den Bereichen Kulturmanagement, angewandte Kulturwissenschaften, Kulturarbeit und Kulturpolitik sowie Kulturvermittlung
• Praktiker in Kultureinrichtungen, die neue Zielgruppen erreichen möchten
Der Herausgeber
Prof. Dr. Martin Tröndle hat den WÜRTH Chair of Cultural Production der Zeppelin Universität inne. Er leitet zwei internationale Forschungsprojekte zur Besucherforschung „eMotion – mapping museum experience“ und „ECR – experimental concert research“. Er ist zudem Mit-Herausgeber der „Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement“.
Over 3,600 entries
‘…not only a dictionary of communication and media but also a liberal education that enables users to see interesting relationships between many of the concepts it discusses.’ Professor Arthur Asa Berger, San Francisco State University
This authoritative and up-to-date A–Z offers points of connection between communication and media and covers all aspects of interpersonal, mass, and networked communication, including digital and mobile media, advertising, journalism, social media, and nonverbal communication.
In this new edition, over 2,000 entries have been revised and more than 500 have been newly added to include current terminology and concepts such as artificial intelligence , cisgender , fake news , hive mind , use theory , and wikiality . It bridges the gap between theory and practice and contains many technical terms that are relevant to the communication industry, including dialogue editing , news aggregator and primary colour correction . Additional material includes a biographical notes appendix, and entries are complemented by approved web links which guide further reading.
This is an indispensable guide for undergraduate students of media and communication studies and also for those taking related subjects such as television studies, video production, communication design, visual communication, marketing communications, semiotics, and cultural studies.
Digitalization of our educational systems is moving faster and deeper into our institutions. I applaud it because it has the potential to save time and effort, allowing me to spend more time on the most important part of my work as a scholar. But I am regularly sick to my stomach about what I applaud, because there is no potential and any news or justice in it unless I conquer it. Moreover, unless I do- conquer that is, it works as much against (non)knowledges as the opposite, and this is speeding up. Hence, I speculate with the concepts of speed and force. I ask, how is it possible to add or speed up and strengthen digital diversity for justice to highlight the entangled contours of knowledges, inequality, equality and quality in education? My gut feeling tells me that my subjective professionalism is under siege and that I need to take back the concept of objectivity to survive. It is paradoxically slow but fast, paradoxically objective but subjective, strong but weak. It implies a liberating loss of control to importance. Education becoming eventicized, professionals and teachers becoming transdisciplinary dataphilosophers.