BookPDF Available

Money down the drain - Corruption in South Africa's water sector

Authors:

Abstract

Systemic corruption has put South Africa’s water security at risk, involving all levels of society across public and private sectors. A disturbing finding is that water sector corruption appears to be an important source of funding for political activity. The report presents a systematic analysis of the character of corruption and of the strategies that have been used. It recommends an overarching strategic response and suggests some more specific interventions.
1. 1
MONEY
down the
DRAIN
Corruption in South
Africa’s water sector
A Water Integrity Network / Corruption Watch report
1. 2
Money down the Drain:
corruption in South Africa’s water sector
March 2020
Principal researcher and author: Mike Muller
Editing: Janine Erasmus
Design: Janine Erasmus
This work is published by Corruption Watch and the Water Integrity Network and licensed under the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of
this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was
believed to be correct as of March 2020. Nevertheless, Corruption Watch and the Water Integrity Network cannot
guarantee the complete ness of the content, nor can they accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for
other purposes or in other contexts.

Corruption Watch is a non-prot organization launched in 2012 that uses public reports as an important source of
information to ght corruption and hold leaders accountable for their actions.
Corruption Watch (RF) NPC
8th Floor, South Point Corner
87 De Korte Street
Braamfontein 2001 Johannesburg
PO Box 30630 Braamfontein 2017
https://www.corruptionwatch.org.za/
The Water Integrity Network (WIN) supports evidence-based advocacy for collective action to prevent and reduce
corruption in the water sector worldwide.
Water Integrity Network
Alt Moabit91b
10559 Berlin, Germany
www.waterintegritynetwork.net
1. 3
CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS 5
SUMMARY 7
Background
Corrupon drivers and strategies
What is being done?
RECOMMENDATIONS 7
Designate the water sector as an ‘island of integrity’
Ending impunity – inslling a culture of consequences
No honest instuons without honest and ethical people
Procurement
Environmental factors that must be addressed
Preferenal procurement
Regulaon of polical pares
Educate the private sector
Support civil society
CONCLUSIONS 10
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION 12
THE WORLD OF WATER - A complicated business 13
WHAT IS CORRUPTION AND WHY DOES IT MATTER IN WATER AND SANITATION? 14
CHAPTER 2 – CASES AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES 17
2.1 THE MOKONYANE PORTFOLIO 18
Sweetwaters, Kanana Park Extension 6 – a prologue 18
The Giyani Water Project- and the problems of BIG infrastructure 18
SAP –The perennial problem of ICT contracts 21
Lesotho Highlands Water Project 22
The War on Leaks ends in defeat 23
Drop a block 26
Blue, Green and No Drop reports - dealing with awkward monitoring 27
The bucket toilet tender snk 28
Mhlatuze–Mgeni merger rings alarm bells 28
Raising Clanwilliam Dam – grow jobs and economy or support patronage? 29
TCTA and the Mzimvubu project 31
2.2 THE ATTRACTION OF LARGE CAPITAL PROJECTS 32
Mangaung and the Gariep pipeline 32
Nelson Mandela Bay – How desalinaon dreams derailed city’s water security 33
Mpumalanga’s municipal budgets – Hijacked or rescued? 35
2.3 THE BUSINESS SIDE OF CORRUPTION 36
How water tankers cause taps to run dry 36
Chemical toilets in Ekurhuleni 37
1. 4
Illegal connecons – corrupon or simply unauthorised service provision? 38
Mining licences, polluon and public versus private interests 39
Corporate corrupon creaon: EOH’s move from SAP to specialised water services 41
Ekurhuleni Meters - Regulaon 32 abuse 43
The chickens of state capture come home to roost, in microcosm 44
2.4 CORRUPTION IS NOW ENDEMIC AND SYSTEMIC 45
CHAPTER 3 - CORRUPTION STRATEGIES: Making sense of the evidence 47
3.1 MANIPULATION of procurement and operaonal processes 47
Beang bureaucracy or creang opportunies for corrupon? 47
Qualicaon and pre-qualicaon 47
The tender process – specicaon, evaluaon and adjudicaon 48
The panel strategy 48
The emergency strategy 49
The Regulaon 32 ‘piggy-backing’ strategy 50
The direcves strategy – give orders then blame the ocials, or the President! 50
The turnkey strategy 51
The ongoing challenge of managing construcon contracts 52
3.2 INFLUENCING THE POLICY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 52
Regional bulk infrastructure grant - creang opportunies for corrupon? 52
Local economic opportunies or protecon rackets? 53
Water projects –a pipeline for polical funding? 54
3.3 TAKING CONTROL OF INSTITUTIONS 56
Instuons – weak or deliberately weakened? 56
Weakening oversight mechanisms 56
Board membership – a duty or a privilege? 57
The broader challenges of instuonal capture 58
STRATEGIES FOR CORRUPTION – A STRUCTURED SUMMARY 59
CHAPTER 4 – WHAT IS TO BE DONE? Confronng two ‘wicked problems’ 63
The context for acon 63
Acons to date 65
Learn Lessons 66
Eecve operaonal management systems 66
The threat of consequences 66
Acon by governance structures 67
Governance arrangements that constrain centralised powers 67
Pressure from external instuons 67
CHAPTER 5 – RECOMMENDATIONS 69
CHAPTER 5 cont. – CONCLUSIONS 75
1. 5
ABBREVIATIONS
African Naonal Congress ANC
Airports Company of South Africa ACSA
Auditor-General of South Africa (the instuon) AGSA
Auditor-general (the individual) AG
Black Economic Empowerment BEE
Chief execuve ocer CEO
Chief nancial ocer CFO
Department of Public Service and Administraon DPSA
Department of Water and Sanitaon 1 DWS
Deputy director-general DDG
Director-general DG
Disaster Management Act DMA
Energy & Water Sector Educaon Training Authority EWSETA
Enterprise Outsourcing Holdings EOH
Informaon and communicaons technology ICT
KwaZulu-Natal KZN
Lesotho Highlands Water Project LHWP
Member of the Execuve Council MEC
Mpumalanga Economic Growth Agency MEGA
Naonal Development Plan NDP
Non-governmental organisaon NGO
Public Finance Management Act PFMA
Regional bulk infrastructure grant RBIG
Sector Educaon Training Authority SETA
Special Invesgang Unit SIU
Standing commiee on public accounts SCOPA
Strategic Water Partners Network SWPN
Stascs South Africa Stats SA
Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority TCTA
1 The Department of Water and Sanitaon has undergone several name changes in the past 25 years. It start-
ed o in 1994 as the Department of Water Aairs and Forestry, changed to the Department of Water and Environmen-
tal Aairs in 2009, and has been the Department of Water and Sanitaon since 2014. The ministerial tles have also
changed accordingly, from Minister of Water Aairs and Forestry, to Minister of Water and Environmental Aairs, then
Minister of Human Selements, Water and Sanitaon. In this report ‘minister’ is understood to be ‘minister of water
and sanitaon’.
1. 6
ABBREVIATIONS
African Naonal Congress ANC
Airports Company of South Africa ACSA
Auditor-General of South Africa (the instuon) AGSA
Auditor-general (the individual) AG
Black Economic Empowerment BEE
Chief execuve ocer CEO
Chief nancial ocer CFO
Department of Public Service and Administraon DPSA
Department of Water and Sanitaon 1 DWS
Deputy director-general DDG
Director-general DG
Disaster Management Act DMA
Energy & Water Sector Educaon Training Authority EWSETA
Enterprise Outsourcing Holdings EOH
Informaon and communicaons technology ICT
KwaZulu-Natal KZN
Lesotho Highlands Water Project LHWP
Member of the Execuve Council MEC
Mpumalanga Economic Growth Agency MEGA
Naonal Development Plan NDP
Non-governmental organisaon NGO
Public Finance Management Act PFMA
Regional bulk infrastructure grant RBIGm
Sector Educaon Training Authority SETA
Southern African Development Community SADC
Special Invesgang Unit SIU
Standing commiee on public accounts SCOPA
Strategic Water Partners Network SWPN
Stascs South Africa Stats SA
Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority TCTA
1 The Department of Water and Sanitaon has undergone several name changes in the past 25 years. It started o in 1994 as
the Department of Water Aairs and Forestry, changed to the Department of Water and Environmental Aairs in 2009, and has been the
Department of Water and Sanitaon since 2014. The ministerial tles have also changed accordingly, from Minister of Water Aairs and
Forestry, to Minister of Water and Environmental Aairs, then Minister of Human Selements, Water and Sanitaon. In this report ‘minister’ is
understood to be ‘minister of water and sanitaon’.
Communal tap in Soweto
1. 7
SUMMARY
Corruption in South Africa’s water sector, its consequences and a way forward
Background
South Africa faces signicant water challenges; water is oen not available where and when it is
needed, or of the quality needed, due to unpredictable rainfall, limited infrastructure, the misuse
of nancial resources, and poor management – aggravated by corrupon. The impact of corrupon
in the water sector is measured in dry taps, lost jobs and polluted rivers; many, parcularly young
children, old people, and those with compromised immune systems, have become ill from drinking
unsafe water or their homes, and toilets cannot be kept hygienic.
Corrupon in the water sector has resulted in deaths.
This corrupon extends from taps in rural villages to the systems that supply South Africa’s economic
heartland. Village taps have run dry so that councillors and their friends could get contracts to truck
water. Construcon of a dam to provide water to Gauteng has been delayed by years, in part because
a minister sought to change procurement rules to benet her friends. In the Western Cape, the
raising of the Clanwilliam Dam, which would create thousands of new farming jobs, has been delayed
for similar reasons.
Companies have paid bribes to get business. Some companies have promoted unnecessary projects
and claimed payment for work done badly or not at all, oen colluding with ocials who oversee
their work. Others have monopolised specialist areas of work to grossly over-charge for their
services. Individual households are involved through unauthorised, unmetered water connecons,
oen made by the same plumbers who maintain the supply systems, using material from their
workplaces.
These problems are aggravated by a failure to appoint competent people to do the jobs required
and ocials being pressurised by policians and seniors to do the wrong thing – risking dismissal or
worse if they don’t comply.
Corrupon drivers and strategies
The report analyses a range of corrupon strategies including:
• Manipulaon of procurement and operaonal processes;
• Inuencing policy and regulatory decisions; and
• Taking control of the decision-making sites of key instuons.
This analysis, combined with an understanding of the drivers of corrupon, informs the
recommendaons made. Corrupon in the water sector is systemic; the formal rules have been
superseded by informal rules that bypass or distort formal processes.1 The soluon to this is not
simply strengthening the formal rules. If the underlying driver is polical – for example, securing
polical party funding or securing polical power - which appears to be the case in some instances,
strategies to address it must be dierent from where the main driver is personal nancial gain.2
What is being done?
The combined eorts of whistle-blowers, invesgave journalists, the Auditor-General of South
Africa (AGSA) and the Special Invesgang Unit (SIU) have begun to address many of the issues
raised in the report. However, although some ocials have resigned and others face internal
disciplinary acon, there have been few serious consequences. This raises quesons about the
eecveness of these acons.
1 Helping countries combat corrupon: the role of the World Bank. 1997
2 Helping countries combat corrupon: the role of the World Bank. 1997
1. 8
RECOMMENDATIONS
Designate the water sector as an ‘island of integrity’
The huge socio-economic impacts of corrupon in the water sector provide strong grounds for designang
it as an island of integrity.
3
South Africans cannot aord the burden of corrupon in a sector which is a vital
determinant of health and life (drinking water), dignity (sanitaon) and economic prosperity.
It will take combined work from government and civil society to achieve this. One useful model would be
the establishment of an an-corrupon forum such as the An-Corrupon Health Forum. This forum, led
by the SIU, brings together key stakeholders including law enforcement agencies, relevant government
departments and agencies, representaves of the private sector, regulators and civil sector organisaons
acve in healthcare and in combang corrupon. Reports of corrupon and gross irregularies are
submied to the forum and allocated to the agency best placed to address them. The involvement of the
AGSA and other Chapter 9 instuons would further strengthen this.
Ending impunity – inslling a culture of consequences
Corrupon in the water sector will not end if agrant abuses go unpunished. A culture must be
established in which misconduct has consequences. This is the responsibility of the relevant water sector
instuons, the AGSA and the broad family of law enforcement authories, including the SIU.
Rampant irregularity in the management of public resources should be regarded as red ags for
corrupon. Furthermore, given the ubiquitous presence of polical appointees in so many alleged
instances of grand corrupon, the likelihood of polical corrupon should always be considered by
the invesgave authories. Indeed, the authories could do well to open invesgaons into all large
procurement contracts concluded during the ministerial tenure of Nomvula Mokonyane.
No honest instuons without honest and ethical people
There are two important requirements for the water sector to become an island of integrity. Ethical
leaders must ensure that appointments to organisaons reinforce these values and processes must be in
place to remove those who break the rules for corrupt purposes.
Consideraon should be given to the involvement of external agencies such as the Public Service
Commission in panels responsible for appointment and discipline.
The appointment of the boards of the public agencies in the water sector should be made in consultaon
with panels constuted to develop and ensure the adherence to merit-based criteria in lling these
important posions.
Procurement
The 2012 Naonal Development Plan highlights the importance of creang a transparent, responsive and
accountable public service. Some organs of state already make substanal amounts of procurement data
public, although more could be done. At present the primary corrupon challenge is the systemic capture
of parts of the state apparatus and disregard for procedures. Detailed reform of procurement systems will
not be appropriate unl greater control is gained over public nancial management.
Once this has been achieved, there are many systems that have been trialled elsewhere that could
strengthen the sector, including a variety of open contracng models which seek to mobilise parcipaon
from the private sector and civil society to achieve greater accountability in public procurement.4,5 Open
contracng recognises that greater transparency from government is insucient – accountability requires
that the private sector compete fairly and that civil society monitor and analyse the public procurement
process. Methods used include integrity pacts, e-procurement, data standards, and red-ag monitoring.
Polical appointees, such as the minister and board members of public agencies, should not involve
themselves in procurement and appointment decisions and where they do so, it should be treated as a
red ag for corrupon.
3 The impact of ‘islands of integrity’. hps://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdesk/the-impact-of-islands-of-integrity
4 See, for example, hps://www.open-contracng.org/
5 Opportunies for Open Contracng in public sector procurement: a review of legislaon. hps://www.researchgate.net/
publicaon/325765499_Opportunies_for_Open_Contracng_in_public_sector_procurement_a_review_of_legislaon
1. 9
Environmental factors that must be addressed
The roots of corrupon in the water sector are located in the wider society. Corrupon will not
successfully be combated unless these are also addressed.
Preferenal procurement
All forms of preferenal procurement, whether for local employment, industrial development or black
economic empowerment (BEE) introduce complexies into the process that can open opportunies for
corrupon.
The social benets of BEE jusfy the connuaon, even intensicaon, of the programme. However,
the operaon of elaborate regulatory frameworks such as BEE should be closely policed, parcularly
at key decision-making points. The savings in reduced instances of corrupon would pay for increased
expenditure on close scruny of the applicaon of BEE transacons. It would also enhance the credibility
of BEE as well as of preferences for the local sourcing of goods and services as well as local employment.
Regulaon of polical pares
The funding of polical pares oers obvious opportunies for extending the inuence of money over
polics. This resulted in the Polical Party Funding Act being passed in 2019.
However, recent controversies foreground important money/polics relaonships that are not covered
by an Act conned to polical party funding, such as the funding of internal polical party leadership
contests. This points to the need for general regulaon of polical pares and not only regulaon of
party funding.
Simultaneous responsibility for managing a large party programme that demands signicant funding and
execuve responsibility for a government department that has a large procurement budget supports an
inference that state responsibilies are being abused to support party responsibilies.
This supports our recommendaon that ministers be prohibited from parcipaon in procurement
decisions. Further consideraon may be given to regulang the role of party oce bearers in the
management of state assets.
Educate the private sector
Too oen, private business is seen as the vicm of corrupon: bribes are paid and tender awards
accepted with the excuse that such pracces are necessary to get work. This atude must be
challenged. Private sector bidders that enter into irregular contracts are breaking the law and placing
their businesses at risk. Companies have a legal duty to ensure that correct procedures have been
followed in the award of public contracts. They should be appropriately penalised when they don’t.
Support civil society
The work of the media and wider civil society in uncovering corrupt acvies, publicising them and
pursuing them unl remedial acon is taken, must be recognised, emphasised and supported.
The right of cizens and civil society organisaons to access informaon about public management
processes, must be recognised and respected, including informaon on procurement processes and
regulatory decision-making. This will enable them to concentrate on the analysis of informaon and
engagement with instuons rather than on court bales to obtain informaon.
The water sector already has extensive linkages with a variety of civil society organisaons and these must
be supported. They have important operaonal insights that may not be available through government
structures which make them valuable allies.
1. 10
CONCLUSIONS
Corrupon in the water sector must be tackled: water is too important to allow its management to be
undermined.
Much of the corrupon is driven by wider polical and economic challenges. Unless these are also
addressed, it is unlikely that eorts to improve and enforce procedures and transparency will be
enough to change the situaon. A parcular focus is needed on the queson of polical funding.
The social and economic impacts of corrupon in the water sector must connue to be highlighted as
part of broader an-corrupon campaigns. The goal should be to mobilise public opinion to protect
society from water sector corrupon.
Ending corrupon will not solve all the country’s water problems, but an eecve campaign to wash
corrupon out of the water sector could create the environment in which larger water problems can be
tackled. It could ensure that water security for all becomes, once again, the primary goal of the water
sector. And, in doing this, the water sector could provide guidance and inspiraon for the rest of the
naon.
1. 11
CHAPTER 1
Introducon
1. 12
INTRODUCTION
South Africa was seen as a global leader in water resource management and the
provision of water services.
Not long ago, democrac South Africa was seen as a global leader in the management of water
resources and the provision of water services. It had achieved the 2015 Millennium Development
Goal for domesc water supply; through its free basic water policy it had given praccal eect to
the Human Right to Water, and it had given legal protecon to environmental water ows. In 2002,
it led the campaign to set a global goal for sanitaon provision that is now included in the UN’s
Sustainable Development Goals.
Since then the performance of South Africa’s water sector has declined signicantly.
• The reliability of water supply services is falling according to ocial data;
• The resilience of services to problems such as drought has decreased. While Cape Town’s
temporary water restricons gained worldwide publicity, regular supply failures are normal
for millions of people around the country;
• Payment for water is falling and, as a result, municipal debt is increasing, undermining
service provision in many localies where there is simply not enough money for operaon
and maintenance;
• Polluon of rivers due to failed municipal wastewater management and poorly regulated
mining operaons is widespread and growing;
• In 2018 the Auditor-General and Parliament’s Standing Commiee on Public Accounts
reported that the management of the naonal Department of Water had collapsed, with
billions of rand of irregular expenditure, huge debts and failed projects.
Many of these problems have been aributed to corrupon. This report seeks to document some
cases of corrupon in the water sector, to understand its impact and to consider how it can be
controlled so that people, their livelihoods and their environment are protected. To do this, it is
rst necessary to be clear about what we mean by corrupon and to recognise the dierent forms
that it can take.
Corrupon is the abuse of public resources or public power for personal gain by anyone at
any level of government or in business. It exists in all countries, the only dierence being
a maer of degree. But how do those responsible benet from it? Who loses and who else
gains? Those quesons are more dicult to answer.
Corrupon is oen linked to the unproducve accumulaon of personal wealth. And,
if we measure the health of a society by its nancial wealth, then the conclusion of the
Internaonal Monetary Fund is important: “systemic corrupon has a parcularly pernicious
eect on economic performance”.
But in complex sociees, not everyone benets from economic growth. Many indeed feel
marginalised as some people become beer o while they are le behind. Their resentment
is helping to drive populist polical movements around the world. Policians recognise
and respond to this. They promise to do what is necessary to provide jobs and services to a
community, in exchange for votes.
Is this reected in the kind of corrupon that is found in South Africa’s water sector? More
precisely how does corrupon impact on the water security of South Africans and their
society more broadly?
This report seeks to present a systemac analysis of corrupon in the water sector and the impact
that it has had, based on specic examples. The analysis shows that the water security of South
African society, “the reliable supply of an adequate quality and quanty of water to meet social
The corruption
that contributes
to the failure
to achieve and
sustain water
security must
be addressed.
It cannot be
allowed to
destroy hopes,
health and lives.
1. 13
and economic needs while protecng the environment”,1 depends on eecve governance and
management. When and where this fails, poor people are oen aected rst and hardest, but
eventually the whole society carries the cost.
The corrupon that is contribung to South Africa’s failure to achieve and sustain water security
must be addressed. It cannot be allowed to destroy peoples’ hopes, health and even their lives.
THE WORLD OF WATER - a complicated business
We distinguish between water as a natural resource (underground and river water) and the
provision of water supply and sanitation services (the water in the pipes)
What do we mean by the “water sector”? In this report, a disncon is made between water as a
natural resource (the water in the rivers and underground) and the provision of water supply and
sanitaon services (the water in the pipes).
Many public organisaons are involved in protecng, managing and using the country’s water
resources and providing water supply and sanitaon services. These range from the naonal
Department of Water and Sanitaon (currently part of the Ministry of Human Selements,
Water and Sanitaon) to local municipalies. Naonal government is responsible for much of the
management of water in rivers, wetlands and lakes – including those shared with other countries.
Municipalies are responsible for providing water services, working within a framework of
regulaons and standards set by naonal government.
The work of all these organisaons helps to ensure that water ows through natural systems and
human-made infrastructures to meet people’s needs. And they need to work together, eecvely.
If one water management funcon fails - to protect the resource from polluon, for instance -
communies and enterprises may be harmed. So this report considers the full scope of the water.
sector because failures in one organisaon oen impact on others – and corrupon is oen the
cause of such failures.
The complex nature of water management presents many opportunies for corrupon. Decisions
have to be taken about the allocaon of available water resources between dierent users
and uses. Acons need to be taken against polluters. The construcon and operaon of large
1 Grey D, Sado CW (2007) Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy 9 (6):545–571
1. 14
infrastructures – dams, canals and pipelines – involves specialised technical services and
complicated procurement procedures.
The provision of water supply and sanitaon services is a separate but related acvity It involves
taking water from a reliable source, treang it to ensure it is safe to use, and distribung
it to the households, businesses and social instuons that need it – all of which involves
infrastructure. Once it has been used, wastewater has to be collected and treated before it is
released back into the environment.
All water management acvies require funding. This may come from government’s tax revenue
or payments by users for the services they receive. And, because just about everyone in society
depends on the sustainable management of the resource and services, water management
instuons are usually part of government or related public management systems.
Over many decades, South Africa has developed both the instuons and the infrastructure
systems needed to provide naonal water security. When these systems work, they are almost
invisible but, when they fail, it can be disastrous. This was shown by the recent crisis situaon in
Cape Town and connues to be demonstrated by the ongoing water services challenges faced in
many small towns and rural areas across the country. In many cases, corrupon has contributed
directly to these failures.
WHAT IS CORRUPTION – and why does it maer in water and sanitaon?
In South Africa’s water sector, corruption has seriously undermined the water security of
households, communities and cities
Corrupon, the abuse of public resources or power for personal gain, is not just about money.
The gains of the perpetrators may include access to power, social status or favours such as
preferenal treatment for family and friends. And the abuse may involve acon or inacon, as
when a factory’s polluon is ignored by the regulator.
This report focuses on the drivers and consequences of corrupon – the public losses that result
from the personal gains. There are far too many examples in South Africa’s water sector where
corrupon has seriously undermined the water security of households, communies and cies.
The most obvious impacts have occurred in poor communies where service provision is
already weakest. Where funds are scarce, any corrupon that diverts money from public
purposes to private pockets directly reduces the provision and quality of services. In parcular,
where needs are great and money scarce, corrupon diverts funds that could have provided
services to under-served users (see The Giyani Water Project).
Although transporng water by road is vastly more expensive than providing a piped supply, it
has become a lucrave business for private tanker operators. Shockingly, there have been cases
where municipal ocials worked with tanker owners, interfering with the public water supply
to create business opportunies for themselves (see How water tankers cause taps to run dry).
And where tanker supplies are provided by the municipality itself, it is common for drivers to
demand payment for the water they are supposed to make available free of charge – and oen
to sell it to more well-o households at the expense of the poor.
Bad public policy decisions, made for the wrong (corrupt) reason, can have signicant negave
impacts. This is evident, for example, where large and expensive capital projects are promoted
instead of smaller, more cost-eecve alternaves (see The Giyani Water Project and Mangaung
and the Gariep pipeline). At the least, this puts up the cost of services to users and to the state,
not only in the construcon, but in the ongoing operaon and maintenance costs.
But once a culture of corrupon has spread, it has more insidious, and arguably more corrosive,
eects. Eecve management is an obstacle to corrupon. So competent and honest ocials
1. 15
are oen challenged – and threatened and dismissed – if their recommendaons and acons do not
suit those of their corrupt superiors or indeed of their subordinates (see IT contracts are a perennial
problem).
To add to the confusion, acon against honest ocials is oen based on their alleged
contravenon of the rules and regulaons that are supposed to protect the public from
corrupon. But there is ample evidence that these provisions are used to inmidate
or remove ocials who are inconveniently competent and honest. This clears the path
for procurement processes to be ignored, for contracts to be awarded to incompetent
consultants and contractors, for licences to be issued inappropriately, and for regulatory
oences to be ignored (see Mining licences, polluon and public vs private interests).
While some businesses are willing partners in corrupon (see Corporate corrupon
creaon), many others are also its vicms. Interference in procurement and regulatory
processes and shortage of funds delays projects, which impacts on the water sector’s
wider community of partners and stakeholders such as construcon companies and
their sta September 2019, Stats SA reported that 30 000 jobs had been lost in the
construcon sector over the previous year. And many of the water sector’s leading
construcon and consulng companies have been sold to foreign owners or just closed
down. Corrupon played a part in the loss of these jobs.
One specialist contractor EsorFranki (who had bid for the Giyani project) stated in the
company’s 2018 annual report2 that:
Alongside contract delays, non-awards and failure to implement stated policy, we have also
experienced an increase in unjust tender awards which are then challenged in court. This lengthy
legal and court process not only delays the contract commencement but also incurs legal fees
impacng results.
Aside from the delays and addional costs, these problems led the rm to retrench almost 1 000
sta, 40% of its workforce. More would have been jobless if the company had not had other work
outside South Africa.
This was a company that made a real eort to stay in the sector. Others have just given up. Aveng,
one of South Africa’s top ve construcon companies, recently sold its water business and now
intends to work on other projects, mainly outside South Africa.
Leading consulng engineering rms, unable to maintain an adequate workow, have sold out to
internaonal companies or just gone out of business. They include Ninham Shand, which developed
the concept for the world famous Lesotho Highlands Project which sustains the people and economy
of Gauteng and surrounding provinces. With these rms goes the knowhow built up over many years
as well as vital opportunies to train the new generaon of professionals who will be needed to deal
with increasingly complex future challenges to our water security.
In the meanme, the safety and reliability of water supply, parcularly in poor rural communies, is
declining dramacally, according to household surveys undertaken by Stats SA. The DWS reported
that in 2016 in the country’s poorest rural districts, only 37% of households had a reliable supply,
despite the billions of rand that has been spent on infrastructure. The cases outlined below show how
corrupon and mismanagement more generally have undermined South Africa’s water security and
damaged countless lives.
2 hp://www.esor.co.za/sites/default/les/Annual%20Reports/Esor%20IAR%202018%20%28singles%29.pdf
Competent and
honest ocials
are challenged –
and threatened
and dismissed – if
their actions and
recommendations
are deemed
unsuitable for
corrupt purposes
1. 16
CHAPTER 2
Cases and their consequences
1. 17
CASES – AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES
The problems are systemic, involving people at all levels, from plumbers and tanker
drivers to mayors and ministers. Many private businesses beneted richly from
corruption and in some cases, actively organised and encouraged it.
This report was prompted by a series of invesgaons published in the City Press about corrupon
in the water sector. These revealed serious irregularies involving huge sums of money in DWS
projects in Giyani, Limpopo. Concerns grew when reports emerged about thousands of unpaid
and unemployed trainees in the department’s mul-billion-rand ‘War on Leaks’ project. Then it
emerged that nearly a billion rand had been commied to a computer project that wasn’t needed.
These cases, it is alleged, all involved former water and sanitaon minister Nomvula Mokonyane
and her associates.
However, the problems of corrupon in the water sector go well beyond just a few individuals. They
are clearly systemic, involving many people at all levels, from plumbers and tanker drivers to mayors
and ministers. Many private businesses joined in too, beneng richly from corrupon and in some
cases, acvely organising and encouraging it.
A wide variety of cases have been idened across many areas of acvity. They range from
corrupon in the supply of water by road tankers and the provision of temporary toilets, to the
systemac loong of large scale construcon contracts intended to develop water resources and
keep the country water secure. Corrupon means that mining’s impact on water has not been
properly regulated. And the fourth industrial revoluon also gures large with massive corrupon
in huge and unnecessary IT projects.
The strategies used for this loong have included the capture of enre water sector organisaons.
But every facet of management has been exploited, including policy making, procurement, and
operaonal and contract administraon. Collusive business pracces have helped to create an
environment for corrupon. And, even at the level of the household tap, corrupt ocials have found
ways to exploit people’s basic needs for personal prot.
The cases presented have been selected to illustrate parcular generic areas of focus. Also included
are a few cases where aempts at corrupon failed - these show that corrupon can be curbed and
provide some ideas about how to reduce, if not prevent, it.
1. 18
2.1 THE MOKONYANE PORTFOLIO
We start with cases that emerged during the tenure of Nomvula Mokonyane as minister of
water and sanitaon (2014 – 2018). Corrupon was already a problem in the department before
Mokonyane’s arrival, with external invesgaons underway since 2012. But at that stage, the scale
was sll relavely small – the Special Invesgang Unit (SIU) reported 28 criminal cases involving
R50-million.3 By the me Mokonyane le, irregular expenditure was well over R4-billion with new
cases sll being uncovered and DWS eecvely bankrupt.
A paern appears to have emerged of ministerial intervenon to favour certain businesses
and programmes and to intervene in the stang of the DWS and water sector instuons to
get her way. The events between 2014 and 2018 provide what appears to be a textbook case
of the pervasive impacts of high-level instuonal corrupon and the mismanagement that
is invariably associated with it – or vice versa. They oer a cauonary tale about what can
happen if polical leaders have the wrong objecves and incenves.
Sweetwaters, Kanana Park Extension 6 – a prologue
Nomvula Mokonyane was involved with the water sector long before she became minister of
water and sanitaon. While a Member of the Execuve Council (MEC) for housing in Gauteng in
2005, she tried to have the Sebokeng wastewater plant south of Johannesburg expanded. When
she le the naonal porolio of water and sanitaon in 2018, it was sll unnished (see below).
But another legacy, relevant to the focus of this report, was the Gauteng project to provide water
and sewage infrastructure in Kanana, a suburb in the same area. The project became controversial
aer the board of directors of the company that was contracted to build it wrote to the South
African president, asking for the contract to be cancelled.
It was reported in the press that “LTE provides consultaon for engineering companies, but was
strangely awarded a tender for the construcon of water and sewer reculaon of 2 689 stands in
Sweetwaters’ Kanana Park Extension 6, even though it does not have the capacity to do the work.
The board of directors were not aware they had landed the contract, but the leer of appointment
was handed to its chief execuve.” 4
According to the report, “Majola [CEO of LTE] appointed Khato Civils, a construcon company, to
do the work as LTE did not have the capacity to execute the project. The contract had apparently
been secured by Majola. Pillay [LTE chairperson] said Majola was mandated to secure contracts on
behalf of the company. However, Majola had to inform the board and ensure that all the proper
procedures were followed, because it could put the company at risk.
Quite what went on at LTE remains uncertain. Pillay resigned as chairperson of the company that
he had established aer an armed robbery at his house shortly aer his leer to the president.5 But
LTE, Khato and their associates connued to cast a shadow over the water sector. The next me they
appeared together in the public domain was in 2016, when then president Jacob Zuma asked the
SIU to invesgate two maers, LTE’s Sweetwaters contract and the increasingly controversial project
to supply water to the community of Giyani.
The Giyani Water Project- and the problems of BIG infrastructure
How R502m grew to R2.7bn in a year.6 That was the headline of the April 2016 City Press report
which revealed that Zuma had ordered the SIU to probe the award of contracts for emergency
works to supply water to Giyani. Two years later, with the department in a nancial crisis, the
Auditor-General’s oce told Parliament that there had been R2.2-billion of irregular expenditure on
the project because contracts had been awarded irregularly. Meanwhile, DWS said that it would cost
R10-billion to complete the project and bring water to all the people in this small town and its 90+
surrounding villages.
3 SIU presentaon to the joint sing of the Porolio Commiee on Water and Sanitaon and the Standing Commiee on Public
Accounts (SCOPA), 27 March 2018
4 Take back R200m tender! hps://www.iol.co.za/news/polics/take-back-r200m-tender-1789219
5 Water wars expose a roen system bleeding cash hps://mg.co.za/arcle/2015-02-12-water-wars-expose-a-roen-system-
bleeding-cash/
6 How R502m grew to R2.7bn in a year hps://city-press.news24.com/News/how-r502m-grew-to-r27bn-in-a-year-20160423
By the time
Mokonyane
left, irregular
expenditure was
well over R4-
billion
1. 19
MP Themba Godi, chairperson of Parliament’s standing commiee on public accounts (SCOPA),
called for a full parliamentary inquiry and for criminal charges to be opened, saying that the
Department of Water and Sanitaon had suered a complete collapse under Mokonyane. But the
case shows how one small incident of corrupon before she arrived on the scene escalated into a
monster once an enabling environment had been created.7
Giyani was established in 1960 to be the ‘capital’ of the Gazankulu ‘homeland’. Many of the
municipality’s 250 000 people are from families that were forcibly moved to this arid area, with
limited agricultural potenal, as part of the apartheid government’s separate development policy.
Almost half of working-age people are unemployed; most have an income of less than R800 per
month. In 2011 almost 70% were reported to be indigent.
Their household water came from boreholes with limited capacity, and a small local dam.
More water is available in the Nandoni Dam, 45km away, but whether this is needed has been
quesoned. In 2011, the Mopani District Municipality, responsible for the region, reported
that Giyani had enough water for basic services but that it was not yet piped to all villages. It
complained of vandalism, unwillingness to pay for water and noted that
“…. Over-usage of water is generally observed in most of the areas, amounng to more
than 150 litres per person per day in both towns and villages.8
But when a drought in 2009 aggravated supply challenges, DWS took the opportunity to promote
a so-called emergency scheme to bring water from the Nandoni Dam to the local Giyani water
works at a cost of R247-million. Addional work was sll needed to take the water to local village
reservoirs from which the municipality was to pipe it to the households.9 In the meanme,
another emergency project was started to x local boreholes.
The DWS used a regional bulk infrastructure grant (a budget over which it had eecve control) to
fund the project and appointed the Mopani Municipality to implement it. In 2010, local company
Tlong Re Yeng was appointed to build the Nandoni pipeline. The award was contested by an
unsuccessful bidder since the winning company was only created aer it had secured the tender
and had no employees, assets or income. In 2012, a judge ordered that the contract be cancelled,
describing it as “a fraud on the municipality” but, aer a succession of appeals, the decision was
only conrmed in 2014. Since some work had already been done, the Supreme Court of Appeal
ordered DWS “to take such steps as may be necessary to determine the extent of the works
necessary to perform remedial work and to complete the construcon of the pipeline and the
other works as contemplated in the aforesaid tender, for purposes of publishing a tender for the
said remedial work and the compleon of the works”.10
Instead, newly appointed minister Mokonyane directed Lepelle Water Board to act as her
implemenng agent. Contrary to the court order which required a tender for the remediaon and
compleon of the works – although she told Parliament that she was complying with it11 – she
instructed Lepelle to appoint consulng rm LTE, with whom she had a previous relaonship,
which was done without any tender process12 13. LTE in turn appointed two associated companies,
Khato Civils and South Zambezi to build the project14
As quesons were raised about why there was sll no water in Giyani’s villages, DWS, Lepelle
and LTE began other intervenons, ‘rehabilitang’ boreholes, building ‘emergency reservoirs’,
reculaon systems and new water treatment facilies – most of which was done without proper
technical planning, budgeng or procurement processes.
7 hps://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/mokonyane-lambasted-for-collapsing-water-dept-scopa-decries-reshuing-and-
calls-for-charges-20180227
8 hp://www.mopani.gov.za/docs/idp/nal%20Mopani%202018%202019%20Versions%203.pdf
9 hp://www.mopani.gov.za/docs/idp/nal%20Mopani%202018%202019%20Versions%203.pdf
10 Esorfranki Pipelines v Mopani District Municipality (40/13) [2014] ZASCA 21 hp://www.saii.org.za/za/cases/ZASCA/2014/21.pdf
11 Minister on Media Reports on DWS bankruptcy/ Kgetleng, Water and Sanitaon Commiee, 3 March 2017 hps://pmg.org.za/
commiee-meeng/24078/
12 hps://pmg.org.za/commiee-meeng/27686/
13 hps://briey.co.za/10033-mokonyane-pushed-r27bn-deal-a-construcon-rm.html
14 hps://city-press.news24.com/News/siu-sues-giyani-water-contractors-for-r22bn-20181127
1. 20
By the me the Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA) invesgated, R2.5-billion had already
been spent, projected to increase to R2.8-billion and beyond. The Auditor-General found that
the contractors had been irregularly appointed, and that many of their claims were clearly false.
When it transpired that the DWS did not have the funds to pay them, construcon ground to a
halt. Despite the vast expense, the main pipeline had sll not been completed in 2019. Almost
as an aside, the AGSA noted that there was, anyway, no plan to fund its operaon.
The Giyani project illustrates some of the many ways in which corrupon works in the
water sector. The quesonable decision to build the Nandoni pipeline was facilitated
by a drought emergency – and by the fact that the DWS had a pot of funds to dip
into (see RBIG – creang a corrupon fund). Although no funding was provided to
operate the pipeline, the municipality was happy to have the infrastructure and, with
it, opportunies to appoint its own favoured rms.
Instead of correcng the municipality’s inial corrupon, as ordered by the judge,
the minister directed Lepelle Water to do the work. She allegedly took advice
from controversial lawyer Luvo Makasi, former chairperson of the Central Energy
Fund, to dodge direct responsibility for the irregular appointment of LTE.15 LTE in
turn exploited the opportunity to grossly overcharge for the work done by their
associates.16 While Mokonyane was legally entled to give direcves to water
boards, her department should have been responsible for paying the costs incurred.
So a small incident of tender fraud triggered a frenzy of mismanagement and major corrupon
involving billions of rand. Both DWS and Lepelle Water have been deeply damaged, weakening
their ability to discharge their funcons. Local municipalies have been le with a dysfunconal
system that they cannot aord to operate. Giyani’s households are lile beer o than they
were before. One unanswered queson is where all the money went.
15 Nomvula Mokonyane’s ‘Ben 10’ calls the shots hps://city-press.news24.com/News/nomvula-mokonyanes-ben-10-calls-the-
shots-20181213
16 hps://pmg.org.za/commiee-meeng/27686/
Many projects
were done without
proper technical
planning, budgeting
or procurement
processes
Nandoni pipeline construcon
1. 21
SAP –The perennial problem of ICT contracts
The Giyani case is complicated. The case of DWS’s SAP contract, on the other hand, is clear: a
decision was taken to spend a huge amount of money buying an IT system for organisaons that
did not need it, without asking them rst.
Once again, the details were rst made public by the City Press which reported, in April 2018 that
under former minister Mokonyane, the DWS had concluded a ve-year contract worth R950-
million for soware services from the German SAP company. This was despite Mpho Mofokeng,
one of the DWS’s two CFOs, warning in a leer to former director-general (DG) Margaret-Ann
Diedricks that:17
• The department had already acquired ‘unlimited’ SAP licences for R178-million in 2013
and didn’t need more;
• The department’s own ‘water trading enty’ which was supposed to use the SAP system
had not been consulted;
• The water boards that were supposed to use the system had not been consulted, even
though they were likely using dierent soware packages;
• Money to pay for the SAP licences was simply not available; and
• The procurement of the licences had not been planned for.
The City Press’s informaon came from an AGSA report, which the authors of this report have
seen, which included further detail about how the minister and certain ocials had simply
ignored the department’s and government’s own structures and procedures. On the basis of that
evidence, the AGSA had no diculty in concluding that the acquision was irregular.18
It was reported that when asked about the allegaons, the DWS spokesman said that “… the
acquision of SAP was approved by the execuve authority (Mokonyane) and was duly nalised
by the Accounng Ocer”.19
In September 2018, President Cyril Ramaphosa ordered the SIU to invesgate this transacon.
It was suggested that R35-million had been paid in kickbacks as part of the contract process. In
November, the SIU informed Parliament that it would iniate civil ligaon in the rst quarter of
2019 and report to the president by 31 March 2019.20
Reports suggest that acon has been taken to recover payments from SAP but there is no
informaon on acon taken against those responsible. This may be a complicated process
because SAP uses other organisaons to sell and implement its products. In another corrupon
case, it explained that it uses ‘sales partners’ and that, if they are the ‘eecve cause’ of SAP
gaining a contract, they would get 10% of the contract value. In the DWS case, the successful
bidder was EOH Mthombo, a unit that had been established to focus on public sector business,
about whom more below.
While, in this case, the ngers point directly at Mokonyane, it is not oen noted that she was
simply following the example of her predecessors, Buyelwa Sonjica and the late Edna Molewa.
When Molewa’s DG Maxwell Sirenya refused to authorise an IT contract that she wanted, he was
red. Sonjica had similarly dismissed DG Pam Yako over allegaons (most of which were rejected
by the tribunal that nally heard them when she appealed her dismissal), that she had irregularly
favoured a parcular IT company. The paern of abuse of specialised services such as IT is one
17 The big thirst hits Limpopo as R772m goes down the drain hps://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/r772m-down-the-
drain-20180422
18 Report of the auditor-general to the joint commiee of inquiry into the funconing of the Department of Water and
Sanitaon: Challenges facing the water and sanitaon porolio. 23 March 2018. hps://www.corruponwatch.org.za/wp-content/
uploads/2020/02/180327AGSA-Challenges_Water_Sanitaon.pdf
19 Nomvula Mokonyane did not sign R1bn contract, says spokesperson. hps://www.iol.co.za/news/polics/nomvula-mokonyane-
did-not-sign-r1bn-contract-says-spokesperson-16934674
20 SIU invesgaons: progress report; Department of Water and Sanitaon challenges: Treasury brieng, with DWS Minister.
hps://pmg.org.za/commiee-meeng/27686/
1. 22
characterisc of corrupon in the water sector in which business has acvely facilitated
misconduct, as is discussed in more detail below.
Lesotho Highlands Water Project
Before informaon technology became such a money-spinner, construcon projects were
the tradional magnet for corrupon because they involve large amounts of money, are
complex and dicult to monitor, and because, since each one is dierent, they are dicult to
benchmark against each other in relaon to cost. The control of such projects has long been
a target for capture because it opens many opportunies for substanal procurement and
contract management abuses. So the various phases of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project
(LHWP), one of the largest construcon projects in Southern Africa, oer a further example of
persistent abuse of power for personal gain at the expense of the public interest.
The LHWP provides some of the water to over 15-million people in South Africa’s inland
economic hub. It diverts water that would ow into the Orange River in South Africa to
ow instead into the Vaal tributary, which passes just 50km from Johannesburg. Instead of
pumping the water 700km uphill, it ows down under gravity to where it is needed, halving
the cost of making water available.
While the project concept is simple, its scale is huge, costs are high and its management is
complex. The two countries co-operate in terms of a treaty which shares the savings from the
project between the two governments.
In the 1990s, the rst phase of the project provided
a textbook case of corrupon in large public sector
construcon projects. 21 22 More recently, it has provided
an insight into the way in which aempts to capture the
management structures and gain control over procurement
and contract management issues can disrupt and delay an
important public project and put a substanal part of South
Africa’s economy at risk.
One consequence of the corrupon in Phase 1A of the
LHWP is that substanal eorts were made to avoid further
corrupon in Phase 2, the construcon of the Polihali
Dam. However, as the minister now responsible from the
South African side, Mokonyane acvely sought to change
the procurement requirements for the project. These
arrangements had been established bilaterally by the two
governments, in consultaon with the World Bank and other
potenal funding agencies.
Mokonyane’s rst step was to replace the leader of South
Africa’s delegaon on the project with her own nominee.
She publicly stated that her aim was to ensure that the work would not go to “the usual
companies”, ignoring the fact that the design and supervision of the Lesotho infrastructure
was highly complex and required internaonal co-operaon between a number of leading
companies. At the same me, she allegedly worked with directors of LTE, her favoured
consulng company, to nd ways to change the project specicaons, to enable them to
parcipate in the re-design of the project.
As City Press reported at the me:23
“• In March 2015, Mokonyane’s director-general, Margaret-Ann Diedricks, demanded
that Dr Zodwa Dlamini – South Africa’s chief delegate to the water commission – halt
the project’s procurement processes, oering no reasons for this.
21 LL Thetsane and GH Penzhorn SC, Case Study: The Lesotho bribery prosecuons, presented at Conference on the Protecon
and Opmizaon of Public Funds - the Cooperaon between Naonal and Internaonal Authories, Rabat, May 14-16, 2007
22 Fiona Darroch (2003) The Lesotho corrupon trials — A case study, Commonwealth Law Bullen, 29:2, 901-975, DOI:
10.1080/03050718.2003.9986648
23 Nomvula Mokonyane’s Watergate. hps://city-press.news24.com/News/nomvulas-watergate-20160710
1. 23
• LTE boss Thulani Majola met with Lesotho ocials to demand tenders, freely dropping
Mokonyane’s name in the meengs.
• In October, Mokonyane removed Dlamini – who has 10 years of experience in water
mega-projects – from the project, oering no reasons for this. She was replaced by
Gauteng’s former MEC for infrastructure development Bheki Nkosi, who served under
Mokonyane when she was Gauteng premier, and worked alongside her in ANC provincial
structures.
• In April 2015, Maseru’s government removed Charles Putsoane, its most senior and
experienced ocial from the project, cing ‘incompetence and insubordinaon’.
• Dlamini and Putsoane were removed aer meeng with LTE Consulng and refusing to
give the company tenders without going through the formal process.
Although Zodwa Dlamini was reinstated aer an intervenon by the Public Protector, she chose to
leave aer receiving a full payout for her outstanding contract. But the Public Protector’s report
conrmed that it was disagreement about procurement policy that led to her departure.
There were always going to be opportunies for South African businesses. Since the LHWP’s rst
phase, the procurement rules always required parcipaon from both countries. What they do
not allow is for ministers from either South Africa or Lesotho to decide who gets which job. And
this was what Mokonyane apparently wanted.
In 2018, the LHDA, the Basotho organisaon which leads construcon of Phase 2, organised road
shows in South Africa to brief local contractors on the many opportunies the project would oer.
Their spokesman concluded by warning his audience that they shouldn’t think that they could
get work by going to Maseru and buying expensive drinks for project sta. There was a formal
procurement process and they should follow it.
LHWP2 is back on track for now. However, even if procurement proceeds cleanly and smoothly,
Mokonyane’s intervenons have further delayed an already delayed project. The result is that the
region served by the Vaal system and Lesotho’s dams will be at risk of serious supply restricons
if there is a drought before 2026, the current opmisc project compleon date. Already, new
developments in major cies have been halted as a result. The current and potenal economic
impacts are signicant.
The War on Leaks ends in defeat
Because projects like the LHWP have been delayed, and because South Africa is a water scarce
country, it is vital that South Africa’s major cies reduce their water losses so that, given their
limited supplies, they can cope with growing demands. When, in 2018, young protesters
threatened burn public buildings and trash government oces, aenon was focused on the
expensive failure of DWS’s War on Leaks project.24
From 2015 to 2019, over R3-billion was spent on training 10 000 arsans and ‘water agents’,
supposedly to help reduce water losses. However, the War on Leaks has neither reduced water
losses nor created jobs. Mokonyane and her senior ocials ignored the country’s well-recognised
capabilies to implement eecve water loss control programmes. The approach taken instead
appears to have been guided by polical consideraons – oering temporary training jobs - rather
than reducing water losses, which is a formal priority for municipal managers.
Pipes that leak water are eecvely leaking money – the cost of the water, treatment chemicals and
energy for pumping. Further nancial leaks occur when water gets to users but is not accounted or
charged for. Reducing this non-revenue water cuts costs, delays the need for new (expensive) supply
investments and improves the quality of service to water users.
Policians understand this logic. So in 2009, then president Jacob Zuma made acon on water
leaks a naonal priority; in 2010, he set a target for the reducons to be achieved, echoed by the
2012 Naonal Development Plan (NDP). In 2013, Minister Edna Molewa announced a naonal
24 Follow up informaon to War on Leaks Trainees. hp://www.randwater.co.za/WarOnLeaks/Knowledge%20Hub/Follow%20
Up%20Informaon%20to%20the%20WOL%20Trainees.pdf
1. 24
Lesotho Highlands Water Project – Katse Dam
1. 25
campaign, supported by organised business’s Strategic Water Partners Network (SWPN). But
it was Nomvula Mokonyane who formally launched the War on Leaks shortly aer she was
appointed as minister of water and sanitaon in 2014.
Water loss reducon projects are about improving the
management of water systems. Properly run, they oen pay
for themselves through the savings they achieve - contractors
are typically paid the value of one or two year’s savings. This
was how the project was originally conceived by the DWS’s
technicians. But Mokonyane ignored technical guidance
and the advice of her SWPN partners and decided that her
programme would simply train 15 000 arsans to work
in municipalies to reduce water losses. At best, this was
unbelievably naïve. While water loss reducon programmes
need people on the ground, they have to be managed as part
of a planned and structured eort.
As with the Giyani Water Project, Mokonyane distributed DWS
funds to other agencies, bypassing nancial management
controls. Rand Water was directed to recruit and manage
the trainees – they employed nearly 100 people to run this
naon-wide programme. The cost of trainees’ spends and
administraon amounted to over R1.7-billion.
Meanwhile, the Energy & Water Sector Educaon Training
Authority (EWSETA), the ocial training authority for the
electricity and water sector, was asked to manage the
training. This was inially supposed to be for arsans25. But
it proved impossible to recruit and train so many people to
naonal standards and the Department of Higher Educaon
and Training decided that their Technical Vocaonal Educaon and Training colleges should
not parcipate. So “the EWSETA then re-directed their focus toward accreding private Skills
Development Providers for the War on Leaks programme”.
Overnight, the EWSETA became the second largest training authority in the country. In a murky
process, EWSETA appointed Boikgantsho Consulng and Events (BCEI), a small company with no
substanal track record in the eld, to manage the programme. It has not been explained how
BCEI procured the trainers and 89 training venues at a cost of almost R2-billion. Some of the
‘training instuons’ chosen did not even have chairs and desks for their trainees.
As the programme proceeded, it emerged that the municipalies where the trainees were
supposed to nd jobs had not been consulted. It was dicult even to place trainees for the
praccal experience that they needed to graduate. As one training expert commented: “a
placement programme that rst trains and then goes to look for host instuons will forever
bale to nd placements”.26
Challenges were now accumulang. In 2017, Rand Water suddenly received a “withdrawal
direcve” and was told that Mhlatuze Water, a small water board in northern KwaZulu-
Natal (KZN), would take over administraon of the 5 000 trainees in the third phase of the
programme. (The chairperson of Mhlatuze Water was the controversial Dudu Myeni, with
whom Mokonyane was working to land a bigger sh - see Mhlatuze-Mgeni merger rings alarm
bells). Rand Water resisted and in March 2018, informed Parliament that DWS must ensure a
proper handover to manage ongoing sta and contractual commitments.27 But Mhlatuze had
already awarded a R98-million contract to another lile-known training company; sensibly,
learning from Rand Waters experience, the contract was subject to conrmaon of funding
from DWS.
25 EWSETA 2015/16 annual report. hps://ewseta.org.za/annual-reports/
26 WoL Evaluaon literature review, page 10
27 Rand Water Board & Sedibeng Water Board 2016/17 Annual Report, with Minister and Deputy Minister. hps://pmg.org.za/
commiee-meeng/25939/
Municipalies need to take a
systemac approach to reduce their
water losses. They must nd out
how much water they put into their
distribuon systems and where it
goes. Physical losses, through leakage
in the public distribuon system
can be reduced by nding and xing
individual leaks as well as by lowering
the pressure in the pipes. Distribuon
pipes may be replaced once the worst
zones have been idened.
Where water users are not registered
on administrave systems, just
regularising and metering their
connecons can signicantly reduce
water use. In the 60% of households
who do not pay for water, xing
leaking taps and toilets which oen
account for much of the water ‘used’,
further reduces physical water losses.
1. 26
Before this transfer could happen, the programme collapsed. The AGSA found that it had not
been budgeted for and that money was being diverted, illegally, from other DWS programmes.
DWS could not pay the trainees and Rand Water, already owed half a billion rand, refused to
advance any further funds. By 2018, DWS was eecvely bankrupt; at the end of 2019, it was
sll struggling to pay outstanding debt and restart essenal programmes.
Many quesons remain. Most of the trainees graduated as so-called water agents whose
qualicaons are not formally recognised, even aer they completed praccal placements.
Thulas Nxesi, minister of employment and labour, recently warned (at a Southern African
Clothing and Texle Workers’ Union conference in September 2019) that huge amounts of
funding were owing to private training providers with lile control on quality – was this
another example?28 The majority of trainees were ‘nominated’ by individual municipalies
rather than properly recruited and opposion pares claimed that this was to distribute
polical patronage.
There is now lile to show for the expenditure. Trainees received some spends and training,
albeit mostly of quesonable quality. EWSETA must sll explain how it spent R2-billion on
trainers and venues and how it assured the value of the qualicaons provided.
Over 20% of DWS’s annual budget of close on R16-billion (and a whole year’s worth of the non-
capital budget of around R3-billion) was diverted from its intended purposes. This severely
disrupted many crical regulatory acvies. Crically, revenue from water sales was not paid to
the state- owned Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority (TCTA), which is responsible for meeng the
loan commitments on large infrastructure projects such as the Lesotho Highlands Water
Project. This ill-discipline threatened TCTA with nancial failure and could make it more dicult
for them to raise investment funds for future water projects.
Drop a block
In some of the poorer townships of Gauteng, 70% or more of water provided is lost. Throughout
the night, ow into those areas hardly reduces despite the fact that no one is actually using
water. It is being lost to leaks, parcularly in the households themselves rather than in the
street.
The War on Leaks trainees could usefully have been deployed to go house-to-house and do
basic plumbing repairs as part of a larger programme of water loss control. The municipalies
could have saved more than enough to pay for the costs of xing the leaks. But, because of
the failure to implement a coordinated programme, the trainees lost job opportunies, water
connues to ow to waste, and the municipalies connue to lose money.
One useful acvity in which some trainees were involved was the ‘dropping a block’
programme. This reduces the volume of water used for ushing toilets by pung a brick-sized
plasc block into their toilet cisterns. But why were the trainees used for this specic acvity?
It transpires that the DWS distributed just over a million plasc blocks at a cost of R161 424 000
– R161 each for a hollow plasc block, the size of a brick, lled with sand. The minister had
directed Sedibeng Water to procure the blocks.29 This was another project on the AGSA’s list of
the department’s irregular projects that were not budgeted for.30
28 DWS unauthorised, irregular, fruitless & wasteful expenditure: hearing, with Minister and Deputy Minister. hps://pmg.org.za/
commiee-meeng/27688/
29 Report of the auditor-general to the joint commiee of inquiry into the funconing of the Department of Water and
Sanitaon: Challenges facing the water and sanitaon porolio, 23 March 2018
30 Department of Water & Sanitaon nancial posion & contested audit: Treasury & Auditor General brieng. hps://pmg.org.
za/commiee-meeng/26328/
If there had been more aenon to stopping leaks and less to giving business to friends, a great
deal of money would have been saved and young people would have had the opportunity to do
useful work. One of the corrosive impacts of corrupon is that it diverts energy from building
solid organisaons that do a good job and making public services work beer.
1. 27
Once again, who beneted from providing a million extremely over-priced plasc blocks? How
they were selected? This informaon has not yet been revealed.
Blue, Green and No Drop reports - dealing with awkward monitoring
In 2008, DWS announced an important iniave to support its oversight of municipal water
supply and sanitaon performance. It introduced the Blue Drop and Green Drop monitoring
reports. As explained by then-minister Lindiwe Hendricks,
“… the rst process would be a Blue Drop cercaon, which would be awarded to
municipalies that complied with 95% of the criteria set for eecve drinking water
management. The Green Drop cercaon would be awarded to municipalies that
complied with 90% of the criteria set for wastewater management.
“… the aim of the cercaon was to build the condence of the cizens and tourist. It
would indicate that consumers would be able to drink tap water with condence, and
also indicate that wastewater was properly managed and discharged in a sustainable
and environmentally acceptable manner.”31
(A No Drop report on the extent of water losses was added to the monitoring porolio in 2014,
in partnership with the Strategic Water Partners Network)
The rst Blue Drop report was published in 2009 and by 2010, 95% of all municipal water
service authories were parcipang. Many of those that achieved a Blue Drop, with a rang
of over 90%, proudly adversed it in their publicity material. But eorts to name and shame
municipalies that were not complying with regulaons were not appreciated. And opposion
policians made polical capital of the rst Green Drop report, which showed that the majority
of South Africa’s municipal wastewater works were dysfunconal.
31 Dwaf unveils new water cercaon scheme for municipalies. hp://www.engineeringnews.co.za/arcle/dwaf-unveils-new-
water-cercaon-scheme-for-municipalies-2008-09-11
‘Drop A Block’ green plasc block
1. 28
As a result, polical resistance to publicaon of the results grew. In 2013 the
Green Drop release was cancelled ‘pending submission to Cabinet’. The last,
abbreviated, set of reports was released in 2014. Subsequently, owing to a
reported shortage of funds, no further reports have been published.
This was the period in which substanal resources were directed to projects such
as Giyani and War on Leaks. Connued monitoring would have revealed that,
despite the expenditure of billions of rand, water supply in Giyani was sll grossly
decient and that water loss had not been signicantly reduced.
The bucket toilet tender snk
Much of this report focuses on water supply issues since they are oen the most immediate
priority for everyone from poor households to big businesses. But sanitaon is an integral part of
water services and, in households with waterborne sanitaon, it is one of the biggest water uses. It
is important for sanitaon to be water ecient and for wastewater to be safely disposed of.
However, sanitaon provision has also been prone to corrupon and the strategy used has been
depressingly familiar. A priority – or even beer, an emergency – is idened and an approach to
address it is proposed that is oen more concerned with opportunies for prot than with eecve
soluons. If communies are lucky, their sanitaon will be improved – but it does not always
follow.
Bucket toilets are a good example. There is general agreement that the manual collecon of human
waste from individual households is unacceptable. In the past, it was used in urban areas with no
sewerage system and where pit latrines are not acceptable. But a naonal polical decision was
taken, correctly, that bucket toilets must be eradicated. And that has created an apparently endless
source of prots for well-connected businesses.
A 2015 invesgaon chronicled how, in the Free State, polically well-connected construcon
company Babereki Consulng Engineers was appointed in 2013 by the Bloem Water board, without
following formal procurement procedures, apparently on instrucon of DWS.32 The rm was already
controversial aer having been removed from a contract to build a new hospital in Kimberley,
because of alleged poor performance – ahead of that contract, it was reported that Babereki’s CEO
Tshego Motaung had donated more than R1-million at a 2008 Jacob Zuma fundraiser in 2008. 33
In court acon against DWS and Bloem Water, Babereki stated that they had invoiced Bloem
Water for R50-million and that Bloem Water had said it was waing for funds from DWS.
Babereki le the site and Bloem Water was sidelined. Shortly aerwards, DWS chose Vharanani
Properes from a previously established panel of ‘preferred contractors’ to complete the
project at a cost that had now risen to R994 150 000. This was the same company that had
taken over the Giyani pipeline contract. Its owner, David Mabilu, has a wide range of business
interests from property to media (and the collapsed VBS Bank), a amboyant lifestyle, and a
record as a polical funder.
Despite the expenditure of hundreds of millions of rand, it is reported that many provincial
households sll have no alternave but to use buckets. Yet one thread runs consistently
through the process: large contracts have been arbitrarily allocated to companies known
for their record of polical funding. In this case, the AGSA told Parliament’s water and
sanitaon commiee that money had been taken from water supply projects to fund the
never-ending bucket eradicaon project.34
Mhlatuze–Mgeni merger rings alarm bells
Given the experiences described above, there is growing awareness of the risks posed by
instuonal capture in the water sector. So alarm bells rang when a merger was proposed between
Umgeni Water and Mhlatuze Water in KZN. There were fears that the proposal was not being
driven by eciencies to be gained from raonalisaon. Umgeni, the country’s second largest water
32 Protector asked to sni out toilet tender snk. hps://mg.co.za/arcle/2015-04-23-protector-asked-to-sni-out-toilet-tender-snk
33 Rape claim against ANC backer. (Fourth paragraph from end) hps://www.iol.co.za/news/polics/rape-claim-against-anc-
backer-426471
34 Department of Water & Sanitaon nancial posion & contested audit: Treasury & Auditor General brieng. hps://pmg.org.za/
commiee-meeng/26328/ and hps://pmg.org.za/les/180509agsa.pdf
One thread runs
consistently through
the process: large
contracts have been
arbitrarily allocated
to companies known
for their record of
political funding
1. 29
board, has long been targeted by unscrupulous business people seeking to partner with public
ocials to make a quick buck.35
In 2016, Dudu Myeni, the controversial chairperson of Mhlatuze and head of the Jacob
Zuma Foundaon, had been found by courts to have overstayed her legally allowed tenure
in Mhlatuze and had to vacate her posion. The subsequent concern was that the merger
of Umgeni and Mhlatuze would allow Mokonyane to appoint Dudu Myeni as chairperson
of the merged enty instead and thus gain control over Umgeni’s sizeable project porolio
and nancial reserves. To further facilitate the merger and perhaps a wider plan for the two
instuons, Mokonyane had dismissed the Umgeni board and appointed an acng chief
execuve accountable only to herself.36
The threat to the nancial reserves led to the merger being halted and the board’s governance
structures being restored. To fund its operaons in the late 1990s, Umgeni had borrowed
billions of rand by issuing bonds. The bonds had been bought by major nancial instuons
who were concerned that, under the new arrangements, interest payments might not be met.
Future Growth, a subsidiary of nancial giant Old Mutual, warned Mokonyane that it would
block the merger to protect its interests, part of a wider eort by the nancial sector to curb
mismanagement in state-owned enterprises.37 38
Fears that the aack on Umgeni Water’s governance was an aempt to inuence the award of
tenders were reinforced when, in 2018, it was alleged that a R220-million security contract had
been irregularly awarded by Umgeni Water to an ANC-linked security company. Controversial
‘piggy-backing’ procurement provisions (see below) were used to give the contract to
Reshebile Aviaon and Protecon Services without a tender. The contract was awarded on
the basis of Reshebile’s exisng contract with the Airports Company of South Africa (ACSA);
ironically, that contract was itself controversial because it had been found that Reshebile did
not qualify to parcipate in ACSA tender processes.28 39
Events like these only served to conrm that the move for many of the intervenons in
water board governance and management was to gain control for irregular purposes. They
also showed that, once control has been gained, formal procurement rules provide limited
safeguards against misappropriaon. What was eecve were threats by nancial instuons
to bring down the whole structure by withdrawing their nancial support.
Raising Clanwilliam Dam – grow jobs and economy or support patronage?
The stop-start project to raise the Clanwilliam dam is an example of how capture can delay
achievement of public goals while opportunies are sought to achieve private benet. The
85-year-old Clanwilliam Dam does not meet current safety standards and it has long been
proposed that, during rehabilitaon, it could usefully be raised. The extra capacity would
increase the yield of the dam by about 40%, allowing over 5 000 ha of addional land to be
irrigated and creang almost four thousand new jobs.
The DWS’s under-employed construcon unit was able to do the job and the project would
have enabled the department to provide much-needed on-the-job training to its sta. Aer
many delays by previous ministers, Mokonyane announced in her 2015 budget speech that the
project would start. The DWS team moved onto site and began preparaons; surrounding land
was acquired and the Cape Town-Namibia N7 naonal highway was diverted to make way for
construcon.
35 Misconduct at Umgeni water board – Kasrils. hps://www.iol.co.za/news/polics/misconduct-at-umgeni-water-board-
kasrils-68117
36 Acng Umgeni Water chief execuve appointed. hps://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/acng-umgeni-water-chief-
execuve-appointed-20170627
37 Water and sanitaon minister’s ‘meddling’ could cost SA R3bn. hps://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/nomvulas-
meddling-could-cost-sa-r3bn-20170923
38 Umgeni Water in R220m tender scandal. hps://city-press.news24.com/News/mon-3pm-piggybacking-the-way-to-get-the-
job-20181224
39 Bidvest Protea Coin (Pty) Ltd v Airports Company of South Africa. hp://www.saii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2017/110.html
1. 30
Then the minister abruptly stopped the project. She had decided to bring in external
contractors and some familiar names were raised. In 2017, Naonal Treasury was asked to
approve a new budget and informed that it was now going to be built by external contractors
“as a result of the need to accelerate the project”. It was suggested this was because the
departmental team did not accept proposals to bring in her preferred providers for some of the
highly specialised specialist services on this technically dicult project.
In 2018, following Mokonyane’s departure, the new minister Gugile Nwin instructed the DWS
to revert to the original approach. Construcon has begun again – a year aer Mokonyane
announced that it would be concluded. Compleon is now scheduled for 2023.
When the project was relaunched, an indicaon of the issues at stake was provided by Helen
Zille, then premier of the Western Cape, who claimed: “Over 2 000 people were bussed in for
the launch, with catering and transport contracts for the event being awarded to the ANC’s
regional treasurer, an ANC acvist and beneciaries of craysh quotas.” According to Zille, ANC
speakers demanded that they be awarded contracts on the project and that the long delay had
been due to pressure from ‘tenderpreneurs’ seeking contracts.40
This may reect a wider challenge, discussed below, where local groups demand parcipaon
in construcon projects and take acon to obstruct work if they are not involved or paid o.
A number of important projects in other sectors have been delayed or stopped as a result,
including a major bridge on the N2 highway in the Eastern Cape and parts of the Rea Vaya Bus
Rapid Transport network in Johannesburg.
40 Tenderpreneurs circle Clanwilliam dam wall project - Helen Zille. hps://www.policsweb.co.za/polics/tenderpreneurs-
circle-clanwilliam-dam-wall-project
Clanwilliam Dam
1. 31
But the cost of responding to these pressures, perhaps with the intenon of also beneng
selected service providers, can be measured in development opportunies lost. In Clanwilliam, it
was thousands of jobs in agriculture. But it also represented a huge waste of departmental funds
and human capabilies, as the construcon team stood idle for more than a year while across the
country, communies were crying out for assistance.
TCTA and the Mzimvubu project
Happily, eorts to capture instuons in order to promote inappropriate projects are somemes
prevented. But this does not happen without conict and casuales.
The Trans-Caledon Tunnel Authority (TCTA) was originally established to manage South Africa’s
contribuon to the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. It was then decided to use its capabilies
inside South Africa to develop large water resource infrastructure on a ‘project nance’ basis
where project beneciaries could fund the costs through taris. It promoted the Berg River Dam
which helped Cape Town and the Western Cape survive the recent drought; the Vaal River Eastern
Sub-system Augmentaon Project, which would increase the security of water supply to Sasol and
Eskom power staons; and an intervenon to manage acid mine drainage.
Given its focus on large capital projects, it was inevitable that the TCTA would come under polical
pressure. It is vulnerable because, as with the water boards, the minister of water can direct
it to undertake specic tasks. Mokonyane made a number of aempts to direct TCTA to fund
inappropriate projects. Perhaps the most audacious were her eorts to force the TCTA to take a
loan from a Chinese bank to build the Mzimvubu dam.
The Mzimvubu development shows how projects in the water sector can go o the rails if polical
leaders have the wrong objecves and incenves. The Mzimvubu is South Africa’s third largest
river, owing almost enrely through the Eastern Cape, one of the country’s three poorest
provinces. Its waters ow into the Indian Ocean at Port St Johns, almost enrely unused.
For decades, eorts to nd ways to use the water producvely have been stymied by geographical
challenges such as deep valleys, with lile irrigable land. The area also receives sucient rain for
dryland farming which, although less producve, is cheaper and easier than irrigaon. Hydropower
development was rejected because of environmental impacts. It seemed that the only use for the
water would be to export it to cies outside the basin which would only be needed some decades
in the future.
In 2013, a review of 17 opons for integrated development considered economic acvies from
agriculture to tourism, and a new dam at Ntabelanga, between Maclear and Tsolo, was proposed.
It could generate a lile hydropower, irrigate 2 800 hectares of reasonably ferle soils and supply a
large regional water scheme.
Mzimvubu river mouth
1. 32
But its feasibility was challenging. The water would be expensive and agriculture would only be
viable if commercial farms produced high-value crops, displacing exisng residents from their
tradional land. The provincial agriculture department did not support this, saying that far more
people could benet with less funds in other places and that commercial farming schemes on
tradional land had generally failed. Eskom was not interested in the small amount of power oered
because of its high cost. And cheaper sources are available for domesc water supply.
However, policians who were enthusiascally promong the scheme, promising jobs and
development, disregarded the important detail – that it could only be viable if power, agriculture
and potable water were developed together. Minister Mokonyane took advantage of the 2015
China-South Africa summit to instruct TCTA to sign an agreement with the China Communicaons
Construcon Company which oered a loan from a Chinese bank. But it was clear from the outset
that the beneciaries of the project, as structured, would not be able to pay operaonal costs, let
alone repay a loan. And Naonal Treasury refused to guarantee the loan since it would add to the
country’s budgetary burden.
Despite this, Mokonyane led a delegaon to China in 2016, including most of the board of TCTA, with
the intenon of proceeding. TCTA’s board, aware that the project could not be nanced through its
normal project nance methodology, explicitly instructed the TCTA CEO (a Mokonyane nominee)
not to sign any loan agreement. So, despite huge pressure from the minister, no loan was signed.
TCTA’s latest annual report states that preparatory work has now stopped as funding is not available.
Fortunately, because TCTA is dependent on nance from the private capital markets, the minister
could not simply dismiss the board without undermining private sector funding sources for other
major projects.
Mokonyane’s determinaon to proceed might be explained by the fact that back in 2015, DWS
had appointed Pro-Plan, a small consulng company with no relevant experience, for the “Design,
construcon supervision and quality control for uMzimvubu Water Project”. Pro-Plan is based in
Mokonyane’s home town in Gauteng; it had worked for her while she was in the Gauteng provincial
government and was also nominated by DWS to oversee another mul-billion-rand white elephant
project to be implemented by the Sedibeng Water Board.
The project remains on the polical agenda, not least perhaps because Pro-Plan has allegedly
been paid almost R500-million for preparatory design work to date, although there is currently a
contractual dispute and it has been suggested that the company’s appointment was irregular in the
rst place.
Both ministers who succeeded Mokonyane have connued to make the polical case for the dam to
be implemented. But, so far, they have recognised the need to ensure that they have willing partners
in the agriculture and power sectors. And they have been prepared to stay within the nancial
management system to do it.
2.2 THE ATTRACTION OF LARGE CAPITAL PROJECTS
Corrupon and mismanagement in the South African water sector cannot
be aributed to just one powerful person although Nomvula Mokonyane
certainly showed that one determined individual can have a devastang
impact. The more tradional view, that the large sums of money involved
in construcon projects aract corrupt people, connues to be true as the
examples presented below demonstrate.
What these examples also highlight, however, is the danger that the potenal
corrupt gains from large projects may lead to projects being promoted
that are inappropriate or indeed unnecessary. On the Mzimvubu project,
Mokonyane provided a useful example – but some of the many others are
outlined below. As these show, the bale for corrupt gains oen starts long
before contracts are signed.
Mangaung and the Gariep pipeline
Mangaung, formerly Bloemfontein, capital of the Free State province and seat of the country’s
Supreme Court of Appeal, currently draws water from two principal sources, the Modder and
Caledon rivers. While these sources have had problems, planning studies have shown that, if
What these examples
also highlight is
the danger that the
potential corrupt
gains from large
projects may lead
to projects being
promoted that are
inappropriate or
indeed unnecessary
1. 33
properly managed, they should be adequate for years to come, parcularly if the city reduces its
water losses.
However, whenever there is a supply problem, aenon turns to the Gariep dam 200km away on
the Orange River. It has long been suggested that the city should build a pipeline to bring water
from the dam although the costs of construcon and pumping the water 200 metres uphill would
substanally increase water costs.
In 2016, Mangaung Metro Municipality appointed GladAfrica, a consulng engineering and
project management rm, to undertake a feasibility study of the pipeline. In its integrated
development plan, the municipality indicated that it hoped to leverage nancing through an
agreement with naonal government.
Meanwhile, LTE Consulng, which has gured in many other cases, was contracted by Bloem Water,
which falls under Department of Water control, to do a feasibility study of the same project, at a
cost of R17 459 000.41 This followed an announcement by Mokonyane in her 2016 budget speech
that “The Department has already commenced with feasibility studies working towards conveying
water from Gariep Dam to Mangaung through the construcon of the Caledon Bloemfontein
potable water supply scheme.42
To date, no decision has been taken. The technical managers connue to maintain and renovate
the exisng scheme, to keep it operaonal. In this case, the logic of the department’s own
planning work, together with the very limited funding available and the fact that the proposed
pipeline would likely double the cost of water to the city seem to have stopped another ambious
plan to implement an unnecessary project.
As reported to a parliamentary commiee, “The Gariep pipeline was started in 2004, and was
then priced at R2-billion. The Metro had to compete with Water and Sanitaon …. It was agreed
that Water and Sanitaon would implement, but the price had escalated to R8-billion, and the
Department did not have money.” 43
The fact that two facons were compeng to reap the benets from its promoon may,
perversely, have helped since the project will only proceed if both pares can agree. Once
again though, this suggests that decisions are driven as much by personal interests as by formal
planning and procurement processes.
Nelson Mandela Bay – How desalinaon dreams derailed city’s water security
The experience of Nelson Mandela Bay Metro Municipality is similar to that in Mangaung except
that delays due to eorts to promote an inappropriate project have created a real crisis. Cape
Town became globally famous for its threatened Day Zero when all residenal taps would be
turned o, although that was never really a likely prospect.
At the same me, the Nelson Mandela Bay metro was facing similar challenges. A long drought
had depleted the city’s water reserves and they were, nominally, trying to reduce domesc
consumpon to the same 50 litres per person per day as Cape Town had enforced in 2018.44
As in Cape Town, the problem was less about the drought and more about the failure to do what
was necessary to ensure the city’s water security, since droughts occur regularly in South Africa.
Unlike Mangaung, Nelson Mandela Bay metro already has access to extensive Orange River water
resources, transferred through an apartheid-era system. All that was needed was a 40km pipeline
to link to the city’s Nooitgedacht treatment works. In 2006, the city had published a 20-year water
plan which stated that the Nooitgedacht scheme would be needed by 2015. So why in 2017 was
its water sll not reaching the city?
41 List of consulng rms currently contracted to the enes. hp://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW1099-
2018-05-29-Annex_C.docx
42 Water and Sanitaon Dept Budget Vote 2016/17. hps://www.gov.za/speeches/address-minister-water-and-sanitaon-ms-
nomvula-mokonyane-occasion-budget-vote-number-36
43 Mangaung & eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality brieng, NCOP Finance, 21 August 2018. hps://pmg.org.za/commiee-
meeng/26870/
44 Port Elizabeth’s dams at lower level than Cape Town. hps://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/08/port-elizabeth-dams-level-cape-
town-180810092406757.html
1. 34
Gariep Dam
1. 35
Other agendas were in play. Around 2005, a group of local entrepreneurs and leading municipal
ocials decided to promote the construcon of a desalinaon plant.45 46 They were not deterred by
the extremely high cost of water from this proposal, many mes more than that of readily available
Orange River water. This would have involved the kind of private sector investment that creates
many opportunies for individual prot at the public expense. And when a naonal ocial asked
about the challenges of nancing the proposed project, the Singaporean promotor simply said, not
to worry, it was ‘all in the bag’ [pers comm 2019].
But the desalinaon project required either a bankable undertaking from the municipality to buy
the water or a central government subsidy. The municipality’s nancial track record was too weak to
convince lenders while eorts to obtain nancial guarantees or emergency drought funding failed to
persuade a scepcal naonal government. Local and naonal authories nally decided to proceed
with the Nooitgedacht scheme but, aer years of delay, funds sll had to be found. As a result, when
the region suered yet another drought, it had to introduce extreme water restricons.
So eorts to promote an unnecessarily expensive scheme for the wrong reasons le
the city vulnerable. The city’s municipality was notorious for corrupon. The book How
to steal a city describes how no project would advance in Nelson Mandela Bay unless
someone in the leadership beneted.47
The repeated water restricons that the city suered saw industries close for lack of
water and further jobs lost in agriculture. By 2016, a black market had emerged in water
stolen from swimming pools by the tanker-load. In September 2019, with the crical
Nooitgedacht infrastructure sll not in place and drought threatening the region once
again, organised business warned of a “jobs blood-bath”.48
This is the cost of corrupon which blocks projects from which municipal leadership
cannot benet and it highlights the need to prevent unethical local leadership from
capturing control of instuons.
Mpumalanga’s municipal budgets – Hijacked or rescued?
In 2012, DD Mabuza, then premier of Mpumalanga and now deputy president, expressed his
concern about the state of municipal water supply services in his province. He said that the
province’s district municipalies were not making adequate progress with investments to improve
the situaon and were indeed returning some of their budget allocaons to Naonal Treasury.
So he announced that his provincial government would take control of their investment funds. At
a meeng aended by almost 100 local and provincial polical heads, ocials and technicians,
he said that the municipalies concerned should transfer their funds for water infrastructure
development to the Mpumalanga Economic Growth Agency (MEGA) which would now implement
water projects. While he recognised that these funds had been allocated to the municipalies, he
warned that if any mayor disagreed with this proposal, they could have a discussion in another
place (understood to be the provincial ANC oce).
While the approach was disnctly novel, the stated move seemed reasonable. Since local
government elecons were due in two years, the premier wanted to ensure fast progress in
improving services since reliable water supplies were a high priority in many constuencies.
Depending on one’s standpoint, this was either a dramac iniave to address an important
problem or the brazen hijacking of municipal budgets.
The test would be whether the intervenon yielded the promised results. On this count, the
benets were less obvious. A review of the projects to be funded (and for which designs were
ready) found many worrying anomalies – including treatment plants without water sources,
reservoirs without supplies to ll them, and many pricing anomalies.
45 Mystery PE man in massive Coega deal. hps://www.environment.co.za/east-cape-wild-coast-south-africa/mystery-pe-man-in-
massive-coega-deal.html
46 GE to build innovave desalinaon plant in South Africa. hps://www.reliableplant.com/Read/6504/ge-to-build-innovave-
desalinaon-plant-in-south-africa
47 Olver, C., 2017. How to steal a city: The bale for Nelson Mandela Bay: An inside account. Jonathan Ball.
48 Dwindling water supply could lead to “job blood-bath” says Business Chamber. hps://www.groundup.org.za/arcle/dwindling-
water-supply-could-lead-job-blood-bath-says-business-chamber/
Eorts to promote
an unnecessarily
expensive scheme
for the wrong
reasons left the
city vulnerable.
The municipality
was notorious for
corruption.
1. 36
MEGA’s procurement of a consultant engineer to manage the investment process got o to a
dicult start. When the bids were opened and presented for evaluaon, the administrave
ocer responsible for procurement informed the bid evaluaon commiee that most tenders
were not compliant and would have to be disqualied. It transpired that, a few days before the
tender closed, s/he had circulated a revision to the request for tenders which required some
addional informaon to be included in tender submissions.
The ocial responsible proposed that the commiee should therefore award the contract to
the only technically qualied bid amongst the few remaining tenders – which was signicantly
more expensive than those that were disqualied. The commiee refused, poinng out that
the last-minute details required were not material. It decided to evaluate all bids rather than
delay the process by starng the process over again. From this process, another company was
recommended.
However, aer the meeng, MEGA’s CEO Boyce Mkhize apparently altered the
commiee’s recommendaons. It was alleged that Mkhize changed the scores of
the commiee to favour a company which the commiee had scored as among
the worst. That company was subsequently appointed. When these issues came
to light, Mkhize resigned, taking a golden handshake of over R4-million.
A few months later, responsibility for the projects was taken from MEGA and
returned to the municipalies and some of the work was eventually nished.
Quite how much money had been spent, where, by whom and for what requires
detailed invesgaon. And Mpumalanga water supplies have connued to
deteriorate.
Ethical leadership focused on achieving public goals is clearly a prerequisite for
achieving water security.
2.3 THE BUSINESS SIDE OF CORRUPTION
Many of the cases presented above focus on the behaviour of public ocials. Yet many private
individuals and businesses deliberately develop and exploit weaknesses in the public sector.
Such behaviour can be found from the level of the community plumber and tanker driver up
to the boardrooms of major internaonal companies. As in other cases, the impacts of this
behaviour are no less serious and are felt most acutely by poor households and communies.
But large businesses, in pursuit of their own goals, oen acvely create the condions in which
corrupon ourishes, at the expense of the natural environment and public health.
How water tankers cause taps to run dry
The focus of an-corrupon eorts is usually on mul-million-rand contracts and high-level
ocials. However, residents of poor communies have another set of problems. They interact
with frontline ocials and sta working for small local municipalies. In these areas, the
concern is oen with the way in which services are actually provided – or, too oen, why they
fail.
Even in the best run systems, piped water supplies somemes fail and it may be necessary to
supply water by tanker. This may be the result of pipe bursts, power failures or interrupons to
allow maintenance and construcon. Because of the inconvenience for users and high costs –
oen 20 mes more than a piped supply – tankers should never be used as a long-term opon.
However, for some people, emergencies that require tanker transport are an opportunity.
Many municipalies hire tankers from private contractors when they are needed. In these
cases, municipal ocials, the tanker owners and even tanker drivers can all benet from tanker
use. But if there is no emergency, the investment in tankers is unproducve and drivers are
idle. This can create dangerous situaons.
In 2014, three people were killed during protests in Mothutlung, a small community lying
between Brits in the North West province and Ga-Rankuwa, part of Tshwane in Gauteng. The
community’s water supply failed, it was reported, because all three pumps serving the area
Ethical leadership
focused on
achieving public
goals is clearly a
prerequisite for
achieving water
security.
1. 37
had broken down. In the interim, the Brits-based Madibeng municipality told residents that they
would be served by tanker.
The residents refused to accept this. They alleged that the pumps had been deliberately sabotaged
to enrich the private owners of water tankers, who had paid kickbacks to municipal ocials to
cut the supply.49 This allegaon was credible. Mothutlung is not a distant rural village. It is close to
major urban centres with reliable water supplies and well developed maintenance facilies, just
10km from the municipal water treatment plant.
Shocked by the conict, provincial and naonal government ocials intervened. They took
control of the municipality, not for the rst or last me, and quickly restored the piped supply. But
problems connued and, even when water was restored, it was not drinkable.
Such problems with tankers are widespread. In Umlazi, eThekwini, residents recently protested
because, they said, tanker drivers were demanding R200 to ll their house tanks aer four weeks
without water.50 There too, protest leaders alleged that the supply cuts were deliberate: “We hear
that ocials are cung our water supply so that we will get water delivered by tankers. We hear
that the ocials are beneng from the water tankers,” said protest leader Nkanyiso Msomi.
In Limpopo province, DWS ocials reported that: “Many tankers were bought during the 2015/16
drought. One anonymous example given is where Sekhukhune ocials buy tankers (at R1.3
million) and then rent these to themselves. ‘They ll the tankers from the Municipal supply and
sell the water at R20/bucket (R1/litre!!). Over Christmas the public supply pipe was closed (by
these same ocials) in order to keep their tankers busy’. And the community feels powerless.”
The DWS has idened tankering as a recurrent problem. A 2018 report notes that “it is
an expensive way of providing water, for both consumers and their Water Authority. It also
perpetuates the underlying problem – absence of a sustainable supply – not only diverng funds
that could be used for permanent infrastructure but also ‘by reducing the will to act’. The urgency
of providing piped water is lessened.51
49 Dirty water scandal. hps://www.meslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2014-01-16-dirty-water-scandal/
50 Protesters blame corrupon for lack of water in Umlazi. hps://www.groundup.org.za/arcle/protesters-blame-corrupon-lack-
water-umlazi/
51 Tankeri ng as a Social Issue (internal document). DWS 2018
Nissan Diesel CW41 water tanker
1. 38
The departmental document also acknowledges systemic corrupon:
“Failure to maintain water supply systems results in interrupons to the
service and the need for emergency supplies (i.e. water tankers). Lack
of maintenance thus becomes part of the business model of those with
interests in transporng water (and) tankering becomes an operaon
that is dicult to stop. … Where tankering services are contracted in,
the owners of these tankers become reliant on the business and have
no incenve to see this come to an end. … Once one starts tankering
it is very hard to stop, as local interests become entrenched. If there is
tankering into an area where a project is planned, then that project is
going to fail.
The departmental document draws the obvious conclusion, but it is not easy to enforce:
“…. tankering ‘frustrates the will to act’ by the supply authority. What may frustrate this ‘will to
act’ to x formal infrastructure is the blossoming industry around water tanker services – with
backward and forward linkages to the District Municipality….. One always needs some emergency
capacity (like one always needs a re engine) – but this is emergency capacity – and should not be
in permanent employ.”
Yet in many regions where local management has failed, municipalies resort to tanker supplies,
connuing the vicious cycle and sustaining the corrupt interests at the expense of providing
eecve basic services to the communies concerned.
Chemical toilets in Ekurhuleni
Similar situaons arise with sanitaon in poor communies. Reports of failure to provide decent
sanitaon services are, correctly, a source of embarrassment to the whole society. So policians
from all pares support calls for acon to improve sanitaon. Just as reliably, protable soluons
will be developed and promoted to achieve this.
Sanitaon provision in informal selements, parcularly those that are regarded as unlikely to be
permanent, is parcularly dicult. Municipalies are reluctant to build permanent infrastructure
that may eventually be abandoned. A convenient soluon is to provide portable chemical toilets.
The aracon of these is that they just need level ground to install and can be hired from service
providers who empty and clean them – correctly managed, this is slightly beer but not much
dierent to a bucket toilet system.
Many companies provide toilet hire services which have become one more lucrave opportunity
for corrupon. In Gauteng’s Ekurhuleni Metro Municipality, a R1.9-billion, three-year tender to
provide and service almost 40 000 chemical toilets was suddenly set aside, sub-divided and re-
allocated to chosen beneciaries.
Of the 250 companies which bid for tenders to supply portable chemical toilets, quite a few of
the lucky 16 to be selected had no experience or equipment and simply hired toilets from larger
companies whose bids had been unsuccessful. This ‘diversicaon’ of tenders was alleged to
have distributed the prots between polically connected pares and, indeed, some of the
beneciaries are beer known for polical corrupon than sanitaon provision.52
This kind of arrangement also leads to problems of supervision and it is common for community
members to complain that toilets are not being maintained. This occurs in parcular where the
successful tenderers do not have their own capacity and have simply sub-contracted supply
from other companies. In these cases, either the price of the service has to be inated, diverng
funds which could be used for other purposes, or contractors make their prots by skimping on
maintenance commitments.
Illegal connecons – corrupon or simply unauthorised service provision?
Even in the poorest communies, many households are directly involved in what some people
call corrupon when they are connected to the supply network without authorisaon. Such illegal
connecons are widespread and they can signicantly aect access to water supplies, as well as
52 Toilet tender snks, hps://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/amabhungane-toilet-tender-snks-20190703
“We hear that ocials
are cutting our water
supply so that we will
get water delivered
by tankers. We hear
that the ocials are
beneting from the
water tankers.”
1. 39
their reliability and safety. Tapping into pipes ‘informally’ oen damages them, shortens their life
and allows leaks to develop and polluted water to inltrate the supply. Somemes, connecons
are made by simply cung into a plasc pipe and bandaging a new connecon onto it with rubber
tubes from bicycle tyres held on by wire.
Where connecons are not formally registered, users do not contribute to the cost of the public
supply. Households that are entled to a free basic water supply are likely to use more than
their basic allowance if supplies are unmetered and unbilled. Overuse then contributes to poor
maintenance and early failure and oen deprives downstream users of their supply.
Households oen see the situaon dierently, arguing that this approach is simply self-
help and should be allowed, parcularly if they are told that water in a passing pipe
is not for them. This may be because they are in an area not intended for selement,
where the local municipality does not want to provide services. In former homelands,
selement may be encouraged to force municipalies to provide services, which
increases land values for tradional leaders.
Illegal connecons are oen made by current or former employees of the municipality
who have the knowledge and access to the tools and material required. So what
appears to be a simple illegal acon may be relavely complicated, involving not just the
householder and a local plumber but tradional authories and municipalies.
An authoritarian administraon would simply declare such acons illegal and instruct
their technicians to remove illegal connecons. But this creates tension with local
tradional leaders and communies, and presents challenges in a country where lack
of access to services is largely determined by a mixture of race and class. Even legally
connected households may prefer that their neighbours use illegal connecons to avoid
having to share their own tap – which would increase their costs.
Given these dynamics, many service providers simply ignore the problem. Even cies such as
Johannesburg are careful about how they deal with these issues. Joburg Water’s operaonal
management system makes it very dicult for maintenance teams to use city resources to make
illegal connecons. And repair teams are instructed to x leaks found in illegal connecons rather
than disconnect them; they are then supposed to tell the commercial department which should
visit and regularise the connecon but this does not oen happen.
So illegal or unauthorised connecons proliferate, leading to shortages. In the absence of user
payments, maintenance is not done and systems deteriorate. Government’s household surveys
show that service reliability is declining all over rural South Africa and, increasingly, in urban
communies as well. Meanwhile, the queson remains: do illegal connecons reect corrupon
or simply a failure of policy, local polics and community management?
Mining licences, polluon and public versus private interests
In the formal business sector, the problems are dierent. Environmental regulaon is idened
as a risk parcularly in sectors such as mining, because it can impose costs and delays. So, where
public ocials have powers to control water polluon and water abstracon, private interests
have an obvious incenve to nd ways to work with them, for mutual benet.
These problems are exacerbated when the issues regulated are complex and poorly understood,
since soluons to complexity oen open opportunies for corrupon.
This is illustrated by the challenges that arise when water licences are required for mining
acvies. Before a mine is established, water managers have to consider whether:
• the mine’s water requirements can be met from available resources;
• the mine’s operaons could indirectly reduce the availability of water for other users (for
instance by drying up boreholes);
• water pumped out of the mine to enable mining operaons will cause polluon problems;
• indirect polluon, such as runo from mining land, may pollute local water resources;
Even legally
connected
households may
prefer that their
neighbours use
illegal connections
to avoid having to
share their own
tap – which would
increase their costs
1. 40
• mining will damage the water resource itself, by draining wetlands or obstrucng streams;
• adequate nancial and technical provisions have been made to protect the environment
aer mine closure.
Assessment of these issues requires detailed informaon about the site, the nature of the
operaons, the infrastructure to be built, how it will be operated, and how mine closure will be
managed and funded. Crically, the regulator also needs detailed informaon about the current
state of the water resource and other uses.
Legislaon requires a formal approval process to address these issues – and guarantees of funding
for remedial work when mining is concluded. This process is prone to poor and deliberately
improper decisions. But because delays are costly, naonal policy has sought to streamline and
coordinate work of the departments involved (minerals, environment, land reform, and water)
and speed up the process. The present regulaons state that licence applicaons must to be
nalised within 300 working days. This is oen inappropriate since informaon must be provided
by applicants and then conrmed and analysed by regulators. The obvious strategy for applicants is
to dump a great deal of informaon on the regulator, object if more informaon is requested and
complain about the me to reach a decision.
But the mines also depend on the competence and good will of the regulator. Since delays are
costly, there are strong incenves for the applicant to speed up the process and for rent-seeking
ocials to slow it down. It is a recipe for corrupon, and this is what has been observed:
“If you can’t get a water licence, this could delay you for years... So why should R10 000
[bribe] be an obstacle... The policies are good. It’s the implementaon and the instuons.
The website [to apply for licence] you can’t get in, it doesn’t work... The work done by the
polical and execuve arm gets confused with this...Polical inuence is standard. You
must move in the right circles.53
Geng a water licence is just the start. Complying with its condions can be just as challenging.
If an ocial demands a bribe, you won’t say [no] as it will create a bad relaonship
with that ocial and they will come and nd fault on your mine every day so this goes
unreported. There is corrupon at high and low levels of government. We also corrupt
ocials as business people. It happens both ways...54
Eecvely, environmental and water use licenses were for sale and for small junior
miners, it may be easiest to ignore water impacts and concentrate on jumping the big
hurdles. The CEO of one small company explained how he worked the system:
“You must nd an individual in the Department of Mineral Resources... oer money
...pop up money all the way... because mining rights can take two years... although
it’s beer now. You rely on that individual to know what to expect. Big companies
have done this before so they know. So it’s not so hard for them... Some mine
without water licences. Some get a mining permit and then mine and get a water
licence later. Some ocials say you can mine, some say you can’t.55
An ongoing source of outrage for the environmental community is that many
companies, old and new, large and small, start mining before they have a licence.
This is parcularly problemac for large companies with reputaonal concerns.
The manager of one large company explained that a licence he had been waing
almost a year for, was desperately weak, and imposed impossible condions. It
required wastewater to be treated to a standard cleaner than drinking water; and the
geographic coordinates located the mine hundreds of kilometres o the coast in the
Atlanc Ocean. His opons? “I can point out the errors and then wait for six months
while they x them or simply start mining and argue later, if necessary”.
53 Coal, water and mining owing badly. Kally Forrest & Lesego Loate, Society, Work & Development Instute, June 2017
54 ibid
55 ibid
Complex regulation,
weak institutions,
pressures for the
transformation of
the mining sector
make for a toxic
environment in
which it is likely
that corruption
will ourish unless
there is strong,
ethical leadership in
business as well as
government
1. 41
Complex regulaon, weak instuons, pressures for the transformaon of the mining sector
make for a toxic environment in which it is likely that corrupon will ourish unless there is
strong, ethical leadership in business as well as government.
Corporate corrupon creaon: EOH’s move from SAP to specialised water services
Regulatory corrupon in mining might be regarded as a deviaon from normal business pracce.
But, beyond mining, the strategies of some large private sector companies appear to have been
structured to enable corrupon. The SAP case described above has shown that public sector IT
provides opportunies for corrupon because of the technically complex nature of the contracts,
which make it dicult to assess value for money and performance. But other specialist services
that oer similar opportunies have increasingly been targeted.
A case in point is Enterprise Outsourcing Holdings (EOH), a conglomerate that branched out from
its original IT business into other specialist services. At one point, it had a mindboggling set of
almost 300 subsidiaries. They range literally from A (About Time Soware, which sells US business
soware services) to Z (Zusiza Pty Ltd, oering training courses ranging from oce cleaning to
project management, and boasng strong relaonships with the country’s SETAs, which control
billions of rand from government’s training levies.)
EOH’s wider business acvies became notorious when it was revealed that a whole division
had apparently been structured to promote public sector corrupon. As the IT business became
increasingly compeve and commodised, EOH started looking for opportunies to run the
specialised technical funcons inside the businesses that used their IT. And, in South Africa,
the obvious place to do that is in the public sector, where many organisaons appear unable to
manage their own operaons. So in 2015, EOH made an aggressive foray into the water sector,
buying up specialist service providers.
By 2018, it had acquired at least 12 companies. Stock market commentators approved: “The
company is looking to provide a one stop soluon for government municipalies in South Africa
and also in developing African countries. They will assist these municipalies in managing their IT
and infrastructure needs eciently. In this space there are numerous small scale technologies to
be adopted that will increase the package of services oered to their customers … in South Africa
water and electricity management are key areas of focus. Any acquision that could bolster their
service oering in this area or strengthen their relaonship with government municipalies in
South Africa or the rest of Africa would make sense.” 56
56 Weekly update for 09/04/2018 – EOH: Changing tyres for a long road ahead, Merchantec, Johannesburg.
Acid mine drainage
1. 42
These companies represented a signicant investment. While EOH’s annual reports do not specify
the revenue from the water sector, “the aggregate carrying amounts of goodwill” allocated
to the water “cash-generang units” was R281 151 000 (6.6% of the total); if “Infrastructure
management’s” R113 701 000 is included, it made up over 9% of the business. And, according to its
annual reports, EOH’s ambion was to expand further in this area.
Rather than look at big construcon projects, EOH concentrated its eorts on the management of
water distribuon networks. This made sense. A reducon of water losses was a naonal priority,
and by 2015, it was clear that the War on Leaks was not going to achieve it. The challenge was to
make money out of good intenons.
So EOH bought the following companies:
• 4 Water Supplies, which specialises in water demand management and loss control, oering
a comprehensive range of products in this eld;
• CivEc Consulng Engineers has designed and installed water networks cies and towns
across Gauteng and Limpopo provinces;
• Combined Systems was PricewaterhouseCoopers’s asset management subsidiary and
had signicant water sector business in a specialised niche where EOH already had three
companies operang;
• CSVwater Consulng Engineers focus on ”the science and engineering of water” and had
worked on DWS’s Green and Blue Drop monitoring programmes;
• Dihlase Consulng Engineers “understand water services, from data collecon and
evaluaon to project design, development, and management”;
• JOAT Consulng and their regional companies oer to reduce non-revenue water “through
a winning combinaon of leading experse, reliable world class products, and in-depth
knowledge of complexies”;
• WRP Consulng Engineers are specialists parcularly “in water conservaon and water
demand management, including non-revenue water reducon” (and, signicantly, were
historically direct competors of JOAT);
• GCT (Grid Control Technologies) specialises in the supply and management of smart meters
for water and electricity and related informaon systems;
• Paterson Candy Internaonal has a focus on water treatment. wastewater and industrial
treatment sectors; and
• GLS Consulng and its subsidiary soware company specialise “in the analysis, planning and
management of water-related and electricity systems” and have a “holisc approach to the
modelling and planning of municipal water, sewer and electricity infrastructure systems by
the applicaon of in-house developed high technology soware and processes”
EOH’s structure allows it to operate a ‘design, build and operate’ business through its subsidiaries,
creang three potenal prot centres – similar to turnkey models. This is a classic strategy for
privasaon but avoids using the sensive ‘P’ word. It allows the company to buy goods and services
where it wants (including from its associates or other preferred providers) and to charge for dierent
elements in a way that makes it dicult for clients to ensure cost eecveness.
The two legs of EOH’s strategy in the municipal water market were thus rstly, to establish a group
of apparently independent companies working in the same elds and, secondly, to develop business
based on turnkey-type projects.
The third leg was hinted at by EOH’s own statement that business with South African local
government depends on “good relaons” with the clients. Aer some massive corrupon scandals,
EOH eventually admied that those relaons were somemes corrupt.57 The company’s internal
invesgaons “found evidence of a number of governance failings and wrongdoing at EOH, including
unsubstanated payments, tender irregularies and other unethical business pracces which are
57 7 burning quesons for EOH as corrupon allegaons bubble over. hps://www.biznews.com/sa-invesng/2017/07/28/eoh-
corrupon-allegaons
1. 43
primarily limited to the public sector business” (and) “….may relate to legimate transacons,
the or bribery and corrupon payments”. 58
In this context, EOH’s water focus raises obvious quesons. How did the company benet from
its focus on specialised areas of operaons such as the management of municipal distribuon
systems? What benet did it receive from the fact that it owned mulple companies that worked
in the same small sub-sector? Were they really compeng against each other or did they enable
tender processes to be rigged, by ensuring that the key bidders were not independent but
members of the same team?
There are suggesons that these weaknesses were protably exploited. During Cape Town’s water
crisis it is alleged that two EOH companies competed separately for a water-saving project. Both
were shortlisted. But because of a (deliberate?) error in the tender documents, the company that
oered the lower price was disqualied. As a result, the more expensive EOH company took the
contract, with a hey premium.
South Africa’s Compeon Commission had considered the potenal risks of allowing EOH, which sll
claims to be Africa’s largest ICT company, to expand its reach.59 When GCT was acquired in 2015, the
Compeon Tribunal agreed with the Commission that “the transacon is unlikely to substanally
prevent or lessen compeon in any relevant market”.60 When PricewaterhouseCoopers wanted to sell
its Combined Systems operaon to EOH, the Commission recognised that the combined group would
probably control over 50% of its asset management market, but concluded that “the proposed merger
raised no signicant concerns given that this is a tender market and that there are certain alternave
service providers acve”. The Tribunal concurred.61
The Cape Town water loss control contract illustrates the danger of relying on the existence of
tender markets as a defence against market dominance. And GCT showed that tenders were
no defence against an-compeve behaviour when it became the focus of a major corrupon
scandal involving control of the South African Police Service’s computer system. Those concerns
saw GCT returned to its shareholders in 2017. EOH’s CEO said that “… all the quesonable
contracts done by the GCT Group were concluded before they were bought by EOH….”
As a consequence of its admissions of corrupon, EOH’s fortunes have connued to decline.
Its share price collapsed as prots turned into substanal losses. The April 2019 interim report
warned shareholders that there had been under-performance in the water space, with, amongst
other issues, delays in starng projects as well as new project awards as a result of public sector
funding and administrave delays. And EOH Mthombo was disbanded.62
What was supposed to be an important new business area for EOH has turned into a swamp.
Concern about potenally corrupt acvity in the water sector has not been allayed by the
connued revelaons of corporate malfeasance. It was, aer all, EOH that won the DWS’s
controversial SAP tender back in 2016. So the SIU invesgators who are looking into that irregular
contract have been knocking at EOH’s door. And given the many other contracts that EOH
companies had with DWS and water sector instuons such as the Water Research Commission,
water boards and municipalies, there may yet be more revelaons about how the company’s
water business really worked.
Ekurhuleni Meters - Regulaon 32 abuse
Another specialised technical niche in the water sector that has proven to be vulnerable to
corrupon is the business of water metering. It is crically important to measure the amount of
water that is supplied to users, as this allows municipalies to not only measure how much of the
water that is put into networks actually gets to users, but also to charge users for the volume that
they use (which is why some social movements and community organisaons oppose metering).
58 EOH Holdings Ltd - Further cauonary announcement. hps://www.sharenet.co.za/v3/sens_display.
php?tdate=20190828174300&seq=62
59 EOH survives annus horribilis as it claws its way out of a gra hole. hps://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/opinion/2019-11-03-
stephen-van-coller-eoh-survives-annus-horribilis-as-it-claws-its-way-out-of-a-gra-hole/
60 EOH Intelligent Infrastructure (Pty) Ltd and Pia Solar SA (Pty) Ltd. hp://www.saii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2016/115.html
61 EOH Mthombo (Pty) Ltd and PricewaterhouseCoopers Combined System (Pty) Ltd. hps://www.comptrib.co.za/case-detail/7322
62 Corrupon-tainted EOH Mthombo to be shuered. hps://www.itweb.co.za/content/VgZeyqJARBPMdjX9
1. 44
However, with the benets come costs. Meter reading also provides opportunies for corrupon
and has proven to be one of the more problemac water supply management funcons, whether
it is performed in-house or out-sourced to private contractors.
Nor is it a problem limited to small household water users. In 2018, the City of Johannesburg
charged employees of Waterfall Estate, one of the largest property developments in the country,
with using illegally installed meters to avoid payment for over R8-million worth of water. So there
is always an appete for metering systems that will provide reliable, tamper-proof, water use
informaon. And the supply of meters – for electricity as well as for water – is a lucrave and
specialised public sector business that has aracted polically connected entrepreneurs.
In Ekurhuleni, it was alleged that R205-million had been spent on buying water meters from
Lesira-Teq without proper procurement procedures, and that the meters supplied were
unreliable. More important, they were grossly overpriced at over R1 800 each while, in a tender
process that was ignored, comparable units were oered for as lile as R1 025.
The municipal ocials invoked the much-abused Regulaon 32 piggy-backing provision that
allows one local government to save me (and money) on procurement by using a tender that
has been awarded by another municipality. They simply purchase the goods or services accepted
in one municipality on the same terms. There is an important condion: The municipalies must
ensure that “there are demonstrable discounts or benets for the municipality or enty to do so”.
That clause was ignored in Ekurhuleni and a number of other municipalies.63 And the original
contract was suspect because Madibeng, where it was awarded, is considered to be one of the
most corrupt municipalies in the country.
There was a paern in this process. Similar contracts were won in other municipalies where
Slindokuhle Hadebe, the head of water in Ekurhuleni, had previously worked. And, in some cases,
it appeared that the municipalies did not really need, or use, the meters. Indeed, in Mangaung,
it was alleged that the company had commied fraud by invoicing for meters that were not
installed. The company’s claim that the meters had been supplied and then taken back because
they were not told where to install them was dicult to contest because none of the employees
at the me were willing to provide informaon. The city lost the case and nearly R20-million.
It may be relevant that Lesira-Teq’s chairperson Baker Maseko was head of strategy for the ANC’s
1998-1999 naonal elecon campaign, and that Hadebe was deputy chair of Edna Molewa’s
advisory council while she was minister of water aairs.
The chickens of state capture come home to roost, in microcosm
The systemic challenges of corrupon in South Africa are widely recognised and oen described
as a problem of state capture – a parcularly damaging form of corrupon that refers to the
capture of decision-making centres of the state by syndicates comprising business interests and
powerful polical leaders. The captured instuons are then repurposed to serve the interests
of their captors – the business interests gain privileged access to state contracts and regulatory
decisions while the polical interests use the largesse to consolidate their polical power. In
many cases, parcularly in local government, the water sector and its acvies are the vicm of
these larger bales over control of resources more generally.
The Lekwa municipality in Mpumalanga province provides an example of how inghng in a
municipality, in this case between ANC facons, has had disastrous impacts on water supply.
Standerton, Lekwa’s main town, is home to the main poultry processing plant of Astral Foods,
the biggest in Southern Africa. It is also one of the largest employers in the area, with over 2 200
workers. But its future is under threat, owing to the lack of a reliable water supply.
Disputes between dierent facons of the ruling party, essenally to capture control of the
municipality’s limited resources, distracted aenon from the crical job of maintaining and
expanding the town’s water supply. Despite the company’s assistance, the municipality had failed to
undertake even minimum maintenance. Even a court order compelling the municipality to provide the
63 Municipal corrupon in spotlight in R614m water scandal. hps://www.meslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2012-08-02-
municipal-corrupon-in-spotlight-in-r614m-water-scandal/
1. 45
contracted volume of water had no impact. As a consequence, the company has had to truck water to
its installaons at considerable expense. It is now considering shiing producon elsewhere.64
2.4 CORRUPTION IS NOW ENDEMIC AND SYSTEMIC
The cases presented above involve all levels of society from municipal plumbers to naonal ministers,
from poor householders to the directors of mulnaonal companies. They suggest that corrupon
is now endemic, present and taken for granted, across the South African water sector. It’s simply
regarded as what may be needed to get work done. And it is not limited to the public sector.
Recently, a water sector expert was asked by a large company to provide a shortlist of consultants
who could tender for a specialised technical project. A group of young black sciensts whom he
had idened tendered against some experienced (white) experts. Their proposal was judged the
best on both technical and nancial criteria, not least because they were willing to undertake the
gruelling eldwork required, and they won the contract.
Shortly aer they were appointed, they called the person who had put them on the shortlist for
the project. Where, they wanted to know, should they pay the 10% commission that they owed?
They were surprised to be told that they had been listed because they had a team capable of doing
a good job; the reward would be for them to perform well since this would enhance the reputaon
of those involved in idenfying and appoinng them.
When this story was recounted to other people, including some who worked in civil society
organisaons, they were amused. The 10% payment to get a decision was now standard pracce,
they said. One told of a rural non-governmental organisaon (NGO) that had been chosen to
receive a large grant for its community work. The last hurdle was a visit by an independent
evaluator, just to check that everything was above board. As he was leaving, he was taken aside by
the head of the NGO and told that, of course, if the grant was approved, he would be geng his
share. That oer lost them the grant.
Civil society faces a dilemma and it is not just small, local community organisaons. The CEO of the
Mvula Trust, a 25-year-old water sector NGO with an annual income of over R100-million, recently
conrmed allegaons that Ishmael Kgetjepe, then educaon MEC in Limpopo province, was paid
over a million rand to maintain a contract to provide school toilets. According to reports “… the
trust’s managers told the auditors that Kgetjepe phoned them and asked them for money, and
somemes he would ask for money ‘in person’ ….. the trust’s management believed that if they had
refused Kgetjepe’s requests, it would have the ‘potenal to directly or indirectly aect our business
relaonship with his department since he is the polical head’. “ 65
These examples suggest that this kind of corrupon is now systemic, spread through the whole
society. It does not mean that every transacon on every project is corrupt. But it does suggest
that, for people working in the water sector, corrupon is just one more operaonal obstacle to be
dealt with, like bad weather, poor foundaon condions, or an equipment breakdown.
How can such systemic corrupon be dealt with? Twenty years ago, the World Bank described a
situaon which has become commonplace in South Africa:
“Where corrupon is systemic, the formal rules remain in place, but they are superseded
by informal rules ... in pracce the law is not enforced or is applied in a parsan way, and
informal rules prevail. Government tender boards may connue to operate even though
the criteria by which contracts are awarded have changed.
The soluon, they warn, is not simply to strengthen the formal rules - more is needed than having
the right legal rules in place. First, the queson must be asked:
“… why the informal rules are at odds with the formal rules and then by tackling the causes
of divergence. In some countries the primary reason for divergence may be polical, a
manifestaon of the way power is exercised and retained.” 66
64 Astral Foods secures emergency water arrangement for Mpumalanga facility. hp://www.engineeringnews.co.za/arcle/astral-
foods-secures-emergency-water-arrangement-for-mpumalanga-facility-2019-06-24
65 R1m ‘bribe’ paid to MEC by NGO contracted to build toilets. hps://city-press.news24.com/News/r1m-bribe-paid-to-mec-by-ngo-
contracted-to-build-toilets-20190305
66 Helping Countries Combat Corrupon: The Role of the World Bank. hp://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/ancorrupt/
corruptn/cor02.htm
1. 46
CHAPTER 3
Corrupon strategies
1. 47
CORRUPTION STRATEGIES – making sense of the evidence
One of the purposes of this report is to understand better the mechanisms used for
corrupt purposes in the water sector. The evidence presented suggests that corruption
can be characterised in three broad areas:
Manipulaon of procurement and operaonal processes
Tradional an-corrupon eorts oen focus on the processes used by organisaons to purchase
goods and services. This is hardly surprising since the manipulaon of these processes can ensure
that the preferred partner gets the contract although they do not present the best technical or
nancial oer. They will oen pay a handsome share of their prots to whoever facilitates their
success. As a result, the mid- and lower-level personnel who administer these processes become
quite expert in subverng them.
Inuencing policy and regulatory decisions
At a higher level, there is a more direct way of extracng benet from the management of public
resources. Decisions on which project to build or which applicaon for a regulatory licence to
approve are oen very protable for the beneciaries. This requires a more strategic type of
involvement before any procurement processes begin. In the case of regulatory decisions, geng
people into posions where criteria are set and recommendaons from technical ocials are
approved oers many opportunies for corrupt engagements.
Taking control of instuons
Many of the administrave obstacles posed by internal rules and regulaons can be overcome if the
leadership of an organisaon has corrupt intent. S/he can appoint compliant people to key posions
to aend to the technical detail. In these cases, what becomes important is to exercise internal
power in ways that do not draw the aenon of external oversight agencies – such as auditors. This
requires a degree of competence as well as compliance on the part of the technicians involved.
Of course, if the wider instuonal oversight environment has also been inltrated, less cauon is
needed and it becomes much easier to proceed.
Set out below are some of the strategies that have been observed in the cases presented, following
this characterisaon.
3.1 MANIPULATION of procurement and operaonal processes
Beang bureaucracy or creang opportunies for corrupon?
Eorts to control nancial management in government have seen a proliferaon of processes and
procedures adopted to try to discipline behaviour. Quite oen, they impede eecve operaons and
implementaon and can actually facilitate misdemeanours if the structures are captured and used to
provide pathways for misappropriaon.
The water sector depends on its built infrastructure and thus on the construcon industry which has
its own complexies. There are many more or less legal strategies that contractors and consultants
use to promise to deliver a project at an apparently impossibly low price yet sll make a prot. So it
is important that their public sector clients employ specialists who understand the system and can
make it work fairly and eecvely while controlling corrupon.
Qualicaon and pre-qualicaon
Tender processes can be rigged even in a well-run system – as long as there are sucient people
willing to inuence the result. The pre-qualicaon phase, oen used in large projects, is a starng
point. Pre-qualicaon helps to ensure that only companies with a reasonable prospect of success
enter the process. This reduces administrave workloads and opportunies for improper lobbying. It
was indeed this process that saw the LTE company excluded from the main LHWP contracts, despite
Nomvula Mokonyane’s determined eorts to promote their parcipaon.
1. 48
But pre-qualicaon can be abused, to reduce the compeon for a preferred bidder. A simple
way to remove a potenal competor of the favoured bidder is to introduce apparently trivial
requirements at a late stage, when many bidders will already have nalised their submissions. The
Mpumalanga programme case described above was a good example.
The tender process – specicaon, evaluaon and adjudicaon
Government regulates procurement processes for all public spending with special provisions for large
infrastructure projects. Naonal departments and municipalies are supposed to establish separate
bid specicaon, bid evaluaon and bid adjudicaon commiees, each of which has a clear mandate.
Some discipline is achieved by involving dierent people in the process of specifying what is required,
evaluang tenders to provide it, and then taking decisions on which tenderer should win the contract
based on recommendaons received.
Yet, in many public organisaons, the outcome of these procedures is oen ignored if senior ocials
believe they can insist on dierent outcomes. So, in the Mpumalanga water programme the bid
evaluaon commiee refused to disqualify the majority of competors, since their non-compliance
with tender condions was judged not to be material. They recommended that the contract be
awarded to the best bid. But the CEO simply changed the evaluaon results and appointed his
preferred company anyway.
A similar approach was taken in the case of the DWS SAP tender which showed that top ocials
were able to ignore procedural objecons with impunity. Thus it is clear that, while it is important for
processes to be followed, they are only eecve if they are complied with at all levels and if there are
consequences for a failure to do so.
The panel strategy
Some procurement rules, intended to enable government to appoint service providers speedily, provide
an apparently easy way to bypass cumbersome tender procedures. An example oen used for the
procurement of consultants and small construcon works is a guideline produced by Naonal Treasury that
explains how a panel of service providers can be established.
“Where consultancy services are required on a recurring basis, a panel of consultants/list of approved
service providers for the rendering of these services may be established. These panels/lists should be
established through the compeve bidding process, usually for services that are of a roune or simple
nature where the scope and content of the work to be done can be described in detail.” 67
The condions for such a list are quite general and, with a lile ingenuity, terms of reference can be drawn
up that favour desired providers; once they are on the panel, work can be channelled to them. This also
allows potenal competors to be eliminated, and its generality makes it more dicult to contest. The
process also allows considerable exibility over costs incurred:
“Once the panel/list of service providers has been approved, only the successful applicants are
approached, depending on the circumstances, either by obtaining quotes on a rotaon basis, or
according to the bid procedure when services are required, with the excepon that the requirement is
not adversed in the Government Tender Bullen again.” 68
According to newspaper reports69, it was through this process that LTE was awarded the controversial
Giyani project:
Asked how his company received the other nine mega water projects, LTE’s chief execuve, Thulani
Majola, said: ‘A tender was adversed for consultants to be on the panel of the Department of Water
and Sanitaon. LTE responded to the tender and was subsequently appointed. ….’ Once on the panel,
Majola said consultants received work based on their capacity and experience.”
The panel process apparently also led to Vharanani Properes being appointed to complete both the Free
State bucket toilets project and the Giyani programme’s Nandoni pipeline – neither of which fall under the
denion of simple or roune.
67 treasury.gov.za/divisions/ocpo/sc/Guidelines/SCM%20Jan900-Guidelines.pdf
68 Guide for Municipal Accounng Ocers_1. hps://archive.org/stream/mfma_guidelines_guide_for_municipal_accounng_o-
cers_1_pdf/MFMA/Guidelines/Guide%20for%20Municipal%20Accounng%20Ocers_1_djvu.txt
69 How R502m grew to R2.7bn in a year. hps://city-press.news24.com/News/how-r502m-grew-to-r27bn-in-a-year-20160423
1. 49
The DWS’s panels were reconstuted aer Mokonyane had said publicly that she didn’t want work to go to
the same old companies. While this was presented as support for black-owned companies, it soon become
clear that parcular black companies were favoured. The upshot is that awards were made, not on the basis
of price and quality, nor on the basis of the BEE credenals of the chosen rms, but rather on the basis of
their relaonship with the minister. This resulted in a series of failed projects and cost overruns.
The emergency strategy
Unexpected events occur. Pumps break down, pipes burst, and natural disasters include oods that
damage infrastructure and droughts that curtail water supply. The possibility of many of these events can
be predicted and planned for. Ulies should keep a stock of common types and sizes of pipes and ngs.
There should be backup sets of pumps and motors – and if one fails, it should be repaired quickly. The
idencaon and protecon of key infrastructure can avoid ood damage while, once it is recognised that
droughts will occur, operang rules can be developed to trigger early supply restricons rather than wait
unl supplies fail.
Nevertheless, most supply chain management policies make provision to bypass normal procedures in the
case of a genuine emergency. The Naonal Treasury guidelines say that:
“In urgent and emergency cases, an instuon may dispense with the invitaon of bids and may
obtain the required goods, works or services by means of quotaons by preferably making use of the
database of prospecve suppliers, or otherwise in any manner to the best interest of the State. ….
Urgent cases are cases where early delivery is of crical importance and the invitaon of compeve
bids is either impossible or impraccal. (However, a lack of proper planning should not be constuted
as an urgent case.)“
However, corrupt ocials make frequent use of the emergency provision to avoid formal procurement
processes either by claiming an emergency or actually creang one – and somemes both. They may
allow water treatment chemicals to run out or delay the repair of key equipment. At the extreme, systems
have been sabotaged to create condions for an emergency intervenon – as alleged in the North West
tanker scam. When procurement is undertaken in these condions, prices are invariably higher than they
need to be and it is more likely that service providers preferred by the ocials concerned will get the
contract.
The emergency strategy was taken to its extremes in the Giyani case when a
drought in 2009 was sll being used to jusfy new tenders and contracts for
major projects six years later. There was a revealing discussion on this subject
with the Auditor-General’s ocials in Parliament’s water commiee as it
sought to understand what had happened at DWS. The chairperson asked what
the bursng of a water pipe would be classied as. The AGSA representave
responded that “it would be classied as an emergency and it would take a day
or two to aend to the emergency and correct it. However, if a pipeline is built
from one dam to another dam it is not an emergency because the project might
be a mul-year project.
Andries Sekgetho, who had led the audit of the Giyani project, explained that there
were problems with the budgeng process, nancial management, compliance,
and even the objecves of the emergency project.
“The inial scope allocated to the implemenng agent that was linked to the
ministerial direcve based on the emergency, was R91-million. The direcve was signed by the minister
on 25 August 2014 aer the contractor had already been appointed by the implemenng agent on
20 August 2014. The scope was subsequently expanded to R248-million, based on a new ministerial
direcve signed on 24 October 2014. The current business plan [2017] now indicated total costs of
R13.6-billion. There were no signed contracts between the department and the implemenng agent.
70
Further detail was provided in subsequent hearings. It was explained that two types of emergencies
are provided for in legislaon, emergencies due to a disaster as per the Constuon and Disaster
70 Contested audit ndings 2016/17 by DWS: Auditor-General brieng. hps://pmg.org.za/commiee-meeng/25407/#s137849583
The emergency
strategy was taken
to its extremes in the
Giyani case when a
drought in 2009 was
still being used to
justify new tenders
and contracts for
major projects six
years later.
1. 50
Management Act (DMA), and emergencies as dened by the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA).
At the least, an emergency needs to pose a risk to health, life, property or environment. It is reasonable
to make inference to meframes spulated by the Constuon and the DMA of 21 days and three
months respecvely. A maximum period of three months can be applied to the immediate acon
meframe as the DMA makes reference to the PFMA. Therefore, the response acons to the emergency
should be executed and completed within the three months. 71
The Regulaon 32 ‘piggy-backing’ strategy
Another provision intended to simplify procurement is also regularly abused. This is the piggy-backing
strategy which allows one public sector enty to use a contract that has been properly procured by
another. So, if the City of Johannesburg has gone through a proper tender process to procure, say, water
treatment chemicals, why should the Midvaal municipality repeat the process? Why not just buy the
same product, from the same supplier at the same price?
This approach is allowed by municipal supply chain management regulaon 32 of 2005. It was the basis
for the award of Umgeni Water’s recent R220-million security contract.72 It was also the provision that
allowed the Ekurhuleni Metro Municipality – and a number of other municipalies – to buy substanally
over-priced and inferior quality water meters.
A parcular variant of this scam is for the inial tender to consist of a bundle of items in which a
small quanty of a few individual items can be included at very high cost without aecng the overall
compeveness of the price. If another organisaon uses the contract price to buy just those items, it is
possible to charge grossly inated prices, apparently legally.
The direcves strategy – give orders then blame the ocials, or the president!
While many corrupon strategies are adopted by ocials in the administraon, there are some that
can only be exercised by a polical head. The Water Services Act (s41(1)) empowers the minister
responsible for the DWS to direct the water boards under their oversight to undertake a specic acvity.
This power was liberally exercised and is at the root of the Giyani and War on Leaks problems where the
department found itself with nancial commitments that had simply not been budgeted for.
This arose because the minister and her senior ocials ignored spulaons in the law that the direcve
must be ‘reasonable’ and that the water board will only pay ‘where the acvity is nancially viable’. In
2018, challenged by the parliamentary commiee on the huge amounts of money owed by DWS to the
Lepelle Water Board, the water board’s CEO Phineas Legodi explained that
…. “when you are given a legal instrucon you can only defy at your own risk because that is
insubordinaon, so direcves had to be understood within that context, as a wrien lawful
instrucon … In good faith the board receives and implements them with the understanding that
money does or will follow.
Asked whether an illegal direcve would be implemented, the CEO responded that if it is illegal then he
cannot implement. However, as a commiee member pointed out, that is not necessarily the end of the
maer.
”…. the biggest problem faced by the water boards is that a direcve is given and then funding does
not follow but the money remains in the department and the water boards end up spending their
own money. There is a weakness somewhere at the level of regulaon of direcves.”73
The history of Giyani and the War on Leaks show that the minister repeatedly abused her power by
issuing direcves for which she had no funds available. The water board expected that DWS would
pay them so that they could pay the minister’s nominated service provider. But this then raises the
issue of why proper procurement processes were not followed. As already indicated, the excuse about
emergencies does not hold and the queson is whether Lepelle can be held responsible for appoinng
a provider nominated by the minister – and whether it can show that this was indeed her instrucon.
71 Brieng: Auditor-General South Africa, porolio commiee of water and sanitaon. Follow-up on audit key maers. hps://
pmg.org.za/les/180509agsa.pdf
72 Umgeni Water in R220m tender scandal. hps://city-press.news24.com/News/mon-3pm-piggybacking-the-way-to-get-the-
job-20181224
73 Lepelle Northern Water Board & Magalies Water Board 2016/17 Annual Report, with Deputy Minister. hps://pmg.org.za/com-
miee-meeng/25885/
1. 51
Two years later, when the SIU quesoned Lepelle about the appointment of LTE on Giyani projects,
both Legodi and Lepelle’s planning manager Carel Schmahl were reported to have signed adavits
saying that they were instructed to appoint LTE.74 Such discreditable behaviour should be seen in
the context of evidence that, where ocials have refused to do what they were told, in the Lesotho
Water Commission or in the case of DG Maxwell Sirenya and Edna Molewa, the ocial is oen simply
replaced.
Unfortunately, under pressure, ministers can and do blame their ocials for illegal acons, even where
they are simply following orders. This is what Mokonyane did:
“On the irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure, she said the Director General present at
the previous meeng had been suspended for derelicon of duty and compliance failures in
management, administraon and accounng. Suspensions were also meted out to DDGs based on
the report of a task team.75
If all else fails, a nal strategy used by Mokonyane in 2018 was to claim that she was acng on a
presidenal direcve:
“Ocials accepted that the War on Leaks project had not been budgeted for and was irregular, but
the reason given was that it had been a ministerial direcve. … The idea of the War on Leaks project
had been put forward for inclusion in the State of the Naon Address by the President in 2015 and
then, based on its inclusion in the State of the Naon Address, a memorandum had been sent to the
Minister of Water and Sanitaon requesng her to sign a direcve for the implementaon of the
project.76
The turnkey strategy
A feature in a number of cases which could be termed ‘grand corrupon’ has been the aempt to gain
control of the enre process of concepon, design and construcon of projects through the use of
turnkey contracts. This was at the root of the Giyani case and the promoon of the Mangaung pipeline
project, and also underpinned some of EOH’s strategies.
The turnkey approach (also called EPC – engineering, procurement and construcon) can be a very
useful way to tackle complex projects that reduces the risk for the client. The client provides a broad
brief, specifying what is required from the project, for instance, the reliable delivery of a given volume
of water treated to a specied standard. The contractor is then chosen on the basis of their ability to
deliver the required outcome.
This gives the contractor the responsibility for choosing the technologies used, integrang them into the
overall project design, building the project and, when it is completed, pung it into operaon to show
that it is producing according to the specicaons. The contractor is also responsible for coordinang
the work of dierent suppliers and sub-contractors and has to carry the cost of any delay.
A turnkey approach could have avoided the management failures that saw compleon delays and huge
cost overruns in Eskom’s Kusile and Medupi power staons.77 If properly supervised, it will also reduce
the risk of corrupon on individual sub-contracts
However, for turnkey approaches to succeed and provide value for money, the contract strategy must be
well dened and contract details carefully drawn and supervised to ensure that the desired outcomes
are achieved, that the risks are carried by the contractor, and that any specic developmental condions
are not abused. In the Giyani project and the Mangaung proposal, the companies that led the process
were not chosen through a proper compeve process and there appeared to be no tender process or
cost controls for the appointment of their sub-contractors.
74 How Mokonyane paved the way for a consulng rm to earn billions. hps://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/how-mokon-
yane-paved-the-way-for-a-construcon-rm-to-earn-billions-20180317
75 Water Aairs irregular, fruitless & wasteful expenditure & accruals, with Minister: hearing 3. hps://pmg.org.za/commit-
tee-meeng/24880/
76 Ibid
77 Tough lessons from Eskom — or not? hps://www.meslive.co.za/sunday-mes/business/2019-04-21-ron-derby-tough-lessons-
from-eskom--or-not/
1. 52
The ongoing challenge of managing construcon contracts
Large construcon contracts are well known for their vulnerability to corrupon and have
thus drawn considerable aenon. Administrave approaches to inial procurement (tender
processes) are well developed and can work if there is independent oversight with no conicts or
own interests, although many of the challenges and risks have been described above.
However, challenges connue once a contract is awarded. In any large construcon project,
there are uncertaines about, for instance, the detailed foundaon condions. There is usually
provision for variaon orders, changes in the dened work if, for instance there is a change in
detailed design, or in the event of delays due to weather, labour challenges, or the failure of
another contractor to deliver the goods. These eventualies can oen be extremely costly as
contractors are entled to claim for all extra costs incurred.
As projects progress, contractors submit invoices for work done, which must be inspected and
conrmed on a day-to-day basis since many elements of the work will be hidden as construcon
proceeds. The compliance with specicaons for quality and quanty of materials used must
be conrmed. If all of these factors are not carefully managed by the client’s representaves,
addional claims can mount rapidly and shoddy workmanship can be hidden.
The opportunies for collusion between the client’s representaves and contractors is thus
a permanent risk – and highlights the importance of appoinng competent and trustworthy
supervising consultants as the client’s representaves. But it also highlights an obvious strategy
for a client that wants to enable inappropriate claims/payments to its chosen contractor – to
appoint sta who will, if so instructed, process contractors’ invoices and not queson excessive or
fraudulent claims.
Many of these issues were idened in Phase 1A of the LHWP and have been migated in
subsequent phases of the project. But this is a permanent acvity and water sector instuons
need to have access to competent infrastructure specialists who can manage the intricacies of
unforeseen circumstances, scope changes, and variaon orders to control such acvies.
3.2 INFLUENCING THE POLICY AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
Regional bulk infrastructure grant - creang opportunies for corrupon?
There are oen choices to be made between dierent projects to achieve the same objecves –
and between projects which might oer more or less social, economic or polical return. These
choices should be made on the basis of public interest criteria – to achieve public policy goals
eciently and cost-eecvely.
But there are many examples where personal polical and private interests seek to guide
decisions towards choices that oer the greatest private prot rather than public benet. In
a perfect world, funds would be allocated to achieve their public purposes through the most
ecient channels. In real organisaons, both private and public, control over budgets is just as
oen a maer of personal power rather than public priority.
When South Africa’s new local government structures were formally established in 2001, DWS
ocials were concerned that they would lose control of the capital budget for water services
to municipalies. While they could sll set condions on the grants from naonal government,
the money would be managed by the municipalies. But they argued, with some juscaon,
that large bulk supply projects which crossed municipal boundaries, would oen be more cost-
eecve.
This was a connuaon of a long debate about the merits of small local schemes managed by the
community of users versus large regional schemes managed by a specialised organisaon. While
cost, technical performance and broad public policy should be the main consideraons, there are
other factors at play. The management of public organisaons oen seek to expand their ability to
deliver on their mandate, as well as to expand their inuence, power and resources – the laer of
which may be exploited to provide more direct personal benets.
1. 53
So South Africa’s water sector NGOs promoted small schemes, oering the
opportunity to support community management. Municipalies wanted to
control acvies in their areas, with the relevant funds. DWS had to argue
that they simply wanted to ensure eecve spending and that, as naonal
regulator of water services, they should be able to set condions on the
use of grant funds from naonal government. It rapidly became obvious
that while DWS could try to inuence the choice of projects to be funded,
municipalies could ignore the regulator with impunity – although the
Mpumalanga case shows that the provincial governments, bypassed by the
formal process, could sll exert informal polical control over the funds.
When municipal supplies started to fail, the situaon changed. Oen, the
problem was that, due to poor planning, distribuon networks had been
expanded without addional supplies of bulk water. But DWS ocials
used the opportunity to promote the concept of large regional schemes that oen pipe water
across the boundaries of individual municipalies. They convinced Naonal Treasury and
the Department of Cooperave Governance and Tradional Aairs to allocate a substanal
proporon of the water grants to DWS through a special regional bulk infrastructure grant
(RBIG).
The RBIG created unfortunate incenves and opportunies. So in some cases, large schemes
have been built rather than cheaper small ones. They are bigger than needed and lile aenon
has been given to the cost of operang them. This approach has oen created liabilies rather
than assets for municipalies. And, as the Giyani project showed, it also enabled corrupon
by evading oversight and weakening incenves to achieve eecve public spending. The RBIG
also helped to limit the accountability of DWS. So when water does not reach households, DWS
simply explains, as they connue to do in Giyani, that connecng households is a municipal
responsibility!
Local economic opportunies or protecon rackets?
A specic feature in South African construcon is the common requirement that a proporon
of the workforce should be drawn from the local community. In communies with high levels
of unemployment and poverty, pressure for jobs even as low-paid general workers is intense.
The polical response has been to require that a proporon of project jobs will go to local
community members. But this has created new challenges.
Whoever is in charge of the recruitment of locals is in a powerful posion. The pracce of
appoinng labour brokers or community liaison ocers to interface between communies
and contractors began on RDP projects in the early years of South Africa’s democracy. This has
become a site of contenon for power and reward and indeed the role of brokers in local polics
has expanded into more general polical acvity.78
Nomvula Mokonyane had personal experience of this. As MEC for housing in Gauteng, she was
responsible for iniang the Sebokeng Regional Sanitaon Scheme (SRSS), idened in 2005 as
a crical naonal project to provide wastewater treatment for the growing populaon of south
Johannesburg and to protect the Vaal River. The project proceeded slowly but was completely
stopped in 2014 by community protests about the 30% quota for local contractors and the
labour employment pracces.
When Mokonyane visited the area in 2015, she heard allegaons of corrupon and neposm.
“Community liaison ocers hire people in a corrupt manner. You’ll oen see ve unskilled
people from one house employed while those with skills sit at home,” said one resident.79
Conicts connued around the project, and in 2018, the new minister, Gugile Nkwin, said that
he would approach the president to declare the SRSS a naonal key point in order to ensure the
security of the infrastructure.80
78 Patronage from below: polical unrest in an informal selement in South Africa. Hannah J. Dawson, 2014. African Aairs,
113/453, 518–539 doi: 10.1093/afraf/adu056
79 Creang employment through infrastructure. Water & Sanitaon Africa, July/Aug 2015, hps://issuu.com/glen.t/docs/wasa_
july_august_2015
80 Steps being taken to x Sebokeng sewer scheme. hps://www.sanews.gov.za/south-africa/steps-being-taken-x-sebokeng-sew-
er-scheme
It rapidly became
obvious that while
DWS could try
to inuence the
choice of projects
to be funded,
municipalities
could ignore the
regulator with
impunity
1. 54
While the Sebokeng problem now appears to have been resolved, with the blockade lied, the
broader problem is now so serious that leading engineering organisaons are warning that it
threatens the whole construcon industry. The CEO of the South African Federaon of Civil
Engineering Contractors believes that the unrest oen witnessed at construcon sites is driven,
to a degree, by the desire of the surrounding communies to become involved in and gain
economically from projects in their area.
“We cannot dismiss that. Th ose expectaons are genuine and have to be met...On the other
hand, you see violence driven by gangs operang maa style. Even worse, they are oen alleged
to be linked to local, provincial and naonal polical gures.81
It is increasingly common for demands to be made for addional allocaons of funds to the
‘community component’ of the project. These demands are oen unrelated to any actual work
done and are eecvely demands for bribes. They are also somemes presented as a protecon
fee, accompanied by threats - and pracce – of inmidaon and violence against project sta. It is
parcularly dicult for public sector contractors to respond to since their accounng regulaons
do not allow for such arrangements, as the project managers for the Clanwilliam dam project
found.82
Water projects –a pipeline for polical funding?
The cases presented do suggest that there is a connecon between corrupon in water projects
and the funding of polical acvies and that this inuences the approach taken and choices
made. This is not an issue limited to South Africa.
However, the queson this raises is whether the water sector is used as a vehicle to fund polical
acvity. Nomvula Mokonyane has formal ANC responsibilies for elecon processes and has
been cited in the Commission of Inquiry into Allegaons of State Capture (Zondo Commission)
for receiving material support from the infamous Bosasa company. The incidents involving DGs
Sirenya and Yako, who were dismissed when they sought to block large ICT contracts, happened in
elecon periods.
The Mpumalanga municipal budget transfers also occurred in the run-up to an elecon at a me
when the premier (now the deputy president) was widely seen to be consolidang his polical
posion and preparing for higher oce.83 The New York Times explicitly claimed that “Using public
funds, especially those earmarked for educaon, Mr. Mabuza and his allies built one of the most
powerful polical machines in the country, turning Mpumalanga … into the ANCs second-biggest
vong bloc”.84
As in so many cases of high-level corrupon in South Africa, there are many anecdotes but lile
rm evidence. There is, however, a clear correlaon between incidents of large scale corrupon
and polical acvity.
81 Construcon industry in rapid decline as work wanes, ‘maa’ takes over, warns Safcec. hp://www.engineeringnews.co.za/ar-
cle/construcon-industry-in-rapid-decline-as-work-wanes-maa-takes-over-warnssafcec-2019-04-08
82 Water Aairs irregular, fruitless & wasteful expenditure & accruals, with Minister: hearing 3. hps://pmg.org.za/commiee-meet-
ing/24880/
83 The case against Deputy President David Mabuza. hps://www.news24.com/Analysis/the-pending-case-against-deputy-presi-
dent-david-mabuza-20190530
84 South Africa’s Deputy President, Accused of Corrupon, Faces Uncertain Future. hps://www.nymes.com/2019/05/22/world/
africa/south-africa-david-mabuza.html
1. 55
1. 56
3.3 TAKING CONTROL OF INSTITUTIONS
Instuons – weak or deliberately weakened?
A frequent concern in South Africa – and many other countries where the public instuons
perform poorly – is their lack of instuonal capacity. The weakness of this diagnosc is that
it assumes that there is a desire at leadership level to have strong and capable instuons.
The evidence from DWS cases is that eorts to strengthen the administrave leadership have
been systemacally undermined by polical heads when compliance with the rules became an
obstacle to their agendas.
The auditor-general, in his report on the state of the DWS, made specic reference to the rate of
turnover of directors-general and chief nancial ocers.
There is signicant instability at leadership level within the DWS. There has been a signicantly
high turnover rate relang to the director-general (DG) posion. Over the past four nancial
years, the DWS has gone through four dierent DGs and/or acng DGs – most of the me,
this posion has been lled in an acng capacity. This adversely aects the programmes
(performance) and the internal control environment of the DWS. Three deputy directors-
general (DDGs) were also placed on suspension and returned to work without any evidence that
invesgaons had been conducted and/or concluded. There were also three resignaons at this
level. Furthermore, there are currently ve acng ocials at these levels, which is very high.
The AG’s report also noted that between 2009 and 2017, the average length of tenure of a DG
was just 11 months, with ve of the nine incumbents in that period acng appointees. Over this
period, three of the four formally appointed DGs resigned - although this could indicate either
unacceptable pressure from the minister or acknowledgement of failure to perform. 91
While appointment of DGs is done in consultaon with the presidency, there is no formal
accountability required when a DG leaves prematurely, opening the door to ministers to apply
pressure on incumbents with whom they disagree.
Weakening oversight mechanisms
An essenal part of weakening instuonal capacity so as to remove constraints on illicit
behaviour is to weaken the mechanisms used for oversight of instuonal performance.
South Africa’s water legislaon requires ministers to collect informaon on both water
services and water resources and to provide that informaon to the public. The decision to
stop the producon of the Blue, Green and No Drop reports would appear to be a deliberate
91 Report of the auditor-general to the joint commiee of inquiry into the funconing of the Department of Water and Sanitaon:
Challenges facing the water and sanitaon porolio. hps://www.corruponwatch.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/180327AG-
SA-Challenges_Water_Sanitaon.pdf
Turnover of directors-general at the Department of Water and Sanitaon - AG report to the joint commiee of inquiry into
the funconing of the Department of Water and Sanitaon. March 2018
1. 57
contravenon of that requirement. Preparaon of the Naonal Water Resource Strategy, which
is explicitly required by law to be produced every ve years to explain how water security is to
be sustained, is more than three years late.
In addion, the department took the unusual step of repeatedly contesng the ndings of the
auditor-general about the state of DWS’s nances. As the AG explained:
“The trend of contestaon to our audit ndings connued and intensied in the previous
audit cycle. Management contested our conclusions in the 2015-16 audit cycle … The claims
of the DWS were dismissed and the conclusions reached by the auditors were found to be
factual, appropriate and supported by adequate work performed. … In the 2016-17 audit
cycle, management contested the audit outcomes of both the DWS and the WTE, which
were again taken through the independent review process. The conclusions and conduct
of the auditors were once again upheld …. The contestaon and pressure placed on the
audit teams, without sucient grounds, appear to be movated by the DWS wanng to
avoid negave audit outcomes and disclosures of irregular as well as fruitless and wasteful
expenditure. The service providers to the DWS where irregular and fruitless and wasteful
expenditure were noted also threatened the AGSA with legal acon.92
Threats were also made against the AG’s sta at Rand Water:
“Makwetu told MPs that senior employees from Rand Water, a department of water and
sanitaon enty, inmidated his sta in August when they told them that that the AG’s audit
ndings “are cosng them their bonuses”.93
While the issues at Rand Water did not appear to indicate corrupon, the atude towards
the AGSA was a maer of concern and perhaps reected the atude of ocials in the sector
towards the role of the AGSA.
Board membership – a duty or a privilege?
Another ministerial prerogave is to appoint chairs and members of the boards of instuons
under their control. In the case of the DWS, this includes the members of water boards, the
TCTA, the Water Research Commission and a number of other instuons such as internaonal
commissions and commiees. Although, again, there are procedures to be followed, ministers
can generally control the process and ensure that their preferred candidates are nominated.
This provides signicant opportunies for patronage since the incumbents receive a useful if not
exorbitant nancial allowance.
The evidence from the cases has shown that ministers have used board appointments to try to
ensure that their wishes are carried out, notably in the case of Lepelle Water, Umgeni Water
and the Lesotho Highlands Water Joint Water Commission. Eorts to inuence decisions at TCTA
and to enable connued control by Dudu Myeni in Mhlatuze through the merger with Umgeni
further illustrate the dynamics that this creates.
The implicaons of these arrangements were made evident in the parliamentary tesmony
of the CEO of Lepelle Water, when asked how he and the board of which he was an execuve
director would deal with an illegal direcve:
…. “when you are given a legal instrucon you can only defy at your own risk because that is
insubordinaon, so direcves had to be understood within that context, as a wrien lawful
instrucon … “ (cited above)
‘Insubordinaon’ is, of course, a revealing word to use in this context – basic corporate
governance principles hold that a director’s decisions are subordinated to the law and the
duciary duty owed to the company, while the CEO is accountable to the board. The minister
– who is designated the shareowner representave – sets the overall strategic mandate
92 Report of the auditor-general to the joint commiee of inquiry into the funconing of the Department of Water
and Sanitaon: Challenges facing the water and sanitaon porolio. hps://www.corruponwatch.org.za/wp-content/up-
loads/2020/02/180327AGSA-Challenges_Water_Sanitaon.pdf
93 ‘You’re cosng us our bonuses’: Kimi Makwetu tells of death threats to audit sta. hps://www.meslive.co.za/polics/2019-
12-04-youre-cosng-us-our-bonuses-kimi-makwetu-tells-of-death-threats-to-audit-sta/
1. 58
which includes specifying the public interest objecves and the trade-o, if any, with eciency
consideraons. She should not be issuing instrucons to the board, much less the execuve
management.
The broader challenges of instuonal capture
In South Africa’s current system of government, ministers have substanal power. In part, this is
because funcons such as personnel management and procurement that were centralised under the
pre-1994 regime have been assigned to individual ministers and their departments.
In addion, departments such as Naonal Treasury and Public Services and Administraon (DPSA),
that are supposed to maintain oversight over the acvies of line departments, have been weakened.
In some cases, this is formal – for instance, procurement acvies that used to be managed by a
central naonal tender board have now been assigned to departments.
But in many cases, their residual oversight mechanism is oen disregarded. So acvies such as
irregular expenditure that should be reported to Naonal Treasury are simply ignored, with no
consequences unless these are discovered when accounts are audited; even then, lile or no acon
is taken. Similarly, departmental reorganisaons, which are supposed to be communicated to and
conrmed by the DPSA, are made without even a communicaon.
This lack of administrave discipline has been allowed by the polical leadership – the presidency,
the transversal departments and the ANC, as the ruling party – either because they were constrained
polically by the dynamics of the ANC or because they actually condoned it, for their own purposes.
This has contributed to a culture of impunity at ministerial level.
At its extreme, this degeneraon of administrave discipline led to the phenomenon of state capture.
The impact of this has been seen in the water sector with, amongst others, the delays to the Lesotho
Highlands Water Project and the Clanwilliam Dam, and the eorts to promote the nancially non-
viable Umzimvubu Dam and Mangaung pipeline projects.
A characterisc of many of the cases raised is how senior managers – including board members and
CEOs or DGs – if not acvely involved in corrupon, turned a blind eye to fairly obvious illegalies.
One reason for this was oen that their jobs, if not their lives, were at risk if they raised awkward
quesons. Another reason is that, even if they reported their concerns and provided evidence of
them, there would be no consequences for the people responsible.
This comes back to the nature of South African society. In countries with fully developed economies,
there are alternaves for senior professionals who leave an instuon – there is even oen sympathy
for those who leave for reasons of principle. In South Africa, with high levels of unemployment, there
are limited alternave opons for employment with anything like current levels of pay. Many of those
jobs are in professional elds dependent on public sector work, for which good relaonships with
government are crical.
In too many cases, ocials have had to balance their job security against their principles; and for
many, understandably, the cost of principles is simply too high.
1. 59
STRATEGIES FOR CORRUPTION – A STRUCTURED SUMMARY
Corrupon strategies in procurement
Strategy Approach and risk Some cases referenced
Intervenon in pre-qualicaon
and qualicaon processes
Manipulaon of tender
invitaons to benet preferred
companies
 EOH’s move from SAP to specialised
water services
 Lesotho Highlands Water Project
Intervenon at tender
evaluaon and adjudicaon
stage
Manipulaon of the evaluaon
and award process to enable
preferred companies to be
selected
 Ekurhuleni Meters - Regulaon 32 abuse
 Mpumalanga’s municipal budgets
Pre-approved panel strategy Mechanism to bypass tender
procedures, promoted as a
way to improve organisaonal
eciency
 Giyani Water Project
 The bucket toilet tender snk
Emergency strategy Use of emergency legislaon as
mechanism to bypass tender
procedures and avoid scruny
of the capabilies of preferred
candidates and the cost of
alternaves
 Giyani Water Project
 How desalinaon dreams derailed NMB
water supply
 How water tankers cause taps to run dry
 The bucket toilet tender snk
Regulaon 32 piggy-backing
strategy
Mechanism to bypass
tender procedures, by
using procedures of other
organisaons to reduce
bureaucracy
 Ekurhuleni Meters - Regulaon 32 abuse
 Mhlatuze-Mgeni merger rings alarm bells
Construcon contract strategy Organisaon of oversight
systems to allow overpayment
to complicit contractors
 Lesotho Highlands Water Project
 Giyani Water Project
Turnkey strategy Bundle design and construcon
(and somemes, nance and
operaon) into single contract
to gain control over operaonal
procurement
 EOH’s move from SAP to specialised
water services
 Giyani Water Project
 Mangaung and the Gariep pipeline
 Sweetwaters, Kanana Park Extension 6 - a
prologue
Preferences for local economic
opportunies or protecon
rackets?
Local preferences used to
gain control of patronage
opportunies and to extort
payments from contractors
 Raising Clanwilliam Dam
 Lesotho Highlands Water Project
 Sweetwaters, Kanana Park Extension 6 - a
prologue
Preferenal procurement Abuse of requirements for
preference to be given to
black companies, personnel or
community involvement
 Giyani Water Project
 EOH’s move from SAP to specialised
water services
 The bucket toilet tender snk
 Lesotho Highlands Water Project
1. 60
HIGHER LEVEL STRATEGIES:
Inuencing policy and regulatory decisions, taking control of instuons
Inuencing policy and regulatory decisions
Strategy Approach and risk Some cases referenced
Control over procurement
processes
Opportunity to alter
recommendaons and bypass
procedures
 Mpumalanga’s municipal budgets
 Giyani Water Project
Regulatory decision-making Opportunity to benet
preferred companies, block
others and extort payments
 Mining licences, polluon, and
public vs private interests
Controlling public oversight of
sector performance
Suppression of performance
data reduces accountability
 Blue, Green and No Drop reports
Determining project strategy The approach taken to project
promoon determined by
personal interests, negavely
aecng public outcomes
 Giyani Water Project
 Lesotho Highlands Water Project
 Mangaung and the Gariep
pipeline
 How desalinaon dreams derailed
NMB water supply
 EOH’s move from SAP to
specialised water services
 The War on Leaks ends in defeat
1. 61
Taking control of instuons (abuse of power)
Strategy Approach and risk Some cases referenced
Design of corporate structures
to facilitate corrupon
Public policy priories and
approaches undermined
 EOH’s move from SAP to specialised
water services
 Sweetwaters, Kanana Park Extension
6 - a prologue
Signing o of procurement
decisions
Procurement processes,
principles and regulaons will
be ignored
 Mpumalanga’s municipal budgets
 EOH’s move from SAP to specialised
water services
 Giyani Water Project
 The bucket toilet tender snk
Appointment of key sta
Honest sta sidelined and
others appointed to abet
private interests
 TCTA and the Mzimvubu project
 Mhlatuze-Mgeni merger rings alarm
bells
Removing key sta Enables principal to appoint
sta to serve personal rather
than public interests
 EOH’s move from SAP to specialised
water services
 Mhlatuze-Mgeni merger rings alarm
bells
 Lesotho Highlands Water Project
1. 62
CHAPTER 4
What is to be done?
1. 63
Priorising project
development
Projects priorised to serve
personal rather than public
interests
 Mangaung and the Gariep pipeline
 The chickens of state capture come
home to roost
Delegaons and direcves Legal powers abused to bypass
procurement processes and
nancial controls
 The War on Leaks ends in defeat
 Giyani Water Project
WHAT IS TO BE DONE? Confronng two ‘wicked problems’
Corruption in the water sector has damaged lives and livelihoods in many
communities. Resources that could have improved services have gone into private
pockets and been used to consolidate the power of ruthless politicians. The
performance of water service institutions has deteriorated so seriously over the past
decade that ministers stopped providing the data. Many strategies used to achieve
personal and political benet at the expense of the public have been documented.
The queson that must now be answered is: what can and should be done to turn the situaon
around?
The challenge is that both corruption and sustainable water management
are ‘wicked problems’, not because they are evil but because they have
no easy solutions that are acceptable to all concerned. According to the
social scientists and planners who first described the concept, they are
“… social system problems which are ill-formulated, where the informaon
is confusing, where there are many clients and decision makers with
conicng values, and where the ramicaons in the whole system are
thoroughly confusing.94
Corrupon in South Africa is evil, in that it preys disproporonately on the
most disadvantaged communies and individuals, it undermines economic
growth and development, and it corrodes democrac governance systems
which rely on trust between those in authority and the cizenry. But it is also
wicked because it is so dicult to nd ways to address it, given the interplay of contesng interests
and priories in complex human sociees.
The provision of water also has wicked characteriscs. There are usually many dierent ways
in which it can be provided and many dierent users, each of whom has their own needs and
preferences. Once supply infrastructure has been built, it must be operated and maintained and
the inial decisions on how to provide it can have long-term implicaons on the viability of the
service. But if users’ circumstances and preferences change, the original soluon may no longer be
workable and, as we see every day in South Africa, supplies fail – leaving communies desperate.
In such situaons, it is concluded that “the polical context is crucial, that argumentaon must
be transparent and robust, and that policy intervenons may have consequences that cannot be
easily controlled in open and highly pluralised social systems.95
Put simply, there are no easy soluons, but a range of acons on many fronts can make a dierence.
94 Crowley, K. and Head, B.W., 2017. The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: revising Riel and Webber. Policy Scienc-
es, 50(4), pp.539-547
95 Crowley, K. and Head, B.W., 2017. The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: revising Riel and Webber. Policy Scienc-
es, 50(4), pp.539-547
There are no
easy solutions,
but a range of
actions on many
fronts can make a
dierence
1. 64
The context for acon
The rst step is to recognise the context. Today’s corrupon cannot be divorced from South
Africa’s past. While bribery, neposm, self-enrichment, and state capture were all present pre-
1994, the very governance systems of colonialism and apartheid were corrupt at their heart
– systems in which public power was used to promote and protect the interests of a small part
of the populaon at the expense of the rest. In addion, a selected group of large domesc and
mulnaonal corporaons were granted privileged access to public services and contracts and
regulatory support.
In water, huge public resources were spent to provide supplies to cies and (white) farmers with a
trickle to the homelands, apartheid’s limited and cynical aempt to create and privilege a ny rural
black elite. The basic needs of the majority of the populaon were largely ignored – in 1994, more
than a third of black South Africans did not have a minimally adequate water supply.
This inheritance has massively shaped the character of corrupon in democrac South Africa and
the measures capable of countering it. A new democrac government immediately had to extend
basic services to the black majority. This required new infrastructure and new instuons to
operate and maintain it.
The massive extension of public services faced severe human resource constraints. These are
apparent in the water sector which requires specialised technical skills to build and operate
large capital-intensive infrastructure as well as commercial and management skills to run the
organisaons required. This programme of service provision immediately created risks, since
infrastructure construcon and provision of sophiscated IT and business services are notoriously
vulnerable to corrupon.
But an equally pressing challenge was to enable the majority of the populaon to parcipate in the
economy. Inevitably, employment in state organisaons was one of the key opportunies in which
rapid progress could be made. Inevitably, there was pressure for the public sector to create more
jobs and polical pressure for polically connected people to benet.
Another priority for the new democrac government was to increase the parcipaon of black
owned businesses in the economy more generally. Preferences introduced under the general
framework of Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) became the agship programme to achieve
this goal. Government sought to use its procurement budget to redress centuries of colonial and
apartheid exclusion by privileging black-owned rms in public procurement.
There is nothing unusual or intrinsically corrupt about a government using its power as a consumer
to achieve its social and economic objecves through preferenal procurement. But as with
any elaborate regulatory scheme, it is vulnerable to corrupon, the more so when the decision
makers are compelled to balance commercial consideraons and public interest consideraons. A
parcularly pernicious form of corrupon of South Africa’s procurement preferences is the pracce
of ‘fronng’ whereby exisng white-owned rms, incenvised to deracialise their ownership and
1. 65
their supply chains in order to be eligible for public procurement contracts, seek to reward black
individuals or black owned rms who can lend the white owned rm their identy in exchange
for a highly leveraged minority share in the white owned business and no semblance of control or
substanal parcipaon.
As a result, there is ample evidence that certain companies gained privileged access to public
procurement contracts, oen at the expense of other genuinely empowered bidders. Some of
these are documented in the case studies in this report. And this pracce has been foregrounded in
evidence presented to the Zondo Commission.
However, what is even more disturbing is the evidence that some of the inducements organised
by individual decision makers have been used to fund polical pares. The infamous Chancellor
House/Hitachi maer, in which the ANC-controlled investment company facilitated a major contract
between Eskom and the Japanese engineering giant in exchange for shares in Hitachi’s South
African operaon, set a benchmark for this kind of behaviour.96 It provided early evidence of the
ANC’s willingness to leverage its polical power to inuence government procurement contracts
to support party interests. And this approach was replicated at a smaller scale in many of the cases
documented in the water sector – and indeed, beneciary companies’ contribuons to polical
pares have been openly acknowledged.
This has created a dynamic that has impacts well beyond the manipulaon of procurement. It has
reached the stage where it has fundamentally aected public decision-making, as acknowledged by
former president Kgalema Motlanthe who stated, as far back as 2007, that: “This rot is across the
board. It’s not conned to any level or any area of the country. Almost every project is conceived
because it oers opportunies for certain people to make money.” 97
The dangers have thus long been recognised – which is one reason that the Naonal Development
Plan98 devoted an enre chapter to ‘Fighng Corrupon’. But these dynamics also have an impact at
an individual and social level. The challenge of enabling a prosperous black middle class to emerge
and ourish merits exceponal measures, such as BEE. Its success is essenal to the country’s
polical stability and sustainability. But members of this emerging class, with no inherited wealth
are very oen supporng a substanal number of less well-o family and community members as
dependants, a huge nancial burden, commonly referred to as a ‘black tax’.99
Those who have jobs help their extended families and communies however they can. They pay the
school fees, electricity and water bills and emergency expenses of many households, which strains
the nances of middle-class wage-earners. And there is pressure on them to help nd employment
opportunies for family members even though, parcularly in the public sector, they may be
accused of neposm.
As Joel Netshitenzhe describes, “rst generaon middle and upper strata” are trying match the
arcially high living standards of their white counterparts, without the underpinnings of decades
of past racial privilege. “As a consequence, they have to rely on massive debt and/or patronage ….
some then try to acquire the resources by hook or by crook.100
In this complex environment, in which policians, individual ocials and businesses all benet from
corrupon, it is lile wonder that the problem has become systemic. A strategic set of responses is
required. What is needed to make them eecve?
Acons to date
Public procurement is widely recognised internaonally as one of the government acvies most
vulnerable to corrupon. This is due to the large sums of money involved, the complex processes
and the intersect between public bodies and the private sector. As the cases presented have
shown, procurement processes can be undermined by a variety of corrupt pracces ranging from
manipulang project specicaons to bribery during tender award processes.
96 Hitachi: a selement payment is not enough. hps://www.corruponwatch.org.za/hitachi-a-selement-payment-is-not-enough/
97 ANC and business: soul for sale. hp://inside-south-africa.blogspot.com/2007/01/nancial-mail-ancs-soul-for-sale.html
98 Naonal Development Plan. hps://naonalplanningcommission.wordpress.com/the-naonal-development-plan/
99 Black Tax: Burden or Ubuntu? Niq Mhlongo (Ed), Jonathan Ball 2019
100 Netshitenzhe, J. (2012) Compeng idenes of a Naonal Liberaon Movement and the challenges of incumbency, ANC Today 12
(23)
1. 66
A further diculty is that, because of its importance and reach in the economy, public
procurement is seen as a powerful policy lever to support transformaon goals, ranging from
improved gender and racial represenvity in the economy to support for local economic
development and nascent naonal and regional industrial development. The challenge that
this presents is that the integraon of these policy goals further complicates already complex
procurement processes.
In 2003, naonal government’s tender processes were decentralised to departmental level in order
to empower departmental accounng ocers and enable them to be held accountable for their
expenditure.101 However, this achieved limited success, not least because of the complicated policy
framework within which each department had to work.
Many of these issues were addressed in the 2012 Naonal Development Plan (NDP). As the NDP
says,
“The state’s procurement expenditure must be used to push transformaon, but it also
needs to be realisc about the ability of creaking procurement systems to balance mulple
priories.102
Acon has been taken in many of the cases presented. It is encouraging and relevant that much
of the informaon about corrupon in the water sector that is in the public domain came as the
result of the eorts of internal whistle-blowers and invesgave journalists. Although in many
water sector instuons the rot has gone so deep that the challenges appear overwhelming, there
are ways forward. A further encouraging nding is that, despite the dicules, many competent
and dedicated public ocials connue to work to maintain the country’s water security and to
resist aempts at corrupon, oen at some cost to their careers.
Amongst formal structures, the work of the auditor-general stands out; many of the media
reports were derived from his team’s inial invesgaons. And, as far back as 2012, the Special
Invesgang Unit was directed by the president to invesgate allegaons of procurement and
contract management irregularies in DWS. Subsequently, in 2016, 2018 and 2019, further
presidenal proclamaons directed it to invesgate water-related irregularies involving DWS,
Lepelle and Umgeni Water Boards as well as the Gauteng Provincial Department of Housing and a
number of municipalies. The total amount involved was esmated at over R4-billion.103
Some of those invesgaons have been completed. The SIU has reported that it has taken legal
acon to terminate contracts and recover funds from the companies involved, and has passed
informaon to the Naonal Prosecung Authority and tax authories to consider criminal acon.
However, although some DWS ocials have resigned and others faced internal disciplinary acon,
there have been few serious consequences, even where the SIU has launched legal acon to
recover funds.104
While the maers are complex, this delay raises quesons about the eecveness of these
acons. A parcular problem is that the framing of the presidenal proclamaons does not
address the accountability of the polical leadership in the instuons concerned. In many
cases, the formal corrupt acon was taken by subordinates, who were presumably acng under
polical direcon; this complicates any direct prosecuon. At this level, perhaps the most notable
consequence has been the removal of Nomvula Mokonyane rst from the water porolio and
then from Cabinet. But this is a relavely minor penalty since she retains the considerable benets
of a rered minister.
Learn Lessons
It is important to learn from cases in the water sector where corrupon has been successfully
constrained. These cases illustrate the circumstances in which this occurs and measures that can
be taken to reduce, if not eliminate, corrupon:
101 hp://www.treasury.gov.za/divisions/ocpo/sc/Guidelines/overview.pdf
102 Naonal Development Plan, Naonal Planning Commission, The Presidency, 2012.
103 SIU, Parliamentary presentaon to SCOPA: SIU invesgaons: progress report; Department of Water and Sanitaon challenges:
Treasury brieng, with DWS Minister. hps://pmg.org.za/commiee-meeng/27686/
104 SIU annual report 2018-19
1. 67
Eecve operaonal management systems
The management systems put in place by Joburg Water not only improved the ulity’s
performance but also made pey corrupon more dicult. The system would not issue material or
tools to any plumbers or foremen unless it was for a registered job card. This discouraged lobbying
by councillors for priority aenon (and, somemes, for illicit private work) because it compelled
them to make those requests through a call centre to register and record the job.
The threat of consequences
The criminal prosecuon of both ocials and private companies following rampant corrupon in
Phase 1A of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project certainly appeared to change behaviour - Phase
1B was completed in 2004, close to its planned me and budget. Although there were some
incidents of corrupon (which also led to criminal charges), there were fewer cost increases due to
the contract variaons and claims that are oen abused by contractors.
Acon by governance structures
In the Mzimvubu project, the board of the TCTA, correctly exercising its duciary responsibility,
resisted aempts to promote inappropriate Chinese funding, despite energec eorts by the
minister. While there was not yet any direct evidence of corrupon, eorts to bypass a feasibility
study that would have claried responsibility for the repayment of the loan suggested gross
negligence or a deliberate aempt to out procedures. The explicit instrucon from the board to
the chief execuve prohibing him from signing a loan agreement in China prevented a potenally
wasteful project from proceeding.
Governance arrangements that constrain centralised powers
During current preparaons for Phase 2 of the Lesotho project, eorts by Nomvula Mokonyane
to alter project arrangements to introduce a favoured consultant failed, and the integrity of the
procurement process was retained. This was largely the result of the instuonal arrangements
set up by agreement with funding agencies, who had a clear interest in avoiding a repeat of the
dicules (and reputaonal damage) experienced in the earlier project phases. The governance
arrangements prevented the process from being taken over by one or two powerful pares.
1. 68
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. 69
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations are made for the water sector on the basis of the
ndings of the report and the lessons that have been learnt. They start with an
overarching strategic approach and then focus on more specic interventions.
Designate the water sector as an ‘island of integrity’
Service delivery problems in the water sector, the impact of corrupon on delivery of water, and
the related social and economic impacts, provide strong grounds for government priorising
an-corrupon eorts in this sector, for designang water an island of integrity.
Water and environmental protecon are rights guaranteed by the South African Constuon and
internaonal law. South Africa’s water resources are constrained by geography and exacerbated
by climate variability and change. Even in a perfect governance environment we would sll face
water problems. South Africans simply cannot aord the added burden of corrupon in a sector
whose product is a vital determinant of health and life (drinking water), dignity (sanitaon) and
economic prosperity.
The aim of designang the sector as an island of integrity is to focus both polical leadership and
cizens on the need to keep corrupon out of water in order to keep the taps owing and the
rivers clean. The designaon should be reected in the choice of minister and the appointment
of senior departmental ocials and in the boards and execuves responsible for water agencies.
They should be people of unimpeachable integrity and technical competence.
Civil society should be encouraged to be vigilant in this area, and supported when they idenfy
issues that need to be addressed – the Cape Town experience has demonstrated the willingness
of the public to respond collecvely to a pressing water crisis. This process will draw on all
instuons of governance, at naonal, provincial and local level. The Auditor-General and law
enforcement instuons should support the processes of tackling corrupon in the sector and
government’s communicaon agencies must reect this.
Ending impunity – inslling a culture of consequences
It will be dicult to end corrupon in the water sector in the current climate in which agrant
abuses go unpunished. Procurement rules are broken with impunity and illegal direcves from
polical heads are not quesoned. Findings of corrupon are made but no eecve acon is
taken against those concerned. The absence of consequences gives perpetrators of corrupon an
incenve to connue; based on experience, they can expect to get away with it.
A culture must be established in which it is expected that misconduct will have consequences.
At a formal level, this is the responsibility of the Auditor-General and the broad family of law
enforcement authories, including agencies such as the Special Invesgang Unit.
The AGSA has played a signicant role in exposing massive irregularies in the management of
water. However, its ndings have, as in many other government agencies, been simply ignored.
The recent amendments to the Public Audit Act (Public Audit Amendment Act No. 5 of 2018)
give the AGSA certain powers to enforce its ndings. These powers should be acvely used in the
water sector as part of the broader integrity campaign.
Rampant irregularity in the management of public resources should always be treated and
invesgated as potenal corrupon parcularly where large-scale irregularies repeatedly occur.
In parcular instuons, public ocials are implicated in serial irregularies and specic rms
regularly benet from these irregularies. Such paerns of irregular conduct should be seen as a
red ag for corrupon.
Furthermore, given the ubiquitous presence of polical appointees in so many alleged instances
of grand corrupon, the likelihood of polical corrupon should always be considered by the
invesgave authories. Indeed, the authories could do well to open invesgaons into all
large procurement contracts concluded during the ministerial tenure of Nomvula Mokonyane.
1. 70
The designaon as an island of integrity should be reected in instuonal arrangements that
reinforce the importance of corrupon prevenon in the water sector. One useful model may
be the establishment of an an-corrupon forum along the lines of the exisng An-Corrupon
Health Forum, led by the SIU. This forum brings together key stakeholders in the public healthcare
system including law enforcement agencies, relevant government departments and agencies,
representaves of the private sector, regulators and civil sector organisaons acve in healthcare
and in combang corrupon. Reports of corrupon and gross irregularies are submied to the
forum and then allocated to the agency best placed to address them. The involvement of the
AGSA and other Chapter 9 instuons would further strengthen its role.
A similar iniave has recently been launched to address the problems of the so-called
construcon maa, which has disrupted more than 75 projects valued at over R25-billion,
nominally seeking local jobs and sub-contracts. Acon is being taken within the framework of
the Prevenon of Organised Crime Act and has involved the Asset Forfeiture and An-Gang units
of the Naonal Prosecung Authority, working together with the South African Forum of Civil
Engineering Contractors and other engineering organisaons.
Appointments – no honest instuons without honest and ethical people
There are two important requirements for the water sector to become an island of integrity.
Firstly, honest, ethical and commied leaders must ensure that recruitment and new
appointments to their organisaons reinforce these values. Secondly, processes must be put
in place to enable them to remove those who break the rules for corrupt purposes. Both
appointment and disciplinary processes are important mechanisms for dealing with impunity
since they establish the guiding values of the instuons concerned.
The cases reviewed have demonstrated how both these processes have been abused. Trivial or
trumped-up charges have been used to remove honest ocials from oce where they have been
obstrucng corrupt acvies. This has allowed the appointment of individuals who, if not actually
complicit, are willing to ignore the corrupt designs of those who appoint them. Similarly, where
eorts have been made to act against corrupt ocials, they have been protected from acon
through the manipulaon of disciplinary processes.
Poorly managed, dysfunconal and captured disciplinary and human resource systems are
common across South Africa’s public sector. In order to support the development of the water
sector as an island of integrity, consideraon should be given to the eecve involvement of
external agencies such as the Public Service Commission or civil society organisaons in panels
responsible for appointment and discipline.
There are also challenges related to the appointment of the boards of the public agencies that
are part of the water minister’s porolio. These are usually made by the minister with the
concurrence of Cabinet, but it is well documented that polical aliaon rather than competence
or integrity has been the determining factor in appointments. It is thus suggested that
recommendaons for such appointments should be made in consultaon with panels deliberately
constuted to ensure a focus on the appropriate consideraons and with the power to block
inappropriate appointments.
Procurement
The 2012 Naonal Development Plan noted that:
“The state’s ability to purchase what it needs on me at the right quality and for the right price
is central to its ability to deliver on its priories. Public-sector procurement expenditure also
needs to be used to drive naonal priories such as localisaon and economic transformaon.
Procurement systems tend to focus on procedural compliance rather than value for money,
and place an excessive burden on weak support funcons.
1. 71
To improve value for money while minimising the scope for corrupon the NDP proposed focusing
on ve areas:
• Dierenang between dierent forms of procurement (that is, treang construcon
projects dierently to, say, procurement of medicines or basic security and cleaning
services);
• Elevang trade-os above the project level (so providing incenves for local producon
at producer level rather than through tenders and encouraging a range of mechanisms to
encourage training and job creaon);
• Build relaonships of trust and understanding (supply chain ocials need to understand
the sector they are dealing with to ensure appropriate approaches are taken);
• Build enabling support structures (specically to professionalise supply chain managers
so that they support rather than seek to replace specialist technical professionals in the
procurement process);
• Ensure eecve and transparent oversight.
On this laer point, specically in relaon to corrupon, the NDP highlights the importance of
creang a transparent, responsive and accountable public service.
“State informaon, including details of procurement, should be made openly available to
cizens. Furthermore, an informaon regulator should be established to adjudicate appeals
when access to informaon requested is denied.”
Some organs of state already make substanal amounts of procurement data public, though
much more could be done to systemase the process. However, at present the primary corrupon
challenge faced by South Africa is the systemic capture of parts of the state apparatus and
disregard for procedures. Detailed reform of procurement systems will not be appropriate unl
greater control is gained over public nancial management in this regard.
Once this has been achieved, there are many systems that have been proposed and trialled
elsewhere that could be of value to further strengthen the sector. These include a variety of open
contracng models. Open contracng seeks to mobilise parcipaon from the private sector and
civil society to achieve greater accountability within public procurement.
Open contracng recognises that greater transparency from government is insucient –
accountability requires that the private sector compete fairly and that civil society monitor
and analyse the public procurement process. The publicaon of procurement informaon, in a
useable, standardised way cannot in itself bring about greater accountability – the monitoring
and analysis of such informaon by civil society is crucial. Methods used include integrity pacts,
e-procurement, data standards, and red-ag monitoring.
Integrity Pacts are mutual commitments between public and contracng pares to
refrain from corrupon and guarantee transparency during a procurement process. An
independent third party, usually a CSO, is given access to documents and procedures
and ensures adherence to the integrity pact.
E-procurement envisages moving away from a paper-based procurement system so
that the process takes place on a publically available plaorm. At the very least it
requires the publicaon of procurement informaon on an e-procurement plaorm.
Open contracng data standards prescribe standards for what informaon should
be published and how. The use of this standard ensures that there is uniformity and
standardisaon of data which improves data quality and allows for comparison and
analysis.
Red ag monitoring uses algorithms to analyse data and pick up anomalies. A set
of procurement norms are built into the soware and when a procurement pracce
violates a norm, the system generates a red ag nocaon. Members of civil society
are then able to invesgate this further in order to determine whether the deviaon
amounts to corrupon or non-compliance with procurement law.
1. 72
A word of cauon in approaching procurement reform: one response to growing corrupon is to
supplement the rules governing systems like procurement. But such measures oen fail and may
make the situaon worse. In weak instuons, cumbersome compulsory rules bring instuons
to a standsll, with ocials unwilling to take acons that may be considered illegal. And corrupt
ocials who break the rules with polical cover have used trivial infracons to aack honest
people who queson their behaviour. The guiding principle should be to ensure that there are
clear lines of responsibility, simple rules that everyone can follow and procedures that allow
deviaons to be idened and acted against.
In addion, experience in the water sector teaches us an important lesson, namely that polical
appointees, such as the minister and board members of public agencies, should not involve
themselves in procurement appointment decisions and where they insist on doing so, it should be
treated as a red ag for corrupon.
Ministerial and board involvement is clearly appropriate at the strategic stage of a large
procurement – the decision to build a large dam or a power staon, or purchase a eet of
airplanes. But they have no call to engage with the operaonal decision about to whom contracts
should be awarded; if they do, the inference is that they are oering a supplier a polical favour in
exchange for a consideraon.
Transparency in regulatory decisions
There is a need to promote greater transparency in the exercise of regulatory decision-making
by ministers and senior ocials. As an example, the minister of water is empowered to issue
direcves to instuons such as water boards and the TCTA. These have enabled ministers to
bypass government’s planning and budgetary procedures. If some of the contenous direcves
described in this report had been publicised at the me, many of the more gratuitous abuses
could have been spoed and stopped at an earlier stage. A simple amendment to the relevant
legislaon could require such direcves to be gazeed by the minister and reported in the annual
reports of the organisaons concerned.
Environmental factors that must be addressed
The roots of corrupon in the water sector are not in the sector itself but in the wider society.
Corrupon will not successfully be combated unless these are also addressed. Law enforcement
agencies are principally responsible for confronng impunity and are dealt with in a separate
recommendaon.
Preferenal procurement
The vexed issue of polical party funding is also dealt with separately. On BEE, corrupon of that
vital social programme doesn’t necessarily presuppose root and branch reform, much less the
scrapping, of BEE. All regulatory frameworks are vulnerable to corrupon, and the more elaborate
and far-reaching the programme, the greater the opportunies for rent-seeking and corrupon.
While this may necessitate an evaluaon of regulaons and an assessment of the social benets
achieved as a result, it should not imply rampant deregulaon. We have no doubt that the social
benets of BEE jusfy the connuaon, even intensicaon, of the programme, However, what
is implied is that the operaon of elaborate regulatory frameworks should be closely policed,
parcularly at key decision-making points.
We also do not doubt that the savings in reduced instances of corrupon would pay for increased
expenditure on parcularly close scruny of the applicaon of BEE transacons. It would also
enhance the credibility of BEE.
Regulaon of polical pares
The funding of polical pares oers obvious opportunies for extending the inuence of money
over polics and is a much discussed issue in South Africa and in other democracies. In South
Africa this has culminated in the passing of the Polical Party Funding Act of 2019. This act has
been waing for the president to set it in moon for over 12 months because, while it has been
signed into law, a date for its implementaon has not yet been announced.
However, recent controversies serve to foreground important money/polics relaonships that
are not covered by an Act that connes itself to polical party funding. Foremost amongst these
is the funding of internal polical party leadership contests. In a country dominated by a single
1. 73
party, these contests may be far more important than the naonal elecons. The inescapable
conclusion points to the need to consider general regulaon of polical pares and not only
regulaon of the funding of pares.
The experience of Nomvula Mokonyane’s reign at the DWS highlights a parcular challenge of
managing the personal/polical/nancial interface. As ANC local government elecons organiser
in 2016, she was quoted as saying that the ANC had spent R1-billion on that campaign – without
explaining where the money had come from. She was also acve at the ANC’s 2019 naonal
conference where faconal funding played a signicant role in the outcomes.
Simultaneous responsibility for managing a large party programme that demands signicant
funding and execuve responsibility for a government department that has a large procurement
budget supports an inference that the state responsibilies are being abused to support party
responsibilies.
This supports our recommendaon that ministers be prohibited from parcipaon in procurement
decisions. Further consideraon may well be given to regulang the role of party oce bearers in
the management of state assets.
Educate the private sector
Too oen, private business is seen as the vicm of corrupon. Bribes are paid and tender awards
accepted with the excuse that such pracces are unfortunately what is necessary to get the work.
This atude has to be challenged. Private sector bidders that enter into such irregular contracts
need to know that they are breaking the law and placing their businesses at risk.
Companies have a legal duty to ensure that correct procedures have been followed in the award
of a public contract and can be severely penalised if they don’t. A recent high court judgement
conrmed by the Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constuonal Court, ordered Cash Paymaster
Services to repay to the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) the enre fee earned on an
irregularly awarded contract.
In prior ligaon which resulted in the Constuonal Court invalidang the main contract
between CPS and Sassa, the court noted:
As Corrupon Watch explained, with reference to internaonal authority and experience,
deviaons from fair process may themselves all too oen be symptoms of corrupon or
malfeasance in the process. In other words, an unfair process may betoken a deliberately
skewed process. Hence insistence on compliance with process formalies has a three-
fold purpose: (a) it ensures fairness to parcipants in the bid process; (b) it enhances
the likelihood of eciency and opmality in the outcome; and (c) it serves as a guardian
against a process skewed by corrupt inuences”.
In short, a rm willing the circumvent or ignore public procurement rules and regulaons may nd
itself having to repay its fee and may nd itself on the wrong side of a criminal invesgaon.
Ironically, a circular from the legal rm of which controversial Mokonyane advisor Luvo Makasi
is a director, warns its clients about the dangers of circumvenng procurement regulaons.
The circular notes that although service providers may be aracted by the “opportunity to
secure work without the rigmarole of an open tender process” they should note that “contracts
concluded contrary to procurement legislaon and regulaons are wholly invalid and cannot be
allowed to stand …. Allowing such contracts to stand would be to allow the conduct (patronage,
collusion, neposm etc.) which the legislaon seeks to prevent.” So companies should be
wary of “appointment by deviaon” from compeve bidding processes. Before accepng
such appointments, they should conrm the reasons and “obtain conrmaon that its current
appointment complied with relevant procurement legislaon and regulaons ….
If more businesses were to follow these recommendaons – and if they were to be appropriately
penalised when they didn’t – it would contribute to an environment less conducive to corrupon.
It would also reduce their risks.
1. 74
Support civil society
Last but not least, the work of the media and wider civil society, including NGOs and professional
bodies, in uncovering corrupt acvies, publicising them and then pursuing them unl appropriate
remedial acon is taken, must be recognised, emphasised and supported.
As a rst step, the right of cizens and civil society organisaons to access informaon about public
management processes, must be recognised and respected. This must go beyond informaon
about public nances (in which South Africa is regarded as amongst the best global performers) to
include informaon on procurement processes and regulatory decision-making. This will enable
civil society to concentrate its limited resources on the analysis of informaon and engagement
with instuons rather than on court bales to obtain the underlying informaon.
The water sector already has extensive linkages with a variety of civil society organisaons at
naonal, provincial and local level and these must be encouraged and supported. The work
of these organisaons oen goes well beyond oversight of government performance and
includes parcipaon in water management and educaon acvies. This gives them important
operaonal insights that may not be available through formal government structures and makes
them a valuable ally in promong water security and achieving eecve performance of water
management funcons.
1. 75
CONCLUSIONS
Water is too important to allow its management to be undermined. Because of
corruption, fewer people have reliable water supplies and many, particularly young
children, old people, and those with compromised immune systems became ill as a
result of drinking unsafe water or because their parents could not keep their homes
and toilets clean and hygienic. It is safe to say that corruption in the water sector in
South Africa has resulted in deaths.
If the War on Leaks had been properly organised, there would have been temporary jobs for
thousands of youngsters that could have led some to useful, recognised training and possibly
permanent employment. The money saved by the municipalies could have been used to maintain
and operate their water infrastructure, perhaps even reducing the wastewater polluon that is
damaging South Africa’s rivers.
Providing more reliable supplies would also have helped to keep exisng jobs. There would not be
threats of company closures in Nelson Mandela Bay Metro or job losses on the chicken farms in
Lekwa municipality.
Given these arguments, most people will agree that corrupon in the water sector must be tackled.
Corrupt acvies cannot be allowed to undermine the country’s water security. Senior ocials must
not be allowed to appoint incompetent friends and family members to key jobs if it means that taps
run dry and toilets are not provided.
Much of the corrupon is driven by wider polical and economic challenges in society. Unless these
are also addressed, it is unlikely that eorts to improve and enforce procedures and transparency will
be enough to change the situaon.
A parcular focus is needed on the delicate queson of polical funding. This report has shown the
strong likelihood that polical pares and policians are using corrupt money taken from the water
sector to fund their polical acvies. There is evidence that, as a consequence, taps have run dry,
rivers have been polluted and South Africans’ water security is not being achieved and sustained.
Although many of the worst cases of corrupon have been well publicised, those responsible have
enjoyed impunity, apparently because of their polical status. This in turn is taken as a licence for
corrupon at lower levels, an infecon that spreads throughout the organisaons aected.
In this situaon, and because the parcularly acute impact of corrupon in the water sector can be
measured in dry taps, lost jobs and polluted rivers, the goal should be to mobilise public opinion to
protect society from water sector corrupon.
As part of this, the social and economic impacts of corrupon in the water sector must connue
to be highlighted as part of broader an-corrupon campaigns. The aim must be to promote social
values that discourage corrupon in order to meet society’s water needs.
Our framework recommendaon is that the water sector be designated a no-go zone for corrupon,
an untouchable island of integrity. This should be manifest in focusing the work of law enforcement
agencies and of deploying government’s community infrastructure to raise awareness of the dire
state of our water management system and the role of corrupon therein.
Those responsible for appointments to posions in the water management system – including the
appointment of the minister – should be seen to be making a parcular eort to ensure that only
people of unimpeachable integrity are put in charge of this vulnerable, life-giving resource.
Ending corrupon will, of course, not solve all the country’s water problems. Households will sll
have to be careful about how they use their water. In economic applicaons, there will connue to
be arguments about where the limited water could best be used, and environmentalists will try to
encourage all consumers of water to leave more in the river, to sustain the natural environment.
1. 76
But an eecve campaign to wash corrupon out of the water sector could create the environment
in which these larger problems can be tackled. It could ensure that water security for all becomes,
once again, the primary goal of the instuons of the water sector. And, in doing this, the water
sector could provide some guidance and inspiraon for the rest of the naon as it navigates through
the challenges of the present into a beer future.
1. 77
Image sources
Cover – Pixabay
Page 11, 16, 17, 24, 55, 64, 68, 76 – Pixabay
Page 6 – Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by Sustainable Sanitaon Alliance Secretariat. Used
under the Creave Commons Aribuon 2.0 Generic licence
Page 13 – WIN
Page 18 – People’s Assembly www.pa.org.za
Page 20 - Vharanani Properes hps://www.vharanani.co.za/vharananiproperes
Page 22 – Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by Tambo. Used under the Creave Commons
Aribuon-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license
Page 24 – Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by SkyPixels. Used under the Creave Commons
Aribuon-Share Alike 4.0 Internaonal licence
Page 27 - Vuk’uzenzele hps://www.vukuzenzele.gov.za/
Page 30 – Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by Winfried Bruenken. Used under the Creave
Commons Aribuon-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license
Page 31 – Umzimvubu Catchment Partnership Programme hps://umzimvubu.org/
Page 34 - Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by Aliwal2012. Used under the Creave Commons
Aribuon-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license
Page 37 – Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by Bob Adams. Used under the Creave Commons
Aribuon-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license
Page 41 – Wikimedia Commons. Uploaded by Gustavo Veríssimo. Used under the Creave
Commons Aribuon 2.0 Generic license
Page 46 – The Water Project. hps://thewaterproject.org/
Page 56 - Auditor-General of South Africa. hps://www.agsa.co.za/
Page 60 – Photo created by jcomp - www.freepik.com
Page 62 – Pexels
Page 67 – Depositphotos
Page 74 - Save the Children, Sweden. hps://www.raddabarnen.se/
... This means that despite policy commitments to decentralized governance, there is no institutional home in the Olifants Catchment in which to embed learning and adaptation nor are there institutional arrangements to support these as part of an organizational norm. This has been compounded by a growing sense of distrust in the role of the state, marred by allegations of increasing unlawful use and corruption (Muller 2020), which have also undermined AWG elsewhere (Lopez et al. 2019). ...
... As emphasized by Melo Zurita et al. (2018), as the world becomes more networked and the emergence of systemic drivers such as climate change render greater complexity and uncertainty, the state will find it increasingly challenging to manage water resources alone, not just in South Africa but globally. Moreover, aside from issues of capacity, the impacts of corruption in particular (especially state-led corruption) undermine trust and enable unlawful practices (Lopez et al. 2019, Muller 2020. Whereas a normative view is one of the state playing a major leadership role, the exploration of alternative institutional arrangements, in which competent collectives can support or assume certain functions (and foster feedbacks) through good governance and enabling institutional arrangements, offers an innovative direction for research and practice. ...
Article
Full-text available
This paper contributes to scholarship on adaptive water governance (AWG), following policy reforms in South Africa, through a focus on systemic feedbacks for learning and adaptation as critical aspects of AWG. We draw insights from three innovative and evolving water governance experiments. In 1998 South Africa adopted integrated water resources management (IWRM) as a transformative approach for achieving an equitable, sustainable, and decentralized stakeholder-centered water resources governance: all hallmarks of an enabling environment for a two-decade history of AWG, although not named as such. Progress in AWG is explored by using a longitudinal, evaluative exploration of three cases in two transboundary basins in South Africa, with a focus on the unfolding enabling environment for achieving sustainability and equity. Building on previous work, we present and discuss a range of enablers that are shown to function systemically to support feedbacks and build adaptive capacity and resilience in complex and uncertain river systems. In the Crocodile Basin, meta-governance arrangements that created an enabling space for collaborative experimentation and learning proved critical as feedbacks were progressively strengthened and embedded through evolving social and institutional arrangements. The enabling environment also supported a networked, blended system of stakeholder- and state-led platforms that have co-evolved through experimentation and learning. Despite progress, long-term persistence of action-learning feedbacks appears less certain in the Olifants Basin cases. We suggest that enabling meta-governance arrangements that offer an institutional home within which to embed learning is critical. The need to explore alternative networked governance arrangements and to explicitly manage for feedbacks that enhance learning at multiple scales is emphasized. We conclude with recommendations for future work on AWG, including reconciling differences between AWG and IWRM that originally framed South African reforms.
... The report highlighted a number of cases to show the scale of systematic corruption across the sector, including how it has impacted on South Africans. [33] ...
... Another point related to exposure is that this analysis cannot take into account interruptions in reliable water supply and delivery, although a recent report found that only 65% of South Africans have a reliable water supply. [33] Third, we neglected the sampling error associated with the exposure estimates and the uncertainty in the burden estimated from the SANBD2 study on the basis that these were generated from national data bases and not samples. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The incidence of diarrhoeal disease is closely linked to socioeconomic and environmental factors, household practices and access to health services. South African (SA) district health information and national survey data report wide variation in the incidence and prevalence of diarrhoeal episodes in children under 5 years of age. These differentials indicate potential for reducing the disease burden through improvements in provision of water and sanitation services and changes in hygiene behaviour. Objectives: To estimate the burden of disease attributed to unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) by province, sex and age group for SA in 2000, 2006 and 2012. Methods: Comparative risk assessment methodology was used to estimate the disease burden attributable to an exposure by comparing the observed risk factor distribution with a theoretical lowest possible population distribution. The study adapts the original World Health Organization scenario-based approach for estimating diarrhoeal disease burden from unsafe WASH, by assigning different standards of household water and sanitation-specific geographical classification to capture SA living conditions in rural, urban and informal settlements. Results: SA experienced an improvement in water and sanitation supply in eight of the nine provinces between 2001 and 2011, with the exception of Northern Cape Province. In 2011, 41% of South Africans lived with poor water and sanitation conditions; however, wide provincial inequalities exist. In 2012, it was estimated that 84.1% of all deaths due to diarrhoeal disease were attributable to unsafe WASH; this equates to 13 757 deaths (95% uncertainty interval (UI) 13 015 - 14 300). Of these diarrhoeal disease deaths, 48.2% occurred in children under 5 years of age, accounting for 13.9% of all deaths in this age group (95% UI 13.1 - 14.4). Between 2000 and 2012, the proportion of deaths attributable to diarrhoea reduced from 3.6% to 2.6%. Gauteng and Western Cape provinces experienced much lower WASHattributable death rates than the more rural, poorer provinces. Conclusion: Unsafe WASH remains an important risk factor for disease in SA, especially in children. High priority needs to be given to the provision of safe and sustainable sanitation and water facilities and promoting safe hygiene behaviours. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the critical importance of clean water for preventing and containing disease.
... However, Africa is challenged with water problems such as water scarcity, limited water supplies, increased use of water, and ineffective water regulation. In countries like Kenya, Malawi, and South Africa among others, water resource shortages, and corruption in the water sector are the major problems restricting water sustainability (Muller, 2020). Additionally, several water ecology issues such as poor water quality, loss of biodiversity, and algae growth are present throughout Africa. ...
... They further stated that educated people are conscious of protecting their environment, and it is also easy for authorities to disseminate information to educated people through print and electronic media. In terms of government interference, Muller (2020) reported that nepotism and embezzlement of funds for water resources management are the main contributors to poor quality and inadequate water supply in Africa. ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this research is to examine the trend of water use efficiency (WUE) and the spillover effect of its determinants in 28 sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries over the period 2007 to 2018 using the directional distance function (DDF) and the spatial Durbin model. Results of the DDF revealed that the most efficient countries include Botswana, and Liberia whereas countries with poor performance include Niger and South Africa. Also, the average efficiency scores over the study period improved steadily from 0.582 in 2007 to 0.698 in 2018. The study showed that under economic distance weight in the spatial Durbin model, the values of the spatial lag coefficients of urbanisation (URB), export (EX), and education (EDU) depict positive and statistically significant effects on WUE, while industrial activities (IND), foreign direct investment (FDI), and government interference (COR) had adverse influence on WUE in SSA. Results of the spatial decomposition effect of URB demonstrated a major impact on WUE in both the local and adjacent countries. However, a significant decline of WUE through the direct and indirect impacts of FDI, EX, and COR in the local and neighboring countries was recorded which indicate the presence of a negative spatial dependency on WUE in SSA. The outcome of this study implies that policymakers in SSA countries must strengthen sustainable water resources management decisions with neighbouring countries to achieve sustainable development goal 6 by 2030 and beyond.
... More so, and unfortunately, water is a high-risk sector for corruption, due to the diverse number of role players, a lack of accountability mechanisms and insufficient transparency (Peña, 2011). In some countries there is evidence of systemic corruption that undermines procedural equity processes and can delay service delivery to those members of the population most in need (Meissner, 2021;Muller, 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
As elusive as the concept of equity may be, it has nevertheless been placed at the heart of global water policy. Yet inequities in access to water and participation in water resources management persist all over the world. The global water crisis is one of inequitable access rather than availability. This critical review explores equity and equality in water resources management through multiple lenses, considering its numerous philosophical underpinnings, and offers a definition of ‘water equity’. We suggest that human rights, procedural and distributive equity (social justice), and cultural, socioeconomic, and political elements (context) are the pillars of water equity. The inter‐relatedness between them and causal effects of each of the pillars are exposed, as are cross cutting features. This contribution to the theoretical interpretation of ‘water equity’ suggests that it is a complex dynamism, a complexity of interrelated features that are constantly in flux. Acknowledging the inherent characteristics of water equity will greatly facilitate its actualisation.
... These challenges are accompanied by huge financial burdens as the water sector is facing a significant funding gap between urgent needs and available funding from both transfers and revenues (ibid.). On top, a high level of corruption and mismanagement undermines South Africa's water security (Muller 2020). The sectoral challenges are summarised in the following "challenge tree" (Fig. 7-2, NBI 2019): ...
Chapter
Full-text available
South Africa aims at ambitious water-related development goals which are in line with the Sustainable Development Goals or even surpass them. The country has established a highly ambitious and worldwide-acknowledged body of water legislation, but is struggling with the implementation of national legal regulations to meet the challenges on local level. Technical aspects and engineering capacities have been neglected in a messy political process, that undermined economic, social and institutional resilience to water stress. The continuing challenges to establish catchment management agencies (CMAs) according to the National Water Act highlight these problems. This implementation gap between macro level (legislation/institutional framework) and micro level (local water management institutions and decision makers) is well documented and results in water crisis, deterioration of resources, collapsing infrastructure and substandard services. Under the iWaGSS project (integrated Water Governance Support System) funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), information and communications technology (ICT) based governance tools and economic measures are developed to bridge the implementation gap and improve water governance on micro (local) level. Good water governance plays a key role for successful water management, as problems and challenges are not merely natural or technical.
Article
The high failure rate of water supply and sanitation (WSS) systems is a major concern, especially for developing countries. Using the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence guidelines, this study carried out a systematic review of literature on failings in WSS in the urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa to identify the factors hindering sustainability as lasting coverage. There were 101 full-text articles examined and 21 articles included in the final review. The findings are discussed through the lens of the financial, institutional, environmental, technological and social (FIETS) framework and depicted in a causal loop diagram to visualize the system structure. In total, 37 factors that contribute to the failings of urban WSS systems across 14 Sub-Saharan African countries were identified. The root causes of failed or failing systems included a lack of stakeholder engagement in the planning and implementation; limited human resources capacity; limitations imposed by settlement type (informal settlements); insufficient funds, corruption and mismanagement of funds; and insufficient operation and maintenance of facilities. The study concludes that sustainability in the sector will involve the use of legal instruments, adequate planning techniques, anti-corruption and cost recovery mechanisms to ensure long-term financing.
Article
Full-text available
This article analyses China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) of 2013–2023, which serves as its economic diplomacy tool in the 21st century. The BRI reflects China’s soft power, which targets redefining the international eco nomic order to serve its interests both economically and strategically. This article aims to identify the core motivations behind China’s BRI, its impact, challenges, and policy implications. To explain the rationale behind the BRI’s emergence, the article uses the Hegemonic Stability and Neoliberal theories as an analytical framework. The content analysis method was used, and data was obtained from secondary sources. The analysis shows that the BRI is a manifestation of China’s global aspirations and strategic maneuvers. The initiative serves as a geopolitical tool to increase China’s global influence while enhancing economic cooperation. The BRI has led to both positive and negative outcomes. This article predicts that the Glob
Article
Full-text available
The Free State Province is a text book case study for hydropolitical fragility in South Africa. The article investigates fragility in the province that is induced by the poor management of water resources within the framework of economic, environmental, political, security and societal dimensions. The study takes place within a theoretical background of the social contract and actor-network theories that are uniquely combined to complement each other since water related state societal relations are linked through a network of human and non-human actors. The article looks at the various factors that impact on hydropolitical fragility in the Free State Province that include a cadre – based administration, corruption, ageing and leaking infrastructure, poor financial administration and regional security issues. These aspects impact on the lives and livelihoods of residents in the province and contribute to increasing political unrest, disinvestment, unemployment, and poverty. Suggestions are made regarding the mitigation of the sources and impacts of hydropolitical fragility that threaten the current stability and political order in the province and country.
Book
Full-text available
The coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19) is one of many global disasters, and in recent history, since events like the bubonic plague and the Spanish flu, it may continue to cause many more mortalities, and most likely disrupt the local and global economies in a significant manner. As reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) in January 2020, Covid-19 was first discovered in China in December 2019. Since then, the contagious virus spread rapidly to other countries and across continents, resulting in total shutdowns of economies and businesses worldwide. Healthcare, economic, and governance systems have been overwhelmed, forcing governments worldwide to rethink their strategies for recovery while developing novel ways of delivering public services.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.