ArticlePDF Available

Botulinum toxin type A: Basic pharmacological profile and therapeutic applications

Authors:
  • University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemitry, Croatia

Abstract and Figures

Botulinum toxin Type A (BoNT/A), produced by the Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria Clostridium botulinum, is one of the most potent toxins in nature, and a very useful therapeutic tool for combating various neurological and autonomic disorders. The main pharmacological features of BoNT/A are neurospecificity, long-lasting effect, and safety. These features are grounded on its peculiar molecular mechanism of action: after specific binding to the neuronal membrane, it is internalized into the neuronal cytosol, where it specifically cleaves one of the proteins necessary for neurotransmitters release. The consequent reversible neuroparalysis lasts for several months and explains the long-lasting clinical effects after a single local toxin application. Although already approved for the prevention of chronic migraine, the basic and clinical investigations have repeatedly shown the potential of BoNT/A in relieving other chronic pain conditions. Accumulated data from experimental pain models demonstrated that BoNT/A reduces pathological pain hypersensitivity after axonal transport to the central nervous system, where it interferes with complex processes of central sensitization. Future experiments are needed to explain in more depth BoNT/A molecular mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic peculiarities.
Content may be subject to copyright.
10
Arh. farm. 2020; 70: 10 – 19 Pregledni rad/ Review article
Botulinum toxin type A: basic pharmacological
profile and therapeutic applications
Lidija Bach-Rojecky*, Višnja Drinovac Vlah
University of Zagreb - Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Department of
Pharmacology, Domagojeva 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
*Corresponding author: Lidija Bach-Rojecky, e-mail: lbach@pharma.hr
Abstract
Botulinum toxin Type A (BoNT/A), produced by the Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria
Clostridium botulinum, is one of the most potent toxins in nature, and a very useful therapeutic
tool for combating various neurological and autonomic disorders. The main pharmacological
features of BoNT/A are neurospecificity, long-lasting effect, and safety. These features are
grounded on its peculiar molecular mechanism of action: after specific binding to the neuronal
membrane, it is internalized into the neuronal cytosol, where it specifically cleaves one of the
proteins necessary for neurotransmitters release. The consequent reversible neuroparalysis lasts
for several months and explains the long-lasting clinical effects after a single local toxin
application. Although already approved for the prevention of chronic migraine, the basic and
clinical investigations have repeatedly shown the potential of BoNT/A in relieving other chronic
pain conditions. Accumulated data from experimental pain models demonstrated that BoNT/A
reduces pathological pain hypersensitivity after axonal transport to the central nervous system,
where it interferes with complex processes of central sensitization. Future experiments are needed
to explain in more depth BoNT/A molecular mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic
peculiarities.
Key words: botulinum toxin type A, mechanism of action, therapeutic applications,
pain investigation
11
Introduction
Clostridium botulinum is an anaerobic spore-forming Gram-positive bacteria which
under appropriate conditions produces different protein neurotoxins (BoNTs). Bacteria
produce seven serotypically distinct BoNTs, denoted as BoNT/A–BoNT/G, which can be
further divided into subtypes according to amino acid sequences. Due to their high
potency and specificity for neurons, BoNTs are one of the most powerful known toxins
in nature (1). Their biological and pharmacological properties have been extensively
studied during the last several decades, with special focus on their potential therapeutic
applications. The therapeutic potential of BoNT/A was unveiled in the 1970s, and
nowadays it has the widest clinical application of all BoNTs.
Structure of BoNT/A
BoNT protein is released from bacteria as a large 900 kDa oligomers consisting of
a 150 kDa neurotoxin and auxiliary proteins, which includes a non-toxic non-
hemagglutinin (NTNH) and three hemagglutinin proteins (2). NTNH contributes to toxin
stability in the acidic environment, while haemagglutinins are involved in translocation
across the intestinal epithelial lining into the lymphatic system and the bloodstream (3).
The neurotoxic part of this progenitor toxin complexes consists of a light chain (L chain;
50 kDa) and a heavy chain (H chain; 100 kDa), which are held together by non-covalent
interactions and a single inter-chain disulfide bond. While the H chain mediates the
specific binding of neurotoxin to the presynaptic plasma membrane of nerve terminals,
the L chain exerts proteolytic activity against specific intracytosolic proteins (3,4).
Molecular mechanism of action
BoNT/A binds with high affinity to peripheral cholinergic nerve terminals and after
entering into the neuronal cytosol blocks the release of acetylcholine from motoneurons
and parasympathetic neurons. The consequence is generalized peripheral flaccid paralysis
of skeletal muscles and dysfunction of cholinergic nervous systems as the most important
pathological features of botulism (4). The mechanism of nerve terminal intoxication by
the BoNT/A includes four steps: 1) specific binding to nerve terminals, 2) internalization
within an endocytic compartment, 3) translocation of the L chain across the vesicle
membrane and its release in the cytosol upon reduction of the interchain disulfide bond;
and 4) cleavage of SNAP-25 (synaptosomal-associated protein 25 kDa), one of the
proteins which is crucial for neurotransmitter release (4). The final result of this specific
series of events is neuroparalysis (Figure 1).
12
Figure 1. Molecular mechanism of BoNT/A action on motor nerve terminals
In analogy with its known action on the neuromuscular junction, it was proposed
that BoNT/A prevents the sensory neurotransmitter release from the peripheral nerve
endings as well (5). This was demonstrated with series of in vitro experiments where
BoNT/A inhibited the release of neurotransmitters such as glutamate, noradrenaline,
serotonin, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, adenosine triphosphate,
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide from cultured cells (4,5).
Clinical applications
BoNT/A has several favorable and unique pharmacological characteristics. As
already described, it is very potent and neurospecific, its action is reversible with time
and finally, it is very safe because of minimal diffusion after local injection in small
volumes. Because of these features, BoNT/A (applied intramuscularly or intradermally
in picogram quantities) is one of the safest and most efficacious therapeutic proteins for
autonomic disorders, spasticity, and hyperkinetic movement disorders, as well as for
cosmetic treatments (6). Since the introduction in human therapy during the 1980s, the
13
number of clinical indications has been continuously expanding (Table I). Currently, the
only approved use of BoNT/A concerning pain is chronic migraine, based on randomized
controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analysis (7).
Table I Therapeutic indications of BoNT/A (Botox) (4)
Neurology focal dystonias (blepharosmasm, cervical dystonia)
non-dystonic disorder (hemifascial spasm)
focal spasticity (limb spasticity)
cerebral palsy
hyperhidrosis
hypersalivation (sialorrhea, drooling in parkinsonian
syndrome)
aesthetics
Ophtalmology
strabismus
Urology
overactive bladder (detrusor o
veractivity)
Pain chronic migraine prevention
Three products that contain BoNT/A are commercially available in this part of the
world: onabotulinumtoxin A (ONA), abobotulinumtoxin A (ABO), and
incobotulinumtoxin A (INCO). ONA and ABO are neurotoxin complexes with auxiliary
proteins (molecular weight 900 kDa) while INCO contains only the purified BoNT/A
(molecular weight 150 kDa). The potency of BoNT preparations is expressed as Units
(U), where 1U corresponds to 1 LD50 in the mouse bioassay (~48 pg). Regarding relative
potency between all three products, in the clinical setting, it was observed that ONA and
ABO have non-parallel dose-response curves, where 1 U of ONA is equivalent o 2.5-3 U
of ABO (conversion ratio is 1:2.5-3), in contrast to ICNO which is equivalently potent as
ONA (8).
14
After local injection into the muscle, BoNT/A induces paralysis 2–3 days after the
application. The paralytic effect is maintained for 3-4 months, while in the autonomic
synapses the effect lasts for approximately 1 year (4). As already mentioned, excellent
safety profile is one of the key features of BoNT/A use. The adverse effects can be related
to the paralysis outside the target muscle because of the local diffusion to adjacent
muscles. This depends on the volume and speed of injection, dose, and site of injection.
For example, dysphagia can be a side-effect in the treatment of cervical dystonia, while
ptosis or a “frozen” face could be seen in facial aesthetics (9,10). After local injections of
BoNT/A, the fraction which didn’t enter the neurons is probably diluted in the lymphatic
circulation and washed away from the injection sites, being unable to affect more distant
nerve endings because of too low concentration.
BoNT/A action on pain
An unexpected discovery that BoNT/A injection into glabellar lines reduces
migraine headaches, followed by positive results coming from randomized clinical trials,
led to regulatory approval of Botox for chronic (not episodic) migraine headaches in
2011 (7). BoNT/A is injected intramuscularly in 31-39 anatomical points distributed
across the corrugator, procerus, frontalis, temporalis, occipitalis, cervical paraspinal, and
trapezius muscle groups. BoNT/A is injected intramuscularly in 31-39 anatomical points
distributed across the corrugator, procerus, frontalis, temporalis, occipitalis, cervical
paraspinal, and trapezius muscle groups. BoNT/A reduces migraine frequency and
provides modest improvement of migraine symptoms. BoNT/A is investigated in other
pain conditions and shows promising results in neuropathic and some other chronic pain
disorders (11,12). In contrast to conventional and non-conventional analgesic drugs, long-
lasting analgesic effect after a single application (several months in humans, more than
15 days in animals) is main advantage of BoNT/A use. While the results are promising,
the quality level of evidence due to a low number of participants, lack of standardized
dosing and delivery protocols, is not persuasive enough to provide explicit guidelines for
pain physicians (12).
Basic research of the action of BoNT/A on pain during the last two decades led to
an important insight into the molecular mechanism of its antinociceptive action. BoNT/A
was investigated in different inflammatory and neuropathic pain models, as well as on
models of “mirror” pain of central origin (Table II).
15
Table II Preclinical investigation of BoNT/A in some experimental inflammatory and
neuropathic pain models (according to review of Matak et al. (12)
Pain models Results
Inflammatory pain models:
- formalin-induced spontaneous pain
- carrageenan-induced hypersensitivity
and paw oedema
- capsaicin–induced hypersensitivity
and neurogenic inflammation
BoNT/A applied s.c. (3.5-7 U/kg) into the rat hind-paw pad
or intrathecally (1 U/kg) into the lumbar segment of the
spinal cord reduced:
- pain behaviours in the second inflammatory phase of the
formalin test;
- thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity but not the size of
local oedema in the carrageenan model;
- thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity but not the local
neurogenic inflammation in the capsaicin model
Neuropathic pain models:
- partial sciatic nerve transection
- streptozotocin-induced diabetic
polineuropathy
- paclitaxel-induced neuropathic
polineuropathy
- infraorbital nerve constriction injury-
induced trigeminal neuropathy
BoNT/A applied s.c. (3.5-7 U/kg) into the hind-paw pad or
intrathecally (1 U/kg) into the lumbar segment of the spinal
cord reduced:
- mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia induced by partial
sciatic nerve injury;
- hypersensitivity to mechanical and thermal stimuli induced
by streptozotocin and paclitaxel (pain reduction was
observed on both paws although BoNT/A was applied on
one side only)
BoNT/A applied s.c. (3.5 U/kg) into the vibrissal pad
reduced:
- mechanical hypersensitivity after partial infraorbital nerve
constriction injury (pain reduction was observed on both
sides of the head although BoNT/A was applied into the
whisker pad on one side only)
16
In analogy with action in the neuromuscular junction, first, it was suggested that the
antinociceptive effect of BoNT/A is a consequence of inhibition of neurotransmitter
release from peripheral sensory nerve endings (13). However, a series of behavioral data
from experimental models demonstrated that the BoNT/A action on pain occurs primarily
in the central nervous system (CNS), where it inhibits neurotransmitter release from
central terminals of primary afferent neurons. This was confirmed by the
immunohistochemical detection of cleaved SNAP-25, using antibody specific for
BoNT/A-cleaved SNAP-25 (the product of BoNT/A proteolytic activity), within the
sensory regions of the brainstem or spinal segment associated with the peripherally
injected area (12,14). These experiments have also suggested that axonal transport of
BoNT/A from the peripheral site of application to the CNS is a prerequisite for its action
on pain (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Proposed mechanism of antinociceptive action of BoNT/A
Furthermore, it was demonstrated that BoNT/A modulates spinal opioid, GABA
and glutamate neurotransmitter systems, as well as microglial activation and signaling.
Attenuation of the microglia activation and neuroinflammation was proposed to play a
role in the overall antinociceptive action of BoNT/A (12,15,16).
In the sensory system, BoNT/A action may be limited to certain neuronal
populations mediating nociception, as already demonstrated for capsaicin-sensitive
17
neurons (17). This could explain the observed selective BoNT/A's antinociceptive action
on some types of chronic pain and patient subpopulations. Long-lasting action after a
single application is most likely a consequence of BoNT/A cellular localization and
escape of intracellular degradation (12). It was demonstrated that BoNT/A light chain
does not distribute evenly within the cytosol, but is concentrated at the inner side of the
plasma membrane thus interacting with small GTP-ase proteins that polymerize into non-
polar filaments to form a part of cytoskeleton. Another possible explanation is that
BoNT/A escapes the ubiquitine-proteasome degradation pathway by recruiting
specialized enzymes that remove polyubiquitin chains (12).
Further experiments investigating BoNT/A effects on multiple sites on its way from
the periphery to the CNS are needed to explain in more depth its action on pain of different
etiologies and to improve its clinical use.
References:
1. Rossetto O, Pirazzini M, and Montecucco C. Botulinum neurotoxins: genetic, structural and
mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:535–549.
2. Benefield DA, Dessain SK, Shine N, Ohi MD, and Lacy DB. Molecular assembly
of botulinum neurotoxin progenitor complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:5630–5635.
3. Gu S and Jin R. Assembly and function of the botulinum neurotoxin progenitor
complex. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2013;364:21–44.
4. Pirazzini M., Rossetto O, Eleopra R, Montecucco C. Botulinum Neurotoxins: Biology,
Pharmacology, and Toxicology. Pharmacol Rev. 2017;69:200–235.
5. McMahon HT, Foran, Dolly JO, Verhage M. Wiegant VM, Nicholls DG. Tetanus toxin and
botulinum toxins type A and B inhibit glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, aspartate, and met-
enkephalin release from synaptosomes. Clues to the locus of action. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267:21338–
21343.
6. Safarpour Y, Jabbari B. Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Movement Disorders. Curr Treat Options
Neurol. 2018;20:4 doi: 10.1007/s11940-018-0488-3.
7. Herd CP, Tomlinson CL, Rick C, Scotton WJ, Edwards J, Ives N, Clarke CE, Sinclair A. Botulinum
toxins for the prevention of migraine in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018, doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD011616.pub2.
8. Frevert J. Pharmaceutical, biological, and clinical properties of botulinum neurotoxin type A
products. Drugs R D. 2015;15:1–9.
18
9. Naumann M, Jankovic J. Safety of botulinum toxin type A: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:981–990.
10. de Almeida AT, De Boulle K. Diffusion characteristics of botulinum neurotoxin products and their
clinical significance in cosmetic applications. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9 (Suppl 1):17–22.
11. Safarpour Y, Jabbari B. Botulinum toxin treatment of pain syndromes –an evidence based review.
Toxicon. 2018;147:120–128
12. Matak I, Bölcskei K, Bach-Rojecky L, Helyes Z. Mechanisms of Botulinum Toxin Type A Action
on Pain. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(8):459. doi:10.3390/toxins11080459
13. Aoki KR. Review of a proposed mechanism for the antinociceptive action of botulinum toxin type
A. Neuro. Toxicology. 2005;26:785-793.
14. Matak I, Bach-Rojecky L, Filipović B, Lacković Z. Behavioral and immunohistochemical evidence
for central antinociceptive activity of botulinum toxin A. Neuroscience. 2011;186:201-207.
15. Drinovac Vlah V, Filipović B, Bach-Rojecky L, Lacković, Z. Role of central versus peripheral opioid
system in antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effect of botulinum toxin type A in trigeminal
region. Eur J Pain. 2018;22:583–591.
16. Drinovac Vlah V, Bach-Rojecky L, Lacković Z. Association of antinociceptive action of botulinum
toxin type A with GABA-A receptor. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2014;121:665–669.
17. Matak I, Rossetto O, Lacković Z. Botulinum toxin type A selectivity for certain types of pain is
associated with capsaicin-sensitive neurons: Pain. 2014;155:1516–1526.
19
Botulinski toksin tip A: osnovni farmakološki
profil i terapijska primena
Lidija Bach-Rojecky*, Višnja Drinovac Vlah
Univerzitet u Zagrebu - Fakultet za Farmaciju i Biohemiju, Katedra za Farmakologiju,
Domagojeva 2, 10 000 Zagreb, Hrvatska
*Autor za korespondenciju: Lidija Bach-Rojecky, e-mail: lbach@pharma.hr
Sažetak
Botulin toksin tipa A (BoNT/A) proizvodi gram-pozitivna anaerobna bakterija Clostridium
botulinum i jedan je od najpotentnijih toksina u prirodi, ali i vrlo korisno terapijsko sredstvo kod
različitih neuroloških i autonomnih poremećaja. Glavne farmakološke karakteristike BoNT/A su
neurospecifičnost, dugotrajno dejstvo i sigurnost. Te su karakteristike utemeljene na njegovom
posebnom molekularnom mehanizmu delovanja: nakon specifičnog vezanja za membranu
neurona, internalizuje se u citosol, gde specifično cepa jedan od proteina potrebnih za egzocitozu
neurotransmitera. Posledična reverzibilna neuroparaliza traje nekoliko meseci i objašnjava
dugotrajne kliničke učinke nakon jednokratne lokalne primene toksina. BoNT/A je odobren za
primenu u prevenciji hronične migrene, a brojna pretklinička i klinička ispitivanja pokazala su
njegov potencijal u ublažavanju drugih hroničnih bolnih stanja. Mnogobrojni podaci iz
eksperimentalnih modela bola pokazali su da BoNT/A smanjuje patološku preosetljivost na bol
nakon aksonskog transporta u centralni nervni sistem, gde interferira sa složenim procesima
centralne senzitizacije. Potrebna su dodatna istraživanja koja bi detaljnije opisala molekularni
mehanizam delovanja BoNT/A na bol, kao i posebne farmakokinetičke karakteristike.
Ključne reči: botulinski toksin tipa A, mehanizam delovanja, terapijska primena,
ispitivanje bola
... 3,4 A molécula da BoNT é composta por uma cadeia leve (50 kDa) e uma cadeia pesada (100 kDa) unidas pelas pontes de dissulfetos e envoltas por hemaglutininas. 5,6 O mecanismo pelo qual a BoNT age levando à paralisia muscular se dá quando a hemaglutinina encosta no axônio terminal, fazendo com que a cadeia pesada se conecte com o receptor presente no axônio, assim a passagem é facilitada e a molécula consegue entrar no neurônio. As cadeias então desconectam-se, e a cadeia leve segue para executar a sua função de clivagem do complexo soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE, em inglês) retirando parte de sua estrutura, o soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor attachment protein-25 (SNAP-25, em inglês). ...
... Logo, o complexo SNARE, que seria responsável pela passagem da acetilcolina para a fenda sináptica, não consegue realizar sua função, impedindo a despolarização da membrana celular e o influxo de cálcio e efluxo de sódio, impossibilitando a contração muscular das fibras de actina e miosina. [5][6][7] O oftalmologista Alan B. Scott, do Eye Research Institute, em São Francisco, Califórnia (1920), descreveu a utilização medicamentosa da BoNT em pacientes com desalinhamento ocular nos casos de estrabismo. 3,4 A injeção dessa toxina proporcionou uma redução da atividade muscular através da denervação química. ...
Article
Full-text available
Resumo Introdução A toxina botulínica A (BoNT-A) atua inibindo a liberação de acetilcolina do terminal présináptico, resultando em paralisia química reversível dos músculos. É um tratamento amplamente aceito para melhorar a aparência das linhas de expressão glabelares que se desenvolvem devido à contração muscular. Materiais e Métodos Foram avaliados os padrões de forças glabelares; classificação de rugas faciais; e quantidade de unidades de BoNT-A utilizadas nos músculos corrugador e prócero. Resultados A média total de unidades de BoNT-A utilizadas foi de 7,2 UI no músculo corrugador (mulheres 7,1 UI e homens 7,4 UI) e de 3,9 U no prócero (mulheres 3,9 UI e homens 4,1 UI), com correlação positiva entre o número de unidades utilizadas e a idade dos 58 participantes. Quanto ao padrão de forças, utilizou-se mais unidades no músculo corrugador com padrão forte e classificação de rugas faciais de 3 a 4, e moderado com a mesma classificação de rugas faciais (8 UI e 8,5 UI, respectivamente), no músculo prócero foram utilizadas mais unidades no padrão de força forte com rugas classificadas em 3 a 4 (5 UI). Sendo as rugas classificadas de 3 a 5 as que mais necessitaram de unidades de BoNT-A. Conclusão A quantidade de unidades de BoNT-A utilizadas é diretamente proporcional ao padrão de força e classificação das rugas faciais, sendo necessária a utilização de mais unidades quando observado o padrão de força forte e classificação de rugas profundas.
Article
Background: Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) primarily acts by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from the presynaptic terminal, resulting in reversible chemical paralysis of muscles. It is a widely accepted treatment for improving the appearance of glabellar expression lines that develop due to muscle contraction. Method: The glabellar force patterns, facial wrinkle classification, and a number of BoNT-A units used in the corrugator and procerus muscles were evaluated. Results: The mean total units of BoNT-A used were 7.2U in the corrugator muscle (7.1U in women and 7.4U in men) and 3.9U in the procerus muscle (3.9U in women and 4.1U in men), with a positive correlation between the number of units used and the age of the 58 participants. Regarding muscle strength pattern, more units were used in the corrugator muscle with a strong pattern and facial wrinkle classification of 3-4 and moderate with the same wrinkle classification (8U and 8.5U, respectively). In the procerus muscle, more units were used in the strong force pattern with wrinkles classified as 3-4 (5U). Wrinkles classified as 3-5 required the highest number of BoNT-A units. Conclusion: The quantity of BoNT-A units used is directly proportional to the strength pattern and classification of facial wrinkles, with more units required when a strong force pattern and deep wrinkle classification are observed.
Article
Full-text available
Context: Acne is a common skin condition characterized by chronic inflammation of the pilosebaceous unit. Increased sebum production is a key component of acne pathogenesis. Various therapies are available for acne, including topical, systemic, and physical treatments. Botulinum toxin is increasingly used in facial cosmetic procedures. Observations suggest that botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) may reduce sebum levels in the face. This finding could potentially lead to the development of a new treatment for oily skin and acne. Evidence Acquisition: A retrospective literature review was conducted by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases using keywords such as "acne," "acne treatment," "oily skin," and "botulinum toxin type A." The review focused on studies that assessed the impact of BoNT-A on patients with acne vulgaris and oily skin, as well as studies that measured skin sebum levels and pore size following BoNT-A application. Results: Nine studies were reviewed. Of these, two evaluated the effects of BoNT-A on 30 and 35 patients with acne vulgaris. Four studies assessed sebum reduction in 20, 50, 42, and 20 patients. Three studies evaluated both sebum reduction and pore size tightening in 10, 25, and 20 patients. Eight studies demonstrated that the application of BoNT-A has a positive effect on patients with acne and reduces sebum production in facial skin. Only one study, which evaluated both sebum reduction and pore size tightening, found no significant effect. Overall, the studies indicate that BoNT-A application can positively impact acne and reduce facial sebum production. Specifically, intradermal application of BoNT-A at low dosages can help reduce acne, sebum production, and tighten pores. Conclusions: BoNT-A shows promise as a treatment for acne and oily skin. While cost-effectiveness may be a challenge for some patients, the benefits of BoNT-A make it a treatment option worth considering. With further studies to optimize dosages and determine the longest duration of efficacy, BoNT-A has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of acne and oily skin.
Article
Full-text available
Already a well-established treatment for different autonomic and movement disorders, the use of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) in pain conditions is now continuously expanding. Currently, the only approved use of BoNT/A in relation to pain is the treatment of chronic migraines. However, controlled clinical studies show promising results in neuropathic and other chronic pain disorders. In comparison with other conventional and non-conventional analgesic drugs, the greatest advantages of BoNT/A use are its sustained effect after a single application and its safety. Its efficacy in certain therapy-resistant pain conditions is of special importance. Novel results in recent years has led to a better understanding of its actions, although further experimental and clinical research is warranted. Here, we summarize the effects contributing to these advantageous properties of BoNT/A in pain therapy, specific actions along the nociceptive pathway, consequences of its central activities, the molecular mechanisms of actions in neurons, and general pharmacokinetic parameters.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Migraine occurs in around 15% of adults and is ranked as the seventh most disabling disease amongst all diseases globally. Despite the available treatments many people suffer prolonged and frequent attacks which have a major impact on their quality of life. Chronic migraine is defined as 15 or more days of headache per month, at least eight of those days being migraine. People with episodic migraine have fewer than 15 headache days per month. Botulinum toxin type A has been licensed in some countries for chronic migraine treatment, due to the results of just two trials. Objectives: To assess the effects of botulinum toxins versus placebo or active treatment for the prevention or reduction in frequency of chronic or episodic migraine in adults. Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE & MEDLINE in Process, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry (to December 2017). We examined reference lists and carried out citation searches on key publications. We sent correspondence to major manufacturers of botulinum toxin. Selection criteria: Randomised, double-blind, controlled trials of botulinum toxin (any sero-type) injections into the head and neck for prophylaxis of chronic or episodic migraine in adults. Eligible comparators were placebo, alternative prophylactic agent or different dose of botulinum toxin. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently selected trials and extracted data. For continuous outcomes we used mean change data when available. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratios (RRs). We used data from the 12-week post-treatment follow-up time point. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created two 'Summary of findings' tables. Main results: Description of trialsWe found 90 articles describing 28 trials (4190 participants), which were eligible for inclusion. The longest treatment duration was three rounds of injections with three months between treatments, so we could not analyse long-term effects. For the primary analyses, we pooled data from both chronic and episodic participant populations. Where possible, we also separated data into chronic migraine, episodic migraine and 'mixed group' classification subgroups. Most trials (21 out of 28) were small (fewer than 50 participants per trial arm). The risk of bias for included trials was low or unclear across most domains, with some trials reporting a high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting.Botulinum toxin versus placeboTwenty-three trials compared botulinum toxin with placebo. Botulinum toxin may reduce the number of migraine days per month in the chronic migraine population by 3.1 days (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.7 to -1.4, 4 trials, 1497 participants, low-quality evidence). This was reduced to -2 days (95% CI -2.8 to -1.1, 2 trials, 1384 participants; moderate-quality evidence) when we removed small trials.A single trial of people with episodic migraine (N = 418) showed no difference between groups for this outcome measure (P = 0.49).In the chronic migraine population, botulinum toxin reduces the number of headache days per month by 1.9 days (95% CI -2.7 to -1.0, 2 trials, 1384 participants, high-quality evidence). We did not find evidence of a difference in the number of migraine attacks for both chronic and episodic migraine participants (6 trials, N = 2004, P = 0.30, low-quality evidence). For the population of both chronic and episodic migraine participants a reduction in severity of migraine rated during clinical visits, on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) of 3.3 cm (95% CI -4.2 to -2.5, very low-quality evidence) in favour of botulinum toxin treatment came from four small trials (N = 209); better reporting of this outcome measure from the additional eight trials that recorded it may have improved our confidence in the pooled estimate. Global assessment and quality-of-life measures were poorly reported and it was not possible to carry out statistical analysis of these outcome measures. Analysis of adverse events showed an increase in the risk ratio with treatment with botulinum toxin over placebo 30% (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.47, moderate-quality evidence). For every 100 participants 60 experienced an adverse event in the botulinum toxin group compared with 47 in the placebo group.Botulinum toxin versus other prophylactic agentThree trials studied comparisons with alternative oral prophylactic medications. Meta-analyses were not possible for number of migraine days, number of headache days or number of migraine attacks due to insufficient data, but individually trials reported no differences between groups for a variety of efficacy measures in the population of both chronic and episodic migraine participants. The global impression of disease measured using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores were reported from two trials that showed no difference between groups. Compared with oral treatments, botulinum toxin showed no between-group difference in the risk of adverse events (2 trials, N = 114, very low-quality evidence). The relative risk reduction (RRR) for withdrawing from botulinum toxin due to adverse events compared with the alternative prophylactic agent was 72% (P = 0.02, 2 trials, N = 119).Dosing trialsThere were insufficient data available for the comparison of different doses.Quality of the evidenceThe quality of the evidence assessed using GRADE methods was varied but mostly very low; the quality of the evidence for the placebo and active control comparisons was low and very low, respectively for the primary outcome measure. Small trial size, high risk of bias and unexplained heterogeneity were common reasons for downgrading the quality of the evidence. Authors' conclusions: In chronic migraine, botulinum toxin type A may reduce the number of migraine days per month by 2 days compared with placebo treatment. Non-serious adverse events were probably experienced by 60/100 participants in the treated group compared with 47/100 in the placebo group. For people with episodic migraine, we remain uncertain whether or not this treatment is effective because the quality of this limited evidence is very low. Better reporting of outcome measures in published trials would provide a more complete evidence base on which to draw conclusions.
Article
Full-text available
Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are now among the most widely used therapeutic agents in clinical medicine with indications applied to the fields of movement disorders, pain disorders, and autonomic dysfunction. In this literature review, the efficacy and utility of BoNTs in the field of movement disorders are assessed using the criteria of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. The literature supports a level A efficacy (established) for BoNT therapy in cervical dystonia and a level B efficacy (probably effective) for blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, laryngeal dystonia (spasmodic dysphonia), task-specific dystonias, essential tremor, and Parkinson rest tremor. It is the view of movement disorder experts, however, that despite the level B efficacy, BoNTs should be considered treatment of first choice for blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, laryngeal, and task-specific dystonias. The emerging data on motor and vocal tics of Tourette syndrome and oromandibular dystonias are encouraging but the current level of efficacy is U (undetermined) due to lack of published high-quality studies.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Although botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) is approved for chronic migraine treatment, its site and mechanism of action are still elusive. Recently our group discovered that suppression of CGRP release from dural nerve endings might account for antimigraine action of pericranially injected BT-A. We demonstrated that central antinociceptive effect of BT-A in sciatic region involves endogenous opioid system as well. Here we investigated possible interaction of BT-A with endogenous opioid system within the trigeminal region. Methods: In orofacial formalin test we investigated the influence of centrally acting opioid antagonist naltrexone (2 mg/kg, s.c.) versus peripherally acting methylnaltrexone (2 mg/kg, s.c.) on BT-A's (5 U/kg, s.c. into whisker pad) or morphine's (6 mg/kg, s.c.) antinociceptive effect and the effect on dural neurogenic inflammation (DNI). DNI was assessed by Evans blue-plasma protein extravasation. Results: Naltrexone abolished the effect of BT-A on pain and dural plasma protein extravasation, whereas peripherally acting methylnaltrexone did not change either BT-A's effect on pain or its effect on dural extravasation. Naltrexone abolished the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of morphine, as well. However, methylnaltrexone decreased the antinociceptive effect of morphine only partially in the second phase of the test and had no significant effect on morphine-mediated reduction in DNI. Conclusions: Morphine acts on pain in trigeminal region both peripherally and centrally, whereas the effect on dural plasma protein extravasation seems to be only centrally mediated. However, the interaction of BT-A with endogenous opioid system, with consequent inhibition of nociceptive transmission as well as the DNI, occurs primarily centrally. Significance: Botulinum toxin type A (BT-A)'s axonal transport and potential transcytosis suggest that its antinociceptive effect might involve diverse neurotransmitters at different sites of trigeminal system. Here we discovered that the reduction in pain and accompanying DNI involves the interaction of BT-A with central endogenous opioid system (probably at the level of trigeminal nucleus caudalis).
Article
Full-text available
The study of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) is rapidly progressing in many aspects. Novel BoNTs are being discovered owing to next generation sequencing, but their biologic and pharmacological properties remain largely unknown. The molecular structure of the large protein complexes that the toxin forms with accessory proteins, which are included in some BoNT type A1 and B1 pharmacological preparations, have been determined. By far the largest effort has been dedicated to the testing and validation of BoNTs as therapeutic agents in an ever increasing number of applications, including pain therapy. BoNT type A1 has been also exploited in a variety of cosmetic treatments, alone or in combination with other agents, and this specific market has reached the size of the one dedicated to the treatment of medical syndromes. The pharmacological properties and mode of action of BoNTs have shed light on general principles of neuronal transport and protein-protein interactions and are stimulating basic science studies. Moreover, the wide array of BoNTs discovered and to be discovered and the production of recombinant BoNTs endowed with specific properties suggest novel uses in therapeutics with increasing disease/symptom specifity. These recent developments are reviewed here to provide an updated picture of the biologic mechanism of action of BoNTs, of their increasing use in pharmacology and in cosmetics, and of their toxicology.
Article
Full-text available
Botulinum neurotoxin injections are a valuable treatment modality for many therapeutic indications and have revolutionized the field of aesthetic medicine so that they are the leading cosmetic procedure performed worldwide. Studies show that onabotulinumtoxinA, abobotulinumtoxinA, and incobotulinumtoxinA are comparable in terms of clinical efficacy. Differences between the products relate to the botulinum neurotoxin complexes, specific biological potency, and their immunogenicity. Protein complex size and molecular weight have no effect on biological activity, stability, distribution, or side effect profile. Complexing proteins and inactive toxin (toxoid) content increase the risk of neutralizing antibody formation, which can cause secondary treatment failure, particularly in chronic disorders that require frequent injections and long-term treatment. These attributes could lead to differences in therapeutic outcomes, and, given the widespread aesthetic use of these three neurotoxin products, physicians should be aware of how they differ to ensure their safe and effective use.
Article
Full-text available
Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are produced by anaerobic bacteria of the genus Clostridium and cause a persistent paralysis of peripheral nerve terminals, which is known as botulism. Neurotoxigenic clostridia belong to six phylogenetically distinct groups and produce more than 40 different BoNT types, which inactivate neurotransmitter release owing to their metalloprotease activity. In this Review, we discuss recent studies that have improved our understanding of the genetics and structure of BoNT complexes. We also describe recent insights into the mechanisms of BoNT entry into the general circulation, neuronal binding, membrane translocation and neuroparalysis.
Article
This review evaluates the existing level of evidence for efficacy of BoNTs in different pain syndromes using the recommended efficacy criteria from the Assessment and Therapeutic Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. There is a level A evidence (effective) for BoNT therapy in post-herpetic neuralgia, trigeminal neuralgia, and posttraumatic neuralgia. There is a level B evidence (probably effective) for diabetic neuropathy, plantar fasciitis, piriformis syndrome, pain associated with total knee arthroplasty, male pelvic pain syndrome, chronic low back pain, male pelvic pain, and neuropathic pain secondary to traumatic spinal cord injury. BoNTs are possibly effective (Level C -one class II study) for female pelvic pain, painful knee osteoarthritis, post-operative pain in children with cerebral palsy after adductor release surgery, anterior knee pain with vastus lateralis imbalance. There is a level B evidence (one class I study) that BoNT treatment is probably ineffective in carpal tunnel syndrome. For myofascial pain syndrome, the level of evidence is U (undetermined) due to contradicting results. More high quality (Class I) studies and studies with different types of BoNTs are needed for better understanding of the role of BoNTs in pain syndromes.
Article
Unlike most classical analgesics, botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) does not alter acute nociceptive thresholds, and shows selectivity primarily for allodynic and hyperalgesic responses in certain pain conditions. We hypothesized that this phenomenon might be explained by characterizing the sensory neurons targeted by BoNT/A in CNS after its axonal transport. BoNT/A's central antinociceptive activity following its application into the rat whisker pad was examined in trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) and higher level nociceptive brain areas using BoNT/A-cleaved synaptosomal-associated protein 25 (SNAP-25) and c-Fos immunohistochemistry. Occurrence of cleaved SNAP-25 in TNC was examined after non-selective ganglion ablation with formalin or selective denervation of capsaicin-sensitive (vanilloid receptor-1 or TRPV1-expressing) neurons, and in relation to different cellular and neuronal markers. Regional c-Fos activation and effect of TRPV1-expressing afferent denervation on toxin's antinociceptive action were studied in formalin-induced orofacial pain. BoNT/A-cleaved SNAP-25 was observed in TNC, but not in higher level nociceptive nuclei. Cleaved SNAP-25 in TNC disappeared after formalin-induced trigeminal ganglion ablation or capsaicin-induced sensory denervation. Occurrence of cleaved SNAP-25 in TNC and BoNT/A antinociceptive activity in formalin-induced orofacial pain were prevented by denervation with capsaicin. Cleaved SNAP-25 localization demonstrated toxin's presynaptic activity in TRPV1-expressing neurons. BoNT/A reduced the c-Fos activation in TNC, locus coeruleus and periaqueductal gray. Present experiments suggest that BoNT/A alters the nociceptive transmission at the central synapse of primary afferents. Targeting of TRPV1-expressing neurons might be associated with observed selectivity of BoNT/A action only in certain types of pain.
Article
The mechanism of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) antinociceptive action in the central nervous system is little known. The potential interaction between BTX-A and GABAergic system has not been investigated previously. In the present study, we demonstrate prevention of BTX-A antinociceptive effect on formalin-induced inflammatory pain and partial sciatic nerve transection-induced mechanical allodynia by GABA-A antagonist bicuculline, thus suggesting association of the GABA-A receptors and antinociceptive action of BTX-A.