ArticlePDF Available

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
NE
US
Academic Publishers
Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences
March 2020 | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | Page 234
The “One Health” concept was introduced at the be-
ginning of the 2000s. In a few words, it summarized
an idea that had been known for more than a century; that
human health and animal health are interdependent and
bound to the health of the ecosystems in which they exist
(OIE, 2020). is concept is envisaged and implemented
by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), but
also for multiple other organizations, as a collaborative
global approach to understanding risks for human and an-
imal health, including both domestic animals and wildlife,
and ecosystem health as a whole (OIE, 2020).
One Health is an approach that recognizes that human
health is closely related to animal health and environmen-
tal health. In a broad sense, the integrated health results
from the interaction between humans, animals, and the
environment, including other living beings, such as the
plants. is initiative is of great importance to the extent
that we can discuss it in the context of infectious disease
ecology, where both animals and the environment have
signicant relationships and relevance for the occurrence
of emerging zoonotic diseases in animals and humans
(Dhama et al., 2013; Bonilla-Aldana et al., 2019). Further-
more, thorough knowledge of the relationships between
host, pathogen and environment along with their ecology
is crucial to counter infectious pathogens.
Zoonotic diseases, in general, are good examples of this.
e threat of emerging and re-emerging zoonoses has now
increased globally due to several factors such as bloom in
trade and travel, climate change, rapidly evolving patho-
gens, population explosion, changing habbits and life-
style of humans, intensive integrated animal farming, and
others. Within the group of zoonotic diseases, there is a
wide range of infectious diseases caused by viral, bacterial,
parasitic, fungal, and even prion pathogens. In this con-
text, we must say that emerging diseases are particularly
associated with environmental and animal factors. Exog-
enous zoonotic pathogens commonly undergo mutations
and after jumping species barrier opt for adaptation to
the hostile environmental conditions before spillover to
humans (Ellwanger and Chies, 2018). e interaction
between these components is critical in the understating
of what happened in the case of the Severe Acute Res-
piratory Syndrome (SARS), the Middle East Respiratory
Syndrome (MERS) and now the Coronavirus Diseases
2019 (COVID-19), bcaused by the SARS-2 Coronavirus
(SARS-CoV-2) (Dhama et al., 2020; Rodriguez-Morales,
Bonilla-Aldana, et al., 2020) (Figure 1).
Editorial
D. Katterine Bonilla-alDana1,2, KulDeep Dhama3, alfonso J. roDriguez-morales2,4*
Revisiting the One Health Approach in the Context of COVID-19:
A Look into the Ecology of this Emerging Disease
Received | March 01, 2020; Accepted | March 06, 2020; Published | March 06,2020
*Correspondence | Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales, Public Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira,
Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia; Email: ajrodriguezmmd@gmail.com
Citation | Bonilla-Aldana DK, Dhama K, Rodriguez-Morales AJ (2020). Revisiting the One Health Approach in the Context of COVID-19: A look into the
Ecology of this Emerging Disease. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 8(3): 234-236.
DOI | http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2020/8.3.234.236
ISSN (Online) | 2307-8316; ISSN (Print) | 2309-3331
Keywords | One Health; Zoonoses; Coronavirus; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2.
Copyright © 2020 Rodriguez-Morales et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestrict-
ed use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1Incubator in Zoonosis (SIZOO), Biodiversity and Ecosystem Conservation Research Group (BIOECOS), Fun-
dación Universitaria Autónoma de las Américas, Sede Pereira, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.; 2Public Health and
Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Risaralda, Co-
lombia; 3Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, Bareilly, Uttar
Pradesh, India; 4Grupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Faculty of Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de
las Américas, Pereira, Risaralda, Colombia.
NE
US
Academic Publishers
Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences
March 2020 | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | Page 235
Figure 1: One health approach in the context of coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the SARS-CoV-2.
Over the past two decades we have seen the destructive
capacity of coronaviruses that are constantly evolving, re-
sulting in fatal outbreaks that pose a signicant threat to
global public health. e noval coronavirus that has recent-
ly emerged is considered as the third CoV outbreak in hu-
mans (Munster et al., 2020). e COVID-19, emerged in
Wuhan, China (Li et al., 2020; Liu & Saif, 2020), at the
end of 2019, causing respiratory, digestive, and systemat-
ic manifestations that adversely aect the human health.
is RNA virus can be transmitted from person to per-
son through airborne particles and drops, infecting type
2 pneumocytes and ciliated bronchial epithelial cells us-
ing ACE2 receptors (Lu et al., 2020; Rodriguez-Morales,
MacGregor, Kanagarajah, Patel, & Schlagenhauf, 2020).
e initial analysis of primary cases suggests a common ex-
posure point for all of the infected individuals, the seafood
market in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. e restaurants
of this market are quite famous for serving several types
of wildlife for human consumption (Hui et al., 2020). e
Huanan South China Seafood Market is an example for
a wet-market that sells poultry, bats, snakes, marmots and
other wild animals. Such wet-markets are hotspots that act
as a human-animal interphase, an ideal point where nov-
el zoonotic viruses can jump the species barrier resulting
in the emergence of novel pathogens. It is also related to
other coronaviruses that circulate among bats, including
SARS-CoV, so it is argued that such animals are the pos-
sible natural host, but other mammals should be involved
as intermediate hosts (Malik et al., 2020). Hence the cir-
cumstantial evidence available from the seafood market in
Wuhan points out the possibility of an intermediate host
in COVID-19 outbreak that transmitted the novel virus
to humans similar to their predecessors SARS and MERS.
In this way, it is imperative to understand the conditions
in which the transmission occurs, where the transmis-
sion is associated in the rst instance in an environment
in which there are favorable conditions for the existence
and interaction of natural host animals or reservoirs that
may be able to carry the SARS-CoV-2 under appropri-
ate circumstances and that in the interaction with the
human being the possibility of establishing transmission
is completed (Figure 1). is should lead to the discus-
sion on the integrative approach and studies of diseases
in the environment, disease ecology (Caron et al., 2015),
that goes beyond the clinical and pathological ndings in
human beings and occurrence in animals. In the case of
COVID-19, as occurs for other emerging zoonotic diseas-
es, it is essential to begun studies assessing which were the
environmental conditions in Wuhan where the rst cases
presented, but in general in places where studies of ani-
mal reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2 will take place, including
temperature, rainfall, humidity, vegetations, as other factors
relevant for the animal distribution, and also interactions
with human beings (Figure 1). COVID-19 outbreak is the
third instance where the virus has crossed the so called spe-
cies barrier twice from wild animals to human beings after
the occurrence of SARS, and MERS outbreaks. e pos-
sibility of a fourth outbreak can be expected in the coming
future, possibly at a huma-animal interphase just like the
wet-market in Wuhan.
It is crucial from the One Health perspective not only to
understand the transmission cycles but also to look for
mechanisms of prevention and mitigation of transmission
that may be useful for future risk conditions in the con-
text of emerging zoonotic diseases including coronavirus
as the case of COVID-19 (Ahmad et al., 2020). Strategic
breach in the interaction between host, pathogen and their
environment may provide an ecient control over many
probable zoonoses in future. Furthermore, strong intersec-
toral collaboration and coordination between the animal
and human health sectors at regional, national and inter-
national levels is an utmost necessasity to prevent, control
and eliminate emerging zoonoses. Urgent and strategic
adoption of One health approach along with an integrated
surveillance, monitoring and networking system, appro-
priately supported by rapid and conrmatory laboratory
investigation facilities, eective immunization/vaccina-
tion and therapeutic approaches along with adopting ap-
propriate prevention and control measures are altogether
highly anticipated to curb the emerging zoonoses globally
(Dhama et al., 2013; Awaidy et al., 2020). Besides these,
due attention towards public awareness and collaborative
disease control strategies need to be implemented in the
right directons amomg dierent sectors and stake-holders
(medical, veterinary, government departments, non-gov-
ernment organizations, NGOs) and various regulatory
health agencies for implementing warranted interventions
for eectively checking the transmisión and spread, and
control of the emerging, re-emerging and zoonotic threats
posed by infectious pathogens.
NE
US
Academic Publishers
Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences
March 2020 | Volume 8 | Issue 3 | Page 236
COVID-19 has presently spread to more than 82 coun-
tries, apart from China from where it originated. As per
the most recent situation report of World Health Organ-
ization (WHO), a total of 94,355 conrmed cases and
3,222 humans deaths have been reported till March 4,
2020 (WHO, 2020). is virus was designated as a Pub-
lic Health International Emergency on January 30, 2020
and a potential pandemic. Seeing the rapid increase in the
number of cases aected and its further spread to many
countries in all the populated regions of the world, except
Antarctica. WHO has now increased the risk assessment
of this emerging coronavirus to a very high risk category.
Researchers and health agencies accross the globe are put-
ting their high eorts to hault the spread of this virus by
adopting appropriate prevention and control measures, and
are pacing high to develop eective vaccines and therapeu-
tics to avoid any pandemic situation. In this direction, One
health approach is also critical for countering COVID-19
and other emerging coronaviral and viral zoonotic diseases.
REFERENCES
•Ahmad T, Khan M, Haroon Musa TH, Nasir S, Hui
J, Rodriguez-Morales AJ (2020). COVID-19:
Zoonotic aspects. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 101607.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101607
•Awaidy SA, Al Hashami H (2020). Zoonotic Diseases
in Oman: Successes, Challenges, and Future
Directions. Vector Borne Zoonot. Dis. 20(1): 1-9.
https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2019.2458.
•Bonilla-Aldana DK, Suarez JA, Franco-Paredes C,
Vilcarromero S, Mattar S, Gomez-Marin JE,
Rodriguez-Morales AJ (2019). Brazil burning! What
is the potential impact of the Amazon wildres on
vector-borne and zoonotic emerging diseases? - A
statement from an international experts meeting.
Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 31/ 101474. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2019.101474
•Caron A, Cappelle J, Cumming GS, de Garine-
Wichatitsky M, Gaidet N (2015). Bridge hosts,
a missing link for disease ecology in multi-host
systems. Vet. Res. 46. 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/
s13567-015-0217-9
•Dhama K, Chakraborty S, Kapoor S, Tiwari R,
Kumar A, Deb R, Rajagunalan S, Singh R., Vora,
K and Natesan, S. (2013). One world, one health -
veterinary perspectives. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 1(1):
5-13.
•Dhama K, Sharun K, Tiwari R, Sircar S, Bhat S, Malik
YS, Singh KP, Chaicumpa W, Bonilla-Aldana DK,
Rodriguez-Morales AJ (2020). Coronavirus disease
2019 – COVID-19.Preprints. 2020030001. https://
doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0001.v1
•Ellwanger JH, Chies JAB (2018). Zoonotic spillover and
emerging viral diseases - time to intensify zoonoses
surveillance in Brazil. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 22(1): 76-
78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2017.11.003.
•Hui DS, I Azhar E, Madani TA, Ntoumi F, Kock
R, Dar O, Ippolito G, Mchugh TD, Memish
ZA, Drosten C, Zumla A, Petersen E. 2020. e
continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel
coronaviruses to global health - e latest 2019
novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int.
J. Infect. Dis. 91:264-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijid.2020.01.009.
•Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, Feng
Z (2020). Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan,
China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.
N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/
NEJMoa2001316
•Liu SL, Saif L (2020). Emerging Viruses without
Borders: e Wuhan Coronavirus. Viruses. 12(2).
https://doi.org/10.3390/v12020130
•Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, Tan W (2020).
Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019
novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and
receptor binding. Lancet. 395(10224): 565-574.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8
•Malik YS, Sircar S, Bhat S, Sharun K, Dhama K, Dadar
M, Tiwari R, Chaicumpa W (2020). Emerging
novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)-Current scenario,
evolutionary perspective based on genome analysis
and recent developments.Vet. Q. 40:68-76. https://
doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2020.172799.
•Munster VJ, Koopmans M, van Doremalen N, van Riel
D, de Wit E (2020). A novel Coronavirus emerging
in China-key questions for impact assessment. N.
Engl. J. Med. 10.1056/NEJMp2000929. https://
doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2000929
•OIE (2020). One Health. https://www.oie.int/en/for-
the-media/onehealth/.
•Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Bonilla-Aldana DK, Balbin-
Ramon GJ, Paniz-Mondol A, Rabaan A, Sah
R, Esposito S (2020). History is repeating itself,
a probable zoonotic spillover as a cause of an
epidemic: the case of 2019 novel Coronavirus. Infez.
Med. 28(1): 3-5.
•Rodriguez-Morales AJ, MacGregor K, Kanagarajah
S, Patel D, Schlagenhauf P (2020). Going global -
Travel and the 2019 novel coronavirus. Travel Med.
Infect. Dis. 33: 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
tmaid.2020.101578
•WHO (2020). https://www.who.int/docs/default-
source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200303-
sitrep-43-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=2c21c09c_2
... These participants (n) comprised 300 respondents from Thailand (N = 559,000), 399 from Lao PDR (N = 1,117,500), and 467 (N = 4,008,854) from Vietnam. The sample size selection bias was less than 7% for all countries as determined by the Yamane sampling method [30]; ...
... The perception of positive collaboration (O2) among farmers is also identified as a key factor that can enhance the effectiveness of health operations within the agricultural community in Thailand and Lao PDR. The absence of a significant correlation between O2 and socioeconomic profiles in Vietnam might be explained by the fact that the positive collaboration is likely perceived as a universally beneficial factor in the context of one health operations [30,32]. Regardless of the socioeconomic status of farmers, the recognition of the value of collaboration may be shared among farmers. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective The study aims to analyze the interconnectedness of farmers’ socioeconomic factors and their awareness of the One Health framework. Method This study conducted a survey with 1,166 observations across Thailand, Lao, and Vietnam and employed binary logit regression for data analysis. Odds ratios were used for interpreting the results. Results The results indicated that certain socioeconomic factors—particularly household income, age, gender roles within the household, and household size—significantly influenced farmers’ awareness and engagement with One Health literacy. Awareness levels varied across the three countries: for example, the composition of adults in Thai farming households was correlated with awareness of environmental health and infectious diseases. In Lao PDR, gender was significantly associated with awareness of animal health, while in Vietnam, it was linked to awareness of animal disease transmission. Conclusion These determinants contribute to the application of a more integrated One Health approach among farmers in these areas.
... Nevertheless, the idea is not to create an incontestable argument that 'local food is best' [72] and fresher [73] but rather to reframe the local-global food systems debate through a resilience lens [74,75] and to identify, experience and demonstrate multi advantages on short supply chains [76,77], such as the implementation of the principles of water-energy-food-ecosystem nexus in practice [78], the local capacity to plan food supply and security in the context of crises such as pandemics [79][80][81], or geostrategic conflicts, and to promote a just economy where local entrepreneurship may have the opportunity to succeed. ...
Article
Full-text available
Food transition has been widely inspiring regional and local food system transformation strategies to accomplish the Sustainable Development Agenda goals. Considering the urgency required to transform food systems by 2030, actions should be supported by principles of science-based and practical effectiveness. Within the framework of the Food Transition Strategy for the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (FTS-LMA), a methodology to identify the potential to establish Multifunctional Agrofood Parks (MAPs) has been applied to inform decision-makers where this potential is located as an opportunity to transform local food system towards healthier and more affordable food production. The method uses an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) operated in a Geographic Information System (GIS) to integrate a multicriteria environment and socioeconomic variables for determining suitable territories for MAP implementation. The results show the higher suitability for the MAP establishment in the LMA is over 30% of the region, which drives a thorough reflection on how to set up a socio-territorial transformation of the metropolitan food system envisioned by the FTS-LMA by using current results as part of a food system planning exercise to determine where the ecological suitability for sustainable food production overlap with the capacity for intervention by the fabric of producers in each of the 18 municipalities.
... Food safety and control of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are among the aims of the One Health concept that considers the health of humans, animals and environment strictly interconnected [1,2]. ...
... It has forced health systems worldwide to respond creatively, leaving valuable lessons and challenges for future public health initiatives. The pandemic has underscored the necessity of prioritizing public health in political decisions, as global stability and survival depend on it [3,4]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The “Sixth Wave of Global Public Health Progress” concept introduces a transformative approach to address contemporary health challenges by leveraging historical advancements and innovative strategies. This wave emphasizes the integration of data-driven decision-making, personalized public health, and technological innovations, such as artificial intelligence and digital tools, to enhance global health outcomes. By focusing on the connectedness of human, animal, and environmental health systems through the One Health approach, the framework aims to tackle critical threats like climate change, pandemics, and social inequities. It advocates for global collaboration, community-centric approaches, and sustainable practices to ensure equitable health access. Ultimately, this paper proposes a comprehensive framework that catalyzes social and scientific discourse, paving the way for resilient and adaptive health systems that align with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.
... The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of an integrated One Health (OH) perspective to evaluate how anthropogenic activities may serve to drive the emergence of novel zoonotic pathogens and provide the conditions for zoonotic outbreaks to achieve epidemic scales (Patz et al. 2004;Amuasi et al. 2020;Bonilla-Aldana et al. 2020). Frameworks for assessing complex epidemic risks are key to fulfilling international commitments to strengthen the OH Agenda (Aguirre et al. 2019;Ebi et al. 2020;de Thoisy et al. 2021). ...
Article
Full-text available
The Pantanal wetland ecosystem of Brazil is experiencing unprecedented local challenges from anthropogenic pressures, as well as from global climate change. These pressures escalate the zoonotic risks from wildlife populations, whose own susceptibility to disease is enhanced by stressors including habitat loss and fragmentation with the resulting decrement in food availability, immunity and resilience in the face of compounding disease risks. This continuous degradation and fragmentation of the ecosystem increases interactions between animals and humans (including indigenous peoples and local communities) further increasing disease risks for the human populations. Weak health systems across the Pantanal are reflected in limited pathogen surveillance, and poor sanitation and disease control measures, serving to further amplify the region’s epidemic and pandemic potential. Using a transdisciplinary One Health (OH) approach to understand the ecological, social and biological drivers of infectious diseases, our research network developed a framework to conceptualise the current tools, evidence and processes for effective research and knowledge production in the Pantanal Wetland ecosystem. Drawing on the expertise of researchers and non-academic key-stakeholders can inform the work of global OH research networks and strengthen the evidence base for OH policy and practice in the Pantanal and other tropical wetland systems.
... CWD parallels COVID-19 in that people adopted new behaviors to reduce the risk from the diseases, whether it is social distancing and wearing masks for COVID-19 or preventing transportation of infected animal carcasses to designated areas and wearing gloves for CWD. The COVID-19 pandemic elicited surprisingly politicized public responses to public health efforts (Mukhtar, 2021), and direct links between COVID-19 and wildlife (Le Page, 2021) made wildlife disease risk management more salient (Bonilla-Aldana et al., 2020). In the United States, political identity was one of the defining traits that appeared to be associated with how a person perceived COVID-19 management (Beall et al., 2021;Casola et al., 2022). ...
Article
Purpose The interconnection between humans and animal has raised the concept of one health (OH) framework. The framework works at local, regional, national and global level with the aim to improve public health. However, while covering the OH approach, the knowledge of indigenous communities has not been given much attention. Despite of the fact that indigenous communities are living closely to ecosystem, their exceptional knowledge on OH has not been utilised. The present study has reviewed different studies to explore the prominent role of indigenous knowledge between the relationship of OH framework and public wellbeing. Design/methodology/approach The present study is a narrative review which has included different quantitative and qualitative studies conducted in the area of OH field in concern to public health and indigenous knowledge. The present study has included the literature which is published in English language from the year 2001–2024 conducted in developed and developing countries. Findings On the basis of prevailing literature in the area, the present study has framed a model to integrate the OH with indigenous knowledge to improve public health. The model explains the concept of public wellbeing which is deeply rooted in the knowledge of indigenous communities associated with animal and veterinary care, ecological aspect, culture, religion, language, healing and wellness, food and nutrition practices. Research limitations/implications After considering the literature prevailing in concern to OH, it has been determined that OH approach is more prominent in scientific environment and laboratory equipment. The discipline of OH requires an inclusion from the researchers of social sciences and various behavioural fields. The present study has offered different factors which may act as an entry point for researchers to explore the field. Further, the study has suggested validating a comprehensive model offered by present study in empirical manner to improve public health. Originality/value The present study has highlighted the relevance of indigenous knowledge for promoting OH principles in public wellbeing. Also, the study has offered a model which can be utilised by future researchers to explore the relationship between OH, indigenous knowledge and public wellbeing.
Article
Full-text available
As aquaculture takes on a major role in global seafood production, the industry has encountered several hurdles, notably in disease management and overharvesting in natural habitats challenges. Vaccination is a critical component of immunological preventive strategy essential for the health management of animals. Over the past two decades, vaccines have revolutionized the sector by addressing these issues while enhancing productivity and ecological balance. Advanced vaccine technologies, including DNA, recombinant, and inactivated vaccines, have demonstrated their potential to transform aquaculture and sea ranching. Innovations like the recombinant DNA vaccine for goldfish using the G protein expressed by baculovirus for spring viremia for carp and the ME-VAC Aqua Strept vaccine for tilapia highlight their ability to reduce antibiotic dependence and support greener practices. Multivalent vaccines in salmon farming further showcase their effectiveness in improving fish health and productivity. Emerging solutions such as plant-based and mucosal vaccines offer scalable, cost-effective options for immunizing large fish populations, reducing disease-related losses, and stabilizing seafood supply chains. Vaccines also improve the survival rates of hatchery-reared fish in natural habitats, supporting long-term sustainability. By integrating vaccination with selective breeding for disease resistance, aquaculture can achieve enhanced productivity and reduced environmental impact. The article highlights the impact vaccines can have on technology leap forward and research cooperation that will allow for collective mobilization to prevent aquatic disease. Not only that, this review also discusses the challenges and opportunities of using vaccines to increase fish resilience for surviving in open waters. Emphasis on the transformative role of vaccines in enabling technological advancements, fostering research collaborations, and addressing economic and environmental challenges to ensure a sustainable future for aquaculture and sea ranching have been highlighted as well. Future research directions and economic implications of widespread vaccine adoption in aquaculture are also discussed.
Article
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed critical weaknesses in the global health system, highlighting the urgent need for a coordinated international approach to pandemic prevention and management. As negotiations for a new WHO pandemic treaty progress, the effective integration of animal welfare is crucial. This paper aims to investigate the perspectives of key civil society organizations on the integration of animal welfare provisions into the pandemic treaty. Through a thematic analysis of documents prepared by FOUR PAWS, Wildlife Conservation Society, and Action for Animal Health between 2020–2023, five major themes are identified: prevention of zoonotic spillover, One Health approach, animal health systems and infrastructure, sustainable and ethical animal management practices, and policy coherence and governance. A comparative analysis of these themes against the April 2024 draft of the pandemic treaty reveals areas of alignment and divergence. Due to the ongoing controversies and the need for further improvements, the WHO's intergovernmental negotiating body was unable to finalize the treaty text for the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024, leading to an extended mandate until 2025. Based on the findings, the paper proposes recommendations to strengthen the integration of animal welfare into the treaty, arguing that incorporating these recommendations is critical for developing a transformative, equitable, and effective treaty that addresses the systemic drivers of pandemic risk.
Preprint
Full-text available
In the past decades, several new diseases have emerged in new geographical areas, with pathogens including Ebola, Zika, Nipah, and coronaviruses (CoV). Recently, a new type of viral infection has emerged in Wuhan City, China, and initial genomic sequencing data of this virus does not match with previously sequenced CoVs, suggesting a novel CoV strain (2019-nCoV), which has now been termed as severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although CoV disease 2019 (COVID-19) is suspected to originate from an animal host (zoonotic origin) followed by human-to-human transmission, the possibility of other routes such as food-borne transmission should not be ruled out. Compared to diseases caused by previously known human CoVs, COVID-19 shows a less severe pathogenesis but higher transmission competence, as is evident from the continuously increasing number of confirmed cases. Compared to other emerging viruses such as Ebola virus, avian H7N9, SARS-CoV, or MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 has shown relatively low pathogenicity and moderate transmissibility Codon usage studies suggest that this novel virus may have been transferred from an animal source such as bats. Early diagnosis by real-time PCR and next-generation sequencing has facilitated the identification of the pathogen at an early stage. Since no antiviral drug or vaccine exists to treat or prevent SARS-CoV-2, potential therapeutic strategies that are currently being evaluated predominantly stem from previous experience with treating SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and other emerging viral diseases. In this review, we address epidemiological, diagnostic, clinical, and therapeutic aspects, including perspectives of vaccines and preventive measures that have already been globally recommended.
Article
Full-text available
Coronaviruses are the well-known cause of severe respiratory, enteric and systemic infections in a wide range of hosts including man, mammals, fish, and avian. The scientific interest on coronaviruses increased after the emergence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) outbreaks in 2002-2003 followed by Middle East Respiratory Syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV). This decade’s first CoV, named 2019-nCoV, emerged from Wuhan, China, and declared as ‘Public Health Emergency of International Concern’ on January 30th, 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO). As on February 4, 2020, 425 deaths reported in China only and one death outside China (Philippines). In a short span of time, the virus spread has been noted in 24 countries. The zoonotic transmission (animal-to-human) is suspected as the route of disease origin. The genetic analyses predict bats as the most probable source of 2019-nCoV though further investigations needed to confirm the origin of the novel virus. The ongoing nCoV outbreak highlights the hidden wild animal reservoir of the deadly viruses and possible threat of spillover zoonoses as well. The successful virus isolation attempts have made doors open for developing better diagnostics and effective vaccines helping in combating the spread of the virus to newer areas.
Article
Full-text available
Zoonotic diseases have shaped the life of human beings during centuries. Particularly the dynamics and changes over time make the difference in the occurrence, emergence and re-emergence of such conditions. Pathogen transmission from a vertebrate animal to a human, also known as zoonotic spillover, represents a global public health burden, which while associated with multiple outbreaks, still remains a poorly understood phenomenon [1]. Zoonotic spillover requires a blend of several factors to ignite, including the ecological, epidemiological and behavioral determinants of pathogen exposure, and the within human intrinsic factors that affect susceptibility to infection, as well as nutritional and cultural factors, associated with foodborne zoonotic diseases [1, 2]. Coronaviruses (CoV) have been previously on the spotlight of this discussion [(3, 4]. They can infect the respiratory, gastrointestinal, hepatic and central nervous system tracts of man, cattle, birds, bats, rodents and various other wild animals (Figure 1) [5, 6]. Coronaviruses, like influenza viruses, circulate in nature in various animal species. Alpha-coronaviruses and beta-coronaviruses can infect mammals and gamma-coronaviruses and delta-coronaviruses tend to infect birds, but some of them can also be transmitted to mammals [5]. These zoonotic viruses, were not considered to be highly pathogenic to humans until the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV) in 2002 and 2003 in Guangdong province, China, as the coronaviruses that circulated before that time in humans mostly caused mild infections in immunocompetent people. Ten years after SARS, another highly pathogenic coronavirus, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERSCoV) emerged in Middle Eastern countries [7].
Article
Full-text available
Background: The initial cases of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)-infected pneumonia (NCIP) occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 and January 2020. We analyzed data on the first 425 confirmed cases in Wuhan to determine the epidemiologic characteristics of NCIP. Methods: We collected information on demographic characteristics, exposure history, and illness timelines of laboratory-confirmed cases of NCIP that had been reported by January 22, 2020. We described characteristics of the cases and estimated the key epidemiologic time-delay distributions. In the early period of exponential growth, we estimated the epidemic doubling time and the basic reproductive number. Results: Among the first 425 patients with confirmed NCIP, the median age was 59 years and 56% were male. The majority of cases (55%) with onset before January 1, 2020, were linked to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, as compared with 8.6% of the subsequent cases. The mean incubation period was 5.2 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1 to 7.0), with the 95th percentile of the distribution at 12.5 days. In its early stages, the epidemic doubled in size every 7.4 days. With a mean serial interval of 7.5 days (95% CI, 5.3 to 19), the basic reproductive number was estimated to be 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.9). Conclusions: On the basis of this information, there is evidence that human-to-human transmission has occurred among close contacts since the middle of December 2019. Considerable efforts to reduce transmission will be required to control outbreaks if similar dynamics apply elsewhere. Measures to prevent or reduce transmission should be implemented in populations at risk. (Funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China and others.).
Article
Full-text available
The recently emerged coronavirus in Wuhan, China has claimed at least two lives as of January 17 and infected hundreds if not thousands of individuals. The situation has drawn international attention, including from the virology community. We applaud the rapid release to the public of the genome sequence of the new virus by Chinese virologists, but we also believe that increased transparency on disease reporting and data sharing with international colleagues are crucial for curbing the spread of this newly emerging virus to other parts of the world.
Article
Coronaviruses can cause severe diseases in humans and animals, as has been stated recently by Biscayart et al. [1]. China has experienced several viral outbreaks in the last three decades; avian influenza outbreak in 1997, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 [2], and severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) in 2010 [3]. In China, yet another pathogenic human coronavirus outbreak was reported in the city of Wuhan. Wuhan is an urban town located in the central part of China. It is one of the significant transportations and business hubs. In 2018, the city comprised of a population of approximately 11.9 million, and one of the seventh most populous Chinese city [1,4]. On December 12, 2019, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission (WMHC) reported 27 individuals infected by a new coronavirus designated 2019-novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by the World Health Organization (WHO). Of the reported cases, seven were critically ill and had a history of exposure with the Seafood Wholesale Market.
Article
Since 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) has made five declarations of disease outbreaks considered Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC): the 2009H1N1 (or swine flu) pandemic, the 2014 polio declaration, the 2014 outbreak of Ebola in Western Africa, the 2015–16 Zika virus epidemic and, as of 17 July 2019, the Kivu Ebola epidemic which began in 2018 [1,2]. Now, on January 30, 2020, after two meetings (the first on January 22 and 23) and a careful assessment of the situation, the Emergency Committee (EC) declared the outbreak of novel coronavirus 2019 (2019-nCoV) in the People's Republic of China a PHEIC [1]. Convened by the WHO Director-General under the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005), the EC considered exportations to other countries and gave evidenced-based advice to the Director-General to support the final decision. The EC provided public health advice and recommendations in the midst of these outbreak [1]. The zoonotic spillover seen during this outbreak [3] has been previously witnessed with other coronaviruses pathogenic for human beings, four of them causing mild respiratory and intestinal disease, but two previously causing major concerns. The first, is the coronavirus causing the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV), that emerged as a global outbreak from China between November 2002 and July 2003. That epidemic, resulted in 8098 cases, with 774 deaths (9.6%) reported in 17 countries [4]. In fact, the PHEIC designation was created following an update to the International Health Regulations (2005) after that outbreak.
Article
Background: In late December, 2019, patients presenting with viral pneumonia due to an unidentified microbial agent were reported in Wuhan, China. A novel coronavirus was subsequently identified as the causative pathogen, provisionally named 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). As of Jan 26, 2020, more than 2000 cases of 2019-nCoV infection have been confirmed, most of which involved people living in or visiting Wuhan, and human-to-human transmission has been confirmed. Methods: We did next-generation sequencing of samples from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and cultured isolates from nine inpatients, eight of whom had visited the Huanan seafood market in Wuhan. Complete and partial 2019-nCoV genome sequences were obtained from these individuals. Viral contigs were connected using Sanger sequencing to obtain the full-length genomes, with the terminal regions determined by rapid amplification of cDNA ends. Phylogenetic analysis of these 2019-nCoV genomes and those of other coronaviruses was used to determine the evolutionary history of the virus and help infer its likely origin. Homology modelling was done to explore the likely receptor-binding properties of the virus. Findings: The ten genome sequences of 2019-nCoV obtained from the nine patients were extremely similar, exhibiting more than 99·98% sequence identity. Notably, 2019-nCoV was closely related (with 88% identity) to two bat-derived severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like coronaviruses, bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21, collected in 2018 in Zhoushan, eastern China, but were more distant from SARS-CoV (about 79%) and MERS-CoV (about 50%). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 2019-nCoV fell within the subgenus Sarbecovirus of the genus Betacoronavirus, with a relatively long branch length to its closest relatives bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21, and was genetically distinct from SARS-CoV. Notably, homology modelling revealed that 2019-nCoV had a similar receptor-binding domain structure to that of SARS-CoV, despite amino acid variation at some key residues. Interpretation: 2019-nCoV is sufficiently divergent from SARS-CoV to be considered a new human-infecting betacoronavirus. Although our phylogenetic analysis suggests that bats might be the original host of this virus, an animal sold at the seafood market in Wuhan might represent an intermediate host facilitating the emergence of the virus in humans. Importantly, structural analysis suggests that 2019-nCoV might be able to bind to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor in humans. The future evolution, adaptation, and spread of this virus warrant urgent investigation. Funding: National Key Research and Development Program of China, National Major Project for Control and Prevention of Infectious Disease in China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shandong First Medical University.