A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Cerebral thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation ablation: a direct
comparison of vitamin K antagonists versus non-vitamin
K-dependent oral anticoagulants
Adrian Petzl
1,2
&Michael Derndorfer
1
&Georgios Kollias
1
&Kgomotso Moroka
1
&Josef Aichinger
1
&
Helmut Pürerfellner
1
&Martin Martinek
1,2
Received: 27 November 2019 /Accepted: 18 February 2020
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Purpose Cerebral thromboembolic events are well-known complications of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and can manifest as
stroke or silent cerebral embolic lesions. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of cerebral embolic lesions
(including silent cerebral embolism and stroke) after AF ablation in patients on vitamin K antagonists versus patients on non-
vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants, and to identify corresponding clinical and procedural risk factors.
Methods A total of 421 patients undergoing PVI were prospectively included into the study. Of these, 43.7% were on VKA and
56.3% on NOAC treatment (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban). In the NOAC group, 38% of patients had an
interruption of anticoagulation for 24–36 h.All patientsunderwent pre- and postprocedural cerebral magnetic resonance imaging.
Results Periprocedural cerebral lesions occurred in 13.1% overall. Of these, three (0.7%) resulted in symptomatic cerebrovas-
cular accidents and 52 (12.4%) in silent cerebral embolic lesions. Incidence of cerebral lesions was significantly higher in patients
on NOAC compared with VKA (16% vs. 9.2%, respectively, p= 0.04), and in patients who had intraprocedural cardioversions
compared with no cardivoersions (19.5% vs. 10.4%, respectively, p= 0.03). In multivariate analysis, both parameters were found
to be independent risk factors for cerebral embolism. No significant difference between interrupted and uninterrupted NOAC
administration could be detected.
Conclusions In patients undergoing AF ablation, we identified the use of NOAC and intraprocedural cardioversion as indepen-
dent risk factors for the occurrence of periprocedural cerebral embolic lesions.
Keywords Atrial fibrillation ablation .Non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulant .Vitamin K antagonist .Stroke .Silent
cerebral embolism .Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging
1 Introduction
Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the corner-
stone of interventional atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment [1].
One of the most severe adverse events of this procedure is
cerebral thromboembolism. The incidence of clinically overt
stroke during PVI is, however, low (approximately 0.1–0.8%)
[2]. Periprocedural silent cerebral embolisms (SCE), on the
other hand, are much more frequent (incidence of about
19%, calculated across different studies) [3]. Although these
lesions are clinically silent, they can be detected by magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) and may cause long-term adverse
effects, such as neurocognitive decline and depression [2]. It is
therefore critical to understand risk factors of periprocedural
cerebral thromboembolism to reduce risks of PVI.
The currently preferred choice to prevent thromboembolic
events in AF are non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants
(NOAC) rather than vitamin K antagonists (VKA) [4]. It is
recommended to continue oral anticoagulation with no oronly
minimal interruption during the PVI procedure [1,4]. There
have been trials establishing efficacy of uninterrupted VKA
Adrian Petzl and Michael Derndorfer contributed equally to this work.
*Adrian Petzl
adrian.petzl@stpoelten.lknoe.at; adrian.petzl@gmail.com
1
Department of Internal Medicine 2 with Cardiology, Angiology and
Intensive Care, Ordensklinikum Linz Elisabethinen, Fadingerstraße
1, A-4020 Linz, Austria
2
Department of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital St. Pölten,
Dunant-Platz 1, A-3100 St. Pölten, Austria
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00718-w
/ Published online: 6 March 2020
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (2021) 60:147–154
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.