ArticlePDF Available

The Impact of Social Media on Youth Mental Health: Challenges and Opportunities



The technology landscape has rapidly evolved in recent years, with social media now playing a central role in the lives of youth. Social media has created both significant new challenges and exciting opportunities. Research is beginning to uncover how specific social media experiences may influence youth mental health.
116 NCMJ vol. 81, no. 2
The technology landscape has rapidly evolved in recent
years, with social media now playing a central role in the
lives of youth. Social media has created both significant new
challenges and exciting opportunities. Research is beginning
to uncover how specific social media experiences may influ-
ence youth mental health.
Digital technologies have become a universal feature of
young people’s lives. Exposure to screens begins early
in life for many youth, with US children under age two spend-
ing an average of 42 minutes per day with screen media
[1]. By the time youth reach adolescence, most are fully
immersed in a world of smartphones, computers, and social
media. Recent nationally representative statistics suggest
that 95% of adolescents aged 13-18 have access to a smart-
phone and 88% have access to a desktop or laptop at home
[2]. In 2018, 45% of US adolescents reported that they were
online “almost constantly,” up from 24% only three years
prior [2]. The pervasiveness of new media has created an
increasingly complex environment for youth, parents, health
care providers, and policymakers to navigate. Indeed, while
this media environment has introduced numerous new chal-
lenges and risks for youth mental health, so too has it pre-
sented considerable benefits and opportunities.
Adolescence and the Media Landscape
Today’s media landscape is larger and more diverse than
ever before, with youth having access to an unprecedented
volume of digital content across numerous devices, includ-
ing smartphones, tablets, computers, laptops, and gaming
consoles. Social media represents a central component of
this landscape. Broadly, social media is defined as any digi-
tal tools or applications that allow users to interact socially
[3], and can be distinguished from traditional media (eg,
television) by the fact that users can both consume and cre-
ate content. Under this broad definition, “social media” may
include social networking sites (eg, Instagram, Snapchat,
Facebook, TikTok), text messaging and messaging apps,
social gaming tools, YouTube, and more. Any comprehensive
understanding of contemporary adolescents’ mental health
requires a consideration of the role of social media.
Adolescence represents a period of heightened risk for
the onset of mental illness, with nearly 1 in 5 adolescents
suffering from a diagnosable mental disorder [4]. Notably,
the incidence of certain mental health concerns, such as
depression [5] and suicide [6], have increased significantly
among adolescents in recent years, with rates of suicide
among youth aged 10-24 increasing 56% from 2007 to 2017
[6]. Given that this increase has coincided with the wide-
spread adoption of social media, this has led to concerns
regarding a potential link. In addition, technology use tends
to increase over the course of childhood, with adolescents
using new media, and social media in particular, at higher
rates and with greater frequency than younger children
[7]. Nearly all adolescents aged 13-17 use some form of
social media, with the most popular sites currently being
YouTube (85%), Instagram (72%), Snapchat (69%), and
Facebook (51%) [2]; however, new platforms are frequently
introduced, with some (ie, TikTok), quickly gaining traction
among young people.
Furthermore, social media may uniquely appeal to ado-
lescents given the characteristics of this developmental
period, making teens particularly susceptible to both the
opportunities and risks of new technologies. During ado-
lescence, rapid development of the brain’s socioaffective
circuitry may heighten sensitivity to social information,
increasing the drive for social rewards and concern over
peer evaluation [8]. Important developmental tasks of ado-
lescence include the establishment of intimate peer rela-
tionships, increasing independence from adults, and the
exploration of identity [9]. Social media offers a prime con-
text for navigating these tasks in new, increasingly complex
ways: peers are constantly available, personal information
is displayed publicly and permanently, and quantifiable peer
feedback is instantaneously provided in the form of “likes”
and “views” [10].
The Impact of Social Media on Youth Mental
Challenges and Opportunities
Jacqueline Nesi
Electronically published March 2, 2020.
Address correspondence to Jacqueline Nesi, Coro West, Ste 204,
1 Hoppin St, Providence, RI 02903 (
N C Med J. 2020;81(2):116-121. ©2020 by the North Carolina Institute
of Medicine and The Duke Endowment. All rights reserved.
NCMJ vol. 81, no. 2
Understanding the Impact of Social Media on
Youth Mental Health
Research on social media and adolescent mental health
has proliferated in recent years, with many studies explor-
ing whether more frequent use of social media is associated
with various mental health concerns, including depression
[11], body image concerns and disordered eating [12], and
externalizing problems [13]. In general, findings from these
studies have been mixed, with many revealing a small but
significant negative effect of social media use on mental
health. A growing body of work now seeks to build on these
studies with more nuanced investigations of how, why, and
for whom social media use may have positive or negative
effects on youth development. Social media comprises a
vast array of digital tools, and thus characterizing its overall
effect on youth remains challenging. First, it is important to
understand individual strengths and vulnerabilities that may
predispose certain adolescents to engage with and respond
to social media in adaptive or maladaptive ways. In addition,
it is critical to identify how specific social media behaviors or
experiences may put adolescents at risk.
Potential Risks of Social Media for Adolescent
Mental Health
Adolescents’ peer experiences play a critical role in
the onset and maintenance of psychopathology. Within
the social media environment, peer interactions can occur
with increased frequency, immediacy, and intensity [10].
Specific online peer experiences have been identified in
prior work as potential risk factors for mental health con-
cerns. Cybervictimization, or the experience of being a vic-
tim of bullying by peers online, has been consistently found
to be associated with higher rates of self-harm and suicidal
behavior [14], as well as internalizing and externalizing prob-
lems [15]. Other types of social media peer experiences,
such as social exclusion and online conflict or drama [16],
also may put youth at risk. Peer influence processes may
also be heightened online, where youth may access a wide
range of their peers in addition to potentially risky content.
Youth who are exposed to social media content depicting
risky behaviors (ie, alcohol and other substance use) may
be more likely to engage in these behaviors themselves [17].
Content related to suicide and self-injury may also be read-
Youngstrom sidebar
NCMJ vol. 81, no. 2
ily available online, potentially increasing suicide risk among
youth who are already vulnerable. In a recent study of over
400 youth who were psychiatrically hospitalized due to risk
of harm to self or others, a small but meaningful proportion
of youth reported viewing online content that promoted sui-
cide (14.8%) or self-injury (16.6%) during the two weeks
prior to their admission [18].
Social comparison may be another risk associated with
adolescents’ social media use. Individuals frequently engage
in selective self-presentation on social media, resulting in a
stream of posts and images that are often carefully crafted
to portray users in a positive light. This may lead some youth
to engage in negative social comparisons regarding their
own accomplishments, abilities, or appearance. Studies
have shown that higher levels of online social comparison
are associated with depressive symptoms in youth [19], and
that appearance-specific comparisons on social media may
heighten risk for disordered eating and body image concerns
Finally, a critical consideration in examining the effects
of technology use on youth mental health is the issue of
displacement: what other important activities are being
replaced by time spent on social media? It is well-estab-
lished that sleep hygiene is essential to youth mental health
and development. However, prior work has reliably demon-
strated a link between mobile screen time before bed and
a range of poorer sleep outcomes, including shorter sleep
duration, poor sleep quality, and daytime sleepiness [21].
Notably, 40% of adolescents report that they use a mobile
device within five minutes before going to sleep, and 36%
report waking up to check their device at least once during
the night [22]. Thus, the impact of social media on sleep
quality remains a primary risk for subsequent mental health
concerns among youth, and is an important area for future
Potential Benefits of Social Media for Adolescent
Mental Health
While much of the narrative surrounding new media
use among adolescents has emphasized potential risks, the
unique features of the social media environment have also
created new opportunities for promoting adolescents’ mental
Youngstrom sidebar continued
NCMJ vol. 81, no. 2
Youngstrom sidebar continued
health. In general, there is a range of potential benefits
associated with social media use, including possibilities for
humor and entertainment, identity exploration, and creative
expression [2, 16, 23]. One of the most clearly established
benefits of social media use is that of social connection, with
81% of teens reporting that social media allows them to feel
more connected to their friends [16]. In a recent nationally
representative survey, 77% of adolescents reported that
social media was at least “somewhat” important for keeping
up with friends on a day-to-day basis, and 69% reported it to
be at least somewhat important for having meaningful con-
versations with close friends [23]. Adolescents frequently
cite connecting with friends and family as a primary positive
aspect of social media [2], and prior work generally shows
that social media use promotes individuals’ well-being when
it is used to advance a sense of acceptance or belonging [24].
The public and highly accessible nature of social media
also creates the possibility for establishing new connections
online. This may provide opportunities to receive online
social support for certain youth, particularly those who may
not readily have access to communities of similar peers. For
example, youth identifying as LGBTQ have been shown to be
more likely than non-LGBTQ youth to have online friends and
to identify these friends as an important source of emotional
support [25]. The receipt of online social support may also
play a protective role for youth with mental illness, including
depression and suicidality. Indeed, one study suggests that
more than half (57.0%) of psychiatrically hospitalized youth
report receiving social support or encouragement on social
media during the two weeks prior to their admission [18].
The promise of new media for promoting adolescent
mental health goes beyond its day-to-day use among youth
to include novel health care applications in screening, treat-
ment, and prevention. In regard to screening, prior work has
demonstrated the potential feasibility of reviewing social
media pages for signs of depression or substance abuse
[17, 26]. On a larger scale, increasingly sophisticated
machine learning algorithms have been developed to detect
social media-based signals of mental illness, including
depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicidality
[27]. Social networking sites like Facebook and Instagram
have already implemented screening and intervention
NCMJ vol. 81, no. 2
procedures when users exhibit signs of emotional distress
or suicide risk. Social media also presents unprecedented
opportunities for increasing mental health awareness, and
social media-based health promotion efforts have been
tested for a variety of mental and behavioral health con-
cerns [28]. The immediate accessibility and potential scale
of social media offers exciting possibilities for youth mental
health treatment, including the potential to serve hard-to-
reach populations. While a large number of mental health
mobile apps have recently been developed for youth, and ini-
tial evidence supports their acceptability, further research is
needed to establish efficacy and effectiveness.
Conclusions and Future Directions
Over the past two decades, new media have established
an increasingly central presence in the lives of youth, pre-
senting both new challenges and new opportunities. An
emerging body of research has begun to identify social
media experiences that may contribute to adolescents’
mental health. However, more research is needed as the
digital media landscape continues to rapidly evolve. Much
of the existing research has relied on self-report measures
of adolescent media use, and has been conducted at a single
time point, preventing any definitive conclusions regarding
whether media use precedes and predicts mental health
outcomes or vice versa. Future experimental and longitu-
dinal studies are needed, including those that incorporate
objective measures, such as direct observation of adoles-
cents’ social media pages. In addition, future investigations
must continue to move beyond previous notions of “screen
time” as a primary contributor to mental health, and instead
consider the specific social media experiences and indi-
vidual characteristics that may make certain adolescents
particularly vulnerable to social media’s positive or negative
effects. Finally, the translation of basic social media research
findings into clinical and policy application remains an area
of critical need in the field. As the presence of new media
only continues to grow, it will be essential to develop evi-
dence-based approaches for encouraging healthy social
media use in youth, and to effectively utilize these tools for
mental health screening and intervention.
Jacqueline Nesi, PhD postdoctoral fellow, Department of Psychiatry &
Human Behavior, Division of Clinical Psychology, Brown University and
Bradley Hasbro Research Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence,
Rhode Island.
Jacqueline Nesi is supported, in part, by funds provide by the
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (PDF-010517). Any opin-
ions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this
material are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessar-
ily reflect the views of AFSP.
Potential conflicts of interest. The author has no relevant conflicts
of interest.
1. Rideout V. The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Kids Age Zero
to Eight. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2017. https://
esearch/csm_zerotoeight_fullreport_release_2.pdf. Published 2017.
Accessed January 10, 2020.
2. Anderson M, Jiang J. Teens, Social Media, & Technology. Pew Re-
search Center website.
18/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/. Published May 31,
2018. Accessed January 10, 2020.
3. Moreno MA, Kota R. Social Media. In: Strasburger VC, Wilson BJ,
Jordan AB, eds. Children, Adolescents, and the Media. 3rd ed. Thou-
sand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2014.
4. National Institute of Mental Health. Mental Illness: Prevalence of
Any Mental Illness. National Institute of Mental Health website.
Accessed January 13, 2020.
5. Keyes KM, Gary D, O’Malley PM, Hamilton A, Schulenberg J. Re-
cent increases in depressive symptoms among US adolescents:
trends from 1991 to 2018. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol.
2019;54(8):987-996. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01697-8
6. Curtin SC, Heron M. Death rates due to suicide and homicide among
persons aged 10-24: United States, 2000-2017. NCHS Data Brief, no
352. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Helath Statistics; 2019. Published
October 2019. Accessed January 10, 2020.
7. Rideout V. The Commmon Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and
Teens. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2015. https://www
-media-use-by-tweens-and-teens-2015. Published 2015. Accessed
January 10, 2020.
8. Somerville LH. Special issue on the teenage brain: Sensitivity to
social evaluation. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013;22(2):121-127. doi:
9. Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA. A developmental psychopathology per-
spective on adolescence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(1):6-20.
10. Nesi J, Choukas-Bradley S, Prinstein MJ. Transformation of adoles-
cent peer relations in the social media context: part 1—A theoretical
framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clin Child
Fam Psychol Rev. 2018;21(3):267-294. doi: 10.1007/s10567-018-
11. McCrae N, Gettings S, Purssell E. Social media and depressive
symptoms in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review. Ado-
lesc Res Rev. 2017;2(4):315-330.
12. Holland G, Tiggemann M. A systematic review of the impact of the
use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating
outcomes. Body Image. 2016;17:100-110. doi: 10.1016/j.body-
13. Riehm KE, Feder KA, Tormohlen KN, et al. Associations between
time spent using social media and internalizing and externaliz-
ing problems among US youth. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;11:1-9. doi:
14. John A, Glendenning AC, Marchant A, et al. Self-harm, suicidal
behaviours, and cyberbullying in children and young people: sys-
tematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4):e129. doi: 10.2196/
15. Fisher BW, Gardella JH, Teurbe-Tolon AR. Peer cybervictimization
among adolescents and the associated internalizing and external-
izing problems: A meta-analysis. J Youth Adolesc. 2016;45(9):1727-
1743. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0541-z
16. Anderson M, Jiang J. Teens’ Social Media Habits and Experiences.
Pew Research Center website.
Published November 28, 2018. Accessed January 10, 2020.
17. Moreno MA, D’Angelo J, Whitehill J. Social media and alcohol: Sum-
mary of research, intervention ideas and future study directions.
Media and Communication. 2016;4(3):50-59.
18. Nesi J, Prinstein MJ. Using social media for social comparison
and feedback-seeking: Gender and popularity moderate asso-
ciations with depressive symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol.
2015;43(8):1427-1438. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0020-0.
19. Fardouly J, Vartanian LR. Social media and body image concerns:
Current research and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;9:1-
20. Carter B, Rees P, Hale L, Bhattacharjee D, Paradkar MS. Association
between portable screen-based media device access or use and
NCMJ vol. 81, no. 2
sleep outcomes a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pedi-
atr. 2016;170(12):1202-1208. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2341
21. Robb MB. The New Normal: Parents, Teens, Screens, and Sleep in
the United States. Common Sense Media: San Francisco, CA; 2019.
united-states.pdf. Published 2019. Accessed January 10, 2020.
22. Rideout V, Robb MB. Social Media, Social Life. San Francisco, CA:
Common Sense Media; 2018. https://www.commonsensemedia.
sociallife_executivesummary-final-release_3_lowres.pdf. Published
2018. Accessed January 10, 2020.
23. Clark JL, Algoe SB, Green MC. Social network sites and well-being:
The role of social connection. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018;27(1):32-37.
24. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Palmer NA, Reisner SL. Online social sup-
port as a buffer against online and offline peer and sexual victim-
ization among U.S. LGBT and non-LGBT youth. Child Abuse Negl.
2015;39:123-136. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.006
25. Nesi J, Wolff JC, Hunt J. Patterns of social media use among adoles-
cents who are psychiatrically hospitalized. J Am Acad Child Adolesc
Psychiatry. 2019;58(6):635-639.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.03.009
26. Moreno MA, Christakis DA, Egan KG, et al. A pilot evaluation of as-
sociations between displayed depression references on facebook
and self-reported depression using a clinical scale. J Behav Health
Serv Res. 2012;39(3):295-304. doi: 10.1007/s11414-011-9258-7
27. Guntuku SC, Yaden DB, Kern ML, Ungar LH, Eichstaedt JC. Detect-
ing depression and mental illness on social media: an integrative re-
view. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;18:43-49.
28. Yonker LM, Zan S, Scirica CV, Jethwani K, Kinane TB. “Friending”
teens: systematic review of social media in adolescent and young
adult health care. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/
... Young people have access to an almost infinite amount of information of dubious quality. One of the reasons for this is the proliferation of smart devices that allow us to enter the online world from anywhere, at any time [1]; [26]; [34]; [35]; [37]. Technological developments at the beginning of the 21st century have brought about many changes in the socialization of adolescent children; [28]; [37]. ...
... The number of users is growing every day and spreading at a high rate worldwide. The majority of young people prefer to spend their time on social media rather than watching TV, listening to the radio, or reading the newspapers [3]; [26]; [30]. The social media 'craze' of youth raises many questions about its impact on society [20]; [32]; [37]. ...
... In light of the above, it can therefore be said that the impact of social media needs to be addressed because it has become a living space, which for the younger generations has also become a social space. Social media has the potential to provide a platform where the socialization of young "people" can take place more easily [26]. Previous studies highlight that many young individuals today cannot communicate face-to-face and find it more difficult to create personal bonds [19]; [28]; [32]; [34]. ...
Full-text available
Social media has become part of our day and its effects are being studied in younger age groups, but there is minimal literature on older young adults. Our research sought to answer the question of the impact of social media use on the interpersonal communication of young college students. Our survey was completed online by 55 first- and second-year sports students, and our results show that effects can be detected in this age group.
... The bulk of research points to digital media use as a factor in decreased adolescent mental health, [1][2][3][4] with some research highlighting social media use specifically. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The link between time spent on digital media and decreased adolescent mental health is controversial, as the effect is not linear. However, most research on social media use and individual adolescent vulnerabilities has linked unhealthy use to decreased emotional well-being. ...
... 16 The specific experience of being a victim of cyberbullying is associated with more suicidal thoughts and selfinjurious behavior. 8,16,17 In fact, suicidal ideation, moderate to severe depression and post-traumatic stress disorder are more prevalent among those reporting cyberbullying at any point. 18 Therefore, screening for high-levels of internet use, addiction, and exposure to cyberbullying experiences, can alert caregivers to the potential for significant emotional distress and suicidal ideation in adolescents. ...
... The focus of research on social media use is to identify individual experiences putting adolescent emotional well-being at risk. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]25 Individual user vulnerabilities and the effects of digital media on those vulnerabilities is suspected of causing them to engage with social media in adaptive or maladaptive ways. 8 For example, adolescent tendencies toward depression, anxiety, and loneliness affects how they use social media. ...
Full-text available
There is increasing concern regarding the impact of social media on adolescent mental health, yet medical providers have limited guidance on how to effectively screen their adolescent patients. Research has suggested a negative association between excessive time on digital media, more than 2-hours per day, and emotional health. Perhaps more importantly, adolescent vulnerabilities, such as existing anxiety or depression, when exposed to certain social media experiences can cause further decline of mental health. The goal of this review is to help providers effectively evaluate social media use in adolescent patients and provide guidance on its use to help preserve or improve their emotional well-being.
... Research on social media use and its impact on the mental health of adolescents has increased recently, with many studies investigating whether constant use of social media is associated with mental health problems, including anxiety and depression (e.g., Karim et al., 2020;Marino et al., 2018;Nesi, 2020;Twenge & Martin, 2020). Despite extensive research, the effect of social media on the mental health of adolescents is not yet understood due to mixed and inconsistent findings (Best et al., 2014;Keles et al., 2020;Orben, 2020;Schønning et al., 2020;Valkenburg et al., 2021). ...
... It is well-established that social connectedness and a sense of belonging are linked to a low risk of anxiety and depression among adolescents (Allen et al., 2014;Jose et al., 2012;McLoughlin et al., 2019). Therefore, online connection and communication can facilitate social and emotional support (Michikyan & Suárez-Orozco, 2016;Weinstein, 2017), which can then enhance the mental health of adolescents and reduce the risk of mental health problems including anxiety, depression and self-harm (Nesi, 2020). ...
Full-text available
Despite extensive research, the mental health implication of social media in adolescents is not yet understood due to mixed and inconsistent findings and more in-depth qualitative studies are needed to expand our understanding of the impact of social media on adolescent mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to explore why and how adolescents use social media, adolescents’ lived experiences on social media, how they make sense of these experiences having impact on their mental health, and the influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on their use of social media and mental health. In-depth interviews were conducted with eleven adolescents aged 14–16 (five female, six male) across England. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Two key themes were identified: the beauty of social media that captured positive experiences and emotions of adolescents and the beast of social media that captured negative experiences and emotions. From the adolescents’ accounts, social media has both positive and negative impacts on their mental health, but mostly positive impacts during the Covid-19 pandemic. The results were discussed in relation to the study aims and previous study findings. Strengths and methodological limitations of the study, implications for future research that emerged from the study were discussed.
... Some researchers have suggested that increased use of social media by adolescents is linked to an increased risk of anxiety disorders [31][32][33][34][35]. Other reported problems include social comparison, disordered eating; substance use; self-harm and depression [29,36]. In summary, scholarly opinion remains divided on the harms and benefits of social media use by adolescents. ...
... This number of views represents the total global views of each individual TikTok tagged with #anxiety since the time of publication. Our raw data set represented approximately 23% of all TikTok views tagged with #anxiety by December 2021 [36]. Second, we downloaded the metadata for these TikTok videos. ...
Full-text available
Introduction Social media is ubiquitous in adolescents’ lives. TikTok is a medium primarily used by adolescents and young adults under 30 years. TikTok is thus an appropriate social media platform with which to examine discussions of anxiety among this age cohort. In this exploratory mixed-methods study we aimed to evaluate the scope of anxiety content available on TikTok in English in December 2021, and to further develop methods for analysing TikTok content. Methods We analysed a data set of 147 TikToks with the hashtag #anxiety. The data set consisted both of metadata and TikTok videos. This data set represented 18% of all TikToks featuring the hashtag #anxiety in December 2021. We examined the following research questions (RQs). RQ1: What are the creator identities reflected in the final data set in this study?; RQ2: What are the metadata characteristics of the TikToks in the final data set?; RQ3: What are the anxiety content themes in the final data set?; and RQ4: What are the characteristics of the data set based on an anxiety management reference checklist? This study involves public data that can reasonably be observed by strangers. This study does not include any identifiable human participants. Results Influencers were the most frequent creator identity in our data set. Influencers comprised 85.5% of the 147 TikToks in our final data set. We coded 79 female (54%) and 45 male (31%) influencers. We found male influencers created the most played (mean 8,114,706), and most liked (mean 1,510,585) TikToks. We found content themes varied by influencer gender. The notable findings were (a) the greater use of humour by males (22.7% males; n=10, and females 12.6%; n=10); and (b) inspiration (38.7%; males n=17; and 13.9%; females n=11). Among female influencers, we identified self-disclosure as the most common theme (n= 40 and 50.7% compared with n=11 and 25% male influencers). Overall, we found limited references to evidence-based anxiety self-care content in our final data set. Discussion We suggest that the TikToks in our data set were primarily directed at raising awareness of and de-stigmatising anxiety symptoms. TikTok anxiety content may be viewed by adolescents for emotional self-regulation beyond evidence-based health information seeking. Self-disclosure on TikTok may also provide symptomatic relief to adolescents with anxiety. We suggest that gender is a salient consideration when considering TikTok content. Conclusions Our findings are consistent with existing literature on adolescent social media use and epidemiological data on anxiety. This research also provides methodological insights for researchers and clinicians seeking to understand TikTok, and to develop engaging content targeted at the specific concerns and preferences of adolescent TikTok consumers.
... However, the environmental climate will threaten worse than ever as density grows and emigration prevalence to the city diversify in culture and customs by 2030. The fear increased in mental diseases among the population, especially the dumping of information on terrorism, murder, fraud, slander, blackmail and many more that make the world unsafe for living (Nesi, 2020;Srivastava, 2009). Because of that, attitudes and behavior need to lead to an environment conducive to all residents. ...
The chain of global change phenomena occurring in life today has resulted in the urgent need to place world-class education as outlined in the Malaysia Blueprint 2013-2025. Hence, the Ministry of Education installed high-performing leaders in all schools by adopting the Transformative leadership style. The post-pandemic crisis is still haunting the lives of everyone, including teachers1 in schools. The urgency of change makes many teachers experience psychological distress. Therefore, the call to conduct research holistically in leadership, management, and resources to overcome the issue. Hence, this article describes a theoretical framework based on gaps and limitations in most past literature. The theoretical lens of social exchange theory contributes to the relationship between Inclusive Leadership, psychological stress, organizational climate and Social Intelligence. Eventually, the Inclusive Leadership style is not yet widely practiced in schools compared to the Transformational leadership style practiced since 2013. Based on literature reviews, this theoretical framework study uses to investigate Inclusive Leadership in curbing psychological distress among school teachers through organizational Climate and Social intelligence mediation. Therefore, the study of this theory aims to contribute to the field of Educational Leadership and Crisis management. And also beneficial not only to the Ministry of Education and to humankind.
Full-text available
s As social media sites are constantly growing, we believe that technology is an important component of today's student life, where social media have many positive effects there are some negative impact such as increasingloneliness and social alienation among youth.The respondents in this exploratory research were chosen at random (N=100, males=51 and females=49) who are enrolled incollege(s) anduniversity of district Okara.This study revealed that social isolation and loneliness are significantly different across the use of social media. This study found that youth involved in extreme use of social media are suffering from loneliness and social isolation. The study suggests that youth should be decreasing the use time ofsocial media on daily basses
Full-text available
Abstract: Social media has significantly altered how individuals engage and communicate over the last decade. Research has shown that social media use can have a positive impact by fostering interconnectedness and alleviating isolation. However, little evidence suggests it can profoundly affect people’s mental health, including externalizing issues like aggression, bullying, opposition, and immaturity, as well as internalizing problems like depression, anxiety, social withdrawal, and low self-esteem. The symptoms mentioned above linked to social media have been termed Media Sysdic Disorder. With increasing exposure to the virtual world of social media, human mental health could be in grave danger if this disorder is not given the requisite attention it needs. The present research aims to prove the existence of Media sysdic disorder (MSD) and explore its effect on individuals. To achieve this purpose, we will explicate social media effects and review and synthesize available related literature. The summarized literature seeks to reveal this disorder's presence, symptoms, patterns, and possible complications. Keywords: social media, Mental Health, Media Sysdic Disorder
Objective: To evaluate the quality of varicocele information on TikTok, a popular video platform that adolescent patients are now turning to as a source of medical information before visiting a doctor. Methods: Using the key word "varicocele," we retrieved the top 225 videos listed on TikTok in May 2022. We extracted general video and engagement data. Video information was coded and analyzed for the completeness of different types of content (definition, symptoms, evaluation, management, and outcomes). The quality of consumer health information was rated using the DISCERN instrument. Results: 36 videos met inclusion criteria; 17 were created by general users, 16 by healthcare professionals or systems (2 by urologists), and 3 by scientific communities. Healthcare professionals had more views than non-healthcare (p = 0.05). The quality of health information using the DISCERN instrument was "poor" from health care professional videos and "very poor" from non-health care professionals. However, the quality of information provided by healthcare professionals was statistically better than that of non-healthcare (p<0.05). Video content mainly focused on symptoms: 50% of videos from healthcare providers had some or extensive content and 41% of non-healthcare had some content. 23% of videos had misinformation. Conclusions: The overall quality of information for varicoceles on TikTok is not acceptable and does not meet patient needs. It is imperative that urologists create robust, accurate content, and partner with these platforms to connect users with higher quality information. TikTok users should also be mindful that information may not be medically accurate.
Background: In adolescents, technology use at bedtime is linked to disrupted sleep and psychological distress. Adolescents are known to sleep later on weekends compared to weekdays but whether this leads to greater technology use, and, hence, additional psychological distress is not known. At greater risk maybe adolescents with a late compared to early chronotype, that is a preference for late versus early sleep onset and offset times. Method: Self-reported measures of sleep timing, chronotype (early, neither early nor late, late), technology medium (social media/texting, TV/streaming, and gaming), and psychological distress (DASS-21) were collected from 462 students attending one Australian high school. Results: Technology use at bedtime was greater on weekends and especially in adolescents with a late chronotype. Social media/texting on weekends was predictive of delayed sleep onset times (β = .120), and shorter sleep (β = -.172). Shorter sleep on weekdays but not on weekends was associated with greater psychological distress. Technology medium and chronotype were not predictive of psychological distress. Conclusions: This study confirmed that technology use and its impact on sleep differed on weekdays compared to weekends and that a late chronotype was associated with greater technology use. However, neither technology medium nor chronotype was found to affect psychological distress. While greater autonomy may be granted to adolescents over the weekend regarding sleep behaviour, young people, parents, and clinicians should be mindful of the link between technology use and sleep.
Full-text available
Background Mental health problems and mental health related mortality have increased among adolescents, particularly girls. These trends have implications for etiology and prevention and suggest new and emerging risk factors in need of attention. The present study estimated age, period, and cohort effects in depressive symptoms among US nationally representative samples of school attending adolescents from 1991 to 2018.Methods Data are drawn from 1991 to 2018 Monitoring the Future yearly cross-sectional surveys of 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students (N = 1,260,159). Depressive symptoms measured with four questions that had consistent wording and data collection procedures across all 28 years. Age–period–cohort effects estimated using the hierarchical age–period–cohort models.ResultsAmong girls, depressive symptoms decreased from 1991 to 2011, then reversed course, peaking in 2018; these increases reflected primarily period effects, which compared to the mean of all periods showed a gradual increase starting in 2012 and peaked in 2018 (estimate = 1.15, p < 0.01). Cohort effects were minimal, indicating that increases are observed across all age groups. Among boys, trends were similar although the extent of the increase is less marked compared to girls; there was a declining cohort effect among recently born cohorts, suggesting that increases in depressive symptoms among boys are slower for younger boys compared to older boys in recent years. Trends were generally similar by race/ethnicity and parental education, with a positive cohort effect for Hispanic girls born 1999–2004.Conclusions Depressive symptoms are increasing among teens, especially among girls, consistent with increases in depression and suicide. Population variation in psychiatric disorder symptoms highlight the importance of current environmental determinants of psychiatric disorder risk, and provide evidence of emerging risk factors that may be shaping a new and concerning trend in adolescent mental health.
Full-text available
Deaths due to suicide and homicide, often referred to collectively as violent deaths, have consistently been a major cause of premature death to persons aged 10–24 in the United States (1–3). In 2017, suicide was the second leading cause of death for persons aged 10–14, 15–19, and 20–24, and homicide ranked third for persons aged 15–19 and 20–24 and fifth for persons aged 10–14 (4). This report presents trends for 2000–2017 in suicide and homicide death rates for all persons aged 10–24 and for age groups 10–14, 15–19, and 20–24.
Full-text available
Adolescents’ use of social media (SM) has increased drastically in recent years, with more than 80% of teens now belonging to sites such as Instagram, Snapchat, and Facebook. ¹ This has critical implications for youths’ psychosocial development. Research increasingly supports a differential susceptibility model of media effects, ² whereby certain adolescents show increased risk for negative effects of SM use. Emerging research with community samples of youth suggest that mental health concerns may be one factor that heightens vulnerability to adverse SM experiences. In particular, youth with internalizing symptoms are more likely to report negative emotional responses to SM activity. ³ In addition, youth with suicidal thoughts or behaviors are more likely to experience cybervictimization, and may be at risk for exposure to suicide-related SM content. ⁴ Despite this preliminary evidence, almost no research to date has examined SM use among youth with clinically severe psychiatric presentations. This has significantly limited our understanding of a central feature in the lives of youth with mental illness. To address this limitation, we examined SM experiences among a large sample of psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents. We sought to determine the prevalence of positive and negative SM experiences in this population, and to explore differences in SM use based on diagnostic presentation.
Full-text available
Investigators have long recognized that adolescents’ peer experiences provide a crucial context for the acquisition of developmental competencies, as well as potential risks for a range of adjustment difficulties. However, recent years have seen an exponential increase in adolescents’ adoption of social media tools, fundamentally reshaping the landscape of adolescent peer interactions. Although research has begun to examine social media use among adolescents, researchers have lacked a unifying framework for understanding the impact of social media on adolescents’ peer experiences. This paper represents Part 1 of a two-part theoretical review, in which we offer a transformation framework to integrate interdisciplinary social media scholarship and guide future work on social media use and peer relations from a theory-driven perspective. We draw on prior conceptualizations of social media as a distinct interpersonal context and apply this understanding to adolescents’ peer experiences, outlining features of social media with particular relevance to adolescent peer relations. We argue that social media transforms adolescent peer relationships in five key ways: by changing the frequency or immediacy of experiences, amplifying experiences and demands, altering the qualitative nature of interactions, facilitating new opportunities for compensatory behaviors, and creating entirely novel behaviors. We offer an illustration of the transformation framework applied to adolescents’ dyadic friendship processes (i.e., experiences typically occurring between two individuals), reviewing existing evidence and offering theoretical implications. Overall, the transformation framework represents a departure from the prevailing approaches of prior peer relations work and a new model for understanding peer relations in the social media context.
Full-text available
Concerns are increasingly raised in academic and lay literature about the impact of the internet on young people’s well-being. This systematic review examined empirical research on the relationship between social media use and depressive symptoms in the child and adolescent population. A systematic search of Medline, PsycInfo and Embase databases yielded eleven eligible studies. Relevant results were extracted from each study, with a total sample of 12,646. Analysis revealed a small but statistically significant correlation between social media use and depressive symptoms in young people. However, studies varied widely in methods, sample size and results, making the clinical significance of these findings nuanced. Over half of the studies were cross-sectional, while those of longitudinal design were of limited duration. This review justifies further investigation of this phenomenon, with a need for consensus on variables and measurement.
Full-text available
Importance: Sleep is vital to children's biopsychosocial development. Inadequate sleep quantity and quality is a public health concern with an array of detrimental health outcomes. Portable mobile and media devices have become a ubiquitous part of children's lives and may affect their sleep duration and quality. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether there is an association between portable screen-based media device (eg, cell phones and tablet devices) access or use in the sleep environment and sleep outcomes. Data sources: A search strategy consisting of gray literature and 24 Medical Subject Headings was developed in Ovid MEDLINE and adapted for other databases between January 1, 2011, and June 15, 2015. Searches of the published literature were conducted across 12 databases. No language restriction was applied. Study selection: The analysis included randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional study designs. Inclusion criteria were studies of school-age children between 6 and 19 years. Exclusion criteria were studies of stationary exposures, such as televisions or desktop or personal computers, or studies investigating electromagnetic radiation. Data extraction and synthesis: Of 467 studies identified, 20 cross-sectional studies were assessed for methodological quality. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were inadequate sleep quantity, poor sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness, studied according to an a priori protocol. Results: Twenty studies were included, and their quality was assessed. The studies involved 125 198 children (mean [SD] age, 14.5 [2.2] years; 50.1% male). There was a strong and consistent association between bedtime media device use and inadequate sleep quantity (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.42-3.32) (P < .001, I2 = 90%), poor sleep quality (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.14-1.88) (P = .003, I2 = 76%), and excessive daytime sleepiness (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.32-5.61) (P = .007, I2 = 50%). In addition, children who had access to (but did not use) media devices at night were more likely to have inadequate sleep quantity (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.39-2.31) (P < .001, I2 = 64%), poor sleep quality (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.11-2.10) (P = .009, I2 = 74%), and excessive daytime sleepiness (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.54-3.35) (P < .001, I2 = 24%). Conclusions and relevance: To date, this study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the association of access to and the use of media devices with sleep outcomes. Bedtime access to and use of a media device were significantly associated with the following: inadequate sleep quantity, poor sleep quality, and excessive daytime sleepiness. An integrated approach among teachers, health care professionals, and parents is required to minimize device access at bedtime, and future research is needed to evaluate the influence of the devices on sleep hygiene and outcomes.
Importance Social media use may be a risk factor for mental health problems in adolescents. However, few longitudinal studies have investigated this association, and none have quantified the proportion of mental health problems among adolescents attributable to social media use. Objective To assess whether time spent using social media per day is prospectively associated with internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal cohort study of 6595 participants from waves 1 (September 12, 2013, to December 14, 2014), 2 (October 23, 2014, to October 30, 2015), and 3 (October 18, 2015, to October 23, 2016) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study, a nationally representative cohort study of US adolescents, assessed US adolescents via household interviews using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing. Data analysis was performed from January 14, 2019, to May 22, 2019. Exposures Self-reported time spent on social media during a typical day (none, ≤30 minutes, >30 minutes to ≤3 hours, >3 hours to ≤6 hours, and >6 hours) during wave 2. Main Outcomes and Measure Self-reported past-year internalizing problems alone, externalizing problems alone, and comorbid internalizing and externalizing problems during wave 3 using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs–Short Screener. Results A total of 6595 adolescents (aged 12-15 years during wave 1; 3400 [51.3%] male) were studied. In unadjusted analyses, spending more than 30 minutes of time on social media, compared with no use, was associated with increased risk of internalizing problems alone (≤30 minutes: relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.30; 95% CI, 0.94-1.78; >30 minutes to ≤3 hours: RRR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.36-2.64; >3 to ≤6 hours: RRR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.74-3.49; >6 hours: RRR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.88-4.26) and comorbid internalizing and externalizing problems (≤30 minutes: RRR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.82; >30 minutes to ≤3 hours: RRR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.83-3.00; >3 to ≤6 hours: RRR, 3.15; 95% CI, 2.43-4.09; >6 hours: RRR, 4.29; 95% CI, 3.22-5.73); associations with externalizing problems were inconsistent. In adjusted analyses, use of social media for more than 3 hours per day compared with no use remained significantly associated with internalizing problems alone (>3 to ≤6 hours: RRR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.11-2.31; >6 hours: RRR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.15-2.77) and comorbid internalizing and externalizing problems (>3 to ≤6 hours: RRR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.51-2.66; >6 hours: RRR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.73-3.43) but not externalizing problems alone. Conclusions and Relevance Adolescents who spend more than 3 hours per day using social media may be at heightened risk for mental health problems, particularly internalizing problems. Future research should determine whether setting limits on daily social media use, increasing media literacy, and redesigning social media platforms are effective means of reducing the burden of mental health problems in this population.
Background: Given the concerns about bullying via electronic communication in children and young people and its possible contribution to self-harm, we have reviewed the evidence for associations between cyberbullying involvement and self-harm or suicidal behaviors (such as suicidal ideation, suicide plans, and suicide attempts) in children and young people. Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the current evidence examining the association between cyberbullying involvement as victim or perpetrator and self-harm and suicidal behaviors in children and young people (younger than 25 years), and where possible, to meta-analyze data on the associations. Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted for all studies published between January 1, 1996, and February 3, 2017, across sources, including MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PsycINFO. Articles were included if the study examined any association between cyberbullying involvement and self-harm or suicidal behaviors and reported empirical data in a sample aged under 25 years. Quality of included papers was assessed and data were extracted. Meta-analyses of data were conducted. Results: A total of 33 eligible articles from 26 independent studies were included, covering a population of 156,384 children and young people. A total of 25 articles (20 independent studies, n=115,056) identified associations (negative influences) between cybervictimization and self-harm or suicidal behaviors or between perpetrating cyberbullying and suicidal behaviors. Three additional studies, in which the cyberbullying, self-harm, or suicidal behaviors measures had been combined with other measures (such as traditional bullying and mental health problems), also showed negative influences (n=44,526). A total of 5 studies showed no significant associations (n=5646). Meta-analyses, producing odds ratios (ORs) as a summary measure of effect size (eg, ratio of the odds of cyber victims who have experienced SH vs nonvictims who have experienced SH), showed that, compared with nonvictims, those who have experienced cybervictimization were OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.65-3.34) times as likely to self-harm, OR 2.10 (95% CI 1.73-2.55) times as likely to exhibit suicidal behaviors, OR 2.57 (95% CI 1.69-3.90) times more likely to attempt suicide, and OR 2.15 (95% CI 1.70-2.71) times more likely to have suicidal thoughts. Cyberbullying perpetrators were OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.02-1.44) times more likely to exhibit suicidal behaviors and OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.10-1.37) times more likely to experience suicidal ideation than nonperpetrators. Conclusions: Victims of cyberbullying are at a greater risk than nonvictims of both self-harm and suicidal behaviors. To a lesser extent, perpetrators of cyberbullying are at risk of suicidal behaviors and suicidal ideation when compared with nonperpetrators. Policy makers and schools should prioritize the inclusion of cyberbullying involvement in programs to prevent traditional bullying. Type of cyberbullying involvement, frequency, and gender should be assessed in future studies.
In the early days of the Internet, both conventional wisdom and scholarship deemed online communication a threat to well-being. Later research has complicated this picture, offering mixed evidence about how technology-mediated communication affects users. With the dawn of social network sites, this issue is more important than ever. A close examination of the extensive body of research on social network sites suggests that conflicting results can be reconciled by a single theoretical approach: the interpersonal-connection-behaviors framework. Specifically, we suggest that social network sites benefit their users when they are used to make meaningful social connections and harm their users through pitfalls such as isolation and social comparison when they are not. The benefits and drawbacks of using social network sites shown in existing research can largely be explained by this approach, which also posits the need for studying specific online behaviors in future research.