ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the phenomenological characteristics of distant trauma memories and the relationship between the vividness of trauma memories, the centrality of event and symptoms of posttraumatic stress in two groups with different types of trauma exposure, namely survivors, and bereaved, from the fire on the passenger ferry Scandinavian Star 26 years earlier. More than two decades after the fire, the traumatic event was represented as a vivid, emotional recollection for many of the victims. For both the survivors and the bereaved, a higher degree of vividness of trauma memories and centrality of event were associated with higher levels of posttraumatic stress. The present findings show that even very distant trauma memories can be represented as vivid recollections. Furthermore, the findings suggest that both vividness of trauma memories and event centrality may contribute to explain how posttraumatic stress reactions can remain present over a very long time. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Vivid memories of distant trauma: Examining the
characteristics of trauma memories and the relationship with
the centrality of event and posttraumatic stress 26 years
after trauma
Ines Blix | Marianne S. Birkeland | Siri Thoresen
Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic
Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway
Correspondence
Ines Blix, Norwegian Centre for Violence and
Traumatic Stress Studies, NKVTS,
Pb. 181 Nydalen, Oslo 0409, Norway.
Email: ines.blix@nkvts.no
Funding information
The independent commission for the
Scandinavian Star case
Summary
In the present study, we investigated the phenomenological characteristics of distant
trauma memories and the relationship between the vividness of trauma memories,
the centrality of event and symptoms of posttraumatic stress in two groups with dif-
ferent types of trauma exposure, namely survivors and bereaved, from the fire on the
passenger ferry, Scandinavian Star, 26 years earlier. More than two decades after the
fire, the traumatic event was represented as a vivid, emotional recollection for many
of the victims. For both the survivors and the bereaved, a higher degree of vividness
of trauma memories and centrality of the event were associated with higher levels of
posttraumatic stress. The present findings show that even very distant trauma mem-
ories can be represented as vivid recollections. Furthermore, the findings suggest that
both vividness of trauma memories and event centrality may contribute to explain
how posttraumatic stress reactions can remain present over a very long time.
KEYWORDS
centrality of event, memory, posttraumatic stress
1|INTRODUCTION
Memories of traumatic experiences are often described as vivid repre-
sentations involving sensory impressions and a sense of reliving.
According to cognitive theories of posttraumatic stress disorder
(PTSD), trauma memories play a key role in the development and
maintenance of posttraumatic stress reactions (Brewin, Dalgleish, &
Joseph, 1996; Ehlers & Clark, 2000; Rubin, Berntsen, & Bohni, 2008).
Memory is also central in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). According to DSM-5, PTSD can
involve disturbances in voluntary retrieval of autobiographical mem-
ory defined as inability to recall key features of the trauma, and
difficulties in involuntary retrieval of autobiographical memories
defined as unwanted upsetting memoriesand flashbacks.
While there is a consensus about the important role of trauma
memory in PTSD, there are divergent views concerning how trauma
memories are processed and how they produce symptoms. According
to some scholars, the integration of traumatic experiences in autobio-
graphical memory is prevented by maladaptive strategies like avoid-
ance and suppression of disturbing thoughts (Brewin et al., 1996;
Ehlers & Clark, 2000). This lack of integration of trauma memories is
proposed not only to result in difficulties in voluntary retrieval of
trauma memories but also repeated recall of vivid involuntary memo-
ries of the traumatic event (for a review see Dalgleish, 2004).
Received: 24 September 2019 Revised: 29 February 2020 Accepted: 2 March 2020
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3650
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
© 2020 The Authors. Applied Cognitive Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Appl Cognit Psychol. 2020;17. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/acp 1
However, according to a different perspective, trauma memories, like
memories from other emotional and distinct experiences, tend to be
highly integrated with our self-concept, interconnected with other
autobiographical memories, and characterized by enhanced memory,
in the form of highly accessible and vivid memories (Rubin, Berntsen, &
Bohni, 2008; Rubin, Boals, & Berntsen, 2008). Furthermore, difficul-
ties in voluntary retrieval of trauma memories are not well docu-
mented; on the contrary, enhancement for emotional stressful or
traumatic experiences is found for both voluntary and involuntary
recall (Berntsen & Rubin, 2014; Hall & Berntsen, 2008). In line with
this, in a literature review on studies of trauma narratives, Crespo and
Fernández-Lansac (2016) reported that trauma memories are charac-
terized by sensory and emotional details, and the degree of sensory
detail was associated with posttraumatic stress.
To explain how trauma memories tend to be highly integrated
with autobiographical memory, the concept centrality of eventwas
introduced (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006a). According to this perspective,
when a traumatic experience is construed as central to one's identity
and represented as a reference point in autobiographical memory,
this leads to more accessible and vivid memories of the traumatic
event, and this can, in turn, lead to posttraumatic stress symptoms
(Berntsen and Rubin (2006a, 2006b). In line with this, studies with
student samples (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006a, 2007; Boals & Schuettler,
2011, Boals, Steward, & Schuettler, 2010; Webb & Jobson, 2011)
and trauma-exposed individuals (Blix, Birkeland, Solberg, Hansen &
Heir, 2016; Brown, Antonius, Kramer, Root, & Hirst, 2010;
Robinaugh & McNally, 2011; Roland, Currier, Rojas-Flores, & Herrera,
2013) have shown that the degree of centrality for highly stressful
events is indeed associated with higher levels of post-traumatic
stress symptoms. Similarly, in a prospective study with bereaved indi-
viduals, Boelen (2012) found that the centrality of a loss was associ-
ated with concurrent symptom levels and severity of symptoms one
year after the loss for prolonged grief disorder, depression and PTSD.
Furthermore, several studies have reported a relationship
between the centrality of event, the vividness of trauma memories
and posttraumatic stress (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006a, 2006b; Fitzgerald,
Berntsen, & Broadbridge, 2016; for a systematic review, see Gehrt,
Berntsen, Hoyle, & Rubin, 2018). Two cross-sectional studies explored
these relationships using mediation analyses. In one study, centrality
was found to mediate the relationship between reliving and post-
traumatic stress (Fitzgerald et al., 2016). In another study, the vivid-
ness of trauma memories was found to mediate the relationship
between the centrality of event, and acute stress reactions and
depression symptoms (Mordeno, Galela, Nalipay, & Cue, 2018).
The role of the vividness of trauma memories and the centrality
of an event might be particularly relevant to consider when post-
traumatic stress reactions endure over a very long time. In general,
memories of personal experiences fade and become less vivid as time
passes by (Schacter, 2002). However, some research suggests that
trauma memories might not fade over time to the same extent as
other personal memories. In a prospective longitudinal study compar-
ing positive and traumatic autobiographical memories, Porter and
Peace (2007) reported that while ratings of vividness, overall quality
and sensory components declined for positive memories, these ratings
remained nearly unchanged for memories of traumatic events.
Most studies investigating the relationship between trauma
memory and posttraumatic stress have focused on fairly recent
trauma, or in samples with variation in how much time has passed
since the traumatic experience. Only a few studies have investigated
the phenomenological characteristics of very distant trauma memo-
ries. Hiskey, Luckie, Davies, and Brewin (2008) reported that elderly
people with intrusive memories from a distant traumatic event expe-
rienced these memories as intense and with vivid sensory compo-
nents. Furthermore, in a study with individuals who reported
traumatic experiences during World War II, the vividness of trauma
memories and centrality of the event was associated with post-
traumatic stress reactions decades after the traumatic experience
(Berntsen & Rubin, 2006b). This suggests that the degree to which
an event is vividly recalled and construed as central to identity and
life story might be factors that contribute to maintaining post-
traumatic stress reactions in the very long term. In the present study,
we investigate the role of vividness and centrality 26 years after a
disaster and thereby add to the very scarce literature on long-term
adjustment after trauma.
A pertinent question, that has not been of focus in the litera-
ture so far, is whether different types of exposure are associated
with differences in characteristics and degree of vividness of
trauma memories. The first aim in this cross-sectional study was to
explore the phenomenological characteristics of voluntarily
retrieved memories (memories recalled with purpose after being
asked to recall what happened) of a distant traumatic experience
in two groups with different types of trauma exposure. The partici-
pants in the present study were all affected by the fire on the pas-
senger ferry, Scandinavian Star, 26 years earlier. Some were
survivors with a life-threatening experience and others were
bereaved who had suffered a traumatic loss. Although the survi-
vors probably experienced more distinct sensory impressions during
the fire, the experience of the bereaved was also highly emotional
and distinct, and we expected that the memories of the bereaved
would also be represented as vivid. We had no particular expecta-
tions regarding potential differences between the groups in the
overall level of vividness. However, based on their very different
traumatic exposures, we wanted to explore potential differences in
phenomenological characteristics between the two groups.
The second aim was to investigate the relationship between the
vividness of trauma memories, the centrality of event and post-
traumatic stress reactions. We expected that the bereaved would
report higher centrality ratings compared to the survivors. While the
traumatic event itself can be a turning point and become central in
one's life story, we hypothesized that losing someone close would
remain more central after decades. Furthermore, we hypothesized
that a higher level of vividness of trauma memories and a higher level
of event centrality would be associated with posttraumatic stress
reactions for both survivors and bereaved.
2BLIX ET AL.
2|METHODS
2.1 |Participants and procedure
The present cross-sectional study was a part of a systematic investiga-
tion of the current mental health status of Norwegian survivors and
bereaved from the passenger ferry, Scandinavian Star, requested by
the Norwegian Parliament in 2016 (Thoresen et al., 2017). At the time
of the fire, 482 persons were on board the ship, of which 159 (33%)
died. The majority of the bereaved (86%) lost a close family member
(58% of the sample lost one and 27% lost more than one close family
member).
Based on lists over survivors and bereaved that we received from
an independent commission appointed by the Norwegian Parliament
with the mandate to evaluate the case of the Scandinavian Star ferry
disaster, we contacted 163 Norwegian survivors and 158 bereaved
during the autumn of 2016, 26 years after the fire. Information about
the study and an invitation to participate were sent by post, and those
who did not want to participate were given the possibility to notify us
if they did not wish to be contacted on the telephone. The inter-
viewers made contact by phone and asked if they wished to
participate.
We had limited information for comparing responders and non-
responders. However, women (98 out of 145 = 68%) were more likely
than men (95 out of 176 = 54%) to participate. Among the survivors,
23% reported having been located in the deadliest parts of the ship
(pre-defined according to certain corridors on certain decks) at the
time the fire started, compared to the original police investigation
placing 28% in these areas. Among the bereaved participants, 70%
had lost a partner, child, parent, and/or a sibling in the fire, compared
to 62% among the bereaved who did not participate in the study.
Informed consent was a two-step process. Before the interview,
the participants (N= 193) consented in writing that the information
could be included in our report to the Norwegian Government. After
completing the interview, most participants (96%, N= 185) gave addi-
tional written consent to use the information for research purposes.
In total, 185 individuals participated in the present study, including
94 survivors and 91 bereaved, resulting in response rates of 57 and
58%, respectively.
The traumatic exposure was severe for many of the survivors, as
76% were in areas of the ship with heavy smoke, 42% heard people
screaming or calling for help, 36% saw injured persons or bodies of
deceased persons, and 62% experienced a dangerous situation during
the evacuation of the ship (authors own). Among the survivors, a small
minority lost a close family member (7%). Of the bereaved, 86%
(n= 78) lost one, two or three close family members in the fire, that is,
partners, children, siblings, parents, grandchildren, or grandparents,
and of the remaining 13 individuals, 10 lost other relatives and 3 lost
ex-partners or others. The bereaved included individuals who were
not present on the ship, but who lost someone close. Among the
bereaved 19% (17 out of 91) of the participants scored above cut-off
for a probable PTSD diagnosis, according to their responses on the
PCL. Using a cut-off score of 31 on the PCL (Blevins, Weathers, Davis,
Witte, & Domino, 2015), 16% (15 out of 94) of the survivors scored
above the cut-off for PTSD.
Data collection took the form of face-to-face interviews, com-
bined with questionnaires filled out by the participants on a tablet
with the interviewer available. The responses were transferred
encrypted to storage within the University of Oslo's services for sensi-
tive data (TSD). To ensure confidentiality, no data were stored on the
tablet. The data used in the current study were part of the self-report
section of the interview. Strict procedures were followed to ensure
confidentiality, and the study was approved by the Regional Commit-
tee for medical and health research ethics. The study also included a
follow-up service for participants in distress.
2.2 |Measures
2.2.1 |Demographics
Demographic information included gender, age and education. For
education, the participants were asked about the number of years of
education after mandatory school. Mandatory school in (Norway) was
9 years at the time of the disaster.
2.2.2 |Memory characteristics
To measure memory characteristics, we used a set of rating scales
from the Autobiographical memory questionnaire (Rubin, Dennis, &
Beckham, 2011; Rubin, Schrauf, & Greenberg, 2003). Participants
were asked to take a moment and think about what happened during
the fire on the Scandinavian Star and asked to indicate on a 7-point
scale [from 1 (not at all) to 7 (to a very large extent)] how they cur-
rently experienced these memories in terms of sensory vividness (it is
like I can hear what is happening, it is like I can see what is happening,
it is like I can feel the smell), emotional experience (I can feel intense
emotions) and sense of reliving (it is like I re-experience what hap-
pened, it is like travelling back in time). A total vividness score was cal-
culated as the mean of all items. Cronbach's alpha was .90.
2.2.3 |The centrality of event
The Centrality of event scale (CES) (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006a) mea-
sures the degree to which an event is integrated into an individual's
life story and identity. The short version is a seven-item questionnaire
with items representing the three factors of reference point, identity,
and turning point: (1) I feel that the event has become part of my
identity; (2) This event has become a reference point for the way I
understand myself and the world; (3) I feel that this event has
become a central part of my life story; (4) This event has coloured
the way I think and feel about other experiences; (5) This event per-
manently changed my life; (6) I often think about the effects this
event will have on my future; and (7) This event is a turning point in
BLIX ET AL.3
my life. Due to a technical error, Item No. 7 of the CES was omitted
from our questionnaire, and the data are based on Item 16 of the
CES. The six questions were rated on a scale from 1 (strongly dis-
agree) to 5 (strongly agree). The scores were calculated as the mean
of all items. Cronbach's alpha was .91.
2.2.4 |Posttraumatic stress
The Posttraumatic Check List (PCL) is a 20-item self-administered
questionnaire that assesses the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms (Blevins
et al., 2015). We used the PCL-S (specific), and the items were specifi-
cally linked to the fire on Scandinavian Star. The participants were
asked to indicate on a 5-point scale (ranging from 0 to 4) the extent to
which extent they had been bothered by each symptom during the
last month. The PCL symptoms score was calculated as the mean of
all items. Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was .94.
3|RESULTS
Distribution of gender, mean age, mean years of education after man-
datory school, mean PCL and mean centrality of event scores are
presented separately for survivors and bereaved (Table 1). While the
groups did not differ in mean age, years of education or gender, the
bereaved group reported higher mean levels of the centrality of event
and posttraumatic stress reactions.
To test mean differences in trauma memory characteristics
between survivors and bereaved, independent sample t-tests were
performed (Table 1). Overall, we did not find evidence that the total
mean vividness scores differed between survivors and bereaved.
When looking at the individual items, the survivors to a larger extent
reported that they can feel the smell, compared to the bereaved. The
bereaved to a larger extent reported experiencing intense feelings and
re-experiencing, compared to the survivors.
Pearson correlations were performed separately for survivors and
bereaved to investigate the relationships between the vividness of
trauma memories, the centrality of event and posttraumatic stress
reactions (Table 2). The results showed significant associations of a
similar magnitude between all these variables, both for survivors and
bereaved.
To investigate the relationship between vividness, the centrality
of event and levels of posttraumatic stress reactions linear regression
analyses were performed separately in the two groups (Survivors,
Bereaved) with PCL scores as the dependent variable. First, memory
vividness and centrality were entered as independent variables in two
TABLE 1 Sample characteristics, mean total scores for posttraumatic stress reactions (PCL), centrality of event (CES), memory vividness
(AMQ), and mean score for each item on AMQ for survivors (n= 94) and bereaved (n= 91) (standard deviations in parentheses)
Survivors (n= 94) Bereaved (n= 91)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD)χ
2
or t,pCohen's d
Gender
Female 43 (45.7) 51 (56.0) χ
2
(1) = 1.96, p= 0.187
Male 51 (54.3) 40 (44.0)
Age in years 53.4 (14.4) 57.4 (14.5) 1.85, p=.066
Years of education
a
3.3 (1.4) 3.4 (1.4) .76, p=.464
Posttraumatic stress (PCL) .70 (.71) .95 (.83) 2.17, p=.031 .32
Centrality of event (CES) 2.74 (1.24) 3.57 (1.02) 4.97, p> .001 .73
Memory vividness (AMQ) 3.67 (1.85) 3.64 (1.66) .12, p= .906
It is like I can hear what is happening 3.17 (2.08) 3.01 (2.06) .52, p=.605
It is like I can see what is happening 4.33 (2.10) 4.19 (2.12) .45, p=.641
It is like I can feel the smell 3.90 (2.40) 2.22 (1.86) 5.25, p<.001
I can feel intense emotions 3.65 (2.21) 4.29 (2.11) 1.99, p=.048
It is like I re-experience what happened 3.78 (2.21) 4.49 (2.02) 2.26, p=0.25
It is like travelling back in time 3.20 (2.16) 3.56 (2.09) 1.12, p=.266
Note: Group comparisons are reported as Chi-Square and t-tests with associated p-values, effect sizes are reported as Cohen's d.
a
For education, the participants were asked about the number of years of education after mandatory school. Mandatory school in (country) was 9 years at
the time of the disaster.
TABLE 2 Correlations between centrality of event (CES),
posttraumatic stress (PCL), and memory vividness (AMQ) for survivors
and bereaved
Survivors Bereaved
2323
1. Posttraumatic stress (PCL) .64*** .55*** .46*** .43***
2. Centrality of event (CES) .53*** .51***
3. Memory vividness (AMQ)
***p<.001.
4BLIX ET AL.
separate regression analyses, while adjusting for age and gender
(Model 1). In the mutually adjusted model (Model 2), memory vivid-
ness and centrality of event were both included simultaneously while
adjusting for age and gender. The results showed that both centrality
of event and memory vividness were uniquely associated with the
level of posttraumatic stress reactions in both groups (Table 3).
4|DISCUSSION
More than 26 years after the fire on the Scandinavian Star, the trau-
matic event was still represented as a vivid, emotional recollection for
many of the victims. This was true for both the survivors and the
bereaved in this study, even though the quality of their traumatic
experiences were highly different. The mean scores for both survivors
and bereaved were around the midpoint of the AMQ scale and may
be considered high, given the 26 years that have passed since the
traumatic event. The present study involved trauma memories that
were voluntarily retrieved, and the results showed that a considerable
proportion of the survivors and bereaved experienced sensory
impressions, intense emotions and a sense of reliving when asked to
recall the event. The survivors, who experienced the fire and the risky
evacuation from the ship first hand, were probably exposed to highly
distinct sensory impressions at the time of the disaster. Although they
reported more olfactory vividness, they did not differ from the
bereaved group, on the other types of sensory vividness. The
bereaved individuals reported a higher level of re-experiencing and
emotional activation when remembering what happened, and in sum,
we found no notable mean difference in vividness between the two
groups. Hence, 26 years after the disaster, the survivors who at the
time of the disaster had been exposed to extraordinary sensory
impressions (e.g., corridors full of smoke, fire, the sight of dead and
injured people, being evacuated from the ship under very dramatic cir-
cumstances) reported similar levels of vividness of their memories as
the bereaved, which had been surrounded by a more everyday con-
text when they learned what happened. Thus, the particular sensory
impressions at the time of the trauma do not necessarily impact the
overall level of vividness of trauma memories in a long-term perspec-
tive. These results show that traumatic experiences can be experi-
enced as vivid recollections decades later both for individuals who
were exposed to a highly life-threatening event and for individuals
who experienced a traumatic loss. This is in line with Porter and Peace
(2007) and Hiskey et al. (2008) who reported that even distant trauma
memories can be experienced as intense and with vivid sensory
components.
For some people, the fire on the Scandinavian Star has become a
reference point in their life story and was perceived as central to iden-
tity. Consistent with previous findings (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006a,
2006b; Fitzgerald et al., 2016), a higher degree of centrality was asso-
ciated with higher levels of vividness. Thus, in line with Berntsen and
Rubin's (2007) perspective, the present results suggest that construing
the event as central in one's life story and to one's identity, can be
one important factor that contributes to keeping the memories alive
TABLE 3 Linear regression analysis for centrality of event (CES) and memory vividness (AMQ) predicting posttraumatic stress symptoms (PCL), in survivors (n= 91) and bereaved (n= 94),
adjusted for gender and age
Survivors Bereaved
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
B95% CI βpB95% CI βpB95% CI βpB95% βp
Age .01 .01.01 .03 .755 .01 .01.01 .05 .568 .01 .111.03 .16 .109 .01 .01.01 .05 .663
Gender .02 .24.27 .01 .910 .02 .25.20 .01 .839 .03 .29.36 .02 .837 .06 .48.26 .04 .720
Memory vividness (AMQ) .22 .14.29 .55 <.001 .11 .04.19 .29 .003 .21 .11.31 .42 <.001 .14 .03.25 .27 .015
Centrality of event (CES) .37 .28.47 .64 <.001 .29 .19.40 .49 <.001 .38 .21.55 .47 <.001 .32 .07.46 .32 .008
R
2
.48 .28
Adjusted R
2
.45 .24
Note: Model 1: memory vividness and centrality were entered separately while adjusting for age and gender. Model 2: vividness and centrality of event were included simultaneously while adjusting for age and
gender.
BLIX ET AL.5
over such a long time. In the present study, the centrality of the trau-
matic event was higher in the bereaved group compared to the survi-
vors. Previous studies have shown that for many bereaved, the loss is
construed as a central event in their life story (Boelen, 2012). How-
ever, this study was the first to compare the level of centrality in two
groups who were afflicted by the same disaster, some as trauma survi-
vors and some as bereaved. The higher level of centrality in the
bereaved group might be explained by the nature of the loss. Loss is
definite and unrepairable, and new life experiences can be bitter
reminders that these cannot be shared with the deceased.
For both survivors and bereaved, more vivid trauma memories and a
higher level of event centrality were associated with higher levels of
posttraumatic stress reactions. For both factors, their associations with
posttraumatic stress reactions were largely reduced when considered
together. This indicates that vividness and centrality are interdependent
factors. Two previous studies have investigated the potential mediating
effect of vividness on the association between centrality and post-
traumatic stress reactionsand the potential mediating effect of centrality
on the association between vividness and posttraumatic stress reactions
(Fitzgerald et al., 2016; Mordeno et al., 2018). However, future longitudi-
nal studies are needed to disentangle the temporal relationships
between these factors and to further reveal how these processes
develop over time.
Our results also suggest that vividness and centrality contribute
uniquely to the maintenance of posttraumatic stress symptoms in the
long run, indicating that these factors may represent distinct pathways.
In other words, there seems to be more to vividness than what can be
explained by centrality, and vice versa. Vivid representations of traumatic
memories may thus feed into posttraumatic stress symptoms indepen-
dently of the degree of centrality of the event. Future research could
investigate whether vividness and centrality impact differentially on the
symptom clustersof posttraumatic stress disorder, or if particular aspects
of vivid trauma memories contribute more to symptom maintenance. A
better understanding of the mechanisms involved is necessaryto prevent
long-term suffering in bereaved andtrauma-exposed individuals.
The present results are in contrast to the view proposing that
posttraumatic stress is associated with difficulties in voluntary recol-
lection of trauma memories. On the contrary, these results suggest
that both vividness and integration of trauma memories in autobio-
graphical memory may contribute to the maintenance of post-
traumatic stress reactions. It is important to note however that the
design of the present study does not allow us to disentangle the
dynamic of the relationship between the centrality of event, the vivid-
ness of trauma memories and posttraumatic stress reactions. One
possibility is that the dynamic between these concepts resembles sev-
eral feedback loops where vivid memories contribute to keeping the
event central, and centrality contributes to keeping the memories
vivid. Similarly, posttraumatic stress reactions contribute to keeping
the memory vivid and central, and centrality and vividness contribute
to the maintenance of posttraumatic stress reactions. Future prospec-
tive studies should look closer at the temporal relationship between
how trauma memories are represented, the centrality of event and
posttraumatic stress reactions.
Although both groups in the present study qualify for the stressor cri-
terion in the DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis (American Psychiatric Association,
2013), life threat and traumatic loss are highly different experiences.
However, little is known about the long-term course of posttraumatic
stress reactions after different types of exposure. In our study, the
bereaved, compared with survivors reported significantly higher levels of
posttraumatic stress. This shows that very long-lasting distress after
trauma can also occur for individuals that were not exposed to a trauma
that involved a threat to own health or life.
The present study has some limitations that need to be
addressed. The memories were constructed and evaluated in an inter-
view setting, and we cannot be sure to what extent these reports
resemble memories constructed in daily life. Furthermore, although
this cross-sectional study had a good response rate, we cannot
exclude that self-selection biases may have affected the result. Self-
selection bias can contribute to both underestimation and over-
estimation of levels of posttraumatic stress. Some individuals with a
low level of current distress may have considered the study irrelevant
for them, whereas individuals with excessive symptoms may have
found participation too distressing. However, even though non-
participation might have affected the observed levels of the vividness
of the trauma memories, the centrality of the traumatic event and
posttraumatic stress reactions, the associations between the variables
are probably more robust against selection bias.
The long time that has passed since the fire on the Scandina-
vian Star needs to be considered when interpreting the results.
Because the only data collection with this sample was performed
26 years after the traumatic event occurred, we cannot determine
how the relationships between memory, the centrality of event
and posttraumatic stress have developed over time. Nonetheless,
the present results are important for showing that even after a
very long time has passed since the traumatic event, the memories
can be represented as vivid recollections. Furthermore, vividness
and event centrality may contribute to explain how posttraumatic
stress symptoms can remain present over a very long time. Future
prospective studies should look closer at the temporal relationship
between how trauma memories are represented, centrality and
posttraumatic stress reactions.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Research data are not shared, due to sensitive data.
ORCID
Ines Blix https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1603-6281
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual
of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2006a). The centrality of event scale: A mea-
sure of integrating a trauma into one's identity and its relation to post-
6BLIX ET AL.
traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy,
44(2), 219231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.01.009
Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2006b). Flashbulb memories and post-
traumatic stress reactions across the life span: Age-related effects of
the German occupation of Denmark during World War II. Psychology and
Aging,21(1), 127139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.127
Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2007). When a trauma becomes a key to
identity: Enhanced integration of trauma memories predicts post-
traumatic stress disorder symptoms. Applied Cognitive Psychology,21
(4), 417431. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3160
Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2014). Involuntary memories and dissociative
amnesia: Assessing key assumptions in posttraumatic stress disorder
research. Clinical Psychological Science,2(2), 174186. https://doi.org/
10.1177/2167702613496241
Blevins, C. A., Weathers, F. W., Davis, M. T., Witte, T. K., & Domino, J. L.
(2015). The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5):
Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic
Stress,28(6), 489498. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22059
Blix, I., Birkeland, M. S., Solberg, Ø., Hansen, M. B., & Heir, T. (2016). The
launching and ensnaring effects of construing a traumatic event as
central to one's identity and life story. Applied Cognitive Psychology.,30
(4), 526531. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3224
Boals, A., & Schuettler, D. (2011). A double-edged sword: Event centrality,
PTSD and posttraumatic growth. Applied Cognitive Psychology,25(5),
817822. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1753
Boals, A., Steward, J. M., & Schuettler, D. (2010). Advancing our under-
standing of posttraumatic growth by considering event centrality.
Journal of Loss and Trauma,15(6), 518533. https://doi.org/10.1080/
15325024.2010.519271
Boelen, P. A. (2012). A prospective examination of the association between
the centrality of a loss and post-loss psychopathology. Journal of Affective
Disorders,137(1), 117124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.004
Brewin, C. R., Dalgleish, T., & Joseph, S. (1996). A dual representation the-
ory of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review,103(4), 670.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.670
Brown, A. D., Antonius, D., Kramer, M., Root, J. C., & Hirst, W. (2010).
Trauma centrality and PTSD in veterans returning from Iraq and
Afghanistan. Journal of Traumatic Stress,23(4), 496499. https://doi.
org/10.1002/jts.20547
Crespo, M., & Fernández-Lansac, V. (2016). Memory and narrative of trau-
matic events: A literature review. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research,
Practice, and Policy,8(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000041
Dalgleish, T. (2004). Cognitive approaches to posttraumatic stress disor-
der: The evolution of multirepresentational theorizing. Psychological
Bulletin,130(2), 228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.228
Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress
disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy,38(4), 319345. https://doi.
org/10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00123-0
Fitzgerald, J. M., Berntsen, D., & Broadbridge, C. L. (2016). The influences
of event centrality in memory models of PTSD. Applied Cognitive Psy-
chology,30(1), 1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3160
Gehrt, T. B., Berntsen, D., Hoyle, R. H., & Rubin, D. C. (2018). Psychological
and clinicalcorrelates of the centrality of eventscale: A systematic review.
Clinical Psychology Review,65,5780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.
2018.07.006
Hall, M. N., & Berntsen, D. (2008). The effect of emotional stress on invol-
untary and voluntary conscious memories. Memory,16(1), 4857.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701333271
Hiskey, S., Luckie, M., Davies, S., & Brewin, C. R. (2008). The phenomenol-
ogy of reactivated trauma memories in older adults: A preliminary
study. Aging and Mental Health,12(4), 494498. https://doi.org/10.
1080/13607860802224367
Mordeno, I. G., Galela, D. S., Nalipay, M. J. N., & Cue, M. P. (2018). Central-
ity of event and mental health outcomes in child and adolescent natu-
ral disaster survivors. The Spanish Journal of Psychology,21. https://
doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.58
Porter, S., & Peace, K. A. (2007). The scars of memory a prospective, longi-
tudinal investigation of the consistency of traumatic and positive emo-
tional memories in adulthood. Psychological Science,18(5), 435441.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01918
Robinaugh, D. J., & McNally, R. J. (2011). Trauma centrality and PTSD symp-
tom severity in adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of
Traumatic Stress,24(4), 483486. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20656
Roland, A. G., Currier, J. M., Rojas-Flores, L., & Herrera, S. (2013).
Event centrality and posttraumatic outcomes in the context of per-
vasive violence: A study of teachers in El Salvador. Anxiety, Stress &
Coping,27(3), 335346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2013.
835402
Rubin, D. C., Berntsen, D., & Bohni, M. K. (2008). A memory-based model
of posttraumatic stress disorder: Evaluating basic assumptions under-
lying the PTSD diagnosis. Psychological Review,115(4), 985. https://
doi.org/10.1037/a0013397
Rubin, D. C., Boals, A., & Berntsen, D. (2008). Memory in posttraumatic
stress disorder: Properties of voluntary and involuntary, traumatic and
nontraumatic autobiographical memories in people with and without
posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: General,137(4), 591. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013165
Rubin, D. C., Dennis, M. F., & Beckham, J. C. (2011). Autobiographical
memory for stressful events: The role of autobiographical memory in
posttraumatic stress disorder. Consciousness and Cognition,20(3),
840856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.015
Rubin, D. C., Schrauf, R. W., & Greenberg, D. L. (2003). Belief and recollec-
tion of autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition,31(6),
887901. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196443
Schacter, D. L. (2002). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and
remembers. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Thoresen, S., Andreassen, A., Arnberg, F. K., Birkeland, M. S., Blix, I., &
Hjorthol, T. (2017). Scandinavian Star. Erfaringer og helse hos over-
levende og etterlatte etter 26 år. Oslo: Norwegian Centre for Violence
and Traumatic Stress Studies.
Webb, H., & Jobson, L. (2011). Relationships between self-consistency,
trauma-centred identity, and post-traumatic adjustment. Clinical Psy-
chologist,15(3), 103111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9552.2011.
00028
How to cite this article: Blix I, Birkeland MS, Thoresen S. Vivid
memories of distant trauma: Examining the characteristics of
trauma memories and the relationship with the centrality of
event and posttraumatic stress 26 years after trauma. Appl
Cognit Psychol. 2020;17. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3650
BLIX ET AL.7
... At the same time, negative and traumatic memories are associated with heightened subjective recall (e.g. increased vividness, Blix et al., 2020;Peace et al., 2008) and emotional intensity (Rubin et al., 2008) but may be subject to inconsistencies in accuracy over time (Giosan et al., 2009;Engelhard et al., 2008but see Alexander et al., 2005. Thus, distress can have significant negative impacts on memory processes. ...
Article
Full-text available
Accuracy of memory is critical in legal and clinical contexts. These contexts are often linked with high levels of emotional distress and social sources that can provide potentially distorting information about stressful events. This study investigated how distress was associated with susceptibility to misinformation about a trauma analogue event. We employed an experimental design whereby in Phase 1, participants ( N = 243, aged 20–72, 122 females, 117 males, 4 gender diverse) watched a trauma film (car crash) and heard an audio summary that contained misinformation (misled items), true reminders (consistent items), and no reminders (control items) about the film. Participants rated their total distress, and symptoms of avoidance, intrusions, and hyperarousal, in response to the film. They then completed cued recall, recognition, and source memory tasks. One week later in Phase 2, participants ( N = 199) completed the same measures again. Generalised linear mixed models were used. A significant misinformation effect was found, and importantly, participants with higher distress levels showed a smaller misinformation effect, owing to especially poor memory for consistent items compared to their less distressed counterparts. Distress was also associated with improved source memory for misled items. Avoidance of the film’s reminders was associated with a smaller misinformation effect during immediate retrieval and a larger misinformation effect during delayed retrieval. Findings suggest that distress is associated with decreased susceptibility to misinformation in some cases, but also associated with poorer memory accuracy in general. Limitations are discussed, and the need for further research is highlighted.
... In contrast, Ogle et al. (2013) found life-threatening events to be more central to the life story than non-life-threatening events, though interpersonal and non-interpersonal events did not differ. Blix et al. (2020) found bereaved from a ferry fire to consider the disaster to be significantly more central to their life story than survivors. While 86% of the bereaved lost close family members, this was the case for only 7% of the survivors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Many theories on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) make assumptions on the relationship between PTSD and centrality of traumas to the life story and identity. Although the Centrality of Event Scale (CES) is a popular measure of centrality of personally experienced events to the life story, no studies have examined whether self-rated “central” events are mentioned, when individuals recount their lives. It is also unknown if mentioning specific event types in the life story is related to psychological health or life story coherence. We asked 386 adults to write their life stories, nominate their most traumatic and positive events, rate these events on the CES, and complete measures of PTSD and depression. Two-thirds of the sample mentioned at least one event, with the positive event being mentioned twice as often as the trauma. Mentioned events were more central than non-mentioned events. Participants who mentioned their trauma scored higher on symptoms of PTSD and depression than participants who only mentioned their positive event, but did not write less coherent life stories. Further, death- and illness-related traumas were mentioned more often than accidents and disasters. Findings are discussed in relation to theories on trauma memory in PTSD.
... Anak-anak khususnya rentan terhadap permasalahan psikologis setelah mengalami kejadian traumatis seperti kematian orang yang penting dalam hidup mereka (Osterweis, Solomon, & Green, 1984). Kejadian traumatis yang sudah berlangsung cukup lama dan terkait dengan tekanan posttraumatic dapat tergambarkan sebagai ingatan yang jelas (Blix, Birkeland, & Thoresen, 2020). Hal ini dapat menjadi penjelasan terkait ingatan partisipan yang cukup jelasyang dirasakan sebagai perpisahan terbesar berkaitan dengan kejadian anggota keluarga yang meninggal. ...
Article
Full-text available
Gangguan attachment merupakan efek yang paling jelas terlihat pada anak-anak yang dibesarkan di suatu institusi seperti panti asuhan. Attachment anak dengan pengasuh di usia dini merupakan hal yang penting karena dapat terkait dengan kesehatan emosional, self-esteem, rasa percaya diri, dan kemampuan interaksi sosial yang baik kelak pada saat anak menginjak usia remaja. Meskipun telah dilakukan usaha untuk menjadikan panti asuhan sebagai tempat yang dapat menggantikan peran keluarga biologis, tinggal di panti asuhan menghilangkan kesempatan anak untuk mengalami kehidupan keluarga yang penting bagi anak dalam mengembangkan hubungan sosial yang sehat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pola attachment dan kualitas hubungan sosial berdasarkan Social Relations Model (SRM) pada remaja yang tinggal di panti asuhan. Hasil dari penemuan ini dapat dijadikan landasan untuk penelitian lanjutan yang hendak meneliti hubungan sosial anak di panti asuhan. Metode campuran digunakan untuk memperoleh gambaran yang luas mengenai SRM remaja. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara dan kuesioner. Remaja yang tinggal di panti asuhan (N=3) diminta mengikuti proses wawancara. Data kuantitatif dijabarkan dalam bentuk tabel, dan data kualitatif dijelaskan menggunakan analisis SRM dengan pendekatan fenomenologis. Pada penelitian ini, dua orang responden menunjukkan pola secure attachment dan satu orang dengan pola dismissive attachment. Berdasarkan tipe attachment, terlihat perbedaan pola hubungan sosial. Tipe secure attachment dapat mengekspresikan emosinya dengan mudah dan memandang pengasuh sebagai sosok yang afektif. Tipe dismissive attachment cenderung tidak mudah mengekspresikan emosinya dan tidak memandang pengasuh sebagai sosok yang afektif.
Article
Background: One way to explore the psychological consequences of state oppression is by focusing on the lasting effects on survivors and their descendants. Objective: In the context of former Czechoslovakia, this study compares the experiences of two generations of families expelled from the country during the “Asanace” campaign with control groups of people whose families have not encountered any forms of oppression. Method: Overall, 58 people participated; 29 from the first and second generations were matched with 29 controls. Questionnaires assessing the severity of stress and trauma-related symptoms, coping strategies, resilience, and family communication were administered. Results: No significant differences were found between the first generation of survivors and the control group. The analysis revealed heightened vulnerability of the second generation as the group reported higher severity of stress and trauma-related symptoms and lower ability to recover from stress. Conclusions: This study investigates the psychological consequences of state oppression on Czechoslovakian dissidents and their offspring, contributing to the understanding of historical trauma and resilience in post- totalitarian countries of Eastern and Central Europe.
Article
The COVID‐19 pandemic constituted tremendous traumatic stress among the frontline healthcare workers. In the present study, we investigated relationships of two types of rumination, namely brooding and reflection, with traumatic stress and post‐traumatic growth and the mediating role of recollective experience in these relationships. A total of 88 healthcare workers (75% female, M age = 54.91) actively providing service to COVID‐19 patients reported two memories of events that impacted them the most at the first peak of the pandemic and rated their recollective experience (i.e., phenomenological characteristics of memories). We used structural equation modelling to test whether recollective experience mediated the link of brooding and reflection with post‐trauma reactions of stress and growth. The findings showed that brooding and reflection were associated with higher levels of traumatic stress and post‐traumatic growth. Importantly, recollective experience mediated the relationship of rumination with traumatic stress but this differed for the type of rumination. Higher brooding was associated with greater traumatic stress and that relationship was independent of how well the memories were recollected, while for reflection, high reflection was associated with stronger recollective experience, which predicted higher traumatic stress and post‐traumatic growth. The present study shows the functional dimensions of reflective rumination and presents novel findings that demonstrates the discrete mnemonic mechanisms underlying the association between brooding, reflection, and post‐trauma reactions.
Article
Full-text available
This study presents a literature review of 22 studies published since 2004 that use linguistic procedures to evaluate narratives by persons who had suffered any traumatic event. The aim is to analyze the features of traumatic memories and, thus, how individuals construct and integrate their recall of what happened with other autobiographical memories. It uses cognitive theoretical models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and their hypotheses about trauma memories as a framework. Findings reveal that trauma narratives are dominated by sensorial/perceptual and emotional details. The study of other narrative aspects (i.e., fragmentation, length, temporal context, and references to self) provides heterogeneous results. Results are discussed in light of the current state of PTSD research, exploring the principal hypotheses that have been proposed in cognitive theories to explain clinical findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
Autobiographical memories of trauma victims are often described as disturbed in two ways. First, the trauma is frequently re-experienced in the form of involuntary, intrusive recollections. Second, the trauma is difficult to recall voluntarily (strategically); important parts may be totally or partially inaccessible-a feature known as dissociative amnesia. These characteristics are often mentioned by PTSD researchers and are included as PTSD symptoms in the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). In contrast, we show that both involuntary and voluntary recall are enhanced by emotional stress during encoding. We also show that the PTSD symptom in the diagnosis addressing dissociative amnesia, trouble remembering important aspects of the trauma is less well correlated with the remaining PTSD symptoms than the conceptual reversal of having trouble forgetting important aspects of the trauma. Our findings contradict key assumptions that have shaped PTSD research over the last 40 years.
Article
The experience of trauma could be considered a central event in one’s life, such that it could be a core component of one’s identity and life story. Indeed, trauma memories are well-remembered, vivid, intense, and easily accessible (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006). The present study investigated the mediating role of sensory-based trauma memory quality in the relationship between centrality of event and mental health outcomes among child and adolescent survivors of a natural disaster ( N = 225) in its immediate aftermath. Results of mediation analyses revealed that centrality of trauma event is related to symptoms of acute stress disorder and depression through sensory-based trauma memory quality (indirect effect 95% C.I. [.06, .11] and [.04, .10], respectively). These findings support the contention that centrality of event is associated to heightened accessibility and vividness of sensory-based trauma memory quality, which in turn is related to an increase in trauma-related symptoms in the immediate aftermath of a natural disaster, where the reminders of trauma are particularly salient in the survivors’ environment and daily activities.
Article
The Centrality of Event Scale (CES) was introduced to examine the extent to which a traumatic or stressful event is perceived as central to an individual's identity and life story, and how this relates to Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms. In addition, the CES has been examined in relation to a range of other conditions and dispositions. We present a systematic review of the correlates of the CES. Results from 92 publications resulted in 25 measurement categories in the six theoretical domains of trauma, negative affect and distress, autobiographical memory, personality, positive affect, and gender. The mean weighted correlations of the 25 measurement categories ranged from -.17 to .55, with standard errors from .01 to .02, allowing us to distinguish empirically among effects. Consistent with the theoretical motivation for the CES and predictions predating the review, the CES correlated positively with a range of measures, correlating most highly with measures related to trauma, PTSD, grief, and autobiographical memory. The findings show that the CES probes aspects of autobiographical memory of broad relevance to clinical disorders, and with specific implications for theories of PTSD.
Article
Construing a traumatic event as central to one's life story and identity is associated with posttraumatic stress. The longitudinal relationship between centrality of event and trajectories of posttraumatic stress was examined. Data from ministerial employees were collected 10 months, 2 years, and 3 years after the 2011 Oslo bombing (N = 259). Using structural equation modeling, the launch and the snare hypotheses were tested. Support for the launch hypothesis was found; higher levels of event centrality 10 months after the attack were associated with higher levels of posttraumatic stress across time. Support for the snare hypothesis was also found; higher levels of centrality 10 months and 2 years after the bombing were related to higher levels of posttraumatic stress, beyond what could be anticipated based on the individual's general trajectory. This suggests that event centrality can influence the overall trajectory, and may also have additional time-specific effects on posttraumatic stress.
Article
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) is a widely used DSM-correspondent self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. The PCL was recently revised to reflect DSM-5 changes to the PTSD criteria. In this article, the authors describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of the PCL for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Psychometric properties of the PCL-5 were examined in 2 studies involving trauma-exposed college students. In Study 1 (N = 278), PCL-5 scores exhibited strong internal consistency (α = .94), test-retest reliability (r = .82), and convergent (rs = .74 to .85) and discriminant (rs = .31 to .60) validity. In addition, confirmatory factor analyses indicated adequate fit with the DSM-5 4-factor model, χ(2) (164) = 455.83, p < .001, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = .07, root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) = .08, comparative fit index (CFI) = .86, and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = .84, and superior fit with recently proposed 6-factor, χ(2) (164) = 318.37, p < .001, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .92, and TLI = .90, and 7-factor, χ(2) (164) = 291.32, p < .001, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .93, and TLI = .91, models. In Study 2 (N = 558), PCL-5 scores demonstrated similarly strong reliability and validity. Overall, results indicate that the PCL-5 is a psychometrically sound measure of PTSD symptoms. Implications for use of the PCL-5 in a variety of assessment contexts are discussed.
Article
The consequences of events for well-being are influenced by individual and situational factors that are often studied in isolation. In the research reported here, a large (N = 489) nonclinical sample of college students reported their most traumatic event, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, depressive symptoms, personality traits, and characteristics of their event memory. This study achieved three major goals. First, we identified the highest types of stress event types in this population as disruptions of interpersonal relationships, homicides/assaults on others, and assaults/accidents involving themselves. Second, we established that the effects of memory characteristics such as vividness, belief, and impact on PTSD symptoms are mediated by the centrality of the event to identity. Third, we affirmed the hypothesis that a structural model of the influence of personality factors on PTSD symptoms has a higher level of concurrent validity if event centrality is included as a mediator of those influences. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Article
Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) models suggest that trauma-centred self-change is motivated by self-consistency.Aim: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between self-consistency, trauma-centred identity, and PTSD symptoms.Method: University students (n = 134) completed measures of trauma-centred identity (Centrality of Events Scale), self-consistency, and post-traumatic stress symptoms (Impact of Events Scale—Revised, Centre for Epidemiological Studies—Depression Scale).Results: A significant positive correlation was found between trauma-centred identity and post-traumatic symptoms. However, self-consistency was not related to post-traumatic symptoms or trauma-centred identity. Given the relationship between depressive symptoms and self-consistency, the correlations were also conducted controlling for depression. When the effects of depressive symptoms were partialled out, both self-consistency and trauma-centred identity were positively correlated with intrusion symptoms.Discussion and Conclusion: The implications for PTSD models, which suggest self-change is motivated by self-consistency, are discussed and implications for clinical treatments are considered.