ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

We report the first record of the genus Xiphactinus from southern South America. The recovered fossil material consists of an associated maxilla and abdominal vertebra, probably derived from latest Maastrichtian marine deposits of the Salamanca Formation in Chubut Province, Argentina. Xiphactinus has been widely reported from Late Cretaceous strata throughout the Northern Hemisphere, although to date, equivalent Southern Hemisphere occurrences include only a single specimen from Venezuela. Our new discovery thus indicates that Xiphactinus had a much more cosmopolitan distribution, encompassing the southern paleolatitudinal extremities of South America during the terminal Cretaceous.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=talc20
Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology
ISSN: 0311-5518 (Print) 1752-0754 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/talc20
First record of the ichthyodectiform fish
Xiphactinus (Teleostei) from Patagonia, Argentina
Julieta J. De Pasqua, Federico L. Agnolin & Sergio Bogan
To cite this article: Julieta J. De Pasqua, Federico L. Agnolin & Sergio Bogan (2020): First record
of the ichthyodectiform fish Xiphactinus (Teleostei) from Patagonia, Argentina, Alcheringa: An
Australasian Journal of Palaeontology, DOI: 10.1080/03115518.2019.1702221
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518.2019.1702221
Published online: 02 Mar 2020.
Submit your article to this journal
View related articles
View Crossmark data
First record of the ichthyodectiform fish Xiphactinus (Teleostei) from
Patagonia, Argentina
Julieta J. De Pasqua, Federico L. Agnolin, and Sergio Bogan
ABSTRACT
We report the first record of the genus Xiphactinus from southern South America. The recovered
fossil material consists of an associated maxilla and abdominal vertebra, probably derived from lat-
est Maastrichtian marine deposits of the Salamanca Formation in Chubut Province, Argentina.
Xiphactinus has been widely reported from Late Cretaceous strata throughout the Northern
Hemisphere, although to date, equivalent Southern Hemisphere occurrences include only a single
specimen from Venezuela. Our new discovery thus indicates that Xiphactinus had a much more
cosmopolitan distribution, encompassing the southern paleolatitudinal extremities of South
America during the terminal Cretaceous.
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 21 May 2019
Revised 15 November 2019
Accepted 2 December 2019
KEYWORDS
Ichthyodectiformes; South
America; terminal
Cretaceous; Gondwana
Julieta J. De Pasqua [julietadepasqua@gmail.com], Laboratorio de Anatom
ıa Comparada y Evoluci
on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de
Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, Av.
Angel Gallardo, 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Federico L. Agnolin
[fedeagnolin@yahoo.com.ar], Laboratorio de Anatom
ıa Comparada y Evoluci
on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales
Bernardino Rivadavia, Av.
Angel Gallardo, 470, C1405DJR, Buenos Aires, Argentina. CONICET; Fundaci
on de Historia Natural F
elix de Azara,
Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropolog
ıa, Universidad Maim
onides; Hidalgo 775 piso 7, C1405BDB, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Sergio
Bogan [sergiobogan@yahoo.com.ar], Fundaci
on de Historia Natural F
elix de Azara, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropolog
ıa,
Universidad Maim
onides; Hidalgo 775 piso 7, C1405BDB, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
ICHTHYODECTIFORMES, most commonly known as
bulldog fishes, were a geographically widely distributed clade
of stem teleosts, whose fossils have been recovered from mar-
ine deposits throughout North and South America, Antarctica,
Africa, Australia, Asia and Europe, and with a chronostrati-
graphical range from the from the Middle Jurassic to Late
Cretaceous (Chang 1963, Bardack 1965, Patterson & Rosen
1977, Schaeffer & Patterson 1984,Tanimoto&Kinkyo2001,
Forey et al. 2003, Arratia et al. 2004,Kimet al. 2014,
Alvarado Ortega and Porras M
uzquiz 2015,Yabumotoet al.
2018). Their general body-plan, preserved gut contents, and
jaw structure suggest an ecological role as higher trophic-level
pelagic macropredators (Cavin et al. 2013,2015).
The oldest recorded ichthyodectiform taxon, Saurocephalus,
was described in the early nineteenth century, and thought to
be a reptile (Harlan 1824). However, over 100 years later,
Bardack & Sprinkle (1969) established that Saurocephalus and
its relatives were indeed fishes, and could be classified as the
Order Ichthyodectiformes. Today, Ichthyodectiformes com-
prises more than 25 nominal genera, including Xiphactinus
Leidy, 1870 (Taverne 2010, Carillo-Brice~
no et al. 2012,Cavin
& Berrell 2019,King&Super2019), which is recognized as
one of the largest-bodied stem teleost taxa known from the
Late Cretaceous (Bardack 1965, Schwimmer et al. 1997,
Shimada et al. 2006, Everhart et al. 2010).
Often spectacular skeletons of Xiphactinus have been
found in the Niobrara Formation of Kansas, USA, and
reveal individuals of up to 5 m in maximum snouttail
length (Cope 1872, Bardack 1965). Nevertheless, remains of
Xiphactinus have also been recovered in South America,
with fossils previously reported from the Late Cretaceous La
Luna Formation of Venezuela (CarrilloBrice~
no et al. 2012),
and here for the first time, from the Late Cretaceousearliest
Paleogene successions exposed in the Chubut Province of
Argentina. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to document
the new Argentinian occurrence of Xiphactinus and assess
its paleobiogeographical implications.
Geological setting
The new Argentinian Xiphactinus specimens, MACN Pv
15979 and MACN Pv 15980, were excavated in April 1946
within the Colhu
e Huapi area of southeastern Chubut
Province in Patagonia (Fig. 1). The Colhue Huapi area con-
tains Late Cretaceous to Paleogene strata including the
ConiacianMaastrichtian Lago Colhu
e Huapi Formation,
which represents a fluvial channel sequence (Casal et al.
2015, Vallati et al. 2016), and the overlying marine
Salamanca Formation, which is Maastrichtianlower
Thanetian in age (Clyde et al. 2014); this unit also incorpo-
rates the CretaceousPaleogene boundary at its base
(Legarreta & Uliana 1994, Gelfo et al. 2009, Clyde et al.
2014). The Salamanca Formation reflects the transgressive
onset of the Atlantic margin into the San Jorge Basin of cen-
tral Patagonia (Camacho 1967), and has yielded a rich fossil
record of marine micro- (Frenguelli 1936, Camacho 1954,
1967,M
endez 1966, Masiuk 1967, Bertels 1975, Matheos
et al. 2005) and macro-invertebrates (Ihering 1903, Feruglio
1949, Camacho 1967, Chebli & Serraiotto 1974, Andreis
1977, Parma & Casad
ıo2005), together with shark teeth
(Arratia & Cione 1996). Although uncertain, we suspect that
ß2020 Geological Society of Australia Inc., Australasian Palaeontologists
ALCHERINGA: AN AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PALAEONTOLOGY
https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518.2019.1702221
Published online 02 Mar 2020
MACN Pv 15979 and MACN Pv 15980 probably also
derived from this succession based on the associated assem-
blage and depositional setting.
Systematic paleontology
Order ICHTHYODECTIFORMES Bardack & Sprinkle, 1969
Suborder ICHTHYODECTOIDEI Romer, 1966
Family ICHTHYODECTIDAE sensu Patterson &
Rosen, 1977
Genus Xiphactinus Leidy, 1870
Xiphactinus sp.
Referred material. MACN Pv 15979, an incomplete maxilla
(Fig. 2AC), and MACN Pv 15980, an abdominal vertebra (Fig.
3AC); these specimens likely represent a single individual.
Description. MACN Pv 15979 is 18 mm in maximum trans-
verse width, 76 mm in maximum height, and 146mm in
maximum length (Fig. 2). The dorsal margin is incompletely
preserved, but can be identified as a maxilla because of its
length, transverse flattening, and straight profile; this differs
from the typically sinuous profile of the dentary in
Xiphactinus (see Bardack 1965). MACN Pv 15979 is triangu-
lar in lateral view and tapering posteriorly. The lateral sur-
face bears faint longitudinal striae; the anterolateral surface
is shallowly concave. Eleven thecodont alveoli are visible;
these steadily increase in diameter toward the mid-length of
the row, and then gradually decrease posteriorly. The pre-
served teeth are sub-circular in basal outline and of variable
size, with minimum/maximum diameters of 4/11 mm.
Their crowns have a narrow band of dentin surrounding
the pulp cavity; no carinae were observed.
MACN Pv 15980 is poorly preserved but was clearly
dorsoventrally compressed and flattened ventrally, with
articular facets for the autogenous neural and hemal arches
(Fig. 3). The lateral surface of the centrum bears a promin-
ent longitudinal ridge bordered by deeply incised fossae.
The articular surfaces are sub-circular in outline with con-
centric growth rings. A fragment of the articulated neural
arch has a sub-oval longitudinal fossa on its lateral side.
Discussion
Taxonomic assignment
MACN Pv 15979 and MACN Pv 15980 can be referred to
Ichthyodectiformes based on the presence of an elongate
maxilla with a single row of teeth, and autogenous neural
arches that are not fused to the centrum (Bardack 1965,
Patterson & Rosen 1977, Mkhitaryan & Averianov 2011).
They are also consistent with the genus Xiphactinus because
of the irregular maxillary tooth size, thecodont tooth
implantation, and longitudinal lateral ridge on the vertebral
centrum that is delimited by deeply incised fossae (Bardack
1965, Nelson 1973). MACN Pv 15979 differs from basal ich-
thyodectiforms, such as Thrissops, which has a curved maxil-
lary profile with small conical teeth of regular size and
uniform spacing; the anterior extremity of the jaw is also
edentulous (Taverne 2008). In contrast, derived ichthyodec-
tiforms, such as Xiphactinus and saurodontids possess
shorter maxillae with reduced edentulous extremities and
raised dental rows (Taverne 2008), as in MACN Pv 15979.
Like MACN Pv 15979, ichthyodectids including Gillicus,
Cooyoo and Ichthyodectes, exhibit sub-circular tooth crowns
with thecodont implantation, but differ in their more uni-
form tooth size in comparison to Xiphactinus (Newton
1877, Bardack 1965, Lees & Bartholomai 1987, Taverne
2008). Gillicus also has minute teeth and a curved maxillary
shape (Lees & Bartholomai 1987, Taverne 2008).
Furthermore, Aidachar can be distinguished from both
MACN Pv 15979 and Xiphactinus by its anteriorly in-curved
(by about 2025) maxilla (evident elsewhere in Gillicus and
Chirocentrites: Taverne 2008) that has a sinusoidal alveolar
margin (Mkhitaryan & Averianov 2011). Lastly, MACN Pv
Figure 1. Map showing the recovery locality of the Argentinean
Xiphactinus fossils.
2 JULIETA J. DE PASQUA ET AL. XIPHACTINUS IN SOUTH AMERICA
15979 lacks the conspicuous tooth foramina (¼replacement
alveoli) of saurodontines (Cavin et al. 2013).
Within Xiphactinus, MACN Pv 15979 most closely resem-
bles Xiphactinus audax in its sub-circular tooth cross-sections,
and lack of distinct carinae; the teeth are otherwise elliptical
in Xiphactinus vetus, whose dentition also displays prominent
carinae (Schwimmer et al. 1997,Vavreket al. 2016).
Paleobiogeographical implications
Historically, the remains of Xiphactinus have been widely
reported from CenomanianMaastrichtian strata across the
Northern Hemisphere (Bardack 1965, Russell 1988,1993,
Schwimmer et al. 1997, Cumbaa et al. 2006, DeMar &
Breithaupt 2006, Vavrek et al. 2016), although recently
Figure 2. AC,Xiphactinus sp. (MACN Pv 15979) incomplete maxilla in A, occlusal and B, lateral views. C, Reconstruction of Xiphactinus cranium indicating the
anatomical position of MACN Pv 15979. Abbreviations: te: teeth, al: alveoli. Scale bar ¼50 mm in A, B; C, not to scale and modified from Bardack (1965).
ALCHERINGA: AN AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PALAEONTOLOGY 3
recovered diagnostic fossils from the Cenomanian of
Venezuela show that the genus was also distributed in the
emerging Atlantic region of northern South America during
the mid-Cretaceous (Carrillo-Brice~
no et al. 2012). Smith
Woodward (1894) also described remains of Portheusaus-
tralis from the Early Cretaceous (late Albian) of Australia.
Hay (1898) designated Portheus as a junior synonym of
Xiphactinus, although Lees & Bartholomai (1987) later estab-
lished that the Australian specimens constituted a separate
genus, Cooyoo. The new Patagonian Xiphactinus occurrence
that we report here is therefore significant, because it not
only extends the stratigraphic range of the taxon to the ter-
minal-Cretaceous in South America, but also reveals a
southern Atlantic higher mid-latitude dispersal that concurs
with the cosmopolitan distribution of ichthyodectiforms and
their inferred pelagic lifestyle (Bardack 1965, Patterson &
Rosen 1977, Schaeffer & Patterson 1984, Tanimoto &
Kinkyo 2001, Forey et al. 2003, Arratia et al. 2004).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Ezcurra (MACN) for access to collections. Our study was
supported by A. Giacchino (Universidad Maimonides), and Fundaci
on
de Historia Natural Felix de Azara. Editorial revisions by the
Alcheringa Editorial Group, together with reviews from Lionel Cavin
and Lance Grande greatly improved our manuscript.
References
ALVARADO ORTEGA, J., PORRAS MÚZQUIZ, H.G., 2015. Xiphactinus en
M
exico; p. 25. In Programa y Res
umenes Del XIV Congreso
Mexicano de Paleontolog
ıa.R
EYNOSO V.H., FLORES MEJÍA, P., AGUILAR,
F., MORENO BEDMAR, J.A. (coompiladores), Coahuila, M
exico;
Paleontolog
ıa Mexicana, volumen especial 1, 2015.
ANDREIS, R.R., 1977. Geolog
ıa del
area de Ca~
nad
on Hondo.
Departamento de Escalante, Provincia del Chubut, Rep
ublica
Argentina. Obra del Centenario del Museo de La Plata 4,77102.
ARRATIA,G.&CIONE, A., 1996. The record of fossil fishes of southern
South America. M
unchener Geowissenshaftliche Abhandlungen 30,972.
ARRATIA, G., SCASSO, R.A. & WOLFGANG, K., 2004. Late Jurassic fishes
from Longing Gap, Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of Vertebrate
Paleontology 24,4155.
BARDACK, D., 1965. Anatomy and evolution of chirocentrid fishes. The
University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Vertebrata 10,188.
BARDACK,D.&SPRINKLE, G., 1969. Morphology and relationships of
saurocephalid fishes. Fieldiana Geology 16, 297340.
BERTELS, A., 1975. Bioestratigraf
ıa del Pale
ogeno en la Rep
ublica
Argentina. Revista Espa~
nola de Micropaleontolog
ıa7, 429450.
CAMACHO, H.H., 1954. Some upper Cretaceous Foraminifera from
Argentina. Contributions from the Cushman Foundation for
Foraminiferal Research 5,3135.
CAMACHO, H.H., 1967. Las transgresiones del Cret
acico Superior y
Terciario de la Argentina. Revista de la Asociaci
on Geol
ogica
Argentina 22, 253280.
CARRILLOBRICEÑO, J., ALVARADOORTEGA,J.&TORRES, C., 2012. Primer
registro de Xiphactinus Leidy, 1870 (Teleostei, Ichthyodectiformes)
en el Cret
acico Superior de Am
erica del Sur (Formaci
on La Luna,
Venezuela). Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 15, 327335.
CASAL, G.A., IBIRICU, L.M., MARTÍNEZ, R., LUNA, M., GONZÁLEZ SVOBODA,
J.E. & IVANY, E., 2015. El registro f
osil de la Formaci
on Lago Colhu
e
Huapi (ConiacianoMaastrichtiano), Grupo Chubut, Argentina.
Ameghiniana 52, 210211.
CAVIN,L.&BERRELL, R.W., 2019. Revision of Dugaldia emmilta
(Teleostei, Ichthyodectiformes) from the Toolebuc Formation,
Albian of Australia, with comments on the jaw mechanics. Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology 39, e1576049.
CAVIN, L., BOUDAD, L., TONG, H., LÄNG, E., TABOUELLE,J.&VULLO, R.,
2015. Taxonomic composition and trophic structure of the contin-
ental bony fish assemblage from the early late cretaceous of
Southeastern Morocco. PLoS One 10, e0125786.
CAVIN, L., FOREY, P.L. & GIERSCH, S., 2013. Osteology of Eubiodectes
libanicus (Pictet & Humbert, 1866) and some other ichthyodecti-
formes (Teleostei): phylogenetic implications. Journal of Systematic
Palaeontology 11, 113175.
CHANG, M., 1963. New materials of Mesoclupea from southeastern
China and on the systematic position of the genus. Vertebrata
PalAsiatica 7, 105115.
CHEBLI,G.&SERRAIOTTO, A., 1974. Nuevas localidades del Paleoceno
marino en la regi
on central de la Provincia del Chubut. Revista de
la Asociaci
on Geol
ogica Argentina 29, 311318.
Figure 3. AD,Xiphactinus sp. (MACN Pv 15980) abdominal vertebra in A, anterior, B,D, lateral, and C, ventral views. Abbreviations: lf: lateral fossa; lsc, lateral sur-
face of centrum; na: neural arch; par: parapophysis; pas: articular facet for parapophysis; vsc, ventral surface of centrum. Scale bar ¼30 mm.
4 JULIETA J. DE PASQUA ET AL. XIPHACTINUS IN SOUTH AMERICA
CLYDE, W.C., WILF, P., IGLESIAS, A., SLINGERLAND, R.L., BARNUM, T., BIJL,
P.K., BRALOWER, T.J., BRINKHUIS, H., COMER, E.E., HUBER, B.T.,
IBAÑEZMEJIA, M., JICHA, B.R., KRAUSE, J.M., SCHUETH, J.D., SINGER,
B.S., RAIGEMBORN, M.S., SCHMITZ, M.D., SLUIJS,A.&ZAMALOA, M.C.,
2014. New age constraints for the Salamanca Formation and lower
R
ıo Chico Group in the western San Jorge Basin, Patagonia,
Argentina: Implications for CretaceousPaleogene extinction recov-
ery and land mammal age correlations. Geological Society of America
Bulletin 126, 289306.
COPE, E.D., 1872. On the families of fishes of the Cretaceous formation in
Kansas. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 12,327357.
CUMBAA, S.L., SCHRODERADAMS, C., DAY, R.G. & PHILLIPS, A.J., 2006.
Cenomanian bonebed faunas from the northeastern margin, western
interior seaway, Canada. Late Cenomanian vertebrates from the
Western Interior. Bulletin of New Mexico Museum of Natural
History and Science 35, 139155.
DEMAR,D.&BREITHAUPT, B.H., 2006. The nonmammalian vertebrate
microfossil assemblages of the Mesaverde Formation (Upper
Cretaceous, Campanian) of the Wind River and Bighorn Basins,
Wyoming. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science
Bulletin 35,3353.
EVERHART, M.J., HAGEMAN, S.A. & HOFFMAN, B.L., 2010. Another
Sternberg FishwithinaFishdiscovery: first report of
Ichthyodectes ctenodon (Teleostei; Ichthyodectiformes) with stomach
contents. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 113 (3
=
4),
197205.
FERUGLIO, E., 1949. Descripci
on Geol
ogica de la Patagonia, Vol. II:
Direcci
on General de Yacimientos Petrol
ıferos Fiscales (YPF),
Buenos Aires, 349 p.
FOREY, P.L., LU, Y., PATTERSON,C.&CLIFF, E.D., 2003. Fossil fishes from
the Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) of Namoura, Lebanon. Journal
of Systematic Palaeontology 1, 227330.
FRENGUELLI, J., 1936. El Banco Verde de Paso Niemann del R
ıo Chico
en el Chubut y sus diatomeas. Revista del Museo de la Plata. Secci
on
Geolog
ıa1,365.
GELFO, J.N., GOIN, F.J., WOODBURNE, M.O. & MUIZON, C.D., 2009.
Biochronological relationships of the earliest South American
Paleogene mammalian faunas. Palaeontology 52, 251269.
HARLAN, R., 1824. On a new fossil genus of the order Enalio Sauri
(Conybeare). Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of
Philadelphia 3, 331337.
HAY, O.P., 1898. Observations on the genus of fossil fishes called by
Professor Cope, Portheus, by Dr. Leidy, Xiphactinus.Zoological
Bulletin 2,2554.
IHERING, H. V., 1903. On the Molluscan fauna of the Patagonian
Tertiary. Proceedings of the American Philosophy Society 41, 132137.
KIM, H.M., CHANG, M.M., WU,F.&KIM, Y.H., 2014. A new ichthyo-
dectiform (Pisces, Teleostei) from the Lower Cretaceous of South
Korea and its paleobiogeographic implication. Cretaceous Research
47, 117130.
KING, J.L. & SUPER, K.J., 2019. The smallest recorded specimen of
Xiphactinus audax from the Niobrara Chalk of Kansas and its impli-
cations for juvenile ichthyodectid ecology. Historical Biology 15.
doi:10.1080/08912963.2019.1623212
LEES,T.&BARTHOLOMAI, A., 1987. Study of a Lower Cretaceous actino-
pterygian (Class Pisces) Cooyoo australis from Queensland,
Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 25, 177192.
LEGARRETA,L.&ULIANA, M.A., 1994. Asociaciones de f
osiles y hiatos en
el Supracret
acico-Ne
ogeno de Patagonia: Una perspectiva estra-
tigr
afico-secuencial. Ameghiniana 31, 257281.
LEIDY, J., 1870. Remarks on ichthyodorulites and on certain fossil mam-
malians. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 22,1213.
LÓPEZARBARELLO, A., RAUHUT,O.&MOSER, K., 2008. Jurassic fishes of
Gondwana.Asociaci
on Geol
ogica Argentina 63, 586612.
MASIUK, V., 1967. Estratigraf
ıa del Rocanense del Puesto Alvarez, curso
inferior del R
ıo Chico, Provincia del Chubut. Revista del Museo de
La Plata, nueva serie: Paleontolog
ıa5, 197258.
MATHEOS, S.D., BREA, M., ZUCOL, A.F., PRÁMPARO, M., RAIGEM BORN,
M.S., IGLESIAS,A.&FISCHER, A., 2005. An
alisis paleoambiental de las
sedimentitas del Daniano del sector sur de los Lagos Musters y
Colhu
e Huapi (Chubut, Argentina). Actas XVI Congreso Geol
ogico
Argenti 3,8390.
MÉNDEZ, I., 1966. Foramin
ıferos, edad y correlaci
on estratigr
afica del
Salamanquense de Punta Peligro (45300S; 67110W), provincia del
Chubut. Revista de la Asociaci
on Geol
ogica Argentina 21, 127157.
MKHITARYAN, T.G. & AVERIANOV, A.O., 2011. New material and phylo-
genetic position of Aidachar paludalis Nesov, 1981 (Actionopterygii,
Ichthyodectiformes) from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan.
Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS 315, 181192.
NELSON, G.J., 1973. Notes on the structure and relationships of certain
Cretaceous and Eocene fishes. American Museum of Natural History
Novitates 2524,131.
NEWTON, E.T., 1877. On the remains of Hypsodon, Portheus and
Ichthyodectes from British Cretaceous strata, with descriptions of a new
species. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of Society 33,505529.
PARMA, S.G. & CASADÍO, S., 2005. Upper CretaceousPaleocene echi-
noids from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Paleontology
79, 10721087.
PATTERSON,C.&ROSEN, D.E., 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and
other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classify-
ing fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 158,
81172.
ROMER, A.S., 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. University Press, Chicago,
468 pp.
RUSSELL, D.A., 1988. A checklist of North American marine Cretaceous
vertebrates including fresh water fishes. Tyrrell Museum of
Palaeontology Occasional Papers 4,158.
RUSSELL, D.A., 1993. Vertebrates in the Cretaceous Western Interior.
Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 39, 665680.
SCHAEFFER,B.&PATTERSON, C., 1984. Jurassic fishes from the western
United States, with comments on Jurassic fish distributions.
American Museum Novitates 2796,186.
SCHWIMMER, D.R., STEWART, J.D. & DENT WILLIAMS, G., 1997. Xiphactinus
vetus and the distribution of Xiphactinus species in the eastern
United States. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 17, 610615.
SHIMADA, K., SCHUMACHER, B.A., PARKIN, J.A. & PALERMO, J.M., 2006.
Fossil marine vertebrates from the lowermost Greenhorn Limestone
(Upper Cretaceous: middle Cenomanian) in southeastern
Colorado. Journal of Paleontology 80,145.
TANIMOTO,M.&KINKYO, T., 2001. Gillicus skeleton from the Upper
Cretaceous Izumi Group (Lower Maastrichtian) of YuraCho,
Sumoto City, Hyogo Prefecture. Southwest Japan the First Find of a
Fossil of the Family Ichthyodectidae in Japan. Chigakukenkyu 50,
4143.
TAVERNE, L., 2008. Considerations about the Upper Cretaceous genus
Chirocentrites and erection of the new genus Heckelichthys
(Teleostei, Ichthyodectifonnes). A New Visit inside the
Ichthyodectid Phylogeny. Bulletin de LInstitut Royal des Sciences
Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 81, 209228.
TAVERNE, L., 2010. Les Ichthyodectidae (Teleostei, Ichthyodectiformes)
des schistes bitumineux de lAptien (Cr
etac
e inf
erieur) de Guin
ee
Equatoriale et du Gabon. Bulletin de LInstitut Royal Des Sciences
Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 80, 115143.
VALLATI, P., CASAL, G.A., FOIX, N., ALLARD, J.O., DESOSA TOMAS,A.&
CALO, M., 2016. First report of a maastrichtian palynoflora from the
Golfo San Jorge Basin, central Patagonia, Argentina. Ameghiniana
53, 495505.
VAVREK, M.J., MURRAY, A.M. & BELL, P.R., 2016. Xiphactinus audax
Leidy 1870 from the Puskwaskau Formation (Santonian to
Campanian) of northwestern Alberta, Canada and the distribution
of Xiphactinus in North America. Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology
Palaeontology 1,89100.
WOODWARD, A.S., 1894. On some fish remains of the genera Portheus
and Cladocyclus from the Rolling Downs Formation of Queensland.
Annals and Magazine of Natural History 6, 444447.
YABUMOTO, Y., HIROSE,K.&BRITO, P., 2018. A new ichthyodectiform
fish, Amakusaichthys goshouraensis gen. et sp. nov. from the Upper
Cretaceous (Santonian) Himenoura Group in Goshoura, Amakusa,
Kumamoto, Japan. Historical Biology 114. doi:10.1080/08912963.
2018.1497022.
ALCHERINGA: AN AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PALAEONTOLOGY 5
... Portheus is currently considered as a junior synonym of Xiphactinus Leidy, 1870. The latter genus was indeed recorded in Cenomanian units of Venezuela (Carrillo-Briceño et al., 2012) and in the Maastrichtian-Thanetian of Argentina (De Pasqua et al., 2020); it is also present as isolated teeth in Campanian-Maastrichtian levels of the Dorotea Formation in Las Chinas, southernmost Chile (RAO., pers. obs., 2019). ...
... verified by Su arez et al. (2003) and this study on the basis of new specimens Patagonia (De Pasqua et al., 2020) and by the presence of isolated teeth in the Dorotea Formation (RAO., pers. obs., 2019). ...
Article
This reseach presents new material of ray-finned fishes recovered from Upper Cretaceous strata exposed in the city of Algarrobo, central Chile. The material includes specimens here referred to the genus Enchodus, which are the first local records of early Maastrichtian age. Three coeval, isolated teeth are here referred to the genus Pachyrhizodus, and six distinctive, barracuda-like teeth are here referred to as indeterminate pachycormids. These finds represent the first record of Pachyrhizodus and the second record of a pachycormid in the Upper Cretaceous of southern South America. In addition, it is provided a critical review of the historic ray-finned fishes from the Upper Cretaceous Quiriquina Formation of central Chile and equivalent units within the Arauco Basin. The updated information suggests that latest Cretaceous actinopterygian diversity along the southeastern Pacific was much discrete than previously thought, and unusually scarce in terms of abundance. Locally, this scarcity was already present during the lower Maastrichtian and persisted throughout the end of the Cretaceous.
Article
Full-text available
Upper Cretaceous coastal marine deposits are widespread in the Southern Urals with a number of marine vertebrates previously reported from this region. However, previous studies on the vertebrate faunas in this region often lack detailed taxonomic descriptions and illustrations, rendering comparisons to other faunal assemblages difficult. A new diverse vertebrate assemblage comprising cartilaginous and bony fishes, as well as marine reptiles, is described here from the Orenburg region near Akkermanovka (Southern Urals, Russia). Thirty five taxa are identified, including three holocephalans (Elasmodus sp., Ischyodus yanshini, Chimaeroid indet.), two hybodontiform sharks (Meristodonoides sp., cf. Polyacrodus sp.), 17 neoselachians (Paraorthacodus cf. andersoni, Paraorthacodus sp., Synechodus sp., Cederstroemia nilsi, Acrolamna acuminata, Archaeolamna ex gr. kopingensis, Cretalamna sarcoportheta, Cretoxyrhina mantelli, Eostriatolamia segedini, E. venusta, Hispidaspis horridus, Hispidaspis cf. gigas, Pseudocorax laevis, Pseudoscapanorhynchus compressidens, Scapanorhynchus rhaphiodon, Squalicorax kaupi, Ptychodus rugosus), a holostean (Lepisosteidae indet.), nine teleosts (Protosphyraena sp., Saurodontidae indet., cf. Pachyrhizodus sp., Pachyrhizodontidae indet., Enchodus petrosus, E. ferox, E. cf. gladiolus, E. spp., Alepisauroidei indet.), two plesiosaurs (Polycotylidae indet., Plesiosauria indet.), and one mosasaurid (Tylosaurinae indet.). Based on the faunal assemblage, a Santonian-?early Campanian age is proposed. Lamniform sharks are the best represented group in terms of taxic diversity and relative abundance, probably reflecting the peak in diversity this group experienced following the Cenomanian radiation in the Late Cretaceous. The faunal assemblage of Akkermanovka exhibits significant taxonomic overlaps with assemblages reported from Asia and North America, but not from Southern Hemisphere continents, indicating east-west dispersal of several marine taxa during the Late Cretaceous.
Article
Full-text available
Juvenile specimens of Xiphactinus audax are rarely preserved in the fossil record and are typically represented by disarticulated cranial elements. Here we report the smallest specimen of Xiphactinus to date, consisting of the left and right dentaries and the right preoperculum. Based on the size of the new specimen and the rarity of small ichthyodectids in the Niobrara Chalk, it is interpreted as a juvenile. We suggest that the early life of Xiphactinus was spent in shallow margins of seaways for protection and to utilize rich food resources, and they were rare in open marine water. Today, juvenile predatory large-bodied fish are rare in open-water sediments, but shallow, nearshore deposits are lacking from the Western Interior Seaway, providing a complicating bias. The teeth of this juvenile X. audax specimen indicate that the diet did not notably change during growth and that even the small specimens would have been piscivorous predators. This is typical of large-bodied predatory fish such as tarpon that utilize estuaries and other shallow environs to mitigate juvenile mortality and do not change their diets much throughout ontogeny. This use of nearshore environments could explain why our Xiphactinus is so small and why such small specimens are rare.
Article
Full-text available
Xiphactinus is the largest teleost fish known from the Late Cretaceous of North America, and has been found across much of the Western Interior Basin. Despite extensive Late Cretaceous marine deposits occurring in Alberta, there has previously been only two possible records of Xiphactinus from the province, neither of which has been diagnosable to the species level. We describe here a portion of the lower jaws, including teeth, of Xiphactinus audax from northeast of Grande Prairie, Alberta. The fossil has large, thecodont teeth that are circular in cross section and lack any carinae, and are highly variable in their overall size. This fossil is the first diagnostic material of X. audax from Alberta, and extends the range of the species by over a thousand kilometres. During the Late Cretaceous, the area the fossil was found in was near the Arctic Circle, and represents an important datapoint within the poorly known, northern portion of the Western Interior Basin.
Article
Dugaldia emmilta is a teleostean fish found in the late Albian Toolebuc Formation in Queensland, Australia. In the original description, D. emmilta was attributed to the Neoteleostei because of the presence of a tripartite occipital condyle, and the species was postulated to have a basal position among neoteleosteans because of the presence of several plesiomorphic characters. A reexamination of the holotype, together with the description of two new specimens, indicates that D. emmilta is an ichthyodectiform fish. A phylogenetic analysis resolves this species as the sister to Ogunichthys + Ichthyodectoidei. This species shows unusual features for an ichthyodectiform, in particular the shape of the mandible and the arrangement of the teeth on the lower jaw. Jaw mechanics in ichthyodectiforms are peculiar because they allow a significant lateral enlargement. In Dugaldia, a similar disposition is present but is exaggerated by specific features of the maxilla and the mandible. Comparisons with the sarcastic fringehead (Neoclinus blanchardi), a living blenny that shows a ‘gaping display,’ reveal that Dugaldia was likely able to exhibit extreme lateral mouth enlargement.
Article
A new ichthyodectiform fish, Amakusaichthys goshouraensis gen. et sp. nov. is described based on several specimens from the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) Hinoshima Formation of the Himenoura Group at Goshoura, Amakusa, Kumamoto in Kyushu, Japan. Amakusaichthys is hypothesized to form a clade with the genus Heckelichthys from the North Atlantic and western Tethyan regions. This new species is highly distinct from other ichthyodectiforms in having the long snout and small mouth with fine conical teeth, which indicates this group had greater diversity than it had been thought.
Article
The Lower Cretaceous actinopterygian fish Xiphactinus australis Woodward, 1894 is redescribed from new material. Comparisons of this taxon with other ichthyodectid genera, Xiphactinus, Ichthyodectes, Cladocyclus and Gillicus, shows it is sufficiently distinct to warrant recognition in a separate gunus, Cooyoo gen.nov., In addition C. australis is shown to be more closely related to Ichthyodectes than Xiphactinus.-Authors