- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Urban Ecosystems
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Risk of bird predation and defoliating insect abundance are greater
in urban forest fragments than street trees
Lawrence C. Long
1
&Steven D. Frank
1
Published online: 20 February 2020
#Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract
Predation by natural enemies is important for regulating herbivore abundance and herbivory. Theory predicts that complex habitats
support more natural enemies, which exert top-down control over arthropods and therefore can reduce herbivory. However, it is
unclear if theory developed in other more natural systems similarly apply to predation by vertebrate and invertebrate natural enemies
across urban habitats of varying complexity. We used plasticine caterpillar models to assess risk of predation by birds and insects,
collected leaf-feeding arthropods, and measured herbivory in willow oak trees (Quercus phellos) in two seasons to determine how
predation influenced herbivory across urban forest fragments, street trees planted near forest fragments, and downtown street trees.
Predation attempts by birds and abundance of chewing folivores were greater on trees growing in urban forest fragments than
downtown street trees. Bird predation attempts and herbivory levels were inconsistent for near-forest trees. Predation attempts by
arthropods did not statistically vary among the three urban tree habitats. Contrary to expectations based on theory, chewing folivore
abundance and herbivory were generally highest on trees growing in urban forests, the most complex habitat we studied, and the
habitat where risk of bird predation was greatest. We suggest that urban forest fragments provide better habitat than other urban
landscapes for both urban birds and chewing folivores by having greater habitat complexity. Therefore, basal resources, such as
availability of suitable habitat, mediate top-down effects on herbivores in cities.
Keywords Forest fragments .Urban birds .Defoliators .Street trees .Top-down control
Introduction
Urban trees provide ecosystem services for people and habitat
for species.Unfortunately, urban street trees often have greater
arthropod pest densities and herbivory than trees in rural for-
ests which can reduce these services (Frankie and Ehler 1978;
Dreistadt et al. 1990; Lunney and Burgin 2004; Christie and
Hochuli 2005; Raupp et al. 2010; Dale and Frank 2014).
However, Kozlov et al. (2017) found lower herbivory in
European cities than rural forests due to predation by birds
and ants suggesting that while common, the pattern of elevat-
ed herbivory in urban ecosystems in not universal (Hochuli
and Threlfall 2017). Urban trees grow in many different loca-
tions, such as along streets and in parking lots, in managed
ornamental landscapes, and in forest fragments. Trees in each
location likely encounter different herbivore communities
which inflict different amounts of herbivory (Hanks and
Denno 1993;Longetal.2019). Trees in forest fragments are
often surrounded by many types of vegetation, including other
trees and shrubs. Vegetation diversity and density could pro-
tect trees from herbivory through multiple ecological mecha-
nisms, such as enhanced natural enemy abundance (Hanks
and Denno 1993; Shrewsbury and Raupp 2000; Tooker and
Hanks 2000) or associational resistance (Barbosa et al. 2009)
where nearby plants help obscure host plants from their her-
bivores (Root 1973; Feeny 1976;Frank2014). On the other
hand, forest trees may be exposed to greater herbivore abun-
dance and diversity and thus more herbivory than trees
surrounded by pavement due to greater plant richness and
abundance (Haddad et al. 2001; Vehviläinen et al. 2007;
Borer et al. 2012; Meyer et al. 2017). Trees growing in a
downtown sidewalk pit or the median of a busy street are
isolated from other vegetation and exposed to abiotic stresses
which can increase herbivore abundance and herbivory in
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article
(https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00939-x) contains supplementary
material, which is available to authorized users.
*Lawrence C. Long
LCLong2@ncsu.edu
1
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina
State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA
Urban Ecosystems (2020) 23:519–531
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00939-x
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.