ArticlePDF Available

Regular eating, not intermittent fasting, is the best strategy for a healthy eating control

Authors:
  • Villa Garda Hospital, Italy
5
onlineijedo.positivepress.net
IJEDO
Italian Journal of Eating Disorders and Obesity
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
IJEDO 2020;2:5-7
Copyright © 2020 Riccardo Dalle Grave. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC
BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that
the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which
does not comply with these terms.
Riccardo Dalle Grave, MD ( ) rdalleg@gmail.com
Received: 11 January 2020; Accepted: 20 January 2020; Published online: 17 February 2020. doi:10.32044/ijedo.2020.02
Abstract
Intermitting fasting has been proposed as a dietary strategy to improve general
health indicators, slow or reverse disease processes and aging. However, data
supporting the beneficial health effects of intermittent fasting mainly derive from
preclinical studies in animals and short-term clinical studies on weight loss
and non-communicable disease risk factors, with no significant differences on
these outcomes when intermittent fasting has been compared with moderate
continuous energy restriction in humans. No data are available on the effect of
intermitting fasting on clinically important outcomes in humans, such as the onset
of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and life expectancy. Instead, several studies
found an association between delayed eating (i.e., spending many hours during the
day without eating) and increased risk of developing episodes of overeating and
binge eating. Moreover, the procedure of regular eating, adopted by the “enhanced”
cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders (CBT-E), results in a rapid decease
in the frequency of binge-episodes in patients with bulimia nervosa and binge-
eating disorders. These data indicate that regular eating, not intermitting fast, is the
best choice for adopting a healthy eating control and avoiding the development of
unregulated and, in some cases, disturbed eating behavior.
Key words
Intermittent fasting
Regular eating
Starvation
Life expectancy
Health disease
Aging
Eating disorders
Bulimia nervosa
Binge-eating disorder
Regular eating, not intermittent fasting,
is the best strategy for a healthy eating control
Riccardo Dalle Grave
Depar tment of Eating and Weight Disorders, Villa Garda Hospital, Garda ( VR), Italy
Intermittent fasting has been recently proposed as an eating
pattern strategy to elicit, through the metabolic switch from
the use of glucose as fuel source to the use of fatty acids and
ketone bodies, the improvement of insulin resistance, obe-
sity, dyslipidemia, high blood pressure and cognitive fun-
ctions, the increased resistance to stress, the suppression of
inflammation and the increase of life expectancy (de Cabo
& Mattson, 2019). These dietary practices in its more com-
mon forms (e.g., alternate fasting days; 5:2 intermittent
fasting, i.e., fasting 2 days each week; daily time-restricted
feeding) (Anton et al., 2018) has been proposed to treat
obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, neurode-
generative diseases, asthma, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthri-
tis, surgical tissue lesions and ischemic and to prolong life
expectancy (de Cabo & Mattson, 2019).
Data supporting the beneficial effects of intermittent
fasting derives from preclinical studies on animals (e.g.
rats) (Anton et al., 2018; Swindell, 2012). The few clini-
cal published studies assessed only the short-term (weeks
or months) effect of this intervention on weight loss and
some non-communicable diseases risk factors. To date no
data are available on the effect of intermitting fasting on
clinically important outcomes, such as the onset of cardio-
vascular diseases, cancer, and lifer expectancy in humans.
Furthermore, most studies did not compare the long-term
effects of intermittent fasting with continuous energy re-
Riccardo Dalle Grave
doi:10.32044/ijedo.2020.02
IJEDO
Italian Journal of Eating Disorders and Obesity
6
onlineijedo.positivepress.net IJEDO 2020;2:5-7
striction. Therefore, it is not known whether the observed
positive effects on risk factors are the result of intermittent
fasting or calorie restriction per se.
The only published clinical study with long-term outco-
me data (i.e., 24 months) on weight loss and cardiovascular
risk factors is a one-year randomized parallel trial which
randomized 332 adults with overweight or obesity to one of
three groups: (1) continuous energy restriction (1000 kcal/
day for women and 1200 kcal/day for men); (2) week-on-
week-off energy restriction (alternating between the same
energy restriction as the continuous group for one week and
one week of habitual diet); or (3) 5:2 (500 kcal/day on mo-
dified fast days each week for women and 600 kcal/day for
men, the 2 days of energy restriction could be consecutive
or non-consecutive). The study did not find significant dif-
ferences in weight loss and in the modification of the cardio-
vascular risk factors among the three groups at both 12 and
24 months (Headland, Clifton, & Keogh, 2019, 2020).
Other tr ials with shor ter duration achieved t he same con-
clusion as the Headland et al. study (2020). For example, a
short-term randomized study, comparing alternate-day fa-
sting with moderate daily caloric restriction in adults with
obesity, found no significant between-group differences in
change in weight body composition, lipids and insulin sen-
sitivity index after 8-weeks of treatment, and no significant
differences in weight regain after 24 weeks of unsupervised
follow-up (Catenacci et al., 2016). The same conclusion was
reached by a 12-month trial that found no significant diffe-
rences in adherence, weight loss and maintenance, and car-
diovascular protection between intermittent fasting (25%
of energy needs on fast days; 125% of energy needs on al-
ternating “feast days”) compared to a moderate continuous
energy restriction (75% of energy needs every day) (Tre-
panowski et al., 2017). The results of these studies confirm
the conclusions of a systematic metanalytical review of 9
studies of a minimum duration of 6 months, in which no
difference in weight loss was observed between continuous
calorie restriction and intermittent fasting (Headland, Cli-
fton, Carter, & Keogh, 2016).
Although there are no significant differences in terms
of weight loss and improvement of cardiovascular risk fac-
tors between intermittent fasting and continuous energy
restriction, several studies found an association between
delayed eating (i.e., spending many hours during the day
without eating) and increased risk of developing episodes
of overeating and binge eating. A laboratory experiment
found that participants deprived of food for 6-hour con-
sumed significantly more calories at the buffet compared
to subjects in the 1-hour food deprivation condition (Tel-
ch & Agras, 1996). Studies on binge-eating disorder (BED)
have observed that patients with overweight and BED who
ate three meals per day weighed significantly less, and had
significantly fewer binge eating episodes, than those who
did not regularly eat three meals per day (Masheb & Grilo,
2006). Moreover, regular consumption of breakfast, lunch
and dinner was significantly correlated with a lower body
mass index in people with obesity and BED (Masheb, Grilo,
& White, 2011). Research has also shown that dieting signi-
ficantly predicted future weight gain in normal weight in-
dividuals (Lowe, Doshi, Katterman, & Feig, 2013), and was
a risk factor for the development of eating disorders of cli-
nical severity (Schaumberg & Anderson, 2016; St ice, 2016).
The most important evidence in favor of regular eating
pattern (3 + 2 + 0), however, derives from the results of stu-
dies that assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of “enhan-
ced” cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for eating disor-
ders (Dalle Grave & Calugi, 2020; Fairburn, 2008). CBT-E
is based on a theory postulating that delayed eating and the
adoption of extreme and rigid dietary rules are the most
potent mechanisms maintaining binge-eating episodes
(Fairburn, Cooper, & Shafran, 2003). For this reason, a key
procedure adopted by CBT-E is “regular eating” that sug-
gest patients to plan in advance 3 main meals (breakfast,
lunch and dinner) and 2 snacks (mid-morning snack and
mid-afternoon snack) and not eating between these inter-
vals: a procedure also called 3 + 2 + 0. Randomized and
cohort studies have shown that regular eating procedures
result in a rapid decrease in the frequency of binge-episo-
des in patients with bulimia nervosa (Dalle Grave, Calugi,
Sartirana, & Fairburn, 2015; Fairburn et al., 2009) and BED
(Grilo & Masheb, 2005). A study assessing the efficacy of
CBT for bulimia nervosa has also found that participants
who ate 80 meals and at least 21 afternoon snacks in the
previous month reported the highest abstinence rate (70%)
from binge-eating episodes (Shah, Passi, Bryson, & Agras,
2005). This finding was also observed in a study using CBT
guided self-help in patients with binge-eating episodes
(Zendegui, West, & Zandberg, 2014). These results led to
affirm that regular eating is probably the single most im-
portant procedure in the treatment of eating disorders with
binge-eating episodes (Fairbu r n, 2013).
In conclusion, there are no evidences, supported by
long-term randomized controlled trials, that intermittent
fasting produces additional clinical benefits, compared to
healthy and regular eating patterns, and greater weight
loss, compared to a moderate continuous energy restri-
ction. Instead, there are some evidences that delayed ea-
ting increases the risk of developing episodes of overeating
Riccardo Dalle Grave
doi:10.32044/ijedo.2020.02
IJEDO
Italian Journal of Eating Disorders and Obesity
7
onlineijedo.positivepress.net IJEDO 2020;2:5-7
and binge eating. For these reasons, it is inappropriate to
recommend intermitting fasting as a healthy eating practi-
ce. Regular eating, preferably based on the Mediterranean
diet model (Estruch et al., 2018), is the best choice to re-
duce the risk of disease and to avoid the development of
unregulated and, in some cases, disturbed eating behavior.
References
Anton, S. D., Moehl, K., Donahoo, W. T., Marosi, K., Lee, S. A.,
Mainous, A. G., 3rd, . . . Mattson, M. P. (2018). Flipping the
Metabolic Switch: Understanding and Applying the Health
Benefits of Fasting. Obesity (Silver Spring), 26(2), 254-268.
doi:10.1002/oby.22065
Catenacci, V. A., Pan, Z., Ostendorf, D., Brannon, S., Gozansky,
W. S., Mattson, M. P., . . . Troy Donahoo, W. (2016). A
randomized pilot study comparing zero-calorie alternate-
day fasting to daily caloric restriction in adults with obesity.
Obesity (Silver Spring), 24(9), 1874-1883. doi:10.1002 /
oby.21581
Dalle Grave, R., & Calugi, S. (2020). Cognitive behavior therapy
for adolescents with eating disorders. New York: Guilford
Press.
Dalle Grave, R., Calugi, S., Sartirana, M., & Fairburn, C. G.
(2015). Transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy
for adolescents with an eating disorder who are not
underweight. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 73, 79-82.
doi:10.1016/j.br at .2015.07.014
de Cabo, R., & Mattson, M. P. (2019). Effects of intermittent
fasti ng on health, aging, and disease. New England Journal of
Medicine, 381(26), 2541-2551. doi:10.1056 /NEJMra19 05136
Estruch, R., Ros, E., Salas-Salvado, J., Covas, M. I., Corella,
D., Aros, F., . . . Investigators, P. S. (2018). Primary
prevention of cardiovascular disease with a mediterranean
diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nut. New
England Journal of Medicine, 378(25), e34. doi:10.1056 /
NEJMoa1800389
Fairburn, C. G. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy and eating
disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
Fairburn, C. G. (2013). Overcoming binge eating, Second Edition.
New York: Guilford Press.
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., Doll, H. A., O’Connor, M. E., Bohn,
K., Hawker, D. M., . . . Palmer, R. L. (2009). Transdiagnostic
cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with eating
disorders: a two-site trial with 60-week follow-up. American
Journal of Psychiatry, 166(3), 311-319. doi:10.1176/appi.
ajp.2008.08040608
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., & Shafran, R. (2003). Cognitive
behaviour therapy for eating disorders: a “transdiagnostic”
theory and treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy,
41(5), 509-528.
Grilo, C. M., & Masheb, R. M. (2005). A randomized controlled
comparison of guided self-help cognitive behaviora l therapy
and behavioral weight loss for binge eating disorder.
Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(11), 1509-1525.
doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.11.010
Headland, M., Clif ton, P. M., Carter, S., & Keogh, J. B. (2016).
Weight-Loss Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-
Analysis of Intermittent Energy Restriction Trials Lasting
a Minimum of 6 Months. Nutrients, 8(6). doi:10. 339 0 /
nu8060354
Headland, M. L., Clifton, P. M., & Keogh, J. B. (2019). Effect
of intermittent compared to continuous energy restriction
on weight loss and weight maintenance after 12 months in
healthy overweight or obese adults. International Journal of
Obesity, 43(10), 2028-2036. doi:10.1038/s41366-018 -0247-2
Headland, M. L., Clifton, P. M., & Keogh, J. B. (2020). Impact
of intermittent vs. continuous energy restriction on weight
and cardiometabolic factors: a 12-month follow-up.
International Journal of Obesity doi:10.1038/s41366 - 020-
0525-7
Lowe, M. R., Doshi, S. D., Katterman, S. N., & Feig, E. H. (2013).
Dieting and restrained eating as prospective predictors of
weight gain. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 577. doi:10.3389 /
fpsyg.2013.0 0577
Masheb, R. M., & Grilo, C. M. (2006). Eating patterns and
breakfast consumption in obese patients with binge eating
disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(11), 1545-
1553. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.013
Masheb, R. M., Grilo, C. M., & White, M. A. (2011). An
examination of eating patterns in community women with
bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. International
Journal of Eating Disorders, 44(7), 618-624. doi:10.1002/
eat.20853
Schaumberg, K., & Anderson, D. (2016). Dietary restraint and
weight loss as risk factors for eating pathology. Eating
Behaviors, 23, 97-103. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.08.009
Shah, N., Passi, V., Bryson, S., & Agras, W. S. (2005). Patterns
of eating and abstinence in women treated for bulimia
nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38(4),
330-334. doi :10.1002 /eat. 20204
Stice, E. (2016). Interactive and Mediational Etiologic Models of
Eating Disorder Onset: Evidence from Prospective Studies.
Annual Rev iew of Clinical Psychology, 12, 359-381. doi:10.1146 /
annurev-clinpsy-021815-093317
Swindell, W. R. (2012). Dietar y restriction in rats and mice: a
meta-analysis and review of the evidence for genotype-
dependent effects on lifespan. Ageing Research Reviews, 11(2),
254-270. doi:10.1016/j.a rr.2011.12.006
Telch, C. F., & Agras, W. S. (1996). The effects of short-term food
deprivation on caloric intake in eating-disordered subjects.
Appetite, 26(3), 221-233. doi:10.1006/appe.1996.0017
Trepanowski, J. F., Kroeger, C. M., Barnosky, A., Klempel, M. C.,
Bhutani, S., Hoddy, K. K., . . . Varady, K. A. (2017). Effect
of alternate-day fasting on weight loss, weight maintenance,
and cardioprotection among metabolically healthy obese
adults : A randomized clinica l trial. JAMA Internal Medicine,
177(7), 930-938. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0936
Zendegu i, E. A., West, J. A., & Zandberg , L. J. (2014). Binge eating
frequency and regular eating adherence: the role of eating
pattern in cognitive behavioral guided self-help. Eating
Behaviors, 15(2), 241-243. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.03.002
... Consequently, instructors' perceptions about technology are important determinants in teaching and learning environments. STEM learning is highly regarded at the moment, and many colleges and universities focus on incorporating new technology in their programs (Solanki and Xu, 2018;Dalle Grave, 2020). Apart from these critical areas, higher education institutions may pursue specialized development programs in relevant fields such as educational technology. ...
Article
Full-text available
Entrepreneurship and business school teachers must extensively use technological and innovative tools to increase the efficacy of their instructional methods. This research aimed to investigate the teachers’ acceptance of technology in the school innovation climate, to enhance the use and effectiveness of educational technology in Thai entrepreneurship and business schools. Furthermore, the conditional influence of knowledge hiding and sharing on the link between school innovation climate and educational technology has been investigated and reported. Using a longitudinal study design data were gathered from the 204 entrepreneurship teachers of six different universities in Pattani, Bangkok, and Songkla Provinces, Thailand. Based on SamrtPLS 3.3.3 analysis, results revealed that the “school innovation climate” positively impacts educational technology use. Additionally, knowledge hiding and sharing moderated the relationship between “school innovation climate” and acceptance of educational technology (actual use of educational technology, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of educational technology). Current research attempted to bridge the gap between knowledge management and innovation theories application in entrepreneurship education. The study brings key policy implications for school leaders and practitioners and suggests several directions for future research.
... However, it is essential to highlight that both interventions must be carried out with professional supervision. Overfeeding episodes can occur after the fasting window, with the risk of developing eating disorders such as binge eating (81). Furthermore, caloric restriction programs can also increase the predisposition to the development of psychological disorders (79). ...
Article
Full-text available
Intermittent fasting (IF) is a popular intervention used to fight overweight/obesity. This condition is accompanied by hypothalamic inflammation, limiting the proper signaling of molecular pathways, with consequent dysregulation of food intake and energy homeostasis. This mini-review explored the therapeutic modulation potential of IF regarding the disruption of these molecular pathways. IF seems to modulate inflammatory pathways in the brain, which may also be correlated with the brain-microbiota axis, improving hypothalamic signaling of leptin and insulin, and inducing the autophagic pathway in hypothalamic neurons, contributing to weight loss in obesity. Evidence also suggests that when an IF protocol is performed without respecting the circadian cycle, it can lead to dysregulation in the expression of circadian cycle regulatory genes, with potential health damage. In conclusion, IF may have the potential to be an adjuvant treatment to improve the reestablishment of hypothalamic responses in obesity.
Article
Full-text available
Intermittent energy restriction continues to gain popularity as a weight loss strategy; however, data assessing it’s long-term viability is limited. The objective of this study was to follow up with participants 12 months after they had completed a 12-month dietary intervention trial involving continuous energy restriction and two forms of intermittent energy restriction; a week-on-week-off energy restriction and a 5:2 programme, assessing long-term changes on weight, body composition, blood lipids and glucose. 109 overweight and obese adults, aged 18–72 years, attended a 12-month follow-up after completing a 12-month dietary intervention involving three groups: continuous energy restriction (1000 kcal/day for women and 1200 kcal/day for men), week-on-week-off energy restriction (alternating between the same energy restriction as the continuous group for one week and one week of habitual diet), or 5:2 (500 kcal/day on modified fast days each week for women and 600 kcal/day for men). The primary outcome was weight change at 24 months from baseline, with secondary outcomes of change in body composition, blood lipids and glucose. For the 109 individuals who completed the 12-month follow-up (82 female, 15 male, mean BMI 33 kg/m²), weight decreased over time with no differences between week-on and week-off and continuous energy restriction or 5:2 and continuous energy restriction with −4.5 ± 4.9 kg for continuous energy restriction, −2.8 ± 6.5 kg for week-on, week-off and −3.5 ± 5.1 kg for 5:2. Total cholesterol reduced over time and glucose, HDL, LDL and triglycerides were unchanged. Intermittent energy restriction was as successful in achieving modest weight loss over a 24-month period as continuous energy restriction.
Article
Full-text available
Background and objective: Intermittent energy restriction (IER) is an alternative to continuous energy restriction (CER) for weight loss. There are few long-term trials comparing efficacy of these methods. The objective was to compare the effects of CER to two forms of IER; a week-on-week-off energy restriction and a 5:2 program, during which participants restricted their energy intake severely for 2 days and ate as usual for 5 days, on weight loss, body composition, blood lipids, and glucose. Subjects and methods: A one-year randomized parallel trial was conducted at the University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. Participants were 332 overweight and obese adults, ages 18-72 years, who were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: CER (4200 kJ/day for women and 5040 kJ/day for men), week-on-week-off energy restriction (alternating between the same energy restriction as the continuous group for one week and one week of habitual diet), or 5:2 (2100 kJ/day on modified fast days each week for women and 2520 kJ/day for men, the 2 days of energy restriction could be consecutive or non-consecutive). Primary outcome was weight loss, and secondary outcomes were changes in body composition, blood lipids, and glucose. Results: For the 146 individuals who completed the study (124 female, 22 male, mean BMI 33 kg/m2) mean weight loss, and body fat loss at 12 months was similar in the three intervention groups, -6.6 kg for CER, -5.1 kg for the week-on, week-off and -5.0 kg for 5:2 (p = 0.2 time by diet). Discontinuation rates were not different (p = 0.4). HDL-cholesterol rose (7%) and triglycerides decreased (13%) at 12 months with no differences between groups. No changes were seen for fasting glucose or LDL-cholesterol. Discussion and conclusion: The two forms of IER were not statistically different for weight loss, body composition, and cardiometabolic risk factors compared to CER.
Article
Full-text available
Background Observational cohort studies and a secondary prevention trial have shown inverse associations between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular risk. Methods In a multicenter trial in Spain, we assigned 7447 participants (55 to 80 years of age, 57% women) who were at high cardiovascular risk, but with no cardiovascular disease at enrollment, to one of three diets: a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil, a Mediterranean diet supplemented with mixed nuts, or a control diet (advice to reduce dietary fat). Participants received quarterly educational sessions and, depending on group assignment, free provision of extra-virgin olive oil, mixed nuts, or small nonfood gifts. The primary end point was a major cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes). After a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the trial was stopped on the basis of a prespecified interim analysis. In 2013, we reported the results for the primary end point in the Journal. We subsequently identified protocol deviations, including enrollment of household members without randomization, assignment to a study group without randomization of some participants at 1 of 11 study sites, and apparent inconsistent use of randomization tables at another site. We have withdrawn our previously published report and now report revised effect estimates based on analyses that do not rely exclusively on the assumption that all the participants were randomly assigned. Results A primary end-point event occurred in 288 participants; there were 96 events in the group assigned to a Mediterranean diet with extra-virgin olive oil (3.8%), 83 in the group assigned to a Mediterranean diet with nuts (3.4%), and 109 in the control group (4.4%). In the intention-to-treat analysis including all the participants and adjusting for baseline characteristics and propensity scores, the hazard ratio was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.91) for a Mediterranean diet with extra-virgin olive oil and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.95) for a Mediterranean diet with nuts, as compared with the control diet. Results were similar after the omission of 1588 participants whose study-group assignments were known or suspected to have departed from the protocol. Conclusions In this study involving persons at high cardiovascular risk, the incidence of major cardiovascular events was lower among those assigned to a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil or nuts than among those assigned to a reduced-fat diet. (Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Health, and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN35739639.)
Article
Full-text available
Measures of dietary restraint do not consistently predict caloric restriction, and these scales appear inadequate for differentiating between healthy and risky restraint in individuals. The current study examined the relationship between self-reported dietary restraint, recent weight loss, body mass index (BMI), and eating pathology in a college sample to determine if dietary restraint coupled with caloric restriction would prove to be a more sensitive marker of eating disorder risk than restraint alone. Participants (N = 245) completed a series of measures evaluating dietary restraint, recent weight loss, and eating habits. Results suggested that dietary restraint related most consistently to eating pathology, with more nuanced results for women regarding the relations between deitary restraint, recent weight loss, and BMI. Findings provided further evidence that dietary restraint and weight loss may relate to eating pathology through independent pathways. In addition, recent weight loss may be a relevant risk factor for women at lower current BMI.
Article
Full-text available
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarise the effects of intermittent energy restriction on weight and biological markers in long term intervention studies of >6 months duration. An electronic search was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases for intervention trials lasting 6 months or longer investigating the effects of intermittent energy restriction. A total of nine studies were identified as meeting the pre-specified criteria. All studies included an intermittent energy restriction arm, with six being directly compared to continuous energy restriction. A total of 981 subjects were enrolled and randomised, with weight loss observed in all intermittent energy restriction arms regardless of study duration or follow up length. Eight interventions in six trials were used for the meta-analyses, with results indicating neither intermittent or continuous energy restriction being superior with respect to weight loss, 0.084 ± 0.114 (overall mean difference between groups ± standard error; p = 0.458). The effects of intermittent energy restriction in the long term remain unclear. The number of long term studies conducted is very limited, and participant numbers typically small (less than 50 completers), indicating the need for larger, long term trials of 12 months or more, to be conducted in order to understand the impact of intermittent energy restriction on weight loss and long term weight management. Blood lipid concentrations, glucose, and insulin were not altered by intermittent energy expenditure in values greater than those seen with continuous energy restriction.
Article
Objective: Objective: Intermittent fasting (IF) is a term used to describe a variety of eating patterns in which no or few calories are consumed for time periods that can range from 12 hours to several days, on a recurring basis. This review is focused on the physiological responses of major organ systems, including the musculoskeletal system, to the onset of the metabolic switch: the point of negative energy balance at which liver glycogen stores are depleted and fatty acids are mobilized (typically beyond 12 hours after cessation of food intake). Results and conclusions: Emerging findings suggest that the metabolic switch from glucose to fatty acid-derived ketones represents an evolutionarily conserved trigger point that shifts metabolism from lipid/cholesterol synthesis and fat storage to mobilization of fat through fatty acid oxidation and fatty acid-derived ketones, which serve to preserve muscle mass and function. Thus, IF regimens that induce the metabolic switch have the potential to improve body composition in overweight individuals. Moreover, IF regimens also induce the coordinated activation of signaling pathways that optimize physiological function, enhance performance, and slow aging and disease processes. Future randomized controlled IF trials should use biomarkers of the metabolic switch (e.g., plasma ketone levels) as a measure of compliance and of the magnitude of negative energy balance during the fasting period.
Article
Importance: Alternate-day fasting has become increasingly popular, yet, to date, no long-term randomized clinical trials have evaluated its efficacy. Objective: To compare the effects of alternate-day fasting vs daily calorie restriction on weight loss, weight maintenance, and risk indicators for cardiovascular disease. Design, setting, and participants: A single-center randomized clinical trial of obese adults (18 to 64 years of age; mean body mass index, 34) was conducted between October 1, 2011, and January 15, 2015, at an academic institution in Chicago, Illinois. Interventions: Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 groups for 1 year: alternate-day fasting (25% of energy needs on fast days; 125% of energy needs on alternating "feast days"), calorie restriction (75% of energy needs every day), or a no-intervention control. The trial involved a 6-month weight-loss phase followed by a 6-month weight-maintenance phase. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was change in body weight. Secondary outcomes were adherence to the dietary intervention and risk indicators for cardiovascular disease. Results: Among the 100 participants (86 women and 14 men; mean [SD] age, 44 [11] years), the dropout rate was highest in the alternate-day fasting group (13 of 34 [38%]), vs the daily calorie restriction group (10 of 35 [29%]) and control group (8 of 31 [26%]). Mean weight loss was similar for participants in the alternate-day fasting group and those in the daily calorie restriction group at month 6 (-6.8% [95% CI, -9.1% to -4.5%] vs -6.8% [95% CI, -9.1% to -4.6%]) and month 12 (-6.0% [95% CI, -8.5% to -3.6%] vs -5.3% [95% CI, -7.6% to -3.0%]) relative to those in the control group. Participants in the alternate-day fasting group ate more than prescribed on fast days, and less than prescribed on feast days, while those in the daily calorie restriction group generally met their prescribed energy goals. There were no significant differences between the intervention groups in blood pressure, heart rate, triglycerides, fasting glucose, fasting insulin, insulin resistance, C-reactive protein, or homocysteine concentrations at month 6 or 12. Mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at month 6 significantly increased among the participants in the alternate-day fasting group (6.2 mg/dL [95% CI, 0.1-12.4 mg/dL]), but not at month 12 (1.0 mg/dL [95% CI, -5.9 to 7.8 mg/dL]), relative to those in the daily calorie restriction group. Mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly elevated by month 12 among the participants in the alternate-day fasting group (11.5 mg/dL [95% CI, 1.9-21.1 mg/dL]) compared with those in the daily calorie restriction group. Conclusions and relevance: Alternate-day fasting did not produce superior adherence, weight loss, weight maintenance, or cardioprotection vs daily calorie restriction. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00960505.
Article
Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alternate-day fasting (ADF) and to compare changes in weight, body composition, lipids, and insulin sensitivity index (Si) with those produced by a standard weight loss diet, moderate daily caloric restriction (CR). Methods: Adults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2) , age 18-55) were randomized to either zero-calorie ADF (n = 14) or CR (-400 kcal/day, n = 12) for 8 weeks. Outcomes were measured at the end of the 8-week intervention and after 24 weeks of unsupervised follow-up. Results: No adverse effects were attributed to ADF, and 93% completed the 8-week ADF protocol. At 8 weeks, ADF achieved a 376 kcal/day greater energy deficit; however, there were no significant between-group differences in change in weight (mean ± SE; ADF -8.2 ± 0.9 kg, CR -7.1 ± 1.0 kg), body composition, lipids, or Si. After 24 weeks of unsupervised follow-up, there were no significant differences in weight regain; however, changes from baseline in % fat mass and lean mass were more favorable in ADF. Conclusions: ADF is a safe and tolerable approach to weight loss. ADF produced similar changes in weight, body composition, lipids, and Si at 8 weeks and did not appear to increase risk for weight regain 24 weeks after completing the intervention.
Article
It is vital to elucidate how risk factors work together to predict eating disorder onset because it should improve the yield of prevention efforts. Risk factors that have predicted eating disorder onset in multiple studies include low body mass index (BMI) for anorexia nervosa; thin-ideal internalization, perceived pressure to be thin, body dissatisfaction, dieting, and negative affect for bulimia nervosa; and body dissatisfaction and dieting for purging disorder. No risk factors have been identified for binge eating disorder. Classification tree analyses have identified several amplifying interactions, mitigating interactions, and alternative pathway interactions between risk factors, such as evidence that elevated BMI amplifies the risk between appearance overvaluation and the future onset of recurrent binge eating. However, there have been no tests of mediational risk factor models in the prediction of eating disorder onset. Gaps in the literature are identified and procedures for providing rigorous tests of interactive and mediational etiologic models are outlined. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Volume 12 is March 28, 2016. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.