In order to adequately quantify and predict the fire performance of novel construction materials and systems, their thermo-mechanical response to representative fire exposures must be defined through appropriately tailored experimentation. One of the most important components of these experiments is measurement of the in-depth temperature profile, which provides insight into the physical and chemical processes occurring within the material, and is critical in validating the output of thermal models. As a result, accurate temperature measurements are imperative. For this purpose, thermocouples of various designs have become ubiquitous in fire experimentation and thermal performance testing. However, there are errors inherent in the use of the thermocouples for solid-phase temperature measurement that, depending on the geometry and materials used, may be very significant. In particular, when a thermocouple with a relatively high thermal conductivity is embedded in a material of much lower conductivity, this can induce a disturbance in the temperature field around the thermocouple due to a ‘thermal bridging’ effect. As a result, the measured temperatures within the material may be much lower than the ‘undisturbed’ temperatures that would exist without the presence of the thermocouple.
This thesis explores the most critical error sources relevant to the measurement of in-depth temperatures in fire experimentation at different scales, in order to recommend methods for minimisation or correction of these errors. This is achieved through a series of experimental campaigns, coupled with heat-transfer modelling and parametric sensitivity analyses. The first of these campaigns involved bench-scale experiments in which samples of vermiculite insulation board – an exemplar non-combustible material – were subjected to well-defined heating conditions. In-depth temperatures were measured by thermocouples inserted either parallel or perpendicular to the heated surface. These experiments were replicated in finite element heat transfer models that were specifically tailored to the experimental conditions. The second campaign expanded on the first by introducing a charring, combustible material as the experimental sample, so that the influence of these additional complexities could be investigated. Laminated bamboo was used as the embedding material in this case, because in-depth temperature measurements are of practical relevance to the characterisation of this novel building material.
Finally, the implications of scaling were investigated through a large-scale compartment fire experiment, in which the performance of both combustible and non-combustible materials was measured. This experiment involved a ‘real’ fire in a full-scale compartment constructed from cross-laminated timber, with a combination of exposed and protected timber surfaces. Each of the walls and the ceiling were heavily instrumented with in-depth thermocouples inserted perpendicular or parallel to the heated surfaces.
In all of the experimental cases, the influence of thermocouple selection and orientation on the measured results was clearly observable. Temperatures measured by thermocouples inserted perpendicular to the heated surface were significantly lower than those from thermocouples in the parallel configuration. These results matched closely with the model predictions for the bench-scale experiments, which accurately reproduced the thermal disturbance induced by the presence of a thermocouple.
A simplified error correction methodology was proposed, which predicts the ‘undisturbed’ temperature at a particular location within the embedding material. This method ‘corrects’ the measurements from a thermocouple inserted perpendicular to the heated surface, and only requires detailed knowledge of the geometry and thermal properties of the thermocouple. The thermal boundary conditions and properties of the embedding material are incorporated in a parametric sensitivity analysis to produce a corrected temperature range that accounts for the uncertainty of these variables. This correction method was found to reduce the thermal disturbance error significantly, providing similar accuracy to measurements from thermocouples inserted parallel to the heated surface. The main challenge to this correction method is the occurrence of charring, moisture migration, and other phenomena that locally cause the heat transfer pathways to diverge from purely inert heat conduction between the thermocouple and embedding material. However, for the case of laminated bamboo heated perpendicular to the grain, it was found that the corrected measurements provided an accurate prediction of the in-depth temperatures until the point at which the char layer reached each thermocouple.
In the large-scale experiment, a novel method for inserting thermocouples parallel to the heated surface was developed. This method circumvents the practical constraints that often prevent the placement of thermocouples parallel to the exposed surface in large-scale experimentation. The effects of moisture migration and evaporation limited the applicability of error correction for the timber elements, but the presented correction method continued to work well for vermiculite insulation at this scale.
In some experimental cases it is unavoidable that a thermocouple will disturb the surrounding temperature field, and this can significantly reduce the accuracy of results from which heat transfer models, charring rates, and thermal behaviour are derived. This thesis provides recommendations for correcting this disturbance where possible, and for accurate measurement and interpretation of solid-phase temperature data in fire experimentation at different scales.