Technical ReportPDF Available
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™
ISSN 2307-8235 (online)
IUCN 2019: T33118A149070891
Scope: Global
Language: English
Shorea inaequilateralis, Red Balau
Assessment by: Randi, A., Julia, S., Tanggaraju, S., Maryani, A., Bodos, V.,
Hamidi, A. & Juiling, S.
View on www.iucnredlist.org
Citation: Randi, A., Julia, S., Tanggaraju, S., Maryani, A., Bodos, V., Hamidi, A. & Juiling, S. 2019.
Shorea inaequilateralis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T33118A149070891.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T33118A149070891.en
Copyright: © 2019 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written
permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.
Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written
permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use.
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN
Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State
University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe;
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London.
If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with
feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided.
THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™
Taxonomy
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family
Plantae Tracheophyta Magnoliopsida Malvales Dipterocarpaceae
Taxon Name:ÊÊShorea inaequilateralis Symington
Common Name(s):
• English: Red Balau
Taxonomic Source(s):
Board of Trustees, RBG Kew. 2019. Plants of the World Online Portal. Richmond, UK Available at:
http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org.
Assessment Information
Red List Category & Criteria: Endangered A4cd ver 3.1
Year Published: 2019
Date Assessed: June 30, 2019
Justification:
This species is native to Brunei, Kalimantan and Sarawak. In Kalimantan the species is only known from
one locality, but is widespread elsewhere. This tree is only found in Peat Swamp Forest, which
experiences a high rate of threat and decline. The threats to the species are from logging and
encroachment of agriculture, but in Brunei the species is not in decline as individuals are in protected
forest. Considering a period of 160 years (1959 to 2119 – two generations), the species is likely to
experience a decline of at least 50%, particularly if the species is lost from it's single locality in
Kalimantan. The species is assessed as Endangered.
Previously Published Red List Assessments
1998 – Critically Endangered (CR)
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.1998.RLTS.T33118A9758195.en
1998 – Vulnerable (V)
Geographic Range
Range Description:
The species is native to Kalimantan, Sarawak and Brunei.
Country Occurrence:
Native: Brunei Darussalam; Indonesia (Kalimantan); Malaysia (Sarawak)
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Shorea inaequilateralis – published in 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T33118A149070891.en
1
Population
Overall the population size is not known. The population of the species is decreasing as it occurs in
threatened peat swamp forest habitat. There is variation in extent of decline between states. In
Sarawak, using Global Forest Watch, it is inferred that the habitat of the species has declined by 46%
between 2000 and 2019. In Kalimantan, the species is considered to experience an equivalent habitat
loss, but the species is only found in one locality there. Despite the occurrence of this locality in a
protected area, the site is still at risk from continuing threats due to encroachment of the National Park.
In Brunei, the subpopulation will be more stable as trees occur in protected areas. Considering a period
of 160 years (1959 to 2119 – two generations), the species is likely to experience a decline of at least
50%.
Current Population Trend:ÊÊDecreasing
Habitat and Ecology (see Appendix for additional information)
This tree species can grow to 45 m tall (Ashton 2004). It grows in mixed peat-swamp forests.
Systems:ÊÊTerrestrial
Use and Trade
This species is used for timber, which can be used for construction.
Threats (see Appendix for additional information)
The species is threatened by the expansion of palm oil plantations, which are destroying the species'
native habitat. The species is also threatened by logging operations. Logging has multiple threats to the
species as mature trees are removed for timber and the current cutting cycle is too quick for the slow
growth rate of the species, hence trees do not reach maturity. Logging also encourages the expansion of
logging roads which degrades and fragments the habitat of the species (Gaveau et al. 2014).
Conservation Actions (see Appendix for additional information)
This species is not present in ex situ collections. It is recommended that these are made for the species.
In Kalimantan the species is present in a National Park, however threats still remain within this
protected area. It is provisionally assessed in this state as Vulnerable. In Sarawak the species is found in
one Totally Protected Area, it is assessed as Critically Endangered in this state (Julia et al. 2016). More
habitat protection is needed for this species.
Credits
Assessor(s): Randi, A., Julia, S., Tanggaraju, S., Maryani, A., Bodos, V., Hamidi, A. & Juiling, S.
Reviewer(s): Barstow, M.
Contributor(s): Khoo, E., Kusumadewi, Y., Ling, C.Y., Maycock, C.R., Pereira, J., Robiansyah, I., Tsen,
S., Hoo, P.K. & Ashton, P.
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Shorea inaequilateralis – published in 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T33118A149070891.en
2
Bibliography
Ashton, P.S. 1982. Dipterocarpaceae. In: C.G.G.J. Van Steenis (ed.), Flora Malesiana.
Ashton, P.S. 1990. Annotations to: conservation status listings for Dipterocarpaceae.
Ashton, P.S. 2004. Dipterocarpaceae. In: E. Soepadmo, L.G. Saw and R.C.K. Chung (eds), Tree Flora of
Sabah and Sarawak, pp. 63-388. Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Sabah Forestry
Department, Sandakan and Sarawak Forestry Department, Kuching.
Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A.W., de la Torre, J. and Scott, B. 2011. Supporting Red List threat
assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: V. Smith and L. Penev (eds) e-
Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. Zookeys 150: 117-126.
BGCI. 2019. PlantSearch. Botanic Gardens Conservation International Available at:
http://www.bgci.org/plant_search.php/. (Accessed: 19 July 2019).
Bryan, J.E., Shearman, P.L., Asner, G.P., Knapp, D.E., Aoro, G. and Lokes, B. 2013. Extreme differences in
forest degradation in Borneo: comparing practices in Sarawak, Sabah, and Brunei. Plos one 8(7): 1-7.
Gaveau, D.L.A., Sloan, S., Molidena, E., Yaen, H., Sheil, D., Abram, N.K., Ancrenaz, M., Nasi, R., Quinones,
M., Wielaard., N. and Meijaard, E. 2014. Four decades of forest persistence, clearance and logging on
Borneo. PLoS One 9(7): e101654.
Gaveau, D.L., Sheil, D., Salim, M.A., Arjasakusuma, S., Ancrenaz, M., Pacheco, P. and Meijaard, E. 2016.
Rapid conversions and avoided deforestation: examining four decades of industrial plantation expansion
in Borneo. Scientific Reports 6: 32017.
GBIF. 2019. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: http://data.gbif.org/species/.
(Accessed: 2019).
IUCN. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-3. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org.
(Accessed: 10 December 2019).
Julia, S. and Vilma, B. 2016. Sarawak Plant Red List: Dipterocarpaceae Series II: Anisoptera, Cotylelobium,
Hopea, Parashorea, Upuna and Vatica.In: Sarawak Forestry (ed.), Sarawak Forestry.
World Resources Institute. 2019. Global Forest Watch. Available at: http://www.globalforestwatch.org/.
(Accessed: January 18).
Citation
Randi, A., Julia, S., Tanggaraju, S., Maryani, A., Bodos, V., Hamidi, A. & Juiling, S. 2019. Shorea
inaequilateralis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T33118A149070891.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T33118A149070891.en
Disclaimer
To make use of this information, please check the Terms of Use.
External Resources
For Images and External Links to Additional Information, please see the Red List website.
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Shorea inaequilateralis – published in 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T33118A149070891.en
3
Appendix
Habitats
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Habitat Season Suitability Major
Importance?
1. Forest -> 1.8. Forest - Subtropical/Tropical Swamp - Suitable -
Plant Growth Forms
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Plant Growth Forms
Tree - large
Threats
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Impact Score
2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> 2.1. Annual &
perennial non-timber crops -> 2.1.3. Agro-industry
farming
Ongoing Majority (50-
90%)
Rapid declines Medium
impact: 7
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
2. Species Stresses -> 2.2. Species disturbance
2. Agriculture & aquaculture -> 2.2. Wood & pulp
plantations -> 2.2.2. Agro-industry plantations
Ongoing Majority (50-
90%)
Rapid declines Medium
impact: 7
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.1. Ecosystem conversion
1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
2. Species Stresses -> 2.2. Species disturbance
5. Biological resource use -> 5.3. Logging & wood
harvesting -> 5.3.2. Intentional use: (large scale)
[harvest]
Ongoing Majority (50-
90%)
Rapid declines Medium
impact: 7
Stresses: 1. Ecosystem stresses -> 1.2. Ecosystem degradation
2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality
2. Species Stresses -> 2.2. Species disturbance
Conservation Actions in Place
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Conservation Actions in Place
In-Place Land/Water Protection and Management
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Shorea inaequilateralis – published in 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T33118A149070891.en
4
Conservation Actions in Place
Occur in at least one PA: Yes
In-Place Species Management
Subject to ex-situ conservation: No
Conservation Actions Needed
(http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes)
Conservation Actions Needed
1. Land/water protection -> 1.2. Resource & habitat protection
3. Species management -> 3.4. Ex-situ conservation -> 3.4.1. Captive breeding/artificial propagation
3. Species management -> 3.4. Ex-situ conservation -> 3.4.2. Genome resource bank
Additional Data Fields
Habitats and Ecology
Generation Length (years): 80
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Shorea inaequilateralis – published in 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T33118A149070891.en
5
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™
ISSN 2307-8235 (online)
IUCN 2019: T33118A149070891
Scope: Global
Language: English
The IUCN Red List Partnership
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species
Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership.
The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens
Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew;
Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London.
THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™
© The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Shorea inaequilateralis – published in 2019.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T33118A149070891.en
6
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
New plantations can either cause deforestation by replacing natural forests or avoid this by using previously cleared areas. The extent of these two situations is contested in tropical biodiversity hotspots where objective data are limited. Here, we explore delays between deforestation and the establishment of industrial tree plantations on Borneo using satellite imagery. Between 1973 and 2015 an estimated 18.7 Mha of Borneo’s old-growth forest were cleared (14.4 Mha and 4.2 Mha in Indonesian and Malaysian Borneo). Industrial plantations expanded by 9.1 Mha (7.8 Mha oil-palm; 1.3 Mha pulpwood). Approximately 7.0 Mha of the total plantation area in 2015 (9.2 Mha) were old-growth forest in 1973, of which 4.5–4.8 Mha (24–26% of Borneo-wide deforestation) were planted within five years of forest clearance (3.7–3.9 Mha oil-palm; 0.8–0.9 Mha pulpwood). This rapid within-five-year conversion has been greater in Malaysia than in Indonesia (57–60% versus 15–16%). In Indonesia, a higher proportion of oil-palm plantations was developed on already cleared degraded lands (a legacy of recurrent forest fires). However, rapid conversion of Indonesian forests to industrial plantations has increased steeply since 2005. We conclude that plantation industries have been the principle driver of deforestation in Malaysian Borneo over the last four decades. In contrast, their role in deforestation in Indonesian Borneo was less marked, but has been growing recently. We note caveats in interpreting these results and highlight the need for greater accountability in plantation development.
Article
Full-text available
The native forests of Borneo have been impacted by selective logging, fire, and conversion to plantations at unprecedented scales since industrial-scale extractive industries began in the early 1970s. There is no island-wide documentation of forest clearance or logging since the 1970s. This creates an information gap for conservation planning, especially with regard to selectively logged forests that maintain high conservation potential. Analysing LANDSAT images, we estimate that 75.7% (558,060 km2) of Borneo's area (737,188 km2) was forested around 1973. Based upon a forest cover map for 2010 derived using ALOS-PALSAR and visually reviewing LANDSAT images, we estimate that the 1973 forest area had declined by 168,493 km2 (30.2%) in 2010. The highest losses were recorded in Sabah and Kalimantan with 39.5% and 30.7% of their total forest area in 1973 becoming non-forest in 2010, and the lowest in Brunei and Sarawak (8.4%, and 23.1%). We estimate that the combined area planted in industrial oil palm and timber plantations in 2010 was 75,480 km2, representing 10% of Borneo. We mapped 271,819 km of primary logging roads that were created between 1973 and 2010. The greatest density of logging roads was found in Sarawak, at 0.89 km km-2, and the lowest density in Brunei, at 0.18 km km-2. Analyzing MODIS-based tree cover maps, we estimate that logging operated within 700 m of primary logging roads. Using this distance, we estimate that 266,257 km2 of 1973 forest cover has been logged. With 389,566 km2 (52.8%) of the island remaining forested, of which 209,649 km2 remains intact. There is still hope for biodiversity conservation in Borneo. Protecting logged forests from fire and conversion to plantations is an urgent priority for reducing rates of deforestation in Borneo.
Article
Full-text available
The Malaysian states of Sabah and Sarawak are global hotspots of forest loss and degradation due to timber and oil palm industries; however, the rates and patterns of change have remained poorly measured by conventional field or satellite approaches. Using 30 m resolution optical imagery acquired since 1990, forest cover and logging roads were mapped throughout Malaysian Borneo and Brunei using the Carnegie Landsat Analysis System. We uncovered ∼364,000 km of roads constructed through the forests of this region. We estimated that in 2009 there were at most 45,400 km(2) of intact forest ecosystems in Malaysian Borneo and Brunei. Critically, we found that nearly 80% of the land surface of Sabah and Sarawak was impacted by previously undocumented, high-impact logging or clearing operations from 1990 to 2009. This contrasted strongly with neighbouring Brunei, where 54% of the land area remained covered by unlogged forest. Overall, only 8% and 3% of land area in Sabah and Sarawak, respectively, was covered by intact forests under designated protected areas. Our assessment shows that very few forest ecosystems remain intact in Sabah or Sarawak, but that Brunei, by largely excluding industrial logging from its borders, has been comparatively successful in protecting its forests.
Article
Full-text available
GeoCAT is an open source, browser based tool that performs rapid geospatial analysis to ease the process of Red Listing taxa. Developed to utilise spatially referenced primary occurrence data, the analysis focuses on two aspects of the geographic range of a taxon: the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO). These metrics form part of the IUCN Red List categories and criteria and have often proved challenging to obtain in an accurate, consistent and repeatable way. Within a familiar Google Maps environment, GeoCAT users can quickly and easily combine data from multiple sources such as GBIF, Flickr and Scratchpads as well as user generated occurrence data. Analysis is done with the click of a button and is visualised instantly, providing an indication of the Red List threat rating, subject to meeting the full requirements of the criteria. Outputs including the results, data and parameters used for analysis are stored in a GeoCAT file that can be easily reloaded or shared with collaborators. GeoCAT is a first step toward automating the data handling process of Red List assessing and provides a valuable hub from which further developments and enhancements can be spawned.
Annotations to: conservation status listings for Dipterocarpaceae
  • P S Ashton
Ashton, P.S. 1990. Annotations to: conservation status listings for Dipterocarpaceae.
Global Biodiversity Information Facility
  • Gbif
GBIF. 2019. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available at: http://data.gbif.org/species/. (Accessed: 2019).