Conference PaperPDF Available

Seismicity in 2019 in the Great Southern region of Western Australia

Authors:
  • Seismological Assocation of Australia

Abstract and Figures

Much of the seismicity in southwest WA occurs in localised groups of recurring earthquakes, or clusters. Four potential cluster sites have been identified in the Great Southern Region of WA in the period January to November 2019. A group near Newdegate contained the largest event of the year (ML 4.3), and it is suggested these events belong to an earthquake group first identified in 2016. The three other groups identified are near Denmark, Gnowangerup and Ongerup. Relocations of many of the events using the VIC5A earth model suggests tighter groupings for the events than the published Geoscience Australia locations. The Gnowangerup and Ongerup groups are also close spatially, and there may be a causal link between the groups. The region has been categorised as a region of relatively low seismicity, and the higher numbers of events in 2019 may be related to the occurrence of two ML 5 event in Lake Muir in late 2018. .
Content may be subject to copyright.
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2019 conference, 30 Nov 01 Dec, Newcastle.
Seismicity in 2019 in the Great Southern region of Western Australia
Vic Dent1 & David Love 2
1. University Associate, Curtin University, Perth, W.A.; Honorary Research Associate, The UWA Institute of
Agriculture, UWA Perth: Email: vic_dent@yahoo.com
2. Seismological Association of Australia, Adelaide, South Australia; Email: david@earthquake.net.au
Abstract
Much of the seismicity in southwest WA occurs in localised groups of recurring earthquakes, or clusters.
Four potential cluster sites have been identified in the Great Southern Region of WA in the period January
to November 2019. A group near Newdegate contained the largest event of the year (ML 4.3), and it is
suggested these events belong to an earthquake group first identified in 2016. The three other groups
identified are near Denmark, Gnowangerup and Ongerup. Relocations of many of the events using the
VIC5A earth model suggests tighter groupings for the events than the published Geoscience Australia
locations. The Gnowangerup and Ongerup groups are also close spatially, and there may be a causal link
between the groups. The region has been categorised as a region of relatively low seismicity, and the higher
numbers of events in 2019 may be related to the occurrence of two ML 5 event in Lake Muir in late 2018.
.
1 Introduction
The Great Southern region of Western Australia (GSR) is an important agricultural area, in the southern part of
the WA wheatbelt. The principal towns are Albany and Katanning. It also constitutes the southern region of the
southwest seismic zone (SWSZ), defined by Doyle (1971), and in the vicinity of “seismic zone 1” of Gaull &
Leiba (1987). This region is considered generally less seismically active than the region to the north (Gaull &
Leiba’s “zone 2”), which includes the Meckering and Cadoux regions. However two ML 5 events were recorded
Figure 1 Events in The Great Southern region of WA, ML ≥ 1.8, Jan. 2017- Nov. 2019
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2019 conference, 30 Nov 01 Dec, Newcastle.
near Lake Muir (Figure 1) in September and November 2018, and about 800 (mostly ML < 1.5) aftershocks were
recorded by Geoscience Australia (GA) up to February 2019 (Clark et al., 2019).
GA’s Neotectonic Features Database shows four probable neotectonic fault scarps in the region, of which the best
defined is a 36 km long scarp south-west of Dumbleyung (Figure 1). Clark (2010) suggests the most recent
movement on this scarp was about 8,000 years ago. Other scarps in the region are near Katanning, Tambellup and
Nyabing.
Much of the seismicity in the SWSZ occurs in localised clusters. Dent (2016) has suggested there are about 60
cluster locations which have been active in the SWSZ over the last ~10 years. They have been labelled according
to the zone they occur in, and the zones are based on latitude. Zones A to F are between 30 and 33 degrees south.
Zone G is 33-34 degrees south, and zone H is 34 to 35 degrees south. Five cluster locations have so far been
identified in zone G and one in zone H, as shown in Table 1, and plotted on Figure 1. These locations are the
assumed centres of reasonably well-defined groups of earthquakes in the past 6 years, and it is suggested that the
locations may also be the focus of future activity.
The 2019 seismicity of the GSR is shown in Figure 1. It shows 7 events of ML 3.0 and above. Four probable
cluster groupings evident in this plot will be
described in more detail below. They are (1)
near Newdegate, (2) north of Denmark, (3)
northeast of Gnowangerup, and (4) north of
Ongerup. Other smaller cluster groups could
also be present. Many of the 2019 events in the
GSR have been relocated. The relocations use
the VIC5A earth model, and generally include
some new data from the “Public Seismic
Network” or PSN (Dent, 2013). A number of
PSN stations have operated near Gnowangerup
since 2008, and GNOT (in the town), opened
January 2017, has contributed data to many of
the relocations. A “seismometers in schools
seismograph (Balfour et al., 2013) at Albany
(AUALB), installed in 2012, also contributes
some useful data.
Figure 2 Events near Newdegate and their relocations
Table 1 Cluster locations previously identified in the Great Southern Region
ID
location
Latitude
Longitude
Largest event
G1
S of Dumbleyung
-33.46
117.66
ML 2.9 (July 2013)
G2
N of Kojonup
-33.69
117.03
ML 3.5 (Oct 2011)
G3
SE of Newdegate
-34.23
119.16
ML 4.3 (July 2019)
G4
West of Nyabing
-33.50
117.92
ML 2.9 (Dec 2015)
G5
NW of Gnowangerup
-33.84
117.94
ML 2.4 (Apr 2013)
H1
N of Rocky Gully
-34.35
117.05
ML 2.9 (June 2013)
* . Indicates ID used in Dent (2016)
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2019 conference, 30 Nov 01 Dec, Newcastle.
2.1 Southeast of Newdegate
Dent (2016) defined a cluster location in the vicinity of Newdegate (G3) , based on a group of events in June
2015. The largest event in this group was ML 2.8.
The largest event in the area in 2019 was an ML 4.3 event on 20 June (Figure 2). There are five other events near
this event (four on 20 June and a small event on 16 Jan). The relocation of four of the events (Table 2) moves
them by up to 20 km, and closer to cluster centre G3. The ML 4.3 event moves to within 2 km of G3.
In 2018 six events occurred in the area of the 2019 activity (3 in July 2018, including the largest, ML 2.8). It
seems likely that the 2018 and 2019 events represent continuing activity at this cluster centre, but the ML 4.3 of
July 2019 is clearly the largest event in at least four years of activity.
2.2 North of Denmark
There are six events in this group, between 01 Aug
and 13 Sept 2019 (Figure 3 and Table 2). The largest
event (ML 3.8) was the initial event, and the following
four occurred over the following 5 weeks. The GA
location of the main event seems remote from the next
five, but it has a high RMS of residuals (Table 2). GA
assigned a depth of 10 km to all events. Three of the
events in the group have been relocated (using the
VIC5A model), and it seems to bring the main event
closer to the following events, and moves it about 10
km north. A common location is suggested at 34.67oS,
117.48oE The largest event has a depth of 8 km and
the RMS of residuals is low, suggesting it is a good
location. These were the first events recorded in the
Denmark area for at least 20 years.
Figure 3 Events near Denmark, and their
relocations. Event numbers refer to Table 2.
Table 2 Locations/relocations of events near Newdegate and Denmark, 2019
Ref
#
Date/Time
GA location
ML
Phases
/stns
Rms
(sec)
Region
Relocation
reloc
Depth
(km)
Phases
/stns
Rms
(sec)
Lat
Lon
Lat
Lon
16/1 1404
-33.14
119.22
1.9
8/5
0.28
Newdegate
-33.14
119.20
9.9
10/8
0.10
20/6 0655
-33.24
119.16
2.3
7/4
0.40
Newdegate
20/6 1430
-33.10
119.33
4.3
27/19
1.04
Newdegate
-33.21
119.19
9.5
10/7
0.18
20/6 1441
-33.19
119.23
2.5
12/7
1.12
Newdegate
-33.26
119.14
2.3
11/7
0.23
20/6 1511
-33.07
119.07
1.9
5/3
0.75
Newdegate
-33.25
119.12
5.9
5/3
0.19
20/6 1547
-33.20
119.17
2.1
7/4
0.78
Newdegate
1
01/8 1649
-34.70
117.56
3.8
19/27
1.10
Denmark
-34.67
117.48
4.1
9/7
0.14
2
06/8 2006
-34.76
117.42
2.3
4/8
0.69
Denmark
3
23/8 2151
-34.75
117.43
2.2
6/10
0.47
Denmark
4
31/8 0556
-34.76
117.43
2.8
8/13
0.58
Denmark
-34.69
117.47
8.5
9/5
0.13
5
09/9 0853
-34.74
117.39
2.5
7/10
0.52
Denmark
-34.65
117.47
2.0
5/3
0.20
6
13/9 1232
-34.78
117.42
2.1
5/10
0.78
Denmark
Ref # - refers to Figure 3
########
22/2
1403
22/2
1543
22/2
1543
1-Mar
3/3 2206
2206??
2218
11/3
0006
21/4
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2019 conference, 30 Nov 01 Dec, Newcastle.
2.3 Northeast of Gnowangerup
There are 22 events in this group (Figures 4, 5 and 6, & Table 3), most of which have been relocated. Relocations
which have GNOT data can be expected to be more accurate. Most events are between February and March 2019,
although the first event was 31 Dec 2018. There was one magnitude 3 event, on 11 March 2019 (ML 3.5).
The GA locations are quite scattered over about 40 km., but the relocations (Figures 4 and 5) suggest a tighter
grouping. Relocation of the main event (ML 3.5) moves it about 10 km westwards, and closer to other events in
the group. A possible northwest trend to the events could be suggested, but with a probable epicentral
uncertainties of at least +/-5 km, this trend is speculative. Note that trends can be introduced by poor azimuthal
distribution of the recording seismographs.
A common location for the group is suggested at 33.87oS, 118.10oE, close to the relocated position of the main
event.
Figure 4 Events near Gnowangerup and Ongerup, and their relocations. Event numbers near Ongerup
refer to Table 3.
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2019 conference, 30 Nov 01 Dec, Newcastle.
2.4 North of Ongerup There are six events in this group (Figures 4 and Table 3). The activity appearing to
begin in November 2018 with an ML 2.7 event, and continuing until at least August 2019. The largest event was
ML 3.6 on 13 January 2019, and there were two other ML 3 events. Relocations bring them closer together. The
probable location seems to be about 4 km northwest of Ongerup, the suggested coordinates being 33.96oS,
118.47oE.
Note that the Ongerup events are “swarm-like” (ie, the largest event is not at the beginning). Note also that there
were more ML 3 events than ML 2 events. They are also relatively ‘spread-out” over 2019.
Figure 5 Events near Gnowangerup (enlarged)
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2019 conference, 30 Nov 01 Dec, Newcastle.
2.5 Other historical activity in the area of Figure 4
Cluster location G5 was named in Dent (2017) on the basis of an ML 2.4 event in April 2014, and about 20 small
events (max ~ ML 1.5) recorded by the seismograph GNOC in August 2016. It is about 10 km west of the 2019
activity, and its estimated uncertainty is about +/- 5 km.
Table 3 Locations/ relocations, of events near Gnowangerup and Ongerup, 2019
Ref
#
Date/time
GA location*
ga
Mag
Region
relocation
reloc
dep
Rms
Lat.
Long.
ML
Latitude
Longitude
Km
sec
1
04/11/18 1348
33.96
118.54
2.7
Ongerup
-33.983
118.582
15.3
.144
31/12/18 2336
33.86
118.06
2.1
-33.859
118.117
11.4
.110
2
13/01/19 1943
33.96
118.52
3.6
Ongerup
-33.950
118.498
14.8
.144
28/01/19 0647
33.89
118.08
2.2
-33.834
118.050
4.1
.172
Closest stn LM01
22/02/19 1403
33.87
118.23
2.5
-33.876
118.081
7.2
.252
22/02/19 1543
33.78
118.14
2.5
-33.801
118.092
7.7
.367
26/02/19 1238
33.74
118.19
2.2
-33.867
118.121
2.6
.09
No stns to sth
01/03/19 1246
33.86
118.25
2.6
-33.880
118.088
4.4
.18
03/03/19 1926
33.77
118.08
2.2
-33.847
118.056
11.3
.37
03/03/19 2053
33.61
118.04
2.3
-33.848
118.100
9.3
.212
big move south
03/03/19 2206
33.67
118.11
2.4
-33.846
118.127
0.8
.09
big move south
03/03/19 2236
33.76
118.09
2.0
-33.829
118.115
2.2
.11
03/03/19 2218
33.72
118.11
2.3
-33.847
118.090
4.3
.16
3
6/03/19 0659
33.92
118.55
3.2
Ongerup
-33.949
118.448
2.9
.49
06/03/19 0745
33.73
118.11
2.4
11/03/19 0006
33.83
118.21
3.5
Gnowang.
-33.864
118.117
9.5
.094
21/03/19 1854
33.87
118.16
2.5
-33.882
118.122
5.8
.189
13/04/19 1618
33.94
118.17
2.5
-33.904
118.150
7.3
.255
20/04/19 1032
33.90
118.12
2.5
-33.910
118.141
10.9
.096
20/04/19 1123
33.87
118.07
2.3
-33.871
118.081
9.6
.126
20/04/19 1254
33.89
118.12
2.3
-33.889
118.115
11.7
.094
21/04/19 1544
33.83
118.01
2.1
-33.860
118.087
9.5
.191
21/04/19 1613
33.87
118.09
2.0
-33.862
118.072
10.6
.134
4
28/8/19 0204
33.94
118.44
3.1
Ongerup
-33.955
118.465
15.2
.06
.059
03/08/19 1841
33.88
118.27
2.2
5
30/08/19 0054
33.94
118.39
2.8
Ongerup
-33.938
118.451
7.4
.118
06/09/19 0734
33.69
117.93
2.5
-33.703
117.983
10.2
.227
6
07/11/19 0124
34.00
118.51
2.3
Ongerup
########
22/2
1403
22/2
1543
22/2
1543
1-Mar
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2019 conference, 30 Nov 01 Dec, Newcastle.
A cluster of small events (largest ML 2.3) was recorded by a temporary network around the seismograph ONG1
between November 1990 and March 1991 (Dent, 2008). Another cluster of small events (largest ML 2.3) occurred
in the vicinity of the seismograph GNOW between November 2007 and March 2008 (Dent, 2008). Only two of
these events were recorded by the GA network, but many hundreds of smaller ones were felt at the location of
GNOW.
3 Discussion
Note that, besides being relatively close spatially (ie, about 30 km apart), the Gnowangerup and Ongerup groups
are roughly contemporaneous, suggesting a connection between the two groups. Contemporaneous activity in two
neighbouring cluster groups has been noted before in the SWSZ, eg. activity at clusters west of Beacon and north
of Koorda in 2012, and north of Hyden and north of Holt Rock in 2013 (Dent & Collins, 2018).
The Newdegate sequence demonstrates clusters can be active over several years at least. As these events are
“recent” (all in 2019), it is likely that more events near these locations may be noted in 2020 and probably
onwards. Better locations of future events may allow refinement of the suggested “common locations”.
As noted earlier, the relocations presented here were made using the VIC5A earth model. The depths computed,
as indicated in Tables 2 and 3, seem on average to be a little greater than 10 km. This is a significant change to
earlier studies, where the earth model used was WA2 (with higher seismic velocities), and the average focal depth
was below 5 km. A focal depth of 10km is the adopted value for GA earthquake locations in most of WA, and this
suggests that the WA2 model may not be appropriate for use in this region.
Figure 5 Time vs Magnitude plot for events near Gnowangerup and Ongerup
Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2019 conference, 30 Nov 01 Dec, Newcastle.
4 Conclusions
Four earthquake cluster groups active in the GSR in 2019 have been identified, assisted by relocations which
generally use additional data. Possible source locations for the groups are suggested. The temporal and spatial
closeness of the Ongerup and Gnowangerup groups suggests a connection between the groups, but its nature is
unknown. The VIC5A earth model produces epicentres with deeper focal depths than the WA2 model, and of the
models available at present, may be the best one to use in the region.
5 Acknowledgements
Thanks to Clive Collins for his meticulous edits and comments on the report.
References
Balfour, N., Salmon, M. and Sambridge, M. (2013). The Australian Seismometers in Schools Network: a
multipurpose network for education, research and monitoring. In Proc. AEES 2013 Conference, Hobart.
Clark, D. (2010). Identification of Quaternary scarps in southwest and central west Western Australia using DEM-
based hill shading: application to seismic hazard assessment and neotectonics, International Journal of Remote
Sensing, 31, 6297-6325.
Clark, D. J., S. Brennand, G. Brenn, T. I. Allen, M. C. Garthwaite, and S. Standen (2019). The 2018 Lake Muir
earthquake sequence, southwest Western Australia: rethinking Australian stable continental region earthquakes,
Solid Earth Discussion papers, in review. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-125.
Dent, V.F. (2008). Improved Hypocentral estimates for two recent seismic events in south-western Western
Australia, using temporary station data. In Proc. AEES 2008 Conference, Ballarat, paper 22.
Dent, V. F. (2013). Using the “PSN” network in southwest Australia to improve earthquake locations in the
region. In Proc. AEES 2013 Conference, Hobart.
Dent, V. F. (2016). A preliminary map of cluster locations in southwest Western Australia, 1990 2016. In
Proc. AEES 2016 Conference, Melbourne.
Dent, V.F., (2017). Earthquake clusters in the southwest Australia seismic zone, June 2016- May 2017. In Proc.
AEES 2017 Conference, Canberra.
Dent, V. F., and Collins. C. (2018). Clustered seismicity in southwest Australia, June 2012 May 2013. In Proc.
AEES 2018 Conference, Perth.
Doyle, H. A. (1971). Seismicity and structure in Australia. Bull. Of the Royal Soc. Of New Zealand, 9 149-152.
Gaull, B. A. & Michael-Leiba, M. O. (1987). Probabilistic earthquake risk maps of southwest Western Australia
B.M.R. Journ. Aust. Geol. & Geoph. (10) 145-151.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Earthquake clustering has long been noted as a significant feature of the seismicity of southwest Western Australia. The cluster locations are of significance because they are sites of repeating seismicity for over a decade or more. Fifty-one cluster centres have been previously defined, mostly from seismicity during the 2012-2017 period. Seismicity during 2017-2020 is reviewed here, resulting in the identification of 28 cluster centres active during this period. Of these, 14 had been active prior to 2017 and 14 are new. The most significant of these were northwest of Beacon, representing ongoing activity, and north of Ravensthorpe, which is a new location. The cluster centres in southwest Western Australia appear to define a NNW trend, as has been noted in earlier studies, and may correlate with the granitoid components of the geology in that region of the Yilgarn craton. The northern region of the study area has more cluster locations than the southern region, which is consistent with earlier studies of the seismicity of the region.
Article
Full-text available
Modern geodetic and seismic monitoring tools are enabling the study of moderate-sized earthquake sequences in unprecedented detail. Here we use a variety of methods to examine surface deformation caused by a sequence of earthquakes near Lake Muir in southwest Western Australia in 2018. A shallow MW 5.3 earthquake on the 16th of September 2018 was followed on the 8th of November 2018 by a MW 5.2 event in the same region. Focal mechanisms for the events suggest reverse and strike-slip rupture, respectively. Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) analysis of the events suggests that the ruptures are in part spatially coincident. Field mapping, guided by the InSAR results, reveals that the first event produced an approximately 3 km long and up to 0.5 m high west-facing surface rupture, consistent with slip on a moderately east-dipping fault. Double difference hypocentre relocation of aftershocks using data from rapidly deployed seismic instrumentation confirms an east-dipping rupture plane for the first event, and shows a concentration located at the northern end of the rupture where the InSAR suggests greatest vertical displacement. The November event resulted from rupture on a northeast-trending strike-slip fault. UAV-derived digital terrain models (differenced with pre-event LiDAR) reveal a surface deformation envelope consistent with the InSAR for the first event, but could not discern deformation unique to the second event. New rupture length versus magnitude scaling relationships developed for non-extended cratonic regions as part of this study allow for the distinction between “visible” surface rupture lengths (VSRL) from field-mapping and “detectable” surface rupture lengths (DSRL) from remote sensing techniques such as InSAR, and suggest longer ruptures for a given magnitude than implied by commonly used scaling relationships.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Earthquake clusters in southwestern Western Australia between 1990 and 2016 have been mapped using a visual perusal of the Geoscience Australia earthquake catalogue. Also plotted are 36 relatively well-determined clusters (Dent 2014, 2015, 2016), from re-evaluation of epicentres mostly between 2014 and 2016. Approximately 100 centres have been identified, but further examination may show that some closely-spaced centres are actually coincident; a cluster of apparent clusters. Many smaller cluster groups may also be present in the data-set. Significant non-clustered activity in the period is also discussed. The majority of the seismicity in the area over the 26-year period examined occurs in clusters, and this pattern may also reflect the distribution of seismicity over a much longer term. The presence of cluster groups in a presentation of historical WA activity by Everingham (1966) is noted.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This report is the 4th in a series of annual reports describing the annual seismicity of the South West Australia (SWA) zone since June 2013. In previous reports, 36 earthquake cluster localities were identified. In this report, covering the period June 2016-May 2017, 101 of the 207 events located by Geoscience Australia in the SWA zone have been relocated using extra data. Of the 207 events, about 170 have been allocated to one of 19 centres identified as being active during the year. Ten of these centres were identified in previous annual reports, and nine have been noted for the first time. However, of these nine, at least five were also active prior to 2013. The relocations have resulted in a number of good focal depth determinations, all less than 7 km, and it is implied that most focal depths in the zone are less than 5 km. Identification of additional events not located by GA suggests that the magnitude-completeness level in SWA is above the ML 1.6 level previously suggested.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Article
Full-text available
New earthquake risk maps of SW Western Australia including continental margins have been prepared. The risk is depicted as contours of peak ground velocity, acceleration, and ground intensity with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. The maps are based on the Cornell-McGuire methodology. Ten earthquake source zones have been thus defined and corresponding recurrence relations derived. We recommend a microzonation study of Perth and installation of more strong-motion instruments to improve our risk estimates, which should be updated in 5-10 years. -from Authors
Article
An examination of regionally extensive hill-shaded Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 90 m resolution and Department of Land Information (DLI) 10 m resolution digital elevation data, and discussions with government and industry geologists familiar with the local geology, has resulted in the identification of 38 previously unrecognized linear topographic scarps in the southwest and central west of Western Australia. I contend that most of these relate to Quaternary surface-rupturing earthquakes. If validated, this more than doubles the number of Quaternary fault scarps known from this area, bringing the total to 60. The newly recognized scarps average between 25 and 50 km in length and from ∼1.5 to 20 m in height. The geometric, recurrence and spatial attributes of these features make it possible to propose a model describing the causative seismicity. The model contends that uniform contractional strain in the ductile lithosphere manifests as localized, transient and recurrent brittle deformation in zones of pre-existing crustal weakness in the upper lithosphere. The data presented allow for ready calculation of the maximum probable magnitude earthquake for the southwest of Western Australia, and identify ‘earthquake-prone’ regions of interest to seismic hazard assessors.
The Australian Seismometers in Schools Network: a multipurpose network for education, research and monitoring
  • N Balfour
  • M Salmon
  • M Sambridge
Balfour, N., Salmon, M. and Sambridge, M. (2013). The Australian Seismometers in Schools Network: a multipurpose network for education, research and monitoring. In Proc. AEES 2013 Conference, Hobart.
Improved Hypocentral estimates for two recent seismic events in south-western Western Australia, using temporary station data
  • V F Dent
Dent, V.F. (2008). Improved Hypocentral estimates for two recent seismic events in south-western Western Australia, using temporary station data. In Proc. AEES 2008 Conference, Ballarat, paper 22.
Using the "PSN" network in southwest Australia to improve earthquake locations in the region
  • V F Dent
Dent, V. F. (2013). Using the "PSN" network in southwest Australia to improve earthquake locations in the region. In Proc. AEES 2013 Conference, Hobart.
Seismicity and structure in Australia
  • H A Doyle
Doyle, H. A. (1971). Seismicity and structure in Australia. Bull. Of the Royal Soc. Of New Zealand, 9 149-152.