Content uploaded by Laura Cañadas
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Laura Cañadas on Jan 01, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Published 01 January 2020
https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2020/1).139.05
EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA Y DEPORTES
OPEN ACCESS
EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA Y DEPORTES
EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA Y DEPORTES
139
139
er
1. trimestre (enero-marzo) 2020
ISSN-1577-4015
er
1. trimestre (enero-marzo) 2020
ISSN: 2014-0983
33
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
ISSUE 139
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
Physical Education Teachers’
Competencies and Assessment
in Professional Practice
Laura Cañadas*, María Luisa Santos-Pastor and Francisco Javier Castejón
Department of Physical Education, Sport and Human Motricity. Faculty of Teacher Training and Education,
Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain
Cite this article:
Cañadas, L., Santos-Pastor, M. L., & Castejón, F. J. (2019). Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies
and Assessment in Professional Practice. Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes, 139, 33-41. https://doi.
org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2020/1).139.05
Resumen
Pre-service Physical Education teacher training should develop key competencies
that guide graduates in their professional work. The application of the formative as-
sessment at this stage is presented as a way for them to acquire these compe-
tencies. This research assesses graduates’ perception of the development of key
teaching competencies and whether there are significant differences depending on
whether or not they are working as teachers. The relationship between some el-
ements of assessment and grading and the development of competencies is also
studied. Four hundred and eighty-seven graduates from seventeen Spanish univer-
sities participated. The results show that (a) there are no differences in the perception
of the competencies acquired depending on whether or not graduates are working;
(b) graduates who are working as teachers positively relate the assessment items
to two of the three sets of competencies studied, and participative forms of grading
to the competencies of development, application and assessment of teaching and
learning processes in physical education; and (c) those who are working believe that
using formative assessment during their pre-service training has helped them put the
teaching competencies into practice in their professional work.
Keywords: pedagogical knowledge, pre-service training, physical education, for-
mative assessment, key competency
Editor:
© Generalitat de Catalunya
Departament de la Presidència
Institut Nacional d’Educació
Física de Catalunya (INEFC)
ISSN: 2014-0983
*Corresponding author:
Laura Cañadas
laura.cannadas@uam.es
Section:
Physical Education
Received:
02 October 2017
Accepted:
14 June 2018
Published:
01 January 2020
33
L. Cañadas et al. Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
34
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
Introduction
One of the main goals of the European Higher Educa-
tion Area (EHEA) is to adapt university degrees to em-
ployment demands. Universities should provide train-
ing that guarantees jobs for graduates, facilitates their
inclusion in the working world and is adapted to its
demands (Cardona-Rodríguez et al., 2016). Graduates
should positively perceive the suitability of their train-
ing to successfully meet employment demands (Elias 7
Purcell, 2004); however, in many cases, the training
received is deemed insufficient for this purpose (Gil et
al., 2009).
This gap would appear to exist in teacher training
(Towers, 2013). The development of the key teaching
competencies is fundamental for the teachers’ future em-
ployability, not only in terms of job opportunities but
also in the capacity that they acquire to adapt to the re-
quirements of the educational setting. The reality of the
classrooms where they will teach calls for a set of fac-
tors and strategies to ensure quality teaching.
The key competencies in teaching are viewed as
a convergence of applied knowledge which encom-
passes content, the way it is taught, the use of tech-
nologies, the type of learning, the emotions involved,
the organisation of students and other factors. Com-
petencies that fit this context (Zabala & Arnau,
2014) constitute key information that includes the
different kinds of knowledge identified by Shulman
(1987): knowledge of the content, pedagogical (di-
dactic) knowledge of the content, curricular knowl-
edge, knowledge of the learners, knowledge of the
educational objectives, knowledge of other objectives
and general pedagogical knowledge. Thus, the key
competencies which are limited to knowledge of the
content and pedagogical knowledge of the content are
expanded to include assessment, the organisation of
learning, active student participation, the use of ICT
and intercultural communication and the management
of feelings and emotions for professional develop-
ment. However, although these competencies tend to
be justified in the university’s academic environment,
they do not always meet the requirements needed in
professional employment. A linear training model
is implemented which stands in contrast to the com-
plexity found in education (Lo, 2010). Professional
development is systematic and deals with uncertain
changes which need adaptive competencies addressed
at the university, but without any guarantee that they
will be valid for teachers.
In Spain, the competencies that must be developed
in the different degree programmes are defined in white
papers (National Quality Assessment and Accreditation
Agency, 2004a, 2004b). In the case of physical educa-
tion (PE) teachers, they comprise knowledge related to
physical conditioning, body expression, motricity and
motor skills, the rules and values of sport, the technical
and tactical elements of sports skills, and the transver-
sal knowledge of teaching that is common in pre-service
training (Cañadas et al., 2019).
Knowledge of the content and its pedagogical
knowledge cannot be understood without referring
to the interactive context, in which assessment plays
a key role. If we consider that a participative meth-
odology improves students’ competencies and is con-
ducive to their professional development, then the
assessment component should involve a formative as-
sessment (Magro & Wilson, 2013). The application
of formative assessment in teacher training is one
possible way for students to acquire the key compe-
tencies which lead to better training and profession-
al development, and subsequently to improvements
in their teaching, as they are more likely to suit the
needs of their job.
Formative assessment is a type of assessment
which demonstrates what has been learnt and provides
information on what can be learnt (Black & William,
2006). In the case of the assessment and its relation-
ship with the key competencies in pre-service training
in PE, there has been a patent trend towards formative
assessment in some studies which have demonstrated
this shift (Cañadas et al., 2018; Gutiérrez-García et
al., 2013). They reveal that key competencies such as
mastery of the teaching process, the use of ICT, or-
ganisational skills or learning to learn are related to
the use of formative assessment (Romero-Martín et
al., 2017).
However, there are very few studies comparing the
perception after pre-service training of working grad-
uates with those of graduates who are not working re-
garding the teaching competencies they developed
during their degree programme. The studies by Campos
et al. (2011) and Gallardo (2006) examine graduates’
assessment of the key competencies acquired and their
opinion at the end of their degree programmes, asking
them about both situations once they are working. How-
ever, these studies have only been conducted in small
samples of graduates (n < 105) and have focused on
Teacher Training PE graduates, without including Phys-
ical Education and Sport Sciences (PESS) graduates.
With regard to assessment, no studies have been found
with graduates that assess whether more interaction with
the faculty in the assessment, as well as greater partici-
pation in establishing the assessment system and tests, or
a more active role in the grading process, are perceived
as helping to develop professional competencies. There-
fore, it seems necessary to establish the influence of the
L. Cañadas et al. Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
35
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
assessment, and more specifically formative assessment,
on the acquisition of the competencies which are devel-
oped in pre-service teacher training and whether these
competencies are positively assessed by the graduates
because of their impact on their professional develop-
ment.
For this reason, the objectives of this study are:
a) to assess whether there are differences in the per-
ception of the acquisition of the key competencies be-
tween graduates of PE Education and PESS accord-
ing to whether or not they are working; b) to assess
the relationship between the assessment received and
the acquisition of teaching competencies according
to whether or not they are working; c) to assess the
relationship between participation in grading and the
acquisition of teaching competencies according to
whether or not they are working; and d) to ascertain
whether those who are currently working believe that
the use of formative assessment during their pre-ser-
vice training helped them to put teaching competencies
into practice.
Methodology
Participants
Non-probabilistic incidental sampling was used to select
the participants. A total of 487 graduates participated
(40.6% females; 59.4% males) from PE Education de-
grees at 17 universities all over Spain. To collect the
information, three geographic zones were established:
a) the Central-South zone (Madrid, Tenerife, Albacete,
Córdoba, Granada and Murcia); b) the Northeast zone
(Valencia, Barcelona, Huesca, Zaragoza and Lleida);
and c) the Northwest zone (Segovia, Valladolid, León,
Vitoria and Zamora) (Figure 1). A total of 53.7% of the
participants are under the age of 25, 38% are between
26 and 30, 5.7% are between 31 and 35 and 2.7% are
36 or older.
Instrument
To collect the information, a questionnaire was used
with items referring to the key competencies for PE
teachers developed during pre-service training. The
participants were also asked about the form of assess-
ment and grading they received during this period and
its repercussions on their acquisition of these key com-
petencies. All the questions were answered on a Likert
scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a lot). The questionnaire
underwent a validation process entailing the following
steps (Romero-Martín et al., 2017): a) possible items
n = 137 n = 151
n = 151
Figure 1
Distribution of graduates by location
were selected based on the white papers on the Teaching
Primary School and PESS degrees and the creation of a
preliminary version of the questionnaire; b) the prelim-
inary version was revised by a group of 10 university
instructors who are experts in PE Education with exten-
sive careers in research and publications in Spanish and
international journals specialising in this field; c) an ini-
tial pre-test was administered to check the degree of rel-
evancy and comprehensibility of the questionnaire; and
finally d) reliability was calculated with the Cronbach’s
α, yielding a value of 0.89. Other data were also request-
ed of the participants, such as the degree programmes
completed, whether or not they were currently working
at a school and how many years of work experience they
had.
For this research, specifically the following items
were used:
(1) The key competencies: comprised of 22 items
with the competencies to be developed during pre-ser-
vice training of PE teachers.
(2) The usefulness of assessment in acquiring teach-
ing competencies during pre-service training (When
formative and continuous assessment was used in your
subjects, do you think it helped you to acquire teaching
competencies?); on their knowledge of the assessment
system and student participation in any aspect of the as-
sessment;
2.a) Interaction between professors and students fos-
ters the assessment process
2.b) Assessment tests were announced sufficiently in
advance
2.c) Assessment tests were based on an agreement
with the students
2.d) Previous knowledge of the assessment system
fostered the learning process
(3) The usefulness of formative and continuous
assessment during pre-service training for putting
Central-South
Northwest
Northeast
L. Cañadas et al. Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
36
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
teaching competencies into practice in active employ-
ment (When your professors used formative and con-
tinuous assessment in your classes, do you think this
helped you to develop teaching competencies in your
active practice?).
(4) The forms of grading used by professors during
their pre-service training: heterograding, self-grading,
dialogued grading and co-grading.
Procedure
The questionnaire used for this study was emailed to
the graduates of each one of the degree programmes
of the different universities for which data were avail-
able. They were asked to participate and were informed
of the objective of the study and data confidentiality
and anonymity were guaranteed. They were sent the
link to the questionnaire. This study follows the ethical
guidelines of the American Psychological Association
(2010).
Statistical Analysis
The analysis was performed using the SPSS v. 21 statis-
tical package. First of all, a confirmatory factor analysis
was performed to find the possible factors that might be
grouping the 22 teaching competencies. The principal
components method with Varimax rotation was used. To
extract the factors, those with eigenvalues over 0.3 were
retained (Pallant, 2013). Subsequently, a Student t-test
was performed to see the differences between the grad-
uates who are working as teachers and those who are
not in the variables studied. To determine the relation-
ship between assessment and grading and teaching com-
petencies, a Pearson’s correlation was performed with
the sample broken down according to whether or not
they are working as PE teachers. A partial correlation
was made between these variables, adjusting for “previ-
ous work experience”. Finally, with the population that
said that they are currently working at a school as a PE
teacher, a Pearson’s correlation was performed between
the question “When your professors used formative and
continuous assessment in your classes, do you think this
helped you to develop teaching competencies in your ac-
tive practice?” and the specific teaching competencies.
The level of significance for all the analyses was set at
p<.05.
Results
Table 1 presents the results of the factor analysis. The
KMO test yields a result of 0.94 (very high), indicat-
ing that the correlations between pairs of items can be
explained by the remaining items chosen, and Bartlett’s
sphericity test shows that the items are not independent
(4930, 449; df. 231 p < .001) and therefore that this
analysis is appropriate.
The competencies related to the design, develop-
ment/application, analysis and assessment of teaching
intervention and learning processes in PE are clustered
around factor 1. We have named this factor “Design,
application and assessment of teaching-learning pro-
cesses in PE”. The second factor is related to the con-
tents of motor and sports skills and is defined as “Motor
and sport contents”. The third factor is associated with
physical activity, physical conditioning and health, and
it will be called “Physical conditioning and health con-
tents”.
Table 2 contains the descriptive statistics of the
teaching competencies and the assessment and grading
received according to whether or not the respondents are
working as teachers. No differences appear in any of the
grouping factors of the competencies. In the questions
referring to assessment, differences only appear in the
“The assessment tests were based on an agreement with
the students” item, with a higher rate reported by those
who are working. Differences in grading only appear in
self- and co-grading, with higher values among those
who are working.
Table 3 shows the relationship between the assess-
ment items studied and the teaching competencies fac-
tors according to whether or not the respondents are
working (model 1, M1) and adjusted according to
whether or not they have work experience as teachers
(model 2, M2). Model 1 shows that those who are not
working find a positive relationship among all the as-
sessment items and the three factors, with the excep-
tion of the “Previous knowledge of the assessment sys-
tem fostered the learning process” item and the factor
on physical conditioning contents. However, the rela-
tionships are minor (all r <.400). Among those who
are working, a positive relationship was found between
the application of the aspects of formative assessment
studied and the factor of “Design, development and
assessment of teaching-learning PE” and “Motor and
sport contents”, with the exception of the “The assess-
ment tests were based on an agreement with the stu-
dents” item. When the values were adjusted in relation
to work experience, the results found in model 1 do
not change. Generally speaking, we can say that the
design, application and assessment of teaching-learn-
ing processes in PE, which would be the subject most
closely related to teaching (didactics), has a greater re-
lationship with both models, 1 and 2, while the two
columns of contents are, also generally speaking, less
related.
L. Cañadas et al. Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
37
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
Table 1
Results of the factor analysis
Specific competencies Components Factors
Designing, applying and analysing teaching interventions in the
PE class .604
Design, application and
assessment of teaching-
learning processes in PE
Developing and putting PE programmes that facilitate the
effective inclusion of students with special educational needs
into practice
.667
Designing, developing and assessing the teaching-learning
processes related to physical activity and sport with attention to
the individual and contextual characteristics of each person
.685
Knowing how to use assessment instruments in the PE class .710
Promoting complementary activities related to physical activity
and sport inside and outside school .550
Responding to diversity in PE practices .693
Having the capacity to reflect on the teaching-learning
process, the different organisational types and the different
methodologies within PE classes
.639
Designing, modifying and/or adapting motor situations geared
towards developing and fine-tuning the motor skills to the
educational context
.576
Designing, developing and assessing teaching-learning
processes related to motor competency, with attention to the
individual and contextual characteristics of each person
.756
Knowing and promoting the different motor manifestations that
are part of your traditional culture .605
Motor and sport contents
Knowing psychomotor development and its developmental
maturation .777
Knowing the elements and fundamentals of body expression and
non-verbal communication and its formative and cultural value .672
Knowing the basic principles of introduction to school sports
and designing specific tasks to use them in teaching .601
Knowing how to use play as a teaching resource and
educational content .408
Knowing and understanding body and motor developmental
processes .561
Knowing the physical capacities and factors that determine
their evolution and knowing how to apply the specific technical
underpinnings
.537
Physical conditioning and
health contents
Knowing the basic biological and physiological principles of the
human body in relation to physical activity .621
Having strategies to apply the elements of health on hygiene
and diet in educational practice .581
Having teaching strategies that promote the acquisition of
regular physical activity habits .544
Knowing how to apply the basic principles (techniques) of
physical activities in nature .439
Analysing and communicating, critically and with solid
foundations, the value of physical education and sport and their
possibilities of contributing to people’s development and wellbeing
.667
Identifying and preventing the health risks stemming from the
practice of inappropriate physical activities .768
Eigenvalues
% cumulative explained variance 40.82 47.96 54.26
KMO: 0.94.
Bartlett’s sphericity test: 4930, 449; df. 231. p < .001.
L. Cañadas et al. Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
38
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
Table 2
Competencies developed and forms of assessment and grading received during pre-service training according to whether or not the
respondent is working as a teacher
Is working
M (SD) Is not working
M (SD)
p
Competencies 143 344
Design, application and assessment of teaching-learning processes in PE –0.12 (1.09) 0.05 (0.96) .101
Motor and sport contents 0.11 (1.03) –0.04 (0.99) .134
Physical conditioning and health contents 0.08 (0.93) –0.03 (1.03) .232
Assessment
The use of formative assessment has helped you to acquire teaching competencies 2.80 (0.95) 2.81 (0.90) .904
Interaction with professors fosters the assessment process 3.59 (0.65) 3.47 (0.79) .119
Assessment tests were announced sufficiently in advance 3.17 (0.81) 3.12 (0.82) .493
The assessment tests were based on an agreement with the students 1.89 (1.31) 1.58 (1.20) .013
Previous knowledge of the assessment system fostered the learning process 3.31 (0.81) 3.22 (0.89) .330
Grading
Heterograding 3.22 (0.86) 3.26 (0.80) .667
Self-grading 1.52 (1.12) 1.22 (1.08) .006
Dialogued grading 1.17 (1.19) 0.99 (1.10) .116
Co-grading 1.50 (1.05) 1.15 (0.99) .001
Note. The significant differences appear in bold.
Table 3
Relationship between the use of formative assessment and the specific competencies developed in pre-service training according to
whether or not the respondent is working as a teacher
Is working Is not working
Design,
application and
assessment of
teaching-learning
processes in PE
Motor
and sport
contents
Physical
conditioning
and health
contents
Design,
application and
assessment
of teaching-
learning
processes in PE
Motor
and sport
contents
Physical
conditioning
and health
contents
Model 1
Assessment
The use of formative assessment has helped
you to acquire teaching competencies 0.341** 0.195* 0.062 0.353** 0.220** 0.176*
Interaction with professors fosters the
assessment process 0.197* 0.186* 0.091 0.252** 0.143* 0.132*
Assessment tests were announced
sufficiently in advance 0.185* 0.184* –0.001 0.130* 0.194** 0.131*
The assessment tests were based on an
agreement with the students 0.434** 0.101 0.072 0.282** 0.136* 0.221**
Previous knowledge of the assessment
system fostered the learning process 0.227* 0.278* 0.039 0.119* 0.159* 0.102
Model 2 (adjusted by teaching experience)
Assessment
The use of formative assessment has helped
you to acquire teaching competencies 0.341** 0.196* 0.062 0.374** 0.231** 0.187*
Interaction with professors fosters the
assessment process 0.200* 0.178* 0.074 0.256** 0.145* 0.134*
Assessment tests were announced
sufficiently in advance 0.187* 0.176* -0.017 0.130* 0.194** 0.132*
The assessment tests were based on an
agreement with the students 0.438** 0.093 0.060 0.278** 0.134* 0.219**
Previous knowledge of the assessment
system fostered the learning process 0.227* 0.278* 0.038 0.125* 0.162* 0.105
**p < .001; *p <. 05.
L. Cañadas et al. Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
39
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
Table 4 shows the relationship between the differ-
ent forms of grading used and the factors into which
the teaching competencies are grouped. In M1, het-
erograding is only directly related to “Motor and sport
contents” among those who are working, albeit only
slightly (r = .167). Among both those who are and are
not working, participative forms of grading are posi-
tively related to “Design, application and assessment of
teaching-learning processes in PE”, with higher values
among those who are working. In terms of “Motor and
sport contents”, those who are working as teachers only
relate it to co-grading, while those who are not working
relate it to all three forms of participative assessment,
albeit only slightly (r<.200). These results remain the
same in M2. Once again, generally speaking, there is
a greater relationship between the Design column and
models 1 and 2 than the contents columns for both popu-
lations of graduates.
Finally, a correlation was performed between
the “When your professors used formative and con-
tinuous assessment in your classes, do you think this
helped you develop teaching competencies in your
active practice?” item and the teaching competencies
only among those graduates who are working. The
goal is to assess whether the pre-service training has
been useful for professional practice, since only in
practice can one truly assess whether the training re-
ceived is practically helpful in meeting the demands of
the working world. A positive correlation was found
between the question and the “Design, application
and assessment of teaching-learning processes in PE”
and “Motor and sport contents” factors (r = .355 and
r = .270; p < .002, respectively).
Discussion
The results of this study show that: a) there are no dif-
ferences in the graduates’ perception of the acquisition
of teaching competencies according to whether or not
they are working; b) the assessment items studied are
positively related to the “Design, application and as-
sessment of teaching-learning processes in PE” and
“Motor and sport contents” competencies, and for
graduates who are not working with “Physical condi-
tioning and health contents” as well; c) among those
who are not working, participative forms of grading
are related to “Design, application and assessment of
teaching-learning processes in PE” and “Motor and
sport contents” and, among those who are working, it
is only related to “Design, application and assessment
of teaching-learning processes in PE”; d) graduates
who are working believe that the use of formative as-
sessment during their pre-service training has helped
them put the specific teaching competencies into prac-
tice in their job.
Given the lack of studies mentioned in the theoret-
ical framework, this study is limited in terms of com-
paring it to other similar studies. However, the study
by Campos et al. (2011), for example, focused specifi-
cally on comparing the differences detected by 104 PE
Table 4
Relationship between the use of different forms of grading and the specific competencies developed in pre-service training according to
whether or not the respondents are working
Is working Is not working
Design,
application and
assessment of
teaching-learning
processes in PE
Motor
and sport
contents
Physical
conditioning
and health
contents
Design,
application and
assessment of
teaching-learning
processes in PE
Motor
and sport
contents
Physical
conditioning
and health
contents
Model 1
Grading
Heterograding 0.059 0.167* 0.035 0.037 0.015 0.037
Self-grading 0.504** 0.146 0.110 0.293** 0.187** 0.031
Dialogued grading 0.431** 0.128 0.055 0.256** 0.140* 0.055
Co-grading 0.442** 0.227* 0.111 0.240** 0.147* 0.084
Model 2 (adjusted by teaching experience)
Grading
Heterograding 0.059 0.168* 0.036 0.035 0.014 0.035
Self-grading 0.507** 0.140 0.100 0.298** 0.189* 0.033
Dialogued grading 0.432** 0.124 0.048 0.260** 0.141* 0.056
Co-grading 0.462** 0.218* 0.088 0.246** 0.149* 0.087
**p < .001; *p <. 05.
L. Cañadas et al. Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
40
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
Teaching graduates at the University of Seville in the
competencies acquired after completing their university
degrees and the use made of them in the job market.
Of the 17 specific competencies they studied, signifi-
cant differences were found in 16, with higher values
after graduation. The only competency which showed
similar values both after completing pre-service train-
ing and in application as a teacher was “detecting ana-
tomical-functional, cognitive and social interaction dif-
ficulties”. These results do not match those found in
this study, in which no significant differences are ob-
served in any of the three factors of the questionnaire
among graduates who are not working and those who
are. These differences may be due to the authors’ small
sample size or to the fact that they only used graduates
from one degree programme at one university. Gallar-
do (2006) also focuses on Teacher Training PE gradu-
ates, in this case at the University of Granada (n = 72).
However, in this case the competencies studied are
general ones.
Other studies have focused on assessing the com-
petencies of graduates when they are already working
as PE professionals in primary and secondary schools
(Kovac et al., 2008), and some assess the perceptions
of students who are still studying for their PESS de-
grees (López-Varas, 2015) or compare the percep-
tions of competencies of students, university faculty
and graduates of the Teacher Training and PE degrees
(Pazo & Tejada, 2012; Romero, 2009). However, this
type of study does not bear in mind the discrepancies
which may exist in the assessment among graduates
who have completed their degrees and those who have
to put the entire set of knowledge and skills used as a
teacher into practice, which is when they can really as-
sess whether or not their pre-service training has been
useful in their professional development and its impact
on their search for employment. In this study, the fact
that no differences were found between both groups
may indicate that the graduates working as teachers
find that their pre-service training helped them to per-
form their job, just as those who are not working per-
ceive it.
Despite the importance attached to the creation of
the EHEA and the changes that its implementation
have brought about in higher education in different
European countries, it should be noted that there are
still only a handful of research studies that seek to as-
certain the repercussions of the changes in the train-
ing of graduates who have studied in the new degree
programmes. It is essential to assess university gradu-
ates’ opinions of the training they receive with the goal
of adjusting the curriculum based on the challenge of
employability, both to adapt to the job market and in
terms of their ability to meet its requirements and de-
mands. Most importantly, we should acknowledge that
there are few studies addressing graduates’ perception
of their training in competencies and the usefulness
of these competencies in their future professional em-
ployment.
In pre-service training, university graduates should
also learn the key professional competencies that they
will need to find employment. Training should be
adapted to the requirements of specific areas, in our
case PE, and be directly related to key competencies
in order to cater to demands from education. Assess-
ment plays a crucial role in this regard, and more spe-
cifically the application of formative assessment in the
different subjects in the degree programme, leading to
more meaningful and profound learning of the subject
matter, helping students to develop key professional
competencies to adapt the assessment of their students
to prevailing needs. In this pre-service training, stu-
dents’ participation in their own assessment and in that
of their peers is extremely important, but so too is par-
ticipation in grading, since such an involvement in this
process would herald a transfer of responsibility. How-
ever, in this study, as in others conducted previously
(Gutiérrez-García et al., 2013; Gutiérrez-García et al.,
2011; Hamodi et al., 2015), both graduates and faculty
report that forms of grading in which the teaching staff
take the decisions continue to prevail at the expense
of other alternative approaches related to participative
grading.
Conclusion
This study has demonstrated that there is no difference
in PE teachers’ perception of the competencies acquired
according to whether or not they are teaching, which in-
dicates that both at the end of their pre-service training
and when embarking upon their professional career they
feel that their training is sufficient to rise to the demands
of the educational setting; however, this result does not
mean that in the future they should not continue to seek
training to deal with the challenges that may arise. On
the other hand, aspects such as being familiar with the
assessment system, how they are going to be assessed
before beginning the learning units or being able to in-
teract and dialogue with the faculty on aspects of the as-
sessment, are all positively related to the development
of competencies. These aspects are also related to the
use of participative forms of assessment. Furthermore,
the graduates report that the use of formative assessment
during their pre-service training has helped them to de-
velop these competencies and to put them into practice
in their professional work. Therefore, according to this
L. Cañadas et al. Physical Education Teachers’ Competencies and Assessment in Professional Practice
PHYSICAL EDUCATION
41
Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes | www.revista-apunts.com 2020, n.º 139. 1st Quarter (January-March), pp. 33-41
study, it may be concluded that: a) pre-service training
of PE teachers helps satisfactorily develop key teaching
competencies, and b) the use of formative assessment at
this stage seems appropriate for helping them acquire
the key teaching competencies and later applying them
in the job world.
However, further studies which explore this topic
more deeply are needed, assessing the usefulness of the
specific competencies developed when they are actually
applied in teaching practice, and assessing the repercus-
sions of the application of active methodologies and for-
mative assessment systems during pre-service training
on the teacher’s professional competencies.
References
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the
American Psychological Association. American Psychological Asso-
ciation.
National Quality Assessment and Accreditation Agency (2004a). Libro
Blanco. Título de grado en Magisterio (Vol. 1). National Quality As-
sessment and Accreditation Agency.
National Quality Assessment and Accreditation Agency (2004b).
Libro Blanco. Título de grado en Ciencias de la Actividad Físi-
ca y del Deporte. National Quality Assessment and Accreditation
Agency.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment for learning in the class-
room. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 9-25). Sage.
Campos, M. C., Ries, F., & Del Castillo, O. (2011). Análisis de las
competencias adquiridas y utilizadas por los egresados maestros
en educación física. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte,
24(7), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde2011.02405
Cañadas, L., Castejón, F. J., & Santos-Pastor, M. L. (2018). Relación
entre la participación del alumnado en la evaluación y la calificación
en la formación inicial del profesorado de educación física. Cultura,
Ciencia y Deporte, 13(39), 291-300.
Cañadas, L., Santos-Pastor, M. L., & Castejón, F. J. (2019). Compe-
tencias docentes en la formación inicial del profesorado de educación
física. Retos. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deportes y
Recreación, 35, 284-288.
Cardona-Rodríguez, A., Unceta-Satrustegui, K., & Barandiaran-Gal-
dós, M. (2016). Comprehensive pertinence in the quality assessment
of higher education / La pertinencia integral en la evaluación de la
calidad de la educación superior. Cultura y Educación, 28(2), 344-
358. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2016.1158446
Elias, P., & Purcell, K. (2004). Is mass higher education working?
Evidence from the labour market experiences of recent gradu-
ates. National Institute Economic Review, 190, 60-74. https://doi.
org/10.1177/002795010419000107
Gallardo, M. A. (2006). La evaluación de competencias profesionales
para la inserción de los maestros de educación física. Revista Elec-
trónica de Investigación Psicoeducativa, 4(3), 469-492.
Gil, J., García, E., & Santos, C. (2009). Miradas retrospectivas de
los egresados sobre la educación superior. Revista de Investigación
Educativa, 27(2), 371-393.
Gutiérrez-García, C., Pérez-Pueyo, A., & Pérez-Gutiérrez, M. (2013).
Percepciones de profesores, alumnos y egresados sobre los sistemas
de evaluación en estudios universitarios de formación del profesora-
do de educación física. Ágora para la Educación Física y el Deporte,
15(2), 130-151.
Gutiérrez-García, C., Pérez-Pueyo, A., Pérez-Gutiérrez, M., & Pala-
cios-Picos, A. (2011). Percepciones de profesores y alumnos sobre
la enseñanza, evaluación y desarrollo de competencias en estudios
universitarios de formación de profesorado. Cultura y Educación,
23(4), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564011798392451
Hamodi, C., López-Pastor, A. T., & López-Pastor, V. M. (2015). Per-
cepciones de alumnos, egresados y profesores sobre los sistemas de
evaluación del aprendizaje. Revista d’innvació educativa, 15, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.7203/attic.14.4175
Kovac, M., Sloan, S., & Starc, G. (2008). Competencies in physical
education teaching, Slovenian teachers’ views and future perspec-
tives. European Physical Education Review, 14(3), 299-323. https://
doi.org/10.1177/1356336X08095668
Lo, C. (2010). Student learning and student satisfaction in an inter-
active classroom. Journal of General Education, 59(4), 238-263.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2010.0025
López-Varas, F. (2015). Relaciones entre competencias, inteligencia y
rendimiento académico en alumnos de grado en Ciencias de la Activi-
dad Física y el Deporte (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Europea
de Madrid).
Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy sys-
tems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42(9), 1647-
1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival guide. Open University Press.
Pazo, C. I., & Tejada, J. (2012). Las competencias profesionales en
educación física. Retos: Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, De-
porte y Recreación, 22, 5-8.
Romero, C. (2009). Definición de módulos y competencias del maestro
con mención en educación física. Revista Internacional de Medicina y
Ciencias del Deporte, 9(34), 179-200.
Romero-Martín, M. R., Castejón-Oliva, F. J., López-Pastor, V. M., &
Fraile-Aranda, A. (2017). Evaluación formativa, competencias co-
municativas y TIC en la formación del profesorado. Comunicar, 52.
https://doi.org/10.3916/C52-2017-07
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the
new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.
org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Towers, J. (2013). Consistencies between new teachers’ beliefs and
practices and those grounding their initial teacher education program.
Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59(1), 108-125.
Zabala, A., & Arnau, L. (2014). Métodos para la enseñanza por com-
petencias. Graó.
Conflict of Interests: No conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
© Copyright Generalitat de Catalunya (INEFC). This article is available from url https://www.revista-apunts.com/en/. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated
otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce
the material. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en