ArticlePDF Available

Review of Project Risk Management and Risk Assessment

Authors:
  • Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi indragiri Rengat

Abstract and Figures

Identify the risk of project and develop the strategies to reduce the effect of risk or prevent the risk from occurring is the main objective of the Project Risk Management. Due to uncertainty the project risk occurs. The possibilities are always there that something known or unknown can happen and it could affect the goal of project. Being prepared to handle the risk is known as risk management. The processes, things or situations that can harm the people or organization identified through a look by risk assessment. It evaluates and analyzes the risk after its identification. To control the harm from happening and to eliminate effectively it can decide the measure after the determination of risk.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1117-1120
1117
Review of Project Risk Management and Risk
Assessment
Lilis Sulastri1*, Sri Utami Ady2, Tomy Fitrio3, Angga Hapsila4, Miftahus Surur5
1Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati, Indonesia
2Economic and Business Faculty, Dr. Soetomo University, Indonesia
3Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indragiri, Indonesia
4Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indragiri, Indonesia
5STKIP PGRI Situbondo, Indonesia
Received: 13/09/2019 Accepted: 22/11/2019 Published: 20/12/2019
Abstract
Identify the risk of project and develop the strategies to reduce the effect of risk or prevent the risk from occurring is the main
objective of the Project Risk Management. Due to uncertainty the project risk occurs. The possibilities are always there that
something known or unknown can happen and it could affect the goal of project. Being prepared to handle the risk is known as
risk management. The processes, things or situations that can harm the people or organization identified through a look by risk
assessment. It evaluates and analyzes the risk after its identification. To control the harm from happening and to eliminate
effectively it can decide the measure after the determination of risk.
Keywords: Project Risk Management, Risk assessment, Harm, Process, Situation
1 Introduction
1
When undertaking the projects in a business
organization risk is inevitable. It needs to ensure by the
managers of the projects that it should keep the risk at
minimal level. There are mainly two types are risk named
positive impact risk and negative impact risk. All the time
the project mangers do not face negative impact as there are
positive impact risk are also available. To counter attack
the risk the manger of projects need to define any solution
or mitigation plan after identification of particular risk. On
the basis of 4 phases of risk management the manager can
plan a strategy. These steps are: (1) identification of Risk,
(2) quantification of risk, (3) risk response to risk, and (4)
monitoring and controlling of risk
1. Identification of Risk: Supervisors face numerous
challenges with regards to naming and identifying the risks
that happen when undertaking ventures. These risks could
be settled through organized or unstructured
conceptualizing or techniques. Understand that dangers
relating to the venture must be taken care of by the
undertaking chief and different partners of the task. Risks,
for example, operational or business risk will be dealt with
by the pertinent groups. The dangers that regularly sway a
task are provider risk, budget risks and resource risk.
Provider hazard would allude to dangers that can happen on
the off chance that the provider isn't meeting the course of
events to supply the assets required. Resource risk happens
Corresponding author: Lilis Sulastri, Universitas Islam
Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati, Indonesia. E-mail:
lilis.sulastri@uinsgd.ac.id.
when the human asset utilized in the undertaking isn't
sufficient or not gifted enough. Budget risk would allude to
dangers that can happen if the expenses are more than what
was planned.
Figure 1: Risk Management
2. Quantification of Risk: On the basis of quality it can
evaluate the risks. With the help of the matrix it analyzes
the chances of occurring the risk by project managers. By
using the matrix the risk can be divided in 4 categories that
are Low, Medium, High and Critical. For place the matrix
in the categories of risk the impact on the project and
probability of occurrence are two criteria that are
considered. For example the risk can be consider as 'High'
category risk if it has highest impact like impact = 4, and it
has low risk occurrence that is probability = 2.
3. Response to Risk: To select the method that decrease
the impact of risk at minimal level when it comes to risk
Journal web link: http://www.jett.dormaj.com
J. Environ. Treat. Tech.
ISSN: 2309-1185
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1117-1120
1118
management it decided by a manager of project. Between
the four strategies of risk response that are given as follows
the project manager can choose the better one.
a. Risk acknowledge
b. Pass on the Risk pass
c. To decrease the impact of risks takes corrective
measure
d. It can avoid the risk
4. Control and Monitoring the Risk
If any changes are done then on a regular basis risks
can be monitored or checked. Through assessing
mechanisms and constant monitoring it can identify the
new risk.
Figure 2: Process of Risk Management
2 Rules of Project Risk Management
The advantages of risk management in projects are
enormous. In a proactive manner if deal with event of
uncertain project it can gain a lot of money. The outcome
will be that seize the opportunities that occur and limit the
effect of project threats. This permits to deliver the project
with the quality results, on budget and on time that wanted
by sponsor of project. If the team members do not have the
chance of enter a putting out fires mode expected to fix the
disappointments that could have been anticipated they can
be much happier.
1. Both Opportunities and Threats Considered: They
are the miscreants that can hurt the project. In present day it
also additionally center around project opportunities and
positive risk. The postive risks are the uncertain situaton
that are good for organisation and project. These guys make
project more profitable,faster and better.
2. Implement and Plan Responses of Risks: Actualizing
a risk reaction is the movement that really increases the
value project. It can minimise negative effects or prevent
occurring of threat. To understand, prioritise and map risks
other rules helped. This will make a sound risk reaction
plan that spotlights on the huge successes (1-10)
3. As a Part of Project Make the Risk Management:
The principal guideline is basic to the accomplishment of
project risk management. In the event that it don't really
insert risk management in project, it cannot receive the full
advanatge of this methodology. It can experience various
defective methodologies in organizations. A few project
utilize no methodology at all to risk management. They are
either insensible, running their first undertaking or they are
some way or another certain that no risks will happen in
their task.
4. Ownership Issues Should Clarify: Some Managers of
project think they are done once they have made a rundown
of risks. Be that as it may, this is just a beginning stage.
The following stage is to clarify who is in charge of what
risk! Somebody needs to feel the warmth if a risk isn't dealt
with appropriately. The trick is basic: for each risk assign a
risk owner that it have found. To optimise risk for the
project is the responsibility of risk owner (11-18).
5. In Project Identify the Risk as soon as possible:
project risk management the executives is to recognize the
risk it is the very basic step. This requires an open
mentality that spotlights on future situations that may
happen. Two principle sources exist to distinguish risks,
paper and people. People are colleagues that each brings
along their own encounters and aptitude. Other people to
converse with are specialists outside the project that have a
reputation of the sort of undertaking or work are
confronting (19-20).
6. Associated Tasks and Risks are tracked: The register
of risk help to track the associated tasks and risks. For each
project manager tracking tasks is an everyday activity.
Coordinating risk task into that day by day schedule is the
simplest arrangement. Risk tasks might be done to
recognize or dissect dangers or to produce, implement and
select responses
7. About Risks Communicate: In many failed projects it
show that project managers in such activities were as often
as possible ignorant of the enormous sledge that was going
to hit them. The alarming finding was that much of the time
somebody of the venture association really saw the sledge,
however didn't illuminate the task administrator regarding
its reality.
8. Risks Analysis: Understanding the idea of a risk is a
precondition for a good response. In this manner, set aside
some effort to have a more critical see individual risk and
don't form a hasty opinion without realizing what a risk is
about. The data you accumulate in a hazard examination
will give important bits of knowledge into project and the
fundamental contribution to optimise the risks to find
effective responses.
9. Risks Prioritise: If a project manager sometime tell
that he equally treat all risks. This makes project life
extremely straightforward. Be that as it may, it doesn't
convey the most ideal outcomes. A few dangers have a
higher effect than others. Accordingly, it better invest your
energy in the dangers that can cause the greatest
misfortunes and additions. Check on the off chance that
have any centerpieces that could crash project.
10. Project Risks Registration: This standard is tied in
with accounting. Keeping up a risk log empowers to view
progress and ensure that it won't overlook a hazard or two.
It is additionally an ideal specialized device that educates
stakeholders and team members what is happening.
3 With ProjectManager.com Managing the
Risk
Utilizing a risk tracking format is a beginning, yet to
oversee project risks it'll need to utilize project
management software. At every phase of a project
ProjectManager.com has various instruments that let
address.
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1117-1120
1119
1. For Risk Management Plans use of Gantt Charts:
Utilize our honor winning Gantt diagrams to make point by
point risk management intends to keep dangers from
getting to be issues. Timetable, appoint and screen
undertaking errands with full perceivability. Colleagues can
even add remarks and records to their relegated
assignments, so all the correspondence occurs on the task
levelcontinuously.
Figure 3: Gantt Charts
2. For Prioritizing and Managing Risks use Kanban
Boards: Utilize kanban sheets to sort and organize risk in
the event that they exist in a progressively deft condition.
You can utilize custom labels to recognize errands as
dangers inside task. Or on the other hand, it can devote an
entire task inside ProjectManager.com to overseeing risks,
so it can rapidly perceive how the earnest risks are being
tended to.
Figure 4: Kanban Boards
4 Risk Assessment
To lead business the identification of risks that can
impact negatively on ability of an organization is known as
risk assessment. To decrease the impact of risks to business
operations the risk assessments help identify these risks of
natural business and give controls, measures and processes.
A fundamental risk assessment will break down each
hazard occasion for the probability that the hazard will
happen and for the effect it will have in the event that it
happens. On a matrix of Risk Assessment it can plotted this
type of qualitative risk analysis information as defined in
the plan of Project Risk Management it incorporates the
risk rating rules.
Figure 5: Matrix of Risk Assessment
5 Risk assessment steps
How a risk assessment is led changes broadly relying
upon the risks special to the kind of business, the industry
that business is in and the consistence standards applied to
that given business or industry. In any case, there are five
general advances that organizations can pursue paying little
heed to their business type or industry.
Step 1: Identify the hazards. The initial phase in a risk
assessment is to distinguish any potential risks that, if they
somehow managed to happen, would adversely impact the
association's capacity to lead business. Potential dangers
that could be considered or recognized during danger
evaluation incorporate cataclysmic events, utility blackouts,
cyber-attacks and failure of control.
Step 2: After the hazards are distinguished, the
following stage is to figure out which business resources
would be adversely impacted if the hazard worked out as
expected. Business resources regarded in danger to these
risks can incorporate basic framework, IT frameworks,
business tasks, organization notoriety and even worker
wellbeing.
Step 3: Develop control measures and Evaluate the
risks. A risk analysis can help distinguish how perils will
affect business resources and the measures that can be
established to limit or take out the impact of these dangers
on business resources. Potential dangers incorporate
property harm, business interference, budgetary misfortune
and legitimate punishments.
Step 4: Findings should be record. The finding of risk
assessment ought to be recorded by the organization and
documented as effectively open, official archives. The
records ought to incorporate subtleties on potential risk,
their related dangers and plans to anticipate the risks.
Step 5: Update and review the risk assessment
regularly. Potential dangers, risks and their subsequent
controls can change quickly in a cutting edge business
condition. It is significant for organizations to refresh their
hazard appraisals normally to adjust to these changes.
6 The goal of risk assessments
Some shared objectives and goals for directing risk
assessments over enterprises and business types incorporate
the accompanying:
1. Legitimizing the expense of security countermeasures to
moderate dangers and vulnerabilities.
Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 2019, Special Issue on Environment, Management and Economy, Pages: 1117-1120
1120
2. Deciding planning to remediate or moderate the
distinguished dangers, dangers and vulnerabilities.
3. Building up a hazard profile that gives a quantitative
investigation of the kinds of dangers the association
faces.
4. Distinguishing, organizing and recording dangers,
dangers and known vulnerabilities to the association's
generation framework and resources.
5. Building up a precise stock of IT resources and
information resources.
6. Understanding the arrival on venture, if assets are put
resources into framework or different business
advantages for balance potential risk.
7. Building up a precise stock of IT resources and
information resources.
7 Conclusion
The process of analyzing, responding and identifying
any risk is known as Project risk management that that
emerges over the existence cycle of an project to enable the
task to stay on track and meet its objective. Risk
management isn't responsive just; it ought to be a piece of
the arranging procedure to make sense of hazard that may
occur in the task and how to control that hazard on the off
chance that it in actuality happens.
References
1. Aven, Terje. Risk assessment and risk management: Review
of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of
Operational Research, 2015.
2. Aschberger K, Johnston HJ, Stone V, Aitken RJ, Hankin SM,
Peters SA, Tran CL, Christensen FM. Review of carbon
nanotubes toxicity and exposureAppraisal of human health
risk assessment based on open literature. Critical reviews in
toxicology. 2010 Oct 1;40(9):759-90.
3. Bing L, Akintoye A, Edwards PJ, Hardcastle C. The allocation
of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK.
International Journal of project management. 2005 Jan
1;23(1):25-35.
4. Cleden, D. Managing project uncertainty. Abingdon: Ashgate
Publishing Group, 2009.
5. Darnall, R. and Preston, J.M. Project Management from
Simple to Complex. Flat World Knowledge, Inc, 2010.
6. Godfrey PS. Control of risk a guide to the systematic
management of risk from construction. CIRIA; 1996.
7. Klemetti A., Risk Management in Construction Project
Networks. Helsinki University of Technology Laboratory of
Industrial Management Report. Espoo.
8. Morgan, G. and Smircich, L. The case for qualitative research.
The Academy of Management Review, 1980;5(4):491-500.
9. PMI (Project Management Institute). A guide to the project
management body of knowledge: PMBOK. 3rd edition.
Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc, 2004.
10. Sanvido, V., Grobler, F., Parfitt, K., Guvenis, M., and Coyle,
M. Critical Success Factors for Construction Projects. Journal
of Construction Engineering and Management,
1992;118(1):94-111.
11. Smith. N.J., Merna, T. and Jobbling P. Managing Risk in
Construction Projects. 2nd edition Oxford: Blackwell
Publishing, 2006.
12. Westland J. Project Management Life Cycle: A Complete
Step-by-step Methodology for Initiating Planning Executing
and Closing the Project. Kogan: Page Limited, 2006.
13. Zou, P., Zhang, G. and Wang, J-Y. Understanding the key
risks in construction projects in China. International Journal of
Project Management, 2007;25:601 614.
14. Zou, P., Zhang G., Wang J-Y. Identifying Key Risks in
Construction Projects: Life Cycle and Stakeholder
Perspectives. Sydney: Faculty of Built Environment,
University of New South Wales, 2006.
15. Nakhaei A, Davoodnia A, Nakhaei H. (NH4) 42
[MoVI72MoV60O372 (CH3COO) 30 (H2O) 72] as a
Heterogeneous Reusable Catalyst for Organic
Reactions: Mini-Review. Journal of Chemical Reviews.
2019 Mar 1;1(2. pp. 78-153):139-53.
16. Solomon O, Rabiu Saidu Umar W, Sanusi Wara H,
Sadiq Yakubu A, Michael Azubuike M, Asugu Mary
M, Louis H. Antiulcerogenic Activity of methanol
extract and solvent fractions of Stem Bark of Lannea
acida (A. Rich) Against Ethanol-Induced Gastric
Mucosal Injury in Albino Rats. Progress in Chemical
and Biochemical Research. 2019 Jan 3;1(1, pp. 1-
80):29-39.
17. Ghanbaria F, Monavarib SM, Sadrc MK, Rahimib R,
Mirbolookia H. Pesticide in Soil and Rice Crop from
North of Iran: Concentration and Risk Assessment.
Advanced Journal of Chemistry, Section A:
Theoretical, Engineering and Applied Chemistry. 2019
Aug 26.
18. Beigzadeh R, Rastegar SO. Assessment of Cr (VI)
Biosorption from Aqueous Solution by Artificial
Intelligence. Chemical Methodologies. 2020 Mar 1;4(2.
pp. 115-219):181-90.
19. Sultana M, Ahmed S, Rabbi F, Alam MT. Identification
of lectins from the seeds of Bangladeshi plants Sesbania
bispinosa and Senna occidentalis by hemagglutination
assay. Asian Journal of Green Chemistry. 2019 Feb 2.
20. Zolnikova IF, Silkin II, Popov AP, Tomitova EA,
Ovcharenko ND. Muskrat’s (Ondatra Zibetica)
endicrine regulation organs as bioindicators for
evaluation of ecological conditions in Baikal Region.
EurAsian Journal of BioSciences. 2019 Jul 7;13(2):707-
9.
... Memahami budaya organisasi memungkinkan manajer proyek untuk menavigasi tantangan potensial dan menyesuaikan strategi proyek yang sesuai. Selain itu, menganalisis kebijakan, prosedur, dan pedoman organisasi membantu mengidentifikasi kendala, persyaratan kepatuhan, dan kerangka tata kelola yang dapat memengaruhi pelaksanaan proyek dan manajemen risiko (Sulastri et al., 2019b). ...
... Persistent and cooperative interaction of control systems with business processes is very much essential for having productive control systema which can positively contribute towards organisational effectiveness. Risk observation and evaluation must be incorporated with business units and practice as well in order to have an efficient and effective control system (Sulastri et al., 2019;Andriana et al., 2019). Additionally, it has become compulsory to have cross-departmental communication in order to form the control component which assures the smooth functioning of the system (Bagchi, Ha, Skjoett-Larsen, & Soerensen, 2005). ...
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the current study is to investigate the moderating effect of Internal control (INTC) on the relationship of supply chain integration (SCI) and firm performance (FP) of the banking sector of Indonesia. For this objective, the data was collected from 450 middle managers by using s stratified sampling technique which yielded a 75 per cent response rate. The SEM analysis of the study has shown that internal integration (INI) and supplier integration (SUI) have a positive and significant integration along with the FP, while customer integration (CUI) does not have a significant relationship with the FP. The indirect effect findings have shown that internal control (INTC) significantly moderates the relationship of INI and SUI, whereas it does not significantly moderate the relationship of CUI and FP. These findings indicate that INTC is an essential variable because it significantly moderates most of the SCI indicators and FP. Therefore, this moderating effect is considered to a big contribution of this study that could become a new area of future research.
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to develop a conceptual model of the mediating role of management accounting system (Broadscope) and organizational culture on the influence of mutual dependency and environmental uncertainty on managerial performance. The sample was 126 managers of Swamitra Palm Oil Plantation in Riau. The entire population was sampled. The data were processed using Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM PLS). The findings in this study are mutual dependency and environmental uncertainty have a positive influence on managerial performance, organizational culture mediates the influence of environmental uncertainty on managerial performance, meanwhile management accounting system (Broadscope) does not mediate the influence of mutual dependency on managerial performance.
Article
This study aimed to develop a conceptual model of the role of differentiation strategy and organizational citizenship behavior in mediating the effect of transformational leadership on the performance of private high schools in Pekanbaru. The sample was 140 principals and vice-principals of private high schools in Pekanbaru. The data obtained were processed using Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM PLS). The findings in this study are that transformational leadership has a positive effect on the performance of private high schools in Pekanbaru, differentiation strategy and organizational citizenship behavior mediate the effect of transformational leadership on the performance of private high schools in Pekanbaru. The most effective pathway to affect the performance of private high schools is the mediating pathway of organizational citizenship behavior on the effect of transformational leadership on the performance of private high schools.
Article
Full-text available
This study aimed to develop a conceptual model of the mediating role of organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior on the influence of organizational justice on the performance of civil servants in the Pekanbaru Municipal Government. The sample was 147 civil servants in the Pekanbaru Municipal Government. The sampling was done using systematic sampling while the data processing was done using Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM PLS). The findings in this study are organizational justice has a positive influence on the performance of civil servants in the Pekanbaru Municipal Government, organizational citizenship behavior mediates the influence of organizational justice on the performance of civil servants in the Pekanbaru Municipal Government, organizational commitment does not mediate the influence of organizational justice on the performance of civil servants in the Pekanbaru Municipal Government. The most effective pathway in influencing employee performance is the mediating pathway of organizational citizenship behavior on the influence of organizational justice on the performance of civil servants.
Article
Full-text available
Over the last decade, polyoxometalates (POMs) have attracted extensive attention as homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts used for organic transformation. The most important feature of POMs is the possibility of the catalyst design at atomic/molecular levels. They could also be used as multifunctional catalysts, based on different metal atoms and heteroatoms in their structure, counter cations, and second structures. In this review, application of the Keplerate-type giant nanoporous isopolyoxomolybdate (NH4)42[Mo VI 72Mo V 60O372-(CH3COO)30(H2O)72], denoted {Mo132} was reviewed in the synthesis of many organic reactions as a heterogeneous solid acid catalyst, which significantly improved the synthesis condition of various organic reactions in the recent years from 2013 to 2019.
Article
Full-text available
Risk assessment and management was established as a scientific field some 30-40 years ago. Principles and methods were developed for how to conceptualise, assess and manage risk. These principles and methods still represent to a large extent the foundation of this field today, but many advances have been made, linked to both the theoretical platform and practical models and procedures. The purpose of the present invited paper is to perform a review of these advances, with a special focus on the fundamental ideas and thinking on which these are based. We have looked for trends in perspectives and approaches, and we also reflect on where further development of the risk field is needed and should be encouraged. The paper is written for readers with different types of background, not only for experts on risk.
Article
Full-text available
As an integral part of risk management process, effective risk transfer should be based on a collective understanding of risks in terms of their impacts, responsible project stakeholders as well as likely stages of occurrence in a project life cycle. Until now, most research has focused on examining risks from the perspective of their impacts on individual project objectives. This paper aims to, from project stakeholder and life cycle perspectives, provide an alternative way to scrutinize the risks associated with construction projects. In light of the AS/NZS4360 Australian/New Zealand Standard of Risk Management and ISO31000 Risk Management (Draft), a methodological framework is developed to provide step-by-step details in identifying and analysing the key risks and allocating them to the responsible stakeholders at particular project phases using two-dimensional graphical presentations. An empirical case study is undertaken to demonstrate the application of this risk management framework. The main contribution of the paper includes the proposition, development and test of a conceptual methodological framework as an alternative way to analyse and manage key risks involved in construction project procurement. In addition, with the aid of the proposed framework, 20 key risks are identified and strategies are formulatedto manage the risks from the joint perspectives of project stakeholders and life cycle.
Article
Full-text available
Public/private partnership (PPP) procurement is seen as an effective way to achieve value for money (VFM) in public infrastructure projects. The Private Finance Initiative (PFI) in the UK is a form of PPP that seeks to combine the advantages of competitive tender and flexible negotiation, and transfer risk away from the public sector. The final risk allocation agreement is reached along with overall contract agreement. It is important for the public client and the private bidders to assess all the potential risks through the whole project life.A questionnaire survey was conducted to explore preferences in risk allocation. Analysis of the response data shows that some risks should still be retained within the public sector or shared with the private sector. These are mainly macro and micro level risks. The majority of risks in PPP/PFI projects, especially those in the meso level risk group, should be allocated to the private sector. However, there are a few risks where unilateral allocation is not always obvious.The research findings should enable public sector clients to establish more efficient risk allocation frameworks in the early stages of project development.
Article
A building project is completed as a result of a combination of many events and interactions, planned or unplanned, over the life of a facility, with changing participants and processes in a constantly changing environment. This paper defines a set of conditions or factors that, when thoroughly and completely satisfied on a project, ensures the successful completion of the facility. Success on a project means that certain expectations for a given participant were met, whether owner, planner, engineer, contractor, or operator. These expectations may be different for each participant. The factors that predicate success were initially derived from the Integrated Building Process Model developed at Penn State by Sanvido in 1990. These factors were then tested on sixteen projects and the results showed excellent correlation between project success and achievement of the factors. Finally, the four factors most critical to success are presented.
Article
The aim of this paper is to understand the key risks in construction projects in China and to develop strategies to manage them. Risks were prioritized according to their significance of influences on typical project objectives in terms of cost, time, quality, safety and environmental sustainability, and then scrutinized from a joint perspective of project stakeholders and life cycle. Postal questionnaire surveys were used to collect data, based on which a total of 25 key risks were ascertained. These risks were compared with the findings of a parallel survey in the Australian construction industry context to highlight the unique risks associated with construction projects in China. Strategies to manage the risks were sought from the perspectives of project stakeholders and life cycle and in light of the Chinese construction culture. It is concluded that clients, designers and government bodies should take the responsibility to manage their relevant risks and work cooperatively from the feasibility phase onwards to address potential risks in time; contractors and subcontractors with robust construction and management knowledge should be employed to minimize construction risks and carry out safe, efficient and quality construction activities.