ArticlePDF Available

Combined Interventions to Reduce Burnout Complaints and Promote Return to Work: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Mediators of Change

MDPI
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH)
Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Burnout has adverse effects on the health and work-related outcomes of employees. Nevertheless, little is known about effective ways of reducing burnout complaints and facilitating full return to work, which defines rehabilitation. This study consists of a systematic review of the effects of combined interventions (i.e., both person-directed and organization-directed). It also includes the identification and description of mediators of change, thereby explaining how combined interventions do or do not work. Seven electronic databases were searched for English peer-reviewed publications: the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection; PsycARTICLES; Web of Science; Scopus; SocINDEX; PubMed; and PsycINFO, using various combinations of search terms (e.g., burnout AND intervention). Out of 4110 abstracts published before 29 September, 2019, 10 studies (reporting the effects of nine combined interventions) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, which were defined using PICOS criteria (participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design). Although the risk of bias of the included studies is high, all combined interventions were effective in facilitating rehabilitation. Results suggest that involving employees in decision-making and enhance their job control and social support, while eliminating stressors, explain the effectiveness of the intentions. With caution, workplace health promotion practitioners are encouraged to use these findings to tackle burnout among employees.
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of
Environmental Research
and Public Health
Review
Combined Interventions to Reduce Burnout
Complaints and Promote Return to Work:
A Systematic Review of Eectiveness and
Mediators of Change
Roald Pijpker * , Lenneke Vaandrager, Esther J. Veen and Maria A. Koelen
Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands;
Lenneke.Vaandrager@wur.nl (L.V.); Esther.Veen@wur.nl (E.J.V.); Maria.Koelen@wur.nl (M.A.K.)
*Correspondence: Roald.Pijpker@wur.nl; Tel.: +31-6-20187620
Received: 1 November 2019; Accepted: 17 December 2019; Published: 19 December 2019


Abstract:
Burnout has adverse eects on the health and work-related outcomes of employees.
Nevertheless, little is known about eective ways of reducing burnout complaints and facilitating
full return to work, which defines rehabilitation. This study consists of a systematic review of
the eects of combined interventions (i.e., both person-directed and organization-directed). It also
includes the identification and description of mediators of change, thereby explaining how combined
interventions do or do not work. Seven electronic databases were searched for English peer-reviewed
publications: the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection; PsycARTICLES; Web of Science;
Scopus; SocINDEX; PubMed; and PsycINFO, using various combinations of search terms (e.g., burnout
AND intervention). Out of 4110 abstracts published before 29 September, 2019, 10 studies (reporting
the eects of nine combined interventions) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, which were defined using
PICOS criteria (participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design). Although the
risk of bias of the included studies is high, all combined interventions were eective in facilitating
rehabilitation. Results suggest that involving employees in decision-making and enhance their job
control and social support, while eliminating stressors, explain the eectiveness of the intentions.
With caution, workplace health promotion practitioners are encouraged to use these findings to tackle
burnout among employees.
Keywords:
burnout; combined interventions; mediators of change; occupational health; PRISMA;
resources; rehabilitation; return to work; systematic review; workforce
1. Introduction
In the countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),
work-related stress is the leading cause of absenteeism [
1
], with significant financial consequences for
society [
2
]. The best-known occupational syndrome—burnout—has adverse eects on the health and
wellbeing of employees (e.g., increasing physical illness [3]), in addition to aecting their attitudes at
work (e.g., decreasing organizational involvement [
4
,
5
]). For instance, burnout has shown to be an
important correlate of musculoskeletal disorders (e.g., chronic back pain), which, in turn, are associated
with a further increase in burnout complaints, daily productivity loss and form a major cause of
occupational leave and prolonged recovery time [
6
,
7
]. Moreover, burnout and its adverse eects on
the health and wellbeing of the workforce, is associated with high rates of sick leave and replacement
costs [
8
,
9
]. It is therefore of the utmost importance to tackle burnout, both for employee health and
wellbeing and for organizational development and performance.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55; doi:10.3390/ijerph17010055 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 2 of 20
Burnout is predominantly described as an outcome of “a prolonged response to chronic emotional
and interpersonal stressors on the job, defined by the three dimensions of exhaustion, cynicism and
professional ecacy” [
10
] (p. 397). Emotional exhaustion refers to a feeling of being depleted and
overextended by one’s emotional and physical resources. Cynicism and depersonalization refer to a
detached response to various aspects of the job. Reduced ecacy and accomplishment refer to a sense
of incompetence and lack of productivity at work [
11
]. Burnout complaints can occur in employees
who are currently still working. Over time, however, burnout can lead employees to take sick leave
and become unable to work [12].
According to several theories, burnout develops in a non-linear manner [
13
]. Models that are
well-supported by empirical evidence include the Job Demand-Control Model [
14
], Conservation
of Resources theory [
15
] and the Job Demands-Resources Model [
16
]. These models emphasize
that the development of burnout is fostered through a complex interplay between factors within
employees (e.g., low self-esteem) and factors within the organizational context (e.g., work overload).
Based on these theories, interventions should target both employees and their working contexts, in
order to facilitate rehabilitation (i.e., reducing burnout complaints and promoting full return to work
(RTW)) [
17
]. Examples of person-directed interventions include psychotherapy and mindfulness
sessions. Examples of organization-directed interventions include changing working schedules and
team building.
1.1. Scientific Gap
To date, most systematic reviews and meta-analyses have focused separately on either
person-directed or organization-directed interventions, both of which have proven suboptimal in
facilitating rehabilitation [
18
]. Their lack of eectiveness has consequently been attributed to the
single-level approach (either person-directed or organization-directed interventions) [
18
]. There is
thus a need to synthesize the eectiveness of existing combined interventions (both person-directed
and organization-directed). Although existing theories suggest that combined interventions could be
eective in facilitating rehabilitation, it would also be interesting to examine why and how interventions
do or do not work. This has yet to be suciently understood [
18
20
]. In studies on interventions
aimed at reducing stress-related complaints in general (and not specifically burnout), job control has
been found to mediate changes in such complaints [
21
]. It would therefore be worthwhile to explore
the role of possible mediators of change in combined interventions.
1.2. Study Objective
Based on studies with experimental designs, the present study aims to assess the eectiveness
of combined (both person- and organization-directed) interventions for employees with burnout
complaints (currently either working or not working) on facilitating rehabilitation. Complementary,
this review aims to identify and describe mediators of change that could explain how combined
interventions do or do not work.
2. Methods
The systematic review was structured according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [
22
]. More specifically, we used the PRISMA checklist
to guide the design and reporting of the systematic review (supplementary materials, Table S1). Since
we did not aim to conduct a meta-analysis of the combined interventions, not all elements of this
checklist were relevant for this review (e.g., statistical measures of consistency).
2.1. Inclusion Criteria
Five inclusion criteria were applied to the identified studies, based on the PICOS criteria
(participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design). First, to reduce heterogeneity
between studies, those focusing on employees were included, while those focusing on students [
23
],
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 3 of 20
athletes [
24
] and volunteers [
25
] were excluded. Second, combined interventions (both person-directed
and organization-directed) were included. Third, we did not define a comparison exposure, which
means that experimental studies that did not include a control group were included. Fourth, studies
using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) to assess burnout were included, as the MBI is regarded
as the gold standard for measuring burnout [
26
], thereby enhancing comparability between studies.
With respect to return to work (RTW), all operationalizations were included. Fifth, randomized
controlled trials, quasi-experimental and pre-test/post-test study designs were included, as these
designs provide more robust evidence than do cross-sectional or other non-experimental designs [
27
].
Finally, only studies published in English between 1970 and 29 September 2019 were included.
2.2. Data Sources and Search Terms
Seven electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed publications: the Psychology and
Behavioral Sciences Collection; PsycARTICLES; Web of Science (all databases); Scopus; SocINDEX;
PubMed; and PsycINFO. Search terms were based on the three dimensions of burnout—emotional
exhaustion, depersonalization or cynicism, personal accomplishment or professional ecacy, Maslach
Burnout Inventory or MBI—and combined with and “intervention”. To ensure substantial breadth and
depth in the electronic databases, the search strategy was pilot tested before the search was conducted.
The first author conducted the electronic search.
2.3. Search Strategy
The database search yielded 4110 hits, including a large number of duplicates (n =1154).
The subsequent search strategy consisted of two stages (See Figure 1). In the first stage, titles and
abstracts were screened against the inclusion criteria and abstracts deviating from them were excluded
(
n=2638
). Where the reviewer was uncertain, the abstract was moved onto the next stage for a
full-text review. In the second stage, full-text articles were screened (n =318) against the inclusion
criteria. Studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria (e.g., non-combined interventions) were
excluded (
n=308
). The first three authors were involved in the full-text screening stage and, in case of
uncertainty, the fourth authors acted as tie-breakers for the inclusion or exclusion of the remaining
articles. The reference lists of the included articles were screened to identify any additional relevant
studies. These lists did not reveal any additional studies and 10 studies were ultimately included in
the review.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, x 3 of 21
studies using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) to assess burnout were included, as the MBI is
regarded as the gold standard for measuring burnout [26], thereby enhancing comparability between
studies. With respect to return to work (RTW), all operationalizations were included. Fifth,
randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental and pre-test/post-test study designs were included,
as these designs provide more robust evidence than do cross-sectional or other non-experimental
designs [27]. Finally, only studies published in English between 1970 and 29 September 2019 were
included.
2.2. Data Sources and Search Terms
Seven electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed publications: the Psychology and
Behavioral Sciences Collection; PsycARTICLES; Web of Science (all databases); Scopus; SocINDEX;
PubMed; and PsycINFO. Search terms were based on the three dimensions of burnoutemotional
exhaustion, depersonalization or cynicism, personal accomplishment or professional efficacy,
Maslach Burnout Inventory or MBI—and combined with and “intervention. To ensure substantial
breadth and depth in the electronic databases, the search strategy was pilot tested before the search
was conducted. The first author conducted the electronic search.
2.3. Search Strategy
The database search yielded 4110 hits, including a large number of duplicates (n = 1154). The
subsequent search strategy consisted of two stages (See Figure 1). In the first stage, titles and abstracts
were screened against the inclusion criteria and abstracts deviating from them were excluded (n =
2638). Where the reviewer was uncertain, the abstract was moved onto the next stage for a full-text
review. In the second stage, full-text articles were screened (n = 318) against the inclusion criteria.
Studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria (e.g., non-combined interventions) were excluded (n
= 308). The first three authors were involved in the full-text screening stage and, in case of uncertainty,
the fourth authors acted as tie-breakers for the inclusion or exclusion of the remaining articles. The
reference lists of the included articles were screened to identify any additional relevant studies. These
lists did not reveal any additional studies and 10 studies were ultimately included in the review.
Figure 1. Process of study selection.
Figure 1. Process of study selection.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 4 of 20
2.4. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
The data extraction phase consisted of two steps. In the first step, studies were described
according to the following characteristics: author(s) and country; setting and design; study aim and
outcomes; participants; controls; theoretical framework; interventions; mediators of change; duration
and frequency; pre-test, post-test and follow-up; and results. In the second step, statistically significant
eects of the combined interventions on the reduction of burnout complaints and the promotion of RTW
were described, as were the theoretical assumptions and mediators of change. All researchers were
actively involved in defining how the data should be extracted and described in an iterative process.
The theoretical assumptions underlying the combined interventions were described in order to
enhance insight into why the interventions did or did not work. For combined interventions that
were not built on any specific theory, it was deemed appropriate to describe the general assumptions
made by the authors (if described). With regard to mediators of change, in addition to reporting those
mediators that were explicitly measured and evaluated concerning change in the outcome variables,
we also described mediators of change that were identified in the theoretical (or other) assumptions
underlying the combined interventions.
Since the overarching aim of this review is to assess the eectiveness of the combined interventions
for the rehabilitation of employees with burnout, it is important to assess the risk of bias of the included
studies to determine the extent to which the reported eects can be attributed to the interventions
and not to a lack of methodological rigor. To assess this risk of bias, we used the Quality Assessment
Tool for Quantitative Studies, which is specifically developed by the Eective Public Health Practice
Project for this critical step [
28
]. The tool can be applied in any public health topic area and has
been evaluated on its validity and reliability, which proved to be strong [
28
,
29
]. The tool defines
six components to assess the risk of bias: selection bias (e.g., do the study participant represent the
target population?), study design (e.g., was a randomized controlled trial design used?), confounders
(e.g., how did the authors deal with possible dierences between experimental and control groups?),
blinding (e.g., were the study participants aware of the research question?), data collection methods
(e.g., were the measurements instruments reliable and valid?), withdrawals and dropouts (e.g., were
withdrawals and dropouts reported?) [
28
]. The first author conducted the assessment and nine studies
showed a “high” risk of bias and one study was assessed as having a “moderate” risk of bias. Studies
were not excluded based on this assessment; however, the results should be interpreted with caution.
To ensure transparency, the assessment scores can be found in the Supplementary materials, Table S2.
3. Results
3.1. Description of the Studies
Descriptive information regarding the 10 studies in this review is presented in Table 1.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 5 of 20
Table 1. Included articles (N =10).
Author/s,
Country Setting, Design Study Aim,
Outcome/sParticipants Controls Theoretical
Framework Interventions Mediators of
Change Measured Duration
Pre-Test (T1),
Post-Test (T2),
Follow-Up (T3)
Results Risk of
Bias
White-collar workers
Studies 1,2
[30,31];
Sweden
Employees on sick
leave due to
burnout; identified
from a social
insurance register;
controlled clinical
trial design
Promoting
RTW; RTW
(sick leave
percentage)
Workers
with burnout;
confirmed by
medical
examination and
questionnaire
interview (n =74)
Workers
with burnout who
were not interested
in participating in
the intervention;
no intervention (n
=74)
Job-person
(mis)match
Combined intervention: a
convergence
dialogue meeting (i.e., dialogue
between the patient and the
supervisor to find solutions to
facilitate RTW)
Partial work
resumption
expected to foster
full RTW
Half-day seminar,
1.5-hour meeting
After 18 and 30
months, the total
sick
leavein the
combined
intervention
group, as
compared to the
control group
After 18 and 30
months, the total
sick
leavein the
combined
intervention group,
as compared to the
control group
High
Study 3
[32];
Netherlands
Stamembers of
29 oncology wards
of 18 general
hospitals;
quasi-experimental
design
Reducing
burnout
complaints;
MBI-HSS
(EE, DP)
Stamembers at
risk of developing
burnout; randomly
selected from 9
wards (n =260)
Stamembers;
remaining 19
wards; no
intervention (n =
404)
Not
reported
Combined intervention: a sta
support group and a
participatory approach (n =260)
Job control, social
support,
participation in
decision-making,
quantitative
demands and
patient-related
emotional
demands
6 monthly sessions
of 4 hours each
T1–before the
intervention
T2–6 months later,
directly after the
intervention ended
T3–6 months after
the intervention
ended
In the combined
intervention, EEat
both T2 and T3, DP
at T3 compared to
the control group
High
Study 4
[33]; Hong
Kong
Construction-related
professionals
engaged in
property
development,
consulting and
contracting
companies;
quasi-experimental
design
Reducing
burnout
complaints;
MBI-GS
(EE, CY,
PE)
Workers at risk of
developing
burnout; all
workers worked in
the same company
(n =55)
None Job-person
(mis)match
Combined intervention; based
on job-redesign addressing
stressors and resources in the
workplace (n =55)
None
A period of one
year. The
frequency of the
interventions
diered according
to the activity
T1–before the
intervention
T2–1 year after the
intervention
T3–none
EE, CYafter the
combined
intervention; PE
High
Study 5
[34];
Finland
White-collar
women diagnosed
as having various
job-related
psychological
health problems
(e.g., burnout);
quasi-experimental
design
Reducing
burnout
complaints;
MBI-GS
(EX, CY, PE
scores)
Female
white-collar
workers;
diagnosed by
physicians based
on their medical
report application
(n =20 +32)
Female
white-collar
workers; awaiting
treatment (n =12).
Based on
job-person
(mis)match
Traditional intervention:
primary focus on the individual
but when necessary, also on the
individual-organizational
interface (n =32)
Combined intervention: similar
to the traditional intervention
but based on a participatory
approach (n =21)
Job control, social
support,
participation in
decision-making
One year with two
rehabilitation
periods (12 and 5
days, respectively)
T1–before the
intervention
T2–after the first
part of the
intervention, 4
months after T1
T3–after the
second part of the
intervention, 8
months after T2
In the combined
intervention, EX
between T1 and T2
and between T1 and
T3; CYbetween T1
and T2; PE
In the traditional
intervention, EX,
CY, DP
In the control group,
CY
between T1 and
T2; CY, DP
High
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 6 of 20
Table 1. Cont.
Author/s,
Country Setting, Design Study Aim,
Outcome/sParticipants Controls Theoretical
Framework Interventions Mediators of
Change Measured Duration
Pre-Test (T1),
Post-Test (T2),
Follow-Up (T3)
Results Risk of
Bias
White-collar workers
Study 6
[35];
Norway
Stamembers
working with
people with
intellectual
disabilities in two
municipalities; 2
groups,
pre-test/post-test
design
Reducing
burnout
complaints;
MBI-GS
(EX, CY, PE
scores)
Staworking in
one municipality
at risk of
developing
burnout (n =79)
Staworking in a
dierent
municipality; no
intervention (n =
33)
Job-person
mismatch
Combined intervention:
focusing on the individual (e.g.,
exercise in a health club) and
the organization (e.g.,
improving the working
schedule) (n =79)
None
A period of 10
months. The
frequency of the
interventions
diered
depending on the
activity
T1–before the
intervention
T2–after the
intervention, (i.e.,
after 10 months)
T3–none
In the combined
intervention EX
after the
intervention, as
compared to the
control group; CY,
PE
In the control group,
EX, CY, PE
High
Healthcare workers
Study 7
[36]; USA
General surgery
residents working
at the University
of Arizona; one
group,
pre-test/post-test
design
Reducing
burnout
complaints;
MBI-GS
(EX, CY,
PE)
Stamembers at
risk of developing
burnout; the
intervention was
part of their formal
(on the job)
education (n =49)
None Not
reported
Combined intervention:
multiple activities (e.g.,
mindfulness sessions, team
building) (n =49)
None
A period of one
year. Monthly,
interactive
sessions were
provided
T1–before the
intervention
T2–One year after
the
implementation of
the intervention
T3–none
EEafter the
combined
intervention; CY,
PE
High
Study 8
[37];
England
Staworking in an
in-patient alcohol
ward; one group,
pre-test/post-test
design
Reducing
burnout
complaints;
MBI (EE,
DP, PA)
Stamembers at
risk of developing
burnout; all sta
were invited to
participate in the
intervention (n =
19)
None
Demand-Control
Support
Job Stress
Model
Combined intervention:
managing stress at the
individual, team and
organizational level and on
understanding the causes and
consequences of aggression (n
=19)
None
Two-day training
with two weeks
between the
training
days
T1–3 months
before the
intervention
T2–1 month after
the intervention
ended
T3–none
PAafter the
combined
intervention, EE,
DP
High
Study 9
[38]; USA
Starepresenting
15 departments
(e.g., nursing,
pharmacy,
housekeeping);
one group,
retrospective
pre-test/post-test
design
Reducing
burnout
complaints;
MBI-HSS
(EE, CY,
PA)
Stamembers at
risk of developing
burnout; a
stratified random
sample reflecting
all departments (n
=51)
None Not
reported
Combined intervention: based
on experiential techniques (e.g.,
team building and enhancing
self-esteem) (n =51)
None Three sessions of
three hours each
T1–3 months
before the
intervention
T2–1 month after
the intervention
ended
T3–none
EE, PAafter the
combined
intervention; CY
High
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 7 of 20
Table 1. Cont.
Author/s,
Country Setting, Design Study Aim,
Outcome/sParticipants Controls Theoretical
Framework Interventions Mediators of
Change Measured Duration
Pre-Test (T1),
Post-Test (T2),
Follow-Up (T3)
Results Risk of
Bias
Self-employed
Study 10
[39];
Netherlands
Self-employed
individuals on sick
leave due to
work-related
psychological
complaints (e.g.,
burnout);
controlled clinical
trial design
Reducing
burnout
complaints,
promoting
RTW;
MBI-NL
(EX, DP, PE
scores),
RTW
(mean
number of
days to
partial and
full return
to work)
Self-employed;
screened by
psychologists (n =
40 +40)
Self-employed;
asked to postpone
their treatment for
four months (n =
42)
Not
reported
Person-directed intervention:
CBT; focused on cognitive
restructuring (n =40)
Combined intervention:
CBT-based stress management
and meetings with labor
experts aimed at changing the
work context (n =40)
None
11 bi-weekly
sessions of
approximately 45
minutes per
session
5 to 6 sessions of
approximately 1
hour, twice per
week
T1-before the
intervention
T2-4 months after
the onset of the
intervention
T3-10 months after
the onset of the
intervention
EE, DP; PE,
regardless of the
intervention
Shorter time to
partial and full RTW
for participants in
the combined
intervention, as
compared to those in
the person-directed
intervention and
control group
Moderate
=significant increase; =no significant change; =significant decrease
Abbreviations: CCT =Controlled Clinical Trial; MBI =Maslach Burnout Inventory; MBI–GS =Maslach Burnout Inventory–General Survey; MBI–HSS =Maslach Burnout Inventory–Human
Services Survey; MBI–NL =Maslach Burnout Inventory–Netherlands; RTW =Return to Work; EX =Exhaustion; CY =Cynicism; DP =Depersonalization; PA =Personal Accomplishment;
PE =Professional Ecacy.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 8 of 20
3.1.1. Countries, Settings and Research Designs
The articles were based on studies conducted in eight countries: USA (n =2), Sweden (
n=2
),
the Netherlands (n =2), Norway (
n=1
), Finland (
n=1
), Hong Kong (n =1) and England (
n=1
).
The settings were highly heterogeneous, ranging from self-employed individuals to white-collar
workers and healthcare workers. The research designs also varied, ranging from a controlled clinical
trial to pre-test/post-test designs. This was also the case for the time between pre-tests and follow-up
measurements, which ranged from four months (Study 5) to 30 months (Studies 1 and 2).
3.1.2. Measures of Burnout and RTW
Most of the studies concerned interventions aimed at reducing burnout complaints (Studies 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8 and 9), although three aimed to promote full RTW (Studies1, 2 and 10). Multiple versions of the
MBI were used across the studies, including the MBI—General Survey (measuring exhaustion, cynicism
and professional ecacy) and the MBI—Human Survey Index (measuring exhaustion, cynicism and
personal accomplishment). Studies 1, 2 and 10 measured RTW, which was operationalized as the mean
number of days to partial and full RTW (Study 10) and the sick leave percentage (Studies 1 and 2).
3.1.3. Combined Interventions, Theories and Mediators of Change
The combined interventions were all dierent in terms of content. More specifically, none of the
studies evaluated the same person-directed and organization-directed interventions. The duration
and frequency of the interventions also diered sharply across the studies, depending on the activities
on which the interventions were based. For example, Study 9 was based on three sessions of three
hours each, while Study 3 was based on six monthly sessions of four hours each. Multiple theoretical
frameworks were identified, with most focused on job-person mismatch (Studies 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6).
Study 8 used the Demand-Control-Support Model and Studies 3, 7, 9 and 10 did not report any
theoretical framework.
Abbreviations: CCT =Controlled Clinical Trial; MBI =Maslach Burnout Inventory; MBI–GS =
Maslach Burnout Inventory–General Survey; MBI–HSS =Maslach Burnout Inventory–Human Services
Survey; MBI–NL =Maslach Burnout Inventory–Netherlands; RTW =Return to Work; EX =Exhaustion;
CY =Cynicism; DP =Depersonalization; PA =Personal Accomplishment; PE =Professional Ecacy.
3.2. Eectitivness of the Combined Interventions
3.2.1. Studies 1 and 2
Eectiveness
A controlled clinical trial design was conducted among Swedish employees on sick leave due to
burnout. The authors conclude that, after 18 months, 89% of the employees in the experimental group
had RTW to a certain extent, whereas only 73% employees in the control group had RTW. The eect of
the combined intervention remained stable after 30 months, where 82.4% of the employees where back
at work, which was still a higher percentage compared to the control group (77.9%).
Underlying Principles
The combined intervention was based on a convergence-dialogue meeting (CDM), which was
intended to cultivate a dialogue between the employee and the supervisor to identify opportunities in
order to facilitate RTW.
The combined Intervention
To facilitate RTW, an outline of the employee’s perspective was compiled according to multiple
sources (e.g., questionnaire replies, the course of events leading to burnout, the employee’s own views
of changes required for RTW). Based on this outline, the supervisor was interviewed at the workplace,
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 9 of 20
in addition to outlining the perceived causes of the employee’s absenteeism and the changes required
in order to facilitate RTW. In general, the intervention focused on solutions and changes aimed at the
identification of converging perspectives and goals between employees and supervisors.
The CDM started by highlighting the agreements and disagreements between the supervisor and
the employee with regard to the causes of the sick leave and the improvements required in order to
facilitate RTW. Each session lasted for about 1.5 hours, resulting in agreements concerning short term
and long-term goals and solutions. Thereafter, the employees were invited to a seminar, along with
4–6 other employees who had participated in the intervention. The seminar consisted of discussions
and lectures on the topic of work-related (and other) stress. These discussions and lectures were also
arranged separately for the supervisors involved. For the employees, the seminar aimed to help them
reflect on how they could prevent a similar occurrence of sick leave in the future. For the supervisors,
the focus was on how to prevent sick leave related to work stress among their employees.
Mediators of Change
The expectation that facilitating partial RTW would predict full RTW was not supported by
empirical evidence. The principles underlying the combined intervention (e.g., an actual change in the
work environment) were not evaluated.
3.2.2. Study 3
Eectiveness
A quasi-experimental study design was employed to investigate Dutch oncology stawith a
risk of developing burnout. The authors conclude that, compared to the two control wards, the
combined intervention resulted in significantly less exhaustion after both 6 and 12 months and in less
depersonalization after six months.
Underlying Principles
No specific theoretical framework was reported. Instead, the combined intervention was inspired
by a participatory approach, in which the interventions were context-specific and based on an
accurate assessment of both individual and organizational factors, rather than relying on pre-packaged,
context-independent programs based on a uniform and theory-based approach. The combined
intervention was developed in collaboration with external counselors and it combined a support
group with the participatory approach. Before the intervention, intake interviews were held with
the managers of the ward (e.g., discussing possible intervention eects), in order to enhance their
motivation to implement the interventions.
The Combined Intervention
The combined intervention consisted of six monthly meetings of three hours each, which were
supervised by both of the team counselors. The first session started with education on job stress
(although no details were provided) and the results concerning the employees’ work situations
(e.g., workload, emotional demands, job control, social support, participation in decision-making), as
measured at T1, were fed back to the employees. During this first meeting, the participants selected
a number of stressors to be addressed (e.g., lack of social support). Each of the remaining meetings
consisted of two parts: education and action. The educational part focused on the emergence and
persistence unwanted behavior (Meeting 2); feedback and communication (Meeting 3); creating a
social support network (Meeting 4); and balancing job-related investments and outcomes (Meeting 5).
The action part focused on enhancing the abilities of the workforce to cope with stressors eectively.
Outcomes of these sessions included restructuring the weekly work meetings in order to allow more
staparticipation in decision-making.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 10 of 20
Mediators of Change
The authors conclude that the combined intervention significantly increased participation in
decision-making, which subsequently led to a decrease in exhaustion. Similar results were reported
for social support and job control: increases in both social support and job control were significantly
related to simultaneous reductions in exhaustion and depersonalization. Even though participants in
the combined intervention reported fewer burnout complaints than did those in the control group,
both exhaustion and depersonalization had increased after one year. This result can be explained by
an increase in the perceived workload (although it is not clear what contributed to this increase).
3.2.3. Study 4
Eectiveness
A quasi-experimental study design was employed to investigate construction-related professionals
engaged in property development, consulting and contracting companies in Hong Kong. One year
after the combined intervention, employees reported significantly fewer feelings of exhaustion and
cynicism than they had before the intervention.
Underlying Principles
The combined intervention was conducted from the perspective of job-person mismatch, using
job-redesign to reduce mismatches (i.e., stressors) identified through a cross-sectional study measuring
job-related variables among employees (i.e., working hours, quantitative workload, role conflict,
control over work pace, satisfaction with supervisor).
The combined Intervention
The person-directed interventions included in-house training courses to enhance the
ability of employees to cope actively with stressors (e.g., improving time management skills).
The organization-directed intervention included a change in working hours (one additional day
oevery two weeks), which was expected to reduce the incidence of long working hours. The authors
did not describe how the combined intervention was implemented or by whom.
Mediators of Change
The mediators of change (possible stressors) were measured only in order to inform the
development of the combined intervention. They were neither tested nor evaluated with regard to the
change in burnout complaints reported by employees.
3.2.4. Study 5
Eectiveness
A quasi-experimental study design was employed in Finland to investigate white-collar workers
(e.g., stafrom social services and health departments) who were currently on sick leave due to burnout.
The authors conclude that the combined intervention produced a significant reduction in feelings of
exhaustion after both four and eight months and in cynicism after four months. Although no changes
occurred in the person-directed intervention (Control group 1), cynicism decreased significantly in the
no-treatment group (Control group 2).
Underlying Principles
The theoretical framework was based on job-person mismatch. During the intervention process,
participants collaborated with representatives from their workplaces and with the rehabilitation sta
to reduce mismatches and improve their working environment.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 11 of 20
The combined Intervention
The combined intervention entailed one year, with two rehabilitation periods (12 and 5
days, respectively). Person-directed interventions involved activities including physiological and
occupational therapy, which was intended to enhance the abilities of employees to cope with
stress and to promote awareness of stress-evoking situations and how people react to stress.
The organization-directed intervention included a link to the workplaces of the rehabilitation
clients. More specifically, the employee’s supervisor, a member of the occupational health and safety
organization, plus a representative from occupational health care were invited to the rehabilitation center
for one day during each rehabilitation period. The inclusion of representatives from the workplace in
the rehabilitation process was intended to involve the employer and to create an obligation for the
employer to implement the actions agreed upon in order to remedy defects in the workplace.
In the first rehabilitation period, the workplace-related representatives collaborated with
the participants and the rehabilitation team to identify ways to improve job conditions for the
participants, based on a memorandum that the participants had prepared in advance of this meeting.
The memorandum included issues that the participants considered essential to enhancing personal
job-related wellbeing and health. In the second rehabilitation period, the same individuals met at the
rehabilitation center again and discussed whether the agreed upon remedies had been implemented
and whether any problems had been related to them. This was expected to reduce burnout complaints.
The purpose of these two meetings was to increase the control that employees had over issues relating
to their jobs and to improve their job conditions.
Mediators of Change
The intervention assumed that a change in burnout complaints (feelings of exhaustion) would
be mediated by a decrease in time pressure at work. The changes in two other burnout symptoms
(cynicism and reduced professional ecacy) were expected to be mediated, particularly by an increase
in perceived job control. Theoretically, the change in these symptoms was also expected to be mediated
by improvements in the workplace climate and satisfaction with the supervisor. The results support that
the combined intervention significantly increased employee job control and that this increase resulted
in lower levels of exhaustion and cynicism over the 12-month rehabilitation process. Workplace climate
had only a minimal (non-significant) mediating influence on exhaustion and no eect on cynicism.
3.2.5. Study 6
Eectiveness
A two-group pre-test/post-test design was employed to investigate community healthcare sta
caring for people with disabilities in two municipalities in Norway. In that country, responsibility
for people with disabilities was transferred from the county to municipal level in 1991. The authors
conclude that the combined intervention significantly reduced feelings of exhaustion after 10 months,
whereas no changes in burnout complaints were observed in the control group.
Underlying Principles
The combined intervention was conducted from the perspective of job-person mismatch. Rather
than trying to eliminate all stressors (i.e., “mismatches”), the intervention assumed that focusing on
mismatches that, if resolved, could potentially generate and allow the implementation of concrete
solutions that would be most eective in reducing burnout complaints. It was also argued that the
involvement of multiple stakeholders (i.e., the manager, two senior leaders, two employees, researchers
and the human resource manager—the working group) and the support of the supervisor were critical
success factors for any intervention in the workplace.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 12 of 20
The Combined Intervention
Employees discussed stressors and potential solutions and this resulted in priority lists concerning
actions aimed at improving working conditions. Based on this list, the working group agreed upon
a set of intervention strategies to be implemented at both the individual and organizational levels.
For example, the person-directed interventions entailed a voluntary exercise program, in which
the study participants were expected to exercise to improve fitness. Three organization-directed
interventions were implemented: the introduction of performance appraisals, the re-organization of
working schedules to promote larger positions (i.e., more working hours each week) and stability
among the staand the improvement of routines for new employees (e.g., better on the job training).
Specific goals were formulated for each of the interventions. For example, the purpose of the exercise
program was to improve the health and wellbeing of employees, thereby buering the adverse eects of
burnout. The organization-directed interventions were intended to provide feedback to both employees
and supervisors, in addition to promoting job security, which is assumed to reduce burnout complaints.
Mediators of Change
Neither the underlying principles (e.g., enabling employees to participate in decision-making) nor
the goals of the intervention (e.g., promoting job security) were evaluated with regard to the change in
burnout complaints.
3.2.6. Study 7
Eectiveness
A one group pre-test/post-test design was employed to investigate general surgery residents
working at the University of Arizona (USA). The authors conclude that the combined intervention
significantly reduced feelings of exhaustion after 12 months.
Underlying Principles
Although the combined intervention was not based on any specific theoretical framework,
multiple assumptions were described. The intervention assumed that enhancing the self-awareness
and emotional intelligence of employees would teach them to respond eectively, rather than reacting
to the stress inherent in their lives and environments, thereby reducing burnout complaints.
The Combined Intervention
The person-directed interventions entailed activities aimed at improving the work-life
balance of employees and promoting healthy diet and exercise (none of which were explained).
One organization-directed intervention was implemented, which entailed a range of team building
activities (none of which were explained). The overall aim of the person-directed and organization-directed
activities was to improve the mental, physical and social health and wellbeing of employees and this was
assumed to reduce burnout complaints. The employees were asked to evaluate the program based on
certain predefined indicators (which were not based on the underlying principles). The results indicated
that, in general, the employees perceived the program as positive. For example, 96% strongly agreed that
the program created cohesiveness and a sense of community among the workforce.
Mediators of Change
None of the underlying principles (e.g., enhancing employee self-awareness) was evaluated with
regard to the change in burnout complaints, nor were the goals of the intervention (e.g., improving
their health) or the predefined outcomes (e.g., promoting a sense of community).
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 13 of 20
3.2.7. Study 8
Eectiveness
A one group pre-test/post-test design was employed to investigate staworking in an alcohol
ward in England. The authors conclude that the combined intervention led to a significant increase in
personal accomplishment after one month.
Underlying Principles
The combined intervention was based on the Demand-Control Support Job Stress Model, with
an emphasis on enhancing social support among the workforce in order to improve their ability to
cope with stress. Social support was assumed to act as a buer against the possible adverse health
eects of excessive psychological demands or stressors. Employees were involved (although it was not
clear how) in identifying stressors, which were then used as a foundation for developing the combined
intervention (although it was not clear how). The stressors identified by the staincluded group work,
dealing with complex clients and client aggression. The practice of working with whole teams was
assumed to have a positive eect on the entire team culture, in addition to introducing bottom-up
working practices aimed at reducing stress (none of these aspects were explained).
The Combined Intervention
Although the combined intervention focused on working with the whole team, elements in
the training also addressed both individual and organizational issues. In practice, the combined
intervention consisted of two days of training, with two weeks between the training days. The focus
of the first day of the training was on “Managing stress at the individual, team and organizational
level,” and the second day was devoted to understanding “the causes and consequences of aggression.”
One aspect of the training consisted of identifying the common antecedents of episodes of violence
from a comprehensive perspective, including client-related, environmental, team and organizational
factors, although none of these factors were explained. The team members then received assistance in
undertaking a comprehensive risk assessment (although it was not clear what was being assessed) and
strategies for implementing interventions to address the risks (these were also not explained).
Mediators of Change
None of the underlying principles (e.g., the role of social support or employee participation) was
evaluated with regard to the change in burnout complaints.
3.2.8. Study 9
Eectiveness
A one group retrospective pre-test/post-test design was employed in the USA to investigate sta
representing multiple healthcare professions (e.g., nursing, pharmacy, housekeeping). The authors
conclude that the combined intervention resulted in a significant decrease in exhaustion and a significant
increase in professional accomplishment.
Underlying Principles
No specific theoretical framework was mentioned, nor was any rationale underlying the
combined intervention.
The combined Intervention
The combined intervention consisted of three sessions (workshops) of three hours each, focusing
on team building (positive human connections), communication skills, building self-esteem and stress
management. Building self-esteem and stress management are person-directed interventions, while
team building is an organization-directed intervention. For example, the team building exercises
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 14 of 20
included the construction of straw towers in small groups, a values-clarification exercise and the
preparation and performance of a musical number in which each person acted as an instrument.
Examples of stress management techniques included breathing exercises, guided visualization and a
shoulder massage with a co-worker.
Mediators of Change
Some mediators of change were subjected to qualitative exploration and quantitative description,
expressing how often a particular theme was mentioned. For example, employees reported that the
combined intervention resulted in better communication with co-workers (24%), a better working
atmosphere (53%) and increased self-esteem (18%). However, none of these mediators was evaluated
with regard to changes in burnout complaints reported by the employees.
3.2.9. Study 10
Eectiveness
A controlled clinical trial design was employed in the Netherlands to investigate self-employed
individuals (i.e., business owners) who were currently on sick leave due to burnout. Participants in the
combined intervention partially returned to work 17 and 30 days earlier than did their counterparts in
the person-directed intervention and the control group. For full RTW, this dierence was approximately
200 days. All of these dierences were statistically significant. When controlling for gender, age,
education and number of employees, however, the eect of the combined intervention was no longer
significant for partial RTW, although it did persist for full RTW.
Underlying Principles
No specific theoretical framework was reported. The intervention had a strong focus on graded
activity. More specifically, it involved a process of gradual exposure, in which the participant’s
activation was increased through small steps. Six labor experts participated in the study. All of
these experts received training in a brief stress management intervention based on cognitive based
therapy. The stress management part of the intervention consisted of psycho-education on work
stress, the registration of symptoms and situations, relaxation, self-help books on rational emotive
behavior therapy and assignments involving writing and time management. In addition, the labor
experts advised the participants with regard to work processes and provided suggestions for reducing
workload and job demands while increasing decision latitude. These components were intended to
foster at least partial work resumption.
The combined Intervention
The combined intervention consisted of five to six sessions of approximately one hour, twice a
week. A person-directed (based on Cognitive Based Therapy) intervention was combined with an
organization-directed intervention focusing on reducing stressors at work (e.g., reducing workload).
Mediators of Change
None of the underlying assumptions (e.g., increasing the employees’ decision latitude) was either
empirically tested or evaluated with regard to change in RTW.
4. Discussion
4.1. Summary of Findings
This study consisted of a systematic assessment of combined interventions with regard to their
eectiveness, theoretical assumptions and mediators of change. Of the 4110 abstracts obtained in a
literature search (published before September 29, 2019), 10 studies (reporting the eects of 9 combined
interventions) fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. It should be emphasized that all 9 combined
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 15 of 20
interventions were eective (at least to a certain extent) in facilitating rehabilitation. With regard to the
reduction of burnout complaints, the combined interventions led to greater improvement in exhaustion
and cynicism (or depersonalization), in both the short term (after 4 months) and the long-term (after 12
years), than in professional ecacy (or personal accomplishment). In terms of promoting RTW, the
combined interventions showed long-term eects on the promotion of full RTW.
Surprisingly, very few of the studies devoted much attention to evaluating potential mediators of
change that could properly explain their results and clarify why and how the combined interventions
did or did not work. Moreover, only three studies included any empirical (or other) test for mediators
of change in order to explain how the combined intervention worked. These studies suggest that
enhancing employees’ sense of job control (i.e., decision authority over their jobs), social support
(e.g., positive feedback from supervisors), participation in decision-making (e.g., selecting stressors and
mismatches) and reducing workload can facilitate rehabilitation among employees who are currently
either working or absent on sick leave. The results of the three studies involving empirical evaluation
of factors mediating change are supported by the fact that all of the studies share specific theoretical (or
other) assumptions concerning the importance of involving employees in decision-making, enhancing
their job control and social support and reducing stressors (e.g., high workload).
4.2. Scientific Implications
To our knowledge, this systematic review is the first to focus on combined interventions. Although
previous reviews have included combined interventions [
40
,
41
], the methods underlying their reviews
have exhibited many limitations (e.g., using only two or three electronic databases; limiting the
search period from 1995 to 2005; and not assessing study quality). The present review addresses
these limitations by using seven relevant databases, expanding the search to include all studies since
the emergence of the burnout concept (>1970), assessing the risk of bias and including only studies
using the MBI or RTW to ensure comparability with regard to the outcome of interest. In addition,
two of the “combined interventions” addressed in the review by Awa, Plaumann and Walter [
41
]
were organization-directed (professional supervision [
42
] and work-shift evaluations [
43
]) rather than
combined interventions and they were thus not included in the present review. Additionally, none of
these reviews attempted to identify and describe the mediators of change to explain how combined
interventions worked, which was an additional aim of this study. Hence, this systematic review
strongly builds upon and complements research on how to eectively facilitate rehabilitation, that is,
reducing burnout complaints and promoting a full RTW.
Indicated by the results of this review, the combined interventions did not lead to much
improvement in two specific dimensions of burnout: personal accomplishment and professional
ecacy. There has long been uncertainty with regard to including these two aspects as dimensions
of burnout, as they could be interpreted as either a cause or consequence of burnout [
44
]. On the
one hand, exhaustion might indicate a lack of personal accomplishment (or professional ecacy).
On the other hand, a lack of ecacy (or accomplishment) could result from poor performance due to
exhaustion [
45
]. It would therefore be interesting for future studies to provide further clarification
on the role of personal accomplishment or professional ecacy as either a cause or consequence
of burnout.
With regards to the mediators of change (whether measured directly or merely described), the
results are very much in line with central theories on burnout. For example, studies inspired by
the Job Demands-Resources Model consistently show that job resources (e.g., job control, social
support) are not only negatively related to burnout but also associated with multiple positive outcomes,
including enhanced job satisfaction and organizational commitment [
16
,
46
]. In a similar vein, a recent
cross-sectional study demonstrates that job control and social support are strongly correlated with the
ability of employees to participate and be productive in a sustainable and meaningful way [
47
]. At the
same time, the results of this review indicate that reducing workload (i.e., a job demand) can also
influence burnout complaints, thus suggesting that interventions should aim to build job resources
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 16 of 20
while addressing stressors. Future intervention studies should continue to clarify the role of job
resources and stressors with respect to reducing burnout complaints.
The studies evaluated in this review also reflect the expectation that facilitating partial RTW
can predict full RTW. These expectations were not supported by empirical evidence. One possible
explanation could be that employees who failed to attain a sustainable RTW toward the end of the
follow-up period had more severe burnout complaints and therefore needed a longer period of partial
RTW. However, study 10 showed that participants in the combined intervention faster RTW than
participants in the control group while their burnout complaints did not improve. This indicates that
reducing burnout complaints and facilitating a sustainable RTW cannot be seen as a single phenomenon,
which is in line with previous studies [48].
This review assessed studies involving employees from a variety of professions (e.g., healthcare,
construction work) and therefore a variety of working contexts. Although the results suggest that
combined interventions have beneficial eects on reducing burnout complaints and promoting full
RTW for multiple professions, they do not necessarily mean that a given intervention will produce
the same eects in a dierent working context. Similarly, this review also includes a study involving
self-employed people, who were thus also business owners. Self-employed individuals dier from
employees in several aspects. For example, studies have demonstrated that self-employed people
are characterized by strong levels of job control, job insecurity, decision latitude, work demands,
intrinsic motivation to work and low levels of social support in their work [
49
]. Although the eect
of the combined intervention aimed at facilitating full RTW among self-employed people (Study 10)
was promising, it does not mean that employees (who are not self-employed) on sick leave would
automatically benefit from the same combined intervention.
4.3. Practical Implications
The results of this review suggest that combined rehabilitation interventions are eective (at
least to a certain extent) in facilitating rehabilitation among employees who are currently working or
absent on sick leave. In general, all of the studies share common theoretical (or other) assumptions
concerning the importance of involving employees in decision-making and enhancing their sense
of job control and social support. These assumptions are further supported by the results of three
studies that involved the empirical evaluation of such mediators of change with regard to burnout
complaints. From the perspective of promoting workplace health, it could be worthwhile to build
such resources while addressing job demands (e.g., excessive workload) in order to alleviate burnout
complaints. Reflecting on the mediators of change—particularly participation in decision-making and
social support—the results suggest that simply paying attention to employees (i.e., listening to them
and addressing their needs) is important to the facilitation of rehabilitation. This knowledge could be
applied directly in practice.
4.4. Limitations
Although all combined interventions were eective in facilitating rehabilitation, nine studies had
a high risk of bias and one study was assessed as having a moderate risk of bias. This substantial risk of
bias has a direct impact on the robustness of the findings of this review. More specifically, it is unclear
whether the eects presented in a given study were due to the combined intervention or to the study
design as such. The results of this review should therefore be interpreted with caution. It should be
emphasized that the risk of bias assessment does not judge the “quality of the included studies,” rather,
it aims to identify possible bias based on the context in which the studies were conducted, thereby
assessing the “quality of the evidence.” Future studies are challenged to enhance the robustness of the
study designs, while taking into account the complexity of the combined interventions, which is a
common challenge in (workplace) health promotion research [50].
It should also be noted that the interventions addressed in this review were only general described
in terms of content and specific theoretical (or other) assumptions. Future studies should therefore
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 17 of 20
provide more in-depth information on the theories or assumptions on which the interventions are built,
as well as on how (and by whom) the interventions were developed, implemented and evaluated,
in addition to providing clear definitions for mediators of change. In addition to the quantitative
measurement and assessment of mediators of change with regard to their eects on the outcome
variables, it would be interesting to evaluate such mediators in qualitative terms. For example, the
quantitative measurement and analysis of participation in decision-making does not say anything
about how, why and under which circumstances employees were involved. In addition to evaluating
the eect of combined interventions on rehabilitation, therefore, research on burnout could benefit
from qualitative process evaluation, which could provide further information on why a combined
intervention did or did not work. Finally, the duration and intensity of the combined interventions
diered substantially, ranging from three sessions of three hours each to six monthly sessions of four
hours each. It is therefore impossible to determine exactly when a given intervention will work.
This review is subject to several limitations. Publication bias is likely to have influenced our
results. Given that studies resulting in negative or no eects are often not published, we were obviously
unable to include them in our review. Similarly, because our review includes only articles published in
English, it overlooks any relevant studies published in other languages. Also, although the MBI is used
as the golden stand for measuring burnout, it is also known to have multiple conceptual, technical and
practical issues [
45
]. For example, it does not measure all burnout symptoms (e.g., depressive feelings
and psychosomatic tension complaints), which are often the first reasons why employees seek help.
Recently, a new instrument—the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—has been developed to address
the issues associated with the MBI [
45
]. For this reason, we also attempted to retrieve studies that
evaluated combined interventions using the BAT by conducting an additional search on October 10,
2019. Unfortunately, this search did not reveal any additional studies. Finally, though the tool used
for the risk of bias assessment has been evaluated as strong [
28
,
29
], we did not systematically test the
instrument for failure in similar studies and we do not have evidence to state how and where the tool
breaks down; that is, we cannot be certain on its validity and reliability.
5. Conclusions
All nine combined (both person-directed and organization-directed) interventions showed a
positive eect on facilitating rehabilitation among employees who are currently working or on sick leave
due to burnout. Although the risk of bias of the included studies is considerably high, the results show
that the mediators of change addressed—job control, social support, participation in decision-making
and workload—contribute to employees’ rehabilitation. Further studies are challenged to enhance
the robustness of the study designs while incorporating the complexity of combined interventions,
preferably by adding qualitative process evaluations besides measuring eects. In addition, research
on burnout interventions could benefit from qualitative process evaluations aimed at unravelling
how and why interventions do or do not work. Finally, with caution, workplace health promotion
practitioners are encouraged to facilitate rehabilitation by building job resources while eliminating
stressors in the workplace.
Supplementary Materials:
The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/55/s1,
Table S1: The PRISMA Checklist; Table S2: The Assessment of Bias Scores of the Included Studies.
Author Contributions:
Conceptualization, all authors; Methodology, all authors; Validation, all authors; Formal
analysis, R.P.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.P.; Writing—review and editing, all authors; Visualization,
R.P.; Supervision, L.V., E.J.V. and M.A.K.; Project administration, R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the
published version of the manuscript.
Funding:
This research and APC were funded by the internal funds of the Health and Society and by the Rural
Sociology chair groups at Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands.
Acknowledgments:
The authors are grateful to Linda Karr for English language editing. This study is part of an
ongoing research project on understanding the mechanisms underlying the successful rehabilitation of (young)
employees with burnout. Finally, we appreciate Peter Tamas’s advice on the overall design of our review.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 18 of 20
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sick on the job?:. In Myths and Realities about
Mental Health and Work; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2012. [CrossRef]
2.
Hassard, J.; Teoh, K.R.H.; Visockaite, G.; Dewe, P.; Cox, T. The cost of work-related stress to society: A
systematic review. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2018,23, 1–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.
Appels, A.; Schouten, E. Burnout as a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Behav. Med.
1991
,17, 53–59.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.
Ruitenburg, M.M.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.; Sluiter, J.K. The prevalence of common mental disorders among
hospital physicians and their association with self-reported work ability: A cross-sectional study. BMC
Health Serv. Res. 2012,12, 292–298. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.
Alarcon, G.M.; Edwards, J.M. The relationship of engagement, job satisfaction and turnover intentions. Stress
Health 2011,27, 294–298. [CrossRef]
6.
Honkonen, T.; Ahola, K.; Pertovaara, M.; Isometsä, E.; Kalimo, R.; Nykyri, E.; Aromaa, A.; Lönnqvist, J. The
association between burnout and physical illness in the general population—Results from the Finnish Health
2000 Study. J. Psychosom. Res. 2006,61, 59–66. [CrossRef]
7.
Allen, D.; Hines, E.W.; Pazdernik, V.; Konecny, L.T.; Breitenbach, E. Four-year review of presenteeism data
among employees of a large United States health care system: A retrospective prevalence study. Hum. Resour.
Health 2018,16, 1–10. [CrossRef]
8.
Swider, B.W.; Zimmerman, R.D. Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout,
and work outcomes. J. Vocat. Behav. 2010,76, 487–506. [CrossRef]
9.
Ahola, K.R.; Gould, R.; Virtanen, M.; Honkonen, T.; Aromaa, A.; Lönnqvist, J. Occupational burnout as a
predictor of disability pension: A population-based cohort study. Occup. Environ. Med.
2009
,6, 284–290.
[CrossRef]
10. Maslach, C.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Leiter, M.P. Job burnout. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001,52, 397–422. [CrossRef]
11.
Maslach, C.; Jackson, S.E. The measurement of experienced burnout. J. Organ. Behav.
1981
,2, 99–113. [CrossRef]
12.
Schaufeli, W.B. Burnout: A short socio-cultural history. In Burnout, Fatigue, Exhaustion: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on a Modern Aiction, 2nd ed.; Neckel, S., Schaner, A.K., Wagner, G., Eds.; Springer International
Publishing: Cham, Switserland, 2017; pp. 105–127. [CrossRef]
13.
Schaufeli, W.; Enzmann, D. The Burnout Companion to Study and Practice: A Critical Analysis, 2nd ed.; Taylor &
Francis: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1998.
14.
Van der Doef, M.; Maes, S. The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review
of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 1999,13, 87–114. [CrossRef]
15. Halbesleben, J.R.; Buckley, M.R. Burnout in organizational life. J. Manag. 2004,30, 859–879. [CrossRef]
16.
Demerouti, E.; Bakker, A.B.; Nachreiner, F.; Schaufeli, W.B. The job demands-resources model of burnout.
J. Appl. Psychol. 2001,86, 499–512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17.
Maslach, C.; Goldberg, J. Prevention of burnout: New perspectives. Appl. Prev. Psychol.
1998
,7, 63–74. [CrossRef]
18.
Maricutoiu, L.P.; Sava, F.A.; Butta, O. The eectiveness of controlled interventions on employees’ burnout: A
meta-analysis. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2016,89, 1–27. [CrossRef]
19.
West, C.P.; Dyrbye, L.N.; Erwin, P.J.; Shanafelt, T.D. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout:
A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2016,388, 2272–2281. [CrossRef]
20.
Kalani, S.D.; Azadfallah, P.; Oreyzi, H.; Adibi, P. Interventions for physician burnout: A systematic review of
systematic reviews. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2018,9, 1–8. [CrossRef]
21.
Bond, F.W.; Bunce, D. Job control mediates change in a work reorganization intervention for stress reduction.
J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2001,6, 290–302. [CrossRef]
22.
Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzla, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and
meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009,151, 264–269. [CrossRef]
23.
IsHak, W.; Nikravesh, R.; Lederer, S.; Perry, R.; Ogunyemi, D.; Bernstein, C. Burnout in medical students: A
systematic review. Clin. Teach. 2013,10, 242–245. [CrossRef]
24.
Goodger, K.; Gorely, T.; Lavallee, D.; Harwood, C. Burnout in sport: A systematic review. Sport Psychol.
2007
,
21, 127–151. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 19 of 20
25.
Kulik, L. Burnout among volunteers in the social services: The impact of gender and employment status.
J. Community Psychol. 2006,34, 541–561. [CrossRef]
26.
Schaufeli, W.B.; Maslach, C. Historical and conceptual development of burnout. In Professional Burnout
Recent Developments in Theory and Research, 2nd ed.; Schaufeli, W.B., Maslach, C., Marek, T., Eds.; Taylor &
Francis: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–16.
27. De Vaus, D. Research Design in Social Research, 2nd ed.; Sage: London, UK, 2001.
28.
Eective Public Health Practice Project (EPHHP). Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Available
online: https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search/14 (accessed on 31 October 2019).
29.
Thomas, B.; Ciliska, D.; Dobbins, M.; Micucci, S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature:
Providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs.
2004
,
1, 176–184. [CrossRef]
30.
Karlson, B.; Jönsson, P.; Palsson, B.; Björnsson, G.; Malmberg, B.; Larsson, B.; Sterberg, K. Return to work
after a workplace-oriented intervention for patients on sick-leave for burnout: A prospective controlled
study. BMC Public Health 2010,10, 1–10. [CrossRef]
31.
Karlson, B.; Jonsson, P.; Osterberg, K. Long-term stability of return to work after a workplace-oriented
intervention for patients on sick leave for burnout. BMC Public Health 2014,14, 1–10. [CrossRef]
32.
Le Blanc, P.M.; Hox, J.J.; Schaufeli, W.B.; Taris, T.W.; Peeters, M.C.W. Take care! The evaluation of a team-based
burnout intervention program for oncology care providers. J. Appl. Psychol. 2007,92, 213–227. [CrossRef]
33.
Yip, B.; Rowlinson, S. Job redesign as an intervention strategy of burnout: Organizational perspective.
J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2009,35, 737–745. [CrossRef]
34.
Hätinen, M.; Kinnunen, U.; Pekkonen, M.; Kalimo, R. Comparing two burnout interventions: Perceived job
control mediates decreases in burnout. Int. J. Stress Manag. 2007,14, 227–248. [CrossRef]
35.
Innstrand, S.T.; Espnes, G.A.; Mykletun, R. Job stress, burnout and job satisfaction: An intervention study
for staworking with people with intellectual disabilities. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil.
2004
,17, 119–126.
[CrossRef]
36.
Riall, T.S.; Teiman, J.; Chang, M.; Cole, D.; Leighn, T.; McClaerty, H.; Nfonsam, V.N. Maintaining the fire but
avoiding burnout: Implementation and evaluation of a resident well-being program. J. Am. Coll. Surg.
2018
,
226, 369–379. [CrossRef]
37.
Hill, R.G.; Atnas, C.I.; Ryan, P.; Ashby, K.; Winnington, J. Whole team training to reduce burn-out amongst
staon an in-patient alcohol ward. J. Subst. Use 2010,15, 42–50. [CrossRef]
38.
Hyman, R.B. Evaluation of an intervention for stain a long-term care facility using a retrospective pretest
design. J. Eval. Health Prof. 1993,16, 212–224. [CrossRef]
39.
Blonk, R.W.B.; Brenninkmeijer, V.; Lagerveld, S.E.; Houtman, I.L.D. Return to work: A comparison of
two cognitive behavioural interventions in cases of work-related psychological complaints among the
self-employed. Work Stress 2006,20, 129–144. [CrossRef]
40.
Ahola, K.; Toppinen-Tanner, S.; Seppänen, J. Interventions to alleviate burnout symptoms and to support
return to work among employees with burnout: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Burn. Res.
2017
,4,
1–11. [CrossRef]
41.
Awa, W.L.; Plaumann, M.; Walter, U. Burnout prevention: A review of intervention programs. Patient Educ.
Couns. 2010,78, 184–190. [CrossRef]
42.
Melchior, M.E.W.; Philipsen, H.; Abu-Saad, H.H.; Halfens, R.J.G.; Van den Berg, A.A.; Gassman, P. The
eectiveness of primary nursing on burnout among psychiatric nurses in long-stay settings. J. Adv. Nurs.
1996,24, 694–702. [CrossRef]
43.
Sluiter, J.K.; Bos, A.P.; Tol, D.; Calff, M.; Krijnen, M.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W. Is staff well-being and communication
enhanced by multidisciplinary work shift evaluations? J. Intensive Care Med. 2005,31, 1409–1414. [CrossRef]
44.
Schaufeli, W.B.; Taris, T.W. The conceptualization and measurement of burnout: Common ground and
worlds apart. Work Stress 2005,19, 256–262. [CrossRef]
45.
Schaufeli, W.B.; De Witte, H.; Desart, S. Manual Burnout Assessment Tool, 2nd ed.; KU Leuven: Leuven,
Belgium, 2019.
46.
Schaufeli, W.B.; Bakker, A.B. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement:
A multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. 2004,25, 293–315. [CrossRef]
47.
Pijpker, R.; Vaandrager, L.; Bakker, E.J.; Koelen, M. Unravelling salutogenic mechanisms in the workplace:
The role of learning. Gac. Sanit. 2018,32, 275–282. [CrossRef]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020,17, 55 20 of 20
48.
Perski, O.; Grossi, G.; Perski, A.; Niemi, M. A systematic reviewand meta-analysis of tertiary interventions in
clinical burnout. Scand. J. Psychol. 2017,58, 551–561. [CrossRef]
49.
Mannheim, B.; Schirin, M. Family structure, job characteristics, rewards and strains as related to work-role
centrality of employed and self-employed professional women with children. J. Organ. Behav.
1984
,5, 83–101.
[CrossRef]
50.
Koelen, M.A.; Vaandrager, L.; Colom
é
r, C. Health promotion research: Dilemmas and challenges. J. Epidemiol.
Community Health 2001,55, 257–262. [CrossRef]
©
2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
... In line with the conclusions reached by Lei and Pijpker et al. [47,59], psychological counseling can be regarded as a post-measurement that mitigates job burnout in different contexts. According to WHO [45], psychological counseling is inherently linked to SDG 3-"Good Health and Well-being". ...
... This conflicts with SDG 3, which seeks to realize well-being and healthy living for all people of all ages. Subsequently, SDG 8 aims to create "decent work", which is defined as an occupation where one's duties or tasks are meaningful, income is reasonable, and the job meets the staff member's expectations [59]. This paper concludes that employing competent, resilient workers involves staff who are able to finish their tasks within the designated time and are capable of executing challenging workloads without experiencing job burnout. ...
Article
Full-text available
Job burnout (as an independent variable) and job performance (as a dependent variable) are often correlated, and one of the main arguments is that psychological counseling can mitigate job burnout, which in turn influences job performance. This article aims to introduce a new perspective on the subject by establishing a new paradigm in the field. It also explores the role of psychological counseling as a precautionary measure. Furthermore, it aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 and 8, which seek to enhance public health, collective well-being, and decent work or at least equitable workplace conditions. Adopting a quantitative analysis method, this study used panel data from 2020 to 2023 and group regression to analyze these data. The instruments comprise job performance (KPI) and mental health records. This study revealed that job burnout as experienced by academics is regulated by their job performance (β = −0.013, p < 0.001. This study revealed that academics’ job performance remained unchanged despite the number of psychological counseling and interventions conducted, so consequently, psychological counseling and interventions do not affect performance directly. This research contributes to the literature by utilizing a novel measurement approach. It is concluded that competency is the key to having a decent work environment and staff experiencing collective well-being.
... Effective work stress management is one of the protective factors, and promotes burnout prevention. Mental health promotion and burnout prevention programs should include the promotion of socio-emotional skills that allow for a better management of work stress (Pijpker et al. 2020;Wu et al. 2021). ...
... Furthermore, it is necessary not onl;ly to apply systematic and continued interventions to prevent and reduce burnout, but also to promote health in the workplace (Suner-Soler et al., 2014). These interventions may be integrated in the culture of the organization with the support of occupational health professionals and psychologists as literature suggests that they have a key role to play in effective workplace wellness promotion and illness prevention programmes (Pijpker et al. 2020 4. The symptom with greatest intensity was exhaustion, followed by irritability and sadness, and became an even more serious public health concern after the pandemics. 5. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Burnout was already a significant problem before the pandemic, but in the aftermath became a serious concern and a public health and occupational health priority. This study had two aims. First, we investigated how different healthy workplace dimensions and other health individual-level variables are related to burnout. Second, we examined differences in terms of presenteeism, absenteeism, and quality of life between employees who report burnout symptoms and those who do not. Methods Participants were 1702 Portuguese employees from various organizations; 69.68% were female, age ranged from 18 to 72 years (mean = 43.25 years, SD = 10.40). Almost half of the participants (49.9%; 851 participants) reported having at least one burnout symptom. Results Participants reported that they have felt exhausted (43.7%), irritated (34.5%) and sad (30.5%) always or very often in the last 4 weeks. Regression analysis revealed that the global score on burnout symptoms was negatively related to leadership engagement, psychosocial work environment, personal health resources, health behaviours, and satisfaction with salary. In addition, the global score on burnout symptoms was positively related to worker involvement, enterprise community involvement, perceived stress, and screen time at work. Furthermore, females tend to report a higher level of burnout symptoms compared to males. In addition, burnout has an impact on sickness absenteeism, presenteeism, and quality of life. Conclusions Our findings have an important contribution to understanding and promoting a healthier work environment, and reinforce the need for measures and policies to promote mental health, manage stress, and prevent burnout in the workplace.
... The authors discovered that integrating individual-focused and organization-focused intervention programs effectively reduced burnout dimensions. Similarly, Pijpker et al. (2020) investigated 10 combined interventions and found that they significantly improved exhaus-tion and cynicism (or depersonalization) in both short-term (after 4 months) and long-term (after 12 years) assessments, compared to professional efficacy (or personal accomplishment). Notably, the content of these combined interventions varied widely. ...
Article
Full-text available
Burnout has been the focus of extensive scientific research. The World Health Organization officially recognized burnout as an occupational phenomenon, defined as a syndrome resulting from chronic workplace stress that remains unmanaged and characterized by three dimensions: exhaustion, cynicism, and inefficacy. Existing literature highlights limitations in current measurement instruments for diagnostic purposes. These tools often yield scores that overlap with other conditions such as fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Chronic exposure to high job demands and low job resources emerges as the primary trigger for burnout. While individual characteristics (such as neuroticism) may increase susceptibility, specific personality traits associated with higher risk remain unclear. Burnout has adverse effects on both individuals and organizations. Typical interventions focus on stress relief and coping strategies to manage high job demands, but their effectiveness diminishes over time. Evidence from organizational interventions suggests that improving employees’ working conditions can reduce burnout risk. Combined interventions offer promise by creating a healthy work environment while empowering employees to handle occasional stress. Social partners should advocate for support in researching burnout, aiming for a clear diagnosis, effective treatment, and preventive measures to mitigate psychosocial risks in the workplace. Practical Relevance: The findings of this article highlight the importance of addressing both job demands and job resources to mitigate burnout in organizational settings. Implementing interventions that improve working conditions and provide adequate support can significantly reduce burnout risk and enhance employee well-being. Organizations should prioritize creating a healthy work environment and empowering employees with the necessary resources to manage workload effectively.
... 33 However, previous studies have shown that organisational stress interventions were more effective than individual interventions, 34 and that combined interventions are more likely to result in longer lasting results than organisational interventions alone. [35][36][37] Individualfocused interventions may not target systemic and interpersonal causes of stress sufficiently, focusing primarily on the individual's ability to cope with stress rather than addressing the causes. Hence, without addressing the underlying organisational or environmental stressors (ie, high job demands), individuals may continue to experience high levels of stress despite their improved efforts to manage it. ...
Article
Full-text available
Work-related stress complaints are a growing societal problem. Occupational health professionals often play a key role in its prevention. However, studies providing an overview of preventive interventions and their effectiveness are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence on the effectiveness of interventions delivered by occupational health professionals to prevent work-related stress complaints. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo and Medline was performed in May 2023 based on PICO (population, intervention, control and outcomes) elements. Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed papers with a randomised controlled trial design, quasi-experimental design and pre-post evaluations with a control group; working populations not on sick leave; interventions delivered by occupational health professionals; and stress outcomes. Data were extracted using a predefined extraction form, risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB-2) and Risk of Bias in non-randomised Studies-of Interventions tool, and a narrative analysis was performed to summarise data. Nine studies were included in this review and encompassed a diverse range of populations, interventions and professionals involved, outcome measures, and effects observed. Five studies found either mixed effects on stress outcomes, short-term positive effects, or positive effects in a subgroup of participants demonstrating high adherence to the intervention. As the results show mixed findings, a high risk of bias, and a limited number of studies was available, more research is needed to the effectiveness of the interventions and the factors underlying this.
... 44 Combined interventions had been found to be effective in improvement in exhaustion and cynicism compared with professional efficacy and promoted full return to work. 46 As the practice of mindfulness has been encouraged since the conception of the hospital, and regular activities organised to promote it as a tool to foster mental resilience, the department aims to embrace it as part of the strategy against burnout. Specifically, there will be department level reminders and broadcasts of cluster or organisational level mindfulness events to encourage participation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction High incidences of burnout has been reported amongst emergency department (ED) personnel during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Emerging from the pandemic, organisational support for psychological health may dwindle and become secondary to economic priorities. We aimed to ascertain the level of burnout within ED staff at our hospital, identify professional groups, which were more vulnerable and domains, which contributed most towards burnout. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study approximately 8 months after major moves to remove COVID‐19 restrictions in Singapore. Data was collected via a self‐administered survey employing the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). Demographics, occupational details, work satisfaction and motivation to stay in the job were also collected and analysed. Results A total of 115 ED staff participated. Overall CBI score was 62.3 ± 22.0. Scores for personal, work‐related and client burnout were 64.9 ± 23.2, 61.6 ± 23.1 and 60.4 ± 26.1, respectively. A total of 44.5% had to take medical leave because of burnout. Nurses had higher overall CBI scores than doctors (67.5 ± 20.5 vs. 54.6 ± 23.0, p = 0.01). Those who were satisfied with their present job had lower overall CBI scores compared to those not satisfied (42.7 ± 17.9 vs. 84.0 ± 14.4, p < 0.001). Overall CBI scores were also lower in those motivated compared with those not motivated to continue in their current job (50.1 ± 16.3 vs. 79.0 ± 15.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion ED staff continue to record high rates of burnout as we transit out of the pandemic. Accompanying rates of medical leave and low levels of motivation to remain in the job are serious occupational health concerns. Factors contributing to burnout in at risk groups such as nurses should be further analysed. High mean CBI scores in the personal and work domains indicate that related factors contribute most towards burnout and interventions should be focused accordingly.
... The U.S. Surgeon General recommended interventions to combat nurse burnout, including giving nurses adequate pay, increasing mental health services for nurses, increasing access to health insurance and personal protective equipment, investing in public health, and reducing administrative burdens (Murthy, 2022). In 2022 resulting from the impact of Covid-19, most organizational interventions focused on answering burnout (Pijpker, Vaandrager, Veen, & Koelen, 2019). The organizational interventions included improving job control, social support, working well in the proper environment, and effort-reward balance (Giga et al., 2018). ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
______________________________________________________________________________ Nurse burnout has been associated with worsened outcomes for nurses, such as increased turnover or quitting and lower job satisfaction. The purpose of this research was to examine Magnet-designation status in U.S. hospitals, specifically shared governance and structural empowerment, and its effects on nurse burnout, nurse turnover, and job satisfaction of nurses. This study utilized a literature review complemented by two semi-structured interviews. The results showed that Magnet hospitals kept lower levels of burnout, better job satisfaction, and less turnover than non-Magnet hospitals, but this was only the case for some studies of Magnet hospitals. Some outcomes could be attributed to Magnet characteristics, such as shared governance, but other factors could have influenced their success.
... 107 This notion is supported by reviews on the combination of organisational and individual interventions to reduce burnout. [108][109][110][111] Promote the positive Promoting the positive in workplace settings is a growing concept, which evolved during the last 10 years, but the evidence base is still small. [112][113][114][115][116] Most reviews focus on individualdirected interventions, and only a few have examined organisationaldirected inter ventions. ...
... These findings are consistent with research that describes the importance of prevention via workplace policies as an essential component of supporting mental health at work [10]. Several studies have found that organizational interventions can be beneficial for worker mental health, including for reducing burnout [25][26][27], though more research is needed regarding the implementation of these intervention in diverse contexts [27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction This study explores the perspectives of workers and managers on workplace programs and interventions that seek to promote mental wellbeing, and prevent and treat mental health conditions The results contributed supporting evidence for the development of the WHO’s first global guidelines for mental health and work, which provide evidence-based recommendations to support the implementation of workplace mental health programs and supports, to improve their acceptability, appropriateness, and uptake. Methods An international online survey was used to examine the values and preferences among workers and managers related to workplace mental health prevention, protection, promotion, and support programs and services. The survey was made available in English, French, and Spanish and recruitment consisted of convenience sampling. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the survey data. Rapid thematic qualitative analysis was used to analyse the results of open-ended questions. Results N = 451 responses representing all WHO regions were included in the analysis. These results provide a unique international perspective on programs and supports for mental health at work, from the standpoint of workers and managers. Results suggest that workers value interventions developed in consultation with workers (including indicated, selective and universal interventions), increased training and capacity building among managers, and targeted interventions to address the pervasive impact of stigma on perceptions about mental health at work and help-seeking. Conclusion The findings of this study seek to reflect the perspectives of workers and their managers, and therein to promote improved access, availability and uptake of mental health programs and supports at work and–ultimately- to support the potential of workplaces as environments that promote and support mental health.
... Practically, this finding also shows that burnout interventions must be sensitive to individuals' personal lives, consistent with previous research highlighting the role of personal factors in burnout (e.g., Dyrbye et al., 2006;Hariharan & Griffin, 2019;Naehrig et al., 2022). Accordingly, the findings suggest that organizationbased interventions alone are unlikely to be as effective as when they are combined with individualistic interventions (Awa et al., 2010;Pijpker et al., 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background In the UK, tens of millions of working days are lost due to work‐related ill health every year, costing billions of pounds. The role of Occupational Health (OH) services is vital in helping workers to maintain employment when they encounter injury or illness. OH providers traditionally rely on a clinical workforce to deliver these services, particularly doctors and nurses with OH qualifications. However, the increasing demand for OH services is unlikely to be met in the future using this traditional model, due to the declining number of OH‐trained doctors and nurses in the UK. Multi‐disciplinary models of OH delivery, including a more varied range of healthcare and non‐healthcare professionals, could provide a way to meet this new demand for OH services. There is a need to identify collaborative models of OH service delivery and review their effectiveness on return‐to work outcomes. There is an existing pool of systematic review evidence evaluating workplace based, multi‐disciplinary OH interventions, but it is difficult to identify which aspects of the content and/or delivery of these interventions may be associated with improved work‐related outcomes. Objectives The aim of this evidence and gap map (EGM) was to provide an overview of the systematic review evidence that evaluates the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of multi‐disciplinary OH interventions intending to improve work‐related outcomes. Search Methods In June 2021 we searched a selection of bibliographic databases and other academic literature resources covering a range of relevant disciplines, including health care and business studies, to identify systematic review evidence from a variety of sectors of employment. We also searched Google Search and a selection of topically relevant websites and consulted with stakeholders to identify reports already known to them. Searches were updated in February 2023. Selection Criteria Systematic reviews needed to be about adults (16 years or over) in employment, who have had absence from work for any medical reason. Interventions needed to be multi‐disciplinary (including professionals from different backgrounds in clinical and non‐clinical professions) and designed to support employees and employers to manage health conditions in the workplace and/or to help employees with health conditions retain and/or return to work following medical absence. Effectiveness needed to be measured in terms of return to work, work retention or measures of absence, or economic evaluation outcomes. These criteria were applied to the title and abstract and full text of each systematic review independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. We awarded each systematic review a rating of ‘High’, ‘Medium’ or ‘Low’ relevance to indicate the extent to which the populations, interventions and their contexts synthesised within the review were consistent with our research question. We also recorded the number of primary studies included within each of the ‘High’ and ‘Medium’ reviews that were relevant to research question using the same screening process applied at review level. Data Collection and Analysis Summary data for each eligible review was extracted. The quality of the systematic reviews, rated as ‘High’ or ‘Medium’ relevance following full text screening, was appraised using the AMSTAR‐2 quality appraisal tool. All data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second, with disagreements being settled through discussion. Summary data for all eligible systematic reviews were tabulated and described narratively. The data extracted from reviews of ‘High’ and ‘Medium’ relevance was imported into EPPI‐Mapper software to create an EGM. Stakeholder Involvement We worked alongside commissioners and policy makers from the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and Department of Work and Pensions (DWP), OH personnel, and people with lived experience of accessing OH services themselves and/or supporting employees to access OH services. Individuals contributed to decision making at all stages of the project. This ensured our EGM reflects the needs of individuals who will use it. Main Results We identified 98 systematic reviews that contained relevant interventions, which involved a variety of professionals and workplaces, and which measured effectiveness in terms of return to work (RTW). Of these, we focused on the 30 reviews where the population and intervention characteristics within the systematic reviews were considered to be of high or medium relevance to our research questions. The 30 reviews were of varying quality, split evenly between High/Moderate quality and Low/Critically‐Low quality ratings. We did not identify any relevant systematic review evidence on any other work‐related outcome of interest. Interventions were heterogenous, both within and across included systematic reviews. The EGM is structured according to the health condition experienced by participants, and the effectiveness of the interventions being evaluated, as reported within the included systematic reviews. It is possible to view (i) the quality and quantity of systematic review evidence for a given health condition, (ii) how review authors assessed the effectiveness or cost‐effectiveness of the interventions evaluated. The EGM also details the primary studies relevant to our research aim included within each review. Authors’ Conclusions This EGM map highlights the array of systematic review evidence that exists in relation to the effectiveness or cost‐effectiveness of multi‐disciplinary, workplace‐based OH interventions in supporting RTW. This evidence will allow policy makers and commissioners of services to determine which OH interventions may be most useful for supporting different population groups in different contexts. OH professionals may find the content of the EGM useful in identifying systematic review evidence to support their practice. The EGM also identifies where systematic review evidence in this area is lacking, or where existing evidence is of poor quality. These may represent areas where it may be particularly useful to conduct further systematic reviews.
Article
Full-text available
Background Historically, in an effort to evaluate and manage the rising cost of healthcare employers assess the direct cost burden via medical health claims and measures that yield clear data. Health related indirect costs are harder to measure and are often left out of the comprehensive overview of health expenses to an employer. Presenteeism, which is commonly referred to as an employee at work who has impaired productivity due to health considerations, has been identified as an indirect but relevant factor influencing productivity and human capitol. The current study evaluated presenteeism among employees of a large United States health care system that operates in six locations over a four-year period and estimated loss productivity due to poor health and its potential economic burden. Methods The Health-Related Productivity Loss Instrument (HPLI) was included as part of an online Health Risk Appraisal (HRA) administered to employees of a large United States health care system across six locations. A total of 58 299 HRAs from 22 893 employees were completed and analyzed; 7959 employees completed the HRA each year for 4 years. The prevalence of 22 specific health conditions and their effects on productivity areas (quantity of work, quality of work, work not done, and concentration) were measured. The estimated daily productivity loss per person, annual cost per person, and annual company costs were calculated for each condition by fitting marginal models using generalized estimating equations. Intra-participant agreement in reported productivity loss across time was evaluated using κ statistics for each condition. Results The health conditions rated highest in prevalence were allergies and hypertension (high blood pressure). The conditions with the highest estimated daily productivity loss and annual cost per person were chronic back pain, mental illness, general anxiety, migraines or severe headaches, neck pain, and depression. Allergies and migraines or severe headaches had the highest estimated annual company cost. Most health conditions had at least fair intra-participant agreement (κ ≥ 0.40) on reported daily productivity loss. Conclusions Results from the current study suggested a variety of health conditions contributed to daily productivity loss and resulted in additional annual estimated costs for the health care system. To improve the productivity and well-being of their workforce, employers should consider presenteeism data when planning comprehensive wellness initiatives to curb productivity loss and increase employee health and well-being during working hours.
Article
Full-text available
Occupational burnout is a common syndrome among physicians and several individual directed and organization directed interventions have been implemented to reduce it. So far, several review studies have tried to identify and introduce the most appropriate interventions. The present article aim was to systematically review of systematic reviews studies of interventions for physician burnout to evaluate and summarize their results, and ultimately guide the researchers to select appropriate interventions. A Search was conducted to find review studies and systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, Google Scholar, Pub Med and Psych INFO. Two reviewers independently selected and evaluated the studies based on inclusion criteria. Four out of seven obtained review studies and systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. These studies have reviewed individual directed interventions as well as organization directed interventions intended to reduce burnout among medical students, interns, physicians, residents, and fellows. Various studies of the effectiveness of individual and organization directed interventions have obtained different results. The present research has shown that reaching conclusions about effective interventions (individual directed or organization directed) for physician burnout is not easy and that a number of mediating or moderating variables probably influence the effectiveness of these interventions. So it is necessary to understand approaches and interventions for the prevention or reduction of physician burnout to fill the gaps in research. Also, review studies is required to be more precise in choosing its including criteria in order to find more accurate results.
Article
Full-text available
Objective To explore the moderating and mediating role(s) of learning within the relationship between sense of coherence (SOC) and generalized resistance resources. Method Cross-sectional study (N = 481), using a self-administered questionnaire, of employees working in the healthcare sector in the Netherlands in 2017. Four residential healthcare settings and one healthcare-related Facebook group were involved. Multiple linear regression models were used to test for moderating and mediating effects of learning. Results Social relations, task significance, and job control significantly explained variance in SOC. Conceptual, social, and instrumental learning, combined, moderated the relationship between SOC and task significance. Instrumental learning moderated the relationship between job control and SOC. Social learning also mediated this relationship. Conceptual learning did not show any moderating or mediating effect. Conclusions The relationship between SOC and the three GRRs seems to be strengthened or explained −to a certain extent − by instrumental and social learning. Healthcare organizations are recommended to promote learning through formal activities as well as through cooperation, feedback, sharing experiences, and job challenges. This requires employee participation and a multilevel interdisciplinary approach.
Book
Full-text available
This interdisciplinary book explores both the connections and the tensions between sociological, psychological, and biological theories of exhaustion. It examines how the prevalence of exhaustion - both as an individual experience and as a broader socio-cultural phenomenon - is manifest in the epidemic rise of burnout, depression, and chronic fatigue. It provides innovative analyses of the complex interplay between the processes involved in the production of mental health diagnoses, socio-cultural transformations, and subjective illness experiences. Using many of the existing ideologically charged exhaustion theories as case studies, the authors investigate how individual discomfort and wider social dynamics are interrelated. Covering a broad range of topics, this book will appeal to those working in the fields of psychology, sociology, medicine, psychiatry, literature, and history.
Article
Full-text available
Clinical burnout is one of the leading causes of work absenteeism in high- and middle-income countries. There is hence a great need for the identification of effective intervention strategies to increase return-to-work (RTW) in this population. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of tertiary interventions for individuals with clinically significant burnout on RTW and psychological symptoms of exhaustion, depression and anxiety. Four electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PubMed and CINAHL Plus) were searched in April 2016 for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials of tertiary interventions in clinical burnout. Article screening and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with random-effects meta-analyses. Eight articles met the inclusion criteria. There was some evidence of publication bias. Included trials were of variable methodological quality. A significant effect of tertiary interventions compared with treatment as usual or wait-list controls on time until RTW was found, HR = 4.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.15–9.45; however, considerable heterogeneity was detected. The effect of tertiary interventions on full RTW was not significant, OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.59–2.98. No significant effects on psychological symptoms of exhaustion, depression or anxiety were observed. In conclusion, tertiary interventions for individuals with clinically significant burnout may be effective in facilitating RTW. Successful interventions incorporated advice from labor experts and enabled patients to initiate a workplace dialogue with their employers.
Article
Occupational burnout is a common syndrome among physicians and several individual directed and organization directed interventions have been implemented to reduce it. So far, several review studies have tried to identify and introduce the most appropriate interventions. The present article aim was to systematically review of systematic reviews studies of interventions for physician burnout to evaluate and summarize their results, and ultimately guide the researchers to select appropriate interventions. A Search was conducted to find review studies and systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, Google Scholar, Pub Med and Psych INFO. Two reviewers independently selected and evaluated the studies based on inclusion criteria. Four out of seven obtained review studies and systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. These studies have reviewed individual directed interventions as well as organization directed interventions intended to reduce burnout among medical students, interns, physicians, residents, and fellows. Various studies of the effectiveness of individual and organization directed interventions have obtained different results. The present research has shown that reaching conclusions about effective interventions (individual directed or organization directed) for physician burnout is not easy and that a number of mediating or moderating variables probably influence the effectiveness of these interventions. So it is necessary to understand approaches and interventions for the prevention or reduction of physician burnout to fill the gaps in research. Also, review studies is required to be more precise in choosing its including criteria in order to find more accurate results.
Article
Background: There have been few programs designed to improve surgical resident wellbeing and such efforts often lack formal evaluation. Study design: General Surgery residents participated in the Energy Leadership Wellbeing and Resiliency Program. They were assessed at baseline and one year after implementation using the Energy Leadership Index (ELI, measures emotional intelligence), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) General Survey, Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the annual required ACGME resident survey. Scores before and after implementation were compared using paired t tests for continuous variables and chi square tests for categorical variables. Results: 49 general surgery residents participate in the program. One year after implementation, resident score on the ELI improved (3.16+0.24 to 3.24+0.32, P=0.03). Resident perceived stress decreased from baseline (PSS 17.0+7.2 to 15.7+6.2, P=0.05). Scores on the emotional exhaustion scale of the MBI decreased (16.8+8.4 to 14.4+8.5, P=0.04). Resident reported satisfaction improved in many areas including satisfaction with leadership skills, work relationships, communication skills, productivity, time management, personal freedom, and work-life balance, increased over the one year intervention (P=NS). On the annual Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) resident survey, residents' evaluation of the program as positive or very positive increased from 80% to 96%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that formal implementation of a program to improve resident wellbeing positively impacted residents' perceived stress, emotional exhaustion, emotional intelligence, life satisfaction, and their perception of the residency program. Formal evaluation and reporting of such efforts allow for reproducibility and scalability, with the potential for widespread impact on resident wellbeing.
Chapter
The work and organisational psychologist Wilmar Schaufeli explores the historical roots of burnout as well as the specific socio-cultural factors that led to its emergence. Addressing the question of whether the major symptoms of burnout are ubiquitous or context specific, he analyses how they relate to similar syndromes, such as neurasthenia and depression. Have burnout-like phenomena been observed in the past as well, and is it a typically Western phenomenon? Schaufeli’s chapter concludes with a discussion of differences in the ways the diagnosis is used and understood in North America and Europe.
Article
(Abstracted from Lancet 2016;388:2272–2281) Physician burnout, as documented in national studies, has a prevalence rate exceeding 50% in both physicians in training and practicing physicians. It negatively affects patient care, professionalism, physicians’ own care, and safety.