Content uploaded by Fouad Jalal Mahmood
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Fouad Jalal Mahmood on Mar 18, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
13
●
1
– ●
2
–
1
2
--
1
fouad.mahmood@univsul.edu.iq, abdullah.tayib@u nivsul.edu.iq
: 14/01/2019 /: 28/08/2019: 22/12/2019
DOI Link: https://sites.google.com/a/univsul.edu.iq/sjes/issue s/vol6no4/sjes-10117
43
240
198
82.5
1
© The Authors, published by University of Sulaimani, college of engineering.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
14
.
Post Occupancy Evaluation
1.2
201225
199754
Kamaruzzaman et al., P.717, 2018
2.2
200853
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
15
3.2
201751
4
201384
5.2
20024330
(Dilani, 2001, P.34)
(Marc, 2013, P.68)
20166162
1(DH Estates and
Facilities, 2008)
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
16
201151
Deasy, 1985, P.97
Thurber & malinouski, 1999, P.498
Ulrich & Roger
(Ulrich & Roger, 1991, P.99)
201654
(Escobar, 2014, P.21)
(Dellinger, 2010, P.62)
Jeong, 2005, P.22
(Zhao, 2012, P.32)
3
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
17
1.3
2
ﯾ
1
Ghazali
et al., 2013
NHS
A Staff and
Patient Environment Calibration Tool
ASPECT
600
(DH Estates and Facilities, 2008)
(Pearson)
3
InternalConsistency
Cronbach’s Alpha
(SPSS)
4
Cronbach’s Alpha
0.710
0.889
0.951
Cronbach’s Alpha01
0.600
SlovenKanire, P.97, 2013
nNe
0.1
240
198
5
82.5
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
18
2.3
Privacy
Views
Comfort & Control
Interior Appearance
Family Support
Facilities
2
IBM SPSS Statistics 24
Mean
Standard Deviation
6
3.3
789101112131415
1.3.3
712
(%54)
(%46)
18-30
(%42.2)(39.9%)
3145(%13.1)
4659
60
(%4.5)
(%25.3)
(%39.4)
(%29.3)(%6.1)
3
(%63.1)
47
(%27.3)8
(%9.6)
2.3.3
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
19
89101112131415
345678
Privacy
3.67
8
3
4.554.424.32
2.90
2.15
Views
2.85
94
4.11
2.14
2.26
2.44
3.27
Comfort & Control
3.64
105
4.36
4.02
3.74
3.63
2.46
Interior Appearance
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
20
368
116
4.55
4.17
26
3.593.49
Family
Support
3.60
127
4.54.26
3.97
2.4
2.85
Facilities
2.44
138
3.96
2.83
1.961.8
1.66
3.3.3
Pearson Correlation
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
21
1415
Pearson Correlation
Chi-Square Tests
sig0.05
14
Chi-Square Tests
63.26sig0.00
0.05
182.29
sig0.00
668.36sig0.00
243.02
0.00sig
15
Pearson Correlation
0.3900.01
0.645000
Pearson Correlation
0.015
0.83
63.13
7
4
1
2
3
4
5
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
22
6
7
8
9
10
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2016
2
1997
3
2011
4
2013
5
2002
6
2012
7
44 49632017
8
2016
9
2008
10- Deasy, C.M Lasswell, Thomas E.,” Designing Places
For People: A Handbook on Human Behavior for
Architects Designers and Facility Managers”, The
Whitney library Of Design, V.S.A - 1985.
11- Dellinger B. Healing Environments. In: Cynthia
McCullough (eds) EVIDENCE-BASED DESIGN FOR
HAELTHCARE FACILITIE, Edwards Brothers, Inc., USA,
2010, pp. 45–80.
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
23
12- DH Estates & Facilities 2008b. A Staff and Patient
Environment Calibration Toolkit (ASPECT): Summary,
NHS,UK
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publica
tions/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_082087, 15
January 2008
13- Dilani, Alan,” Psychosocially Supportive Design-
Scandinvian Health Care Design”, World Hospitals and
health Services: the official journal of the International
Hospital Federation, 2001, 37(1): 31-38.
14- Escobar, Cecilia, “Evidence-Bsaed Healthcare Design: A
Theoretical Approach to a substance Abusetreatment
Facility Interior design”, A M.SA Thesis Submitted to
the College of Environment, MichiganState University,
USA, 2014.
15- Ghazali R, Abbas M, Kamali N. “Healing Environment in
Pediatric Wards: From research to practice”.
J Social and
Behavioral Sciences
2013; 105: 229-238.
16- Jeong, Kwang Young, "In Detail 05 – Hospital", Arch
world co., Ltd, Korean, 2005.
17- Kamaruzzaman S, Egbu C, Mahyuddin N, et al. The
impact of IEQ on occupants’ satisfaction in Malaysian
buildings. J Indoor and Built Environment, 2018; 27:
715-725.
18- Kanire, G., “Social Science Research Methodology:
Concepts, Methods and Computer Application. GRIN
Verlag, Germany, 2013.
19- Marc Eggert, Dipl. ETH ,”Healing Environments in
Children’s Care”, the Saudi forum for planning and
design hospitals, 2013.
20- Thurber, C. & Malinouski, J., "Environmental Correlative
of Negative Emotion in Children", Journal of
Environment and Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 4, P.(487-513),
1999
21- Ulrich, Roger S., "Effects of Interior Design on Wellness:
Theory and Scientific Research", Journal ofHealthCare
Design, 1991, 3: 77-94.
22- Zhao Y. Evidence based design in healthcare:
Integrating user perception in automated space layout.
Ph.D. thesis, University of Loughborough, UK, 2012.
Impact of Psychological Comfort on the Interior
Design of Patients’ Rooms in Hospitals
The General Hospitals in Sulaimani
City as a Case Study
Fouad Jalal Mahmood1 –
Assist. Lecturer
Dr. Abdullah Y. Tayib2 – Professor
1Architecture Department – University of Sulaimani
fouad.mahmood@univsul.edu.iq, abdullah.tayib@u nivsul.edu.iq
Abstract
The aim of the research is to clarify the effect of internal
design indicators on improving the efficiency of patients'
rooms, to deploy these indicators to be integrated into the
curing contexts in achieving healing in a compatible way
with the psychological comfort of patients in five public
hospitals in Sulaimani city. The contemporary trends in
the interior design of hospitals depend on the strong link
between the healing environment, which differs from the
curing environment by envolving the psychological
dimension in the treatment process (curing), and the
efficiency of the indoor environment that directly affects
the psychological comfort of the patients
The research has adopted a descriptive analytical approach
compatible with the nature of the research, using a
quantitative measure of the 43-items questionnaire,
encompassing six items of psychological comfort
including: (Privacy, Views, Comfort & control, Interior
appearance, Family support, and Facilities). A total of 240
questionnaires were distributed on the study samples, and
then 198 questionnaire forms were retrieved after being
completed by the respondents. The percentage of valid
questionnaires was 82.5%. The findings of the study
showed a positive correlation between internal design
indicators and psychological comfort of patients in the
patients’ rooms with the possibility of providing a
supportive environment for psychological comfort through
these indicators. The findings revealed the patients’
satisfaction with the items that support the psychological
comfort in the selected hospitals in general and the newly
built especially. Also, the findings show a negative
correlation between some demographic characteristics of
the patients (age, educational attainment, and duration of
stay) and psychological comfort in the patients’ rooms in
public hospitals.
Keywords: Psychological dimension, Psychological
comfort, Interior Spaces, Healing environment, Hospital
interior design.
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
24
1
01
2011
Privacy
02
Thurber &
malinouski1999
Views
03
Ulrich &
Roger1991
Comfort &
Control
04
2016
Interior
Appearance
05
Escobar
2014
Family
Support
06
Dellinger2010
Facilities
2
01
HL01
400
2013
02
HL02
320
1974
2005
03
HL03
210
2014
04
HL04
40
2010
05
HL05
36
2017
1006
2256
3
Sig.
A
Privacy
5
.802
0.00*
B
Views
6
.832
0.00*
C
Comfort & Control
10
.917
0.00*
D
Interior Appearance
14
.938
0.00*
E
Family Support
3
.571
0.00*
F
Facilities
5
.735
0.00*
0.05
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
25
4Cronbach’s Alpha
Cronbach’s Alpha
A
Privacy
5
0.831
B
Views
6
0.867
C
Comfort & Control
10
0.889
D
Interior Appearance
14
0.836
E
Family Support
3
0.710
F
Facilities
5
0.837
43
0.951
5
01
HL01
400
347
76
65
02
HL02
320
264
72
52
03
HL03
210
124
58
48
04
HL04
40
40
30
22
05
HL05
36
27
22
11
1,006
802
258
198
6
5
4
3
2
1
7
35
28
28
11
5
107
54%
30
24
20
11
6
91
46%
1830
41
17
20
3
3
84
42.4%
3145
18
21
22
15
3
79
39.9%
4659
6
10
4
2
4
26
13.1%
60
0
4
2
2
1
9
4.5%
12
8
25
0
5
50
25.3%
30
18
19
8
3
78
39.4%
18
23
3
12
2
58
29.3%
5
3
1
2
1
12
6.1%
3
41
33
20
20
11
125
63.1%
47
12
14
26
2
0
54
27.3%
8
12
5
2
0
0
19
9.6%
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
26
8
Privacy
Mean
01
4.35
1.52
3.92
4.82
4.82
3.89
02
2.35
2.65
4.50
4.73
4.64
3.77
03
2.31
2.69
4.29
4.77
4.55
3.72
04
2.80
1.94
4.58
4.50
4.82
3.73
05
2.66
1.96
4.29
3.91
3.27
3.22
A
2.90
2.15
4.32
4.55
4.42
3.67
9
Views
Mean
06
4.35
3.27
4.25
3.45
4.36
3.94
07
2.89
1.87
4.63
1.91
3.18
2.90
08
3.35
1.44
4.38
1.68
1.82
2.53
09
3.22
2.71
3.85
2.18
1.91
2.77
10
3.02
2.63
3.81
2.05
2.00
2.70
11
2.77
1.79
3.77
1.55
1.36
2.25
B
3.27
2.26
4.11
2.14
2.44
2.85
10
Comfort & Control
Mean
12
4.45
3.21
4.71
2.50
2.45
3.46
13
4.72
4.08
4.63
4.50
4.45
4.48
14
3.02
3.33
4.29
4.68
3.45
3.75
15
4.45
1.81
4.46
4.09
4.36
3.83
16
2.98
1.52
3.96
2.73
2.82
2.80
17
3.62
1.27
4.46
4.36
4.45
3.63
18
4.54
1.98
3.88
4.09
4.09
3.72
19
4.45
1.88
4.38
3.41
3.00
3.42
20
3.57
1.48
4.46
2.73
2.73
2.99
21
4.45
4.04
4.42
4.27
4.45
4.33
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
27
C
4.02
2.46
4.36
3.74
3.63
3.64
11
Interior Appearance
Mean
22
4.82
3.19
4.50
3.77
4.09
4.07
23
4.72
3.60
4.37
4.41
4.55
4.33
24
2.83
2.29
4.67
2.45
3.36
3.12
25
4.45
2.85
4.67
3.68
4.00
3.93
26
4.35
1.90
4.63
2.36
2.45
3.14
27
4.08
1.50
4.38
2.32
2.45
2.95
28
4.63
3.48
4.67
4.55
4.45
4.36
29
2.54
1.48
4.71
2.36
2.64
2.75
30
3.98
1.60
4.62
3.55
3.00
3.35
31
4.17
3.71
4.67
4.68
4.64
4.37
32
4.91
2.98
4.38
4.73
3.45
4.09
33
4.35
1.85
4.50
3.91
3.45
3.61
34
4.26
3.00
4.46
4.23
3.27
3.84
35
4.35
2.98
4.54
3.27
3.00
3.63
D
4.17
2.6
4.55
3.59
3.49
3.68
12
Family Support
Mean
36
2.78
3.79
4.13
4.77
4.73
4.04
37
2.69
1.60
4.21
4.55
3.36
3.28
38
3.08
1.81
4.46
4.18
3.82
3.47
E
2.85
2.4
4.26
4.5
3.97
3.60
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
28
13
Facilities
Mean
39
3.80
2.83
4.38
3.32
3.36
3.54
40
1.09
1.27
4.08
2.00
1.09
1.91
41
1.34
1.25
3.06
3.73
2.09
2.29
42
1.05
1.40
4.25
1.55
1.82
2.01
43
1.74
1.56
4.04
3.55
1.45
2.47
F
1.8
1.66
3.96
2.83
1.96
2.44
14
(Sig)
1
63.26
.000
2
182.29
.000
3
668.36
.000
4
243.02
.000
15
r
(Sig)
1
0.390
0.01
2
-0.645
0.00
3
0.015
0.83
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
29
√
01
02
1830
3145
4659
60
03
04
05
3
47
8
5
4
3
2
1
A
Privac y
01
02
03
04
05
B
Views
06
07
08
09
10
11
C
Comfort & Control
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
D
Interior Appearance
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
E
Family Support
36
37
38
F
Facilities
39
40
41
42
43
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
30
1
1
2
3Mean
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
18- 30 31- 45 46- 59
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2
1.33
3
3
3
2.9
2.15
4.32
4.55
4.42
0 1 2 3 4 5
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 4 – 2019
31
4Mean
5Mean
6Mean
2.33
1.33
3
2
2
3.27
2.26
4.11
2.14
2.44
0 1 2 3 4 5
2.07
1.21
2.35
1.86
2.07
4.02
2.46
4.36
3.74
3.63
0 1 2 3 4 5
1.83
1.41
2.5
1.58
1.91
4.17
2.6
4.55
3.59
3.49
0 1 2 3 4 5
Sulaimani Journal for Engineering Sciences / Volume 6 - Number 1 – 2019
32
7Mean
8Mean
1.33
1.17
2
1.67
1.5
2.85
2.4
4.26
4.5
3.97
0 1 2 3 4 5
1.17
1.17
2.33
1.83
1.83
1.8
1.66
3.96
2.83
1.96
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5