Technical ReportPDF Available

Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change: Peace and Conflict Studies at the Edge of Transformation. Policy Brief No. 68 (December), Toda Peace Institute.

Authors:
  • Centre Marc Bloch, Franco-German Research Center for the Humanities and Social Sciences (Berlin)

Abstract

This Policy Brief presents a comprehensive review of the literature on environmental conflict and peacebuilding. It traces the development of the field from its beginnings in the 1980s until today, identifying several distinct stages which are characterised by specific research questions, approaches and findings. Based on this literature review the authors address major gaps and shortcomings as well as problematic implications of the research so far. A critical approach is developed which can inform Environmental Peace and Conflict Studies in the future, taking up incentives from the field of Anthropocene Studies and the concepts of ‘sustaining peace’ and ‘sustainable peace.’ The Policy Brief concludes with some recommendations that can give direction for a new wave of research which is currently emerging.
Policy Brief No. 20 APLN/CNND
1
!
!
Environmental!Peacebuilding!and!Climate!Change:!
Peace!and!Conflict!Studies!at!the!Edge!of!Transformation!
1
!
!
!
Judith!Nora!Hardt!and!Jürgen!Scheffran!
!
!
Summary!
This! Policy! Brief! presents! a! comprehensive! review! of! the! literature! on! environmental!!
conflict!and!peacebuilding.!It!traces!the!development!of!the!field!from!its!beginnings!in!the!
1980s!until! today,!identifying! several!distinct! stages!which! are!characterised!by! specific!!
research!questions,!approaches! and!findings.!Based! on!this! literature!review!we! address!
major!gaps!and!shortcomings!as!well!as!problematic!implications!of!the!research!so!far.!We!
develop!a!critical!approach!which!can!inform!Environmental!Peace!and!Conflict!Studies!in!
the!future,!taking!up!incentives!from!the!field!of!Anthropocene!Studies!and!the!concepts!of!
‘sustaining!peace’!and!‘sustainable!peace’.!The!Policy!Brief!concludes!with!some!recommen-
dations!that!can!give!direction!for!a!new!wave!of!research!which!is!currently!emerging.!!
! !
1
!We!thank!the!Toda!Policy!Brief!editors!and!Juan!Telleria!for!their!constructive!criticism!and!support.
Policy!Brief!No.!68!
December!2019!
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
2
Introduction!
Research!on!peacebuilding!is!evolving!over!time!and!remains!a!central!concern!of!the!theory!
and!practice!of!Peace!and!Conflict!Studies.!Peacebuilding!concepts!have!changed!progres-
sively,! with! the! inclusion! of! new! dimensions,! topics! and! actors,! constantly! exposed! to!!
perceptions!of!new!challenges,!disruptive!phenomena!and!an!ever!more!complex!world.!
Two!main!changes!in!the!discourse!and!practice!of!peacebuilding!have!occurred!recently,!
relatively!isolated!from!each!other.!These!are,!firstly,!the!re-adjustment!from!!"#$"%&'()'*+!
to!the!blueprint!of!,&,-#'*'*+.!"#$"!and,!secondly,!attempts!to!include!environmental!issues,!
especially!climate!change,! in!peacebuilding.!The!first! change!has!been! pushed!by!several!
United!Nations!institutions!to!bring!about!greater!success!and!prevent!further!failures!that!
threaten!the!credibility! of!the!UN! in!regard!to!peacebuilding! (UNSG,!2015:!33).! The!shift!
towards! the! ‘sustaining! peace’! concept! encompasses! three! main! characteristics.! First,! it!!
addresses!the!root!causes!of!violent!conflicts!in!order!to!reach!reconciliation!and!build!“a!
common!vision!of!a!society”!(UNSG,!2015:!9).!Second,!national!stakeholders,!local!owner-
ship!and!domestic!actors!lie!at!the!centre,!while!the!UN!as!an!external!actor!is!assigned!an!
accompanying!role!(UNSG,!2015:!47).!This!change,!also!referred!to!as!a!(/$#(.-&0*,!highlights!
increasing!awareness!of!the!importance!of!specific!societal,!cultural!and!historical!charac-
teristics!of!affected!societies.!Third,!‘sustaining!peace’!is!not!limited!to!post-conflict!situa-
tions!but!also!aims!to!prevent!a!lapse!into!conflict!in!the!first!place!and!is!thereby!linked!
more!closely!to!development!(UNSG,!2015:!17).!
Hence!‘sustaining!peace’!implies!“a!constant!and!longstanding!commitment,!where!bench-
marks!for!exit!remain!flexible”!(Bargués-Pedreny,!2018:!8).!Some!authors!criticise!this!shift!
to!the!‘sustaining!peace’!concept!as!it! can!be!understood!as!abandoning!the!possibility!of!
reaching!peace;!the!process!of!peacebuilding!is!now!conceptualised!as!being!without!a!“final!
deadline”!(Bargués-Pedreny,!2018:!142;!see!Jahanbegloo,! 2017).!Others!see!this!strategic!
shift! as! a! necessary! response! to! the! insight! that! peacebuilding! is! a! multidisciplinary,!!
complex! and! longer-term! process,! similar! to! the! multi-dimensional! concept! of! human!!
security!(Caparini!and!Milante,!2017:!221).!!
The!‘sustaining!peace’!concept!is!not!to!be!confused!with!the!concept!of!,&,-#'*#%(".!"#$",!
which!evolved!in!the! 1990s,!with!its!attempt!to! strengthen!linkages!between!sustainable!
development!and!peacebuilding.!One!fundamental!difference!is!that!in!contrast!to!‘sustain-
able!peace’,! the! ‘sustaining!peace’! concept! makes!almost! no! reference!to! environmental!!
phenomena,!nor!to!the!challenges!that!result!from!them,!although!sustainable!development!
is!an!important!contribution!to!sustaining!peace!(UNSG,!2015).!
In!a!parallel!and!seemingly!isolated!trend,!we!detect!a!growing!awareness!of!the!challenges!
that!environmental!phenomena,!and!especially!climate!change,!present!to!the!peacebuild-
ing!field.! The! publication!of! the!Routledge! Handbook!titled! “Environmental!Conflict! and!
Peacebuilding”!(Swain!and!Öjendal,!2018:!xxi)!is!advertised!as!“the!first”!to!present!an!over-
all!approach!of!environmental!peacebuilding!to!“policy!makers!and!students/researchers!
alike”.! Nevertheless,! the! research! on! the! linkages! between! environment,! development,!
peace!and!conflict!has!evolved!into!a!relatively!broad!body!of!literature!since!the!end!of!the!
Cold!War.!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
3
The!central! concern!of! this!paper! is!to! propose!a! pathway!to! address!the! links!between!!
environmental!phenomena!and!Peace!and!Conflict!Studies!in!a!more!comprehensive!way.!It!
proceeds!in!three!steps.!First,! we!undertake!a! literature!review! on!environmental! peace-
building,!through!the!two!main!strands!of!the!literature,!environmental!peace!and!environ-
mental!conflict.!The!purpose! is!to!make!the!underlying! logic!of!the!field!more! accessible.!
Second,! we! offer! a! critical! reading! that!reveals! deficits! and! pitfalls! in! some! of! the! main!!
rationales!in!the!literature.!Third!we!explore!pathways!to!further!advance!the!debates!and!
research.!!
Our!approach!is!informed!by!the!emerging!acceptance!that!we!live!in!a!new!geological!era,!
the!Anthropocene,!and,!flowing!from!that!insight,!the!differentiation!between!1*-20/!/$"*".
-2'*3'*+!and!4/(/$"*".-2'*3'*+!(Cudworth!and!Hobden,!2011).!According!to!Cudworth!and!
Hobden,!1*-20/!/$"*". -2'*3'*+!describes!a!dynamic! interrelated!human-nature! world!in!
contrast!to!4/(/$"*".-2'*3'*+!that!treats!natural!processes!as!separate!from!human!action.!!
Following!this!introduction,!the!paper!is!organised!in!three!sections.!The!next!section!gives!
an!overview!of!the!different!conceptualisations!of!the!linkages!of!environment!and!climate!
change!on!the!one!hand!and!conflict!and!peace!on!the!other,!which!over!time!have!emerged!
in! the! Peace! and! Conflict! Studies! literature.! The! critical! analysis! of! this! literature! is!!
discussed!in!Section!3.!In!Section!4!we!present!the!major!conclusions!and!recommendations!
with!regard!to!bridging!the!isolated!bodies!of!literature!and!further!developing!the!research!
into!the!field!of!Environmental!Peace!and!Conflict!Studies.!!
Stocktaking!of!the!Ties!that!Bind!Environment!to!Peacebuilding!!
In!this!section,!we!provide!an!overview!of!the!major!underlying!and!constitutive!theories!
which!relate!environment!and!climate!change!to!peacebuilding.!We!will!also!show!how!the!
approaches!to!the!interrelationship!between!environmental!issues!and!conflict,!peace!and!
cooperation!have!evolved.!In!order!to!facilitate!the!overview,!we!classify!and!differentiate!
chronologically!the!different!waves!of!research!relating!to!the!main!approaches!to!environ-
mental!conflict! and!environmental! peace.!As!highlighted!in! Table!1,!these! focal!points! of!
research!are!still!ongoing!and!are!being!addressed!in!parallel.!!
!
!.
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
4
Table!1:!Evolution!of!research!phases!of!the!literature!on!environmental!conflict!and!environmental!
peace.!Source:!Elaborated!by!the!authors!on!the!basis!of!Dalby!(2002),!Dalby,!Brauch,!and!Oswald!
Spring!(2009),!Hardt!(2018:!45).!
Start!Year!
Foci!and!content!of!the!environ-
mental-conflict!research!
Foci!and!content!of!the!environ-
mental-peace!research!
1989!
5'0,-.6#7".
Environmental!resources!and!
state!security!
8#0(9.,-&)'",!!
Concept!of!sustainable!peace!
1994-ongoing!
:"$/*).6#7"..
Environment!and!the!socio-!
political!dimensions!of!conflict!
2002!
5'0,-.6#7".
Environmental!issues!as!constitu-
tive!for!cooperation!and!peace!
2007-!ongoing!
;2'0).6#7".
Climate!change!as!a!trigger!for!
risks!and!conflicts!
:"$/*).6#7"..
Cooperation!through!and!against!
climate!change!!
2015-!ongoing!!
;2'0).6#7".!
Environmental!peacebuilding!
2018-!ongoing!
!
!
The!Links!Between!Environment,!Climate!Change!and!Conflict!!
Research!on!environmental!components!of! conflict!and!the!importance!of!environmental!
issues!in!relation!to!conflict!goes!back!to!the!early!1970s!and!has!remained!one!of!the!most!
important!research!issues!through!to!the!present!day.!.
In!the!final!phase!of!the!Cold!War!and!the!period!after,!a!number!of!publications!recognised!
linkages!between!military!security!and!environmental!security.!During!this!research!phase,!
the!main!focus!was!on!the!observations!of!increasingly!harmful!and!detrimental!repercus-
sions! of! environmental! destruction! affecting! societies! and! state! security.! In! particular,!!
concerns! about! environmental! destruction! brought! about! by! military! force! and! warfare!
were!raised,!including!nuclear!winter!and!other!environmental!risks!from!the!nuclear!arms!
race!and!war!(Westing,!1980,!1990).!In!this!period,!there!were!some!mentions!of!sustaina-
ble!development!as!a!contribution!to!security!(see!WECD,!1987),!but!the!major!approaches!
linking!environment!and!conflict!were!mostly!focused!on!environmental!resources!and!on!
how!the!scarcity!or!abundance! of!a! resource!might! cause!tensions!or!exacerbate!existing!
conflict.!This!link!is!still!one!of!the!most!important!research!issues!and!is!often!related!to!
water,!food!or!energy!resources,!to!which!we!refer!below.!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
5
The!second!wave!of!environmental-conflict!research!started!in!the!1990s!and,!importantly,!
was!triggered!by! a!broadening!conception!of! security.!The!growing!confluences!between!
Peace!and! Conflict!Studies! (as!well! as!Security! Studies)!with! Development!Studies!influ-
enced!the!conception!of!security!and!conflict!in!the!context!of!multiple!complex!challenges!
related! to! socio-political! causes! and! consequences.! The! increasing! acknowledgement! of!!
environmental!destruction,!and!how!this! influenced!conflict,! was!an!important!driver!for!
this!evolution.!!
This!second!wave!of!research!was!advanced!by!the!work!of!several!scholars!and!by!institu-
tions!such!as!the!University!of!Toronto,!the!Swiss!Federal!Institute!of!Technology!and!the!
Swiss!Peace!Foundation!(Dalby,!2002;!Dalby,!Brauch!and!Oswald!Spring,!2009).!The!main!
concern!of!these!highly!diverse!research!projects!was!to!verify!the!assumption!that!envi-
ronmental!issues!can!trigger!conflict! in!relation!to! state!security! (Dalby,!2002).!A! central!
reference!here!is!the!(University!of)!Toronto!school!that!marks!the!traditional!approach!of!
the!literature!on!environmental!conflict.!It!focuses!mainly!on!the!question!of!whether!envi-
ronmental!scarcity!can! precipitate!violent!conflict.!According! to!the!lead-author,!Thomas!
Homer-Dixon!(1994:!25),!the!multiple!effects!of!environmental!scarcity!(including!popula-
tion!movement!and!economic!decline)!have!negative!and!cumulative!social!impacts,!such!as!
weakening!or!de-legitimising!states.!Homer-Dixon’s!most!relevant!research!finding!is!that!
environmental!scarcity!may!contribute!to!conflict,!but! that!this!is!more!likely!to!take!the!
form!of!sub-national!diffuse!violence!than!of!inter-state!war.!
Another! important! reference! to! environmental-conflict! is! the! 8*7'0/*<"*-. #*). =/*>('$-,.
?0/@"$-!(ENCOP),!carried!out!by!the!Centre!for!Security!Studies!and!Conflict!Research!of!the!
Swiss!Federal!Institute!of!Technology!and!the!Swiss!Peace!Foundation.!The!main!focus!was!
on!the!interrelationship!between!environmental!degradation,!mal-development!and!violent!
conflict,! whereby! conflict! was! described! as! a! multi-faceted! process,! highlighting! the!!
importance!of!socio-political!factors,!such!as!social!injustice!and!inequitable!resource!access!
(Baechler,!1998:!25).!In!contrast!to!the!Toronto!school,!ENCOP!located!the!cause!and!the!
trigger!of!possible!environmental!conflict!in!society!and!thereby!had!a!more!political!and!
critical!approach.!
Several!other! research!projects! on!environmental!conflict! have!been! led!by! adelphi! (see!
Lietzman!and!Carius!1999),!the!Environmental!Change!and!Security!Program!(ECSP)!of!the!
Woodrow!Wilson!Center!(www.newsecuritybeat.org),!and!by!the!Peace!Research!Institute!
Oslo!(Diehl!and!Gleditsch,!2000).!Most!of!these!approaches!had!a!specific!focus!on!how!en-
vironmental!issues!lead!to!conflicts!in!relation!to!states!and!the!international!state!system.!!
During!the!same!time!period,!other!researchers!focused!on!the!vulnerability!of!societies!and!
on!the!question!of!how!global,!regional!and!local!environmental!change!affects,!inhibits!and!
undermines! development.! Prominent! activities! of! the! research! community! include! the!!
project!A(/%#(.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.=2#*+".#*).4&<#*.:"$&0'-9!(GECHS)!and!the!B*'-").C#-'/*,.
B*'7"0,'-9.D*,-'-&-"./>.8*7'0/*<"*-. #*). 4&<#*. :"$&0'-9,!which!further!pushed!the!conflu-
ence! between! the! environmental-conflict! literature,! the! concept! of! human! security! and!!
Development!Studies.!!
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
6
In!addition!to!these!joint!research!efforts,!several!authors!contributed!research!on!environ-
mental!conflict!(see! e.g.! Scheffran!and! Vogt,!1998)! and,!at! the!turn! of!the! century,!high-
lighted!the!importance! of!the! under-researched!debate!on! sustainable!development! and!
peace!(Scheffran!and!Vogt,!1998:!9).!Among!these!authors,!the!consequences!of!military!ac-
tivity!during!war!and!peace!times!were!an!important!concern!(Dalby,!2002;!Barnett,!2000;!
2001).!!
;2'0).6#7"E.=('<#-".=2#*+".#,.#.;0'++"0.>/0.:"$&0'-9.F',3,.#*).=/*>('$-,.
The!third!wave!of!research!which!commenced!in!2007!(the!year!of!the!release!of!the!4th!
IPCC! report),! was! characterised! by! a! shift! of! focus! to! the! climate! –! conflict! link.! In! this!!
context,!climate!change!and!its!environmental!effects!are!presented!as!either!triggers,!stress!
multipliers!or!causes!of!conflicts!and!risks.!Much!of!the!research!has!focused!on!quantitative!
statistical! analyses! of! climate-conflict! linkages! (see! the! overview! in! Mach! et! al.,! 2019).!!
Theoretical! conceptualisations! and! system! models,! such! as,! for! example,! the! integrated!
framework!of!interaction!between!climate!change,!natural!resources,!human!security!and!
societal!instability!(Scheffran!et!al.,!2012),!have!received!less!attention.!!
Some!authors!conceived!more!explicit!linkages!between!climate!change!and!conflict!by!put-
ting!forward!the!notion!of!so-called!$('<#-".6#0,!(see!Welzer,!2012;!Dyer,!2009).!While!this!
deterministic!approach!has!been!heavily! debated!and!criticised,!reference!is!made!to,!for!
example,! the! wars! in! Darfur! and! Syria.! Implicit! in! a! historical! representation! of! climate!!
determinism!is!the!assumption!that!climate! change!has!been! a!key!impact! factor!in!long-
term!cycles!over!the!last!centuries!of!human!evolution!and!related!economic!crises,!social!
instability,!conflict!and!migration!(Zhang!et!al.,!2007:!19214-19219).!
Often!studies!link!climate!change!to!conflict!more!indirectly,!for!example!by!exploring!how!
the!military!affects!climate!change!(see!Barnett,!2007)!or!how!climate!change!contributes!
to!poverty!and!inequality!and!thereby!creates!fertile!ground!for!the!recruitment!of!fighters!
and!terrorists!(see!Interpol!UN!Environment!Report,!2016).!!
Another!strand!of!research!is!connected!to!the!concept!of!human!security!and!examines!the!
impact!that!climate!change!has!on!societies!through!undermining!development!which!then!
leads!to!conflict!(Barnett!and!Adger,!2007:!651).!Several!studies!suggest!that!climate!change!
vulnerability! increases! the! likelihood! of! the! outbreak! of!conflict! and! thereby! leads! to! a!!
7'$'/&,.$9$("!(see!e.g.!Besigye,!2013).!Smith!and!Vivekananda!(2007:!158)!outline!a!similar!
relationship,!stating:!
If! the! relationship! between! climate! change! and! violent! conflict! is! not!!
addressed,!there!will!be!a!vicious!circle!of!failure!to!adapt!to!climate!change,!
worsening!the!rise!of!violent!conflict!and,!in!turn,!reducing!further!the!ability!
to!adapt.!
The!2014!IPCC!report!also!relates!climate!change!to!conflict:!
[C]limate!change!can!indirectly!increase!risks!of!violent!conflicts!in!the!form!
of!civil!war!and!inter-group!violence!by!amplifying!well-documented!drivers!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
7
of!these!conflicts!such!as!poverty!and!economic!shocks!(<")'&<.$/*>')"*$").!
Multiple!lines!of!evidence!relate!climate!variability!to!these!forms!of!conflict.!
(IPCC!Summary,!2014:!20).!!
The!nexus!between!climate!change!and!conflict!often!includes!the!factor!of!migration.!Since!
the!strong!migration!movements!in!2015,!which!affected!several!countries!of!the!European!
Union,! this! climate-migration-conflict! nexus! has! received! considerable! attention! among!
public!and!policy-makers,!journalists!and!researchers!(Scheffran,!2017)!
=0'-'$',<./>.-2".8*7'0/*<"*-#(G=/*>('$-.;2"/09.
Since!its!inception,!the!research!on!the!links!between!the!environment!and!conflict!has!been!
accompanied!by! critical!questions.! The!core!criticism! is!that! a!clear!correlation!between!!
environment,! climate! change! and! conflict! has! not! been! proven.! The! latest! IPCC! special!!
report!(2018)!recommends!caution!regarding!possible!sample!biases!and!the!overestima-
tion!of!this!link.!In!response!to!Hsiang!and!Burke!(2014),!Buhaug!et!al.!(2014:!396)!high-
lighted!“that! research!to! date!has! failed!to! converge!on! a!specific! and!direct!association!!
between!climate!and!violent!conflict.!!
In!this!context,!the! research!designs! that!link!climate!change! to!conflict!are!criticised!for!
their! over-reliance! on! mixed-method! approaches! and! broad! meta-analysis! with! little!!
evidence!for!a!strong!correlation!between!the!variables!of!climate!change!and!conflict!(see!
Ide!and!Scheffran,!2014;!Ide!et!al.,!2018).!Another!important!criticism!that!points!at!a!biased!
approach!to!research! design!and!to! narrow!policy!interests! is! the!geographically!limited!
focus!on!certain!regions,!mainly!Africa,!in!contrast!to,!for!example,!Asia!or!Oceania!(Adams!
et!al.,!2018:!200).!This!is!called!the!streetlight!effect!(Hendrix,!2017).!Along!with!other!au-
thors,!Adams!et!al.!(2018:!202)!argue!that!the!sampling!bias!of!the!climateconflict!research!
field!is!due!to!factors!such!as!geopolitical!interest!or!data!availability,!which!in!turn!leads!to!
overrepresentation!of!certain! regions!that!are!in! consequence!“stigmatized!as!inherently!
violent!and!unable!to!cope!with!climate!change!peacefully”.!!
The!Links!between!Environment,!Climate!Change!and!Peacebuilding!
The! criticism! of! the! environmental-conflict! literature! outlined! above! has! importantly!!
contributed!to!a!shift!of!focus!so!as!to!also!address!the!linkages!between!environment,!peace!
and!cooperation.!The!environmental-peace!thesis!has!been!articulated!as!a!counter-move!
to!environmental!conflict.!Although!environmental!peacebuilding!emerged!in!the!2000s,!it!
was!pre-empted!by!other!alternative!conceptions,!in!particular!the!concept!of!sustainable!
peace!which!goes!back!to!the!1990s!(e.g.!Scheffran,!1996,!2011;!for!more!recent!perspec-
tives!see!Brauch!et!al.,!2016)!and!addresses!multiple!linkages!in!the!nexus!between!sustain-
ability,!development!and!peace.!The!concept!of!sustainable!peace!aims!to!protect!the!Earth!
against! environmental! threats! and! to! harmonise! conflicting! goals! of! environmental! and!!
security!policy.!It!furthermore!aims!to!implement!local!and!global!governance!and!develop!
a!preventive! strategy! of!global! risk! reduction,!rooted! in! the!satisfaction! of! basic!human!
needs!without!destroying!the!natural!conditions!of!life.!It!strives!to!minimise!the!negative!
interactions!between!armed!conflict,!environmental!destruction!and!low!levels!of!develop-
ment,! which! would! lead! to! a! ‘vicious! cycle’! of! a! non-peaceful! and! unsustainable! world.!!
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
8
Instead,!the!concept!aims!at!a!mutually!enforcing!‘virtuous!cycle’!by!strengthening!positive!
linkages! between! human! development,! environmental! protection! and! peace-building!
(Scheffran,!2016),!thus!serving!as!a!framework!for!environmental!peace-building.!
5'0,-.H#7"E.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.D,,&",.#,.=/*,-'-&-'7"./>.=//!"0#-'/*.
The! >'0,-. 6#7"!of! the! environmental-peace! debate! investigated! whether! environmental!!
cooperation! contributes! to! peace,! discussing! several! linkages! (see! Conca,! 2001;! Conca,!
Carius!and!Dabelko,!2005).!Different!environmental!characteristics!were!identified!as!con-
stitutive!of!cooperation,!for!example:!environmental!issues!require!long-term!perspectives!
and!anticipatory! actions,! they!ignore! political! boundaries,!different! levels! (from!local! to!
global)!must!be!taken!into! account!when! addressing!them,!as! well!as! sudden,!surprising,!
and! dramatic! changes.! These! characteristics! are! seen! as! strengthening! peacebuilding!!
because!cooperation!transforms!conflict!through!building!trust!and!confidence,!encourag-
ing!local!and!nongovernmental!participation,!extending!community!building!beyond!polar-
ising!economic!linkages,!establishing!legal!rights!and!addressing!a!broad!variety!of!stake-
holders!and!groups!(Conca,!Carius!and!Dabelko,!2005:!149-157).!!
Another!argument!in!favour!of!the!link!between!environment,!peace!and!cooperation!is!that!
environmental!cooperation!at!a!large!scale!is!presented!as!the!&(-'<#-"!strategy!for!effec-
tively!facing!the!ecological!challenge!(Conca!and!Dabelko,!2002).!The!main!idea!of!the!envi-
ronmental!peace!thesis!is!to!respond!to!the!two!challenges!of!conflict!and!environmental!
destruction!through!one!approach.!Practical!expressions!of!the!environmental!peace!thesis!
are,!for!example,!peace!parks!(see!Brock,!1991)!and!the!communitarian!use,!management!
and!conservation!of!shared!water!resources,!such!as!the!case!of!the!Okavango!River
2
.!
:"$/*).H#7"E.=//!"0#-'/*.'*.F",!/*,".-/.#*).#+#'*,-.=('<#-".=2#*+".
The!second!wave!of!environmental!peace!focuses!more!explicitly!on!climate!change!and!was!
initiated!in!close!proximity!to!the!4th!Assessment!Report!IPCC!(2007).!This!report!provoked!
a!broader!awareness!of!the!disruptive!consequences!that!climate!change!and!more!gener-
ally! global! environmental! change! have! on! societies! and! states! (see! Dalby,!Brauch! and!!
Oswald!Spring,!2009).!An!important!argument!is!similar!to!the!rationale!of!the!first!wave,!
namely!that!peaceful!cooperation!is!a!strategy!or!even!a!necessity!to!address!and!minimise!
climate!change,!which!would!otherwise!lead!to!conflict!(Buhaug,!2016:!336).!!
Another!focus!of!the!climate!change-peace!approach!is!on!vulnerable!societies,!based!on!the!
acknowledgment! that! vulnerable! societies! are! often! geographically! more! exposed! to!!
climate!change! and!often!“lack! the!capacity!to! manage!these!impacts”! (see!e.g.!Matthew,!
2014:!114).!Furthermore,!Matthew!(2014:!124)!states:!“Post-conflict!societies!are!perhaps!
the!most!fragile!societies!on!the!planet,!and!to!try!to!assist!them!while!ignoring!the!insights!
of!climate!science!would!be!irresponsible!and!dangerous”.!!
A!further! argument! is!that! if!efforts! to! fight!climate! change!and! establish! peace!are! not!!
undertaken,! dealing! with! ensuing! violent! conflicts! will! be! much! more! expensive! than!!
2
!See!at:!http://www.tbpa.net/page.php?ndx=78!(accessed!in!August!2019).!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
9
climate!change!adaptation!(Smith! and!Vivekananda,!2007:!175).!Based! on!these! insights,!
several!authors! recommend!intervention,!support! and!provision! of! directives!for! peace-
building!in!relation!to!climate!change,!arguing!that!the!effects!of!building!resilience!against!
climate!change!also!help!in!the!peacebuilding!process!(see!also!Brzoska!et!al.,!2012;!Schil-
ling!et!al.,!2017).!Therefore,!simultaneously!addressing!climate!change!and!peacebuilding!
is!described!as!a!necessity!and!as!a!win-win!situation!(see!Besigye,!2013).!!
;2'0).H#7"E.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.?"#$"%&'()'*+.
Many!of! the! ties!outlined!above! are! taken!up! again!in! the! recently!published! Routledge!
Handbook!(Swain!and! Öjendal,! 2018)!which! presents!environmental! conflict! and!peace-
building! and! climate! change! as! new! and! important! issue! areas.! It! revives! many! of! the!!
already!described! linkages!between! environment,!climate! change,! conflict!and! peace.!As!
such,! we! refer! to! this! book! as! an! example! for! explicitly! detecting! major! rationales! that!!
underpin!the!environmental!peacebuilding!literature.!
This!includes!the!impetus!to!show!the!linkages!between!environment!and!peace!and!thus!
stress!the!importance!of!environmental!peacebuilding!(Swain!and!Öjendal,!2018).!Environ-
ment!and! climate! change!are! also!described!as! a! bridge!or! as!a! vehicle!to! bring! conflict!!
parties!together!or!to!alleviate!the!mistrust!and!open!up!a!frozen!conflict!in!which!active!
fighting! has! stopped! without! resolving! the! conflict!(Swain! and! Öjendal,! 2018).! This! is!!
possible!because!environmental!issues!are!considered!as!“low!politics”!(Conca!and!Beevers,!
2018:!63).!Furthermore,!climate!change!functions!as!“a!threat!to!unite!against;!the!need!for!
adaptation!offers!a!task!on!which!to! cooperate”!and!as!such! brings!different!(conflicting)!
actors,! communities! or! parties! together! (Smith! and! Vivekananda,! 2007:! 174).! In! other!
words,!the!environment!primarily!functions!as!a!dimension!and/or!as!a!new!entry!point!to!
solve!conflicts.!.
Another! important! rationale! is! that! peace! and! sustainability! are! becoming! mutually!!
dependent!as!“neither!peace!nor!sustainability!will!be!possible!without!the!other”!(Amster,!
2018:!74),!an!argument!also!put!forward!in!the!literature!on!sustainable!peace!(Scheffran,!
2016).!
These! linkages! lead! to! three! main! consequences.! First,! processes! of! conflict! and! peace!!
cannot!be!treated!or!even!conceived!in!isolation!from!the!environment!therefore!a!broad!
coalition!and!trans-disciplinary!pool!of!actors,!knowledge!and!experts!is!required.!Second,!
climate!and!environmental!politics!need!to!be!critically!analysed!as!new!domains!that!influ-
ence! peace! and! conflict! situations.! Third,! celebrated! by! several! authors,! is! the! resulting!!
win-win!strategy!of!environmental!peacebuilding!that!simultaneously!addresses!sustaina-
bility,!peace!and!conflict!(Matthew,!2014;!2018;!Milante,!2017).!!
=0'-'$',<.#*).I"%#-",./*.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.?"#$".#*).8*7'0/*<"*-#(.?"#$"%&'()'*+.
The!main!debate!on!environment-peace!relations!and!environmental!peacebuilding!in!con-
nection!to!climate!change!questions!the!validity!of!the!link.!Ide!(2018)!and!Ide!et!al.!(2018)!
makes! the! point! that! there! is! no! common! definition! of! what! constitutes! environmental!
peace! and! cooperation.! This! makes! it! difficult! to! prove! that! environmental! cooperation!
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
10
causes!peace(building).!Thus,!environmental!cooperation!can!merely!be!seen!as!a!>#$'('-#G
-/0!for!more!general!cooperation!and!peacebuilding!(Ide,!2018:!361).!!
Another!debate!focuses!on!who!is!in!charge!of!including!climate!change!and!environmental!
issues!into!peacebuilding.!The!traditional!actor,!the!military,!has!been!fundamentally!criti-
cised!by!some!and!praised!by!others!for!its!ability!to!serve!this!purpose.!!
J*.-2".8)+"./>.#.C"6.F","#0$2.H#7".
As!we!compare!the! basic!rationales! in!the!different! research!waves!described! above,!we!
recognise!that!the!exploration!of!the!links!between!environmental!and!climate!change!on!
the!one!hand!and!peace!and!conflict!on!the!other!is!repeated!throughout!the!evolution!of!
the!research!on!environmental!peacebuilding.!The!progress!made!in!pursuing!these!rela-
tively!broad!and!mature!research!questions!is!therefore!relatively!limited,!if!we! consider!
the!underlying!concepts.!There!are,!however,!some!promising!developments!in!the!research!
field,!which!seem!to!have!the!potential!to!invoke!substantial!progress.!!
The!first!is!the!general!motivation!to!set!up!better!visibility!and!acceptance!of!the!field!(see!
Swain!and!Öjendal,!2018).!Very!recently,!the!Environmental!Peacebuilding!Association!was!
created!celebrating!its!first!conference!in!2019!at!the!University!of!Irvine!(California).!!
The!second!development!is!a!tendency!to!move!from!theory!to!practice.!The!focus!on!spe-
cific!tools!and!ways!to!transform!the!traditional!peacebuilding!projects!and!policies!through!
the!inclusion!of!climate!and!environmental!change!is!innovative!and!could!be!viewed!as!a!
marker!for!initiating!a!new!wave!of!research.!Instead!of!describing,!questioning!or!problem-
atising!the!link!between!environment,!peace!and!conflict,!the!focus!is!on!how!and!where!to!
implement!strategies!against!climate!change!or!take!environmental!issues!into!considera-
tion.!In!this!context,!several!authors!point!to!the!necessity!for!longer!time!perspectives!for!
peacebuilding!as!being!beneficial!to!donors!and!people!in!conflict!situations!(Matthew,!2014;!
2018;! Milante,! 2017).! Others! suggest! focusing! on! areas! that! go! beyond! the! nation! state!
boundaries! (Mobjörk,! 2017)! or! including! mitigation! and! adaptation! policies! for! climate!
change!in!peacebuilding!processes!(Besigye,!2013:!24).!!
In! order! to! facilitate! the! process! of! including! climate! change! in! peacebuilding,! Matthew!
(2014)!provides!a!good!overview!of!several!obstacles.!He!points!to!the!difficulty!of!estab-
lishing!an!inventory!of!practical!tools!that!would!be!easily!accessible!to!the!many!architects!
of!reconstruction!and!capacity-building!and!the!necessity!of!maintaining!a!general!aware-
ness!of!the!people!who!work!on!the!issue!of!peacebuilding!(Matthew,!2014:!121).!
Other!authors!highlight!that!the!integration!of!the!environment!in!peacebuilding!strategies!
and!activities!is!important!in!order!to!reduce!the!impact!caused!by!the!peacebuilding!sector!
itself.!Through!“crude!exploitation!of!natural!resources,!unsustainable!environmental!prac-
tices,!and!massive!threat!to!resource-based!local!livelihoods”!the!peacebuilding!sector!can!
create!“short-term! urgency”!and! “long-term!unsustainability”! (Swain!and!Öjendal,! 2018:!
10).!!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
11
Another!proposal!to!move!the!field!into!new!directions!is!to!include!different!theories.!Le!
Billon!and!Duffy!(2018:!247)!outline!fruitful!results!that!have!come!from!informing!Peace!
and!Conflict!Studies!with!Political!Ecology!as!a!theoretical!basis!for!addressing!environmen-
tal!concerns!and!human-nature!relations.!They!state!that!Political!Ecology!can!contribute!to!
Peace!and!Conflict!Studies!through!reconceptualising!“scarcity,!abundance!and!dependence!
temporally!through!historically-grounded!analysis”! and!through!situating! these!concepts!
“within!uneven!power!relations!and!resource!entitlements”!(Le!Billon!and!Duffy,!2018:!247).!!
We!also!note!a!promising!new!research!programme!that!aims!to!re-focus!on!regions!other!
than!Africa,!which!so!far!has!received!most!attention;!The!Toda!Peace!Institute!has!devel-
oped! a! programme! dealing! with! climateinduced! conflict! and! conflict-sensitive!climate!
change!policies!in!Oceania.!Another!example!of!such!a!trend!is! shown!in!the!fact!that! the!
first!Environmental!Peacebuilding!Conference!in!Irvine!included!a!specific!regional!focus!on!
Colombia.!
After!this!overview!of!the!evolution!of!the!research!field,!we!come!to!the!interim!conclusion!
that!within!the!field,!the!search!for! a!broader!and! encompassing! framework!that!bridges!
theory!and!practice!seems!to!be!on!its!way.!
Critical!Analysis!of!Rationales!for!Environmental!Peacebuilding!in!the!Context!
of!Climate!Change!
We!turn!to!a!critical!examination!of!the!above!outlined!rationales!that!underpin!the!envi-
ronmental!peacebuilding!literature,!including!environmental!conflict!and!climate!security!
risks.! This! examination! is! guided! by! some! major! insights! that! emerge! from! critical!!
approaches! to! peacebuilding,! climate! science! and! Anthropocene! studies! and! points! at!!
several!deficits!and!problematic!implications.!A!main!motivation!for!this!section!is!that!the!
field!is!poised!for!transformation,! and!therefore! there!is!an!opportunity!to! provide!some!
impulses! that! can! be! useful! for! policy-makers,! such! as! the! emergence! of! new! research!!
programmes!which!systematically!engage!with!existing!knowledge!and!research!results.!To!
do!so,!we!are!firstly!demarcating!the!pitfalls!and!blind!spots!of!the!literature,!and!secondly!
providing!recommendations!on!how!to! address!important! research!gaps,!along! the!path-
ways!of!critical!theory.!
Bias!Towards!Conflict!
The!overall!assessment!of! the!environmental!peacebuilding!literature!confirms!the! exist-
ence!of!an!important!bias!towards!conflict!and!violence!(see!Barnett,!2018).!Several!varia-
tions!of!the!climate!and!environmental!conflict!thesis!dominate!a! number!of!publications!
and!receive!extensive!(public,!media,!policy!and!academic)!attention,!often!limiting!peace!
research!to!the!study!of!war!(Gleditsch!et!al.,!2014).!Furthermore,!the!environmental!peace!
thesis! is! in! fact! also! related! to! a! third! wave! of! environmental! conflict! studies:! several!!
authors!criticise!that!the!central!focus!of!analysis!is!still!on!violence!and!conflict!(or!their!
absence),!not!on!peace!(Dalby,!Brauch!and!Oswald!Spring,!2009:!782;!Barnett,!2018:!3-4).!
Another!striking!fact!is!that!a!definition!of!positive!environmental!peace!remains!to!be!de-
veloped!(see!Dalby,!2018:!11;!Swatuk,!2018:!322;!325)!-!we!will!elaborate!on!this!below.!!
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
12
Missing!Anthropocene!Thinking!!!
We! observe! that! most! of! the! environmental! peace! and! conflict! literature! conceives! the!!
environment!or!climate!change!as!one!dimension!of,!or!as!a!trigger!for,!peace!or!conflict.!As!
described!above,!the!environment!or!climate!change!is!even!proposed!as!a!v"2'$("!for!reach-
ing!conflict!resolution!and!maintaining!political!stability.!This!approach!is!relatively!limited!
because!many!highly!complex!phenomena!are!ignored,!along!with!several!other!essential!
characteristics!of!the!environment,!such!as!the!indivisible!complex!interrelations!with!other!
ecological!processes!including!disruptions!such!as!biodiversity!loss!and!ocean!acidification.!
The!interlinkages!of!these!different!processes!and!the!important!characteristics!of!intracta-
bility!and!irreversibility!still!need!to!be!acknowledged!in!the!literature!on!environmental!
peacebuilding.! Current! approaches! mainly! communicate! the! possibility! of! managing! the!
complex!human-nature! entanglements,!which! treat!climate! change!and! nature!as! if!they!
were!linear!stable!processes.!In!the!context!of!the!emerging!acceptance!of!a!new!geological!
era,! the! Anthropocene,! and! the! recent! IPCC! special! report! (2018),! this! assumption! of!!
controlling!inputs!and!outputs!of!human-nature!relations!has!been!proven!to!be!profoundly!
wrong,!once!again.!It!is!striking!that!climate!change!gained!so!much!attention!in!2007!as!to!
induce!new!research!waves!on!environmental!peace!and!conflict,!while!the!concepts!of!the!
Anthropocene!and!the!Earth!System!Sciences!(see!e.g.!Rockström!et!al.,!2009)!have!received!
rather!little!attention.!In!contrast!to!the!understanding!of!the!Anthropocene!as!a!dynamic!
human/nature!interrelationship,!most!of!the!environmental!peace!and!conflict!literature!is!
still!anchored! in!the! analysis!of! human-human!relations! in!the! tradition!of! the!4/(/$"*".
-2'*3'*+,!where!natural!processes!are!separated!from!and!merely!seen!as!a!background!for!
human!action.!
Alienation!of!Political!Causes!and!Actors!!
Another!important!shortcoming!that!underpins!the!literature!is!the!assumption!of!a!win-
win!strategy!through!a!combination!of!sustainability,!peace!and!equity.!We!do!not!negate!
the!likelihood!that!addressing!the!effects!of!climate!change!may!create!synergies!for!tackling!
development,!poverty,!security,!conflict!and! peace.!Nevertheless,!we! recommend!caution!
about!the!assumption!that!a!win-win!strategy! simultaneously!addressing!climate!change,!
endangered! ecosystems,! underdevelopment,! conflict! and! vulnerability! can! work! in! one!
strike.! The! spill-over! effects! still! require! further! research! (see! Dresse! et! al.,! 2018).! We!!
assume!that!strategies!that!claim!to!address!all!of!these!in!one!approach!are!likely!to!fail.!
This!probability!of!failure!increases!if!the!root!causes!of!climate!change!are!not!addressed!
and,!as!Hayes!(2016:!40)!highlights,!many!of!the!contemporary!approaches!to!environmen-
tal!peacebuilding!deflect!attention!away!from!these!causes.!!
The!approach!focusing!on!so-called!“hotspots”!directs!political!responsibility!towards!the!
weakest!and!most!affected!regions!and!people,!away!from!the!major!structures!and!centres!
of! power! which,! in! the! context! of! climate! change,! are! located! elsewhere.! The! so-called!
hotspot!focus!overloads!the!communities!suffering!from!conflict!situations!with!the!respon-
sibility!to!reduce!the!effects!of!climate!change!for!the!sake!of!humanity!and!to!simultane-
ously!maintain!international!security.!Other!issues,!such!as!major!environmental!polluters!
that!are!situated!in!“peaceful!regions”!of!the!world,!receive!none!or!little!of!the!attention!
they!deserve!as!contributors!to!climate!change.!This!focus!away!from!root!causes!has!also!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
13
been!described!by!critical!peacebuilding!scholars!who!do!not!refer!to!environmental!issues.!
Mac!Ginty!(2013:!389),!for!example,!pointed!out!that!“many!of!the!roots!of!violent!conflict!
and!the!means!to!turn!the!tide!against!conflict!reside!in!the!global!north”.!!
De-politicisation!of!Climate!Change!
In!the!above!outlined!rationales,!there!is!a!tendency!to!de-politicise!climate!change!in!the!
sense!that!it!is!taken!for!granted!and!portrayed!as!an!apolitical!phenomenon.!At!times,!it!is!
even!described! as!a!positive! phenomenon!that! unites!several!parties! in!cooperation! and!
peaceful! action.! In! contrast,! a! critical! political! inquiry! of! these! framings! posits! that! the!
causes! of! climate! change! and! the! actors! responsible! for! it! need! to! be! included! into! the!!
analytical!framing!of!the!climate!change!–!conflict!nexus.!This!requires!a!broader!geographic!
and! temporal! scope! of! analysis! (see! Dalby,! 2018;! Hardt,! 2018)! that! goes! beyond! the!!
contemporary!state!of!the!art!in!Peace!and!Conflict!Studies.!!
Another!contribution!that!critical!approaches!can!make!is!to!unpack!how!peacebuilding!is!
‘read’,!by!whom!and!why!(Mac!Ginty,!2013:!2;!5).!The!political!interests!inherent!in!certain!
discourses,!research!designs!and!geographical!foci!require!more!attention,!especially!in!the!
context!of! environmental!peacebuilding.!The! technocratic!and! managerial!approaches!to!
environmental! peacebuilding! rely! on! certain! norms.! They! include! certain! actors! in! the!!
decision-making!process,!and!exclude!others!and!therefore!serve!different!actors.!As!Cox!
(1981:!128)!states:! theory!always!serves!someone! or!some!purpose,!which! is!not!neces-
sarily!obvious,!or! even!hidden.!Furthermore,!Aggestam!(2018:!104-105)! is!critical!of!the!
technocratic!approach!to!the!climate!–!conflict!nexus!as!it!reduces!external!responsibility!
and!accountability.!
Universalist!Versus!Pluralist!Visions!of!Peace!
The!analysis!also!reveals!that!in!spite!of!the!absence!of!a!clear!definition!of!environmental!
peace(-building),!the!literature! is!strongly!anchored! in!the!notion! of!J*".?"#$",! meaning!
that!there!is!only!one!possible!definition!of!peace!and!one!way!that!it!unfolds.!This!becomes!
clearer!when!we!look!at!the!literature!by!making!use!of!the!differentiation!between!‘prob-
lem-solving’!on!the!one!hand!and!‘critical!change’!on!the!other:!it!reveals!the!tendency!to!
de-politicise! which! ultimately! reduces! peace(-building)! to! a! technical! exercise! based! on!
problem-solving! theory! (Newman,! 2013;! Aggestam,! 2018;! Goetze,! 2017).! This! critique!!
particularly!applies!to!the!latest!calls!to!move!from!theory!to!practice,!through!the!inclusion!
of!mitigation!and! adaptation! policies!into! peacebuilding.! Goetze!(2017:! 4)!describes! the!!
rationale!of!this!approach:!“The!question!is!to!find!the!right!screws!to!turn,!and!peacebuild-
ing!will!build!peace”.!In!this!reading,!the!new!foci!on!sustaining!peace,!the!hotspot!focus!and!
the!inclusion!of!climate!change!into!peacebuilding!seem!to!be!other!‘screws’!to!turn!in!order!
to!reach!the!desired!goal,!which!is!one!particular!form!of!peace,!based!on!universalism.!This!
approach!is!again!linked!to!the!simplification,!de-politicisation!and!technocratic!solutions!
outlined! above.! The! mainstream! environmental! peacebuilding! literature! relies! on! this!!
universalist!conception!of!peace,!which!falls!short!in!several!ways,!as!it!ignores!pluralistic!
visions!of!peace!(see!e.g.!Juyal,!2017;!Koivukoski,!2017)!or!the!possibility!of!analysing!situ-
ations!in! which!conflict! and! cooperation!occur! at!the! same!times! in!different! forms! and!
places!(see!Conca!and!Beevers!2018:!69).!
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
14
Conclusions!and!Recommendations!for!Future!Pathways!
This!policy!brief!provided!an!overview!and!a!critical!assessment!of!the!major!rationales!be-
hind!the!approaches!that!bind!the!environment!and!climate!change!to!conflict!and!peace.!
While! the! acknowledgement! of! climate! change! in! peacebuilding! has! been! recently! pre-
sented! as! a! novelty,! we! have! shown! that! the! discourse! on! the! climate! change! –!!
conflict/peace!nexus!to!a!certain!extent!is!“old!wine!in!new!bottles”:!the!underlying!linkages!
have!been!repeatedly!addressed!in!the!course!of!the!evolution!of!the!literature!on!environ-
ment!and!conflict/peace!since!the!end!of!the!Cold!War.!
A!critical!analysis!allowed!the!unpacking!of!the!particular!ways!in!which!environment!and!
climate!change!are!addressed!in!Peace!and!Conflict!Studies;!we!pointed!at!some!of!the!main!
constraints!and!blind!spots!of!the!environmental!conflict!and!peace!framework.! We!have!
shown!that!an!important!shortcoming!of!the!major!body!of!literature!is!that!it!is!limited!to!
a!conception! of!the!world! that!dichotomises!humans! and!Earth! as!separate!entities! and,!!
accordingly,!addresses! climate!change! or!environment! as!a! controllable!dimension.! This!!
literature!lacks!a!holistic!understanding!and!downplays!the!importance!of!climate!change!
as!a!major!global!challenge.!Hence!problem-solving,!technocratic!approaches!and!manage-
rial,!de-politicising!tendencies!dominate!the!field.!These!approaches!are!connected!to!the!
conception!of!J*".?"#$",!with!‘peace’!defined!only!in!relation!to!violence!and!conflict!(or!the!
absence!thereof).!Hence!there!is!a! clear!bias!towards! conflict!and! violence.!This!makes!it!
necessary!to!further!the!work!on!a!definition!of!(environmental)!peace.!!
An!overall!conclusion!refers!to!the!blueprint!of!the!concept!of!sustaining!peace!and!to!its!
ignorance!with!regard!to!environmental!issues,!as!well!to!the!shortcomings!of!the!environ-
mental!peacebuilding!literature!in!general.!The!aim!to!work!towards!peace!or!to!conceptu-
alise!peace,!will!be!possible!only!when!the!basic!condition!of!our!earthbound!existence!is!
addressed,!and!the!disruptive!changes!that!humanity!and!especially!the!rich!and!powerful!
have!brought!to!the!world!in!form!of!climate!change!and!the!Anthropocene!are!tackled.!!
In!the!following,!we!outline!openings!for!future!research,!based!on!our!argument!that!the!
peacebuilding!literature!has!to!deal!more!explicitly!with!the!shortcomings!and!blind!spots!
discussed! above.! We! recommend! four! main! future! research! avenues! for! the! field! of!!
environmental! peacebuilding! and! for! the! broader! Peace! and! Conflict! Studies! that! also!!
include!the! concept!of! ‘sustaining!peace’! and!which!take! note!of! interconnections!in! the!!
research!field:!
1.!!Include!complex!dynamic!human-nature!relations!
Perspectives!on!the!conceptions!of!peace!and!conflict!which!are!confined!only!to!human-
human!relations!need!to!be!expanded!to!include!dynamic!and!interrelated!complex!human-
nature! relations! and! interactions! (see! Scheffran! et! al.,! 2012).! In! this! context,! a! central!!
concern!is!the!need!to!combine!the!literature!on!‘sustaining!peace’,!which!almost!entirely!
ignores!environmental!dimensions,!with!the!growing!body!of!literature!on!environmental!
peacebuilding,!as!well!as!with!conceptions!of!sustainable!peace.!The!challenges!of!investi-
gating!the!world!of!humans!as!intrinsically!interlinked!and!bound!to!the!Earth!system!can!
no!longer!be!ignored!by!Peace!and!Conflict!scholars!and!practitioners.!Therefore,!broader!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
15
transdisciplinary!research!will!be!necessary!(Kalinowski,!2012),!including!disciplines!such!
as!climate!science,!Earth!System!science,!the!emerging!Anthropocene!Studies!and!especially!
the!Environmental!Humanities!(see!Hardt,!2018).!Some!proposals!already!exist!to!bring!the!
separate!research!fields!of!peace,!conflict,!development!and!sustainability!studies!together.!
Traditional!definitions!of!conflict!and!violence!also!need!to!be!open!to!new!approaches,!such!
as! structural! violence! and! political! power! in! relation! to! the! environment.! These! are!!
important!avenues!for!future!research!(see!Nixon,!2011).!
2.!!Focus!on!peace!
Our!second!main!research!proposal!is!to!explore!environmental!peace!in!a!way!that!is!inde-
pendent!from!violence!and!conflict!(see!Dalby,!2018;!Swatuk,!2018).!As!Kalinowski!(2012:!
274-280)!states,!in!relation!to!environment!and!climate!change,!Peace!and!Conflict!Studies!
is!getting!lost!between!strategies!against!poverty,!and!for!human!security!and!development.!
Stimulating!research!on!the! conception!of!peace!would! furthermore!help! to!confront! the!
bias!and!basic!ontology!of!conflict!in!the!literature.!Therefore,!we!stress!the!necessity!to!put!
more!focus!on!positive!instead!of!negative!linkages!(Scheffran!and!Vogt,!1998:!10;!Scheffran,!
2011;!2016),!towards!the!question!of!defining!positive!conceptions!of!environmental!peace!
and!sustainable!peace.!!
3.!!Include!critical!approaches!to!challenge!universalism!!
A!specific!focus!on!critical!approaches,!as!opposed!to!problem-solving!approaches,!would!
help!to! grasp!certain! phenomena!that! are!currently!relatively!unexplored.!Most! of!these!
phenomena!have!been!outlined!in!the!section!above:!the!questioning!of!power!structures,!
discourse! settings,! and! accompanying! political! interests! and! biases.! Such! critical!!
approaches!would!also!enable!us!to!challenge!the!mainstream!universalism.!!
4.!!Initiate!a!new!integrative!research!wave!
Addressing!the!above!points! would!broaden!the!study!field!-!opening!the! debates!on!the!
linkages!between!the!different!scientific!fields!and!communities!and!with!regard!to!human-
nature!relations.!The!emerging!field!of!Anthropocene!Studies,!and!critical!re-thinking!and!
scrutinizing!of!basic!assumptions!about!and!perceptions!of!the!world!and!of!humankind!in!
and!as!part!of!the!Earth,!provide!valuable!contributions!that!cannot!be!ignored!any!longer.!
We!therefore! recommend!that!the! energy!for! initiating!a!new! wave!of!research! which!is!
currently!emerging!should!explicitly!focus!on!bridging!the!isolated!bodies!of!literature.!We!
put!forward! a!plea!for! a!broader! transdisciplinary,!integrative! and!in-depth!approach! to!!
analyse!and!assess! the!issues!at! hand,!with!a! focus!on!interconnectedness! and!relations.!
This!could!lead!to!a!new!stage!of!Environmental!Peace!and!Conflict!Studies.!!
We! hope! that! through! this! overview! of! the! field,! and! by! unpacking! some! of! the! major!!
restraints!and!blind!spots!of!research!on!conflict,!peace,!environment!and!climate!change,!
we!have!been!able!to!trigger!a!first!step!on!this!path.!
! !
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
16
References!
Adams,!Courtland,!Tobias!Ide,!Jon!Barnett!&!Adrien!Detges!2018.!“Sampling!Bias!in!Climate-
Conflict!Research”,!C#-&0".=('<#-".=2#*+"K.8,!200G203.!
Aggestam,! Karin! 2018.! “Depoliticisation,! Water! and! Environmental! Peacebuilding”,! in:!
Swain!Ashok!&!Joakim!Öjendal!(eds.),!F/&-(")+".4#*)%//3./>.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.=/*>('$-.
#*).?"#$"%&'()'*+K!Routledge,!Londres,!97G107.!
Amster,! Randall! 2018.! “Environment,! Climate! Change,! and! Peace”,! in:! Swain,! Ashok! &!
Joakim!Öjendal!(eds.),!F/&-(")+".4#*)%//3./>.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.=/*>('$-.#*).?"#$"%&'()G
'*+K!Routledge,!Londres,!73G82.!
Baechler,!Günther!1998.!“Why!Environmental!Transformation!Causes!Violence:!A!Synthe-
sis”,!8*7'0/*<"*-#(.=2#*+".#*).:"$&0'-9.?0/@"$-.F"!/0-K!4,!24G39.!
Bargués-Pedreny,! Pol! 2018.! I">"00'*+. ?"#$". '*. D*-"0*#-'/*#(. :-#-". L&'()'*+M. I'>>"0"*$"K..
F",'('"*$".#*).=0'-'N&"K!Routledge,!Abingdon.!
Barnett,!Jon!2000.!“Destabilizing!the!EnvironmentGConflict!Thesis”,!F"7'"6./>.D*-"0*#-'/*#(.
:-&)'",K!26(2),!271G288.!
——!2001.!;2".O"#*'*+./>.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.:"$&0'-9E.8$/(/+'$#(.?/('-'$,.#*).?/('$9.'*.-2".C"6.
:"$&0'-9.80#,!Zed!Books,!Londres.!
——!2007.!“Environmental!Security!and!Peace”,!P/&0*#(./>.4&<#*.:"$&0'-9K.3(1),!4G16.!
——!2018.!“Global!Environmental!Change!I:!Climate!Resilient!Peace?”,!?0/+0",,.'*. 4&<#*.
A"/+0#!29,!agosto,!1G10.!
Barnett,!Jon!&!Neil!W.!Adger!2007.!“Climate!Change,!Human!Security!and!Violent!Conflict”,!
?/('-'$#(.A"/+0#!29K!26(6),!639G655.!
Besigye!Bazirake,!Joseph!2013.!“Climate!Change!Discourse!in!Peacebuilding”,!?"#$".F"7'"6E.
1.P/&0*#(./>.:/$'#(.P&,-'$"K.25(4),!489G494.!
Brauch,! Hans-Günther,! Ursula!Oswald!Spring,!John! Grin!&! Jürgen!Scheffran!(eds.)! 2016.!
4#*)%//3./*.:&,-#'*#%'('-9.;0#*,'-'/*.#*).:&,-#'*#%(".?"#$",!Springer.!
Brock,! Lothar! 1991.! “Peace! through! Parks:! The! Environment! on! the! Peace! Research!
Agenda”,!P/&0*#(./>.?"#$".F","#0$2K.28(4),!407G423.!
Brzoska,!Michael,!Martin!Kalinowski,!Volker!Matthies!&!Berthold!Meyer!2012.!“Einleitung:!
Klimawandel!und!Konflikte”,!in:!Michael!Brzoska,!Martin!Kalinowski,!Volker!Matthies!
&!Berthold!Meyer!(eds.),!Q('<#6#*)"(.&*).Q/*>('3-"M.R"0,'$2"02"'-('$2&*+.7"0,&,.!0SG
7"*-'7".50'")"*,!/('-'3T,!Nomos,!Baden-Baden,!7G24.!
Buhaug,! Halvard! 2016.! “Climate! Change! and! Violent! Conflict:! Taking! Stock”,! ?"#$". 8$/*.
?"#$".:$'.?&%(.?/(K.22(4),!331G338.!
Buhaug,!Halvard,!Jonas!Nordkvelle,!Thomas!Bernauer!"-.#(M!2014.!“One!Effect!to!Rule!them!
All?!A!Comment!on!Climate!and!Conflict”,!=('<#-'$.=2#*+"K!127,!391-397.!
Caparini,!Marina!&!Gari!Milante!2017.!“Sustaining!Peace:!the!New!Overarching!United!Na-
tions!Framework”,!in:!:D?FD.U")MVK.:D?FD.W"#0%//3.XYZ[E.10<#<"*-,K.I',#0<#<"*-.#*).
D*-"0*#-'/*#(.:"$&0'-9K!Oxford!University!Press,!Oxford,!220G232.!
Conca,!Ken!2001.!“Environmental!Cooperation!and!International!Peace”,!in:!Diehl,!Paul!F.!&!
Niels!P.!Gleditsch!(eds.),!8*7'0/*<"*-#(.=/*>('$-,!Westview!Press,!Oxford,!225G250.!!
Conca,!Ken!&!Geoffrey!Dabelko!2002.!8*7'0/*<"*-#(.?"#$"<#3'*+,!John!Hopkins!University!
Press,!Washington!DC.!
Conca,!Ken,!Alexander!Carius!&!Geoffrey!Dabelko!2005.!“Building!Peace!through!Environ-
mental!Cooperation”,!in:! Starke,!Linda! (ed.),!:-#-". />.-2". H/0(). XYY\M. 1.H/0()6#-$2.
D*,-'-&-".F"!/0-./*.?0/+0",,.;/6#0),.#.:&,-#'*#%(".:/$'"-9,!W.W.!Norton!&!Company,!
Worldwatch!Institute,!Londres!&!Massachusetts,!144G157.!
Conca,! Ken! &! Michael! D.! Beevers! 2018.! “Environmental! Pathways! to! Peace”,! in:! Swain,!
Ashok!&! Joakim! Öjendal!(eds.),! F/&-(")+". 4#*)%//3. />. 8*7'0/*<"*-#(. =/*>('$-. #*).
?"#$"%&'()'*+K!Routledge,!Abingdon,!54G72.!
Cox,!Robert!W.!1981.!Social!Forces,!States!and!World!Orders:!Beyond!International!Rela-
tions!Theory”,!O'(("**'&<,!10(2),!126-155.!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
17
Cudworth!Erika! &!Stephen!Hobden! 2011.!?/,-2&<#*.D*-"0*#-'/*#(. F"(#-'/*,E. =/<!("]'-9K.
8$/(/+',<K.#*).A(/%#(.?/('-'$,K!Zed!Books,!Londres..
Dalby,!Simon!2002.!8*7'0/*<"*-#(.:"$&0'-9,!University!of!Minnesota!Press,!Minneapolis.!
——!2018.!“Climate!Change!and!Environmental!Conflicts”,!in:!Swain,!Ashok,!&!Joakim!Öjen-
dal! (eds.),! F/&-(")+". 4#*)%//3. />. 8*7'0/*<"*-#(. =/*>('$-. #*). ?"#$"%&'()'*+K!
Routledge,!Abingdon,!42G53.!
Dalby,!Simon,!Hans!Günter!Brauch!&!Úrsula!Oswald!Spring!2009.!“Environmental!Security!
Concept!Revisited!during!the!First!Three!Phases!(1983G2006)”,!in:!Brauch,!Hans!Gün-
ter,! Úrsula! Oswald! Spring,! John! Grin,! Czeslaw! Mesjasz,! Patricia! Kameri-Mbote,!
Navnita! Chadha! Behera,! Béchir! Chourou,! &! Heinz! Krummenacher! (eds.),! 5#$'*+.
A(/%#(.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.=2#*+"M.8*7'0/*<"*-#(K.4&<#*K.8*"0+9K.5//)K.4"#(-2.#*).H#-"0.
:"$&0'-9.=/*$"!-,,!Springer,!Berlín,!781G790.0!
Diehl,! Paul! &! Nils! Petter! Gleditsch! (eds.)! 2000.! 8*7'0/*<"*-#(. =/*>('$-M. 1*. 1*-2/(/+9,!
Westview!Press,!Oxford.!
Dresse,!Anaïs,!Itay!Fischhendler,!Jonas!Østergaard!Nielsen!&!Ziko!Dimitrios!2018.!“Environ-
mental!Peacebuilding:!towards!a!Theoretical!Framework”,!=//!"0#-'/*.#*).=/*>('$-,!
1G21.!
Dyer,!Gwynne!2009.! =('<#-".H#0,M. ;2".5'+2-.>/0. :&07'7#(. #,.-2". H/0().J7"02"#-,K!Vintage!
Canada,!Toronto.!
Gleditsch,!Nils!Peter,!Jonas!Nordkvelle!&!Strand!Harvard!2014.!“Peace!Research!G!Just!the!
Study!of!War?”,!P/&0*#(./>.?"#$".F","#0$2,!51(2),!145G158.!
Goetze,!Catherine!2017.!;2".I',-'*$-'/*./>.?"#$"M.1.:/$'#(.1*#(9,',./>.?"#$"%&'()'*+,!Univer-
sity!of!Michigan!Press,!Ann!Arbor.!
Hardt,!Judith!Nora!2018.!8*7'0/*<"*-#(.:"$&0'-9.'*.-2".1*-20/!/$"*"E.1.*"6.50#<"6/03.>/0.
1*#(9,',M.1,,",,'*+.;2"/09.#*).?0#$-'$",!Routledge,!Abingdon.!
Hayes,!Ben!2016.!“Colonising!the!Future:!Climate!Change!and!International!Security!Strate-
gies”,!in:!Buxton,!Nick,!Ben!Hayes!&!Susan!George!(eds.),!;2".:"$&0".#*). -2".I',!/,G
,",,")M.4/6.-2".O'('-#09.#*).=/0!/0#-'/*,.#0".:2#!'*+.#.=('<#-"G=2#*+").H/0(),!Pluto!
Press,!Londres,!39G62.!
Homer-Dixon,!Thomas!F.! 1994.! “Environmental!Scarcities! and!Violent!Conflict:!Evidence!
from!Cases”,!D*-"0*#-'/*#(.:"$&0'-9!19(1),!5G40.!
Hsiang,!Solomon! M.!&! Burke,!Marshall! 2014.!“Climate,! conflict,!and! social!stability:! what!
does!the!evidence!say?”!=('<#-'$.=2#*+"!123:!3955.!
Ide,!Tobias!2018.!“Does!Environmental!Peacemaking!between!States!Work?!Insights!on!Co-
operative!Environmental!Agreements!and!Reconciliation!in!International!Rivalries“,!
P/&0*#(./>.?"#$".F","#0$2,!55(3),!351-365.!
Ide,!Tobias,!Vakur!Sümer!&!Larissa!M.!Aldehoff!2018.!“Environmental!Peacebuilding!in!the!
Middle!East”,!in:!Swain,!Ashok!&!Joakim!Öjendal!(eds.),!F/&-(")+".4#*)%//3./>.8*7'G
0/*<"*-#(.=/*>('$-.#*).?"#$"%&'()'*+,!Routledge,!Abingdon,!175G187.!!
Ide,!Tobias!&!Jürgen!Scheffran!2014.!“On!Climate!Change!and!Cumulation:!Suggestions!for!
Integrative!Cumulation!of!Knowledge!in!the!Research!on!Climate!Change!and!Violent!
Conflict”,!A(/%#(.=2#*+"K.?"#$".^.:"$&0'-9K.26(3),!263G279.!
Interpol!&!UN!Environment!2016.!:-0#-"+'$.F"!/0-E.8*7'0/*<"*-K.?"#$".#*).:"$&0'-9.G.1.=/*G
7"0+"*$"./>.;20"#-M.!
IPCC!G!Intergovernmental!Panel!on! Climate!Change!(ed.)!2007.! =('<#-".=2#*+".XYY[E. D<G
!#$-,K.1)#!-#-'/*.#*).R&(*"0#%'('-9M.=/*-0'%&-'/*./>.H/03'*+.A0/&!.DD.-/.-2".5/&0-2.1,G
,",,<"*-.F"!/0-./>.-2".D?==,!Cambridge!University!Press,!Cambridge.!
——!2014.!=('<#-".=2#*+".XYZ_E.D<!#$-,K.1)#!-#-'/*K.#*).R&(*"0#%'('-9GD?==.HADD.1F\.:&<G
<#09.>/0.?/('$9<#3"0,M.=/*-0'%&-'/*./>.H/03'*+.A0/&!.DD.-/.-2".5'>-2.1,,",,<"*-.F"!/0-.
/>.-2".D*-"0+/7"0*<"*-#(.?#*"(./*.=('<#-".=2#*+",!Cambridge!University!Press,!Cam-
bridge.!
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
18
——!2018.!A(/%#(.H#0<'*+./>.ZM\`=M.1*.D?==.:!"$'#(.F"!/0-./*.-2".'<!#$-,./>.+(/%#(.6#0<'*+.
/>.ZM\`=.#%/7".!0"G'*)&,-0'#(. ("7"(,. #*). 0"(#-"). +(/%#(.+0""*2/&,". +#,. "<',,'/*. !#-2G
6#9,K!in!-2".$/*-"]-./>.,-0"*+-2"*'*+.-2".+(/%#(.0",!/*,".-/.-2".-20"#-./>.$('<#-".$2#*+"K.
,&,-#'*#%(".)"7"(/!<"*-K.#*).">>/0-,.-/."0#)'$#-".!/7"0-9,!IPCC,!Geneva.!
Jahanbegloo,!Ramin!2017.!“A!Nonviolent!Perspective!on!Peace”,!in:!Juyal,!Shreesh,!&!John!
Duncan!(eds.),!?"#$".',,&",.'*.-2".XZ,-.$"*-&09.+(/%#(.$/*-"]-,!Cambridge!Scholars!Pub-
lishing,!Newcastle!upon!Tyne,!24G34.!
Juyal,!Shreesh!2017.! “Peace!Perspectives”,!in:!Juyal,! Shreesh!&!John!Duncan! (eds.),!?"#$".
D,,&",.'*. -2".XZ,-.="*-&09.A(/%#(.=/*-"]-,!Cambridge!Scholars!Publishing,!Newcastle!
upon!Tyne,!1G23.!
Kalinowski,!Martin!B.!2012.!“Klimawandel!und!Konflikte:!Was!ist!die!Aufgabe!für!Friedens-!
und!Konfliktforschung?”,!in:!Brzoska,!Michael,!Martin!Kalinowski,!Volker!Matthies!&!
Berthold!Meyer!(eds.),!Q('<#6#*)"(.&*).Q/*>('3-"M.R"0,'$2"02"'-('$2&*+.7"0,&,.!0S7"*G
-'7".50'")"*,!/('-'3T,!Nomos,!Baden-Baden,!271G284.!
Koivukoski,!Toivo!2017.!“The!Question!of!Peace!as!Political!Telos”,!in:!Juyal,!Shreesh!&!John!
Duncan!(eds.),! ?"#$". D,,&",. '*. -2". XZ,-. ="*-&09. A(/%#(. =/*-"]-,! Cambridge!Scholars!
Publishing,!Newcastle!upon!Tyne,!35G47.!
LeBillon,!Philippe!&!Rosaleen!Duffy!2018.!“Conflict!Ecologies:!Connecting!Political!Ecology!
and!Peace!&!Conflict!Studies”,!P/&0*#(./>.?/('-'$#(.8$/(/+9K!25(1),!239G260.!
Lietzmann,!Kurt!&!Alexander!Carius!1999.!8*7'0/*<"*-.#*).:"$&0'-9M.1.8&0/!"#*.?"0,!"$G
-'7",!Springer,!Berlin.!!
Mach,!Katherine!J.,!et!al.!2019.!“Climate!as!a!risk!factor!for!armed!conflict“,!C#-&0"!571:!193
197.!
Mac!Ginty,!Roger!2013.! “Introduction”,!in:!Mac!Ginty,! Roger!(ed.),!F/&-(")+".4#*)%//3. />.
?"#$"%&'()'*+,!Routledge,!Abingdon,!1G8.!
Matthew,! Richard! A.! 2014.! “Integrating! Climate! Change! into! Peacebuilding”,! =('<#-'$.
=2#*+",.123(1),!83G93.!
——!2018.!“Climate!Change!Adaptation!and!Peacebuilding”,!in:!Swain,!Ashok!&!Joakim!Öjen-
dal! (eds.),! F/&-(")+". 4#*)%//3. />. 8*7'0/*<"*-#(. =/*>('$-. #*). ?"#$"%&'()'*+,!
Routledge,!Abingdon,!108G120.!
Milante,!Gary!2017.!“Peace!and!Development”,!in:!:D?FD.U")MVK.:D?FD.W"#0%//3.XYZ[E.10<#G
<"*-,K.I',#0<#<"*-.#*).D*-"0*#-'/*#(.:"$&0'-9K!Oxford!University!Press,!Oxford,!213G
219.!
Mobjörk,!Malin!2017.!“Exploring!the!Climate-Conflict!Link:!the!Case!of!East!Africa”,!in:!:D?FD.
U")MVK.:D?FD.W"#0%//3.XYZ[E.10<#<"*-,K.I',#0<#<"*-.#*).D*-"0*#-'/*#(.:"$&0'-9K!Ox-
ford!University!Press,!Oxford,!287G299.!
Newman,!Edward!2013.! “The!International!Architecture!of!Peacebuilding”,!in:! Mac!Ginty,!
Roger!(ed.),!F/&-(")+".4#*)%//3./>.?"#$"%&'()'*+,!Routledge,!Abingdon,!311G324.!
Nixon,!Rob!2011.!:(/6.R'/("*$".#*).-2".8*7'0/*<"*-#(',<./>.-2".?//0,!Harvard!University!
Press,!Londres.!
Rockström,!Johan,!Will!Steffen,!Kevin!Noone!"-.#(M!2009!“Planetary!Boundaries:!Exploring!
the!Safe!Operating!Space!for!Humanity”,!8$/(/+9.#*).:/$'"-9,!14(2),!32.!
Scheffran,!Jürgen!1996.!“Leben!bewahren!gegen!Wachstum,!Macht,!Gewalt!—!Zur!Verknüp-
fung!von!Frieden!und!nachhaltiger!Entwicklung,!H',,"*,$2#>-.&*).50'")"*,!3,!5G9.!
——!2011.!“Frieden! und!nachhaltige!Entwicklung”,! in:!Gießmann,! Hans-Joachim!&! Bern-
hard!Rinke!(eds.),!4#*)%&$2.50'")"*,!VS,!Wiesbaden,!310G323.!
——2016.!“From!a!Climate!of!Complexity!to!Sustainable!Peace:!Viability!Transformations!
and!Adaptive!Governance!in!the!Anthropocene”,!in:!Brauch,!Hans!Günter,!et!al.!(eds.),!
4#*)%//3./*.:&,-#'*#%'('-9.;0#*,'-'/*.#*).:&,-#'*#%(".?"#$",!Springer,!305-347.!
——!(ed.)!2017.! O'+0#-'/*. &*). 5(&$2-. a6',$2"*. Q('<#6#*)"(. &*). Q/*>('3-"*,! Hamburger!
Symposium!Geographie,!Band!9.!Schriftenreihe!des!Instituts!für!Geographie!der!Uni-
versität!Hamburg.!
Scheffran,!Jürgen!&!Wolfgang!Vogt!(eds.)!1998.!Q#<!>.&<.)'".C#-&0M.B<6"(-a"0,-b0&*+.&*).
)'".cb,&*+.b3/(/+',$2"0.Q/*>('3-",!Darmstadt.!
J Hardt and J Scheffran Environmental Peacebuilding and Climate Change
19
Scheffran,!Jürgen,!Michael!Brzoska,!Jasmin!Kominek,!Peter!Michael!Link!&!Jan-Peter!Schil-
ling!2012.!Climate!Change!and!Violent!Conflict”,!:$'"*$",!336,!869-871.!
Schilling,!Janpeter,!Sarah! L.!Nash,!Tobias!Ide,! Jürgen!Scheffran,!Rebecca!Froese,!Pina! von!
Prondzinski!2017.!Resilience!and!environmental!security:!towards!joint!application!
in!peacebuilding.!A(/%#(.=2#*+"K.?"#$".^.:"$&0'-9!29(2):!1-21.!
Smith,!Dan! &!Janani! Vivekananda!2007.! 1. =('<#-". />. =/*>('$-M. ;2". c'*3,. %"-6""*. =('<#-".
=2#*+"K.?"#$".#*).H#0,!International!Alert,!Londres.!
Swain,!Ashok!&!Joakim!Öjendal!2018.!“Environmental!Conflict!and!Peacebuilding.!An!Intro-
duction”,!in!Swain,! Ashok!&!Joakim! Öjendal!(eds.),!F/&-(")+". 4#*)%//3. />.8*7'0/*G
<"*-#(.=/*>('$-.#*).?"#$"%&'()'*+,!Routledge,!Abingdon,!1G14.!
Swatuk,!Larry!2018.!“Environmental!Resource!Governance!and!Peace.!A!Critical! Review”,!
in:!Swain,!Ashok!&!Joakim!Öjendal!(eds.),!F/&-(")+".4#*)%//3./>.8*7'0/*<"*-#(.=/*G
>('$-.#*).?"#$"%&'()'*+,!Routledge,!Abingdon,!315G328.!
UNSG!2015.!;2".=2#(("*+"./>.:&,-#'*'*+.?"#$"M.F"!/0-./>.-2".1)7',/09.A0/&!./>.8]!"0-,.>/0.
-2".XYZ\.F"7'"6./>.-2".B*'-").C#-'/*,.?"#$"%&'()'*+.10$2'-"$-&0"M.United!Nations!Se-
curity!Council,!Nueva!York.!
WCED!&!Brundtland,!Gro!Harlem!1987.!J&0.=/<</*.5&-&0"E.;2".H/0().=/<<',,'/*./*.8*G
7'0/*<"*-.#*).I"7"(/!<"*-,!Oxford!University!Press,!Nueva!York.!
Welzer,!Harald!2012.!“Climate!Wars”.!Polity!Press,!Cambridge,!UK.!
Westing,!Arthur!H.!(ed.)!1990.!8*7'0/*<"*-#(.4#a#0),./>.H#0E.F"("#,'*+.I#*+"0/&,.5/0$",.
'*.#*.D*)&,-0'#('a").H/0(),!Sage,!London.!
Zhang,!David!D.,!Peter!Brecke,!Harry!F.!Lee,!Yuan-!Qing!He!&!Jane!Zhang!2007.!“Global!Cli-
mate!Change,!War,!and!Population!Decline!in!Recent!Human!History”,!?0/$"")'*+,./>.
-2".C#-'/*#(.1$#)"<9./>.:$'"*$",!104(49),!19214-19219.!
!
!
This!text!is!a!further!elaborated!and!extended!version!of!a!Spanish!text,!with!the!following!
reference:!!
!
Hardt,!Judith!Nora!&!Jürgen!Scheffran!2019.!“Construcción!de!paz!medioambiental!y!cambio!
climático:!Evaluación,!análisis!crítico!y!perspectivas”,!in! Pérez!de!Armiño,! Karlos!&!
Iker! Zirion! Landaluze! (eds.),! ?#a. =0d-'$#M. 1!/0-",. -"e0'$/,. #. (#,. !"0,!"$-'7#,. )". !#a.
!/,('%"0#(,!Tecnos,!Madrid,!389-421.!
!
!
!
Policy Brief No. 68 Toda Peace Institute
20
The!Authors!
Judith! Nora! Hardt!works!as! a!Postdoctoral!Researcher! with!the!Institute! for! Peace!Re-
search!and!Security!Policy!at!the!University!of!Hamburg!and!at!the!Centre!Marc!Bloch,!Berlin.!
Her!research!is!based!on!a!critical-normative!approach!and!aims!to!develop!the!conceptu-
alizations!of!security,!conflict,!human!well-being!and!justice!via!the!new!readings!of!human-
nature!relations.!The!forms!and! roles!of! agency,!expertise,! power!and!normative! founda-
tions!within!global!governance!are!further!constitutive!elements!of!her!research.!Currently!
she!focuses!on!the! emerging!climate! security!governance!complex.!In!this!context,!Judith!
works!in!close!cooperation!with!the!German!Foreign!Ministry!of!Affairs!with!the!aim!to!de-
velop!new!policy!approaches!and!recommendations!in!order!to!overcome!the!several!chal-
lenges!of!the!climate!security!field!with!the!joined!forces!of!the!triangulation!of!theory!and!
practice.!Recent!publications!include!(2018)!"Environmental!Security!in!the!Anthropocene:!
Assessing!theory!and!practice"!(Routledge).!She!is!active!in!the!ScientistsForFuture.!
Jürgen!Scheffran!is!professor!in!integrative!geography!at!the!University!of!Hamburg!and!
head!of!the!Research!Group!Climate!Change!and!Security!(CLISEC).!He!is!involved!as!Princi-
pal!Investigator!in!the!Cluster!of!Excellence!“Climate,!Climatic!Change!and!Society”!(CLICCS)!
and!in!the!Center!for!Earth!System!Research!and!Sustainability!(CEN).!Previously!he!held!
research!positions!at!University! of!Marburg,!Technical!University! of!Darmstadt,! Potsdam!
Institute!for!Climate!Impact!Research!and!University!of!Illinois.!He!has!been!contributing!to!
several!projects! and!organizations,!including! the!United!Nations,! the!Technology! Assess-
ment!Bureau!of!the!German!Parliament,!the!German!Committee!for!Sustainability!Research!
(DKN)!and!the!Fachkommission!Fluchtursachen!of!the!German!government.!Research!fields!
include:!climate!security,!environmental!conflict! and!human! migration;!land! use,!energy-
water-food!nexus!and!rural-urban!interaction;!sustainability!and!complexity!science;!tech-
nology!assessment!and!arms!control!of!missiles,!space!and!nuclear!weapons.!Recent!co-ed-
ited! books! include! “Agent-based! Modeling! of! Environmental! Conflict! and! Cooperation”!
(2019),!“Handbook!on!Sustainability!Transition!and!Sustainable!Peace”!(2016)!and!“Climate!
Change,!Human!Security!and!Violent!Conflict”!(2012).!
Toda!Peace!Institute!
The!Toda!Peace!Institute!is!an!independent,!nonpartisan!institute!committed!to!advancing!
a!more!just!and!peaceful!world!through!policy-oriented!peace!research!and!practice.!The!
Institute!commissions! evidence-based!research,! convenes!multi-track! and!multi-discipli-
nary!problem-solving!workshops!and!seminars,!and!promotes!dialogue!across!ethnic,!cul-
tural,!religious!and!political!divides.!It!catalyses!practical,!policy-oriented!conversations!be-
tween!theoretical!experts,!practitioners,!policymakers!and!civil!society!leaders!in!order!to!
discern!innovative!and!creative!solutions!to!the!major!problems!confronting!the!world!in!
the!twenty-first!century!(see!www.toda.org!for!more!information).!
Contact!Us!
Toda!Peace!Institute!
Samon!Eleven!Bldg.!5th!Floor!
3-1!Samon-cho,!Shinjuku-ku,!Tokyo!160-0017,!Japan!
Email:!contact@toda.org!
... Accordingly, nonhuman factors acquired greater relevance in peace and conflict studies, as evidenced by the emergence of environmental peacebuilding as a new discipline 5 , which links ecological (in) security to the struggle of creating broader forms of peace [19]. Thus, environmental peacebuilding is one of the most relevant and controversial outcomes of the resilience approach, as it sees the environment as something of which humans are both shaping actors and weaponless spectators, and therefore, as both a threat multiplier and a source of empowerment that in either case must be 'managed' primarily through technical preparedness [5,27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Most literature on peacebuilding has been characterized by the intention to set resilience as an alternative to liberal peace or as a reproduction of it, thus conflating different types of policy development into a single dependent variable, whereby policy change happened or not. The central aim of the article is to clarify the type of change represented by the resilience approach. Evidence seems to show that resilience is an adaptation of the instruments and settings that leaves the overall goals of the policy unaltered. The second aim of the article is to suggest a move away from current monolithic interpretations, providing insights into how resilience can be saved from itself. The paper is not meant to provide exhaustive answers or indisputable empirical findings, but rather to shed light on the actual limitations of research in peacebuilding, and to provide some cues for future studies on how peace practice might change.
Chapter
This chapter introduces the book, Climate Security in the Anthropocene— Exploring the Approaches of United Nations Security Council Member-States. Climate change is increasingly positioned as a security issue. A number of influential governance actors including states, international organisations, and civil society groups now connect climate change to a variety of security threats such as armed conflict, disasters, low socio-economic development, and fragile governing institutions. These threat perceptions have translated into political action and have led to the formation of a complex constellation of governance actors in response. In particular, over the past fifteen years both permanent and non-permanent member-states of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) have been instrumental in constructing and responding to climate security threats. This introductory chapter presents the overall aim of the book, which is to analyse whether the concept of security has shifted over time with respect to climate change, and if so, how these shifts have occurred in state practices. It begins by tracing the evolution of climate security in academic scholar- ship and in the UNSC. It then presents the theoretical framework of the book, which distinguishes between three ideal-types of climate security: national security, human security, and ecological security. It concludes by outlining the methodology of the book, which is comprised of fifteen case study chapters that explore the various ways in which member-states that sat on the UNSC between 2018 and in 2020 constructed and responded to climate security threats.
Article
Full-text available
Since the end of the Cold War, studies regarding the linkages between environment, security and conflict have been increased. Parallel to this growth, the impacts of environmental problems (such as scarcity, resource curse, etc.) have begun to be seen as critical and imperative in peacebuilding processes. Within this framework, environmental peacebuilding appeared as an emerging approach that has its roots in the works of Ken Conca and Geoffrey Dabelko in 2002. In 2013, Environmental Peacebuilding Association (EnPAx) was established as a knowledge platform including the community of practice for this particular field. Besides, many international organizations such as the European Union, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and the United Nations (UN) Agencies are increasingly adopted an environmental peacebuilding approach. In particular, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) carries out practices in this context. Within this framework, this paper will critically evaluate UNEP's assessment program in Afghanistan through the lens of environmental peacebuilding. First, the concept of environmental peacebuilding will briefly be explained. Subsequently, UNEP’s initiative of ‘’Post-Conflict Environmental Assessment in Afghanistan’’ will be used as a case model for environmental peacebuilding.
Article
Full-text available
The links between climate change and conflict are manifold and gaining increasing attention in policy and research. However, the link between sustainable peace and climate justice has been widely overlooked. This article addresses this gap conceptually and shows that civil conflict transformation offers effective means to address the climate crisis. Climate change mitigation, climate adaptation and conflict transformation need to be thought together, just like peace, environment and development, in order to shape social-ecological transformations. -- Die Zusammenhänge zwischen Klimawandel und Konflikten sind vielfältig und werden in Politik und Forschung zunehmend thematisiert. Die Verbindung von nachhaltigem Frieden und Klimagerechtigkeit ist hingegen wenig erforscht. Dieser Beitrag adressiert diese Lücke konzeptionell und zeigt auf, dass Zi- vile Konfliktbearbeitung wirksame Mittel zu Bewältigung der Klimakrise bereithält. Klimaschutz, Klimaanpassung und Konfliktbearbeitung müssen genauso wie Frie- den, Umwelt und Entwicklung zusammengedacht werden, um sozial-ökologische Transformationen zu gestalten.
Article
Il contesto storico attuale è caratterizzato da una crescente attenzione alle problematiche ambientali, percepite come vere e proprie emergenze da affrontare su scala globale con elevata priorità. In premessa, la situazione congiunturale della guerra in corso sul territorio ucraino viene analizzata esclusivamente sul versante ambientale e, in particolare, per i risvolti legati all’alterazione degli habitat e all’aumento delle emissioni climalteranti in atmosfera. Le convenzioni ambientali dell’ONU in materia di cambiamenti climatici, di diversità biologica e di lotta alla desertificazione rappresentano un punto di riferimento imprescindibile per la transizione verso uno sviluppo realmente sostenibile. In tale contesto si incardina e declina l’attività del Comando Unità Forestali, Ambientali e Agroalimentari dell’Arma dei Carabinieri (CUFA), sia come forza di polizia ambientale strutturata ed efficiente nel garantire la prevenzione dei reati in danno all’ambiente, alle foreste e al settore agroalimentare nel nostro Paese, sia in proiezione internazionale. Questa impostazione viene perseguita nell’ambito di una nuova “diplomazia ambientale” in grado di esportare le buone pratiche all’interno di un perimetro di cooperazione definito in accordo con le Agenzie dell’ONU e in raccordo con i riferimenti istituzionali nazionali.
Chapter
This chapter looks into the extent to which faith-based civil society can contribute to environmental peace and justice in the Anthropocene. It focuses on Pope Francis’ Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’ [“Praise be to you, my Lord”], “On Care for Our Common Home” which is used here as an exploratory case study. It argues that humanity can withstand the effects of industrial revolution, the advancement of science and technology and governments’ unfair policies that are deemed anthropogenic causes of the disintegrating Earth system (ES). The potential of faith-based civil society to lead a promising transformative action to save our planet is situated at both a theological/spiritual level (world regions’ population, fundamentals, beliefs, and teaching on care for the environment) and an experiential/pragmatic level (human agency, resilience and stewardship). Based on the conceptual and practical analysis of Earth sciences and how these apply to the Anthropocene, this chapter put forth four strategies as pathways to mitigate the crumbling of the ES and its corollaries, mainly climate change, as well as drought, famine, loss of lands and displacement of populations. These strategies are (1) promoting ecological peace education, (2) popularising environmental justice, (3) encouraging a change in the belief that satisfying individual needs is the basic purpose of life, and lastly (4) emboldening humanity’s conscientious stewardship over creation and its natural environment.KeywordsAnthropoceneCatholicismCivil societyFaith-based organisationsEnvironmental justiceLaudato Si’Peace ecologyPeacebuilding
Article
Full-text available
Research findings on the relationship between climate and conflict are diverse and contested. Here we assess the current understanding of the relationship between climate and conflict, based on the structured judgments of experts from diverse disciplines. These experts agree that climate has affected organized armed conflict within countries. However, other drivers, such as low socioeconomic development and low capabilities of the state, are judged to be substantially more influential, and the mechanisms of climate–conflict linkages remain a key uncertainty. Intensifying climate change is estimated to increase future risks of conflict.
Article
Full-text available
Environmental peacebuilding represents a paradigm shift from a nexus of environmental scarcity to one of environmental peace. It rests on the assumption that the biophysical environment’s inherent characteristics can act as incentives for cooperation and peace, rather than violence and competition. Based on this, environmental peacebuilding presents cooperation as a win-win solution and escape from the zero-sum logic of conflict. However, there is a lack of coherent environmental peacebuilding framework and evidence corroborating the existence of this environment-peace nexus. Building on a multidisciplinary literature review, this article examines the evolution of environmental peacebuilding into an emerging framework. It unpacks the concept and explains its main building blocks (conditions, mechanisms and outcomes) to develop our understanding of when, how and why environmental cooperation can serve as a peacebuilding tool. It assembles these building blocks into three generic trajectories (technical, restorative and sustainable environmental peacebuilding), each characterised according to their own causality, drivers and prerequisites, and illustrated with concrete examples. Finally, this article draws attention to the remaining theoretical gaps in the environmental peacebuilding literature, and lays the foundations for an environmental peacebuilding research agenda that clarifies if and how environmental cooperation can spill over across borders, sectors and scales towards sustainable peace.
Article
Full-text available
Critics have argued that the evidence of an association between climate change and conflict is flawed because the research relies on a dependent variable sampling strategy1–4. Similarly, it has been hypothesized that convenience of access biases the sample of cases studied (the ‘streetlight effect’⁵). This also gives rise to claims that the climate–conflict literature stigmatizes some places as being more ‘naturally’ violent6–8. Yet there has been no proof of such sampling patterns. Here we test whether climate–conflict research is based on such a biased sample through a systematic review of the literature. We demonstrate that research on climate change and violent conflict suffers from a streetlight effect. Further, studies which focus on a small number of cases in particular are strongly informed by cases where there has been conflict, do not sample on the independent variables (climate impact or risk), and hence tend to find some association between these two variables. These biases mean that research on climate change and conflict primarily focuses on a few accessible regions, overstates the links between both phenomena and cannot explain peaceful outcomes from climate change. This could result in maladaptive responses in those places that are stigmatized as being inherently more prone to climate-induced violence.
Chapter
Whether the issue is climate change, the loss of biodiversity, the spread of land degradation, water scarcity, or the continued strip-mining of coastal zone resources, regional approaches to adaptation have become increasingly important in human terms. Simply put, our failure to make global progress in preventing these problems in the twenty [five] years since Rio means we have an added moral responsibility to attend to their consequences in the next twenty. If so, then we are all regionalists now. © 2018 selection and editorial matter, Ashok Swain and Joakim Øjendal; individual chapters, the contributors.
Chapter
This chapter provides a comprehensive discussion of the environmental peacebuilding literature with a special focus on the Middle East. In order to do so, it first reviews the different streams of research which contribute to our understanding of environmental peacebuilding. We also formulate some suggestions for the theoretical integration of the different approaches. Afterwards, the – rather mixed – results of several key studies on environmental peacebuilding are presented. In the following, we present two case studies which illustrate the potentials and pitfalls of environmental peacebuilding in the Middle East: interactions between Turkey, Syria and Iraq concerning the Euphrates and Tigris river basin(s), and water-related cooperation between Israel and Jordan.
Article
The literature on environmental peacemaking argues that cooperation in the face of shared environmental challenges can facilitate further cooperation, trust building, and eventually peace between states in conflict. Empirical research on environmental peacemaking, predominantly conducted in the form of single case studies, has so far been inconclusive. This article uses a cross-case, multimethod research design to test the environmental peacemaking proposition. More specifically, it argues that the conclusion of a cooperative environmental agreement can have a positive impact on reconciliation between rival states. Based on a new dataset on international rivalry termination, transboundary protected areas, and international freshwater agreements, this article first conducts a statistical analysis and a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). The results are then verified and refined by six case studies. Triangulation of findings from the three studies suggests that the conclusion of a cooperative environmental agreement facilitates reconciliation in international rivalries. But this effect is contingent on a number of scope conditions, such as high environmental attention, internal political stability, wider patterns or traditions of environmental cooperation, and already ongoing processes of reconciliation. Still, the findings imply that environmental challenges do not only affect peace and security in a negative way. Addressing them jointly also opens opportunities for peacemaking and peacebuilding between states.