Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
Current inuence ofChina’s ban onplastic waste imports
WanliWang1· NickolasJ.Themelis2· KaiSun1· AthanasiosC.Bourtsalas2· QunxingHuang1 · YunheZhang1·
Received: 12 March 2019 / Revised: 25 March 2019 / Accepted: 27 March 2019 / Published online: 23 April 2019
© Zhejiang University Press 2019
The current global production of plastics is over 300 million tons, 20% of which is produced in China. It has been estimated
that about 90% of the discarded plastics are not recycled. China was the world’s leading importer of waste plastics, while since
January 1, 2018, China’s import ban on waste plastics has been put into force, which has had a far-reaching eﬀect on global
plastic production and solid waste management. Southeast Asian countries like Malaysia have replaced China as the leading
importer of plastic wastes. As the main exporter of waste plastics, EU has released strategy and initiative about plastics to
restrict the use of micro plastics and single-use plastics. Meanwhile main European counties like UK, German and France
have also taken own active measures to realize the control of packaging waste and non-recycled plastic and the recycling of
plastic wastes in several years. As For the US, some areas such as Seattle and San Francisco have positively responded to the
global trend of plastic ban. However, the controversy over “plastic restriction” in the whole state obstructed the promulgation
and implementation of the national plastic ban. On the whole, major companies and more than 60 countries all over the world
have introduced levies or bans to combat single-use plastic wastes. The Chinese government began to rectify the domestic
waste plastics market and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China has clariﬁed the threshold of waste
plastic treatment capacity for key enterprises. In addition to landﬁll, direct recovery and waste to energy processes are the
main disposal methods of waste plastics. Thermoplastics like PE, PP and PET that are sorted out from the waste stream by
citizens can be directly recycled to the primary material. The mixed waste plastics can be used as fuel in waste to energy
plants, or as feedstock to pyrolysis plants that transform them to high value-added oil or chemical materials, which are more
promising disposal methods of waste plastics.
Keywords Waste plastics· China· Ban· Import· Pyrolysis
Plastics are polymer compounds derived from the polym-
erization of small molecular organic compounds such as
ethylene, styrene, etc. and can be classiﬁed broadly into
thermoplastic and thermosetting plastics. Since the initial
invention of plastics, various kinds of plastic products have
become excellent substitutes for traditional materials such as
paper, wood, metal and ceramics in various manufacturing
industries because of their advantages of light weight, high
strength, good insulation, high transparency, excellent cor-
rosion resistance, low cost and ease of fabrication . The
current global production is estimated at about 300 million
tons and it is expected to reach 500 million tons by 2050,
most of which will be single-use products .
The various advantages of plastics have led to expansive
growth in their production and consumption and this has also
resulted in serious problems such as environmental pollu-
tion and waste disposal. Plastic debris is the major pollutant
listed by the EU (61%) and the USEPA (78%) .
However, despite much eﬀort in developing countries,
less than 10% of the generated plastic wastes are being recy-
cled to the original materials . As a result, about 75% of
the wastes ﬂoating in the marine environment are plastics
and over two-thirds of which are not biodegradable [5, 6].
A study by JR Jambeck reported that over 5 million tons of
* Qunxing Huang
1 State Key Laboratory Clean Energy Utilization,
Zhejiang University, Hangzhou310027, Zhejiang,
2 Columbia University, Earth Engineering Center, NewYork,
68 Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
plastic wastes were discarded into the oceans in 2010 .
The plastic debris in aquatic habitats has caused immeasur-
able potential harm to marine ecosystems and also to the
health of terrestrial organisms .
Because of the mounting problems due to plastic pollu-
tion, governments in many countries have tightened restric-
tions on plastic products, in particular single-use ones. China
is an active participant and promoter of plastic wastes con-
trol. In April 2017, the Chinese government approved a ban
on imported “recyclable” solid wastes. The ban list included
24 kinds of solid wastes, among which non-industrial plas-
tic wastes is the most prominent. The Chinese ban became
eﬀective at the beginning of 2018 and has had a far-reach-
ing eﬀect on global plastic production and on solid waste
This study examines the global response to China’s ban
on plastic waste imports, the current situation on plastic
waste generation and disposition in China and future pros-
pects for sustainable resource recovery from non-recyclable
Plastic wastes intheworld
Key facts: plastics andplastic wastes
Plastic production inthewhole world, Europe andtheUS
Plastics are versatile materials which could be widely used
in the ﬁelds of industrial production and our daily lives.
Current production of plastics consumes 6% of the global
oil production and, if the current trend continues, it will
increase to 20% by 2050 . As shown in Fig.1a, the
annual production of plastics in the world reached 335
million tons by 2016, with an annual growth rate of about
4% . China is the largest producer of plastic prod-
ucts, accounting to about 29% of worldwide production,
followed by North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA)
(19%) and Europe (18%). Asia accounts for nearly half of
the world’s plastic production.
Fig. 1 Global plastic production
(a) by year and (b) by area, in
2016 Data source: Eurostat
69Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
Types anduse ofplastics
Take Europe for example. The dominant plastic products
are polypropylene (PP), low density polyethylene (LDPE)
and high-density polyethylene (HDPE); these three com-
pounds amount to 49.1% of all plastics in Europe (Fig.2
1. Polypropylene (PP)
Polypropylene is a semi-crystalline thermoplastic plastic. It
is widely used because of its high impact resistance, strong
mechanical properties and resistance to a variety of organic
solvents, acids and alkalis. The main applications of PP
include the production of long and short polypropylene ﬁb-
ers, woven bags, packaging bags, injection molded products
which are used for electrical, telecommunications, lighting,
lighting equipment and TV sets of ﬂame retardant parts. PP
contributes about 24% in plastic wastes category which are
the largest amount of plastics found in MSW . The high
demand of PP in daily life causes the amount of PP wastes
to increase each year.
2. Low-density polyethylene (LDPE)
Low-density polyethylene (LDPE), also known as high-
pressure polyethylene, is suitable for various molding
processes. Unlike HDPE, LDPE has more branching that
results in weaker intermolecular force, lower tensile strength
and lower hardness. The main LDPE products include thin
ﬁlm products, such as agricultural ﬁlm, ground cover ﬁlm,
agricultural membrane, vegetable shed ﬁlm, packaging ﬁlm
such as candy, vegetables, frozen food and other packaging,
liquid packaging with blow molding ﬁlm (milk, soy sauce,
juice, soy milk); Heavy packaging bags, shrinkage packag-
ing ﬁlms, elastic ﬁlms, lined ﬁlms; building ﬁlms, general
industrial packaging ﬁlms and food bags, etc.
3. High-density polyethylene (HDPE)
High-density polyethylene (HDPE), also known as low-
pressure polyethylene, is a translucent film with high
crystallinity and a certain degree of non-polarity. It is an
opaque white material with speciﬁc density lower than water
(0.941– 0.960). It is soft but slightly harder than LDPE and
slightly stretchable. Due to its high-strength properties,
HDPE is widely used in manufacturing of milk bottles,
detergent bottles, oil containers, toys and more . In addi-
tion, HDPE is also used to produce packaging ﬁlm, ropes,
woven mesh, ﬁshing nets, water pipes, injection molding of
lower grade daily necessities and housings, non-bearing load
components, rubber boxes, turnover boxes, extrusion blow
molding containers, hollow products, etc.
4. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)
PVC is formed by the polymerization of the monomer
(H2C=CHCl) and, therefore, consists of about 56% chlo-
rine and 44% carbon plus hydrogen . Some minor com-
pounds, such as plasticizer and anti-aging agent are added
in the manufacturing process to enhance the heat resistance,
toughness and ductility of PVC; they may be potentially
toxic so PVC is generally not used to store food and medi-
cine. The compatibility of PVC with other additives makes
it a versatile plastic. Regular PVC products include wire and
cable insulation, window frames, boots, food foil, medical
devices, blood bags, automotive interiors, packaging, credit
cards, synthetic leather, etc.
5. Polyurethane (PUR)
Polyurethane is the most common plastic in the thermoset-
ting family of plastics which accounts for only a small frac-
tion of the plastic waste stream. Polyurethane (PUR) is a pol-
ymer with a repeating structural unit of the carbamate chain
made from isocyanates and polyols. The density of PUR
soft foam ranges from 0.015 to 0.15g/cm. PUR products
are divided into foaming products and non-foaming prod-
ucts. The foaming products include soft, hard, semi-rigid
PUR foam, while non-foaming products include coatings,
Fig. 2 Main types of plastics
demanded by Europe in 2016
70 Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
adhesives, synthetic leather, elastomers and elastic ﬁbers.
Foam is the most widely used PUR product.
6. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
Polyethylene terephthalate is formed by the polymerization
of the monomer (C10H8O4)n and, therefore, it consists of
about 33% oxygen with the balance carbon and hydrogen.
PET plastics have good transparency, excellent dimensional
stability and electrical insulation. Containers made of PET
have high strength, good transparency, are non-toxic and
easy to fabricate; other applications of PET include electri-
cal insulation, printing sheets, magnetic tapes, X-ray and
other photographic ﬁlms .
7. Polystyrene (PS)
Polystyrene is made by polymerization of the monomer
(C8H8)n. As other plastics it can be colored by means of
additives. It is heat resilient and it oﬀers strength and very
low density which make this polymer suitable for use in
many applications, such as food packaging, electronics, con-
struction, medical, appliances and toys. The wide range of
applications results in a large volume fraction of PS in the
MSW stream .
The distribution of use of plastic products in various
industries is shown in Fig.3.
Waste plastics production
The global consumption of plastics in 2016, by region, is
shown in Fig.4. The per capita consumption of plastics in
developed countries is much higher than in other regions.
Plastic consumption in NAFTA has reached 139kg/person,
Fig. 3 Main market demand for
plastic products in 2016 
Fig. 4 Per capita consumption
of plastics (in kg/person) 
71Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
which is the highest in the world. The per capita consump-
tion in Asia is lower than the world average.
Figure5 shows that the accumulation of plastic waste has
reached 5.8 billion tons by 2015. And if the current trend
continues, it will exceed an astonishing 25 billion tons by
2050, with around 50% still undisposed .
Table1 lists the distribution of life-span of four of the
most common plastics: PE, PP, PS and PVC. Around 67% of
the PE products have a life-span of less than 2years. Moreo-
ver, more than half of the PP and PVC products have a life
span of less than 5years. Polyoleﬁns (PE and PP) are mainly
used to produce packaging materials, such as plastic bags,
milk bottles, packaging ﬁlms, sweet and snack wrappers,
etc. while the life-span of plastic products used for packag-
ing usually does not exceed one month, which has led to the
rapid accumulation of PE and PP-based plastic wastes .
The weight ratios of common compounds (PE, PP, PS
etc.) in the waste stream, as estimated by four separate
studies are shown in Table2. These numbers indicate that
plastic products made from PE, PP and PS have a much
Global response toChina’s ban onplastic waste
As noted earlier, China’s ban on non-industrial plastic
wastes began on January 1, 2018. Prior to this ban, China
(45%) and other developing countries in East Asia were
the main destinations of the estimated 70% of plastic
wastes exported in 2016 by higher-income countries .
China’s ban on plastic wastes has resulted in higher
consumption of virgin plastic. Morgan Stanley has pre-
dicted that China’s ban would change by about 2% the
polyethylene supply in the world, from recycled plastics
to virgin plastic .
Prior to the Chinese ban, Europe and Central Asia were
the main exporters of plastic wastes (32%), followed by
North America (14%) . The responses of the main
exporters, active followers and participants are summa-
rized in the following section.
Fig. 5 Cumulative plastic
waste generation and disposal
(1950–2015) and projection of
historical trends to 2050 
Table 1 Distribution of life-span of four types of plastics
Type 1–2years (%) 3–5years (%) 6–9years (%) More than
PE 67 20 10 3
PP 38 20 34 8
PS 40 25 35 0
PVC 35 15 20 30
Average 45 20 25 10
Table 2 Weight ratios of typical
plastic species in plastic wastes
in some regions
Weight ratios Country or region References
LDPE:HDPE:PP:PS:PVC = 27%:21%:18%:16%:7% The U.S. and Canada (1992) 
PE:PP:PS = 68%:6%:16% Portugal (1999) 
PE:PS:PP:PET:PVC = 42.2%:24.1%:17.6%:8.9%:5.1% Sapporo, Japan (2003) 
PP:HDPE:LDPE:PS:PET = 30.4%:26.5%:22.8%:18.0%:2.3% Czech Republic (2004) 
72 Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
The European Commission has indicated that by 2030, all
plastic packaging will be recyclable on the EU market and
the intentional use of micro plastics will be restricted .
The eﬀort of European Commission in this new year started
with the publication of European Strategy for Plastics in
a Circular Economy (COM/2018/28 ﬁnal), on January 16,
2018, which listed the future EU measures for implementing
this strategy and its recommendations to the member states
and the industry. The measures contain 39 actions divided
in four aspects:
1. Improving the economics and quality of plastics recy-
2. Curbing plastic waste and littering;
3. Driving investment and innovation towards circular
4. Harnessing global action.
This ﬁrst-ever European Plastics Strategy highlights the
gaps between the current legal and policy framework about
marine plastic wastes and starts to change the ways in which
plastic products are designed, produced, used and recycled
in Europe. On May 28, 2018, E.C. released the Proposal for
a Direction of the European Parliament and of the Council
on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on
the environment (COM/2018/340 ﬁnal—2018/0172 (COD)).
This initiative identiﬁed gaps between the existing actions
and legislation and reinforced the EU systemic approach to
plastic waste problem. On October 24, 2018, the European
Parliament adopted a plan which banned single-use plastics
like plates, cutlery, straws and cotton swabs in participating
countries by 2021.
In the UK, China’s ban on waste plastics has forced the
UK to shift its waste exports to other Asian and European
countries. Malaysia has become a major importer of waste
plastics from the UK, with a total import volume of 105,000
tons in 2018, which was 42,000 tons (68%) higher than in
2017. Turkey, Poland, Indonesia and the Netherlands fol-
lowed closely, with imports of plastic wastes increasing by
60,000 tons in 2018 . Also, in response to the global
trend of plastic limitation, the Prime Minister Theresa May
announced a plan to ban the sale of plastic straws, drink stir-
rers and plastic-stemmed cotton buds by April 2017.
In Germany, the German Federation of Waste, Water and
Raw Material Management stated that the total export of
plastic wastes from Germany to China has dropped from
346,000 tons in 2017 to only 16,000 tons in 2018. A new
German law focuses on reducing packaging waste and was
approved by the upper house of the German parliament on
May 12, 2017. This law was enforced as of January 2019
and aims to recycle 63% (from 36% in the past) of the plastic
packaging materials and reach a target of 70% reusable bev-
France is planning to introduce a penalty system for non-
recycled plastic and use only recycled plastic for packaging
Some regions in the US have also adopted a series of restric-
tions on plastic wastes. On July 1, 2018, Seattle became the
ﬁrst US city to ban plastic utensils and straws in this city’s
5000 restaurants. San Francisco also voted to ban plastic
straws and containers as of July 1, 2019. The U.S. Plas-
tics Resin Producers has committed to recycle or recover
100% of the plastic packaging by 2040. Some states or cities
are also strengthening the restrictions on single-use plastic
products, while in some other regions, the controversy over
“plastic restriction” is continuing (Fig.6).
According to statistics from the US Census Bureau and
international trade commission, the exports of plastic wastes
from the US to China dropped sharply from about 900 mil-
lion between January and October in 2017 to about 120 mil-
lion tons in the same period in 2018. Malaysia has replaced
China as the leading importer of plastic wastes from the US,
with imports of plastic waste exceeding 192,000 tons in the
ﬁrst 10months of 2018. In addition, Thailand’s imports of
waste plastics from the US also increased signiﬁcantly .
China’s imports of virgin PE have increased by 19%, and
the plastics industry in the US has invested $185 billion
to build new capacity as the response to this development
Response ofother countries andorganizations
• On June 5, 2018, India vowed to ban single-use plastics
by 2022. In April 2018, Nasarawa State announced that
it is collaborating with the Federal Ministry of Environ-
ment to establish a plastic recycling plant in the Karu
in order to deal with the plastic wastes in major urban
centers in the state.
• When the amount of plastic wastes imported increased
sharply after the Chinese ban, Thailand announced plans
to ban the import of plastic wastes from Western coun-
tries by 2021.
• Vietnam has suspended imports of waste plastics after
June 25, 2018 and the restriction has been extended until
• Japan is subsidizing the production of bioplastics to
replace petroleum-based plastic products and has made
a budgetary provision of ¥5 billion for the researches
about the disposal of used bioplastic products.
• Governments in more than 60 countries, e.g. Morocco,
Rwanda, Chile, Botswana and Peru have introduced lev-
73Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
ies and bans to combat single-use plastic waste. However,
inadequate enforcement has made these bans ineﬀective.
• Several major companies, such as Amcor, Ecover, Evian,
L’Oréal, Mars, M&S, PepsiCo, The Coca-Cola Company,
Unilever, Walmart and Werner & Mertz, which in total
produce 6 million tons of plastic packaging per year, are
mounting eﬀorts to replace the current plastic packaging
with 100% reusable, recyclable or compostable packag-
ing by 2025 or earlier . Also, Aramark and Starbucks
have committed to reduce or abolish the use of single use
plastics by 2020 and 2022, respectively.
Global trade inplastic wastes aftertheChinese ban
As shown in Fig.7, after China’s ban, the import of US
plastic wastes to China in 2018 was only one tenth of that
in 2017. Since 2016, the importation of plastic wastes has
increased by over 100% in India, Thailand, Vietnam and
Malaysia. However, other Asian countries, such as Indonesia
and Vietnam have controlled eﬀectively the imports of waste
Plastic wastes inChina
Plastic production inChina
Through decades of rapid development, the plastics indus-
try of China has become a major world player in the world.
Production and sale of plastic products accounted for about
20% of the global output value .
According to the 2018–2023 research report on market
prospects and investment opportunities of China’s plastic
products industry from the China Merchants Industrial
Research Institute, the cumulative production of plastics in
China was 77 million tons in 2018, and the annual growth
rate was around 3.1%. The principal uses and estimated ton-
nages of plastics in China are summarized in Table3 .
Fig. 6 The geography of plastic bag bans in the US (2018) 
74 Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
Policy fortreating plastic wastes
The “Industry standard” of the Ministry of Industry and
Information Technology (MIIT) defines the threshold
of waste plastic treatment capacity of three key types of
According to the requirements, (1) the annual waste
plastic disposal capacity of new enterprises engaged in
regenerated PET bottle ﬂakes producing must be over
30,000 tons and that of established enterprises should
be over 20,000 tons; (2) the annual disposal capacity of
waste plastics for new enterprises engaged in waste plastic
crushing, cleaning and sorting must be over 30,000 tons
and for established enterprises over 20,000 tons; (3) the
annual waste plastic treatment capacity of new enterprises
engaged in plastic recycling and granulation must be over
5,000 tons and for existing enterprises over 3000 tons .
Fig. 7 Exports of “other” plas-
tics (e-plastics, mixed plastics,
etc.) from the U.S. to other
countries in periods of Jan–Sep
2017 and Jan–Sep 2018 
Table 3 Main uses of plastics in China 
Industry Plastics Main types Plastic consumption in 2016
Building materials Doors and windows PVC, PE 2.6 million tons
Cars Baﬄe panel PP More than 400 thousand tons
Textile Clothes PET, PP 10 million tons
Agriculture Mulch PE 3 million tons
Industrial packaging Plastic woven bag, wrapped ﬁlm PP, PE 3 million tons of PP, 1.5 million tons of PE
Daily life of residents Shopping bags PE 1 million tons
Bottles PET, PE 5 million tons of PET, 0.5 million tons of PE
Washing bottles PE, PP 1 million tons of PE, 0.5 million tons of PP
Composite packaging PET, PE, PP 1 million tons of PET, 2 million tons of PP,
0.5 million tons of PE
Courier bags PE 0.7 million tons of PE
Cushion packaging EPS, PE 1 million tons
Disposable tableware PS, PP 2 million tons
Eisai nonwoven fabric PP, PET 2 million tons
Durable goods Home appliance PVC, PP 0.3 million tons
Furniture PVC, PP 2 million tons
Storage box PE, PP 1 million tons
Wallpaper PVC 2 million tons
75Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
Recycling ofplastic wastes
According to statistics, the annual output of municipal solid
waste has reached more than 210 million tons in China ,
among which the waste plastics account for 11% (about 23
million tons) . As for the recycling and utilization of
waste plastics, the average recycling rate in China is only
25%, about 14 million tons of waste plastic are discarded
each year .
Waste plastic recycling not only saves national resources
and promotes economic development, but also makes great
contribution to environmental protection. It is a green envi-
ronmental protection industry that benefits the country
and people. At present, waste plastics are piled up without
being recycled eﬀectively in many cities, causing severe
environmental pollution problems. The waste plastic recy-
cling industry in China is in its early infancy and consists of
small- and medium-sized manufacturers.
Plastic wastes treatments
The complexity of plastic types and high cost of separating
make it diﬃcult to recycle and reprocess the plastic wastes.
According to statistics, only 9% of the plastics were recycled
and about 12% were sent to waste to energy (WTE) plant for
incineration, while most of the plastics (79%) were disposed
as trash and end up in landﬁll or in the natural environment
Resource recovery fromplastic wastes
Thermoplastics like PE, PP and PET that are sorted out
from the waste stream by citizens can be recycled to the
primary material. Waste PE, PP and PET can be made
into ﬁnished products after granulation, or be directly
processed by simply cleaning, crushing and plasticizing.
The utilization mode without any modiﬁcation is called
direct recycling. Direct recycling is characterized with low
operating costs, low equipment and technological require-
ments. However, direct recycling also has negligible deﬁ-
ciency. It cannot be used in the production of higher qual-
ity products. In order to improve the quality of recycled
materials, it is often necessary to add a certain proportion
of virgin PE, PP, or PET materials, which accordingly
increase the manufacturing cost . Modiﬁed regenera-
tion refers to the modiﬁcation of recycled materials by
mechanical blending or chemical grafting, which could
improve the mechanical properties of the modiﬁed regen-
erated products. Modiﬁed regeneration process routes are
more complex and some also need speciﬁc mechanical
Combustion withenergy recovery (waste toenergy
Mixed plastic wastes have a caloriﬁc value of about 35MJ/
kg which is about 85% that of fuel oil. Therefore, they can
be used to fuel power plants, in place of coal or oil. Com-
bustion is fully controlled, does not require pretreatment
of the mixed waste plastics and is a mature technology
practiced in over one thousand plants worldwide and is
relatively mature . The ﬂowsheet of a waste to energy
process is shown in Fig.8.
The incineration of waste plastics is accompanied by
the production of toxic organic gases such as polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxins and furans. Plastic compo-
nents containing chlorine, nitrogen and other additives will
also release inorganic pollutants such as NOx and HCl dur-
ing the incineration process, causing secondary pollution.
A report from environmental campaigners has claimed
that UK incinerators will cause nearly £25bn of environmen-
tal harm during the next 30years by burning plastics .
Swindon Borough Council has proposed temporarily
stopping the recycling of mixed plastics and instead send
it to Energy-from-Waste. Swindon said this was because
of uncertainty about exports and other markets.
Fig. 8 Process ﬂow chart of combustion with energy recovery
76 Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
Pyrolysis ofplastic wastes tooil
Since petroleum is the principal source of plastics manu-
facturing, there is great potential for transforming plastic
wastes to oil through the pyrolysis process. The oil produced
by pyrolysis has a high caloriﬁc value comparable to com-
Diﬀerent types of plastics can be deﬁned based on mois-
ture, ﬁxed carbon, volatile matter and ash content (proxi-
mate analysis). High volatile content favors the production
of liquid oils, while high ash content reduces the amount of
liquid oils produced, thereby increasing gaseous yield and
coke formation. Most waste plastics have very high volatiles
and low ash content. It should be noted that the yield and
quality of the pyrolysis products depend on the operating
parameters of the pyrolysis process. The main parameters
include temperature, reactor type, residence time, pressure,
catalyst dosage and the type of ﬂuidizing gas and its ﬂow
rate . Figure9 is a process ﬂow chart of pyrolysis and
gasiﬁcation of township domestic waste.
Gasiﬁcation of waste plastics produces a stream of gases
including H2, CO, CO2, CH4 and N2. A signiﬁcant advan-
tage of gasiﬁcation compared to pyrolysis is that it is more
ﬂexible. Gasiﬁcation of waste plastics is mainly for the
production of energy-carrying gas (H2) and synthesis gas
(fuel, dimethyl ether, methanol, etc.), wherein the syn-
thesis gas has an average caloriﬁc value of about 6–8MJ/
m3. The composition and application of the gas produced
by the gasiﬁcation process depend on the gasifying agent
The main problem of plastic gasiﬁcation is the high tar
content in gas products, which is usually higher than the tar
content in biomass gasiﬁcation. Therefore, gasiﬁcation of
waste plastics requires a very eﬃcient gas cleaning system.
Gasiﬁcation is expected to maximize the conversion of
plastics into gas products or syngas. Tar and carbon are
the main undesirable by-products. Gasiﬁcation process
includes complex chemical reactions: gas-phase drying,
pyrolysis, reforming and heterogeneous carbon gasiﬁca-
tion, which is summarized in Fig.10.
Direct recycle has advantages of low operating cost, less
equipment and processing requirements, but it can not be
used to produce high-quality regenerated products .
Incineration can realize energy recovery and volume reduc-
tion of waste plastics eﬀectively whereas it will bring severe
secondary pollution and the quality of the product is rela-
tively low . Gasiﬁcation has high process ﬂexibility and
high product quality. However, the tar in syngas has become
a serious problem in large-scale application of gasiﬁcation
technology . Pyrolysis is not as mature as incineration,
but the mild reaction conditions, easily controlled reaction
process, high value-added products and less secondary pol-
lution make it a promising technology .
Fig. 9 Industrial ﬂow chart of
pyrolysis gasiﬁcation treatment
Fig. 10 Flow chart of plastics
77Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
Discussion abouttheimpact ofChina’s ban
onplastic waste treatment
At present, the main means of disposal of waste plastics are
landﬁll, incineration, recycling, pyrolysis and gasiﬁcation,
etc. For countries with systematic garbage classiﬁcation,
such as the EU and Japan, the high-quality waste plastic
components (such as PP, PE and PET) can be directly used
as the raw material for plastic regeneration. As a result,
direct recycle becomes the main disposal means of waste
plastics at present and in the future. For countries that do
not have a complete waste classiﬁcation system, incineration
is the most economical, eﬃcient and convenient method to
realize the treatment of large-scale mixed waste plastics in
a long time. In addition, because of the low requirement
of raw material, controllable high-quality of products and
less environment pollution, pyrolysis as a disposal means of
waste plastics has attracted worldwide attention and research
interest. High-quality fuel and chemical materials produced
by pyrolysis could meet the world’s energy and industrial
development needs . Thus, WTE technologies repre-
sented by pyrolysis are more promising methods to realize
resource reuse in the long term.
This review provides concise summary of the global
response to China’s ban on plastic waste imports, the cur-
rent situation on plastic waste generation and disposition in
China and sustainable resource recovery technologies from
non-recyclable plastic wastes. China’s import ban on waste
plastics has been put into force since January 1, 2018, which
led to the changes of waste plastics policy and market waste
plastics globally. Southeast Asian countries like Malaysia
have become the leading importer of plastic wastes. EU
and the US have positively responded to the China’s ban,
strategy and initiative released about plastics to restrict the
use of micro plastics and single-use plastics. Meanwhile,
main European counties like UK, Germany and France have
also taken their own active measures in response to the Chi-
na’s ban on waste plastics. In addition to the ban on waste
imports, the Chinese government has also made certain reg-
ulations on the domestic waste plastics market. The global
recovery rate of waste plastics is only about 10%. Waste to
energy technologies based on pyrolysis and other thermal
disposal means are promising technology to realize the uti-
lization of non-recycled plastic wastes. Through comparing
a variety of waste plastic disposal technologies, pyrolysis is
more promising method because of its mild reaction condi-
tions, easily controlled reaction process, high value-added
products and less secondary pollution.
Acknowledgements Acknowledgment is gratefully extended to
the National Key Research and Development Program of China
1. Wong SL, Ngadi N, Abdullah TAT, etal. Current state and future
prospects of plastic waste as source of fuel: a review. Renew Sus-
tain Energy Rev. 2015;50:1167–80.
2. Sardon H, Dove AP. Plastics recycling with a diﬀerence. Science.
3. Rochman CM, Browne MA, Halpern BS, etal. Policy: classify
plastic waste as hazardous. Nature. 2013;494(7436):169.
4. How many kinds of plastic are there? What are the common plas-
tic materials? Where did he end up? See: https ://www.huanb ao-
world .com/a/zixun /2018/0611/20731 .html. Accessed on 11 June
5. Bergmann M, Tekman MB, Gutow L. Marine litter: sea change
for plastic pollution. Nature. 2017;544(7650):297–297.
6. Thompson R. Environment: a journey on plastic seas. Nature.
7. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, et al. Marine pollu-
tion. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science.
8. Rochman CM. Microplastics research-from sink to source. Sci-
9. Ikea’s solution to peak stuﬀ? Invest in plastics recycling plant. See:
https ://www.thegu ardia n.com/susta inabl e-busin ess/2017/may/15/
ikea-peak-stuff -plast ics-recyc ling-renew ables ?CMP=ema-
1706&CMP. Accessed on: 15 May 2017.
10. Plasticeurope. Plastics—the facts 2016. Analysis of European lat-
est plastics production, demand and waste data, 2017.
11. Plasticeurope. Plastics—the Facts 2017. Analysis of European
latest plastics production, demand and waste data, 2018.
12. Michael A. Plastic waste total in MSW. Soc Plast Ind 2010.
13. Sharuddin SDA, Abnisa F, Wan MAWD, etal. A review on pyrol-
ysis of plastic wastes. Energy Convers Manag. 2016;115:308–26.
14. Takeoka Y. Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC). Berlin: Springer; 2015.
15. Cepeli̇ogullar O, Putun AE. Thermal and kinetic behaviors of bio-
mass and plastic wastes in-co-pyrolysis. Energy Convers Manag
16. Global Consumption of Plastic Materials By Region (1980–2015).
See: https ://www.plast icsin sight .com/globa l-consu mptio n-plast
ic-mater ials-regio n-1980-2015/. Accessed on: March 24, 2016.
17. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. Production, use, and fate of all
plastics ever made. Sci Adv. 2017;3(7):e1700782.
18. Al-Salem SM, Lettieri P, Baeyens J. The valorization of plas-
tic solid waste (PSW) by primary to quaternary routes: from
re-use to energy and chemicals. Prog Energy Combust Sci.
19. Ehrig RJ. Plastics recycling: products and processes. Oxford:
Oxford University Press; 1992.
20. Pinto F, Costa P, Gulyurtlu I, Cabrita I. Pyrolysis of plastic wastes.
1. Eﬀect of plastic waste composition on product yield. J Anal
Appl Pyrolysis. 1999;51(1–2):39–55.
21. Bhaskar T, Uddin MA, Murai K, etal. Comparison of thermal
degradation products from real municipal waste plastic and model
mixed plastics. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2003;70(2):579–87.
22. Fortelný I, Michálková D, Kruliš Z. An eﬃcient method of mate-
rial recycling of municipal plastic waste. Polym Degrad Stab.
23. Brooks AL, Wang S, Jambeck JR. The Chinese import ban and its
impact on global plastic waste trade. Sci Adv. 2018;4(6):0131.
78 Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy (2019) 1:67–78
24. China’s Ban on Recyclables: Beyond the Obvious… See: https
://www.iswa.org/home/news/news-detai l/artic le/china s-ban-on-
recyc lable s-beyon d-the-obvio us/109/. Accessed on: 16 Jan 2018.
25. Plastic Waste: a European strategy to protect the planet, defend our
citizens and empower our industries. See: http://europ a.eu/rapid /
press -relea se_IP-18-5_en.htm. Accessed on: 16 Jan 2018.
26. Who became the champion of importing waste plastics from
Europe and America in the past year? https ://mp.weixi n.qq.
com/s?_biz=MjM5M TM5Nj M4NA==&mid=26623 28353
&idx=2&sn=72e5b ca144 4b0be 112d6 baa52 a35b3 9f&chksm
=bded6 f6e8a 9ae67 80fe6 723c7 5e7b3 d54e4 c9140 29c4d 6e25e
e5deb 5afd9 a7aa8 667b5 09ec0 2&mpsha re=1&scene =23&srcid
=0111L C4HFe iKTuU HY0ol UFTh#rd. Accessed 11 Jan 2019.
27. Bag ban battles remain intense. See: https ://www.plast icsne
ws.com/artic le/20180 112/NEWS/18011 9960/bag-ban-battl es-
remai n-inten se. Accessed 12 Jan 2018.
28. The Plastic Problem. See: https ://newpl astic secon omy.org/proje
cts/innov ation -prize . Accessed 19 May 2017.
29. Export market roundup: Vietnam bans e-plastic imports. See:
https ://resou rce-recyc ling.com/e-scrap /2018/12/06/expor t-marke
t-round up-vietn am-bans-e-plast ic-impor ts/. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
30. The plastics production in China accounts for 20% of the total
amount in the world. See: http://www .sujia o1668 .com/newsd etail
-388.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2018.
31. Ke MJ. Market study of China waste plastics in recycle and recov-
ery. Plastics Packaging. 2018;28(3):24–41.
32. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued the
“Industry standard for the comprehensive utilization of waste
plastics”. See: http://news.sl168 .com/detai ls.aspx?id=23121 .
Accessed on: September 1, 2017.
33. National Bureau of Statistics of China. See: http://data.stats .gov.
34. Zhou H, Long YQ, Meng AH, et al. Thermogravimetric char-
acteristics of typical municipal solid waste fractions during co-
pyrolysis. Waste Manag. 2015;38(1):194–200.
35. How far is the road to waste plastic recycling? See: https ://www.
su-liao.com/html/xinwe n/xingy exinw en/15770 .html. Accessed on:
November 13, 2018.
36. Silveira AVM, Cella M, Tanabe EH, etal. Application of tribo-
electrostatic separation in the recycling of plastic wastes. Process
Saf Environ Prot. 2018;114:219–28.
37. Wu YH. Study on assessment and potential environmental impact
of waste plastic recovery technology. Harbin: Harbin Institute of
38. Jefferson H, Robert D, Edward K. Plastics recycling: chal-
lenges and opportunities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.
39. Report claims plastics incineration causes harm totalling £25bn.
See: https ://www.mrw.co.uk/lates t/repor t-claim s-plast ics-incin
erati on-cause s-harm-total ling-25bn/10036 431.artic le?block title
=other -news&conte ntid=13699 . Accessed 22 Oct 2018.
40. Lopez G, Artetxe M, Amutio M, etal. Recent advances in the
gasiﬁcation of waste plastics. A critical overview. Renewable &
Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018, 82: 576-596.
41. Carvalho MT, Agante E, Durão F. Recovery of PET from pack-
aging plastics mixtures by wet shaking table. Waste Manag.
42. Wen Z, Di J, Liu S, etal. Evaluation of ﬂue-gas treatment technolo-
gies for municipal waste incineration: A case study in Changzhou,
China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018:S0959652618306140.
43. Luo S, Xiao B, Hu Z, etal. Hydrogen-rich gas from catalytic
steam gasiﬁcation of biomass in a ﬁxed bed reactor: inﬂuence of
temperature and steam on gasiﬁcation performance. Int J Hydro-
gen Energy. 2009;34(5):2191–4.
44. Al-Salem SM, Antelava A, Constantinou A, etal. A review on
thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of plastic solid waste (PSW). J
Environ Manag. 2017;197:177–98.
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional aﬃliations.