ArticlePublisher preview available

The Case for Retiring Flexibility as a Major Component of Physical Fitness

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Flexibility refers to the intrinsic properties of body tissues that determine maximal joint range of motion without causing injury. For many years, flexibility has been classified by the American College of Sports Medicine as a major component of physical fitness. The notion flexibility is important for fitness has also led to the idea static stretching should be prescribed to improve flexibility. The current paper proposes flexibility be retired as a major component of physical fitness, and consequently, stretching be de-emphasized as a standard component of exercise prescriptions for most populations. First, I show flexibility has little predictive or concurrent validity with health and performance outcomes (e.g., mortality, falls, occupational performance) in apparently healthy individuals, particularly when viewed in light of the other major components of fitness (i.e., body composition, cardiovascular endurance, muscle endurance, muscle strength). Second, I explain that if flexibility requires improvement, this does not necessitate a prescription of stretching in most populations. Flexibility can be maintained or improved by exercise modalities that cause more robust health benefits than stretching (e.g., resistance training). Retirement of flexibility as a major component of physical fitness will simplify fitness batteries; save time and resources dedicated to flexibility instruction, measurement, and evaluation; and prevent erroneous conclusions about fitness status when interpreting flexibility scores. De-emphasis of stretching in exercise prescriptions will ensure stretching does not negatively impact other exercise and does not take away from time that could be allocated to training activities that have more robust health and performance benefits.
Vol.:(0123456789)
Sports Medicine (2020) 50:853–870
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01248-w
CURRENT OPINION
The Case forRetiring Flexibility asaMajor Component ofPhysical
Fitness
JamesL.Nuzzo1,2
Published online: 16 December 2019
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
Abstract
Flexibility refers to the intrinsic properties of body tissues that determine maximal joint range of motion without causing
injury. For many years, flexibility has been classified by the American College of Sports Medicine as a major component of
physical fitness. The notion flexibility is important for fitness has also led to the idea static stretching should be prescribed
to improve flexibility. The current paper proposes flexibility be retired as a major component of physical fitness, and conse-
quently, stretching be de-emphasized as a standard component of exercise prescriptions for most populations. First, I show
flexibility has little predictive or concurrent validity with health and performance outcomes (e.g., mortality, falls, occupa-
tional performance) in apparently healthy individuals, particularly when viewed in light of the other major components of
fitness (i.e., body composition, cardiovascular endurance, muscle endurance, muscle strength). Second, I explain that if
flexibility requires improvement, this does not necessitate a prescription of stretching in most populations. Flexibility can
be maintained or improved by exercise modalities that cause more robust health benefits than stretching (e.g., resistance
training). Retirement of flexibility as a major component of physical fitness will simplify fitness batteries; save time and
resources dedicated to flexibility instruction, measurement, and evaluation; and prevent erroneous conclusions about fitness
status when interpreting flexibility scores. De-emphasis of stretching in exercise prescriptions will ensure stretching does
not negatively impact other exercise and does not take away from time that could be allocated to training activities that have
more robust health and performance benefits.
* James L. Nuzzo
j.nuzzo@neura.edu.au
1 Neuroscience Research Australia, Barker Street, Randwick,
NSW, Australia2031
2 School ofMedical Sciences, University ofNew South Wales,
Sydney, NSW, Australia
1 Flexibility Dened
Flexibility refers to the intrinsic properties of body tissues
that determine maximal joint range of motion (ROM) with-
out causing injury [1, 2]. Static flexibility refers to joint
ROM usually in relaxed muscle [2, 3]. Static flexibility is
subjective, as the limit ROM is determined by the tester or
the patient and their stretch tolerance [2, 3]. Tools used to
assess static flexibility include rulers, goniometers, electro-
goniometers, inclinometers, fleximeters, photography, vis-
ual estimations, and three-dimensional kinematics [411].
Dynamic flexibility refers to stiffness of the muscle-tendon
unit within normal ROM [2, 3]. Dynamic flexibility is more
objective [2, 3] and is assessed with force sensors, isokinetic
dynamometers, and shear wave elastography.
The current paper is concerned with static flexibility and
the sit-and-reach test. The sit-and-reach requires participants
to sit on the floor or in a chair and reach toward their toes.
This test is used in school fitness batteries in the United
States [12, 13]. The American College of Sports Medi-
cine (ACSM) states the sit-and-reach should be included in
health-related physical testing due to the “relative importance
of hamstring flexibility to activities of daily living and sports
performance…” [14]. Numerous studies have examined the
validity and reliability of the sit-and-reach [4, 1550]. The
test is reliable andprimarily measures hamstrings flexibility.
2 Brief History ofFlexibility intheUnited
States
Clinical tests have been used to measure static flexibil-
ity (hereafter termed “flexibility”) in intact humans since
the early 1900s [11, 51]. In 1941, Cureton summarized
research on flexibility [52]. He discussed ways flexibility
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... The American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) defines flexibility as the ability to move through full range of motion (ROM) [66]. Despite popular beliefs, the role of flexibility in injury risk is not clear, and the importance attributed to flexibility has been questioned in recent years [67]. Indeed, a recent systematic review assessing 78 studies with 71,324 athletes showed no relationship between assessments of flexibility, mobility, and ROM with hamstring injury risk [68]. ...
... Moreover, the development of flexibility is usually equated with stretching [66,67,70,71], despite strength training also being effective for improving ROM [67,[71][72][73][74]. Regarding the relationship between stretching and injury risk, a systematic review showed that stretching before or after exercise did not reduce injury risk [75]. In the last 20 years, several other systematic reviews have shown no effect of stretching on injury risk [45,[76][77][78][79][80][81][82]. ...
... Moreover, the development of flexibility is usually equated with stretching [66,67,70,71], despite strength training also being effective for improving ROM [67,[71][72][73][74]. Regarding the relationship between stretching and injury risk, a systematic review showed that stretching before or after exercise did not reduce injury risk [75]. ...
Chapter
Lower limbs muscle injuries (LLMI) are the most common sports-related injuries during practice and/or competition. The most affected muscle groups are the adductors, hamstrings, quadriceps, and calf muscles. These injuries generate a considerable competitive and economic burden, justifying a comprehensive investment in strategies focused on reducing injury risk. This chapter delivers an overview of potential risk reduction strategies of LLMI. Although the focus will be on exercise-based strategies, it should be recognized that strategies may be equally relevant (e.g., rules changes, proper equipment). Exercise-based strategies for reducing LLMI risk should consider two interacting features: modality and dose. The evidence surrounding different exercise modalities (e.g., strength training, balance training), dose-response relationships, timing of implementation (e.g., warm-up, postexercise), and mediator factors (e.g., adherence to interventions, interindividual variability in response) is explored. Potential trade-offs (e.g., reduction of injury risk versus performance impairment), the often-misunderstood role of asymmetry, and the value of screening tools are also debated. Currently, most of what is known derives from associative studies and causal relationships are largely unknown, while the focus on average data may be detracting from more personalized approaches to injury risk reduction. Therefore, although a conceptual model for reducing the risk of LLMI is provided, it should be considered tentative.
... 5 It encompasses components such as speed, power, coordination, reaction time, agility and balance. 6 These components affect performance in health-related physical fitness, yet they have attracted less research interest. This is important also from the perspective of current fitness level of children and adolescents, since globally, nowadays generations are less fit 7 and more inclined to health risks associated with poor fitness. ...
... For more comprehensive picture, flexibility was included in this study despite its controversy. 6 The information gained from our research can guide interventions, inform curricular development, and contribute to injury prevention and performance enhancement efforts in physical education and sports settings. ...
Article
Full-text available
It is vital from the public health and educational perspective to be familiar with changes in the fitness levels of individuals and populations since fitness is associated with several health outcomes and cognition. Skill‐related physical fitness refers to performance in sports or occupation and is associated with motor skill performance. The aim of the present study was to examine secular trends in skill‐related physical fitness of 16 678 participants in four youth generations of Slovenian children and adolescents in years 1983 (n = 3128), 1993/94 (n = 3413), 2003/04 (n = 5497), and 2013/14 (n = 4640). Using repeated cross‐sectional design, we observed fitness level of all participants divided into three age groups: 6–10, 11–14, and 15–19 years. Skill‐related physical performance was measured with seven fitness tests for speed, coordination, balance, and flexibility. Analysis of covariance was used to compare differences in fitness performance between decades in each age and sex group, adjusted for body height, body weight, and body mass index. Overall, large but inconsistent changes in coordination, a small improvement in speed, and a decline in flexibility were seen. The trends over the whole examined period were not linear throughout decades. Generally, positive trends were noticed in periods 1983–1993 (range 1.4%–17.9%; except flexibility) and 2003/04–2013/14 (range 0.2%–36.4%; except age group 15–19 years) while in the period 1993/94–2003/04 there are some particularities in secular trends according to individual components as well as age groups. In general, the secular trend showed a positive direction for both genders (p < 0.05), except for gross motor coordination, which demonstrated positive trends in 1993 and 2013 compared with a decade earlier (p < 0.05) and from 1983 to 2013/14, except for the youngest boys in 2003 and the youngest girls from 1993 to 2003 (p < 0.05). Our findings call for exercise programs aimed at improving speed and gross motor coordination in both sexes and all age groups, especially in the group of 15–19 years old.
... In addition to a stable state of health, physical training can give you a fresher physical sensation. Therefore, the more you move, the less you get tired, and you can increase your endurance through physical training [11]. ...
... Restricting analyses to data from cohorts 2016 until 2022 allowed us to include an indicator of a sixth physical fitness component, that is static balance. This test has been available only since 2016, replacing a flexibility test used between 2011 and 2015 [38]. Finally, as the focus is on the Covid pandemic effect and as there were particularly pronounced cohort effects relating to the 2011 to 2015 cohorts, the selection used here gives more weight to recent secular trends. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background In spring of 2020, the Sars-CoV-2 incidence rate increased rapidly in Germany and around the world. Throughout the next 2 years, schools were temporarily closed and social distancing measures were put in place to slow the spread of the Covid-19 virus. Did these social restrictions and temporary school lockdowns affect children’s physical fitness? The EMOTIKON project annually tests the physical fitness of all third-graders in the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany. The tests assess cardiorespiratory endurance (6-min-run test), coordination (star-run test), speed (20-m sprint test), lower (powerLOW, standing long jump test), and upper (powerUP, ball-push test) limbs muscle power, and static balance (one-legged stance test with eyes closed). A total of 125,893 children were tested in the falls from 2016 to 2022. Primary analyses focused on 98,510 keyage third-graders (i.e., school enrollment according to the legal key date, aged 8 to 9 years) from 515 schools. Secondary analyses included 27,383 older-than-keyage third-graders (i.e., OTK, delayed school enrollment or repetition of a grade, aged 9 to 10 years), who have been shown to exhibit lower physical fitness than expected for their age. Linear mixed models fitted pre-pandemic quadratic secular trends, and took into account differences between children and schools. Results Third-graders exhibited lower cardiorespiratory endurance, coordination, speed and powerUP in the Covid pandemic cohorts (2020–2022) compared to the pre-pandemic cohorts (2016–2019). Children’s powerLOW and static balance were higher in the pandemic cohorts compared to the pre-pandemic cohorts. From 2020 to 2021, coordination, powerLOW and powerUP further declined. Evidence for some post-pandemic physical fitness catch-up was restricted to powerUP. Cohen’s |ds| for comparisons of the pandemic cohorts 2020–2022 with pre-pandemic cohorts 2016–2019 ranged from 0.02 for powerLOW to 0.15 for coordination. Within the pandemic cohorts, keyage children exhibited developmental losses ranging from approximately 1 month for speed to 5 months for cardiorespiratory endurance. For powerLOW and static balance, the positive pandemic effects translate to developmental gains of 1 and 7 months, respectively. Pre-pandemic secular trends may account for some of the observed differences between pandemic and pre-pandemic cohorts, especially in powerLOW, powerUP and static balance. The pandemic further increased developmental delays of OTK children in cardiorespiratory endurance, powerUP and balance. Conclusions The Covid-19 pandemic was associated with declines in several physical fitness components in German third-graders. Pandemic effects are still visible in 2022. Health-related interventions should specifically target those physical fitness components that were negatively affected by the pandemic (cardiorespiratory endurance, coordination, speed).
... Restricting analyses to data from cohorts 2016 until 2022 allowed us to include an indicator of a sixth physical fitness component, that is static balance. This test has been available only since 2016, replacing a flexibility test used between 2011 and 2015 [38]. Finally, as the focus is on the Covid pandemic effect and as there were particularly pronounced cohort effects relating to the 2011 to 2015 cohorts, the selection used here gives more weight to recent secular trends. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background. In spring of 2020, the Sars-CoV-2 incidence rate increased rapidly in Germany and around the world. Throughout the next 2 years, schools were temporarily closed and social distancing measures were put in place to slow the spread of the Covid-19 virus. Did these social restrictions and temporary school lockdowns affect chil- dren’s physical fitness? The EMOTIKON project annually tests the physical fitness of all third-graders in the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany. The tests assess cardiorespiratory endurance (6-min-run test), coordination (star-run test), speed (20-m sprint test), lower (powerLOW, standing long jump test), and upper (powerUP, ball-push test) limbs muscle power, and static balance (one-legged stance test with eyes closed). A total of 125,893 children were tested in the falls from 2016 to 2022. Primary analyses focused on 98,510 keyage third-graders (i.e., school enrollment accord- ing to the legal key date, aged 8 to 9 years) from 515 schools. Secondary analyses included 27,383 older-than-keyage third-graders (i.e., OTK, delayed school enrollment or repetition of a grade, aged 9 to 10 years), who have been shown to exhibit lower physical fitness than expected for their age. Linear mixed models fitted pre-pandemic quadratic secu- lar trends, and took into account differences between children and schools. Results. Third-graders exhibited lower cardiorespiratory endurance, coordination, speed and powerUP in the Covid pandemic cohorts (2020–2022) compared to the pre-pandemic cohorts (2016–2019). Children’s powerLOW and static balance were higher in the pandemic cohorts compared to the pre-pandemic cohorts. From 2020 to 2021, coor- dination, powerLOW and powerUP further declined. Evidence for some post-pandemic physical fitness catch-up was restricted to powerUP. Cohen’s |ds| for comparisons of the pandemic cohorts 2020–2022 with pre-pandemic cohorts 2016–2019 ranged from 0.02 for powerLOW to 0.15 for coordination. Within the pandemic cohorts, keyage children exhibited developmental losses ranging from approximately 1 month for speed to 5 months for cardiorespi- ratory endurance. For powerLOW and static balance, the positive pandemic effects translate to developmental gains of 1 and 7 months, respectively. Pre-pandemic secular trends may account for some of the observed differences between pandemic and pre-pandemic cohorts, especially in powerLOW, powerUP and static balance. The pandemic further increased developmental delays of OTK children in cardiorespiratory endurance, powerUP and balance. Conclusions. The Covid-19 pandemic was associated with declines in several physical fitness components in German third-graders. Pandemic effects are still visible in 2022. Health-related interventions should specifically target those physical fitness components that were negatively affected by the pandemic (cardiorespiratory endurance, coordina- tion, speed).
... Flexibility is an important factor in both sports performance and the rehabilitation process [1,2]. Several stretching techniques are effective in increasing range of motion (ROM), with static stretching being the most commonly used [3]. ...
Article
Introduction: Flexibility seems to be an essential part of both the training and rehabilitation processes. Several stretching techniques have been used to improve the range of motion (ROM) of the joints with the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) method being the most effective one. Although plantar flexors are ideal to compare the acute effects of synergistic muscle groups on performance, it is not clear whether the PNF stretch at different muscle lengths could result in different alterations. Material and methods: Sixteen male students randomly performed 2 levels of stretching (PNF with bended knees, or PNFshort, and with extended knee, or PNFlong) and 3 types of jumps, separated by 48 hours (7 sessions in total). Jumping parameters were recorded by a force plate, and the final jumping height (H) and ground reaction forces (Fz) were analyzed. Furthermore, the ROM of the ankle joint was recorded before, right after, and 15 minutes after the stretches. Results: The ankle joint’s ROM joint was increased after both interventions. No significant changes were found in the jumping height of all jumps. The Fz, during the squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ), were increased after PNFshort. Similarly, a significant increase was found in Fz in drop jumps (DJ) right after the PNFshort. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that PNF stretches of different lengths could potentially alter the stretch-shortening cycle’s performance, possibly leading to a non-optimal muscle-tendon interaction.
... Flexibility, in general, is considered one of the important aspects of physical fitness related to health. However, in recent years, whether flexibility can be considered as important as muscular strength, muscular endurance, or cardiopulmonary fitness has been called into question because, among other reasons, unlike the other related factors, no evidence exists that it has a significant predictive value of mortality [65]. Flexibility has uncertain predictive value for the appearance of back pain or injuries in adults. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: Physical capacity (PC) is a strong determinant of health, quality of life, and functional independence in older adults. Having reference values for PC specific to a particular region allows for a contextual interpretation of an individual's level. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the evolution of key aspects of PC during the aging process and provide reference values for the major components of health-related PC for the older adult population in Northwest Mexico. Methods: A total of 550 independent older adults (60-84 years, 70% women) from the city of Hermosillo (Sonora, Mexico) were included between January and June 2019. PC was assessed using the Senior Fitness Test Battery (SFTB) and grip-strength test. Reference values were established for 5-year age groups, providing percentile values at 10, 25, 50, 75, and 90. The percentage decrease in functional capacity with aging was determined via a linear regression analysis of age against the percentage value of each subject relative to the average value of 60-year-old individuals of the same sex. Results: Statistically significant differences in the results between men and women within the same age group were few and inconsistent, except for handgrip strength, which was lower in women across all age groups. The functional level, with respect to reference values for each age and sex group, was similar between men and women. The most pronounced functional decline during the aging period occurs between 70 and 80 years of age. The various tests generally show an annual percentage loss of approximately 1% from 60 years of age. Conclusions: This is the first study in Mexico that provides reference values for physical capacity using the Senior Fitness Test Battery. In general, older adults-both men and women-show similar functional levels with respect to their respective reference values. In general, an annual decline of 1% from the age of 60 years occurs.
... Науковець J.L. Nuzzo досліджує роль гнучкості у фізичній підготовці та спорті [5]. Автор розглядає експерименти, які вказують на те, що гнучкість може мати обмежену важливість у фізичній підготовці, і пропонує зняти гнучкість зі списку основних компонентів фізичної підготовки. ...
... Therefore, reduction of flexibility could be found in athletes. The American College of Sports Medicine has classified flexibility as a major component of physical fitness because it determines the maximum ROM of joints without causing injury (Nuzzo, 2020). Research evidence suggest that flexibility is a key factor in sports for performing, such as sprinting, jumping, agility and balance. ...
Article
Full-text available
The study purpose was to assess the relationship between Latent Myofascial Trigger Point and range of motion in the lower limb of athletes. A lower Pain pressure threshold (< 25 lbs/cm2) in muscles indicates the presence of a latent myofascial trigger point. Materials and methods. Initially, the study involved 46 male Athletes (aged 20-23 years) as participants. The pain pressure threshold was measured by the pressure algometer (FPX 25 Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT, USA) to detect latent myofascial trigger points on the hamstring and quadriceps muscles. Out of 46 participants, 23 tested positive with a latent myofascial trigger point, and rest of them tested negative with a latent myofascial trigger point. All the participants measured knee flexor and extensor range of motion with the Kinovea software (version 0.9.5). In descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation were used, and Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between the variables. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results. A significant correlation was found between Latent Myofascial Trigger Points and lower limb range of motion (p < 0.05), and it was also observed that the magnitude of correlation coefficient was very large (0.7–0.9). Conclusions. Latent Myofascial Trigger Points impair sports performance by decreasing the range of motion of knee flexors and extensors. In light of this, Latent Myofascial Trigger Point should be considered a serious musculoskeletal disorder, and appropriate preventative measures should be taken by health professionals.
... Physical fitness is the foundation of the people and the key to the development of scientific, cultural and moral qualities. 5 Only by improving the physical quality of college students can their overall qualification level be improved. Therefore, this paper discusses the effect of aerobics training on improving the body, heart and lung functions of universities. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction The good performance of college students depends directly on their physical integrity, which is subordinated to good physical fitness and cardiopulmonary resistance. It is believed that aerobic training, an adaptation to the progressive increase of physical endurance, may benefit college students. Objective Study whether aerobic training can affect college students’ physical fitness and cardiopulmonary endurance. Methods Through experimental comparison, the physical fitness and cardiopulmonary endurance of students in the aerobics elective class and the university athletics elective class were compared. Body indexes were measured before and after the intervention, statistically analyzed, and discussed according to the literature. Results There were significant changes in the 50-meter run time for university students in the elective aerobics class from 9.24±1.71 to 7.81±2.02, the five-meter run from 11.56±1.03 to 7.87±0.23, the standing jump from 156.92±14.79 to 170.56±19.93, and the sitting flexion from 14.07±1.98 to 17.52±3.79. These changes accompanied the changes in cardiorespiratory endurance in the aerobics elective class. In contrast, the changes in student indicators in the track and field elective class were not as evident. Conclusion Aerobic training positively impacted overall physical quality, including elevation of fitness indices and cardiopulmonary endurance in college students. Level of evidence II; Therapeutic studies - investigation of treatment outcomes. Keywords: Aerobic Exercises; Physical Fitness; Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Article
Full-text available
Objective This study aimed to explore the relationship between dependence in Activities of Daily Living and muscle strength, muscle morphology and physical function in older nursing home residents, taking possible confounders into consideration. Methods A total of 30 nursing home residents (age, 85.6±7.1 years) were included in this observational cross-sectional study. Performance of basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) was assessed with the Resident Assessment Instrument and categorized as either independent or dependent. Isometric grip, quadriceps and elbow-flexor strength were determined by hand-dynamometry, muscle thickness and echo intensity by B-mode ultrasonography, a sit-to-stand task by using a stop watch and physical activity by the German-Physical-Activity Questionnaire. Degree of frailty was evaluated according to Fried’s frailty criteria, whereas cognition, depression, incontinence, pain and falls were part of the Resident Assessment Instrument. Results Dependence in Activities of Daily Living was negatively correlated with physical activity (rs = -0.44, p = .015), handgrip (rs = -0.38, p = .038), elbow-flexor (rs = -0.42, p = .032) and quadriceps strength (rs = -0.67, p < .001), analysed by Spearman’s correlation. Chronic diseases (rs = -0.41, p = .027) and incontinence (rs = -0.39, p = .037) were positively correlated with ADL while the other variables were not related. Only quadriceps strength remained significant with logistic regression (Wald(1) = 4.7, p = .03), when chronic diseases, quadriceps and handgrip strength were considered (R² .79). 11 kg was the best fitting value in this sample to predict performance in Activities of Daily Living, evaluated with Receiver-Operating Characteristic analysis, with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 79%. Conclusion and implication Quadriceps strength had a positive independent relationship with performance in ADL in the nursing home residents studied. Although a large prospective study is needed to verify the results, maintaining quadriceps strength above 11 kg may be helpful in retaining independence in this cohort.
Article
Full-text available
This study examined the differences in fundamental motor skills (FMSs) and specific conditioning capacities (SCCs) between a coach’s classification of first team (FT) and second team (ST) U10 soccer players and examined the most important qualities based on how the coach differentiates them. The FT (n = 12; Mage = 9.72 ± 0.41) and ST (n = 11; Mage = 9.57 ± 0.41) soccer players were assessed using the Test of Gross Motor Development-2, standing long jump, sit and reach, diverse sprints, and the 20 m multistage fitness test (MSFT). The coach’s subjective evaluation of players was obtained using a questionnaire. No significant differences existed between the FT and ST in any variables (p > 0.05). However, large and moderate effect sizes were present in favour of the FT group in locomotor skills (d = 0.82 (0.08, 1.51)), gross motor quotient (d = 0.73 (0.00, 1.41)), height (d = 0.61 (−0.12, 1.29)), MSFT (d = 0.58 (−0.14, 1.25)), and maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) (d = 0.55 (−0.17, 1.22)). Furthermore, the coach perceived the FT group as having greater technical and tactical qualities relative to ST players. This suggests that it might be more relevant for players of this age to develop good FMS connected to technical skills, before focusing on SCC. Therefore, it might be beneficial for soccer coaches to emphasize the development of FMSs due to their potential to identify talented young soccer players and because they underpin the technical soccer skills that are required for future soccer success.
Article
Full-text available
Along with the increasing popularity of taekwondo, there is a need of evidence-based talent identification (TID) and development programs based upon profiles of future elite athletes. This study first aims to investigate the differences between elite and non-elite taekwondo athletes in anthropometry, physical performance and motor coordination. The second aim is to demonstrate the applicability of z-scores in TID research. A total of 98 Taekwondo athletes between 12 and 17 years old were tested using a generic test battery consisting of four anthropometrical (Height, Weight, Fat Percentage, BMI), six physical performance (Sit & Reach, Sprint 5m, Sprint 30m, Counter Movement Jump, Squat Jump, Endurance Shuttle Run) and three motor coordination tests (Moving Sideways, Jumping Sideways, Walking Backwards). Based on the individual success at international competition level, 18 were categorised as elite athletes and 80 were considered as non-elite. T-tests (step 1) on raw test scores and MANOVAs on z-scores (step 2) were conducted to examine differences between the elite and non-elite taekwondo athletes for anthropometry, physical performance and motor coordination tests. Finally, z-scores were reconverted to raw scores to demonstrate practical significance for coaches. Overall, elite taekwondo athletes score better compared to the non-elite group. The MANOVA analysis better scores for elites on fat percentage (-0.55 versus 0.12;p = 0.006), BMI (-0.37 versus 0,08;p = 0.067) sprint speed 30m (-0.48 versus 0.11;p = 0.029), counter movement jump (0.79 versus -0.18;p = 0.000), squat jump (0.42 versus -0.11;p = 0.041), moving sideways (0.79 versus -0.18;p = 0.000) and walking backwards (0.54 versus -0.12;p = 0.006). This study confirms our knowledge on physical profiles of elite taekwondo athletes and expands our knowledge to the domain of motor coordination. This study showed how the z-score method can be used to distinguish between elite and non-elite athletes, the former being low in number by definition.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Ballet dancers have a high prevalence of injuries to the lower extremity. Many studies have investigated the relationship between dance injury and risk factors. However, risk factors for lower-extremity injury comparing recreational- and elite-level ballet dancers are scarce. Objective: To systematically review available original studies to assess risk factors for lower-extremity injury in female ballet dancers between recreational and elite ballet dancers. Data sources: Five online databases [Web of Science, PubMed, OVID (Medline), EBSCO, and ProQuest] were searched systematically. Study selection: Included studies had an analytic study design published in the past 11 years and investigated an association between potential risk factors and lower-extremity injury in female ballet dancers. Study appraisal: Assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Downs and Black (DB) criteria and Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine. Results: Seventeen studies were included. Alignment was a risk factor for lower-extremity injury in both recreational and elite ballet dancers. In elite ballet dancers, poor lumbopelvic movement control, inappropriate transversus abdominis contraction, decreased lower-extremity strength, and poor aerobic fitness were risk factors for lower-extremity injury. In recreational ballet dancers, hypermobility of the hip and ankle and longer training hours were risk factors for lower-extremity injury. Mean DB score was 15.94 (SD 1.57). The majority of studies were retrospective cohort studies or had poor follow-up, with 7 level 2b studies, 6 level 3b studies (cross-sectional), and 4 level 1b studies (prospective cohort with good follow-up). Conclusions: Alignment was identified as a common risk factor for recreational and elite ballet dancers. Other risk factors differed between recreational ballet dancers and elite ballet dancers. Future studies are warranted to use a prospective study design, identify dance level-specific risk factors, and implement evidence-based prevention strategies.
Article
Ferreira-Júnior, JB, Benine, RPC, Chaves, SFN, Borba, DA, Martins-Costa, HC, Freitas, EDS, Bemben, MG, Vieira, CA, and Bottaro, M. Effects of static and dynamic stretching performed before resistance training on muscle adaptations in untrained men. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2019-This study evaluated the effects of dynamic and static stretching (SS) performed before resistance training on biceps femoris hypertrophy and knee flexor strength gains in untrained young men. Forty-five untrained young men (age, 21.2 ± 0.5 years; mass, 72.2 ± 5.6 kg; height, 178 ± 1 cm) were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 groups: (a) 80 seconds of SS (n = 14); (b) 80 seconds of dynamic stretching (DS, n = 13); or (c) control group (CON, n = 18) in which subjects performed no stretching before exercise. Both SS and DS were performed before resistance exercise. Resistance training consisted of 4 sets of 8-12 repetition maximum of seated leg curl exercise 2 days per week for 8 weeks, with a period of at least 48 hours between sessions. Unilateral biceps femoris muscle thickness (MT) and maximal isometric strength (MIS) of the knee flexors were measured 1 week before training and 1 week after the last training session. There were significant increases in MIS (SS = 13.9 ± 10.3 kgf; DS = 10.2 ± 13.1 kgf; CON = 12.7 ± 7.6 kgf; p < 0.05) and MT (SS = 6.0 ± 3.5 mm; DS = 6.7 ± 4.1 mm; CON = 5.7 ± 3.0 mm; p < 0.05) with no significant differences across groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, all groups demonstrated moderate effect sizes for MIS (1.27-1.4), and DS was the only group that had a large effect size for MT increases (DS = 2.18; SS = 1.35; CON = 0.92). In conclusion, 80 seconds of SS and DS did not induce any additional muscular adaptations to resistance training in untrained young men.
Article
Flexibility exercise training for adults with fibromyalgia This review summarizes the effects of flexibility exercise for adults with fibromyalgia. What problems do fibromyalgia cause? People with fibromyalgia have persistent, widespread body pain. They may also have fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep difficulties. What is flexibility exercise training? Flexibility exercise training is a type of exercise that focuses on improving or maintaining the amount of motion available in muscles and joint structures by holding or stretching the body in specific positions. Study characteristics We searched the literature up to December 2017 and found 12 studies (743 individuals) that met our inclusion criteria. Flexibility interventions were compared with control (treatment as usual), aerobic training interventions (e.g. treadmill walking), resistance‐training interventions (e.g. using weight machines that provide resistance to movement), and other interventions (e.g. Pilates). The average age of participants was 48.6 years. Trials were conducted in seven countries, and most studies (58.3%) included only female participants. Exercise trials ranged from 4 to 20 weeks. The stretching exercise programs ranged from 40 to 60 minutes, 1 to 3 times a day. The intensity of the stretches (e.g. how far the stretch was taken in the available range of motion) was not reported in most cases. The time each stretch was held ranged from 6 to 60 seconds. The targeted muscles were usually of both the upper and lower extremities, neck, and back. The flexibility training was either supervised or done at home. Our main comparison was flexibility exercise versus land‐based aerobic training. Key results at the end of treatment for our main comparison Compared with land‐based aerobic exercise training, flexibility exercise resulted in little benefit at 8 to 20 weeks' follow‐up. Each measure below was measured on a scale from 0 to 100, with lower scores better. Health‐related quality of life: People who received flexibility exercise training were 4% worse (ranging from 6% better to 14% worse). • People who had flexibility training rated their quality of life as 46 points. • People who had aerobic training rated their quality of life as 42 points. Pain intensity: People who received flexibility exercise training were 5% worse (ranging from 1% better to 11% worse). • People who had flexibility training rated their pain as 57 points. • People who had aerobic training rated their pain as 52 points. Fatigue: People who received flexibility exercise training were 4% better (ranging from 13% better to 5% worse). • People who had flexibility training rated their fatigue as 67 points. • People who had aerobic training rated their fatigue as 71 points. Stiffness: People who received flexibility exercise training were 30% better (ranging from 8% better to 51% better). • People who had flexibility training rated their stiffness as 49 points. • People who had aerobic training rated their stiffness as 79 points. Physical function: People who received flexibility exercise training were 6% worse (ranging from 4% better to 16% worse). • People who had flexibility training rated their physical function as 23 points. • People who had aerobic training rated their physical function as 17 points. Withdrawal from treatment A total of 18 per 100 people dropped out of the flexibility exercise training group for any reason compared to 19 per 100 people from the aerobic training group. Harms We found no clear information on harms. One study reported that one participant had swelling (tendinitis) of an ankle tendon (Achilles), but it is unclear if this was related to participation in the flexibility exercise. Quality of evidence The evidence does not show that flexibility exercise significantly improves health‐related quality of life, pain, fatigue, or physical function. The number of people dropping out from each group was similar. Although the evidence suggests that flexibility exercise improves stiffness, caution is advised in interpretation of these results, as this improvement was seen in only one study with very few participants. We considered the overall certainty of the evidence to be low to very low due to study design issues, the small number of participants, and low certainty of results.
Article
Background: While traditional resistance exercises have been widely used to promote muscle strength and hypertrophy in the elderly, few studies have reported the use of a functional approach in which common patterns for daily activities are considered the primary stimulus. Objective: Investigate whether functional training has similar effects the traditional on body composition and muscle strength components in physically active older women. Methods: Forty-seven older women completed a randomized and crossover clinical trial, distributed in three groups: Functional or Traditional Training (FUNCT/TRAD: n=32; 65.28±4.96 years) and Stretching Group (STRETCH: n=15; 64.40±3.68 years). Maximal dynamic strength was verified with the 1 repetition maximum (RM) test in the leg press and rowing machines. Muscular power was analyzed using 50% of the maximum load, speed was determined using a linear encoder, and isometric strength was analyzed with hand and lumbar dynamometers. ANOVA for repeated measures was applied for comparisons. Results: The FUNCT showed a significant decrease in fat percentage (p=0.015, 3.51%) and the TRAD a significant increase in lean mass (p=0.008, 2.92%). Both FUNCT and TRAD generated significant increases in all components of muscle strength compared to baseline whereas STRETCH showed declines in these variables. No statistically significant differences were observed between the experimental groups in body composition. Conclusion: Functional and traditional training are equally efficient in improving strength components in physically active older women and, therefore, they may be complementary to combat some of the deleterious effects of senescence.
Article
Context: Rowers are at risk for overuse injuries, including low back pain (LBP). Defining the utility of screening tests for identifying those at risk for LBP can aid in the development of guidelines for injury prevention. Objective: To determine if the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and impairments can identify rowers at risk for developing LBP. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Athletic training room. Patients or other participants: A total of 31 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I, female, open-weight rowers (age = 19.9 ± 1.4 years, height = 163.6 ± 30.8 cm, mass = 84.1 ± 37.63 kg); coxswains were excluded. Main outcome measure(s): We assessed the FMS and 5 impairment measures of the Star Excursion Balance Test, closed kinetic chain dorsiflexion range of motion, and the plank, Sorensen, and sit-and-reach tests before the fall season. Low back pain injuries were tracked by the sports medicine staff. Impairment measures were compared between the injured and uninjured athletes. The FMS cutoff score that discriminated injured from uninjured rowers was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Impairments were compared between those at a higher versus lower risk of LBP. Results: Eighteen rowers sustained an LBP injury. No differences in FMS or impairments between groups were demonstrated. The FMS receiver operating characteristic curve analysis cutoff score was 16 points (area under the curve = 0.60, specificity = 0.67, risk ratio = 1.4 [95% confidence interval = 0.91, 2.11]). Rowers with an FMS score ≤16 had a shorter plank-test time (109.5 ± 60.2 seconds) than those with less risk (175.3 ± 98.6 seconds, mean difference = 65.9 seconds, 95% confidence interval = -129.4, -2.3; P = .043). Conclusions: Those with an FMS score ≤16 had a shorter plank-test hold time, indicating that a lack of core endurance may contribute to the increased risk of LBP in female rowers. An FMS score ≤16 indicated a small increased risk (1.4) of developing LBP compared with rowers who had scores >16; however, the FMS is not recommended for widespread screening of female rowers because the risk ratio was relatively small and had a wide 95% confidence interval.