‘It’s about wholeness. I love my awesomeness and I love my
flawesomeness’: An IPA analysis of coaching with the shadow in mind.
Dmitry Gourov & Tim Lomas
Difficult emotions and cognitive states are recognised in second wave positive
psychology as being a gold mine for personal growth. The growing body of knowledge in
positive psychology gives coaching psychologists a perimeter to work with, whilst
archetypal shadow analysis, rooted in Jung’s teachings, gives depth and insight. While
definitions of coaching vary considerably, it can be argued to function as shining a light
onto things that are hidden for the client, thereby bringing wholeness and clarity.
Interpretive phenomenological analysis was used to analyse coaching with the shadow in
mind, where this work became defined as looking at parts that are hidden, suppressed,
unowned and unacknowledged by us and others. Semi-structured interviews were
conducted with four professional coaches. Three higher order themes were identified: the
coach’s personal journey through the shadow, what a shadow coach does and the client’s
journey into the shadow. These themes may generate insight into this paradigm of
coaching for the first time and is an important step in the ongoing integration of second
wave positive psychology and coaching psychology.
Keywords: shadow coaching, second wave positive psychology, narrative coaching,
wholeness, coaching psychology.
This is a pre-publication version of the following article:
Gourov, D., & Lomas, T. (2019). ‘It’s about wholeness. I love my awesomeness and I love my
flawesomeness’: An IPA analysis of coaching with the shadow in mind. The Coaching Psychologist,
The following maxim was inscribed at the entrance to the Temple of Apollo at
Delphi: "Man, know thyself, and you are going to know the gods". Knowledge of self
remains an important pursuit. Jung (1954, p. 265) captured the quest for knowledge as
one where “One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making
the darkness conscious.” Kashdan and Biswas-Diener (2014) translate this stance for the
modern reader as one of being comfortable with both positive and negative emotions.
Lomas and Ivtzan (2016, p. 1754) argue that “…ostensibly negative states could
paradoxically be conducive to flourishing.” For this present study, the research question
is: how can coaches be comfortable working both with the good and with the bad that is
within us? This research sits at the intersection of three fields: positive psychology 2.0,
Jungian shadow work and coaching psychology (Figure 1).
[INSERT FIGURE 1 HERE]
Jung (1964, p. 118) described the shadow as that which “…contains the hidden,
repressed and unfavorable aspects of the personality”. Jung (1954) also described the
presence of the ‘positive’ aspects of the shadow: that which could be talent, our potential
or parts of us that could be suppressed for fear of responsibility. As part of working with
the shadow, we must confront and come to terms with the unknown. Until we do this
work, our deeper parts may sabotage our conscious intentions, manifesting as
mechanism of self-defense where “People often project their shadow issues onto others […]
That which a person does not own in him/herself yet, becomes difficult to tolerate in
others.” (de Toit, 2016, p. 193). This process of detecting and integrating the shadow
may feel chaotic and threatening (Johnson, 1993) but offers a way to tame dark aspects
of the personality. What is also expected as part of this shadow process is the emergence
of hidden talents and strengths. Acknowledging their presence takes courage and
integrating them might demand a change in lifestyle.
The original focus of positive psychology was on what is going right with people
(Biswas-Diener & Dean, 2007). As the field of positive psychology is maturing, it has
given rise to second wave positive psychology (2WPP) (Lomas & Ivtzan, 2016) and
Positive Psychology 2.0 (Wong, 2011), also referred to as the “dark side”, which
investigates benefits of negative emotions and experiences which trigger discomfort.
Engaging with challenge and discomfort has a great potential for growth, healing, insight
and transformation. In other words, “…the ‘dark side’ contains the seed for a potential
positive outcome, even when the path towards this outcome is testing” (Ivtzan et al., 2015,
Positive psychology has been referred to as the science at the heart of coaching
(Kauffman et al., 2010), one that provides a delimited scope of practice (Seligman,
2007). Although definitions of coaching vary considerably (Palmer & Whybrow, 2005),
the assumption is that people are basically healthy and “…seek to be more emotionally,
spiritually and psychologically fulfilled” (Biswas-Diener & Dean, 2007, p. 27). de Haan
(2008) asserts that the role of the coach is to hold the space, challenge and support,
suggest and explore. In the coaching partnership, goals are there to help organise the
work, with the coach staying curious, open, non-judgemental and with a positive regard
(Passmore, 2007). Cox, Bachkirova and Clutterbuck (2014, p. 22) refer to the coaching
process as “…making the unconscious conscious, to increase self-awareness […] and so
learn how to approach new challenges with more awareness and freedom”.
Positive psychology is positioned to support the coaching profession and give
additional tools of practice (Biswas-Diener, 2010), with archetypal shadow analysis
giving depth and insight to coaching psychology (de Toit, 2016). It can be argued that
powerful things start to happen when these two components – positive psychology and
shadow analysis - meet in a coaching space. The combination of the two has been scantly
discussed in a coaching psychology context: literature has only briefly touched upon
these areas, with Sims (2017) appealing to positive psychology coaches to embrace the
‘bad’ along with the ‘good’ - to coach with difficult emotions in mind. It is this gap that
this present study sought to make smaller by exploring how shadow work guided by
second wave positive psychology be used in a coaching environment.
Hefferon et al. (2017, p. 211) argue that “Qualitative approaches are ideal for
exploring under-researched areas of investigation and allow for the development of novel,
bottom-up theories”. This research topic has an unclear emerging theoretical
underpinning and a limited pool of research; hence a qualitative research method being
adopted. A social constructivist research philosophy was employed for this study,
acknowledging multiple versions of reality and focusing on understanding the coaches’
experience (Willig, 2013).
Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) was used to analyse semi-
structured interviews. IPA allows for a deep interpretation of the participant’s
experience, where it is an open-ended, non-directive exploratory interview process,
which also allows for the “…articulation of both convergence and divergence within the
study sample” (Smith, 2017, p. 303). It allows for the analysis of what is being said as it is
perceived by both the participant and the researcher.
Four English-speaking coaches took part in the study (three female and one
male). Two participants were based in the United Kingdom and two in the United States.
All were professional coaches with a minimum of four years of experience. A small
sample of coaches is sufficient to yield a rich dataset using IPA (Smith, Flowers & Larkin,
2009). A purposeful sampling technique was used to select the most information rich-
interviewees (Palinkas et al., 2015). The main criterion of selection was that coaches use
shadow work in a coaching environment. The secondary criterion was the use of
positive psychology and second wave positive psychology interventions and philosophy
in the coach’s work. Given that there was potential for sensitive and challenging
information to surface during the interviews and the likely reluctance of coaches to
speak openly and honestly about the probable overlap between therapy and coaching,
full confidentiality and full data anonymity was applied with all participants. The broad
list of questions used in the interviews is attached in Appendix A.
Each interview audio file was transcribed and coded, including pauses, mistakes,
slips of speech and other dynamics at play (Biggerstaff & Thompson, 2008). A wide
margin was left on either side of the transcription for comments and coding. The first
author listened, read and re-read the text, seeking to understand what the participants
said. After coding and identifying broad themes in the first transcript, a similar process
followed for the remaining three transcripts. As a result, four independent theme lists
were compiled and common themes identified.
Three overarching themes emerged from the data. These were labeled as: 1) the
coach’s personal journey, 2) what a shadow coach does and 3) the client’s journey into
the shadow. The first two topics focused on the understanding of the coach and what
experiences, behaviour and qualities facilitated shadow coaching. The last theme was
the coach’s perception of what was happening for the clients as they underwent this
paradigm of coaching. The main themes and their corresponding sub-themes are shown
in Table 1.
[INSERT TABLE 1 HERE]
1. Coach’s personal journey
1.1 Defining the shadow
Understanding and defining what the shadow is key for any further discussion.
The themes and definitions from the participants were not identical yet shared a similar
understanding. Where the words “hiding” and “suppressing” were frequently
mentioned. Moreover, this hiding and suppressing happens not only from others, but
importantly from ourselves.
The hidden part of us, those parts of us that we deny, suppress and hide from other people, but
uhhmm…but sometimes we hide them from ourselves as well. [P4]
That we suppress, or that we hide from ourselves or from others, or anything really that we see in
others that touches us, on a level that, you know, irritates us. [P3]
The other emerging insight is that the shadow is unacknowledged, and yet influencing
life. One participant mentioned how there is a reluctance to go into the shadow, and
everythinig that is contained in it. Yet, it was mentioned that by doing that work great
Unacknowledged and yet hanging over me…It’s the suppressed part, it’s the part that I don’t want
to look at, it’s scary, I am not going to go there…but when we go there, there is great learning. [P1]
Another participant talked about parts and qualities that are not owned, and how these
form underlying beliefs and commitments. It is also something that the clients no longer
see in themselves.
Underlying beliefs, that they are not aware of, underlying commitments that they make…the part
of themselves that they no longer see, the qualities in themselves that they don’t own. [P2]
1.2 The importance of the personal journey
All participants reported how their personal exploration of the shadow was
important for this kind of coaching. It was their own past experiences that helped to
understand what this work is about. By working with the shadow, participants were
able to refer to this as a personal journey, one of deep exploration, which took them to
dark and light places, looking at the good and the bad. This process also helped the
coaches to know themselves better. Having gone on this journey helped the coaches gain
more meaning and reframe the dark side to something more conducive to their
wellbeing, in the process pushing to make life-affirming choices which were also
phrased as ‘life and death’ choices. It is as if, by making a definitive choice, a
commitment and a new will to live was made.
There is always a personal journey. You are never going to find a coach that doesn’t come from
And really get up close and personal with my dark side, and that absolutely transformed my well-
being, and allowed me to stop dying and start living again…so I thought, are you going to sink or
swim? This is the REAL question, and I am relieved the answer was swim. [P1]
For some participants it was working through their dark side, which is what came
up first, whilst for others it was the gold that was hidden there. Finding and
acknowledging the beauty and the light in themselves was at times just a challenging as
going through darker material.
That’s the thing that originally hooked me into this work, was to think, ok, I get this, the dark stuff,
I don’t want anybody to see that, but the light, you know, so, I worked very hard at finding, my
light shadows. [P4]
1.3 Sharing stories:
Coaching is all about the client. As a result, sharing personal stories of one’s own
shadow journey is not something that immediately comes to mind. Yet sharing helps
build trust with clients and encourages them to see life in a new way. The stories that do
get shared ought to be relevant, and this sharing ought to be done carefully with clients
that are sincerely interested and could benefit from what is being shared by the coach.
If you can give examples of your own life story, it does help the client to, maybe, it triggers
something for them, or they remember something, or they understand it in a way, that they can
get their own, can see themselves in that. [P4]
I don’t share unless they ask…when I began coaching it was kind of like “oh, coaching is about
them, not about you”…In the beginning, I was a bit more careful with sharing, now days I do share,
not with everyone, uhm. I see, in what I can share…[P4]
Those coaches who shared their own journey, through articles, interviews and
social media, increased their visibility. As a result, the sharing of the coach’s personal
journeys allowed the clients to relate to the coach even before they got to know them.
Most of the people I work with, I don’t go looking for them, they find me, the same way you looked
up my profile, and, aaaa here is a guy what I am interested in, most of my clients have the
opportunity to see something about them, in my blog posts, interviews. [P1]
2. What a shadow coach does?
This theme explored the participant’s perception of the qualities and traits they
valued in a coach that does shadow work. One such quality is the ability to hold space;
the allowing to happen whatever the client chooses to bring into that space. That means
as a coach one needs to be totally present with the client, having an absolute focus on
what is happening in the here and the now. Tuning into the moment and tuning out
everything that is outside of it. Being mindful and practicing mindfulness.
I think the essential quality that a coach needs to have, to be able to coach the client’s shadow is
the ability to hold space. I walk with my clients, metaphorically, I hold their hand metaphorically,
and I introduce them to their shadow, in a way which gives them the trusting confidence to fall
apart, knowing that I am there to give them courage to go through this. [P1]
In addition, more soft qualities like empathy emerged from the interview data. A
coach can feel the emotions that are coming up for the client but does not seek to
identify with them. Acting more like a mirror that reflects, so that the client can clearly
see what it is that they are feeling and are able to articulate that.
I think to hold somebody else, like in your hand basically, you have to be really well trained, to
have, be empathetic, you have to do your own work so that you can be like a clean vessel. [P2]
The qualities of holding space and being empathetic create an aura in coaching
work, where the client feels safe to bring up any topic, even those they may never have
brought up with anyone else.
An interesting topic appeared in the first interview, which was one of intention in
the coaching space. The remaining participants were then probed on the importance of
having an intention to help them in their coaching work.
What I do have is an intention, and it took me some time to figure my intention out…it’s to help
them develop their self-awareness so that in due course they can develop self-acceptance, self-
approval, and ultimately self-love. And that is what I am always working, always my intention,
and if I don’t feel that’s what I need, or want, I won’t work with them. [P1]
Self-awareness emerged as important theme. One that influenced the way
coaches entered the coaching relationship. One of the participants described this as
being a multi-step process, where the ability to love oneself can be the end goal, but one
starts with the notion of increasing self-awareness. The same phenomenon, but from
another angle, was described by another participant, where their intention was focused
on helping the client become emotionally whole, and in that way learn to love
My intention as a coach, in general, is that they learn to uncover their shadows so that they
become more emotionally whole, they become less reactive, they become the observer and not
the reactor in their lives. My intention for them is to learn to love themselves, and the way they
learn to love themselves is to learn to trust themselves. [P2]
2.3 Therapeutic coaching
Given that shadow work originated in therapy work, it was interesting to see how
these two areas were differentiated by the participants. The commonality of the two was
confirmed, with a large ‘grey area’ present.
I think it’s really grey area and it’s very intertwined. [P3]
Despite the presence of the grey area and the connectedness of the work, it was
made very clear that shadow coaching was not therapy, although the effect of the work
was therapeutical. What made shadow coaching different was the coach’s own
experience of the shadow, which allowed to support the client on this path.
An overlap, where coaching can be therapy, therapeutic and healing, without being therapy per
se, it’s still coaching, it’s that grey area in the middle…you can only do this work, if you have
actually done the hard work on yourself, by going up close with the shadow…combination of
qualities and experiences that a coach bring to it, which allows a therapeutic effect to, without
being therapeutic per se. [P4]
It’s really action-oriented, they come for a different feeling, they come for a goal and a vision. [P2]
What also made shadow coaching different from therapy was its goal oriented
and time framed approach. Coaches noted how their clients found it particularly difficult
to stay goal focused given the intensity of what emerged. The potential for the
conversation to go in many directions was present. The latter made it very easy to
evolve into a continuous discovery of the shadow. Staying goal focused and being very
specific helped the coaches avoid the pitfall of making shadow coaching a long-winded
investigation, without a clear end, which can happen in therapy.
It’s more, I think, uhm, goal oriented, other than you want to feel better, or you want to
understand more about, you know, your past, or why you do the things you do, but we always
start out with a goal. What is it that you want to achieve? We ask them to be specific, and
measurable, and you know, that is the hardest part for people. [P4]
3 The client’s journey into the shadow
3.1 Action steps
A number of common action steps emerged on what helped clients achieve their
goals. One such action step was ‘acknowledging the shadow’, although coaches noted
this was something the clients were reluctant to do. As part of this process, coaches
facilitated the clients to see their own shadow. The challenge was to help the clients see
how the shadow was manifesting in their life, and then take ownership thereof.
Have to acknowledge the shadow, and that’s a really big part of coaching with the shadow. [P1]
They don’t want to acknowledge that there is on them, when we do the exercise, seeing in the
others and reflecting on you, uhm, like “I am not like that, I am the opposite” there is some
indignation sometimes, I am not going to accept that part of me, I am going to keep that part in the
The goal is, let me put that more positively, to take responsibility for 100% responsibility for our
thoughts, feelings, and actions. [P4]
Coaches noted how taking responsibility for the shadow required a great deal of
honesty. In their experience, this was not easy, but is the answer to whatever the
underlying issue was hidden there. Once discovered, it became an issue of
accountability, of holding the client accountable for the things discovered and helping
them to move towards the goal.
Like in a third session, when we start to go deep, they completely disappear. Like out of the face of
the earth, they don’t pick up the calls, they don’t answer the phone…[P3]
One coach noted how clients at times disappear when the shadow is brought out
into the conversation. Noting that sometimes change is good as long as it is talked about,
but implementing it can be difficult and unpleasant. The knowledge that this has the
potential to happen can help a coach prepare and maybe warn a client in advance. In
that way, the chance of it happening will be diminished.
All four participants expressed a feeling that coaching with the shadow in mind
lead to positive results. An overarching observation was that clients started out feeling
stuck, unsatisfied and not being able to understand the reason behind this. As clients
took back both the light and the dark aspects of their personality, they felt more at ease
in their own skin.
When they start, they are stuck in a rut, they are lost, even in despair, and afterwards, they are
flourishing…And that can be a lot of it is moving forward, uhm, life, career, and their well-being.
All those things. But they, they live more joyfully, but the keyword is LIVE. [P1]
One particular point strongly articulated by two participants was that
clients developed the ability to make active choices about their life, rather than waiting
for something to happen. Much more flourishing was observed to be taking place by the
end of the shadow coaching work. The clients’ focus on actions, particularly those aimed
to improve their lives, that allowed them to dare to go after their goals and dreams or to
go from a place of good to great, facilitated this transformation.
I see people stepping up, and actually doing things. You know that kind of thing when they are just
doing that on their own. We are working with people who are going from a place of good to great!
A number of participants noted how important the moment of accepting both the
light and the dark qualities was: something that led to the clients experiencing greater
wholeness and self-love. It is at that moment that the coaches saw real changes and
clients were able to ‘become just themselves’, without judgment or fear, accepting
whatever it was that was burdening them.
So, they start to use their life instead of letting their life use them. It’s about wholeness. I love my
awesomeness and I love my flawesomeness. [P2]
The purpose of the study was to investigate the coaches’ experience of coaching
the shadow - the good and the bad, the light and the dark - and to develop an
understanding of the nuances of this work. The study is one of the first to explore and
define the area of shadow coaching, with three component themes of shadow work
emerging from the data set. The three key themes are: the coach’s personal journey
through the shadow; what a shadow coach does; and the client’s journey into the
shadow. The key result of this work was that the combination of these three elements
was argued by the participants to lead to transformation, integration and wholeness in
the coaching space. As a result, the study sheds some light on how coaches can work
with both light and dark aspects of the personality and do so more deliberately.
The emerging definition of the shadow coaching paradigm is one of enabling
behavioural change and goal achievement by investigating personality traits that are
hidden, suppressed, unowned and unacknowledged by us and others. This definition
resonates with Jung (1954, 1964) and with de Toit (2016, p.189) where “…the
archetypal approach works on root causes, gaining greater awareness and shifts the way
of thinking of the coachee.” It is emerging as an avant-garde approach where irrational
and limiting behaviours are brought to light. Shadow coaching differs from therapy, with
the study participants noting how coaching was goal-oriented and time-framed. This
finding mimics the goal-oriented coaching principles (Biswas-Diener & Dean, 2007; de
Haan et al., 2016; Grant, 2014) that distinguish coaching from therapy. Moreover, Jordan
and Livingstone (2013) mention how the level of a client’s therapeutic instability is a
key differentiation point. Despite differences in coaching approaches among the
interviewees, there was the admission that a large ‘grey area’ was present. Even though
coaching with the shadow in mind was not therapy, its effect was termed therapeutic by
the participants. Jackson and Parsons (2016, p.95) labelled this emerging approach as
‘therapeutic coaching’, where “…clients can explore their vulnerabilities and fears and
initiate new resilient and self-supporting behaviors.” In this ‘grey area’, it may be the case
that coaches do overstep borders and boundaries between coaching and therapy, and as
Sime and Jacob (2018) show this is dependent on the coach’s self-selected boundaries
and feelings of competency. The latter can be improved upon by coaches being trained
in this paradigm of coaching, particularly practitioners that are already well versed in
Jungian depth psychology and in the three key themes that have emerged from the
One of these key themes was that of the ‘personal journey’, by means of which
coaches are drawn to shadow work. A coach’s personal experience and understanding
heavily influences the way the shadow is understood and explained. In a coaching space,
telling personal stories is one of the key ways for a coach to articulate his coaching
philosophy, values and beliefs, and be aware of the ‘why’ behind the actions (Carless &
Douglas, 2011). Sharing personal stories of one’s own shadow journey is not something
that immediately comes to mind. More so, given that, as a coach, we are trained to listen
to ask powerful questions and to offer feedback (van Nieuwerburgh, 2017). Yet, the
ability of the coach to tell personal shadow examples and stories - a form of narrative
coaching - helps the client contemplate and see new possibilities (McMillan, 2015).
Storytelling can serve as a link between abstract psychological concepts that may be
difficult to grasp and real-life problems. As such, this may help the client to open up and
tell their story and then see “…the diverse and possibly conflicting narratives in their
biography and to question the truth of narratives in which they may be stuck” (Vogel,
2012, p. 7). However, as a coach, one needs to be careful not to cross a line from
storytelling that is accompanied by reflection and learning, to storyselling, which is
closer to providing guidance and advice, and trying to influence in a particular way
(Lapp & Carr, 2008).
Another theme in the study, is the coach’s ability to hold space while doing
sensitive work. This is the cornerstone of shadow work and aligns with research by de
Haan (2008) where the role of the coach is to hold space. Furthermore, being empathetic
was noted to be very important, something also shown by Passmore (2007) and van
Nieuwerburgh (2017), as well as Rogers’ (1992), where showing empathy helps clients
accept their reality. de Haan, Culpin and Curd (2011) argue that it is the ‘common
factors’ (such as the coaching relationship, empathic understanding and positive
expectations), rather than a specific technique, that determine good coaching.
One notable finding is that of the intentions that a coach brought into the
coaching space. This echoes one of the core conditions of therapeutical change, namely
unconditional positive regard (Rogers, 1992). A key intention that one of the
participants set out with, was to allow their clients to have the ability to love oneself as
the end goal. In the coaching process, the coach would be showing love and compassion
towards the client. As a first step, Participant 1 recommended creating awareness,
which could be achieved by means of a mindfulness practice. Passmore and Marianetti
(2007) suggested how mindfulness can be used in a coaching context to support both
the coach and the client.
Lastly, the theme of the client‘s journey through the shadow focused on the
benefits of doing shadow work. All participants noted how their clients went from a
place of languishing to a place of flourishing. This aligns with past research in SWPP
(Lomas & Ivtzan, 2016) where opposing forces, such as positive and negative, are
connected and dependent, with growth as a result of the interplay of these opposites.
The interviews also suggested that engaging with discomfort, acknowledging it and
taking responsibility – in essence taking the projection back (de Toit, 2016) - opened up
potential for growth and transformation. Similar themes were explored by Kashdan and
Biswas-Diener (2014), where embracing challenging experiences and learning from
them led to greater happiness. As such, shadow coaching provides the space for all
emotions and experiences to surface and use these for personal growth. Coaches
working with the shadow in mind are answering Sims’ (2017) call to work with the
whole range of human emotions, which is an important next step in the ongoing
integration of 2WPP and coaching.
Limitations and recommendations for future research
The current study contains limitations that ought to be taken into account when
considering the themes and conclusions. As with all IPA studies, the researchers are
acknowledged as active agents in the generation of research, the personal biases and the
understanding of shadow coaching may have made the topic narrower than it could be.
The researchers are also aware that the diverse training in shadow work of the
participating coaches was not duly explored.
Future studies may attempt to make the sample more globally diverse, with both
Western and Eastern practitioners. An additional suggestion would be to focus on the
client’s perspective and gain potentially valuable insights into their lived experience of
being coached with the shadow in mind.
Coaching is a relatively young profession with a growing body of research that is
still building its credibility and research base. This qualitative study is the first to
explore and define the shadow coaching paradigm from a coaches’ perspective. Where
three distinct components emerged from the data set. Coaching psychologists’ can
experiment with these findings and themes in their practice. This research indicates that
there are significant benefits to be reaped from working with the shadow in a coaching
context. And that by being trained in this paradigm of coaching, coaches can honour the
boundaries between coaching and therapy in a more robust fashion.
Correspondence: Dmitry Gourov Email: email@example.com
Tim Lomas Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Biswas-Diener, R., & Dean, B. (2007). Positive psychology coaching: Putting the science of
happiness to work for your clients. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). Practicing Positive Psychology Coaching. Hoboken, NJ: John
Wiley & Sons.
Carless, D., & Douglas, K. (2011). Stories as Personal Coaching Philosophy. International
Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 6(1), 1–12.
Cox, E., Bachkirova, T. and Clutterbuck, D. (2014). The complete handbook of coaching.
2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA.: SAGE.
de Haan, E. (2008). I Struggle and Emerge: Critical Moments of Experienced Coaches.
Consulting Psychology Journal, 60(1), 106–131.
de Haan, E., Culpin, V., & Curd, J. (2011). Executive coaching in practice: What
determines helpfulness for clients of coaching? Personnel Review, 40(1), 24–44.
de Haan, E., Grant, A. M., Burger, Y., & Eriksson, P. O. (2016). A large-scale study of
executive and workplace coaching: The relative contributions of relationship,
personality match, and self-efficacy. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and
Research, 68(3), 189–207.
du Toit, D. H. (2016). An archetypal approach to coaching. In L. E. van Zyl, M. W. Stander,
& A. Odendaal (Eds.), Coaching psychology: Meta-theoretical perspectives and
applications in multicultural contexts (pp. 187-203). Cham, Switzerland: Springer
Grant, A. (2014). Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the
coach–coachee relationship: which best predicts coaching success? Coaching An
International Journal of Theory Research and Practice, 7(1), 18-38
Hefferon, K., Ashfield, A., Waters, L., & Synard, J. (2017). Understanding optimal human
functioning–The ‘call for qual’ in exploring human flourishing and well-being.
Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 211–219.
Ivtzan, I., Lomas, T., Hefferon, K., & Worth, P. (2015). Second Wave Positive Psychology
Embracing the Dark Side of Life. London: Routledge.
Johnson, R. A. (1993). Owning your own shadow: Understanding the dark side of the
psyche. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Jung, C.G. (1954). The philosophical tree. In the Collected Works 13. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. New York, NY: Dell Pub. Co.
Jackson, S., & Parsons, A. A. (2016). Developing Principles For Therapeutic Coaching : A
UK Perspective. Philosophy of Coaching: An International Journal, 1(1), 80–98.
Jordan, M., & Livingstone, J. B. (2013). Coaching vs Psychotherapy in health and
Wellness: Overlap, Dissimilarities, and the Potential for Collaboration. Global
Advances in Health and Medicine, 2(4), 20–27.
Kashdan, Todd and Biswas-Diener, Robert (2014). The Upside of Your Dark Side: Why
Being Your Whole Self – Not Just Your “Good” Self – Drives Success and
Fulfillment. New York, NY: Penguin Random House LLC.
Kauffman, C., Boniwell, I. & Silberman, J. (2010). The positive psychology approach to
coaching. In E. Cox, T. Bachkirova & D. Clutterbuck (Eds.), The complete handbook of
coaching (pp.158–171). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Lapp, C. A., & Carr, A. N. (2008). Coaching can be storyselling: creating change through
crises of confidence. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(5), 532–559.
Lomas, T., & Ivtzan, I. (2016). Second Wave Positive Psychology: Exploring the Positive–
Negative Dialectics of Wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1753–1768.
McMillan S. (2015). The stories we tell: A Narrative approach to coaching. Coaching
Today, 15, 6-10.
Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N., and Hoagwood, K.,
(2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed
Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and
Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533-544.
Passmore, J. (2007). An integrative model for executive coaching. Consulting Psychology
Journal: Practice and Research, 59(1), 68-78.
Rogers, C. (1992). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality
change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 827–832.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Coaching and positive psychology. Australian Psychologist,
Sime, C., & Jacob, Y. (2018). Crossing the line? A qualitative exploration of ICF master
certified: Coaches’ perception of roles, borders and boundaries. International
Coaching Psychology Review, 13(2), 44–70.
Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological Analysis
Theory, Method, Research. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
Smith, J.A. (2017). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Getting at lived experience,
The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 303-304.
van Nieuwerburgh, C. (2017). An Introduction to Coaching Skills: A Practical Guide. 2nd
Ed. London: Sage.
Vogel, M., (2012) Story Matters: An Inquiry into the Role of Narrative in Coaching.
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 10(1), 1-12.
Willig, C. (2013). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. Introducing Qualitative
Research in Psychology (3rd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Wong, P.T. (2011). Positive psychology 2.0: Towards a balanced interactive model of the
good life. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 52(2), 69–81.
Figure 1: Venn diagram which identifies the conceptual positioning of this research
Source: Author’s own understanding and research
Jungian Shadow work -
integrating supressed parts of
the personality, both good and
bad, to create greater richness,
unity of life (Jung, 1954;
Johnsons, 1993) and stimulate
true growth and awareness (du
Coaching Psychology -
goal attainment, as clients
seek to be more
fulfilled (Biswas-Diener &
Positive Psychology 2.0 -
how good and bad states
create flourishing (Lomas
& Ivtzan, 2016; Wong,
2011; Kashdan & Biswas-
1. THE COACH’S PERSONAL JOURNEY
1.1 DEFINING THE SHADOW
1.2 THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PERSONAL
1.2 SHARING STORIES
2. WHAT A SHADOW COACH DOES
2.3 THERAPEUTIC COACHING
3. THE CLIENT’S JOURNEY INTO THE
3.1 ACTION STEPS
A broad list of interview questions
1. If someone didn’t know what the shadow side is, how would you define it?
2. Can you tell me more, of how you came to this definition?
3. What does one need as a practitioner to do shadow work?
4. What models help you put shadow work into a framework?
5. What has been your experience doing “shadow work” with clients?
6. Is this coaching? Is this therapy? How would you call this work?
7. What happens after shadow work is done?