- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Nature Climate Change
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Letters
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0600-z
1Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 2International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
3School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. *e-mail: gaupp@iiasa.ac.at
The risk of extreme climatic conditions leading to unusually
low global agricultural production is exacerbated if more than
one global ‘breadbasket’ is exposed at the same time. Such
shocks can pose a risk to the global food system, amplifying
threats to food security, and could potentially trigger other
systemic risks1,2. While the possibility of climatic extremes
hitting more than one breadbasket has been postulated3,4,
little is known about the actual risk. Here we combine region-
specific data on agricultural production with spatial statistics
of climatic extremes to quantify the changing risk of low pro-
duction for the major food-producing regions (breadbaskets)
over time. We show an increasing risk of simultaneous failure
of wheat, maize and soybean crops across the breadbaskets
analysed. For rice, risks of simultaneous adverse climate con-
ditions have decreased in the recent past, mostly owing to
solar radiation changes favouring rice growth. Depending on
the correlation structure between the breadbaskets, spatial
dependence between climatic extremes globally can mitigate
or aggravate the risks for the global food production. Our
analysis can provide the basis for more efficient allocation of
resources to contingency plans and/or strategic crop reserves
that would enhance the resilience of the global food system.
Climate variability explains at least 30% of year-to-year fluctua-
tions in agricultural yield5. Under ‘normal’ climatic circumstances,
the global food system can compensate local crop losses through
grain storage and trade6. However, it is doubtful whether the global
food system is resilient to more extreme climatic conditions7, when
export restrictions8 and diminished grain stocks may undermine
liquidity in agricultural commodity markets, resulting in higher
price volatility. The food price crisis in 2007–2008 showed that
climatic shocks to agricultural production contribute to food price
spikes9 and famine10, with the potential to trigger other systemic
risks, including political unrest1 and migration2. Climatic telecon-
nections between global phenomena such as El Niño/Southern
Oscillation and regional climate extremes such as Indian heatwaves11
or flood risks around the globe12 could lead to simultaneous crop
failure in different regions13, therefore posing a risk to the global
food system6,8 and amplifying threats to global food security. While
the possibility of a climatic extreme hitting more than one breadbas-
ket has been a growing cause for concern3,4, few studies have inves-
tigated the probability of simultaneous production shocks14–16 or
estimated the joint likelihoods of adverse climate conditions17. Here
we present quantitative risk estimates of simultaneous breadbasket
failures due to climatic extremes by explicitly accounting for spatial
dependence structures between the regions and show how risk has
changed over time.
We analysed climatic and crop yield data (Methods) for the main
agricultural regions within the highest crop-producing countries
(the United States, Argentina, Europe, Russia/Ukraine, China, India,
Australia, Indonesia and Brazil) by mass in both 1961 and 2012,
according to Food and Agriculture Organization data. The global
breadbaskets for each crop and corresponding states and provinces
are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. For wheat, maize, soybean and
rice, the selected breadbaskets account for 74%, 74%, 81% and 74%
of the total production in the breadbasket countries and 56%, 56%,
73% and 38% of the total global production in 2012, respectively.
We developed region-dependent relationships between climatic
variables (temperature, precipitation and solar radiation indicators;
Supplementary Table 1) and logistically detrended crop yields using
data for the period 1967–2012, and we analysed the dependence
structure at regional and global scales using a vine copula approach
(Methods). We report results (1) for each breadbasket and the states/
provinces within that breadbasket and (2) aggregating across mul-
tiple breadbaskets at a global scale. We look at changes over time by
comparing the period 1967–1990 with 1991–2012. For the individ-
ual breadbaskets, increases of climate risk (defined as exceedance
of a region-specific climate threshold that corresponds to the lower
25th yield deviation percentile; Supplementary Fig. 3) and simul-
taneous crop failures of states/provinces within one breadbasket
were found for 18 out of 32 climate indicators across all regions and
crops. For example, for soybean in China, the critical climate indi-
cator is the number of days above 30 °C during the growing season
(Supplementary Table 1). While only 1.2% of extreme hot months
occurred simultaneously in all provinces of the Chinese soybean
breadbasket in any given year in the period 1967–1990 (defined
as the exceedance of the ‘days-above-30 °C’ temperature indica-
tor threshold), this increased to 18.4% for the period 1991–2012
(Fig. 1). This accords with other analyses18,19 that report a significant
increase in temperature extremes in China in recent decades.
On a global scale, there has been a substantial increase in the
probability of multiple global breadbasket failures for all crops
except rice (Fig. 2). The number of breadbaskets suffering from
an unfavourable climate for plant growth increased significantly
on average between the two periods for wheat, maize and soybean
and decreased for rice. Looking at the extremes, the annual prob-
ability of all breadbaskets experiencing climate risks simultaneously
increased from 0.3% to 1.2% for wheat, from 0.8% to 1.1% for maize
and from 1.7% to 2% for soybean. For rice, it decreased from 21.2%
to 11.8% between the two periods. Wheat has experienced the larg-
est increases in simultaneous climate risks (16.8% from an average
3.42 to 4 breadbaskets experiencing risks simultaneously). Risks
from temperature effects have increased in all temperature-sensi-
tive wheat breadbaskets, whereas precipitation risks have increased
only in India and Australia and decreased in China, Europe, Russia/
Ukraine and the United States (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5). For
the summer crops soybean and maize, simultaneous risks have on
Changing risks of simultaneous global
breadbasket failure
Franziska Gaupp 1,2*, Jim Hall1, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler2 and Simon Dadson3
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE | VOL 10 | JANUARY 2020 | 54–57 | www.nature.com/natureclimatechange
54
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved