Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND
Content may be subject to copyright.
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019,pp.27‐36DOI:10.2478/hjbpa‐2019‐0027
TrendsofCorporateMissionStatements:
Frompursuingprofittodistinctiveandsocialvalue
Seo,GANG‐HOON,
BusinessAdministration,KobeUniversity,Kobe,Japan
163b115b@stu.kobe‐u.ac.jp
Itoh,MUNEHIKO,
ResearchInstituteforEconomicsandBusinessAdministration,KobeUniversity,Kobe,Japan
itohm@rieb.kobe‐u.ac.jp
Abstract
A mission statement has a significant meaning as the initialand e ssential step in a company’s
strategic planning process. Previous studies have pointed out the necessity of monitoring and
longitudinalstudyofcorporatemissionstatementsastheyshouldbecontinuouslyrevisedagainst
changesincompanies’strategiesandbusinessenvironment.Thisstudyaimstoshedlightonwhat
types of strategies and values are currently highlighted in companies’ mission statements in
comparisonwiththe findings of a well‐knownpreviousstudy.Therefore, this study conducted a
contentanalysis of 491 Fortune 500companies’ mission statements. As a result, we found that
“philosophy” is mostly highlighted and “profitability” is not emphasized in contemporary
companies’missionstatements.Comparedtothepaststudy,thesefindingsimplythattherehave
beendramaticchangesinthecontentofcorporatemissionstatements.Besides,thisstudydivided
491Fortune500companiesinto two groups, high performers and low performers,according to
theirFortune ranking and investigatedsignificantdifferences between high and lowperformers
usingt‐tests. Thehighperformerswere foundtomoreoften highlight“self‐concept”and “public
image” than low performers. However, the difference in mean scores between high and low
performers has become smaller than in the past finding. In particular, there is no statistical
difference in mission statement component numbers between high and low performers. These
findingscanprovidefutherunderstandingaboutchangesofcompanies’strategicemphasisandthe
natureofcorporatemissionstatements.Thisstudyprovidesacomparativeinsightforpractitioners
makingcompanymissionstatements.
Keywords:StrategicManagement;MissionStatement;Fortune500companies;ContentAnalysis
JELClassification:M0;M1;M160
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
28
1. Introduction
Themainpurposeofthisstudyistoshedlightonwhatkindofstrategiesand
valuesare highlighted incontemporary companies’mission statements. Hence,
thisstudyfocusesoncontentanalysesof491Fortune500companies’mission
statements.
This study’s main findings demonstrate that current companies do not
strategicallypursueprofit merely,butpursue distinctiveand socialvalueat the
sametime.Theseresultsimplythattherearesignificantchangesincompanies’
strategicemphasiscomparedtothe past.Therefore,thisstudy hasimplications
forstrategicplanningandtheunderstandingofthenatureofcorporatemission
statements.
Thispaperconsistsof5sections.Thenextsectionwillfocusondiscussions
aboutstudiesofmissionstatementsinstrategicmanagementbeforeclarifyingthe
research questions. In section 3, to fill research gaps, content analyses of 491
Fortune500companies’missionstatementsandt‐testsareintroduced.Inchapter
4, the results of the content analyses and further statistical analyses are
presented. In section 5, based on the results and discussions, theoretical and
practicalimplicationsaredescribed.
2. ResearchBackground
Amissionstatementisdefinedasageneralexpressionofacompany’s
purpose(Kemp&Dwyer,2003)andanidealcompany’sfuture,whichdefinesthe
strategicdirection(Law&Brenznik,2018).Furthermore,amissionstatementhas
been defined as “vision”, “values, beliefs”, “principles”, “strategic intent”,
“philosophy”,andsoon(Lin&Ryan,2016).
There has been an extensive discussion about the mission statement’s
implicationsforthestrategicplanningaspect.Ackoff(1987)notedthatacompany
withoutasharedmission islikeatraveller withoutadestination.Pearce (1987)
arguedthatthemissionstatementisacompany’svaluablestrategictool.Pearce
&David(1987)arguedthattheprogressofdevelopingamissionstatementisan
importantfirststepinstrategicplanning.Besides,Kemp&Dwyer(2003)suggested
that developing an organizational mission is an essential part of strategic
management. Moreover, a mission statementisnecessaryforformulating,
implementing,andevaluatingacompany’sstrategy(Law&Brenznik,2018;Kemp
&Dwyer,2003).
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
29
There are reasons why a mission statement is related to a company’s
strategic planning. Firstly, a well‐established and clear mission statement is
essentialforformulatingacompany’sshort‐termandlong‐termgoals,priorities,
andfuturedirections(Linetal.,2018;Ingenhoff&Fuhrer,2010;Kingetal.,2010;
Kemp&Dwyer,2003;Pearce&David,1987,Pearce,1987).Second,themission
statement plays a significant role in positioning the organization and
differentiatingitfromothers(Law&Brenznik,2018;Linetal.,2018;Lin&Ryan,
2016;Ingenhoff& Fuhrer,2010;Kemp &Dwyer,2003).Mostofthe companies
have unique mission statements (Kemp & Dwyer, 2003), which express their
corporatepersonalities(Linetal.,2018).
Infact,manyscholarshavereportedthattheexistenceofaclearandwell‐
organized mission statement is associated with higher levels of organizational,
financial(Hirotaetal.,2010;Alavi& Karami,2009;Atrillaetal.,2005)andnon‐
financialperformance(Dermol&Širca,2018;Linetal.,2016;Dermol,2012;Hirota
etal.,2010),so thatacomprehensivemission statementindicatesacompany’s
high‐qualitystrategic planning endeavorand capability (Pearce &David, 1987).
AccordingtoPearce&David(1987),thehighperformersmoreoftenhighlighted
“customer”, “product”, and “location” than low performers. However, Bart &
Baetz(1998)notedthatthereisnoclearstatisticalevidenceabouttheassociation
betweentheexistenceofamissionstatementandacompany’sfinancial
performance.Ontheotherhand,Dermol&Širca(2018)arguedthattherewasa
significantassociationbetweentheexistenceofacompanymissionstatementand
non‐financialperformance suchas organizationalvalues. Accordingto Linet al.
(2016),thecustomer’sbrandtrustandbrandequityarepositivelyaffectedbya
goodmissionstatement.Also,Dermol(2012)notedthattheexistenceofamission
statementispositivelyconnectedwithValueAddedperEmployee(VAE).
Inpastdecades,alargebodyofliteratureemergedinthefieldofcorporate
missionstatements.However,verylittleattentionhasbeengiventothecurrent
mainthemesofthecorporatemissionstatement.AlthoughKingetal.(2010)and
Linetal.(2018)triedtoshowthetrendofcorporatemissionstatements,Kinget
al. (2010)’s data set (50 Fortune 500 firms) and Lin et al. (2018)’s industrial
background(onlytheairlineindustry)werelimited.Ithasbeenpointedoutthat
themonitoringandlongitudinalstudyofmissionstatementsisnecessary(Linet
al., 2018; Kemp & Dwyer, 2003), as corporate mission statements should be
revisedgraduallyagainstchangesofenvironment,strategy,andbusinesspractices
(Linetal.,2018;Kingetal.,2010;Kemp&Dwyer,2003).Thisresearchgapcanbe
bridgedbyinvestigating contemporarytrends andthemes ofcorporatemission
statements.
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
30
Basedonpreviousdiscussions,thisstudysettworesearchquestions:
RQ1:Whatkindofthemesarehighlightedinmissionstatementscompared
toPearce&David(1987).
RQ2:Aretheredifferencesbetweenhigh‐performersandlow‐performers’
mission statement component numbers compared to Pearce & David
(1987).
3. Researchmethodology
This study adopted content analysis as the research method.
“(Quantitative)contentanalysis isthe systematicandreplicableexaminationof
symbolsofcommunication,whichhavebeenassignednumericvaluesaccording
to valid measurement rules, and the analysis of relationships involving those
valuesusingstatisticalmethods,todescribethecommunication,drawinferences
about its meaning, or infer from the communication to its context, both of
productionandconsumption”(Riffeetal.,2014,pp.19).
Accordingto Riffeet al.(2014), thismethod’sadvantage isthat content
analysisis a nonreactive measurement technique.That is, by adopting content
analysis,researcherscanavoidthebiasarisingfromtheprocessofidentifyingMS
componentsasthetextualcontentorcommunicationdataisseparateandapart
from communicators and receivers. Moreover, it makes possible longitudinal
studies,because“contentoftenhasalifebeyonditsproductionandconsumption”
(Riffeet al., 2014,pp.30). This studyaims to contributeto longitudinal mission
statement studies by shedding light on the changing themes of the corporate
missionstatement.Therefore,weadoptcontentanalysisastheresearchmethod.
Tocompare with Pearce& David (1987),the seminal work incorporate
missionstatementresearch,weusedthesameFortune500companies’dataand
researchmodel.Weattemptedtocollectall500Fortune500companies'mission
statementsfromtheirofficialwebsitesmanuallyfromJuly1sttoJuly30th,2019,
andsucceeded in collecting 491 statements. Apple (Fortune ranking 3) did not
disclose an official mission statement, while the following companies’ mission
statementscouldnotbeaccessedfromoutsidetheUS;EnergyTransfer(Fortune
ranking 60), HCA Healthcare (Fortune ranking 68), US Foods Holding (Fortune
ranking 126), Advance Auto Parts (Fortune ranking 327), Constellation Brands
(Fortuneranking404),NVR(Fortuneranking425),AscenaRetailGroup(Fortune
ranking458),andAmeren(Fortuneranking469).Afterthat,wedividedthedata
intotwogroups(high‐performersandlow‐performers)accordingtotheirFortune
ranking,whichisdecidedbyrevenue,profits,assets,andemployees.Inthisstudy,
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
31
the high‐performers consist of companies with Fortune ranking 1 to 250 (246
companies),whilelow‐performersconsistofthoseranking251to 500 (245
companies).
Ithasbeenpointed outthatsubjectiveness isadisadvantageof content
analysis.Toavoidthisdisadvantage,Riffeetal.(2014)suggestedshowingaclear
codingruleandinter‐raterreliability.Table1showsthecodingrule.
Table1.Codingrule
Components Definition
Customer
“Thespecificationoftargetcustomerandmarkets”
(Pearce&David,1987,p.109)
Products/Services
“Theidentificationofprincipalproducts/services”
(Pearce&David,1987,p.109)
Location/Market
“Thespecificationofgeographicdomain”
(Pearce&David,1987,p.109)
Technology
“Theidentificationofcoretechnologies”
(Pearce&David,1987,p.109)
Concernforprofitability
“Theexpressionofcommitmenttosurvival,growth,and
profitability”(Pearce&David,1987,p.109)
Philosophy
“Thespecificationofkeyelementsinthecompanyphilosophy”
(Pearce&David,1987,p.109)
Sel
f
‐concept
“Theidentificationofthecompanyself‐concept”
(Pearce&David,1987,p.109)
Concernforpublicimage
“Theidentificationofthefirm’sdesiredpublicimage”
(Pearce&David,1987,p.109)
Source:Pearce&David,1987
Thecodingruleincludesthecomponentsandtheirdefinitionsinamission
statement.When applyingthe codingrule, thenumber ‘1’was assigned tothe
componentifcorrespondingcontentswerepresentinthemissionstatement,and
‘0’wasassignedtothevariableifcorrespondingcontentswereabsent.Theresults
werethensubjectedtot‐testsusingSPSS.
To assess inter‐rater reliability, two coders were involved in this study.
Each coder independently analyzed andclassifiedthemissionstatements. To
assesstheinter‐raterreliability,Cohen'sKappawascalculatedbySPSStobe0.465,
whichindicatesmoderateinter‐rateragreement(Landis&Koch,1977).
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
32
4. Results
Table 2 shows the frequency of components of 491 Fortune 500
companies'missionstatements.ThefrequencywascalculatedbySPSS.
Table2.Frequencyofcomponentscomparedtopastfindings
Component
Pearce&David(1987) PresentResearch
Number Percentage Ranking Number Percentage Ranking
Customer 29 48% 6 412 84% 3
Product 41 67% 5 421 86% 2
Location 25 41% 7 293 60% 6
Technology 12 20% 8 281 57% 7
Profitability 55 90% 1 198 40% 8
Philosophy 48 79% 3 427 87% 1
Sel
f
‐concept 47 77% 4 351 72% 4
Publicimage 53 87% 2 327 67% 5
Source:Pearce&David,1987andAuthors,2019
Thisfinding indicates that, compared to Pearce& David (1987), current
Fortune500companiesmostlyhighlight“philosophy”.Ontheotherhand,current
companiesdonotexplicitlyemphasize“profitability”intheirmissionstatements.
It is a dramatic change from Pearce & David (1987), in that companies now
highlight“philosophy”insteadof“profitability”.
Table3showsthestatisticaldifferencebetweenhighandlowperformers’
missionstatementcomponentscomparedwithPearce&David(1987)asshown
byt‐tests.
Table3.Statisticaldifferencesbetweenhighandlowperformers’MScomponentcontent
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
33
Note:A“Yes”meansat‐valuestatisticallysignificantatlessthan0.05.
Source:Pearce&David,1987andAuthors,2019
In the past finding, the three components were statistically different
betweenhighandlowperformers.Also,overall,thehighperformers’meanscores
werebiggerthanthelowperformers.Inthepresentresearch,thesetendencies
arechanged.Onlytwocomponentsaresignificantlydifferentbetweenhighand
lowperformers,thatis,highperformersmoreoftenhighlight“self‐concept”and
“publicimage”thanlowperformers.Moreover,thedifferenceinmeanscores
betweenhighandlowperformersishasbecome.
In addition to these findings, Table 4 indicates the statistical difference
betweenhighandlowperformers’missionstatementcomponentnumbersinthe
presentresearch.
Table4.Statisticaldifferencebetweenhighandlowperformers’MScomponentnumbers
Mean Std.Deviation t p
High
Performers
n=246
Low
Performers
n=245
High
Performers
Low
Performers
Component
Number
6.49 6.29 2.006 1.891 1.125 0.261
Note:*p<0.05
Source:Authors,2019
AsTable4shows,there isnosignificantdifference inmissionstatement
componentnumbersbetweenhighandlowperformers.
5. Discussion,andConclusions
Asdescribed above, currentcompanies mostly highlight“philosophy” in
theirmissionstatements.Moreover,thehighperformersmoreoften highlight
“self‐concept” than low performers. “Self‐concept” indicates a company’s
competitiveadvantageandsellingpoint.Also,accordingtoKemp&Dwyer(2003),
“philosophy”is relatedto the company’sunique identityand culture. Itcan be
inferred that “self‐concept” and “philosophy” make a company’s unique
personality, culture and appeal. A company’s strong culture is relevant to
sustainedcompetitiveadvantage(Barney,1986).Furthermore,asmanyscholars
havepointedout,themissionstatementplaysasignificantroleinpositioningthe
organizationanddifferentiatingitfromothers(Law&Brenznik,2018; Linetal.,
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
34
2018; Lin & Ryan, 2016; Ingenhoff & Fuhrer, 2010; Kemp & Dwyer, 2003).
Therefore,itispresumedthatduetointensifyingcompetitionacrossindustries,
companies recognize well that differentiating themselves from competitors is
important. Therefore, “philosophy” and “self‐concept” are highlighted in
contemporary corporate mission statements, while “profitability” is not
emphasized. Furthermore, the high performers more often highlight “public
image” than low performers. This finding is consistent with King et al. (2010),
which noted that contemporary companies emphasize ethical value in mission
statements. Pursuing “profitability” is still a significant strategic direction for
companies,butitispresumedthatthechangeisduetoestablishingtheconcept
of Creating Shared Value (CSV). CSV indicates the link between competitive
advantageandcorporatesocialresponsibility.TheconceptofCSVhighlightsvalue‐
creatingthroughacommitmenttosociety (Porter&Kramer,2011).Thereisno
doubtthatcurrentcompaniesareembracingmoreresponsibilitiestosocietyand
communities than ever before. Contemporary companies do not pursue profit
merely,butpursuesocialvalueatthesametime.
Besides,thedifferenceinmean scorebetweenhighandlow performers
hasbecome smaller andthere is no significant differencein mission statement
component numbers between high and low performers. These findings do not
deny the previous finding of a positive association between a good mission
statementandthe company’sperformance, butindicate that,compared tothe
past,current companies well understand the meaning of effortto manage the
mission statement, so the gap is diminished. Most of the 491 Fortune 500
companieshaveeitherexplicitorimplicitmissionstatements.Also,morethanhalf
of the 491 Fortune 500 companies in this study have comprehensive mission
statements.Thatis,330companies’(67.20%)missionstatementsconsistoffrom
sixtoeightcomponents,147companies’(29.93%)missionstatementsconsistof
from three to five components, and only 14 companies’ (2.85%) mission
statementsconsistoffromzerototwocomponents.
This study’s theoretical implication is that it shedslight on the trend of
current companies’ strategic priorities and direction through analysing 491
Fortune 500 companies’ mission statements. Current companies highlight a
differentiatingstrategy.Moreover,theydonotpursueprofitmerely,butpursue
socialvalueatthesametime.Also,thisstudycanprovidefurtherunderstanding
of the nature of the corporate mission statement by presenting the change of
missionstatement contents. Asa practical implicationfor managerswhomake
companies’mission statements, thesefindings are beneficialfor a comparative
purpose.Thus,whenmanagersdecidethestrategicdirectionand futuregoalof
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
35
theircompaniesbyreferencingcurrentcasesofexcellentcompanies,theywillfind
theseresultsinformative.
Acknowledgement
Wearethankfulfor theacademicresearch grants we received fromtheOtukaToshimi
scholarshipfoundation.
References
[1] Ackoff,R.,(1987).Missionstatements,PlanningReview,15(4),pp.30‐31.
[2] Alavi, M. T., & Karami, A., (2009). Managers of small and medium enterprises: mission
statementandenhancedorganisationalperformance,JournalofManagementDevelopment,
28(6),pp.555‐562.
[3] Atrilla, P., Omranb, M., Pointonc, J., (2005). Company mission statements and financial
performance,CorporateOwnership&Control,2(3),pp.28‐35.
[4] Barney,J. B.,(1986). Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive
Advantage?,AcademyofManagementReview,11(3),pp.656‐665.
[5] Bart,C.K.,&Baetz,M.C.,(1998).Therelationshipbetweenmissionstatements and firm
performance:anexploratorystudy,JournalofManagementStudies,35(6),pp.823‐853.
[6] Dermol, V., (2012). Relationship between mission statement and company performance,
scientificannalsofeconomicsandbusiness,59(1),pp.321‐336.
[7] Dermol,V.,&Širca,N.T.,(2018).Communication,companymission,organizationalvalues,
andcompanyperformance,Procedia‐SocialandBehavioralSciences,238,pp.542‐551.
[8] Hirota,S.,Hong,P.,Park,Y.W.,(2010).Corporatemission,corporatepoliciesandbusiness
outcomes:evidencefromJapan,ManagementDecision,48(7),pp.1134‐1153.
[9] Ingenhoff,D.,&Fuhrer,T.,(2010).Positioninganddifferentiationbyusingbrandpersonality
attributes,CorporateCommunications:AnInternationalJournal,15(1),pp.83‐101.
[10] Kemp, S., & Dwyer, L., (2003). Mission statements of international airlines: a content
analysis,TourismManagement,24,pp.635‐653.
[11] King,D.L,CaseC.J.,Premo,K.M.,(2010).Currentmissionstatementemphasis:Beethical
andgoglobal,AcademyofStrategicManagementJournal,9(2),pp.73‐90.
[12] Landis,J.R.,&Koch,G.G.,(1977).Themeasurementofobserveragreementforcategorical
data,Biometrics,33(1),pp.159‐74.
[13] Law,K.M.Y.,&Brenznik,K.,(2018).Whatdoairlinemissionstatementsrevealaboutvalue
andstrategy?,JournalofAirTransportManagement,70,pp.36‐44.
[14] Lin, Y. H., Ryan, C., Wise, N., Low, L. W., (2018). A content analysis of airline mission
statements: Changing trends and contemporary components, Tourism Management
Perspective,28,pp.156‐165.
[15] Lin, Y., & Ryan, C., (2016). From mission statement to airlinebranding,Journal of Air
TransportManagement,53,pp.150‐160.
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC
HOLISTICAVol10,Issue3,2019
36
[16] Pearce,J.A.,(1987).TheCompanyMissionasaStrategicTool,SloanManagementReview,
23(3),pp.15.
[17] Pearce,J.A.,&David,F.,(1987).CorporateMissionStatements:TheBottomLine,Academy
ofManagementExecutive,1(2),pp.109‐115.
[18] Porter,M.,&Kramer,M.R.,(2011).Creatingsharedvalue,HarvardBusinessReview,89(1),
pp.4‐17.
[19] Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico,F., (2014). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content
analysisinresearch(Thirdedition),NewYork:Routledge.
Unauthentifiziert | Heruntergeladen 07.12.19 13:40 UTC