ArticlePDF Available

Case Review of Risperidone Overdose: Alerts Parental Education

Authors:
  • Hinduhriday Samrat Balasaheb Thackarey Medical College and Dr R N Cooper Hospital, Mumbai.
VOLUME 14 ISSUE 02 JULY-DEC 2018
Editor-in-Chief: Dr. K K Shaha
Joint Editor: Dr. A P Patra
Highlights
Revised Manuscript Submission Guidelines 55
JIST Copy Right From 55
The JIST Reviewer Recognion Program 56
Toxiquiz 2019 59
Corrigendum 60
Indexed/Abstracted with
MEDLINE, Index Medicus [through World Health Organisaon for SEAR Countries]
CAB Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts (Impact Indicator: 0.022)
Recognized by
U.S. Naonal Library of Medicine (NLM, Locator Plus) ID: 101321567
University Grant Commission (UGC), India Sl. No. 11071 9015-9C799666D827
Visit us at: www.jist.org.in
Indexed/Abstracted with
MEDLINE, Index Medicus [through World Health Organisaon for SEAR Countries]
CAB Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts (Impact Indicator: 0.022)
Recognized by
U.S. Naonal Library of Medicine (NLM, Locator Plus) ID: 101321567
University Grant Commission (UGC), India Sl. No. 11071 9015-9C799666D827
Visit us at: www.jist.org.in
JIST IS A BONAFIDE MEMBER OF
CROSSREF WITH DOI PREFIX:10.31736/
ISSN: 0973-3558
E-ISSN: 0973-3566
Journal of the Indian Society of Toxicology

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

EDITOR

JIST Headquarters




The Indian Society of Toxicology


Headquarters:

ISSN: 0973-3558 e-ISSN:0973-3566
“Just as a doctor gives dierent doses of the same medicine to dierent paents according to their
constuon, so does a Spiritual Master prescribe dierent methods to dierent people to aain salvaon.
Spirituality is the praccal science of life. Apart from taking us to the ulmate goal of Self-realizaon
it also teaches us the nature of the world, and how to understand and live life fully in the best way
possible.
- Satguru Mata Amritanandamayi Devi
Payment for publicaons in JIST





Arcle submission:
Payment for Subscribers of JIST
              

For subscripons:    
       

               
             


Indexed/Abstracted with:







The Journal of the Indian Society of Toxicology

   
   




II
ADVISORS
EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS & REFEREES
INTERNATIONAL
 (UK)
 (USA)
 (USA)
 (USA)
 (USA)
(USA)
(New Zealand)
(New Zealand)
(Singapore)
(Singapore)
(Saudi Arabia)
 (UAE)
Southern Zone
(Kerala)
 (Karnataka)
 (Karnataka)

(Telangana)
(Telangana)
(Andhra Pradesh)
Eastern Zone
(Kolkata)
(Odisha)
(Odisha)
(Kolkata)
(Odisha)
Northeast Zone
Dr. Sanjay Kumar Das (Dehradun)
(Rishikesh)
(Gangtok)
Western Zone
(Goa)
 (Goa)
 (Gujarat)
(Gujarat)
 (Maharashtra)
 (Maharashtra)
NATIONAL
Northern Zone
(New Delhi)
(New Delhi)
(New Delhi)
 (Raipur)
(Jodhpur)
(Raipur)
III
 J

     

      





       


      

     



      

        





      

       

       

      

      

      

     

     

The Indian Society of Toxicology


EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
President : 
Vice Presidents :   
  
  
  
  
General Secretary : 
Treasurer : 
Jt. Secretaries :   
  
  
  
  

Members:   
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
IST Headquarters : 
 

 
 
JIST Editorial
 
 
 
 
 
ISSN: 0973-3558
e-ISSN:0973-3566
IV
The Indian Society of Toxicology

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
n
n
n
n
n 
 
n
n
n
 
ELIGIBILITY AND MEMBERSHIP

n            
 
n
n
n
n
n
 



          



V
The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology
SUBSCRIPTION FORM





              

   
(ck relevant box

               


ISSN: 0973-3558
e-ISSN: 0973-3566








         


Dr. V. V. Pillay




ISSN: 0973-3558
e-ISSN:0973-3566
VI
The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 3 years 5 years
   


  


  


  
INSTITUTIONAL
 3 years 5 years
   


  


  


  
INDIVIDUAL
Publicaon Charges :





Adversement Tari :





Disclaimer:
VII
The Indian Society of Toxicology
APPLICATION FOR MEMBERSHIP

Dr. V V Pillay





                
 
           
           
                  
           

Parculars :












*Rs. 250/2500 for Annaul/Life membership, respectively for postgraduate students (enclose endorsement certicate from head of department).




ISSN: 0973-3558
e-ISSN:0973-3566
VIII
CONTENTS
EDITORIAL
Be aware of predators!!
ARTICLES
 
- Eni-yimini Solomon Agoro, Mieebi Marn Wankas  
 
 
- Muzzafer Mohammad Mir, Mir Bilal, Zahoor Ahmad Parry, Ursilla Taranum, Mir Inkhab  
 
 
- Somashekhar S. Pujar, Kashif Ali, Ravindra S. Honnungar, Prasanna S. Jirli,
Khaja Azizuddin Junaidi, Pushpa M.G.  
 
 
- Varsha Dhurvey, Bhawna Gotmare, Firdos Karim  
 
- Shubneet Kaur, Praveen Kumar Yadav  
 
- Vivekanshu Verma, Prateek Rastogi, Devendra Richhariya, Ajay Thapa, Punidha Kaliaperumal,
Chidrupi Sharma,  
 
- Anita Yadav, Rajkumar Dahiya, Jagdish Ram Bhargav, Adarsh Kumar,
Madhulika Sharma, RK Sarin  
 
- Rajashree Khot, Ameya Bhis, Rakhee Josh, Nilima Pal Ambade  
 
- Anupama Mauskar, Nusrat Inamdar, Carpurgaur Shirsat  
IX
EDITORIAL
Be aware of predators!!
 











             


 

              



       
        
                



   

   







      


        
X
Editor
The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology
   




      

      





Consequences
              
 
       


XI
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.12-16
Eni-yimini Solomon Agoro
1Department of Biochemistry Federal University, Otuoke Bayelsa State, Nigeria,
2The Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.


Biochemical Parameters in Rabbits

Declared none
ABSTRACT
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a toxic gas that escapes easy detecon
due to its euphoric nature. It ulizes hypoxia in causing
mortality or morbidity. The study was aimed at evaluang the
eect of chronic CO concentraon (>200 ppm) in some liver
biochemical parameters ulizing rabbit as a choice animal
model. A total twenty (20) apparently health albino rabbits
constuted the sample size as validated by mead’s equaon.
The animals were divided into four groups of ve rabbits
each. The rst group constuted the controls, the remaining
groups constuted rabbits exposed thirty minutes daily to
CO for 10th, 20th and 30th respecvely. Blood samples were
extracted from the hearts of the animals for the analysis of
liver enzymes, proteins and bilirubin. One way anova (pos hoc-
LSD) was used for the stascal analysis with level of signicant
considered at > 0.05. The study showed that serum aspartate
aminotransferases (AST), alanine aminotransferases (ALT),
alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total and conjugated bilirubin and
albumin/glibulin rao increased signicantly (p>0.05) across
the duraons of exposure. On the contrary, serum total protein
and globulin decreased signicantly (p>0.05). The ndings
revealed that chronic inhalaon of CO could have a long term
negave consequence on the liver.

AST,
ALT,
ALP,
Bilirubin,
proteins, CO.
Received on 5th October 2018
Accepted on 28th December 2018
Published on 31st December 2018
©2018 The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology.
Published at JIPMER, Pondicherry, 605006, INDIA Subscripon & payment related
queries at: toxicology@aims.amrita.edu and rest all types of queries related to the
journal to be done at drambika_editor@jist.org.in
ARTICLE INFO
 Enis Biomedicals (eBm) LTD, Igbogne
Epie, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria; E-mail: siragoro@yahoo.
com: Tel.: 08037434995.
How to Cite this arcle:Agoro ES, Wankasi MM. The Eects
of Chronic Carbon Monoxide Intoxicaon on some liver
Biochemical Parameters in Rabbits. Journal of Indian Society of
Toxicology 2018;14(2):12-16.  

INTRODUCTION
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a poisonous non-irritant gas
produced as a result of incomplete combuson of organic
materials due to insucient supply of oxygen. It displaces
oxygen from binding to haemoglobin in the circulatory
system, hence resulng to asphyxic and subsequent
hypoxia that usually result to the collapse of the respiratory
system. Carbon monoxide not only decreases the oxygen
content of blood, but also decreases oxygen availability
to ssues, thereby producing a greater degree of ssue
hypoxia than equivalent reducon in oxyhaemoglobin
caused by hypoxia.1 Carbon monoxide also binds to other
heme proteins, such as myoglobin and mitochondrial
cytochrome oxidase a3, which limits oxygen use when
ssue paral oxygen pressure (PO2) is very low. Organs
with high oxygen demand, such as the heart and brain,
are most sensive to hypoxia and account for the major
clinical sequelae of carbon monoxide poisoning.2 Others
less impacted are lungs, liver and spleen.2 If concentraon
of CO concentraon exceeds 100 ppm, it can be
dangerous for humans. Symptoms of CO poisoning may
include headache, sweang, dizziness, dim vision, tremor
and loss of consciousness.3 Rabbit was the choice animal
model for the research work. The suitability of rabbit as a
choice animal for this study is aributed to its anatomical
The Eects of Chronic Carbon Monoxide Intoxicaon on some liver Biochemical Parameters in Rabbits
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
and physiological similaries to human.4,5 The liver carries
out several important funcons that involve excretory,
synthec or detoxifying mechanisms. Liver funcon tests
are groups of blood tests that give informaon about
the state of the liver.6 A liver funcon test used for this
study includes total protein, albumin, globulin, aspartate
and alanine aminotransferases, bilirubin and alkaline
phosphatase. These biochemical parameters give a
clearer picture of the hepatocellular and biliary axis of the
liver status. Distorons in these biochemical parameter’s
concentraons and acvies point to a compromised
liver. Nigerians are exposed to varying degrees of CO
due to the high demand for CO-producing machines and
equipment. A deliberate study of the eect of chronic
exposure to CO on liver biochemistry could possibly
open up unknown pathophysiology of some idiopathic
diseases. The products of the ndings could be useful in
policy shaping in combang chronic diseases, prevenng
avoidable epidemics and enhancing Medicare. The
eects of CO on a lot of organs, ssues and cells have
been studied by handful of researchers with ndings
implicang CO.7,8,9,10,11,12 Carbon monoxide mechanism
of acon is primarily through starvaon of organs of
oxygen. Most organs survival is basically depended on
the regular supply of oxygen; hence any denial could be
deleterious. Liver is the center of metabolic processes
and usually need regular supply of oxygen. This study is
aimed basically to reveal the possible eect of chronic CO
intoxicaon on the biochemical parameters that is used
to evaluate the integrity and status of the liver.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Area
The CO intoxicaon aspect of the study was carried out
at the fringe of Epie Creek secon of Igbogene Epie in
Bayelsa State Nigeria. Similarly, the Chemical Pathology
Laboratory of the Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital
Okolobiri, Bayelsa State served the biochemical analysis.
Study Populaon
The strength of the sample size of the study was derived
from Mead’s resource equaon.13 A total of twenty (20)
albino rabbits constuted the sample size. The study
involved a chronic exposure of study animals to daily
thirty minutes of mild concentraon of carbon monoxide
for a minimum of ten days and maximum of 30 days. The
rabbits were divided into four groups. The rst group
constuted the controls which were not exposed to
CO prior to mechanical sacrice. The remaining three
groups (10th, 20th and 30th) were exposed to CO for 30
minutes daily for ten days, twenty days and thirty days
respecvely. The daily exposure of CO concentraon was
pegged not more than 200 ppm as dened by Golden,14
and Strumann et al.15 for chronic CO intoxicaon study.
The carbon monoxide gas was obtained from a portal
Sumac generang set.
Ethical Approval
The ethical clearance and experimental protocol were
approved by the Ethics Commiee of the Bayelsa State
Ministry of Health. The Animal Welfare Act of 1985 of the
United States of America for research and Instuonal
Animal Care and Use Commiee (IACUC) protocols were
stringently adhered to.16
Selecon Criteria
Rabbits used were apparently healthy and acve as
conrmed and approved by a veterinary doctor. Rabbits
showing signs or symptoms of illness were excluded from
the research. Lysed blood samples were also rejected.
The research ulized only male albino rabbits of same
age and weight. The age range was between six to eight
months. The weight brackets were 1.5-2kg.
Collecon of Blood Samples
Blood samples were collected from the heart using the
method postulated by Ness.17 Blood was withdrawn
slowly into the appropriate containers to prevent the
heart from collapsing. The blood samples collected were
dispensed into plain containers, allowed to clot and then
separated for the biochemical analysis.
Laboratory Analysis
Serum total protein and albumin concentraons were
esmated quantavely using Biuret and Bromocresol
(BCG) methods respecvely as modied by Randox
Laboratories (United Kingdom). Serum globulin
concentraon and albumin/globulin (a/g) rao were
derived mathemacally.18
Total Protein = Albumin + Globulin
Hence, Globulin = Total Protein – Albumin.
A/G rao= Albumin/Globulin
Agoro ES, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.12-16
Aspartate aminotransaminase (AST), alanine
aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
acvies were assayed using ELITech Clinical Systems
with the aid Selectra proM.. Malloy-Evelyn modied end
point method was used for the esmaon of total and
conjugated bilirubin.18 The unconjugated bilirubin was
esmated mathemacally by subtracng conjugated
bilirubin from total bilirubin.
Stascal Analyses
Data were analyzed with Stascal Package for Social
Sciences (SPSS) program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA;
Version 18-21). One-way ANOVA (Post Hoc- LSD) was
used in comparing the means of the liver biochemical
parameters of the various chronic CO intoxicaon groups
of the study.
DISCUSSION
The pulsale inhalaon of CO by Nigerians is roune due
to the massive use of equipment that releases CO and
the huge gap in power supply. Chronic carbon monoxide
poisoning is the inhalaon of low quanty of CO over a
long duraon. This study revealed a signicant decrease
(p < 0.05) in concentraons of serum total protein and
Legend: TP- Total Protein; ALB-Albumin; GLO- Globulin; A/G- Albumin/Globulin.
Symbols- a: P < 0.05 vs control, b: P < 0.05 vs Day 10, c: P < 0.05 vs Day 20
Data are expressed as mean ± SD; Signicant at 0.05 Condence (p < 0.05)
Concentraon of acute CO intoxicaon= ≤ 200 pm

Parameters Control 
  Day 30 f-value 
 47.75 ± 6.24 36.75 ± 4.03 a 33.50 ± 3.11 a 33.50 ± 3.70 a 8.021 0.003
 30.25 ± 2.36 28.25 ± 4.92 26.75 ± 3.86 29.25 ± 2.99 0.665 0.590
 16.50 ± 6.56 8.50 ± 1.73 a 8.25 ± 4.99 a 4.25 ± 0.96 a 5.870 0.010
 2.20 ± 1.23 3.50 ± 1.16 5.00. ± 4.14 7.10 ± 1.49a 3.194 0.063
Legend: AST- Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT-Alanine Aminotransferase; ALP-Alkaline Phosphatase;
TB-Total Bilirubin; CB- Conjugated Bilirubin; UB- Unconjugated Bilirubin.
Symbols- a: P < 0.05 vs control, b: P < 0.05 vs Day 10, c: P < 0.05 vs Day 20
Data are expressed as mean ± SD; Signicant at 0.05 Condence (p < 0.05). Concentraon of acute
CO intoxicaon= ≤ 200 pm

 
Parameters Control 
      
 14.75 ± 2.06 19.00 ± 4.69 38.50 ± 6.35 ab 44.00 ± 4.32 ab 38.68 0.00
 13.75 ± 4.79 42.75 ± 3.10 a 85.50 ± 4.80 ab 115.75 ± 13.07 abc 144.07 0.00
AST/ALT 0.88 ± 0.25 0.45 ± 0.09 a 0.46 ± 0.09 a 0.38± 0.03 a10.83 0.00
 18.75 ± 6.99 38.50 ± 5.80 a 96.50 ± 11.82 ab 169.25 ± 19.96 abc 117.84 0.00
 2.13 ± 0.22 2.38 ± 0.44 3.80 ± 0.48 ab 4.20 ± 0.88 ab 135.23 0.00
 0.93 ± 0.15 0.98 ± 0.15 2.30 ± 0.42 ab 2.50 ± 0.50 ab 24.01 0.00
 1.20 ± 0.14 1.40 ± 0.47 1.50 ± 0.79 1.70 ± 0.55 0.598 0.00
RESULTS
The Eects of Chronic Carbon Monoxide Intoxicaon on some liver Biochemical Parameters in Rabbits
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
globulin concentraons across the chronic CO intoxicaon
groups (Table 1). The reducon in serum total proteins
and globulins concentraons could be aributed to
immune-suppression. Globulins are immune proteins
produced in response to infecon and inammaon.
The consistent exposure to CO resulted to the decrease
in concentraon of serum globulin which is indicave of
depression of the immune system. Serum total protein
concentraon decrease as observed in this study is due
to the fall in globulin concentraon as further elucidated
by the increase in A/G rao. An increase in A/G rao is
aributable to immunodepression and compromise19. A
depressed immune system is a path usually ulized by
a lot of diseases. The depression could lead to an ease
acquision of a lot of diseases that could be idiopathic
origin. Furthermore the results of this study revealed
a signicant increase (p < 0.05) in concentraons and
acvies of some of the liver biochemical funcon
parameters (Table 2) as the duraon of CO intoxicaon
increased. The increased acvies of AST and ALT are
proof of the toxicity of CO on the hepatocytes and liver
parenchymal cells. The deterioraon of the liver could
be due to the hypoxic acon of the oending agent (CO).
The liver requires connuous availability of oxygen for its
wide range of funcons. This nding agreed partly with
Nanji et al., 20 that showed a necroc eect on the liver
by the synergisc eect of CO and ethanol. This study also
showed that serum ALP acvity increased markedly as the
duraon of CO exposure increased. The increase showed
that CO hypoxic eect also extended to the biliary tree
and surrounding cells. This report contrasted the work
reported by Niebró et al.,21 that showed a decline in
concentraon of ALP in guinea pigs aer 7 days exposure
with 4-5 percent of CO in the air. Moreover, this study
showed a steady increase in total and conjugated bilirubin
as the duraon of CO exposures increase. The elevaon
of conjugated bilirubin could be aributed to the eect of
CO on the blood cells, hepatocellular insuciency or the
biliary tree reux. Stefan et al.,22 showed that at a low
concentraon of carbon monoxide, bilirubin exerts an
an-oxidave funcon, hence protecng cells and ssues
from injuries and that low concentraon of CO serve as a
protecve shield of various body organs. Unconjugated
bilirubin exhibited no signicant dierence across the
study duraon. This has further shown that CO induced
hyperbilirubinaemia cause be reversible as the liver cells
were sll conjugang and not have completely collapsed
CONCLUSION
The aim of the study was to assess the eect of chronic
CO poisoning on biochemical parameters commonly used
to evaluate the integrity and status of the liver. The nding
showed that chronic inhalaon of CO could cause long liver
damage resulng from the consistent starvaon of the
liver of oxygen. Furthermore, the hypoxia characteriscs
could insgate immune-suppression that may make the
body vulnerable to arrays of diseases.
REFERENCES
1. Carl, A.B., Edward, R.A. (2001). Analytes of Haemoglobin
Metabolism-Porphyrin, Iron, and Bilirubin, In Fundamentals of
Clinical Chemistry. Fih edion. Saunders, pp.603.
2. Prockop, L.D. and Chichkova, R.I. (2007). Carbon monoxide
intoxicaon: an updated review. Journal of the
Neurological Sciences, 262, (1–2), 122–130.
3. Anderson, J., Menkedick, J.R. and Wooton, M.A. (2005). Healthy
Homes Issues: Carbon Monoxide. US Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 3:1–35.
4. Gwon, A. (2008). The rabbit in cataract/IOL surgery. In: Tsonis,
P.A. (ed.) Animal models in eye research. Elsevier, pp. 184-204.
5. Los, L. (2008). The rabbit as an animal model for post-natal
vitreous matrix dierenaon and degeneraon. Eye, 22, 1223-
1232.
6. Ochei J., Kolhatkar A (2003). Haematology In: Medical
Laboratory Science Theory and pracce, Tata McGraw-Hill.Pp
251.
7. Agoro, E.S., Akubugwo, E.I., Chinyere, G.C., Alabrah, P.W. and
Ombor, J.A. (2018a).The cumulave eects of chronic carbon
monoxide inhalaon on serum and vitreous protein and lipid
panels. American Journal of Research C om mu ni cati on,
6(8)
8. Agoro, E.S., Chinyere, G.C., Akubugwo, E.I., Wankasi, M.M. &
Agi, V.N. (2018b). Some vitreous humour cardiorenal
biochemical parameters as an indicator of acute carbon
monoxide poisoning death: an animal model, Australian Journal
of Forensic Sciences, DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2018.1429015
9. Agoro, E.S., Akubugwo, E.I., Chinyere, G.C., Nwachuku, I.E., Agi,
V.N. (2017a). Vitreous Humour Lipid Peroxidaon as an Emerging
Concept of Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning. Int J Forensic Sci
Pathol.;5(8):392-399.
10. Agoro, E.S., Akubugwo, E.I., Chinyere, G.C. and Ombor, A.J.
(2017b). Lipids levels in Vitreous Humor of Rabbits aer Carbon
Monoxide Poisoning Death. SM J Forensic Res Criminol., 1
(1):1004
11. Agoro, E.S., Akubugwo, E.I., Chinyere, G.C. and Samuel, R.
(2017c). Comparison of Vitreous Protein Proles of Rabbits
subjected to Acute Carbon Monoxide poisoning and normal
animal aer death. J Forensic Sci Res., 1:040-045.
Agoro ES, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.12-16
12. Agoro, E.S., Azuonwu, O., Abbey, S.D. (2017d). The Forensic
Applicaon of Microbiological Quality of the Vitreous Humor
on the Invesgaon of Acute and Chronic Carbon Monoxide
Poisoning. GSL J Forensic Res., 1:101.
13. AKirkwood, J. and Robert, H. (2010). The UFAW Handbook on
the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research
Animals. Wiley- Blackwell. pp. 29.
14. Golden, M. (2008). Carbon monoxide poisoning. Journal of
Emergency Nursing, 34 (6): 538-542.
15. Strumann, T., Scheerer, A., Prince, T.S. and Golden, L.A. (1998).
Unintenonal Carbon Monoxide Poisoning from an unlikely
source. The Journal of the American Board of family Pracce,
11 (6): 481-484.
16. Benjamin, A. and Jean, L.. (2016). Legislave History of the
Animal Welfare Act.
17. Ness R.D. (1999). Clinical pathology and sample collecon of
exoc small animals. The Veterinary Clinics of North America:
Exoc Animal Pracce, 2(3), 591-620.
18. Michael, L. B., Edward, P. F. and Larry, E. S. (1992). Clinical
chemistry: principles, procedures, correlaons . Philadelphia:
Lippinco Williams & Wilkins, pp 100-200.
19. Agoro, E. S., Wankasi, M.M. and Adikime, N. (2013). Studies on
Serum Proteins Concentraons in Pregnant women in Bayelsa
State. Journal of Medical Laboratory Science, 22 (1):49-57.
20. Nanji, A.A. and Jui, L.T. (1989). French SW Eect of chronic
carbon monoxide exposure on experimental alcoholic liver
injury in rats. Life Science, 45(10):885-90.
21. Niebró, J. T. and Gruszczyńska, M. (1992). Experimental studies
of the eect of carbon monoxide on the rena of guinea pigs of
dierent age. Klin Oczna, 94 (4):81-2.
22. Stefan, W. R., Danielle, M. and Augusne M. K. (2007). Carbon
Monoxide and Bilirubin Potenal Therapies for Pulmonary/
Vascular Injury and Disease. American Journal of Respiratory
and Cell Molecular Biology, 36(2): 175–182.April;15(2):160-9.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018


1Department of General Medicine, Govt. Medical College, Srinagar.




Declared none
ABSTRACT
Background: In Asia around 50% poisoning are due to
organophosphorus (OP) poisoning. The esmated mortality
from Organophosphates ingeson ranges from 10% to 20%.
Objecve: The present study was undertaken to study
the glycemic changes in acute organophosphorus
(ancholinesterase) poisoning and its relaonship with
severity, morbidity and mortality.
Methods: This prospecve observaonal study was conducted
in Government Medical College, Srinagar; Jammu Kashmir;
India. Two hundred six paents with organophosphorus
poisoning were studied.
Results: In this study, the mortality was 10.2% (21 deaths in 206
paents), and venlaon was required in 29 (14.07%) paents.
In paents who expired, glycosuria was found in 76.2% and
blood glucose levels were 216±61 mg/dl, as compared to
paents who survived in whom glycosuria was found in 9.2%
and blood glucose levels were 136±88 mg/dl(P <0.005).
Conclusion: Glycemic changes (hyperglycemia and glycosuria)
are good markers for predicng morbidity and also assessing
need for venlator support.

Glycemia;
organophosphorus;
glycosuria;
blood glucose,
hyperglycemia.
Received on 10th November 2018
Accepted on 23rd December 2018
Published on 31st December 2018
©2018 The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology.
Published at JIPMER, Pondicherry, 605006, INDIA Subscripon & payment related
queries at: toxicology@aims.amrita.edu and rest all types of queries related to the
journal to be done at drambika_editor@jist.org.in
ARTICLE INFO
 Muzzafer Mohammad Mir Department
of General Medicine, Govt. Medical College, Srinagar.; E-mail:
drmuzzafer@yahoo.co.in: Tel.: 7006250472.
How to Cite this arcle:Mir MM , Bilal M, Parry ZH, Taranum
U, Inkhab M. Correlang glycemic changes in acute
organophosphorus poisoning paents with severity, morbidity
and mortality: a prospecve study at Kashmir valley. Journal of
Indian Society of Toxicology 2018;14(2):17-21. 

INTRODUCTION
Organophosphates (OP) are the predominant group
of inseccides employed globally for pest control.
Organophosphates (OPs) are widely used in agriculture
and OP intoxicaon is a global public health problem.
[1– 3] As per World Health Organizaon (WHO), three
million cases of pescide poisoning occur every year
and most of them occur in Asia and at least 50% due
to organophosphorus poisoning.[4] The World Health
Organizaon esmated that the incidence of pescide
poisoning in developing countries doubled during 10
years period from 1990.[5] OP intoxicaon can occur by
accidental occupaonal exposure or suicide aempts.
OP poisoning causes adverse eects on ssues and organ
funcon [6 - 9] and these may lead hyperglycemia. A few
earlier studies have reported glycemic changes ranging
from hypoglycemia to hyperglycemia, glycosuria and
ketoacidosis in OP poisoning. [10, 11] There is 10-20% case
fatality rate in developing countries compared with much
lower fatality in developed countries.[12] A number of
systems have been proposed for predicng outcome in
OP poisoning. Many are reliant on laboratory tests. [13-17]
Others that use clinical parameters have been validated

Mir MM, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.17-21
using small numbers of paents. [18] The present study
was undertaken to study the various glycemic changes in
acute ancholinesterase poisoning and their relaonship
with morbidity and mortality.
Aim of study
1) To evaluate glycemic changes in OP poisoning and its
correlaon with severity of organophosphorus
poisoning
2) To evaluate the usefulness of glycemic changes as
predictors of signicant morbidity and mortality in OP
poisoning.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This prospecve observaonal study was done in
Government SMHS Hospital from March 2015 to January
2016. Two hundred six paents of acute OP poisoning
fullling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included
in the study.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Paents of either sex, above 18 yrs of age. Paents with
history of consumpon of organophosphorus compound
presenng within 24 hrs.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Age less than 18 yrs.
History of Diabetes.
Mixed poisoning.
Unknown poisoning.
A detailed history regarding age sex, type of compound
consumed, me-lag between consumpon and iniaon
of treatment, thorough clinical examinaon was
undertaken. The severity of the poisoning was graded on
a scale of 0 to 3 based on the classicaon by Bardin et
al. [19]
At the me of admission, complete blood count, random
blood sugar, urinalysis for glycosuria and ketone bodies,
arterial blood gas analysis, renal and liver funcon tests
were performed. Glycated hemoglobin levels were
done to check for undiagnosed diabetes. Glycosuria was
detected using dipscks. The magnitude of glycosuria
was quaned as 0.25g% (1+), 0.5g% (2+), 1g% (3+) and
>2g% (4+). The cases with hyperglycemia were tested at
regular intervals unl their blood sugars were normal. The
duraon of glycosuria was also similarly recorded. The
presence of hyperglycemia or glycosuria or hypoglycemia
or ketosis was correlated with the severity of poisoning,
morbidity in terms of complicaons, hospital stay >7days
and requirement of assisted venlaon, and mortality.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Data were analyzed using SPSS. Results were expressed as
mean ± standard deviaon (SD). Categorical variables were
analyzed using the chi-square test and nonparametric
variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
A level of stascal signicance was established at P <
0.05 for all analyses.
RESULTS
Basic characteriscs of the study populaon.
 
Age (years) 26.03±15.29
18-30 176 (85.4%)
30-40 21 (10.2%)
>40 9 (4.3%)
Sex
Males 68 (33%)
Females 138 (67%)
Marital status
Married 64(31.06%)
Unmarried 142(68.93%)
Residence
Rural 159(77.18%)
Urban 47(22.81%)
Venlaon required 29 (14.07%)
Hospital stay (days) 3.58±2.49*
Mortality 21 (10.2%)
DISCUSSION
Organophosphate poisoning is a serious clinical enty
and causes considerable mortality and morbidity. The
esmated mortality from OP ingeson ranges from 10%
to 20%. [20-23] In this study, the mortality was 10.2% (21
deaths in 206 paents), and venlaon was required in
29 (14.07%) paents. Few studies have highlighted the
occurrence of glycosuria with or without hyperglycemia in
OP poisoning [10, 11, and 24]. In this study, hyperglycemia
was noted in 78 cases (37.86%) and glycosuria was noted
Correlang Glycemic changes in Acute Organophosphorus poisoning paents with severity, morbidity and mortality
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
Parameter  Grade II

Grade III
 
 7060±2014 9160±3124 14200±7426 <0.05 ANOVA
 0.90±0.32 1.01±0.40 1.20±0.620 .0013ANOVA

 126.32±81.4 161±67 196±77 <0.001ANOVA
 13(9.2%) 9(21.9%) 11(45.83%) <0.05 CHI
 0 01(2.4%) 3(12.5%) <0.05 CHI
Laboratory values on admission in hospital
*TLC: Total leucocyte cout
Table 3:Comparison of glycemic changes between paents with or without
requirement of mechanical venlaon
Parameter Required

Not




210±64 142±90 <0.05 Unpaired t
test
 12(41.37%) 21(11.86%) <0.05 Fischer exact
 03(10.34%) 01(0.56%) 0.009 Fischer exact
Table 4:Comparison of the glycemic changes between paents with
hospital stay ≤ 7 days and >7 days.
Parameter 






194±87 136±78.56 <0.05 unpaired t test
 17(48.5%) 16(9.30%) <0.05 Fischer exact
 4(11.42%) 00(0%) <0.05 Fischer exact
Table 5:Comparison of the glycemic changes between paents who expired and survived.
Parameter   


216±61 137±88 <0.05unpaired t test
 16(76.20%) 17(9.2%) <0.05 Fischer exact
 3(14.28%) 01(0.54%) 0.003 Fischer exact
in 33 cases of OP poisoning (16.02%) and ketoneuria
was noted in 4 cases (1.94%). We also observed that
blood glucose levels were more in grade III poisoning
(196±77mg/dl) as compared to grade II (161±67) and
grade I poisoning (126±81).A signicant correlaon
was found between hyperglycemia, glycosuria and the
severity of poisoning. These nding correlated with study
of Sangur et al [25] and Shobha et al [11] and Pendkar
et al [24]. Many mechanisms have been propounded
in the pathogenesis of hyperglycemia following OP
compound poisoning _ marked catecholamine excess
following connuous cholinergic smulaon induced
by the poisoning, persistent cholinergic smulaon
leading to ACTH release from the anterior pituitary[27,
28] and increased glycogen breakdown.[29] Various
studies have tried to idenfy morbidity and mortality
Mir MM, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.17-21
predictors in OP poisoning. Goswamy et al. found that
measurement of the serum acetylcholinesterase level is
useful in predicng the prognosis in OP poisoning. [30]
However, Aygun et al. have reported that low levels of
serum acetylcholinesterase support the diagnosis of
acute OP poisoning, but are not useful as prognosc
indicator. [31] Lee P et al reported that APACHE II score
>26 was a poor prognosc indicator in OP poisoning. [32]
Eizadi-Mood N et al reported that APACHE II and modied
APACHE II scores can be used in predicng outcomes in
organophosphate poisoning .[33] Davies JO et al reported
the use of Glasgow coma scale in predicng outcome
in acute organophosphorus poisoning.[34] Rehiman S
reported the usefulness of serum cholinesterase level,
clinical score at presentaon as prognosc indicator in
organophosphorus poisoning. [35] Sam KG et al reported
that GCS, APACHE II, predicted mortality rate (PMR) can
be applied in predicng mortality in OP poisoning [36].
Bhaacharyya et al reported that serum creanine
phosphokinase, erythrocyte cholinesterase level, blood
pH and total atropine dose were strongly correlated
with clinical severity.[37] In this study, glycosuria was
found in 41.37% in paents who required venlaon
as compared to 11.86% in those who did not require
venlaon (P <0.005). Mean blood glucose levels were
210±64 mg/dl in paents who required venlaon and
142±90 mg/dl in paents who did not require venlaon
(P <0.005). Stascally signicant associaon was found
between requirement of mechanical venlaon and
hyperglycemia and glycosuria. Paents whose hospital
stay was more than 7 days, glycosuria was found in 48.5%
as compared to 9.30% in whom hospital stay was less
than 7 days(P <0.005). Mean blood glucose levels were
194±87 mg/dl in paents whose hospital stay was >7 days
and 136±78.56 mg/dl in paents whose hospital stay was
≤7 days (P <0.005). Hospital stay >7 days was signicantly
associated with hyperglycemia and glycosuria. In paents
who expired, glycosuria was found in 76.2% and blood
glucose levels were 216±61 mg/dl, as compared to
paents who survived in whom glycosuria was found
in 9.2% and blood glucose levels were 136±88 mg/dl(P
<0.005). This is in accordance with the study of Goel et al.
[14] Sangur et al. [ 25] Pendkar et al. [24] These results
indicate that hyperglycemia and glycosuria are good
markers for predicng morbidity and also assessing need
for venlator support.
REFERENCES
1. Sogorb MA, Vilanova E, Carrera V. Future applicaons of
phosphotriesterases in the prophylaxis and treatment of
organophosphorus inseccide and nerve agent poisonings.
Toxicol Le 2004; 151: 219–33.
2. Langley R, Sumner D. Pescide mortality in the United States,
1979–1998. Vet Hum Toxicol 2002; 44: 101–5.
3. Öztürk MA, Keleşmur F, Kurtoğlu S, Güven K, Arslan D.
Ancholinesterase poisoning in Turkey--clinical, laboratory and
radiologic evaluaon of 269 cases. Hum Exp Toxicol 1990; 9:
273–9.
4. Singh S. organophosphorus poisoning: an evidence based
approach. MJAFI 2004; 60; 2-4.
CONCLUSION
Glycemic changes (hyperglycemia and glycosuria) were
observed more in paents of grade II and III OP poisoning
and these were the paents who were associated with
increased morbidity and mortality.
Glycemic changes (hyperglycemia and glycosuria) are
good markers for predicng morbidity and also assessing
need for venlator support.
Glycemic changes (hyperglycemia and glycosuria) can be
used to develop a severity scoring system in acute OP
poisoning cases.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Department of Medicine,
Government Medical College Srinagar.
Compeng Interests
No compeng interest.
Consent for Publicaon
Consent to parcipate is not provided as no individual
data is provided and it is not possible for paents to be
idened from the anonymised data used.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Parcipate
Ethics approval was not required as data were collected
rounely for clinical purposes.
Abbreviaons
OP : Organophosphorus poisoning.
Correlang Glycemic changes in Acute Organophosphorus poisoning paents with severity, morbidity and mortality
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
5. World Health Organizaon. WHO Recommended Classicaon
of Pescides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classicaon 2000-
2001. Geneva: World Health Organizaon; 2001. WHO/PCS/01.4
6. Hsiao C-T, Yang C-C, Deng J-F, Bullard MJ, Liaw S-J. (1996) Acute
pancreas following organophosphate intoxicaon. Clin
Toxicol. 34 (3): 343-47.
7. Agosni M, Bianchin A. (2003) Acute renal failure from
organophosphate poisoning: a case of success with
haemoltraon.Hum Exp Toxicol.22: 165-67.
8. Yurumez Y, Ikizceli I, Sozuer EM, Soyuer I, Yavuz Y, Avsarogulları L,
and Durukan P. (2007) Eect of interleukin-10 on ssue damage
caused by organophosphate poisoning. Basic Clin Pharmacol
Toxicol. 100: 323-27.
9. Kerem M, Bedirli N, Gürbüz N, Ekinci O, Bedirli A, Akkaya T,
Sakrak O, Pasaoglu H. (2007) Eects of acute fenthion toxicity on
liver and kidney funcon and histology in rats. Turk J Med Sci. 37
(5): 281-88.
10. Meller D, Fraser I, Kryger M. Hyperglycemia in ancholinesterase
poisoning. Can Med Assoc J 1981;124:745-8.
11. Shobha TR, Prakash O. Glycosuria in organophosphate and
carbamate poisoning. J Assoc Physicians India 2000;48:1197-9.
12. Eddleston M, Phillips MR. Self poisoning with pescides. BMJ
2004;328:42-4.
13. Bardin PG, van Eeden SF, Moolman JA, Foden AP, Joubert JR.
Organophosphate and carbamate poisoning. Arch Intern Med
1994;154:1433-41.
14. Goel A, Joseph S, Dua TK. Organophosphate poisoning:
Predicng the need for venlatory support. J Assoc Physicians
India 1998;46:786-90.
15. Grmec S, Mally S, Klemen P. Glasgow Coma Scale score and QTc
interval in the prognosis of organophosphate poisoning. Acad
Emerg Med 2004;11:925-30.
16. Lee P, Tai DY. Clinical features of paents with acute
organophosphate poisoning requiring intensive care. Intensive
Care Med 2001;27:694-9.
17. Matsumiya N, Tanaka M, Iwai M, Kondo T, Takahashi S, Sato S.
Elevated amylase is related to the development of respiratory
failure in organophosphate poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol
1996;15:250-3.
18. Senanayake N, de Silva HJ, Karalliedde L. A scale to assess
severity in organophosphorus intoxicaon: POP scale. Hum Exp
Toxicol 1993;12:297-9.
19. Bardin PG, Van Eden SF. Organophosphate poisoning: grading
the severity and comparing treatment between atropine and
glycopyrolate. Crit Care Med 1990;18:956–960
20. Munidasa UA, Gawarammana IB, Kularatne SA, Kumarasiri
PV, Goonasekera CD. Survival paern in paents with acute
organophosphate poisoning receiving intensive care. J Toxicol
Clin Toxicol 2004;42:343-7.
21. Yamanaka S, Yoshida M, Yamamura Y, Nishimura M, Takaesu
Y. A study on acute organophosphorus poisoning - Changes in
the acvity and isoenzyme paerns of serum cholinesterase in
human poisoning. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi 1993;48:955-65.
22. Yamashita M, Yamashita M, Tanaka J, Ando Y. Human mortality in
organophosphate poisonings. Vet Hum Toxicol 1997;39:84-5.
23. Wycko DW, Davies JE, Barquet A, Davis JH. Diagnosc and
therapeuc problems of parathion poisonings. Ann Intern Med
1968;68:875-82.
24. Pritee G Pendkar, K S Ghorpade, G S Manoorkar, Amol Shinde
blood glucose level in acute organophosphorus poisoning 15(2):
342-44
25. Sungur M, Guven M. Intensive care management of
organophosphate insecside poisoning, crit.care 2001; 5(4);
211-5.
26. Shobha T R, Prakash O, Glycosuria in organophosphate and
carbamate poisoning. JAPI 2000; 48(12).
27. Ramu A, Slonim AE, London M, Eyal F. Hyperglycemia in acute
malathion poisoning. Isr J Med Sci 1973;9:631-4.
28. Koundinya PR, Ramamurthi R. Eect of organophosphate
pescide Sumithion (Fenitrothion) on some aspects of
carbohydrate metabolism in a freshwater sh, Sarotherodon
(Tilapia) mossambicus (Peters). Experiena 1979;35:1632-3.
29. Civen M, Leeb JE, Wishnow RM, Wolfsen A, Morin RJ. Eects of
low level administraon of dichlorvos on adrenocorcotrophic
hormone secreon, adrenal cholesteryl ester and steroid
metabolism. Biochem Pharmacol 1980;29:635-41.
30. Goswamy R, Chaudhuri A, Mahashur AA. Study of respiratory
failure in organophosphate and carbamate poisoning. Heart
Lung 1994;23:466-72
31. Aygun D, Doganay Z, Alntop L, Guven H, Onar M, Deniz T,
et al. Serum acetylcholinesterase and prognosis of acute
organophosphate poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002;40:903-
10
32. Lee P, Tai DY. Clinical features of paents with acute
organophosphate poisoning requiring intensive care. Intensive
Care Med 2001;27:694-9.
33. Eizadi-Mood N, Saghaei M, Jabalameli M. Predicng outcomes
in organophosphate poisoning based on APACHE II and modied
APACHE II scores. Hum Exp Toxicol 2007;26:573-8.
34. Davies JO, Eddleston M, Buckley NA. Predicng outcome in
acute organophosphorus poisoning with a poison severity score
or the Glasgow coma scale. QJM 2008;101:371-9.
35. Rehiman S, Lohani SP, Bhaarai MC. Correlaon of serum
cholinesterase level, clinical score at presentaon and severity
of organophosphorous poisoning. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc
2008;47:47-52.
36. Sam KG, Kondabolu K, Pa D, Kamath A, Pradeep Kumar G,
Rao PG. Poisoning severity score, APACHE II and GCS: Eecve
clinical indices for esmang severity and predicng outcome of
acute organophosphorus and carbamate poisoning. J Forensic
Leg Med 2009;16:239-47.
37. Bhaacharyya K, Phaujdar S, Sarkar R, Mullick OS. Serum
creane phosphokinase: A probable marker of severity in
organophosphorus poisoning. Toxicol Int 2011;18:117-23.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.22-25
Somashekhar S. Pujar34
56
2,5Postgraduate, 1Associate Professor, 3Professor and HOD, 4Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, J.N.
Medical College, Belagavi
6Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, BIMS, Belagavi




Declared none
ABSTRACT
Introducon : Poisoning is a problem throughout the world but
its paern vary from one place to other place. The deaths due
to poisoning can be intenonal or unintenonal. The deaths
due to poisoning is increasing at an alarming rate in developing
countries like India because a large number of pescides
are easily accessible to the people with the development in
industrial and agricultural elds.
Objecves : To know the paern and outcome of poisoning
cases admied in a terary care hospital over a period of 3
years.
Materials and Methods : A retrospecve record based study
of all poisoning samples sent for analyzing to Poison Detecon
Centre (PDC) of KLE hospital, Belagavi from January 2014 to
December 2016. The data regarding paern of poisoning, age,
sex, occupaon, basic demographics prole and outcome were
collected from hospital records.
Results: There were total 521 cases of which 426 were posive
for various poisonous compounds and 95 were negave for the
standard tested. Most of the poisoning cases were observed
in males amounng 257 (60.3%). The commonest age group
was 19-29 years (46.5%) and male to female rao was 1.52:1.
The maximum number of cases reported were among illiterate
(71.8%) and were from rural background (70.6%) involved in
agricultural acvies (42.7%). Organophosphorus (57%) was
commonest compound and least was Amitraz (1.2%). The total
mortality was 39 and the maximum deaths were seen with
Organophosphorus compound (66.6%).

Poisoning, Paern,
Poison Detecon
Centre, Rural,
Organophosphorus
Received on 30th December 2018
Accepted on 31st December 2018
Published on 31st December 2018
©2018 The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology.
Published at JIPMER, Pondicherry, 605006, INDIA Subscripon & payment related
queries at: toxicology@aims.amrita.edu and rest all types of queries related to the
journal to be done at drambika_editor@jist.org.in
ARTICLE INFO
 Kashif Ali, Postgraduate, Department
of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Kaher’s J.N. Medical
College, Belagavi-590010. Email: alikashif568@yahoo.in
How to Cite this arcle:Pujar SS, Ali K, Honnungar RS, Jirli PS,
Junaidi KA, Pushpa MG. Paern and Outcome of Poisoning
Cases Analyzed in Poison Detecon Centre of a Terary Care
Hospital: A 3 year Retrospecve Study. Journal of Indian
Society of Toxicology 2018;14(2):22-25.  

INTRODUCTION
Poisoning is a major medicosocial and legal problem
all over the world but its morbidity and mortality vary
from one place to other place. Among the unnatural
deaths, death owing to poisoning stand next only to road
trac accident deaths.[1] The deaths due to poisoning is
increasing at an alarming rate in developing countries like
India. A large number of pescides are easily accessible
to the people with the development in industrial and
agricultural elds.The World Health Organizaon (WHO)
esmates that about 3 million cases of poisoning occur
Paern and Outcome of Poisoning Cases Analyzed in Poison Detecon Centre of a Terary Care Hospital
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
every year in the world and about 1,93,460 deaths occur
due to unintenonal poisoning.[2] Of these 90% of fatal
poisoning occurs in developing countries parcularly
among agricultural workers. The commonest cause of
poisoning in India and other developing countries is due to
pescides, the reason being agriculture based economy,
poverty, illiteracy, ignorance and lack of protecve
clothing and easy availability of highly toxic pescides.[3]
A study on the paern of poisoning is important as it will
help us to gain a beer understanding of the current trend
in poisoning cases. The paern or prole of poisoning
in a specic region depends on diverse factors such as
age, gender, place of residence, occupaon, educaonal
status, availability and accessibility of pescides.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
It is a 3 year retrospecve study of all poisoning samples
analyzed at Poison Detecon Centre (PDC) of KLE Hospital
aached to Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi
from January 2014 to December 2016. The study included
data regarding paern of poisoning, age, sex, occupaon
and basic demographics prole were collected along with
the name of poisonous substances and outcome from
hospital records. Stascal analysis was done by using
SPSS soware version 25 and the results were calculated
in percentages.
Ethical Clearance was Taken from Instuonal Ethical
Commiee.
 Male Female Total Percentage
 05 (1.9%) 05 (3%) 10 2.3
 47 (18.3%) 37 (21.9%) 84 19.7
 122 (47.5%) 76 (44.9%) 198 46.5
 33 (12.8%) 21 (12.4%) 54 12.7
 26 (10.1%) 16 (9.5%) 42 9.9
 13 (5.1%) 10 (5.9%) 23 5.4
 07 (2.7%) 02 (1.2%) 09 2.1
 04 (1.6%) 02 (1.2%) 06 1.4
 257 169 426 100

Table 1 depicts that males predominated females and the
male to female poisoning rao is 1.52:1. The majority of
cases belonged to age group 19-29 years (46.5%) followed
by age group 2-18 years (19.7%) while least number of
cases were seen with age group >70 years (1.4%).
Distribuon of cases according to place of
residence.
Table 2 depicts that majority of the cases were from
rural background (70.6%) followed by urban populaon
(29.4%)
Place of Residence Number of cases Percentage
 301 70.6
 125 29.4
 426 100
Table 3 depicts that the most common populaon aected
were the people involved in agricultural acvies (42.7%)
followed by housewife (25.6%) and students (19.5%).
Table 3:
 Number of cases Percentage
 182 42.7
 109 25.6
 83 19.5
 28 6.6
 24 5.6
 426 100
RESULTS
There were total 521 cases of which 426 were posive for
various poisonous compounds and 95 were negave for
the standard tested.
Table 4: 
Table 4 depicts that majority of cases were illiterate (71.8%) as compared to literates (28.2%)
 Number of cases Percentage
Illiterate 306 71.8
Literate 120 28.2
Total 426 100
Ali K, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.22-25
DISCUSSION
In our study, males (60.3%) predominated females
(39.7%) and the male to female poisoning rao was
1.52:1 which is similar to the study conducted by Kiran et
al.[4] This could be due to risk taking behavior of males and
indulging in outdoor acvies. The present study shows
that most of the cases belong to age group 19-29 years
which constute 46.5%. This observaon is consistent
with the studies conducted by Gupta et al[5], Dash et al
[6] and Srivastava et al.[7] In this study rural populaon
(70.6%) was aected more as compared to urban
populaon (29.4%) which is similar to ndings noted by
Tejas et al[8] and Virendar et al.[9] It could be due to the
fact that rural people are more exposed to pescides as
they are involved in agricultural acvies. In this study it
has been observed that the most vulnerable occupaon
  Percentage Mortality Percentage
 243 57 26 66.6
 75 17.5 08 20.5
 31 7.3 02 5.1
 25 5.8 01 2.6
 16 3.8 01 2.6
 12 2.9 00 00
 05 1.2 01 2.6
 19 4.5 00 00
 426 100 39 100
Table 5:
     




Total cases Mortality Mortality Percentage
 116 (27.2%) 05 (12.8%) 26 66.6
 121 (28.4%) 09 (23.1%) 08 20.5
 108 (25.4%) 11 (28.2%) 02 5.1
 81 (19%) 14 (35.9%) 01 2.6
 426 39 01 2.6
Table 6:
 
                
               

group was the people involved in agricultural acvies
(42.7%) and people who were illiterate (71.8%) which is
similar to studies done by Sandhu et al[10], Pate et al[11]
and Karamjit et al.[12] According to a study done by Dhanya
et al[13] and Marahaa et al[14] the organophosphorus
poisoning constute maximum number of cases (57%)
followed by unspecied drugs (17.5%) which is similar to
our ndings. It was found in our study that more the me
elapsed since exposure to hospital arrival more was the
mortality which is similar to studies done by Gupta et al[15]
and Ramesha et al.[16]
CONCLUSION
In our study there were total 426 cases in which male
predominated female with rao of 1.52:1 and 19-29
years was the commonest age group. Most of them
Paern and Outcome of Poisoning Cases Analyzed in Poison Detecon Centre of a Terary Care Hospital
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
were illiterate from rural/agricultural background. The
commonest compound was organophosphorus. The
total mortality was 39 and maximum mortality was
seen with organophosphorus compound. Since we are a
developing country its our duty to handle mulfunconal
tasks in providing informaon about the various hazards
of pescides and drugs and by establishing poison
informaon centers. Various health care centers need to
organize mass educaon programs to create awareness
to prevent poisoning and its fatalies. There should be
strict pescide regulaon laws to decrease the burden of
incidence of poisoning. Along with this various training
programs should be organized and proper counseling
should be done.
REFERENCES
1. Global Health Esmates 2016: Death by cause, age, sex by
country and by region 2000-2016 Geneva, World Health
Organizaon;2018. Available at hp://www.who.int. Accessed
on 18 Aug 2018.
2. World Health Organizaon,2016. Prevenng disease through
healthy environments: A global assessment of the burden of
disease from environmental risks;2016. Available at hp://www.
who.int. Accessed on 18 Aug 2018.
3. Reddy KSN. The Essenals of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology.
33rd Ed;2014, p.500
4. Kiran N, Shobha Rani RH, Jaiprakash V, Vanaja K. Paern of
poisoning reported at South Indian terary care hospital. IJFMT.
2008;2(2):17-9.
5. Gupta BD, Vaghela PC. Prole of fatal poisoning in and around
Jamnagar. JIAFM. 2005;27(3):145-8.
6. Dash SK, AluriSR, Mohanty MK, Patnaik KK. Sociodemographic
prole of poisoning. JIAFM. 2005;27(3):133-8.
7. Srivastava A, Peshin SS, Kaleekal T, Gupta SK. An epidemiological
study of poisoning cases reported to the Naonal Poison
Informaon Centre AIIMS, New Delhi. Hum ExpToxicol.
2005;24(6):279-85.
8. Tejas P, Kark P, RN Tandon, Saumil M. A study of acute poisoning
cases excluding animal bites at civil hospital, Ahmedabad. JIAFM.
2013;35(2):120.
9. Virendar PS, BR Sharma, Dasari Harish, Krishnan Vij. A ten year
study of poisoning cases in a terary care hospital. IIJFMT.
2004;2(1).
10. Sandhu SS, Garg A, Gorea RK. Poisoning trends in Faridkot
region: A retrospecve study. J Punjab Acad Forensic Med
Toxicol.2010;10(1):20-3.
11. Pate RS, Rojekar MV, Hire RC. Trends of poisoning cases in
terary care teaching hospital in western Indian populaon.
IJMTFM. 2017;7(3):177-84
12. Karamjit S, Oberoi SS, Bhullar DS. Poisoning trends in the Malwa
region of Punjab. J Punjab Acad Forensic Med Toxicol. 2003;3:26-
9.
13. Dhanya SP, Dhanya TH, Bindulatha RN, Herna CG. A retrospecve
analysis of the paern of poisoning in paents admied to the
Medical College Hospital, Calicut. Medical Journal 2009;7(2):1-
8.
14. Marahaa SB, Singh J, Shrestha R, Koju R. Poisoning cases
aending emergency department in Dhulikhel Hospital-
Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital. Kathmandu University
Medical Journal. 2009;7(2):152-6.
15. Gupta P, Kumar A, Singh SP, Prakash M, Gupta M, Kumar P.
Paern of cases of Acute Poisoning in a Rural Terary care center
in Northern India. Ntl J Community Med 2016;7(4):307-10.
16. Ramesha KN, Krishnamurthy BH, Kumar GS. Paern and
Outcome of acute poisoning cases in a terary care hospital in
Karnataka, India. IJCCM. 2009;13(3):152-5.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.26-29
Varsha Dhurvey
1 Professor, 2 Research Scholar
Department of Zoology, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur-India


Gland of Wistar rats

    All authors state that
there is no conict of interest withthe work done in this study.
ABSTRACT
Introducon: Lead (Pb), a heavy metal, is toxic to both human
and animals. There is evidence in the literature that, lead is
highly toxic metal for human and other mammals. The toxic
eect of lead can manifest in various organs, and the male
reproducve organ is an important target.
Material and methods :The objecve of present study is to
invesgate the eect of lead acetate on seminal vesicle and
prostate gland in Wistar rats. Eighteen adult Wistar rats were
divided into three groups, A, B and C. Group A was control and
provided with normal food and water as well as Group B and
C were received 5mg/kg body weight of lead acetate daily for
15 and 30 days respecvely. Aer the compleon of treatment
body and organs weight and histology of seminal vesicle and
prostate gland were examined.
Result : Results showed that decrease in body weight and
organs weight when compared to control. Histopathology of
seminal vesicle of treated rats showed, destrucon in epithelial
lining, reducon in mucosal fold of anddecrease in secreon
as compared to control. As well as prostate gland of treated
group shows lower secretary acvity of epithelium, reduced
secreon, aening of epithelium lining and increasing
intersal space between alveoli.
Discussion and conclusion : It can be concluded from the
results that lead acetate cause toxic eect on seminal vesicle,
prostate gland and impaired male ferlity.

lead acetate; seminal
vesicle; prostate
gland; body weight;
histopathology; albino rat
Received on 8th August 2018
Accepted on 20th November 2018
Published on 31st December 2018
©2018 The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology.
Published at JIPMER, Pondicherry, 605006, INDIA Subscripon & payment related
queries at: toxicology@aims.amrita.edu and rest all types of queries related to the
journal to be done at drambika_editor@jist.org.in
ARTICLE INFO
Varsha Dhurvey, Professor, Department
of Zoology, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University,
Nagpur-India. Email: varshadhurvey@yahoo.com
How to Cite this arcle:Dhurvey V, Gotmare B, Karim F. Lead
Acetate induced Histological alteraons in Seminal-vesicle
and Prostate Gland of Wistar rats. Journal of Indian Society of
Toxicology 2018;14(2):26-29.  

INTRODUCTION
Lead is the most toxic and major contaminated heavy
metal in our environment. [1, 2] Lead occurs naturally in
the environment in lile amount. However, most of the
high levels found throughout the environment come
from human acvies. The environmental levels of lead
have increased more than 1000- fold over the past three
centuries as a result of human made acvity. The greatest
increase occurred between the years 1950 and 2000, and
reected increasing world wide use of leaded gasoline. [3]
Lead does not have any detectable benecial biological
role, however on the contrary its detrimental eect on
physiological, biochemical and behavioral dysfuncons
have been documented in animals and humans by several
invesgators.[4, 5] Lead metal is a male reproducve
toxicant. [6] Toxicity is manifested in male reproducve
funcon by deposion of lead in testes, epididymis, vas
deferens, seminal vesicle and seminal ejaculate. Lead has
an adverse eect on sperm count, sperm molity and
retarded the acvity of spermatozoa. [7] The involvement
of heavy metal including lead had been implicated in the
Lead Acetate induced Histological alteraons in Seminal-vesicle and Prostate Gland of Wistar rats
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
eology of male inferlity. Environmental exposure to
toxic levels of lead occurs in a number of industries with
potenal adverse eect on the reproducve capacity. [8]
A very lile informaon is available about eect of lead
acetate on seminal vesicle and prostate gland. Hence, the
present study aimed to nd out the eect of lead acetate
on seminal vesicle and prostate gland in Wistar rat.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal collecon and maintenance: Eighteen adult
male albino rats weighing between 237-310 grams were
brought from the animal house unit in Department
of Biochemistry, RTM Nagpur University Nagpur. The
experimental protocol was approved by Instuonal
Animals Ethical Commiee (IAEC) and animal care was
taken as per the guidelines of Commiee for the Purpose
of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals
(CPCSEA), Govt. of India (Registraon No. 478/01/
aCPCSEA). The rats were fed with pellet commercial diet
daily and water was provided regularly.
Treatment: The animals were divided into 3 groups A, B
and C, each group containing 6 animals. Group A was used
as control and provided only with dislled water. Lead
acetate 5mg/kg bw administered daily in group B and C
for15 and 30 days respecvely. At theend of treatment,
animals were sacriced by using anesthec chloroform.
At autopsy, body weight of each animal was recorded
and seminal vesicle and prostate gland were removed,
cleaned, weighed and processed for histology.
Histology: Aer the compleon of treatment, animals
were sacriced; seminal vesicle and prostate gland of
control and experimental animals were removed xed
in Bouin’s uid for 24 hrs. Then dehydrated by passing
through graded series of ethyl alcohol, clear in xylene,
embedding in paran wax, blocks were prepared, and
seconed serially at 5µm. For histological study the
secons were stained with haematoxyline and eosin.
The photomicrographs were taken with the help of
digital camera Nikon COOLPIX 8400 aached to the light
microscope Nikon Eclipse E200.
Stascal analysis: The variance between control and
experimental values was calculated using student’s test
with the help of graph pad calculator.
RESULTS
Evaluaon of body, seminal vesicle and prostate gland
weight: The body weight was signicantly decreased in
both the treated group, but parcularly aer 30 days of
treatment as compared to control. Weight of seminal
vesicle and prostate gland was decreased in both the
groups of experimental animals receiving lead acetate.
There was a slight change in seminal vesicle and prostate
gland weight of animals receiving lead acetate for short
(15 days) duraon (Table 1).
Histology of seminal vesicle: The animal with 15 days
treatment with lead acetate shows lower secretary
acvity of epithelium, degenerave changes occur in
epithelium structure, size and shape of cells. Marked
reducon in mucosal folds, with decrease in secreon
(Fig. 2) compared to control (Fig. 1). The histopathological
alteraons were more obvious in animal treated with
lead acetate 5 mg/kg daily for 30 days. In this treated
animal, destrucon of epithelial lining cells with complete
absence of glandular secreon. There was a decrease
in height of mucosal folds and epithelial cells appeared
with small and dense nuclei. In some alveoli there was a
complete loss or decrease of mucosal folding (Fig. 3).
Histology of prostate gland: Prostate gland of rats with
15 days treatment with lead acetate shows lower
secretary acvity of epithelium, degenerave changes
occur in epithelium structure, size and shape of cells
and reduced secreon(Fig. 5) as compared to control
(Fig. 4).The destrucve changes were more prominent
in animal treated with lead acetate 5mg/kg daily for 30
days.Destrucons of epithelial lining cells with complete
absence of glandular secreon, epithelium is aened
and atrophied,enlargement of prostac alveoli and
aened epithelial lining, damage in epithelial lining,
oozing of prostac secreon into intersal space(Fig. 6).
DISCUSSION
In the present study, body weight and weight of seminal
vesicle and prostate gland were slightly decrease which
might be due to loss of electrolyte the similar results were
reported on sodium uoride,[9] cadmium chloride,[10,11]
nickel sulphate,[12] molybdenum.[13] Reducon of seminal
vesicle weight rao in lead intoxicated rats indicated
seminal damage and impaired funcon.[14]The present
study revealed that the seminal vesicle of treated rat
shows lower secretary acvity of epithelium. Degenerave
changes occur in epithelium structure, size, and shape of
cells, marked reducon in mucosal folds, with decrease
in secreon. The histopathological alteraons were
more obvious in animal treated with lead acetate 5 mg/
Dhurvey V, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.26-29
kg body weight daily for 30 days, in this treated animal,
destrucon of epithelial lining cells with complete absence
of glandular secreon. There was a decrease in height of
mucosal folds and epithelial cells appeared with small
and dense nuclei. In some alveoli there was a complete
loss or decrease of mucosal folding. These results are in
agreement with [7] the destrucon of epithelial cell and
low density of seminal plasma, [15] showed the reduced
mucosal fold height and number, lowered secreon in
the lumen. Destrucon and disorganizaon in the lining
epithelium and exfoliaon of some cells in the lumen.
[10, 16] Lead induced seminal vesicle damage such as,
hemorrhage, cell debris, and reduced secreon. [7, 17, 18]
Histopathological study of prostate gland of lead acetate
treated rat showed degenerave changes in epithelium
structure, size and shape of cells, destrucon of epithelial
REFERENCES
1. Patra A., Rautray A, Swarup A., Oxidave stress in lead and
cadmium toxicity and its amelioraon, Vet. Med. Inter. (2011)
1–9 (Arcle ID 457327).
2. Tatrai E, Kovacikova Z, HudakA,Adamis Z. Comparave invitro
toxicity of cadmium and lead on redox cycling in type II
pneumocytes. Journal of applied toxicology.2001; 21, 479-483.
3. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR),
Toxicological Prole for Lead, U.S. Department of Health and
HumanServices, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA, 2007.
4. R.A. Goyer, M.G. Cherian, Ascorbic acid and EDTA treatment of
lead toxicity in rats, Life Sci. 24 (1979) 433–438.
5. Ru H., Markowitz M., Bijur P., Rosen J. Relaonships among
blood lead levels, iron deciency, and cognive development
in two-year-old children, Environ. Health Perspect. 104 (1996)
180–185.
6. Winder C., Reproducve and chromosomal eect of occupaonal
exposure to lead on the male, Reprod. Toxicol. 3 (1989) 221–
233.
7. Chowdhury A., Recent advances in heavy metals induced eect
on male reproducve funcon – A retrospecve, Al Ameen J.
Med. Sci.2 (2009) 37–42.
8. El-Zohairy EA, Youssef AF, Abul-Nasr SM, Fahmy IM, Salem D,
Kahil AK. Reproducve hazards of lead exposure among urban
egypan men. ReprodToxicol. 1996; 10:145–151.
9. Chinoy N. and Sharma A. Amelioraon of uoride toxicity by
vitamin’s E and D in reproducve funcon of male mice.
Digital Archive of Fluoride Journal. 1998; 203-216.
10. Hady A, Aal K, Moneim W, Ghafeen (2006) Eect of lead,
cadmium and their combinaon on the tess and seminal
vesicle of rats.Mansoura J. ForensicMed. Clin. Toxicology.2006;
17-37.
lining, in some alveoli enlarged and aened of alveoli
epithelial lining as compared to control. This results
are in agreement with [6] the destrucon of epithelial
cells, disintegraon of the epithelial cells lining,[19] the
boundaries of the cells were not clear,oozing of prostac
secreons into intersal space,[20] lead induced prostate
damage such as hyperplasia, reduced secreon.[7, 17, 18]
CONCLUSION
From the above result it can be concluded that
administraon of 5 mg/kg body weight of lead acetate
daily for 15 days and 30 days duraon in drinking water
could adversely aect the histopathology of seminal
vesicle as well as prostate gland and thus impairs the
reproducve funcons in male albino rat.
11. Saksena S, Dahlgren L, Lau I. Chang M. Reproducve and
endocrinological features of male rats aer treatment with
cadmium chloride. Biology of Reproducon.1977; 609-613.
12. Pandey R. Singh S. Seminal toxicity of nickel sulfate in mice.
Biological Trace Element Research.2001; 211-212.
13. Pandey R. Singh S.Eect of molybdenum on ferlity of male rats.
Bio metal. 2002; 65-72.
14. Farook T, Vanithakumari G, Bhavanewari G, MaliniT,Mononayaki
S. Eect of anethole on seminal vesicle of albino rat. Ancient
Science of Life. 1991; 9-11.
15. Nordberg Eect of long term care cadmium exposure on the
seminal vesicle of mice. Reproducve Ferlity.1975; 165-167.
16. Alaee S, Talaiekhozani A, Rezaei S, AlaeeK,Youseane. Cadmium
and male inferlity. Journal of Inferlity and Reproducve
Biology 2014; 62-69.
17. Mohammed A, Ruquyah S. Jafr A. (2016) Eect of dierent doses
level of silver nanoparcles (AgNPs) on the seminal vesicle and
prostate in albino male rat. Histopathological study. Internaonal
Journal of Scienc and Engineering Research.2016; 980-983.
18. Sitavi Y. Murthy S. Eect of heavy metal stress on the seminal
vesicle of Glossogobiuris. Internaonal Journal of Recent
Scienc Research. 2013; 451-454.
19. Romonyuk A. and Shkryoba A. Morphological changes of
prostate gland due to heavy exposure to heavy metals salts. The
New Armenian Medical Journal 2015; 58-62.
20. Spick C. Hearmn K. Czernin J. Evoluon of prostate cancer with
C-Acetate PET/CT. The Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2018; vol.
(57).5-10.
Lead Acetate induced Histological alteraons in Seminal-vesicle and Prostate Gland of Wistar rats
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
No. of
animals
Treatment 





Seminal
vesicle
Prostate gland
 Dislled water(15days) 241.6±1.21 242.20±0.86 0.676±0.0022 0.402±0.0048
 Lead acetate (15days) 236.40±1.86 175.20±1.07 0.671±0.0019 0.375±0.0059
 Dislled water(30days) 307.80±0.86 309±0.89 0.653±0.0029 0.332±0.0016
 Lead acetate (30days) 302.80±1.36 225.20±1.24 0.555±0.0029 0.313±0.0025

 
        
      

Figure 3:
 

Figure 5        

       


Figure 4:       
       

Figure 6 

       

         
       

Values expressed in Mean±SE
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
30 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.30-34

1M.Sc. Research Scholar, Department of Forensic Science, Punjabi University, Paala, 147002




Declared None.
ABSTRACT
In developing countries such as India, poisoning is one of
the major causes of deaths. Study of paerns of poisoning
help in ascertaining the prevalent problems associated with
poisoning in India. In the present study, a retrospecve study
has been conducted to study the poisoning cases reported in
Civil Hospital of Moga district of Punjab State of Northern India
during the period of January 2007 to May 2016.

Poisoning cases;
retrospecve study; moga;
Punjab; forensic medicine.
Received on 11th January 2018
Accepted on 23rd November 2018
Published on 31st December 2018
©2018 The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology.
Published at JIPMER, Pondicherry, 605006, INDIA Subscripon & payment related
queries at: toxicology@aims.amrita.edu and rest all types of queries related to the
journal to be done at drambika_editor@jist.org.in
ARTICLE INFO
 Praveen Kumar Yadav, UGC-SRF,
Department of Forensic Science, Punjabi University, Paala,
147002. Email: praveenky15@yahoo.com
How to Cite this arcle:Kaur S, Yadav PK. Poisoning trends in
Moga district of Punjab: A 10 year Record based Observaonal
Study. Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology 2018;14(2):30-
34. 
INTRODUCTION
A poisoning episode may be dened as the exposure of
an individual (either by ingeson, injecon or inhalaon)
to a substance(s) associated with the signicant potenal
to cause harm[1]. Poisoning is one of the major causes
of deaths across the world and is a major epidemic
of non-communicable disease in the present century.
Acute poisoning is a global health problem.[2] Poisoning
can either be acute or chronic depending on the me -
period for which poisoning has occurred. Acute poisoning
cases are most commonly encountered by the doctors.
Chronic poisoning can result from various sources
such as environment, food and water supplies, or the
industrial release of waste products.[3].[4] Poisoning
can be accidental, homicidal or suicidal. Accidental
poisonings may be occupaonal hazard as in cases of
pescide poisoning in farmers, etc. Homicidal poisonings
are comparavely rare. The paern of suicidal deaths
can reect the prevailing social set up and psychological
mind-set of the inhabitants of a region[5]. Paerns of
poisoning may vary with geographical locaon. Therefore,
it is important to study the paerns of poisoning in
various parts of world. In developing countries with rural
economies, poisoning by pescides and herbicides is
common. However, the paerns of habitaon and work
can also expose the populaon in warmer countries to
toxins from snakes or spiders. Paerns of poisoning also
Poisoning trends in Moga district of Punjab: A 10 year Record based Observaonal Study
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
reect which type of poisons are readily available or are
important for local tradions. In developed countries,
the epidemiology of poisoning oen reects prescribing
pracce and availability[3]. Therefore, the study of
paerns of poisoning can help in policy making by the
governments of various countries. In this study, we have
done a retrospecve study of various poisoning cases
encountered in a Civil hospital of Moga District of Punjab
state of Northern region of India. From this study, we
hope to uncover the paerns of poisoning prevalent in
the respecve region.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The present study is a retrospecve study which was
conducted in the Civil Hospital of Moga District of Punjab
state of Northern region of India from January 2007 to
May 2016. Figure 1 illustrates the study area. This study
comprised of the individuals who were admied in the
emergency division dedicated to poisoning cases of the
hospital and were alleged to have been poisoned. The
data was collected from the hospital records. Cases, which
were referred from nearby districts to the central hospital
of Moga district, were not considered. In total 646 case
histories were studied to uncover various paern of
poisoning in the region.
RESULTS
A total 646 individuals were treated for poisoning in the
emergency division of the Civil hospital of Moga District.
433 (67%) paents were males and 213 (33%) were
females. From Fig 2 and Table 1, it is evident that the
incidence of poisoning is maximum in the age group of
21-30 years (278 or 43%) followed by 11-20 years (141
or 21.8%) and 31-40 years (120 or 18.6%) whereas the
minimum numbers of poisoning cases were reported
in age group of less than 10 years (20 or 3.1%). Table 2
illustrates the month wise poisoning case distribuon.
Maximum numbers of paents were admied in July (73
or 11.3%) and September (70 or 10.8%) followed by May
(63 or 9.8%) and April (58 or 8.5%). Minimum numbers
of paents were admied in the month of February and
December (36 or 5.6% paents each). The percentage
of paents admied was maximum in the years of 2014
and 2015 with 89 (13.8) poisoning cases each. This
percentage was followed by 2011 (80 or 12.4%) and 2010
(76 or 11.8%). The minimum numbers of poisoning cases
were observed in year 2007 (39 or 6%) (Table 3). Suicidal
cases (273 or 42.3%) and accidental cases (222 or 34.4%)
were major cause of poisonings followed by addicon
cases (78 or 12.1). Homicidal cases were 19 (2.9%) in
number. 281 paents belonged to poor nancial status
whereas 226 paents belong to good nancial status
(Table 4). Celphos which is the brand name for aluminium
phosphide and is used as pescide was responsible for
maximum numbers of poisoning causalies in the study
area. It resulted in 148 (22.9%) poisoning admissions
followed by drug overdose (12.1%), inseccide poisoning
(11.6%), pescide poisoning (7.1%), and phenyl poisoning
(5.3%) (Table 5). Out of total 646 admissions, 61 (9.4%)
paents died, 368 (57.0%) were treated and discharged,
and 217 (33.6%) were referred to other hospital for
further treatment (Table 6)
DISCUSSION
In the present study, the percentage of males among total
poisoning cases was 67% and 33% were females. These
ndings are strongly supported by and are in convergence
with the naonal and global ndings. A possible
explanaon to these ndings can be the frequent exposure
of males to poisoning agents due to their occupaon.
Males are more prone to the stress which may lead to
the suicidal use of poisoning agents[6]. Similar ndings
were observed by Zia et al[7] (71.4% males), Issa et al[8]
(90.9% males), Singh et al [6] (72.72% males), Prajapa
et al[9] (65.4% males). Kumar and Reddy[10] (65.10%
males), Maskey et al[11] (56.6% males), Aaka et al[2]
(69.3% males). Only minor increments were reported
by Jalali et al[12] (51% males) and Hameed et al [13]
(50.9% males), Jailkhani et al[14] (52% males). Dogan et
al [15], Zohre et al[16] (28.7% males) has reported more
number of poisoning cases in females as compared to
the males. In this study males constuted only 35.3% of
total poisoning cases. In the present study, the age group
having maximum causalies due to poisoning was the
21-30 years age group followed by 11-20 years age group
and 31-40 years age group whereas the least number
of paents belonged to less than 10 year age group and
more than 51 year age group. The age groups of 21-30
years and 31-40 years are the most acve periods of an
individual’s life and result in maximum stress as well.
Various studies (Singh et al[6], Liu et al[17], Escorey
and Shirley[18], Meel[19], Sandhu and Dalal[20], Batra
et al[21], Dash et al[22]duraon of hospitalizaon and
me lapse before arrival at hospital. All OP poisoning
cases admied to the Emergency Department of MKCG
Medical College Hospital and other fatal cases received at
the mortuary between September 1999 and August 2001
were prospecvely studied. Males outnumbered females
and most OP poisoning occurred in the 21-30 year age
group. In 68 (97.1%, Nigam et al[23],Garg and Verma[24])
Yadav PK, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.30-34
show the vicms are frequently aected in the most
acve periods of their lives i.e. adult age. The vicms
in their extremes of ages were far less aected due to
limited exposure to poisonous substances. Excepon to
this nding was observed by Ahmed et al[25] who reports
that maximum poisoning cases fell within the age group
of 10-20 year age group. In the present study, maximum
numbers of poisoning cases were admied in the months
of July and September followed by the months of May and
April. In the summer months, the agricultural and farming
acvies are on peak which may result in easy availability
of poisonous substances such as organophosphates. This
increase in farming acvity will in return result in the
increase of poisoning cases in summer season. Similar
trends have been proposed by Dash et al[22]duraon of
hospitalizaon and me lapse before arrival at hospital.
All OP poisoning cases admied to the Emergency
Department of MKCG Medical College Hospital and other
fatal cases received at the mortuary between September
1999 and August 2001 were prospecvely studied. Males
outnumbered females and most OP poisoning occurred
in the 21-30 year age group. In 68 (97.1%, Singh et
al[26], and Jalali et al[12].In the present study, maximum
numbers of poisoning cases admied were suicidal cases
followed by accidental cases. The number of homicidal
poisoning is very less as compared to suicidal cases.
Similar results have been reported by Vougiouklakis and
Mitselou et al[1], Aaka et al[2], Liu et al[17], Escoery
and Shirley[18], Batra et al[21], Nigam et al[23], Ahmad
et al[25], Singh et al[26], Soltaninejad et al[27], Zhou
et al[28], and Lee et al[29], Flaganan et al[30], Spiller
et al[31], Gupta and Vaghela[32]. Kiran et al[33], Kar et
al[34]. Homicidal poisoning cases as the major cause of
deaths have been reported by McDowell et al[35] and
Hempstead[36]. Accidental poisoning cases as largest
contributor to poisoning causalies were reported by
Malangu[37].In the present study, maximum of poisoning
cases reported were of organophosphate poisoning. This
may be because, India is an agriculture based country and
in farming oriented states such as Punjab, there is an easy
availability of organophosphates. Organophosphates are
used as pescides to be sprayed on the crops. Similar
paerns have been reported by Aaka et al.[2], Ahmad et
al.[25], Nigam et al.[23].
CONCLUSION
In the present study paerns of poisoning at the Civil
Hospital of Moga District of Punjab state of Northern
region of India from January 2007 to May 2016 were
studies. It was observed that maximum number of
poisoning cases were reported in male populaon of 21-
30 years age group. Moreover, accidental poisoning was
most common cause of poisoning. It was also observed
that poor economic condion was the major cause of
poisoning. Celphos, which is a brand name of aluminium
phosphide was the most frequent substance used for the
poisoning.
REFERENCES
1. Vougiouklakis T, Boumba VA. Fatal poisoning in the region of
Epirus , Greece , during the period 1998 – 2004. 2006;6–10.
       
      


2. Aaka, Yadav PK, Bumbrah GS, Gambhir S, Sharma RM. Poisoning
Trends In Panchkula District Of Haryana State, India. J Forensic
Med Toxicol. 2015;32(1):7–16.
Poisoning trends in Moga district of Punjab: A 10 year Record based Observaonal Study
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 33
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
3. Sandilands EA, Bateman DN. The epidemiology of poisoning.
Medicine (Balmore) [Internet]. 2015;44(2):76–9. Available
from: hp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2015.11.015
4. Waring WS. The Acute Management of Posioning. Medicine
(Balmore).
5. Mbbs TK, Assistant DFM. Suicidal poisoning in Southern India :
Gender dierences. 2008;
6. Singh SP, Aggarwal AD, Oberoi SS, Aggrawal KK, Thind AS, Bhullar
DS, et al. Study of poisoning trends in north India e A perspecve
in relaon to world stascs. J Forensic Leg Med [Internet].
2013;20:14–8. Available from: hp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
jm.2012.04.034
7. Ziya MK, Öztürk G, Gurler M, Karaarslan B, Erden G, Karapirli M,
et al. Pescide poisoning cases in Ankara and nearby cies in
Turkey : An 11-year retrospecve analysis. J Forensic Leg Med.
2013;20:274–7.
8. Issa SY, El M, Salam MA, Al-mazroua MK, Hamd MA, Kharoshah
M. Spectrum of unnatural deaths associated with posive
toxicology ndings in Eastern province , KSA : An autopsy based
study. Egypt J Forensic Sci [Internet]. 2016; Available from:
hp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2016.05.005
9. Prajapa K, Merchant SP, Patel PR. Trends of Suicidal Poisoning
In Ahmedabad ( Retrospecve Study ). NHL J Med Sci.
2012;1(1):18–22.
10. N HK, P SR. A Study of Poisoning Cases at Harsha Hospital
Nelamangala , Bangalore Rural. Medico-Legal Updat.
2013;13(1):168–71.
11. Maskey A, Parajuli M, Kohli SC, Baral S, Basnet S, Poudel N.
Scenario of Poisoning Cases in Adults Admied in Manipal
Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. Nepal J Med Sci.
2012;01(01):23–6.
12. Jalali A, Savari M, Dehdardargahi S, Azarpanah A. The paern of
poisoning in southwestern region of Iran: Envenoming: As the
major cause. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2012;7(3):100–5.
13. Hameed FA, Ansari HK, Al-Najjar FJ. Prevalent Poisonings in
Adults and Adolescents in Dubai : A Compendium from Rashid
Hospital. Asia Pacic J Med Toxicol. 2014;3(3):115–9.
14. Jailkhani SMK, Naik JD, Thakur MS, Langare SD, Pandey VO.
Retrospecve Analysis of Poisoning Cases Admied in a Terary
Care Hospital. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2014;10(2):365–8.
15. Dogan FS, Ozaydin V, Varisli B, Incealn O, Ozkok Z. The Analysis
of Poisoning Cases Presented to the Emergency Department
within a One-Year Period. Turkish J Emerg Med [Internet].
2014;14(4):160–4. Available from: hp://dx.doi.org/10.5505/1
304.7361.2014.87360
16. Zohre E, Ayruk C, Bozkurt S, Kose A, Narci H, Cevik I, et al.
Retrospecve Analysis of Poisoning Cases Admied to the
Emergency Medicine. Arch Iran Med. 2015;18(2):117–22.
17. Liu Q, Zhou L, Zheng N, Zhuo L, Liu Y, Liu L. Poisoning deaths
in China : Type and prevalence detected at the Tongji Forensic
Medical Center in Hubei. 2009;193:88–94.
18. Escoery CT, Shirley SE. Fatal poisoning in Jamaica: A coroner’s
autopsy study from the University Hospital of the West Indies.
Med Sci Law. 2004;44(2):116–20.
19. Meel BL. Fatalies by poisoning in the Mthatha area of South
Africa. South African Fam Pract. 2007;49(7):17–8.
20. Sandhu S, Dalal J. Trends of poisoning in Faridkot region of
Punjab- A retrospecve study of one year. J Indian Acad Forensic
Med. 2010;32(1):08-10.
21. Batra AK, Keoliya AN, Jadhav GU. Poisoning : An Unnatural Cause
of Morbidity and Mortality in Rural India. JAPI. 2003;51:955–9.
22. Dash SK, Mohanty MK, Mohanty S, Patnaik KK. Organophosphorus
poisoning: vicm specic analysis of mortality and morbidity.
Med Sci Law. 2008;48(3):241–5.
23. Nigam M, Jain AK, Dubey B., Sharma V. Trends of
organophosphorus poisoning in bhopal region An autopsy based
study. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2004;26(2):971–4.
24. Garg V, Verma SK. Trends of Poisoning in Rural Area of South-
West , Punjab. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2010;32(3):189–93.
25. Ahmad R, Ahad K, Iqbal R, Muhammad A. Acute poisoning
due to commercial pescides in multan. Pakistan J Med Sci.
2002;18(3):227–31.
26. Singh K, Oberoi SS, Bhullar DS. Poisoning trends in Malwa region
of Punjab. J Punjab Acedemy Forensic Med Toxicol. 2003;3:26–9.
27. Soltaninejad K, Faryadi M, Sardari F. Acute pescide poisoning
related deaths in Tehran during the period 2003-2004. J Forensic
Leg Med. 2007;14(6):352–4.
28. Zhou L, Liu L, Chang L, Li L. Poisoning Deaths in Central China
(Hubei): A 10-year Retrospecve Study of Forensic Autopsy
Cases. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(SUPPL. 1):234–7.
29. Lee SK, Lee SK, Rhee JS, Jung JM, Lee HS. Pescide poisoning
deaths detected at the Naonal Forensic Service headquarters
in Seoul of Korea : A ve year survey ( 2005-2009 ) Pescide
Poisoning Deaths Detected at the Naonal A Five-Year Survey (
2005-2009 ). Enviromental Heal Toxicol. 2010;25(4):263–71.
30. Flanagan RJ, Rooney C, Griths C. Fatal poisoning in childhood ,
England & Wales 1968 – 2000. 2005;148:121–9.
31. Spiller HA, Appana S, Brock GN. Epidemiological trends of suicide
and aempted suicide by poisoning in the US : 2000 – 2008.
Leg Med [Internet]. 2010;12(4):177–83. Available from: hp://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.04.005
32. Gupta BD, Vaghela PC. Prole of fatal poisoning in and around
Jamnagar. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2005;27(3):971–4.
33. Kiran N, RRH S, Jaiprakash V, Vanaja K. Paern of poisoning
reported at South Indian terary care hospital. Indian J Forensic
Med Toxicol. 2008;2(2):17–9.
34. Kar SM, Timsinha S, Aggrawal P. Epidemiological study of
organophosphate poisoning at manipal teaching hospital,
Pokhara, Nepal. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2010;32(2):108–9.
35. McDowell R, Fowles J, Philip D. Deaths from poisoning in
Newzealand: 2001-2002. Newzeal Med J. 2005;118(1225):U1725.
36. Hempstead K. Manner of death and circumstances in fatal
poisoning: Evidence from New Jersey. Inj Prev. 2006;12(2):ii44-
ii48.
37. Malangu N. Acute poisoning at two hospitals at Kampala -
Uganda. J Forensic Leg Med. 2008;15:489–92.
Yadav PK, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
34 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.30-34
Months Frequency Percent 

 49 7.6 7.6
 36 5.6 13.2
 55 8.5 21.7
 58 9.0 30.7
 63 9.8 40.4
 49 7.6 48.0
 73 11.3 59.3
 55 8.5 67.8
 70 10.8 78.6
 49 7.6 86.2
 53 8.2 94.4
 68 5.6 100.0
 646 100.0
Economic

Frequency Percentage 
Percentage
 226 35.0 35.0
 281 43.5 78.5
 21 3.3 81.7
 118 18.3 100.0
 646 100.0
Mortality Frequency Percent 
Percentage
 61 9.4 9.4
 368 57.0 66.4
 217 33.6 100.0
 646 100.0
 Frequency Percent 
Percentage
 20 3.1 3.1
 141 21.8 24.9
 278 43.0 68.0
 120 18.6 86.5
 56 8.7 95.2
 31 4.8 100.0
 646 100.0

Year Frequency Percentage 
Percentage
 35 5.4 5.4
 89 13.8 19.2
 89 13.8 33.0
 75 11.6 44.6
 72 11.1 55.7
 80 12.4 68.1
 76 11.8 79.9
 47 7.3 87.2
 44 6.8 94.0
 39 6.0 100.0
 646 100.0
Table 3:
 Frequency Percent 
Percentage
 54 8.2 8.2
 33 5.1 13.3
 3.5 13.8
 148 22.9 36.7
 4 .6 37.3
 78 12.1 49.4
 3.5 49.9
 75 11.6 61.5
 67 10.4 71.9
 4 .6 72.5
 46 7.1 79.6
 31 5.3 84.9
 30 4.6 89.5
 68 10.5 100.0
 646 100.0
Table 5:
 

Table 4:
 
Table 6:
 
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566 35
Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
3
4
1 Emergency & Trauma care, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurugram
2 Forensic Medicine & toxicology, Sikkim Manipal Instute of Medical Sciences, Gangtok
3 Emergency & Trauma Care, Grande Internaonale Hospital, Nepal
4 Emergency & Trauma Care. Connental Hospital, Hyderabad




    All authors state that
there is no conict of interest withthe work done in this study.
ABSTRACT
Modern Medicine has been at the forefront in the use of
paent simulaon for research, training and performance
assessment. With simulaon, no paents are at risk for
exposure to novice caregivers or unproven technologies. It
becomes very important in eld of toxicological emergencies,
due to its acute onset of presentaon, rapid progression of
symptoms, early deterioraon of vitals and adverse outcomes
in morbidity and mortality of paents in extremes of ages.
Our observaonal study suggests that Forensic Medicine and
Toxicology (FMT) residents have limited exposure to crically
ill paents of trauma and toxicology and the budding forensic
professionals lack the skills to manage them. Simulaon has
the potenal to ll this educaonal void in managing clinical
forensic and toxicological emergencies. The following review
will aempt to answer this call by quanfying the eect of
simulaon-based educaonal intervenons on retenon of
knowledge and clinical performance, as applied to acute care
toxicology.

Poisoning management, Simulaon,
training, Teamwork, Condence, clinical skills,
Resuscitaon, toxicological Emergencies
Received on 30th July 2018
Accepted on 10th December 2018
Published on 31st December 2018
©2018 The Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology.
Published at JIPMER, Pondicherry, 605006, INDIA Subscripon & payment related
queries at: toxicology@aims.amrita.edu and rest all types of queries related to the
journal to be done at drambika_editor@jist.org.in
ARTICLE INFO
 Vivekanshu Verma, Emergency &
Trauma care, Medanta-The Medicity, Gurugram. Email:
vivekanshu@yahoo.co.in
How to Cite this arcle:Verma V, Rastogi P, Richhariya D,
Ajay Thapa A, Kaliaperumal P, Sharma C. Mastery learning
of Toxicology life support skills by FMT residents using
simulaon technology in India. Journal of Indian Society of
Toxicology 2018;14(2):35-41.  


Simulaon has been used as a teaching tool for nearly 40
years in elds as diverse as aviaon and military training.
However, integraon of this technology into the arenas of
medical educaon and assessment is a relavely recent
development.1 Vision 2015 document of MCI emphasizes
adopon of Contemporary Educaon Technologies - Skills
lab, E-learning, Simulaon.1 Simulaon benets learners
in geng hand’s on experience without causing any
harm to actual casualty.2 Today’s learners have had wide
exposure to communicaon technology through high-
speed computers, the Internet, and smartphones. Given
this exposure and the learners’ experse in its use, they
are recepve and generally excited about educaonal
experiences involving simulated situaons because they
oer a more acve process and employ state-of-the-
art technology.3 The purpose of medical simulaon is

Verma V, et al.
ISSN: 0973-3558, e-ISSN: 0973-3566
36 Journal of Indian Society of Toxicology (JIST) Volume 14, Issue 2, 31 Dec 2018
DOI: 10.31736/jist/v14.i2.2018.35-41
to emulate real paents, anatomic regions, and clinical
tasks, or to parallel real-life situaons in which medical
care is provided.4 The widespread adopon of simulaon
technology marks a divergence from the tradional ‘see
one, do one, teach one’ method of medical training,
which for centuries has relied upon real paents.
Mulple factors have contributed to this revoluon
in training. Changing paerns in healthcare delivery
have resulted in shorter hospital stays and clinic visits.5
Furthermore, the increasing drive to reduce medical
errors and improve paent safety has fueled the impetus
to incorporate simulaon technology into training and
assessment programs.5 Limitaons on trainee work
hours have contributed to decreased clinical experience.6
This has resulted in reduced paent availability for
learning, decreased exposure to crically ill paents, and
decreased me for clinical faculty to teach.7 In addion,
technological advances in diagnosis and treatment, such
as newer imaging modalies and life-saving procedures,
require development of skill sets that dier from
tradional approaches.8 Concurrent progress in simulaon
technology that enables increasingly realisc models
oers advantages for such skill acquision.9 Simulaon
in toxicology educaon can teach the skills needed to
manage rare or crical events, such as cardiopulmonary
arrest or associated trauma.10 Toxicology Trainees can
make errors and learn to recognize and correct them
in the simulated environment without fear of being
penalized or causing harm to paents. And nally, ethical
quesons arise concerning the appropriateness of using
real paents as training resources.11 Much of this debate
centers on sensive tasks (i.e., pelvic examinaons in
females) or those that involve potenal risk of harm
to paents (endotracheal intubaon or other invasive
procedures). All of these factors driving the increased
use of simulaon are part of a paradigm shi toward
outcomes-based medical educaon.12 The consensus
calls for research to explore the methods of assessment
and the correlaon of simulated assessments with clinical
performance.13 One reason for greater use of simulaon
in teaching in Clinical toxicology is that changes in
health care system have shortened hospital stays and
brought sicker paents into the hospital, leaving fewer
opportunies for learners to gain hands-on experience
in managing toxicological emergencies. Simulaon is
currently used as an assessment tool to provide ongoing
feedback during training (formave assessment) and
is gaining popularity as an adjuncve method for
demonstrang competency (summave assessment).14
Recent literature demonstrates increased retenon of
knowledge and skills aer simulaon-based training
in the areas of resuscitaon in intoxicated, associated
trauma, airway management, procedural training, team
training, and disaster management in mass casualty due
to poisoning.15
Conceptual Background
Mannequins come in