ArticlePDF Available

Evaluation of Certain Egyptian Heterorhabditids Isolates as Molluscicidal Nematodes for The Control of Deroceras reticulatum and D. leave Slugs under Laboratory Conditions

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Deroceras laeve Müller and D. reticulatum Müller are serious slugs of field crops in Egypt. Chemical control using metaldehyde baits is still the main control tactic. In 2018, a survey of terrestrial slugs at Belbis district, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt failed to find the molluscicidal nematode, Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. Dead slugs produced only free-living or non pathogenic nematodes belong to Family Rhabditidae. Two imported EPNs species; Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HP88 strain) were screened for molluscicidal activity against D. laeve and D. reticulatum compared with three Egyptian Heterorhabditis isolates, Ht strain, Ar-4 strain and Serag1 strain. S. carpocapsae (All strain) and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain), showed promising results by killing territorial slugs. S. carpocapsae (All strain) resulted in the greatest percentage mortalities 100% in D. laeve and D.reticulatum after 14 days at a concentration of 2000IJs/cm whereas, the application of H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain) induced percentages mortality 50 and 66.67% with D. laeve and D. reticulatum, respectively. The Egyptian strain H. bacteriophora showed less molluscicidal activity against the two tested slugs. After 14 days, D. reticulatum mortalities were 36.67, 40.00 and 46.33 % by the application of H. bacteriophora (Serag1 strain), H. bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain), respectively. Whereas, the percentage mortalities were 20.00, 23.33 and 26.67 % ; 10.00, 13.33 and 13.33% in D. leave at low concentrations (1000 IJs/cm 2 & 500 IJs/cm 2), respectively. Egyptian isolates showed less encourage usage as a specific biological control agent against D.laeve and D.reticulatum compared to S. carpocapsae (All strain) and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain). Finally, results of this study indicate the need to an extensive survey in all Egypt to detect and isolate the slug parasitic nematode, P. hermaphrodita as it was recorded in Dakahlia governorate infesting different snails and slug species and research should proceed to find virulent isolates from EPNs to control terrestrial slugs.
Content may be subject to copyright.
El-Ashry and Abd El-Aal
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
Evaluation of Certain Egyptian Heterorhabditids Isolates as Molluscicidal
Nematodes for The Control of Deroceras reticulatum and D. leave Slugs
under Laboratory Conditions.
El-Ashry, R. M. and E. M. Abd El-Aal
Dept. Plant Protection, Fac. Agric., Zagazig University, Egypt.
Corresponding author email: mrmaa2010@yahoo.com
:
ABSTRACT
:
Deroceras laeve ller and D. reticulatumller are serious slugs of field crops in Egypt.
Chemical control using metaldehyde baits is still the main control tactic. In 2018, a survey of
terrestrial slugs at Belbis district, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt failed to find the
molluscicidal nematode, Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. Dead slugs produced only
free-living or non pathogenic nematodes belong to Family Rhabditidae. Two imported
EPNs species; Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora
(HP88 strain) were screened for molluscicidal activity against D. laeve and D.
reticulatum compared with three Egyptian Heterorhabditis isolates, Ht strain, Ar-4 strain
and Serag1 strain. S. carpocapsae (All strain) and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain),
showed promising results by killing territorial slugs. S. carpocapsae (All strain)
resulted in the greatest percentage mortalities 100% in D. laeve and D.reticulatum after
14 days at a concentration of 2000IJs/cm whereas, the application of H. bacteriophora
(HP88 strain) induced percentages mortality 50 and 66.67% with D. laeve and D.
reticulatum, respectively. The Egyptian strain H. bacteriophora showed less
molluscicidal activity against the two tested slugs. After 14 days, D. reticulatum
mortalities were 36.67, 40.00 and 46.33 % by the application of H. bacteriophora
(Serag1 strain), H. bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain),
respectively. Whereas, the percentage mortalities were 20.00, 23.33 and 26.67 % ; 10.00,
13.33 and 13.33% in D. leave at low concentrations (1000 IJs/cm2 & 500 IJs/cm2),
respectively. Egyptian isolates showed less encourage usage as a specific biological
control agent against D.laeve and D.reticulatum compared to S. carpocapsae (All strain)
and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain).
Finally, results of this study indicate the need to an extensive survey in all Egypt to
detect and isolate the slug parasitic nematode, P. hermaphrodita as it was recorded in
Dakahlia governorate infesting different snails and slug species and research should
proceed to find virulent isolates from EPNs to control terrestrial slugs.
Keywords: Survey, Biological control, Deroceras laeve, D. reticulatum, Heterorhabditis
bacteriophora, Steinernema carpocapsae.
INTRODUCTION
Slugs belong to Mollusca, Gastropoda cause considerable damage to field crops,
vegetables, fruit trees, ornamental plants, landscapes, nurseries and greenhouses
(Kaya, 2001). Slugs may also pose a health threat to humans, pets, and wildlife by
Evaluation of Certain Egyptian heterorhabditids Isolates….
72
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
serving as intermediate hosts for many vertebrate parasites (e.g., lungworm) (South,
1992).
In Egypt, land gastropods could be considered as dangerous crop pests and cause
considerable damage to the majority of economic crops. The increased pest status of
these species differed from place to another, depending on food supply and weather
conditions especially in moist areas where they find the optimum conditions for rapid
multiplication (Kassab and Daoud,1964; El-Okda, 1980 and El-Deeb et al.,1996, 2003).
Theenhaus and Scheu (1996) showed that many of slug species do not pose a risk to
plant, human or veterinary health; indeed, they can play a role in nutrient cycling and
ecological diversity. On the other hand, numerous slug species cause considerable
amounts of economic damage in field crops especially in damp, mild climates (Barker,
2002).
Current control options include chemical, cultural and biological approaches.
Molluscicides based on baits containing metaldehyde and methiocarbas active
ingredients dominate chemical control products (Glen and Moens, 2002&Abd El-Aal,
2007), have proven to be effective when properly used. These materials are the most
widely used for slug control. However, under cool and wet conditions when slugs are
most active and troublesome, the slugs can often recover (Ohlendorff, 1998). In addition,
these chemical baits are toxic, posing health concerns for children, pets, and wildlife.
Furthermore, there are environmental objections to the use of molluscicidal chemicals.
Consequently, an integrated strategy is usually required and new developments will be
crucial to maintain and improve the existing levels of control.
With respect to pest slug management, although natural enemies of mollusks have
been known for many years (Runham and Hunter, 1970), their wide-scale potential as a
control solution has not been subject to intensive research activity until the last 3050
years, in large part because of the dominance of the agrochemical industry. The parasitic
nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Schneider) is the most widely established,
commercially available slug biocontrol agents in Europe and is currently sold as the
proprietary product Nemaslug1(Wilson et al.,1993). Nemaslug1 is effective against
adults and juveniles of nine pest slug species and solely juveniles of two species (Rae et
al., 2007). Notable exceptions include Limax maximus and the Arion slugs, A. hortensis
and Arion subfuscus, which are not susceptible.
Although P. hermaphrodita was discovered almost 155 years ago (Schneider, 1859), it
was not until it was isolated again in the UK in 1988 that its potential as a slug biocontrol
agent was recognized (Wilson et al., 1993), and it was later shown to be associated
symbiotically with the bacterium Moraxella osloensis (Bevre &Henrikson) (Tan and
Grewal, 2001; 2002; 2003). A number of snail species has been shown to be susceptible
to P. hermaphrodita (Rae et al., 2007), which reflects the similarities in their anatomy
and biology. Despite the known parasitic relationships between a range of slug and
nematode species (Morand et al., 2004), P.hermaphrodita was the first nematode actually
shown to kill slugs (Wilson et al., 1993; Pieterse et al., 2017 & Nermut and Puza, 2017 ;
Askary et al., 2017).
Certain strains of the entomopathogenic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapsae, S.
feltiae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora have also been tested in bioassays, but positive
results reported by Jaworska (1993) could not be replicated elsewhere (Wilson et al.,
1994). Host range experiments have shown that P. hermaphrodita is effective against a
wide variety of economically important pest slug and snail species (Coupland, 1995;
Wilson and Gaugler, 2000; Glen and Coupland, 2017;Tandingan et al., 2017)
El-Ashry and Abd El-Aal
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
Therefore, the aim of present study is to conduct a survey for molluscicidal nematodes
at Belbis district, Zagazig, Egypt and evaluate the efficacy of three local strains of
entomopathogenic nematode, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Ar-4, Serag1and Ht strains)
isolated from EL-Arish and Giza Governorates, Egypt and two imported nematode
species, Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain) and H.bacteriophora (HP88strain) for the
control of two terrestrial slugs (Deroceras leave Müller,1774 and D. reticulatum
Müller,1774) under laboratory conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
1- Survey studies
A survey study for collecting molluscicidal nematodes was conducted throughout
slug-prone areas (fruit trees, mandarin, navel orange, guava orchards,mango trees and
ornamental plants, hibiscus, magnolia, rose trees)of Basateen Serag El-Dein locality,
Belbies district. Slug collection was accomplished mainly through sight inspection of
groundcover. Refuge traps were used to collect current slug species (Abd El-Aal,2001). It
is simply consisted of lengths (15 cm x 20 cm) of damp wood placed adjacent to slug
infested areas. The slug species collected are the field (gray garden) slug, Deroceras
laeve Müller and D. reticulatum Müller .
The collected slugs were kept in 640 cc plastic containers with moist cotton cloth
inside coolers maintained below 20°C, until transported back to Agricultural Zoology
Laboratory in Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University,
Egypt where this work was conducted. Captured slugs were placed in large plastic
containers (30 x 25 x 13 cm) lined with moist sterile sandy soil, provided daily with
lettuce as food, and observed for signs of nematode infection (swollen mantle) for a
period of more than two weeks. Declining slugs were placed in White traps (Kaya and
Stock 1997) to collect any emerging dauer juvenile nematodes. The healthy slugs were
maintained in the plastic containers for future use in bioassays. Nematodes isolated from
the survey were tested with Koch’s Postulates to determine pathogenicity.
2- Isolation, rearing and preparing of native entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs):
EPNs were collected, reared and prepared as described by EL-Ashry et al., 2018. The
original method described by Dutky et al.(1964) was used with some modifications,
where the dead larvae were placed on a special fabric muslin cloth to avoid the
disintegration of the filter papers. Nematode juveniles were maintained in 0.1%
formaldehyde until identification. Three isolates designated as H.bacteriophora (Ar-
4strain) from EL-Arish, H. bacteriophora (Serag1strain) from Belbies and
H.bacteriophora (Htstrain) from Giza were extracted from soil samples.
3- Molluscicidal activity of native and imported entomopathogenic nematodes:
EPNs were screened for molluscicidal activity against two common pest slug species, D.
reticulatum and D. laeve. The following experimental design was used for all bioassays.
Plastic boxes (10 x15x 6cm) were lined on the inside walls with copper tape to prevent
the slugs from moving to the lid and still in contact with the nematodes. Five small
ventilation holes were made in the lids, and the plastic cages were filled with 10 g of
sterile sand. Nematode infective juvenile (IJ) suspensions were concentrated to the
desired concentrations (2000 IJs/cm2, 1000 IJs/cm2 and 500 IJs/cm2) and applied directly
to the soil surface in 1.5 ml of water.
Evaluation of Certain Egyptian heterorhabditids Isolates….
74
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
To insure optimum pathogenicity, only less than 2 weeks old IJ cultures were used in
the bioassays. The control treatment consisted of 1.5 ml of distilled water. Every plastic
cage contained a single, healthy slug. Slugs were fed daily on one lettuce disc (3.5 cm
diameter) and replaced every 48 h. Moisture was adjusted as needed. The experiment was
maintained at laboratory temperature (22º ± 3C), and slug mortality was monitored daily
for two weeks. Slug cadavers were placed in White traps to recover any emerging
nematodes.
Each screening or treatment consisted of three replicates consisting of 10 slugs for each
nematode species or strain. Mortality percentages were calculated according the
following formula:
100
slugs ofnumber Total
slugs dead ofNumber
(%)Mortality
4- Statistical analysis:
The experiments were carried out in a completely randomized design with 3
replications for each treatment. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA)
using MSTATversion4 (1987).Means were compared by Duncans multiple range test
(Duncan, 1955) at P ≤ 0.05
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
1- Survey of terrestrial slugs and molluscicidal nematodes at Belbis district, Sharkia
Governorate:
An extensive survey was carried out during two successive years started from January,
2016 to December, 2017 to obtain basic information’s concerning occurrence of
terrestrial slugs in 35 localities (villages) at Belbis district (county) of Sharkia
Governorate . The two gray field slug species, Deroceras reticulatum and D.laeve were
collected at some given site, but, D. reticulatum was usually the dominant one. Collected
slugs were observed carefully for signs of nematode infection (swollen mantle). Slug
cadavers placed on White traps and Koch’s Postulates were followed. Isolated nematodes
were non-pathogenic. Survey of terrestrial slugs at Belbis district failed to find the
molluscicidal nematode, P. hermaphrodita. The slug parasitic nematode, P.
hermaphrodita was recorded in Egypt in Dakahlia governorate associated with different
snail and slug species i.e. Monacha cantiana, Eobania vermiculata, Helix aspersa and
Lehmania marginata. (Genena et al., 2011).
2- Pathogenicity of imported EPNs and local isolates of Egyptian Heterorhabditis
bacteriophora isolates against Deroceras leave and D. reticulatum:
Three Egyptian Heterorhabditis isolates were screened for molluscicidal activity
against D. leave compared with two imported species, S. carpocapsae (All strain) and
H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain) after different periods of exposure. Both S.
carpocapsae (All strain) and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain), at the highest
concentration (2000 IJs/cm2) showed promising results by killing 100% and 50 %
of territorial slug, D. leave after 14 days of exposure, respectively. (Table 1). At
low application rates, 1000IJs/cm2and 500IJs/cm2, percentage mortalities decreased
to 70.00, 43.33; 43.33, 26.67 % with S. carpoapsae (All strain) and
H.bacteriophora (HP88 strain), after 14 days of exposure, respectively.
El-Ashry and Abd El-Aal
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
Whereas, the three strains of Egyptian H. bacteriophora , H. bacteriophora (Serag1
strain), H. bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain) showed less
effectiveness as molluscicidal activity against D.laeve slug. At concentration of 2000
IJs/cm2, percentage mortalities in D. leave ranged from 26.33 to 30.00 % by the
application of H. bacteriophora (Serag1 strain) , H. bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H.
bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain).
Table 1. Molluscicidal activity of Egyptian Heterorhabditis strains against the gray slug
Deroceras laeve compared with Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain) and
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HP88 strain) after different periods of exposure.
Nematode species
Conc.
6 days
10 days
14 days
S. carpocapsae (All strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
56.67 a
83.33 a
100.0 a
1000 IJs/cm2
36.67 a
60.00 a
70.00 a
500 IJs/cm2
6.67 de
16.67 c
43.33 b
H. bacteriophora (HP88
strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
26.67 b
43.33 b
50.00 b
1000 IJs/cm2
20.00 b
30.00 b
43.33 b
500 IJs/cm2
6.67 de
16.67 c
26.67 bc
H. bacteriophora (Serag1
strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
6.67 de
16.67d
26.33 cd
1000 IJs/ cm2
6.67 de
10.00 cd
20.00 c
500 IJs/ cm2
0.00 f
10.00 cd
10.00 d
H. bacteriophora (Ht strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
6.67 de
13.33 d
26.67 bc
1000 IJs/ cm2
6.67 de
13.33 c
23.33 cd
500 IJs/ cm2
0.00 f
10.00 cd
13.33 d
H. bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
13.33 c
20.00cd
30.00 bc
1000 IJs/ cm2
10.00 cd
16.67 c
26.67 c
500 IJs/ cm2
3.33 de
13.33 c
13.33 d
Each value is a mean of three replicates with 10 slugs in each replicate.
Tested slugs were observed daily for mortality but only table contains data of 6,10 and 14 days.
The same letter (s) in columns indicates no significant differences at P≤ 0.05according to Duncan's
multiple range test.
Minimum percentage mortalities were obtained when Egyptian H. bacteriophora
strains were used at low concentrations, 500IJs/cm2 and 1000IJs/cm2. Percentage
mortalities in D. leave ranged from 10.0 to 20.0; 13.33 to 23.33; 13.33 to 26.67% by the
application of H. bacteriophora (Serag1 strain), H. bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H.
bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain) after 14 days of exposure, consequently . After 6 days,
percentage mortalities in D. leave ranged from 6.67 to 13.33 % by the application of H.
bacteriophora (Serag1 strain), H. bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4
strain) , consequently. Whereas, in imported EPNs species, S. carpocapsae (All strain)
and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain), percentage mortalities values were 56.67 and
26.67%, respectively.
Data in Table (2) showed that exotic nematode species, S. carpocapsae (All strain)
and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain) were more aggressive killer to D. reticulatum than
native strains of H. bacteriophora. Data revealed that S. carpocapsae (All strain) and
H.bacteriophora (HP88 strain) after 14 days of application, recorded percentage
mortalities in D. reticulatum reached 100 and 66.67 %, respectively.
Evaluation of Certain Egyptian heterorhabditids Isolates….
76
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
Moreover, H.bacteriophora (HP88 strain) exhibited lower percentage mortalities, 56.67
and 43.33% at a concentration of 1000 IJs/cm2 and 500 IJs/cm2, respectively. Percentage
mortalities resulted from usage Egyptian isolates were the least at three tested rates 2000,
1000 and 500 IJs/cm2.
Table 2. Molluscicidal activity of Egyptian Heterorhabditis strains against the gray slug
Deroceras reticulatum compared with Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain) and
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HP88 strain) after different periods of exposure.
Nematode species
Conc.
Deroceras reticulatum
Mean percent mortality %
6 days
10 days
14 days
S. carpoapsae (All strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
66.67 a
90.00 a
100.0 a
1000 IJs/cm2
63.33a
80.00 a
90.00 a
500 IJs/cm2
33.33 b
40.00 b
60.00 b
H. bacteriophora (HP88
strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
50.00 b
56.67 b
66.67 b
1000 IJs/ cm2
33.33 b
43.33 b
56.67 b
500 IJs/ cm2
23.33bc
40.00 b
43.33 c
H. bacteriophora (Serag1
strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
23.33 c
26.67 c
36.67c
1000 IJs/ cm2
16.67c
26.67bc
26.67d
500 IJs/ cm2
16.67 d
20.00 c
23.33 d
H. bacteriophora (Ht strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
16.67 c
23.67 c
40.00 c
1000 IJs/ cm2
16.67 d
20.00 c
33.33 cd
500 IJs/ cm2
13.33 d
16.67 c
26.67 d
H. bacteriophora (Ar-4
strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
20.00 c
30.00 c
46.33 c
1000 IJs/ cm2
16.67 d
23.33 c
33.33 cd
500 IJs/ cm2
13.33 d
20.00 c
26.67 d
Each value is a mean of three replicates with 10 slugs in each replicate.
Tested slugs were observed daily for mortality but only table contains data of 6, 10 and 14days.
The same letter (s) in columns indicates no significant differences at P≤ 0.05according to Duncan's multiple
range test.
Percentage moralities in D.reticulatum were 36.67, 26.67; 40.00, 33.33 and 46.33,
33.33% at a concentration of 2000 IJs/cm2 and 1000 IJs/cm2 with H. bacteriophora
(Serag1 strain), H. bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain),
respectively. At a concentration of 500 IJs/cm2, percentage mortalities decreased to reach
23.33, 26.67 and 26.67 % after 14 days of application in D.reticulatum , consequently.
Efficacy of two imported nematode species, S. carpocapsae (All strain) and H.
bacteriophora (HP88 strain) compared to Egyptian Heterorhabditis strains as
molluscicidal activity against D. leave and D. reticulatum slugs under laboratory
conditions clearly showed that D. reticulatum was more susceptible than D. laeve and
ineffectiveness of Egyptian strains (Table 3). At highest inoculum level (2000 IJs/ cm2), S.
carpocapsae (All strain) and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain) induced maximum mean
percentage mortalities with values amounted to 71.11, 94.44 and 44.45, 57.78% in D.
laeve and D.reticulatum , respectively. Egyptian heterorhabditis, H. bacteriophora
(Serag1 strain), H. bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain), ranked
the next and induced mean percentage mortalities in D. leave amounted to 18.89, 15.67
and 21.11 consequently.
El-Ashry and Abd El-Aal
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
Whereas, in D. reticulatum percentage mortalities were 28.89, 26.78 and 32.11% with
the same mentioned nematode strains. Whereas, tested entomogenous nematodes at
concentrations of 1000 and 500 IJs/cm2 showed lower mean percent mortality against
D.leave and D. reticulatum, nevertheless imported EPNs nematodes were more effective
than Egyptian strains (Table 3).
Table 3. Low susceptibility of two collected slugs, Deroceras laeve and D.reticulatum to
Egyptian Heterorhabditis strains as compared with imported EPNs, S. carpoapsae (All
strain) and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain).
Nematode species
Concentrations
D. leave
D. reticulatum
% Mortality
mean
% Mortality
Mean
S. carpocapsae (All strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
71.11
94.44
1000 IJs/cm2
60.00
73.33
500 IJs/cm2
26.67
44.45
H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
44.45
57.78
1000 IJs/ cm2
32.22
44.44
500 IJs/ cm2
23.33
35.55
H. bacteriophora (Serag1
strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
18.89
28.89
1000 IJs/ cm2
16.67
23.34
500 IJs/ cm2
12.22
20.00
H. bacteriophora (Ht strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
15.67
26.78
1000 IJs/ cm2
14.45
23.33
500 IJs/ cm2
10.00
18.89
H. bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain)
2000 IJs/ cm2
21.11
32.11
1000 IJs/ cm2
16.67
23.33
500 IJs/ cm2
12.22
21.11
The estimation of the results of the molluscicidal activity of Egyptian isolates namely
H.bacteriophora (Serag1 strain), H.bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4
strain) based on percentage mortalities when compared to S. carpocapsae (All strain) and
H.bacteriophora (HP88 strain) at the three concentrations (2000, 1000 and 500 IJs/cm2)
showed less encourage usage as a specific biological control agent against D.leave and
D.reticulatum.
Terrestrial gastropods species like Deroceras spp. caused damage to important
agricultural and horticultural crops due to feeding or contamination with faeces and
slime (Godan, 1983, 1999 and South, 1992), leading to deterioration in the quality of
the crops and economic loss. D. reticulatum distribute not only in temperate climates
such as Egypt but also in in Europe. Obtained results confirmed those reported by
many authors who detected molluscicidal activity of Steinernema and Heterorhabditis
species infecting slugs and snails (Jaworska, 1993; Wilson and Gaugler, 2000 and
Genena, 2008). Most of these studies were conducted on S.carpocapsae (All Polish
isolates),S.feltiae and H.bacteriphora infected terrestrial slugs, D. agreste and D.
reticulatum (Jaworska, 1993). Likewise , suppressive effects of EPNs have been
demonstrated on other slugs, D. reticulatum or Limax marginatus under laboratory
conditions like H. bacteriophora , H. marelatus , S. carpocapsae , S. glaseri, S.
kushidai, S. longicaudum, S. oregonense, S. riobrave and S. Siamkayai (Kaya, 2001) at
concentration of 1000 IJs/cm2 and 500 IJs/cm2.
Evaluation of Certain Egyptian heterorhabditids Isolates….
78
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
EPNs of the Steinernema and Heterorhabditis genera live in the soil and are natural
parasites of insects found in this ecosystem, as well as having a symbiotic relationship with
bacteria of the Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus genera, respectively (Forst and Clarke ,
2002).Tan and Grewel (2002 & 2003) revealed that P. hermaphrodita associated
symbiotically with the bacterium Moraxella osloensis and kills slugs using an endotoxin
(Bevre & Henrikson). Glen and Coupland (2017) mentioned that slug parasitic nematode ,
P. hermaphrodita was effective as biocontrol agent.
Our results showed that, in most cases imported EPNs (S.carpocapsae All strain and H.
bacteriophora H88 strain) belonging to steinernematids and heterorhabditids were more
effective than local isolates of H. bacteriophora (Serag1 strain, Ht strain and Ar-4 strain)
against terrestrial slugs, D. reticulatum than D. leave even at high or low concentrations
(2000 IJs/cm2, 500 IJs/cm2). D. reticulatum was more susceptible to local isolates than D.
leave.
In conclusion, more efforts should be done to isolate an efficacious nematode species or
to find P. hermaphrodita in Egypt for use against slug pests.
REFERENCES
Abd El-Aal, E. M. (2001). Studies on certain land snails at Sharkia Governorate. M. Sc. Thesis,
Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ. 160 pp.
Abd El-Aal, E. M. (2007). Ecological, biological and control studies on certain land snail
species in Sharkia Governorate. PhD. Thesis, Fac. Agric., Zagazig Univ. , 188 pp.
Askary, T.H., Nermut, J., Ahmad, M.J. and Ganai, M.A. (2017) Future thrusts in expanding
the use of entomopathogenic and Slug Parasitic Nematodes in agriculture. In:
Biocontrol Agents: Entomopathogenic and Slug Parasitic Nematodes. Abd-Elgawad,
M.M.M., Askary, T.H. and Coupland, J. (eds), Wallingford, CAB International, UK,
pp. 620-628.
Barker, G.M. (2002). Gastropods as pests in New Zealand pastoral agriculture, with
emphasis on Agriolimacidae, Arionidae and Milacidae. In: Barker GM, editor.
Molluscs as Crop Pests. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxford, UK; p. 361423.
Coupland, J. B. (1995). Susceptibility of helicid snails to isolate of the nematode
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita from southern France. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 66 :207-
208.
Dutky, S.; Thompson, J. and Cantwell, G.(1964). A technique for the mass propagation of
the DD-136 nematode. J. Insect Pathol., 6: 417422.
EL-Ashry, R.M.; El-Sheikh, M.F.M.; Azazy, A. M. and Arafa, Olfat , E. (2018). Field
control of Synanthedon myopaeformis Borkh and Zeuzera pyrina L. using
entomopathogenic nematodes, insecticides and microbial agents.
Egypt.J.Agronematol.,17:(2)121-131.
El-Deeb, H.I.; Ghamry, E. M.; El-Hawashy, N. and Essa, N. (1996). Relative abundance of
some land snails in certain Governorates of Egypt. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 21
(8) : 2922-2933.
El-Deeb, H.I.; Sobeiha, A. K.; Fouad Maha, M. and Asran Fawkyia, D.A. (2003).
Utilization of some mechanical and cultural measures against terrestrial snails.
Zagazig J. Agric. Res., 30 (6) : 2371-2383.
El-Okda, M.M. (1980). Land snails of economic importance on vegetable crops at
Alexandria and neighbouring regions. Agric. Res. Rev., 58 (1): 79-85.
El-Ashry and Abd El-Aal
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
Forst, S. and Clarke, D. (2002).Bacteria-nematode symbiosis, CABI Publishing, Oxon,
UK, 55-77.
Genena, Marwa A.M. (2008) Advanced studies on chemical and biorational control of
certain terrestrial gastropods. M.Sc. Fac. Agric. Mansoura Univ. pp.113.
Genena , Marwa A.M.; Mostafa, Fatma A.M. ; Fouly, A.H. and Yousef, A.A.(2011).
First record for the slug parasitic nematode, Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita
(Schneider) in Egypt. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 44(4):340-
345
Glen, D.M. and Coupland, J. (2017) The discovery and commercialization of a slug
parasitic nematode. In: Biocontrol Agents: Entomopathogenic and Slug Parasitic
Nematodes. Abd-Elgawad, M.M.M., Askary, T.H. and Coupland, J. (eds),
Wallingford, CAB International, UK, pp. 548-559.
Glen. D.M. and Moens, R. (2002). Agriolimacidae, Arionidae and Milacidae as pests in
West European cereals. In: Barker GM, editor. Molluscs as Crop Pests. CABI
Publishing, Wallingford, UK; p. 468.
Godan, D. (1983). Pest slugs and snails: biology and control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Godan, D. (1999). Molluscs: their significance for science, medicine, commerce and
culture. Blackwell Wissenschafts -
Verlag,Berlin.http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/PESTNOTES/pn7427.html
Jaworska, M. (1993). Laboratory infection of slugs (Gastropoda: Pulmonata) with
entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Nematoda). J. Invertebrate Pathol.
61(2):223224.
Kassab, A. and Daoud, H. (1964). Notes on the biology and control of land snails of
economic importance in the U. A. R. J. Agric. Res. Rev. Cairo, 42 : 77-98.
Kaya, H. K., and Stock, S. P. (1997). Techniques in insect nematology. Pp. 281-324. In
L. A. Lacey (ed.). Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology. Academic Press, San
Diego, CA.
Kaya, H.K. (2001). Molluscicidal nematodes for biological control of pest slugs. Slosson
Report. pp. 15.
Mc Donnell RJ, Lutz MS, Howe DK and Denver DR (2018) First Report of the
Gastropod-Killing Nematode, Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, in Oregon, U.S.A.
J. Nematol. 50(1):77-78. doi: 10.21307/jofnem-2018-014.
Morand, S; Wilson, M.J. and Glen, D.M. (2004). Nematodes (nematoda) parasitic in
terrestrial gastropods. In: Barker GM, editor. Natural Enemies of Terrestrial
Molluscs. CABI Publishing,Oxford; p. 525557.
Nermut, J. and Puza, V. (2017) Slug parasitic nematodes: biology, parasitism, production
and application. In: Biocontrol Agents: Entomopathogenic and Slug Parasitic
Nematodes. Abd-Elgawad, M.M.M., Askary, T.H. and Coupland, J. (eds),
Wallingford, CAB International, UK, pp. 533-547.
Ohlendorff, B. (1998). Slugs and snails. In: UC Pest Management Guidelines, Pest notes:
Univ. Calif. Agric. Nat. Resources Publication 28.
Rae, R.; Robertson, J.F. and Wilson, M.J. (2005).Susceptibility of indigenous UK
earthworms and an invasive pest flatworm to the slug parasitic nematode
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. Biocontrol, Science Technol. ;15(6):623626.
Rae, R.; Verdun, C.; Grewal, P.S.; Robertson, J.F. and Wilson, M.J. (2007). Biological
control of terrestrial molluscs using Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita- progress and
prospects. Pest Management Science;63:11531164.
Schneider, A. (1859). Über, eine Nematodenlarvae und gewisseVerscheidenheiten in den
Geschlechtsorganen der Nematoden. Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaft Zoologie;10:176
178.
Evaluation of Certain Egyptian heterorhabditids Isolates….
80
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)
South, A. (1992).Terrestrial slugs. Biology, ecology and control. Chapman & Hall,
London.
Tan, L. and Grewal, P.S. (2001). Pathogenicity of Moraxella osloensis, a bacterium
associated with the nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita to the slug
Deroceras reticulatum. Appl. Environmental Microbiol. 67(11):50105016.
Tan, L. and Grewal, P.S. (2003). Characterisation of the first molluscicidal
lipopolysaccharide from Moraxella osloensis. Applied Environmental Microbiol.
69(6):36463649.
Tan, L. and Grewel, P.S. (2002). Endotoxin activity of Moraxella osloensis against the
grey garden slug, Deroceras reticulatum. Applied Environmental Microbiol.
68(8):39433947.
Tandingan De Ley, I., MC Donnell, R.J., Paine, T.D. and De Ley, P.(2017)
Phasmarhabditis: the slug and snail parasitic nematodes in North America. In:
Biocontrol Agents: Entomopathogenic and Slug Parasitic Nematodes. Abd-
Elgawad, M.M.M., Askary, T.H. and Coupland, J. (eds), Wallingford, CAB
International, UK, pp. 560-578.
Theenhaus, A. and Scheu, S.(1996). The influence of slug (Arionrufus) mucus and cast
material addition on microbial biomass, respiration, and nutrient cycling in beech
leaf litter. Biology Fertility of Soils 23(1):8085.
Wilson, M. J., and Gaugler, R. (2000). Terrestrial mollusks. Pp. 787-804. In L. A. Lacey
and H. K. Kaya (eds.). Field Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology.
Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Wilson, M. J.; Glen, D. M. and George, S.K. (1993). The rhabditid nematode
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita as a potential biological control agent for slugs.
Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 3: 503-511.
Wilson, M.J.; Glen, D.M.; George, S.K.; Pearce, J.D. and Wiltshire, C.W.(1994).
Biological control of slugs in winter wheat using the rhabditid nematode
Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita. Annals Appl. Biol. 125(2):37790.
El-Ashry and Abd El-Aal
Egypt. J. Agronematol., Vol. 18, No.2 (2019)

Heterorhabditis 
Deroceras reticulatumD. leave



Deroceras reticulatum D. laeve
 . 
 Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita        
.
    S. carpoapsae AllH. bacteriophoraHP88
H. bacteriophoraD.reticulatumD.laeve
S. carpoapsaeD.laeveD. reticulatum
   
  H. bacteriophora HP88
             
P. hermaphrodita           

Article
Full-text available
Mortality of imported entomopathogenic nematodes, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HP88),H. indica, and Steinernema carpocapsae (All) compared with local EPNs isolates, H. bacteriophora (Ar-4), H. bacteriophora (Serag1), and H. bacteriophora (Ht) alone or combined with the recommended dose of abamectin and fenamiphos on juvenile mortality percentages of two land snail species, Eobania vermiculata (Müller) and Monacha cartusinana (Müller) have been studied in a series of laboratory experiments. Results exhibited that, mortality percentages and combined effect in the two land snail species were obviously influenced by EPNs species/strains, concentrations and exposure time. Among EPNs, H. bacteriophora HP88, H. indica, and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4) achieved the highest means of mortality percentages (66.67 & 70.0, 65.33 & 68.67 and 54.67 & 62.0 %) after three weeks of exposure with E. vermiculata and M. cartusinana. Whereas, S. carpocapsae (All) achieved the least mortality means (46.0 & 49.33 %) respectively. On the other hand, application of 500 IJs of EPNs conjunction with RD of abamectin and fenamiphos surpassed use EPNs or RD alone to reach (69.00, 70.00, 62.67 %), in fenamiphos and abamectin reached 71.33, 67.33 and 62.67 % in E. vermiculata with H. bacteriophora HP88, H. indica and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4), respectively. While the parallel values with M. cartusinana were 81.33, 84.00, 76.00 % in fenamiphos treatments and 72.00, 46.67, 67.33 % with abamectin treatments. CF of the tested EPNs with nematicides and their response varied according to periods of exposures. Synergistic and additive effects were exposed with EPNs and tested nematicides after one week, whereas additive or antagonistic effects were recorded after two and three weeks with examined land snail species.
Article
Full-text available
Biological control using entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) is known as an ecofriendly strategy in integrated pest management. The terrestrial slug Parmacella ibera is a major pest of vegetables and citrus trees in north of Iran. The heavy costs and environmental concerns of synthetic molluscicides led the study to use EPNs, against the slug P. ibera. The present study was arranged to evaluate and compare the performance of EPNs, Steinernema feltiae, S. carpocapsae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora on P. ibera population (mortality rate) and the feeding rate in vitro, and also its damage (seedlings establishment rate) in vitro. Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, as a slug parasite nematode, and also the metaldehyde, as a molluscicide, were used as positive controls. The results of the study showed that the highest mortality rate (%) and the seedlings establishment rate (%) of the slug population were observed in S. carpocapsae, S. feltiae and H. bacteriophora treatments, respectively. The feeding rate (%) of the slug declined in the treatments with H. bacteriophora, S. feltiae and S. carpocapsae, respectively. The mortality rate of the pest was enhanced by extending the exposure time and increasing levels of the nematodes. Therefore, it can be concluded that the EPNs S. carpocapsae, S. feltiae and H. bacteriophora are able to control the slug P. ibera population.
Article
Full-text available
Three field trials were carried out to evaluate the efficacy of two local strains of entomopathogenic nematode, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Ar-4 and Ht strains) isolated from EL-Arish and Giza in Egypt and two commercially available nematode species, Steinernema carpocapsae (All strain) and H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain) for the control of fruit tree borers, Synanthedon myopaeformis and Zeuzera pyrina on apple trees. The entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) were used alone or combined with recommended dose of the microbial pesticide, Bacillus thuringiensis (Diple2X), and insecticides, diazinon and phenthoate. The obtained results showed that the combined EPNs with insecticides were more effective as injection technique than spray method. Mortality percentages of S. myopaeformis ranged between 47.61 to 88.88 % in the injection treatments while in the spraying one it ranged between 37.14 to 74.07 %. In comparison between the efficacy of native and imported entomopathogenic nematodes in controlling Z. pyrina using spray technique, percentage mortality resulted from the combination of native nematodes i.e. H.bacteriophora (Ht strain) and H. bacteriophora (Ar-4 strain) and insecticides either penthoate or diazinon reached 69.23; 64.00 and 22.72; 64.18%, respectively. Whereas, percentages mortality were 44.44; 50.00 and 52.94; 54.16% with S. carpocapsae (All strain) andH. bacteriophora (HP88 strain), respectively. The susceptibility of Z. pyrina to the nematode species differed greatly according to the nematode species used either alone or in combination with the recommended dose of B. thuringiensis. The entomopathogenic nematode H. bacteriophora (HP88 strain) was more virulent than S. carpocapsae (All strain) in controlling Z. pyrina with percentage mortality reached 77.5 and 62.1%, respectively.
Chapter
This 19-chapter book discusses the biology (including reproduction, life history, feeding preferences and sexual behaviour) of molluscs as pests of horticultural, field and fodder crops, and outlines the development of appropriate mechanisms for the control of these pests (mainly biological, cultural and chemical). Two chapters review progress towards the development of chemical control strategies, one addressing the toxicology of chemicals, the other the deployment of molluscicides in baits. These chapters also highlight the statistical and biological procedures for screening and evaluating molluscicides which are not a component of the standard procedure of mollusc control. A series of chapters focus on specific crop situations, providing a synopsis of the current pest status of gastropod species or species groups.
Chapter
This book contains chapters that capture the full breadth of the basic and applied information on entomopathogenic (EPNs) and slug parasitic nematodes (SPNs) that are used or have potential in the management of insect pests, molluscs and/or other researched targets such as plant parasitic nematodes. The information includes the remarkable developments and latest achievements in this direction. The volume is divided into seven parts. The two chapters in Part I introduce comprehensive information on beneficial nematodes in general and their importance, with emphasis on crop pest management. In Part II, there are four chapters devoted to covering the different aspects of the morphology, taxonomy, biology and diversity of EPNs. Part III deals with EPNs and their symbiotic bacteria against crop insect pests and consists of seven chapters. Four chapters describe their role in the management of such insects in the orders Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Diptera, as well as stored grain pests. Two chapters address the toxic secretions of the EPN-mutualistic bacterial species in the two genera Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus , and their efficacy against crop insect pests either singly or with EPNs. The last chapter of this part is devoted to the mass production, formulation and application of EPNs. Part IV addresses 11 developed and developing countries as points in case, where the role of EPNs in the integrated pest management strategies implemented in each of these countries is presented. Part V presents the genetics for enhancing the efficacy of EPNs. It contains two chapters dealing with nematode breeding, as well as classical and current methods to achieve such an enhancement. Part VI has three chapters organized for SPNs. In Part VII, there are three chapters to conclude the potential commercialization and future prospects of EPNs and SPNs.
Chapter
This book contains chapters that capture the full breadth of the basic and applied information on entomopathogenic (EPNs) and slug parasitic nematodes (SPNs) that are used or have potential in the management of insect pests, molluscs and/or other researched targets such as plant parasitic nematodes. The information includes the remarkable developments and latest achievements in this direction. The volume is divided into seven parts. The two chapters in Part I introduce comprehensive information on beneficial nematodes in general and their importance, with emphasis on crop pest management. In Part II, there are four chapters devoted to covering the different aspects of the morphology, taxonomy, biology and diversity of EPNs. Part III deals with EPNs and their symbiotic bacteria against crop insect pests and consists of seven chapters. Four chapters describe their role in the management of such insects in the orders Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Diptera, as well as stored grain pests. Two chapters address the toxic secretions of the EPN-mutualistic bacterial species in the two genera Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus , and their efficacy against crop insect pests either singly or with EPNs. The last chapter of this part is devoted to the mass production, formulation and application of EPNs. Part IV addresses 11 developed and developing countries as points in case, where the role of EPNs in the integrated pest management strategies implemented in each of these countries is presented. Part V presents the genetics for enhancing the efficacy of EPNs. It contains two chapters dealing with nematode breeding, as well as classical and current methods to achieve such an enhancement. Part VI has three chapters organized for SPNs. In Part VII, there are three chapters to conclude the potential commercialization and future prospects of EPNs and SPNs.
Chapter
This book contains chapters that capture the full breadth of the basic and applied information on entomopathogenic (EPNs) and slug parasitic nematodes (SPNs) that are used or have potential in the management of insect pests, molluscs and/or other researched targets such as plant parasitic nematodes. The information includes the remarkable developments and latest achievements in this direction. The volume is divided into seven parts. The two chapters in Part I introduce comprehensive information on beneficial nematodes in general and their importance, with emphasis on crop pest management. In Part II, there are four chapters devoted to covering the different aspects of the morphology, taxonomy, biology and diversity of EPNs. Part III deals with EPNs and their symbiotic bacteria against crop insect pests and consists of seven chapters. Four chapters describe their role in the management of such insects in the orders Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Diptera, as well as stored grain pests. Two chapters address the toxic secretions of the EPN-mutualistic bacterial species in the two genera Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus , and their efficacy against crop insect pests either singly or with EPNs. The last chapter of this part is devoted to the mass production, formulation and application of EPNs. Part IV addresses 11 developed and developing countries as points in case, where the role of EPNs in the integrated pest management strategies implemented in each of these countries is presented. Part V presents the genetics for enhancing the efficacy of EPNs. It contains two chapters dealing with nematode breeding, as well as classical and current methods to achieve such an enhancement. Part VI has three chapters organized for SPNs. In Part VII, there are three chapters to conclude the potential commercialization and future prospects of EPNs and SPNs.