Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Difficulties in learning algebra: An analysis of students’ errors
To cite this article: T I Pramesti and H Retnawati 2019 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1320 012061
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
This content was downloaded from IP address 38.145.99.193 on 30/11/2019 at 01:40
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
ISIMMED2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1320 (2019) 012061
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012061
1
Difficulties in learning algebra: An analysis of students’ errors
T I Pramesti1, H Retnawati2
1Mathematics Education Department of Graduate School, Yogyakarta State University
Sleman, D. I. Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281
2Mathematics Education Department, Yogyakarta State University Sleman, D. I.
Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281
trisyliaip.2017@student.uny.ac.id
Abstract. Algebra is an important domain that first studied at the junior high school. This
domain will be useful in obtaining the concept of another domain. However, learning algebra
in the early grades has some challenges for students. This study aims to describe students’
difficulties when learning algebra in the early grade. This study is a qualitative research with
phenomenology approach. Participants in this study are 65 students from junior high schools in
Bantul Regency, Province of Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The data collected used
test. Data are analyzed using Milles & Huberman Model, with reduction, data display and
verification. The results of the analysis show that students’ difficulties in learning algebra are
(1) understanding the problem;(2) understanding meaning of variables and;(3) operation
algebra. Therefore, the teachers’ strategy to teach algebra material have to developed to
minimize students’ difficulties in learning algebra.
1. Introduction
Mathematics is the queen of all science and considered impeccable in its methods, validity, and logic
[1]. Mathematics has a certain method, its undoubted validity is also related to this with its consistent
nature, and putting forward this logic is also related to rationality of thinking. Mathematics cannot be
separated by abstract object. Nevertheless, mathematics is also a very important science part of daily
activities. Mathematics in education is a concern and important to learn. Mathematics can be learned
by school children when used in real life everyday because in reality some aspects of life require
mathematical skills, as a means of communication, and can be used in conveying information, and
giving satisfaction when solving problems [2].
Mathematics consists of various domains, one of which is algebra. Algebra is the core topic of
mathematics and in junior high school becomes important for another material [3]. The success of
students in algebra material will be very influential on the next material. As mentioned in Jupri’s
research [3] algebra is also an instrument in obtaining other mathematical domains such as analytic
geometry, calculus, and statistics. So algebra is the language of knowledge, but also a big way to
higher mathematics.
Algebra material includes the concept of solving arithmetic, procedures for solving problems, the
relationship between quantities, and the last is structure. However, the ability of students in the algebra
domain is still relatively low. This is indicated by the achievement of TIMSS results in 2007 and 2011
in the 8th grade algebra domain. Following are the TIMSS results in 2007 and 2011 in table 1.
ISIMMED2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1320 (2019) 012061
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012061
2
Table 1. TIMSS results in 2007 and 2011
Years
2007
2011
International average
Math Score
Algebra Domain Scores
500
427
405
500
386
392
Rating
36 from 49
38 from 42
Other data also show that students' abilities in the algebra domain are still relatively low. This can
be seen from mastery level in the algebra material in Bantul Regency, as follows in table 2.
Table 2. Mastery level in the Algebra Material in Bantul Regency Middle School
Year 2014/2015
Year 2015/2016
Year 2016/2017
Year 2017/2018
58.63
56.79
57.02
57.54
From the table above is known that the ability of students in 2014/2015 algebra material is 58.63%,
in 2015/2016 it is 56.79% and in 2016/2017 it is 57.02%, and in 2017/2018 amounting to 57.54%. The
data shows that the absorption of algebra material has decreased and increased. However, students'
ability to understand algebra material in Bantul Regency is still in the low category.
Algebra learning in junior high school students is also important because students at this level just
know what algebra is. Judging from the psychology of students, junior high school students in the
early grades also have characteristics which are 13-16 years old. Other important characteristics are
related to their cognitive abilities which are at the stage of formal operational development. At this
stage students are able to reason by using relationships between objects in life to be associated with
mathematical problems. So students are still in the transition stage from concrete thinking to abstract
thinking. While the algebraic thinking position has been at the stage of abstract thinking. So that most
students experience difficulties in learning algebra.
Many studies mention the difficulties of students in learning algebra in the process of
mathematization everyday sentences to mathematical forms, understanding algebraic equations,
arithmetic operations, understanding the meaning of symbols equal to and meaning of variables [3][4].
Activity mathematization same with Abstraction involves making math in symbols [5]. Activity of
understanding algebraic equations and arithmetic operations includes in transformational activities.
Transformational activities include procedural activities. Suppose loading factoring, substituting,
simplifying expiration [6]. The principal of the transformation activity is in order to balance.
Same as Jupri’s research, other research in algebra sub-material straight-line equation also shows
students' errors in understanding the concept and procedural errors [7]. The lack of understanding
concept also become one of types of student error in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem
solving [8][9].
Other studies show students' difficulties in solving the problem of one of the algebraic linear
equations of two variables in the form of reading errors, comprehension errors, transformations, skill
processes and encoding [10]. Another errors in resolving HOTS problems is in the form of a number
skill, a skill arithmetic process or relating to calculations, understanding information or information
skills, understanding language or language skills and difficulties in understanding representations or
visual-spatial skills[11]. This error also include procedures being forgotten [8]. In general, algebra
becomes a problem for students [1].
Teachers need to understand students’ learning difficulties in order to creat effective teaching
strategies and to produce meaningful learning among students. After the teachers find the difficult
indicators, they might create new learning strategies that will be meaningful for providing the
students’ conceptual understanding towards the students regarding the difficult indicators. Multiple
learning strategies might be applied in the learning process by adjusting the students’ conditions, the
materials or the indicators that will be studied and the drawbacks of each student [9].
ISIMMED2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1320 (2019) 012061
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012061
3
Student have low ability in this algebra material shows students have difficulties in learning
algebra. Difficulties in learning algebra can be seen from how students work on algebra problems.
students 'difficulties in learning algebra need to be minimized by a strategy, and first find out the
students' difficulties. As Result, there should be a study that explain what difficulties are experienced
when students learn algebra in Junior High School Students.
2. Method
2.1 Research Type.
This research is a qualitative study in the phenomenological approach. This research aims to explore
the kesulitan when students doing algebra’s task in junior high school students.
2.2 Research Participants
The research participants are 65 students of Junior High School in Bantul Regency, Province of
Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Participants have characteristics 13-15 years old. All
students have studied algebra.
2.3 Instrument and Procedure
The instrument used in this study is a test question consisting of 4 items topic about algebra.
2.4 Data Analysis
Analysis of the data used is Milles & Huberman Model, with reduction, data display and verification.
In the analysis of the first model data collection is document colected from students answer sheet.
Second, Data reduction is a form of sharpening analysis, classify, direct, discard unnecessary data
organize data in such a way that conclusions final can be drawn and verified. Data reduction takes
place continuously continues as long as the research has not ended. Products from Data reduction is in
the form of summaries of field notes, both from initial note, expansion, or addition.
Third, Data presentation is a series of information organizations allowing research conclusions
to be made. Data presentation intended to find patterns that are meaningful as well gives the
possibility of conclusions and withdrawals provide action. States that data presentation in the form of
sentence narratives, images/schemes, networks and tables as the narrative. Last, Withdrawal
conclusions are part of the activities complete configuration. Conclusions also verified during the
study. Conclusions have been drawn since researchers conducted records, patterns, statements,
configurations, causal directions, and various propositions.
3. Result
Data analysis shows some of the difficulties faced by students in working on algebraic problems. Each
will be explained in each item. The percentage of students who answered correctly is shown in table 3.
Table 3. The percentage of students answer correctly
Number
Indicator Problem
The percentage of students
answer correctly
1 a
1 b
2
3
4
Understand the problem
Understand the meaning of variables
Operate algebraic forms
Solving word problems related to algebra
Make algebra problems
36.92%
18.84%
53.30%
41.53%
23.07%
The percentage of students who answered correctly on question item 1a is 36.92% and 1b is
18.84%. To solve this problem, students must understand the problem to make a mathematical form.
ISIMMED2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1320 (2019) 012061
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012061
4
In addition, students must understand the concept of variable meaning also. Question item 1 is shown
in figure 1.
In terms of how students understand the problem, there are still many students' does not understand
the problem, namely 41 students. From this problem, it is discovered that a tailor bought five logs for
sewing for the uniform of the order of Maju Jaya Middle school. After all the uniforms are finished
stitching, it turned out that the fabric is still 7 meters away. So that the mathematical form of the fabric
used is 5x– 7, –7 shows the rest of the fabric after use. There are 24 students who correctly answer the
question. One of the students' correct is shown in figure 2.
Where as from the results of the completion of the students who solve the problem correctly
consider the 5x+ 7 mathematical form. This means that students do not understand the problem given,
that the important sentence is the remainder which means -7, not + 7.
Students who answer incorrectly state that the algebraic form is correct with the reason that 5x is
the size of the stitch and 7 is the remaining stitch. Students do not pay attention to the plus minus sign
and the meaning of plus minus sign. One of students’ error is shown in figure 3.
Figure 1. Question item 1
Figure 2. One of the students who correctly
answer
Figure 3. One of the students’ error answer
The percentage of students who answered correctly on question item 2 is 53.30%. Question item 2
is shown in figure 4. This problem is a form of operating problem simplifying the algebraic form. In
solving this problem requires procedural capability that is in operation paying attention to the same
variables. Where in this case 6x is operating in addition to 3x. Then, – 3y is operated with 7y. So the
result is 9x + 4y. One of the students' correct is shown in figure 5.
So that when students find it difficult to solve the problem, the procedural ability of students is still
low. Most students are correct in solving it but there are still some students who are wrong in doing it.
One of the students’ errors is shown in figure 6.
Figure 4. Question item 2
A tailor bought five logs for sewing clothes for uniforms ordered by Maju Jaya Middle school.
After all the uniforms are finished stitching, it turned out that the fabric was still 7 meters away.
The algebraic form used to sew the uniform is 5x + 7.
a. Is the algebraic form true? Give your explanation.
b. The meaning of variable x is fabric spindle. Is meaning of the variable true? Give your
reason.
The simple form of 6x – 3y + 3x + 7y is ....
ISIMMED2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1320 (2019) 012061
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012061
5
Figure 5. One of the students who
correctly answer
Figure 6. One of the students’ error answer
The percentage of students who answered correctly on question item 3 is 41.53%. Question item 3
is shown in figure 7. This problem is a form of problem solving everyday problems related to algebra.
In solving these problems requires the ability to understand the problem, as well as procedural abilities
in applying algebraic forms. to answer this question students must know the concept of the area of a
rectangle, namely by multiplying the length and width of the first, however there is important
information that there is a width of the road that is equal to 1 meter. Thus, the length of the original
garden (x + 4) m becomes (x + 4 - 1) m or equal to (x + 3) m. For a fixed garden width of x meters.
Then in determining the area using algebraic multiplication operations, as follows:
𝐿 = 𝑝 × 𝑙
𝐿 = (𝑥 + 3). 𝑥
𝐿 = 𝑥. 𝑥 + 3. 𝑥
𝐿 = 𝑥2+ 3𝑥
So that the area of the park (shaded) is obtained, namely (𝑥2+ 3𝑥) m2. One of the students' correct
is shown in figure 8.
Students who answered incorrectly, did not fully understand the problem given, most students
ignored the information on the width of the road, so the width of the park remained (x + 4) m. One of
the students’ errors is shown in figure 9.
Figure 7. Question item 3
Figure 8. One of the students who correctly
answer
Figure 9. One of the students’ error answer
The picture below shows a rectangular garden, the white area is a road with a width of 1 meter.
State the area of the park (shaded) in m2.
ISIMMED2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1320 (2019) 012061
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012061
6
The percentage of students who answered correctly on question item 4 is 8.3%. Question item 4 is
shown in figure 10. This problem is a form of reasoning problem that students are required to create.
As well as the presence of creative thinking are required in the matter. The ability to understand the
meaning of variables is also seen. One of the students' correct is shown in figure 11.
Some students cannot solve the problem, because they are not familiar with the type problem. So
the role of the teacher in developing creative thinking skills. One of the students’ errors is shown in
figure 12.
Figure 10. Question item 4
Figure 11. One of the students who correctly answer
Figure 12. One of the students’ error answer
4. Discussion
The students' error in preparing the questions related to algebra include at least three difficulties,
namely understanding the problem, understanding the meaning of variables, and operating the
algebraic form. Every error or difficulty has a different factor. These factors must be minimized.
The first students’ errors is understanding the problem. Understanding the problem in problem
solving ability is an important matter that needs to be considered [11]. In understanding the problem is
also one form of error that many students do, stated in the study by Wijaya’s research [12] students
experienced errors in understanding the PISA problem, namely the process of creating a mathematical
model. This is due to several factors, one of which is the error of reading and understanding
information [10]. Other causes of difficulties in mathematics problems of students in problem solving
skills, namely difficulties in understanding visual aspects and spatial, as well as difficulties in doing
perception (spatial)[13].
Not absorbing information properly is one of the factors that influence student errors [7]. This error
is seen when students make algebraic expressions. The process of making algebraic expressions is
called mathematization, which is also a form of student difficulties in learning algebra [3]. The last
Make a problem stating the following algebraic form along with the meaning of the variable:
a. 7x – 11 = 24
b. 5x + 7y + 2z
ISIMMED2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1320 (2019) 012061
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012061
7
that related to this problem is student not understand with creativity problem. This kind of problem is
HOTS problem. Therefore, building HOTS-oriented learning can be conducted through minimalizing
eacher domination and maximizing the role of students in the learning process [9][14].
The second students’ errors is in understanding the meaning of variables. This error is included in a
misunderstanding of the concept. In this case related to algebra material, students' conceptual
misconception is on the concept of variable meaning. This is in line with research into the basic
conceptual errors of algebra [13]. Misconceptions on certain material will be very influential with
previous concepts and influence other related concepts [7][15].
The third error is in operating the algebraic form. this error will also be related to procedural
capabilities. Procedural errors are operating rules in algebraic form. This error is also related to the
accuracy of students working on it.
5. Conclusion
The students' error in preparing the questions related to algebra include at least three things, namely
understanding the problem, understanding the meaning of variables, and operating the algebraic form.
Various advanced studies can be carried out in relation to the difficulties that students do in learning
algebra. Therefore, the teachers’ strategy to teach algebra learning material can be developed so as to
minimize student difficulties in learning algebra.
References
[1] Bell A 1995 Purpose in school algebra J. Math. Behav. 14 41–73
[2] Cockcroft W H 1982 Mathematics Counts: Report of The Committe of Enquiry into The
Teaching of Mathematics in School (London: HMSO)
[3] Jupri A, Drijvers P and van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M 2014 Difficulties in initial algebra
learning in Indonesia Math. Educ. Res. J. 26 683–710
[4] Setiawan Y B, Hapizah H and Hiltrimartin C 2015 Kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal
olimpiade SMP konten aljabar J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat. 5
[5] Lew Hee-Chan 2004 Developing Algebraic Thinking in the Earlier Grades : A Case Study of
the Chinese Elementary School Curriculum 1 Math. Educ. 8 107–30
[6] Kieran C 2004 Algebraic Thinking in the Early Grades: What Is It? 1 Math. Educ. 8 139–51
[7] Retnawati H 2017 Kesalahan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Persaman Garis Lurus
Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat. 9
[8] Veloo A K H N and A W S W Types of Student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and
problem solving Asian Soc. Sci. 11 324–34
[9] Retnawati H, Prof. B K, Arlinwibowo J and Sulistyaningsih E 2017 Why are the Mathematics
National Examination Items Difficult and What Is Teachers’ Strategy to Overcome It? Int. J.
Instr. 10 257–76
[10] Rohmah M and Sugeng S 2018 Analysis Problem Solving in Mathematical Using Theory
Newman 14 671–81
[11] Karimah et al 2018 Analysis of difficulties in Mathematics learning on students with guardian
personality type in problem solving HOTS geometsy test IOP Conf. Ser. J. Phys. 1–10
[12] Wijaya A and Robitzsch A 2014 Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks :
An analysis of students ’ errors 11
[13] Sengul S and Erdogan F 2014 A Study On The Elementary Students’ Perceptions Of Algebra
Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 3683–7
[14] Retnawati H, Djidu H, Kartianom, Apino E and Anazifa R D 2018 Teachers’ Knowledge about
higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy Probl. Educ. 21st Century 76 215–30
[15] Tias A A W and Wutsqa D U 2015 Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMA Dalam Pemecahan Masalah
Matematika Kelas XII IPA di Kota Yogyakarta J. Ris. Pendidik. Mat. 2 28–39