Access to this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Scientific Data
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
1
SCIENTIFIC DATA | (2019) 6:293 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0283-3
www.nature.com/scientificdata
Long-term monitoring data from a
*r & Andreas Wagner
e introduction of the European “Energy Performance of Buildings Directive” in 2001 gave a strong incentive
to reduce excessive energy consumption through a holistic approach in terms of building design and integrated
energy concepts. Within this context, the program SolarBau, introduced by the German Federal Ministry of
Economic Aairs, funded ambitious demonstration projects within the non-residential building sector setting
benchmarks in terms of low primary energy consumption. Buildings in Germany are benchmarked through their
primary energy demand for heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting and domestic hot water (DHW). e moni-
tored building described here had a projected value of 107 kWh/m²a.
Within this program, a strong focus was set on various passive cooling strategies in combination with a higher
insulation standard than required by German regulations in the year of construction (see Table1 for details).
Daylight factors above standard at the workspaces were achieved by proper window design and light directing
devices (venetian blinds with dierent blind positions and ceiling panels above the desks). At the same time,
occupants’ interactions with windows and blinds – essential aspects in the context of passive cooling concepts –
was addressed1–3 as well as their thermal comfort under these conditions. A two-year monitoring aer commis-
sioning of the building was compulsory for a proof of concept for all funded buildings.
Inuencing factors on the occupants’ behaviour with regard to the operation of windows and blinds are,
among others, the indoor and outdoor environmental conditions such as temperatures, relative humidity levels,
air quality levels, and lighting levels4,5. Due to their daily and seasonal variation, long-term monitoring data, i.e.
at least a full year, is essential to capture their inuence on occupants’ behavioural patterns.
e monitored building is located in Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Key characteristics of the building are
presented in Table1. An important design feature to enhance natural night ventilation is a large atrium with
an extended “chimney” around which the oces are located. is enables a buoyancy-driven airow from the
windows through the oces themselves, into the trac zones, and then up into the chimney where the air leaves
the building. e airows through the oces are levelled out by the opening angle of the top lights, located above
the manually operable windows. Directly exposed concrete ceilings in the oces enable the activation of thermal
mass as an essential part of passive cooling by night ventilation. Furthermore, the atrium increases the usage of
natural lighting for the interior trac zones.
Only the meeting rooms, the oces to the south behind the double-skin facade, oces with suspended ceil-
ings and a number of special purpose areas are actively cooled, but are not part of this dataset.
e occupant is able to open the windows manually. For operating the top–light windows (see Fig.1) occu-
pants have to use the control panel which is located beside the door (opposite to the façade). rough this panel,
Building Science Group, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Englerstr. 7, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany. *email: marcel.
schweiker@kit.edu
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
2
SCIENTIFIC DATA | (2019) 6:293 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0283-3
www.nature.com/scientificdata
www.nature.com/scientificdata/
occupants can also control the exterior Venetian blinds and the articial lighting of the oce. Outdoor noise due
to trac was only present in the area of the south facing rooms, which are not part of this dataset. No other noise
sources are known. Outdoor air quality was high, given outdoor CO2-levels (included in data) being mean 465
ppm ± 52 (standard deviation).
e dataset published consists of long-term data from January 2005 to December 2008, i.e. starting 2 years
after the construction, when initial problems with controls where already solved. The data published has a
10-minute interval for continuous data and the event data with individual time stamps and consists of data from
17 oces.
e data has been analysed and used by several authors. A rst analysis of the indoor environmental con-
ditions and energy revealed that indoor air quality levels were high, that the primary energy consumption was
at a low level as predicted, and that the monitoring was a useful measure towards an optimized operation6,7.
Schakib-Ekbatan et al. questioned the t between occupant behaviour and the building concept and found several
occurrences of occupants’ window opening behaviour contradicting the natural ventilation concept8. An addi-
tional analysis of the data applied a data mining framework for identifying occupancy patterns and found four
archetypal working proles9.
In order to collect long-term data automatically and frequently, all sensors were con-
nected to the building management system (BMS) of the building. Data were gathered in 10-minute intervals or
as event data. Data was stored for one day locally and send at night as csv-les to the server of the researcher. Data
was stored in a MySQL database.
A weather station was located on the top of the building at 2 m above the roof, i.e. around 30 m above street
level. e weather station is providing data regarding the outdoor conditions for all oces, such as temperature or
wind speed. However, the microclimate on the façades can dier, e.g. depending on the intensity and direction of
wind. e precipitation meter was not heated. However, snowfall is seldom. ere are no direct obstacles close-by
aecting the wind speed or direction. Still, wind speed and direction might have been aected by the buildings
in the neighbourhood.
All oces included in this data base have a size of ~20 m2 and are facing east or west (see also Table2). Each
oce has one xed and two operable windows with top light windows above, internal top light windows between
oce and corridor (to allow for night ventilation into the atrium) and external sun protection elements (operated
both manually and automatically). One or two persons occupy each oce.
Presence of occupants was measured by an infrared sensor located in the middle of the ceiling panel, which is
suspended from the ceiling above the work places.
Type of building Multi-storey oce building
Dimension 17,402 m2 (8,585 m2 heat ed)
No. of Employee ~350 employees
Location Frankfurt, Germany
ermal characteristics High energy standard of building envelope
Walls: U-values 0.24 to 0.5 W/m2K)
Windows: U-values 1.5 W/m2K, solar transmittance <40%, light transmittance 70%
Structural system Reinforced concrete construction
Type of observed spaces Oce rooms
Year of construction 2002
No. of oors 2-level underground car park +4 oce oors + 1 oor apartments on top
Window dimensions Windows:
Top lights
Windows, orientation Mostly E and W
Window opening
All windows open inwards. No obstacles prevented window opening except those potentially added by
occupants (e.g. plants or papers placed in front of window)
Windows: Manual opening through window handle by occupants only, windows had hinges on one side and
could be fully opened (rotated) to any degree up to 90° opening angle Top lights: automatic control + manual
opening through switch next to oce door by occupants, windows had hinges at the bottom and opened on top;
any degree up to ° was possible at manual control; at automatic control for night-time ventilation the angle was
predened in order to balance pressure dierence between oors and achieve almost the same volume ow for
each oor and oce.
Window control options Automated 10 minutes ush ventilation before working hours through top lights in the façade and between
oce and corridor
Aerwards: Top lights: Tilt (automatic + occupant driven mode), Windows: Tilt-and turn (occupant driven)
Shading devices External sun protection (automatic + occupant driven mode) with dierent angle of blinds in the upper part to
provide daylight guidance. Sun protection consists of light metal Venetian blinds with a slats width of 80 mm
and a reectance of 60%..
Predicted annual primary
energy consumption 107 kWh/m²
Monitored annual primary
energy consumption 100 kWh/m² in third year of monitoring
Tab le 1. Building characteristics.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
3
SCIENTIFIC DATA | (2019) 6:293 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0283-3
www.nature.com/scientificdata
www.nature.com/scientificdata/
Air temperature, relative humidity and CO2-level were measured inside each oce close to the oce door at
1.1 m height through a device attached to the walls separating the oces from the corridor.
Occupants can change the status of top-light windows, blinds, and lighting through a set of buttons close
to the oce door. Windows can be opened directly at the façade. Status of windows was measured through
reed-contacts connected to the buildings’ BMS system. Position of the blinds was measured based on blinds’
motor run time.
e data points available in the database are presented in Table3. ese data can be grouped into outdoor
environmental data, indoor environmental data, energy related data, and data related to occupancy and occupant
behaviour.
All data records listed in this section are available from the project pages10 on Open Science Framework (OSF)
and can be downloaded without an OSF account. We licensed the data under a CC0 1.0 Universal license.
File format: comma separated values le (.csv). Data is available as one le for each sensor
including date and time column. All date formats are in the format day, month, year, i.e. dd.mm.yyyy. Devices in
use are recorded with 1 or 100, those not in use with 0. is translates to open windows being in the data recorded
as 1 and completely closed blinds with values 100.
Fig. 1 Window positions and dimensions of one oce.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
4
SCIENTIFIC DATA | (2019) 6:293 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0283-3
www.nature.com/scientificdata
www.nature.com/scientificdata/
File format: comma separated values le (.csv).
Incoming datasets were analysed according to their completeness and validity. An error message was sent to the
researchers in case these checks revealed problems. ese analyses mainly targeted for checking availability of
data and to lter implausible or missing values. Missing values in air temperature, relative humidity, and CO2
were marked by a value of “0” and ltered automatically. Implausible values, e.g. indoor air temperatures above
35 °C, were agged by the monitoring soware and manually inspected using the visualization tools of the mon-
itoring soware. e monitoring soware used was MoniSo11.
e air temperature sensors were checked and calibrated during commissioning by the facility management
and later comparison through a high-quality comfort meter equipment in sample rooms showed good con-
formity. All other sensors had been calibrated by the manufacturer, but could not be calibrated again during
operation.
Room
ID Room air
temperature Occupancy Window
control Top window
control Sun
protection Electricity
demand lighting Electricity
demand plugs CO2− Concen-
tration
East
E01 E01Tair E01Occ E01W E01WT E01SP
E02 E02Tair E02Occ E02W E02WT E02SP
E03 E03Tair E03Occ E03W E03WT E03SP
E04 E04Tair E04Occ E04W E04WT E04SP E04CO2
E05 E05Tair E05Occ E05W E05WT E05SP
E06 E06Tair E06Occ E06W E06WT E06SP E06ElL E06ElP
E07 E07Tair E07Occ E07W E07WT E07SP E07ElL E07ElP E07CO2
E08 E08Tair E08Occ E08W E08WT E08SP
E09 E09Tair E09Occ E09W E09WT E09SP
E10 E10Tair E10Occ E10W E10WT E10SP
E11 E11Tair E11Occ E11W E11WT E11SP
Wes t
W01 W01Tair W01Occ W01W W01WT W01SP W01ElL W01ElP
W02 W02Tair W02Occ W02W W02WT W02SP
W03 W03Tair W03Occ W03W W03WT W03SP
W04 W04Tair W04Occ W04W W04WT W04SP
W05 W05Tair W05Occ W05W W05WTaW05SP W05ELP W05CO2
W06 W06Tair W06Occ W06W W06WT W06SP
Tab le 2. Orientation and variables available for each oce. aNote that no data le is provided for this sensor,
because no event was recorded over the monitoring period.
Categories of data Subcategories of
measured data Va riable Interval
Sensor
Range Accuracy
Inhabitants
Other Presence (all rooms) Event — —
Other Window state (open/closed) Event — —
Other Top-light window state (open/closed) Event
Other State of sun protection (open/closed) Event — —
Indoor conditions
Hygro-thermal Air temperature 10 minutes 0–40 °C ±0.1 K
Hygro-thermal Relative humidity (all rooms) 10 minutes 0–100% ±1%
Indoor Air Quality CO2-level (3 rooms) 10 minutes 300–3500 ppm ±3%
External conditions
Hygro-thermal Air temperature 10 minutes −40–+ 45 °C ±0.1 K
Hygro-thermal Relative humidity 10 minutes 0–100% ±2%
Visual Illuminance (4 orientations + horizontal) 10 minutes 0–100,000 lx ±5%
Solar radiation Horizontal solar radiation 10 minutes 0–1300 W/m² ±2.5%
Other Precipitation (Amount and event) 10 minutes — —
Other Wind speed and direction 10 minutes 0–360° 0–20 m/s —
Energy
Heating/cooling Overall heat quantity pellet boiler and gas boiler 10 minutes ±1%
Lighting Lighting energy (3 meters for 5 rooms) 10 minutes ±0.5%
Equipment Plug loads separated by IT and other (3 rooms) 10 minutes ±0.5%
Other Total electricity use of building 10 minutes ±0.5%
Tab le 3. Variables, their categories and subcategories according to the ontology for building monitoring13, and
intervals.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
5
SCIENTIFIC DATA | (2019) 6:293 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0283-3
www.nature.com/scientificdata
www.nature.com/scientificdata/
By the general and open csv format the researcher is free to use whatever soware s/he nds suitable for analysing
or visualising the data. For comfort analysis the R-package comf is recommended12.
For further analyses, it needs to be considered, that top window and blind states were either changed through
the BMS or manually by occupants. e algorithm of automatic controls of top windows and blinds is unknown.
e authors assume that it will be possible to identify automated and manual controls by means of statistical
analyses.
Window state and blind status changes were recorded by the BMS and are available with their original time
stamp. Blind events are all changes, i.e. also changes of blind position e.g. between 20 and 80% closing.
Note that the ocial monitoring period by the original research team ended in October 2006. Aer that, data
was still automatically received, but the status of sensors not checked anymore. erefore, the number of sensors
having failures and not providing data continuously increases, which needs to be considered when using data
points aer 2006.
Custom code was used to validate the incoming data from the BMS for completeness and validity. e code
had been very specic according to the system conguration and is not available anymore. Its value for future
applications or future data usage would be very low because 90% of the code was written to check the syntactically
correctness of the data. While the authors expected such syntactical correctness being granted for data exported
from a BMS, the rst month of monitoring (not included in the database) showed several problems with the
structure of the data, which required many lines of custom code, very specic to the BMS in place and therefore
not generalizable to any other application.
Received: 8 May 2019; Accepted: 14 August 2019;
Published: xx xx xxxx
1. Wagner, A. & Schaib-Ebatan, . User satisfaction as a measure of worplace quality in the oce. In Work Environments: Design in
Physical Space, Mobility, Communication (ed. Schittich, C.) 54–57 (Basel: Birhäuser Architetur, 2011).
2. Toum, J., Andersen, . V. & Jensen, . L. Occupant performance and building energy consumption with dierent philosophies of
determining acceptable thermal conditions. Build. Environ. 44 (2009).
3. Schaib-Ebatan, ., Wagner, A. & Lussac, C. Occupant satisfaction as an indicator for the socio-cultural dimension of sustainable
oce buildingsdevelopment of an overall building index. in CISBAT, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (2011).
4. Schweier, M., Carlucci, S., Andersen, . ., Dong, B. & O’Brien, W. Occupancy and Occupants’ Actions. In Exploring Occupant
Behavior in Buildings (eds Wagner, A., O’Brien, W. & Dong, B.) 7–38 (Springer, 2018).
5. Hong, T., Taylor-Lange, S. C., D’Oca, S., Yan, D. & Corgnati, S. P. Advances in research and applications of energy-related occupant
behavior in buildings. Energy Build. 116, 694–702 (2016).
6. leber, M. & Wagner, A. esults of Monitoring a Naturally Ventilated and Passively Cooled Oce Building in Franfurt aM,
Germany. In Proceedings of EPIC 2006 AIVC Conference: Lyon, France (2006).
7. Wagner, A., leber, M. & Parer, C. Monitoring esults of a Naturally Ventilated and Passively Cooled Oce Building in Franfurt,
Germany. Int. J. Vent. 6, 3–20 (2007).
8. Schaib-Ebatan, ., Zaici, F. Z., Schweier, M. & Wagner, A. Does the occupant behavior match the energy concept of the
building? - Analysis of a German naturally ventilated oce building. Build. Environ. 84, 142–150 (2015).
9. D’Oca, S. & Hong, T. Occupancy schedules learning process through a data mining framewor. Energy Build. 88, 395–408 (2015).
10. Schweier, M., leber, M. & Wagner, A. Long-term monitoring data from a naturally ventilated oce building. Open Science
Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2YDZG (2019).
11. leber, M. & Wagner, A. Monitoring Low-Energy Buildings by a self-developed Soware-Tool. In Proceedings of the IBPC Conference
in Istanbul, Turkey (2009).
12. Schweier, M. comf: An Pacage for ermal Comfort. Studies. R J. 8, 341–351 (2016).
13. Mahdavi, A. & Taheri, M. An ontology for building monitoring. J. Build. Perform. Simul. 10, 499–508 (2017).
is research was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi) with the
project ID’s 0335007 F and 03ET1289B.
All authors provided feedback on all steps, especially critical feedback on the paper. M.S. prepared the data
repository and wrote the paper. M.K. was involved in the data collection, data preparation and writing of the
paper. A.W. was involved in the data collection and writing of the paper.
e authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.S.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional aliations.
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
6
SCIENTIFIC DATA | (2019) 6:293 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0283-3
www.nature.com/scientificdata
www.nature.com/scientificdata/
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Cre-
ative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. e images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not per-
mitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the
copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
e Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
applies to the metadata les associated with this article.
© e Author(s) 2019
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Terms and Conditions
Springer Nature journal content, brought to you courtesy of Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH (“Springer Nature”).
Springer Nature supports a reasonable amount of sharing of research papers by authors, subscribers and authorised users (“Users”), for small-
scale personal, non-commercial use provided that all copyright, trade and service marks and other proprietary notices are maintained. By
accessing, sharing, receiving or otherwise using the Springer Nature journal content you agree to these terms of use (“Terms”). For these
purposes, Springer Nature considers academic use (by researchers and students) to be non-commercial.
These Terms are supplementary and will apply in addition to any applicable website terms and conditions, a relevant site licence or a personal
subscription. These Terms will prevail over any conflict or ambiguity with regards to the relevant terms, a site licence or a personal subscription
(to the extent of the conflict or ambiguity only). For Creative Commons-licensed articles, the terms of the Creative Commons license used will
apply.
We collect and use personal data to provide access to the Springer Nature journal content. We may also use these personal data internally within
ResearchGate and Springer Nature and as agreed share it, in an anonymised way, for purposes of tracking, analysis and reporting. We will not
otherwise disclose your personal data outside the ResearchGate or the Springer Nature group of companies unless we have your permission as
detailed in the Privacy Policy.
While Users may use the Springer Nature journal content for small scale, personal non-commercial use, it is important to note that Users may
not:
use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at
onlineservice@springernature.com
Available via license: CC BY
Content may be subject to copyright.